Environmental and Social Monitoring Report

Semi-Annual Report December 2019 to June 2020 January 2021

CAM: Third Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Services Sector Development Program

Prepared by the Ministry of Rural Development for the Asian Development Bank.

CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 31st December 2020)

Currency unit - Riel (KHR) KHR1.00 = $ 0.00024396 $1.00 = KHR _4099

ABBREVIATIONS

ADB - Asian Development Bank AP - Affected People CC - Commune Council CCA - Climate Change Assessment COC - Code of Conduct CPF - Community Participatory Framework DBST - Double Bitumen Sealing Treatment DP - Development Partner DRM - Disaster Risk Management ECCAS - Environment and Climate Change Adaptation Specialist EHSO - Environmental Health and Safety Officer EMAP - Environmental Management Action Plan EMP - Environmental Management Plan FS - Feasibility Study GAP - Gender Action Plan GRM - Grievance Redress Mechanism HSE - Health, Safety and Environment IEE - Initial Environmental Examination IP - Indigenous People IPPF - Indigenous People Planning Framework IR - Involuntary Resettlement KE - Key Expert MIS - Management Information System MOE - Ministry of Environment MRD - Ministry of Rural Development NGO - Non-Government Organization NKE - Non-Key Expert NSP - National Strategic Plan OHS - Occupational, Health and Safety PAM - Project Administration Manual PCU - Project Coordination Unit PDRD - Provincial Departments of Rural Development PE - Polyethylene PIC - Project Implementation Coordination PPMS - Project Performance Management System PPT - Provincial Project Team RAP - Resettlement Action Plans RGC - Royal Government of Cambodia RP - Resettlement Plan RWSS - Rural Water Supply and Sanitation RWSSH - Rural Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene RWSSP2 - Second Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Project SDP - Sector Development Program SIA - Social Impact Assessments SPS - Safeguard Policy Statement TRWSSS-SDP - Third Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Services Sector Development

Program VDC - Village Development Committee WSUG - Water and Sanitation User Group

WEIGHTS AND MEASURE

ha - hectare m - meter km - kilometer l/s - Liters per second masl - Meters above sea level mm - millimetre oC - Degree Centigrade dBA - Decibel mg/l - Milligram per liter

NOTE

In this report, "$" refers to US dollars.

This Semi-Annual Environmental and Social Safeguards Monitoring Report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature.

In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

Contents Executive SUMMARY ...... 3 I. INTRODUCTION and project Overview ...... 7 A. Project at a Glance ...... 7 B. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT...... 7 C. DESCRIPTION OF SUB-PROJECTS ...... 8 II. Environmental Performance MONITORING ...... 10 A. Summary of Compliance with EMP Requirements (Environmental Performance) ...... 11 B. Issues for Further Action ...... 15 C. Other activities ...... 16 III. Involuntary Resettlement Performance Monitoring ...... 16 A. Summary of Compliance with IR Requirements ...... 21 B. issues for further action...... 22 IV. Indigenous Peoples safeguard Monitoring (for projects with Cham Minorities) ...... 23 A. Summary of Compliance with IP Requirements ...... 24 B. issues for further action ...... 24 V. Gender Monitoring ...... 25 A. Summary of Compliance with GAP Requirements ...... 26 B. issues for further action ...... 26 VI. Occupational, Health and Safety (OHS) Performance Monitoring ...... 26 VII. Information Disclosure and Socialization including Capability Building ...... 27 VIII. Grievance Redress mechanism ...... 29 IX. Conclusions ...... 30 A. Important Results from the Implementation of EMAP/EMP and RP Monitoring ...... 30 B. Recommendations to improve EMAP/EMP and RP management, implementation, and monitoring ...... 31 C. Conclusions from the social safeguard monitoring ...... 31 D. Social Safeguard follow up actions for TWRSS SDP ...... 31 X. Annexes ...... 32 Annex 1 - Lists of Public Participation ...... i Annex 2 - Photographs ...... vii Annex 3 – Supporting Document : Change of Village Name due to Mistake – Community Pond in Kampot Province ...... ix Annex 4 – Locations of New Drilled Wells – Batch I Sub-Projects...... x

figure 1 Location map of target provinces ...... 8 figure 2 Location map of batch 1 a and 1b subprojects ...... 9

table 1. Number of water supply and sanitation facilities, batch i, by province ...... 10 table 2. Community ponds under construction, batch 1 (1a&1b) as of 8th july 2020...... 11 table 3. Summary of ir impact assessments, batch i sub-projects (sddr july 2019) ...... 16 table 4. Area required for pond expansion ...... 18 table 5. Dates of community consultation – batch 2 ...... 20 table 6. Summary- batch i sub-projects – presence of ip/ethnic minority ...... 23 table 7. Summary of community consultations ...... 27

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i) This report is the Semi-annual Environmental and Social Safeguards Monitoring Report for the Third Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Services Sector Development Program (TRWSS-SDP), covering the period from December 2019 to June 2020 with a note that the Project implementation activities had not started in December 2019. ii) During this reporting period the Batch 1 sub-projects have reached the stage of construction of water and sanitation facilities and Batch II sub-projects at the stage of completing the feasibility study reports. iii) The planning and preparation of Batch 1 and Batch 2 subprojects include (i) dissemination of project information to affected communities; (ii) participatory consultations including transect walks, FGDs and surveys; (iii) identification of vulnerable people, Indigenous Peoples or Ethnic Minorities, and consultations with them; (iv) signing agreement between the donor and the MRD in case voluntary donation (v) signing agreement of shared used for drilled wells that are located on an individually owned land, but will be used by a number of households via the water and sanitation users groups. iv) There are 15 sub-projects under Batch 1A and 1B. Subprojects refer to project activities at a commune level, e.g. all project activities in commune A is considered as one subproject. The Batch 1A and 1B subprojects include the following improvement of water supply and sanitation facilities 1) rehabilitation of 21 community ponds, 2) construction of 754 new drilled wells, 3) rehabilitation of 31 drilled wells, 4) rehabilitation of 70 dug wells, 5) establishment of 2 small piped-water supply systems, 6) provision of 45,211 rainwater jars, 7) subsidies for 6,462 household latrines, and 8) construction of 78 public latrines and provision of 76 Polyethylene (PE) tanks. v) As of July 2020, civil work under Batch 1a and 1b has reached approximately 45% completion. The household latrines have reached almost 10% completion, rainwater jars and plastic tanks 10% and, for new drilled wells is also about 10% completed. vi) Environment: The project classification for environment is Category B for all subprojects. Each subproject of Batch 1A and 1B was classified as “C” for environment which meant conducting an IEE was not necessary during this period. The IEE/EMP for Batch 1 (1A and 1B) was updated to include COVID 19 Health and Safety Plan. The environmental impacts of the project were positive, and the few potential negative impacts were considered temporary, short-term and were mitigated to an acceptable level with the proposed mitigation and water quality monitoring measures. vii) Resettlement: The project was classified as Category C for Involuntary Resettlement (IR). There has been no involuntary resettlement impacts on any sub-project to date for all sub-project under batch 1A and 1B as the land required for the project was predominantly community land or else was donated voluntarily following process and procedures set out specifically for this project and as guided by the Community Participatory Framework (CPF). viii) For the construction of new drilled wells, the land is provided by the owner of the land where the well is located for shared use among members of the Water and Sanitation Users Group (WSUGs) comprising 15 to 25 HHs. The required plot for the drilled well location is 5m x 5m or equivalence to 25 m2. For Batch I sub-projects, 754 landowners have agreed to provide this small plot of land for location of the 754 new drilled wells. ix) The 21 community ponds to be rehabilitated under Batch I require an additional land of

3

26,135 m2 for expansion. All the community ponds are located on public land and the ponds expansion did not involve private land except in the case of one pond in Trapaing Kuy in Kampot Province that requires private land donation by 2 families. The project follows the CPF in all processes pertaining to land used by the project. x) Voluntary land donation documents required for the Batch I sub-projects had been completed and collected prior to the start of construction activities. As per CPF requirements, ADB safeguard team subsequently advised that all the donation documents and agreement on shared use had to be amended. This is to ensure adequate proof of full consultation in the process of donating the land/assets and with the clarity that there are no adverse impacts on the affected persons. The Project initially adopted the formats of land donation documents that was used in the Second Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Project due to the absence of the social safeguard specialist during the initial Project period. All the land donation documents under Batch I Sub-Projects as well as Batch 2 Sub-Projects are to be recollected and presented in the next semi-annual safeguard Monitoring Report which is due by end of January 2021. xi) Indigenous People: The project was classified as category B for Indigenous People impact. The sub-projects in Batch 1A and 1B included Indigenous People and/or ethnic minorities as target beneficiaries due to improved access to safe potable water and sanitation services/facilities. Batch 1 sub-projects have been classified as "C" while the other batch 2 to 4 yet to be confirmed. xii) During this reporting period the presence of the Cham community was confirmed in Tayov village, Taing Samraong commune, Phnom Srouch district, Kampong Speu Province. The PPT reported that the Cham people account for 20% of the total village population. Members of the Cham community in Tayov village have participated actively in the sub-project activities and been informed at each stage of the sub-project. xiii) To ensure that potential environmental problems are detected and addressed appropriately, environmental monitoring is conducted during subproject implementation. During construction, the key tasks is to monitor the compliance with environmental mitigation measures provided in the EMP/COC and water quality monitoring for each subproject by the Provincial Department of Rural Development (PDRD) with oversight from the Project Coordination Unit (PCU). Environmental monitoring was conducted by the community including the Water and Sanitation User Group (WSUG) who are providing community feedback during construction. This will continue through operation. All the subprojects are classified under environmental impact category C at the Feasibility design stage. Implementation of batch 1A and 1 B is currently underway and the Generic EMP will be included in all bidding documents. xiv) The Project Coordination Unit (PCU) recruited Non-Key Experts (NKEs), (2 experts for each province) to work full time with the Provincial Project Team (PPT) that have been established in Provincial Department of Rural Development (PDRD). NKE and PPT staff are responsible for implementation of the project activities, to carry out commune and village work plans, the formation of Water and Sanitation User Groups (WSUGs), capacity building, environmental and social safeguard monitoring through fieldworks and online communication. The meetings and field visits are conducted weekly to check status of the construction of water supply and sanitation facilities. This is documented in weekly and monthly progress reports. xv) Monitoring was conducted by PCU and PIC jointly 3 times throughout the construction period i.e. at the start, during and at the end of construction. The PPTs and NKEs conducted monitoring once a week for the construction and operation phases as well as

4

maintaining constant communication with the commune chief, village chiefs and contractors through telegram during the construction period. xvi) From 6-9 July 2020, environmental monitoring was conducted by the Environmental and Climate Change Adaptation Specialist (ECCAS) with the participation of Capacity Building and Gender Specialists. The Social Safeguard Specialist of the PIC and PCU were not yet on board during this reporting period. The monitoring activities included field visits and site inspections, consultations and focused group discussions with the stakeholders and concerned provincial and local authorities. During the field survey, 18 consultation meetings were held to collect primary data and information regarding compliance of the Environmental Monitoring Plan (EMP) / Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) implementation and gender issues. In total 83 persons including 21 (25%) women participated. xvii) Consultation meetings also took place as part of the participatory design process for the 18 subprojects under Batch 2. The consultations were held both at commune and village levels. The participants included PCU and PPT representatives, commune chiefs, commune council members, village development committee (VDC) members and community members. The meetings provided the platform for disclosure of project information and for the communities and local authorities to gain understanding of the importance of water, sanitation and hygiene improvement, raise the needs for improvement of the situation in the commune and ask questions regarding the sub- project designs. In total 438 persons, including 93 (21%) women participated xviii) The WSUGs and other members in the community such as Village Development Committee (VDC), Focal persons, and Commune Council (CC) have monitored safeguards including water quality by observation. They are responsible for reporting to the PPTs. xix) Corrective measures: For batch 1A and 1B, there were corrective measures applied as recommended in the due diligence report for Batch I. These include: (1) inclusion of the Generic Environmental Management Plan (EMP) in the contract documentation; (2) the introduction and dissemination of Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) to the potentially affected people before the construction; and (3) consideration of ethnic and religious minority groups such as Cham in the public consultation and socialization process. These have been implemented during this reporting period. xx) The name of one pond, out of the two ponds implemented in Kampot Province, had to be corrected due to a mistake in specifying the village name in the Feasibility Study Report. The village of Trapaing Korky was incorrectly mentioned as Srae Chreuv. There is no change of the geographical location nor the size of the community pond. The original proposal was the community pond in Trapaing Korky village not in Srae Cheuv village. This has now been corrected and documented in Annex 3 and a contract variation has been completed. xxi) There were no major concerns observed in the work sites during the current monitoring period. Issues associated with most construction works have been observed such as generation of dust causing air pollution in localized areas and nuisance noise from operation of equipment and transport and haul vehicles. These issues are isolated and generally away from community areas. Inadequate waste management has been observed in most of the work sites visited. These impacts can, however, be readily mitigated as per the approved EMPs.

5

Recommendations xxii) All the community ponds under construction should take appropriate measures to mitigate the potential adverse impacts, especially waste management at construction sites. The project will follow up on this matter and ensure contracts are sufficiently clear regarding waste management obligations. This obligation will be brought to the contractors’ attention prior to contract signing. xxiii) Soil erosion risks should be minimized, or if possible, eliminated in the work sites. Slope stabilization measures should accordingly be established were necessary. Excavation works should not be undertaken during rainy periods; and xxiv) The Contractor shall at all times coordinate with the Project Implementation Consultants (PIC), Provincial Project Team (PPTs), Non-Key Experts (NKEs) and site supervisors to ensure works are efficiently and effectively undertaken. This would also ensure that the stakeholders and Affected People (Aps) in the area are properly informed of the implementation and duration of the project. They should also be informed of the Grievance Redress Mechanism including the names and phone numbers of the members of the GRM committee. PCU will organize to have a sign board at the village where constructions are being carried out that display the GRM contact persons. xxv) Water sampling and laboratory testing of water facilities in batch 1A and 1B has not been completed. The project’s team are currently reviewing water quality in the context of the project implementation. MRD’s water quality testing laboratory has started operation in December 2020 and water quality testing should be completed xxvi) Improvement of social safeguards documentation following the CPF’s requirements including i) revision of donation form, ii) revision of shared use agreement letter (for drilled well), and iii) revision of public meeting minutes and records of relevant documents. xxvii) Overall social safeguard monitoring including the functioning of the Grievance Redress Mechanism in all participating provinces to be strengthened

6

I. INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT OVERVIEW

A. PROJECT AT A GLANCE Project Number Third Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Services Sector Development Program and Title (TRWSS-SDP) – ADB Loans CAM 3832/3833/Grants 0670/0671 Safeguards Environment The project overall is category B with the sub-project’s Category category C Indigenous Peoples B Involuntary Resettlement C Reporting Period 01 December 2019 to 30 June 2020 Last Report Date 15th July 2020 Outputs % Accomplished 45% Output 1: Rural water supply infrastructures and services improved and expanded. 10% Output 2: Rural sanitation infrastructure and Key sub-project services improved and expanded. activities since last 10% report: Output 3: Institutional capacity improved.

• The project is a continuing project of the RWSSP-2 . The key activities include the rehabilitation of existing community ponds, dug wells and drilled wells and constructions of new drilled wells, provision of rainwater jars, constructions of household and public latrines as well as behavior change promotion and capacity building activities. • Feasibility study reports of all subprojects (18 subprojects) of Batch 2 have been drafted and submitted to ADB for review and comments. • All proposed water supply and sanitation facilities in Batch 1 have been procured and civil works have been awarded to construction companies namely Hout Chhoeun Construction Co., Ltd for community ponds and Drilled/dug Wells; Ung Kim Heng Construction Co., Ltd for latrines in lot4 and water jars and Peng Sour Construction Co., Ltd for latrines, small water pipe system and Polyethylene (PE) water tank in lot 1, 2, and 3. • During this reporting period, construction of five out of all proposed community ponds in Batch 1, is progressing (45% completed) . The rest have yet to start . • Changes of surrounding environment: None • Status of Permits/Consents: 100% completed for Batch 1 but Batch 2 is under the progress. Report Prepared by Long Kheng / William Crawford / Khaim Sophornn / PIC team

B. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT

1. The Third Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Services Sector Development Program Sector Development Program (SDP) supports the Royal Government of Cambodia’s (RGC) efforts to provide universal access to water supply, improved sanitation, and safe hygiene behavior in rural areas by 2025. The SDP comprises of a project, financed by loan and grants to expand rural water supply and sanitation (RWSS) services in at least 11 districts in 10 provinces (See Figure 1 for location map of target provinces), and a program, financed by a policy-based loan, under which the Asian Development

7

Bank (ADB) will support governance and institutional improvements in RWSS financing, planning and asset registration and information management.

FIGURE 1LOCATION MAP OF TARGET PROVINCES

C. DESCRIPTION OF SUB-PROJECTS

2. The project consists of approximately 40 Sub-Projects. Subprojects refer to project activities at the commune level, e.g. all project activities in commune A is considered as one subproject. T h e Subprojects will be implemented in 4 batches. The first batch consists of two stages (Batch 1A and Batch 1B) and the implementation of this Batch is scheduled for completion in 2020. The second, third and fourth will follow subsequently. (See Figure 2 for location of Batch 1A and 1B Sub-Projects).

8

FIGURE 2 LOCATION MAP OF BATCH 1 A AND 1B SUBPROJECTS

3. Batch 1 is divided into two parts: (i) Batch 1A subprojects, prepared under the project design technical assistance (PPTA) and (ii) Batch 1B subprojects, prepared under RWSSP2 additional financing (AF). Table 1 below presents the sub-projects of Batch 1 by Province.

4. The procurement for Batch I was prepared in advance and this allowed for contracts to be awarded as soon as the loan was effective. These sub-projects are under implementation. Batch 1A subprojects cover the following (i) Sambuor commune, Mongkol Borei district Banteay Meanchey province; (ii) Prey Khpos Commune, Bavel District, Battambang province; (iii) Peam Commune, Samakki Meanchey district, Kampong Chhnang province; (iv) Tang Samroang Commune, Phnom Sruoch district, Kampong Speu province; (v) Chhuk Khsach Commune, Baray District, Kampong Thom province, (vi) Lbeuk Commune, Chhuk District, Kampot province; (vii) Samroang Commune, Phnom Kravanh District, Pursat province; and (viii) Lveaeng Ruessei Commune, Chi Kraeng District, Siem Reap province.

Batch 1B subprojects were designed during the first half of 2020, and construction started in July 2020. These subprojects are located in; (i) Phum Thmei Commune, Thmar Poiuk District, Banteay Meanchey province; (ii) Hab Commune, Koas Krala District, Battambang province; (iii) Koas Krala Commune, Koas Krala District, Battambang province; (iv) Tang Krasang Commune, Tuek Phos District, Kampong Chhnang province; (v) Ti Pouk Commune, Santuk District, Kampong Thom province; and (vi) Ansa Chambak Commune, Krakor District, Siem Reap province. Works to be implemented under subprojects 1A and 1B include rehabilitation of community ponds, rehabilitation and/or construction of dug wells, construction of drilled wells, provision of rainwater jars, construction of household latrines, construction of public latrines, and rainwater collection tanks for schools and health centers.

9

Table 1. Number of water supply and sanitation facilities, Batch I, by Province

PROVINCES DESCRIPTION TOTAL KCN KSP KPT KTM SRP PUS BTB BMC WATER SUPPLY COMPONENT Rehabilitation of community 8 2 2 9 21 ponds Small piped 2 0 2 water systems Rehabilitation of 3 7 43 8 9 70 hand-dug wells Rehabilitation of 22 0 0 5 0 4 31 drilled wells New drilled wells 206 14 91 152 113 76 70 32 754 Rainwater jars 5,766 3,210 1,890 4,466 9,623 8,571 8,793 2,892 45,211 (1,000 litters) Rainwater PE tank (10,000 6 4 2 3 11 13 16 12 76 litters) SANITATION COMPONENT Household 916 215 426 947 930 1,352 1,168 508 6,462 latrines Public latrine 12 4 2 5 10 15 16 14 78 Resources: Procurement Record as of July 2020

II. ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING

5. The monitoring was undertaken in the target provinces of Batch 1A and 1B by environmental and social specialists from PCU, PPTs, PIC and local authorities and local communities relevant. The monitoring activities were conducted in July in 2 target provinces namely Kampot and Kampong Speu Province. There were 5 of 21 community ponds approved for Batch 1 that are currently being constructed (See table 2 below).

6. In Kampong Speu Province, 3 of 14 community ponds have been excavated. These are located in Srae Srov, Phum Thmey and Krang Thom villages in Tang Samraong Commune, Phnom Sruoch District. Tang Samraong commune is mainly located in a floodplain area while portions of the commune, (two villages) are located along the stream, which is connected to Stung Prek Thot. The commune can be accessed via a Double Bitumen Sealing Treatment (DBST) road from the National Road No. 4 at the entrance gate to Prey Romeat pagoda.

7. In Kampot Province, the two community ponds proposed for rehabilitation are being constructed during the time of the monitoring. These are in Trapeang Korky and Trapeang Kuy Villages, Lbeuk Commune in Chhuk District. The said community ponds are in an elevated location as the terrain in the area is relatively hilly.

8. Table 2 presents the brief description of the community ponds inspected during the monitoring period. Only five community ponds out of all the planned water supply and sanitation facilities had started rehabilitation or construction at that time.

9. All community ponds for Batch 1 in Kampong Speu and Kampot provinces had no change to the size or volume from the original feasibility study. The pond sizes are as detailed in Table 2 below. One pond in Kampot province had the village name incorrectly documented during the FS study and

10

subsequent FS report. The village of Trapaing Korky was incorrectly named as Srae Chreuv. The geographical location and the size of the community pond did not change; the proposed community pond is in Trapaing Korky village and not in Srae Cheuv village. It was a reporting error. (See Annex 3). A contract variation had been completed relating to this change. This change of name has no impact and does not affect the local people and beneficiaries, the land contribution or the design due to the volume of the pond remaining the same as in the proposal for water supply improvement.

10. IEE/EMP and/or Environmental Code of Conduct (COC) were prepared and approved last year for the implementation and have been disclosed on ADB’s webpage. The IEE/EMP has been updated to include COVID 19 Health and Safety Plan.

Table 2. COMMUNITY PONDS UNDER CONSTRUCTION, BATCH 1 (1A&1B) as of 8th July 2020.

% of Number of No. Province Village Pond (Size) construction Pond Completed Krang Thum 45x45x6m Size 1 0% Thmei 45x45x6m Size 1 60% Kanda 45x45x6m Size 1 0% 1 Kampong Speu Srae Chrov 45x45x6m Size 1 65% Ta Youv 45x45x6m Size 1 60% Chrey Sen Chey 45x45x6m Size 3 0% Trapeang Kuy 50x30x6m Size 1 50% 2 Kampot Trapeang Korky 50x30x6m Size 1 50% Ta Ong 45x45x6m Size 1 0% 3 Siem Reap Rumchey Chroh 45x45x6m Size 1 0% Sranal Village 140x50x6m Size 1 0% Ta Meaeng Pok 40x40x6m Size 1 0% Srae Prey 40x40x6m Size 1 0% Thma Dab 40x40x6m Size 1 0% 4 Banteay Meanchey Sambuor Village 120x50x6m Size 1 0% Kok Svay Village 50x33x6m Size 1 0% Thmei Lech Village 71x55x6m Size 1 0% Thmey Kandal Village 65x42x6m Size 1 0% Thmey Tboung Village 70x36x6m Size 1 0% TOTAL 21

A. SUMMARY OF COMPLIANCE WITH EMP REQUIREMENTS (ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE) COMPLIANCE COMMENTS OR REASONS FOR EMP STATUS COMPLIANCE, PARTIAL ISSUES FOR FURTHER REQUIREMENTS (YES, NO OR COMPLIANCE/NON- ACTION PARTIAL) COMPLIANCE PRE-CONSTRUCTION PHASE Disturbance of The selected location of the water Unexploded YES supply and sanitation for all the Continue to monitor. Ordnance (UXO) subprojects in batch 1A and 1B are

11

COMPLIANCE COMMENTS OR REASONS FOR EMP STATUS COMPLIANCE, PARTIAL ISSUES FOR FURTHER REQUIREMENTS (YES, NO OR COMPLIANCE/NON- ACTION PARTIAL) COMPLIANCE in the used land areas within the villages. The locations are also very low risk for UXO so no further action is necessary. Quality of Water quality of the groundwater groundwater Water quality sampling resource has yet to be determined resources deep need to be undertaken. This – as there have been no sampling and shallow wells ONGOING issue and its associated undertaken for analysis. The and pipelines using cost is currently under facilities have yet to be completed drilled wells as a review by the project team. or used. source Install fences around the Potential hazards All the ponds have not been ponds upon completion from use of water fenced or sealed to protect and, concrete line the PARTIAL/ONGOING of community them from pollution as they ponds and channels for ponds are not yet complete. waste water when needed. The dikes and excavated Dikes built surrounding the ponds earth will be compacted Flooding PARTIAL were not compacted properly. and/or concreted according to the agreement Adequacy of groundwater and The locations of the water supply YES None surface water systems were carefully identified. resources There are no historical/cultural Impact on areas located within the historical/cultural YES construction area of the water None monuments supply system.

Encroachment of There are no protected areas or precious ecological YES sanative ecological areas located None areas within the project site. Specification of All parties especially contractors YES None materials and PCU agreed Design of water supply system was Changes in modified due to voluntary donated YES None design/sites land available and approved by PCU CONSTRUCTION PHASE Village meeting should be organized with attendance Contractor and sub-contractor of local residents, have communicated with local stakeholders and the Lack of awareness authorities especially PTTs, contractor. During these PARTIAL of Contractor commune and village chiefs, not meetings the contractor however with villagers for water should be ready to explain points and pond construction. regarding the expected impacts during the construction phase. Concerns of Most of the community members community during YES were happy with rehabilitation of None construction the community ponds and thought

12

COMPLIANCE COMMENTS OR REASONS FOR EMP STATUS COMPLIANCE, PARTIAL ISSUES FOR FURTHER REQUIREMENTS (YES, NO OR COMPLIANCE/NON- ACTION PARTIAL) COMPLIANCE the ponds will bring positive impact to local residents, particularly easy access to water supply, this offset the temporary impacts during the construction stage. Movement of The construction materials and construction debris were removed to/from the materials and YES No need other action construction sites during daylight debris to and from hours only. the site No silt traps were installed and excavation was undertaken Silt traps to be installed, even during the rainy season. compacted and concreted Erosion risks PARTIAL But the construction activities for the slopes where it is were stopped on rainy days considered necessary. and while the site was inundated with water. At the construction sites, The project will follow up on surplus material and waste management to excavation waste were ensure the issue is removed to location approved adequately covered in the Generation of by the land owner. Waste contracts and that the YES construction waste streams are regarded as small contractor is aware of their due to the short time required obligations for site for construction. management and specifically for waste management. Construction activities carried out Noise and dust only during daytimes and roads of nuisance from YES bare earth were wetted when there None construction was a risk of high dust levels at activities sensitive sites. Construction operations only took Release of silt from place during the dry days but silt Use silt traps to prevent soil construction PARTIAL traps were not used as stated in erosion and landslide. operation EMP. Constructor assisted and trained (on the job) his staff to be Safety hazard to construction management the workers and YES supervision, Health, Safety and None public Environment (HSE) issues and equipped work areas with first aid boxes. Temporary Pumps and pipelines were properly inconvenience due set for pumping mine water or No necessary needs to take YES to pipe excavation rainwater from borrow pits and additional action. works. excavated pools Solid waste such as bottles, cans and plastic materials have not Trash bins should be

been properly disposed. These are available for workers with Hazardous PARTIAL observed around the camps and adequate disposal of waste materials agricultural areas nearby the during construction and

ponds. Hazardous materials are after completion, minimal.

13

COMPLIANCE COMMENTS OR REASONS FOR EMP STATUS COMPLIANCE, PARTIAL ISSUES FOR FURTHER REQUIREMENTS (YES, NO OR COMPLIANCE/NON- ACTION PARTIAL) COMPLIANCE No vegetation clearance due to the construction took place in the Impact on YES open-lands and/or rehabilitated None vegetation ponds.

There are little adverse impacts due to the construction of the water supply because they are only small Impacts to private YES scale and located within the agreed None property and assets sites by the community and local authorities.

During the construction phase water run-off can be contaminated from the construction works (esp. with pond construction).

However, awareness raising on Water quality PARTIAL water issues for community Continue to monitor members, workers and construction managers was carried out via consultation meeting or public participation. This issue and its avoidance was addressed in these sessions. Awareness raising to villagers and WSUGs should be officially Conditions in and local authorities on water issues, formed and ensured the around reservoirs PARTIAL and encouraging community to fencing and planting are and ponds responsible for tree planting and implemented. fencing the water supply facilities. Contractor/construction manager Occupational and limited speed of vehicles and Community health YES transport loading. Hazard materials None and safety were kept in storage and maintenance carefully. Covid -19 prevention including frequent handwashing, wearing masks and social distancing has COVID 19 Risk been practiced. Only local workers Management in the YES were employed. All of the None work sites construction sites are located in remote areas and no new comers (migrant workers) were working there. Algae growth in Continue to monitor and The facilities under construction water storage YES ensure the issues raised in have no reported issue with algae. structure the EMP implemented. There were no pools and other wet Breeding area for YES areas None mosquitoes remaining for mosquitoes’ breeding. Ground conditions To be monitored when None of those activities were around wells, PARTIAL operation of the facilities required at this stage. pumps and tap started.

14

COMPLIANCE COMMENTS OR REASONS FOR EMP STATUS COMPLIANCE, PARTIAL ISSUES FOR FURTHER REQUIREMENTS (YES, NO OR COMPLIANCE/NON- ACTION PARTIAL) COMPLIANCE stands No latrines have been installed Locations of because construction workers and PARTIAL None latrines staffs used local resident’s toilet facilities Locations of leachate fields related to public N/A latrines

Health and safety risks of handling N/A fecal matter Household cleanliness and N/A personal hygiene IMPACTS RELATED TO CLIMATE CHANGE The community ponds were designed to store water with Provide training on CCA Extreme storms PARTIAL consideration to high rainfall events and DRM to villagers, VDC and rainfall and can withstand extreme storm and WSUGs conditions. Increased The community ponds were atmospheric designed to store the volume of temperatures up to water including during periods of Provide training on CCA 1,5oC by 2050 YES extended drought and the and DRM to villagers, VDC anticipated increase in water usage and WSUGs per capita during high ambient temperature events. The community ponds were designed to store the volume of Provide training on CCA water including periods of and DRM to villagers, VDC Extended drought YES extended drought and the and WSUGs and deliver anticipated increase in water usage training on sustainable use per capita during high ambient of water resources temperature events.

Note: The PCU/PPTs has been established as per the Project Administration Manual (PAM). The Ministry of Rural Development (MRD) has nominated Mrs. Hor Lalin as environmental focal person and Mr Touch Oudom as social safeguard focal person for the PCU

B. ISSUES FOR FURTHER ACTION RESPONSIBILITY ISSUE REQUIRED ACTION RESOLUTION AND TIMING OLD ISSUE FROM PREVIOUS REPORT No issue from previous report as this is the first report for the Project. NEW ISSUES FROM THIS REPORT Water quality sampling need to Undertake regular water CONTRACTOR/ASAP be undertaken quality sampling Construct fencing around Install fence around the pond. CONTRACTOR/ASAP the facility Undertake revegetation of the Revegetate work sites CONTRACTOR/ASAP work sites.

15

RESPONSIBILITY ISSUE REQUIRED ACTION RESOLUTION AND TIMING Silt traps to be established in the Install silt traps in work work site. CONTRACTOR/ASAP sites

Surplus material needs to be Haul out immediately CONTRACTOR/ASAP hauled out of work areas. surplus material Revegetation need to be Revegetate work sites undertaken to stabilize the especially the slopes of the CONTRACTOR/ASAP slopes of the ponds and dikes. ponds and dikes Village meeting should be organized with attendance of local residents, stakeholders Ensure consultation with and the contractor. During these VDCS AND villagers conducted, meetings the contractor should CONTRACTOR/ASAP recorded and monitored be ready to explain regarding the expected impacts during the construction phase.

C. OTHER ACTIVITIES

Other issues not covered by EMAP/EMP

11. none

Environmental monitoring as required by GOI (e.g., air quality, water sampling)

12. Environmental monitoring is not required by the RGC for small rural water supply systems.

III. INVOLUNTARY RESETTLEMENT PERFORMANCE MONITORING

13. There are 15 subprojects under Batch I ( Batch 1A and 1B). Subprojects refer to project activities at a commune level, e.g. all project activities in commune A is considered as one subproject . All of the 15 subprojects (or 15 communes) under Batch 1 (Batch I A and Batch I B) have been categorized as “Category C” for IR impacts as confirmed in the Social Due Diligence Report of July 2019. The CPF was implemented during all stages of the planning, implementation and monitoring of all the sub-projects in Batch 1. The 15 subprojects and the status of IR impacts are shown below.

TABLE 3 : SUMMARY OF IR IMPACT ASSESSMENTS, BATCH I SUB-PROJECTS (SDDR JULY 2019)

HH Latrine (#) (#) HH Latrine

PE Tanks (#) PE (#) Tanks

#)

No. Province District Commune

IR impacts IR

Public Latrine Public (

Rain Water Rain Jar (#)

New Drilled Drilled New (#) Well

Rehad. Well Dug (#)

Rehab. Drilled Well(#)

Small Piped Small Network (#) CommunityPond(#) Sameakki No Mean 1) Peam 0 0 13 77 2553 0 7 428 1 impact Kampong Chey 1 Chnang No Tuek Phos 2) Tang Krasang 0 0 9 129 3213 0 5 488 5 impact

16

HH Latrine (#) (#) HH Latrine

PE Tanks (#) PE (#) Tanks

#)

No. Province District Commune

IR impacts IR

Public Latrine Public (

Rain Water Rain Jar (#)

New Drilled Drilled New (#) Well

Rehad. Well Dug (#)

Rehab. Drilled Well(#)

Small Piped Small Network (#) CommunityPond(#) No Kampong Phnum 2 3) Tang Samraong 8 3 0 14 3210 0 4 215 4 impact Speu Sruoch No 3 Kampot Chhuk 4) Lbaeuk 2 7 0 91 1890 0 2 426 2 impact

No Krakor 5) Ansa Chambak 0 0 0 48 3576 0 5 733 5 impact 4 Pursat No Phnom 6) Samraong 0 8 0 28 4995 0 10 619 8 impact Kravanh No Baray 7) Chhuk Khsach 0 0 5 99 1379 2 4 501 2 impact Kampong 5 Thom No Santuk 8) Ti Pou 0 0 0 53 3087 0 1 446 1 impact

No Chi Kraeng 9) Lveaeng Ruessei 2 43 0 86 3155 0 5 438 6 impact 6 Siem Reap No Soutr 10) Samraong 0 0 0 27 6468 0 5 492 5 impact Nikom No Mongkol 11) Sambour 5 0 0 11 528 0 9 243 7 impact Banteay Borei 7 Mean No chey Thma 12) Phum Thmei 4 9 4 21 2364 0 5 265 5 impact Puok No Bavel 13) Prey Khpos 0 0 0 70 3153 0 6 573 6 impact

No 8 Battambang 14) Hab 0 0 0 0 2388 0 5 294 5 impact Koas Krala No 15) Koas Krala 0 0 0 0 3252 0 5 301 5 impact

No Total 21 70 31 754 45211 2 78 6462 67 impact

17

14. The civil work under the Batch 1A and 1B include 1) rehabilitation of 21 community ponds, 2) construction of 754 new drilled wells, 3) rehabilitation of 31 drilled wells, 4) rehabilitation of 70 dug wells, 5) construction of 2 small piped-water supply systems, 6) construction of 45,211 rainwater jars, 7) construction of 6,462 household latrines, and 8) construction of 78 public latrines and 76 PE tanks.

15. The voluntary land donation for Batch IA and 1A involves a total of 754 families who have each provided a small plot of their land, 5 m x 5 m respectively for location of the new drilled wells. The list of locations of these 754 drilled wells is presented in Annex 4. The land donation documents had been completed. (see further explanation under para 20 below)

16. The rehabilitation of the 21 community ponds under Batch I sub-projects require expansion of 26,135 m2 (see Table 4 below). All these ponds are located on public land the expansion remains on public land except for one pond in Trapaing Kuy Village in Kampot Province. The expansion of this pond involved private land that had been voluntarily donated by 2 families. The land donation documents had been completed prior to the commencement of civil works.(see further explanation under para 20 below)

TABLE 4 AREA REQUIRED FOR POND EXPANSION Existing Pond Proposed Rehabilitation Required expansion area Village location of Top Top pond Area of pond Total Dykes expansion expansion Length Width Depth Area Length Width Depth Area (m2) area (m2) area (m2) (m) (m) (m) (m2) (m) (m) (m) (m2)

Kampot Province. Chhuk District, Lbeuk Commune

Trapaing Kuy 49 27 0,8 1323 50 30 6 1500 640 177 817

Trapaing Korky 49 27 0,8 1323 50 30 6 1500 640 177 817

Kampong Speu Province, Phnum Sruich District, Tang Samraong Commune

Kran Thum 40 40 0,9 1600 45 45 6 2025 720 425 1145

Srae Chreuv 40 40 0,9 1600 45 45 6 2025 720 425 1145

Thmei 40 40 0,9 1600 45 45 6 2025 720 425 1145

Kandal 40 40 0,9 1600 45 45 6 2025 720 425 1145

Ta Youv 40 40 0,9 1600 45 45 6 2025 720 425 1145

Chrey Sen chey 40 40 0,9 1600 45 45 6 2025 720 425 1145

Chrey Sen chey 40 40 0,9 1600 45 45 6 2025 720 425 1145

Chrey Sen chey 40 40 0,9 1600 45 45 6 2025 720 425 1145

Siem Reap Province, Chi Kraeng District, Lvaeung Russei Commune

Ta Ong 40 40 0,9 1600 45 45 6 2025 720 425 1145

18

Existing Pond Proposed Rehabilitation Required expansion area Village location of Top Top pond Area of pond Total Dykes expansion expansion Length Width Depth Area Length Width Depth Area (m2) area (m2) area (m2) (m) (m) (m) (m2) (m) (m) (m) (m2)

RumChey 40 40 0,9 1600 45 45 6 2025 720 425 1145

Banteay Mean Chey, Mongkol Borei District, Sambour Commune

Sranal 140 50 1,5 7000 140 50 6 7000 1520 0 1520

Ta Meaeng Pok 40 30 2 1200 40 40 6 1600 640 400 1040

Sambuor 120 50 1,5 6000 120 50 6 6000 1360 0 1360

Srae Prey 40 30 2 1200 40 40 6 1600 640 400 1040

Thma Dab 40 30 2 1200 40 40 6 1600 640 400 1040

Banteay Mean Chey, Thma Puok District, Phum Thmei Commune

Kok Svay 40 27 0,8 1080 50 33 6 1650 664 570 1234

Thmei Lech 65 36 1,5 2340 71 55 6 3905 1008 1565 2573

Thmei Kandal 45 35 1,2 1575 65 42 6 2730 856 1155 2011

Thmei Tboung 61 35 0,9 2135 70 36 6 2520 848 385 1233

Total expansion area required 26135

17. The Project has implemented the Community Participation Framework (CPF) developed in July 2019 during all stages of feasibility, planning and implementation including (i) dissemination of project information to affected communities; (ii) participatory consultations including transect walks, FGDs and surveys; (iii) identification of vulnerable people, Indigenous Peoples or Ethnic Minorities, and consultations with them; (iv) signing MOU between the donor and the MRD in case voluntary donation is applicable as per developed criteria (v) signing agreement of shared used of drilled wells by members of the water and sanitation users groups

18. During the public consultation meetings, all information specified in Para 79 of CPF which include project disclosure, identification of vulnerable people, IP or Ethnic Minorities, voluntary land donation and shared use agreements and Grievance Redress Mechanism were covered. All the sites under the Batch I sub-projects have been consulted during the sub-project preparations

19. During the preparatory phase, communities in all the 15 sub-projects under Batch I were consulted, and the IR/IP assessments were conducted by the PPTA Team. As presented in the SDDR submitted under the PPTA, the 15 subprojects were confirmed to have no impacts on IR and IP. Based on consultations and monitoring during this reporting period no IR impacts were identified nor anticipated during implementation. Whenever land was acquired for infrastructure it was predominantly community land or private land which was voluntarily donated following project consultations and agreements on the location of water supply and sanitation systems.

19

20. The voluntary land donation documents had been collected for all sub-projects under Batch I through a participatory approach. The Social safeguard team of ADB advised the project team that the land donation documents had to be revised to be fully in line with the CPF. These include i) revision of land donation form, ii) revision of shared use agreement letter (for drilled well), and iii) revision of public meeting minutes and records of relevant documents. These amended formats were disseminated to the PPTs in early December 2020 and the amended documents will be presented in the Jul-Dec 2020 Monitoring Report which is due end of January 2021.

21. Community consultations for Batch 2 sub-projects have taken place during the feasibility study stage. During this reporting period the feasibility study reports of Batch 2 Sub Projects are under finalization. The consultations were held both at commune and village levels. The participants included PCU and PPT representatives, commune chiefs, commune council members, village development committee (VDC) members and community members. The meetings provided the platform for disclosure of project information and for the communities and local authorities to gain understanding of the importance of water, sanitation and hygiene improvement, raise the needs for improvement of the situation in the commune and ask questions regarding the sub-project designs. In total 438 persons, including 93 (21%) women participated. See also Table 5 below.

TABLE 5 : COMMUNITY CONSULTATION – BATCH 2

Dates of Community No. of Participants No. COMMUNES/ SubProjects Consultation

Total Female % Female 1 Ampil 13-May-20 20 1 5 2 Kp Lpov 18-May-20 30 8 27 3 Ta Taok 19-May-20 31 11 35 4 Dambok Roung 05-May-20 48 12 25 5 Chhean Laeung 06-May-20 22 3 14 6 Krang Lvea 08-May-20 25 7 28 7 Tasu 07-May-20 13 3 23 8 Putrea 07-May-20 17 0 0 9 Chrach 07-May-20 17 4 24 10 Rohat Toek 12-May-20 28 4 14 11 Chaeung Daeung 11-May-20 24 3 13 12 Prongil 24-Apr-20 18 2 11 13 Bak Chenhchien 24-Apr-20 19 2 11 14 Russei 07-May-20 34 10 29 15 Pongro Leu 03-Jun-20 33 7 21 16 Boeng Nimol 16-Jun-20 20 5 25 17 Neareay 16-Jun-20 16 5 31 18 Krang Snay 23-Jun-20 23 6 26

22. The monitoring visits by the national team in July 2020 focused on two provinces where construction activities of 5 community ponds had started in Kampong Speu and Kampot. At that time, the construction of all other water supply and sanitation facilities had yet to start. Questions raised by the communities and the answers provided by the Project Team are summarized in the table below:

20

Questions / Comments Answers Villager: When does the project implementation Team : The project has started implementation and at this start, and complete? (especially referring to time (July) the ponds rehabilitation has started and rehabilitation and construction of wells) expected to complete in the next 5 to 6 months. Well construction and construction of other water and sanitation facilities is planned to start in the coming months and all expected to complete by the end of this year at the latest Villager: The people asked Team to renovate pond Team: The pond was already designed based on the on time for avoiding the water block during wet existing topographical areas of pond’s location . The season. location has been surveyed and implementation was scheduled during dry season Villager: What is the width, depth of the ponds and Team: The standard size of community ponds to be the size of the intake structure? rehabilitated by the project is 50m by 50m and 6m deep but the size can vary according the land availability of the community (it can be bigger or smaller) but the depth is fixed to 6m. The pond is equipped with an intake pipe with diameter of 0.6 m. Villager: What will the project do, if the project is Team: The project will avoid or minimize any negative affected on people’s properties such as rice field, impact on the private land and other structures or fruit fruit trees? trees of the people. There is no effect on fruit trees or shrub forest around the selected ponds.

A. SUMMARY OF COMPLIANCE WITH IR REQUIREMENTS COMPLIANCE COMMENTS OR REASONS FOR STATUS IR REQUIREMENTS COMPLIANCE, PARTIAL ISSUES FOR FURTHER ACTION (YES, NO OR COMPLIANCE/NON-COMPLIANCE PARTIAL) Establishment of The PCU and PPT are staffed and mobile. personnel in the PCU / YES None PPTs. IR assessment for The IR screening checklists have been categorization of sub- completed for all the batch 1 sub-projects and project batch 1A and 1B are attached to the feasibility study reports and the SDDR on Batch I Sub-Projects. The sub- projects will either be sited on the public/community land, or a privately-owned YES land plots, where the infrastructure will be used None based on the shared use agreement between the beneficiary households. Therefore, the batch-1 sub-projects designs have been confirmed to have no involuntary resettlement impact and classified as category C on involuntary resettlement impact. Public Consultation and Public consultation has been conducted process for batch 1A and for batch IA and IB at commune and 1) PPTs to monitor and ensure 1B village level. The project information contractors inform WSUGs of including i) summary of the project; ii) the results of water quality objectives and expected results; iii) testing to confirm that the water location of the selected batch 1 sub- YES is safe for drinking and cooking projects; iii) type of water supply and 2) Train WSUGs, clarify roles and sanitation improvements supported by responsibilities and make these the project; iv) eligibility criteria for known to the communities sanitation subsidies; v) grievance redress (members of WSUGs) mechanism. Issues raised during these consultations were monitored during field

21

COMPLIANCE COMMENTS OR REASONS FOR STATUS IR REQUIREMENTS COMPLIANCE, PARTIAL ISSUES FOR FURTHER ACTION (YES, NO OR COMPLIANCE/NON-COMPLIANCE PARTIAL) visit in July 2020 and 2 issues have yet to be fully addressed 1) water quality testing results shared with communities 2) confirmation of roles and responsibilities of water and sanitation teams (WSUGs) at village level Land area to be acquired WSS facilities finalized: rehabilitation of 21 is finalized for batch 1A community ponds, 70 dug wells and 31 drilled and 1B wells; 754 new drilled wells, 45,211 rainwater jars, 2 small piped systems, 78 public latrines, Continue to monitor construction YES 6462 HH latrines, 67 PE tanks. Land area to activities of all WSS facilities be acquired is 18,850 sq.m (754 x 25 sq.m) for new drilled wells and 26,135 m2 for expansion of 21 community ponds

Land donation agreements were completed but The project will follow up and ensure that need to be replaced with the amended format the pending documents for voluntary land Voluntary donation in order to fully comply with the CPF donations, shared use agreement, public documentation is requirements. Collection of the revised PARTIAL meeting minutes and records of relevant complete for batch 1A documents is currently underway and is documents are completed and present and 1B scheduled for completion by mid Jan 2021 and these in the July-December 2020 will be presented in the July to December 2020 Monitoring Report Monitoring Report. Compensation payments for affected assets is No compensation payments were required NOT APPLICABLE continue to monitor complete prior to impact during this reporting period. for batch 1A and 1B

B. ISSUES FOR FURTHER ACTION RESPONSIBILITY ISSUE REQUIRED ACTION RESOLUTION AND TIMING OLD ISSUE FROM PREVIOUS REPORT No issue from previous report as this is the first report for the Project NEW ISSUES FROM THIS REPORT Ensuring completion of Monitor, check submission of to be completed and PPTs of the Batch I water quality testing and water quality testing results by reported in the Jul- provinces dissemination of results contractors and disseminate to Dec 2020 Monitoring Q4 2020 to the community related WSUGs Report. Disseminate the amended Completion of all land format, PPTs to collect the donation agreements PPT, PCU, PIC, completed documents and As above using the amended Q4 2020 provide scanned copies to format PCU. GRM information yet to GRM information to be be displayed at the PPTs As above displayed at construction sites construction sites Training and clarification Conduct training of WSUGs ToT: responsibility of of roles and (starting from Training of PCU/PIC; training of As above responsibilities of Trainers) WSUGs : PPTs WSUGs

22

IV. INDIGENOUS PEOPLES SAFEGUARD MONITORING (FOR PROJECTS WITH CHAM MINORITIES)

23. The Project is classified as category B for Indigenous Peoples (IP) impact as it will positively affect the ethnic minorities and indigenous peoples due to improved access to sustainable and safe water supply and sanitation. An Indigenous Peoples Planning Framework (IPPF) has been prepared to guide the design process (for the sub-projects under batches 2 to 4) and to involve ethnic minorities and indigenous people in the consultation and decision-making process on the sub-project design, implementation and monitoring.

24. Based on the FSRs on Batch I Sub-Projects, no IP has been identified in the sub-project areas. A survey conducted during the Feasibility Studies indicate a minor percentage of non-Khmer ethnic group in the surveyed communes including 10% of Chinese in Tang Samraong; 5.3% of IP Por in Samraong; 2% of Vietnamese in Prey Khpos; and a total of 32% of Cham in Sambour, Peam, and Samraong communes. These communities will not be experiencing any negative impact from the batch 1 subprojects. Provided that the implementation and monitoring are carried out in full alignment with the plan and design, the project is expected to have exclusively positive impact on rural population, including the ethnic minorities and/or indigenous peoples. See details of indigenous peoples/ ethnic minority presented in the sub-project areas under Batch I below

TABLE 6 SUMMARY- BATCH I SUB-PROJECTS – PRESENCE OF IP/ETHNIC MINORITY

Presence of Indigenous Peoples/ Ethnic Province District Commune / Sub-Project Minority Kampong Sameakki Mean Chey Peam Cham Chnang Tuek Phos Tang Krasang none Kampong Speu Phnum Sruoch Tang Samraong Cham Kampot Chhuk Lbaeuk none Krakor Ansa Chambak none Pursat Phnom Kravanh Samraong Cham Baray Chhuk Khsach none Kampong Thom Santuk Ti Pou none Chi Kraeng Lveaeng Ruessei none Siem Reap Soutr Nikom Samraong IP Por Banteay Mean Mongkol Borei Sambour Cham community Chey Thma Puok Phum Thmei none Battambang Bavel Prey Khpos Vietnamese (indicated as 2%) Koas Krala Hab none

25. During monitoring activities, it was reported that there is presence of Cham communities in the sub- project locations, for example in Ta Yaou village, Taing Samraong commune, Phnom Srouch district, Kampong Speu province, Cham community constitutes approximately 20% of the total village population. The Cham community in Ta Yaou Village is well assimilated into the local communities, fluent in Khmer language and pursuing the same livelihood activities as the mainstream Khmer. They have been fully integrated into Khmer communities while maintaining their ethnic character. The Cham people have been active participants in the public consultations in Taing Samroang sub-project. The PPT reported that one male and one female representatives of the Cham community in Ta Yaou village are members of the board of the WSUG. They are also the beneficiaries of the water supply and sanitation improvement including increased hygiene awareness to be achieved through the Sub-Project implementation.

23

A. SUMMARY OF COMPLIANCE WITH IP REQUIREMENTS

COMPLIANCE COMMENTS OR REASONS FOR IP_ STATUS ISSUES FOR FURTHER COMPLIANCE, PARTIAL REQUIREMENTS (YES, NO OR ACTION COMPLIANCE/NON-COMPLIANCE PARTIAL) Establishment of All the required staff in the PCU and PPTs personnel in the PCU / YES Continue to monitor. are active. PPTs. IP assessment for sub-project 1A and 1B IP assessment for PARTIAL Conduct assessments for sub- was conducted during the sub-project categorization of sub- projects not presented in SDDR preparations. The SDDR presented results project batch 1A and 1B Batch I of assessment only for sampled sub-projects Public consultations were conducted for Batch I as described in the SDDR Public consultations will and FSRs. always include IP / ethnic

minority communities when Public Consultation and PPT Kampong Speu confirmed that the they are present in the project process for batch 1A YES participants in public meetings areas. Records of meetings to and 1B organized by the PPT included include list of attendance representatives of the Ethnic Cham segregated by gender and communities in Srayov village who ethnicity actively participated. (picture available in Annex 3) All dimensions (cultural, Batch 1A and 1B projects considered all social, socio-political issues relative to cultural, socio-political and and religious) of the religious implications of project construction introduction of water and and use. Continue to monitor and ensure sanitation facilities and YES compliance the capacity building Feasibility studies of Batch II include activities related to identification of cultural, social and religious health and sanitation are dimensions) identified Representation of IPs is always considered WSUG board has and acted upon when the location reasonable necessitates. Continue to monitor and promote representation from the YES representation of IP and EM ethnic and religious PPT Kampong Speu confirmed that one groups minority groups in batch male and one female members of the Cham 1A and batch 1B Community in Ta Yaou Village have been selected as board members of WSUG

B. ISSUES FOR FURTHER ACTION

RESPONSIBILITY ISSUE REQUIRED ACTION RESOLUTION AND TIMING OLD ISSUE FROM PREVIOUS REPORT No issue from previous report as this is the first report for the Project NEW ISSUES FROM THIS REPORT Improvement needed of social Complete revision of safeguards documentation donation forms, shared use Complete all the following the CPF’s agreement letters, public PPT, PCU, PIC revisions required requirements including i) meeting minutes and Q4 2020 and present in the revision of donation form, ii) records of relevant Jul-Dec report revision of shared use documents agreement letter (for drilled

24

RESPONSIBILITY ISSUE REQUIRED ACTION RESOLUTION AND TIMING well), and iii) revision of public meeting minutes and records of relevant documents

V. GENDER MONITORING

26. The TRWSS-SDP project's gender classification is "Gender Equity Theme" (GEN) which means that:

- further gender analysis and preparation of a gender action plan are required; and - the project outcome directly addresses gender equality and/or women’s empowerment by narrowing gender disparities, and the outcome performance indicators include gender indicators.

27. A National Gender Equity Specialist has been recruited by the PIC to assist MRD in the required analysis and plan development.

28. The TRWSS-SDP project's gender classification is "Effective Gender Mainstreaming" which means that the project outcomes directly address gender equality and/or women’s empowerment by narrowing gender disparities, and the outcome performance indicators include gender indicators. A key focus of the Gender Action Plan (GAP) is to support women’s active participation, access to project information and benefits through various skills development activities. During project implementation, monitoring and reporting on gender targets and indicators and on the implementation progress of the GAP and other gender provisions is required. Review missions and project completion missions include assessments and reports on GAP implementation and achievements of the gender targets included in the GAP and the design and monitoring framework.

29. The process for the design of the project has placed high importance on ensuring that the subprojects conform with the strategic objectives and the principles of the National Strategic Plan (NSP) for Rural Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (RWSSH) for 2014-2025. The design of the GAP is mindful of the mandates of the NSP RWSSH particularly its aspirations to mainstream gender in the RWSSH sector.

30. Key Issues. Gender equity studies and GAP carried out under RWSS-2 reported that in most of the cases, women have low decision-making capacity; also, capacity of women as WSUG board members are limited regarding decision-making and therefore, women let the men make the decisions. Even though almost 50% of board member are women, their decision-making capacity and opportunity remains low. This, in part, can be attributed to the cultural belief that WSUG work is the role of men rather than women.

31. Proposed Strategy for GAP is as follows:

- Provide women’s leadership skill training for women to ensure that their decision-making capacity will be enhanced and can make the best choice for their sanitation and water supply facilities. - Continue strengthen capacity of Gender Focal Points at the provincial, commune and village level related to women’s leadership skills, gender role in Water and Sanitation.

25

A. SUMMARY OF COMPLIANCE WITH GAP REQUIREMENTS COMPLIANCE COMMENTS OR REASONS FOR GAP STATUS ISSUES FOR FURTHER COMPLIANCE, PARTIAL REQUIREMENTS (YES, NO OR ACTION COMPLIANCE/NON-COMPLIANCE PARTIAL) Targets for female The project has targets for female staffing and decision- Continue to monitor to participation (at least 50% in the making in sector and YES ensure compliance and PCU and PPT of which 40% are commune ensure the management and / or supervisors. institutions; The target is 40% female Participation in participation. The target has been planning, design, Continue to provide guide operation and PARTIAL achieved in participation in WSUGs’ for improvement, and board and in some cases such as maintenance of monitor for compliance planning meetings it was less than investments; 40% Actions to improve Training for the PCU, PPTs Continue and build upon gender awareness of YES includes and mainstreams the current awareness implementing gender awareness aspects. actions for gender. agencies.

B. ISSUES FOR FURTHER ACTION RESPONSIBILITY AND ISSUE REQUIRED ACTION RESOLUTION TIMING OLD ISSUE FROM PREVIOUS REPORT No issue from previous report as this is the first report for the Project NEW ISSUES FROM THIS REPORT Continue to guide PPTs Women’s participation in and monitor the target of GENDER FOCAL PERSONS some activities did not Monitor and report OF PCU/PPTS/PIC meet the target of 40% at least 40% women’s participation

VI. OCCUPATIONAL, HEALTH AND SAFETY (OHS) PERFORMANCE MONITORING

A. OHS for workers RESPONSIBILITY AND ISSUE REQUIRED ACTION RESOLUTION TIMING OLD ISSUE FROM PREVIOUS REPORT No issue from previous report as this is the first report for the Project. NEW ISSUES FROM THIS REPORT COVID 19 pandemic Increase knowledge of PTTs/Contractor; soon Government’s circulation workers on COVID 19 risk as appropriated and guidelines related and management. COVID 19 pandemic. Women workers Recruit and pay more Contractor/ASAP attention on woman workers regarding working time and health care.

26

B. Public safety RESPONSIBILITY AND ISSUE REQUIRED ACTION RESOLUTION TIMING OLD ISSUE FROM PREVIOUS REPORT No issues from previous report as this is the first report for the Project. NEW ISSUES FROM THIS REPORT COVID-19 Increase knowledge and ASAP This is an ongoing awareness to ensure issue that requires public safety are not at risk constant monitoring. from project.

VII. INFORMATION DISCLOSURE AND SOCIALIZATION INCLUDING CAPABILITY BUILDING

32. Coordination Meeting and Consultations. The PIC kick-off meeting was held in the MRD on 1 April 2020 to discuss the Assignment objectives and its implementation plan, to establish a coordination mechanism with the MRD, PCU and PPTs, to undertake initial discussions with stakeholders, and to collect available relevant data and reports, including laws and regulations. A follow- up coordination meeting took place on 20 April 2020 in the MRD between the PIC NKEs and the PCU Project Director and Manager. This meeting forged consensus around the MRD expectations, in addition, it supports the cooperation required for efficiency and coordination between the client and the Consortium. The MRD provided the PIC team with the list of 18 proposed target communes in ten provinces to be considered for Batch 2 of the TRWSS-SDP. The selection of the target communes was made by the MRD using the following key criteria:

➢ Communes with the lowest rural water supply and sanitation coverage are prioritized; ➢ Communes having no overlap with the RWSS projects financed by other DPs or NGOs are prioritized. ➢ Communes with the highest number of ID-Poor households are given a priority, ➢ Communes located within the districts, where the transfer of rural water supply O&M and rural sanitation and hygiene functions to the sub-national level has been piloted or planned, are given priority.

33. The field visit to the targeted provinces of Kampong Speu and Kampot was conducted between 06 and 09 July 2020. The team comprised of Mrs. Kol Prapey, Gender Specialist, Mr. Long Kheng, Environmental & Climate Change Adaptation Specialist and Mrs. An Ny, Capacity Development Specialist. The team held meetings with NKEs and PPTs and local communities including the Gender focal person. See List of Participants in Annex 1. The summary of number of participants is as follows.

TABLE 7 SUMMARY OF COMMUNITY CONSULTATIONS Date Topics of consultation Participants Location of meetings M F % Female Total participation 7 Jul • Progress in the province to date 6 3 33 9 Kampong • Constraints that have been faced Speu, • Suggestions on capacity building Provincial needed capital • Discussion on the GAP and GRM

27

Date Topics of consultation Participants Location of meetings M F % Female Total participation 7 Jul • Information on the project including 10 2 17 12 Phnom GAP Srouch , • GRM checking if there is any Kampong complain Speu • Land donation • Climate change • Construction activities including the obligations of contractors 7 Jul • Information on the project including 21 8 28 29 Tang GAP Samroang, • GRM checking if there is any Kampong complain Speu • Land donation • Climate change • Construction activities including the obligations of contractors 8 Jul • Information on the project including 10 3 23 13 Trapeang GAP Korky, • GRM checking if there is any Kampot complain • Land donation • Climate change • Construction activities including the obligations of contractors 8 Jul • Information on the project 15 5 25 20 Trapeang • GAP Kuy – • GRM – checking if there is any Kampot complain • Land donation • Climate change • Construction activities esp on community ponds rehabilitation, obligations of contractors

34. The purpose was to provide information on the Project and subprojects to all related key persons and ensure understanding of project implementation. A question-and-answer session was conducted and enabled the team to receive feedback from the participations. Key findings from the commune and village meetings are summarized below:

- Most construction sites use heavy equipment which requires more skilled workers especially for well drilling. This limits the opportunities for local community members to be employed in the project, however, members of the local communities have been employed as labourers. The workers use the local toilets available, and these are now segregated for male and female. No child labor involved at any of the construction sites and women can be employed as unskilled laborer’s at construction sites. The contractors are not clear with core labor standards for health and safety, although no accidents have been reported. - The contractors need to be more aware of the Gender Action Plans (GAP). The project needs to encourage and advice contractors regarding these obligations. Opportunities and equal pay for equal for work, for female employees needs to be checked, enforced and reported. - Women and men in these provinces still maintain traditional roles, this dichotomy is manifested economically and can sometimes be seen in relative health of women in comparison to men. Women are exclusively responsible for managing household budgets and taking responsibility for identifying local sources of credit for the household. Men are generally responsible for heavy

28

physical labor and care of large livestock. Collection of water is mostly done by women. The health status of rural women is likely to be poorer than men’s and their workload is traditionally greater. There is joint access and control over resources for production such as land. The land title or social land concession that the household possesses is in both husband and wife’s names and joint agreement is necessary before land can be sold. There is also joint access to and control over capital. For gaining access to a loan, the signatures of both the husband and wife are required on the bank loan agreement. - The access to information, knowledge and education on water and sanitation facilities is still limited for both men and women. Women are less likely to be functionally literate. There is a low level of knowledge concerning water and sanitation, and operation and maintenance of water supply systems amongst households in general. - During the consultation meetings, the participation of women was still limited and less than the expected minimum of 40% (ranging from 17 to 33%). The Gender Specialist recommended consistent use of sex-disaggregated data in all monitoring forms and reports. The Gender Focal Persons in the two provinces do not yet have good understanding of the GAP indicated by the lack of efforts to encourage women’s participation in the meetings. Women need to be informed well in advance in order that they can organize their daily activities to be able to participate in public meetings. This has not happened yet and has been noted to future consultation meetings in all provinces. - During interviews it was also noted that the knowledge / awareness of women (the villagers) of the sanitation improvement activities and the importance of their participation in the water and sanitation improvement was still low. Only the representative of the Commune Committee for Women and Children has knowledge. - Climate change: The community members said they had heard about the impact of climate change, and that in their opinion the climate in their locality is now hotter than before, with less rainfall, stronger sun and higher temperatures. - There is no water users’ group established for the commune pond construction work / employment in construction work / using machinery

35. On Job Training on Feasibility Study Report Preparation was held during May 2020 aimed at building capacity of PPT key personnel and NKE in feasibility study (FS) report preparation follow the new contents that includes the sections of geology and ground water study, and climate change and disaster risk assessment, and raise adaption measures and providing guidance on the activities to be carried out by all PPTs and NKE staff during the implementation of Batch 1A and Batch 1B. There was a total 46 participants including 30 people from all 10 provinces (3 people from each province, projection manager, water or sanitation staff and an NKE), 14 people from PCU and 2 PIC staff. The participant list is in Annex 1. The training has delivered key outputs as follows:

- 44 participants (20% is female) understood the structure of the new FS report and knew how to conduct climate change and disaster risk assessment and management - Draft 18 FS reports, which have integrated climate change and disaster risk assessment and management, of 18 sub-projects for Batch 2 in 10 target provinces - Clear outline for project implementation during the construction of rural water supply and sanitation facilities in 8 target provinces (Banteay Meanchey, Battambang, Pursat, Kampong Chhnang, Siem Reap, Kampong Thom, Kampong Speu and Kampot).

VIII. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM

36. Although the subproject is not expecting any issues on land acquisition and resettlement, the Project has established the complaint mechanism, in line with the Royal Government Procedures, to solve unexpected cases. The affected persons (households) submit their complaints first to Village Chief (Chairperson of VDC), who will facilitate and coordinate to solve resettlement issues. If the issues could

29

not be solved, these cases would be forwarded to commune council. The commune council will try to settle these issues at the commune level; however, in case the APs are not satisfied with the commune councils’ decision, they could submit their complaints to District Governor’s and to Provincial Governor’s offices. The provincial governor’s decision will be final and both parties (the project and affected persons) in dispute agree this to binding arbitration, so the governor’s decision is accepted. The process will be repeated during the construction and commissioning period. Whilst this would require extra resourcing, it also provides a clear means for proactive and transparent problem solving at a local level.

37. The GRM for the Batch I Sub-projects was established during the Second RWSSP. The PPTs responsible for the Batch I Sub-projects from the 6 provinces participating in the Second RWSSP were trained, familiar with the roles and responsibilities of the GRM focal persons and had maintained the complaint registration forms. The 4 newly participating provinces ie Kampong Speu , Kampot , Preah Vihear and Otdar Mean Chey had not yet established the GRM committees during this reporting period due to the absence of the Social Safeguard Specialist. This had subsequently been done (beyond this reporting period) and will be presented in the next report.

38. Training / refresher training on GRM for all PPTs responsible for Batch I and II are scheduled for the end of 2020. Complaint registration form and response form to be used if complaint occurs will be provided.

39. Contactors have been informed of the GRM committee in the respective province. A sign board displaying contact details of the GRM focal persons has yet to be provided at the construction sites.

40. Based on monitoring during this period, the summary of grievances that has been lodged/registered during the monitoring period of January to June 2020 is as follows

• Number of new grievances, if any, since last monitoring period: None • Number of grievances resolved: None • Number of outstanding grievances: None

DETAILS REQUIRED ACTION, (DATE, PERSON, RESPONSIBILITY AND RESOLUTION TYPE OF GRIEVANCE ADDRESS, CONTACT TIMING DETAILS, ETC.) OLD ISSUE FROM PREVIOUS REPORT none none none none

NEW ISSUES FROM THIS REPORT none none none none

IX. CONCLUSIONS

A. IMPORTANT RESULTS FROM THE IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAP/EMP AND RP MONITORING

41. The monitoring activities were undertaken as per the safeguards requirements of the SPS 2009 of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) and the Ministry of Rural Development and Ministry of Environment of the Royal Government of Cambodia. The sub-projects were monitored on the basis of compliance to the approved Environmental Management Plan (EMP) as contained in the Feasibility Study prepared for each sub-project. The EMP stipulates the mitigating measures to be established and implemented by the Contractor in his Contract Area for the duration of his Contract Period.

30

42. Impacts from the implementation of the Sub-Projects are mostly related to construction works and easily be mitigated and are reversible. The identified impacts during construction phase include dust, solid waste generation, occupational and community health risks for construction activities, nuisance noise, soil erosion of side slopes, siltation of nearby water courses, flooding and removal of vegetative cover. Impacts during operation are also expected, mainly with regards disposal of excess or silt from the ponds. The EMP provides mitigation measures and monitoring requirements and is included as an appendix in all bidding and contract documents.

B. RECOMMENDATIONS TO IMPROVE EMAP/EMP AND RP MANAGEMENT, IMPLEMENTATION, AND MONITORING 43. The following are the recommended future actions for improvement: - All the community ponds under construction should take appropriate measures to mitigate the potential adverse impacts especially the waste management in the work sites; - Improve monitoring and implementation of waste management at work sites. - Soil erosion risks should be minimized, or if at all possible, eliminated in the work sites. Slope stabilization measures should be established when needed. Excavation works should not be undertaken during rainy periods; and - The Contractor or sub-contractor and construction managers should at all times coordinate with the PIC, PPT, NKEs and site supervisors to ensure works are efficiently and effectively undertaken. This would also ensure that the stakeholders and APs in the area are properly informed of the implementation of the project.

C. CONCLUSIONS FROM THE SOCIAL SAFEGUARD MONITORING

44. IR impact assessment has been completed for Batch I sub-projects and the status of no-impact has been confirmed during this reporting period.

45. IP impact assessment has been conducted for Batch I sub-projects. During the reporting period, presence of Cham minority community and their active participation in the Tang Samraong Sub-project has been confirmed. IP impacts need verification for Batch I sub-projects

46. The Project has adopted the GRM established during the RWSSP II and the PPTs of the provinces participating in this previous Project are trained on GRM. However, the four newly participating provinces need to establish GRM Committees. GRM training and refresher training and provision of GRM related forms (complaint form, response form and complaint register) need to be conducted urgently and will incorporate the details in the next monitoring report.

D. SOCIAL SAFEGUARD FOLLOW UP ACTIONS FOR TWRSS SDP

- Replace the previously collected voluntary land donation documents with the amended formats as per ADB advice following the CPF process and procedures, ensuring complete documentation by mid Jan 2021 - Verify the Indigenous Peoples impacts in all sub-projects - Establish and train GRM committees in the Provinces of Kampong Speu, Kampot, Otdar Mean Chey and Preah Vihear. - Inform PPT to erect signboards at construction sites to display GRM focal persons - Strengthen the capacities of both male and female staff of each PPT especially those assigned as safeguard focal persons in ensuring safeguard considerations during the planning stage and monitoring compliance . - Ensure all future community consultations strictly follow the CPF requirements and be recorded completely including minutes of meetings, topics of consultation, list of participants (F, M and ethnic if there is presence of ethnic minority/ IP), summary of discussion points and one or two

31

pictures of the meetings. A template will be developed by the safeguard specialist and introduced to all provinces - Ensure collection of sex- disaggregated and ethnicity disaggregated data (in subprojects with IP and ethnic minorities) in all safeguards monitoring reports. - The Gender Specialist to provide further orientation to the provincial gender focal persons on the targets of the GAP, actions to be taken to meet the targets, reporting on progress, challenges and lessons learned in meeting the GAP targets.

X. ANNEXES

Annex 1 – Lists of Participants: Public Participation: Commune& Village Meeting and On-Job Training Annex 2 – Photographs: Construction Site Visit and Meeting/Training Annex 3: Supporting document – Change of Name of the Pond in Kampot due to Mistake in Specifying the name Annex 4 – Locations of New Drilled Wells – Batch 1 Sub-Projects

32

ANNEX 1 - LISTS OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Annex 1.1 Public participant List Village Meetings on 7-8 July 2020

i

ii

iii

iv

Annex 1..2 List of the Participants of On-Job Training at DRWS on 18-19 May 2020

v

vi

ANNEX 2 - PHOTOGRAPHS Annex 2.1: Samples of Photographs of the site inspection and Village Meeting & Training:

MEETING WITH PPT AND NKE AT PDRD; AND VILLAGES AND COMMUNE CHIEFS AT TANG SAMRAONG COMMUNE OFFICE, KAMPONG SPEU PROVINCE ON 7TH JULY 2020

CONSTRUCTION SITE INSPECTION AT SRE CHROV VILLAGE, TANG SAMRAONG COMMUNE, PHNOM SRUOCH DISTRICT, KAMPONG SPEU PROVINCE ON 7TH JULY 2020

MEETING WITH BENEFICIARIES AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS AT TRAPEANG KUY AND TRAPEANG KORKY VILLAGE, LBEUK COMMUNE, CHHUK DISTRICT, KAMPOT PROVINCE ON 8TH JULY 2020

vii

CONSTRUCTION SITE INSPECTION AT TRAPEANG KUY VILLAGE, LBEUK COMMUNE, CHHUK DISTRICT, KAMPOT PROVINCE ON 8TH JULY 2020

CONSTRUCTION SITE INSPECTION AT TRAPEANG KORKY VILLAGE, LBEUK COMMUNE, CHHUK DISTRICT, KAMPOT PROVINCE ON 8TH JULY 2020

Consultation Meeting with villagers and local authority at village levels in Kampong Speu and Kampot province

viii

ANNEX 3 – Supporting Document : Change of Village Name due to Mistake – Community Pond in Kampot Province

ix

ANNEX 4 – Locations of New Drilled Wells – Batch I Sub-Projects

No District Commune Villages New Drilled well

I. Banteay Mean Chey Province

1 Ta Meaeng Pok 2

2 Srae Prey Mongkol Borei Sambuor 3

3 Chaek Angkar 2

4 Thma Dab 4

Sub-Total 1A 11 I. BMC

1 Kap Chor 5

2 Kok Svay 5

3 Rolum Chrey Phum Thmei 3

4 Phmar Pouk Thmei Lech 1

5 Thmei Kandal 2

6 Thmei Tboung 3

7 To Tea 2

Sub-Total 1B 21

TOTAL BMC 32 II. Battambang Province

1 Ta Hi 2

2 Pou 1

3 Ta Mat 14

4 Makkloea 22

5 Bavel Prey Khpos Prey Khpos 4

6 Sranal 2

7 Dangkao Pen 11

8 Kbal Thnal 5

9 Boeng Chumnieng 1

x

10 Kbal Ang 8

Sub-Total - BTB - 1A 70

TOTAL BTB 70 3 Kampong Chhnang Province (KCN)

1 Chrak Kov 8

2 Chrak Sdech 5

3 Serey Vong 4

4 Teang Paun 8

5 Kraing Kantrol 11

6 Kraing Doung 10 Samakki 7 Peam Sok Senchey Meanchey 3

8 Svay Kambet 6

9 Srae Andoung 1

10 Takaev 3

11 Kraing Beng 13

12 Changva Riel 3

13 Chrab Kantuot 2

Sub-Total - KCN - 1A 77 KCN

1 Chambak Kantreanh 17

2 Tbaeng Khpos 16

3 Chas 9

4 Kouk Nang 7

5 Krang Ta Mom 10

6 Tuek Phos Tang Krasang Srae Uk 13

7 Romeas 9

8 Kouk Puoch 8

9 Veal Sbov 20

10 Thmei 5

11 Tang Krasang 8

xi

12 Krang Ma 7

Sub-Total - KCN - 1B 129

TOTAL KCN 206 Kampot Province

1 Trapaing Korky 22

2 Trapaing Kuy 20

3 Chhuk Lbeuk Tuol 21

4 Srae Chreuv 11

5 Trapaing Thmar 17

Sub-Total - KPT - 1A 91

TOTAL KPT 91 Kampong Speu Province )KSP)

1 Kran Thum 9

2 Phnom Sruoch Tang Samraong Thmei 4

3 Kandal 1

Sub-Total - KSP - 1A 14

TOTAL KSP 14

Kampong Thom Province (KTM)

1 Ta Prok 15

2 Choam Trach 9

3 Doun Tom 10

4 Chan Lhang 10

5 Kdam Ha 1

6 Chhpen Baray Chhuk Khsach 4

7 Thmei 9

8 Prasat 7

9 Phlov Totueng 3

10 Phlov Treas 11

11 Serei Sokhom 5

12 Serei Reach 10

xii

13 Sangkae Chrum 5

Sub-Total - KTM - 1A 99

KTM

1 Ti Pou 4

2 Nimitt 7

3 Thmei 2

4 Phlong Santuk Tipo 15

5 Chhuk Romduol 10

6 Choam Thnanh 5

7 Srae Srama 7

8 Ta Preach 3

Sub-Total - KTM - 1B 53

TOTAL KTM 152

Pursat Province (PST)

1 Veal 5

2 Ou Heng 1

3 Angkrong 9

4 Samroang II Phnom Kravanh Samraong 1

5 Prek I 7

6 Prek II 1

7 Tades 2

8 Roveang 2

Sub-Total - PUS - 1A 28

PST

1 San Sor 5

2 Khsach La Eth 6

3 Thkol Thom Krakor Ansa chambock 17

4 Thkol Touch 13

5 Arong Pruoch 1

6 Kbal Damrei 6

xiii

Sub-Total - PUS- 1B 48

TOTAL PST 76

SRP

1 Ta Ong 2

2 Kouk Ampil 5

3 Rumchey Chroh 10

4 Thnal 11

5 Knong 5

6 Prey Totueng Chikraeng Lveaeng Ruessei 10

7 Kbal Kduoch 13

8 Ballang 12

9 Chambak Khpos 4

10 Rung Thmei 2

11 Lveaeng Ruessei 2

12 Kakaoh 10

Sub-Total - SRP- 1A 86

Siem Reap Province (SRP)

1 Svay Chrum 3

2 Bat Dangkor 4

3 Ang Konh 2

4 Krang Khcheay 2

5 Soutr Nikom Samraong Samraong Tboung 4

6 Samraong Cheung 4

7 Bet Meas 2

8 Thnal Chaek 3

9 Stueng 3

Sub-Total - SRP- 1B 27

TOTAL SRP 113

GRAND - TOTAL 754

xiv