Webcam - Wikipedia, the Freevisited Encyclopedia on 7/20/2015 Page 1 of 6
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Understanding Microsoft Virtualization Solutions Ebook
MICROSOFT LICENSE TERMS MICROSOFT EBOOK These license terms are an agreement between Microsoft Corporation (or based on where you live, one of its affiliates) and you. Please read them. They apply to the licensed content named above, which includes the media on which you received it, if any. By using the licensed content, you accept these terms. If you do not accept them, do not use the licensed content. If you comply with these license terms, you have the rights below. 1. OVERVIEW. Licensed Content. The licensed content includes the eBook and associated media. License Model. The licensed content is licensed on a per user per device basis. 2. INSTALLATION AND USE RIGHTS. a. General. One user may install and use one copy of the licensed content on a single computer. b. Portable Device. You may install an additional copy of the licensed content on a portable device for the exclusive use of the primary user of the first copy of the licensed content. 3. SCOPE OF LICENSE. The licensed content is licensed, not sold. This agreement only gives you some rights to use the licensed content. Microsoft reserves all other rights. Unless applicable law gives you more rights despite this limitation, you may use the licensed content only as expressly permitted in this agreement. You agree Not to make copies of the licensed content; Not to distribute, rent, lease, lend, reproduce, transit, adapt, modify, link to, post, forward, make derivative works based upon, disseminate, publish or sublicense the licensed content or combine the licensed content with -
Locating and Extracting Digital Evidence from Hosted Virtual Desktop Infrastructures: Cloud Context
Locating and Extracting Digital Evidence from Hosted virtual desktop Infrastructures: Cloud Context NIRBHAY JAWALE B.C.I.S (AUT University) New Zealand A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty of Design and Creative Technologies AUT University in partial fulfilment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Forensic Information Technology School of Computing and Mathematical Sciences Auckland, New Zealand 2010 II Declaration I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, it contains no material previously published or written by another person nor material which to a substantial extent has been accepted for the qualification of any other degree or diploma of a University or other institution of higher learning, except where due acknowledgement is made in the acknowledgements. ........................... Signature III Acknowledgements This thesis was conducted at the Faculty of Design and Creative Technologies in the school of Computing and Mathematical Sciences at AUT University, New Zealand. During the course of writing this thesis, I have received a valuable support from many people. Firstly, I would like to thank my family for their blessings, encouragement and believing that I could get through this study. Secondly, I am deeply thankful and honored by having Professor Ajit Narayanan as my thesis supervisor. This thesis would not have been possible without his guidance, encouragement and interest; he took to supervise my thesis topic. I very much enjoyed the critical discussions and comments on my research topic with Professor Ajit Narayanan, this thesis would not have been in the present form without his valuable contribution. -
2007 ANNUAL REPORT Fiscal Year 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 (U.S
2007 ANNUAL REPORT Fiscal Year 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 (U.S. dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) Total Revenues $ 1,100,288 $ 1,268,470 $ 1,482,626 $ 1,796,715 $ 2,066,569 Gross Margin 33.1% 32.2% 34.0% 32.0% 34.3% FY07 Non-GAAP Gross Margin 34.4% Operating Income $ 123,882 $ 145,554 $ 171,674 $ 198,911 $ 230,862 FY07 Non-GAAP Operating Income $ 250,326 Operating Margin 11.3% 11.5% 11.6% 11.1% 11.2% FY07 Non-GAAP Operating Margin 12.1% Net Income $ 98,843 $ 132,153 $ 149,266 $ 181,105 $ 229,848 FY07 Non-GAAP Net Income $ 244,786 Earnings per diluted share $ 0.49 $ 0.67 $ 0.77 $ 0.92 $ 1.20 FY07 Non-GAAP Earnings per diluted share $ 1.27 Diluted number of shares (in millions) 205,638 200,639 198,250 198,770 190,991 Cash Flow from Operations $ 145,108 $ 166,460 $ 213,674 $ 152,217 $ 305,681 Capital Expenditures $ 28,657 $ 24,718 $ 40,541 $ 54,102 $ 47,246 Cash & Cash Equivalents net of Short-Term Debt $ 208,632 $ 280,624 $ 331,402 $ 230,943 $ 398,966 Shareholders’ Equity $ 365,562 $ 457,080 $ 526,149 $ 685,176 $ 844,525 Fiscal Year-end Market Capitalization (in billions) $ 1.40 $ 2.17 $ 2.92 $ 3.80 $ 5.32 NOTE: The Fiscal Year 2007 Non-GAAP gross margin, operating income, operating margin, net income and earnings per diluted share fi gures exclude the cost or net cost of share- based compensation in Fiscal Year 2007, the fi rst year we refl ected this expense in our fi nancial results. -
Microsoft Corporation As Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioner ————
No. 18-956 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ———— GOOGLE LLC, Petitioner, v. ORACLE AMERICA, INC., Respondent. ———— On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ———— BRIEF OF MICROSOFT CORPORATION AS AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER ———— LISA W. BOHL JEFFREY A. LAMKEN MOLOLAMKEN LLP Counsel of Record 300 N. LaSalle St. MICHAEL G. PATTILLO, JR. Chicago, IL 60654 MOLOLAMKEN LLP (312) 450-6700 The Watergate, Suite 660 600 New Hampshire Ave., NW LEONID GRINBERG Washington, DC 20037 MOLOLAMKEN LLP (202) 556-2000 430 Park Ave. [email protected] New York, NY 10022 (212) 607-8160 Counsel for Amicus Curiae :,/621(3(635,17,1*&2,1&± ±:$6+,1*721'& TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Interest of Amicus Curiae ......................................... 1 Summary of Argument ............................................... 3 Argument ...................................................................... 6 I. Innovation in Today’s Computer Industry Depends on Collaborative Development and Seamless Interoperability—Both of Which Require Reuse of Functional Code .............................. 7 A. Innovation in the Modern Computer Industry Relies on Collaborative Development ..................... 7 B. Interoperability Is a Key Component of Technological Innovation Today ....................................... 10 C. Reuse of Functional Software Code, Including APIs, Is Critical To Promoting Collaborative Development and Interoperability ......... 12 II. Courts Have Long Applied a Flexible Fair Use Doctrine To Address Software’s Unique Nature ............................. 15 A. Software’s Collaborative and Functional Elements Distinguish It from Traditional Creative Works Subject to Copyright Protection ............. 16 B. A Flexible Fair Use Doctrine Is Essential To Promoting Collaboration and Interoperability in Modern Software Development— As Courts Have Long Recognized .......... 18 (i) ii TABLE OF CONTENTS—Continued Page C. -
SCRAPING PHOTOGRAPHS Maggie King
SCRAPING PHOTOGRAPHS Maggie King INTRODUCTION ................................................................ 188 I. TECHNICAL BACKGROUND ON SCRAPING ................................... 190 A. How to Scrape a Photograph ....................................... 190 B. Why Scrape a Photograph? ......................................... 192 II. THE LAW OF SCRAPING ................................................... 193 A. CFAA Claims ......................................................... 194 1. CFAA Background: Ambiguous Statutory Language ......... 194 2. CFAA Scraping Claims in Caselaw .............................. 195 B. Contract Claims ..................................................... 197 C. Copyright Claims .................................................... 198 III. SCRAPING PHOTOGRAPHS ............................................. 200 A. Copyright and Photographs ........................................ 201 1. Analogous scraping activities are fair use ..................... 202 2. Face Scans are not protectible derivative works. ............ 203 B. Data Ownership ..................................................... 205 1. Non-exclusive licenses bar platforms from asserting claims for user-generated data ............................................... 205 2. Paths to asserting user claims directly ........................ 206 IV. UNRESTRICTED SURVEILLANCE AND STRONGER PROTECTIONS FOR CYBERPROPERTY .............................................................. 207 CONCLUSION ................................................................. -
The Dos and Don'ts of Videoconferencing in Higher
The Dos and Don’ts of Videoconferencing in Higher Education HUSAT Research Institute Loughborough University of Technology Lindsey Butters Anne Clarke Tim Hewson Sue Pomfrett Contents Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................3 How to use this report ..............................................................................................................3 Chapter 1 Videoconferencing in Higher Education — How to get it right ...................................5 Structure of this chapter ...............................................................................................5 Part 1 — Subject sections ............................................................................................6 Uses of videoconferencing, videoconferencing systems, the environment, funding, management Part 2 — Where are you now? ......................................................................................17 Guidance to individual users or service providers Chapter 2 Videoconferencing Services — What is Available .....................................................30 Structure of this chapter ...............................................................................................30 Overview of currently available services .......................................................................30 Broadcasting -
Broadband for Development in the ESCWA Region Enhancing Access to ICT Services in a Global Knowledge Society
Broadband for Development in the ESCWA Region Enhancing Access to ICT Services in a Global Knowledge Society Broadband for Development in the ESCWA Region Enhancing Access to ICT Services in a Global Knowledge Society Acknowledgement and Disclaimer This publication was jointly funded by UN–ESCWA and Alcatel–Lucent, with additional support for final compilation and reproduction from the United Nations Development Account proj- ect “Capacity building for ICT policymaking”. The report was super- vised by Mansour Farah, Team Leader for ICT Policies, ESCWA, and Souheil Marine, Digital Bridge Manager, Alcatel–Lucent, who defined the initial project, jointly led the publication team, contributed to the drafting of various chapters, and assured the overall quali- ty of the publication. In preparing this publication, Ayman El–Sherbiny, First Informa- tion Technology Officer in ESCWA, contributed to the drafting of var- ious chapters and acted as a focal point, defining and coordinat- ing substantive assignments between national and regional consult- ants and the publication team. Imad Sabouni, ESCWA consultant, carried out the regional analysis of case studies, compiled various contributions, and drafted core chapters. Eric Delannoy, Alcatel–Lucent consultant, also contributed to the drafting of vari- ous chapters and provided technical input. Thanks are due to Mohamed Abdel–Wahab and Mohammed Al–Wahaibi, ESCWA consultants, for their valuable contributions of case studies on Egypt and Oman respectively, and also to Habib Torbey, CEO of Globalcom Data Services, for his input on Lebanon. We would like to express our sincere appreciation to Abdulilah Dewachi, Regional Adviser on ICT, ESCWA, and to Samir Aïta, ESCWA consultant, for their review and valuable comments lead- ing to enhancements to the final drafts of the publication. -
Copyright and Copy-Reliant Technology. Matthew As G Loyola University Chicago, [email protected]
Loyola University Chicago, School of Law LAW eCommons Faculty Publications & Other Works 2009 Copyright and Copy-Reliant Technology. Matthew aS g Loyola University Chicago, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://lawecommons.luc.edu/facpubs Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Sag, Matthew, Copyright and Copy-Reliant Technology,103 NU L.R. 1607 (2009) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by LAW eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications & Other Works by an authorized administrator of LAW eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Copyright 2009 by Northwestern University School of Law Printed in U.S.A. Northwestern University Law Review Vol. 103, No. 4 COPYRIGHT AND COPY-RELIANT TECHNOLOGY Matthew Sag* INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1607 I. COPY-RELIANT TECHNOLOGIES AND THE INTERNET ............................................ 1610 A. New Technologies, Copyright Markets, and Copyright Law ..................... 1611 B. Four Case Studies of Copy-Reliant Technology ........................................ 1616 II. THE DOCTRINAL IMPLICATIONS OF NONEXPRESSIVE USE .................................... 1624 A. The Principle of Nonexpressive Use ......................................................... 1624 B. Doctrinal Incorporation of Nonexpressive Use ......................................... 1639 C. Fair Use and Nonexpressive Use ............................................................. -
Rethinking Anticircumvention's Interoperability Policy
Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons Faculty Publications 2009 Rethinking Anticircumvention's Interoperability Policy Aaron K. Perzanowski Case Western University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/faculty_publications Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons Repository Citation Perzanowski, Aaron K., "Rethinking Anticircumvention's Interoperability Policy" (2009). Faculty Publications. 44. https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/faculty_publications/44 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Rethinking Anticircumvention’s Interoperability Policy Aaron K. Perzanowski* Interoperability is widely touted for its ability to spur incremental innovation, increase competition and consumer choice, and decrease barriers to accessibility. In light of these attributes, intellectual property law generally permits follow-on innovators to create products that interoperate with existing systems, even without permission. The anticircumvention provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”) represent a troubling departure from this policy, resulting in patent-like rights to exclude technologies that interoperate with protected platforms. Although the DMCA contains internal safeguards to preserve interoperability, judicial misinterpretation and narrow statutory text render those safeguards largely ineffective. One approach to counteracting the DMCA’s restrictions on interoperability is to rely on antitrust scrutiny and the resulting mandatory disclosure of technical information. However, both doctrinal and policy considerations suggest that antitrust offers a less than ideal means of lessening the DMCA’s impact on interoperability. -
Informed Consent for Telemedicine Services
INFORMED CONSENT FOR TELEMEDICINE SERVICES Patient Name: Date of Birth: Address: City: State: Zip: Date Consent Discussed: INTRODUCTION Telemedicine is a subset of telehealth services that uses online, interactive videoconference software to provide medical services from a distance. Private insurance companies in CT and Medicaid temporarily, are required by law to cover telemedicine health services. Telemedicine does not include the use of fax, audio-only telephone, e-mail, or videotelephony products such as FaceTime and Skype. Telemedicine involves the use of electronic communications to enable health care providers at different locations to share individual patient medical information for the purpose of improving patient care. Providers may include primary care practitioners, specialists, and/or subspecialists. The information may be used for diagnosis, therapy, follow‐up and/or education, and may include any of the following: • Patient medical records • Medical images • Live two‐way audio and video • Output data used will incorporate network and software security protocols to protect the confidentiality of patient identification to safeguard the data and to ensure its integrity against intentional or unintentional corruption EXPECTED BENEFITS • Improved access to medical care by enabling a patient to remain in his/her home (or at a remote site) while the physician obtains test results and consults from healthcare practitioners at distant/other sites • More efficient medical evaluation and management POSSIBLE RISKS As with any medical procedure, there are potential risks associated with the use of telemedicine. These risks include, but may not be limited to: • In rare cases, information transmitted may not be sufficient (e.g. poor resolution of images) to allow for appropriate medical decision making by the provider and consultant(s) | 945 Main Street Suite 205, Manchester, CT 06040 | p 860.553.3020 | f 860.553.3232 | www.emmaushealthllc.com | Page 1 of 2 Rev. -
How Can Telehealth Help in the Provision of Integrated Care?
HEALTH SYSTEMS AND POLICY ANALYSIS POLICY BRIEF 13 How can telehealth help in the provision of integrated care? Karl A. Stroetmann, Lutz Kubitschke Simon Robinson, Veli Stroetmann Kevin Cullen, David McDaid Keywords: © World Health Organization 2010 and World Health Organization, on behalf of the European Observatory TELEMEDICINE on Health Systems and Policies 2010 COMPUTER COMMUNICATION NETWORKS – utilization Address requests about publications of the WHO DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE, Regional Office for Europe to: INTEGRATED – trends Publications HEALTH POLICY WHO Regional Office for Europe COST –BENEFIT ANALYSIS Scherfigsvej 8 DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark Alternatively, complete an online request form for documentation, health information, or for permission to quote or translate, on the Regional Office web site (http://www.euro.who.int/pubrequest). All rights reserved. The Regional Office for Europe of the World Health Organization welcomes requests for permission to reproduce or translate its publications, in part or in full. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar This policy brief is one of a nature that are not mentioned. -
A Cross- Sectional Study Among Switzerland-Based Occupational
Does Therapy Always Need Touch? - A cross- sectional study among Switzerland-based occupational therapists and midwives regarding their experience with health care at a distance during the COVID-19 pandemic in Spring 2020 Verena Klamroth ( [email protected] ) ZHAW: Zurcher Hochschule fur Angewandte Wissenschaften https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8944-792X Michael Gemperle ZHAW: Zurcher Hochschule fur Angewandte Wissenschaften Thomas Ballmer ZHAW: Zurcher Hochschule fur Angewandte Wissenschaften Susanne Grylka-Baeschlin ZHAW: Zurcher Hochschule fur Angewandte Wissenschaften Jessica Pehlke-Milde ZHAW: Zurcher Hochschule fur Angewandte Wissenschaften Brigitte Gantschnig ZHAW: Zurcher Hochschule fur Angewandte Wissenschaften Research article Keywords: Tele-health, tele-care, tele-rehabilitation, tele-monitoring health professions, video-telephony, technology acceptance, occupational therapy, midwifery Posted Date: November 6th, 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-103168/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/19 Abstract Background: The COVID-19 pandemic impedes therapy and care activities. Health care at a distance (HCD) is a promising way to ll the supply gap. However, facilitators and barriers inuence the use and experience of HCD in occupational therapists (OTs) and midwives. We identied use of services and appraisal of experiences of Switzerland-based OTs and midwives regarding the provision of HCD during the lockdown as it pertains to the COVID-19 pandemic in spring 2020. 1. Hypothesis: Profession, age in years, and area of work have a signicant and meaningful inuence over whether HCD is provided. 2. Hypothesis: Profession, age in years, area of work, possibility of reimbursement by health insurance, and application used have a signicant and meaningful inuence on the experience of HCD.