DOCSLIB.ORG

The Public Defender of Georgia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Public Defender of Georgia 200 6 The Public Defender of Georgia Report of the Public Defender of Georgia 1 Human Rights in Georgia Report of the Public Defender of Georgia 2006first half of TBILISI 2007 THE REPORT WAS PUBLISHED WITH THE FINANCIAL SUPPORT OF GOVERNMENT OF NORWAY AND UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (UNDP) Contents 1. INTRODUCTION BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE SITUATION 9 2. THE SITUATION OF PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS IN THE SPHERE OF JUSTICE AND POWER STRUCTURES 15 The Judiciary and Human Rights 15 Prosecutors Office and Human Rights 28 Fiscal Police and Human Rights 45 Ministry of Internal Affairs and Human Rights 48 Police Monitoring 55 Human Rights in Armed Forces 56 3. THE SITUATION IN THE PENITENTIARY SYSTEM 58 Changes to the Law on Imprisonment, prisoner rights and the situation in the penitentiary establishments 58 The Training Centre for the Penitentiary and Probation Service 60 Visits to Prisoners 60 The Right to Defence 67 Video Cameras in Meeting Rooms 69 Food, Parcels, Packages 69 Natural Light and Ventilation 72 Hygiene 74 Clothing and Bedding 76 Work and Education 77 Prisoners Property 79 Overcrowding 79 Prisoner Accommodation 81 Escorting Inmates 81 Beating and Torturing Prisoners, Riot at Prison No.5 82 Provision of Medical Services in the Penitentiary System 89 4. ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGEMENTS 141 5. EXECUTION OF JUDGEMENTS OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS 143 The Situation of Execution of Judgements of the European Court 143 Considering ECHR Judgements 144 6. ON THE VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE TERRITORIES OUTSIDE THE CONTROL OF CENTRAL AUTHORITIES 146 The Situation in Georgian-Language Schools in Gali Region 151 Democratic Institutions in the Peace-Keeping Zone 152 The Situation of the Protection of Human Rights in Tskhinvali Region 153 Persecution for Political Beliefs 153 Liability for Human Rights Violations in the Territory of Abkhazia and South Ossetia 154 7. ON THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC SITUATION OF IDPS 156 8. PROTECTION OF REFUGEES RIGHTS 169 9. FREEDOM OF ASSEMBLY AND MANIFESTATIONS 173 10. THE SITUATION OF MEDIA IN GEORGIA 179 Media in the Regions 181 Enhancing Cooperation between State Structures and Mass Media 186 Plan for Protection of Journalists 190 11. PROTECTION OF FREEDOM OF BELIEF AND TOLERANCE 197 Protection of Freedom of Belief 197 Problematic Issues 199 Tolerance and Integration 200 Annex 1 200 Annex 2 202 12. THE NATIONAL MINORITIES COUNCIL 204 13. THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD 207 Centre for the Rights of the Child 207 Monitoring of Childrens Institutions 208 Street Children 211 Applications 215 Deinstitutionalisation Programme 216 The State Policy towards Juvenile Delinquents 217 6 14. GENDER EQUALITY ISSUES 220 15. THE PROBLEM OF TRAFFICKING IN GEORGIA 225 16. PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES 229 Annex 235 17. SOCIAL -ECONOMIC RIGHTS 237 The Right to Adequate Standard of Living 238 The Right to Property 245 Importance of Entrepreneurial Activity and Freedom of Entrepreneurship 251 The Labor Right 254 18. THE RIGHT TO HEALTH PROTECTION 266 Main Trends of Demographic Development 266 Provision of High Quality Medical Care 268 Monitoring of Medical Services and Social Assistance for the HIV/AIDS Patients 270 Professional Responsibility of Doctors 276 19. FREEDOM OF PUBLIC INFORMATION 295 The Concept of Freedom of Information 295 Facts of Delayed Issuance of Public Information and Follow-On by the Public Defender 295 20. THE RIGHT TO EDUCATION 299 21. PATIENTS RIGHTS AND THEIR PLACEMENT AND TREATMENT CONDITIONS IN PSYCHIATRIC CLINICS 301 22. LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS 306 200 23. CONSTITUTIONAL CLAIMS OF PUBLIC DEFENDER 315 24. LEGAL GUARANTEES OF POWERS OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER 319 25. RECOMMENDATIONS 324 6 Report of the Public Defender of Georgia 7 BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE SITUATION The report on the human rights situation shall be submitted to Parliament by the Public Defen- der twice every year, as provided for by Article 22 of the Law on the Public Defender of Georgia. 1 This Report contains an analysis INTRODUCTION of the human rights situation in Georgia for the first half of 2006, describes the violations found in the reporting period, and provi- des recommendations on measu- res to be taken with a view to re- medying the situation. Creation of the Public Defenders Institution under the 1995 Consti- tution and adoption of the Organic Law on the Public Defender of Ge- Preparation of legal proposals and orgia in 1996 led to the establish- recommendations on statutory acts ment of a national mechanism for submitted to Parliament for consid- the protection of human rights fo- eration constitutes an important unded on traditions and basic prin- part of the work carried out by the ciples of European Ombudsmans Public Defenders Office, and is cov- institutions. Since 1996, the Pub- ered in a special chapter of the Re- lic Defenders Office has provided port. an effective leverage for the protec- tion of human rights in Georgia, The Public Defenders Office seeks as corroborated by numerous in- to promptly follow on all facts of terventions by PDO, as well as in- human rights violations. As a result, creased trust by the public. the public trust and credit given to 200 the PDO has increased consider- It is important to note that over the ably. reporting period the PDO, in con- junction with international and lo- The sociological survey conducted cal experts, prepared a package of by the Business Consulting Group draft changes and amendments to (BCG) within the framework of the the Law on the Public Defender. UNDP sponsored Public Defend- The changes to be made to the Law ers Office Support Project gives an stem from the current situation in idea of the attitude of the public the protection of human rights and to the issue of human rights pro- aim to better specify the Public tection in Georgia. The survey cov- Defenders functions, thus leading ered 3500 respondents from 407 6 to better effectiveness of the insti- reference points in various regions tution. Draft changes were submit- of Georgia, including representa- ted to Parliament for consideration tives of executive, legislative and ju- at its spring session. diciary bodies, NGOs and the me- Report of the Public Defender of Georgia 9 INTRODUCTION dia. The survey helped to identify problems of particular concern for the public. Most of the respondents see the main problem in prevailing socio-economic predicament in the country. PLEASE, ASSESS EACH OF THE PROBLEMS LISTED BELOW ON 1-11 SCALE, WHERE 1 MEANS ABSOLUTELY INSIGNIFICANT AND 11 MEANS VERY SIGNIFICANT DONT KNOW PERCENTAGE OF AVERAGE ASSESSMENT RESPONDENTS UNEMPLOYMENT 10,4 1,8% LOW LEVEL 10,0 4,8% OF REMUNERATION HEALTHCARE, 9,1 2,2% SOCIAL WELFARE DRUGS 9,0 3,8% HUMAN RIGHTS 8,8 5,9% VIOLATION ENVIRONMENTAL 8,0 5,2% PROBLEMS CORRUPTION 7,9 8,6% SECURITY 7,7 6,6% ETHNIC PROBLEMS 6,9 6,8% FREEDOM OF THOUGHT 6,8 6,8% AND EXPRESSION TERRORISM 6,1 8,3% Answers to the question Whom would you apply to in case your rights are violated? looked as follows: 10 WHOM WOULD YOU APPLY TO IN CASE YOUR RIGHTS ARE VIOLATED? CONSOLIDATED DATA PUBLIC DEFENDER (PUBLIC 20,2% DEFENDERS OFFICE) COURT 11,2% POLICE, PATROL 9,5% GOVERNOR, GOVERNORS OFFICE 6,2% DEFENCE COUNSEL, LAWYER 3,8% LAW-ENFORCEMENT BODIES 3,4% (LEGISLATIVE BODIES AT ALL LEVELS) LOCAL AUTHORITIES 3,2% (LOCAL GOVERNMENT) PRESIDENT 3,1% SAKREBULO (LOCAL COUNCIL) 2,7% NGO 1,9% RELEVANT BODY 1,7% GOVERNMENT 1,6 OTHER 5,2% NO ONE 15,2% DIFFICULT TO ANSWER 16,5% NOTE: RESPONDENTS COULD INDICATE SEVERAL OPTIONS; 200 HENCE, THE SUM TOTAL IS GREATER THAN 100%. In order to get a clear picture of the work carried out by the Public Defender in the reporting period, we tried to identify the main trends and tendencies in the protection of human rights, as well as attitudes of the public to the PDO. In order to consider the main strands in the PDOs work, the data for the earlier half of 2006 were compared with the results of 2005, as well as 2003 and 2004. Comparative analysis has demonstrated certain changes both in statistics and dynamics, surfaced new tendencies (positive and negative aspects), and pointed to ways of addressing the problems, as well as future prospects. One of the important elements in PDOs activities is its follow-up work in response to citizens complaints and 6 applications addressed to the Public Defender complex, versatile and time-consuming work. The diagram below shows the dynamics of applications addressed to the Public Defenders Office in 2003- 2006. Report of the Public Defender of Georgia 11 INTRODUCTION NUMBER OF APPLICATIONS ADDRESSED TO THE PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE (2003-2006) TOTAL NUMBER OF APPLICATIONS NUMBER PERCENTAGE 2500 35% 40% 35% 2000 30% 25% 1500 20% 20% 25% 20% 1000 15% 10% 500 5% 0 0% 2003 2004 2005 2006 I naxevari IN 2005, THE NUMBER OF APPLICATIONS BOTH FROM TBILISI AND REGIONS WAS ALMOST TWICE APPLICATIONS FROM TBILISI AS MUCH AS IN 2004. 2000 44% 50% 45% 40% 1500 30% 35% 26% 30% 1000 25% 20% 15% 500 10% 5% 0 0% 2003 2004 2005 HAVE YOU EVER HEARD OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE? YES NO 67,4% 32,6% 12 The main line of reasoning for respondents satisfied with the PDO is the enhanced work of the Ombudsman over the past period (63.6%). Respondents showing criticism say that the PDO is not fully independent, or it starts a case but fails to complete it. They think that the institution is weak, as it lacks leverage necessary for adequately addressing an issue. The diagram below shows the break-up of applications submitted to the PDO in the first half of 2006.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download Pdf Brochure
    New Year Tour to Armenia and Georgia Key information Duration: 7 days / 6 nights Best season: Winter Tour type: Small group / individual (starting from 2 persons) What’s included: Transfer to/from the airport, accommodation in Armenia (3 nights) and in Georgia (3 nights) in 3*/4* hotels and double rooms, breakfast and christmas dinner, 1 bottle of water per day (0.5lt.), transport with air conditioning, English speaking guide service, all entrance fees, transfer to the border with Georgia What’s not included: Flights, visa fee, medical insurance Itinerary in brief Day 1 - Arrival - Yerevan City Tour Day 2 - Tsaghkadzor - Sevan - Sevanavank - Yerevan Day 3 - Garni - Geghard - Echmiadzin - Yerevan Day 4 - Debet - Sanahin - Haghpat - Armenia-Georgia border - Tbilisi Day 5 - Tbilisi City Tour Day 6 - Mtskheta - Ananuri - Gudauri - Tblisi Day 7 - Kakheti - Sighnaghi - Alazani - Tbilisi - Departure Detailed itinerary Day 1 After your arrival at Zvartnots airport, we will organize a transfer to the hotel for you. Your journey will start from the ancient capital of Armenia – Yerevan. Walking along the city streets, you will enjoy the bright festive atmosphere, friendly smiles of local people and unique coloring of this wonderful ancient city. You will make a stop at the Opera House, at the Republic Square, as well as climb the Cascade, the observation area of which offers a breathtaking view of Yerevan and Ararat. You will also have an opportunity to visit souvenir shops and make nice purchases. The dinner will be arranged in the traditional Armenian restaurant. Overnight: Hotel in Yerevan Meals: Lunch Day 2 On the second day, you’ll go to the most popular ski resort of Armenia – Tsaghkadzor.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia: What Now?
    GEORGIA: WHAT NOW? 3 December 2003 Europe Report N°151 Tbilisi/Brussels TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 II. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................. 2 A. HISTORY ...............................................................................................................................2 B. GEOPOLITICS ........................................................................................................................3 1. External Players .........................................................................................................4 2. Why Georgia Matters.................................................................................................5 III. WHAT LED TO THE REVOLUTION........................................................................ 6 A. ELECTIONS – FREE AND FAIR? ..............................................................................................8 B. ELECTION DAY AND AFTER ..................................................................................................9 IV. ENSURING STATE CONTINUITY .......................................................................... 12 A. STABILITY IN THE TRANSITION PERIOD ...............................................................................12 B. THE PRO-SHEVARDNADZE
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom of Religion in Abkhazia and South Ossetia/Tskhinvali Region
    Freedom of Religion in Abkhazia and South Ossetia/Tskhinvali Region Brief prehistory Orthodox Christians living in Abkhazia and South Ossetia are considered by the Patriarchate of the Georgian Orthodox Church to be subject to its canonical jurisdiction. The above is not formally denied by any Orthodox Churches. Abkhazians demand full independence and imagine their Church also to be independent. As for South Ossetia, the probable stance of "official" Ossetia is to unite with Alanya together with North Ossetia and integrate into the Russian Federation, therefore, they do not want to establish or "restore" the Autocephalous Orthodox Church. In both the political and ecclesiastical circles, the ruling elites of the occupied territories do not imagine their future together with either the Georgian State or the associated Orthodox Church. As a result of such attitudes and Russian influence, the Georgian Orthodox Church has no its clergymen in Tskhinvali or Abkhazia, cannot manage the property or relics owned by it before the conflict, and cannot provide adequate support to the parishioners that identify themselves with the Georgian Orthodox Church. Although both Abkhazia and South Ossetia have state sovereignty unilaterally recognized by the Russian Federation, ecclesiastical issues have not been resolved in a similar way. The Russian Orthodox Church does not formally or officially recognize the separate dioceses in these territories, which exist independently from the Georgian Orthodox Church, nor does it demand their integration into its own space. Clearly, this does not necessarily mean that the Russian Orthodox Church is guided by the "historical truth" and has great respect for the jurisdiction of the Georgian Orthodox Church in these territories.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia/Abkhazia
    HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH ARMS PROJECT HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH/HELSINKI March 1995 Vol. 7, No. 7 GEORGIA/ABKHAZIA: VIOLATIONS OF THE LAWS OF WAR AND RUSSIA'S ROLE IN THE CONFLICT CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................................................5 EVOLUTION OF THE WAR.......................................................................................................................................6 The Role of the Russian Federation in the Conflict.........................................................................................7 RECOMMENDATIONS...............................................................................................................................................8 To the Government of the Republic of Georgia ..............................................................................................8 To the Commanders of the Abkhaz Forces .....................................................................................................8 To the Government of the Russian Federation................................................................................................8 To the Confederation of Mountain Peoples of the Caucasus...........................................................................9 To the United Nations .....................................................................................................................................9 To the Organization on Security and Cooperation in Europe..........................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Africa and Southern Caucuses Tours - 2018
    Africa and Southern Caucuses Tours - 2018 1) 2018 East African Agribusiness Tour Wayne Dredge (Convenor) The itinerary for 2018’s African agribusiness tour is presently being finalised and will be circulated early in the new-year. The tour, which begins in Nairobi, will touch ground in Kenya, Tanzania, Malawi, Mozambique, Zimbabwe and Zambia to conclude at the most quintessential of African landmarks, Victoria Falls. The highlights will include visits to some of Sub-Saharan Africa’s fastest developing agricultural enterprises and most advanced research institutions. Presentations from global experts on food security, nutrition, conservation, future agricultural technology, product procurement and food manufacturing will be interspersed throughout the 24-day tour. Places are still available and any people wishing to learn more are encouraged to contact Mr Jim Geltch before the final cut off for new participants on February 28th. 2) Proposed tour of the Southern Caucuses in 2018 Simon Appleby (Convenor) The South Caucasus, incorporating the lands between the Black and Caspian Seas (Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan) is the Cradle of Wine, with archeological remains of winemaking dating as far back as 8000 years ago. It is believed that wild grapevine varieties were first domesticated in this region, with over 600 autochthonous vine variteies in the two countries, and that pre-Christian civilisations had a deep connection with viticulture and winemaking as part of religious ritual. Armenia is the oldest surviving Christian nation on earth, with Georgia having converted soon afterwards in the 4th century, and the two countries offer a unique opportunity to experience ancient wine culture in a comfortable and friendly environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Revolutionary Tactics: Insights from Police and Justice Reform in Georgia
    TRANSITIONS FORUM | CASE STUDY | JUNE 2014 Revolutionary Tactics: Insights from Police and Justice Reform in Georgia by Peter Pomerantsev with Geoffrey Robertson, Jovan Ratković and Anne Applebaum www.li.com www.prosperity.com ABOUT THE LEGATUM INSTITUTE Based in London, the Legatum Institute (LI) is an independent non-partisan public policy organisation whose research, publications, and programmes advance ideas and policies in support of free and prosperous societies around the world. LI’s signature annual publication is the Legatum Prosperity Index™, a unique global assessment of national prosperity based on both wealth and wellbeing. LI is the co-publisher of Democracy Lab, a journalistic joint-venture with Foreign Policy Magazine dedicated to covering political and economic transitions around the world. www.li.com www.prosperity.com http://democracylab.foreignpolicy.com TRANSITIONS FORUM CONTENTS Introduction 3 Background 4 Tactics for Revolutionary Change: Police Reform 6 Jovan Ratković: A Serbian Perspective on Georgia’s Police Reforms Justice: A Botched Reform? 10 Jovan Ratković: The Serbian Experience of Justice Reform Geoffrey Robertson: Judicial Reform The Downsides of Revolutionary Maximalism 13 1 Truth and Reconciliation Jovan Ratković: How Serbia Has Been Coming to Terms with the Past Geoffrey Robertson: Dealing with the Past 2 The Need to Foster an Opposition Jovan Ratković: The Serbian Experience of Fostering a Healthy Opposition Russia and the West: Geopolitical Direction and Domestic Reforms 18 What Georgia Means: for Ukraine and Beyond 20 References 21 About the Author and Contributors 24 About the Legatum Institute inside front cover Legatum Prosperity IndexTM Country Factsheet 2013 25 TRANSITIONS forum | 2 TRANSITIONS FORUM The reforms carried out in Georgia after the Rose Revolution of 2004 were Introduction among the most radical ever attempted in the post-Soviet world, and probably the most controversial.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Effectively Fight Corruption in Ukraine COALITIONS of the LIKE-MINDED CAN DEGRADE ENTRENCHED INTERESTS
    How to Effectively Fight Corruption in Ukraine COALITIONS OF THE LIKE-MINDED CAN DEGRADE ENTRENCHED INTERESTS PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo No. 405 December 2015 Robert Orttung1 George Washington University Nearly two years after the Euromaidan protests chased Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych from power, corruption remains among the top internal problems hindering the country’s development. Although the Euromaidan protests brought about a change of government, they did not change how the system works. Entrenched interests from the old system remain in place and continue to dictate what happens in the country. Despite this unfortunate reality, some things in Ukraine have changed, and it is possible to see a path toward a better future. This, however, requires popular action. It is the only way to overcome the elite interests that continue to support the status quo. Ukraine’s politicians have demonstrated time and time again that they will not initiate change on their own. The way to promote anti- corruption reform is through increased and persistent people power. Ukraine’s Anti-Corruption Record since the Euromaidan Most Ukrainians see little progress in cleaning up their political and economic systems since the dramatic events of late 2013 and early 2014. An oligarch now serves as president and many other oligarchs remain influential. No high level officials have been arrested for participating in corrupt activities and there has been little investigation of the old regime, much less a good faith effort to restore the assets looted by the previous leaders. Additionally, there has been little practical reform of the courts. A continuing series of scandals has rocked the General Prosecutors’ office, which employs approximately 20,000 officials and is frequently portrayed as the center of corruption.
    [Show full text]
  • Ser Oliver Uordropi 150
    saqarTvelos parlamentis erovnuli biblioTeka saqarTvelos erovnuli arqivi ser oliver uordropi 150 Tbilisi 2015 1 UDC (uak) 001 (410)(092) 008.1 (479.22.410) wigni Seadgina, SeniSvnebi da komentarebi daurTo, redaqtireba gaukeTa, inglisuri teqsti qarTul Targmans Seudara istoriis doqtorma: beqa kobaxiZem teqsti inglisuridan qarTul enaze Targmna: salome beniZem qarTuli Targmanis stilisturi redaqtireba diana anfimiadisa wina ydaze gamosaxulia saqarTvelos sagareo saqmeTa ministri - evgeni gegeWkori da didi britaneTis umaRlesi komisari - ser oliver uordropi tfilisSi 1919 wlis 30 agvistos mowyobil daxvedraze. foto daculia saqarTvelos erovnul arqivSi. On the front cover there are illustrated Minister of Foreign Affairs of Georgia – Evgeni Gegechkori and British High Commissioner in Transcaucasia – Sir Oliver Wardrop at the arrival meeting of Wardrop in Tiflis on 30th of August 1919. The photograph is preserved in the National Archives of Georgia. ukana ydaze gamosaxulia ser oliver uordropi - misi udidebulesobis generaluri konsuli strasburgSi. 1925 weli. foto hilari grandis uordropebis ojaxis albomidan. On the back cover there is illustrated Sir Oliver Wardrop – His Majesty’s Consul-General in Strasbourg. 1925. Photograph from Wardrops family album of Hilary Grundy. © saqarTvelos parlamentis erovnuli biblioTeka © saqarTvelos erovnuli arqivi Sps “irida” rusTavi, firosmanis q.#7 ISBN 978-9941-0-8216-0 2 sarCevi: redaqtoris winasityvaoba ...............................................................................................4 “ser oliver uordropi:
    [Show full text]
  • Regulating Trans-Ingur/I Economic Relations Views from Two Banks
    RegUlating tRans-ingUR/i economic Relations Views fRom two Banks July 2011 Understanding conflict. Building peace. this initiative is funded by the european union about international alert international alert is a 25-year-old independent peacebuilding organisation. We work with people who are directly affected by violent conflict to improve their prospects of peace. and we seek to influence the policies and ways of working of governments, international organisations like the un and multinational companies, to reduce conflict risk and increase the prospects of peace. We work in africa, several parts of asia, the south Caucasus, the Middle east and Latin america and have recently started work in the uK. our policy work focuses on several key themes that influence prospects for peace and security – the economy, climate change, gender, the role of international institutions, the impact of development aid, and the effect of good and bad governance. We are one of the world’s leading peacebuilding nGos with more than 155 staff based in London and 15 field offices. to learn more about how and where we work, visit www.international-alert.org. this publication has been made possible with the help of the uK Conflict pool and the european union instrument of stability. its contents are the sole responsibility of international alert and can in no way be regarded as reflecting the point of view of the european union or the uK government. © international alert 2011 all rights reserved. no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without full attribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Aw As Adjunct to Custom?
    LAW AS ADJUNCT TO CUSTOM? Abkhaz custom and law in today’s state-building and ‘modernisation’ - (Studied through dispute resolution) DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE SCHOOL OF ANTHROPOLOGY AND CONSERVATION AT THE UNIVERSITY OF KENT FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY 12 FEBRUARY 2015 By Michael Costello Examiners: Professor Michael Fischer Associate Professor Jacob Rigi Supervisor: Lecturer Glenn Bowman 1 LAW AS ADJUNCT TO CUSTOM? The relationship between Abkhaz custom and law in today’s state-building and ‘modernisation’ - (Studied through dispute resolution) Abstract The setting for research is Abkhazia a small country south of the Caucasus Mountains and bordering Europe and the Near East. The Abkhaz hold onto custom – apswara – to make of state law an adjunct to custom as the state strives to strengthen its powers to ‘modernise’ along capitalist lines. This institution of a parallel-cum-interwoven and oppositional existence of practices and the laws questions the relationship of the two in a novel way. The bases of apswara are its concepts of communality and fairness. Profound transformations have followed the dissolution of the Soviet Union, and the breakaway from and subsequent war with Georgia, none of which have brought the bright prospects that were hoped-for with independence. The element of hope in post-Soviet nostalgia provides pointers to what the Abkhaz seek to enact for their future, to decide the course of change that entertains the possibility of a non-capitalist modernisation route and a customary state. Apswara is founded on the direct participatory democracy of non-state regulation. It draws members of all ethnicities into the generation of nationalist self-awareness that transcends ethnicity and religions, and forms around sacred shrines and decisions taken by popular assemblies.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Abkhazia: Living with Insecurity
    5 Abkhazia: Living with insecurity Maxim Gvindzhiya Destroyed building in Sukhum(i) PHOTO: ANNA MATVEEVA Summary When conflict with Georgian forces broke out in August 1992, many Abkhaz were armed only with hunting rifles, though more advanced weapons were soon acquired from Russian troops, either by negotiation or unilateral seizure. The SALW used were mostly of Soviet/Russian origin. Since the conflict ended in 1993, SALW have remained widespread. The local population still feels insecure, and in such circumstances, people are reluctant to hand in their weapons. Tension is particularly high in the Gal(i) region, which lies on the de facto Abkhaz border that forms a ceasefire line with Georgia proper. The government of the unrecognised Republic of Abkhazia has had some success in regulating SALW proliferation. Legal arms sales are better controlled, and the MOI keeps a register of all individuals who possess arms. Legislation has been passed on the possession and trafficking of firearms. However, whenever tension escalates at the border, guns again become more visible in society. 2 THE CAUCASUS: ARMED AND DIVIDED · ABKHAZIA Traditional gun A close affinity with guns and pastoral gun possession, especially in the mountain culture areas, is rooted in the cultural traditions of the Abkhaz. In the past, an Abkhaz man typically provided his family with food by hunting, fishing or farming and these trad- itions remain strong. Today, coupled with the impact of the war, the Abkhaz attitude to weapons is still largely governed by tradition. Traditional Abkhaz culture stresses the importance of firearms in society, and these ideas are instilled in the Abkhaz from birth.
    [Show full text]
  • Flash Floods
    DREF final report Georgia: Flash Floods DREF operation n° MDRGE003 FF-2011-000071-GEO 22 December 2011 The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent (IFRC) Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF) is a source of un-earmarked money created by the Federation in 1985 to ensure that immediate financial support is available for Red Cross Red Crescent response to emergencies. The DREF is a vital part of the International Federation’s disaster response system and increases the ability of National Societies to respond to disasters. Summary: CHF 59,960 has been allocated from the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF) on 25th of June 2011 to support the Georgia National Society in delivering immediate assistance to some 1,750 beneficiaries for a period of three months. Unearmarked funds to repay DREF are encouraged In Western and Eastern Georgia many regions were affected by unceasing rains from 12 to 22 June 2011 with landslides that followed. Seven people lost their lives. Over 3,000 houses have been affected, with 1,500 of them badly damaged. The ground floors of 350 houses were made unsuitable for living due to water/ damage. Additionally, the mudslides and the water have damaged/ polluted farming soil, roads, bridges, canals, and water supply system and communication network. The residents of affected regions amounting to 70000 people have been cut off Affected population in Dusheti is receiving relief from the water and gas utility system. The water has items from DREF Operation. Photo: Georgian Red swept away several roads, leaving many settlements Cross Society isolated.
    [Show full text]