Star Formation History and Environment of the Dwarf Galaxy
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 1–11 (XXX) Printed 12 November 2018 (MN LATEX style file v2.2) Star formation history and environment of the dwarf galaxy UGCA92⋆ Lidia Makarova1,2†, Dmitry Makarov1,2,3, Sergey Savchenko4 1Special Astrophysical Observatory, Nizhniy Arkhyz, Karachai-Cherkessia 369167, Russia 2Isaac Newton Institute of Chile, SAO Branch, Russia 3Universit´eLyon 1, Villeurbanne, F-69622, France; CRAL, Observatoire de Lyon, St. Genis Laval, F-69561, France 4Astronomical Institute, Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia Accepted XXX. Received XXX; in original form XXX ABSTRACT We present a quantitative star formation history of the nearby dwarf galaxy UGCA 92. This irregular dwarf is situated in the vicinity of the Local Group of galaxies in a zone of strong Galactic extinction (IC 342 group of galaxies). The galaxy was resolved into stars with HST/ACS including old red giant branch. We have constructed a model of the resolved stellar populations and measured the star formation rate and metallicity as function of time. The main star formation activity period occurredabout 8 – 14 Gyr ago. These stars are mostly metal-poor, with a mean metallicity [Fe/H] ∼−1.5– −2.0 dex. About 84 percent of the total stellar mass was formed during this event. There are also indications of recent star formation starting about 1.5 Gyr ago and continuing to the present. The star formation in this event shows moderate enhancement from ∼ 200 Myr to 300 Myr ago. It is very likely that the ongoing star formation period has higher metallicity of about −0.6 – −0.3 dex. UGCA92 is often considered to be the companion to the starburst galaxy NGC1569. Comparing our star formation history of UGCA92 with that of NGC1569 reveals no causal or temporal connection between recent star formation events in these two galaxies. We suggest that the starburst phenomenon in NGC 1569 is not related to the galaxy’s closest dwarf neighbours and does not affect their star formation history. Key words: galaxies: dwarf – galaxies: formation – galaxies: evolution – galaxies: stellar content – galaxies: individual: UGCA 92 arXiv:1203.1397v1 [astro-ph.CO] 7 Mar 2012 1 INTRODUCTION into account loose associations of dwarf galaxies (Tully et al. 2006), most of the galaxies within 3 Mpc are not isolated ob- Dwarf galaxies are most numerous objects in the Universe. jects. The nearby group around IC 342 is obscured by strong The question of star formation in dwarf galaxies is extremely Galactic extinction (see Fig. 1). The IC 342-Maffei complex important for understanding of their origin and evolution. should have significant impact on dynamic and evolution The local Universe (610 Mpc) is particularly important and of the nearby Universe. Unfortunately, the ‘Zone of Avoid- convenient for studying dwarf galaxies. Nearby galaxies are ance’ hides this region from us and a determination of main resolved into individual stars, which allow us to study stel- properties of galaxies behind it is a challenge. lar population of these galaxies directly. In the last decades, significant progress has been achieved in the study of re- In the framework of the study of the structure of the solved stellar populations due to the Hubble Space Telescope nearby Universe (HST project 9771) we have obtained the (HST ) and new large ground-based telescopes. images of dwarf galaxies within IC 342/Maffei complex. In About 50 per cent of nearby galaxies are situated in the present work we have considered the star formation his- groups and clouds (Makarov & Karachentsev 2011). Taking tory of the dwarf irregular galaxy UGCA 92, which has for a long time been considered to be the closest neighbour of the nearest starburst galaxy NGC 1569 (Karachentsev et al. ⋆ Based on observations made with the NASA/ESA Hubble 1994b; Makarova & Karachentsev 2003). Space Telescope, obtained from the data archive at the Space Telescope Science Institute. STScI is operated by the Associa- The small irregular galaxy UGCA 92 was discovered by tion of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc. under NASA Nilson (1974) and independently catalogued as a possible contract NAS 5-26555. planetary nebula by Ellis et al. (1984). CCD observations † E-mail: [email protected] of Hoessel et al. (1988) partially resolving it into individ- c XXX RAS 2 Makarova et al. Figure 1. Location of the IC 342/Maffei complex of galaxies in Galactic coordinates. Colours denote galaxy type. The IRAS extinction map is shown in grey scale. ual stars in the g and r passband images first showed that Table 1. General parameters of UGCA 92. UGCA 92 (EGB 0427+63) is a dwarf irregular galaxy. Hodge h m s & Miller (1995) detected 25 H ii regions within UGCA 92, R.A.(J2000) 04 32 03.5 [2] Dec (J2000) +63◦36′58′′ [2] concentrated in two well-separated regions of the galaxy. The reddening, measured from the emission-line spectra for size, arcmin 2.0 × 1.0 [3] bright H ii regions is E(B − V ) = 0.90 ± 0.08 and the mean Linear diameter, kpc 3.1 [1] oxygen abundance is about 13 per cent solar, with an uncer- (m − M)0, mag 27.41 ± 0.25 [1] tainty of 50 per cent. Karachentsev & Kaisin (2010) carried Distance, Mpc 3.03 ± 0.35 [1] out Hα flux measurement for UGCA 92 and derived a cur- BT , mag 15.22 [4] rent star formation rate of log(SFR) = −1.51 M⊙/yr. (B − V )T , mag 1.34 [4] The general parameters of UGCA 92 are presented in V3′ , mag 14.55 [5] Table 1. The total magnitudes, colours and central surface I3′ , mag 12.87 [5] JT , mag 12.38 [6] brightnesses, µ(0), are not corrected for Galactic extinction. KsT , mag 11.12 [6] −2 µ(0)B , mag arcsec 25.1 [4] −2 µ(0)V , mag arcsec 24.18 ± 0.01 [5] −2 2 THE DATASET µ(0)I , mag arcsec 22.61 ± 0.01 [5] E(B − V ), mag 0.79 ± 0.13 [7] The dwarf irregular galaxy UGCA 92 was observed aboard AI , mag 1.54 ± 0.25 [7] HST using Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS) at March −1 28, 2004 (SNAP 9771, PI I. Karachentsev). Two exposures VLG, kms 93 [8] MB, mag −15.61 [1] were made with the filters F606W (1200 s) and F814W (900 8 MHI , M⊙ 1.56 × 10 [8] s). An ACS image of the dwarf galaxy is shown in Fig. 2. MHI /LB 0.55 [8] The photometry of resolved stars in the galaxy was per- 1 Fraction of old stars (12–14 Gyr), % 84 ± 7 [1] formed with the ACS module of the dolphot package for Metallicity of old stars, [Fe/H], dex −2.0 – −1.5 [1] crowded field photometry (Dolphin 2002) using the recom- Fraction of young stars (500 Myr), % 7.6 ± 0.7 [1] −1 −1 mended recipe and parameters. Only stars with photometry hSFRi, 12 – 14 Gyr ago, M⊙ yr 1.2 ± 0.1 × 10 [1] −1 −2 of good quality were included in the final list, following rec- hSFRi, last 500 Myr, M⊙ yr 4.3 ± 0.6 × 10 [1] ommendations given in the dolphot User’s Guide. We have selected stars with signal-to-noise (S/N) > 5 in both filters, [1] this work; [2] LEDA; [3] Karachentsev et al. (2004); 2 [4] Karachentseva et al. (1996); [5] Sharina et al. (2008); χ 6 2.5 and |sharp| 6 0.3. The resulting colour-magnitude [6] Vaduvescu et al. (2005); [7] Schlegel et al. (1998); [8] Be- diagram contains 32699 stars (Fig. 3). gum et al. (2008) Artificial star tests were performed using the same re- duction procedures to estimate photometric errors, crowd- edness and blending effects in the most accurate way. A large library of artificial stars was generated spanning the necessary range of stellar magnitudes and colours so that the distribution of the recovered photometry is adequately 1 http://purcell.as.arizona.edu/dolphot/ sampled. The photometric errors and completeness are pre- c XXX RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–11 Star formation history of UGCA92 3 Figure 2. HST /ACS image of UGCA 92 in F606W filter. The image size is 3.4 × 3.4 arcmin. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 1 1 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 completeness 0.2 completeness 0.2 0 0 −1 −0.5 −0.5 , mag , mag ∆ ∆ 0 0 0.5 0.5 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 F606W, mag F814W, mag Figure 4. Photometric errors and completeness for UGCA 92. The top panels show the completeness, i.e. the fraction of artificial stars recovered within the photometric reduction procedure, as a function of the F606W and F814W magnitudes. The bottom panels give the difference between the measured and the true input magnitude (∆mag = measure − input). The error bars are 1 σ residuals. sented in Fig. 4. The 1 σ photometric precision is 0.07 at 3 COLOUR-MAGNITUDE DIAGRAM F814W = 25 and 0.19 at F814W = 27 mag. Malmquist bias becomes notable for stars with F814W > 26.8 mag. In All resolved stars are significantly shifted to redder colours F606W the 1 σ photometric precision is 0.06 at 26 and 0.18 due to high extinction in the Zone of Avoidance of the at 28 mag. Milky Way. The diagram is typical for dwarf irregular galax- ies. A pronounced upper main sequence (MS) and proba- ble helium-burning blue loop stars are found at F606W − c XXX RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–11 4 Makarova et al.