DOCSLIB.ORG

Ukrainian Prism: Foreign Policy 2017 Ukrainian Prism: Foreign Policy 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ukrainian Prism: Foreign Policy 2017 Ukrainian Prism: Foreign Policy 2017 EDITORS: HENNADIY MAKSAK | HANNA SHELEST | NADIIA BUREIKO | NADIIA KOVAL | MARIA KOVAL UKRAINIAN PRISM: FOREIGN POLICY 2017 UKRAINIAN PRISM: FOREIGN POLICY 2017 Contacts The views expressed in this publication are not necessarily Friedrich Ebert Foundation, Oce in Ukraine those of the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. 34 Puschkinska str., 01004 Kyiv, Ukraine Commercial use of any materials, printed by the Friedrich- Tel.: +38 044 2340038 Fax: +38 044 4514031 Ebert-Stiftung, is not allowed without written consent of FES. http://www.fes.kiev.ua Contacts: [email protected] Foreign Policy Council “Ukrainian Prism” http://www.prismua.org [email protected] УДК 327(477)"2017"(048.83) =111 Editors: Hennadiy Maksak, Hanna Shelest, PhD, Nadiia Bureiko, PhD, Nadiia Koval, Maria Koval Consultants: O. Genchev, Y. Filipenko, Amb., Dr. S. Korsunskyi, D. Konyshev, Dr. I. Lossovsky, Amb., Dr. A. Veselovskyi Ukrainian Prism: Foreign Policy 2017. Analytical study // Foreign Policy Council “Ukrainian Prism”, Friedrich Ebert Foundation, Office in Ukraine – Kyiv, 2018. – 224 p. ISBN 978-617-7157-69-3 This analytical study represents a systematic and comprehensive analysis of the Ukrainian foreign policy in 2017. 50 Directions were analysed – from cooperation with key partners and international organizations to public diplomacy. Five evaluation criteria – indicators, based on the new model of research methodology, were applied. The experts have studied and assessed activities of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine, the Foreign Affairs Committee of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (Parliament) and other institutions, involved into the creation and implementation of the foreign policy of Ukraine. This study is the third annual study. Previous years analysis can be found at http://prismua.org The reference to the author and the analytical study are obligatory in the cases of complete or partial use of its materials. © Friedrich Ebert Foundation, Office in Ukraine, 2018. Content Introduction ....................................................................................... 5 Methodology of Research .............................................................. 6 Foreign Policy of Ukraine in 2017 ...............................................14 1. G -7 Сountries .............................................................................. 25 United Kingdom .................................................................................. 26 Italy ......................................................................................................30 Canada ................................................................................................. 34 Germany .............................................................................................. 37 USA .......................................................................................................41 France .................................................................................................. 45 Japan ....................................................................................................48 2. European Integration................................................................ 52 European Union .................................................................................. 53 Political dialogue .......................................................................... 54 Economic cooperation .................................................................. 56 Visa-free dialogue ......................................................................... 58 Eastern Partnership .............................................................................61 European Energy Community ............................................................ 64 3. Euroatlantic Integration .......................................................... 67 4. Bilateral Relations ......................................................................71 Belarus ................................................................................................. 72 Georgia ..................................................................................................75 Israel .................................................................................................... 78 Iran.......................................................................................................82 China ....................................................................................................85 Lithuania ..............................................................................................88 Moldova ................................................................................................91 Poland .................................................................................................. 95 Romania ...............................................................................................99 Slovakia .............................................................................................. 102 Turkey .................................................................................................105 Hungary ............................................................................................. 108 Russia ...................................................................................................111 Political relations .........................................................................112 Economic relations ......................................................................114 Energy relations ..........................................................................116 5. Regional Cooperation Asia-Pacific Region ............................................................................ 120 Middle East .........................................................................................124 Western Balkans ................................................................................ 128 Baltic States ........................................................................................132 Visegrad Four .....................................................................................136 Northern Europe ............................................................................... 140 Latin America .....................................................................................145 South Asia ...........................................................................................149 Sub-Saharan Africa .............................................................................153 Central Asia.........................................................................................157 Black Sea Region ................................................................................161 6. International Organizations OSCE ...................................................................................................166 United Nations ...................................................................................170 Council of Europe ...............................................................................174 7. Multilateral Initiatives Human Rights ....................................................................................179 Climate Change .................................................................................. 183 Nuclear Non-proliferation ..................................................................187 International Security ........................................................................191 8. Build-up international support on countering Russian aggression ........................................................................195 9. Economic Diplomacy ................................................................199 10. Public Diplomacy ..................................................................203 11. Ukrainians Abroad .................................................................207 Summary table of the foreign policy evaluation in 2017 ..... 211 Recommendations to the Ukraine’s Foreign Policy Agenda 2018 ....................................................................................215 Abbreviations ................................................................................. 218 Authors and Consultants ............................................................220 On Foreign Policy Council “Ukrainian Prism” ..................... 224 On Friedrich Ebert Foundation ................................................ 225 Dear Friends, We are pleased to present you the third issue of the annual analytical report “Ukrainian Prism: Foreign Policy 2017”. Traditionally in this report, experts of the Foreign Policy Council “Ukrainian Prism” in partnership with the Regional Representation of the Friedrich Ebert Foundation in Ukraine analysed details of the Ukrainian foreign policy elaboration and implementation, as well as systematically evaluated its success according to the proposed scale. Every year we improve our methodology of evaluation and take into account results of the discussions held both in Ukraine and abroad. While preparing this year foreign policy assessment, we decided to expand it with some important geographical and functional directions. In such a way, the total number of the analysed foreign policy vectors reached 50. The overall score of the 2017 assessment of the foreign policy performance has improved. Among the positive results, one can clearly see the activation of the institutions that elaborate and implement the foreign policy in the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Report on the Human Rights Situation in Ukraine 16 May to 15 August 2018
    Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Report on the human rights situation in Ukraine 16 May to 15 August 2018 Contents Page I. Executive summary .......................................................................................................................... 1 II. OHCHR methodology ...................................................................................................................... 3 III. Impact of hostilities .......................................................................................................................... 3 A. Conduct of hostilities and civilian casualties ............................................................................. 3 B. Situation at the contact line and rights of conflict-affected persons ............................................ 7 1. Right to restitution and compensation for use or damage of private property ..................... 7 2. Right to social security and social protection .................................................................... 9 3. Freedom of movement, isolated communities and access to basic services ...................... 10 IV. Right to physical integrity ............................................................................................................... 11 A. Access to detainees and places of detention ............................................................................ 11 B. Arbitrary detention, enforced disappearance and abduction, torture and ill-treatment ............... 12 C. Situation
    [Show full text]
  • When Can Oil Economies Be Deemed Sustainable?
    THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF THE MIDDLE EAST SERIES EDITOR: ASHRAF MISHRIF When Can Oil Economies Be Deemed Sustainable? Edited by Giacomo Luciani · Tom Moerenhout The Political Economy of the Middle East Series Editor Ashraf Mishrif Centre for Middle East & Mediterranean Studies King’s College London London, UK This series explores the nature of Middle Eastern political regimes and their approaches to economic development. In light of the region’s dis- tinctive political, social and economic structures and the dramatic changes that took place in the wake of the Arab spring, this series puts forward a critical body of high-quality, research-based scholarship that reflects cur- rent political and economic transitions across the Middle East. It offers original research and new insights on the causes and consequences of the Arab uprisings; economic reforms and liberalization; political institutions and governance; regional and sub-regional integration arrangements; for- eign trade and investment; political economy of energy, water and food security; finance and Islamic finance; and the politics of welfare, labor mar- ket and human development. Other themes of interest include the role of the private sector in economic development, economic diversification, entrepreneurship and innovation; state-business relationships; and the capacity of regimes and public institutions to lead the development process. More information about this series at http://www.palgrave.com/gp/series/14415 Giacomo Luciani • Tom Moerenhout Editors When Can Oil Economies Be Deemed Sustainable? Editors Giacomo Luciani Tom Moerenhout Graduate Institute of International and Columbia University Development Studies School of International and Geneva, Switzerland Public Affairs New York, NY, USA Paris School of International Affairs Sciences Po Paris, France ISSN 2522-8854 ISSN 2522-8862 (electronic) The Political Economy of the Middle East ISBN 978-981-15-5727-9 ISBN 978-981-15-5728-6 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5728-6 © Gulf Research Centre Cambridge 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • A/HRC/38/25 General Assembly
    United Nations A/HRC/38/25 General Assembly Distr.: General 17 May 2018 Original: English Human Rights Council Thirty-eighth session 18 June–6 July 2018 Agenda items 2 and 5 Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and reports of the Office of the High Commissioner and the Secretary-General Human rights bodies and mechanisms Contribution of parliaments to the work of the Human Rights Council and its universal periodic review Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights* Summary The present report is submitted pursuant to Human Rights Council resolution 35/29, in which the Council requested the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to prepare a study, in close cooperation with the Inter-Parliamentary Union and in consultation with States, United Nations agencies and other relevant stakeholders, on how to promote and enhance synergies between parliaments and the work of the Human Rights Council and its universal periodic review, and to present it to the Council at its thirty-eighth session, in order to provide States and other relevant stakeholders with elements that could serve as orientation to strengthen their interaction towards the effective promotion and protection of human rights. The present report focuses on the role of parliaments in the field of human rights and contains an analysis of responses to a questionnaire for parliaments sent by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to Member States, United Nations agencies and other stakeholders through a note verbale dated 16 November 2017, pursuant to Human Rights Council resolution 35/29.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional & Parliamentary Information
    UNION INTERPARLEMENTAIRE INTER-PARLIAMENTARY UNION CCoonnssttiittuuttiioonnaall && PPaarrlliiaammeennttaarryy IInnffoorrmmaattiioonn Half-yearly Review of the Association of Secretaries General of Parliaments Preparations in Parliament for Climate Change Conference 22 in Marrakech (Abdelouahed KHOUJA, Morocco) National Assembly organizations for legislative support and strengthening the expertise of their staff members (WOO Yoon-keun, Republic of Korea) The role of Parliamentary Committee on Government Assurances in making the executive accountable (Shumsher SHERIFF, India) The role of the House Steering Committee in managing the Order of Business in sittings of the Indonesian House of Representatives (Dr Winantuningtyastiti SWASANANY, Indonesia) Constitutional reform and Parliament in Algeria (Bachir SLIMANI, Algeria) The 2016 impeachment of the Brazilian President (Luiz Fernando BANDEIRA DE MELLO, Brazil) Supporting an inclusive Parliament (Eric JANSE, Canada) The role of Parliament in international negotiations (General debate) The Lok Sabha secretariat and its journey towards a paperless office (Anoop MISHRA, India) The experience of the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies on Open Parliament (Antonio CARVALHO E SILVA NETO) Web TV – improving the score on Parliamentary transparency (José Manuel ARAÚJO, Portugal) Deepening democracy through public participation: an overview of the South African Parliament’s public participation model (Gengezi MGIDLANA, South Africa) The failed coup attempt in Turkey on 15 July 2016 (Mehmet Ali KUMBUZOGLU)
    [Show full text]
  • International Organizations and Settlement of the Conflict in Ukraine
    International Organizations and Settlement of the Conflict in Ukraine Alena F. Douhan* Abstract 195 I. Introduction 196 II. The United Nations and the Conflict in Ukraine 199 1. UN Security Council 199 2. UN General Assembly 201 3. Other UN Organs 202 III. Regional Organizations and the Conflict in Ukraine 203 1. Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe 203 2. Council of Europe 205 3. European Union 206 4. North Atlantic Treaty Organization 208 5. Collective Security Treaty Organization 209 IV. Conclusions 211 Abstract The situation in Ukraine has been a matter of concern for the interna- tional community since January 2014 and remains a central focus of legal and political scientists. The United Nations (UN) Security Council ap- peared to be unable not only to settle the conflict but also to take any feasi- ble measures for its settlement. As a result, a range of regional organizations became involved in the crisis. This article examines the legal perspectives of the activity of the UN and regional organizations which aimed to prevent, detain and settle the conflict in Ukraine. It also determines the specifics of methods used by each organization, assesses the efficacy of their activity and develops proposals for enhancement of their effectiveness. * Associate Professor of the International Law Department, Belarusian State University, Ph.D. (Minsk); where in this article only the title of a document is mentioned in a footnote, reference is made to press-statements of the United Nations accessible at <http://www.un. org>. ZaöRV 75 (2015), 195-214 http://www.zaoerv.de © 2015, Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 196 Douhan I.
    [Show full text]
  • How Far Can the EU Expand? the Dilemmas of Ukrainian Membership
    EU crisis simulation 2013 issue brief How Far Can the EU Expand? The Dilemmas of Ukrainian Membership By Scott N. Duryea While the Council of Europe faces many important issues affect the future of the EU, few involve the geopolitical pressures and question of European identity raised by the possibility of Ukraine membership. Opening membership to European democracies is a foundational concept of the EU, but Ukraine possess great difficulties; it is a very large country (roughly the same in size and population to France), poor it brings difficult relations with Russia. Ukraine has a long border with Russia; 2300 km (1400 miles) long and hosts Russia’s most important navy base. Its population includes are large Russian minority. Some 30 percent of its population (14.5 million out of 45.6 million people) are native Russian-speakers. Bringing Ukraine into the EU would transform the country, and the EU. Refusing to admit Ukraine might have equally powerful consequences. Ukraine is increasingly falling into the fold of the European Union. Many Ukrainians seek eventual membership into the EU, but a number of pressing issues must be resolved before Ukraine fully goes west. These include reforming Ukrainian bureaucracy, obeying the rule of law, cracking down on corruption, and evading Russian attempts to keep Ukraine from breaking away from its unhealthy Eurasian ties. At stake is not just the future of the concept of Europe and European relations with Russia, but the future of Ukrainian democracy and national identity. As stated in the EU Council Conclusions on Ukraine of 10 December 2012, Ukraine’s EU status focuses on three elements of reform: 1 The compliance of the 2012 parliamentary elections with international standards and follow-up actions, Ukraine’s progress in addressing the issue of selective justice and preventing its recurrence, and Implementing the reforms defined in the jointly agreed Association Agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • RIGHTS at RISK
    RIGHTS at RISK Time for Action Observatory on the Universality of Rights Trends Report 2021 RIGHTS AT RISK: TIME FOR ACTION Observatory on the Universality of Rights Trends Report 2021 Chapter 4: Anti-Rights Actors 4 www.oursplatform.org 72 RIGHTS AT RISK: TIME FOR ACTION Observatory on the Universality of Rights Trends Report 2021 Chapter 4: Anti-Rights Actors Chapter 4: CitizenGo Anti-Rights Actors – Naureen Shameem AWID Mission and History ounded in August 2013 and headquartered Fin Spain,221 CitizenGo is an anti-rights platform active in multiple regions worldwide. It describes itself as a “community of active citizens who work together, using online petitions and action alerts as a resource, to defend and promote life, family and liberty.”222 It also claims that it works to ensure respect for “human dignity and individuals’ rights.”223 United Families Ordo Iuris, International Poland Center for World St. Basil the Istoki Great Family and Endowment Congress of Charitable Fund, Russia Foundation, Human Rights Families Russia (C-Fam) The International Youth Alliance Coalition Russian Defending Orthodox Freedom Church Anti-Rights (ADF) Human Life Actors Across International Heritage Foundation, USA FamilyPolicy, Russia the Globe Group of Friends of the and their vast web Family of connections Organization Family Watch of Islamic International Cooperation Anti-rights actors engage in tactical (OIC) alliance building across lines of nationality, religion, and issue, creating a transnational network of state and non-state actors undermining rights related to gender and sexuality. This El Yunque, Mexico visual represents only a small portion Vox party, The Vatican World Youth Spain of the global anti-rights lobby.
    [Show full text]
  • Respect for Human Rights During the Armed Conflict in Ukraine
    RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS DURING THE ARMED CONFLICT IN UKRAINE JUDICIAL APPLICATION OF INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS LAW Contract # AID-OAA-I-13-00032, Task # AID-121-TO-16-00003 USAID Nove Pravosuddya Justice Sector Reform Program Contract Officer representative: Oleksandr Piskun, Democracy Project Management Specialist, Office of Democracy and Governance, USAID Mission to Ukraine Development Objective 2: Accountability and Transparency of the Judiciary to Citizens and the Rule of Law Increased Author: Mykola Gnatovsky, Associate Professor of the International Law, Institute of International Relations, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv; President of the European Committee for Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment Provided by: Chemonics International Inc. June 30, 2017 Disclaimer Positions of the authors in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the US Agency for International Development or the US Government. TABLE OF CONTENTS Definition of the Rules of International Humanitarial Law Applicable to the Armed Conflict in Ukraine ...................................................................................... 1 Basic Principles of Applying International Humanitarian Law .................................. 1 Obligations to Prosecute Persons Guilty of War Crimes under the European Convention on Human Rights ................................................................................. 6 Practical Application of International Humanitarian Law in Ukraine (2014-2017)
    [Show full text]
  • Gennadiy Druzenko Permanent Address: 11 Avtozavodska St., Ap
    Name: Mr. Gennadiy Druzenko Permanent address: 11 Avtozavodska st., ap. 108, Kyiv, 04074, Ukraine Telephone: + 380 50 3579922 Email: [email protected] Nationality: Ukrainian Date of birth: 28 April 1972 Education 2007-2008 University of Aberdeen (Scotland, UK), LL.M. in European Law (Chevening Scholar), Degree with commendation 1999-2000 Ukrainian Centre for Legal Studies of National Taras Shevchenko University of Kyiv, Master of Law (Degree with distinction) 1995-1999 International Science and Technology University (Kyiv, Ukraine), Bachelor of Law (Degree with distinction) 1992-1993 Christian Theological College of Kyiv, Diploma in Theology Trainings, summer schools ect. Summer School The European Decision-Making Process (Institute 2008 for European Studies of the Vrije Universiteit in Brussels & Diplomatic Academy of Vienna) 2007 Summer School for Academic English (Aberdeen, UK) 2006 Summer University for Democracy (Strasbourg) 2006 Ukrainian School for Political Studies (established by the CoE Directorate General of Political Affairs) 2004 Training trip to Brussels and Strasbourg for getting to know the work of the EU institutions (European Union Visitors Programme) 2002 Training trip to Poland "Study of Polish experience of adoption of acquis communautaire" 2000 Summer school of the EU law "European Studies – 2000" Employment record Fulbright-Kennan Institute Research Scholar (Woodrow Wilson 09.2009 – till now International Center for Scholars, Washington DC) 07.2005-07.2007 Vice-president of the Institute for European Integration
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Evaluation of Soft Drink Taxes As Part of Nutrition Policies in Gulf Cooperation Council Countries: Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and United Arab
    F1000Research 2021, 9:1287 Last updated: 09 SEP 2021 RESEARCH ARTICLE Impact evaluation of soft drink taxes as part of nutrition policies in Gulf Cooperation Council countries: Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 1 not approved] Previously titled: "Impact evaluation of national nutrition policies to address obesity through implementation of sin taxes in Gulf Cooperation Council countries: Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Oman, United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Qatar" Ayoub Al-Jawaldeh 1, Rania Megally2 1Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean (EMRO), World Health Organization (WHO), Cairo, 11371, Egypt 2German International University for Applied Sciences (GIU), Administrative Capital, Regional Ring Road, Cairo, Egypt v2 First published: 30 Oct 2020, 9:1287 Open Peer Review https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27097.1 Latest published: 29 Jun 2021, 9:1287 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27097.2 Reviewer Status Invited Reviewers Abstract Background: Prevalence of overweight and obesity is high in the 1 2 Eastern Mediterranean Region, and there are higher rates in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. This had led GCC countries to version 2 impose policies that aim to decrease obesity, overweight, and (revision) diabetes rates. The objective of this research is to measure the impact 29 Jun 2021 of such implemented policy to reduce obesity, namely taxes applied to sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) in GCC. version 1 Methods: The impact of SSB taxes has been measured using a panel 30 Oct 2020 report report data set that covers sales volumes of soft drinks in GCC countries from 2010 to 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Theparliamentarian
    TheParliamentarian Journal of the Parliaments of the Commonwealth 2015 | Issue Three XCVI | Price £13 Elections and Voting Reform PLUS Commonwealth Combatting Looking ahead to Millenium Development Electoral Networks by Terrorism in Nigeria CHOGM 2015 in Malta Goals Update: The fight the Commonwealth against TB Secretary-General PAGE 150 PAGE 200 PAGE 204 PAGE 206 The Commonwealth Parliamentary Association (CPA) Shop CPA business card holders CPA ties CPA souvenirs are available for sale to Members and officials of CPA cufflinks Commonwealth Parliaments and Legislatures by CPA silver-plated contacting the photoframe CPA Secretariat by email: [email protected] or by post: CPA Secretariat, Suite 700, 7 Millbank, London SW1P 3JA, United Kingdom. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE The Commonwealth Parliamentary Association (CPA) exists to connect, develop, promote and support Parliamentarians and their staff to identify benchmarks of good governance and implement the enduring values of the Commonwealth. Calendar of Forthcoming Events Confirmed at 24 August 2015 2015 September 2-5 September CPA and State University of New York (SUNY) Workshop for Constituency Development Funds – London, UK 9-12 September Asia Regional Association of Public Accounts Committees (ARAPAC) Annual Meeting - Kathmandu, Nepal 14-16 September Annual Forum of the CTO/ICTs and The Parliamentarian - Nairobi, Kenya 28 Sept to 3 October West Africa Association of Public Accounts Committees (WAAPAC) Annual Meeting and Community of Clerks Training - Lomé, Togo 30 Sept to 5 October CPA International
    [Show full text]
  • Examining Communication Techniques Adopted by the Senate to Promote Mandatory Public Participation in Kenya
    EXAMINING COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUES ADOPTED BY THE SENATE TO PROMOTE MANDATORY PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN KENYA BY ADHIAMBO LIDYA CONCEPTA A RESEARCH PROJECT SUBMITTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI, SCHOOL OF JOURNALISM & MASS COMMUNICATION IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN COMMUNICATION STUDIES 2018 i DECLARATION This is to certify that this research is my own original work and is in no way a reproduction of any other work that has been previously presented for award of a degree in any University. No part of this project may be reproduced without the prior permission of the author or the University of Nairobi. Adhiambo Lidya Concepta ……………………. ………………….. K50/81032/2012 Signature Date This research has been submitted for examination with my approval as University Supervisor. Dr. Peter Onyango Onyoyo ……………………. ………………….. Signature Date ii DEDICATION To my dad, the late James Owino Agiso Abonyo, who encouraged me to further my studies and my mother, Monica Akumu Obul-Owino, for teaching me the values of education. I would also like to dedicate this project to my husband, James Otieno Kaoga and my sons; Sammy Kaoga, Paul Kaoga and Austin Kaoga for their patience through this whole project. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I give thanks to the Almighty God for the gift of life and His providence. He has been my guide in the entire study. I would also like to appreciate Dr. Peter Onyango Onyoyo of the University Of Nairobi School Of Law. As my supervisor, he provided insights and helped me explore new ideas during my study. My appreciation also goes to the faculty members, School of Journalism, the University of Nairobi.
    [Show full text]