DOCSLIB.ORG

Coleoptera) from the Palaearctic Region Stefano Ziani Geolab, Via Case Di Dozza, [email protected]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Coleoptera) from the Palaearctic Region Stefano Ziani Geolab, Via Case Di Dozza, Stefanoziani@Alice.It University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida 2-12-2015 New country records of Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) from the Palaearctic Region Stefano Ziani GeoLab, Via Case di Dozza, [email protected] Aleš Bezděk Institute of Entomology, [email protected] Tristão Branco [email protected] Oliver Hillert [email protected] Stanislav Jákl [email protected] See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Ziani, Stefano; Bezděk, Aleš; Branco, Tristão; Hillert, Oliver; Jákl, Stanislav; Král, David; Mantič, Marion; Rößner, Eckehard; and Sehnal, Richard, "New country records of Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) from the Palaearctic Region" (2015). Insecta Mundi. 912. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/912 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Authors Stefano Ziani, Aleš Bezděk, Tristão Branco, Oliver Hillert, Stanislav Jákl, David Král, Marion Mantič, Eckehard Rößner, and Richard Sehnal This article is available at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/912 INSECTA MUNDI A Journal of World Insect Systematics 0409 New country records of Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) from the Palaearctic Region Stefano Ziani GeoLab, Via Case di Dozza, 22, 40026 Imola (BO), Italy Aleš Bezděk Biology Centre ASCR, Institute of Entomology, Branišovská 31, CZ-370 05 České Budějovice Czech Republic Tristão Branco Rua de Camões 788, 2º Dto, P-4000-142 Porto, Portugal Oliver Hillert Kieferndamm 10, 15566 Schöneiche b. Berlin, Germany Stanislav Jákl Geologická 1218, CZ-152 00 Praha 5, Czech Republic David Král Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology, Viničná 7 CZ-128 43 Praha 2, Czech Republic Marion Mantič Střední 40, CZ-748 01 Hlučín, Czech Republic Eckehard Rößner Reutzstr. 5, 19055 Schwerin Germany Richard Sehnal Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources Department of Zoology and Fisheries, Kamýcká 129, CZ-165 21 Praha 6, Czech Republic Date of Issue: February 12, 2015 CENTER FOR SYSTEMATIC ENTOMOLOGY, INC., Gainesville, FL Stefano Ziani, Aleš Bezděk, Tristão Branco, Oliver Hillert, Stanislav Jákl, David Král, Marion Mantič, Eckehard Rößner, Richard Sehnal New country records of Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) from the Palaearctic Region Insecta Mundi 0409: 1–36 ZooBank Registered: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BC346F5E-BEEC-4FF7-84DF-C12F9D30B61E Published in 2015 by Center for Systematic Entomology, Inc. P. O. Box 141874 Gainesville, FL 32614-1874 USA http://centerforsystematicentomology.org/ Insecta Mundi is a journal primarily devoted to insect systematics, but articles can be published on any non-marine arthropod. Topics considered for publication include systematics, taxonomy, nomenclature, checklists, faunal works, and natural history. Insecta Mundi will not consider works in the applied sciences (i.e. medical entomology, pest control research, etc.), and no longer publishes book reviews or editorials. Insecta Mundi publishes original research or discoveries in an inexpensive and timely manner, distributing them free via open access on the internet on the date of publication. Insecta Mundi is referenced or abstracted by several sources including the Zoological Record, CAB Ab- stracts, etc. Insecta Mundi is published irregularly throughout the year, with completed manuscripts assigned an individual number. Manuscripts must be peer reviewed prior to submission, after which they are reviewed by the editorial board to ensure quality. One author of each submitted manuscript must be a current member of the Center for Systematic Entomology. Chief Editor: Paul E. Skelley, e-mail: [email protected] Head Layout Editor: Eugenio H. Nearns Editorial Board: J. H. Frank, M. J. Paulsen, Michael C. Thomas Review Editors: Listed on the Insecta Mundi webpage Manuscript Preparation Guidelines and Submission Requirements available on the Insecta Mundi web- page at: http://centerforsystematicentomology.org/insectamundi/ Printed copies (ISSN 0749-6737) annually deposited in libraries: CSIRO, Canberra, ACT, Australia Museu de Zoologia, São Paulo, Brazil Agriculture and Agrifood Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada The Natural History Museum, London, UK Muzeum i Instytut Zoologii PAN, Warsaw, Poland National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, CA, USA Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Gainesville, FL, USA Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL, USA National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA Zoological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint-Petersburg, Russia Electronic copies (Online ISSN 1942-1354, CDROM ISSN 1942-1362) in PDF format: Printed CD or DVD mailed to all members at end of year. Archived digitally by Portico. Florida Virtual Campus: http://purl.fcla.edu/fcla/insectamundi University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Digital Commons: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/ Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:hebis:30:3-135240 Copyright held by the author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Com- mons, Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc/3.0/ Layout Editor for this article: Eugenio H. Nearns 0409: 1–36 2015 New country records of Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) from the Palaearctic Region Stefano Ziani GeoLab, Via Case di Dozza, 22, 40026 Imola (BO), Italy [email protected] Aleš Bezděk Biology Centre ASCR, Institute of Entomology, Branišovská 31, CZ-370 05 České Budějovice Czech Republic [email protected] Tristão Branco Rua de Camões 788, 2º Dto, P-4000-142 Porto, Portugal [email protected] Oliver Hillert Kieferndamm 10, 15566 Schöneiche b. Berlin, Germany [email protected] Stanislav Jákl Geologická 1218, CZ-152 00 Praha 5, Czech Republic [email protected] David Král Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology, Viničná 7 CZ-128 43 Praha 2, Czech Republic [email protected] Marion Mantič Střední 40, CZ-748 01 Hlučín, Czech Republic [email protected] Eckehard Rößner Reutzstr. 5, 19055 Schwerin Germany [email protected] Richard Sehnal Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources Department of Zoology and Fisheries, Kamýcká 129, CZ-165 21 Praha 6, Czech Republic [email protected] Abstract. New country records for Coleoptera Scarabaeoidea are provided. For each species the distribution is given. Key Words. New country records, Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea, Palaearctic. Introduction In anticipation of the second edition of the Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera, to be issued at a later date, we have decided to publish a multi-authored contribution to the knowledge of distribution of the Scarabaeoidea known to occur in the Palaearctic Region. 1 2 • INSECTA MUNDI 0409, February 2015 ZIANI ET AL. Numerous new or noteworthy country records are provided. For each species, the number and col- lecting data of examined specimens are given, and the distribution is specifi ed. Materials and Methods The reference starting point is the third volume of the Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera edited by Löbl and Smetana (2006). We have considered all previous subgenera of Aphodius as distinct genera (see Dellacasa et al. 2001 for details) and have followed the nomenclature proposed by Pittino (2006) and Stebnicka (2011) regarding the subfamily Aegialiinae of Scarabaeidae. The suprageneric nomenclature follows, with some exceptions, the paper of Bouchart et al. (2011). The limits of the Palaearctic Region are according to those specifi ed in Löbl and Smetana (2006). The responsible author or authors for each record is/are stated at the end of the respective note. The following abbreviations identify the collections housing the material examined (names of cura- tors of institutional collections are in parentheses): AKCA — Andreas Kopetz collection, Amt Wachsenburg, Germany; BMNH — Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom (Maxwell V. L. Barclay); DFCS — Dirk Frenzel collection, Sonneberg, Germany; DKCP — David Král collection (deposited in NMPC); EHCV — Eckart Heise collection, Vastorf, Germany; ERCS — Eckehard Rößner collection, Schwerin, Germany; GJCB — Günter Jaeschke collection, Berlin, Germany [†]; HKCS — Harald Kalz collection, Schlabendorf, Germany; HMCZ — Heiko Müller collection, Zittau, Germany; IECA — Biology Centre ASCR, Institute of Entomology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic (Aleš Bezděk); ISNB — Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Brussels, Belgium (Alain Drumont); JWCP — Jörg Weipert collection, Plaue, Germany; IZHC — Institut für Zoologie der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg (Karla Schneider); KRCB — Klaus Renner collection, Bielefeld, Germany; MMCH— Marion Mantič collection, Hlučín, Czech Republic; MECP — Michael Eifl er collection, Pinneberg, Germany; MWNS — Naturwissenschaftliche Sammlung Museum
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Phylogenetic Relationships of Iberian Dung Beetles Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae): Insights on the Evolution of Nesting Behavior
    J Mol Evol +2002) 55:116±126 DOI: 10.1007/s00239-002-2314-4 Phylogenetic Relationships of Iberian Dung Beetles Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae): Insights on the Evolution of Nesting Behavior Soraya Villalba,Jorge M. Lobo,Fermõ  n Martõ n-Piera,* Rafael Zardoya Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, Jose Gutie rrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain Received: 22 October 2001 / Accepted: 25 January 2002 Abstract. A phylogeny of the main lineages of dung Introduction beetles +Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) from the Iberian Peninsula was based on partial nucleotide sequences The Scarabaeinae +dung beetles) are a worldwide- +about 1221 bp) of the mitochondrial cytochrome distributed, highly successful subfamily of Coleoptera oxidase I and II genes of 33 taxa. Our phylogenetic with nearly 5000 species grouped in 234 genera analyses con®rmed the validity and composition of +Hanski and Cambefort 1991). Ever since Linnaeus' most of the recognized tribes within the subfamily. Systema Naturae, dung beetles have received wide Interestingly, the Onitini showed an evolutionary rate attention from entomologists because of their singu- signi®cantly higher than that of the other tribes. The lar adaptations in exploiting vertebrate dung pads molecular phylogeny supports a sister-group rela- +e.g., Fabre 1897, 1899; Heymons and von Lengerken tionship of the tribes Onitini and Oniticellini + On- 1922; Burmeister 1930; Heymons 1930; Prasse 1957; thophagini. A close relationship of Scarabaeini, Rommel, 1961; Balthasar 1963; Halter and Matth- Gymnopleurini, and Sisyphini is also suggested but ews 1966; Halter and Edmonds 1982). Scarabaeids lacks bootstrap support. Surprisingly, the Coprini, are one of the best-studied groups of beetles in terms which had always been related to the Oniticellini and of taxonomy +Janssens 1949; Balthasar 1963; Iablo- Onthophagini, were placed closer to the Scarabaeini, kov-Khnzorian 1977; Zunino 1984; Browne and Gymnopleurini, and Sisyphini.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification, Natural History, and Evolution of Epiphloeinae (Coleoptera: Cleridae)
    A N N A L E S Z O O L O G I C I (Warszawa), 2008, 58(1): 1-34 CLASSIFICATION, NATURAL HISTORY, AND EVOLUTION OF EPIPHLOEINAE (COLEOPTERA: CLERIDAE). PART VI. THE GENERA EPIPHLAEUS SPINOLA AND OPITZIUS BARR WESTON OPITZ Kansas Wesleyan University, Department of Biology, 100 East Claflin Avenue, Salina KS 67401-6196, USA; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract.— New World genus Epiphlaeus is redefined and evolutionarily linked to its sister genus Opitzius Barr. Epiphlaeus includes six species as follows: E. adonis sp. nov., E. duo- decimmaculatus (Klug), E. fundurufus sp. nov., E. princeps (Gorham), E. pulcherrimus (Gorham), E. quattuordecimmaculatus Chevrolat, and E. tigrinus sp. nov. The monotypic Opitzius is based on O. thoracicus Barr. Specimens of these two genera are variously deposited in 37 institutional and private collections. These checkered beetles frequent the surface of felled tree boles to forage on adults and immatures of lignicolous insects. Their large size and mobility make them very noticeable on the bark of fallen trees. It is postulated that they are participants in a mimetic ring with log-inhabiting mutillids and flies part of the mimetic mix. Hennigian principles were applied to 22 adult morphological characters, which yielded a nearly totally resolved phylogenetic hypothesis between Epiphlaeus and Opitzius, and among Epiphlaeus species groups. The combined geographical range of the inclusive species extends from northwestern Nicaragua to southeastern Brazil. It is hypothesized that ancestral Epiphlaeus – Opitzius evolved in South America with some descendants entering Insular Central America after closure of the Panamanian portals during the Miocene. Pleistocene climatic factors are thought to have influenced species diversity, and perhaps speciation events in conjunction with aspects of dispersal, vicariance, and taxon pulse dynamics.
    [Show full text]
  • Dung Beetle Assemblages Attracted to Cow and Horse Dung: the Importance of Mouthpart Traits, Body Size, and Nesting Behavior in the Community Assembly Process
    life Article Dung Beetle Assemblages Attracted to Cow and Horse Dung: The Importance of Mouthpart Traits, Body Size, and Nesting Behavior in the Community Assembly Process Mattia Tonelli 1,2,* , Victoria C. Giménez Gómez 3, José R. Verdú 2, Fernando Casanoves 4 and Mario Zunino 5 1 Department of Pure and Applied Science (DiSPeA), University of Urbino “Carlo Bo”, 61029 Urbino, Italy 2 I.U.I CIBIO (Centro Iberoamericano de la Biodiversidad), Universidad de Alicante, San Vicente del Raspeig, 03690 Alicante, Spain; [email protected] 3 Instituto de Biología Subtropical, Universidad Nacional de Misiones–CONICET, 3370 Puerto Iguazú, Argentina; [email protected] 4 CATIE, Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza, 30501 Turrialba, Costa Rica; [email protected] 5 Asti Academic Centre for Advanced Studies, School of Biodiversity, 14100 Asti, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Dung beetles use excrement for feeding and reproductive purposes. Although they use a range of dung types, there have been several reports of dung beetles showing a preference for certain feces. However, exactly what determines dung preference in dung beetles remains controversial. In the present study, we investigated differences in dung beetle communities attracted to horse or cow dung from a functional diversity standpoint. Specifically, by examining 18 functional traits, Citation: Tonelli, M.; Giménez we sought to understand if the dung beetle assembly process is mediated by particular traits in Gómez, V.C.; Verdú, J.R.; Casanoves, different dung types. Species specific dung preferences were recorded for eight species, two of which F.; Zunino, M. Dung Beetle Assemblages Attracted to Cow and prefer horse dung and six of which prefer cow dung.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Cetoniinae for the French Polynesia Fauna (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae)
    Bulletin de la Société entomologique de France, 120 (3), 2015 : 379-381. A new Cetoniinae for the French Polynesia fauna (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) by Thibault RAMAGE 9 quartier de la Glacière, F – 29900 Concarneau <[email protected]> Abstract. – The Cetoniinae fauna of French Polynesia was restricted until now to a single introduced species, Protaetia fusca (Herbst, 1790). A second species is here reported from Tahiti, Glycyphana stolata (Fabricius, 1781). P. fusca is also reported from the Marquesas Islands for the first time. Résumé. – Une nouvelle Cétoine pour la faune de Polynésie française (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). La faune des Cetoniinae de Polynésie française, qui ne comprenait jusqu’à présent qu’une espèce introduite, Protaetia fusca (Herbst, 1790), compte désormais une seconde espèce, connue en Polynésie pour l’instant de Tahiti seulement, Glycyphana stolata (Fabricius, 1781). P. fusca est également citée pour la première fois des Marquises. Keywords. – Glycyphana stolata, Protaetia fusca, Cetoniini, French Polynesia. _________________ Until now only one species of Cetoniinae was known in French Polynesia, Protaetia fusca (Herbst, 1790) (PAULIAN, 1998). This species was reported only from the Society Islands, and it appears that it is also present in the Marquesas Islands. A second Cetoniinae, Glycyphana stolata (Fabricius, 1781), has been collected recently on Tahiti. It seems that G. stolata is now settled in French Polynesia and will probably spread in the different archipelagoes. Abbreviations. – CTR, Thibault Ramage’s personal collection, Concarneau ; MNHN, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris. Family Scarabaeidae Latreille, 1802 Subfamily Cetoniinae Leach, 1815 Tribe Cetoniini Leach, 1815 Genus Glycyphana Burmeister, 1842 Glycyphana (Glycyphaniola) stolata (Fabricius, 1781) Cetonia stolata Fabricius, 1781 : 58.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contribution of Cacao Agroforests to the Conservation of Lower Canopy Ant and Beetle Diversity in Indonesia
    10.1007/s10531-007-9196-0 Biodiversity and Conservation © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007 10.1007/s10531-007-9196-0 Original Paper The contribution of cacao agroforests to the conservation of lower canopy ant and beetle diversity in Indonesia Merijn M. Bos1, 2 , Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter1 and Teja Tscharntke1 (1) Department of Crop Science, Agroecology, University of Göttingen, Waldweg 26, Gottingen, 37073, Germany (2) Present address: State Museum of Natural History, Rosenstein 1, D-70191 Stuttgart, Germany Merijn M. Bos Email: [email protected] Received: 31 March 2006 Accepted: 13 August 2006 Published online: 13 June 2007 Abstract The ongoing destruction of tropical rainforests has increased the interest in the potential value of tropical agroforests for the conservation of biodiversity. Traditional, shaded agroforests may support high levels of biodiversity, for some groups even approaching that of undisturbed tropical forests. However, it is unclear to what extent forest fauna is represented in this diversity and how management affects forest fauna in agroforests. We studied lower canopy ant and beetle fauna in cacao agroforests and forests in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia, a region dominated by cacao agroforestry. We compared ant and beetle species richness and composition in forests and cacao agroforests and studied the impact of two aspects of management intensification (the decrease in shade tree diversity and in shade canopy cover) on ant and beetle diversity. The agroforests had three types of shade that represented a decrease in tree diversity (high, intermediate and low diversity). Species richness of ants and beetles in the canopies of the cacao trees was similar to that found in lower canopy forest trees.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Phylogenetic Hypotheses Regarding Aphodiinae (Coleoptera; Scarabaeidae)
    STATE OF KNOWLEDGE OF DUNG BEETLE PHYLOGENY - a review of phylogenetic hypotheses regarding Aphodiinae (Coleoptera; Scarabaeidae) Mattias Forshage 2002 Examensarbete i biologi 20 p, Ht 2002 Department of Systematic Zoology, Evolutionary Biology Center, Uppsala University Supervisor Fredrik Ronquist Abstract: As a preparation for proper phylogenetic analysis of groups within the coprophagous clade of Scarabaeidae, an overview is presented of all the proposed suprageneric taxa in Aphodiinae. The current knowledge of the affiliations of each group is discussed based on available information on their morphology, biology, biogeography and paleontology, as well as their classification history. With this as a background an attempt is made to estimate the validity of each taxon from a cladistic perspective, suggest possibilities and point out the most important questions for further research in clarifying the phylogeny of the group. The introductory part A) is not a scientific paper but an introduction into the subject intended for the seminar along with a polemic against a fraction of the presently most active workers in the field: Dellacasa, Bordat and Dellacasa. The main part B) is the discussion of all proposed suprageneric taxa in the subfamily from a cladistic viewpoint. The current classification is found to be quite messy and unfortunately a large part of the many recent attempts to revise higher-level classification within the group do not seem to be improvements from a phylogenetic viewpoint. Most recently proposed tribes (as well as
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships and Distribution of the Rhizotrogini (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Melolonthinae) in the West Mediterranean
    Graellsia, 59(2-3): 443-455 (2003) PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE RHIZOTROGINI (COLEOPTERA, SCARABAEIDAE, MELOLONTHINAE) IN THE WEST MEDITERRANEAN Mª. M. Coca-Abia* ABSTRACT In this paper, the West Mediterranean genera of Rhizotrogini are reviewed. Two kinds of character sets are discussed: those relative to the external morphology of the adult and those of the male and female genitalia. Genera Amadotrogus Reitter, 1902; Amphimallina Reitter, 1905; Amphimallon Berthold, 1827; Geotrogus Guérin-Méneville, 1842; Monotropus Erichson, 1847; Pseudoapeterogyna Escalera, 1914 and Rhizotrogus Berthold, 1827 are analysed: to demonstrate the monophyly of this group of genera; to asses the realtionships of these taxa; to test species transferred from Rhizotrogus to Geotrogus and Monotropus, and to describe external morphological and male and female genitalic cha- racters which distinguish each genus. Phylogenetic analysis leads to the conclusion that this group of genera is monophyletic. However, nothing can be said about internal relationships of the genera, which remain in a basal polytomy. Some of the species tranferred from Rhizotrogus are considered to be a new genus Firminus. The genera Amphimallina and Pseudoapterogyna are synonymized with Amphimallon and Geotrogus respectively. Key words: Taxonomy, nomenclature, review, Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Melolonthinae, Rhizotrogini, Amadotrogus, Amphimallon, Rhizotrogus, Geotrogus, Pseudoapterogyna, Firminus, Mediterranean basin. RESUMEN Relaciones filogenéticas y distribución de
    [Show full text]
  • Quick Guide for the Identification Of
    Quick Guide for the Identification of Maryland Scarabaeoidea Mallory Hagadorn Dr. Dana L. Price Department of Biological Sciences Salisbury University This document is a pictorial reference of Maryland Scarabaeoidea genera (and sometimes species) that was created to expedite the identification of Maryland Scarabs. Our current understanding of Maryland Scarabs comes from “An Annotated Checklist of the Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) of Maryland” (Staines 1984). Staines reported 266 species and subspecies using literature and review of several Maryland Museums. Dr. Price and her research students are currently conducting a bioinventory of Maryland Scarabs that will be used to create a “Taxonomic Guide to the Scarabaeoidea of Maryland”. This will include dichotomous keys to family and species based on historical reports and collections from all 23 counties in Maryland. This document should be cited as: Hagadorn, M.A. and D.L. Price. 2012. Quick Guide for the Identification of Maryland Scarabaeoidea. Salisbury University. Pp. 54. Questions regarding this document should be sent to: Dr. Dana L. Price - [email protected] **All pictures within are linked to their copyright holder. Table of Contents Families of Scarabaeoidea of Maryland……………………………………... 6 Geotrupidae……………………………………………………………………. 7 Subfamily Bolboceratinae……………………………………………… 7 Genus Bolbocerosoma………………………………………… 7 Genus Eucanthus………………………………………………. 7 Subfamily Geotrupinae………………………………………………… 8 Genus Geotrupes………………………………………………. 8 Genus Odonteus...……………………………………………… 9 Glaphyridae..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Species Composition and Community Structure of Dung Beetles Attracted to Dung of Gaur and Elephant in the Moist Forests of South Western Ghats Author(S): K.V
    Species Composition and Community Structure of Dung Beetles Attracted to Dung of Gaur and Elephant in the Moist Forests of South Western Ghats Author(s): K.V. Vinod and Thomas K. Sabu Source: Journal of Insect Science, 7(56):1-14. 2007. Published By: Entomological Society of America DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1673/031.007.5601 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1673/031.007.5601 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. -RXUQDORI,QVHFW6FLHQFH_ZZZLQVHFWVFLHQFHRUJ ,661 Species composition and community structure of dung beetles attracted to dung of gaur and elephant in the moist forests of South Western Ghats K.V. Vinodb and Thomas K. Sabua /LWWHU(QWRPRORJ\5HVHDUFK8QLW3*
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Analysis of Geotrupidae (Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea) Based on Larvae
    Systematic Entomology (2004) 29, 509–523 Phylogenetic analysis of Geotrupidae (Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea) based on larvae JOSE´ R. VERDU´ 1 , EDUARDO GALANTE1 , JEAN-PIERRE LUMARET2 andFRANCISCO J. CABRERO-SAN˜ UDO3 1Centro Iberoamericano de la Biodiversidad (CIBIO), Universidad de Alicante, Spain; 2CEFE, UMR 5175, De´ partement Ecologie des Arthropodes, Universite´ Paul Vale´ ry, Montpellier, France; and 3Departamento Biodiversidad y Biologı´ a Evolutiva, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), Madrid, Spain Abstract. Thirty-eight characters derived from the larvae of Geotrupidae (Scarabaeoidea, Coleoptera) were analysed using parsimony and Bayesian infer- ence. Trees were rooted with two Trogidae species and one species of Pleocomidae as outgroups. The monophyly of Geotrupidae (including Bolboceratinae) is supported by four autapomorphies: abdominal segments 3–7 with two dorsal annulets, chaetoparia and acanthoparia of the epipharynx not prominent, glossa and hypopharynx fused and without sclerome, trochanter and femur without fossorial setae. Bolboceratinae showed notable differences with Pleocomidae, being more related to Geotrupinae than to other groups. Odonteus species (Bolboceratinae s.str.) appear to constitute the closest sister group to Geotrupi- nae. Polyphyly of Bolboceratinae is implied by the following apomorphic char- acters observed in the ‘Odonteus lineage’: anterior and posterior epitormae of epipharynx developed, tormae of epipharynx fused, oncyli of hypopharynx devel- oped, tarsal claws reduced or absent, plectrum and pars stridens of legs well developed and apex of antennal segment 2 with a unique sensorium. A ‘Bolbelas- mus lineage’ is supported by the autapomorphic presence of various sensoria on the apex of the antennal segment, and the subtriangular labrum (except Eucanthus). This group constituted by Bolbelasmus, Bolbocerosoma and Eucanthus is the first evidence for a close relationship among genera, but more characters should be analysed to test the support for the clade.
    [Show full text]
  • An Electronic Checklist of the New World Chafers (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae)
    AN ELECTRONIC CHECKLIST OF THE NEW WORLD CHAFERS (COLEOPTERA: SCARABAEIDAE: MELOLONTHINAE) Version 3 ARTHUR V. EVANS Research Associate, Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC; Department of Recent Invertebrates, Virginia Museum of Natural History, Martinsville, VA; Department of Biology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA; c/o1600 Nottoway Ave., Richmond, VA 23227, USA; [email protected] and ANDREW B. T. SMITH Canadian Museum of Nature, P.O. Box 3443, Station D, Ottawa, ON, K1P 6P4, Canada; [email protected] INTRODUCTION The following is a checklist of all Melolonthinae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) found in the New World. It has been modified from Evans (2003), Evans and Smith (2005), and Smith and Evans (2005) and has been updated to 13 March 2009. Included in this checklist are all of the available names given for New World Melolonthinae (both valid and invalid). Tribes are listed in traditional order (pseudo-phylogenetically) with genera, species, and subspecies listed alphabetically within. Under each valid generic name the subgenera and synonymies are listed as are type species and, in some cases, citations for keys, checklists, and bibliographies. Listed under each valid species are synonymies, distributional data by country, and citations for new combinations and spellings. A complete bibliography is included in the “References” section of all papers mentioned in the checklist. The purpose of this checklist is to present accurate and complete information for all the names of Melolonthinae in the New World. The taxonomy herein is based on the current literature (even if we have unpublished data contradicting what has been published) and the nomenclature carefully follows the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature.
    [Show full text]
  • Bolboceras Kirby, 1819 (July) (Insecta, Coleoptera): Proposed Precedence Over Odonteus Samouelle, 1819 (June)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Papers in Entomology Museum, University of Nebraska State December 2002 Bolboceras Kirby, 1819 (July) (Insecta, Coleoptera): proposed precedence over Odonteus Samouelle, 1819 (June) Mary Liz Jameson University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] H. F. Howden Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa, Canada Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologypapers Part of the Entomology Commons Jameson, Mary Liz and Howden, H. F., "Bolboceras Kirby, 1819 (July) (Insecta, Coleoptera): proposed precedence over Odonteus Samouelle, 1819 (June)" (2002). Papers in Entomology. 89. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologypapers/89 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Museum, University of Nebraska State at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Papers in Entomology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. 246 Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 59(4) December 2002 Case 3097 Bolboceras Kirby, 1819 (July) (Insecta, Coleoptera): proposed precedence over Odonteus Samouelle, 1819 (June) M.L. Jameson University of Nebraska State Museum, W436 Nebraska Hall, Lincoln, Nebraska 685884.514, U.S. A. (e-mail: mjameson1 @unl.edu) H.F. Howden Canadian Museum of Nature, P. 0. Box 3443, Station 'D',Ottawa, Canada Kl P 6P4 (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract. The purpose of this application, under Articles 23.9.3 and 8 1.2.3 of the Code, is to conserve the generic name Bolboceras Kirby, 1819 for a group of scarab beetles (family GEOTRUPIDAE)by giving it conditional precedence over the older name Odonteus Samouelle, 18 19 whenever they are considered to be synonyms.
    [Show full text]