Amfenac Increases the Radiosensitivity of Uveal Melanoma Cell Lines

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Amfenac Increases the Radiosensitivity of Uveal Melanoma Cell Lines Eye (2008) 22, 701–706 & 2008 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0950-222X/08 $30.00 www.nature.com/eye 1 1 1 Amfenac increases BF Fernandes , J-C Marshall , S Di Cesare , LABORATORY STUDY P Logan1, S Maloney1 and MN Burnier Jr1,2 the radiosensitivity of uveal melanoma cell lines Abstract with an incidence of seven cases per million.1 Enucleation of the affected eye was the only Purpose To evaluate the proliferation rates of available treatment for UM for most of the last five human uveal melanoma (UM) cell lines 2 after treatment with amfenac, a century. However, with the advent of more cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor, and conservative alternatives to treat the primary subsequent radiation exposure. tumour, enucleation rates have substantially Methods Five human UM cell lines (92.1, declined in recent years. The procedure is now SP6.5, MKT-BR, OCM-1, and UW-1) and one reserved for large tumours or those cases where 3 1 human fibroblast cell line (BJ) were incubated there is no hope of regaining vision. Department of Ophthalmology and with amfenac. Treated and non-treated cell Radiation is the preferred form of treatment 4 Pathology, The McGill lines were then exposed to various doses of c for most cases of UM. UMs are typically treated 5 University Health Center & radiation: 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 Gy. Sulphorhodamine- with a calculated apex dose of 70–85 Gy. Henry C Witelson Ocular B assay was used to assess proliferation rates Iodine-125 is the most commonly used isotope Pathology Laboratory, 48 h post-radiation. for plaque radiotherapy of choroidal Montreal, Canada 6 Results Treatment of UM cell lines with melanomas, although cobalt-60, ruthenium- 2Department of amfenac prior to radiation led to a marked 106, iridium-192, strontium-90, and palladium- 3 Ophthalmology. Federal reduction in proliferation rates. This difference 103 have also been used. Modern techniques University of Sa˜ o was statistically significant in all cell lines at for brachytherapy involve suturing a shielded PauloFUNIFESP/EPM, Sa˜ o every radiation dose (Po0.005), with the plaque containing seeds of the radioactive Paulo, Brazil exception of 92.1 at 2 Gy (P ¼ 0.157). Fibroblasts isotope to the sclera. This remains in place for a treated with amfenac showed significantly specified number of days to deliver the proper Correspondence: BF Fernandes, higher proliferation rates after 2 and 8 Gy, with dose of radiation. Although the rates of tumour Department of no significant differences at 0, 4, and 6 Gy. control are high, visual acuity is compromised Ophthalmology and Conclusions The radiosensitivity of UM cell in 25–35% of cases.6 Some of the complications Pathology, lines was increased by the administration of associated with the treatment are neovascular The McGill University Health amfenac, the active metabolite of nepafenac. glaucoma, cataract, radiation retinopathy, and Center & Henry C Witelson Ocular Pathology There appears to be a radioprotective effect of 7 optic nerve neuropathy. Thus, a substantial Laboratory, amfenac on human fibroblasts. The topical number of eyes are still enucleated due to 3775 University Street, administration of nepafenac may decrease failure of tumour control or radiation-related Room 216, tumour recurrence and radiation-induced complications. Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A-2B4 complications while broadening the indications There are two forms of the cyclooxygenase Tel: þ 1 514 398 7192 ext. for radiotherapy by treating larger tumours. (COX) enzyme, COX-1 and COX-2. While COX-1 00384; Eye (2008) 22, 701–706; doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6703042; is expressed constitutively in normal tissues,8 Fax: þ 1 514 398 5728. published online 30 November 2007 COX-2 is an inducible enzyme expressed in E-mail: bruno.mtl@ response to a variety of inflammatory and gmail.com Keywords: uveal melanoma; radiation; COX-2; mitogenic stimuli.9 COX-2 expression has been amfenac; cell lines Received: 13 June 2007 reported in a wide variety of malignant Accepted in revised form: tumours,10–12 including uveal melanoma.13 The 27 October 2007 expression of COX-2 has been linked to various Published online: 30 processes, including tumour proliferation,14 November 2007 Introduction 15 16,17 immunosuppression, and metastasis. The authors have no Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common Specific COX-2 inhibitors are currently in use financial conflict of interest primary intraocular malignant tumour in adults for patients diagnosed with familial regarding this article. Amfenac and uveal melanoma BF Fernandes et al 702 adenomatous polyposis, a genetic disorder, which Irradiation predisposes patients to colon cancer.18 The effectiveness Prior to radiation, each cell line was seeded at a of these selective inhibitors has been investigated in a concentration of 500 000 cells per ml in micro petri dishes variety of tumours and shows promise for use as an and incubated overnight with a 150 nM concentration of adjuvant therapy.19 amfenac (Alcon Laboratories Inc., Fort Worth, TX, USA), COX-2 inhibitors have also previously been shown to the active metabolite of nepafenac. The concentration of increase the radiosensitivity of lung20 and breast21 cancer 150 nm was the recommended 50% inhibitory cell lines. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that a concentration (IC ) of COX-2 activity.28 On the following COX-2 inhibitor is capable of minimizing radiation 50 day, the cells were exposed to graded doses of g damage to non-neoplastic tissues.22 Nepafenac is a COX- irradiation: 2, 4, 6, and 8 Gy (137Cs source, g Cell 1000). 2 inhibitor formulated for topical administration to the Controls consisted of cell lines exposed to radiation eye.23,24 The purpose of our study was to determine the without prior incubation with amfenac. effects of amfenac, the active metabolite of nepafenac, on Post radiation, all micro petri dishes containing the radiosensitivity of five human UM cell lines and one 500 000 cells/plate were trypsinized using 0.05% Trypsin human fibroblast cell line. in EDTA, then washed in 5% FBS RPMI solution, and centrifuged for 5 min at 3000 g. The cells were then diluted to a concentration of 50 000 cells/ml in 5% FBS Methods RPMI solution. These dilutions were seeded in a 96-well Cell culture plate format at a concentration of 5000 cells per well and left to incubate at 371C for 48 h to adhere to the bottom of Four previously characterized human UM cell lines (92.1, the wells. After 48 h, we could already see colonies SP6.5, MKT-BR, OCM-1), one transformed human uveal formed. Thus, to guarantee exponential growth, we melanocyte cell line (UW-1) and one human fibroblast chose to run the proliferation assay at this time point. The cell line (BJ, American Type Culture Collection, USA) proliferation assay was done in triplicate per exposure were incubated at 371C in a humidified 5% CO -enriched 2 condition. atmosphere.25 The cell lines used have previously been graded in terms of proliferative and invasive abilities and 25 metastatic potential. The UM cell lines were cultured in Sulphorhodamine-B assay RPMI-1640 medium (Invitrogen, Burlington, ON, Canada), supplemented with 5% heat inactivated fetal The Sulphorhodamine-B assay kit (TOX-6, Sigma-Aldrich bovine serum (FBS), 1% fungizone, and 1% penicillin– Co., St Louis, Missouri, USA) was used to measure total 29 streptomycin purchased from Invitrogen (Burlington, cell material as described previously. Each of the ON, Canada). The fibroblast cell line was cultured in treated and non-treated cell lines were seeded into wells 3 DMEM medium (Invitrogen, Burlington, ON, Canada), at a concentration of 5 Â 10 cells per well, with a supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 1% minimum of three wells per cell line/radiation dose. The 1 fungizone, and 1% penicillin-streptomycin purchased cells were then allowed to incubate for 48 h at 37 C. from Invitrogen (Burlington, ON, Canada). Cells were Following the incubation period, the cells were fixed to cultured as a monolayer in 25 cm2 flasks (Fisher, Whitby, the bottom of the wells using a solution of 50% 1 ON, Canada) and observed two times weekly, at every Trichloroacetic acid for 1 h at 4 C. The plates were then media change, for normal growth by phase contrast rinsed with distilled water, to remove trichloroacetic acid microscopy. The cultures were grown to confluence and and medium, and later air dried. The Sulphorhodamine- passaged by treatment with 0.05% trypsin in EDTA B dye solution was next added to each well and allowed (Fisher) at 371C and washed in 7 ml RPMI-1640 media to stain for 25 min. The Sulphorhodamine-B solution was before being centrifuged at 120 g for 10 min to form a subsequently removed by washing with a 10% acetic acid pellet. Cells were then suspended in 1 ml of medium and solution and once more allowed to air dry. The dye that counted using the Trypan Blue dye exclusion test for use had become incorporated into the fixed cells at the in all subsequent assays. bottom of the wells was solubilized in a 10 mM solution The UM cell lines 92.1, SP6.5, and MKT-BR were of Tris. The absorbance of the solute was measured using established by Dr Jager (University Hospital Leiden, The a microplate reader at a wavelength of 510 nm. Netherlands), Dr Pelletier (Laval University, Quebec, Canada) and Dr Belkhou (CJF INSERM, France), Data analysis respectively. Dr Albert (University of Wisconsin- Madison, USA) established the OCM-1 and UW-1 cell The Student’s t-test was used to compare proliferation lines.26,27 results between treated and non-treated cell lines after Eye Amfenac and uveal melanoma BF Fernandes et al 703 various doses of radiation.
Recommended publications
  • Comparison of Ketorolac 0.4 and Nepafenac 0.1 for the Prevention Of
    Downloaded from http://bjo.bmj.com/ on June 11, 2015 - Published by group.bmj.com Clinical science Comparison of ketorolac 0.4% and nepafenac 0.1% for the prevention of cystoid macular oedema after phacoemulsification: prospective placebo-controlled Editor’s choice Scan to access more free content randomised study Patrick Frensel Tzelikis,1 Monike Vieira,1 Wilson Takashi Hida,1,2 Antonio Francisco Motta,2 Celso Takashi Nakano,2 Eliane Mayumi Nakano,1 Milton Ruiz Alves2 1Brasilia Ophthalmologic ABSTRACT disposal, but there is still debate over whether to Hospital, HOB, Brasilia, DF, Purpose To compare the anti-inflammatory efficacy of use them in combination for routine cases. Brazil 2Ophthalmology Department, ketorolac of tromethamine 0.4% and nepafenac 0.1% Despite a convincing theory of pathogenesis Faculdade de Medicina, eye drops for prophylaxis of cystoid macular oedema involving migratory inflammatory mediator and Universidade de São Paulo, (CME) after small-incision cataract extraction. hyperpermeability of retinal blood vessels, particu- São Paulo, SP, Brazil Methods Patients were assigned randomly to three larly the retinal capillary bed, evidence-based medi- groups. Group 1 patients received a topical artificial tear cine still regards prophylaxis and treatment with Correspondence to fl Dr Patrick F Tzelikis, Brasilia substitute (placebo); group 2 received ketorolac anti-in ammatory agents as unproven. The present Ophthalmologic Hospital, HOB, tromethamine 0.4% (Acular LS, Allergan) and group 3 study evaluated the effects of ophthalmic solutions SQN 203, bloco K, apart 502, received nepafenac 0.1% (Nevanac, Alcon). The of the NSAIDs ketorolac 0.4% and nepafenac 0.1% Brasilia, DF 70833-110, Brazil; incidence and severity of CME were evaluated by retinal in preventing CME assessed by optical coherence [email protected] foveal thickness on optical coherence tomography (OCT) tomography (OCT) using central subfield thickness 3 Received 15 August 2014 after 1, 4 and 12 weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • S1 Table. List of Medications Analyzed in Present Study Drug
    S1 Table. List of medications analyzed in present study Drug class Drugs Propofol, ketamine, etomidate, Barbiturate (1) (thiopental) Benzodiazepines (28) (midazolam, lorazepam, clonazepam, diazepam, chlordiazepoxide, oxazepam, potassium Sedatives clorazepate, bromazepam, clobazam, alprazolam, pinazepam, (32 drugs) nordazepam, fludiazepam, ethyl loflazepate, etizolam, clotiazepam, tofisopam, flurazepam, flunitrazepam, estazolam, triazolam, lormetazepam, temazepam, brotizolam, quazepam, loprazolam, zopiclone, zolpidem) Fentanyl, alfentanil, sufentanil, remifentanil, morphine, Opioid analgesics hydromorphone, nicomorphine, oxycodone, tramadol, (10 drugs) pethidine Acetaminophen, Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (36) (celecoxib, polmacoxib, etoricoxib, nimesulide, aceclofenac, acemetacin, amfenac, cinnoxicam, dexibuprofen, diclofenac, emorfazone, Non-opioid analgesics etodolac, fenoprofen, flufenamic acid, flurbiprofen, ibuprofen, (44 drugs) ketoprofen, ketorolac, lornoxicam, loxoprofen, mefenamiate, meloxicam, nabumetone, naproxen, oxaprozin, piroxicam, pranoprofen, proglumetacin, sulindac, talniflumate, tenoxicam, tiaprofenic acid, zaltoprofen, morniflumate, pelubiprofen, indomethacin), Anticonvulsants (7) (gabapentin, pregabalin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, carbamazepine, valproic acid, lacosamide) Vecuronium, rocuronium bromide, cisatracurium, atracurium, Neuromuscular hexafluronium, pipecuronium bromide, doxacurium chloride, blocking agents fazadinium bromide, mivacurium chloride, (12 drugs) pancuronium, gallamine, succinylcholine
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Annex I Summary of Product Characteristics
    ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS 1 1. NAME OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT NEVANAC 1 mg/ml eye drops, suspension 2. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION 1 ml of suspension contains 1 mg nepafenac. Excipients: benzalkonium chloride 0.05 mg. For a full list of excipients, see section 6.1. 3. PHARMACEUTICAL FORM Eye drops, suspension (eye drops) Light yellow to dark yellow uniform suspension, pH 7.4 (approximately). 4. CLINICAL PARTICULARS 4.1 Therapeutic indications Prevention and treatment of postoperative pain and inflammation associated with cataract surgery (see section 5.1). 4.2 Posology and method of administration Use in adults, including the elderly The dose is one drop of NEVANAC in the conjunctival sac of the affected eye(s) 3 times daily beginning 1 day prior to cataract surgery, continued on the day of surgery and for the first 2 weeks of the postoperative period. Treatment can be extended to the first 3 weeks of the postoperative period, as directed by the clinician. An additional drop should be administered 30-120 minutes prior to surgery. Paediatric patients NEVANAC is not recommended for use in children below 18 years due to a lack of data on safety and efficacy. Use in hepatic and renal impairment NEVANAC has not been studied in patients with hepatic disease or renal impairment. Nepafenac is eliminated primarily through biotransformation and the systemic exposure is very low following topical ocular administration. No dose adjustment is warranted in these patients. Method of administration For ocular use. Instruct patients to shake the bottle well before use. If more than one topical ophthalmic medicinal product is being used, the medicines must be administered at least 5 minutes apart.
    [Show full text]
  • Estonian Statistics on Medicines 2016 1/41
    Estonian Statistics on Medicines 2016 ATC code ATC group / Active substance (rout of admin.) Quantity sold Unit DDD Unit DDD/1000/ day A ALIMENTARY TRACT AND METABOLISM 167,8985 A01 STOMATOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS 0,0738 A01A STOMATOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS 0,0738 A01AB Antiinfectives and antiseptics for local oral treatment 0,0738 A01AB09 Miconazole (O) 7088 g 0,2 g 0,0738 A01AB12 Hexetidine (O) 1951200 ml A01AB81 Neomycin+ Benzocaine (dental) 30200 pieces A01AB82 Demeclocycline+ Triamcinolone (dental) 680 g A01AC Corticosteroids for local oral treatment A01AC81 Dexamethasone+ Thymol (dental) 3094 ml A01AD Other agents for local oral treatment A01AD80 Lidocaine+ Cetylpyridinium chloride (gingival) 227150 g A01AD81 Lidocaine+ Cetrimide (O) 30900 g A01AD82 Choline salicylate (O) 864720 pieces A01AD83 Lidocaine+ Chamomille extract (O) 370080 g A01AD90 Lidocaine+ Paraformaldehyde (dental) 405 g A02 DRUGS FOR ACID RELATED DISORDERS 47,1312 A02A ANTACIDS 1,0133 Combinations and complexes of aluminium, calcium and A02AD 1,0133 magnesium compounds A02AD81 Aluminium hydroxide+ Magnesium hydroxide (O) 811120 pieces 10 pieces 0,1689 A02AD81 Aluminium hydroxide+ Magnesium hydroxide (O) 3101974 ml 50 ml 0,1292 A02AD83 Calcium carbonate+ Magnesium carbonate (O) 3434232 pieces 10 pieces 0,7152 DRUGS FOR PEPTIC ULCER AND GASTRO- A02B 46,1179 OESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE (GORD) A02BA H2-receptor antagonists 2,3855 A02BA02 Ranitidine (O) 340327,5 g 0,3 g 2,3624 A02BA02 Ranitidine (P) 3318,25 g 0,3 g 0,0230 A02BC Proton pump inhibitors 43,7324 A02BC01 Omeprazole
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Formulary List of Covered Prescription Drugs
    2021 Formulary List of covered prescription drugs This drug list applies to all Individual HMO products and the following Small Group HMO products: Sharp Platinum 90 Performance HMO, Sharp Platinum 90 Performance HMO AI-AN, Sharp Platinum 90 Premier HMO, Sharp Platinum 90 Premier HMO AI-AN, Sharp Gold 80 Performance HMO, Sharp Gold 80 Performance HMO AI-AN, Sharp Gold 80 Premier HMO, Sharp Gold 80 Premier HMO AI-AN, Sharp Silver 70 Performance HMO, Sharp Silver 70 Performance HMO AI-AN, Sharp Silver 70 Premier HMO, Sharp Silver 70 Premier HMO AI-AN, Sharp Silver 73 Performance HMO, Sharp Silver 73 Premier HMO, Sharp Silver 87 Performance HMO, Sharp Silver 87 Premier HMO, Sharp Silver 94 Performance HMO, Sharp Silver 94 Premier HMO, Sharp Bronze 60 Performance HMO, Sharp Bronze 60 Performance HMO AI-AN, Sharp Bronze 60 Premier HDHP HMO, Sharp Bronze 60 Premier HDHP HMO AI-AN, Sharp Minimum Coverage Performance HMO, Sharp $0 Cost Share Performance HMO AI-AN, Sharp $0 Cost Share Premier HMO AI-AN, Sharp Silver 70 Off Exchange Performance HMO, Sharp Silver 70 Off Exchange Premier HMO, Sharp Performance Platinum 90 HMO 0/15 + Child Dental, Sharp Premier Platinum 90 HMO 0/20 + Child Dental, Sharp Performance Gold 80 HMO 350 /25 + Child Dental, Sharp Premier Gold 80 HMO 250/35 + Child Dental, Sharp Performance Silver 70 HMO 2250/50 + Child Dental, Sharp Premier Silver 70 HMO 2250/55 + Child Dental, Sharp Premier Silver 70 HDHP HMO 2500/20% + Child Dental, Sharp Performance Bronze 60 HMO 6300/65 + Child Dental, Sharp Premier Bronze 60 HDHP HMO
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Prophylactic Nepafenac 0.1% Eye Drops
    Ophthalmol Ina 2015;41(3):265-271 265 Original Article The Effect of Prophylactic Nepafenac 0.1% Eye Drops on Macular Changes after Phacoemulsiication in Non- Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Patients Using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) Soeiandi Soedarman *, Ari Djatikusumo *, Syska Widyawati *, Arini Setiawati ** * Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Indonesia University Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta ** Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutic, Faculty of Medicine, Indonesia University Cipto Manungkusumo Hospital, Jakarta ABSTRACT Background: To evaluate the effect of prophylactic nepafenac eye drops on macular thickness changes after phacoemulsiication surgery in mild to moderate NPDR patients. Method: This study is an open label randomized clinical trial. Thirty-six subjects who met the inclusion criteria underwent phacoemulsiication. One group (18 subjects) were given nepafenac 0.1% eye drops and the rest were given placebo. Foveal thickness was measured by SD-OCT before surgery and the fourth week after phacoemulsiication. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and degree of inlammation in the anterior chamber were also being assessed. Result: There was a statistically signiicant increase foveal thickness in the placebo group 4 weeks after phacoemulsiication (p=0.022). Clinically, percentage degree of inlammation in anterior chamber in placebo group was higher than nepafenac group (38.9% : 5.6%) but not signiicantly different between 2 groups (p=0.27). Nepafenac group achieved clinically better BCVA than the placebo group 4 weeks after phacoemulsiication, although statistically there was no signiicant difference between 2 groups (p=0.991). Conclusion: Nepafenac 0.1% eye drops could prevent foveal thickening 4 weeks after phacoemulsiication in mild to moderate NPDR patients.
    [Show full text]
  • Prophylactic Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs for the Prevention of Macular Oedema After Cataract Surgery (Review)
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Prophylactic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the prevention of macular oedema after cataract surgery (Review) Lim BX, Lim CHL, Lim DK, Evans JR, Bunce C, Wormald R Lim BX, Lim CHL, Lim DK, Evans JR, Bunce C, Wormald R. Prophylactic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the prevention of macular oedema after cataract surgery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016, Issue 11. Art. No.: CD006683. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006683.pub3. www.cochranelibrary.com Prophylactic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the prevention of macular oedema after cataract surgery (Review) Copyright © 2016 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. TABLE OF CONTENTS HEADER....................................... 1 ABSTRACT ...................................... 1 PLAINLANGUAGESUMMARY . 2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR THE MAIN COMPARISON . ..... 4 BACKGROUND .................................... 7 OBJECTIVES ..................................... 8 METHODS ...................................... 8 RESULTS....................................... 11 Figure1. ..................................... 12 Figure2. ..................................... 15 Figure3. ..................................... 18 Figure4. ..................................... 20 ADDITIONALSUMMARYOFFINDINGS . 20 DISCUSSION ..................................... 23 AUTHORS’CONCLUSIONS . 24 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . 24 REFERENCES ..................................... 25 CHARACTERISTICSOFSTUDIES . 30 DATAANDANALYSES. 115 ADDITIONALTABLES.
    [Show full text]
  • Topical Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs As Adjuvant
    Int Ophthalmol DOI 10.1007/s10792-016-0374-5 ORIGINAL PAPER Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as adjuvant therapy in the prevention of macular edema after cataract surgery Nicola Cardascia . Carmela Palmisano . Tersa Centoducati . Giovanni Alessio Received: 15 April 2016 / Accepted: 6 October 2016 Ó Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016 Abstract with a fixed combination of dexamethasone and Purpose The purpose of the study was to assess netilmicin, and some patients were additionally adjuvant treatment with topical nonsteroidal anti- treated with NSAIDs (bromfenac, nepafenac, indo- inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (0.9 % bromfenac, methacin, or diclofenac). 0.1 % nepafenac, 0.5 % indomethacin, or 0.1 % Results Fourteen patients were treated with bromfe- diclofenac) in addition to topical steroidal treatment nac, 15 with nepafenac, 12 with indomethacin, and 14 with 0.1 % dexamethasone and 0.3 % netilmicin for with diclofenac; ten patients were treated with prevention of cystoid macular edema (CME) after dexamethasone and netilmicin alone. At the end of uneventful small incision cataract extraction with the follow-up, macular thickness, evaluated at 1-week foldable intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. post-surgery, was reduced only in the group treated Setting Institute of Ophthalmology, Department of with nepafenac (-1.3 %, p = 0.048), was increased Scienze Mediche di Base, Neuroscienze ed Organi di in the group treated with dexamethasone and netilmi- Senso, Aldo Moro University, Policlinico Consorziale cin alone (?4.3 %, p = 0.04), and did not change in di Bari, Bari, Italy. the groups treated with bromfenac (-1.1 %, p = 0.3), Design A retrospective 6-month single center study. indomethacin (?0.1 %, p = 0.19), or diclofenac Methods Patients were divided into groups accord- (?1.2 %, p = 0.74).
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Effect of Nepafenac and Diclofenac Ophthalmic Solutions
    Journal name: Clinical Ophthalmology Article Designation: Clinical Trial Report Year: 2016 Volume: 10 Clinical Ophthalmology Dovepress Running head verso: Kawahara et al Running head recto: Nepafenac versus diclofenac ophthalmic solutions after cataract surgery open access to scientific and medical research DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S101836 Open Access Full Text Article CLINICAL TRIAL REPORT Comparison of effect of nepafenac and diclofenac ophthalmic solutions on cornea, tear film, and ocular surface after cataract surgery: the results of a randomized trial Atsushi Kawahara1–3 Background: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of nepafenac ophthalmic Tsugiaki Utsunomiya4 suspension 0.1% (Nevanac) and diclofenac sodium ophthalmic solution 0.1% (Diclod) on the Yuji Kato2 cornea, tear film, and ocular surface after cataract surgery. Yoshinori Takayanagi3 Methods: A total of 60 eyes (60 patients) were selected for this study, with no ocular diseases other than cataract (scheduled for cataract surgery by one surgeon). Patients were randomly 1Department of Ophthalmology, Sapporo Tokushukai Hospital, Sapporo, enrolled to receive nepafenac or diclofenac in the perioperative period, and cataract surgery Hokkaido, Japan; 2Sapporo Kato Eye was performed using torsional microcoaxial phacoemulsification and aspiration with intraocular For personal use only. Clinic, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan; lens implantation via a transconjunctival single-plane sclerocorneal incision at the 12 o’clock 3Takayanagi Clinic, Kushiro, Hokkaido, Japan; 4Department of Ophthalmology, position. We compared intra- and intergroup differences preoperatively and postoperatively in Asahikawa Medical University, conjunctival and corneal fluorescein staining scores, tear film breakup times, Schirmer’s tests, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan the Dry Eye Related Quality of Life Scores, and tear meniscus areas using anterior segment optical coherence tomography.
    [Show full text]
  • Analgesic Anti-Inflammatory Adhesive Preparations
    Europaisches Patentamt (19) European Patent Office Office europeeneen des brevets EP 0 71 3 697 A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION (43) Date of publication: (51) |nt Cl.e: A61K9/70 29.05.1996 Bulletin 1996/22 (21) Application number: 95307605.6 (22) Date of filing: 25.10.1995 (84) Designated Contracting States: • Orihara, Masamichi DE ES FR GB IT Minamisatama-gun Saitama-ken (JP) • Sugimoto, Yoshio (30) Priority: 26.10.1994 J P 284573/94 Saitama-ken (JP) • Yamazaki, Masaru (71) Applicant: Tokuhon Corporation Kitakatsushika-gun Saitama-ken (JP) Tokyo (JP) • Hoshino, Mitsunari Saitama-ken (JP) (72) Inventors: • Uchikawa, Masumasa • Sasaki, Yasuhiko Saitama-ken (JP) Saitama-ken (JP) • Arai, Hiroshi • Matsumura, Yukihiro Saitama-ken (JP) Saitama-ken (JP) • Imai, Susumu (74) Representative: Thomas, Roger Tamlyn et al Kitatsushika-gun Saitama-ken (JP) D. Young & Co. • Tooyama, Tetsuhiro 21 New Fetter Lane Saitama-ken (JP) London EC4A 1 DA (GB) (54) Analgesic anti-inflammatory adhesive preparations (57) A non-steroidal analgesic anti-inflammatory phenylyl)propionic acid and a modified copolymer in adhesive preparation obtained by coating one surface which methylmethacrylate is allowed to graft-polymer- of support with an adhesive containing S-(+)-2- ize on said copolymer, or with an adhesive containing ( 2-fluoro-4-biphenylyl)propionic acid and a styrene-iso- S-(+)-2-(2-fluoro-4-biphenylyl) propionic acid, sodium prene-styrene block copolymer or S-(+)-2-(2-fluor-4-bi- carboxymethyl cellulose and sodium polyacrylate. Is- O) CO CO o a. LU Printed by Jouve, 75001 PARIS (FR) EP 0 713 697 A1 Description The present invention concerns a non-steroidal analgesic anti-inflammatory adhesive preparation which contains as the pharmacologically effective component S-(+)-2-(2-fluoro-4-biphenylyl) propionic acid [abbreviated S-(+)-FP 5 hereinafter] which may be optically resolved from the racemic form 2-(2-fluoro-4-biphenylyl) propionic acid (also called: flurbiprofen).
    [Show full text]
  • Estonian Statistics on Medicines 2013 1/44
    Estonian Statistics on Medicines 2013 DDD/1000/ ATC code ATC group / INN (rout of admin.) Quantity sold Unit DDD Unit day A ALIMENTARY TRACT AND METABOLISM 146,8152 A01 STOMATOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS 0,0760 A01A STOMATOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS 0,0760 A01AB Antiinfectives and antiseptics for local oral treatment 0,0760 A01AB09 Miconazole(O) 7139,2 g 0,2 g 0,0760 A01AB12 Hexetidine(O) 1541120 ml A01AB81 Neomycin+Benzocaine(C) 23900 pieces A01AC Corticosteroids for local oral treatment A01AC81 Dexamethasone+Thymol(dental) 2639 ml A01AD Other agents for local oral treatment A01AD80 Lidocaine+Cetylpyridinium chloride(gingival) 179340 g A01AD81 Lidocaine+Cetrimide(O) 23565 g A01AD82 Choline salicylate(O) 824240 pieces A01AD83 Lidocaine+Chamomille extract(O) 317140 g A01AD86 Lidocaine+Eugenol(gingival) 1128 g A02 DRUGS FOR ACID RELATED DISORDERS 35,6598 A02A ANTACIDS 0,9596 Combinations and complexes of aluminium, calcium and A02AD 0,9596 magnesium compounds A02AD81 Aluminium hydroxide+Magnesium hydroxide(O) 591680 pieces 10 pieces 0,1261 A02AD81 Aluminium hydroxide+Magnesium hydroxide(O) 1998558 ml 50 ml 0,0852 A02AD82 Aluminium aminoacetate+Magnesium oxide(O) 463540 pieces 10 pieces 0,0988 A02AD83 Calcium carbonate+Magnesium carbonate(O) 3049560 pieces 10 pieces 0,6497 A02AF Antacids with antiflatulents Aluminium hydroxide+Magnesium A02AF80 1000790 ml hydroxide+Simeticone(O) DRUGS FOR PEPTIC ULCER AND GASTRO- A02B 34,7001 OESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE (GORD) A02BA H2-receptor antagonists 3,5364 A02BA02 Ranitidine(O) 494352,3 g 0,3 g 3,5106 A02BA02 Ranitidine(P)
    [Show full text]
  • Cyclooxygenase
    COX Cyclooxygenase Cyclooxygenase (COX), officially known as prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase (PTGS), is an enzyme that is responsible for formation of important biological mediators called prostanoids, including prostaglandins, prostacyclin and thromboxane. Pharmacological inhibition of COX can provide relief from the symptoms of inflammation and pain. Drugs, like Aspirin, that inhibit cyclooxygenase activity have been available to the public for about 100 years. Two cyclooxygenase isoforms have been identified and are referred to as COX-1 and COX-2. Under many circumstances the COX-1 enzyme is produced constitutively (i.e., gastric mucosa) whereas COX-2 is inducible (i.e., sites of inflammation). Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), such as aspirin and ibuprofen, exert their effects through inhibition of COX. The main COX inhibitors are the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). www.MedChemExpress.com 1 COX Inhibitors, Antagonists, Activators & Modulators (+)-Catechin hydrate (-)-Catechin Cat. No.: HY-N0355 ((-)-Cianidanol; (-)-Catechuic acid) Cat. No.: HY-N0898A (+)-Catechin hydrate inhibits cyclooxygenase-1 (-)-Catechin, isolated from green tea, is an (COX-1) with an IC50 of 1.4 μM. isomer of Catechin having a trans 2S,3R configuration at the chiral center. Catechin inhibits cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) with an IC50 of 1.4 μM. Purity: 99.59% Purity: 98.78% Clinical Data: Phase 4 Clinical Data: No Development Reported Size: 100 mg Size: 10 mM × 1 mL, 5 mg, 10 mg, 25 mg, 50 mg (-)-Catechin gallate (-)-Epicatechin ((-)-Catechin 3-gallate; (-)-Catechin 3-O-gallate) Cat. No.: HY-N0356 ((-)-Epicatechol; Epicatechin; epi-Catechin) Cat. No.: HY-N0001 (-)-Catechin gallate is a minor constituent in (-)-Epicatechin inhibits cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) green tea catechins.
    [Show full text]