DOCSLIB.ORG

Company Profile

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SUMMER INTERNSHIP RESEARCH PROJECT On the topic “Comparison of marketing strategy a cock&pepsi in Agra.” SUBMITTED TO GLA UNIVERSITY, MATHURA Towards Partial Fulfillment of Requirement for Masters in Business Administration Degree PROJECT GUIDE: SUBMITTED BY: Pravendra Singh Vedprakash Yadav “Sale executive” MBA 2ND Year Of sales&marketing service Roll No.1006370109 Pvt.Ltd. Coca-Cola Agra GLA University Mathura 1 | P a g e ACKNOWLEDGEMENT It is my pleasure to be indebted to various people, most of which were experts in their respective fields, who influenced my thinking, behavior, and acts during the course of study. I am greatly thankful to Mr.A.K.Verma Training and Placemsent GLAIBM Mathura for giving me a platform to have this wonderful opportunity and being able to get glimpses of corporate world. As a fresher for the corporate, I was not having any idea about corporate culture. But I would like to give special thanks to my project guide Mr . Darshan Saxena (training manager) of sales&marketing services Pvt.Ltd. Coca-cola Agra and also great support by pravendra singh (sales executive) who on behalf of his opulent experience, told me about the basic of corporate and guided me which helped me to complete the project efficiently and showed me the right path to reach the final destination with minimum hiccups and was always there with a helping hand in times of need throughout my project. I am thankful to him for his support, cooperation, and motivation provided to me during the completion of project. Last but not the least; I would like to thank Top Management and all the respondents for giving their precious time, relevant information and experience. Lastly, I would like to be thankful my father for their moral and financial support and my friend with whom I shared my day-to-day experience and received lots of suggestions that improved my work quality. 2 | P a g e DECLARATION I, Vedprakash Yadav a student of MBA II Year in GLA University Mathura hereby declare that all the information; facts and figures furnished in this report are based on my own findings and experience. This information has been used for purely academic purpose. I hereby declare the work was done by me and suitable information has been downloaded from websites and other related resources of the company. The project report is the result of my own hard work and self belief. 3 | P a g e ABSTRACT Soft drinks are playing the vital role in the market and the companies are also getting the good profits on these products. The soft drinks industry has originated in 1772. Now these drinks spread all over the world and the millions of bottles is consumed every day. Now this business is a global one and the companies are facing high competition in this business and they are changing their strategies according to the situations. Pearl Beverages Pvt. Ltd. Takes a great care to maintain quality control of products in their factory. The bottles are visually examined for impurities continuously, as the bottles move out. Samples are checked every ten minutes of production time by the chemist for its quality and hygienic condition. The chemical analysis is also flavours, gas contain and sugar percentage. The appearance, smell and taste of the production are suspended and the correcting measures are taken also as to sent right the bottling process. The main objective of the study is to find out the strength and weakness of the Pepsi in Agra zone when compared to the Coca-cola, that is mainly in the three places in Agra, Firozabad And Hathras . Consulting almost all the outlets in these three areas, which are selling the soft drinks with a structured questionnaire, has done the study. The data has been collected and analyzed and interpreted by the help of the graphical representation technique. The analysis revels the various strengths and weaknesses of Pepsi in these areas along with the position of competitors. The most of the consumers preferred soft drinks because of better taste and to quench out their thrust. But now days, due to the changing food habits consumers have started adding the soft drinks in their food habits. The total sales of the soft drinks the Pepsi’s share is more but when compared with the Cock the number of outlets are less than Cock. Finally it can be concluded that the industry needs lot of channel management activities to do along with various promotional strategies for the customers. I wish the company got its objectives achieved 4 | P a g e CONTENTS Chapter No Title 1. INTRODUCTION & DESIGN OF THE STUDY 1.1 About the Marketing topic 1.2 Need of the Study 1.3 Hypothesis 1.4 Objective of the Study 1.5 Research Methodology 1.6 Limitations of the Study 1.7 Chapter Plan of the Study 2. ORGANIZATION PROFILE 2.1 Genesis and Growth 2.2 Organization Structure 2.3 Production Function 2.4 HR Function 2.5 Finance Function 2.6 Marketing Function 2.7 Future Plans 3. THEORITICAL FRAMEWORK 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Topic Coverage 3.3 How it relates to Marketing Management 3.4 Measuring Performance 5 | P a g e 4. DATA ANALYSIS & INTERPRETATION 5. SUMMARY & SUGGESTIONS 5.1 Summary 5.2 Major findings 5.3 Suggestions 5.4 Implications for Owners / Managers 5.5 conclusions 5.6 Scope for the Future research 6. BIBLIOGRAPHY & QUESTIONNAIRE 6.1 Bibliography 6.2 Questionnaire 6 | P a g e CHAPTER-1 Introduction & Design of the Study 7 | P a g e 1.1 INTRODUCTION In this chapter various accepts of study are going to be discussed. To which area of management that study belongs to and various concepts that are related the area of study. The present outcomes under marketing and deals in the specific with the distribution network and its management. PEPSI COLA was in India from 1956-61 and left the country, as its products were not acceptable by the Indian customers. But recently in 1990 it re-entered the Indian market, where by PEPSI FOODS LIMITED was entered into a joint venture with PEPSI INTERNATIONAL, TATA and VOLTAS. PEPSI Bottlers and Producers of soft drinks buy concentrate and sell at fixed price and add a margin rationally for its products. 8 | P a g e 1.2 NEED OF THE STUDY In modern days, market plays a vital role in rapidly changing industrial scenario. The marketing decline is under going reappraisal in the light of vast goals, technological, economic and social changes being faced by the today companies. The order to known the changes in the field of marketing it are necessary to conduct market survey. Study is conducted considering the following accepts: Firstly, visage is a representative of soft drink market which is highly promoting with a lot of potential which is at to be tapped. Secondly the behavior of the retailer is very much influenced by the additional benefits he is getting for selling the products having. Thirdly to understand the market condition of the soft drinks in the present scenario and the competition level in the market. Considered the key role of the retailer in present day market as an attempt was made to study the impact of company’s schemes of offering coolers to the retailers. 9 | P a g e 1.3 SCOPE OF THE STUDY There is lot of scope for the further study in the project. Further study can be done in the following ways. We can make a study on Pepsi and Cock companies’ efficiency in their promotion activities. The same study can be conducted in other areas under bottling unit to generalize the finding for entire area under it. There is chance to know whether the Pepsi and Cock are doing the right thing regarding the sales promotion, product quality, discounts and advertising. A study on impact of visit coolers sales of Pepsi also be taken up. 10 | P a g e 1.4 OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY In view of intensifying competition in soft drink market, it is imperative that a brand keeps a constant, which on them market and response properly and promptly to the dynamics of the market. It is in view of this fact has the present study has been taken up for “PEPSI”. To know and compare the merchandising of Pepsi and Cock in retail outlets. To know the promotional activities of sales promotion, advertising and public relations. To know the strategy of Pepsi and its competitors regarding the Marketing Mix. To know the problems of retailers regarding the trade schemes and consumer offers. To identify the retailers opinion towards Pepsi products. To know the problems of retailers and to offer the suggestion for improving in sales. 11 | P a g e 1.5 METHODOLOGY Introduction: In this chapter, basically the methodology, by which the report has been prepared, is explained. The exact need for conducting the study and total design of framework of the report prepared is discussed. The limitations of the study are also discussed here. According to the survey beverages can be classified into two segments. The first segment can be done basing on the milk content, like milk based products like tea, coffee, flavoured milk, and health drinks (milk, malt and coco) and the second segment can be done on non-milk products such as soft drinks and mineral water. According to the survey conducted on the consumption of beverages, Tea comprises 90%, filtered coffee 4%, beverages 2%, instant coffee 2% and carbonated soft drinks just above 1% of total consumption.
Recommended publications
  • Case 23 Pepsico's

    Case 23 Pepsico's

    BFV GROUP : Beatrice Teresa Colantoni, Francesco Morgia, Valentina Palmerio. PepsiCo’s Business Case – CASE 23 PEPSICO’S HISTORY. PepsiCo, Inc., was established in 1965 when PepsiCola and Frito-Lay shareholders agreed to a merger between the salty-snack icon and soft-drink giant. The new company was founded with annual revenues of $510 million and such well-known brands as Pepsi-Cola, Mountain Dew, Fritos, Lay’s, Cheetos, Ruffles, and Rold Gold. By 1971, PepsiCo had more than doubled its revenues to reach $1 billion. The company began to pursue growth through acquisitions outside snacks and beverages as early as 1968, but its 1977 acquisition of Pizza Hut significantly shaped the strategic direction of PepsiCo for the next 20 years. The acquisitions of Taco Bell in 1978 and Kentucky Fried Chicken in 1986 created a business portfolio described by Wayne Calloway (PepsiCo’s CEO between 1986 and 1996) as a balanced three-legged stool. Calloway believed the combination of snack foods, soft drinks, and fast food offered considerable cost sharing and skill transfer opportunities. PepsiCo strengthened its portfolio of snack foods and beverages during the 1980s and 1990s, adding also quick-service restaurant. By 1996 it had become clear to PepsiCo management that the potential strategic-fit benefits existing between restaurants and PepsiCo’s core beverage and snack businesses were difficult to capture. In 1997, CEO Roger Enrico spun off the company’s restaurants as an independent, publicly traded company to focus PepsiCo on food and beverages. Soon after the spinoff of PepsiCo’s fast-food restaurants was completed, Enrico acquired Cracker Jack, Tropicana, Smith’s Snackfood Company in Australia, SoBe teas and alternative beverages, Tasali Snack Foods (the leader in the Saudi Arabian salty-snack market), and the Quaker Oats Company.
  • People & Economic Activity

    People & Economic Activity

    PEOPLE & ECONOMIC ACTIVITY STARBUCKS An economic enterpise at a local scale Dr Susan Bliss STAGE 6: Geographical investigation ‘Students will conduct a geographical study of an economic enterprise operating at a local scale. The business could be a firm or company such as a chain of restaurants. 1. Nature of the economic enterprise – chain of 5. Ecological dimension restaurants, Starbucks • Inputs: coffee, sugar, milk, food, energy, water, • Overview of coffee restaurants – types sizes and transport, buildings growth. Latte towns, coffee shops in gentrified inner • Outputs: carbon and water footprints; waste. suburbs and coffee sold in grocery stores, petrol stations and book stores. Drive through coffee places • Environmental goals: sustainability.‘Grounds for your and mobile coffee carts. Order via technology-on garden’, green power, reduce ecological footprints demand. Evolving coffee culture. and waste, recycling, corporate social responsibilities, farmer equity practices, Fairtrade, Ethos water, • Growth of coffee restaurant chains donations of leftover food 2. Locational factors 6. Environmental constraints: climate change, • Refer to website for store locations and Google Earth environmental laws (local, national). • Site, situation, latitude, longitude 7. Effects of global changes on enterprise: • Scale – global, national, local prices, trade agreements, tariffs, climate change, competition (e.g. McDonalds, soft drinks, tea, water), • Reasons for location – advantages changing consumer tastes. Growth of organic and • Growth in Asian countries https://www.starbucks. speciality coffees. Future trends – Waves of Coffee com/store- locator?map=40.743095,-95.625,5z Starbucks chain of restaurants 3. Flows Today Starbucks is the largest coffee chain in the world, • People: customers – ages as well as the premier roaster and retailer of specialty • Goods: coffee, milk, sugar, food coffee.
  • Quaker Sees an ROI of Over 6X by Reaching Amazon Shoppers on Amazon and Across the Web1

    Quaker Sees an ROI of Over 6X by Reaching Amazon Shoppers on Amazon and Across the Web1

    Case Study Amazon.com | Amazon Advertising Platform (AAP) Quaker sees an ROI of over 6X by reaching Amazon shoppers on Amazon and across the web1 The Quaker Oats company, a leading manufacturer of packaged grocery The AMG Solution foods and subsidiary of PepsiCo, Inc., worked with Amazon Media Quaker and AMG launched a campaign using custom Group (AMG) to drive purchase considerations and sales of Quaker coupon ads that ran on Amazon.com and amplified Oatmeal Squares Cereal. They assumed the AMG campaign would campaign reach with the Amazon Advertising Platform deliver on their objectives on Amazon, but they were also interested (AAP). The AMG campaign also revealed exact groups in learning what effect the campaign would have on offline sales in of Amazon customers who were who were most likely traditional brick and mortar stores. Through a mix of standard AMG to take action after exposure to their ads such as those post-campaign measurements and AMG’s partnership with Nielsen who were in-market for other grocery products. With HomeScan, Quaker was able to better understand the effect of their carefully targeted ads served across Amazon and campaign on key success metrics – both on and offline. AAP, Quaker maximized exposure among groups that mattered most, yielding a strong ROI. Online Success Metrics Total Campaign ROI For every $1 spent on advertising with Amazon, Quaker recognized over $6 in incremental sales Offline Sales Boost ¡ 26% lift in offline sales as a result of the on-Amazon portion of the campaign ¡ 29% lift in offline sales as a result of the AAP portion of the campaign On-Amazon Success Metrics On average, users who were exposed to Quaker ads were: ¡ 5x more likely to consider Quaker Oatmeal Squares versus those who weren’t ¡ Almost 2x more likely to purchase Quaker Oatmeal Squares versus those who weren’t About The Quaker Oats Company: The Quaker Oats Company, headquartered in Chicago, is a Methodology unit of PepsiCo, Inc., one of the world’s largest consumer packaged goods companies.
  • View Annual Report

    View Annual Report

    2 Letter to Shareholders 10–11 Financial Highlights 12 The Breadth of the PepsiCo Portfolio 14 Reinforcing Existing Value Drivers 18 Migrating Our Portfolio Towards High-Growth Spaces Table 22 Accelerating the Benefits of of Contents One PepsiCo 24 Aggressively Building New Capabilities 28 Strengthening a Second-to-None Team and Culture 30 Delivering on the Promise of Performance with Purpose 33 PepsiCo Board of Directors 34 PepsiCo Leadership 35 Financials Dear Fellow Shareholders, Running a company for the long • We delivered +$1 billion savings term is like driving a car in a race in the first year of our productiv- that has no end. To win a long race, ity program and remain on track you must take a pit stop every now to deliver $3 billion by 2015; and then to refresh and refuel your • We achieved a core net return car, tune your engine and take other on invested capital3 (roic) of actions that will make you even 15 percent and core return on faster, stronger and more competi- equity3 (roe) of 28 percent; tive over the long term. That’s what • Management operating cash we did in 2012—we refreshed and flow,4 excluding certain items, refueled our growth engine to help reached $7.4 billion; and drive superior financial returns in • $6.5 billion was returned to our the years ahead. shareholders through share repurchases and dividends. We invested significantly behind our brands. We changed the operating The actions we took in 2012 were model of our company from a loose all designed to take us one step federation of countries and regions further on the transformation to a more globally integrated one to journey of our company, which enable us to build our brands glob- we started in 2007.
  • IN the COURT of CHANCERY of the STATE of DELAWARE in Re

    IN the COURT of CHANCERY of the STATE of DELAWARE in Re

    IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE In re PEPSIAMERICAS, INC. : Consolidated C.A. No. 4530-VCS SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION : VERIFIED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT Plaintiffs Philadelphia Public Employees Retirement System (“Philadelphia PERS”), The General Retirement System of the City of Detroit (“Detroit General”), The Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit (“Detroit P&F”), the City of Ann Arbor Employees’ Retirement System (“Ann Arbor”) and Beverly Rosman (“Rosman,” and collectively with Philadelphia PERS, Detroit General, Detroit P&F and Ann Arbor, “Plaintiffs”), by and through their undersigned counsel, upon knowledge as to themselves and upon information and belief as to all other matters, allege as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. Plaintiffs are holders of common stock of PepsiAmericas, Inc. (“PAS” or the “Company”). Plaintiffs bring this action individually and as a class action on behalf of all holders of PAS common stock other than the defendants and their affiliates. Plaintiffs seek injunctive and other equitable relief in connection with the proposal of PepsiCo, Inc. (“PepsiCo”) to acquire all of the PAS’ outstanding shares that PepsiCo does not already own for a combination of cash and stock valuing PAS at $23.27 per share (the “Proposed Merger”). 2. PepsiCo simultaneously offered to acquire Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc. (“PBG” and with PAS, the “Companies”) at $29.50 per share, and has made consummation of a merger with either bottler contingent on consummating a merger with the other. PepsiCo’s offers are timed and structured to favor PepsiCo and promise a paltry 17.1 percent premium over the closing prices of the Companies’ stock on April 17, 2009, the last trading day prior to PepsiCo’s announcement of the Proposed Merger.
  • Online Appendix: Not for Publication the Competitive Impact of Vertical Integration by Multiproduct Firms

    Online Appendix: Not for Publication the Competitive Impact of Vertical Integration by Multiproduct Firms

    Online Appendix: Not For Publication The Competitive Impact of Vertical Integration by Multiproduct Firms Fernando Luco and Guillermo Marshall A Model Consider a market with NU upstream firms, NB bottlers, and a retailer. There are J inputs produced by the NU upstream firms and J final products produced by the NB bottlers. Each final product makes use of one (and only one) input product. All J final products are sold by the retailer. The set of products produced by each upstream i j firm i and bottler j are given by JU and JB, respectively. In what follows, we restrict j j to the case in which the sets in both fJBgj2NB and fJU gj2NU are disjoint (i.e., Diet Dr Pepper cannot be produced by two separate bottlers or upstream firms). We allow for a bottler to transact with multiple upstream firms (e.g., a PepsiCo bottler selling products based on PepsiCo and Dr Pepper SG concentrates). The model assumes that linear prices are used along the vertical chain. That is, linear prices are used both by upstream firms selling their inputs to bottlers and by bottlers selling their final products to the retailer. The price of input product j set by an upstream firm is given by cj; the price of final good k set by a bottler is wk; and the retail price of product j is pj. We assume that the input cost of upstream firms is zero, and the marginal costs of all other firms equals their input prices. The market share of product j, given a vector of retail prices p, is given by sj(p).
  • Form 10-Q United States Securities and Exchange Commission Washington, D.C

    Form 10-Q United States Securities and Exchange Commission Washington, D.C

    FORM 10-Q UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 (Mark One) X QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended March 20, 1999 (12 weeks) ------------------------------ OR TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number 1-1183 [GRAPHIC OMITTED] PEPSICO, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) North Carolina 13-1584302 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporate or organization) Identification No.) 700 Anderson Hill Road, Purchase, New York 10577 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) 914-253-2000 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) N/A (Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES X NO Number of shares of Capital Stock outstanding as of April 16, 1999: 1,476,995,019 PEPSICO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES INDEX Page No. Part I Financial Information Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income - 12 weeks ended March 20, 1999 and March 21, 1998 2 Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows - 12 weeks ended
  • CASE 1-3Coke and Pepsi Learn to Compete in India

    CASE 1-3Coke and Pepsi Learn to Compete in India

    CASE 1-3 Coke and Pepsi Learn to Compete in India they had to finance their own R&D in order to find a substitute THE BEVERAGE BATTLEFIELD ingredient. Many failed and quickly withdrew from the industry. In 2007, the President and CEO of Coca-Cola asserted that Coke Competing with the segment of carbonated soft drinks is an- has had a rather rough run in India; but now it seems to be getting other beverage segment composed of noncarbonated fruit drinks. its positioning right. Similarly, PepsiCo’s Asia chief asserted that These are a growth industry because Indian consumers perceive India is the beverage battlefield for this decade and beyond. fruit drinks to be natural, healthy, and tasty. The leading brand has Even though the government had opened its doors wide to for- traditionally been Parle’s Frooti, a mango-flavored drink, which eign companies, the experience of the world’s two giant soft drinks was also exported to franchisees in the United States, Britain, Por- companies in India during the 1990s and the beginning of the new tugal, Spain, and Mauritius. millennium was not a happy one. Both companies experienced a range of unexpected problems and difficult situations that led them to recognize that competing in India requires special knowl- OPENING INDIAN MARKET edge, skills, and local expertise. In many ways, Coke and Pepsi In 1991, India experienced an economic crisis of exceptional sever- managers had to learn the hard way that “what works here” does ity, triggered by the rise in imported oil prices following the first Gulf not always “work there.” “The environment in India is challenging, War (after Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait).
  • Horizons BR 5.32.04

    Horizons BR 5.32.04

    w E N horIzoNS TradE Show Koury Convention Center • Greensboro, NC JUNE 15, 2016 Greetings to our Industry Partners! Welcome to the New Horizons Trade Show! We appreciate your attendance and participation in this annual event. Our membership enjoys this opportunity to meet with you and to examine your products. We hope you will find the Trade Show beneficial for your company. The staggered entry by membership classifi - cation has been provided to give you optimum time with all of our members. Please join me in thanking the Trade Show Committee under the leadership of Amelia Holland and Dawn Roth. This committee has worked hard all year to make this event beneficial for you and for our members. On behalf of each member of the association, I want to thank you for the many things you do at the local level as well as state level for School Nutrition. Many of you have contributed time and resources that have strengthened our effectiveness in serving the students of North Carolina. I look forward to speaking with you during the show. Thanks again for your support! Alison Francis SNA-NC President 2015-2016 Greetings and Welcome to the 2016 New Horizons Trade Show! The continued growth of this annual event exemplifies the strong relationship between industry and the membership of the School Nutrition Association of North Carolina. This show provides our members with ample opportunities to network with industry and exchange ideas and product information. Your commitment to School Nutrition is what continues to make it one of the best Trade Shows around.

  • Some Suppliers Worry About Tesla Tion’S Internal Deliberations

    . ****** TUESDAY, AUGUST 21, 2018 ~ VOL. CCLXXII NO. 43 WSJ.com HHHH $4.00 DJIA 25758.69 À 89.37 0.3% NASDAQ 7821.01 À 0.1% STOXX 600 383.23 À 0.6% 10-YR. TREAS. À 14/32 , yield 2.823% OIL $66.43 À $0.52 GOLD $1,186.80 À $10.30 EURO $1.1484 YEN 110.07 What’s Long Wait Ends With an Embrace for Separated Korean Families U.S. News Toughens Business&Finance Stance esla’s tumultuous year On China Thas fueled concern among some suppliers about the electric-car maker’s fi- Tariffs nancial strength, after pro- duction of the Model 3 BY BOB DAVIS drained some of its cash. A1 AND ANDREW DUEHREN PepsiCo agreed to buy WASHINGTON—The Trump seltzer-machine maker administration is moving SodaStream for $3.2 billion, closer this week to levying tar- the company’s latest move iffs on nearly half of Chinese to broaden its offerings. A1 imports despite broad opposi- Tyson Foods struck a tion from U.S. business and deal to acquire Keystone the start of a fresh round of Foods, a top meat supplier talks between the U.S. and to McDonald’s and other China aimed at settling the chains, for $2.16 billion. B1 trade dispute. The twin administration ini- France’s Total is having tiatives—pursuing tariffs on difficulty unloading its $200 billion of Chinese goods stake in a $5 billion natu- while relaunching talks to ral-gas project in Iran to a scrap tariffs—reflect a split Chinese partner.
  • MASTER UPC June08

    MASTER UPC June08

    PCBC of Marysville & Manhattan UPC List PROD UPC DESCRIPTION SIZE PACK NUMB CODE 12oz 12pk PET 502 Pepsi 12pk 0 12000 00830 6 2-12pks 503 Dt Pepsi 12pk 0 12000 00831 3 2-12pks 510 Mt Dew 12pk 0 12000 00832 0 2-12pks 511 Dt Mt Dew 12pk 0 12000 00833 7 2-12pks 550 Dr Pepper 12pk 0 78000 00602 5 2-12pks 551 Dt Dr Pepper 12 pk 0 78000 00603 2 2-12pks 16.9oz 12pk PET 1302 Pepsi 12pk 0 12000 10200 4 2-12pks 1303 Dt Pepsi 12pk 0 12000 10201 1 2-12pks 1310 Mt Dew 12pk 0 12000 10203 5 2-12pks 1311 Dt Mt Dew 12pk 0 12000 10737 5 2-12pks 20oz Pet 602 Pepsi 20 oz 0 12000 00129 1 24 loose 603 Dt Pepsi 20 oz 0 12000 00130 7 24 loose 607 CF Dt Pepsi 20 oz 0 12000 00121 5 24 loose 690 Cherry Pepsi 20 oz 0 12000 00559 6 24 loose 691 Dt Cherry Pepsi 20 oz 0 12000 00579 4 24 loose 686 Dt Pepsi Vanilla 20 oz 0 12000 81189 0 24 loose 677 Dt Pepsi Max 20 oz 0 12000 01880 0 24 loose 610 Mt Dew 20 oz 0 12000 00131 4 24 loose 611 Dt Mt Dew 20 oz 0 12000 00134 5 24 loose 692 Code Red 20 oz 0 12000 00224 3 24 loose 618 Live Wire 20 oz 0 12000 81131 9 24 loose 613 Sierra Mist 20 oz 0 12000 00354 7 24 loose 612 Sierra Mist Free 20 oz 0 12000 20115 8 24 loose 628 Sierra Mist Orange 20 oz 0 12000 02786 4 24 loose 629 Sierra Mist Free Orange 20 oz 0 12000 02794 9 24 loose 634 Mug Rootbeer 20 oz 0 12000 00910 5 24 loose 636 DEWmocracy Volt Rasp 20 oz 0 12000 02862 5 24 loose 637 DEWmocracy Rev Berry 20 oz 0 12000 02866 3 24 loose 638 DEWmocracy Nova Straw 20 oz 0 12000 02870 0 24 loose 650 Dr Pepper 20 oz 0 78000 08240 1 24 loose 651 Dt Dr Pepper 20 oz 0 78000 08340
  • Final Project a PROJECTON PEPSICO. STING ENERGY DRINK

    Final Project a PROJECTON PEPSICO. STING ENERGY DRINK

    Final Project A PROJECT ON PEPSI CO. STING ENERGY DRINK (2011) ------------------------------------------------- Submitted By: FFaarrhhaan Abbiid 11663322--110099000044 Ghulam Shabbir 1632-109007 MBA (Marketing) ------------------------------- Approved by: _________________________________________ _________________________________________ _ Dean Faculty of Marketing Project Supervisor Inner Title A PROJECT ON PEPSI CO. STING ENERGY DRINK A PROJECT SUBMITTED TO THE PIMSAT INSTITUTE OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER IN BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION (MARKETING) BY FARHAN ABID & GHULAM SHABBIR MASTER IN BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION FACULTY OF MARKETING, PIMSAT INSTITUE OF HIGHER EDUCATION, PAKISTAN 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS SSeerriiaall DDeessccrriippttiioonn PPaaggeNN oo.. CCeerrttiiffiiccaatteess vviiii--iixx Acknowledgements x DDeeddiiccaattiioonn xxii EExxeeccuuttiivveSS uummmmaarryy xxiiii CChhaapptteerNN oo.11 IInnttrroodduuccttiioon TTo EEnneerrggy DDrriinnkk 1133--1144 11..11 IInnggrreeddiieennttsOO fEE nneerrggyDD rriinnkk 1155--1188 11..22 EEffffeeccttss 1199--2200 11..33 AAtttteemmppttsTTo BBaa nn 2211 11..44 HHiissttoorryy 2222--2244 11..55 CCaaffffeeiinnaatteedAA llccoohhoolliicEE nneerrggyDD rriinnkkss 2255--2266 11..66 AAnnttii--EEnneerrggyDD rriinnkkss 2277 11..77 HHiiddddeenRR iisskks 2277--2288 CChhaapptteerNN oo.22 IInnttrroodduuccttiioonTT oPP eeppssii 2299--3300 22..11 CCoommppaannyOO vveerrvviieeww 3311--3322 22..22 ABB rriieefPP eeppssiHH iissttoorryy 3333--4400 22..33 MMiissssiioonn 4411