DOCSLIB.ORG

Conceptions of Homeland and Identity Among Meskhetian

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Conceptions of Homeland and Identity Among Meskhetian CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Texas A&M University CONCEPTIONS OF HOMELAND AND IDENTITY AMONG MESKHETIAN TURK REFUGEES IN THE U.S. AND TURKEY A Dissertation by HULYA DOGAN Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Chair of Committee, Cynthia Werner Committee Members, Norbert Dannhaeuser Thomas Green Lynne Walters Head of Department, Cynthia Werner August 2016 Major Subject: Anthropology Copyright 2016 Hulya Dogan ABSTRACT This dissertation focuses on the Meskhetian Turks, a small non-titular group who has experienced multiple displacements, violent persecution, and ongoing exile since 1944. Initially, the Meskhetian Turks were one of several groups who were deported from their homeland, Georgia, to Central Asia under Stalin’s rule along with the other groups such as the Chechens, Crimean Tatars, and Ingushes who were designated as traitors of the Soviet Union in 1944.After being victims of mass deportation from Georgia, the Meskhetian Turks experienced pogroms in Uzbekistan, and human rights abuses in Russia. Starting from 2004, the U.S. accepted approximately 14,000 Meskhetian Turks as refugees. By incorporating qualitative data collected through fieldwork in Turkey and the United States, this dissertation investigates where the home is for the group as asking whether Georgia still holds the meaning as homeland or the location of the “homeland” is shifting, as the population resettles in a surrogate homeland, Turkey. The processes of de-territorialization and reterritorialization are operationalized by examining “sentimental attachment to homeland” (to Turkey or to Georgia at various scales of place) and “satisfaction with place” (current places of residence in both Turkey and the United States). As referencing the literature on transnationalism, de-territorialization vs. reterritorialization, primordialism and integration, this dissertation sought to answer the questions of if the multiplicity of attachments to places through living in, remembering, and imagining them can be observed for Meskhetian Turks and as a diasporic ethnic ii group which does not have a nation-state, how Meskhetian Turks preserve their cultural values and ethnic identity in Turkey and United States. This study contributes to the theoretical understanding of ethnic identity formation among displaced populations, with special focus on the concept of homeland and transnationalism. iii DEDICATION To my family and Annem ve Babam icin iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Upon the completion of this study, I would like to express my sincere appreciation to those people whose encouragement and support made the completion of this dissertation possible. I would like first to express my sincerest gratitude to Dr. Cynthia Werner, chair of my committee, who frequently and generously shared her knowledge and her time with me through every step of this study and the entire time I have been in the program. Her enthusiasm and kindness in educating and guiding me will never be forgotten. I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my dissertation committee members; Dr. Norbert Dannhaeuser, Dr. Tom Green, and Dr. Lynne Walters for their support and critical input. Furthermore, I would like to express my gratitude to Dr. Tim Walters who supported me with his help during the proof reading and copy editing process. A special thanks is to my husband, Dr. Can Dogan, whose constant encouragement, love, and patience, helped me make it through the difficult times during this study. I know that I cannot thank him enough. Especially his endless support during the course of this dissertation made me appreciate more than ever how lucky I am to have him in my life. I would like to extend my gratitude to all Meskhetian Turks in Houston and Istanbul who agreed to participate to my study and spent time with me throughout. v Last but not the least; I am grateful to my parents, Fatma and Abdurrahman Ozcan, without whom none of this would have been possible. I will always remember the sacrifices they made for my education. Their belief in me has always given me the strength and the courage to succeed. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT .......................................................................................................................ii DEDICATION .................................................................................................................. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................... v TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................vii LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................ x LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ xi CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 1 Inspiration: One Hot Afternoon in Houston ................................................................... 1 Origins and Terms .......................................................................................................... 6 Population....................................................................................................................... 9 Research Questions ...................................................................................................... 10 Organization of Dissertation / Chapter Summaries...................................................... 12 CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW ....................................................................... 15 Refugees ....................................................................................................................... 17 Transnationalism .......................................................................................................... 21 Diasporas ...................................................................................................................... 25 Homeland and Identity ................................................................................................. 29 Evolution of People-Place Attachment in Social Studies ............................................ 31 Homeland as an Idealized Mythical Piece of Land ...................................................... 35 De-territorialization and the Changing Face of Homeland .......................................... 37 Repatriation to Georgia or Turkey-Where is Homeland? ............................................ 39 Gender and Identity ...................................................................................................... 43 Summary and the Theoretical Framework ................................................................... 47 CHAPTER III THE HISTORY OF MESKHETIAN TURKS ...................................... 50 Mass Deportation from Uzbekistan in 1989 ................................................................ 62 Meskhetian Turks in Krasnodar Krai ........................................................................... 67 Brief Description of Life in Krasnodar .................................................................... 67 Studies on Meskhetian Turks ....................................................................................... 70 vii CHAPTER IV METHODOLOGY ................................................................................ 72 Research Population ..................................................................................................... 75 Data Collection ............................................................................................................. 76 Multi-Sited Ethnography .......................................................................................... 76 Sample Population .................................................................................................... 77 Unstructured Interviews ........................................................................................... 78 Life History and Family History Interviews ............................................................ 79 Internet Resources .................................................................................................... 79 Participant Observation ............................................................................................ 80 Challenges and Limitations of Project ......................................................................... 83 CHAPTER V TURKEY AS A HOMELAND ............................................................... 85 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 85 Meskhetian Turks in Turkey ........................................................................................ 86 Demography and Mapping ........................................................................................... 91 Home/Homeland – Negotiation of Belonging ............................................................. 93 Self-Identification and Homeland Image ................................................................... 100 Gender Strategies, Identities and the Notion of Homeland ........................................ 107 Sense of Belonging for Women in Turkey................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Turkey and Iraq: the Perils (And Prospects) of Proximity
    UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE www.usip.org SPECIAL REPORT 1200 17th Street NW • Washington, DC 20036 • 202.457.1700 • fax 202.429.6063 ABOUT THE REPORT I RAQ AND I TS N EIGHBORS Iraq’s neighbors are playing a major role—both positive and negative—in the stabilization and reconstruction of “the new Iraq.” As part of the Institute’s “Iraq and Henri J. Barkey Its Neighbors” project, a group of leading specialists on the geopolitics of the region and on the domestic politics of the individual countries is assessing the interests and influence of the countries surrounding Iraq. In addition, these specialists are examining how Turkey and Iraq the situation in Iraq is impacting U.S. bilateral relations with these countries. Henri Barkey’s report on Turkey is the first in a series of USIP special reports on “Iraq The Perils (and Prospects) of Proximity and Its Neighbors” to be published over the next few months. Next in the series will be a study on Iran by Geoffrey Kemp of the Nixon Center. The “Iraq and Its Neighbors” project is directed by Scott Lasensky of the Institute’s Research and Studies Program. For an overview of the topic, see Phebe Marr and Scott Lasensky, “An Opening at Sharm el-Sheikh,” Beirut Daily Star, November 20, 2004. Henri J. Barkey is the Bernard L. and Bertha F. Cohen Professor of international relations at Lehigh University. He served as a member of the U.S. State Department Policy Planning Staff (1998–2000), working primarily on issues related to the Middle East, the eastern Mediterranean, and intelligence matters.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of the Caucasus After the Second Chechen War
    CEPS Working Document No. 148 The Future of the Caucasus after the Second Chechen War Papers from a Brainstorming Conference held at CEPS 27-28 January 2000 Edited by Michael Emerson and Nathalie Tocci July 2000 A Short Introduction to the Chechen Problem Alexandru Liono1 Abstract The problems surrounding the Chechen conflict are indeed many and difficult to tackle. This paper aims at unveiling some of the mysteries covering the issue of so-called “Islamic fundamentalism” in Chechnya. A comparison of the native Sufi branch of Islam and the imported Wahhaby ideology is made, in order to discover the contradictions and the conflicts that the spreading of the latter inflicted in the Chechen society. Furthermore, the paper investigates the main challenges President Aslan Maskhadov was facing at the beginning of his mandate, and the way he managed to cope with them. The paper does not attempt to cover all the aspects of the Chechen problem; nevertheless, a quick enumeration of other factors influencing the developments in Chechnya in the past three years is made. 1 Research assistant Danish Institute of International Affairs (DUPI) 1 1. Introduction To address the issues of stability in North Caucasus in general and in Chechnya in particular is a difficult task. The factors that have contributed to the start of the first and of the second armed conflicts in Chechnya are indeed many. History, politics, economy, traditions, religion, all of them contributed to a certain extent to the launch of what began as an anti-terrorist operation and became a full scale armed conflict. The narrow framework of this presentation does not allow for an exhaustive analysis of the Russian- Chechen relations and of the permanent tensions that existed there during the known history of that part of North Caucasus.
    [Show full text]
  • Exactly Five Years Ago
    10-05:issue2 4/14/10 12:24 PM Page 52 The Meskhetians Exactly five years ago, something happened in Russia which one might have thought impossible half a century after Joseph Stalin’s passing: an entire ethnic group – one which Stalin had accused of treason and evicted from its homeland – was once again forced to change their place of residence. Thousands of Meskhetian Turks, after surviving deportation in the 1940s and Uzbek pogroms in the 1990s, had only just become settled in Krasnodar Krai when, a few years into the 21st century, they were faced with run-of-the-mill nationalism cultivated by those in power and reinforced by Cossacks. The surge of violence Above: Kushali Dursunov and By Dmitry Shevchenko prompted many Meskhetians to leave for the U.S., under his wife Zulfiya Muradova have decorated the house they rent a special immigration program. And while Russian media in a Turkish manner. Men and Photos by Viktor Paramonov declared that the Meskhetian problem had been women sit separately, and resolved, for many this was not the case: not qualified to most of the living room is taken up by a raised area used emigrate, they now cannot join their families on the for sleeping, eating, and other side of the Atlantic. meeting guests. 52 Russian Life | May/June 2010 10-05:issue2 4/14/10 12:24 PM Page 53 IN THE RECENT PAST, the stanitsa* of Nizhnebakanskaya Turks or from practicing Islam (most are Sunni was, in its own way, the “capital” of a Turkish Muslim). But everything changed when the Bolsheviks community in Krasnodar Krai.
    [Show full text]
  • Written Evidence Submitted by East Turkistan Government in Exile (XIN0078)
    Written evidence submitted by East Turkistan Government in Exile (XIN0078) The East Turkistan Problem and How the UK Should Address it East Turkistan Government in Exile The East Turkistan Government in Exile (ETGE) is the democratically elected official body representing East Turkistan and its people. On September 14, 2004, the government in exile was established in Washington, DC by a coalition of Uyghur and other East Turkistani organizations. The East Turkistan Government in Exile is a democratic body with a representative Parliament. The primary leaders — President, Vice President, Prime Minister, Speaker (Chair) of Parliament, and Deputy Speaker (Chair) of Parliament — are democratically elected by the Parliament members from all over the East Turkistani diaspora in the General Assembly which takes place every four years. The East Turkistan Government in Exile is submitting this evidence and recommendation to the UK Parliament and the UK Government as it is the leading body representing the interests of not only Uyghurs but all peoples of East Turkistan including Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, Uzbeks, and Tatars. More importantly, the ETGE has submitted the first ever legal complaint to the International Criminal Court against China and its officials for genocide and other crimes against humanity. We would like the UK Government to assist our community using all available means to seek justice and end to decades of prolonged colonization, genocide, and occupation in East Turkistan. Brief History of East Turkistan and the Uyghurs With a history of over 6000 years, according to Uyghur historians like Turghun Almas, the Uyghurs are the natives of East Turkistan. Throughout the millennia, the Uyghurs and other Turkic peoples have established and maintained numerous independent kingdoms, states, and even empires.
    [Show full text]
  • Novus Ortus: the Awakening of Laz Language in Turkey”
    DOI: 10.7816/idil-04-16-08 idil, 2015, Cilt 4, Sayı 16, Volume 4, Issue 16 NOVUS ORTUS: THE AWAKENING OF LAZ LANGUAGE IN TURKEY Nurdan KAVAKLI 1 ABSTRACT Laz (South Caucasian) language, which is spoken primarily on the southeastern coast of the Black Sea in Turkey, is being threatened by language endangerment. Having no official status, Laz language is considered to be an ethnic minority language in Turkey. All Laz people residing in Turkey are bilingual with the official language in the country, Turkish, and use Laz most frequently in interfamilial conversations. In this article, Laz language is removed from the dusty pages of Turkish history as a response to the threat of language attrition in the world. Accordingly, language endangerment is viewed in terms of a sociolinguistic phenomenon within the boundaries of both language-internal and -external factors. Laz language revitalization acts have also been scrutinized. Having a dekko at the history of modern Turkey will enlighten whether those revitalization acts and/or movements can offer a novus ortus (new birth) for the current situation of Laz language. Keywords: Laz language, endangered languages, minority languages, language revitalization Kavaklı, Nurdan. "Novus Ortus: The Awakening of Laz Language in Turkey”. idil 4.16 (2015): 133-146. Kavaklı, N. (2015). Novus Ortus: The Awakening of Laz Language in Turkey. idil, 4 (16), s.133-146. 1 Arş.Gör., Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, İngilizce Öğretmenliği Bölümü, Ankara, nurdankavakli(at)gmail.com 133 www.idildergisi.com Kavaklı, Nurdan. "Novus Ortus: The Awakening of Laz Language in Turkey". idil 4.16 (2015): 133-146.
    [Show full text]
  • Features of the Language of Tatars Living in China
    Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 17 (2): 168-172, 2013 ISSN 1990-9233 © IDOSI Publications, 2013 DOI: 10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2013.17.02.12181 Features of the Language of Tatars Living in China Alfiya Shavketovna Yusupova, Ilvira Nikolaevna Denmukhametova, Guzel Amirovna Nabiullina and Gulnaz Rinatovna Mugtasimova Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russia Abstract: This study is focused on linguistic (phonetic, lexical and grammatical) features of speech of the Tatar diaspora living in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (People’s Republic of China). The language of the Tatars living in this area has undergone certain changes due to its interactions with the contacting Turkic (Uyghur and Kazakh) languages. Due to the historical events, this language has been evolving in isolation from the modern Tatar-speaking population in the Chinese-speaking environment. For this very reason, archaic elements typical of the Old Tatar language have been preserved in it. On the other hand, the close territorial contacts, as well as national and cultural ties with the Uyghurs and Kazakhs have been establishing good conditions for penetration of Chinese words into the language of Tatars living in China. Studying the lexical and grammatical features of the language of the Tatar diaspora in the People’s Republic of China plays a significant role for solving individual problems related to the history and dialectology of the Modern Tatar and other Turkic languages (in particular, Uyghur and Kazakh ones). Key words: Tatar language Diaspora Lexical and grammatical features Borrowings Dialect INTRODUCTION Chinese cities of Kulja, Ürümqi and Tacheng were the centers of Tatar communities abroad.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Turkish People
    June IJPSS Volume 2, Issue 6 ISSN: 2249-5894 2012 _________________________________________________________ History of the Turkish people Vahid Rashidvash* __________________________________________________________ Abstract The Turkish people also known as "Turks" (Türkler) are defined mainly as being speakers of Turkish as a first language. In the Republic of Turkey, an early history text provided the definition of being a Turk as "any individual within the Republic of Turkey, whatever his faith who speaks Turkish, grows up with Turkish culture and adopts the Turkish ideal is a Turk." Today the word is primarily used for the inhabitants of Turkey, but may also refer to the members of sizeable Turkish-speaking populations of the former lands of the Ottoman Empire and large Turkish communities which been established in Europe (particularly in Germany, France, and the Netherlands), as well as North America, and Australia. Key words: Turkish people. History. Culture. Language. Genetic. Racial characteristics of Turkish people. * Department of Iranian Studies, Yerevan State University, Yerevan, Republic of Armeni. A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories Indexed & Listed at: Ulrich's Periodicals Directory ©, U.S.A., Open J-Gage, India as well as in Cabell’s Directories of Publishing Opportunities, U.S.A. International Journal of Physical and Social Sciences http://www.ijmra.us 118 June IJPSS Volume 2, Issue 6 ISSN: 2249-5894 2012 _________________________________________________________ 1. Introduction The Turks (Turkish people), whose name was first used in history in the 6th century by the Chinese, are a society whose language belongs to the Turkic language family (which in turn some classify as a subbranch of Altaic linguistic family.
    [Show full text]
  • Representation of Ethnic Identities in Turkish
    French Journal For Media Research – n° 6/2016 – ISSN 2264-4733 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ REPRESENTATION OF ETHNIC IDENTITIES IN TURKISH ADVERTISEMENTS R.Gulay Ozturk Associate Prof of Advertising, İstanbul Commerce University, Advertising Department [email protected] Resumé Dans le monde d’aujourd’hui où tout est formé selon les besoins et les demandes des consommateurs, la détermination de ces derniers et la réalisation d’activités de marketing intégrées offre un avantage compétitif significatif aux marques. S’adresser aux consommateurs selon leurs besoins et demandes, et spécialement dans des pays à diversité culturelle, permet d’atteindre les buts du marketing. De ce point de vue, il est important de prendre en compte les différentes identités culturelles de la population. Chaque groupe ethnique possède sa propre langue, sa croyance, ses valeurs etc. Par contre leur représentation dans l’industrie médiatique peut différer de ce qu’il en est réellement. La Turquie est un pays multiculturel. Divers groupes ethniques y vivent. Par exemple les Kurdes, les Lazes, les Circassiens, les Caucasiens, les Arméniens, les Rums/Grecs, les Alévis, les Yazidis etc. Toutes ces identités ethniques représentent une importante valeur pour la Turquie. Ma recherche porte ainsi sur la représentation des identités ethniques dans les publicités turques. Ma question principale est donc celle-ci: “Comment ces identités sont-elles reflétées dans les pratiques publicitaires”. Les concepts d’identité ethnique, de marketing ethnique et de publicité ethnique y seront tout d’abord expliqués et débattus selon la littérature concernée, puis j’entreprendrais une analyse de contenu sur des exemples de publicité, pour finalement tenter d’expliquer pourquoi l’identité ethnique est importante pour les marques et la publicité en Turquie et dans le monde.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Analysis of Male Hungarian Conquerors: European and Asian Paternal Lineages of the Conquering Hungarian Tribes
    Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences (2020) 12: 31 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-019-00996-0 ORIGINAL PAPER Genetic analysis of male Hungarian Conquerors: European and Asian paternal lineages of the conquering Hungarian tribes Erzsébet Fóthi1 & Angéla Gonzalez2 & Tibor Fehér3 & Ariana Gugora4 & Ábel Fóthi5 & Orsolya Biró6 & Christine Keyser2,7 Received: 11 March 2019 /Accepted: 16 October 2019 /Published online: 14 January 2020 # The Author(s) 2020 Abstract According to historical sources, ancient Hungarians were made up of seven allied tribes and the fragmented tribes that split off from the Khazars, and they arrived from the Eastern European steppes to conquer the Carpathian Basin at the end of the ninth century AD. Differentiating between the tribes is not possible based on archaeology or history, because the Hungarian Conqueror artifacts show uniformity in attire, weaponry, and warcraft. We used Y-STR and SNP analyses on male Hungarian Conqueror remains to determine the genetic source, composition of tribes, and kin of ancient Hungarians. The 19 male individuals paternally belong to 16 independent haplotypes and 7 haplogroups (C2, G2a, I2, J1, N3a, R1a, and R1b). The presence of the N3a haplogroup is interesting because it rarely appears among modern Hungarians (unlike in other Finno-Ugric-speaking peoples) but was found in 37.5% of the Hungarian Conquerors. This suggests that a part of the ancient Hungarians was of Ugric descent and that a significant portion spoke Hungarian. We compared our results with public databases and discovered that the Hungarian Conquerors originated from three distant territories of the Eurasian steppes, where different ethnicities joined them: Lake Baikal- Altai Mountains (Huns/Turkic peoples), Western Siberia-Southern Urals (Finno-Ugric peoples), and the Black Sea-Northern Caucasus (Caucasian and Eastern European peoples).
    [Show full text]
  • Between Integration and Resettlement: the Meskhetian Turks
    BETWEEN INTEGRATION AND RESETTLEMENT: THE MESKHETIAN TURKS Oskari Pentikäinen and Tom Trier ECMI Working Paper # 21 September 2004 EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR MINORITY ISSUES (ECMI) Schiffbruecke 12 (Kompagnietor Building) D-24939 Flensburg Germany ( +49-(0)461-14 14 9-0 fax +49-(0)461-14 14 9-19 e-mail: [email protected] internet: http://www.ecmi.de ECMI Working Paper # 21 European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) Director: Marc Weller © Copyright 2004 by the European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) Published in August 2004 by the European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) List of Abbreviations.................................................................................................4 I. Introduction...........................................................................................................6 1. Who Are the Meskhetian Turks?...........................................................................9 2. A History of Forced Migration............................................................................11 II. The Meskhetian Turks’ Current Demographic and Socio-Political Situation.......13 1. Georgia...............................................................................................................15 2. Azerbaijan...........................................................................................................19 3. Ukraine...............................................................................................................20 4. Russia..................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook for Host Families of Turkish Participants
    Handbook for Host Families of Turkish Participants 2010 1 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................... 5 Turkish Culture Quiz ..................................................................................................................... 7 Turkish Culture Quiz Answers ....................................................................................................... 8 Forward ....................................................................................................................................... 10 Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 11 Who is a Turk? .................................................................................................................... 11 A Brief History ..................................................................................................................... 12 What is Culture? .................................................................................................................. 14 The Cultural Iceberg ............................................................................................................ 14 Generalizations and Stereotypes ........................................................................................ 16 Culture and Perception ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Landscapes, Settlements and Traditional Housing in Samtskhe-Javakheti, Georgia
    ROMAN MAISURADZE, TAMAR KHARDZIANI, TEA ERADZE QUAESTIONES GEOGRAPHICAE 40(1) • 2021 LANDSCAPES, SETTLEMENTS AND TRADITIONAL HOUSING IN SAMTSKHE-JAVAKHETI, GEORGIA ROMAN MAISURADZE 1, TAMAR KHARDZIANI 2, TEA ERADZE 1 1Department of Geography, Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia 2Vakhushti Bagrationi Institute of Geography, Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia Manuscript received: February 4, 2021 Revised version: March 1, 2021 MAISURADZE R., KHARDZIANI T., ERADZE T., 2021. Landscapes, settlements and traditional housing in Samtskhe-Javakheti, Georgia. Quaestiones Geographicae 40(1), Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań, pp. 85–95. 5 figs, 2 tables. ABSTRACT: A change in livelihood and folk architecture is an indicator of cultural landscape transformation, which is often the result of changes occurring in the natural and socio-political realms. The diversity of architectural types of buildings as an element of landscape diversity distinguishes our research region. The presented study deals with a long-term change of housing and architectural types of settlements. Our goal was to identify, geolocalise, and classify the vernacular architecture of Samtskhe-Javakheti within the different types of natural landscapes. For this purpose, we used the HGIS (Historical Geoinformation System) approach, which comprises the application of both historic sources and GIS technologies. We identified seven types of buildings in the study area, the characteristics of which depended on the natural landscape features. The following factors had been determining the geography of the con- struction: geology, seismicity, terrain, climate, access to building materials and defence. Dominant architectural types of buildings in the study region were as follows: fortress Rabat with stone houses, stone houses, semi-underground houses mixed with stone houses, semi-underground houses, terraced semi-underground houses, cave dwellings and wooden log houses.
    [Show full text]