DOCSLIB.ORG

RAIB Summary of Recommendation Status 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RAIB Summary of Recommendation Status 2020 RAIB summary of recommendation status 2020 Report Event Rec RAIB Investigation title Status of recommendation End implementer(s) number date number concern 16/2020/01 Awaiting Response GB Railfreight Runaway and derailment of a wagon at 16/2020 09/03/20 16/2020/02 Awaiting Response Hanson UK Clitheroe, Lancashire 16/2020/03 Awaiting Response Freight Operating Companies 15/2020/01 Awaiting Response Network Rail Near miss between a passenger train and cars at Norwich Road level crossing, New 15/2020 24/11/19 15/2020/02 Awaiting Response Network Rail Rackheath, Norfolk 15/2020/03 Awaiting Response Network Rail Passenger train collision with a derailed 14/2020 23/03/20 14/2020/01 Awaiting Response Network Rail locomotive at Bromsgrove 13/2020/01 Awaiting Response London North Eastern Railway 13/2020/02 Awaiting Response London North Eastern Railway Collision and derailment at Neville Hill 13/2020 13/11/19 13/2020/03 Awaiting Response Hitachi STS 13/2020/04 Awaiting Response London North Eastern Railway 13/2020/05 Awaiting Response RSSB 12/2020/01 Awaiting Response Network Rail Derailment of a freight train near Wanstead 12/2020 23/01/20 Park 12/2020/02 Awaiting Response VTG Key: Recommendations made prior to 2020 that remain open Recommendations made during 2020 Recommendations implemented during 2020 Recommendations where status changed during 2020 RAIB summary of recommendation status 2020 1 April 2021 Report Event Rec RAIB Investigation title Status of recommendation End implementer(s) number date number concern 11/2020/01 Awaiting Response Network Rail 11/2020/02 Awaiting Response Network Rail 11/2020/03 Awaiting Response Network Rail 11/2020/04 Awaiting Response Network Rail 11/2020/05 Awaiting Response Network Rail Track workers struck by a train at Margam, 11/2020 03/07/19 11/2020/06 Awaiting Response Network Rail Neath Port Talbot 11/2020/07 Awaiting Response Network Rail 11/2020/08 Awaiting Response Network Rail 11/2020/09 Awaiting Response Network Rail 11/2020/10 Awaiting Response Network Rail 11/2020/11 Awaiting Response Rail Delivery Group Signal passed at danger at Loughborough 10/2020 26/03/20 10/2020/01 Awaiting Response Rail Operations Group South Junction, Leicestershire 09/2020/01 Awaiting Response West Midlands Trains Fatal accident at Tyseley depot 09/2020 14/12/19 09/2020/02 Awaiting Response West Midlands Trains Key: Recommendations made prior to 2020 that remain open Recommendations made during 2020 Recommendations implemented during 2020 Recommendations where status changed during 2020 RAIB summary of recommendation status 2020 2 April 2021 Report Event Rec RAIB Investigation title Status of recommendation End implementer(s) number date number concern 08/2020/01 Awaiting Response Network Rail 08/2020/02 Awaiting Response Network Rail Collision between mobile elevating work 08/2020 25/01/20 08/2020/03 Awaiting Response Network Rail platforms at Rochford, Essex 08/2020/04 Awaiting Response Network Rail 08/2020/05 Awaiting Response Network Rail 07/2020/01 Awaiting Response Network Rail 07/2020/02 Awaiting Response Network Rail Freight train derailment at Willesden High 07/2020 06/05/19 Level Junction, north-west London 07/2020/03 Awaiting Response Network Rail 07/2020/04 Awaiting Response DB Cargo (UK) Ltd 06/2020/01 Awaiting Response Keolis Amey Metrolink Signal passed at stop and near miss, 06/2020 17/05/19 06/2020/02 Awaiting Response Keolis Amey Metrolink Deansgate-Castlefield tram stop, Manchester 06/2020/03 Awaiting Response Keolis Amey Metrolink 05/2020/01 Implementation Ongoing RSSB Loss of brake control on a sleeper train 05/2020 01/08/19 approaching Edinburgh 05/2020/02 Implemented Serco Caledonian Sleeper Limited Key: Recommendations made prior to 2020 that remain open Recommendations made during 2020 Recommendations implemented during 2020 Recommendations where status changed during 2020 RAIB summary of recommendation status 2020 3 April 2021 Report Event Rec RAIB Investigation title Status of recommendation End implementer(s) number date number concern 04/2020/01 Awaiting Response Environment Agency 04/2020/02 Awaiting Response Network Rail Train collision with material washed out from 04/2020 13/06/19 04/2020/03 Awaiting Response Network Rail a cutting slope at Corby, Northamptonshire 04/2020/04 Awaiting Response Network Rail; Rail Delivery Group 04/2020/05 Awaiting Response Network Rail 03/2020/01 Awaiting Response Network Rail 03/2020/02 Awaiting Response Network Rail Class investigation into factors affecting 03/2020/03 Awaiting Response Network Rail safety-critical human performance in 03/2020 31/03/14 signalling operations on the national network 03/2020/04 Awaiting Response Network Rail 03/2020/05 Awaiting Response Network Rail 03/2020/06 Awaiting Response Network Rail 02/2020/01 Implemented Ffestiniog & Welsh Highland Railways 02/2020/02 Implemented Ffestiniog & Welsh Highland Railways Runaway locomotive at Beddgelert, North 02/2020 16/04/19 Wales 02/2020/03 Progressing Ffestiniog & Welsh Highland Railways 02/2020/04 Implemented Heritage Railway Association Key: Recommendations made prior to 2020 that remain open Recommendations made during 2020 Recommendations implemented during 2020 Recommendations where status changed during 2020 RAIB summary of recommendation status 2020 4 April 2021 Report Event Rec RAIB Investigation title Status of recommendation End implementer(s) number date number concern 01/2020/01 Implementation Ongoing Network Rail 01/2020/02 Implementation Ongoing Network Rail Serious operational irregularity at Balham 01/2020 20/04/19 01/2020/03 Implementation Ongoing Network Rail 01/2020/04 Implementation Ongoing Network Rail Network Rail; Rail Safety and 17/2019/01 Implementation Ongoing Standards Board 17/2019/02 Implemented Hitachi STS Loss of safety critical signalling data on the Network Rail; Rail Safety and 17/2019 20/10/17 17/2019/03 Implementation Ongoing Cambrian Coast line Standards Board 17/2019/04 Implementation Ongoing Hitachi STS; Network Rail 17/2019/05 Implementation Ongoing Hitachi STS 15/2019/01 Implemented Keolis Amey Metrolink 15/2019/02 Progressing Keolis Amey Metrolink Passenger injury at Ashton-under-Lyne tram 15/2019 12/03/19 stop 15/2019/03 Implementation Ongoing Keolis Amey Metrolink Keolis Amey Metrolink; North West 15/2019/04 Implementation Ongoing Ambulance Service Key: Recommendations made prior to 2020 that remain open Recommendations made during 2020 Recommendations implemented during 2020 Recommendations where status changed during 2020 RAIB summary of recommendation status 2020 5 April 2021 Report Event Rec RAIB Investigation title Status of recommendation End implementer(s) number date number concern 14/2019/01 Implementation Ongoing Passenger Train Operating Companies 14/2019/02 Progressing Heritage Train Operating Companies Fatal accident involving a train passenger at 14/2019 01/12/18 Twerton 14/2019/03 Implemented Great Western Railway 14/2019/04 Progressing RSSB Fatal accident at Tibberton No.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Schedule 8 Recalibration for CP6: Phase 1 Monitoring Point
    www.pwc.co.uk Schedule 8 Recalibration for CP6: Phase 1 Monitoring Point Weights (MPWs) Prepared for Rail Delivery Group (RDG) and Cancellation November 2017 Minutes (CMs) Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Context 3 2 Methodology 4 2.1 General approach 4 2.2 Principles for recalibrating MPWs and CMs 4 2.3 MPWs 8 2.4 CMs 9 3 Modelling 12 3.1 Process 12 3.2 Data sources and data cleansing 12 TOC engagement 12 MOIRA 12 PEARS 12 TOC specific data 13 3.3 Modelling MPWs 13 3.4 Modelling CMs 13 3.5 Model Review 14 Appendix 1 15 2 1 Introduction 1.1 Context The Office of Rail and Road (ORR) is currently in the process of reviewing the access charges and related matters for Network Rail for Control Period 6 (CP6), which runs from 1st April 2019 to 31st March 2024. As part of this review, the Rail Delivery Group (RDG) is leading the recalibration of Schedule 8, the performance regime which compensates train operators for the impact of unplanned service disruption. RDG commissioned PwC to undertake Phase 1 of the review, which focused on two key parameters used in the Schedule 8 performance regime1: Monitoring Point Weights (MPWs) A Monitoring Point is a point on the network (almost always a station) at which the lateness of trains in a Service Code within a Service Group in a given direction (forward/reverse) is measured. MPWs are calculated for each Monitoring Point. They reflect the proportion of a Service Group’s passengers alighting and interchanging at that Monitoring Point and any preceding stations which are not captured by a Monitoring Point.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2016 This Page Is Intentionally Left Blank
    Annual Report 2016 This page is intentionally left blank 2 This report is published in accordance with: l the Railway Safety Directive 2004/49/EC; l the Railways and Transport Safety Act 2003; and l the Railways (Accident Investigation and Reporting) Regulations 2005. © Crown copyright 2017 You may re-use this document/publication (not including departmental or agency logos) free of charge in any format or medium. You must re-use it accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and you must give the title of the source publication. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This document/publication is also available at www.gov.uk/raib. Any enquiries about this publication should be sent to: RAIB Email: [email protected] The Wharf Telephone: 01332 253300 Stores Road Fax: 01332 253301 Derby UK Website: www.gov.uk/raib DE21 4BA This report is published by the Rail Accident Investigation Branch, Department for Transport. Cover image credits: Top: image taken from RAIB report 05/2016: Derailment at Godmersham. Second from top: image taken from RAIB report 09/2016: Runaway and collision at Bryn station. Third from top: image taken from RAIB report 11/2016: Derailment of a freight train near Langworth (image courtesy of Network Rail). Fourth from top: image taken from RAIB report 04/2017: Collision between a train and a tractor at Hockham Road user worked crossing. This page is intentionally left blank 4 Preface This is the Rail Accident Investigation Branch’s (RAIB) Annual Report for the calendar year 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • 02-120. Electric Multiple Units, Trains 9351 and 3647, Collision
    R A I L W A Y O C C U R R E N C E R E P O R T 02-120 electric multiple units, Trains 9351 and 3647, collision, 31 August 2002 Wellington TRANSPORT ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION COMMISSION NEW ZEALAND The Transport Accident Investigation Commission is an independent Crown entity established to determine the circumstances and causes of accidents and incidents with a view to avoiding similar occurrences in the future. Accordingly it is inappropriate that reports should be used to assign fault or blame or determine liability, since neither the investigation nor the reporting process has been undertaken for that purpose. The Commission may make recommendations to improve transport safety. The cost of implementing any recommendation must always be balanced against its benefits. Such analysis is a matter for the regulator and the industry. These reports may be reprinted in whole or in part without charge, providing acknowledgement is made to the Transport Accident Investigation Commission. Report 02-120 electric multiple units Trains 9351 and 3647 collision Wellington 31 August 2002 Abstract On Saturday 31 August 2002 at about 1515, Train 9351, a Tranz Metro1 Johnsonville to Wellington electric multiple unit passenger service collided with Train 3647, a Tranz Metro Upper Hutt to Wellington electric multiple unit passenger service, as both trains were approaching the Wellington platforms on converging tracks. There were no injuries to passengers or crew and only minor damage to the trains. The safety issues identified included the well-being of the electric multiple unit driver of Train 9351 and his resulting capacity to recognise and respond to a danger signal indication.
    [Show full text]
  • A Set Packing Inspired Method for Real-Time Junction Train Routing
    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Sep 27, 2021 A Set Packing Inspired Method for Real-Time Junction Train Routing Lusby, Richard Martin; Larsen, Jesper; Ehrgott, Matthias; Ryan, David Publication date: 2009 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Lusby, R. M., Larsen, J., Ehrgott, M., & Ryan, D. (2009). A Set Packing Inspired Method for Real-Time Junction Train Routing. DTU Management. DTU Management 2009 No. 15 http://www.man.dtu.dk/upload/institutter/ipl/publ/publikationer%202009/rapport%2015.pdf General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. A Set Packing Inspired Method for Real-Time Junction Train Routing Report 15.2009 DTU Management Engineering Richard M. Lusby Jesper Larsen Matthias Ehrgott David Ryan December 2009 A Set Packing Inspired Method for Real-Time Junction Train Routing Richard M. Lusbyz∗, Jesper Larsen,z Matthias Ehrgott ,x David Ryan x z Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Kgs.
    [Show full text]
  • Timetable Information Data Feed Interface Specification
    Timetable Information Data Feed Interface Specification Document Ref: RSPS5046 Version: 03-00 Rail Settlement Plan Limited Registered Office, 2nd Floor, 200 Aldersgate Street, London EC1A 4HD www.raildeliverygroup.com 020 7841 8000 Registered in England and Wales No. 03069042 Ref: RSPS5046 03-00 Timetable Information Page: 2 of 39 Data Feed Interface Specification Date: 01-Aug-2018 Version History Version Date Author Comments 00-00-A 24-Jan-14 Edna Kelly First draft. 00-00-B 21-May-14 Edna Kelly Reviewed by iBlocks. JIRA STD-612: ‘Copyright text to be added’ 00-00-C 22-May-14 Edna Kelly Addressed internal review comments. Neil Barkham 00-00-D 05-Jun-14 Neil Barkham More internal review comments addressed. 00-00-E 16-Jul-14 Neil Barkham Final external review comments addressed. 01-00 04-Aug-14 Neil Barkham Issued. 01-00-A 19-Jan-17 Edna Kelly Next Review Date reached. 01-00-B 08-Feb-17 Neil Barkham Correction of file references (§ 2.4). Train schedule clarification (§ 5.2.3.3). 01-00-C 28-Mar-17 Neil Barkham External review comments addressed. 01-00-D 19-Apr-17 Neil Barkham Addressed final external review comment. 02-00 15-May-17 Neil Barkham Issued. 02-00-A 05-Mar-18 Neil Barkham Updated to include ‘Additional Fixed Links File’ and the ‘TOC Specific Interchange Times File’. General review. Restructure to put example data with the feed definitions. 02-00-B 16-Apr-18 Neil Barkham Updated after internal review. 02-00-C 22-May-18 Neil Barkham Updated after external review.
    [Show full text]
  • Eighth Annual Market Monitoring Working Document March 2020
    Eighth Annual Market Monitoring Working Document March 2020 List of contents List of country abbreviations and regulatory bodies .................................................. 6 List of figures ............................................................................................................ 7 1. Introduction .............................................................................................. 9 2. Network characteristics of the railway market ........................................ 11 2.1. Total route length ..................................................................................................... 12 2.2. Electrified route length ............................................................................................. 12 2.3. High-speed route length ........................................................................................... 13 2.4. Main infrastructure manager’s share of route length .............................................. 14 2.5. Network usage intensity ........................................................................................... 15 3. Track access charges paid by railway undertakings for the Minimum Access Package .................................................................................................. 17 4. Railway undertakings and global rail traffic ............................................. 23 4.1. Railway undertakings ................................................................................................ 24 4.2. Total rail traffic .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Safety Report 2019-2020
    19 20 OFFICE OF THE NATIONAL RAIL SAFETY REGULATOR Level 1, 75 Hindmarsh Square Adelaide SA 5000 PO Box 3461, Rundle Mall Adelaide SA 5000 Phone 08 8406 1500 Email [email protected] Web onrsr.com.au ISSN: 2204 - 2571 Copyright information © 2020 Office of the National Rail Safety Regulator RAIL SAFETY REPORT This material may be reproduced in whole or in part, provided the meaning is unchanged and the source is acknowledged. 2019-2020 Contents The Regulator’s Message 2 Introduction 5 About the Office of the National Rail Safety Regulator 6 About This Report 9 ONRSR 2019–2020 - At a glance 10 Rail Safety Statistical Summary 13 Railway-Related Fatalities 15 Railway-Related Serious Injuries 21 Passenger Train Derailments 26 Tram Derailments 29 Freight Train Derailments 31 Train Collisions 34 Tram Collisions 37 Signals Passed at Danger and Authorities Exceeded 40 Train Fires 42 Other Noteworthy Occurrences 44 National Priorities 47 National Priorities 2019–2020 - At a glance 48 Level Crossing Safety 51 Track Worker Safety 57 Contractor Management 60 Control Assurance 61 Data-Driven Intelligence 63 Safety Themes 65 Data Sharing 67 Appendix A: Network Statistics 72 Appendix B: Scope and Methods 74 the regulator’s message I DON’T THINK IT IS AN OVERSTATEMENT TO SUGGEST THE WORLD HAS BECOME A MORE COMPLICATED PLACE IN THE LAST 12 MONTHS. AT THE RISK OF SOUNDING SOMEWHAT CLICHÉD, THE NEED TO LOOK AFTER OURSELVES AND EACH OTHER REALLY IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN EVER. Never losing sight of why we are here and having genuine clarity of purpose has been The report also charts the progress we, as a regulator, and industry integral to the Office of the National Rail Safety Regulator’s (ONRSR) response to the collectively have made on our national priority issues – track worker safety, emergence of COVID-19.
    [Show full text]
  • Sr.No. Description Page No. 1. Important Definitions, Classification of 02 Stations 2
    1 INDEX Sr.No. Description Page No. 1. Important Definitions, Classification of 02 Stations 2. Signals 07 3. Defective Signals 15 4. Authorities 24 5. Systems of working 30 6. Shunting 35 7. Speed 39 8. Head light, Flasher light, Marker light 43 9. Pushing back 45 10. FOIS, COIS 48 11. ACD 51 12. ODC, Marshalling 52 13. Isolation, Interlocking 59 14. Reception and Despatch of trains 63 15. Defective Points 68 16. Temporary Single Line Working 71 17. All Communication Failure on Double Line 75 18. All Communication Failure on Single Line 78 19. Abnormal Working in Automatic Section 82 20. Train Parting, Train Dividing 93 21. Assistance to disabled engine 100 22. Sending Assisting Engine into Obstructed 101 Block Section 23. Train Delayed in Block Section 102 24. Working of Tower Wagon 103 25. Working of Material Train 105 26. Working of Lorry, Trolly and Motor Trolly 109 27. Monsoon Patrolling, Defects in Track 118 28. Working of Track Maintenance Machines 122 29. Accident 127 30. Block Instrument – Bell Code 139 31. Engine Whistle Code 142 32. Working of Train without Brake Van 145 33. Personal Store of Guard / Loco Pilot 147 34. Train Stalled on Gradient – Duties 150 35. Protection Rules 152 36. Traction Subsidiary Rules 155 37. Abbreviations 168 Traffic Faculty, Zonal Railway Training Institute, Central Railway / Bhusawal 2 Important Definitions 1. Adequate Distance: G.R.1.02 (2) – It means the distance sufficient to ensure safety. a) Block Over-lap – The distance sufficient to ensure safety for granting line clear. It shall be not less than 400 meters in TALQ signalling system and not less than 180 meters in MAUQ / MACLS signalling system.
    [Show full text]
  • Britain's Rail Delivery Group, Comprising the Chief Executives of the Rail Owning Groups, Freight Operators and Network Rail T
    Written evidence from the Rail Delivery Group (ROR 01) 1. This is the response of the Rail Delivery Group (RDG) to the Transport Select Committee’s call for evidence on the reform of the railways. 2. The RDG welcomes the Government’s support for the RDG contained in the Command Paper ‘Reforming our Railways: Putting the Customer First’, which was published today. The Paper calls on the Rail Delivery Group to provide leadership to the industry and to respond to the Government’s strategic challenges. The Command Paper lays out the Government’s vision for an expanding and efficient railway that meets the needs of passengers, freight users and taxpayers. The Government sees the Rail Delivery Group leading the industry in driving up efficiency and demand for the railway. This is a challenge that the Group accepts. 3. The Command Paper calls on the Rail Delivery Group to lead the rail industry in working together to deliver a more efficient, more affordable railway. The Rail Delivery Group is pleased that the Government has recognised that the Group is taking and shaping the industry’s agenda for a sustained programme of improved management and running of the rail network. 4. The Command Paper lists the six priority areas being addressed by the Group • Asset, programme and supply chain management; • Contractual and regulatory reform; • Technology, innovation and working practices; • Train utilisation; • A whole-system approach; and • Industry planning 5. The Rail Delivery Group was created to unlock efficiencies that will improve Britain’s railways. In its first nine months the Group has identified opportunities for a range of savings, for example in asset management through earlier involvement of the operators in planning work on the network.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-01 20 Point Plan Issue14.Pdf
    Fleet Management Good Practice Guide – 20 Point Plan Issue 14 – January 2019 AMENDMENT RECORD Issue Dated Notes Section 2: MP code removed from Technical incident reasons 14 December 2018 table “701D” 14 December 2018 Inclusion of new Section 10: Managing Ageing Rolling Stock 14 December 2018 Sections new cover inserted 14 December 2018 General document sections restructure 14 December 2018 Gary Cooper’s foreword updated Fleet Management Good Practice Guide: Issue 14 - January 2019 ii Foreword Our customers’ needs have been consistent ever since the birth of the railway, whether they are passengers, or businesses that send freight by rail, and the message is simply: run my train on time. Meeting this need is a priority for all of us in rail, and the desire for on-time service delivery shows in the correlation between punctuality and customer satisfaction and, in turn, the correlation between customer satisfaction and rail businesses’ revenues. It is important therefore, for the industry and the country as well as customers that we run punctual trains. We have been failing to do this for too long. After improving performance every month from 2002 – 2011, we now repeatedly miss the punctuality levels that TOCs and NR Routes agree they will deliver. The reliability of the vehicles we operate is part of that under-delivery and we have to do better. In 2013, the fleet planned a national passenger fleet performance challenge of delivering 11 500 MTIN by March 2019, a 20% improvement in reliability over this five- year control period. The reality is that we are likely to deliver only 9 000 MTIN by then.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Policy Paper
    A new structure for success on Britain’s railway An ATOC position paper on industry structural reform March 2011 / 2 1 Introduction The challenge facing the rail industry is to cut costs while continuing to improve services for passengers. The McNulty Review into value for money has identified savings of up to £1bn a year above the efficiency targets already set for Network Rail, and the Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) estimates that rail infrastructure costs are up to 40% higher than in Europe. The key to better value for money is a more commercial railway that releases the full potential of the private sector and puts the passenger at its heart. This means a new, ‘horses for courses’, approach in which franchises are designed around the commercial and operational realities of each route, with government intervening and specifying to lesser or greater extents, as appropriate. There have been positive steps already. The Government’s policy of longer, less prescriptive franchises creates the potential to build on the success of operators in increasing patronage and driving revenue growth by attracting more private sector investment and reducing their own costs, particularly in areas where significant efficiency improvements are not possible within a short contract. Network Rail (NR)’s plans to create devolved business units should also help the operation of trains and track to work more closely together. But the scale of cost efficiencies identified requires a real step change which can only be achieved through more fundamental reform of the railways, engendering an even stronger commercial relationship between train operator and infrastructure provider and allowing train operators to play a much bigger part in prioritising infrastructure expenditure in line with customer needs.
    [Show full text]
  • LNW Route Specification 2017
    Delivering a better railway for a better Britain Route Specifications 2017 London North Western London North Western July 2017 Network Rail – Route Specifications: London North Western 02 SRS H.44 Roses Line and Branches (including Preston 85 Route H: Cross-Pennine, Yorkshire & Humber and - Ormskirk and Blackburn - Hellifield North West (North West section) SRS H.45 Chester/Ellesmere Port - Warrington Bank Quay 89 SRS H.05 North Transpennine: Leeds - Guide Bridge 4 SRS H.46 Blackpool South Branch 92 SRS H.10 Manchester Victoria - Mirfield (via Rochdale)/ 8 SRS H.98/H.99 Freight Trunk/Other Freight Routes 95 SRS N.07 Weaver Junction to Liverpool South Parkway 196 Stalybridge Route M: West Midlands and Chilterns SRS N.08 Norton Bridge/Colwich Junction to Cheadle 199 SRS H.17 South Transpennine: Dore - Hazel Grove 12 Hulme Route Map 106 SRS H.22 Manchester Piccadilly - Crewe 16 SRS N.09 Crewe to Kidsgrove 204 M1 and M12 London Marylebone to Birmingham Snow Hill 107 SRS H.23 Manchester Piccadilly - Deansgate 19 SRS N.10 Watford Junction to St Albans Abbey 207 M2, M3 and M4 Aylesbury lines 111 SRS H.24 Deansgate - Liverpool South Parkway 22 SRS N.11 Euston to Watford Junction (DC Lines) 210 M5 Rugby to Birmingham New Street 115 SRS H.25 Liverpool Lime Street - Liverpool South Parkway 25 SRS N.12 Bletchley to Bedford 214 M6 and M7 Stafford and Wolverhampton 119 SRS H.26 North Transpennine: Manchester Piccadilly - 28 SRS N.13 Crewe to Chester 218 M8, M9, M19 and M21 Cross City Souh lines 123 Guide Bridge SRS N.99 Freight lines 221 M10 ad M22
    [Show full text]