DOCSLIB.ORG

Stratigraphy of the Basin, Wyoming

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stratigraphy of the Basin, Wyoming Stratigraphy of the Wind River Formation in South-Central Wind River Basin, Wyoming GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 594-A Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission STRATIGRAPHY OF THE WIND RIVER FORMATION IN SOUTH-CENTRAL WIND RIVER BASIN North end Rattlesnake Range South end Bighorn Mts - \ I Part of south-central Wind River Basin. View northeastward from a point about one-half mile north of Coyote Springs. Puddle Springs Arkose Member of the Wind River Formation underlies most of area of photograph. Lines trace outcrop of Dry Coyote Conglomerate Bed (top and base not shown) of the Puddle Springs Arkose Member. Kc, Cody Shale. Aerial photograph courtesy of Page J enkins. Stratigraphy of the Wind River Formation in South-Central Wind River Basin, Wyoming By PAUL E. SOISTER SHORTER CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENERAL GEOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 594-A Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission A detailed study of the physical stratigraphy of the uraniu1n-bearing formation in and near the important Gas Hills uranium district of central Wyoming UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1968 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Abstract------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ A1 Introduction__________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2 Geologic setting_______________________________________________________________________________________________ 2 VVind River Formation_________________________________________________________________________________________ 7 History of stratigraphic terms_______________________________________________________________________________ 7 Paleontology and stratigraphic position_______________________________________________________________________ 9 General lithology and thickness______________________________________________________________________________ 10 Occurrence and facies relations_ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ __ __ __ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ 11 Correlations----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 14 Lithologic units____________________________________________________________________________________________ 15 Lower fine-grained member_ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ __ __ __ _ __ _ __ _ __ __ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ __ 15 Conglomerate_____________________________________________________________________________________ 16 Sandstone________________________________________________________________________________________ 17 Siltstone__________________________________________________________________________________________ 17 Claystone_________________________________________________________________________________________ 18 Carbonaceousbeds_________________________________________________________________________________ 18 Puddle Springs Arkose Member_________________________________________________________________________ 20 General description and occurreD ce _ _ _ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ __ __ __ _ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ __ __ __ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 20 Rock types and units ____________ ~_________________________________________________________________ 26 Channelsandstonebeds________________________________________________________________________ 26 Landslide debris from the Mowry Shale__________________________________________________________ 26 Carbonaceous beds and carbonized and silicified wood______________________________________________ 30 East Canyon Conglomerate Bed_________________________________________________________________ 32 I>ry Coyote Conglomerate Bed__________________________________________________________________ 33 Muskrat Conglomerate Bed_____________________________________________________________________ 36 Other conglomerate beds_ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ __ __ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ __ __ _ _ 3 7 Upper transition zone__________________________________________________________________________________ 38 Source of sediments________________________________________________________________________________________ 39 I>epositional environment___________________________________________________________________________________ 40 PaleogeographY---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 40 Paleoclimate__________________________________________________________________________________________ 42 I>eposition of sediments__ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ __ _ __ _ __ _ __ __ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ _ __ __ __ __ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ 45 Stratigraphic position of uranium deposits____________________________________________________________________ 4 7 References cited___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ __ __ _ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ 48 ILLUSTRATIONS [Plates 1-5 are in pocket] PLATE 1. Geologic map of south-central VVind River Basin. 2-4. Stratigraphic sections of Wind River Formation: 2. Areas A and B. 3. Areas C and I>. 4. Areas E, F, and G. 5. Geologic map showing outcrop of I>ry Coyote and Muskrat Conglomerate Beds. FRONTISPIECE. Part of south-central Wind River Basin. View northeastward from a point about one-half mile north of Coyote Springs. Page FIGURE 1. Index map of central VV yoming_ __ _ __ __ __ _ __ _ __ _ __ _ __ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ A3 2. Map of the south-central part of the VVind River Basin showing location of measured sections, facies and other boundaries, and depositional edge of the Wind River Formation_______________________________________ 4 v VI CONTENTS Page FIGURE 3. Photograph showing exhumed ridges and valleys of breached Dutton Basin anticline and large open-pit uranium mines in the Puddle Springs Arkose Member________________________________________________________ A6 4. Photograph of Beaver Divide escarpment southeast of Coyote Springs______________________________________ 7 5. Diagrammatic section of Wind River Formation in south-central and central Wind River Basin_______________ 8 6. Isopach map showing original thickness of Wind River Formation and physiographic features of pre-Tertiary rocks that affected deposition of the sediments______________________________________________________ 11 7. Diagrammatic stratigraphic section of Wind River Formation near south-central edge of Wind River Basin_____ 12 8. Photographs showing lower fine-grained member of the Wind River Formation______________________________ 16 9. Map of an area south of Coyote Springs showing variation in thickness of a carbonaceous shale penetrated by drillholes--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 19 10. Photographs of the coal and carbonaceous shale of the central carbonaceous zone at a Lucky Me open-pit uranium Inine___________________________________________________________________________________________ 21 11. Map showing present extent of central carbonaceous zone of lower fine-grained member of Wind River Formation and approximate position and geology of highlands during its deposition_________________________________ 22 12. Diagrammatic section of flat, tabular body containing limonite, Inanganese, and uranium in sandstone above Dry Coyote Conglomerate Bed____________________________________________________________________ 25 13. Geologic map and cross sections showing lower Eocene landslide debris from the Mowry Shale west of Coyote Springs_________________________________________________________________________________________ 29 14. Photographs of lower Eocene landslide debris from the Mowry Shale______________________________________ 30 15. Paleogeographic map showing approximate limits of East Canyon Conglomerate Bed and position of highlands during deposition of the sediments_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 32 16-19. Photographs showing: 16. Dry Coyote Conglomerate Bed exposed in a uranium prospect pit__________________________________ 34 17. Dry Coyote Conglomerate Bed in W~ sec. 32, T. 33 N., R. 90 W__________________________________ 35 18. Conglomerate and sandstone of the Puddle Springs Arkose Member exposed in an open-pit uranium mine__ 37 19. Marker beds in lower part of Wagon Bed Formation and part of upper transition zone of the Wind River Formation_______________________________________________________________________________ 38 TABLE Page TABLE 1. Rocks overlapped by Wind River Formation in areas shown in figure 2____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A5 SHORTER CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENERAL GEOLOGY STRATIGRAPHY OF THE WIND RIVER FORMATION IN SOUTH-CENTRAL WIND RIVER BASIN WYOMING By PAuL E. SoisTER ABS'l'RACT and silicified wood are common in parts of the arkose. Cementing or interstitial materials include clay, gypsum, limonite, calcite, The area of this report is the t:outh-central part of the Wind jarosite, pyrite,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • South Dakota to Nebraska
    Geological Society of America Special Paper 325 1998 Lithostratigraphic revision and correlation of the lower part of the White River Group: South Dakota to Nebraska Dennis O. Terry, Jr. Department of Geology, University of Nebraska—Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588-0340 ABSTRACT Lithologic correlations between type areas of the White River Group in Nebraska and South Dakota have resulted in a revised lithostratigraphy for the lower part of the White River Group. The following pedostratigraphic and lithostratigraphic units, from oldest to youngest, are newly recognized in northwestern Nebraska and can be correlated with units in the Big Badlands of South Dakota: the Yellow Mounds Pale- osol Equivalent, Interior and Weta Paleosol Equivalents, Chamberlain Pass Forma- tion, and Peanut Peak Member of the Chadron Formation. The term “Interior Paleosol Complex,” used for the brightly colored zone at the base of the White River Group in northwestern Nebraska, is abandoned in favor of a two-part division. The lower part is related to the Yellow Mounds Paleosol Series of South Dakota and rep- resents the pedogenically modified Cretaceous Pierre Shale. The upper part is com- posed of the unconformably overlying, pedogenically modified overbank mudstone facies of the Chamberlain Pass Formation (which contains the Interior and Weta Paleosol Series in South Dakota). Greenish-white channel sandstones at the base of the Chadron Formation in Nebraska (previously correlated to the Ahearn Member of the Chadron Formation in South Dakota) herein are correlated to the channel sand- stone facies of the Chamberlain Pass Formation in South Dakota. The Chamberlain Pass Formation is unconformably overlain by the Chadron Formation in South Dakota and Nebraska.
    [Show full text]
  • Morrison Formation 37 Cretaceous System 48 Cloverly Formation 48 Sykes Mountain Formation 51 Thermopolis Shale 55 Mowry Shale 56
    THE STRUCTURAL AND STRATIGRAPHIC FRAMEWORK OF THE WARM SPRINGS RANCH AREA, HOT SPRINGS COUNTY, WYOMING By CHRISTOPHER JAY CARSON Bachelor of Science Oklahoma State University 1998 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE July, 2000 THE STRUCTURAL AND STRATIGRAPHIC FRAMEWORK OF THE WARM SPRINGS RANCH AREA, HOT SPRINGS COUNTY, WYOMING Thesis Approved: Thesis Advisor ~~L. ... ~. ----'-"'-....D~e~e:.-g-e----- II ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to express appreciation to my advisor Dr. Arthur Cleaves for providing me with the opportunity to compile this thesis, and his help carrying out the fieldwork portion of the thesis. My sincere appreciation is extended to my advisory committee members: Dr. Stan Paxton, Dr. Gary Stewart, and Mr. David Schmude. I wish to thank Mr. Schmude especially for the great deal of personal effort he put forth toward the completion of this thesis. His efforts included financial, and time contributions, along with invaluable injections of enthusiasm, advice, and friendship. I extend my most sincere thank you to Dr. Burkhard Pohl, The Big Hom Basin Foundation, and the Wyoming Dinosaur Center. Without whose input and financial support this thesis would not have been possible. In conjunction I would like to thank the staff of the Wyoming Dinosaur Center for the great deal of help that I received during my stay in Thermopolis. Finally I wish to thank my friends and family. To my friends who have pursued this process before me, and with me; thank you very much.
    [Show full text]
  • Rodents (Mammalia) from the Pilgrim Creek Local Fauna, Wyoming: a Mixed Eocene and Oligocene Assemblage (Duchesnean to Whitneyan)
    Paludicola 11(2):51-72 March 2017 © by the Rochester Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology RODENTS (MAMMALIA) FROM THE PILGRIM CREEK LOCAL FAUNA, WYOMING: A MIXED EOCENE AND OLIGOCENE ASSEMBLAGE (DUCHESNEAN TO WHITNEYAN) William W. Korth Rochester Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology, 265 Carling Road, Rochester, New York 14610 <[email protected]> ABSTRACT Previously, only the non-eomyid rodents from the Pilgrim Creek fauna of Wyoming have been described (Sutton and Black, 1975; Korth, 1981; Korth and Emry, 2013). This fauna has been considered as Chadronian in age since its first description. Twenty-seven species of rodents are recognized here from this fauna. There is a predominance of Chadronian species (13 taxa); however, the presence of three species known elsewhere from the Duchesnean (“Leptotomus” guildayi, Metanoiamys korthi, Griphomys cf. alecer), four from the Orellan (“Prosciurus” sp., cf. relictus, Eumys elegans, “Scottimus” viduus, Protosciurus sp., cf. P. mengi), and two from the Whitneyan (Leptodontomys douglassi, Ansomys sp., cf. A. cyanotephrus,) demonstrates that the fauna is clearly mixed with elements from four different horizons. INTRODUCTION either earlier or later horizons, demonstrating the evident mixing of faunas. Over 40 years ago, Sutton and Black (1975) _________________________________________ identified 11 species of rodents from the Pilgrim Creek fauna of Wyoming (Table 1). However, TABLE 1. Previously identified rodents from the Pilgrim Creek specimens of the family Eomyidae were not local fauna, Wyoming (Sutton and Black, 1975). described or listed. The locality from which the Ischyromyidae fossils were collected is in the Teton National Forest Ischyromys cf. veterior in Jackson County, Wyoming along Pilgrim Creek Cylindrodontidae (Sutton and Black, 1975).
    [Show full text]
  • Related Magmatism in the Upper Wind River Basin, Wyoming (USA), GEOSPHERE; V
    Research Paper THEMED ISSUE: Cenozoic Tectonics, Magmatism, and Stratigraphy of the Snake River Plain–Yellowstone Region and Adjacent Areas GEOSPHERE The leading wisps of Yellowstone: Post–ca. 5 Ma extension- related magmatism in the upper Wind River Basin, Wyoming (USA), GEOSPHERE; v. 14, no. 1 associated with the Yellowstone hotspot tectonic parabola doi:10.1130/GES01553.1 Matthew E. Brueseke1, Anna C. Downey1, Zachary C. Dodd1, William K. Hart2, Dave C. Adams3, and Jeff A. Benowitz4 12 figures; 2 tables; 1 supplemental file 1Department of Geology, Kansas State University, 108 Thompson Hall, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA 2Department of Geology and Environmental Earth Science, Miami University, 118C Shideler Hall, Oxford, Ohio 45056, USA 3Box 155, Teton Village, Wyoming 83025, USA CORRESPONDENCE: brueseke@ ksu .edu 4Geophysical Institute and Geochronology Laboratory, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775, USA CITATION: Brueseke, M.E., Downey, A.C., Dodd, Z.C., Hart, W.K., Adams, D.C., and Benowitz, J.A., 2018, The leading wisps of Yellowstone: Post–ca. 5 Ma ABSTRACT the issue of linking volcanic events to a specific driving mechanism (Fouch, extension-related magmatism in the upper Wind River 2012; Kuehn et al., 2015). Complicating matters, magmatism often continues Basin, Wyoming (USA), associated with the Yellow- The upper Wind River Basin in northwest Wyoming (USA) is located ~80– long after (e.g., millions of years) the upper plate has been translated away stone hotspot tectonic parabola: Geosphere, v. 14, no. 1, p. 74–94, doi:10.1130/GES01553.1. 100 km southeast of the Yellowstone Plateau volcanic field. While the upper from an upwelling plume (Bercovici and Mahoney, 1994; Sleep, 2003; Shervais Wind River Basin is a manifestation of primarily Cretaceous to Eocene Lara- and Hanan, 2008; Jean et al., 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Ludvigson Et Al-Current Research.Indd
    New Insights on the Sequence Stratigraphic Architecture of the Dakota Formation, Ludvigson et al. i New Insights on the Sequence Stratigraphic Architecture of the Dakota Formation in Kansas–Nebraska–Iowa from a Decade of Sponsored Research Activity Greg A. Ludvigson, Kansas Geological Survey, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS Brian J. Witzke, Iowa Geological Survey, Iowa Department of Natural Resources, Iowa City, IA R. M. Joeckel, Nebraska Conservation and Survey Division, School of Natural Resources, The University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE Robert L. Ravn, The IRF Group, Anchorage, AK Preston Lee Phillips, Department of Geology and Geography, University of North Carolina at Pembroke, Pembroke, NC Luis A. González, Department of Geology, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS Robert L. Brenner, Department of Geoscience, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA Abstract The Cretaceous Dakota Formation in the areas of Kansas, Nebraska, and Iowa contains a rich and well-preserved microfl ora of fossil palynomorphs. A comprehensive listing of these taxa is presented in this publication as part of a continuing effort to develop a refi ned biostratigraphic scheme for mid-Cretaceous terrestrial deposits in North America. The Dakota Formation in this region contains four distinctive Albian–Cenomanian palynostratigraphic zones that are used to partition the unit into successive depositional cycles, and each zone records deposition in fl uvial-estuarine environments. The late Albian Kiowa–Skull Creek depositional cycle at the base of the Dakota Formation is recognized throughout the study area, and is also recognized in other parts of the Cretaceous North American Western Interior basin. The overlying newly recognized latest Albian “Muddy–Mowry Cycle” is formally defi ned for the fi rst time in this paper and correlates with depositional cycles recognized by other workers in other parts of the Western Interior basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanical Stratigraphic Controls on Natural Fracture Spacing and Penetration
    Journal of Structural Geology 95 (2017) 160e170 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Structural Geology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jsg Mechanical stratigraphic controls on natural fracture spacing and penetration * Ronald N. McGinnis a, , David A. Ferrill a, Alan P. Morris a, Kevin J. Smart a, Daniel Lehrmann b a Department of Earth, Material, and Planetary Sciences, Southwest Research Institute, 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, TX 78238-5166, USA b Geoscience Department, Trinity University, One Trinity Place, San Antonio, TX 78212, USA article info abstract Article history: Fine-grained low permeability sedimentary rocks, such as shale and mudrock, have drawn attention as Received 20 July 2016 unconventional hydrocarbon reservoirs. Fracturing e both natural and induced e is extremely important Received in revised form for increasing permeability in otherwise low-permeability rock. We analyze natural extension fracture 21 December 2016 networks within a complete measured outcrop section of the Ernst Member of the Boquillas Formation Accepted 7 January 2017 in Big Bend National Park, west Texas. Results of bed-center, dip-parallel scanline surveys demonstrate Available online 8 January 2017 nearly identical fracture strikes and slight variation in dip between mudrock, chalk, and limestone beds. Fracture spacing tends to increase proportional to bed thickness in limestone and chalk beds; however, Keywords: Mechanical stratigraphy dramatic differences in fracture spacing are observed in mudrock. A direct relationship is observed be- Natural fractures tween fracture spacing/thickness ratio and rock competence. Vertical fracture penetrations measured Fracture spacing from the middle of chalk and limestone beds generally extend to and often beyond bed boundaries into Fracture penetration the vertically adjacent mudrock beds.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Geology Wind/Bighorn River Basin Wyoming and Montana
    WYOMING STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Plate I Thomas A. Drean, State Geologist Wind/Bighorn Basin Plan II - Available Groundwater Determination Technical Memorandum Surface Geology - Wind/Bighorn River Basin SWEET GRASS R25E R5E R15E R30E R10E R20E MONTANA Mm PM Jsg T7S KJ !c Pp Jsg KJ water Qt Surface Geology Ti ! Red Lodge PM DO PM PM Ts Ts p^r PM N ^r DO KJ DO !c Wind/Bighorn River Basin Tts Mm water Mm Ti Ti ^r DO Kmt Ti LOCATION MAP p^r ^r ^r Qt WYOMING Wyoming and Montana Kf Qt Ti p^r !c p^r PM 0 100 250 Miles Tts ^r PM DO Ti Jsg MD Ts Ti MzPz Kmv !Pg Qt compiled DO DO Tts Ts Taw DO DO DO water Qt Kc PM ^r Twl Qt Ob O^ by ^r Mm DO !c MD MONTANA Thr Ti Kc Qr Klc p^r Kmv Kc : # Ts ^r : O^ Nikolaus Gribb, Brett Worman, # Ts # water : PM Taw # Kf : PM !cd : Ket Qb Taw Qu Twp Thr # Ki Twl 345 P$Ma : Thr O^ Qa KJg Tfu : Jsg ^r Qu : :: # Kl (! KJk : Qr Qls Tomas Gracias, and Scott Quillinan Qb : Thr Ts Taw # Tfu 37 PM Kft: : # :: T10S Qls # Thr : # ^r Kc (! Kft Kmt # :::::: p^r :: : Qu KJk Kc MD Taw DO Qu # p^r Qg :: Km KJ WYOMING Taw Ti : Kl 2012 Thr : Qb # # # Qg : water DO Qls ::: !c !Pg !cd MDO water water Kc Qa :::::: :: Kmt ::: : Twl 90 : Ti Ts Qu Qa Qg Kmv !Pcg Mm KJk : Qg : 212 : Qu Qg £¤ Kmv KJ ¨¦§ Tts Taw p^r ^r # Kl : Kf Kf 338 Ob !cd Qu Qu Ttp # (! : : : p^r ::: !Pg O^ MD P$Ma Thr : Qa # DO Km Qls 343 ^r Qls Taw : Qb Qg Qls Qa Km Jsg water (! : Qb # !cd ^r Kc BighornLake : MD # Taw Qa Qls Qt MD A′ MD MD Qg Twl !Pg Qu Qb Tii # Twp ^r water MzPz Qg Tfu Kl ::: Taw Taw Twp Qls : Qt Kmv Qa Ob P$Ma : Thr Qa # Tcr ^r water Qa Kft # Qt O^
    [Show full text]
  • Dinotracks.Indb 358 1/22/16 11:23 AM Dinosaur Tracks in Eolian Strata: New Insights Into Track Formation, Walking Kinetics and Trackmaker Behavior 18
    358 DinoTracks.indb 358 1/22/16 11:23 AM Dinosaur Tracks in Eolian Strata: New Insights into Track Formation, Walking Kinetics and Trackmaker Behavior 18 David B. Loope and Jesper Milàn Dinosaur tracks are abundant in wind-blown hooves of the bison deformed soft, laminated sediment – the Mesozoic deposits, but the nature of loose eolian sand perfect medium to preserve recognizable tracks. The next makes it difficult to determine how they are preserved. This windstorm buried the tracks. Today, the thick cover of grasses also raises the questions: Why would dinosaurs be walking protects the land surface so well that there are no soft, lami- around in dune fields in the first place? And, if they did go nated sediments for cattle to step on. And, if any tracks were, there, why would their tracks not be erased by the next wind somehow, to get formed, no moving sediment would be avail- storm? able to bury them. Mesozoic eolian sediments around the world, which have been the focus of a number of case studies Introduction in recent years, preserve the tracks of dinosaurs that walked on actively migrating sand dunes. This chapter summarizes Most dunes today form only in deserts and along shore- the known occurrences of dinosaur tracks in Mesozoic eo- lines – the only sandy land surfaces that are nearly devoid of lian strata and discusses their unique modes of preservation plants. Normally plants slow the wind at the ground surface and the anatomical and behavioral information about the enough that sand will not move even when the plant cover trackmakers that can be deduced from them.
    [Show full text]
  • Eocene Green River Formation, Western United States
    Synoptic reconstruction of a major ancient lake system: Eocene Green River Formation, western United States M. Elliot Smith* Alan R. Carroll Brad S. Singer Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wisconsin, 1215 West Dayton Street, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA ABSTRACT Members. Sediment accumulation patterns than being confi ned to a single episode of arid thus refl ect basin-center–focused accumula- climate. Evaporative terminal sinks were Numerous 40Ar/39Ar experiments on sani- tion rates when the basin was underfi lled, initially located in the Greater Green River dine and biotite from 22 ash beds and 3 and supply-limited accumulation when the and Piceance Creek Basins (51.3–48.9 Ma), volcaniclastic sand beds from the Greater basin was balanced fi lled to overfi lled. Sedi- then gradually migrated southward to the Green River, Piceance Creek, and Uinta ment accumulation in the Uinta Basin, at Uinta Basin (47.1–45.2 Ma). This history is Basins of Wyoming, Colorado, and Utah Indian Canyon, Utah, was relatively con- likely related to progressive southward con- constrain ~8 m.y. of the Eocene Epoch. Mul- stant at ~150 mm/k.y. during deposition of struction of the Absaroka Volcanic Prov- tiple analyses were conducted per sample over 5 m.y. of both evaporative and fl uctuat- ince, which constituted a major topographic using laser fusion and incremental heating ing profundal facies, which likely refl ects the and thermal anomaly that contributed to a techniques to differentiate inheritance, 40Ar basin-margin position of the measured sec- regional north to south hydrologic gradient. loss, and 39Ar recoil.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment J Assessment of Existing Paleontologic Data Along with Field Survey Results for the Jonah Field
    Attachment J Assessment of Existing Paleontologic Data Along with Field Survey Results for the Jonah Field June 12, 2007 ABSTRACT This is compilation of a technical analysis of existing paleontological data and a limited, selective paleontological field survey of the geologic bedrock formations that will be impacted on Federal lands by construction associated with energy development in the Jonah Field, Sublette County, Wyoming. The field survey was done on approximately 20% of the field, primarily where good bedrock was exposed or where there were existing, debris piles from recent construction. Some potentially rich areas were inaccessible due to biological restrictions. Heavily vegetated areas were not examined. All locality data are compiled in the separate confidential appendix D. Uinta Paleontological Associates Inc. was contracted to do this work through EnCana Oil & Gas Inc. In addition BP and Ultra Resources are partners in this project as they also have holdings in the Jonah Field. For this project, we reviewed a variety of geologic maps for the area (approximately 47 sections); none of maps have a scale better than 1:100,000. The Wyoming 1:500,000 geology map (Love and Christiansen, 1985) reveals two Eocene geologic formations with four members mapped within or near the Jonah Field (Wasatch – Alkali Creek and Main Body; Green River – Laney and Wilkins Peak members). In addition, Winterfeld’s 1997 paleontology report for the proposed Jonah Field II Project was reviewed carefully. After considerable review of the literature and museum data, it became obvious that the portion of the mapped Alkali Creek Member in the Jonah Field is probably misinterpreted.
    [Show full text]
  • How Do Sedimentary Beds Form? – and Why Can We See Them? Demonstrating How the Beds in Sedimentary Rocks Are Deposited
    Earthlearningidea – https://www.earthlearningidea.com How do sedimentary beds form? – and why can we see them? Demonstrating how the beds in sedimentary rocks are deposited Sedimentary rock layers are called beds, if they are more than 1 cm thick*. Each bed was laid down by a single sedimentary event, so the beds in the photo below were laid down by many, many separate events of sand deposition. The junction between beds is called a bedding plane and is normally a flat horizontal surface. Bedding in a measuring cylinder, with sands of different colour on the left and sands of one colour (but added in several sedimentary episodes or spoonfuls) on the right. (Chris King). So, later when the sands have been compacted and cemented to form sandstones, the slight Bedding in 140 million year old sedimentary rocks, Morro differences between the top of one bed and the Solar, Lima, Peru. This series of beds has been tilted by bottom of another remain. These are later tectonic forces. attacked by weathering and erosion so that the Image licensed by Miguel Vera León under the Creative bedding plane and the beds can be seen. Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license. Bedding planes are even clearer if there was an You can make your own beds by filling a 2 interval of time between the laying down of the measuring cylinder /3 full of water and adding upper and lower beds. In that time interval, the spoonfuls of sand. Each spoonful you add is a lower bed may have become more compacted, or single sedimentary episode and the junction partially eroded or sedimentary structures like between each layer is a bedding plane.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1 – Environmental Predictor Data
    APPENDIX 1 – ENVIRONMENTAL PREDICTOR DATA CONTENTS Overview ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Climate ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Hydrology ................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Land Use and Land Cover ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 Soils and Substrate .................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Topography .............................................................................................................................................................................. 10 References ................................................................................................................................................................................ 12 1 OVERVIEW A set of 94 potential predictor layers compiled to use in distribution modeling for the target taxa. Many of these layers derive from previous modeling work by WYNDD1, 2, but a
    [Show full text]