DOCSLIB.ORG

Covering Bristol, Somerset, South Gloucestershire and Most of Wiltshire

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Covering Bristol, Somerset, South Gloucestershire and Most of Wiltshire Covering Bristol, Somerset, South Gloucestershire and most of Wiltshire En v ir o n m e n t 'W aW Ag en cy Waste Minimisation Contents W hat is waste minimisation? Page Waste minimisation is the 2 Waste Minimisation reduction of waste at source. It is 5 Environmental Auditing better to prevent waste being 6 The Environment Agency produced in the first place than to and Waste Minimisation treat it afterwards and prevention 8 Local Waste Minimisation is usually cheaper than cure! Initiatives 10 Local Waste Minimisation Waste minimisation can be Groups achieved by a variety of means, 11 What Next ? from redesign of products and 12 Practical Tips To Minimise processes to changes in working Waste practices. It can involve 14 Recycling Operators techniques such as: 22 Request For More Information 23 Useful Contacts • use of alternative raw materials; 23 Available Grants And Awards • solvent recovery; • recycling of by products; • modification to plant; • alternative use of waste products. Why minimise waste? The Government has set out a waste management hierarchy which puts the following in the preferred order for dealing with waste: • waste minimisation, • reuse, • recovery - recycling - composting - energy • disposal The waste strategy builds on the ideas for sustainable development. This means that the full environmental costs, should, as far as possible, be taken into account in any new development. The Government introduced a landfill tax on 1 October 1996 with the aim of putting pressure on waste 2 producers to minimise waste What are the benefits? arisings and divert waste for recycling and reuse. Waste minimisation can give your company a competitive edge and Businesses are also expected to many companies of all sizes are have higher environmental becoming increasingly aware of a standards and tighter restrictions sustained waste minimisation on traditional waste disposal programme because it does not routes have inevitably resulted in take long for evidence of financial higher waste disposal costs to 'payback'. It also reduces: companies. • production costs; Reasons why your company • on-site waste monitoring and should aim to minimise wastes: treatment costs; • raw materials costs; • it makes good economic sense • energy and water costs; by reduction in production • long term environmental costs and opening up new liability and insurance costs; markets; • the risk of spills and accidents. • The new landfill tax will inevitably lead to higher disposal costs and increase your overall production costs; • increasing stringent leglisation, eg, Integrated Pollution Control (IRC); • rising disposal costs; • possible fines and clean-up costs; • environmental performance, your record will be of increasing importance to investors, bankers and insurers and environmental issues are likely to be of growing interest to your workforce; • consumer demand for 'greener' products and a more responsible attitude towards .........and improves the environment from industry; • public access to environmental • overall operating efficiency; information is increasingly in • income through the sale of demand (IPC already facilitates recyclable wastes; public registers). • the safety of employees; • Producer Responsibility • the company's image in the Obligations (Packaging Waste) eyes of the shareholders, Regulations (due to be employees and the community. introduced in 1997) place an obligation on all companies UK Companies have already that handle 50 tonnes or more shown that waste minimisation of packaging materials per year does work and there are to recover and recycle set substantial benefits. percentages. ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 0 7 4 7 1 4 How to minimise waste! systematic, documented evaluation of how well There is no standard formula for organisations, management and reducing waste - each process is equipment are performing. The different. You can improve your aim of the audit is to safeguard overall efficiency just by avoiding the environment by: leaks and spills, by better materials handling, by closing ' • facilitating management internal material loops (recycling control of environmental acid streams, cleaning baths, practices; catalysts etc) as well as by • assessing compliance with redesigning processes and company policies, which would products. include meeting regulatory requirements and standards A key tool in the development of application. a waste minimisation strategy will be through a systematic audit of There are a number of different your waste generating and types of Environmental Audit handling activities. You should which include: aim to: Liabilities - Compliance, • identify the waste generated Health and examine where, how and and Safety and why it is being created; operational risk. • identify costs and allocate them Management - Corporate, Policy to those departments which and Issue generate them; Activities - Site, waste and • set waste reduction targets products. which are realistic and are compatible with the company's other targets; • identify opportunities for waste prevention, for materials reuse or recycling and seek markets for the waste produced; • make the workforce more aware of the need to reduce the waste generated by the company; • develop more monitoring systems. A waste minimisation audit will help you to identify the various options for minimising waste; options which can then be evaluated to assess the technical and economic impact on your company. The environmental audit can be a powerful management tool. Carried out periodically and objectively it provides a Environmental Auditing The benefits of environmental auditing. Environmental auditing will highlight any inadequacies in the use of raw materials and energy leading to major cost saving opportunities. It will also: • reduce financial liabilities; • increase employee awareness of environmental policies and responsibilities; • provide a benchmark for measuring environmental performance and documentary evidence of the success of minimisation initiatives; • improve familiarisation of relevant future legislations; 'Audit activities' should identify • improve neighbourhood and understand the management relation; control system, assess the control • improve customer relations. systems, verify them and evaluate the findings. Conducting an Post audit reports provide environmental audit. opportunities for improvement, a corrective action programme and The essential requirement for a follow-up activities which should successful audit is commitment include monitoring the action from the top and by effective plan, review environmental policy communication, and allocations of and develop a Corporate Strategy. appropriate resources and manpower. When carrying out the audit it may make sense to seek expert Whichever type of audit is help. The DTI/DOE may be able required it is usually conducted in to help with 2 hours free advice on: three phases: The Environmental Helpline 0800 • pre-audit activities; 585794, • activities at site; • post audit activities. or alternatively ring: 'Pre-audit activities' set out the The Somerset Waste Minimisation planning phase of conducting the Croup who may be able to help audit and at this stage sets out the or advise on professional objectives, schedules and selects 'Environmental Consultants' the site activities, selects the team working in Somerset. Contact and prepares the audit plan. North Wessex Area Waste: 01278 457333. The Environment Agency The Environment Agency allow for more accurate and waste minimisation assessments of the cost to industry of waste. The Environment Agency South West Region covers Cornwall, This will enable the Agency to be Devon, Dorset, Somerset, Bristol, better placed to encourage the South Gloucestershire and most of minimisation of industrial waste at Wiltshire. It is responsible for a source. wide range of activities to secure the environmental protection and The North Wessex Area improvement of water, land and and waste minimisation air. The North Wessex Area is The South West is one of the committed to waste minimisation. eight Environment Agency It aims to develop and promote regions in England and Wales and the use of best practical is subdivided into Areas (the technology for the economic North Wessex Area consisting of minimisation of all waste arisings Somerset, Bristol, South from businesses to secure Gloucestershire and most of environmental and financial Wiltshire). benefits. South West Region We will be seeking to: • develop techniques to accurately quantify the volume and cost of wastes generated. • use the above techniques to quantify the volume and costs of wastes generated by member companies. • discover and share information on the best practical techniques to minimise waste. • reduce the volumes of wastes through the use of waste minimisation techniques, thus The Agency is committed to producing environmental and playing a key role in achieving financial benefits. more sustainable waste management. Industry will be • disseminate information on encouraged, through surveys successful waste minimisation undertaken by the Environment techniques and the scale of the Agency, to establish systems for benefits produced. determining the amount of waste in each waste stream which will 6 The role of government all businesses that handle 50 tonnes or more of packaging The Government has set out a materials per year to recover and waste management hierarchy recycle a set percentage of which puts the following options packaging. Again, the aim is to into a preferred order for put pressure
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Local Authorities (Goods and Services) (Public Bodies) (England) (No
    Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format. STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2001 No. 691 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The Local Authorities (Goods and Services) (Public Bodies) (England) (No. 2) Order 2001 Made - - - - 5th March 2001 Laid before Parliament 9th March 2001 Coming into force - - 31st March 2001 The Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, in exercise of the powers conferred on him by sections 1(5) and (6) of the Local Authorities (Goods and Services) Act 1970 and now vested in him(1) hereby makes the following Order: Citation, commencement and extent 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the Local Authorities (Goods and Services) (Public Bodies) (England) (No. 2) Order 2001 and shall come into force on 31st March 2001. (2) This Order extends to England only(2). Designation as a public body 2. Each of the following bodies, being a person appearing to the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions to be exercising functions of a public nature, shall be a public body for the purposes of the Local Authorities (Goods and Services) Act 1970 in its application to England: NewSchools (Cornwall) Limited(3); and United Waste Services (South Gloucestershire) Limited(4). (1) 1970 c. 39. The powers conferred on the Minister of Housing and Local Government are exercisable by the Secretary of State, see article 2 of the Secretary of State for the Environment Order 1970 (S.I. 1970/1681), and see also S.I.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Our Performance So Far
    Draft: Final. APPENDIX 6: South Gloucestershire Council Climate Emergency Declaration Review of Year One of the Climate Emergency Action Plan South Gloucestershire Council Climate Emergency University Advisory Group UWE Bristol October 2020 1 Draft: Final. Index Section Page Executive Summary 3 Introduction and Context 8 South Gloucestershire’s Climate Emergency Process 10 South Gloucestershire’s Baseline 13 South Gloucestershire’s Climate Emergency Year 1 15 Action Plan Gaps in the Content of the Year 1 Plan 19 Year on Year Reduction in Emissions Required to 20 Meet the Target Areas of Focus for the Year 2 Plan 22 Recommendations for Improving Partnership Work 24 and Increasing Area Wide Engagement on the Climate Emergency Strategic Context (Political, Environmental, Social, 29 Technical, Legal, Economic) analysis Comparison of South Gloucestershire’s Climate Action 30 with that of North Somerset, Oxford, Plymouth and Wiltshire. Fit of South Gloucestershire’s Actions with the 42 National Policy Direction Summary, Conclusions and Recommendations 46 Appendix 1. 50 Setting Climate Commitments for South Gloucestershire. Quantifying the implications of the United Nations Paris Agreement for South Gloucestershire. Tyndall Centre Method Appendix 2. Oxford City Council Climate Emergency 52 Appendix 3. Wiltshire Climate Emergency 58 Appendix 4. North Somerset Climate Emergency 60 Appendix 5. Plymouth City Council Climate 62 Emergency Appendix 6. Global Warming of 1.5°C IPCC Special 64 Report. Summary Report for Policymakers Appendix 7 A Note on Terms 64 Note: All web sites accessed in September and October 2020 2 Draft: Final. Executive Summary South Gloucestershire Council asked UWE’ University Advisory Group to review Year One of the Climate Emergency Action Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Service Leaflet South Glos
    Advocacy Contact If you feel that you are struggling to get your South Gloucestershire Recovery Service point of view across, you may wish to consider North Team having someone to act as an advocate. The Elms, 26 Gloucester Road, Thornbury, Bristol, BS35 1DG You can find out more about this from Tel: 01454 271000 Care Forum South Team 0117 956 9331 Kingswood Civic Centre High street, Kingswood https://www.thecareforum.org/advocacy/ South Bristol, BS15 9TR Local Information Tel: 0117 378 4611/4621 9am - 5pm Gloucestershire (For medical emergencies dial 999) Your care co-ordinator is: Recovery Service PALS To make a comment, raise a concern or make a complaint, please contact the Trust’s Patient Advice and Liaison Service (PALS) Tel: 01225 362 900 Other people involved in your care are: Freephone: 0800 073 1778 Information for service users and carers Email: [email protected] Other languages and formats If you need this information in another language or format (such as large print, audio, Braille), please call the PALS number. Lead: South Glos Recovery Team Manager Leaflet code: AWP 022E Last reviewed: March 2021 Next review due: March 2023 What is the recovery service? Together, we will regularly review your care Where possible, they will involve family, friends plan and what support you require. and carers in the care plan, making sure We provide care, treatment and support for everyone knows who to contact in an people who have been referred for further help Some people need higher levels of support at emergency. after assessment from the primary care liaison times or struggle with seeking help.
    [Show full text]
  • South Gloucestershire
    Archaeological Investigations Project 2003 Desk-based Assessments South West SOUTH GLOUCESTERSHIRE South Gloucestershire 1/556 (B.79.N001) ST 66137889 BS36 1AL BADMINTON ROAD AND COLSACK LANE, WESTERLEIGH Land at Badminton Road and Coalsack Lane, Westerleigh, South Gloucestershire Stevens, D Bristol : Bristol & Region Archaeological Services, 2003, 20pp, pls, colour pls, figs, tabs, refs Work undertaken by: Bristol and Region Archaeological Services A study was carried out in response to proposals for a golf course extension. It was shown that there was intense coal mining activity in the area from the 17th to the mid 20th century. The assessment also indicated medieval sites of archaeological importance close to the study area. [Au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: PM 1/557 (B.79.N005) ST 78006180 BS34 8QZ HEWLETT PACKARD, FILTON Hewlett Packard, Filton, South Gloucestershire and Bristol Stoten, G Cirencester : Cotswold Archaeology, 2003, 23pp, colour pls, figs, tabs, refs Work undertaken by: Cotswold Archaeology An assessment was carried out at the site in advance of commercial development. Several hedgerows were taken into consideration at the site. The setting of the Grade II Listed farmhouse was also considered, although its setting had already been affected. There were also thought to be early post- medieval buildings preserved at the site. [Au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: PM 1/558 (B.79.N006) ST 65707600 BS16 5QS LAND ADJACENT TO 91A HILL HOUSE ROAD, MANGOTSFIELD Land adjacent to 91A Hill House Road, Mangotsfield, South Gloucestershire Barber, A Cirencester : Cotswold Archaeology, 2003, 24pp, colour pls, figs, tabs, refs Work undertaken by: Cotswold Archaeology An assessment was undertaken to establish the potential of the site in advance of a proposed new house.
    [Show full text]
  • Cornwall Council) (Respondent) V Secretary of State for Health (Appellant)
    Trinity Term [2015] UKSC 46 On appeal from: [2014] EWCA Civ 12 JUDGMENT R (on the application of Cornwall Council) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for Health (Appellant) R (on the application of Cornwall Council) (Respondent) v Somerset County Council (Appellant) before Lady Hale, Deputy President Lord Wilson Lord Carnwath Lord Hughes Lord Toulson JUDGMENT GIVEN ON 8 July 2015 Heard on 18 and 19 March 2015 Appellant (Secretary of Respondent (Cornwall State for Health) Council) Clive Sheldon QC David Lock QC Deok-Joo Rhee Charles Banner (Instructed by (Instructed by Cornwall Government Legal Council Legal Services) Department) Appellant /Intervener (Somerset County Council) David Fletcher (Instructed by Somerset County Council Legal Services Department) Intervener (South Gloucestershire Council) Helen Mountfield QC Sarah Hannett Tamara Jaber (Instructed by South Gloucestershire Council Legal Services) Intervener (Wiltshire Council) Hilton Harrop-Griffiths (Instructed by Wiltshire Council Legal Services) LORD CARNWATH: (with whom Lady Hale, Lord Hughes and Lord Toulson agree) Introduction 1. PH has severe physical and learning disabilities and is without speech. He lacks capacity to decide for himself where to live. Since the age of four he has received accommodation and support at public expense. Until his majority in December 2004, he was living with foster parents in South Gloucestershire. Since then he has lived in two care homes in the Somerset area. There is no dispute about his entitlement to that support, initially under the Children Act 1989, and since his majority under the National Assistance Act 1948. The issue is: which authority should be responsible? 2. This depends, under sections 24(1) and (5) of the 1948 Act, on, where immediately before his placement in Somerset, he was “ordinarily resident”.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 6 Performance Indicator and CIPFA Data Comparisons BVPI Comparisons
    Appendix 6 Performance Indicator and CIPFA Data Comparisons BVPI Comparisons Southend-on-Sea vs CPA Environment High Scorers / Nearest Neighbours / Unitaries BV 106: Percentage of new homes built on previously developed land 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Southend-on-Sea 100 100 100 CPA 2002 Environment score 3 or 4 in unitary authorities, by indicator 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool 56.8 63 n/a Bournemouth 94 99 n/a Derby 51 63 n/a East Riding of Yorkshire 24.08 16.64 n/a Halton 27.48 49 n/a Hartlepool 40.8 56 n/a Isle of Wight 84 86 n/a Kingston-upon-Hull 40 36 n/a Luton 99 99.01 n/a Middlesbrough 74.3 61 n/a Nottingham 97 99 n/a Peterborough 79.24 93.66 n/a Plymouth 81.3 94.4 n/a South Gloucestershire 41 44.6 n/a Stockton-on-Tees 33 29.34 n/a Stoke-on-Trent 58.4 61 n/a Telford & Wrekin 54 55.35 n/a Torbay 39 58.57 n/a CIPFA 'Nearest Neighbour' Benchmark Group 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool 56.8 63 n/a Bournemouth 94 99 n/a Brighton & Hove 99.7 100 n/a Isle of Wight 84 86 n/a Portsmouth 98.6 100 n/a Torbay 39 58.57 n/a Unitaries 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Unitary 75th percentile 94 93.7 n/a Unitary Median 70 65 n/a Unitary 25th percentile 41 52.3 n/a Average 66.3 68.7 n/a Source: ODPM website BV 107: Planning cost per head of population.
    [Show full text]
  • Cheddar Gorge, Somerset
    Cheddar Gorge, Somerset Place To Walk Location & Access: Cheddar Gorge is located at grid reference ST 471 543 (Sat Nav – BS27 3QF) next to the village of Cheddar (population 5,700). It can be accessed via the A371 from Wells, 7 miles to the south east. There are car parks in the village, and there are two car parks within the gorge itself at ST 474 545 and ST 468 540. First Bus serves Cheddar Gorge from Weston-Super-Mare, Axbridge, Wells and Street. Key Geography: Limestone gorge, tourist honey pot, caving and other adventure sports. Description: Cheddar Gorge is the finest example of a limestone gorge in Britain, lying on the southern edge of the Mendip Hills in Somerset. It is almost three miles long, and has a maximum depth of 137 metres. There is a near-vertical cliff-face to the south, and steep, grassy slopes to the north. Contrary to popular belief, Cheddar Gorge is not a collapsed cavern – but is a gorge cut by a surface river, and since left high and dry as drainage went underground. The gorge was formed by meltwater floods during the many cold periglacial periods over the last 1.2 million years. During these Arctic episodes, the development of permafrost blocked the caves with ice and frozen mud making the limestone rock impermeable. Snowmelt floods during the brief summers were then forced to flow on the surface, carving out the gorge in the process. During the warmer interglacial periods, the water flowed underground again through the permeable limestone – leaving the gorge dry.
    [Show full text]
  • CPRS00002.Pdf
    Schedule to Certificate No CPRS 00002 Issue No: 8 Hanson Quarry Products Europe Ltd Hanson House, 14 Castle Hill, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 4JJ Manufacturing Plants Table Plant Address Postcode Abergele Quarry Nant Du Road, St George, Abergele, Conway LL22 9BD Appledore Wharf Bidna Yard, Hubbastone Road, Appledore, Bideford, Devon EX39 1LZ Auckley Quarry Hurst Lane, Auckley, Doncaster, South Yorkshire DN9 3HQ Austerfield Quarry Highfield Lane, High Street, Austerfield, Nr Doncaster, South Yorkshire DN10 6RG Barton Quarry off Walton Lane, Barton-under- Needwood, Staffordshire DE13 8EJ Baston Quarry Baston Fen, Peterborough, Cambridgeshire PE6 9QA Batts Combe Quarry Warrens Hill, Cheddar, Somerset BS27 3LR Birch Quarry Roundbush Corner, Maldon Road, Layer Marney, Colchester, Essex CO5 9XE Bozeat Quarry Bozeat, Wellingborough, Northamptonshire NN29 7UN Brayford Quarry Brayford, Barnstaple, Devon EX32 7QD Bridgwater Wharf Dunball, Bridgwater, Somerset TA6 4EJ Smiths Concrete, Waverley Wood Farm, Weston Lane, Bubbenhall, Bubbenhall Quarry CV8 3BN Coventry, Warwickshire Builth Quarry Llanelwedd, Builth Wells, Powys LD2 3UB Bulls Lodge Quarry Generals Lane, Boreham, Chelmsford, Essex CM3 3HR Cardiff Wharf Roath Dock Road, Northside, Roath Dock, Cardiff CF10 4ED Cefn Mawr Quarry Cadpole Road, Pantybuarth, Mold, Flintshire CH7 5EA Chipping Sodbury Quarry Wickwar Road, Chipping Sodbury, Bristol. Avon BS37 6AY Coldstone Quarry Greenhow Hill, Pateley Bridge, Harrogate, North Yorkshire HG4 3HT Coln Quarry Claydon Pike, Lechlade, Gloucestershire GL7
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Governance a Summary of Council Activities on Governance Change
    Rethinking governance A summary of council activities on governance change Contact information: Ed Hammond, [email protected] / 07764 684 182 Date: November 2020 (1st edition) About this document This is an appendix to the Centre for Governance and Scrutiny’s “Rethinking governance for the 20s”, published in November 2020. This appendix, which will be updated at least annually, provides as comprehensive as possible a range of examples of councils which have, since 2011, changed their formal governance arrangements. If your council is listed here but you feel the information provided doesn’t give the whole story, please contact us; equally, please contact us if your council has changed its governance arrangements, or has considered doing so, but is not listed. The information in this document was correct at the time of writing. 1 Councils which considered a formal change, but decided against it There are a large number of councils who have considered their options – often in depth – and decided not to pursue any formal change. Some of these councils ended up adopting hybrid arrangements, which are discussed in more detail below. ▪ Plymouth (unitary council). Full Council commissioned a working group to investigate the possibilities around governance change in 2016. A set of design principles were developed and a comprehensive review was carried out which recommended no change to the Council’s formal governance model, but amendments to the way that the authority operated within the leader-cabinet system. (Report to committee: https://democracy.plymouth.gov.uk/documents/s77001/CHANGING%20GOV ERNANCE%20ARRANGEMENTS%20REPORT%2016012017%20Constitution%20 Review%20Group.pdf ) ▪ Lancashire (county council).
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Stratton St Margaret Neighbourhood Plan
    2019 -2026 Submission Draft Stratton St Margaret Parish Council Andrea Pellegram Ltd. July 2019 FOREWORD ..................................................................................................................... 1 The Steering Group 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 2 OUR VISION .................................................................................................................... 4 STRATTON ST MARGARET PARISH ................................................................................... 6 STRATEGIC CONTEXT ..................................................................................................... 11 Development outside the parish boundaries 11 Distribution of development within the parish boundaries 15 HOUSING ...................................................................................................................... 18 GRANGE LEISURE AND OTHER COMMUNITY FACILITIES ................................................. 20 TRAFFIC AND MOVEMENT ............................................................................................. 23 LOCAL CENTRES ............................................................................................................. 28 HERITAGE ...................................................................................................................... 30 OPEN SPACES ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mendip Hills AONB Survey
    Mendip Hills An Archaeological Survey of the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty by Peter Ellis ENGLISH HERITAGE Contents List of figures Introduction and Acknowledgements ...................................................1 Project Summary...................................................................................2 Table 1: New sites located during the present survey..................3 Thematic Report Introduction ................................................................................10 Hunting and Gathering...............................................................10 Ritual and Burial ........................................................................12 Settlement...................................................................................18 Farming ......................................................................................28 Mining ........................................................................................32 Communications.........................................................................36 Political Geography....................................................................37 Table 2: Round barrow groups...................................................40 Table 3: Barrow excavations......................................................40 Table 4: Cave sites with Mesolithic and later finds ...................41 A Case Study of the Wills, Waldegrave and Tudway Quilter Estates Introduction ................................................................................42
    [Show full text]
  • Stanton Fitzwarren - Census 1881
    Stanton Fitzwarren - Census 1881 Year of Schedule Surname Given Names Relationship Status Sex Age Birth Occupation Birth Place Address Notes 1 Tuckey Sarah Ann Head Widow F 50 1831 Farmer of 170 Acres Employing 3 Men 1 Boy Shrivenham Berks Marston Road 1 Tuckey Blanche M M Daughter Unmarried F 30 1851 South Marston Wilts 1 Tuckey Henry A Son Unmarried M 21 1860 Farmer's Son South Marston Wilts 1 Tuckey Robert L Son M 16 1865 Farmer's Son South Marston Wilts 1 Barnes Matilda Visitor Unmarried F 39 1842 Hungerford Berks 2 Bowles John Head Married M 55 1826 Ag Lab Stratton St Margaret Wilts Marston Road 2 Bowles Ann Wife Married F 55 1826 Stratton St Margaret Wilts 2 Bowles Henry Son M 17 1864 Ag Lab South Marston Wilts 2 Bowles Emily Daughter F 15 1866 General Servant South Marston Wilts 2 Bowles Richard Son M 10 1871 Scholar South Marston Wilts 3 Boulton John J Head Married M 43 1838 Ag Lab Highworth Wilts Marston Road 3 Boulton Elizabeth J Wife Married F 41 1840 Highworth Wilts 3 Boulton Albert E Son M 16 1865 Labourer in a Factory Stanton Fitzwarren Wilts 3 Boulton Martha J Daughter F 2 mths 1881 Stanton Fitzwarren Wilts 4 Grubb William Head Widower M 69 1812 Ag Lab Stratton St Margaret Wilts Highworth Road 4 Chamberlain Thomas Son in Law Married M 44 1837 Ag Lab Fyfield Glos 4 Chamberlain Mary Ann Wife Married F 45 1836 South Marston Wilts 4 Grubb William G Son M 8 1873 Scholar South Marston Wilts 5 Clark Charles Head Married M 57 1824 Shepherd Horsham Sussex Park Farm 5 Clark Fanny Wife Married F 53 1828 (not stated) Wilts 1871 Census
    [Show full text]