Soule, Daniel PJ (2006) the Construction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Soule, Daniel PJ (2006) the Construction Soule, Daniel P.J. (2006) The construction and negotiation of meaning in Scottish political discourse : a case study of the 2003 Scottish Parliament elections. PhD thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/3088/ Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Glasgow Theses Service http://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] THE CONSTRUCTION AND NEGOTIATION OF MEANING IN SCOTTISH POLITICAL DISCOURSE: A CASE STUDY OF THE 2003 SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT ELECTIONS By DANIEL P. J. SOULE A Thesis Submitted in Fulfilment of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of English Language University of Glasgow August 2006 © Daniel P. J. Soule,2006 SUMMARY This study is concernedwith the nature of political discourse in the 2003 devolved Scottish elections. The investigation explores the potential effects of the new constitutional arrangementsand electoral system on the campaign discourse of Scottish political parties. The four weeks of election campaigning are studied, from the 1stApril to the 1StMay 2003. Analysis focuses on many of the main texts produced during the election campaign, including manifestos, party election broadcastsand newspaperarticles. Conducted in the Critical Discourse Analysis tradition, this investigation combines insights from Fairclough's social focus and three dimensional analysis of discourse and van Dijk and Chilton's cognitive approaches.This synthesis of approachesis an attempt to produce an analysis that can explicate both social and cognitive aspectsof ideological discourseproduction. In so doing, the study reappraisesvan Dijk's original conception of the `ideological square' (1998) as a description of competitive discourse.The thesis explores the dynamics of party political competition and ideological negotiation in devolved Scottish politics, with particular attention paid to the discourse of coalition and nationalist politics. The thesis begins by outlining the following: the need for this investigation; initial background information on the events leading up to Scottish devolution; preliminary methodological detail; and a structural outline of the thesis. Discussion then focuses ideological on the characterof Scottish politics, both in terms of public opinion and the positions of political parties, as representedby the content of their manifestos. Continuing the analysis of party manifestos, chapter 3 explores discursive strategies used by political parties to construct identities and negotiate relationships in light of actual or potential coalition government. The following chapter then moves the analysis onto party election broadcasts,taking particular interest in the rhetorical methods employed in the positive and negative presentation of policies. Chapter 5 then analysesthe press reception of party election broadcasts.Looking at the recycling of political messages,chapter 5 usesmetaphor analysis to investigate representations of elections in press coverage.Having establishedthe importance of a nationalist agendain Scottish politics during previous sections, Chapter 6 investigates representationsof Scottish national identity in election discourse.The final chapter summarizesresults, discussesthe strengthsand weaknessesof the thesis' design and suggestsavenues for future research. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my supervisor, Professor John Corbett, for his help and guidance through the course of producing this thesis. His suggestionsin terms of the investigation's direction and the finer points of linguistic analysis have been crucial to the completion of this study. Professor Corbett's recommendationson the structure of my argument in the early stagesand his perspective on the final drafts have been invaluable. Murray Leith also deservesthanks for input on matters concerning political science, Scottish politics and national identity. His feedback on the style of some early drafts was also useful. I would also like to thank Chris Winslow, Esther Black and George Baxter for their first hand experiences of devolved Scottish politics and political campaigning. My conversations with them were particularly useful in relating my investigation to the involved in activities of those the everyday communication of politics. Finally, Jenny, my wife, and my parents deservethanks for their constant Jenny encouragement. was often a sounding board for initial ideas and drafts, and an important source of practical help and advice. Contents Chapter 1: Introduction: New Scottish Politics. New Discourse? 1.1 Background to Devolution 2 ............................................................... 1.1.1 ResearchingScottish Politics 8 ................................................ 1.2 A Critical Discourse Methodology 9 ..................................................... 1.2.1 A Definition Discourse 15 of .................................................... 1.3 A Structure for Exploring Scottish Electoral Discourse 16 ............................. Chapter 2: A Manifesto Analysis of the Ideological Centre of Scottish Electoral Politics 2.1 Introduction 20 ............................................................................... 2.1.1 Investigating ideological 22 content ........................................... 2.2 What is 24 an'ideological centre'? ....................................................... 2.3 The Scottish 26 centre ground of politics ................................................. 2.3.1 Social identity 26 structure and national ....................................... 2.3.2 National identity `in Cold Climate' 29 and party politics a .................. 2.3.3 From mass to 31 values policy preferences.................................... 2.4 Manifesto Statements the Scottish Centre 34 of .......................................... 2.4.1 Health ........................................................................... 36 2.4.2 Education ....................................................................... 37 2.4.3 Law & Order ................................................................... 38 2.4.4 Economy Finance and ......................................................... 41 2.4.5 Democracy ..................................................................... 47 2.4.6 Agriculture/Aquaculture ...................................................... 50 2.4.7 Environment .................................................................... 51 2.5 Conclusion ................................................................................. 52 Chapter 3: The Construction and Negotiation of Ideological In and Out-Groups in Election Manifestos 3.1 Introduction ................................................................................ 55 3.2 Rhetorical Context ........................................................................ 55 3.2.1 Exploring the rhetorical context ............................................. 58 3.3 Rhetorical for inter-group strategies competitions................................... 65 66 3.3.1 Constructing positive in-group representations........................... 74 3.3.2 Identifying with the electorate............................................... 77 3.3.3 Constructing negative out-group representations......................... 93 3.4 Conclusion ................................................................................ Chapter 4: Rhetorical Strategiesin Party Election Broadcasts:Redefining the Ideological Squarein the Centre of Devolved Scottish Politics 98 4.1 Introduction ................................................................................ Strategies 101 4.2 Argumentative ................................................................ 101 4.2.1 Adversarial strategies......................................................... 107 4.2.2 Non-adversarial positive strategies.......................................... 4.2.3 Mitigation 109 strategies........................................................... 4.2.3.1 Labour 110 ............................................................... 4.2.3.2 SNP 113 .................................................................. 4.2.3.3 Liberal Democrats 115 .................................................. 4.2.4 Strategiesfor negotiating power sharing, sharedpolicy achievements 117 and potential coalition partnerships................................................ 4.3 Conclusion 124 ................................................................................. Chapter 5: The Mutual Construction of Political Discourse: Party Election Broadcasts and their Media Reception 5.1 What is 126 press reception? ................................................................ 5.2 Methods from to 129 and concepts: metaphor and schemata recycling ................ 5.3 Metaphor and conceptual schemata in press reception: war, argument, pugilism divorce 135 and ..................................................................................... 5.3.1 Politics is 136 war .................................................................. is 141 5.3.2 Politics argument...........................................................
Recommended publications
  • UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The Party Politics of Political Decentralization Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6jw6f00k Author Wainfan, Kathryn Tanya Publication Date 2018 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles The Party Politics of Political Decentralization A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science by Kathryn Tanya Wainfan 2018 c Copyright by Kathryn Tanya Wainfan 2018 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION The Party Politics of Political Decentralization by Kathryn Tanya Wainfan Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Los Angeles, 2018 Professor Michael F. Thies, Chair In this dissertation, I ask why certain types of parties would agree to support creating or empowering sub-national governments. In particular, I focus on nationalized parties { those that gain support from throughout a country. Political decentralization can negatively impact nationalized parties in at least two ways. First, it reduces the amount of power a party can enjoy should it win control of the national-level government. Second, previous studies show that political decentralization can increase party denationalization, meaning regional parties gain more support, even during national-level elections. I argue that nationalized parties may support decentralization when doing so reduces the ideological conflicts over national-level policy among voters whose support they seek. By altering political institutions, a party may be able to accommodate differing policy prefer- ences in different parts of the country, or limit the damage to the party's electoral fortunes such differences could create.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Party Profiles 2012
    Risk profiles 2013 update We have developed formal processes to enable us to deploy our resources more effectively. This includes the generation of risk profiles to inform our audit strategy. These profiles bring together various different pieces of information relating to parties Returns data 2010 - 2012 Next update November 2014 Find out more about our policy and risk profiles on our website at: http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/party-finance/enforcement/risk-profiles Key Financial risk criteria This indicates the financial scale, cash flow and past accounting accuracy of the party. We weight these indicators to Profiled A-C produce a rating of A, B or C for each party. A rating of ‘C’ may indicate, for instance, a party with high levels of debt that has had Compliance risk criteria This indicates a party’s level of compliance with their statutory obligations over a period of three years. The levels of Profiled high, compliance are broadly categorised as being either ‘high’, ‘medium’ or ‘low’. medium or low Operational risk criteria This helps to illustrate the scale of a party’s activity and therefore how significant the impact of a failure to comply Profiled 1-5 with the regulatory requirements might be. The higher the number is the larger the scale of operation a party has. EC Reference Number Entity name Register Financial Compliance Operational Likelihood of audit 704 1st 4 Kirkby Great Britain A High 1 Low 210 21st Century Conservative Democrats Great Britain A High 1 Low 2115 21st Century Democracy Great Britain A High 1 Low
    [Show full text]
  • BUSINESS BULLETIN No. 86/2015 Tuesday 26 May 2015
    BUSINESS BULLETIN No. 86/2015 Tuesday 26 May 2015 Summary of Today’s Business Meetings of Committees 9.15 am Health and Sport Committee the David Livingstone Room (CR6) 10.00 am Education and Culture Committee the Robert Burns Room (CR1) 10.00 am Justice Committee the James Clerk Maxwell Room (CR4) 10.00 am Public Petitions Committee the Mary Fairfax Somerville Room (CR2) 11.30 am Delegated Powers and Law Reform the Adam Smith Room Committee (CR5) ___________________________________________________________________ Meeting of the Parliament 2.00 pm Time for Reflection followed by Parliamentary Bureau Motions followed by Topical Questions (if selected) followed by Scottish Government Debate: Equity and Excellence in Education followed by Business Motions followed by Parliamentary Bureau Motions 5.00 pm Decision Time followed by Members‘ Business – S4M-13110 Christine Grahame: Through Our Eyes For full details of today’s business, see Section A. For full details of the future business, see sections B and C. ___________________________________________________________________ 1 Contents The sections which appear in today‘s Business Bulletin are in bold Section A: Today‘s Business - Meetings of Committees - Meeting of the Parliament Section B: Future Meetings of the Parliament Section C: Future Meetings of Committees Section D: Oral Questions - Questions selected for First Minister‘s Questions - Questions selected for response by Ministers and junior Scottish Ministers at Question Time Section E: Written Questions – new questions for written
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Scottish Council Elections 2017
    Report on Scottish Council Elections 2017 Hugh Bochel* and David Denver** August 2017 *University of Lincoln **Lancaster University Introduction The 2017 elections for Scottish local councils – held on May 4th – took place five years after the previous round in 2012. The reason for the five-year gap was that prior to 2012 the Scottish Parliament took a decision to ‘uncouple’ these elections from those for the Scottish Parliament. That is, they were no longer to be held on the same day in the same year. In 2015, however, the scheduled Scottish Parliament elections were postponed for a year because a UK general election was due following the passage of the Fixed-Term Parliaments Act and the end of the Coalition government. Consequently, the local elections were in turn delayed for a year. The administration of the elections Councils were helpful and efficient in providing the data required by the Electoral Commission, despite the proximity of the United Kingdom general election. Much information was made available on their websites immediately following the elections, particularly in relation to the results. There were, however, as we have noted at past elections, a number of apparent discrepancies in the returns from some councils, especially around postal ballots. These appear to result from the potential for differences in the treatment of the numbers of covering envelopes and ballot papers returned, so that, for example, covering envelopes may be sent in without the A envelope or the PVS enclosed, while the missing document may or may not be sent in a separate covering envelope later, or two ballots may be returned in one envelope, thus differential counting occurs.
    [Show full text]
  • Stakeholder Engagement Joint Committee Profiles Version 2.6 (Nov 2020) Council Composition
    Stakeholder Engagement Joint Committee Profiles Version 2.6 (Nov 2020) Council Composition The Joint Committee is comprised of members from the following political and non-political groups (listed in alphabetical order): Political Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party – 3 members Social Democratic Group - 1 member Scottish Labour Party – 8 members Scottish Liberal Democrat Party – 2 members Scottish National Party – 19 members Non-Political Independent – 5 members + 1 vacancy (South Lanarkshire Council) + 1 non-appointment (Orkney Islands Council) Executive Sub-Committee Members Councillor John Shaw (Renfrewshire Council) - Convener Councillor Paul Di Mascio (North Lanarkshire Council) - Vice-Convener Provost Bill Howatson (Aberdeenshire Council) Councillor Angus MacMillan Douglas (Angus Council) Councillor Graeme Hutchison (The City of Edinburgh Council) Provost Norman Macdonald (Comhairle Nan Eilean Siar) Councillor Stephen Thompson (Dumfries & Galloway Council) Councillor Altany Craik (Fife Council) Councillor Ruairi Kelly (Glasgow City Council) Councillor Alister Mackinnon (The Highland Council) Councillor Joe Cullinane (North Ayrshire Council) Councillor Amanda Hawick (Shetland Islands Council) Councillor Collette Stevenson (South Lanarkshire Council) Contents Aberdeen City Council..........4 Aberdeenshire Council..........5 Angus Council..........6 Argyll and Bute Council..........7 The City of Edinburgh Council..........8 Clackmannanshire Council..........9 Comhairle nan Eilean Siar..........10 Dumfries and Galloway Council..........11
    [Show full text]
  • Political Strategy and Ideological Adaptation in Regionalist
    A University of Sussex DPhil thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://eprints.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details Political Strategy and Ideological Adaptation in Regionalist Parties in Western Europe: A Comparative Study of the Northern League, Plaid Cymru, the South Tyrolese People‟s Party and the Scottish National Party Emanuele Massetti DPhil in Politics and Contemporary European Studies University of Sussex October 2009 i Statement I hereby declare that this thesis has not been and will not be, submitted in whole or in part to any other University for the award of any other degree Signature................................................................... ii University of Sussex Emanuele Massetti DPhil in Politics and Contemporary European Studies Title Political Strategy and Ideological Adaptation in Regionalist Parties in Western Europe: A Comparative Study of the Northern League, Plaid Cymru, the South Tyrol People‟s Party and the Scottish National Party. Summary of the thesis The aim of the thesis is contribute to the growing comparative literature on regionalist parties in Western Europe, focusing on strategy and ideology. The research questions correspond to the three ideological dimensions/domains which are taken into consideration (centre-periphery, left- right and European integration), as well as to the links amongst such dimensions/domains: why are some regionalist parties more moderate (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • And Be the Nation Again: a Consideration of the Scottish Nationalist Movement and Scottish National Party”
    1 “And Be the Nation Again: A Consideration of the Scottish Nationalist Movement and Scottish National Party” Zachary P. B. Agatstein A thesis submitted to The Faculty of the College of Social Sciences and Humanities of Northeastern University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Political Science May 2015 !2 ABSTRACT TITLE PAGE “And Be the Nation Again: A Consideration of the Scottish Nationalist Movement and Scottish National Party” by Zachary P. B. Agatstein ABSTRACT OF THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Political Science in the College of Social Sciences and Humanities of Northeastern University May 2015 !3 Abstract of Thesis This work considers the case of modern Scottish nationalism, its resurgence in the mod- ern era, and the effects that the European Union and the process of Europeanization have had on the nationalist movement. Particular attention is paid to a specific actor in this process, namely the Scottish National Party as the embodiment of the nationalist move- ment and the chief way in which nationalists are able to engage the political process. This project contends that the Scottish National Party’s cooption of Scottish patriotism, use of an incrementalist approach to securing authority and devolved institutions within Scot- land, as well as their engagement of instead of opposition to the European Union have enabled them to claim the center ground in the debate over Scotland’s future. !4 Table of Contents Abstract
    [Show full text]
  • Orkney Manifesto Group
    ORKNEY MANIFESTO GROUP Manifesto for the Orkney Islands Council election to be held th on Thursday, 4 May, 2017 The Orkney Manifesto Group believes that at any election the electorate should know what they are voting for as well as who they are voting for. ORKNEY MANIFESTO GROUP Published by the Orkney Manifesto Group Sycamore Main Street Kirkwall KW15 1BU Email: [email protected] Web site: www.orkneycommunities.co.uk/omg Manifesto for the OIC election on 4 May, 2017 Page 2 ORKNEY MANIFESTO GROUP Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 5 Strategic Considerations ..................................................................................................... 6 Sustainability of island life ............................................................................................. 6 Economic development ................................................................................................... 6 Infrastructure ................................................................................................................... 7 Health and social care ..................................................................................................... 8 Community empowerment.............................................................................................. 8 Conservation of the environment .................................................................................... 9 Governance ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Candidates in Wales? Description
    Candidates Candidates Candidates Regulated Entity Name Description In England? In Scotland? In Wales? A Better Way to Govern TRUE TRUE TRUE A Better Way to Avoid Corruption A Better Way to Govern TRUE TRUE TRUE A Better Way to Business Equity A Better Way to Govern TRUE TRUE TRUE A Better Way to Defend Britain A Better Way to Govern TRUE TRUE TRUE A Better Way to Delivery Justice A Better Way to Govern TRUE TRUE TRUE A Better Way to Elderly Care A Better Way to Govern TRUE TRUE TRUE A Better Way to Environmental Economics A Better Way to Govern TRUE TRUE TRUE A Better Way to Future Prosperity A Better Way to Govern TRUE TRUE TRUE A Better Way to House Britain A Better Way to Govern TRUE TRUE TRUE A Better Way to Regulate Banking A Better Way to Govern TRUE TRUE TRUE A Better Way to Reward Efforts A Better Way to Govern TRUE TRUE TRUE A Better Way to Secure Democracy A Better Way to Govern TRUE TRUE TRUE A Better Way to Universal Education Abolish the Scottish Parliament Party FALSE TRUE FALSE Abolish Scottish Parliament - Services not Salaries Abolish the Scottish Parliament Party FALSE TRUE FALSE Abolish Scottish Parliament - Maintain the Union Abolish the Scottish Parliament Party FALSE TRUE FALSE Abolish Scottish Parliament - No Second Referendum Abolish the Scottish Parliament Party FALSE TRUE FALSE Abolish Scottish Parliament - We've Had Enough Abolish the Scottish Parliament Party FALSE TRUE FALSE Abolish Scottish Parliament Party - Abolish Holyrood Abolish the Scottish Parliament Party FALSE TRUE FALSE Abolish Holyrood - Abolish
    [Show full text]
  • Have a Voice. Have a Choice. Have a Voice
    Have a voice. Have a choice. Have a voice. Have a choice. Contents 3 Understanding Politics & Democracy - A UK-wide perspective 13 12 Ways Young People Can Get Involved in Politics 24 Local government - Get involved by getting elected! 41 How to host a hustings 2 Have a voice. Have a choice. Understanding Politics & Democracy A UK-Wide Perspective Written by Kirstie Edwards, Project & Participation Officer at Youth Cymru 3 Have a voice. Have a choice. Politics and democracy across the UK can look a little different depending on where you live. Over the next few pages we’ll explore how democracy isn’t just about voting and turning up at the polls on election day- although this is an important part of it- and how you can get involved in your corner of the UK. Democracy is about having your say and getting involved all year round. The first step is to recognise what you are passionate about. The second step is to choose what the best course of action is; whether it’s social action or a petition, protesting, campaigning, voting or contacting your elected representative. Our Bright Future Our 4 5 Have a voice. Have a choice. What does that look like in your country? Now listen carefully this is where it might get confusing! You have more than one elected representative. Everyone in the UK is represented by an MP and several Councillors, and some also elect a Mayor. If you live in a devolved nation (Wales, Scotland & Northern Ireland) you elect members of that devolved parliament/legislature too.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Politics & Democracy
    Have a voice. Have a choice. Understanding Politics & Democracy A UK-wide perspective Written by Kirstie Edwards, Project & Participation Officer at Youth Cymru Have a voice. Have a choice. Politics and democracy across the UK can look a little different depending on where you live. Over the next few pages we’ll explore how democracy isn’t just about voting and turning up at the polls on election day- although this is an important part of it- and how you can get involved in your corner of the UK. Democracy is about having your say and getting involved all year round. The first step is to recognise what you are passionate about. The second step is to choose what the best course of action is; whether it’s social action or a petition, protesting, campaigning, voting or contacting your elected representative. Our Bright Future Our 2 3 Have a voice. Have a choice. What does that look like in your country? Now listen carefully this is where it might get confusing! You have more than one elected representative. Everyone in the UK is represented by an MP and several Councillors, and some also elect a Mayor. If you live in a devolved nation (Wales, Scotland & Northern Ireland) you elect members of that devolved parliament/legislature too. In Wales they are called MS (Members of the Senedd), in Scotland MSP (Members of the Scottish Parliament) and in Northern Ireland MLA (Members of the Legislative Assembly). Councillors are elected by Ward/ Scotland has 129 Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSP). If you District to represent you at local government level.
    [Show full text]