Bornhardts, Bouldes and Inselbergs

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bornhardts, Bouldes and Inselbergs Caderno Lab. Xeolóxico de Laxe Coruña. 1995. Vol. 20, pp. 347-380 Bornhardts, Boulders and Inselbergs Bornhardts, Bloques e Inselbergs TWIDALE, c. R. Bornhardts are steep-sided domical hills. The profiles are associated with sheet fractures, and their plan form with steeply dipping fractures oforthogonal or rhomboidal systems. They are well developed in massive rocks, especially, but not only, in granite, and they occur in various climatic settings. They are found in multicyclic landscapes. They occur in massifs as well as in isolation, as inselbergs; in either setting they meet the adjacent plain or valley floor in a piedmont angle or nick. They may be the basic form from which are derived nubbins and castle koppies. Bornhardts are upstanding for various reasons. For example, sorne are tectonic forms, while others are exposed stocks. Such causations have only local validity. Two competing hypótheses find favour as general explanations. Sorne workers conclude that bornhardts are remnants of circumdenudation, monadnocks de position or Fernlinge, residuals shaped by and remaining afterscarp retreat. Others consider that bornhardts are structural forms, Hartlinge, or monadnocks de dureté, which have evolved in two stages and are etch forms. The rock compartments on which they are based resisted subsurface weathering either because of their composition or because of their low fracture density. They are comparable to corestone boulders, with the important difference that whereas corestones are detached, bornhardts remain in physical continuity with the main mass ofcountry rock. TWIDALE, C. R. (Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia). 348 Twidale, e, R, CAD. LAB. XEOL. LAXE 20 (1995) INTRODUCTION PREVIOUS EXPLANATIONS Bornhardtsare bald, domical hills (PL 1), Sorne early workers saw bornhardt Sorne occur in isolation, as inselbergs, or inselbergs are literal as wellas littoralfeatures island mountains, but many are found in (e.g. albeit briefIy, BORNHARDT, 1900), and many bornhardts are found in coastal ordered groups within massifs (PL2). They settings as for example in the Rio de]aneiro were first recorded inthescientific literature area, and at several sites along the south by Darwin, from the Rio de] aneiro area, in coast of Australia. But it was soon realised 1846, but are named after Wilhelm thatsuchcoastal connectionsare coincidental Bornhardt, who bequeathed to us splendid rather than essential, for not only do many descriptions and perceptive comments on bornhardts stand aboye and beyond the the forms in an inselberg setting from what reach of any feasible sealevel, but there is is now Tanzania (BORNHARDT, 1900; also no evidence ofoceanic contacts during WILLIS, 1934). Why, when and how have the likely period offormation, either in the theyformed, whyare they domical, andwhy recent or distant past, or indeed, in sorne do sorne stand in isolation? instances, at any time. Thus, the domes of the high Sierra Nevada in California, are BORNHARDT CHARACTERISTICS developed ingranitic rocks emplacedduring the Cretaceous(e.g. BATEMAN and Bornhardts are found in a variety of WAHRHAFTIG, 1966; HUBER, 1987) topographic contexts, in aH major climatic and standing as they do thousands ofmetres settings, and in a variety of lithologies, high in the relief, surely cannot have been though they are best developed, preserved touched by the sea after the exposure ofthe and displayed in granitic rocks, in shield host masses. Similarly Ayers Rock formed lands, and in arid or savanna climates. They in the later Cretaceous and Cainozoic times (TWIDALE, 1978a; HARRIS and meet the adjacent plains or vaHey floors in TWIDALE, 1991), but there is noevidence an abrupt breakofslope called thepiedmont of marine incursions into the region since angle or nick, and occur in multicyclic the Early Cretaceous, and even then not into landscapes. In plan, they are defined by the immediate vicinity of the residual steeply dipping fracturesand their convex­ (FRAKES et aL, 1988). upward profiles are associated with sheet Bornhardts are well developed and fractures (KING, 1949a; BIROT, 1950; preserved in arid and semiarid lands, and TWIDALE, 1982 a and b). this convinced many workers that there is a Bornhardts are spectacular, even genetic connection between landform and dramatic, landscape features (see e. g. VAN climatically induced processes. Inselbergs DER POST, 1962, pp.181-182) and they and inselberg landscapes were at one time have long engaged the interest ofgeologists attributed to differential aeolian planation and geomorphologists. They have been at the regional scale (PASSARGE, 1904a, explained in various ways. AII of the 1904b, 1924; see also KEYES, 1912; interpretations advanced in explanation of ]UTSON, 1914), but the concept never bornhardts, however, are based either in achieved widespread acceptance and soon environment or in structure. faded as evidence accumulated pointing to CAD. LAB. XEOL. LAXE 20 (1995) Bornhardts, boulders 349 Pi. 1. Bald, domical residuals or bornhardts, central N amibia. Pi. 2. Bornhardts arranged on adjacent fracture defined blocks, in the Kamiesberge ofNamaqualand, South Africa. 350 Twidale, C. R. CAD. LAB. XEOL. LAXE 20 (1995) the erosional dominance of rivers, even in In arid or semiarid conditions, and in a aridandsemiaridlands (e.g.]UTSON, 1934; dissected landscape, water gravitates to the PEEL, 1941). Many interpret bornhardt water table, leaving the higher zones high, inselbergs as remnants ofcircumdenudation, dry and stable (see e.g. BARTON, 1916); as the final residuals surviving after long whereas at and below the water table, the distance scarp retreat, Fernlinge or bedrock is in contact with water and is monadnocks de position (KING, 1942, altered, rendering it susceptible to erosiono 1949a). King (1957) suggested that scarp Surface wash is also concentrated in the recession is dominant wherever the land piedmont zone. Thus, lower slopes are surface is shaped byrunning water, butmost steepened and the upper undermined, workers consider that the process operates leading to scarp retreat (TWIDALE and optimally in semiarid and savanna MILNES, 1983; TWIDALE, 1983). Thus conditions. The mechanism is certainly the scarp retreat hypothesis is theoretically operative in appropriate structural feasible, and is now, as in the past, the most conditions, namely, where there is a resistant favoured explanation of inselberg and caprock; and it is significant that this situa­ bornhardt formation (e.g. KING, tion is commonplace in southern Africa, 1949a,1953; PUGH, 1956; OLLIER and where King developed the concepto TUDDENHAM, 1962; SELBY 1970). Recession ofscarps is also assisted by aridity For other workers, however, bornhardts or by semiarid conditions, where the are structuralforms (sensu lato): Hartlingeor importance of what moisture there is, is monadnocks de dureté .A few isolated enhanced, and where scarp foot weathering granite residuals are demonstrably upthrust becomes a dominant factor in shaping slope along faults and are tectonic forms. The Pic morphology and in determining slope Parana, in southeastern Brazil, is a well behaviour (TWIDALE, 1967; TWIDALE documentedexample(BARBIER, 1957)and and MILNES 1983). So important is this sorne of the pitonsof French Guyana are factor that scarp retreat can be envisaged evidently ofthe same genre (CHOUBERT, eveninnon-caprocksituations,as for instance 1949). But, far more commonly the fractu­ in granitic terrains, for it can be argued that res that define bornhardts are joints, with no PI. 3. The Pinnacles, a small group ofinselbergs near Broken Hill, western New South Wales. CAD. LAB. XEüL. LAXE 20 (995) Bornhardts} boulders 351 demonstrateddifferential movement, so that adjacent plains. For these, a maJorlty of though locally valid, this tectonic bornhardts, appeal has been made to explanation has no general application. variations in fracture density (e.g. LE Evidently sorne bornhardts are upstanding CONTE, 1873), with the suggestion that because they are developed in a different the upstanding hills are developed on type of rock which is, implicitly, more massive, compact compartments, and the resistant to weathering and erosion than plains eroded in rock characterised by that which underlies the adjacent plains or numerous open fractures. Sorne early valleys. Thus, sorne of the bornhardts of workers, and notably MENNELL (1904), French Guyana are formed in a leucogranite argued that water could more readily which is more resistant than the biotite-rich penetrate into compartments of high frac­ rocks in which the plains are eroded ture density, with the result that these were (HURAULT, 1963). The Pinnacles (P1.3), eroded to leave the compact masses in relief. near Broken Hill, in western New South They considered that the differential Wales, are buttressed by discrete blocks of weathering took place at the surface, after vein quartz which render the masses more exposure. The exploitation of prominent resistant than the biotite-rich schists that vertical fractures to give acicular forms and have been worn down to form turrets, as in the eastern Sierra Nevada of thesurroundingplains. Sorne domicalforms California (for instance in Unicorn peakand are merely exposed stocks, or batholithic around MtWhitney), the OrganMountains protuberances, whichare more resistant than of New Mexico (see SEAGER, 1981), in the host rock. Several examples have been southern Greenland (SOEN, 1965) and, in cited from Mozambique and Zimbabwe
Recommended publications
  • Geologic Map and Digital Database of the Cougar Buttes 7.5′ Quadrangle, San Bernardino County, California
    science for a changing world U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OPEN-FILE REPORT U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 00-175 GEOLOGIC MAP AND DIGITAL DATABASE OF THE COUGAR BUTTES 7.5′ QUADRANGLE, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Version 1.0 SUMMARY PAMPHLET: LATE CENOZOIC DEPOSITS OF THE COUGAR BUTTES 7.5′ QUADRANGLE, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By Robert E. Powell1 and Jonathan C. Matti2 2000 Prepared in cooperation with Mojave Water Agency California Division of Mines and Geology This database is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. U.S. Geological Survey 1 904 W. Riverside Avenue, Spokane, WA 99201-1087 2 520 N. Park Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85719 Open-File Report 00-175, The Geologic Map and Digital Database of the Cougar Buttes 7.5' Quadrangle, San Bernardino County, California, and this summary pamphlet have been approved for release and publication by the Director of the U.S. Geological Survey. The geologic map, digital database, and summary pamphlet have been subjected to rigorous review and are a substantially complete representation of the current state of knowledge concerning the geology of the quadrangle, although the USGS reserves the right to revise the data pursuant to further analysis and review. This Open-File Report is released on the condition that neither the USGS nor the United States Government may be held responsible for any damages resulting from its authorized or unauthorized use.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 629 – Glossary of Landform and Geologic Terms
    Title 430 – National Soil Survey Handbook Part 629 – Glossary of Landform and Geologic Terms Subpart A – General Information 629.0 Definition and Purpose This glossary provides the NCSS soil survey program, soil scientists, and natural resource specialists with landform, geologic, and related terms and their definitions to— (1) Improve soil landscape description with a standard, single source landform and geologic glossary. (2) Enhance geomorphic content and clarity of soil map unit descriptions by use of accurate, defined terms. (3) Establish consistent geomorphic term usage in soil science and the National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS). (4) Provide standard geomorphic definitions for databases and soil survey technical publications. (5) Train soil scientists and related professionals in soils as landscape and geomorphic entities. 629.1 Responsibilities This glossary serves as the official NCSS reference for landform, geologic, and related terms. The staff of the National Soil Survey Center, located in Lincoln, NE, is responsible for maintaining and updating this glossary. Soil Science Division staff and NCSS participants are encouraged to propose additions and changes to the glossary for use in pedon descriptions, soil map unit descriptions, and soil survey publications. The Glossary of Geology (GG, 2005) serves as a major source for many glossary terms. The American Geologic Institute (AGI) granted the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) permission (in letters dated September 11, 1985, and September 22, 1993) to use existing definitions. Sources of, and modifications to, original definitions are explained immediately below. 629.2 Definitions A. Reference Codes Sources from which definitions were taken, whole or in part, are identified by a code (e.g., GG) following each definition.
    [Show full text]
  • A Geomorphic Classification System
    A Geomorphic Classification System U.S.D.A. Forest Service Geomorphology Working Group Haskins, Donald M.1, Correll, Cynthia S.2, Foster, Richard A.3, Chatoian, John M.4, Fincher, James M.5, Strenger, Steven 6, Keys, James E. Jr.7, Maxwell, James R.8 and King, Thomas 9 February 1998 Version 1.4 1 Forest Geologist, Shasta-Trinity National Forests, Pacific Southwest Region, Redding, CA; 2 Soil Scientist, Range Staff, Washington Office, Prineville, OR; 3 Area Soil Scientist, Chatham Area, Tongass National Forest, Alaska Region, Sitka, AK; 4 Regional Geologist, Pacific Southwest Region, San Francisco, CA; 5 Integrated Resource Inventory Program Manager, Alaska Region, Juneau, AK; 6 Supervisory Soil Scientist, Southwest Region, Albuquerque, NM; 7 Interagency Liaison for Washington Office ECOMAP Group, Southern Region, Atlanta, GA; 8 Water Program Leader, Rocky Mountain Region, Golden, CO; and 9 Geology Program Manager, Washington Office, Washington, DC. A Geomorphic Classification System 1 Table of Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... 5 I. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................. 6 History of Classification Efforts in the Forest Service ............................................................... 6 History of Development .............................................................................................................. 7 Goals
    [Show full text]
  • Mt Mabu, Mozambique: Biodiversity and Conservation
    Darwin Initiative Award 15/036: Monitoring and Managing Biodiversity Loss in South-East Africa's Montane Ecosystems MT MABU, MOZAMBIQUE: BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION November 2012 Jonathan Timberlake, Julian Bayliss, Françoise Dowsett-Lemaire, Colin Congdon, Bill Branch, Steve Collins, Michael Curran, Robert J. Dowsett, Lincoln Fishpool, Jorge Francisco, Tim Harris, Mirjam Kopp & Camila de Sousa ABRI african butterfly research in Forestry Research Institute of Malawi Biodiversity of Mt Mabu, Mozambique, page 2 Front cover: Main camp in lower forest area on Mt Mabu (JB). Frontispiece: View over Mabu forest to north (TT, top); Hermenegildo Matimele plant collecting (TT, middle L); view of Mt Mabu from abandoned tea estate (JT, middle R); butterflies (Lachnoptera ayresii) mating (JB, bottom L); Atheris mabuensis (JB, bottom R). Photo credits: JB – Julian Bayliss CS ‒ Camila de Sousa JT – Jonathan Timberlake TT – Tom Timberlake TH – Tim Harris Suggested citation: Timberlake, J.R., Bayliss, J., Dowsett-Lemaire, F., Congdon, C., Branch, W.R., Collins, S., Curran, M., Dowsett, R.J., Fishpool, L., Francisco, J., Harris, T., Kopp, M. & de Sousa, C. (2012). Mt Mabu, Mozambique: Biodiversity and Conservation. Report produced under the Darwin Initiative Award 15/036. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London. 94 pp. Biodiversity of Mt Mabu, Mozambique, page 3 LIST OF CONTENTS List of Contents .......................................................................................................................... 3 List of Tables .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geology 100 Chapter 18
    Deserts and Wind Action Desert – any region with a low rainfall Less than 25 cm of rain in a year Desert plants have small leaves, extensive roots, are spread out (Figure) Location is related to descending air (Subtropical High Pressure – Tropics of Cancer/Capricorn) (Figures) 1. Some deserts are the result of rain shadow (which is still High Pressure) 2. Tropic of Cancer/Capricorn (Large scale) 3. Large Scale Rain shadow and Proximity from oceans (Gobi) 4. Western coasts of continents – cold currents run along the western edges of continents 5. Poles- Like Tropic of Cancer/Capricorn – descending air Characteristics of Deserts 1. Most deserts lack through – flowing streams Exceptions – Colorado River, Nile River 2. Most deserts have internal drainage Streams drain toward land-locked basins instead of the sea Controlled by local base levels 3. Rainfall typically comes from violent thunderstorms Results in flash floods and/or mudflows/debris flows Arroyos or Dry washes – typically narrow canyons with vertical walls and flat, gravel -strewn floors 4. Rocks that weather in humid climates can be very resistant in the desert. Ex: Lava flows, Limestone Shales, silts, erode easily Chemical weathering is generally lower Fluvial Landforms of the Desert 1) Arroyos or Washes (also called barrancas or wadis) 2) Badlands: highly dissected landforms or topography 3) Plateaus: regions of higher elevation but lower relief 4) Mesas and Buttes >Usually have a caprock 5) Pediments: erosional surface Arid Depositional Features 1) Alluvial Fans 2)
    [Show full text]
  • Granite Landscapes, Geodiversity and Geoheritage—Global Context
    heritage Review Granite Landscapes, Geodiversity and Geoheritage—Global Context Piotr Migo ´n Institute of Geography and Regional Development, University of Wrocław, pl. Uniwersytecki 1, 50-137 Wrocław, Poland; [email protected] Abstract: Granite geomorphological sceneries are important components of global geoheritage, but international awareness of their significance seems insufficient. Based on existing literature, ten distinctive types of relief are identified, along with several sub-types, and an overview of medium-size and minor landforms characteristic for granite terrains is provided. Collectively, they tell stories about landscape evolution and environmental changes over geological timescale, having also considerable aesthetic values in many cases. Nevertheless, representation of granite landscapes and landforms on the UNESCO World Heritage List and within the UNESCO Global Geopark network is relatively scarce and only a few properties have been awarded World Heritage status in recognition of their scientific value or unique scenery. Much more often, reasons for inscription resided elsewhere, in biodiversity or cultural heritage values, despite very high geomorphological significance. To facilitate future global comparative analysis a framework is proposed that can be used for this purpose. Keywords: geoheritage; geodiversity; granite landforms; landform classification; World Heritage 1. Introduction Geoheritage is variously defined in scholarly literature, but notwithstanding rather subtle differences there is a general agreement that is refers to elements of the Earth’s geo- Citation: Migo´n,P. Granite diversity that are considered to have significant scientific, educational, cultural or aesthetic Landscapes, Geodiversity and value and are therefore subject to conservation and management [1,2]. Geodiversity, in Geoheritage—Global Context. turn, means the natural range of geological (rocks, minerals, fossils), geomorphological Heritage 2021 4 , , 198–219.
    [Show full text]
  • Age and Origin of the White Mesa Alluvium, Northeastern Arizona: Geosphere, V
    Research Paper THEMED ISSUE: CRevolution 2: Origin and Evolution of the Colorado River System II GEOSPHERE Reevaluation of the Crooked Ridge River—Early Pleistocene (ca. 2 Ma) age and origin of the White Mesa alluvium, northeastern GEOSPHERE; v. 12, no. 3 Arizona doi:10.1130/GES01124.1 Richard Hereford1, L. Sue Beard1, William R. Dickinson2, Karl E. Karlstrom3, Matthew T. Heizler4, Laura J. Crossey3, Lee Amoroso1, P. Kyle House1, 14 figures; 3 tables; 3 supplemental files and Mark Pecha5 1U.S. Geological Survey, 2255 N. Gemini Drive, Flagstaff, Arizona 86001, USA CORRESPONDENCE: rhereford@ usgs .gov 2Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, 1040 E. 4th Street, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA 3Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, 221 Yale Boulevard NE, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106, USA 4New Mexico Geochronology Research Laboratory, New Mexico Bureau of Geology & Mineral Resources–New Mexico Institute of Mining & Technology, 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, New Mexico CITATION: Hereford, R. Beard, L.S., Dickinson, 87801, USA W.R., Karlstrom, K.E., Heizler, M.T., Crossey, L.J., 5Arizona Laserchron Center, Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, 1040 E. 4th Street, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA Amoroso, L., House, P.K., and Pecha, M., 2016, Re- evaluation of the Crooked Ridge River—Early Pleis- tocene (ca. 2 Ma) age and origin of the White Mesa alluvium, northeastern Arizona: Geosphere, v. 12, no. 3, p. 768–789, doi:10.1130/GES01124.1. ABSTRACT older than inset gravels that are interbedded with 1.2–0.8 Ma Bishop–Glass Mountain tuff. The new ca. 2 Ma age for the White Mesa alluvium refutes the Received 27 August 2014 Essential features of the previously named and described Miocene Crooked hypothesis of a large regional Miocene(?) Crooked Ridge paleoriver that pre- Revision received 12 November 2015 Ridge River in northeastern Arizona (USA) are reexamined using new geologic dated carving of the Grand Canyon.
    [Show full text]
  • Alphabetical Glossary of Geomorphology
    International Association of Geomorphologists Association Internationale des Géomorphologues ALPHABETICAL GLOSSARY OF GEOMORPHOLOGY Version 1.0 Prepared for the IAG by Andrew Goudie, July 2014 Suggestions for corrections and additions should be sent to [email protected] Abime A vertical shaft in karstic (limestone) areas Ablation The wasting and removal of material from a rock surface by weathering and erosion, or more specifically from a glacier surface by melting, erosion or calving Ablation till Glacial debris deposited when a glacier melts away Abrasion The mechanical wearing down, scraping, or grinding away of a rock surface by friction, ensuing from collision between particles during their transport in wind, ice, running water, waves or gravity. It is sometimes termed corrosion Abrasion notch An elongated cliff-base hollow (typically 1-2 m high and up to 3m recessed) cut out by abrasion, usually where breaking waves are armed with rock fragments Abrasion platform A smooth, seaward-sloping surface formed by abrasion, extending across a rocky shore and often continuing below low tide level as a broad, very gently sloping surface (plain of marine erosion) formed by long-continued abrasion Abrasion ramp A smooth, seaward-sloping segment formed by abrasion on a rocky shore, usually a few meters wide, close to the cliff base Abyss Either a deep part of the ocean or a ravine or deep gorge Abyssal hill A small hill that rises from the floor of an abyssal plain. They are the most abundant geomorphic structures on the planet Earth, covering more than 30% of the ocean floors Abyssal plain An underwater plain on the deep ocean floor, usually found at depths between 3000 and 6000 m.
    [Show full text]
  • Planation Surfaces As a Record of Mantle Dynamics
    Planation surfaces as a record of mantle dynamics: The case example of Africa François Guillocheau, Brendan Simon, Guillaume Baby, Paul Bessin, Cécile Robin, Olivier Dauteuil To cite this version: François Guillocheau, Brendan Simon, Guillaume Baby, Paul Bessin, Cécile Robin, et al.. Planation surfaces as a record of mantle dynamics: The case example of Africa. Gondwana Research, Elsevier, 2018, 53, pp.82-98. 10.1016/j.gr.2017.05.015. insu-01534695 HAL Id: insu-01534695 https://hal-insu.archives-ouvertes.fr/insu-01534695 Submitted on 8 Jun 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Accepted Manuscript Planation surfaces as a record of mantle dynamics: The case example of Africa François Guillocheau, Brendan Simon, Guillaume Baby, Paul Bessin, Cécile Robin, Olivier Dauteuil PII: S1342-937X(17)30249-6 DOI: doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2017.05.015 Reference: GR 1819 To appear in: Received date: 4 June 2016 Revised date: 15 May 2017 Accepted date: 18 May 2017 Please cite this article as: François Guillocheau, Brendan Simon, Guillaume Baby, Paul Bessin, Cécile Robin, Olivier Dauteuil , Planation surfaces as a record of mantle dynamics: The case example of Africa, (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2017.05.015 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Brukkaros N a M I B I A
    BRUKKAROS N A M I B I A G 3 E 0 O 9 1 L - O Y G E I V C R A U S L Source: Roadside Geology of Namibia An impressive inselberg rising some 600 m above the surrounding plain and 1600 m above sea level, Gross Brukkaros is the only topographic feature releaving the monotony of the flat country between Mariental and Keetmans- hoop, which is part of the Nama-Karoo Basin. It has a basal diameter of ca. 7 km, and with a steep-sided ring-shaped ridge bordering a central depression, has the typical shape of an extinct volcano, but actually resulted from the interaction of hot magma (molten rock) and groundwater known as phreatomagmatism. Brukkaros rests upon flat-lying reddish-brown sandstones and shales of the upper Nama Group (ca. 530 million years), which were overlain by tillites and shales of the Karoo-age Dwyka Group (ca. 220 m.y.) during the Gondwana glacial period. Subsequent uplift of the southern African sub-continent caused most of the Dwyka beds to be removed, but a few remnants which escaped erosion occur locally on the eastern and southwestern slopes of the mountain. The evolution of Brukkaros began ca. 75 million years ago towards the end of the Cretaceous period, with the intrusion of carbonate-rich magma into the Nama sediments then covering southern Namibia. Some distance below the surface the hot magma encountered groundwater, which was immediately flushed into steam. The resulting pressure caused the overlying rocks to bulge upwards and form a 400 m high and 10 km wide dome, into which more magma intruded, producing more steam.
    [Show full text]
  • U-Pb Dating and Sm-Nd Isotopic Analysis of Granitic Rocks from The
    1 U-Pb dating and Sm-Nd isotopic analysis of granitic rocks 2 from the Tiris Complex: New constaints on key events in the 3 evolution of the Reguibat Shield, Mauritania 4 5 D. I. Schofield1, M. S. A. Horstwood2, P. E. J. Pitfield3, M. Gillespie4, F. 6 Darbyshire2 , E. A. O’Connor3 & T. B. Abdouloye5 7 8 1British Geological Survey, Columbus House, Cardiff, CF15 7NE, UK 9 (e-mail: [email protected]) 10 2NERC Isotope Geoscience Laboratory, Kingsley Dunham Centre, Nottingham NG12 11 5GG, UK 12 3British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham, NG12 5GG, UK 13 4 British Geological Survey, Murchison House, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, 14 Scotland, EH9 3LA, UK 15 54DMG, Ministère des Mines et de l’Industrie, Nouakchott, RIM. 16 17 18 Abstract: The Reguibat Shield of N Mauritania and W Algeria represents the 19 northern exposure of the West African Craton. As with its counterpart in equatorial 20 West Africa, the Leo Shield, it comprises a western Archaean Domain and an eastern 21 Palaeoproterozoic Domain. Much of the southern part of the Archaean Domain is 22 underlain by the Tasiast-Tijirit Terrane and Amsaga Complex which, along with the 23 Ghallaman Complex in the northeast, preserve a history of Mesoarchaean crustal 24 growth, reworking and terrane assembly. This study presents new U-Pb and Sm-Nd 25 data from the Tiris Complex, a granite-migmatite-supracrustal belt, that intervenes 26 between these units and the Palaeoproterozoic Domain to the northeast. 27 New U-Pb geochronology indicates that the main intrusive events, broadly 28 associated with formation of dome-shaped structures, occurred at around 2.95 to 2.87 29 Ga and 2.69 to 2.65 Ga.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Genetics of Manihot Esculenta Ssp
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Archive Ouverte en Sciences de l'Information et de la Communication This is a postprint version of a paper published in Molecular Ecology (2009) 18:2897-2907; doi: 10.1111/j.1365- 294X.2009.04231.x and available on the publisher’s website. POPULATION GENETICS OF MANIHOT ESCULENTA SSP. FLABELLIFOLIA GIVES INSIGHT INTO PAST DISTRIBUTION OF XERIC VEGETATION IN A POSTULATED FOREST REFUGIUM AREA IN NORTHERN AMAZONIA Anne Duputié 1, 2, Marc Delêtre 3, Jean-Jacques de Granville 4, Doyle McKey 1 The Guianas have often been proposed as a forest refugium; however, this view has received little testing. Studies of population genetics of forest taxa suggest that the central part of French Guiana remained forested, while the southern part (currently forested) may have harboured more open vegetation. Insights into the population structure of species restricted to non-forested habitats can help test this hypothesis. Using six microsatellite loci, we investigated the population genetics of French Guianan accessions of Manihot esculenta ssp. flabellifolia, a taxon restricted to coastal savannas and to rocky outcrops in the densely forested inland. Coastal populations were highly differentiated from one another, and our data suggest a recent colonization of these savannas by M. esculenta ssp. flabellifolia in a west-to-east process. Coastal populations were strongly differentiated from inselberg populations, consistent with an ancient separation of these two groups, with no or low subsequent gene flow. This supports the hypothesis that the central part of the region may have remained forested since the last glacial maximum, impeding the establishment of Manihot.
    [Show full text]