Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 148/Friday, July 31, 2020/Rules and Regulations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 148/Friday, July 31, 2020/Rules and Regulations 46302 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Purpose of Regulatory Action regarding the Navy’s activities. Major These regulations, issued under the provisions include, but are not limited National Oceanic and Atmospheric authority of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 to: Administration • The use of defined powerdown and et seq.), provide the framework for shutdown zones (based on activity); authorizing the take of marine mammals 50 CFR Part 218 • Measures to eliminate the incidental to the Navy’s training and likelihood of ship strikes; testing activities (which qualify as • [Docket No. 200713–0188] Activity limitations in certain areas military readiness activities) from the and times that are biologically use of sonar and other transducers and RIN 0648–BJ00 important (i.e., for foraging, migration, in-water detonations throughout the reproduction) for marine mammals; and MITT Study Area. The MITT Study Taking and Importing Marine • Implementation of a Notification Area includes the seas off the coasts of Mammals; Taking Marine Mammals and Reporting Plan (for dead or live Guam and the Commonwealth of the Incidental to the U.S. Navy Training stranded marine mammals); and Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI), the • and Testing Activities in the Mariana Implementation of a robust in-water areas around the Mariana Islands Training and Testing (MITT) monitoring plan to improve our Islands Range Complex (MIRC), the Study Area understanding of the environmental transit corridor between the MIRC and effects resulting from the Navy training AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries the Hawaii Range Complex (HRC), and and testing activities. Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and select pierside and harbor locations. The Additionally, the rule includes an Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), transit corridor is outside the geographic adaptive management component that Commerce. boundaries of the MIRC and represents allows for timely modification of ACTION: Final rule; notification of a great circle route across the high seas mitigation or monitoring measures issuance of Letter of Authorization. for Navy vessels transiting between the based on new information, when MIRC and the HRC. The planned appropriate. SUMMARY: NMFS, upon request from the activities also include various activities U.S. Navy (Navy), issues these in Apra Harbor such as sonar Background regulations pursuant to the Marine maintenance alongside Navy piers The MMPA prohibits the ‘‘take’’ of Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) to located in Inner Apra Harbor. marine mammals, with certain govern the taking of marine mammals NMFS received an application from exceptions. Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and incidental to the training and testing the Navy requesting seven-year (D) of the MMPA direct the Secretary of activities conducted in the Mariana regulations and an authorization to Commerce (as delegated to NMFS) to Islands Training and Testing (MITT) incidentally take individuals of multiple allow, upon request, the incidental, but Study Area. The Navy’s activities species of marine mammals (‘‘Navy’s not intentional, taking of small numbers qualify as military readiness activities rulemaking/LOA application’’ or of marine mammals by U.S. citizens pursuant to the MMPA, as amended by ‘‘Navy’s application’’). Take is who engage in a specified activity (other the National Defense Authorization Act anticipated to occur by Level A and than commercial fishing) within a for Fiscal Year 2004 (2004 NDAA). Level B harassment incidental to the specified geographical region if certain These regulations, which allow for the Navy’s training and testing activities, findings are made and either regulations issuance of a Letter of Authorization with no serious injury or mortality are issued or, if the taking is limited to (LOA) for the incidental take of marine expected or authorized. harassment, a notice of a proposed mammals during the described activities Section 101(a)(5)(A) of the MMPA (16 authorization is provided to the public and timeframes, prescribe the U.S.C. 1371(a)(5)(A)) directs the for review and the opportunity to permissible methods of taking and other Secretary of Commerce (as delegated to submit comments. means of effecting the least practicable NMFS) to allow, upon request, the An authorization for incidental adverse impact on marine mammal incidental, but not intentional taking of takings shall be granted if NMFS finds species and their habitat, and establish small numbers of marine mammals by that the taking will have a negligible requirements pertaining to the U.S. citizens who engage in a specified impact on the species or stocks and will monitoring and reporting of such taking. activity (other than commercial fishing) not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of the species or DATES: Effective from July 31, 2020, to within a specified geographical region July 30, 2027. if, after notice and public comment, the stocks for taking for subsistence uses agency makes certain findings and (where relevant). Further, NMFS must ADDRESSES: A copy of the Navy’s issues regulations that set forth prescribe the permissible methods of application, NMFS’ proposed and final permissible methods of taking pursuant taking and other means of effecting the rules and subsequent LOA for the to that activity, as well as monitoring least practicable adverse impact on the existing regulations, and other and reporting requirements. Section affected species or stocks and their supporting documents and documents 101(a)(5)(A) of the MMPA and the habitat, paying particular attention to cited herein may be obtained online at: implementing regulations at 50 CFR part rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/ 216, subpart I, provide the legal basis for similar significance, and on the marine-mammal-protection/incidental- issuing this final rule and the availability of such species or stocks for take-authorizations-military-readiness- subsequent LOAs. As directed by this taking for certain subsistence uses activities. In case of problems accessing legal authority, this final rule contains (referred to in this rule as ‘‘mitigation these documents, please use the contact mitigation, monitoring, and reporting measures’’); and requirements listed here (see FOR FURTHER requirements. pertaining to the monitoring and INFORMATION CONTACT). reporting of such takings. The MMPA FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Summary of Major Provisions Within defines ‘‘take’’ to mean to harass, hunt, Stephanie Egger, Office of Protected the Final Rule capture, or kill, or attempt to harass, Resources, NMFS, (301) 427–8401. The following is a summary of the hunt, capture, or kill any marine SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: major provisions of this final rule mammal. The Analysis and Negligible VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:59 Jul 30, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\31JYR3.SGM 31JYR3 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations 46303 Impact Determination section below proposed rulemaking comment periods influence the frequency, duration, discusses the definition of ‘‘negligible were considered in this final rule. intensity, and location of required impact.’’ Comments received on the proposed training and testing activities, but the The NDAA for Fiscal Year 2004 (2004 rule are addressed in this final rule in basic nature of sonar and explosive NDAA) (Pub. L. 108–136) amended the Comments and Responses section. events conducted in the MITT Study section 101(a)(5) of the MMPA to The following types of training and Area has remained the same. remove the ‘‘small numbers’’ and testing, which are classified as military The Navy’s rulemaking/LOA ‘‘specified geographical region’’ readiness activities pursuant to the application reflects the most up-to-date provisions indicated above and MMPA, as amended by the 2004 NDAA, compilation of training and testing amended the definition of ‘‘harassment’’ will be covered under the regulations activities deemed necessary to as applied to a ‘‘military readiness and LOA: Amphibious warfare (in-water accomplish military readiness activity.’’ The definition of harassment detonations), anti-submarine warfare requirements. The types and numbers of for military readiness activities (section (sonar and other transducers, in-water activities included in the rule account 3(18)(B) of the MMPA) is (i) Any act that detonations), surface warfare (in-water for fluctuations in training and testing injures or has the significant potential to detonations), and other testing and in order to meet evolving or emergent injure a marine mammal or marine training (sonar and other transducers). military readiness requirements. These mammal stock in the wild (Level A The activities will not include any pile regulations will cover training and Harassment); or (ii) Any act that driving/removal or use of air guns. testing activities that will occur for a disturbs or is likely to disturb a marine This will be the third time NMFS has seven-year period following the mammal or marine mammal stock in the promulgated incidental take regulations expiration of the current MMPA wild by causing disruption of natural pursuant to the MMPA relating to authorization for the MITT Study Area, behavioral patterns, including, but not similar military readiness activities in which expires on August 3, 2020. limited to, migration, surfacing, nursing, the MITT Study Area, following those Description of the Specified
Recommended publications
  • Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All Rights Reserved. Memorial Tributes: Volume 16
    Memorial Tributes: Volume 16 Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Memorial Tributes: Volume 16 CHRISTIAN J. LAMBERTSEN 1917–2011 Elected in 1977 “For contributions to environmental science and to diving physiology and technology.” BY TOM HAWKINS SUBMITTED BY THE HOME SECRETARY CHRISTIAN J. LAMBERTSEN, a distinguished scientist, medical doctor, inventor, environmentalist, pioneer in undersea and aerospace medicine, and professor at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine for his entire adult life, died on February 11, 2011, at the age of 93. He excused himself from daily activities at the university only in the past several years, when he was forced to slow down because of physical incapacitation. He was held in especially high regard by the U.S. Navy SEALs, who considered him a friend, mentor, and “Father of U.S. Combat Swimming,” a title he very much appreciated. Dr. Lambertsen received a B.S. degree from Rutgers University in 1938 and his M.D. degree from the University of Pennsylvania in 1943. His extraordinary lifetime of accomplishments began during involvement with the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) during World War II when, as a 23-year-old medical student, he presented his invention of a self-contained underwater swimming apparatus. Once developed, it was called the Lambertsen Lung and eventually the Lambertsen Amphibious Respiratory Unit (or simply LARU). The LARU would enable a well-trained swimmer to work bubble-free underwater and thus operate around 151 Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Memorial Tributes: Volume 16 152 MEMORIAL TRIBUTES objective areas without detection from above.
    [Show full text]
  • Diving Safety Manual Revision 3.2
    Diving Safety Manual Revision 3.2 Original Document: June 22, 1983 Revision 1: January 1, 1991 Revision 2: May 15, 2002 Revision 3: September 1, 2010 Revision 3.1: September 15, 2014 Revision 3.2: February 8, 2018 WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION i WHOI Diving Safety Manual DIVING SAFETY MANUAL, REVISION 3.2 Revision 3.2 of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Diving Safety Manual has been reviewed and is approved for implementation. It replaces and supersedes all previous versions and diving-related Institution Memoranda. Dr. George P. Lohmann Edward F. O’Brien Chair, Diving Control Board Diving Safety Officer MS#23 MS#28 [email protected] [email protected] Ronald Reif David Fisichella Institution Safety Officer Diving Control Board MS#48 MS#17 [email protected] [email protected] Dr. Laurence P. Madin John D. Sisson Diving Control Board Diving Control Board MS#39 MS#18 [email protected] [email protected] Christopher Land Dr. Steve Elgar Diving Control Board Diving Control Board MS# 33 MS #11 [email protected] [email protected] Martin McCafferty EMT-P, DMT, EMD-A Diving Control Board DAN Medical Information Specialist [email protected] ii WHOI Diving Safety Manual WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION DIVING SAFETY MANUAL REVISION 3.2, September 5, 2017 INTRODUCTION Scuba diving was first used at the Institution in the summer of 1952. At first, formal instruction and proper information was unavailable, but in early 1953 training was obtained at the Naval Submarine Escape Training Tank in New London, Connecticut and also with the Navy Underwater Demolition Team in St.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Dominic I
    OPERATION DOMINIC I United States Atmospheric Nuclear Weapons Tests Nuclear Test Personnel Review Prepared by the Defense Nuclear Agency as Executive Agency for the Department of Defense HRE- 0 4 3 6 . .% I.., -., 5. ooument. Tbe t k oorreotsd oontraofor that tad oa the book aw ra-ready c I I i I 1 1 I 1 I 1 i I I i I I I i i t I REPORT NUMBER 2. GOVT ACCESSION NC I NA6OccOF 1 i Technical Report 7. AUTHOR(.) i L. Berkhouse, S.E. Davis, F.R. Gladeck, J.H. Hallowell, C.B. Jones, E.J. Martin, DNAOO1-79-C-0472 R.A. Miller, F.W. McMullan, M.J. Osborne I I 9. PERFORMING ORGAMIIATION NWE AN0 AODRCSS ID. PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT. TASU Kamn Tempo AREA & WOW UNIT'NUMSERS P.O. Drawer (816 State St.) QQ . Subtask U99QAXMK506-09 ; Santa Barbara, CA 93102 11. CONTROLLING OFClCC MAME AM0 ADDRESS 12. REPORT DATE 1 nirpctor- . - - - Defense Nuclear Agency Washington, DC 20305 71, MONITORING AGENCY NAME AODRCSs(rfdIfI*mI ka CamlIlIU Olllc.) IS. SECURITY CLASS. (-1 ah -*) J Unclassified SCHCDULC 1 i 1 I 1 IO. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES This work was sponsored by the Defense Nuclear Agency under RDT&E RMSS 1 Code 6350079464 U99QAXMK506-09 H2590D. For sale by the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161 19. KEY WOROS (Cmlmm a nm.. mid. I1 n.c...-7 .nd Id.nllh 4 bled nlrmk) I Nuclear Testing Polaris KINGFISH Nuclear Test Personnel Review (NTPR) FISHBOWL TIGHTROPE DOMINIC Phase I Christmas Island CHECKMATE 1 Johnston Island STARFISH SWORDFISH ASROC BLUEGILL (Continued) D.
    [Show full text]
  • Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine
    Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine 7KH-RXUQDORIWKH6RXWK3DFL¿F8QGHUZDWHU0HGLFLQH6RFLHW\ ,QFRUSRUDWHGLQ9LFWRULD $% ISSN 1833 - 3516 Volume 37 No. 4 ABN 29 299 823 713 December 2007 Diving expeditions: from Antarctica to the Tropics Diving deaths in New Zealand Epilepsy and diving – time for a change? Mechanical ventilation of patients at pressure Print Post Approved PP 331758/0015 9^k^c\VcY=neZgWVg^XBZY^X^cZKdajbZ(,Cd#)9ZXZbWZg'%%, PURPOSES OF THE SOCIETY IdegdbdiZVcY[VX^a^iViZi]ZhijYnd[VaaVheZXihd[jcYZglViZgVcY]neZgWVg^XbZY^X^cZ Idegdk^YZ^c[dgbVi^dcdcjcYZglViZgVcY]neZgWVg^XbZY^X^cZ IdejWa^h]V_djgcVa IdXdckZcZbZbWZghd[i]ZHdX^ZinVccjVaanViVhX^Zci^ÄXXdc[ZgZcXZ OFFICE HOLDERS EgZh^YZci 9g8]g^h6Xdii (%EVg`6kZcjZ!GdhhancEVg` :çbV^a1XVXdii5deijhcZi#Xdb#Vj3 Hdji]6jhigVa^V*%,' EVhiçEgZh^YZci 9gGdWncLVa`Zg &'7VggVaa^ZgHigZZi!<g^[Äi] :çbV^a1GdWnc#LVa`Zg5YZ[ZcXZ#\dk#Vj3 68I'+%( HZXgZiVgn 9gHVgV]H]Vg`Zn E#D#7DM&%*!CVggVWZZc :çbV^a1hejbhhZXgZiVgn5\bV^a#Xdb3 CZlHdji]LVaZh'&%& IgZVhjgZg 9g<jnL^aa^Vbh E#D#7dm&.%!GZY=^aaHdji] :çbV^a1hejbh5[VhibV^a#cZi3 K^Xidg^V(.(, :Y^idg 6hhdX#Egd[#B^`Z9Vk^h 8$d=neZgWVg^XBZY^X^cZJc^i :çbV^a1hejbh_5XY]W#\dki#co3 8]g^hiX]jgX]=dhe^iVa!Eg^kViZ7V\),&%!8]g^hiX]jgX]!CO :YjXVi^dcD[ÄXZg 9g;^dcVH]Vge ').XC^X]dahdcGdVY!H]ZcidcEVg` :çbV^a1h]Vge^Z[5YdXidgh#dg\#j`3 LZhiZgc6jhigVa^V+%%- EjWa^XD[ÄXZg 9gKVcZhhV=VaaZg E#D#7dm-%'(!8Vggjb9dlch :çbV^a1kVcZhhV#]VaaZg5XYbX#Xdb#Vj3 K^Xidg^V('%& 8]V^gbVc6CO=B< 9g9Vk^YHbVgi 9ZeVgibZcid[9^k^c\VcY=neZgWVg^XBZY^X^cZ :çbV^a1YVk^Y#hbVgi5Y]]h#iVh#\dk#Vj3 GdnVa=dWVgi=dhe^iVa!=dWVgi!IVhbVc^V,%%% LZWbVhiZg
    [Show full text]
  • James Ronald Stewart Oral History
    ORAL HISTORY PROJECT of The H. John Heinz III Center for Science, Economics and the Environment In conjunction with the Colloquia Series OCEANOGRAPHY: THE MAKING OF A SCIENCE People, Institutions and Discovery Transcript of the Videotape-Recorded Interview with JAMES RONALD STEWART Conducted at Scripps Institution of Oceanography The University of California San Diego La Jolla, California February 10,2000 Interviewer: Ron Rainger Funded by the Office of Naval Research Video and Audio Recordings by George Washington University Television Transcribed by TechniType Transcripts, Davis, CA 2 JAMES RONALD STEWART February 10,2000 Ron Rainger, interviewer [Note: Volume level on Ron Rainger's microphone is extremely loW.] Ron Rainger: This interview is being conducted by Ron Rainger. The interviewee is Mr. James Ronald Stewart, chief diving officer at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography. James Stewart: Chief diving officer, emeritus. RR: Emeritus. At Scripps Institution of Oceanography. Today is February 10,2000, and this is at the Scripps Institution. I wondered if you could begin by telling us how you became interested in diving and oceanography. Stewart: Well, as I indicated to you a little earlier in our conversation, back in the thirties, the Scripps pier was then open to public fishing and it was open until, actually, about the begimling of World War II. My Dad would take part of his vacation and we would come and camp out on the beach, down in what is now Kellogg Park right down below us here. He'd come out and fish 1 on the pier and I'd go out with him, and when he'd catch a fish, I would take a look at is and run up to the old Scripps aquarium and see what that fish was.
    [Show full text]
  • WRECK DIVING™ ...Uncover the Past Magazine
    WRECK DIVING™ ...uncover the past Magazine Graf Zeppelin • La Galga • Mystery Ship • San Francisco Maru Scapa Flow • Treasure Hunting Part I • U-869 Part III • Ville de Dieppe WRECK DIVING MAGAZINE The Fate of the U-869 Reexamined Part III SanSan FranciscoFrancisco MaruMaru:: TheThe MillionMillion DollarDollar WreckWreck ofof TRUKTRUK LAGOONLAGOON Issue 19 A Quarterly Publication U-869 In In our previousour articles, we described the discovery and the long road to the identification ofU-869 off the The Fate Of New Jersey coast. We also examined the revised histories issued by the US Coast Guard Historical Center and the US Naval Historical Center, both of which claimed The U-869 the sinking was a result of a depth charge attack by two US Navy vessels in 1945. The conclusion we reached was that the attack by the destroyers was most likely Reexamined, Part on the already-wrecked U-869. If our conclusion is correct, then how did the U-869 come to be on the III bottom of the Atlantic? The Loss of the German Submarine Early Theories The most effective and successful branch of the German By John Chatterton, Richie Kohler, and John Yurga Navy in World War II was the U-boat arm. Hitler feared he would lose in a direct confrontation with the Royal Navy, so the German surface fleet largely sat idle at anchor. Meanwhile, the U-boats and their all- volunteer crews were out at sea, hunting down enemy vessels. They sank the merchant vessels delivering the Allies’ much-needed materials of war, and even were able to achieve some success against much larger enemy warships.
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Patrol Aviation: 90 Years of Continuing Innovation
    J. F. KEANE AND C. A. EASTERLING Maritime Patrol Aviation: 90 Years of Continuing Innovation John F. Keane and CAPT C. Alan Easterling, USN Since its beginnings in 1912, maritime patrol aviation has recognized the importance of long-range, persistent, and armed intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance in sup- port of operations afl oat and ashore. Throughout its history, it has demonstrated the fl ex- ibility to respond to changing threats, environments, and missions. The need for increased range and payload to counter submarine and surface threats would dictate aircraft opera- tional requirements as early as 1917. As maritime patrol transitioned from fl ying boats to land-based aircraft, both its mission set and areas of operation expanded, requiring further developments to accommodate advanced sensor and weapons systems. Tomorrow’s squad- rons will possess capabilities far beyond the imaginations of the early pioneers, but the mis- sion will remain essentially the same—to quench the battle force commander’s increasing demand for over-the-horizon situational awareness. INTRODUCTION In 1942, Rear Admiral J. S. McCain, as Com- plane. With their normal and advance bases strategically mander, Aircraft Scouting Forces, U.S. Fleet, stated the located, surprise contacts between major forces can hardly following: occur. In addition to receiving contact reports on enemy forces in these vital areas the patrol planes, due to their great Information is without doubt the most important service endurance, can shadow and track these forces, keeping the required by a fl eet commander. Accurate, complete and up fl eet commander informed of their every movement.1 to the minute knowledge of the position, strength and move- ment of enemy forces is very diffi cult to obtain under war Although prescient, Rear Admiral McCain was hardly conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Submarine Warfare, Fiction Or Reality? John Charles Cheska University of Massachusetts Amherst
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 1962 Submarine warfare, fiction or reality? John Charles Cheska University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses Cheska, John Charles, "Submarine warfare, fiction or reality?" (1962). Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014. 1392. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/1392 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. bmbb ittmtL a zia a musv John C. Chaaka, Jr. A.B. Aaharat Collag* ThMis subnlttwi to tho Graduate Faculty in partial fulfillment of tha requlraaanta for tha degraa of Master of Arta Uoiwaity of Maaaaohuaetta Aaherat August, 1962 a 3, v TABU OF CONTENTS Hm ramp _, 4 CHAPTER I Command Structure and Policy 1 II Material III Operations 28 I? The Submarine War ae the Public Saw It V The Number of U-Boate Actually Sunk V VI Conclusion 69 APPENDXEJB APPENDIX 1 Admiralty Organisation in 1941 75 2 German 0-Boat 76 3 Effects of Strategic Bombing on Late Model 78 U-Boat Productions and Operations 4 U-Boats Sunk Off the United States Coaat 79 by United States Forces 5 U-Boats Sunk in Middle American Zone 80 inr United StatM ?bkii 6 U-Bosta Sunk Off South America 81 by United States Forces 7 U-Boats Sunk in the Atlantio in Area A 82 1 U-Boats Sunk in the Atlentio in Area B 84 9A U-Boats Sunk Off European Coast 87 by United States Forces 9B U-Bnata Sunk in Mediterranean Sea by United 87 States Forces TABLE OF CONTENTS klWDU p«g« 10 U-Boats Sunk by Strategic Bombing 38 by United States Amy Air Foreee 11 U-Boats Sunk by United States Forces in 90 Cooperation with other Nationalities 12 Bibliography 91 LIST OF MAPS AND GRAPHS MAP NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Print Version (PDF)
    Key West: Home of ARSOF Underwater Operations by Kenneth Finlayson OSS Seal Dive Badge Army Special Operations Forces (ARSOF) became the standard employs a variety of methods to insert troops in their apparatus for underwa- area of operations. Infiltration by air, land, and sea are ter swimmers in the MU.2 SCUBA: Self-Contained Under- all viable options evaluated by ARSOF units during mis- Lambertsen transferred water Breathing Apparatus is sion planning.1 The proponency for waterborne opera- to the OSS in 1943 from the term commonly applied to tions training, either surface or sub-surface, has been the Army Medical Corps. underwater diving equipment assigned to Special Forces since 1952. This article will After training newly other than those of the “hard- trace the origins of Army underwater operations from recruited MU swimmers hat” variety. Where necessary, World War II to the establishment of the Special Forces on his apparatus on Cata- the different types of systems Underwater Warfare Operations (SFUWO) school at Key lina Island, California, will be explained. West, Florida. Special Forces underwater operations have and in Nassau, Grand undergone a number of Bahamas, Lambertsen course changes and facil- was sent to Ceylon (Sri ities upgrades since the Lanka) on 7 January 1945. school was established at He joined the MU at the Key West in 1965. base at Galle, Ceylon, The origins of ARSOF where the MU had been maritime operations can headquartered since be traced to the Office of arriving in the theater in Strategic Services (OSS) June 1944.3 during World War II. The Maritime Unit The OSS had a Maritime was in the China-Bur- Operations Branch and ma-India Theater (CBI) Maritime Unit (MU) because Brigadier Gen- that became operational eral William O.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Navy Activities Descriptions
    Appendix A: Navy Activities Descriptions NORTHWEST TRAINING AND TESTING FINAL EIS/OEIS OCTOBER 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A NAVY ACTIVITIES DESCRIPTIONS .............................................................................. A-1 A.1 TRAINING ACTIVITIES ................................................................................................................. A-1 A.1.1 ANTI-AIR WARFARE TRAINING ............................................................................................................ A-1 A.1.1.1 Air Combat Maneuver ............................................................................................................... A-2 A.1.1.2 Missile Exercise (Air-to-Air) ....................................................................................................... A-3 A.1.1.3 Gunnery Exercise (Surface-to-Air) ............................................................................................. A-4 A.1.1.4 Missile Exercise (Surface-to-Air) ................................................................................................ A-5 A.1.2 ANTI-SURFACE WARFARE TRAINING ..................................................................................................... A-6 A.1.2.1 Gunnery Exercise Surface-to-Surface (Ship) .............................................................................. A-7 A.1.2.2 Missile Exercise Air-to-Surface .................................................................................................. A-8 A.1.2.3 High-speed Anti-Radiation Missile
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Aspects of Harsh Environments, Volume 2, Chapter
    Military Diving Operations and Medical Support Chapter 31 MILITARY DIVING OPERATIONS AND MEDICAL SUPPORT † RICHARD D. VANN, PHD*; AND JAMES VOROSMARTI, JR, MD INTRODUCTION BREATH-HOLD DIVING CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM OXYGEN TOXICITY IN COMBAT DIVERS UNDERWATER BREATHING APPARATUS Open-Circuit Self-Contained Underwater Breathing Apparatus: The Aqualung Surface-Supplied Diving Closed-Circuit Oxygen Scuba Semiclosed Mixed-Gas Scuba Closed-Circuit, Mixed-Gas Scuba THE ROLE OF RESPIRATION IN DIVING INJURIES Carbon Dioxide Retention and Dyspnea Interactions Between Gases and Impaired Consciousness Individual Susceptibility to Impaired Consciousness DECOMPRESSION PROCEDURES No-Stop (No-Decompression) Dives In-Water Decompression Stops Surface Decompression Repetitive and Multilevel Diving Dive Computers Nitrogen–Oxygen Diving Helium–Oxygen and Trimix Diving Omitted Decompression Flying After Diving and Diving at Altitude The Safety of Decompression Practice SATURATION DIVING Atmospheric Control Infection Hyperbaric Arthralgia Depth Limits Decompression THERMAL PROTECTION AND BUOYANCY TREATMENT OF DECOMPRESSION SICKNESS AND ARTERIAL GAS EMBOLISM Therapy According to US Navy Treatment Tables Decompression Sickness in Saturation Diving MEDICAL STANDARDS FOR DIVING SUBMARINE RESCUE AND ESCAPE SUMMARY *Captain, US Navy Reserve (Ret); Divers Alert Network, Center for Hyperbaric Medicine and Environmental Physiology, Box 3823, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710 †Captain, Medical Corps, US Navy (Ret); Consultant in Occupational, Environmental, and Undersea Medicine, 16 Orchard Way South, Rockville, Maryland 20854 955 Military Preventive Medicine: Mobilization and Deployment INTRODUCTION Divers breathe gases and experience pressure land) teams and two SEAL delivery vehicle (SDV) changes that can cause different injuries from those teams. SEALs are trained for reconnaissance and encountered by most combatant or noncombatant direct action missions at rivers, harbors, shipping, military personnel.
    [Show full text]
  • The Archeology of the Atomic Bomb
    THE ARCHEOLOGY OF THE ATOMIC BOMB: A SUBMERGED CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT OF THE SUNKEN FLEET OF OPERATION CROSSROADS AT BIKINI AND KWAJALEIN ATOLL LAGOONS REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS Prepared for: The Kili/Bikini/Ejit Local Government Council By: James P. Delgado Daniel J. Lenihan (Principal Investigator) Larry E. Murphy Illustrations by: Larry V. Nordby Jerry L. Livingston Submerged Cultural Resources Unit National Maritime Initiative United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Southwest Cultural Resources Center Professional Papers Number 37 Santa Fe, New Mexico 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS ... LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS ......................................... 111 FOREWORD ................................................... vii Secretary of the Interior. Manuel Lujan. Jr . ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................... ix CHAPTER ONE: Introduction ........................................ 1 Daniel J. Lenihan Project Mandate and Background .................................. 1 Methodology ............................................... 4 Activities ................................................. 1 CHAPTER TWO: Operation Crossroads .................................. 11 James P. Delgado The Concept of a Naval Test Evolves ............................... 14 Preparing for the Tests ........................................ 18 The AbleTest .............................................. 23 The Baker Test ............................................. 27 Decontamination Efforts .......................................
    [Show full text]