<<

International Journal of Impotence Research (2004) 16, S34–S37 & 2004 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0955-9930/04 $30.00 www.nature.com/ijir

Vardenafil preclinical trial data: potency, pharmacodynamics, , and adverse events

E Bischoff1*

1Bayer Pharma Research, HealthcareWuppertal, PH-R-EU-CV-ll, Wuppertal, Germany

Vardenafil potently inhibits human 5 (PDE5) with an IC50 of 0.7 nM. Enhancement of (NO)-induced erections in rabbits by 0.1 mg/kg vardenafil is limited by its pharmacokinetic properties (Tmax ¼ 1h; T1/2 ¼ 1.2 h), although erectile effects have been observed after 7 h. In humans, vardenafil is rapidly absorbed (Tmax E40 min) and more slowly E metabolized (T1/2 4 h), with an absolute of 14.5% (vs 40% for ). Although the consumption of high-fat meals does not affect the drug’s relative bioavailability, it retards intestinal absorption. Coadministration of CYP3A4 inhibitors such as ritonavir can affect hepatic metabolism. M1, an active metabolite of vardenafil, is a four-fold-less potent inhibitor of PDE5 than its parent compound, contributing approximately 7% to vardenafil’s overall efficacy. The of all selective PDE5 inhibitors commonly include , small reductions in blood pressure, headache, and nasal congestion. International Journal of Impotence Research (2004) 16, S34–S37. doi:10.1038/sj.ijir.3901213

Keywords: 30,50-cyclic-GMP phosphodiesterase; selective phosphodiesterase inhibitors; muscle; smooth; penile erection; penis; human

Introduction pelvic nerve stimulation2 and in a rat model, displaying greater efficacy on erectile response than sildenafil at comparable doses.4 As mentioned previously, vardenafil exhibits high Efficacy in vivo not only depends on the potency potency in inhibiting PDE5, with an IC50 of 0.7 nM. and the selectivity of a particular PDE5 inhibitor, but Vardenafil increases intracellular cGMP in the also on its pharmacokinetic (PK) properties. They presence of , an NO donor, in can be characterized by its absorption, distribution, both rabbit and human cavernosal tissue. In a direct metabolism, and . In general, plasma comparison with sildenafil, vardenafil was proven concentrations of a compound correlate with its 1,2,3 effective at lower concentrations. Also, vardena- efficacy. Tmax, the time to achieve maximal plasma fil significantly potentiated both acetylcholine concentration (Cmax), often corresponds to the (Ach)-induced and transmural electrical stimula- maximal pharmacodynamic effects of a given phar- tion-induced relaxation of trabecular smooth macologic agent. muscle. In rabbits, oral vardenafil was eliminated from the As shown in a conscious rabbit model, the in vitro plasma at a half-life (T1/2) of approximately 1.2 h, efficacy of vardenafil has translated to similar more rapidly than the T1/2 of 4–5 hours observed efficacy in vivo. Vardenafil potentiated erectile in humans. In this model, the vardenafil plasma responses to intravenous sodium nitroprusside in concentration (Tmax ¼ 1 h) determined its initial conscious rabbits in a dose-dependent manner at efficacy in enhancing NO-induced erections. How- 1,3 doses of 0.1–3 mg/kg. The minimum dose re- ever, significant erectile responses persisted even quired for a significant erectile effect was deter- after 7 h (T1/2  4) when plasma concentrations had mined to be 0.1 mg/kg. Vardenafil also demonstrated declined to 2.5%. This implies that in humans, effectiveness in an anesthetized rabbit model with vardenafil with a Tmax of approximately 40 min 5 could remain efficacious beyond one T1/2. Table 1 summarizes the most important PK *Correspondence: E Bischoff, PhD, Bayer Pharma Re- properties of vardenafil, sildenafil, and . search, Bayer HealthcareWuppertal, PH-R-EU-CV-ll, D- Vardenafil’s absolute bioavailability is 14.5% com- 42096 Wuppertal, Bldg. 500, Germany. pared to 40% for sildenafil; the value for tadalafil is E-mail: [email protected] not yet published. Intestinal absorption of the drug Vardenafil: Preclinical data E Bischoff S35 can be influenced by nutrition. A high-fat meal duration of 460% penile rigidity were 37.2 min at delays the time to maximum plasma concentration, the base and 28.7 min at the tip. Plasma levels rose but does not alter vardenafil’s relative bioavailability rapidly after oral administration. Median Tmax was (B90%). Vardenafil, as well as sildenafil, undergo 0.9 h for the 10 mg dose and 0.7 h for the 20 mg dose. hepatic metabolism via the CYP3A4 pathway. Mean Cmax was 9.1 and 20.9 mg/l, respectively. The Therefore, concomitant administration of strongly average terminal plasma half-life (T1/2) was 4.2 h for CYP3A4-inhibiting drugs or drugs that are metabo- the 10 mg dose and 3.9 h for the 20 mg dose (Table 2). lized by this pathway can elevate plasma levels of The area under the curve (AUC), normalized for these PDE5 inhibitors. Moderate dosage adjustments both dose and body weight, was proportional to are required for patients using drugs such as dose. ritonavir concomitantly with vardenafil or sildena- Vardenafil was well tolerated. Its administration fil. Vardenafil is primarily excreted through the was associated with a small reduction in blood feces (91–95%), with minimal renal excretion of the pressure and a minor compensatory increase in drug. heart rate at parameters not deemed to be clinically Four active metabolites of vardenafil have been relevant. As PDE5 is expressed in vascular smooth identified. The most prominent metabolite, M1, is muscle cells, vasodilation has been recognized as a vardenafil with its ethyl group removed at the potential and mechanism-related side effect of PDE5 ring. M1 is an effective PDE5 inhibitor, inhibitor therapy. The related adverse events of but with a potency four times less than that of its vasodilatation, like cutaneous flushing, headache, parent compound. The metabolite’s contribution to nasal congestion, and rhinitis, have been reported the overall efficacy of vardenafil has been estimated with vardenafil use, but it is not yet clear whether at approximately 7% (Table 2). headache is due to vasodilation and increased The pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of blood flow.7 However, at standard doses applied a single oral dose of vardenafil, 10 mg or 20 mg, were to the treatment of ED, these effects have not studied in 21 patients with (ED) been determined to produce clinically significant in a RigiScan study.6 Compared to placebo, varde- changes.5 nafil 10 mg led to a mean increase of 24.4 min in the and donor compounds release NO, duration of 460% penile rigidity at the base, and of which stimulates guanylyl cyclase and by doing so 24.8 min at the tip. For the 20 mg dose, increases in enhances the synthesis of cGMP. Consequently, this class of coronary vasodilators is expected to amplify the pharmacodynamic effects of PDE5 inhibition Table 1 Comparison of pharmacokinetics of sildenafil, tadalafil, in all tissues and cells that express PDE5. This and vardenafil includes the risk of precipitous . There- fore, concomitant use of nitrate-containing prepara- Parameter Sildenafil Tadalafil Vardenafil tions is contraindicated with PDE5 inhibitor therapy. Although PDE5 is expressed to some extent 100 mga 20 mgb 20 mgc in human platelets, sildenafil alone exerts no direct Tmax (h) 1.1670.99 2.0 0.66 (0.250–3.0) T1/2 (h) 3.8270.84 17.5 3.971.31 effect on platelet function, but in vitro potentiates 7 7 8–9 Cmax (ng/ml) 327 236 378 20.9 1.83 the antiaggregatory effects of nitric oxide donors. AUC (ng  h/ml) 19637859 8066 74.571.82 PDE5 is expressed not only in vascular tissue but also in the esophagus and in cells of Tmax indicates times of occurrence for maximum drug concentra- the intestine. Mechanisms dependent on nitric tion; T1/2 indicates half-life time of drug; Cmax indicates maximum concentration of drug. oxide–cGMP regulate the motility of the esophagus a Viagra product monograph. and pylorus. Consequently, dyspepsia and other b B Pullman, 1C351 (Cialis) Symposium, Indianapolis, IN, USA, digestive system disorders have been identified as June 7, 2001. mechanism-related side effects of PDE5 inhibitor c Klotz et al.5 therapy. As high concentrations of PDE5 are found in various regions of the brain, effects on cognitive and neurologic function have also been associated with Table 2 Relative potency (Prel) and overall potency (Poverall)of vardenafil and its metabolites PDE5 inhibitors. Growing experimental evidence in various animal models suggests that orally delivered Compound IC50 (nM) Prel (%) Poverall (%) sildenafil or vardenafil improved object recognition memory in rats.10 When administered before or Vardenafil 0.89 100 100 immediately following training, sildenafil facilitated BAY 44-5576 ¼ M1 3.2 27.8 7.2 BAY 44-5578 ¼ M4 16 5.6 0.06 retention performance of a one-trial step-through BAY 44-5577 ¼ M5 18 4.9 0.61 inhibitor avoidance task in both male and female mice.11 Sildenafil may affect retention by altering

Prel(%) ¼ 100 (%) Â IC50 (vardenafil)/IC50 (metabolite); Poverall mechanisms involved in memory storage, possibly (%) ¼ Prel (%) Â ratio AUC (%)/100 (%). through the nitric oxide-guanylyl cyclase-cGMP

International Journal of Impotence Research Vardenafil: Preclinical data E Bischoff S36 system.10 As yet, the effect of PDE5 inhibitors on system by PDE5 inhibitors? The NO-dependent cognition in humans has not been determined. In increase of intracellular cGMP by PDE5 inhibition a double-blind study of central side effects of has been shown to be an effective mechanism in sildenafil on attention and memory functions in the treatment of ED. Patients suffering from spinal young male subjects, the drug did not overtly affect cord injury lack the centrally mediated stimula- behavioral patterns.12 However, auditory event- tion of erectile nerves, which normally leads to a related brain potentials indicated an enhanced release of NO and subsequently to an increased ability to focus attention and to select relevant target synthesis of cGMP. That might explain the lower stimuli. efficacy of PDE5 inhibitors in this group of The nitric oxide–cGMP pathway is thought to be patients. Direct, NO-independent stimulation of involved in nociception, and evidence exists that (sGC) should also lead to PDE inhibitors can modulate the process of pain elevated cGMP levels in tissues and could be an perception. Nitric oxide substantially influences the attractive alternative therapeutic option for the resting activity of dorsal-horn neurons. In rats, treatment of ED in these patients. The use of PDE5 blockade of nitric oxide synthesis increased the inhibitors, which are able to chemically release frequency of background activity of high-threshold NO, may be a further option. mechanosensitive neurons and resulted in activity among 80% of previously inactive neurons.13 In- Another NO-independent treatment option could be hibition of NO synthesis did not significantly the inhibition of roh-kinase, which has been shown impact the background activity of non-nociceptive 19 to be effective in relaxation of penile tissue. The neurons. role of cGMP in spinal nociceptor transmision is In the formalin test in rats, sildenafil enhanced currently only poorly understood. Therefore, the the antinociceptive effect of diclofenac and pro- possibility of the modulation of this neuronal net- duced an antinociceptive effect itself during the work by PDE5 inhibitors is highly speculative and latter phase of the test.14 Furthermore, nitric oxide needs a lot of basic research. levels are known to increase in response to periph- eral nerve injury. While headache is one of the most common side effects of sildenafil therapy, this drug- related adverse event can more likely be attributed 15,16,17 to vasodilation than to elevated levels of NO. References Many uncertainties persist with respect to the interrelationships of pain, cGMP, and the physiolo- gic mechanisms of PDE inhibition. 1 Saenz de Tejada I et al. The phosphodiesterase inhibitory selectivity and the in vitro and in vivo potency of the new PDE5 inhibitor vardenafil. Int J Impot Res 2001; 13: 282–290. 2 Choi S et al. Efficacy of vardenafil and sildenafil in facilitating Important concepts penile erection in an animal model. J Androl 2002; 23: 332–337. 3 Bischoff E et al. The oral efficacy of vardenafil hydrochloride for inducing penile erection in a conscious rabbit model. 1. Are there potential clinical applications for J Urol 2001; 165: 1316–1318. 4 Giuliano F et al. Proerectile effect of vardenafil: in vitro selective PDE5 inhibitors in the treatment and/ experiments in rabbits and in vivo comparison with sildenafil or prevention of dementias such as Alzheimer’s in rats. Eur Urol 2003; 44: 731–736. disease and other disorders of cognitive function? 5 Klotz T et al. Vardenafil increases penile rigidity and A variety of , including PDE5, tumescence in erectile dysfunction patients: a RigiScan and pharmacokinetic study. World J Urol 2001; 19: 32–39. are expressed in the brain at different levels in 6 Bischoff E et al. Vardenafil improved erection at four times the different functional and anatomic regions of the plasma half life in a conscious rabbit model. Int J Impot Res brain. There is clear experimental evidence that 2002; 14(Suppl 3): S42. cGMP has an influence on cognitive function as 7 Wallis RM, Corbin JD, Francis SH, Ellis P. Tissue distribution well as on neurogenesis. But although selective of phosphodiesterase families and the effects of sildenafil on tissue cyclic nucleotides, platelet function, and the contractile inhibitors of PDE5 are available, only limited responses of trabeculae carneae and aortic rings in vitro. Am J experimental data on a possible functional rele- Cardiol 1999; 83(5A): 3C–12C. vance are published. It can be speculated that 8 Rehse K, Scheffler H, Reitner N. Interaction of Viagra with the PDE5 inhibitors, which can cross the blood-brain NO donors molsidomine and RE 2047 with regard to antithrombotic and blood pressure-lowering activities. Arch barrier, could be useful for the treatment of Pharm (Weinheim) 1999; 332: 182–184. dementia and also for neurodegenerative dis- 9 Berkels R et al. Modulation of human platelet aggregation by 17,18 eases. the phosphodiesterase type 5-inhibitor sildenafil. J Cardiovasc 2. What novel therapies might be developed to treat Pharmacol 2001; 37: 413–421. ED in patients suffering from spinal cord injury? 10 Prickaerts J et al. Effects of two selective phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, sildenafil and vardenafil, on object recogni- Should pharmaceutical research be devoted to tion memory and hippocampal cyclic GMP levels in the rat. the modulation of the sensory spinal nociceptor Neuroscience 2002; 113: 351–361.

International Journal of Impotence Research Vardenafil: Preclinical data E Bischoff S37 11 Baratti CM, Boccia MM. Effects of sildenafil on long-term 16 Fink HA et al. Sildenafil for male erectile dysfunction: a retention of an inhibitory avoidance response in mice. Behav systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 2002; Pharmacol 1999; 10: 731–737. 162: 1349–1360. 12 Schultheiss D et al. Central effects of sildenafil (Viagra) on 17 Kruuse C, Thomsen LL, Jacobsen TB, Olesen J. The phospho- auditory selective attention and verbal recognition memory in diesterase 5 inhibitor sildenafil has no effect on cerebral blood humans: a study with event-related brain potentials. World J flow or blood velocity, but nevertheless induces headache Urol 2001; 19: 46–50. in healthy subjects. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2002; 22: 13 Hoheisel U, Unger T, Mense S. A block of spinal nitric oxide 1124–1131. synthesis leads to increased background activity predomi- 18 Zhang R et al. Sildenafil (Viagra) induces neurogenesis and nantly in nociceptive dorsal horn neurones in the rat. Pain promotes functional recovery after stroke in rats. Stroke 2002; 2000; 88: 249–257. 33: 2675–2680. 14 Asomoza-Espinosa R et al. Sildenafil increases diclofenac 19 Cellek S, Rees RW, Kalsi J. A Rho-kinase inhibitor, soluble antinociception in the formalin test. Eur J Pharmacol 2001; activator and NO-releasing PDE5 inhibitor: 418: 195–200. novel approaches to erectile dysfunction. Expert Opin Investig 15 Dundar M, Kocak I, Dundar SO, Erol H. Evaluation of side Drugs 2002; 11: 1563–1573. effects of sildenafil in a group of young healthy volunteers. Int Urol Nephrol 2001; 32: 705–708.

International Journal of Impotence Research