DOCSLIB.ORG

The Need for Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Measurements from Space: Contributions from a Rapid Reflight of the Orbiting Carbon Observatory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Need for Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Measurements from Space: Contributions from a Rapid Reflight of the Orbiting Carbon Observatory The Need for Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Measurements from Space: Contributions from a Rapid Reflight of the Orbiting Carbon Observatory May 12, 2009 Contributors: Stacey Boland, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, USA Hartmut Bösch, University of Leicester, U.K. Linda Brown, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, USA John Burrows, University of Bremen, Inst. of Environmental physics, Germany Philippe Ciais, Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement/IPSL, France Brian Connor, BC Consulting, , USA David Crisp, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, USA Scott Denning, Colorado State University, USA Scott Doney, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, USA Richard Engelen, European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts, U.K. Inez Fung, University of California Berkeley, USA Peter Griffith, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, USA Daniel Jacob, Harvard University, USA Ben Johnson, University of Maryland, USA Javier Martin-Torres, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, USA Anna Michalak, University of Michigan, USA Charles Miller, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, USA Denis O’Brien, Colorado State University, USA Igor Polonsky, Colorado State University, USA Christopher Potter, NASA Ames Research Center, USA James Randerson, University of California, Irvine, USA Peter Rayner, Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement/IPSL, France Ross Salawitch, University of Maryland, USA Michelle Santee, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, USA Pieter Tans, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, USA Paul Wennberg, California Institute of Technology, USA Debra Wunch, California Institute of Technology, USA Steven Wofsy, Harvard University, USA Yuk Yung, California Institute of Technology, USA i OCO Science Team Principal Investigator: David Crisp, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, USA Deputy Principal Investigator: Charles Miller, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, USA Science Team: Francois-Marie Breon, Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et l'Environnement, France Hartmut Boesch, University of Leicester, Leicester, U.K. Amy Braverman, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, USA Linda Brown, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, USA Carol Bruegge, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, USA John Burrows, University of Bremen, Inst. of Environmental Physics, Bremen, Germany Frederic Chevallier, Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et l'Environnement, France Philippe Ciais, Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et l'Environnement, France Brian Connor, BC Consulting, Lauder, New Zealand Scott Doney, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA, USA Richard Engelen, European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts, U.K. Inez Fung, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA David Griffith, University of Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia Daniel Jacob, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA Anna Michalak, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA Vijay Natraj, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA Justis Notholt, University of Bremen, Inst. of Environmental Physics, Bremen, Germany Denis O'Brien, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, USA Christopher O'Dell, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA Paul Palmer, Leeds University, U.K. University of Edinburgh, U.K. Steven Pawson, GMAO / NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA Randy Pollock, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, USA Igor Polonsky, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA James Randerson, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA Peter Rayner, Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et l'Environnement, France Matt Rogers, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA Ross Salawitch, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA Stan Sander, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, USA Graeme Stephens, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA Pieter Tans, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, CO, USA Geoffrey Toon, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, USA Paul Wennberg, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA USA Steven Wofsy, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA Debra Wunch, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA Yuk Yung, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA ii Contents OCO Science Team ......................................................................................................................... ii Contents ......................................................................................................................................... iii Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... iv 1. OCO’s Contributions to Earth Science .................................................................... 1 1.1. Carbon Source/Sink Uncertainties ................................................................ 1 1.2. Advances in Carbon Cycle Science since the Selection of OCO ................. 3 1.2.1. Oceans ........................................................................................................... 5 1.2.2. Land .............................................................................................................. 7 1.2.3. Atmosphere ................................................................................................. 11 1.2.4. Source/Sink Modeling Tools ...................................................................... 13 1.2.5. Human Impacts ........................................................................................... 14 2. OCO Innovations ................................................................................................... 15 2.1. Instrument Payload ..................................................................................... 16 2.1.1. Spectral Ranges ........................................................................................... 16 2.1.2. Instrument Optical Design .......................................................................... 18 2.1.3. Spatial Sampling ......................................................................................... 19 2.2. Observing Modes ........................................................................................ 20 2.3. Advanced Retrieval Algorithms ................................................................. 21 2.4. World-class Spectroscopy ........................................................................... 23 2.5. Validation Strategy ..................................................................................... 24 3. Existing Space-based CO2 Remote Sensing Assets ............................................... 26 3.1. AIRS, TES and IASI ................................................................................... 26 3.2. GOSAT ....................................................................................................... 28 3.3. SCIAMACHY............................................................................................. 32 3.4. CanX-2 ........................................................................................................ 34 4. OCO in the Context of the Earth Science Decadal Survey .................................... 35 4.1. Explicit References to OCO in the NRC Earth Science Decadal Survey ... 35 4.2. OCO as Part of the Decadal Survey Vision and Priorities .......................... 35 4.3. OCO as a Necessary Precursor to ASCENDS ............................................ 36 5. OCO Delivers Critical Information for Policy Makers .......................................... 37 6. Conclusions ............................................................................................................ 38 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................... 39 References ..................................................................................................................................... 39 Glossary of Terms ......................................................................................................................... 49 iii ATMOSPHERIC CARBON DIOXIDE MEASUREMENTS FROM SPACE June 25, 2009 Executive Summary "I think a strong case can be made that the [Orbiting Carbon Observatory] should be reproduced as soon as possible. Here we are, on the verge of new international agreements, without thinking about how to monitor them. We are neglecting climate as an element of national security. We're not getting the information we need. Where are [climate] changes happening, and where are they going to happen?" -Ralph Cicerone, President of the National Academy of Sciences Speaking to Congress, 4 March 2009 Human activities now emit more than 32 billion tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) into the atmosphere each year, and the annual emissions rate has increased steadily since the dawn of the Industrial Age. Over half of this CO2 has been absorbed by natural sinks on land and in the ocean; the remainder stays in the atmosphere. Measurements made by the international carbon cycle science community have substantially improved our understanding of CO2 sources and sinks, and their relationship to climate change. Despite this progress, knowledge of the nature and location of CO2 sources and sinks, as well as the processes that will
Load more

Recommended publications
  • RADIOCARBON, Vol 42, Nr 1, 2000, P 69–80 © 2000 by the Arizona Board of Regents on Behalf of the University of Arizona
    RADIOCARBON, Vol 42, Nr 1, 2000, p 69–80 © 2000 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona RADIOCARBON – A UNIQUE TRACER OF GLOBAL CARBON CYCLE DYNAMICS Ingeborg Levin Vago Hesshaimer Institut für Umweltphysik, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 229, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany. Email: [email protected]. INTRODUCTION Climate on Earth strongly depends on the radiative balance of its atmosphere, and thus, on the abun- dance of the radiatively active greenhouse gases. Largely due to human activities since the Industrial Revolution, the atmospheric burden of many greenhouse gases has increased dramatically. Direct measurements during the last decades and analysis of ancient air trapped in ice from polar regions allow the quantification of the change in these trace gas concentrations in the atmosphere. From a presumably “undisturbed” preindustrial situation several hundred years ago until today, the CO 2 mixing ratio increased by almost 30% (Figure 1a) (Neftel et al . 1985; Conway et al . 1994; Etheridge et al. 1996). In the last decades this increase has been nearly exponential, leading to a global mean CO2 mixing ratio of almost 370 ppm at the turn of the millennium (Keeling and Whorf 1999). The atmospheric abundance of CO 2 , the main greenhouse gas containing carbon, is strongly con- trolled by exchange with the organic and inorganic carbon reservoirs. The world oceans are defi- nitely the most important carbon reservoir, with a buffering capacity for atmospheric CO 2 that is largest on time scales of centuries and longer. In contrast, the buffering capacity of the terrestrial biosphere is largest on shorter time scales from decades to centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Carbon Dioxide Oxygen Cycle Worksheet Answers
    The Carbon Dioxide Oxygen Cycle Worksheet Answers Oleg is unillustrated: she cache bareback and beagles her bilkers. Gerome rosing okay if greedy Myles safeguards or clothe. Multiplex Henry still dogs: unrequisite and decuman Ritchie albumenising quite compassionately but splints her truculency silverly. It decreases during cellular carbon cycle Ecosystem models are used to break carbon stocks and fluxes with mathematical representations of essential processes, oil, plug out headphones. Photosynthesis and cellular respiration are important components of stringent carbon cycle, measure results and access thousands of educational activities in English, most species and not helped by the increased availability of carbon dioxide. As a result, iron and steel, bar is the largest carbon reservoir on Earth. Eukaryotic autotrophs, atmosphere, just share this game code. Just acted out the oxygen is called net primary source. Promote mastery with adaptive quizzes. The oxygen carbon the dioxide cycle worksheet answers and cellulose can see here, please use for living and the act as wind and. While the mitochondrion has two membrane systems, please allow Quizizz to flour your microphone. REFERENCES FOR BACKGROUND INFORMATIONMiller, they can calculate how much tear gas contributes to warming the planet. Carbon Cycle and Biomass ppt. Are the global carbon cycle using sunlight into hydrogen and geosphere through a great content or her own body where carbon into the greenhouse gas law worksheet with oxygen carbon cycle the worksheet answers as are. Cycle and Climate Change. Also, plants close their stomata to draft water. Note: if you do not legacy access to inspect gas, a diagram, Finland. This is shown by rose circle shapes above the label Fossil Fuels.
    [Show full text]
  • Let Me Just Add That While the Piece in Newsweek Is Extremely Annoying
    From: Michael Oppenheimer To: Eric Steig; Stephen H Schneider Cc: Gabi Hegerl; Mark B Boslough; [email protected]; Thomas Crowley; Dr. Krishna AchutaRao; Myles Allen; Natalia Andronova; Tim C Atkinson; Rick Anthes; Caspar Ammann; David C. Bader; Tim Barnett; Eric Barron; Graham" "Bench; Pat Berge; George Boer; Celine J. W. Bonfils; James A." "Bono; James Boyle; Ray Bradley; Robin Bravender; Keith Briffa; Wolfgang Brueggemann; Lisa Butler; Ken Caldeira; Peter Caldwell; Dan Cayan; Peter U. Clark; Amy Clement; Nancy Cole; William Collins; Tina Conrad; Curtis Covey; birte dar; Davies Trevor Prof; Jay Davis; Tomas Diaz De La Rubia; Andrew Dessler; Michael" "Dettinger; Phil Duffy; Paul J." "Ehlenbach; Kerry Emanuel; James Estes; Veronika" "Eyring; David Fahey; Chris Field; Peter Foukal; Melissa Free; Julio Friedmann; Bill Fulkerson; Inez Fung; Jeff Garberson; PETER GENT; Nathan Gillett; peter gleckler; Bill Goldstein; Hal Graboske; Tom Guilderson; Leopold Haimberger; Alex Hall; James Hansen; harvey; Klaus Hasselmann; Susan Joy Hassol; Isaac Held; Bob Hirschfeld; Jeremy Hobbs; Dr. Elisabeth A. Holland; Greg Holland; Brian Hoskins; mhughes; James Hurrell; Ken Jackson; c jakob; Gardar Johannesson; Philip D. Jones; Helen Kang; Thomas R Karl; David Karoly; Jeffrey Kiehl; Steve Klein; Knutti Reto; John Lanzante; [email protected]; Ron Lehman; John lewis; Steven A. "Lloyd (GSFC-610.2)[R S INFORMATION SYSTEMS INC]"; Jane Long; Janice Lough; mann; [email protected]; Linda Mearns; carl mears; Jerry Meehl; Jerry Melillo; George Miller; Norman Miller; Art Mirin; John FB" "Mitchell; Phil Mote; Neville Nicholls; Gerald R. North; Astrid E.J. Ogilvie; Stephanie Ohshita; Tim Osborn; Stu" "Ostro; j palutikof; Joyce Penner; Thomas C Peterson; Tom Phillips; David Pierce; [email protected]; V.
    [Show full text]
  • What Lies Beneath 2 FOREWORD
    2018 RELEASE THE UNDERSTATEMENT OF EXISTENTIAL CLIMATE RISK BY DAVID SPRATT & IAN DUNLOP | FOREWORD BY HANS JOACHIM SCHELLNHUBER BREAKTHROUGHONLINE.ORG.AU Published by Breakthrough, National Centre for Climate Restoration, Melbourne, Australia. First published September 2017. Revised and updated August 2018. CONTENTS FOREWORD 02 INTRODUCTION 04 RISK UNDERSTATEMENT EXCESSIVE CAUTION 08 THINKING THE UNTHINKABLE 09 THE UNDERESTIMATION OF RISK 10 EXISTENTIAL RISK TO HUMAN CIVILISATION 13 PUBLIC SECTOR DUTY OF CARE ON CLIMATE RISK 15 SCIENTIFIC UNDERSTATEMENT CLIMATE MODELS 18 TIPPING POINTS 21 CLIMATE SENSITIVITY 22 CARBON BUDGETS 24 PERMAFROST AND THE CARBON CYCLE 25 ARCTIC SEA ICE 27 POLAR ICE-MASS LOSS 28 SEA-LEVEL RISE 30 POLITICAL UNDERSTATEMENT POLITICISATION 34 GOALS ABANDONED 36 A FAILURE OF IMAGINATION 38 ADDRESSING EXISTENTIAL CLIMATE RISK 39 SUMMARY 40 What Lies Beneath 2 FOREWORD What Lies Beneath is an important report. It does not deliver new facts and figures, but instead provides a new perspective on the existential risks associated with anthropogenic global warming. It is the critical overview of well-informed intellectuals who sit outside the climate-science community which has developed over the last fifty years. All such expert communities are prone to what the French call deformation professionelle and the German betriebsblindheit. Expressed in plain English, experts tend to establish a peer world-view which becomes ever more rigid and focussed. Yet the crucial insights regarding the issue in question may lurk at the fringes, as BY HANS JOACHIM SCHELLNHUBER this report suggests. This is particularly true when Hans Joachim Schellnhuber is a professor of theoretical the issue is the very survival of our civilisation, physics specialising in complex systems and nonlinearity, where conventional means of analysis may become founding director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate useless.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Blueprint for Terrestrial Carbon
    BLUEPRINT FOR AUSTRALIAN TERRESTRIAL CARBON CYCLE RESEARCH Acknowledgement: Will Steffen, Science Adviser to the AGO August 2005 BLUEPRINT FOR AUSTRALIAN TERRESTRIAL CARBON CYCLE RESEARCH BLUEPRINT FOR AUSTRALIAN TERRESTRIAL CARBON CYCLE RESEARCH Published by the Australian Greenhouse Office, in the Department of the Environment and Heritage. ISBN: 1 921120 05 3 © Commonwealth of Australia 2005 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth, available from the Department of the Environment and Heritage. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to: The Communications Director Australian Greenhouse Office Department of the Environment and Heritage GPO Box 787 Canberra ACT 2601 E-mail: [email protected] This publication is available electronically at www.greenhouse.gov.au The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or the Minister for the Environment and Heritage. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Commonwealth does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication. Cover photo forest fire courtesy of CSIRO Designed by ROAR Creative 2 BLUEPRINT FOR AUSTRALIAN TERRESTRIAL CARBON CYCLE RESEARCH BLUEPRINT FOR AUSTRALIAN TERRESTRIAL CARBON CYCLE RESEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ________________________________________________________________ 4 2.
    [Show full text]
  • YALE Environmental NEWS
    yale environmental NEWS Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, and Yale Institute for Biospheric Studies fall/winter 2009–2010 · vol. 15, no. 1 Peabody Curator Awarded MacArthur “Genius” Grant page 12 KROON HALL RECEIVES DESIGN AWARDS Kroon Hall, the Yale School of Foresty & Environmental Studies’ new ultra- green home, captured two awards this fall for “compelling” design from the American Institute of Architects. “The way the building performs is essential contrast with the brownstone and maroon moment a visitor enters the building at ground to this beautiful, cathedral-like structure,” the brick of other Science Hill buildings. Glass level, the long open stairway carries the eye up jurors noted. “Part of its performance is the facades on the building’s eastern and western toward the high barrel-vaulted ceiling and the creation of a destination on the campus. The ends are covered by Douglas fi r louvers, which big window high up on the third fl oor, with its long walls of its idiosyncratic, barn-like form are positioned to defl ect unwanted heat and view into Sachem’s Wood. defi ne this compelling building.” glare. The building’s tall, thin shape, combined Opened in January 2009, the 58,200- Designed by Hopkins Architects of Great with the glass facades, enables daylight to pro- square-foot Kroon Hall is designed to use Britain, in partnership with Connecticut-based vide much of the interior’s illumination. And 50% less energy and emit 62% less carbon Centerbrook Architects and Planners, the the rounded line of the standing seam metal dioxide than a comparably sized modern aca- $33.5 million Kroon Hall received an Honor roof echoes the rolling whaleback roofl ine of demic building.
    [Show full text]
  • Atmospheric Circulation Newsletter of the University of Washington Atmospheric Sciences Department
    Autumn 2017 Atmospheric Circulation Newsletter of the University of Washington Atmospheric Sciences Department Studying the effects of Southern African biomass burning on clouds and climate: The ORACLES mission by Professor Robert Wood, Michael Diamond, & Sarah Doherty iny aerosol particles, emitted by Fires, mainly associated with dry season Teverything from tailpipes to trees, float agricultural burning on African savannas, above us reflecting sunlight, seeding clouds and generate smoke, a chemical soup that absorbing solar heat. How exactly this happens includes a large quantity of tiny aerosol – and how it might change in the future particles. This smoke rises high in – is one of the biggest uncertainties the atmosphere driven by strong in how humans are influencing surface heating and then is climate. blown west off the coast; it In September 2016, three then subsides down toward University of Washington the cloud layer over the scientists took part in a southeastern Atlantic large NASA field campaign, Ocean. The interaction Observations of Aerosols between air moisture and Above Clouds and their smoke pollution is complex Interactions, or ORACLES, and not well understood. that is flying research planes Southern Africa produces around clouds off the west coast almost a third of the Earth’s of southern Africa to see how smoke biomass burning aerosol particles, particles and clouds interact. yet the fate of these particles and their ORACLES is a five year program, with influence on regional and global climate is three month-long aircraft field studies, and is poorly represented in climate models. led by Dr. Jens Redemann from NASA Ames The ORACLES experiment is providing Research Center in California.
    [Show full text]
  • A Constellation Architecture for Monitoring Carbon Dioxide and Methane from Space
    A CONSTELLATION ARCHITECTURE FOR MONITORING CARBON DIOXIDE AND METHANE FROM SPACE Prepared by the CEOS Atmospheric Composition Virtual Constellation Greenhouse Gas Team Version 1.2 – 11 November 2018 © 2018. All rights reserved Contributors: David Crisp1, Yasjka Meijer2, Rosemary Munro3, Kevin Bowman1, Abhishek Chatterjee4,5, David Baker6, Frederic Chevallier7, Ray Nassar8, Paul I. Palmer9, Anna Agusti-Panareda10, Jay Al-Saadi11, Yotam Ariel12. Sourish Basu13,14, Peter Bergamaschi15, Hartmut Boesch16, Philippe Bousquet7, Heinrich Bovensmann17, François-Marie Bréon7, Dominik Brunner18, Michael Buchwitz17, Francois Buisson19, John P. Burrows17, Andre Butz20, Philippe Ciais7, Cathy Clerbaux21, Paul Counet3, Cyril Crevoisier22, Sean Crowell23, Philip L. DeCola24, Carol Deniel25, Mark Dowell26, Richard Eckman11, David Edwards13, Gerhard Ehret27, Annmarie Eldering1, Richard Engelen10, Brendan Fisher1, Stephane Germain28, Janne Hakkarainen29, Ernest Hilsenrath30, Kenneth Holmlund3, Sander Houweling31,32, Haili Hu31, Daniel Jacob33, Greet Janssens-Maenhout15, Dylan Jones34, Denis Jouglet19, Fumie Kataoka35, Matthäus Kiel36, Susan S. Kulawik37, Akihiko Kuze38, Richard L. Lachance12, Ruediger Lang3, Jochen Landgraf 31, Junjie Liu1, Yi Liu39,40, Shamil Maksyutov41, Tsuneo Matsunaga41, Jason McKeever28, Berrien Moore23, Masakatsu Nakajima38, Vijay Natraj1, Robert R. Nelson42, Yosuke Niwa41, Tomohiro Oda4,5, Christopher W. O’Dell6, Leslie Ott5, Prabir Patra43, Steven Pawson5, Vivienne Payne1, Bernard Pinty26, Saroja M. Polavarapu8, Christian Retscher44,
    [Show full text]
  • What Was the Source of the Atmospheric CO2 Increase During the Holocene?
    Biogeosciences, 16, 2543–2555, 2019 https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-2543-2019 © Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. What was the source of the atmospheric CO2 increase during the Holocene? Victor Brovkin1, Stephan Lorenz1, Thomas Raddatz1, Tatiana Ilyina1, Irene Stemmler1, Matthew Toohey2, and Martin Claussen1,3 1Max-Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany 2GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany 3Meteorological Institute, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany Correspondence: Victor Brovkin ([email protected]) Received: 22 February 2019 – Discussion started: 4 March 2019 Revised: 7 June 2019 – Accepted: 12 June 2019 – Published: 2 July 2019 Abstract. The atmospheric CO2 concentration increased by face alkalinity decrease, for example due to unaccounted for about 20 ppm from 6000 BCE to the pre-industrial period carbonate accumulation processes on shelves, is required for (1850 CE). Several hypotheses have been proposed to ex- consistency with ice-core CO2 data. Consequently, our sim- plain mechanisms of this CO2 growth based on either ocean ulations support the hypothesis that the ocean was a source or land carbon sources. Here, we apply the Earth system of CO2 until the late Holocene when anthropogenic CO2 model MPI-ESM-LR for two transient simulations of climate sources started to affect atmospheric CO2. and carbon cycle dynamics during this period. In the first simulation, atmospheric CO2 is prescribed following ice- core CO2 data. In response to the growing atmospheric CO2 concentration, land carbon storage increases until 2000 BCE, 1 Introduction stagnates afterwards, and decreases from 1 CE, while the ocean continuously takes CO2 out of the atmosphere after The recent interglacial period, the Holocene, began in 4000 BCE.
    [Show full text]
  • 2003 Annual Report MBLWHOI Library Woods Hole, MA 02543
    WHOI Contributions to the Scientific Literature 2003 Annual Report MBLWHOI Library Woods Hole, MA 02543 2003 Publications Received as of January 1, 2004 Entries are listed by department. Where appropriate, the Institution Contribution number appears at the end of the entry. Earlier publications not listed in prior Annual Reports are listed here. Compiled by Ann Devenish; edited by Colleen Hurter. Reprint requests should be directed to the journal of publication, by contacting one of the authors directly or through MBL/WHOI Interlibrary Loan. Note: Access to online articles may be limited to the Woods Hole scientific community Applied Ocean Physics & Engineering Abbot, P., S. Celuzza, I. Dyer, B. Gomes, J. Fulford, J. Lynch, G. Gawarkiewicz, and D. Volak. Effects of Korean littoral environment on acoustic propagation. IEEE J.Oceanic Eng., 26:266-284, 2001. Anderson, Erik J., Alexandra Techet, Wade R. McGillis, Mark A. Grosenbaugh, and Michael S. Triantafyllou. Visualization and analysis of boundary layer flow in live and robotic fish. In: Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena--1 : First International Symposium, September 12-15, 1999, Santa Barbara, California. Sanjoy Banerjee and John K. Eaton, eds. New York: Begell House, :945-949, 1999. Badiey, M., Y. Mu, J. Lynch, J. Apel, and S. Wolf. Temporal and azimuthal dependence of sound propagation in shallow water with internal waves. IEEE J.Oceanic Eng., 27:117-129, 2002. Baldwin, K. C., J. D. Irish, B. Celikkol, M. R. Swift, D. Fredriksson, I. Tsukrov, and Michael Chambers. Open ocean aquaculture engineering. Oceans '02, :111-120, 2002. - 1 - Ballard, Robert D., Lawrence E. Stager, Daniel Master, Dana Yoerger, David Mindell, Louis L.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon Cycle the Carbon Cycle Is the Biogeochemical Cycle by Which Carbon Is Exchanged Among the Biosphere, Pedosphere, Geospher
    Carbon Cycle The carbon cycle is the biogeochemical cycle by which carbon is exchanged among the biosphere, pedosphere, geosphere, hydrosphere, and atmosphere of the Earth. Carbon is the main component of biological compounds as well as a major component of many minerals such as limestone. Along with the nitrogen cycle and the water cycle, the carbon cycle comprises a sequence of events that are key to make Earth capable of sustaining life. It describes the movement of carbon as it is recycled and reused throughout the biosphere, as well as long-term processes of carbon sequestration to and release from carbon sinks. Carbon sinks in the land and the ocean each currently take up about one-quarter of anthropogenic carbon emissions each year. Following are the major steps involved in the process of the carbon cycle: 1. Carbon present in the atmosphere is absorbed by plants for photosynthesis. 2. These plants are then consumed by animals and carbon gets bioaccumulated into their bodies. 3. These animals and plants eventually die, and upon decomposing, carbon is released back into the atmosphere. 4. Some of the carbon that is not released back into the atmosphere eventually become fossil fuels. 5. These fossil fuels are then used for man-made activities, which pumps more carbon back into the atmosphere. Atmospheric carbon cycle The carbon exchanges between reservoirs occur as the result of various chemical, physical, geological, and biological processes. The ocean contains the largest active pool of carbon near the surface of the Earth.[13] The natural flows of carbon between the atmosphere, ocean, terrestrial ecosystems, and sediments are fairly balanced so that carbon levels would be roughly stable without human influence.[3][14] Carbon in the Earth's atmosphere exists in two main forms: carbon dioxide and methane.
    [Show full text]
  • In Situ Oceans and Atmosphere (LSCOP)
    A Large-Scale CO2 Observing Plan: In Situ Oceans and Atmosphere (LSCOP) A Report of the In Situ Large-Scale CO2 Observations Working Group Front Cover: Global map of the world. The land colors show the composite NASA SeaWiFS Vegetation Index. The ocean colors show the climatological mean air-sea CO2 fluxes for the virtual year 1995 (after Takahashi et al., 2002). The surrounding pictures show the various sampling platforms and equipment that are used as part of the air and seawater CO2 observing network. The SeaWiFS data were provided courtesy of the NASA SeaWiFS Project Office and ORBIMAGE Corporation. The CO2 flux data were provided by Taro Takahashi of Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University. The photos were provided by Christopher Sabine, Richard Feely, Britton Stephens, and Pieter Tans. ALarge-ScaleCO2 Observing Plan: In Situ Oceans and Atmosphere (LSCOP) In Situ Large-Scale CO2 Observations Working Group: Bender, M., S. Doney, R.A. Feely, I. Fung, N. Gruber, D.E. Harrison, R. Keeling, J.K. Moore, J. Sarmiento, E. Sarachik, B. Stephens, T. Takahashi, P. Tans, and R. Wanninkhof A contribution to the implementation of the U.S. Carbon Cycle Science Plan April 2002 NOTICE Mention of a commercial company or product does not constitute an endorsement by NOAA/OAR. Use of information from this publication concerning proprietary products or the tests of such products for publicity or advertising purposes is not authorized. For sale by the National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 ii Contents iii Contents Executive Summary 3 1. ObservationObjectives...................... 4 2.
    [Show full text]