Religion and Political Crisis in Ukraine

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Religion and Political Crisis in Ukraine 17 / 2015 Religion and Political Crisis in Ukraine Guest Editor Catherine Wanner, Pennsylvania State University A clergyman on Maidan Nezalezhnosti, Kiev, August 2014 © Carmen Scheide Open Access Online Journal of the Center for Governance and Culture in Europe University of St. Gallen URL: www.gce.unisg.ch, www.euxeinos.ch ISSN 2296-0708 Center for Governance and Last Update 18 April 2015 LanDis & GYR Culture in Europe STIFTung University of St.Gallen Table of Contents A Note From the Editorial Team 3 Religion and Political Crisis in Ukraine Editorial by Catherine Wanner 4 Analysis Orthodoxy and the Future of Secularism After the Maidan by Catherine Wanner 8 Was There an Alternative? Metropolitan Bishop Onuphrius and his First Steps by Nikolay Mitrokhin 13 The Jews of Ukraine: Past and Present by Yuliana Smilianskaya 20 Islam and Muslims in Ukraine After the “Revolution of Dignity”: Current Challenges and Perspectives by Oleg Yarosh 35 Protestant Churches After the Maidan by Mikhailo Cherenkov 42 Between ‘Mother Homeland’ and Saint Mary: The Independence Monu- ment on the Maidan in Kiev by Wilfried Jilge 49 Opinions “Being Church” during Times of crisis by Myroslav Marynovych 55 The Responsibility of the Churches During the Ukrainian Crisis by Yuriy Chornomorets 60 Church-State-Relations After the Maidan by Oleksandr Sagan 67 Bibliography 72 Publishing Information/Contact 73 Euxeinos 17/2015 2 A Note From the Editorial Team Euxeinos Dear reader, the following collection of articles is the result of the ‘Religion in Ukraine’ Conference that took place in Kiev, Ukraine, at the end of September 2014. Catherine Wanner – Professor of History, An- thropology, Religious Studies, and Barry Director of the Paterno Fellows Program at Pennsylvania State University – organized the Conference to illuminate how events on Maidan Square shaped perceptions of state-faith relations in Ukraine. The collection of articles thus includes a range of opinions and attitudes on how religion shaped events on the Maidan, and vice versa – published in the second section of this edition. A second set of articles – published in the first section – examines these events from a theoretical perspective. The following articles also appeared in collaboration with, and are available in print in Religion & Gesellschaft in Ost und West (RGOW2/2015 43. Jahrgang). Religion & Gesellschaft is published by G2W, the Ecumenical Forum for Faith, Religion, and Society. We would like to take this opportunity to express our gratitude to Catherine Wanner, the authors, and the G2W Institute for their collaboration, and hope the articles are as instructive to you, the reader, as they were for us. ------------- The views, beliefs, and opinions expressed in the following articles are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect those of the Euxeinos editorial team. Euxeinos makes no truth-claims as regards the relationship between one’s religious practice, change, and/or affiliation to a particular faith, and subsequent political orientation. Sandra King-Savic, Carmen Scheide and Maria Tagangaeva Euxeinos 17/2015 3 Religion and Political Crisis in Ukraine ince the first internationally-recognized ating effects of clerical meddling in politics. Sstate boundaries were created in 1991 from The import of religion on politics and popular the territories of the former Soviet Union, pop- perceptions of political legitimacy were only ular unrest and vociferous demands for re- heightened in both countries after the Maidan form have spiked during pivotal moments. In protests were sparked. This development pro- Ukraine these protests have taken the form of vided the motivation to dedicate an issue of mass street protests, which coalesced into the Euxeinos to changes in the religious landscape Editorial 2004 Orange Revolution and, more recently, in Ukraine. into the 2013-14 Maidan protests. Although there have been isolated forms of high vis- Maidan as Turning Point ibility, high impact protest in Russia as well, When Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych such as the Pussy Riot punk performance in and his governing circle of oligarchic partners Moscow’s Cathedral of Christ the Savior in decided to privilege maintaining good rela- 2012, the same level of broad mass initiatives tions with Russia by entering into the Eur- to force reform have not occurred in Russia. asian Customs Union over taking the initial Although these two countries share a common steps toward a trade agreement with the Eu- cultural tradition of Orthodoxy, an Eastern ropean Union, popular protests set in motion Christian faith, in Russia Orthodox clergy, re- consequences that continue to test geopolitical ligious institutions and believers by and large alliances. After several hundred years of po- help maintain the status quo by discouraging litical union with Russia and a mere 23 years open unrest even though the popular griev- of independence, as far as the most vocal seg- ances against judicial corruption, income in- ment of the population was concerned, the fu- equality and negligible investment in infra- ture of the country was decidedly European. structure are comparable in both countries. In Protest over Yanukovych’s decision combined contrast, Ukrainian clergy, religious institu- with popular disgust over corrupt and self- tions and, above all, average believers have ac- serving governance that found expression in tively played a key role in fomenting demands massive street protests in Kyiv, the capital of for change justified by religiously inspired Ukraine, beginning on November 21, 2013. rhetoric and symbolism. This coalesced into a broad social movement The instrumental use of religious sentiment in for reform that has come to be known as the both contexts reflects the emergence of condi- “Maidan,” after the main city square in Kyiv, tions in which religion is capable of playing an Maidan Nezalezhnosti, or Independence expedient role in forging a new governing and Square. The Maidan protests, which at their moral order. It is doing so, however, quite dif- height involved over one million people in a ferently in both countries. Paradoxically, it is city with three million residents, were even- the common faith tradition that Ukraine and tually disbanded on February 20, 2014 when Russia share that has come to separate these President Yanukovych gave the order to clear two countries. Each one is becoming more re- the square of its protesters, resulting in the ligiously committed, thanks to a recognition of death of over one hundred people. the galvanizing potential of shared religious The audibility of the religiously-inspired sentiment, and yet simultaneously more sec- rhetoric and the visibility of religious symbol- ular in orientation as a reaction to the alien- ism and clergy on the Maidan was ubiquitous Euxeinos 17/2015 4 Editorial through each of the phases -- hopeful protests, in the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, violent struggle and now mass mourning and but in general as these two countries contin- collective commemoration. This pronounced ue to rapidly evolve and forge new forms of religiosity on the public square does not, how- governance. Religious institutions in Ukraine ever, reflect a “postsecular” rediscovery of have altered the dynamics of their subservient religion after Soviet anti-religious campaigns state-allied role in governance, which in many to promote an atheist worldview. Rather, the respects constitutes a departure from tradi- instrumental use of clergy, religious sentiment tional church-state relations within an Eastern and transcendent symbolism on the Maidan Orthodox tradition. The implications in a vari- reflects the emergence of conditions in which ety of faith traditions of a recalibrated balance religion is capable of playing an expedient role of powers among the state, the populace and in the process of forging a new governing and religious leaders is a central theme explored in moral order. During the protests, assertions of the articles that follow. transcendence fed convictions that the mas- Not only did the Maidan protests ultimately sive efforts required of a humiliated and tired lead to a string of unforeseen actions and re- population to radically redirect governing actions with global implications, they also practices were indeed possible (Fylypovych mark a turning point in church-state relations and Horkushi 2014). Religion was effectively in Ukraine that do not find their counterpart used to bolster a sense of Ukrainian nation- in Russia at this time. The implications of hood and has been instrumental in articulat- this pivotal moment are fundamental and far ing and making manifest an embraced sense reaching. Religious organizations have be- of Ukrainian nationality. Indeed, the meaning- gun to reconfigure understandings of cultural ful role played by clergy and religious insti- space, religious boundaries and their relation tutions during this pivotal moment of protest to state borders and issues of sovereignty. and struggle has irreversibly altered the bal- This, in turn, informs assessments of political ance of church-state relations in Ukraine. The legitimacy, moral authority and allegiance. In power of the Ukrainian people to launch and short, religious communities in Ukraine and sustain mass street protests is now undeni- Russia have been invested with new roles, al- able. This power stems from a shared rejection beit different ones. These new roles are ren- of forms of governance predicated on a social dering these societies more secular
Recommended publications
  • War in Religious Dimension
    War in religious dimension Attacks on religion in Crimea and Donbas region Report submitted under Article 15 for the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court Kyiv 2019 1 Table of content The Authors..........................................................................................................................................3 Truth Hounds...............................................................................................................................3 International Renaissance Foundation.......................................................................................3 Executive summary...............................................................................................................................3 Legal assessment..................................................................................................................................5 Methodology........................................................................................................................................7 Collecting data.............................................................................................................................7 Analyzing data.............................................................................................................................8 Background...........................................................................................................................................9 Prewar context............................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Orthodox Question in the USSR
    The Ukrainian Orthodox Question in the USSR FRANK E. SYSYN In 1977 Father Vasyl' Romanyuk, a prisoner in the Soviet Gulag because of his struggle for religious and national rights, addressed a letter to Metropolitan Mstyslav, leader of the Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church in the West:. Your Grace! First of all, I assure you of my devotion and humility. I declare that I consider and have always considered myself a member of the U[krainian] A[utocephalous] O[rthodox] C[hurch] in spite of the fact that I formally belonged to a different hierarchy, for it is well known that the Ukrainian Church, Orthodox as well as Catholic, is outlawed in Ukraine. Such are the barbaric ethics of the Bolsheviks. 1 The appeal was a remarkable testimony that almost fifty years after the destruction of the Ukrainian Orthodox Autocephalous Church formed in the 1920s and over thirty years after the eradication of the Church restored during the Second World War, loyalty to Ukrainian Orthodoxy still remains alive among Ukraine's believers. It also demonstrates how shared persecution has brought new ecumenical understanding between U,laainian Orthodox and Ukrainian Catholics. 'To discuss the position of Ukrainian Orthodoxy in the Soviet Union is a difficult task, for since the destruction of tens of its bishops, thousands of its priests, and tens of thousands of its lay activists in the early 1930s (and once again after the Second World War), and its forcible incorporation into the Russian Orthodox Church, it exists more as a loyalty and an Ull­ realised dream than as an active movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction. Religion in Ukraine: Political and Historical Entanglements
    Guest editor: BALTIC Yuliya Yurchuk WORLDS The role of religion in the Ukrainian political landscape special section Introduction. Religion in Ukraine: political and historical entanglements kraine usually becomes the — called the Tomos — was given by the Ecu- be tackled in the articles. On this note, I focus of the international menical Patriarch of Constantinople to should add an important disclaimer: it is media and lively scholarly the newly established Orthodox Church not spirituality and religious belief as such U interest when it undergoes of Ukraine. Thus, in 2019 the world wit- that are in the focus of this special section. some tremendous political and societal nessed the birth of one more Orthodox The purpose of this discussion is to put changes. Sufce to mention the year 2004 Church, a rare event in church history. the question of religion into the focus of when the Orange revolution was on front The whole discussion on religion in the studies which approach diferent as- pages all over the world, or 2013-2014 Ukraine, however, cannot be restricted pects of Ukrainian reality today and show when mass protests — now known as the how an analysis of an intricate interplay Euromaidan Revolution — followed by between religion, politics, and society can the Russian annexation of Crimea and “IN 2019 THE help us better understand this reality. the continuing war in Donbas came into WORLD WITNESSED 1 Religious affiliation the spotlight worldwide. What happened THE BIRTH OF ONE in Ukraine in the years 2018 and 2019 in numbers drew considerably less attention both in MORE ORTHODOX According to the sociological survey international media and among scholars, conducted in 2018, about 72% of respon- CHURCH, A RARE although historically these years are no dents declared themselves as believers.2 less remarkable than the years of mass EVENT IN CHURCH Compared with the number of believers unrests and regimes changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Biggest Expulsion in Eight Years
    Table of Contents OSCE held a round table in Odessa on the development of interfaith dialogue Ukrainian religious leaders think religion law contains Soviet-like restrictions Ukraine acknowledges right of conscientious objection Evangelical pastor abducted by Kremlin-backed militants in Luhansk and released four days later Ukrainian nationalists storm Hasidic encampment High court of Ukraine upholds right to conscientious objection during military mobilization International community should give adequate assessment of Moscow patriarchate’s responsibility for incitement and developments in Crimea and Donbas, Andriy Yurash says Ukrainian Orthodox priest and nun killed Targeted for religious beliefs in Eastern Ukraine Jehovah’s Witnesses broadcast special meeting into war zone of Ukraine Muslims not persecuted like many Christians in Ukrainian rebel regions Moscow Patriarchate rapidly losing out in Ukraine and beyond Evidence of religious persecution in the occupied Donbas Survey depicts Christian population of Ukraine A Ukrainian Orthodox priest (Kyiv Patriarcate) from Kherson released from captivity in Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR) Churches will obtain right to establish educational institutions Ukrainian rebels seize Baptist house of worship Russian forces destroy one of Donbas’ largest Orthodox churches Jehovah’s Witnesses religious buildings seized in Eastern Regions of Ukraine Court of Appeal upheld a believer’s right to alternative service The war and the Orthodox churches in Ukraine Ukrainian Orthodox parish transfers from Moscow to Kiev patriarchates Donbas and Crimea: new challenges for religious freedom in 2014 OSCE held a round table in Odessa on the development of interfaith dialogue The role of dialogue in strengthening the security of religious and other communities was a key theme of the regional roundtable in Kyiv.
    [Show full text]
  • Traditional Religion and Political Power: Examining the Role of the Church in Georgia, Armenia, Ukraine and Moldova
    Traditional religion and political power: Examining the role of the church in Georgia, Armenia, Ukraine and Moldova Edited by Adam Hug Traditional religion and political power: Examining the role of the church in Georgia, Armenia, Ukraine and Moldova Edited by Adam Hug First published in October 2015 by The Foreign Policy Centre (FPC) Unit 1.9, First Floor, The Foundry 17 Oval Way, Vauxhall, London SE11 5RR www.fpc.org.uk [email protected] © Foreign Policy Centre 2015 All rights reserved ISBN 978-1-905833-28-3 ISBN 1-905833-28-8 Disclaimer: The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors alone and do not represent the views of The Foreign Policy Centre or the Open Society Foundations. Printing and cover art by Copyprint This project is kindly supported by the Open Society Foundations 1 Acknowledgements The editor would like to thank all of the authors who have kindly contributed to this collection and provided invaluable support in developing the project. In addition the editor is very grateful for the advice and guidance of a number of different experts including: John Anderson, Andrew Sorokowski, Angelina Zaporojan, Mamikon Hovsepyan, Beka Mindiashvili, Giorgi Gogia, Vitalie Sprinceana, Anastasia Danilova, Artyom Tonoyan, Dr. Katja Richters, Felix Corley, Giorgi Gogia, Bogdan Globa, James W. Warhola, Mamikon Hovsepyan, Natia Mestvirishvil, Tina Zurabishvili and Vladimir Shkolnikov. He would like to thank colleagues at the Open Society Foundations for all their help and support without which this project would not have been possible, most notably Viorel Ursu, Michael Hall, Anastasiya Hozyainova and Eleanor Kelly.
    [Show full text]
  • The Peninsula of Fear: Chronicle of Occupation and Violation of Human Rights in Crimea
    THE PENINSULA OF FEAR: CHRONICLE OF OCCUPATION AND VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN CRIMEA Kyiv 2016 УДК 341.223.1+342.7.03](477.75)’’2014/2016’’=111 ББК 67.9(4Укр-6Крм)412 Composite authors: Sergiy Zayets (Regional Center for Human Rights), Olexandra Matviychuk (Center for Civil Liberties), Tetiana Pechonchyk (Human Rights Information Center), Darya Svyrydova (Ukrainian Helsinki Human Rights Union), Olga Skrypnyk (Crimean Human Rights Group). The publication contains photographs from public sources, o7 cial websites of the state authorities of Ukraine, the Russian Federation and the occupation authorities, Crimean Field Mission for Human Rights, Crimean Human Rights Group, the online edition Crimea.Realities / Radio Svoboda and other media, court cases materials. ‘The Peninsula of Fear : Chronicle of Occupation and Violation of Human Rights in Crimea’ / Under the general editorship of O. Skrypnyk and T. Pechonchyk. Second edition, revised and corrected. – Kyiv: KBC, 2016. – 136 p. ISBN 978-966-2403-11-4 This publication presents a summary of factual documentation of international law violation emanating from the occupation of the autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol (Ukraine) by the Russian Federation military forces as well as of the human rights violations during February 2014 – February 2016. The publication is intended for the representatives of human rights organizations, civil activists, diplomatic missions, state authorities, as well as educational and research institutions. УДК 341.223.1+342.7.03](477.75)’’2014/2016’’=111 ББК 67.9(4Укр-6Крм)412 ISBN 978-966-2403-11-4 © S. Zayets, O. Matviychuk, T. Pechonchyk, D. Svyrydova, O. Skrypnyk, 2016 Contents Introduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukrainian Orthodox Church
    UKRAINIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH - A POWERFUL PEACE ACTOR? According to the Constitution, Ukraine is a secular state, where its churches and all religious organizations are separated from the state and the legislative process. According to theologian Gennadiy Druzenko, in the framework of the regional scope, Ukraine might be described as one of the most religious countries in Europe.1 It is an undeniable fact, as the history of the Ukrainian Church dates back to the times of the Kyivan Rus, when its Prince Volodymyr the Great received Christianity from Constantinople in 988. It was one of the most remarkable event in the Ukrainian state creation that united Ukrainian people spiritually. However, it further served as an instrument of manipulations and basis for lies from the Russian side so as to justify its rights for the Ukrainian state. Further centuries are marked by a constant fight of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Kyiv Patriarchate, Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church against the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate, one of the most pivotal soft instruments of the Russian hybrid warfare and the Russian foreign policy in promoting ideas of the so-called “Russian World”, to become a powerful actor on the international arena and win hearts and minds of Ukrainians. Nevertheless, in the times of the “Ukraine crisis”, that broke out in 2014 after the illegal annexation of Crimea and the manifestations of the Russian aggression in Eastern Ukraine, the question of the religious independence from Russia was more pressing than ever. And finally, on January 9, 2019, a historical event has taken place – Ecumenical Patriarchate Bartholomew signed the Tomos of autocephaly, as a result the newly-established Orthodox Church of Ukraine was granted its canonical independence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly 1988
    ІізЬесі by the Ukrainian National Association Inc.. a fraternal non-profit association| ШrainianWeekl Y Vol. LVI No. 24 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, JUNE 12,1988 25 cents Ukrainian Church issues overshadow | Oemonstrations inWashm^on Kiev Soviet Millennium celebrations mark Ukramian Christian Millennium Ukrainian Americans St. Volodymyr statue by Bohdan Nahaylo have recently stepped up their cam­ paign for the legalization of their hold Truth March is site of celebration As the Moscow Patriarchate be­ Church. Last week, a Ukrainian WASHINGTON - More than 500 LONDON -^ About 200 people gins its main celebrations of the Catholic bishop, two priests and two Ukrainian Americans gathered in Lafa­ gathered on Sunday, June 5, in Kiev Millennium of the Christianization lay believers were removed from a yette Park across from the White House around the statue of Grand Prince of Kievan Rus', the question of the train and prevented from traveling to on Sunday, June 5, to begin the Millen­ Volodymyr, who introduced Christia­ suppressed Ukrainian Catholic Moscow to meet with President nium Truth March to the Soviet Em­ nity in his realm in 988, to hold an Church has come to the fore and is Reagan. bassy. The National Committee to unofficial celebration of the Millen­ casting a shadow over the official In view of all this, it is hardly Commemorate the Millennium of nium of the baptism of Kievan Rus'. festivities. surprising that on the opening day of Christianity in Ukraine organized the News of the demonstration was Last week, President Ronald Rea­ the celebrations in the Soviet capital, rally to protest the Soviet government's reported by the London-based Ukrai­ policy of banning the Ukrainian Ortho- nian Press Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Problematic Issues of Institutional Development of Islamic Associations in Contemporary Ukraine
    Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe Volume 40 Issue 3 Religious Communities in Article 8 Contemporary Ukraine Since Independence 4-2020 Problematic Issues of Institutional Development of Islamic Associations in Contemporary Ukraine Serhii Ismahilov Ukrainian Center for Islamic Studies Galyna Sagan Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree Part of the Eastern European Studies Commons, and the Islamic Studies Commons Recommended Citation Ismahilov, Serhii and Sagan, Galyna (2020) "Problematic Issues of Institutional Development of Islamic Associations in Contemporary Ukraine," Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe: Vol. 40 : Iss. 3 , Article 8. Available at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree/vol40/iss3/8 This Peer-Reviewed Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PROBLEMATIC ISSUES OF INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF ISLAMIC ASSOCIATIONS IN CONTEMPORARY UKRAINE By Serhii Ismahilov and Galyna Sagan Serhii Ismahilov, Sheikh Said Ismagilov – Mufti of the Religious Administration of Muslims of Ukraine “Ummah,” President of All-Ukrainian Public Organization “Ukrainian Center for Islamic Studies.” He is a scholar specializing in Islamic studies. Research interests: history of Islam in Ukraine and the world; sources of Sharia in Islam; theological foundations of Shia Imamiyyah; freedom of conscience (legislative support, practical implementation); state-church relations; political studies of religion; international relations. Email: [email protected] Galyna Sagan, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Associate Professor in the Department of World History, Deputy Dean of Scientific-Educational and Socio-Humanitarian Work of Faculty of History and Philosophy, at the Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University.
    [Show full text]
  • Manifestation of the Religious Factor in the Ukrainian Socio-Political Crisis (2013-2014)
    Special Issue INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND July 2016 CULTURAL STUDIES ISSN 2356-5926 Manifestation of the religious factor in the Ukrainian socio-political crisis (2013-2014) Vladimir Nikolaevich Rogatin1, Rinat Ahmetgalievich Nabiev. Kazan Federal University, Kremliovskaya str, 18, 420008, Kazan, Russian Federation. Abstract: Ukrainian socio-political crisis involved different sectors of society, including religious organizations and religious leaders. The involvement of religious actors in political action has led to the politicization of religious organizations and the creation of a religious justification of protests and violence. Reasons for protests neither had religious background nor covered any religious matters. Despite this fact, Catholics, Baptists, neo-pagans and non-canonical Orthodox church became the leaders in actions of opposition politicians and public figures at the “Euromaidan”. Discussion related to the manifestation of the religious factor in the Ukrainian crisis is primarily focused on the issue of artificial or spontaneous attraction of the religious organizations and their leaders to these events. A high level of confidence of the Ukrainians in the religious leaders, which sometimes greatly exceeds the confidence in politicians and government, is due to that Ukrainian politicians consider religious organizations as a mean of influencing public opinion. Religious concepts justifying the violence of and protests against the regime of Viktor Yanukovych became particularly popular in the Ukrainian events,
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Tourism in Ukraine Anastasia Riabenka, Lyudmyla Yurchuk
    Religious Tourism in Ukraine Anastasia Riabenka, Lyudmyla Yurchuk National University of Food Technologies Introduction. There is a suggestion in the religious world, that prayer is more effective in certain places, in one way or another connected with the history of religion and the blessing of God in the search for a long time the faithful go to pilgrimage tours. Pilgrims visit not only temples, churches, monasteries, and holy rivers, lakes, etc. Religious tourism also commonly referred to as faith tourism, is a type of tourism, where people travel individually or in groups for pilgrimage or leisure (fellowship) purposes. Modern religious tourists are more able to visit holy cities and around the world. The most famous holy cities are Mecca, Madinah, Karbala, Jerusalem and Varanasi. In the research used analysis method and historical method. In a separate area of tourism pilgrimage tours to Ukraine stood out recently. However, the Ukrainian lands can be rightfully called the cradle of Orthodoxy. Since ancient times, there was built a great number of churches, cathedrals and monasteries of great beauty with a high dome and bells. Organization of international pilgrimage tourism in Ukraine is significantly inhibited by the presence of numerous problems, the solution of which is the case of the state, all organizations and institutions involved in tourism. Regions of international pilgrimage tourism can and should be Prykarpattya and Transcarpathia related to culture and memorable places of the peoples related with Catholicism, Judaism, Armenian Church. Kiev, Chernigov, Odessa, Poltava and many other cities are carriers not only of the Christian monoculture and poly-culture both in the pas and in our days.
    [Show full text]
  • The Making of Ethnicity in Southern Bessarabia: Tracing the Histories Of
    The Making of Ethnicity in Southern Bessarabia: Tracing the histories of an ambiguous concept in a contested land Dissertation Zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Philosophie (Dr. phil.) vorgelegt der Philosophischen Fakultät I Sozialwissenschaften und historische Kulturwissenschaften der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, von Herrn Simon Schlegel geb. am 23. April 1983 in Rorschach (Schweiz) Datum der Verteidigung 26. Mai 2016 Gutachter: PD Dr. phil. habil. Dittmar Schorkowitz, Dr. Deema Kaneff, Prof. Dr. Gabriela Lehmann-Carli Contents Deutsche Zusammenfassung ...................................................................................................................................... iii 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Questions and hypotheses ......................................................................................................................... 4 1.2. History and anthropology, some methodological implications ................................................. 6 1.3. Locating the field site and choosing a name for it ........................................................................ 11 1.4. A brief historical outline .......................................................................................................................... 17 1.5. Ethnicity, natsional’nost’, and nationality: definitions and translations ............................
    [Show full text]