Petrology and Diagenesis of the of the Boone Formation
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
PETROLOGY AND DIAGENESIS OF THE Sl-IOHT CREEK OOLITE MEMBER OF THE BOONE FORMATION, NORTHEAST OKLAHOMA By DAVID W. VADEN I\ Bachelor of Science in Arts and Sciences Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma 1984 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahome State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December, 1987 PETROLOGY AND DIAGENESIS OF THE SHORT CREEK OOLITE MEMBER OF THE BOONE FORMATION, NORTHEAST OKLAHOMA Thesis Approved: ~-~:~::: ____________ _ ~ ______ 1!11/::km~_11 __j)_4&4~-- Dean of the Graduate College ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to sincerely thank Dr. Zuhair Al-Shaieb for his friendship, support, and ever-patient guidance. I feel very fortunate to have had the opportunity to know and work with him and shall always value his friendship. I also wish to express my sincere gratitude to Dr. Doug Kent for his friendship and assistance over the past four years. In addition, thanks go to Ors. Kent and Scott Ritter for their participation as members of my committee. Special thanks go to Curt McCormick and to Peter Bayley for their assistance in the field and laboratory. Many thanks to the University Center for Water Research for their funding of a geochemical and hydrogeological study of acidic mine drainage in the Tri-State area; work I con- ducted on this topic was largely responsible for the interest generated concerning the geology of the area. Sincere thanks go to members of my family for their sup- port and encouragement during this long process. E}:plicitly, thanks go to my parents, Gene and Beverly; and to Jan and Robin, my sisters; and to Robert Landrum. Members of my wife's family to whom I extend my gratitude include her par- ents, Thomas and Elma Ray; and to Beverly, David, Janet, and Julie Ray; and to Perry and Carol Ray. iii Finally, my greatest thanks go to my wife for her un- wavering encouragement and support, even in the midst of her own graduate study and thesis. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. INTRODUCTION AND PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS. • 1 Introduction • • • • • • • • • • • 1 Location of Study Area • • • • • • 2 Physiography •••••• • • • 2 Methodology. • • • • • • • • • . • . • • . 5 Previous Investigations. 9 Purpose of Investigation • • • • • . • . 13 II. OUTCROP GEOLOGY • • 15 Exposures of the Short Creek Oolite. 15 Outcrop 1. • • • • • • •••••• 18 General • • • • • • • • • • • • • 18 The Joplin Member • • • • • • • • 18 The Short Creek Oolite Member • • 21 The Baxter Springs Member • • • • • • 24 The Moccasin Bend Member ••••••• 26 Outcrop 2. • • • • • • • • 27 General . 27 The .Joplin Member •••••••••• 27 The Short Creek Oolite Member •••• 32 The Baxter Springs Member • • 33 Outcrop 3. • . • • . • • 34 General • . • . • . • . • . 34 The Short Creek Oolite Member • . 34 The Baxter Springs Member • • • • • • 42 The Moccasin Bend Member. • • • • 43 I I I. STRATIGRAPHY OF THE BOONE FORMATION • • 45 General Stratigraphic Features • • • • 45 The Boone Formation. • • • • • • • 47 The Osage Series • • • • • • • ••••• • 49 The St • .Joe Limestone Member. • • 49 The Reeds Spring Member • • • • • • • 57 The Grand Falls Member ••••• • 59 The .Joplin Member •••••••. • • 63 The Short Creek Oolite Member • • 64 The Baxter Springs Member • 72 The Meramec Series • • • • • • • • • • 76 v J Bed Subunit ••••••• • • • 76 The Moccasin Bend Member •• • • • 77 IV. STRUCTURE OF THE TRI-STATE AREA • • 79 Regional Structural Setting. • . 79 Local Structural Setting • 84 Miami Trough. • • • • • • . • . • • • 89 Seneca Graben • • • • • • 92 Bendelari Monocline •• 93 Geology of the Ore Bodies. • • 94 v. DEPOSITION OF UPPER OSAGE STRATA. • • 98 General Features • • • • • • . 98 Development and Recognition of Facies ••• 104 Oolitic Shoal Facies. • .107 Inner Shelf Facies. • • • •• 109 Outer Shelf Faci es. • • • 112 Environmental Summary . 113 VI. PETROGRAPHY OF THE SHORT CREEK OOLITE .117 General Petrographic Features and Classification • • • • • • • • • 117 Allochemical Constituents •• • . • 118 Oaids . .118 Superficial Grains. • • 121 Aggregate Grains. • • • • • • 124 Peloids • • • • • • • .124 Skeletal Debris •• .125 Terrigenous Clastic Constituents • .134 Detrital Quartz •• .134 Detrital Clays •••• .134 Diagenetic Constituents. .137 Calcite Cements ••• • 137 Si 1 ica. • • .143 Glauconi te. • • • • • • • • • • 147 Pyrite. • • • • • • • 150 Dolomite •• • .150 VII. DIAGENESIS OF THE SHORT CREEK OOLITE. .155 Ooid Genesis • • • • • • • • • • • • • 155 Cortical Fabric as a Function of Original Mineralogy. • . • 155 Cortical Fabric as a Function of Hydrodynamic Conditions •• .156 Short Creek Ooids • • • • • • • .158 Diagenesis of the Short Creek Oolite Discussion and Paragenesis •• .159 Early Diagenesis. • • ••• .162 Shallow Burial ••••• .163 Deeper Burial • • .•• • • • 171 Late Diagenesis <Telogenesis> • .174 Paragenetic Summary ••••••••• .178 vi VIII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS • • • • • . .183 Short Creek Stratigraphy • • .183 Structure of the Study Area. • .184 Deposition of the Short Creek •• • •• 184 Petrography of the Short Creek • .185 Diagenesis of the Short Creek. • •• .187 Future Research. • ••• .188 BIBLIOGRAPHY •.••.• •• 190 vii LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Location of northeastern Oklahoma study area • 4 2. Physiographic divisions of the Ozark region. 7 3. Geologic map-Short Creek exposures • 17 4. Exposures at Outcrop 1 • • 20 5. Idealized measured section-Outcrop 1 • 23 6. Exposures at Outcrop 2 • . 29 7. Idealized measured section-Outcrop 2 • . 31 8. Exposures at Outcrop 3 • . 36 9. Idealized measured section-Outcrop 3 . • 38 10. Stylolitization at Short Creek-Baxter Springs contact. • 41 11. Boone members vs. informal letter designati?n· • 51 12. Stratigraphic comparison by author • • 53 13. Cross-section of regional facies development • • 61 14. Map of well locations-Kansas • • 69 15. Cross-section along line E-F'. 71 16. Regional structure of Ozark Anticline. • 81 17. Cross-section illustrating tilting in pre-Chattanooga time • • 83 18. Cross-section illustrating tilting in Early Pennsylvanian. • 86 19. Detail map of local structures . • 88 viii Figure Page 20. Map of local structures. • • 91 21. Mined areas of the Oklahoma-Kansas field • • 96 22. Paleogeographic and lithofacies map. • .101 23. Paleoceanographic and paleobathymetric map • .103 24. Idealized diagram of sedimentary environment •• 106 25. Local facies depicted in cross-section • • • 116 26. Ooid nucleation on pelmatozoan skeletal debris .120 27. Concentric cortical fabric • • .123 28. Composite cortical fabric. .123 29. Syntaxial calcite overgrowths on pelmatozoan skeletal debris. • • • • • .127 30. Neomorphosed gastropod fragment. .130 31. Bryozoan fragment. • • • • • p • •• 133 32. Detrital quartz with syntaxial quartz overgrowth • • • • • • • • •• 136 33. Stylolites and clayey residuum • .136 34. Early calcite cements •• • .139 35. Equant calcite cements • .142 36. Ooid silicification. • .146 37. Fibrous chalcedony • .149 38. Replacement of ooid by glauconite •• .152 39. Replacement of ooid by glauconite and silica •• 152 40. Typical x-ray diffraction curve. • .154 41. Diaganetic zones •• • • 161 42. Late, fracture-filling calcite cements • • .173 43. Development of oomoldic porosity •• • .177 ix F igure Page 44. Schematic paragenetic sequence . .180 >: CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION AND PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS Introduction Northern Ottawa County, Oklahoma, is important as the site of extensive commercial exploitation of zinc and lead ores from the Tri-State District. These ore deposits are largely confined to the Mississippian Boone Formation. As a result, the literature contains many studies on mining geology, local structures, a~d Boone Formation stratigraphy. Comparatively little has been published, however, concerning the sedimentation, petrography, and diagenesis of the Boone Formation, or its various members. The Short Creek Oolite Member of the Boone Formation was chosen for such a study because of its unique lithologic character, and because it has been mapped on the surface. The Short Creek Oolite is a thin, but persistent bed of oolitic limestone which outcrops widely along the Neosho and Spring Rivers, and their tributaries, in Ottawa County, Oklahoma. The unit is also exposed to the south in Delaware County, Oklahoma and in southwest Missouri; it is also known in the subsurface of southeast Kansas. 1 2 Location of Study Area The area under investigation is located in eastern and southeastern Ottawa County, Oklahoma <Figure 1). Adjacent areas in Delaware County, Oklahoma, and in Kansas and Missouri have been visited during the course of this investigation, but exposures of the Short Creek Oolite are mainly limited to the indicated area. After investigating many different exposures, three out- crops were selected for detailed study. Their locations are presented as follows: Outcrop 1 is located at NEl/4, Sec.29, T27N, R24E, and occurs along the east bank of the Neosho River a few hundred feet upstream of its confluence with the Spring River; Outcrop 2 is located at NEl/4, NWl/4, Sec.13, T26N, R23E, and occurs along a nameless tributary to the \ head-waters of Grand Lake; Outcrop 3 is located at SW1/4, NWl/4, Sec.35, T27N, R24E, and occurs along State Highway 10 about 2 miles southeast of Wyandotte, Oklahoma. Physiography The northeastern Oklahoma study area occurs on the southwestern flank of the Ozark uplift. The Ozark uplift is a broad asymmetric dome occupying an area of approximately 40,000 square miles in Missouri, Arkansas, and Oklahoma <Huffman, 1958,