THE DEVELOPMENT of PARTICIPATORY THEATRE by Gilbert Leslie Muchmore a Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT of D

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE DEVELOPMENT of PARTICIPATORY THEATRE by Gilbert Leslie Muchmore a Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT of D The development of participatory theatre Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Muchmore, Gilbert Leslie, 1937- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 04/10/2021 11:29:56 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/317873 THE DEVELOPMENT OF PARTICIPATORY THEATRE ■ by . Gilbert Leslie Muchmore A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF DRAMA In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of . MASTER OF. ARTS \ In the Graduate College . THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfill­ ment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in The University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission3 provided that accurate acknowl­ edgment of source is made* Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College, when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the inter­ ests of scholarshipo In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author„ SIGNEDu APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved on the date shown below: ~7, / ‘3 '7 d ROBEpS^f^OTORTH "7D^e™™^™~™" Associate Professor of Drama ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This writer wishes to express appreciation.to Mr. Peter R„ Marroney, Head of the Department of Drama, and to Mr. Robert A. Keyworth, Associate Professor of Drama, for their assistance in the preparation of this thesis. Also, the writer is indebted to Mrs. Rosemary Gipson, Instructor of Drama, for her inspiration and many suggestions relative to the pursuit of this subject. TABLE: OF CONTENTS > Page ABS T a o o o o o o -o o ,o o o o o _o a a a a a a aa -' XZ Chapter la HISTORICAL BACKGROUND a a a , . „ V » a « „ 1 The Spiritual Theatre « . a » a 0 e a = » 5 The Popular Theatre = , » = » a » a 0 15 The Traditional Theatre a » a a « ® 0 ® ® 21 The German Anti-Illusionistic Theatre « . 25 The French Anti-Illusionistic Theatre e 37 2. CURRENT SOCIOLOGICAL AND CULTURAL PHENOMENA a a a a a a a . a ■ a a a a a a a a 52 3a CONTEMPORARY PARTICIPATORY THEATRE 9 . » » , . 71 The New Participatory Theatre Scene » . 72 New Participatory Theatre: A Page in HlStOry a & a & a a a a a a a a a a a 3 A * LIST OF REFERENCES a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 89 ABSTRACT The theatre is under pressure to find new direc­ tions in an age characterized by super-technology. But the established theatre is too helplessly ensnared in the economic structure to take the bold steps required. Thus, the revolutionary theatre directors and writers are look­ ing for a vital place for theatre in a dynamic culture and a violently changing society. They are aware at once of the mass-media sensibilities of today’s audience, the technological advances at the disposal of the theatre, and the essence of the theatrical experience which has not changed through the ages. Finding in history that theatre succeeds when the spectator takes a direct and creative part in the performance, the new theatre is seeking a re­ sponsive and integrated role for the electronic-age spectator. v CHAPTER 1 . HISTORICAL BACKGROUND It must be assumed that Shakespeare, not to men­ tion other great dramatists of the Elizabethan theatre, wrote with his one. eye. on the theatre and its potential, while the other eye was on the audience and its needs = What Shakespeare formulated, as he sat down to invent a play, was the performance--the occasion with all its ele­ ments: actor, words, poetry, dance, song, theatre, and audience. To deny as much would be to deny Shakespeare the intelligence to be sensitive to the functioning of his artistic medium. However, what history has passed down to us consists almost exclusively of his words, which, re­ markable as they are, have been assimilated into the tradition of literature, where they have been called either poetry or drama. The effect has been to isolate the con­ tent of theatre- from its form, a phenomenon which, until lately has pervaded the study, of theatre. Although our century has seen the emergence of academic theatre disci­ plines , these subjects were still treated independently of dramatic texts, until some of the most effective contem­ porary playwrights correctly consider themselves total- theatre artists and refuse to have their works analyzed ' .'1 . , . ' '. ' except in performance. Carried to its purest expression, this thinking would prohibit the unrolling of the texts of theatre except in performance; an extreme view that is, nonetheless, intrinsic to the contention that theatre is an art in its own right. Is theatre an art in its own right? If so, how does it function? What are its purposes? How does it relate to other arts and to cultural activities in general? These are questions which constantly demand new.answers. Today, as periodically throughout history, we are seeking l ' - to reestablish the theatre as an essential and vital human activity. In America, there is wide-spread worry that the profession of theatre is doomed, while a multitude of un-, conventional theatre directors and experimenters struggle to show that they hold the key to salvation.. It is the time to stop and ask some very basic questions, to define theatre, and to examine this definition from every possi­ ble perspective. Only by doing so can we infer that theatre has somehow gone astray, and that the visions of a future theatre are valid. This paper is essentially an historical inquiry about a specific present day concept of theatre: partici­ patory theatre. To facilitate the relating of historical developments to this concept, it will be necessary to begin with a tentative answer to the question "What is theatre?" Theatre historian Richard Southern discusses the . - • V ' 3 definition of theatre in terms appropriate to the purposes of this paper. Working toward a simplistic definition, as free as possible from overly repeated qualifications, he concludes that "Theatre is an act." Actually, Southern does not intend this to be an autonomous and inclusive definition; he is stressing that theatre is essentially . doing rather than creating, as distinguished from other arts. "Drama may be the thing done, but theatre is doing.D r a m a becomes a contribution, to literature, but theatre is the single, ephemeral occasion which is gone forever once the "act" is completed. Southern’s discussion also establishes the basic components of actor and audi­ ence, and he distinguishes theatre from ordinary "acts." The essence of theatre, he concludes, "does not lie in what is performed. It does not even lie in the way it is performed. The essence of theatre lies in the impression made on the audience by the manner in which you perform. Theatre is essentially a reactive art."^ Thus far, theatre is comprised of an act and the reaction to that act by an audience. But, while this definition points to the importance of audience response, it fails to specify the nature of either the act or the 1. The Seven Ages of the Theatre (London, 1964), p. 22, 2. ' Ibid. 3. Ibid., p. 26. - ' occasion. Does the occasion of a man In everyday life acting out a story or joke, before a friend constitute theatre? Peter Brook writes that "a man walks across [anJ empty space and this is all that is needed for an act of theatre to be engaged,*'^ On the other hand, Eric Bentley believes that the act must be mimetic at least. The theatrical situation, reduced to a minimum, is that A im- personates B while C looks on.’ As regards the occasion Ken Dewey, a theatre experimenter, tells Richard Kostelanetz: "The root of the theatrical experience.is, in addition to the integration of the elements involved, the bringing together of people for the purpose of articu- lating a mutual.concern." The focus here is on the participatory aspect of the theatre experience. It implies that there is artistic activity on the part of the specta­ tor as well as the actor. With all modifications considered, theatre may now be defined an occasion for group activity in which there 2.S a mimetic act and the reaction to that act by an audi­ ence . Participatory may be thought of as emphasis upon the occasion and the reaction, which are closely interrelated,. Occasion informs the purpose of the theatre, which varies; 4. The Empty Space (New York, 1968), p. 9. 5. The Life of the Drama (New York, 1964), p> 150. 6. The Theatre of Mixed Means (New York, 1968), p. 182. ; : . the purpose may be to entertain, to elevate spiritually, or to educate. For some, the.purpose of theatre is ther­ apy, It may be a combination of any or all. of these, or, it may simply be considered art and intended to reveal some truth. Whatever the purpose, it also dictates the nature of the desired response. Participatory theatre as­ sumes an occasion where the purposes of the player, and those of the audience in going to the theatre, are iden­ tical, and that the manner in which the act is communicated is effective for those given purposes.
Recommended publications
  • Stage Violence, Power and the Director an Examination
    STAGE VIOLENCE, POWER AND THE DIRECTOR AN EXAMINATION OF THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF CRUELTY FROM ANTONIN ARTAUD TO SARAH KANE by Jordan Matthew Walsh Bachelor of Philosophy, University of Pittsburgh, 2012 Submitted to the Faculty of the University of Pittsburgh in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Philosophy. The University of Pittsburgh May 2012 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ARTS & SCIENCES This thesis was presented by Jordan Matthew Walsh It was defended on April 13th, 2012 and approved by Jesse Berger, Artistic Director, Red Bull Theater Company Cynthia Croot, Assistant Professor, Theatre Arts Department Annmarie Duggan, Assistant Professor, Theatre Arts Department Dr. Lisa Jackson-Schebetta, Assistant Professor, Theatre Arts Department 2 Copyright © by Jordan Matthew Walsh 2012 3 STAGE VIOLENCE AND POWER: AN EXAMINATION OF THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF CRUELTY FROM ANTONIN ARTAUD TO SARAH KANE Jordan Matthew Walsh, BPhil University of Pittsburgh, 2012 This exploration of stage violence is aimed at grappling with the moral, theoretical and practical difficulties of staging acts of extreme violence on stage and, consequently, with the impact that these representations have on actors and audience. My hypothesis is as follows: an act of violence enacted on stage and viewed by an audience can act as a catalyst for the coming together of that audience in defense of humanity, a togetherness in the act of defying the truth mimicked by the theatrical violence represented on stage, which has the potential to stir the latent power of the theatre communion. I have used the theoretical work of Antonin Artaud, especially his “Theatre of Cruelty,” and the works of Peter Brook, Jerzy Grotowski, and Sarah Kane in conversation with Artaud’s theories as a prism through which to investigate my hypothesis.
    [Show full text]
  • The Theatre of the Real Yeats, Beckett, and Sondheim
    The Theatre of the Real MMackenzie_final4print.indbackenzie_final4print.indb i 99/16/2008/16/2008 55:40:32:40:32 PPMM MMackenzie_final4print.indbackenzie_final4print.indb iiii 99/16/2008/16/2008 55:40:50:40:50 PPMM The Theatre of the Real Yeats, Beckett, and Sondheim G INA MASUCCI MACK ENZIE THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY PRESS • COLUMBUS MMackenzie_final4print.indbackenzie_final4print.indb iiiiii 99/16/2008/16/2008 55:40:50:40:50 PPMM Copyright © 2008 by Th e Ohio State University. All rights reserved. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data MacKenzie, Gina Masucci. Th e theatre of the real : Yeats, Beckett, and Sondheim / Gina Masucci MacKenzie. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978–0–8142–1096–3 (cloth : alk. paper)—ISBN 978–0–8142–9176–4 (cd-rom) 1. English drama—Irish authors—History and criticism—Th eory, etc. 2. Yeats, W. B. (William Butler), 1865–1939—Dramatic works. 3. Beckett, Samuel, 1906–1989—Dramatic works. 4. Sondheim, Stephen—Criticism and interpretation. 5. Th eater—United States—History— 20th century. 6. Th eater—Great Britain—History—20th century. 7. Ireland—Intellectual life—20th century. 8. United States—Intellectual life—20th century. I. Title. PR8789.M35 2008 822.009—dc22 2008024450 Th is book is available in the following editions: Cloth (ISBN 978–0–8142–1096–3) CD-ROM (ISBN 978–0–8142–9176–4) Cover design by Jason Moore. Text design by Jennifer Forsythe. Typeset in Adobe Minion Pro. Printed by Th omson-Shore, Inc. Th e paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Hamlet According to Jan Kott and Jerzy Grotowski1
    Multicultural Shakespeare: Translation, Appropriation and Performance vol. 17 (32), 2018; DOI: 10.18778/2083-8530.17.06 ∗ Wanda Świątkowska The Political Hamlet According to Jan Kott and Jerzy Grotowski1 Abstract: The article presents political interpretations of Hamlet in Poland in the turbulent period of politcal changes between the mid-1950s and mid-1960s. The author discusses the relationships between Shakespeare’s tragedy and Polish political context as well as the influence of audience expectations in the specific interpretations. The selected performances are: Hamlet by Roman Zawistowski (at the Old Theatre in Cracow 1956) and Hamlet Study by Jerzy Grotowski (at the Laboratory Theatre of 13 Rows in Opole 1964). They both were hugely influenced by major commentators of Hamlet, i.e. Stanisław Wyspiański and Jan Kott. The author argues that up-to-date readings of Hamlet, which started with Wyspiański’s study in 1905, flourished in the mid-1950s and mid-1960s when concerning specific political events: the Polish Thaw of 1956 and March 1968, when the Jews were expelled from Poland. Thus Hamlet of that time was updated and must be seen through the prism of political events. Keywords: William Shakespeare, Stanisław Wyspiański, Jerzy Grotowski, Jan Kott, Hamlet, Hamlet Study, Polish Thaw of 1956, March 1968, politics. This article looks at two interpretations of William Shakespeare’s Hamlet and the concepts of updating the tragedy put forward by Jan Kott, and Jerzy Grotowski. It will not investigate their further professional relationship or Kott’s attitude to Grotowski’s later works. The article will only focus on one episode in their careers that took place in Poland in the period between the mid-1950s and mid-1960s.
    [Show full text]
  • Prof. Siemund
    Veranstalter: Dennis Büscher-Ulbrich Off-Off-Broadway and Beyond: Experimental Theatre Thema: and Avant-Garde Performance 1945–1970 [AA-A3, ENG-7, AA-W] Art der Veranstaltung: Seminar Ib Veranstaltungsnummer: 53-561 Zeit: Mo 18-20 Raum: Phil 1269 Beginn: 17. Oktober 2011 Course Description: The early developing OFF-OFF- BROADWAY MOVEMENT of the 1950s and 1960s sought freedom from the various constraints — aesthetically and otherwise — of conventional theatre. Mainstream theatre at the time was dominated by the musical and the psycho- logical drama, spawning pro- ductions that were conceived as business ventures and, if successful, packaged and toured. The notion of theatre as a packaged commodity offended the avant-garde sensibilities of artists who observed the psycho- logical and physical constraints built within the theatrical space itself. Instead, they enthusi- astically turned to alternative sites and experimental forms, eventually collapsing the dis- tinction between theatre and PERFORMANCE ART. While con- ventional theatre taught the spectator to lose herself in the fictional onstage time, space, and characters, avant-garde theatre and performance relied on the spectator’s complete consciousness of the present, i.e. the real time and space shared by audience and performers. The primary importance of the spectator’s consciousness of the present is that she is an active force in creating the theatrical event rather than a passive observer of a ready-made production. To approach this phenomenon, we will be looking closely at three significant avant-garde moments in postwar American theatre and performance: THE LIVING THEATRE, HAPPENINGS/FLUXUS, and the BLACK ARTS MOVEMENT. We will analyze and discuss experimental plays that still work within the confines of theatrical space, like The Connection (1959) and Dutchman (1964), semi-improvisational and interactive plays, like Paradise Now (1967), as well as Happenings and other ‘far-out’ performances.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the Theatre Audience: a Theory of Production and Reception
    THE ROLE OF THE THEATRE AUDIENCE THE ROLE OF THE THEATRE AUDIENCE: A THEORY OF PRODUCTION AND RECEPTION By SUSAN BENNETT, B.A., M.A. A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Parial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy McMaster University January 1988 DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (1988) McMASTER UNIVERSITY (English) Hamilton, Ontario TITLE: The Role of the Theatre Audience: A Theory of Production and Reception AUTHOR: Susan Bennett, B.A. (University of Kent at Canterbury) M.A. (McMaster University) SUPERVISOR: Dr. Linda Hutcheon NUMBER OF PAGES: viii, 389 ii ABSTRACT Th thesis examines the reception of theatrical performanc by their audience. Its starting points are (i) Brech s dramatic theory and practice, and (ii) theories 0 reading. These indicate the main emphases of the th ,is--theoretical approaches and performance practices, rather than the more usual recourse to dramatic ;xts. Beyond Brecht and reader-response criticism, other studies of viewing are explored. Both semiotics lnd post-structuralism have stimulated an intensity )f interest in theatrical communication and such inves ~gations provide an important impetus for my work. In suggesting a theory of reception in the theatre, examine _theatre's cultural status and the assumption underlying what we recognize as the theatrical event. The selection of a particular performanc is explored and from this, it is suggested that there _s an inevitable, inextricable link between the produc ~ve and receptive processes. The theory then looks to lore immediate aspects of the performance, including 1e theatre building (its geographic location, architectu 11 style, etc.), the performance itself, and the post-p :formance rituals of theatre-going.
    [Show full text]
  • TRAINING the YOUNG ACTOR: a PHYSICAL APPROACH a Thesis
    TRAINING THE YOUNG ACTOR: A PHYSICAL APPROACH A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty of The University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts Anthony Lewis Johnson December, 2009 TRAINING THE YOUNG ACTOR: A PHYSICAL APPROACH Anthony Lewis Johnson Thesis Approved: Accepted: __________________________ __________________________ Advisor Dean of the College Mr. James Slowiak Dr. Dudley Turner __________________________ __________________________ Faculty Reader Dean of the Graduate School Mr. Durand Pope Dr. George R. Newkome __________________________ __________________________ School Director Date Mr. Neil Sapienza ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION TO TRAINING THE YOUNG ACTOR: A PHYSICAL APPROACH...............................................................................1 II. AMERICAN INTERPRETATIONS OF STANISLAVSKI’S EARLY WORK .......5 Lee Strasberg .............................................................................................7 Stella Adler..................................................................................................8 Robert Lewis...............................................................................................9 Sanford Meisner .......................................................................................10 Uta Hagen.................................................................................................11 III. STANISLAVSKI’S LATER WORK .................................................................13 Tension
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Hamlet According to Jan Kott and Jerzy Grotowski
    Multicultural Shakespeare: Translation, Appropriation and Performance Volume 17 Article 6 June 2018 The Political Hamlet According to Jan Kott and Jerzy Grotowski Wanda Świątkowska Jagiellonian University in Cracow Follow this and additional works at: https://digijournals.uni.lodz.pl/multishake Part of the Theatre and Performance Studies Commons Recommended Citation Świątkowska, Wanda (2018) "The Political Hamlet According to Jan Kott and Jerzy Grotowski," Multicultural Shakespeare: Translation, Appropriation and Performance: Vol. 17 , Article 6. DOI: 10.18778/2083-8530.17.06 Available at: https://digijournals.uni.lodz.pl/multishake/vol17/iss32/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Arts & Humanities Journals at University of Lodz Research Online. It has been accepted for inclusion in Multicultural Shakespeare: Translation, Appropriation and Performance by an authorized editor of University of Lodz Research Online. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Multicultural Shakespeare: Translation, Appropriation and Performance vol. 17 (32), 2018; DOI: 10.18778/2083-8530.17.06 ∗ Wanda Świątkowska The Political Hamlet According to Jan Kott and Jerzy Grotowski1 Abstract: The article presents political interpretations of Hamlet in Poland in the turbulent period of politcal changes between the mid-1950s and mid-1960s. The author discusses the relationships between Shakespeare’s tragedy and Polish political context as well as the influence of audience expectations in the specific interpretations. The selected performances are: Hamlet by Roman Zawistowski (at the Old Theatre in Cracow 1956) and Hamlet Study by Jerzy Grotowski (at the Laboratory Theatre of 13 Rows in Opole 1964). They both were hugely influenced by major commentators of Hamlet, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Teresa de Lauretis Futurism: A Postmodern View* The importance of Modernism and of the artistic movements of the first twenty or so years of this century need not be stressed. It is now widely acknowledged that the "historical avant-garde" was the crucible for most of the art forms and theories of art that made up the contemporary esthetic climate. This is evidenced, more than by the recently coined academic terms "neoavanguardia" and "postmodernism," 1 by objective trends in the culture of the last two decades: the demand for closer ties between artistic perfor- mance and real-life interaction, which presupposes a view of art as social communicative behavior; the antitraditionalist thrust toward interdisciplinary or even non-disciplinary academic curri- cula; the experimental character of all artistic production; the increased awareness of the material qualities of art and its depen- dence on physical and technological possibilities, on the one hand; on the other, its dependence on social conventions or semiotic codes that can be exposed, broken, rearranged, transformed. I think we can agree that the multi-directional thrust of the arts and their expansion to the social and the pragmatic domain, the attempts to break down distinctions between highbrow and popular art, the widening of the esthetic sphere to encompass an unprecedented range of phenomena, the sense of fast, continual movement in the culture, of rapid obsolescence and a potential transformability of forms are issues characteristic of our time. Many were already implicit, often explicit, in the project of the historical avant-garde. But whereas this connection has been established and pursued for Surrealism and Dada, for example, Italian Futurism has remained rather peripheral in the current reassessment; indeed one could say that it has been marginalized and effectively ignored.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dismembered Body in Antonin Artaud's Surrealist Plays
    CHAPTER TWO THE DISMEMBERED BODY IN ANTONIN ARTAUD’S SURREALIST PLAYS THOMAS CROMBEZ In two of his surrealist plays, Antonin Artaud inserted a scene where human limbs rain down on the stage. The beginning of Le Jet de sang (The Spurt of Blood, 1925) features a young couple pathetically declaring their love for one another, when suddenly a hurricane bursts, two stars collide, and “a series of legs of living flesh fall down, together with feet, hands, heads of hair, masks, colonnades, portals, temples, and distilling flasks”1 (Artaud 1976a, 71). In a later scenario prepared for the Theatre of Cruelty project, La Conquête du Mexique (The Conquest of Mexico, 1933), the volley of human limbs is echoed almost verbatim. Human limbs, cuirasses, heads, and bellies fall down from all levels of the stage set, like a hailstorm that bombards the earth with supernatural explosions.2 (Artaud 1979, 23) These literal and, according to the theatrical conventions of the day, almost unstageable instances of “dismemberment in drama” point to a distinctive characteristic of Artaud’s work. He seemed to strive for a purely mental drama, to be staged for the enjoyment of the mind’s eye. The distinctly appropriative method he employed to write his mental play- texts may be labeled, borrowing an expression from Alfred Jarry studies, as “the systematically wrong style” (Jarry 1972, 1158). This expression has already proven its worth as the most concise term for Jarry’s linguistically grotesque plays, composed of Shakespearean drama, vulgar talk, heraldic language, archaisms, and corny schoolboy humor. The first part of my essay considers why the standard poststructuralist interpretation of Artaud’s œuvre is unable to provide a strictly literal reading of the human body parts that litter the stage.
    [Show full text]
  • Islamic State & the Theatre of Cruelty
    TILBURG ISLAMIC STATE & THE UNIVERSITY THEATRE OF CRUELTY Parallels between the Islamic State & Artaudian Theatre Thesis Algemene Cultuurwetenschappen BA | LPW Driessen The Islamic State and the Theatre of Cruelty Parallels between the Islamic State & Artaudian Theatre by Lennart Driessen S577263 Bachelorthesis ACW Tilburg University - School of humanities Under the supervision of: Jan Jaap de Ruiter 2 "If the attacks on the Twin Towers used the iconography of the Hollywood action blockbuster, the beheadings in the desert evoke drama far more ancient – Old Testament strife, Hellenic legend. [..]It may sound unlikely, but ISIS is carrying out in extremis the program of the “theatre of cruelty” of the influential French dramaturge- demiurge Antonin Artaud." - Joji Sakurai for Yale Global "Artaud, a sickly child twisted further by the shock of World War I, wanted his actors to “assault the senses” of the audience, shocking parts of the psyche that other theatrical methods had failed to reach. Well, IS has read the book. It’s been obvious since September 11 that we’re living in an age of vicious political theater. That’s what “terrorism” is: the manipulation of large populations by shock and awe and “liberating unconscious emotions”" -Hugh Prysor-Jones for Chronicles Magazine 3 Index Introduction..............................................................................................................................p.5 Chapter 1 - Hypothesis and methodology................................................................................p.7
    [Show full text]
  • History of Towson University's MFA in Theatre Arts Program
    Towson University: College of Fine Arts and Communication M.F.A. in Theatre Arts History of Towson University’s M.F.A. in Theatre Arts Program The MFA Program in Theatre Arts at Towson University started in 1994 under the leadership of Juanita Rockwell. In its 20‐year history, the program has engaged in a number of ambitious projects (originated by both students and faculty), presented over 60 theatre projects and performance pieces and received a number of outside accolades for these endeavors. Students and alumni have worked with a variety of professional artists and have also gone on to create theatre companies of their own. They have also taught at a number of colleges and universities, and have embarked on successful professional careers at institutions around the country. Tours MFA productions have toured to international festivals in Bulgaria, Slovakia, Egypt, Poland and Hungary. National tours of shows have included trips to Boston, New York City, Washington, D.C., Philadelphia, Chicago, and Austin, Texas. In the summer of 2009, a group of MFA students did a Study Abroad Program to Wroclaw, Poland. There they attended the Grotowski Institute’s festival, “The World as a Place of Truth,” a celebration of the life and work of the famous Polish theatre director Jerzy Grotowski. The students also participated in a five‐day, six‐hours‐a‐day workshop with Teatr ZAR, the in‐house theatre company at the Grotowski Institute. In the summer of 2011, the program presented a showcase at the ToRoNaDa Space in New York City. The two‐week showcase, entitled Modicums, includes The Natasha Plays; Return to Sender by Shannon McPhee; The Title Sounded Better in French by Lola B.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Tendencies Beyond Realism in Arthur Miller's Dramatic Works
    Inês Evangelista Marques 2º Ciclo de Estudos em Estudos Anglo-Americanos, variante de Literaturas e Culturas The Intimate and the Epic: Two Tendencies beyond Realism in Arthur Miller’s Dramatic Works A critical study of Death of a Salesman, A View from the Bridge, After the Fall and The American Clock 2013 Orientador: Professor Doutor Rui Carvalho Homem Coorientador: Professor Doutor Carlos Azevedo Classificação: Ciclo de estudos: Dissertação/relatório/Projeto/IPP: Versão definitiva 2 Abstract Almost 65 years after the successful Broadway run of Death of a Salesman, Arthur Miller is still deemed one of the most consistent and influential playwrights of the American dramatic canon. Even if his later plays proved less popular than the early classics, Miller’s dramatic output has received regular critical attention, while his long and eventful life keeps arousing the biographers’ curiosity. However, most of the academic works on Miller’s dramatic texts are much too anchored on a thematic perspective: they study the plays as deconstructions of the American Dream, as a rebuke of McCarthyism or any kind of political persecution, as reflections on the concepts of collective guilt and denial in relation to traumatizing events, such as the Great Depression or the Holocaust. Especially within the Anglo-American critical tradition, Miller’s plays are rarely studied as dramatic objects whose performative nature implies a certain range of formal specificities. Neither are they seen as part of the 20th century dramatic and theatrical attempts to overcome the canons of Realism. In this dissertation, I intend, first of all, to frame Miller’s dramatic output within the American dramatic tradition.
    [Show full text]