Mangoes from India

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mangoes from India Mangoes from India Draft Revised Import Policy July 2004 Draft Revised Import Policy – Mangoes from India Foreword © Commonwealth of Australia 2004 This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organization. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved. Requests for further authorization should be directed to the Commonwealth Copyright Administration, Intellectual Property Branch, Department of Communications, Information Technology and the Arts, GPO Box 2154, Canberra ACT 2601 or by email to [email protected]. Draft Revised Import Policy – Mangoes from India CONTENTS TABLES AND FIGURES ..............................................................................................................................7 TABLES ..........................................................................................................................................................7 FIGURES........................................................................................................................................................7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................................................................................................12 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................................15 PROPOSAL TO IMPORT FRESH MANGOES FROM INDIA ..............................................................16 BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................................................16 SCOPE.........................................................................................................................................................17 AUSTRALIA’S CURRENT QUARANTINE POLICY FOR IMPORTS OF FRESH MANGO FRUIT..............................17 THE FRESH MANGO INDUSTRY.............................................................................................................25 THE MANGO INDUSTRY IN AUSTRALIA .........................................................................................................25 Export of mangoes from Australia .....................................................................................................26 THE MANGO INDUSTRY IN INDIA ..................................................................................................................27 Mango production in India ..................................................................................................................29 Export of mangoes from India............................................................................................................31 PEST RISK ANALYSIS...............................................................................................................................32 STAGE 1: INITIATION ...................................................................................................................................32 STAGE 2: RISK ASSESSMENT......................................................................................................................32 Pest categorisation ..............................................................................................................................32 DETAILED RISK ASSESSMENT FOR QUARANTINE PESTS...........................................................36 ARTHROPODS .............................................................................................................................................36 GROUP 1 – FRUIT FLIES..............................................................................................................................36 Introduction and spread potential ......................................................................................................40 Consequences......................................................................................................................................43 Unrestricted risk estimate ...................................................................................................................44 GROUP 2A – MANGO PULP WEEVIL ............................................................................................................44 Introduction and spread potential ......................................................................................................45 Consequences......................................................................................................................................47 Unrestricted risk estimate ...................................................................................................................48 GROUP 2B – MANGO SEED WEEVIL............................................................................................................48 Introduction and spread potential ......................................................................................................49 Consequences......................................................................................................................................51 Unrestricted risk estimate ...................................................................................................................52 GROUP 3A – ARMOURED SCALES ..............................................................................................................52 Page 3 Draft Revised Import Policy – Mangoes from India Introduction and spread potential ......................................................................................................56 Unrestricted risk estimate ...................................................................................................................59 GROUP 3B – SOFT SCALES ........................................................................................................................59 Introduction and spread potential ......................................................................................................62 Consequences......................................................................................................................................64 Unrestricted risk estimate ...................................................................................................................65 GROUP 3C – MEALYBUGS ..........................................................................................................................65 Introduction and spread potential ......................................................................................................71 Consequences......................................................................................................................................74 Unrestricted risk estimate ...................................................................................................................75 GROUP 3D – PLANT BUGS..........................................................................................................................76 Introduction and spread potential ......................................................................................................77 Consequences......................................................................................................................................79 Unrestricted risk estimate ...................................................................................................................80 GROUP 4A – RED-BANDED MANGO CATERPILLAR .....................................................................................80 Introduction and spread potential ......................................................................................................81 Consequences......................................................................................................................................84 Unrestricted risk estimate ...................................................................................................................84 GROUP 4B – HONEYDEW MOTH..................................................................................................................84 Introduction and spread potential ......................................................................................................86 Consequences......................................................................................................................................88 Unrestricted risk estimate ...................................................................................................................89 GROUP 4C – POMEGRANATE FRUIT BORER...............................................................................................89 Introduction and spread potential ......................................................................................................89 Consequences......................................................................................................................................91 Unrestricted risk estimate ...................................................................................................................92 GROUP 4D – COCOA TUSSOCK MOTH........................................................................................................92 Introduction and spread potential ......................................................................................................93
Recommended publications
  • 1 1 DNA Barcodes Reveal Deeply Neglected Diversity and Numerous
    Page 1 of 57 1 DNA barcodes reveal deeply neglected diversity and numerous invasions of micromoths in 2 Madagascar 3 4 5 Carlos Lopez-Vaamonde1,2, Lucas Sire2, Bruno Rasmussen2, Rodolphe Rougerie3, 6 Christian Wieser4, Allaoui Ahamadi Allaoui 5, Joël Minet3, Jeremy R. deWaard6, Thibaud 7 Decaëns7, David C. Lees8 8 9 1 INRA, UR633, Zoologie Forestière, F- 45075 Orléans, France. 10 2 Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte, UMR 7261 CNRS Université de Tours, UFR 11 Sciences et Techniques, Tours, France. 12 3Institut de Systématique Evolution Biodiversité (ISYEB), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, 13 CNRS, Sorbonne Université, EPHE, 57 rue Cuvier, CP 50, 75005 Paris, France. 14 4 Landesmuseum für Kärnten, Abteilung Zoologie, Museumgasse 2, 9020 Klagenfurt, Austria 15 5 Department of Entomology, University of Antananarivo, Antananarivo 101, Madagascar 16 6 Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E., Guelph, ON 17 N1G2W1, Canada 18 7Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (CEFE UMR 5175, CNRS–Université de Genome Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by UNIV GUELPH on 10/03/18 19 Montpellier–Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier–EPHE), 1919 Route de Mende, F-34293 20 Montpellier, France. 21 8Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, SW7 5BD, UK. 22 23 24 Email for correspondence: [email protected] For personal use only. This Just-IN manuscript is the accepted prior to copy editing and page composition. It may differ from final official version of record. 1 Page 2 of 57 25 26 Abstract 27 Madagascar is a prime evolutionary hotspot globally, but its unique biodiversity is under threat, 28 essentially from anthropogenic disturbance.
    [Show full text]
  • Abacca Mosaic Virus
    Annex Decree of Ministry of Agriculture Number : 51/Permentan/KR.010/9/2015 date : 23 September 2015 Plant Quarantine Pest List A. Plant Quarantine Pest List (KATEGORY A1) I. SERANGGA (INSECTS) NAMA ILMIAH/ SINONIM/ KLASIFIKASI/ NAMA MEDIA DAERAH SEBAR/ UMUM/ GOLONGA INANG/ No PEMBAWA/ GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENTIFIC NAME/ N/ GROUP HOST PATHWAY DISTRIBUTION SYNONIM/ TAXON/ COMMON NAME 1. Acraea acerata Hew.; II Convolvulus arvensis, Ipomoea leaf, stem Africa: Angola, Benin, Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae; aquatica, Ipomoea triloba, Botswana, Burundi, sweet potato butterfly Merremiae bracteata, Cameroon, Congo, DR Congo, Merremia pacifica,Merremia Ethiopia, Ghana, Guinea, peltata, Merremia umbellata, Kenya, Ivory Coast, Liberia, Ipomoea batatas (ubi jalar, Mozambique, Namibia, Nigeria, sweet potato) Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Sudan, Tanzania, Togo. Uganda, Zambia 2. Ac rocinus longimanus II Artocarpus, Artocarpus stem, America: Barbados, Honduras, Linnaeus; Coleoptera: integra, Moraceae, branches, Guyana, Trinidad,Costa Rica, Cerambycidae; Herlequin Broussonetia kazinoki, Ficus litter Mexico, Brazil beetle, jack-tree borer elastica 3. Aetherastis circulata II Hevea brasiliensis (karet, stem, leaf, Asia: India Meyrick; Lepidoptera: rubber tree) seedling Yponomeutidae; bark feeding caterpillar 1 4. Agrilus mali Matsumura; II Malus domestica (apel, apple) buds, stem, Asia: China, Korea DPR (North Coleoptera: Buprestidae; seedling, Korea), Republic of Korea apple borer, apple rhizome (South Korea) buprestid Europe: Russia 5. Agrilus planipennis II Fraxinus americana,
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Basis of Pheromonogenesis Regulation in Moths
    Chapter 8 Molecular Basis of Pheromonogenesis Regulation in Moths J. Joe Hull and Adrien Fónagy Abstract Sexual communication among the vast majority of moths typically involves the synthesis and release of species-specifc, multicomponent blends of sex pheromones (types of insect semiochemicals) by females. These compounds are then interpreted by conspecifc males as olfactory cues regarding female reproduc- tive readiness and assist in pinpointing the spatial location of emitting females. Studies by multiple groups using different model systems have shown that most sex pheromones are synthesized de novo from acetyl-CoA by functionally specialized cells that comprise the pheromone gland. Although signifcant progress was made in identifying pheromone components and elucidating their biosynthetic pathways, it wasn’t until the advent of modern molecular approaches and the increased avail- ability of genetic resources that a more complete understanding of the molecular basis underlying pheromonogenesis was developed. Pheromonogenesis is regulated by a neuropeptide termed Pheromone Biosynthesis Activating Neuropeptide (PBAN) that acts on a G protein-coupled receptor expressed at the surface of phero- mone gland cells. Activation of the PBAN receptor (PBANR) triggers a signal trans- duction cascade that utilizes an infux of extracellular Ca2+ to drive the concerted action of multiple enzymatic steps (i.e. chain-shortening, desaturation, and fatty acyl reduction) that generate the multicomponent pheromone blends specifc to each species. In this chapter, we provide a brief overview of moth sex pheromones before expanding on the molecular mechanisms regulating pheromonogenesis, and con- clude by highlighting recent developments in the literature that disrupt/exploit this critical pathway. J. J. Hull (*) USDA-ARS, US Arid Land Agricultural Research Center, Maricopa, AZ, USA e-mail: [email protected] A.
    [Show full text]
  • Pest and Diseases in Mango (Mangifera Indica L.) J
    PEST AND DISEASES IN MANGO (MANGIFERA INDICA L.) J. González-Fernández, J.I. Hormaza IHSM la Mayora CSIC-UMA, 29750 Algarrobo, Malaga, Spain EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In this work, we review the most important pests and diseases that affect mango production worldwide as well as the main measures implemented to control them. Pests and diseases are the main factors that can impact sustainable mango fruit production in the tropics and subtropics worldwide. Commercial cultivation of mango, characterized by expansion to new areas, changing crop management, replacement of varieties and increased chemical interventions, has altered significantly the pest and disease community structure in this crop in the different mango producing regions. In addition, climate change is inducing the emergence of new pests and, whereas globalization and trade liberalization have created wide opportunities for mango commercialization growth, at the same time, this can result in faster dispersion of pests and diseases among different mango growing areas if proper sanitary measures are not implemented. This review covers different topics related to pests and diseases in mango. First, a thorough description of the main pests and diseases that affect mango is provided. Second, the different approaches used in different mango producing countries for chemical and biological control are described. Third, recommendations for appropriate mango management techiques that include integrated pest and disease management, reduction in the use of chemicals and the implementation of a good monitoring and surveillance system to help control the main pests and diseases, are also discussed. Finally, the current knowledge on agrohomeopathy and Korean Natural Farming is analyzed and recommendations on future lines of research to optimize mango pest and disease control are discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Andhra Pradesh
    PROFILES OF SELECTED NATIONAL PARKS AND SANCTUARIES OF INDIA JULY 2002 EDITED BY SHEKHAR SINGH ARPAN SHARMA INDIAN INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION NEW DELHI CONTENTS STATE NAME OF THE PA ANDAMAN AND NICOBAR CAMPBELL BAY NATIONAL PARK ISLANDS GALATHEA NATIONAL PARK MOUNT HARRIET NATIONAL PARK NORTH BUTTON ISLAND NATIONAL PARK MIDDLE BUTTON ISLAND NATIONAL PARK SOUTH BUTTON ISLAND NATIONAL PARK RANI JHANSI MARINE NATIONAL PARK WANDOOR MARINE NATIONAL PARK CUTHBERT BAY WILDLIFE SANCTUARY GALATHEA BAY WILDLIFE SANCTUARY INGLIS OR EAST ISLAND SANCTUARY INTERVIEW ISLAND SANCTUARY LOHABARRACK OR SALTWATER CROCODILE SANCTUARY ANDHRA PRADESH ETURUNAGARAM SANCTUARY KAWAL WILDLIFE SANCTUARY KINNERSANI SANCTUARY NAGARJUNASAGAR-SRISAILAM TIGER RESERVE PAKHAL SANCTUARY PAPIKONDA SANCTUARY PRANHITA WILDLIFE SANCTUARY ASSAM MANAS NATIONAL PARK GUJARAT BANSDA NATIONAL PARK PURNA WILDLIFE SANCTUARY HARYANA NAHAR SANCTUARY KALESAR SANCTUARY CHHICHHILA LAKE SANCTUARY ABUBSHEHAR SANCTUARY BIR BARA VAN JIND SANCTUARY BIR SHIKARGAH SANCTUARY HIMACHAL PRADESH PONG LAKE SANCTUARY RUPI BHABA SANCTUARY SANGLA SANCTUARY KERALA SILENT VALLEY NATIONAL PARK ARALAM SANCTUARY CHIMMONY SANCTUARY PARAMBIKULAM SANCTUARY PEECHI VAZHANI SANCTUARY THATTEKAD BIRD SANCTUARY WAYANAD WILDLIFE SANCTUARY MEGHALAYA BALPAKARAM NATIONAL PARK SIJU WILDLIFE SANCTUARY NOKREK NATIONAL PARK NONGKHYLLEM WILDLIFE SANCTUARY MIZORAM MURLEN NATIONAL PARK PHAWNGPUI (BLUE MOUNTAIN) NATIONAL 2 PARK DAMPA WILDLIFE SANCTUARY KHAWNGLUNG WILDLIFE SANCTUARY LENGTENG WILDLIFE SANCTUARY NGENGPUI WILDLIFE
    [Show full text]
  • Studies on Wood Boring Insects of Malabar Region of Kerala
    Vol. 5, Issue 1, Pp: (19-25), March, 2021 STUDIES ON WOOD BORING INSECTS OF MALABAR REGION OF KERALA GANA KARIKKAN1 AND SHEIK MOHAMMED SHAMSUDEEN2 1Forest Entomology and GIS Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology, Sir Syed College, Taliparamba, Kannur, Kerala- 670142, India 2Department of Zoology, Mananthavady Campus, Kannur University, Wayanad, Kerala- 670645, India ARTICLE INFORMATION ABSTRACT Article History: The present study of wood boring insect was carried out during the period th Received : 20 March 2021 from February 2019 to January 2020. A Field survey was conducted in Accepted: 18th April 2021 Published online: 17th May 2021 different areas -Thaliparamba, Kannadiparamba, Thottada, Aralam Wildlife Sanctuary (Pookkund, Thullal, Valayamchal) and Elayavoor of Kannur Author’s contribution District. This short-term study recorded 38 species of wood borers. The GK complied all the results and performed the experiments, SMS collected specimens were under 7 Families named Cerambycidae, designed the study and wrote the paper. Curculionidae, Brentidae, Bostrychidae, Platypodidae, Buprestidae and Lyctidae. Cerambycidae was the dominant family followed by Bostrychidae Key words: and least was Brentidae. The collected specimens were pinned, dried and Wood boring insect, survey, Thaliparamba, Wildlife Sanctuary, stored in insect cabinets and kept in Forest Entomology and GIS Research Cerambycidae, Curculionidae, Brentidae Laboratory. 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS 1. INTRODUCTION In Kerala about 53 species of beetles were recorded The present study of wood boring insect was carried as pest of one or more of 46 species of stored timber out during the period from February 2019 to January (Mathew, 1982). Studies on the timber beetles found 2020. Different locations in Malabar region were in the Indian subcontinent were primarily made by selected for the investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae: Ophioninae) Newly Recorded from Japan
    Japanese Journal of Systematic Entomology, 22 (2): 203–207. November 30, 2016. Three Oriental Species of the Genus Enicospilus Stephens (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae: Ophioninae) Newly Recorded from Japan So SHIMIZU 1), 2) and Kaoru MAETO 1) 1) Laboratory of Insect Biodiversity and Ecosystem Science, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Kobe University, Rokkodaicho 1–1, Nada, Kobe, Hyogo 657–8501, Japan. 2) Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Three species of the ophionine genus Enicospilus Stephens, 1835 collected in the Ryukyu Islands, E. abdominalis (Szépligeti, 1906), E. nigronotatus Cameron, 1903, and E. xanthocephalus Cameron, 1905, were newly recorded from Japan. E. abdominalis and E. xanthocephalus are widely distributed in the Oriental region and its neighbouring areas, however E. nigronota- tus is endemic to the Oriental region. Most of the specimens were collected in light traps, and thus the species are presumed to be nocturnal. Introduction (SMZ1500, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) was used for morphological observation. Multi-focus photographs for figure 1 were taken The genus Enicospilus Stephens, belonging to the tribe using a single-lens reflex camera (D90, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) Enicospilini Townes of the ichneumonid subfamily Ophioninae and were stacked by using Zeren Stacker. Figure 2 was taken Shuckard (Townes, 1971; Rousse et al., 2016), comprises over using a digital microscope (VHX-600, Keyence, Osaka, 700 species that are distributed in all biogeographical regions Japan). All figures were edited by Adobe Photoshop© CS5. except for the Arctic (e.g., Yu et al., 2012; Broad & Shaw, 2016). The morphological terminology mainly follows Gauld It is the solitary koinobiont endoparasitoid of middle- to large- (1991) and Gauld & Mitchell (1981).
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of the Insect Pests from Some Orchards in the Middle of Iraq
    1 Plant Archives Vol. 20, Supplement 2, 2020 pp. 4119-4125 e-ISSN:2581-6063 (online), ISSN:0972-5210 SURVEY OF THE INSECT PESTS FROM SOME ORCHARDS IN THE MIDDLE OF IRAQ Hanaa H. Al-Saffar and Razzaq Shalan Augul Iraq Natural History Research Center & Museum, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq. E-mails : [email protected], [email protected] Abstract This study designed at identifying insect pests that attack some trees and shrubs grown in the orchards in different regions, middle of Iraq. The investigation included date palm, citrus, pomegranate trees and grape shrubs. During the survey, 10 species were recorded on date palms (the most infested was Ommatissus lybicus de Bergevin, 1930, followed by Oryctes elegans Prell, 1914), four species on citrus (the most infested was Aonidiella orientalis (Newstead, 1894) followed by whitefly Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood, 1856), one species only on pomegranate ( Aphis punicae Passerini, 1863), and one species Arboridia hussaini (Ghauri, 1963) on Grapes. Given the importance of date palm trees in Iraq, the most important insect pests present and recorded in previous studies have been summarized. Also, the synonyms of the species and their geographical distribution are provided. Keywords : Iraq, Orchards, Pests, Shrubs, Survey, Trees. Introduction pomegranates, figs and grapes randomly during the period from 1 st .March to 1 st .November.2019. There are many tools The orchards in the middle of Iraq are one of the most important by farmers due to the important crops they offer in used to collect the specimens that including: nets, aspirators, the local market, such as dates, citrus fruits, pomegranate, light traps, and also by direct method using the forceps.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    CONTENTS SL. NO. CHAPTERS PAGE NO. NORTH BENGAL WILD ANIMALS PARK: AT A GLANCE 1 CHAPTER I 1.1 INTRODUCTION 3 1.2 MISSION 4 1.3 OBJECTIVE 4 1.4 STRATEGY 4 CHAPTER II 2.1 ADMINISTRATIVE SECTION 5 2.2 ACCOUNTS 5 2.3 ANIMAL SECTION 6 2.4 VETERINARY SECTION 12 2.4.1 DIS-INFECTION PROGRAMME 12 2.4.2 CAMPS ORGANIZED 13 2.5 COMMISSARY SECTION 13 2.6 EDUCATION 13 2.7 RESEARCH 16 2.8 GARDEN SECTION 17 2.9 SANITATION SECTION 17 2.10 SECURITY SECTION 17 2.11 MAINTENANCE SECTION 17 CHAPTER III 3.1 VISITOR STATISTICS 17 3.2 PARKING REVENUE COLLECTED 18 3.3 WHAT THE DIGNITARIES HAD TO SAY 19 EVENTS WORTH SPECIAL MENTION DURING 3.4 THE YEAR 2016-17 20 INAUGURATION OF TIGER SAFARI AND 3.4.1 DIFFERENT OTHER PROJECTS 20 3.4.2 EVENT ORGANISED BY THE RED CROSS SOCIETY 20 3.4.3 YEARLY MEET OF STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD 20 3.4.4 BENGAL TRAVEL MART 20 CHAPTER III 3.4.5 CELEBRATION OF WORLD FORESTRY DAY 20 3.4.6 HUMAN HEALTH CHECK UP CAMP AT TORIBARI 20 3.4.7 ANIMAL HEALTH CHECK UP CAMP AT TORIBARI 21 3.4.8 INDEPENDENCE DAY CELEBRATION 21 3.4.9 RAKSHA BANDHAN CELEBRATION 21 3.4.10 VISIT OF PCCF (HOFF), W.B. 21 VISIT OF MIC (FOREST), PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PCCF 3.4.11 (HOFF), PCCF (GENERAL) AND OTHER FOREST OFFICIALS 21 3.4.12 FISH RELEASE INSIDE THE HERBIVORE SAFARI 21 3.4.13 VISIT OF MEMBER SECRETARY, CENTRAL ZOO AUTHORITY 21 3.4.14 ZOOLOGICAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE TRAINING 21 3.4.15 INAUGURATION OF GHARIAL QUARANTINE ENCLOSURE 21 3.4.16 CHILDREN'S DAY CELEBRATION 22 3.4.17 MORTER SHELL DISCOVERED INSIDE PARK PREMISES 22 PHOTO PLATE I 23 PHOTO PLATE II 24 CHAPTER IV 4.1 BIODIVERSITY OF NORTH BENGAL WILD ANIMALS PARK 25 4.1.1 PRELIMINARY CHECKLIST OF FLORA 25 4.1.2 PRELIMINARY CHECKLIST OF FAUNA 29 ANNEXURE 35 NORTH BENGAL WILD ANIMALS PARK, SILIGURI AT A GLANCE Year of Establishment 2015 Area 297 Hectares Category of Zoo Medium Altitude 80- 100 m Temperature Upto 35ºC highest and 2ºC lowe st Mailing Address North Bengal Wild Animals Park, 5 th Mile, Sevoke Road, Salugara, Siliguri-734008 E-Mail [email protected] Web www.northbengalwildanimalspark.in Zoo Timings 9:00 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Looper Caterpillar- a Threat to Tea and Its Management
    Circular No. 132 September 2010 Looper Caterpillar- a Threat to Tea and its Management By Dr. Mainuddin Ahmed Chief Scientific Officer Department of Pest Management & Mohammad Shameem Al Mamun Scientific Officer Entomology Division BANGLADESH TEA RESEARCH INSTITUTE SRIMANGAL-3210, MOULVIBAZAR An Organ of BANGLADESH TEA BOARD 171-172, BAIZID BOSTAMI ROAD NASIRABAD, CHITTAGONG Foreword Tea plant is subjected to the attack of pests and diseases. Tea pests are localized in tea growing area. In tea, today one is a minor and tomorrow it may be a major pest. Generally Looper caterpillar is a minor pest of tea. Actually it is a major shade tree pest. But now-a-days it is a major pest of tea in some areas. Already some of the tea estates faced the problem arising out of this pest. Under favourable environmental conditions it becomes a serious pest of tea and can cause substantial crop loss. The circular has covered almost all aspects of the pest ornately with significant information, which will be practically useful in managing the caterpillar. Particular emphasis has been given on Mechanical control option as a component of IPM strategies. With timely adoption and implementation of highlighted information in this circular, planters will be able to manage the caterpillar more efficiently in a cost-effective, environment friendly and sustainable way. September 2010 Mukul Jyoti Dutta Director in-charge Looper Caterpillar- a Threat to Tea and its Management Introduction The looper caterpillar, Biston suppressaria Guen. is one of the major defoliating pests of tea plantation in North-East India, causing heavy crop losses.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology of Anar Butterfly, Deudorix Isocrates (Fab.) (Lycaenidae: Lepidoptera) on Pomegranate, Punica Granatum L
    Available online at www.ijpab.com Kumar et al Int. J. Pure App. Biosci. 5 (1): 498-503 (2017) ISSN: 2320 – 7051 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18782/2320-7051.2564 ISSN: 2320 – 7051 Int. J. Pure App. Biosci. 5 (1): 498-503 (2017) Research Article Biology of Anar Butterfly, Deudorix isocrates (Fab.) (Lycaenidae: Lepidoptera) on Pomegranate, Punica granatum L. K. P. Kumar1*, P. D. Kamala Jayanthi2, S. Onkara Naik2, Abraham Verghese3 and A. K. Chakravarthy2 1Department of Agricultural Entomology, University of Agricultural Sciences, Gandhi Krishi Vignan Kendra (GKVK), Bengaluru-560065, Karnataka, India 2Division of Entomology and Nematology, Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Hesseraghatta Lake PO, Bengaluru-560089, Karnataka, India 3GPS Institute of Agricultural Management, Bengaluru- 560 058, Karnataka, India *Corresponding Author E-mail: [email protected] Received: 8.02.2017 | Revised: 20.02.2017 | Accepted: 21.02.2017 ABSTRACT Pomegranate butterfly, Deudorix isocrates is one the most obnoxious pest on pomegranate crop incurring about 65-70 percent of yield loss worldwide. However, the experiment was conducted on biology of pomegranate fruit borer at the laboratory of Division of Entomology and Nematology, ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Hessaraghatta, Bengaluru during 2013-14. Biological studies revealed that gravid female lays shiny white eggs singly on the calyx of flowers or on young fruits. The incubation, larval, prepupal and pupal periods were 7.15 ± 0.10, 32.9 ± 2.38, 4.35 ± 0.12 and 10.25 ± 0.10 days respectively. The adult longevity of male and female was 8.26 ± 0.14 and 10.28 ± 0.20 days respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Crop and Stored Grain Pest and Their Management. (ENTO-4311)
    Lec. 1(p.1 – 2): Introduction of Economic Entomology and Economic Classification of Insect Pests Lec. 2-5 (p.3- 15) Rice: Yellow stem borer, gallmidge, brown planthopper, green leafhopper, hispa, leaf folder, ear head bug, grasshoppers, root weevil, swarming caterpillar, climbing cutworm, case worm, whorl maggot, leaf mite, panicle mite, IPM practices in rice. Lec. 6-8 (p.16- 25) Sorghum and other millets: Sorghum shoot fly, stem borer, pink borer, sorghum midge, ear head bug, red hairy caterpillar, deccan wingless grasshopper, aphids, maize shoot bug, flea beetle, blister beetles, ragi cutworm, ragi root aphid, army worm. Wheat: Ghujia weevil, ragi pink borer, termites. Lec. 9-11 (p. 26- 33) Sugarcane: Early shoot borer, internodal borer, top shoot borer, scales, leafhoppers, white grub, mealy bugs, termites, whiteflies, woolly aphid, yellow mite. Lec 12- 14 (p.34- 47) Cotton: Spotted bollworm, american bollworm, pink bollworm, tobacco caterpillar, leafhopper, whiteflies, aphid, mites , thrips, red cotton bug, dusky cotton bug, leaf roller, stem weevil, grasshoppers, mealybug, IPM in cotton. Lec. 15 (p.48 - 51) Jute: jute semilooper, jute stem weevil, jute stem girdler, Bihar hairy caterpillar Mesta: Hairy caterpillars, stem weevil, mealy bugs, leafhopper, aphid. Sunhemp: Hairy caterpillars, stem borer, flea beetle. Lec. 16-17 (p.52- 59) Pulses: Gram caterpillar, plume moth, pod fly, stem fly, spotted pod borer, cowpea aphid, cow bug, pod bug, leafhopper, stink bug, green pod boring caterpillar, blue butterflies, redgram mite. Pea: pea leaf miner and pea stem fly Soyabean: Stem fly, ragi cutworm, leaf miner, whitefly. Lec. 18 (p.60- 63) Castor: Semilooper, shoot and capsule borer, tobacco caterpillar, leafhopper, butterfly, whitefly, thrips, castor slug, mite.
    [Show full text]