GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY LAW CENTER

BULLETIN 2002-2003 Georgetown University Law Center 600 New Jersey Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001 (202) 662-9000

The policy of Georgetown University Law Center is to provide equal opportunity in its programs, activities, and employment practices; to prohihit discrimination in edu• cation and employment because of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, age, handicap or disability, or sexual orientation; and to prohihit sexual harassment.

Inquiries regarding the University's Affirmative Action Plan may be directed to:

Special Assistant to the President for Affirmative Action G-10 Darnaii, Georgetown University Washington, DC 20057

Georgetown University is an Affirmative Action/ Equal Employment Opportunity Employer FULL-TIME FACULTY 1

JURIS DOCTOR PROGRAM 37 JOINT DEGREE PROGRAMS 51 GRADUATE PROGRAM 57 i2 GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES 69 3 e o CONDUCT POLICIES 77 u TUITION AND FEES 91 o THE LAW CURRICULUM 97

COURSE CLUSTERS 103 APPENDICES 117 Appendix A: Directory of Administrative Officers and Officers of Instruction 119 Appendix B: JD Program Adjunct Faculty 126 Appendix C: Graduate Program Adjunct Faculty 133 Appendix D: Charles Fahy Distinguished Adjunct Professor Award Recipients 138 Appendix E: Scholarships 139 Appendix F: Loans 145 Appendix G: Prizes and Awards 146

INDEX 149

2002-2003 ACADEMIC CALENDAR 153

I

DEANS AND VICE PRESIDENTS FULL-TIME FACULTY 2002-2003

FULL-TlME FACULTY 3

Although a variety of factors contribute to the qual• York's Deputy Mayor for Operations from 1999-2000. ity of an education in the law, at the core is a period In this capacity he was responsible for overseeing of association with an exceptional group of legal the development and implementation of strategic educators. That opportunity is afforded to Georgetown planning initiatives for the City's core operating law students in great abundance. Members of the agencies. In addition to this, Mr. Augostini also Law Center faculty represent and extraordinary served as the Mayor's Director of Intergovernmental range of professional and scholarly accomplishment Affairs with responsibility for directing the City's in every area of legal practice. Many have achieved communications with the congress, state legislature national or international prominence and remain and city council. Prior to this, Mr. Augostini served actively involved in their specialized field. Members as a Deputy Budget Director for Revenue and of the Georgetown faculty share a common com• Intergovernmental Affairs at the City of New York's mitment to teaching; they place a special value on Office of Management and Budget (OMB) from accessibility and informal discussion. They share the 1995-1999. In this capacity Mr. Augostini was desire to help students learn how to view each legal responsible for preparing, negotiating and monitoring issue from the broadest intellectual and social per• the City's revenue budget and multi-year revenue spective. They are committed to helping every student forecasts. He also was responsible fot overseeing develop the habits of mind that are characteristic OMB's intergovernmental affairs staff which was of the best lawyers. responsible for analyzing and measuring the impact of Federal, State and City legislative changes on the City's financial plan. In addition to his service to DEANS AND VICE PRESIDENTS the City of New York, Mr. Augostini served the State of New York from 1989 to 1995 in a variety Judith Areen of positions. From 1989-1991 he served as a Staff Executive Vice President, Law Center Affairs; Analyst to the General Assembly's Higher Education Dean of the Law Center; Professor of Law Committee. From 1991-1995 he served on the A. B., Cornell; J.D., Yale General Assembly's Ways and Means Committee staff, first as a senior budget analyst responsible fot Dean Areen is a leading scholar in the fields of higher education finance and budget issues and family law and hioethics. Her recent publications then as the principal fiscal analyst responsible for include Family Law (4th ed., 1999) and Law, analyzing and negotiating issues relating to local Science and Medicine (co-authored, 1996 2nd ed.). government budgeting and finance. Prior to his During 1988-89, Dean Areen was a fellow at the service at the state level, Mr. Augostini was a Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars program associate with the Nelson A. Rockefeller where she researched the seventeenth-century ori• Institute of Government, the public policy research gins of the relationship between family and law. arm of the State University of New York, from Dean Areen has also had a distinguished career in 1988-1989 where he worked on workforce and public service. Prior to coming to Georgetown in economic development research projects. 1972, she served in the Budget Bureau of the City of New York. Between 1977-80 she served as spe• cial counsel to the White House Task Force on Everett Bellamy Regulatory Reform and as General Counsel and Assistant Dean (JD Program); Adjunct Professor of Law Domestic Reorganization Coordinator of the President's Reorganization Project in the Office of B.S., M.S., University of Wisconsin; J.D., Management and Budget. Dean Areen is a Senior Cleveland-Marshall, Cleveland State University Research Fellow of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics Dean Bellamy is a memher of the Faculty and and a member of the American Law Institute. She Student Life, Law Journals, Honorary Degrees, the has served on the Board of Governors of the D.C. Task Force on Diversity and Community, and the Bar Association, on the Advisory Committee to the Moot Court Board. His recent writings include: Secretary of Defense on Women in the Services, "The Status of African American Law Professors" and on the Executive Committee of the Association (1992); "Academic Enhancement and Counseling of American Law Schools. Programs: Counseling Minority Law Students," St. Louis University Public Law Review (1991). Christopher L. Augostini Dean Bellamy teaches Small Business Law at the Associate Vice President (Business and Financial Affairs) Law Center. Before joining the Law Center staff, he served as Director of Student Activities at B. A., M.A., State University of New York at Albany Cleveland State University. He has also been an Christopher L. Augostini served in a variety of instructor for the Council on Legal Education senior financial and operating positions at hoth the Opportunity Program, and chairperson of the state and local government level before joining D.C. Chapter of the National Conference on Black Georgetown University Law Center. Mr. Augostini Lawyers. Currentiy, He is a memher of the American served as the Chief-of-Staff to the City of New Bar Association Section of Business Law and for 4 FULL-TIME FACULTY ten years, he served as a member of the Board of the New York firm of Davis Polk 8c Wardwell as a Governors of the National Bar Association. corpotate associate. During 1982-83, Professor Feinerman was Fulbright Lecturer on Law at Kevin T. Conry Peking University. In 1986, he was a Fulbright Associate Vice President (Development and External researcher in Japan. In 1989, he was awarded a Affairs); Adjunct Professor of Law MacArthur Foundation fellowship to study China's practice of international law. During the 1992-93 B.S.F.S., J.D., Georgetown academic year, he was a Fellow at the Woodrow A memher of the Law Center community since Wilson International Center for Scholars. From 1976, Mr. Conry's responsibilities include develop• 1993-95, on leave from the Law Center, Dean ment, alumni affairs, and puhlic relations. As the Feinerman was the Director of the Committee on chief advancement officer for the Law Center, he is Scholarly Communications with China. Dean responsible for the current Third Century compre• Feinerman served as Editor-in-Chief of the hensive fiindraising campaign, the establishment ABA's China Law Reporter from 1986-1998, was and administration of alumni programs, and the the co-editor of The Limits of the Rule of Law in publication of the school's magazine, Georgetown China (2001) and co-author of China After the Law, and the management of media relations ser• WTO; What You Need to Know Now (2001). vices. Prior to assuming those responsibilities, Mr. Conry was an Assistant Dean for the JD Program Gihan Fernando and the Assistant Dean for Administration with Assistant Dean (Career Services) responsibilities for the campus expansion program. He has served on the Faculty Recruiting, Academic B.A., Johns Hopkins; J.D., Georgetown Standards, Financial Aid, New Building, and Long- Dean Fernando received a BA with honors in Range Planning Committees. He is active in the Political Economy from Johns Hopkins University law advancement sections of the AALS and the in 1986. He went on to receive his JD degree from ABA. An adjunct faculty memher of the faculty, he the Georgetown University Law Center, where he teaches a seminar on law and non-profit organiza• was a member of the Georgetown Law Journal and tions. His community service involves volunteer a Law Fellow. After practicing law with McKenna work for Blessed Sacrament Catholic Community 8c Cuneo in Washington, DC, he joined the Office and Carpenter's Shelter. of Career Counseling and Placement at NYU School of Law where he worked closely with JD and foreign Andrew P. Cornblatt LLM students. In 1995, he joined Cornell Law Assistant Dean (Admissions) School, where first he served as Director of Career Planning and Counseling, and then as Assistant B.A., Harvard; J.D., Boston College Dean for Student Services. Currently, he is a Dean Cornblatt has been a member of the Law member of the District of Columbia and New York Center community since 1980. He served as State Bars, and an active member of the National Assistant Director of Admissions from 1980-87 Association for Law Placement (NALP). Fernando's when he was appointed Director of Admissions professional activities include serving on NALP's until his most recent appointment as Assistant hoard, acting as NALP's liaison to the ABA Dean. Dean Cornhlatt's responsibilities include Standing Committee on Minorities in the Judiciary overseeing hoth the JD and LL.M programs which and serving on the advisory hoard for the recent receive more than 9,000 applications annually. He is ABA/NALP study on judicial clerkships. the chair of the Student and Faculty Life Committee, a member of the Financial Aid and Long-Range Susan K. Gurley Planning Committees, and an ex-officio member of Assistant Dean (International and Graduate Programs) the Admissions Committee. In addition, Dean B.S., Virginia Polytechnic University; Cornblatt is an advisor for the Student Ambassadors. J.D., University of Virginia James V. Feinerman Before coming to the Law Center, Dean Gurley Associate Dean (International and Graduate Programs); served as the D.C. based Director for Last-West James M. Morita Professor of Asian Legal Studies; Management, Institute, (LWMI) a not for profit Director, Asian Law and Policy Studies firm providing legal reform assistance to developing countries. Before LWMI, she worked for four years, B.A., M.A., M.Phil., Ph.D., Yale; J.D., Harvard at the U.S. Agency for International Development Dean Feinerman joined the Law Center faculty as as a senior legal reform expert on legal reform proj• a visiting professor for the 1985-86 academic year. ects in Central and Eastern Europe, Russia, and Immediately after law school he studied in the the Newly Independent States. Before joining People's Republic of China. Subsequently, he joined USAID, she worked as the Deputy Director of the FULL-TIME FACULTY 5

Commercial Law Development Program at the US Wallace J. MIyniec Department of Commerce providing WTO and Associate Dean (Clinical Education and Public related trade assistance to countries in Central and Service); Lupo-Ricci Professor of Clinical Legal Studies; Eastern Europe. Director, Juvenile Justice Clinic B.S., Northwestern; J.D., Georgetown Vicki C. Jackson Dean MIyniec teaches courses in Family Law and Associate Dean (Research); Professor of Law Juveniles and the Courts, and assists with the train• B.A.J.D.,Yale ing of fellows in the Prettyman Legal Internship While at Yale, Professor Jackson served as editor Program. He is the author of numerous hooks of the Yale Law Journal. Upon graduation from law and articles concerning criminal law and the law school, she served as a law clerk to Judge Murray relating to children and families. He was the direc• Gurfein (U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit), tor of the Judicial Conference Study on ABA Morris Lasker (U.S. District Court, Southern Criminal Justice Standards, the administrator of District of New York), and to U.S. Supreme Court the Emergency Bail Fund, and served as a consul• Justice Thurgood Marshall. She teaches courses in tant to the San Jose State University and University Constitutional Law, Comparative Constitutional Law, of Maryland Schools of Social Work, the ABA's Federal Courts, the Supreme Court, and Governmental National Resource Center on Child Abuse and Neglect, several law schools, and the California Bar Immunities. She is co-author with Professor Mark Examiners. He was a recipient of a Bicentennial Tushnet of a coursehook on Comparative Constitutional Fellowship from the Swedish government to study Law. Her articles on federalism, sovereign immunity their child welfare system. He is also the recipient and the 11th Amendment, and gender equality have of the William Pincus award for his contributions appeared in the Harvard Law Review, Yale Law to clinical legal education and the Stuart Stiller Journal, Georgetown Law review, and other scholarly award for legal service in the public interest. He journals. Her research interests also include gender has been on the AALS Standing Committee on hias, comparative constitutional law, and federalism. Clinical Education and served as chair in 1992. She is on the D.C. Bar Board of Governors, and Since 1998, he has been Chair of the ABA Juvenile was a co-chair of the Special Committee on Gender Justice Committee. of the D.C. Circuit Task Force on Gender, Race and Ethnic Bias (1992-95), and a member of the D.C. Circuit Advisory Committee on Procedures Pablo Molina (1992-98). Chief Information Officer B.A., M.B.A., St. Louis University Ruth Lammert-Reeves Assistant Dean (Financial Aid) Pablo G. Molina comes to the Law Center from the University of Pennsylvania Law School where B.A., Ohio University; M.A., Bowling Green State he spent the last two years as Director of University Information Technology Services. Prior to that, he served as Lecturer/Director of Information Services Dean Lammert-Reeves joined the Law Center as at Washington University in Saint Louis and MIS Director of Financial Aid, becoming Assistant Dean Director at the Saint Louis Zoological Park. A for Financial Aid in 1990. Prior to joining the Law native of Spain, Pablo started his professional Center, she served as Director of Financial Aid at career in Spain, France, and Portugal, holding Maryland Institute, College of Art in Baltimore, several technology management positions and as Maryland, and as a memher of the student services Editor in Chief of the Spanish Edition of PC staff at Albion College in Albion, Michigan. She Magazine. He holds both a Bachelor's and an has served as a board member of the Access Group MBA degree in Management Information Systems Inc., Law School Admissions Services, and the from Saint Louis University, and has completed AALS Section on Student Services and chaired postgraduate coursework in Technology several committees within these organizations. She Management at Washington University in Saint has also represented graduate and professional Louis and the Wharton School of Business. He schools as a member of various committees of the holds both Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer National Association of Student Financial Aid and Certified Novell Engineer certifications. He Administrators. She is the author of The Kaplan regularly speaks at law and technology conferences, Guide The Road to Law School, Kaplan's Getting into such as those hosted hy the Center for Computer- Law School and Kaplan-Newsweek's The Law Assisted Legal Instruction, the American Bar Admissions Advisor (May, 2000). Association, or the American Association of Law Libraries. 6 FULL-TIME FACULTY

Barbara Moulton Lisa M. Porcari Assistant Dean (Public Interest and Community Service) Assistant Dean (Clinical Legal Education) B.A., Assumption College; J.D., Georgetown B.A., Tufts University; J.D., New York University School of Law Dean Moulton has been on the staff of the Law Center since 1995 and was named Assistant Dean Dean Porcari is responsible for administrative in 2000. She directs the Office of Public Interest supervision of the J.D. clinical program and student and Community Service (OPICS), which coordi• academic counseling related to clinical education. nates pro bono activities for the Law Center com• She is also responsible for the academic administra• munity and provides career counseling services to tion of the Law Center's graduate clinical fellowship students and alumni intending to pursue public program and the LL.M. (Advocacy) degree. She interest legal careers. Prior to joining the Law came to the Law Center in the summer of 1999 as Center, Dean Moulton was a staff attorney for the an adjunct professor and supervising attorney for Alliance for Justice (1991-1995) and a litigation students in the Appellate Litigation Program. Prior associate at the Boston office of Ropes & Gray to joining the Law center, she was a Motions Law (1989-1991). She is a member of the Public Clerk for the United States Court of Appeals fot Interest and Placement Committees. the Second Circuit. She later worked in the litiga• tion departments of two law firms in New York, Carol Q. O'Neil and also represented indigent criminal defendants Assistant Dean (JD Program) at the Center for Appellate Litigation. B.A., Manhattanville College; M.A.T, University Therese Lee Stratton of Massachusetts; J.D., Georgetown Assistant Dean (Faculty Support and Campus Services) Dean O'Neil's responsibilities include curriculum B.S., M.S., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State development and scheduling for the JD program, University supervision of the JD adjunct faculty program, supervision of publications and web content devel• Dean Stratton's responsibilities include the Law opment, and student academic counseling. She sits Center's physical plant as well as its administrative on the Academic Standards Committee and the and support services. Following opportunities as a Law Center's Teaching Committee. She was previ• human resources professional and management ously in private practice in the District of Columbia. analyst, she began her career at Georgetown as a As a Law Center student, she was a Law Fellow Personnel Officer on main campus. She joined the and an assistant editor of The Tax Lawyer. Upon Law Center in October 1985 as Assistant Registrar, graduation, she was awarded the Dean's Certificate and later became Associate Registrar. In 1989 she for Special Service to the Law Center Community assumed the responsibilities of the new position of and was named to the Order of the Coif. Director of Administration. Over time these responsibilities have grown as Dean Stratton has Wendy Collins Perdue managed construction, the physical plant and opera• Associate Dean (JD Program); Professor of Law tions, created and managed our child care center, overseen the copy center and the mailroom, pro• B.A., Wellesley; J.D., Duke vided administrative support to the faculty, created Professor Perdue has been a professor at the Law key components of our puhlic safety program, and Center since 1982. Before joining the Law Center developed positive relationships with our neighbors faculty, she served as a law clerk for the Honorable on New Jersey Avenue. Anthony M. Kennedy of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and was an associate with the D.C. firm of Hogan and Hartson. She teaches Civil Procedure, FULL-TIME FACULTY Conflict of Laws, and Constitutional Law, and has taught Antitrust and Regulation of Futures Trading. Charles F. Abernathy Her writings are primarily in the fields of civil Professor of Law procedure and conflict of laws. She is a co-author of Civil Procedure: Cases, Materials, and Questions A.B.,J.D., LL.M., Harvard and Conflict of Laws: American, Comparative, Professor Abernathy works in the fields of civil International. She is a member of the Montgomery rights and comparative law. He is the author of County Planning Board and a commissioner of the Civil Rights and Constitutional Litigation (West, Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning 3d ed. 2000), the first modern casebook on federal Commission. civil rights statutes, and co-author of The Law of Equal Employment Opportunity, a treatise on employment discrimination law. In comparative law Professor Abernathy focuses on the philosophical FULL-TIME FACULTY 7 and practical issues related to conceptualization of Hope Babcock the legal process in common law and civil law coun• Professor of Law tries. He specializes in teaching American law to B.A., Smith CoUege; LL.B., Yale students from foreign legal backgrounds and is the author of Law in the United States (International Professor Babcock served as general counsel to the Law Institute Press). Professor Abernathy was the National Audubon Society from 1987-91 and as Fulbright Professor of Law in Egypt in 1983-84, deputy general counsel and Director of Audubon's served as director of Georgetown University Law Public Lands and Water Program from 1981-87. Center's summer programs abroad (in Florence, Previously, she was a partner with Blum, Nash & Italy, and Heidelberg, Germany) from 1987-2000, Railsback, where she focused on energy and envi• and often lectures at law schools abroad (Italy, ronmental issues, and an associate at LeBoeuf, Lamb, Switzerland, Argentina, and Germany). Leihy 8c MacRae where she represented utilities in the nuclear licensing process. From 1977-79, she Lama Abu-Odeh served as a Deputy Assistant Secretary of Energy Associate Professor of Law and Minerals in the U.S. Department of the Interior. Professor Babcock has taught environmental and LL.B., University of Jordan, Ammam, Jordan; natural resources law as a visiting professor at Pace LL.M., University of Bristol, England; MA, University Law School and as an adjunct at the University of York, York, England; S.J.D., Harvard University of Pennsylvania, Yale, Catholic University, Prior to joining the Law Center, Professor Abu- and Antioch law schools. Professor Babcock was a Odeh was a consulting assistant professor at member of the Standing Committee on Lnvironmental Stanford Law School, where she taught Criminal Law of the American Bar Association, and served Law, Comparative Family Law, Islamic Law, and a on the Clinton-Gore Transition Team. seminar entitled "Nations, Races, and Religion." Professor Abu-Odeh was a writing instructor in the Jeffrey D. Bauman Graduate Program and Coordinator of Special Professor of Law; Co-Director, Joint Degree in Academic Projects, Islamic Legal Studies Program, Business Administration at Harvard Law School. She worked at the World Bank as legal counsel in the Middle Last/North B.A., M.A., LL.B., Yale Africa Division, Legal Department. As an elections Professor Bauman's specialty is corporate law. Before observer for the United Nations, South Africa, joining the Law Center in 1973, he spent four years Professor Ahu-Odeh participated in voter educa• at the Securities and Exchange Commission and tion, party monitoring, and election supervision five years in private practice. In addition, he has during the period leading to the first democratic served on the Executive Council of the Securities elections in South Africa. Professor Abu-Odeh has Law Committee of the Federal Bar Association, the written articles on feminism and Islam and is the Committee on Federal Regulation of Securities of author of a forthcoming publication. Modernizing the American Bar Association, and the Committee Muslim Family Law: The Case of Egypt. on Corporations, Partnerships and other Business Organizations of the D.C. Bar Association. His T. Alexander Aleinikoff writings include several law journal articles con• Professor of Law cerning rule lOh-5. Professor Bauman is also the co-author of a recent casebook on corporations. B.A., Swarthmore College; J.D., Yale Professor Bauman is on the Board of Trustees of the Professor Aleinikoff joined the law faculty after hav• Shakespeare Theatre, and the Board of Directors of ing served as the Executive Associate Commissioner the Washington Legal Clinic for the Homeless, and for Programs in the U.S. Department of Justice's the Frederick B. Abramson Memorial Foundation. Immigration and Naturalization Service and as General Counsel in the Immigration and David E. Bernstein Naturalization Service. He has been on the faculty Visiting Professor of Law at the University of Michigan Law School. After receiving his law degree, he served as law clerk to B.A., Brandeis;J.D., Yale the Honorable Edward Weinfeld, U.S. District Professor Bernstein is an Associate Professor at Judge. He has published numerous articles in the the George Mason University School of Law in areas of immigration, race, statutory interpretation, Arlington, Virginia. Professor Bernstein is a gradu• and constitutional law, and his most recent scholar• ate of Yale Law School, where he was senior editor ship includes three books. From Migrant to Citizen: of the Yale Law Journal and a John M. Olin Fellow Membership in a Changing World (with Douglas in Law, Economics, and Puhlic Policy. After clerk• Klusmeyer), Immigration: Process and Policy (with ing for The Honorable David Nelson of the Sixth David Martin and Hiroshi Motomura), and Modern Circuit and working as a litigator at Crowell 8c Constitutional Theory: A Reader (with John Garvey). Moring, he served as a Mellon Foundation Research 8 FULL-TIME FACULTY

Fellow at Columbia University School of Law. Court, the role of the Constitution in this country Professor Bernstein is the author of over forty and its relevance for emerging democracies. In scholarly articles, book chapters, and think tank November 1998, she testified before the House studies. He is author of Only One Place of Redress: Judiciary Committee as one of 19 constitutional law African-Americans, Labor Regulations, and the Courts experts on what is an impeachable offense. She also from Reconstruction to the New Deal (Duke 2001) testified before the Senate on whethet the President and co-editor of Phantom Risk: Scientific Inference can be indicted and tried while in office. She has and the Law (MIT 1993). Professor Bernstein is participated in numerous international symposia co-author of The New Wigmore: Volume on Expert organized by the Grutet Institute, giving papers on and Demonstrative Evidence (forthcoming late 2002) a variety of comparative law issues. Widely quoted and recently finished a book manuscript tentatively in the media. Professor Bloch has appeared on entitled Equality at Any Price"? How the Expansion numerous television and radio programs on CNN, of Antidiscrimination Laws Threatens Civil Liberties. ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, Fox News Channel, Professor Bernstein teaches American Constitutional NPR, CBC, and USAID to discuss various topics History, Constitutional Law, Torts II, Products including the Clinton-Lewinsky scandal, impeach• Liability, Evidence, Scientific and Expert Evidence, ment, and the independent counsel statute as well as and Lnvironmental Regulation. pertinent constitutional issues of the moment. Last year she was one of the expert panelists on a new Margaret Mendenhall Blair show, "Inside DC with Fred Graham," a weekly Visiting Associate Professor of Law program that examined the latest developments in the law and produced by Court TV. She is now a B.A., University of Oklahoma; M.A., M.Phil., regular contrihutor to the website "TheLAW.COM." Ph.D., Yale In addition to teaching. Professor Bloch is a Professor Blair is the Research Director for the member of the American Law Institute, participant Sloan-Georgetown Project on Business Institutions, on the Twentieth Century Fund Project on the and a Visiting Professor teaching Corporate Finance Judiciary, and a Fellow of the American Bar and Corporations. She is also a non-resident Senior Foundation. Locally, she is a commissioner on the Fellow in the Economic Studies Program at the Judicial Nominating Committee for the District Brookings Institution. From 1988 through 1994, of Columbia Courts and has worked with the she was in residence at Brookings as a Senior United States Court of Appeals for the District of Research Analyst. She has been teaching Corporate Columbia Circuit, serving on the Committee to Finance as a visiting Professor at the Law Center Write the Oral History of the Circuit and on since 1996. She had a prior career as a journalist, numerous arrangement and program committees for serving as Bureau Chief for Business Week magazine the D.C. Circuit Judicial Conference. In addition, in the late 1970s and early 1980s. Professor Blair is she has been an editorial advisor to "Justice," the currently doing research on team production and Journal of the Department of Justice. Professor the legal structure of business organizations, on Bloch is also active in the D.C. Bar, serving on the trust as a mechanism of governance in business Ethics Committee, the Rules of Professional firms, on human capital, and on the growing impor• Conduct Review Committee, the Judicial Evaluation tance of intangible factors. She has also taught at Committee, the Steering Committee of D.C. Bar the University of Maryland College of Business and Section for Courts, Lawyers, and the Administration Management. of Justice, the Committee to Celebrate the Bicentennial of the Constitution, and the Susan Low Bloch Administrative Law Section nominating commit• Professor of Law tee. She is also on the Board of the Institute for Puhlic Representation and an advisor to students B.A., Smith; M.A., Ph.C, J.D., University of in the Puhlic Interest Law Scholars Program at Michigan Georgetown. Before joining the Law Center, Professor Bloch joined the faculty in 1983. She Professor Bloch served as a law clerk for Justice teaches Constitutional Law I and II, Federal Thurgood Marshall and for Judge Spottswood Courts, Communications Law, and a seminar on Robinson. She also practiced law at Wilmer, Cutler, the Supreme Court. Professor Bloch is the author and Pickering for about four years. Susan Bloch did of numerous articles in the areas of constitutional her legal training at the University of Michigan, and administrative law and is the co-author of the where she graduated summa cum laude. Before that, book Supreme Court Politics: The Institution and Its she received graduate degrees in mathematics and Procedures, published hy West Publishing Company computer science from the University of Michigan in 1994. She has given lectures and interviews on a and a B.A. with distinction from Smith College. variety of topics, including impeachment, presiden• She is married to Richard Bloch and has two tial immunity, historical overviews of the Supreme children, Rebecca and Michael. FULL-TIME FACULTY 9

Maxwell Gregg Bloche Uganda, and Tanzania. Prior to coming to the Professor of Law; Adjunct Professor of Public Health, Georgetown Women's Law and Puhlic Policy Johns Hopkins University; Co-Director, Joint Degree in Fellowship in 1998-1999, she clerked for U.S. Law and Public Health District Judge Ann D. Montgomery and engaged in a variety of women's human rights projects. B.A., Columbia; J.D., M.D., Yale Professor Bond's research, fact-finding work, and Professor Bloche's main areas of interest are health publications have dealt with a number of issues, law and policy, regulatory and contractual responses including: the 1995 Fourth World Conference on to risk, and the links between health and respect for Women in Beijing, domestic violence in Bulgaria international human rights. His recent and current and Macedonia; sexual harassment in Bulgaria; work addresses the pursuit of efficiency in health maternal mortality as a human rights issue in care provision, the dual loyalties of physicians in Uganda and Mexico; domestic violence in Nepal; managed health plans, the role of for-profit institu• trafficking in women; women's rights in Cambodia; tions in medicine, and market driven regulatory and a variety of issues concerning United Nations efforts to contain medical costs. His writing has treaty mechanisms. appeared in the past few years in the Journal of the American Medical Association, Health Ajjairs, the J. Peter Byrne New England Journal of Medicine, and other medical Professor of Law and health policy journals, as well as law reviews and books. Professor Bloche received a Robert B.A., Northwestern; M.A., J.D., University of Wood Johnson Foundation Investigator Award in Virginia Health Policy Research for 1997-2000 to support Professor Byrne joined the Law Center faculty in his research on the legal and regulatory governance 1985. After graduation from the University of of managed care organizations. He has been a con• Virginia law school, he served as a law clerk to sultant to the Institute of Medicine, South Africa's Judge Frank Coffin and U.S. Supreme Court Justice Truth and Reconciliation Commission (on human Lewis Powell and then worked as an associate with rights in the health sector), the American Association the D.C. firm of Covington & Burling. He teaches for the Advancement of Science, the National and writes in the areas of Property, Land Use, Institutes of Health, the World Health Organization, Constitutional Law, and Higher Education Law and other private and puhlic bodies. He also serves and Policy. He served as Associate Dean for the JD on the hoards of Physicians for Human Rights and Program from 1997 to 2000. He was John Carroll several other non-profit groups, and he is an adjunct Research Professor in 1996-97. professor in the Department of Health Policy and Management at Johns Hopkins University. Before Angela J. Campbell joining Georgetown's faculty in 1989, he received Professor of Law; Associate Director, Institute for several awards for research and scholarship as a Public Representation resident physician and law student, and he was an editor of the Yale Law Review. B.A., Hampshire; J.D., UCLA; LL.M., Georgetown Professor Campbell teaches at the Institute for Johanna Bond Puhlic Representation where she is in charge of the Visiting Associate Professor of Law; Assistant Director, Citizens Communications Center project. Prior to International Women's Human Rights Clinic joining the Institute, she was an attorney with the Communications and Finance Section of the U.S. B.A., Colorado College; M.A., J.D., University of Department of Justice Antitrust Division and in Minnesota, LL.M., Georgetown private practice as an associate with the law firm Professor Bond teaches in the International Fisher, Wayland, Cooper & Leader. From 1981-83 Women's Human Rights Clinic (IWHRC) and she was a Graduate Fellow at the Institute. Writings serves as the Assistant Director of the Clinic. include "Self-Regulation and the Media" in the Professor Bond also co-teaches International and Federal Communications Law Journal, "Ads2Kids.com: Comparative Law on the Rights of Women. During Should Government Regulate Advertising to her tenure at IWHRC, Professor Bond has also Children on the World Wide Web?" in the Conzaga acted as a legal consultant to the United Nations Law Review, "Lessons from Oz: Quantitative Development Fund for Women and has authored Guidelines for Children's Educational Television" in numerous publications addressing issues such as Comm/Ent, "Universal Service Provisions: The women's human rights and clinical teaching. Her 'Ugly Duckling' of the 1996 Act" in the Connecticut publications include a law review article on human Law Review, "Publish or Carriage: Approaches to rights fact-finding as clinical method, a co-authored Analyzing the First Amendment Rights of hook chapter on violence against women as an Telephone Companies" in the North Carolina Law international human rights issue, and a forthcoming Review, and "Teaching Advanced Legal Writing in edited volume on women's human rights in Ghana, a Law School Clinic" in the Seton Hall Law Review. 10 FULL-TIME FACULTY

Barry E. Carter writing a book about race and class segregation in Professor of Law; Director, Program in International America. Prior to joining the faculty. Professor Business and Economic Law Cashin was the Staff Director for the Community Empowerment Board in the Office of the Vice B.A., Stanford; M.P.A., Princeton; J.D., Yale President at the White House. She developed and Professor Carter has an extensive background in oversaw policies to support comprehensive community- foreign policy, international business and trade, and based revitalization strategies in distressed urban international law. After graduating from Stanford and rural communities. Previously, Professor Cashin University and earning a master's degree in eco• was the Director of Community Development for nomics from Princeton, he attended Yale Law the National Economic Council at the White House, School, where he was the Projects Editor on the where she managed interagency policy development Yale Law Journal. He then worked in the Office of processes for urban policy and community develop• the Secretary of Defense and on Dr. Kissinger's ment initiatives. Professor Cashin also worked as National Security Council staff, where he concen• an Associate Counsel for the Office of Transition trated on U.S.-Soviet and European issues. Next he Counsel and as an associate at Sirote & Permutt, PC. was a Fellow at Harvard's Kennedy School of Professor Cashin was law clerk to U.S. Supreme Government and an International Affairs Fellow at Court Justice Thurgood Marshall and Judge Abner the Council on Foreign Relations. Later he was a Mikva of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District senior counsel on the Senate Select Committee on of Columbia Circuit. Intelligence Activities. Before joining the Law Center faculty in 1979, he had also been a trial and Richard H. Chused appellate lawyer in private practice in Washington, Professor of Law DC, and California. He was a visiting professor at Stanford Law School in 1990 and the Executive A.B., Brown; J.D., Chicago Director of the American Society of International Professor Chused teaches Property, Copyright, Law (ASIL) during 1992-93. He went on leave Family Law, and Gender and Law in American from Georgetown to he the acting Under Secretary History. His recently published work includes a and then the Deputy Under Secretary for Export history of landlord-tenant court in New York City Administration in the U.S. Department of at the turn of the Twentieth Century, anthologies Commerce during 1993-96. He also served then as for property and copyright courses, and Private Acts U.S. vice chair to Secretary of Defense William in Public Places: A Social History of Divorce in the Perry on bilateral defense conversion committees Formative Era of American Family Law, a study of with Russia, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, and Belarus, was legislative divorce in the first half of the nineteenth the chair on the committee with Uzbekistan, and century. He has also written a property textbook, a served on committees with China. Professor series of articles on the hiring and treatment of Carter's recent publications include his widely-used women and minorities in American law schools, casebook on International Law (3rd ed., 1999, with and another set on the legal history of women's co-author), and the companion International Law: property law. Before joining the Law Center faculty, Selected Documents, 2001-2002 Edition (2001, with he taught for five years at Rutgers University School co-author). His first hook. International Economic of Law in Newark. He is also a memher of various Sanctions: Improving the Haphazard U. S. Legal history associations and the Society of American Regime (1988), won the annual award from the Law Teachers, on whose Board of Governors he sat ASIL in 1989 for the outstanding new hook on for twelve years. international law subjects. He is a memher of the Council on Foreign Relations, the American Law Institute, the American Bar Association, the ASIL, Juhe L. Cohen and the American Bar Foundation. He has also Professor of Law served on two hinational dispute resolution panels A.B., Harvard-Radcliffe; J.D., Harvard under the North American Free Trade Agreement. Until joining the U.S. Government, he had also been Professor Cohen teaches and writes about intel• the vice president of the Arms Control Association lectual property law and data privacy law, with and chairman of the Advisory Board of the Defense particular focus on computer software and digital Budget Project. works and on the intersection of copyright, privacy, and the First Amendment in cyberspace. She is a member of the Advisory Board of the Electronic Sheryll D. Cashin Privacy Information Center. Prior to joining the Professor of Law Law Center Faculty in 1999, Professor Cohen was Assistant Professor of Law at the University of B.E., Vanderhilt; M.A., Oxford; J.D., Harvard Pittsburgh School of Law. She previously prac• Professor Cashin teaches and writes about politics, ticed with the San Francisco firm of McCutchen, government and the urban poor. She is currently Doyle, Brown & Lnersen, where she specialized in FULL-TIME FACULTY 11

intellectual property litigation. She was law clerk to Annual Fund. Earlier he had been chair of the the Honorable Stephen Reinhardt of the U.S. Court Georgetown Law Fund. During 1997-98, he lec• of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. tured in Germany, Colombia, Russia, Korea, China, Japan, and Paraguay, and in 1999 in Italy. He Stephen B. Cohen served as the Chair of the Board of Trustees of the Professor of Law Tai Hsuan Foundation, and is presently a member of the Board of Trustees of the Traditional A. B., Amherst; J.D., Yale Acupuncture Institute, the National Acupuncture Since 1980, Professor Cohen has taught courses at Foundation, Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine the Law Center in his two principal areas of Alliance, and is on the Board of Visitors of John expertise: tax and international human rights. He Marshall Law School. served as corpotate secretary of the Southern Africa Enterprise Development Fund, established by the David D. Cole U.S. government to encourage private sector Professor of Law development in Southern Africa. He also is on the Academic Advisory Board of the International B.A.,J.D.,Yale Human Rights Law Group. He was Deputy Assistant After graduating from Yale Law School, Professor Secretary of State for Human Rights from 1978-80 Cole served as a law clerk to Judge Arlin M. Adams and has been a consultant to the Department of of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third State. Currently, he serves on the Academic Advisory Circuit. Professor Cole then became a staff attorney Joint Committee on Taxation, on the U.S. Congress. for the Center for Constitutional Rights where he His writings include a casebook on federal income litigated a number of major First Amendment cases, taxation and various articles on tax and corporate including Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989), law and on national security and foreign policy. United States v. Lichman, 496 U.S. 928 (1990), He has also been a professor at the University of which established that the First Amendment pro• Wisconsin, Stanford, and Rutgers. tects flag burning, and National Lndowmentfor the Arts V. Finley, which challenged the constitutionality Sherman L. Cohn of content restrictions on federal art funding. He Professor of Law continues to litigate First Amendment and other constitutional issues as a volunteer staff attorney at B. S.F.S., LL.B., LL.M., Georgetown the Center. He has published in a variety of areas, Professor Cohn has been a professor at the Law including civil rights, criminal justice, constitutional Center since 1965. He specializes in the fields of law and law and literature. He is the legal affairs civil procedute and professional responsihility and correspondent for The Nation, a columnist for has published various hooks and articles on those Legal Times, a commentator on National Public subjects in recent years. Before joining the Law Radio; All Things Considered, and the author of No Center faculty, he served as a clerk forjudge Charles Lqual Justice: Race and Class in the American Criminal Fahy of the D.C. Circuit and in the Appellate Justice System (New Press, 1999), which was named Section of the Civil Division of the Department of Best Nonfiction Book of 1999 by the Boston Book Justice. He is a member of the D.C, Maryland, Review and best hook on an issue of national policy in and Virginia hats and is also a memher of the 1999 by the American Political Science Association. American Law Institute, the American Judicature Society, and the Society of American Law Teachers. Anthony E. Cook He served for eleven years as the first national Professor of Law president of the American Inns of Court. He is a memher of the Charles Fahy American Inn. He B.A., Princeton; J.D., Yale served as the Administrator of Preview of U.S. Professor Cook joined the Law Center faculty in Supreme Court Cases from 1976-79 and as Director 1991 from the University of Florida Law School of Continuing Legal Education at the Law Center where he taught from 1987-1990. He has com• from 1977-84. From 1982-93, he served as chair of pleted two Harvard fellowships, the first in Ethics the National Accreditation Commission for and the Professions in 1990 and the second in Schools and Colleges of Acupuncture and Oriental Religion and Puhlic Values in 1995. Whde at Medicine. From 1983-87, he served as president Georgetown, he has taught courses in Corporations, of the American Section of the International Legal Justice, Jurisprudence and Race, Law and Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists and as American History. Professor Cook's scholarship has deputy president of the International Association. explored the implications of progressive religious He is currently the President of the Jewish Law theology and spirituality for theories of law and Association. He has also served as a director of the social justice. His latest work, The Least of These: Foundation for Mideast Communication. From Race, Law and Religion in American Culture (1997), 1985-87, he served as chair of the Georgetown explores the relevance of the social gospel and Dr. 12 FULL-TIME FACULTY

Martin Luther King Jr.'s life and work for issues of founded the Harvard Voluntary Defenders in 1949, race and social justice in America. Professor Cook is and he has since received honorary doctoral degrees himself a Baptist minister and was recently honored from Fairfield, Temple, and Georgetown Universities. hy the American Bar Association as "One of 21 Young He has served as a consultant to various commis• Lawyers Leading America into the 21st Century." sions and government entities hoth here and abroad. By working both in the law school and with poor He is a member of the hats of the U.S. Supreme and oppressed communities, Professor Cook was Court, Pennsylvania, Illinois, and the District of cited for his unique "synergy of action and thought." Columbia and a variety of related committees. His innumerable additional activities have included John M. Copaeino positions on the Boards of Hebrew University in Professor of Law; Director, Criminal Justice Clinic and Jerusalem and Common Cause, and membership in L. Barrett Prettyman Program the American Law Institute. He has also been chair of the Criminal Justice Section of the ABA and B.A., M.A.T., Duke; J.D., University of Virginia; president of the National Association of Criminal LL.M., Georgetown Defense Lawyers. He has chaired the ABA Special Professor Copaeino is Director of the Criminal Committee on Criminal Justice in a Free Society Justice CUnic and the L. Barrett Prettyman graduate and he was a member of the ABA Standing fellowship in criminal trial advocacy. Prior to join• Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility. ing the faculty, he was the Director of the Juvenile In addition, his membership on the Board of Law Clinic at the Antioch School of Law. He is a Directors of the International League for Human graduate of the University of Virginia Law School Rights, a private organization having consultative and received an LL.M. as a Prettyman Fellow at the status with the United Nations, has taken him on Law Center. He has served as lead counsel in hun• special missions to Northern Ireland to investigate dreds of criminal cases and post conviction cases in the "Bloody Sunday" incident, and to the Soviet the District of Columbia. He regularly participates Union to investigate the conditions of activists and in local and national training programs for criminal contact members of the Human Rights Committee defense lawyers. of Moscow. His writings include several law review articles on criminal justice topics and three hooks: Chief Counsel {1976), Justice Denied: A Challenge to Samuel Dash Lord Widery's Report on "Bloody Sunday" (1972), and Professor of Law; Director, Institute of Criminal Law The Eavesdroppers (1959). and Procedure B.S., Temple; J.D., Harvard Frances C. DeLaurentis Professor Dash has taught at the Law Center since Associate Professor of Legal Research and Writing 1965. He brings to his courses considerable exper• B.A., Notre Dame; J.D., Catholic University tise in criminal law and trial procedure, having served as a trial attorney with the Appellate Section Prior to joining the Law Center, Professor of the Criminal Division of the U.S. Department of DeLaurentis was an instructor of the Lawyering Justice and the Chief of the Appeals Division of the Skills Program at The Catholic University of District Attorney's Office of Philadelphia, and as America, Columbus School of Law, where she the First Assistant District Attorney of Philadelphia taught for three years. Previously, Professor and the District Attorney of Philadelphia. His eight DeLaurentis was a shareholder/memher of the firm years of private practice included partnerships in the of Verner, Liipfert, Bernhard, McPherson and Philadelphia firms of Blank, Rudenko, Klaus & Hand, Chartered, where her practice involved civil Rome and Dash 8c Levy, where he specialized in litigation before local and federal courts throughout trial practice. In addition, he has served as Executive the United States and the Commonwealth of Director of the Philadelphia Council for Community Puerto Rico. She served as co-chair of the firm's Advancement, a pioneer Philadelphia poverty pro• Summer Associate Program, a memher of the gram, and was chief counsel and staff director of the firm's Hiring Committee, and as the firm's Sexual U.S. Senate Select Committee on Presidential Harassment Ombudsman. Campaign Activities (the Senate Watergate Committee) from February 1973 to September Richard D. Diamond 1974. During the summer of 1985 he served as Professor of Law chief counsel of the Alaskan Senate's Impeachment Inquiry against the Governor. From 1983 to 1992, A.B., Princeton; M.A., J.D., Yale he served as Special Advisor to the Senate of After receiving his M.A.(Political Science) and J.D., Puerto Rico in the Carro Naravilla Investigation. Professor Diamond served as a law clerk for Judge From 1994 to 1998, he served as Outside Lthics Stanley A. Weigel of the U.S. District Court for the Consultant to Independent Counsel in the Northern District of California and Chief Justice Whitewater Investigation. While at Harvard he Warren E. Burger of the U.S. Supreme Court. He FULL-TIME FACULTY 13

was formerly a partner with the D.C. firm of Robert F. Drinan, S.J. Steptoe &Johnson, where he practiced for ten years Professor of Law in the areas of antitrust and international trade liti• B.A., M.A., Boston CoUege; LL.B., LL.M., gation hefore joining the Law Center faculty in Georgetown; Th.D., Gregorian University, Rome January 1985. Professor Diamond currently serves on the Georgetown Medical Center Committee fot Father Drinan, in addition to teaching courses at Transitional Administration. His writings include the Law Center in International Human Rights, "Lconomic Foundations of Countervailing Duty Law," Constitutional Law, Civil Liherties, Legislation, in the Virginia Journal of International Law, and "A Advanced Legal Ethics Seminar, and Professional Search for Economic and Financial Principles in the Responsihility, pursues careers as a priest, lawyer, Administration of U.S. Countervailing Duty Law," politician, and activist. He has received twenty-one in Law and Policy in International Business. honorary degrees, including Georgetown, Loyola (Chicago), Villanova, Syracuse, and Santa Clara. Viet D. Dinh He has served as a visiting professor at four Professor of Law; Deputy Director, Asian Law lA American universities and as the Dean of the Policy Studies Program Boston College Law School. During the ten years between his Deanship at Boston College and join• A. B.,J.D., Harvard ing the Law Center faculty in 1981, he served in the After law school, where he was a Class Marshal and United States Congress as a Representative from an Olin Research Fellow in Law and Economics, Massachusetts, where he was a memher of various Professor Dinh served as a law clerk to Judge committees and the chair of the Subcommittee on Laurence H. Silherman of the U.S. Court of Appeals Criminal Justice of the House Judiciary Committee. for the D.C. Circuit and to U.S. Supreme Court As a Congressman, his travels included official Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. He was Associate Congressional delegations to Vietnam, Thailand, Special Counsel to the U.S. Senate Banking Hong Kong, China, and Japan. He has also served Committee for the Whitewater investigation and on private delegations to the Netherlands, South Special Counsel to U.S. Senator Pete V. Domenici Africa, Sudan, Israel, and the Soviet Union and pri• for the impeachment trial of President Clinton. He vately sponsored human rights missions to Chile, also serves as counsel to the Special Master mediat• the Philippines, El Salvador, Guatemala, Nicaragua, ing a number of lawsuits by Holocaust victims Argentina, France, and Vietnam. He is a regular against German and Austrian financial institutions. contributor to several law reviews and journals of pol• His representative writings include "Codetermination icy and opinion and the author of The Mobilization and Corporate Governance in a Multinational of Shame: A World View of Human Rights (Yale Business Enterprise" in the Journal of Corporation University Press, 2001); The Fractured Dream Law, "What is the Law in Law and Development?" (Crossroad, 1991); Stories From the American Soul in The Creen Bag, and "Financial Sector Reform and (Loyola U. Press, 1990); Cry of the Oppressed: The Lconomic Development in Vietnam" in Law and History and Hope of the Human Rights Revolution; Policy in International Business. Cod and Caesar on the Potomac: A Pilgrimage of Conscience; Beyond the Nuclear Freeze; Honor the Promise: America's Commitment to Israel; Vietnam Diana Roberto Donahoe and Armageddon; Democracy, Dissent and Disorder; Professor of Legal Research and Writing The Right to be Educated (ed.); and Religion, the B. A., Williams; J.D., LL.M., Georgetown Courts and Public Policy. Father Drinan serves on numerous committees devoted to the furtherance After finishing law school. Professor Donahoe of human rights. He is currently serving as a mem• served as a law clerk for Judge George H. Revercomh ber of the ABA House of Delegates and is a past- of the U.S. District Court for the District of chair of the ABA Section on Individual Rights Columbia. After her clerkship, she was a Prettyman and Responsibilities. In addition, he serves on the Fellow in the Georgetown Criminal Justice Clinic Board of Directors of the International League for where she represented criminal defendants and Human Rights, the Lawyer's Committee for supervised law students in court. She teaches International Human Rights, the Council for a Legal Research and Writing, Advanced Legal Livable World Educational Fund, Americans for Writing in Practice, Applied Legal Composition, Democratic Action, and the NAACP Legal and Legal Discourse. Her publications include: Defense and Educational Fund. He is one of the "Teachinglaw.com," " 'Could Have,' 'Would Have,' founders of the Lawyer's AUiance for Nuclear Arms What the Supreme Court Should Have Done in Control and the National InterreUgious Task Force Whren v. United States," "Fair Prosecution on Soviet Jewry. Challenges in Maryland: An Analysis and Proposal," and "Analyzing the Writer's Analysis: Will it Be Clear to the Reader?" 14 FULL-TIME FACULTY

Peter B. Edelman counsel to King & Spalding, a visiting scholar at the Professor of Law; Co-Director, Joint Degree in American Bankruptcy Institute and a bar review Public Policy lecturer for BRI. A. B., LL.B., Harvard Deborah Epstein Professor Edelman had a distinguished career in all Professor of Law; Director, Domestic Violence Clinic three branches of government before joining the B.A., Brown; J.D., New York University Latv Center in 1982. He served as a law clerk for Judge Henry Friendly of the Second Circuit and Professor Epstein joined the faculty as a visiting Justice Arthur Goldberg of the U.S. Supreme professor in 1993, and now serves as Director of Court. He was special assistant to Attorney General the Domestic Violence Clinic. Prior to joining the John Douglas at the Department of Justice and law faculty. Professor Epstein practiced at the legislative assistant to Senator Robert Kennedy. In civil rights firm of Bernahei & Katz, representing addition, he served as Vice President of the University plaintiffs in sex discrimination suits, and clerked of Massachusetts, director of the New York State for Eastern District of Pennsylvania Judge Marvin Division for Youth, and was a partner with the Katz. From 1994-96, Professor Epstein co-chaited a D.C. firm of Foley & Lardner. He was the J. Skelly multi-disciplinary effort to create a new Domestic Wright Memorial Fellow at the Yale Law School Violence Unit within the D.C. Superior Court that during the spring of 1991. Professor Edelman has fundamentally restructured the way that the local also been highly involved as a leader in community justice system handles civil and criminal family and national organizations; he has been Chairman abuse matters. Until 2001, she co-directed the D.C. of the Board of the Center for Community Change Superior Court's Domestic Violence Intake Center and co-chair of Americans for Peace Now, and was and directed the Emergency Domestic Relations a board memher of Common Cause and of the Project, a public interest organization providing University of the District of Columbia. He is cur• legal and educational services to indigent victims of rently Board President of the New Israel Fund and intimate abuse. She is a member of the Mayor's also serves on the hoards of the Puhlic Welfare Commission on Violence Against Women, the Foundation, the National Center for Youth Law, D.C. Domestic Violence Fatality Review Team, the the Juvenile Law Center, and the Center for Law D.C. Domestic Violence Coordinating Council, and Social Policy, among others. He teaches and has served on the Board of Directors of the Constitutional Law, Social Welfare Law, and Public D.C. Coalition Against Domestic Violence. She is Interest Lawyering at the Law Center. He served as the author of several publications in the areas of Director of the Federal Legislation Clinic in the domestic violence and sexual harassment law. spring of2000, and in the spring of 2001, and founded a new District of Columbia Division of that clinic Daniel R. Ernst in the fall of 2001, to work on local issues affecting Professor of Law low-income people. From 1993 until spring 1997, he was on leave from the Law Center, serving first B.A., Dartmouth; J.D., Chicago; M.A., Ph.D., as Counselor to the Secretary of Health and Human Princeton; LL.M., University of Wisconsin Services, and then as Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation in the same Department. Professor Ernst joined the Georgetown faculty in the 1988-89 academic year. He is the author of Lawyers Against Labor (1995), for which he received David G. Epstein the Littleton Griswold Award of the American Visiting Professor of Law Historical Association. In 1996, he was a Fulbright Research Scholar at the National Library of New B. A.,J.D., Texas; LL.M., Harvard Zealand, and in 1998 he was the Jack and Margaret When not off visiting. Professor Epstein teaches Sweet Visiting Professor of History at Michigan bankruptcy, contracts, corporations and secured State University. He teaches courses in American credit at the University of Alabama Law School. In Legal History and Property. the summer of 2001, he taught at the University of Texas Law School, then Harvard Law School for Chai R. Feldblum the spring of 2002, and New York University Law Professor of Law; Director, Federal Legislation Clinic School for the fall of 2002. Recent publications B.A., Barnard College; J.D., Harvard include a 2002 edition of his bankruptcy nutshell, a corporations casebook and the contracts casebook Professor Feldblum joined the faculty as a visiting that Professor Epstein will be using at Georgetown, professor for the 1991-93 academic years. In 1993, Making and Doing Deals. 2003 publications will she established a new law school clinic, the Federal include the bankruptcy casebook he is using at Legislation Clinic, and has served as the Clinic's Georgetown, a casebook on secured credit and a Director since 1993. Prior to joining the law faculty, nutshell on business structures. Professor Epstein is Professor Feldblum worked as a legislative counsel FULL-TIME FACULTY 15 at the AIDS Action Council, and at the ACLU to the American Law Institute's Federal Income Tax AIDS Project, focusing on federal legislation con• Project. He has also served as a member of advisory cerning AIDS. She clerked for First Circuit Court groups to the Committee of Internal Revenue and of Appeals Judge Frank M. Coffin in 1985, and for the Tax Division of the Department of Justice. Supreme Court Justice Harry A. Blackmun in Before moving to Washington in 1980 when his 1986. From 1989-90, Professor Feldblum played a wife got a good job here. Professor Ginsburg was leading role in the drafting and negotiating of the the Beekman Professor of Law at Columbia Americans with Disabilities Act, a law that prohihits University. He was a visiting professor at Stanford discrimination based on disability. She has also in the spring of 1978, at Harvard in the spring of worked extensively in advancing gay and lesbian 1986, at Chicago in the spring of 1990, and at New rights, particularly in the drafting of the Employment York University in the spring of 1993. Professor Nondiscrimination Act. Professor Feldblum engages Ginsburg is co-author, with Jack S. Levin of Chicago, in scholarly work and practical advocacy in the of Mergers, Acquisitions, and Buyouts, a semi-annually areas of disahility rights, lesbian and gay rights, updated treatise which addresses tax and other and health and social welfare legislation. aspects of this exciting subject. The portions of the treatise written hy Professor Ginsburg are, he is Heidi Li Feldman certain, easily identified and quite superb. Professor of Law; Co-Director, Joint Degree in Philosophy Steven P. Goldberg A.B., Brown; J.D., Ph.D., University of Michigan Professor of Law In hoth her scholarship and her teaching. Professor A. B., Harvard; J.D., Yale Feldman integrates law and philosophy. Her areas of specialty include tort law, legal theory, legal ethics, Professor Goldberg is best known for his writings ethics, political philosophy, epistemology, philoso• in the field of law, science, and values. His books phy of science and philosophy of mind. As of 1999, include Seduced by Science: How American Religion Professor Feldman's major scholarly project is a book Has Lost its Way and Culture Clash: Law and Science examining the reasonable person as represented in in America, winner of the Alpha Sigma Nu Book tort law. This interdisciplmary project, tentatively Award. Following graduation from law school, he entitled Care, Character, and American Tort Law, served as a law clerk to D.C. Circuit Court Chief explains and justifies the role of the reasonable person Judge Bazelon and U.S. Supreme Court Justice construct in American tort law. In 1998, she Brennan. In addition, he is a former attorney with contributed a selection related to this project to the the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Professor anthology Law and Science, published by Oxford Goldberg is a member of the D.C. and Maryland University Press. Other recent and forthcoming Bats and the Section on Science and Technology of publications include "Apparently, Suhstantial, Oddly the ABA. He is also a memher of the American Hollow: The Enigmatic Practice ofJustice J a review Association for the Advancement of Science. of William Simon's recent hook in the Michigan Law Review and a foreword to a Ceorgetown Journal Steven H. Goldblatt of Legal Lthics symposium issue. Professor Feldman Professor of Law; Director, Appellate Litigation Clinic teaches torts, advanced torts, and seminars in legal history and legal ethics. She has been a memher of B. A., Franklin & Marshall; J.D., Georgetown the faculty at the University of Michigan Law After graduating from the Law Center in 1970, School, a visiting professor at the University of Professor Goldblatt was an Assistant District Tokyo, and a visiting associate professor at the Law Attorney and then a Deputy District Attorney of Center. Currently, Professor Feldman is a memher Philadelphia. He has been chair of the American of the executive committee for the Association of Bar Association Criminal Justice Section Amicus American Law Schools Torts Section. She is a Curiae Briefs Committee (1982-1999). In 1985, he Member of the Coif and was Articles Editor of the was a memher of the ABA committee that issued Michigan Law Review. the report, "Appellate Litigation Skills Training: The Role of the Law Schools." He served as reporter to Martin D. Ginsburg the ABA Criminal Justice Section's Special Committee Professor of Law on Criminal Justice in a Free Society. That commit• tee's report. Criminal Justice in Crisis, was published A.B., Cornell; J.D., Harvard in 1988. In 1992, he was the reporter to the ABA Professor Ginsburg specializes in teaching tax at Task Force on Minorities in the Justice System. Its the Law Center. His numerous professional activi• July 1992 report was adopted by the ABA and is ties in the tax field include positions as chair of the now being implemented. His recent writings in the Committee on Simplification of the American Bar criminal justice area include several briefs in the Association's Tax Section, chair of the New York United States Supreme Court. He has argued State Bar Association's Tax Section, and consultant three cases in that Court on behalf of Appellate 16 FULL-TIME FACULTY

Litigation Clinic clients. He currently serves as the drafting of the Emergency Health Powers Act to Chairperson of the Rules Advisory Committee of combat hioterrorism and other emerging health the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces threats. The Model Emergency Health Powers Act and serves on the ABA Criminal Justice Standards was drafted for the CDC in coUahoration with the Committee. National Governors Association, National Association of Attorneys General, National Conference of State Lawrence O. Gostin Legislatures, Association of State and Territorial Professor of Law; Professor of Public Health, the Johns Health Officials, and the National Association of Hopkins University; Director, Centerfor Law A the City and County Health Officers. Professor Gostin Public's Health "The CDC-Funded Center Promoting was a memher of the President's Task Force on Public Health Through Law"; Co-Director, Joint Degree National Health Care Reform. His principal areas in Public Health of work on the President's Task Force was on the ethical foundations of the new health care system, B.A., State University of New York at Brockport; puhlic health, and privacy and the health information J.D., Duke; LL.D., (Hon.) State University of (chair). Professor Gostin was formerly Executive New York Director of the American Society of Law, Medicine Lawrence Gostin is an internationally recognized & Ethics and adjunct Professor of Law and Puhlic scholar in law and puhlic health. He is Professor of Health at Harvard University. In the United Law at Georgetown University; Professor of Public Kingdom, Professor Gostin was the Chief Executive Health at the Johns Hopkins University; and the of the National Council for Civil Liberties, Legal Director of the Center for Law & the Public's Health Director of the National Association of Mental at Johns Hopkins and Georgetown Universities Health, and faculty memher of Oxford University. (CDC Collaborating Center "Promoting Public Professor Gostin received the Rosemary Delbridge Health Through Law"). He is also the Co-Director Memorial Award from the National Consumer of the Georgetown/Johns Hopkins Program on Council (U.K.) for the person "who has most Law and Puhlic Health. Professor Gostin Faculty influenced Parliament and government to act for Affiliate fot the Kennedy Institute of Ethics and the welfare of society." He also received the Key to the Steering and Executive Committees of the Tohoko University (japan) for distinguished Institute for Health Care Research and Policy of contrihutions to human rights in mental health. Georgetown. Professor Gostin is an elected lifetime Professor Gostin has a J.D. from Duke University Memher of the Institute of Medicine/National and Honorary Doctorate of Law conferred hy the Academy of Sciences (lOM/NAS). For the Chancellor of the State University of New York lOM/NAS, he serves on the Board on Health (system-wide). In 1974-75, Professor Gostin was a Promotion and Disease Prevention, the Institutional Fulbright Fellow at Balliol CoUege, Oxford University Review Board, and three expert study committees, and the Social Research Unit, University of London. including the Committee on Assuring the Health Professor Gostin's latest hooks are Public Health Law: of the Public in the 21st Century. He is also an Power, Duty, Restraint (University of CaUfornia elected lifetime Fellow of the Hastings Center. He Press and the Milbank Memorial Fund, 2000) and was appointed by the Secretary for Health and Public Health Law and Ethics: A Reader (University Human Services to serve on the Advisory Council of California Press and the Milbank Memorial of the Office of AIDS Research, National Institutes Fund, 2002). of Health. Professor Gostin also consults for the World Health Organization and the Council of Michael H. Gottesman International Organizations for Medical Sciences. Professor of Law Professor Gostin is the Health Law and Lthics Editor of the Journal of the American Medical A.B., Chicago; LL.B., Yale Association (JAMA). He is also on the editorial Professor Gottesman served as an adjunct professor hoard of scholarly journals, including the Yale J. on at the Law Center from 1978-88, and joined the Regulation, Milbank Quart., Int'lJ. ofBioethics, and faculty as a full-time professor in 1989. Specializing the Int'l. J. of Health A Human Rights. Formerly, in the fields of labor law, constitutional law, and Professor Gostin was Editor-in-Chief of the / of civil rights, Professor Gottesman practiced with the Law, Medicine A Ethics, Executive Editor of the Washington, D.C, firm Bredhoff and Kaiser from American J. of Law A Med., and Western European 1961-88, and has argued numerous cases in the Editor of the Int'l. J. of Law A Psychiatry. Professor U.S. Supreme Court. From 1977-81 he served, by Gostin has lead major law reform initiatives for the appointment of President Carter, on the Judicial U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Nominating Commission fot the District of Columbia, (The Model State Puhlic Health Information reviewing hundreds of candidates for vacancies on Privacy Law) and a consortium of states (The the U.S. Court of Appeals and the U.S. District "Turning Point" Puhlic Health Statute Modernization Court for the District of Columbia. Professor Project to draft a Model Public Health Law). In Gottesman is a member of the Board of Trustees of the wake of September Ilth, 2001, he has led the FULL-TIME FACULTY 17 the Lawyers' Committee fot Civil Rights Under Law, the American Law Institute, and serves as an arhi- a memher of the American Academy of Appellate trator in domestic and international contract disputes. Lawyers, and a memher of the Law Committee of Before joining the Law Center faculty in 1972, his the American Association of University Professors. professional experiences ranged from attorney advi• sor at State Department to lecturer in law at the Ganrang Mitu Gnlati Ahmadu BeUo University in Zaria, Nigeria, where Professor of Law he assisted with the organization of the first law degree program in that country. He also practiced A. B., University of Chicago; M.A., Yale; J.D., privately as an associate with the New York firm of Harvard Shearman and Sterling and the D.C. firm of Surrey Professor Gulati joins the faculty from UCLA and Morse. Professor Gustafson has lectured at School of Law, where he joined the faculty in fall universities and to professional groups in every 1997 to teach Business Associations and Securities inhabited continent. Regulation. He received the Yale University Fellowship (1988-91). He studied law at Harvard Robert J. Haft Law School where he received two fellowships, the Professor of Law Harvard Human Rights Fieldwork Fellowship and the John M. Olin Research Fellowship. At Harvard, B.A., City College of New York; J.D., Columbia. Professor Gulati was also editor of the Harvard Professor Haft teaches Torts, Corporations, and Law Review (1993-94), fieldwork editor for the Securities Regulation at the Law Center, and is the Harvard Human Rights Journal (1993-94), and a author of several articles and hooks in the corporate student attorney with Harvard Legal Aid Bureau and securities law field. Following his graduation (1992-93). After graduating from law school in from Columbia School of Law in 1954, he served as 1994, Professor Gulati worked for a year as an a law clerk for the Honorable Irving R. Kaufman. associate with the law firm of Cleary, Gottlieh, He then spent four years as an associate with Goldstein, Steen 8c Hamilton in New York, where he focused Judd 8c Gurfein, fourteen years as a partner of on structuring deht transactions and securitizing Stamer 8c Haft, and four years as a partner with receivahles. He then clerked for the Honorable Kronish, Lieb, Shainswit, Weiner and Hellman. Sandra L. Lynch of the United States Court of He served as Special Consultant (full-time) to the Appeals for the First Circuit, Boston (1995-96), Securities and Exchange Commission from 1977-78 and as law clerk to the Honorable Samuel A. Alito, and, after joining the Law Center faculty in 1978, Jr. of the United States Court of Appeals for the remained as a part-time special consultant to the Third Circuit in Newark, N.J. Professor Gulati's SEC until 1981. He is a member of the American publications include: "Why are There so Few Black Law Institute, the Federal Regulation of Securities Lawyers in Corporate Law Firms," 84 California Committee of the ABA and the Executive Council Law Review 432 (1996); "Efficiency Wages and of the Securities Law Committee of the FBA. He Tournaments: A Theory of Employment has been a Visiting Professor at various foreign law Discrimination Law for 'High-Level' Jobs," schools, including the Sorhonne (Paris I), Cambridge Discussion Paper No. 182, John M. Olin Center (Jesus College), and the European University for Law, Economics and Business, Harvard Law Institute in Florence. School (March 1993) (with David Charny); and "Remnants of Matriliny: Widows of Two Kerala Villages" 76 MANUSHI: Journal of Women and Mark E. Haskins Society 32 (1993) (with Leela Gulati). Professor Visiting Professor of Law Gulati was a visiting professor at the Law Center B.B.A., University of Cincinnati; M.B.A., Ohio for the 2001-02 academic year. University; Ph.D., Pennsylvania State University Professor Haskins is a Professor of Business Charles H. Gustafson Administration at the Darden Graduate School of Professor of Law Business Administration, University of Virginia. He is currently responsible for Darden's First Year B. S., Buffalo; J.D., Chicago Accounting course and while at Darden, he has Professor Gustafson pursues his interest both in tax also taught International Financial Reporting and law and policy and in international law at the Law Business Lthics. Professor Haskins is active in Center. He teaches Tax I, Law and Development, Darden's Executive Education programs and in International Tax Planning, International Business various corporate professional development programs. Transactions, and International Law. He is the His areas of expertise are Corporate Financial author of articles on taxation and international law Reporting, International Financial Reporting, issues, co-author of three casebooks on taxation, has Managerial Accounting, and Performance been active in various committees on tax and inter• Measurement. He has co-authored or co-edited books national law of the American Bar Association and on corporate financial reporting (most recently 18 FULL-TlME FACULTY

Fundamentals of Accounting for Decision Making (2000) Claire A. HiU (co-author)), international financial reporting, and a Visiting Sloan Associate Professor of Law handhook for CFOs. His articles have dealt with B.A., M.A., University of Chicago; J.D., American; such varied topics as auditing, collaboration, and LL.M.,J.S.D., Columbia financial analysis. Professor Hill joins the Law Centet as a visiting Lisa Heinzerling professor from Chicago-Kent CoUege of Law, where Professor of Law she teaches business organizations and contracts and seminars in corporate transactions and advanced A. B., Princeton; J.D., Chicago topics in business and corporate law. Professor Hill After finishing law school, where she served as joined the Chicago-Kent faculty in 1999 after visit• editor-in-chief of the University of Chicago Law ing at Chicago-Kent for the 1999 spring semes• Review, Professor Heinzerling clerked for Judge ter. She was a visiting professor at Northwestern Richard A. Posner of the U.S. Court of Appeals for University School of Law in the spring of 2001. the Seventh Circuit and Justice William J. Brennan, She was previously an associate professor at George Jr., of the U.S. Supreme Court. She was a Skadden Mason School of Law. Before teaching at George Fellow at Business & Professional People for the Mason, she was a John M. Olin FeUow in Law and Puhlic Interest, in Chicago, and fot three years Economics at Columbia University School of Law. practiced environmental law in the Massachusetts Before entering academia, Professor Hill practiced Attorney General's office. She has been a visiting law in the corporate departments of Milbank, professor at the Harvard and Yale law schools. Her Tweed, Hadley & McCloy in New York; Dickstein, scholarship in environmental law has been pub• Shapiro & Morin in Washington, D.C; and Fried, lished in, among other places, the Yale Law Journal, Frank, Harris, Shriver Scjacohson in New York. Harvard Law Review, University of Chicago Law She has published articles on secured deht, securiti• Review, and Ceorgetown Law Journal. zation, emerging markets finance, and the law and economics of contract language. Kristin Nicole Henning Visiting Associate Professor of Law; Deputy Director, Craig Holfman Juvenile Justice Clinic Associate Professor of Legal Research and Writing B. A., Duke; J.D., Yale; LL.M., Georgetown B.A., CoUege ofWiUiam &Maty; Ph.D., University of Connecticut; J.D., University of Texas. Following her graduation from Yale Law School, Professor Henning came to the Georgetown Law Professor Hoffman is a linguist and a lawyer who has Center in 1995 as a Stuart-Stiller Fellow in the specialized in transactional writing and negotiating Criminal and Juvenile Justice Clinics. As a Fellow during his nine years of practice in Austin, Texas she represented adults and children in the D.C. and Washington, D.C. Professor Hoffman has Superior Court, while supervising law students in also taught writing, first to undergraduates at the the Juvenile Justice Clinic. After her fellowship. University of Connecticut, and then to law students Professor Henning returned to the Clinic as an at hoth the University of Texas Law School and the Adjunct Professor from 1999 to 2001. In 1997, Washington CoUege of Law of the American Professor Henning also joined the staff of the University. Professor Hoffman has received several Puhlic Defender Service for the District of fellowships in linguistics, cognitive science, business, Columbia where she continued to represent clients and writing. and helped to organize a Juvenile Unit designed to meet the multi-disciplinary needs of children in the John H.Jackson juvenile justice system. Professor Henning served as University Professor Lead Attorney for the Juvenile Unit from 1998 until she left the Puhlic Defender Service to return A.B., Princeton; J.D., University of Michigan to the Law Center in 2001. Professor Henning has Professor Jackson joined the Georgetown faculty been active in local, regional and national juvenile after a distinguished career as Hessel L. Yntema justice reform, serving on local Superior Court com• Professor of Law at the University of Michigan. He mittees as well as on the Mid-Atlantic Advisory has been a visiting faculty memher at the University Board to the National Juvenile Defender Training, of Delhi in Delhi, India and the University of Technical Assistance and Resource Center; the Brussels in Brussels, Belgium, a Consultant on Legal Defender Policy Group of the National Legal Aid Education to the Ford Foundation, a Research and Defender Association; and hy chairing the Scholar at the headquarters of General Agreement on Juvenile Justice Committee of the Criminal Law Tariffs and Trade (GATT) in Geneva, Switzerland, and Individual Rights Section of the D.C. Bar. and a RockefeUer Foundation FeUow in Brussels, Belgium. He has served as Associate Vice President for Academic Affairs at the University of Michigan FULL-TlME FACULTY 19 and as General Counsel for the Office of the Committee of the California State Bar, drafter of President's Special Representative for Trade in the the statute to regulate bank check holding practices, U.S. Executive Office of the President in Washington, and co-counsel in class actions challenging hank D.C. He has also served as a memher of the Board stop-payment fee charges. Her article, "Ending the of Editors for the American Journal of International Floating Check Game" (1985), grew out of this Law, the Journal of Law and Policy in International involvement. She organized the Financial Institutions Business, the International Tax A Business Lawyer, and Consumer Financial Services section of the AALS. the Fordham International Law Journal, and the She is a past-president of hoth the Association of Maryland Journal of International Law A Trade. He American Law Schools and the Society of American is a member of the editorial board for The World Law Teachers. She was elected to membership in Economy and a past memher of the editorial boards the American Law Institute in 1984. Professor for the International Bar Association and the Jordan is no stranger to Washington; she was a law Journal of World Trade Law. He has published student here, serving as editor-in-chief of the numerous books, articles, and chapters. In 1992 he Howard Law Journal and worked summers here at received the Wolfgang Friedman Memorial Award Covington & Burling and the State Department for lifelong contribution to the field of interna• Legal Advisors Office. She was a White House tional law, of the Columbia University Journal of Fellow in 1980-81, serving as special assistant to Transnational Law and Columbia Society of the Attorney General. She was counsel to Professor International Law at Columbia University. He has Anita HiU during the Clarence Thomas confirma• been an honorary vice president of the American tion hearings. Her recent writings include. Race, Society of International Law, having previously Gender and Power in America (with A. HiU, Oxford served in various capacities including Vice President University Press, 1995) and Lynching the Dark of the Society. Among his more recent books are: Metaphor of American Law (Basic Books, forthcoming The Jurisprudence of the GATT and the WTO: spring 1999). Insights on Treaty Law and Lconomic Relations (Cambridge University Press, 2000), The World Neal K. Katyal Trade Organization: Constitution and Jurisprudence. Professor of Law (Chatham House Papers, The Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1998), Legal Problems of A. B., Dartmouth; J.D., Yale International Lconomic Relations (3td ed. 1995, co- Prior to coming to Georgetown, he was law clerk authored); The World Trading System (MIT Press, to Justice Stephen G. Breyer of the U.S. Supreme 2d ed. 1997); Implementing the Uruguay Round Court and to Judge Guido Calahresi of the Second (Oxford Press, 1997, co-authored). His articles have Circuit Court of Appeals. During 1998-99, Professor appeared in law reviews throughout this country Katyal served as National Security Adviser to the and abroad. He is the editor in chief of the Journal Deputy Attorney General, U.S. Department of of International Lconomic Law and is also Director Justice. He was commissioned by President Clinton of the Institute of International Lconomic Law at in 1999 to co-author a report on ways the legal the Law Center. On November 5, 1998, Professor profession can enhance its pro bono activities and Jackson was formally inaugurated to the position of diversify the Bar, served as co-counsel to Vice University Professor. His inaugural lecture was sub• President Al Gore in the United States Supreme sequently the basis of an article in the Journal of Court case of Bush v. Palm Beach Canvassing International Lconomic Law (Vol. 4, Issue 1). Board in 2000, and was Visiting Professor at Yale Professor Jackson was also honored in early 2000 hy Law School in 2001-02. His publications have the publication of a volume of essays in his honor appeared in Yale Law Journal, Harvard Law Review, hy authors from four different contments, discussed University of Chicago Law Review, Stanford Law and presented at a conference held at GULC in Review, Michigan Law Review, and Pennsylvania January 2001. Law Review. His primary academic interests are Constitutional Law (primarily separation of powers, Emma Coleman Jordan constitutional legitimacy, presidential power, slavery Professor of Law and affirmative action). Criminal Law (particularly cybercrime, conspiracy, architectural solutions to crime B.A., San Francisco State University; J.D., Howard and the role of deterrence), and Education Law. Professor Jordan is best known for her work in the fields of financial services and civil rights. Before Patricia A. King coming to Georgetown, she taught for twelve years Carmack Waterhouse Professor of Law, Medicine, at the University of California, Davis. She began Lthics, and Public Policy her teaching career at Stanford Law School as a teaching fellow. She teaches courses in Torts, B. A., Wheaton CoUege; J.D., Harvard Financial Services and Commercial Law at the Law Professor King's expertise is in the study of law, Center. She has been active in the financial services medicine, ethics and public policy. She is also an field, serving as chair of the Financial Institutions 20 FULL-TlME FACULTY adjunct professor in the Department of Health of the American Civil Liberties Union, focusing on Policy and Management, School of Hygiene and reproductive rights and disahility policy. Professor Puhlic Health at Johns Hopkins University. She is Kohn has written several practice documents on the co-author of Cases and Materials on Law, Science representing victims of domestic violence including and Medicine. She teaches Family Law and Torts practice manual for pro bono attorneys. Most and offers a seminar in Bioethics and the Law. She recently. Professor Kohn published in the Hastings is a member of the American Law Institute and the Constitutional Law Quarterly on the conflict Institute of Medicine and a Fellow of the Hastings between first amendment rights and effective Center. Her work in the field of bioethics has remedies for victims of domestic violence. included service on the HEW-Advisory Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee, the President's David A. Koplow Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Professor of Law; Director, Centerfor Applied Legal Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Studies the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral B.A., Harvard, Queen's College at Cxford; Research, and the Ethics, Legal and Social Issues J.D., Yale Working Group of the Human Genome Project. After graduating from Yale Law School in 1978, She is a board memher of the Hospice Foundation, Professor Koplow served first as an attorney-advisor, the National Partnership of Women and Families, then as special assistant to the Director of the U.S. the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, and Chair Arms Control and Disarmament Agency. He has of the Board of Trustees of Wheaton College. Her also served as secretary of the Lawyers Alliance for professional experience hefore joining the Law Center World Security and as a memher of the Policy faculty in 1973 was primarily in the civil rights field; Board of Legal Counsel for the Elderly and the she was the Deputy Director of the Office of Civil steering committee of Section 2 of the D.C. Bar. Rights and Special Assistant to the Chairman of He has been at the Law Center since 1981. From the ELOC. She also served as a Deputy Assistant 1997-99, while on leave from the Law Center, he Attorney General in the Civil Division of the served as Deputy General Counsel (International Department of Justice. Affairs) at the Department of Defense. Professor Koplow teaches International Law I, and a seminar Laurie S. Kohn in the area of national security, arms control and Visiting Associate Professor of Law; Deputy Director, non-proliferation. He also directs a clinic, the Domestic Violence Clinic Center for Applied Legal Studies, which practices in the field of political asylum. He has written in B.A., Harvard; J.D., LL.M., Georgetown the areas of international law, U.S. foreign affairs Professor Kohn is the deputy director of the law, and arms control, especially regarding verification Domestic Violence Clinic where she has taught of compliance with arms control treaties. since 1998. Professor Kohn supervises students rep• resenting victims of domestic violence, teaches the Abe Krash clinic seminar, and litigates CPO and criminal con• Distinguished Visitorfrom Practice tempt cases. Outside of the classroom. Professor Kohn regularly presents in community and acade• B.A.,J.D., Chicago mic settings on issues related to domestic violence Professor Krash is currently a partner at Arnold & and women's rights. Professor Kohn is a memher of Porter. His practice includes antitrust and trade reg• the D.C. Domestic Violence Targeted Offender ulation matters, government relations, and general Program, the D.C. Fatality Review Team, and acted litigation. Professor Krash has been an adjunct pro• as Assistant Director of the Emergency Domestic fessor at the Law Center since 1989, and has also Relations Project (EDRP), a community advocacy taught at the Yale Law School. He has published organization that helps thousands of family abuse articles in the areas of constitutional law, criminal victims obtain legal protection every year. Prior to law, antitrust and trade regulation, legal ethics, and joining the faculty of the Domestic Violence Chnic, federal civil procedure. Professor Kohn was an associate at the D.C. law firm of Crowell & Moring, LLP, where she special• Alan J. Kreczko ized in medical malpractice and insurance coverage Visiting Professor of Law litigation. Before entering private practice, Professor Kohn focused on disability rights, assisting in the B.A., Boston College; J.D., University of Michigan legislative process for the Americans with Disabilities Professor Kreczko graduated from Boston College Act in Senator Kennedy's office, and later in and the University of Michigan Law School, where implementing and enforcing the ADA fot the he served on the editorial staff of the Michigan Law Civil Rights Division at the Department of Justice. Review. In 1976, he joined the U.S. Department of Professor Kohn also worked at the legislative office State as an attorney adviser in the Cffice of the FULL-TIM E FACULTY 21

Legal Adviser. In 1979, Professor Kreczko was Charles R. Lawrence, III designated legal adviser to Presidential envoy Sol Professor of Law Linowitz for the Camp David autonomy talks, B.A., Haverford College; J.D., Yale beginning a long period of active engagement in Israeli-Arab negotiations. He remained as legal Professor Lawrence joined the Law Center faculty adviser to Presidential envoys Philip Hahib and from Stanford Law School where he taught from Donald Rumsfeld in the Israel/Lebanon negotia• 1986-92. He began his teaching career at the tions from 1981 until 1983. From 1983 until 1987, University of San Francisco in 1974 and has visited Professor Kreczko became the Assistant Legal the faculty of several law schools, including Adviser for Near East and South Asian Affairs, Harvard, Berkeley, UCLA, and the University of maintaining his role in Middle East negotiations, Southern California. Professor Lawrence is best including the Madrid Peace Conference. From 1988 known fot his work in antidiscrimination law, equal until April 1993, Professor Kreczko served as Deputy protection, and critical race theory. His most recent Legal Adviser in the Department of State, with hook. We Won't Co Back: Making the Case for oversight responsibility for Near East, environmen• Affirmative Action (Houghton Mifflin, 1997), is co- tal, law enforcement and intelligence matters. In authored by Georgetown Law Professor Mari April 1993, Professor Kreczko was appointed Special Matsuda. Professor Lawrence has received the Assistant to the President and Legal Adviser for University of San Francisco School of Law's "Most the National Security Council, where he advised Distinguished Professor Award" and the John the President and National Security Council on the Bingham Hurlhurt Award fot Excellence in Teaching, legal aspects of national security issues. In 1998, presented hy the 1990 graduating class of Stanford Professor Kreczko joined the State Department's Law School. He is a member of the board of advi• Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration as its sors and past-president of the Society of American Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary. From January Law Teachers. Professor Lawrence currently serves 2000 through January 2001, Professor Kreczko on the District of Columbia Board of Education. served as acting Assistant Secretary for the bureau. Richard J. Lazarus Donald C. Langevoort Professor of Law Professor of Law B.S., B.A., University of Illinois; J.D., Harvard B.A., University of Virginia; J.D., Harvard Professor Lazarus teaches environmental law, nat• Prior to joining the Law Center faculty in 1999, Professor Langevoort was the Lee S. and Charles ural resources law, federal hazardous waste regula• A. Spelt Professor at Vanderhilt University School tion, and torts. He previously worked for the U.S. of Law, where he joined the faculty in 1981. The Justice Department, in both the Environmental courses Professor Langevoort teaches are Contracts, and Natural Resources Division and the Solicitor Securities Regulation, various seminars on corporate General's Office, where he was assistant to the and securities issues, and Corporations. Professor Solicitor General. Professor Lazarus has represented Langevoort has received the Paul J. Hartman Award the United States, state and local governments, and for Excellence in Teaching at Vanderhilt. He has environmental groups in the U.S. Supreme Court been a visiting professor at Harvard Law School in approximately 30 cases, many of which raised and the University of Michigan Law School and a natural resource and environmental law issues. His lecturer at the Washington College of Law, American legal scholarship is in the area of environmental and University. After practicing for two years at Wilmer, natural resources law. He has most recently pub• Cutler 8c Pickering in Washington, D.C, he lished law review articles on the Fifth Amendment joined the staff of the U.S. Securities 8c Exchange Just Compensation Clause, environmental justice, Commission as Special Counsel in the Cffice of the and environmental crime. Professor Lazarus serves General Counsel. Professor Langevoort is the co• on several national advisory hoards, including the author, with Professors James Cox and Robert Lnvironmental Defense Fund's Litigation Review Hillman, of Securities Regulation: Cases and Materials Committee. (Aspen Law 8c Business), and the author of a trea• tise entitled Insider Trading: Regulation, Enforcement David J. Luban and Prevention (West Group). He has also written Frederick J. Haas Professor of Law and Philosophy many law review articles, a number of which seek to incorporate insights from social psychology and B.A., University of Chicago; M.A., M.Phil., behavioral economics into the study of corporate Ph.D., Yale and securities law and legal ethics. Professor Langevoort has testified numerous times hefore Having taught at Kent State University and the Congressional committees on issues relating to University of Maryland School of Law and the insider trading and securities litigation reform. Institute for Philosophy and Puhlic Policy at the University of Maryland, Professor Luhan joined the Georgetown faculty in 1997. He has been a visiting 22 FULL-TlME FACULTY faculty member at the Yale Law School, Harvard Law hefore joining the Law Center. Before joining Law School, University of Melbourne, Dartmouth the faculty at UCLA, she was professor of law for College, the Max Planck Institute for Foreign and eight years at the University of Hawaii School of International Private Law (Hamburg) and the Law, teaching American Legal History, Torts, Max Planck Institute for European Legal History Constitutional Law, Civil Rights, and Sex (Frankfurt). His recent publications include The Discrimination. Professor Matsuda has also taught Ethics of Lawyers (ed.). Legal Modernism, and Legal at Stanford Law School and the University of Lthics (co-authored). His numerous articles and Hiroshima and served as a judicial training consul• chapters have focused on a range of topics in legal tant in Micronesia and South Africa. She was an ethics, the social responsihility of lawyers, law and associate at the labor law firm of King 8c Nakamura philosophy, jurisprudence, and social justice. He has in Honolulu and was law clerk to the Honorable been a Woodrow Wilson Graduate Fellow, a Herbert Y.C. Choy of the Ninth Circuit Court of Guggenheim Fellow, a Danforth Fellow, a Keck Appeals. Professor Matsuda has written well-known Foundation Distinguished Senior Fellow in Legal articles on constitutional law and jurisprudential Ethics and Professional Culture at Yale Law School, issues, including hate speech, affirmative action, and a Fellow of the Woodrow Wilson International and feminist theory. Her hooks include Called From Center for Scholars. He was chosen by the American Within (University of Hawaii Press); Words that Bat Foundation for the 1998 Keck Foundation Wound (Westview Press); and We Won't Go Back, Lecturer Award in Legal Lthics and Professional Making a Case for Affirmative Action (co-authored, Responsihility. Houghton Mifflin). Professor Matsuda is currently serving on the court-appointed Texaco Task Force Laura W. S. Macklin on Equality and Fairness as part of a record-setting Professor of Law; Director, Juvenile Justice Clinic, anti-discrimination settlement. She serves on the Family Opportunity Division national advisory hoards of Ms. Magazine; the American Civil Liherties Union; and the National B.A., California (Santa Barbara); J.D., California Asian Pacific Legal Consortium. (Berkeley) Professor Macklin currently teaches in the Family Deven Claire McGraw Opportunity Division of the Juvenile Justice Clinic. Visiting Associate Professor of Law; Acting Director, Between 1981-91, she taught in the Institute for Federal Legislation Clinic Public Representation. From 1991-95, she taught B.A., B.S., University of Maryland; J.D., at the Center for Applied Legal Studies. While in Georgetown; M.P.H., Johns Hopkins law school at U.C. Berkeley, she served as an extern to Justice Stanley Mosk of the California Supreme Professor McGraw will be the Acting Director of Court and as a membership editor of the California the Federal Legislation Clinic during the Fall 2002 Law Review. Upon moving to Washington, D.C, she semester and Co-Director through the Spring 2003 became an associate with the law firm of Covington semester. Prior to joining the clinic as a teaching & Burling. Approximately two and one-half years fellow for the 2000-02 academic years, Professor later, she resigned to become a staff attorney in the McGraw served as Deputy Legal Counsel to law reform unit of the Neighhorhood Legal Services Governor Paul CeUucci and Lieutenant Governor Program, specializing in public benefits and health Jane Swift of Massachusetts, providing advice on law. Her work there included class action litigation health care, housing and ethics issues. Professor and legislative advocacy. She has served on the McGraw also was an associate for four years in the Board of Directors of the NLADA/LSC Access to health law group at Ropes 8c Gray in Boston, where Justice Project and on the Executive Committee of her practice included advising non-profit hospitals the Alliance for Justice, a membership organization on federal and state regulatory issues, counseling of puhlic interest groups. She has taught federal health care clients on various managed care arrange• litigation courses for legal services attorneys and in ments and structuring transactions between non• ATLA, NITA, and PLI programs. At Georgetown, profit hospitals and physician groups. While in law her clinical teaching and cases have included special school. Professor McGraw was one of the first students education, constitutional rights, disability rights, of the Federal Legislation Clinic, working with the immigration law, and administrative law. She writes Deputy General Counsel of the Department of ahout issues of court reform and procedural justice, Health and Human Services on the health care and about puhlic interest law. reform proposal introduced hy President Clinton. Before attending law school. Professor McGraw Mari J. Matsuda worked for four years and an assistant producer for Professor of Law CBS News. B.A., Arizona State; J.D., Hawaii; LL.M., Harvard Professor Matsuda was a professor of law at the University of California at Los Angeles School of FULL-TlME FACULTY 23

Carrie J. Menkel-Meadow Studies. Her teaching fields include Legislation, Professor of Law Civil Procedure, and Law and Culture. A. B. Barnard College, Columbia; J.D., University of John G. Murphy, Jr. Pennsylvania, LL.D., Quinnipiac College of Law Professor of Law Professor Menkel-Meadow joined the full-time A. B., Harvard; LL.B., Georgetown faculty in 1996 after serving as a visiting professor in 1992 and 1994. She joined us from UCLA Professor Murphy has taught courses in Individual where she had been a professor of law since 1979, Rights, the Supreme Court, the Federal System, serving as well as a professor in the Women's Commercial Law, Federal Election Law, Professional Studies program, Acting Director of the Center for Responsihility, Corporations, and Criminal Law. the Study of Women, and Co-Director of UCLA's From 1982-86 he also served the Law Center as Center on Conflict Resolution. She has taught as a Associate Dean for the Graduate Program. Before Distinguished Visiting Professor of Legal Theory at joining the Law Center in 1965, he was a clerk for the University of Toronto, a visiting professor at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, an Harvard Law School, Stanford Law School, and as associate at the D.C. firm of Covington & Burling, a clinical professor at the University of Pennsylvania. and Conference Director for the HEW and GEO A national expert in alternative dispute resolution, programs for delivery of legal services to low-income the legal profession, and legal ethics, clinical legal individuals. In addition, he served as General education, feminist legal theory, and women in the Counsel to the PLC from 1975-76, as Ford legal profession, Professor Menkel-Meadow has Foundation Project Specialist in Beirut, Lebanon, written and lectured extensively in these fields. She from 1970-72, and as visiting professor at the is the author of Mediation: Theory, Policy & Practice University of Guadalajara in Mexico (I99I), at (2001) and over 60 articles. She has won the Center Palackeho University in Czechoslovakia (1992), and for Public Resources' First Prize for Scholarship in at Xiamen University, Xiamen, Peoples Republic of Alternative Dispute Resolution three times (in China (1999). 1983, 1990, and 1998). She has also won the Rutter Award for Excellence in Teaching at UCLA. She Reinhard Mussgnug currently chairs the CPR-Georgetown Commission Visiting Professor of Law on Ethics and Standards in Alternative Dispute Resolution. She serves on the Executive Committee Universities of Heidelberg, Lrlangen, Munich of the Board of Directors of the American Bar Professor Mussgnug is a Visiting Professor at Foundation and on the Research Grants Committee Georgetown. Since 1978, Professor Mussgnug has of the Law School Admissions Council. She also been a fuU time professor of Constitutional Law, sits on numerous boards of puhlic interest organiza• Administrative Law, Constitutional History, tions and the editorial boards of journals in dispute Finance Tax Law and director of the Institute for resolution, law and social science and feminism. She Financial and Tax Law at the University of Heidelberg. has chaired the AALS Sections on Law and Social Previously, he was a fuU time professor for Puhlic Science, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Women in Law at the University of Mannheim and at the Free Legal Education, and has been on the Executive University of Berlin. Professor Mussgnug was a Committee of the Section on Clinical Education. judge on the Supreme Administrative Court of In addition to her scholarship, research, and teach• Baden-Wuttemberg in Mannheim. He has taught ing. Professor Menkel-Meadow often serves as a and lectured in Europe and the United States and is mediator and arbitrator in puhlic and private settings a member of numerous legal and educational orga• and has trained lawyers and mediators in the United nizations. Professor Mussgnug's fields of research States and abroad. She is currently the director of are constitutional and administrative law, tax law the Georgetown Hewlett Fellowship Program in and tax administration, and jurisprudential principles Conflict Resolution and Problem-Solving. of legal education, among others.

Naomi Mezey Eleanor Holmes Norton Associate Professor of Law Professor of Law B. A., Wesleyan University; J.D., Stanford; M.A., B. A., Antioch; M.A., LL.B., Yale University of Minnesota Before joining the Law Center faculty in 1982, Professor Mezey served as law clerk for Judge Professor Norton served for four years as chair of the Marilyn Hall Patel of the United States District U.S. Lqual Employment Opportunity Commission. Court for the Northern District of California. She She has taught ELO Law, Labor Law, and has been a Legislative Aide to former Senator Alan Negotiations at the Law Center. She also served as Cranston and a teaching assistant at the University Assistant Legal Director of the ACLU for five years of Minnesota in the Department of American and then chaired the New York City Commission 24 FULL-TIME FACULTY on Human Rights from 1970-77. She published and to Justice Sandra Day O'Connor of the U.S. "Justice and Efficiency in Dispute Systems" in Supreme Court. 1990 {Ohio State Journal of Dispute Resolution), "Bargaining and the Ethic of Process" in 1989 {New Robert L. Oakley York University Law Review), "Equal Employment Professor of Law; Director, Law Library Law: Crisis in Interpretation, Survival Against the B.A., J.D., CorneU; M.S.L.S., Syracuse Odds" in 1988 {Tulane Law Review), "Commentary" in American Labor Policy: A Critical Appraisal of the Professor Oakley is the Law Librarian as weU as a NLRA in 1987, and three articles in 1984: "Public professor at the Law Center. Before joining the Assistance, Post-New Deal Bureaucracy and the Law Center in 1982, he served as Associate Law Law" {Yale Law Journal), "The Private Bar and Librarian at CorneU Law School and Director of Public Confusion: A New Civil Rights Challenge" the Law Library and associate professor of law at {Howard Law Journal) and "Minority Workers of Boston University School of Law. His writings Tomorrow" {Work in the 21st Century). Her numerous include a bibliography of organized crime and leadership positions include service as chair of the articles entitled "InteUectual Property Issues and ACLU National Advisory Council, the Workplace Information Networks," "The Deteriorating Historical Health Fund, and the Women's Law and Policy Record: Imphcations for Scholars and Libraries," Fellowship. In addition, she serves on the Boards of "CoUection Development: The Impact of a National the Martin Luther King, Jr., Center for Social Law Library," "Education for Law Librarianship: Change, the RockefeUer Foundation, the Community Avoiding the Trade School Mentality," and Foundation of Greater Washington, and the Southern "Copyright and Preservation: A Serious Problem Christian Leadership Conference. She serves on the in Need of a Thoughtful Solution." He represents Boards of the Pitney Bowes, Metropolitan Life, and the interests of the American Association of Law Stanley Works corporations. She is also a member Libraries in matters on Capitol HiU and around of the Council on Foreign Relations, the National Washington and he has served on numerous other professional committees. Professor Oakley is the Lndowment for Democracy, and the U.S. Citizens' current President of the American Association of Committee to Monitor the Helsinki Accords, and Law Libraries. on the Advisory Board of the Carter Center in Atlanta, GA. and the National Women's Political Caucus. She held the O'Neill Visiting Chair at James C. Oldham Boston CoUege in 1989, was the Ralph E. Shikes St. Thomas More Professor of Law and Legal History Bicentennial FeUow at Harvard Law School in B.S., Duke; LL.B., Stanford; M.S.B.A., Denver 1988, was a Visiting FeUow at Harvard's John F. Kennedy School of Government in the spring of In addition to his teaching duties at the Law Center, Professor Oldham spends considerable time 1984, and a Visiting Phi Beta Kappa Scholar in in London doing manuscript research in English 1985. She is a memher of the National Academy legal history. His major work is The Mansfield of Science's Committees on the Status of Black Manuscripts and the Crowth of English Law in the Americans and on Technological Changes in Eighteenth Century, two volumes, published by the Employment. She is also a member of the Ford University of North Carolina Press for the American Foundation Study on the Future of the Welfare Society fot Legal History. Professor Oldham col• State. Professor Norton is currently on leave from lects hooks from and ahout early modern England the Law Center. In November 1990, she was elected and teaches Seminars at the Law Center on English as the District of Columbia delegate to the United Legal History and on the history of the jury. He States House of Representatives. also teaches Bargain, Exchange, and Liability; Contracts; Labor Law; Labor Arbitration; and Julie Rose O'SuUivan Torts. He specialized in labor law with the Denver Professor of Law firm of Sherman and Howard, and now serves as a Labor Arhitrator on several permanent panels. He is A.B., Stanford; J.D., CorneU currently the Impartial Umpire for Bethlehem Steel Professor O'SuUivan joined the faculty in November Co. and the United Steel Workers, and Permanent 1994 from her position in the Office of Independent Umpire for Alcoa and the Steelworkers. He is a Counsel (Little Rock, Arkansas), where she worked memher of the National Academy of Arhitrators and recently served as chair of the Foreign Service on the "Whitewater" investigation. She served as an Grievance Board at the State Department. He is assistant U.S. attorney in the Criminal Division of the author of a student text, Labor Law, and has the U.S. Attorney's Office of the Southern District published numerous articles on legal history and on of New York. In addition. Professor O'SuUivan was labor and employment discrimination topics. a litigation associate with Davis Polk & WardweU and served as clerk to the Honorable Levin H. Campbell of the First Circuit Court of Appeals FULL-TlME FACULTY 25

Ladislas M. Orsy, S.J. American Law, and Commercial Law: Sales Visiting Professor of Law Transactions at the Law Center. From 1993-97, she served as Associate Dean for the JD and M.A., Oxford; D.C.L., Gregorian University, Rome; Graduate Programs at the Law Center. She has L.Ph. and L.S.T., School of Theology St. Alhert, been Treasurer of the D.C. Bar and a memher of Louvain, Belgium the Secretary of State's Advisory Committee on Father Orsy was formerly a professor of canon law Private International Law (the Study Group on the at the Catholic University of America. He has Law Applicable to International Sales), the D.C. taught Canon Law at the Gregorian University in Bar Screening Committee, and the Editorial Board Rome, Fordham University, the University of of the Washington Lawyer. She currently serves on Frihourg, Switzerland, and the Law Center. Father the Board of Trustees of the Child Welfare League Orsy is the author of nine books and more than two of America, Emmanuel College, Family and Child hundred articles on topics in theology and canon Services of Washington, DC, and of the Florence law. He is a regular visitor at the Law Center where Crittenton Mission Foundation. Before becoming he teaches Roman Law, History of Philosophy of involved in puhlic service, she practiced privately Law, and Canon Law. with the D.C. firm of Hogan and Hartson and taught Conflicts at Catholic University. After grad• Joseph A. Page uation from law school, she served as a clerk for the Honorable Ruggero J. Aldisert of the U.S. Court Professor of Law of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Professor Patterson B.A., LL.B., LL.M., Harvard is a memher of the American Law Institute. Professor Page's academic interests lie in the fields of torts, products liability, and food and drug regu• Ronald A. Pearlman lation. His most recent scholarly projects include Professor of Law; Director, Graduate Tax Program articles entitled "Automohile-Design Liability and B.A., with honors, ].D., cum laude. Northwestern; Compliance with Federal Standards," co-authored LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown. with Ralph Nader and published in the George Washington University Law Review, "Liability for Professor Pearlman teaches Tax I, Corporate Tax II, Unavoidably and Unreasonably Unsafe Products: and Taxes.com: the Taxation of Electronic Commerce, Does Negligence Doctrine Have a Role to Play?," and coordinates the Graduate Tax Scholars enrich• published in the Chicago-Kent Law Review, and ment program. Prior to joining the faculty, he was a "Federal Regulation of Tobacco Products and tax partner in the law firm of Covington & Burling. Products That Treat Tobacco Dependence: Are the Previously, he served in three tax positions with the Playing Fields Level?" in the Food and Drug Law Federal Government. In the mid-1960's, Professor Journal. He also writes about Latin America. His Pearlman served with the Cffice of Chief Counsel latest hook The Brazilians explains what makes of the Internal Revenue Service in Washington. Brazilians Brazilian. His other hooks include The After IS years of private law practice in St. Louis, Revolution That Never Was: Northeast Brazil, 1955- he returned to Washington in 1983 to serve first as 1964; Bitter Wages: The Nader Report on Disease and the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Tax Pohcy at the Injury on the Job (co-author); The Law of Premises U.S. Treasury, and then as the Assistant Treasury Liability (two editions); and Peron: A Biography Secretary for Tax Policy, a presidential appointment. (A second updated edition of the Spanish-language At the Treasury, he had overall responsihility for edition of Peron was published in Argentina in development of the Department's 1984 tax reform 1999). He has also written a lengthy introduction to proposals and President Reagan's 1985 tax reform Eva Peron, In My Own Words. Professor Page is a recommendations to the Congress. He represented Director of Puhlic Citizen, Inc., and of the American the Administration during the consideration of Museum of Tort Law, a memher of the Associated the Tax Reform Act of 1986 by the House of Faculty of the Latin American Studies Program at Representatives. After a brief return to private Georgetown University, and a memher of the practice, he was appointed Chief of Staff of the Biography Group of Washington. Congressional Joint Committee on Taxation where he served from 1988-1990. Over the years. Professor Pearlman has served in a number of professional Elizabeth Hayes Patterson organizations and advisory groups, including as Associate Professor of Law Vice-Chair (Government Relations) of the ABA A.B., Emmanuel; J.D., Catholic University Section of Taxation and as a consultant to two tax policy projects of the American Law Institute. He also Before joining the Law Center faculty in 1980, has served on the adjunct faculties of the University Professor Patterson served as Chair of the D.C. of Virginia School of Law and Washington University Puhlic Service (Utilities) Commission and was a School of Law in St. Louis and has lectured at the Commissioner of the D.C. Puhlic Service Commission. Japan Ministry of Finance and ESADE Law School She now teaches Conflicts, Contracts, Race and 26 FULL-TIME FACULTY in Barcelona, Spain. Professor Pearlman has testified Economy." Professor Pitofsky has taught courses at hefore Congress over 30 times on tax policy matters. the Law Center in Antitrust, Consumer Protection, Federal Courts, and Constitutional Law. He prac• Gary Feller tices law as counsel to the D.C. firm of Arnold and Professor of Law Porter and was an attorney with Dewey, Ballantine, Bushby, Palmer and Wood. In addition, he served B.A., Emory; J.D., Harvard as a memher of the Council of the Administrative Professor Pellet joined the Georgetown faculty Conference to the United States and the Board of from the University of Virginia Law School where Governors of the D.C. Bar Association. he taught from 1982-88. After graduating from law school, where he served on the Harvard Law John Podesta Review, Professor Pellet clerked for the Honorahle Visiting Professor of Law Morris Lasker of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Professor Pellet is B.A., Knox College; J.D., Georgetown co-secretary of the Conference on Critical Legal Professor Podesta is the former Chief of Staff to Studies and a contributing editor of Tikkun maga• the President. He served in the first Clinton zine. He has taught Contracts, Constitutional administration as an assistant to the President and Law, Criminal Procedure, and Jurisprudence at staff secretary at the White House, where he man• Georgetown. His writings are primarily in the field aged the paper flow to and from the President, of legal theory and legal history. including coordination of White House Senior Staff advice on Presidential decision memoranda Nina PiUard and approval on all Presidential documents. He Associate Professor of Law also served as the principal White House spokes• person on the Whitewater investigation and as the B.A.,Yale;J.D., Harvard senior policy advisor to the President on govern• After serving as a law clerk to the Honorable Louis ment information, privacy, telecommunications, and H. PoUak of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern regulatory policy. Before joining the Clinton admin• District of Pennsylvania, Professor Pillard held the istration. Professor Podesta was president and gen• Marvin M. Karpatkin fellowship at the ACLU and eral counsel of Podesta Associates, Inc., a then worked for several years at the NAACP Legal Washington, D.C, government relations and pub• Defense and Education Fund, Inc. She joined the lic affairs firm. He has had extensive Capitol Hill U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Solicitor experience, serving as chief counsel for the Senate General as Assistant to the Solicitor General in 1994 Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry where she served until 1997 when she joined the and as chief minority counsel to the Senate faculty at Georgetown. She has litigated numerous Judiciary Committee Subcommittees on Patents, cases, including more than twenty that she has Copyrights, and Trademarks; Security and Terrorism; briefed and six that she has argued before the and Regulatory Reform. He was special assistant to Supreme Court. In 1998-2000, Professor Pillard the director of Action, a federal volunteer agency took leave from the Law Center to work in the and served as trial attorney in the Department of Department of Justice as Deputy Assistant Attorney Justice, Land and Natural Resources Division. General, Cffice of Legal Counsel. She returned to Professor Podesta has taught as an adjunct at the teaching in the summer of 2000. Law Center and has been a guest lecturer at American University Washington College of Law and at Harvard Law School. He was a visiting pro• Robert Pitofsky fessor at the Law Center in the I995-I996 and Sheehy Professor of Antitrust Law and Trade Regulation I996-I997 academic years, and has been a summer A.B., New York University; LL.B., Columbia faculty member since 1997. Professor Pitofsky has had a distinguished career in government and is especially known for his work in Clarissa C. Potter the antitrust field. He has served as a commissioner Associate Professor of Law and later chairman of the Federal Trade Commission, A.B., Miami University of Ohio; J.D., Yale the director of the Bureau of Consumer Protection of the FTC, counsel to the American Bar Association Professor Potter has been teaching tax related Commission to Study the FTC, and chair of a courses since she joined the faculty from the Cffice Department of Defense Task Force on downsizing of Tax Policy, U.S. Treasury Department. There she the Defense Industry. In addition, he is co-author of served in a number of positions, including Acting the text, Cases & Materials on Antitrust, and his recent Tax Legislative Counsel and Acting Deputy Tax writings include "New Definitions of Relevant Legislative Counsel. While at Treasury, Professor Market and the Assault on Antitrust" and "Proposals Potter advised the Secretary of Treasury and for Revised Merger Enforcement in a Global Assistant Secretary for Tax Policy on domestic tax FULL-TlME FACULTY 27 policy issues and participated in strategic planning 85 Virginia Law Review (1999), to be reprinted in and developing tax initiatives. Previously, Professor Securities Law Review (2001). Potter was Legislation Counsel for the Joint Committee on Taxation, U.S. Congress, where she Kevin P. Quinn, S.J. analyzed legislative proposals for tax policy issues, Professor of Law economic effects, and administratibility. As a tax A. B., Fordham; M.Div., S.T.L., Jesuit School of associate with Sullivan & Cromwell in New York, Professor Potter worked on tax matters relating to Theology at Berkeley; J.D., Ph.D., University of innovative financial instruments, derivative financial California (Berkeley) products, partnerships, mutual funds, corporate After finishing law school, where he was a member reorganizations and restructurings, and acquisitions. of the California Law Review, and then receiving Professor Potter currently serves as projects director his Ph.D. in Jurisprudence and Social Policy, Father for the American Tax Policy Institute. Quinn clerked for Judge Joseph M. McLaughlin of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Adam C. Pritchard In addition, he has served as a visiting lecturer in Visiting Assistant Professor of Law criminal law at the Santa Clara University School of Law and was an instructor in social studies, B.A., J.D., University of Virginia; M.P.P., University philosophy, and theology at Regis High School in of Chicago New York City. Father Quinn is a Senior Research Professor Pritchard holds B.A. and J.D. degrees Fellow of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics and has had from the University of Virginia, as well as an M.P.P. articles published on bioethical and jurisprudential from the Harris School of Puhlic Policy at the topics. University of Chicago. While at Virginia, he was an Olin Fellow in Law and Economics and served as jmj. Ramsfield articles development editor on the Virginia Law Professor of Law; Director, Legal Research and Writing Review. After graduation, he clerked for Judge J. B. A., Wellesley; B.M., J.D., University of Wisconsin Harvie Wilkinson III of United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and served as a Professor Ramsfield specializes in the study of legal Bristow Fellow in the Cffice of the Solicitor discourse, hoth in the United States and abroad. General at the U.S. Department of Justice. After By combining studies in linguistics, composition working in private practice, he served as senior theory, and cognitive psychology, she has created a counsel in the Cffice of the General Counsel of the unique approach to teaching legal writing. She SEC, where he wrote appellate briefs and studied teaches continuing legal education courses nation• the effect of recent reforms in the area of securities ally and internationally, helping lawyers to write fraud litigation. He received the SEC's Law and better, faster. She also helped create Georgetown's Policy Award for his work in United States v. O'Hagan, United States Legal Discourse, a course designed in which the Supreme Court upheld the misappro• especially for mternational lawyers. She has assisted priation theory of insider trading. Professor Pritchard South Africa's twenty-two law schools to create new has been a visiting professor at Northwestern four-year curricula that incorporated classes in legal University School of Law. His current research discourse. She has also presented classes and work• focuses on the effects of fraud on securities markets shops to many international lawyers and judges, and the role of class action litigation in controlling including justices from Iceland, South Africa, and fraud. Professor Pritchard joined the Michigan Slovenia; lawyers from Russia, France, Germany, faculty in 1998 and teaches courses in corporate and Sweden, and Uganda; and legal educators from securities law. He also serves as faculty advisor to Italy, Australia, and New Zealand. She is the the Law School's student chapter of the Federalist author of "Is Logic Culturally Based? A Contrastive Society for Law and Public Policy and as an adjunct International Approach to the U.S. Law Classroom." scholar to the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. 47 /. Legal Ed. 157 (1997), co-author with Mary Professor Pritchard's publications include "Statutes Ray of Legal Writing: Cetting It Right and Cetting It with Multiple Personality Disorders: The Value of Written (3d ed. 2000), and the author of The Law as Ambiguity in Statutory Design and Interpretation" Architecture: Building Legal Documents (2000). (with Joseph A. Grundfest), 54 Stanford Law Review (forthcoming, 2002); "The Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998: The Sun Sets on Milton C. Regan.Jr. California's Blue Sky Laws," (with David M. Levine), Professor of Law to be excerpted in (Robert W. Hamilton), Corporations B.A., University of Houston; M.A., University of (Including Partnerships and Limited Liability California (Los Angeles); J.D., Georgetown Partnerships) 7th ed. (forthcoming 2001); "Markets as Monitors: A Proposal to Replace Class Actions Professor Regan received his Bachelors in Political with Exchanges as Securities Fraud Monitors," Science and his Masters in Urban and Regional Planning. At Georgetown, he was a memher of 28 FuLL-TiME FACULTY

The Law Journal and received several awards. Upon Roe is the founder and Director of the D.C. Family completing his studies at Georgetown, Professor Literacy Project, which teaches prisoners how to Regan clerked for Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg on read with their children and other developmentally the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of appropriate practices. His present research focuses Columbia Circuit and Justice William J. Brennan, on learning theory and its implications for law and Jr. of the Supreme Court of the United States. He law teaching. was an associate at Davis Polk & Wardwell in Washington, DC, where he specialized in defense Julia L. Ross of attorneys and accountants in liability actions and Associate Professor of Legal Research and Writing in white-collar criminal practice, and performed pro bono work on behalf of tenant associations. B.A., Hamilton College; J.D., Harvard Law School Professor Regan has served as an adjunct faculty Professor Ross was an attorney at Gipson Hoffman & member in the University of Maryland Urban Pancione, Los Angeles, where she was a shareholder Affairs Program. He is the author of Alone Together: and member of the firm's management committee. Law and the Meanings of Marriage (Oxford University Her civil trial practice included copyright, trademark, Press, 1999), Family Law and the Pursuit of Intimacy, defamation, breach of contract, and shareholder (New York University Press, 1993), and several derivative actions, with experience in all aspects of articles on family law, legal ethics, and legal theory, civil litigation, including pleadings, discovery and is the co-editor with Anita L. AUen, of Debating motions practice, trial, ADR, and appeals. While at Democracy's Discontent: Essays on American Politics, Gipson Hoffman, she wrote a successful Petition Law, and Public Philosophy (Oxford University for Certiorari and brief on the merits in the U.S. Press, 1998). Supreme Court in Fogerty v. Fantasy, a copyright dispute. Professor Ross was a summer associate Kristen Konrad Robbins for Smith & Hulsey, Jacksonville, Florida, and Associate Professor of Legal Research and Writing Hecht & Associates, Toronto, Canada, and was Assistant Director of Admissions at Flagler College B.A., Wellesley College; J.D., Georgetown in Florida. She was law clerk to Honorable H. Lee After graduating from the Law Center, Professor Sarokin, U.S. District Judge, Newark, New Jersey. Robhins joined the firm of Kirkland & Ellis in Washington, D.C. While at Kirkland & Ellis, she Susan Deller Ross specialized in litigation, including products liability, Professor of Law; Director, International Women's breach of contract, copyright infringement, and Human Rights Clinic shareholder derivative suits. She also represented pro bono clients seeking social security disahility B.A., Knox; J.D., New York University benefits. Professor Robbins has previously taught Legal Professor Ross is Director of the Law Center's Research and Writing at the George Washington Women's International Human Rights Clinic. University National Law Center. Before joining the Law Center faculty in 1983, she was Special Litigation Counsel to the U.S. Justice Richard L. Roe Department's Civil Rights Division, and hefore Professor of Law; Director, D. C. Street Law Project that the Clinical Director of the ACLU's Women's Rights Project and an attorney with the Equal B.A., Yale; J.D., University of Maine Employment Opportunity Commission. She also Professor Roe directs the Law Center's D.C. Street practiced privately with the firm of Bellamy, Blank, Law Project clinic and specializes in educating the Goodman, Kelly, Ross and Stanley and has taught puhlic ahout the law. In the Street Law clinic, law as an adjunct professor at the law schools of Columbia students teach practical law in high schools in the University, Rutgers, New York University, and District of Columbia. Prior to joining the Law Center George Washington University, and also as a visit• faculty in 1983, he served as Program Director of ing professor at George Washington. She has served the National Institute for Citizen Education in the on the Screening and Advisory Committees of the Law and Executive Director of the Coalition for Women's Legal Defense Fund and has been General Law Related Education in Washington, D.C. He Counsel and a member of the Board of Directors of has also conducted numerous workshops through• the Women's Equity Action League's Educational out the country on teaching about the law to the and Legal Defense Fund. Her recent writings include puhlic. He is the co-author of the high school textbook. two books on civil rights law. Sex Discrimination and Great Trials in American History. He has reviewed the Law (co-author, 1st ed. 1975; 2nd ed. 1996) and upcoming arguments in Preview of Supreme Court The Rights of Women (1st ed. 1973; co-author, 2nd Cases, written several articles for Update on Law Related ed. 1983; 3rd ed. 1984). Before receiving her J.D. Education, edited the ABA publication "Putting on she served for two years in the Peace Corps in West Mock Trials" and is the author of "Valuing Student Africa (Ivory Coast). Speech" in the California Law Review. Professor FULL-TlME FACULTY 29

Paul F. Rothstein of 2000, Professor Rubin served as counsel to Vice Professor of Law President Gore before the U.S. Supreme Court in the two Florida election cases, Bush v. Palm Beach B.S., J.D., Northwestern County Canvassing Board and Bush v. Gore. Professor Rothstein is well known for his work in evidence, civil and criminal lawsuits, and the judicial Steven C. Salop process from the Supreme Court on down. He is Professor of Economics and Law the author of Evidence: Cases, Materials and Problems; B.A., University of Pennsylvania; M.Phil., Evidence in a Nutshell: State and Federal Rules; Ph.D., Yale Federal Rules of Evidence and several other hooks and over 100 articles. His background is that of a Professor Salop teaches courses in Antitrust Law, practicing litigation attorney. His numerous profes• Economic Reasoning and the Law, and conducts a sional activities include positions as chair of the Faculty Workshop in Law and Economics. His ABA Rules of Evidence and Criminal Procedure recent writings include several articles in the Yale Committee, Board memher and Education Chairman Law Review, Georgetown Law Journal, American of the FBA, chair of the AALS Evidence Section, Economic Review, Antitrust Law Journal, and other and consultant to the National Conference of scholarly journals. His research focuses on antitrust Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, the U.S. law and economics and economic analysis of indus• Congress, and the National Academy of Sciences. trial competition and imperfect information. In addition, he has been a regular contributing editor Before joining the Law Center faculty in I98I, he to the Legal Times, the New York Law Journal, and served as Associate Director for Special Projects the Criminal Law Bulletin and is on the Publication with the Bureau of Economics of the FTC, as an Advisory Board of Matthew Bender Co. Professor adjunct professor of economics at the University of Rothstein was a Fulbright Scholar at Oxford University Pennsylvania, where he received his B.A. in 1968, in England prior to entering the profession. and as an economist with the Civil Aeronautics Board and Federal Reserve Board. He is a memher Peter J. Rubin of the American Economic Association and the Associate Professor of Law Econometric Society. He has been an associate editor of the Journal of Lconomic Perspectives, The B.A., Yale; J.D., Harvard International Journal of Industrial Organization and the Journal of Industrial Economics. He is currently After graduating from law school, where he served an associate editor of the Review of Industrial as an editor of the Harvard Law Review, Professor anization. Rubin clerked for Judge Collins J. Seitz of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit and Justice David H. Souter of the United Roy A. Schodand States Supreme Court. Professor Rubin spent sev• Professor of Law eral years before joining the faculty as a practicing lawyer specializing in constitutional litigation. He A.B., Columbia; LL.B., Harvard served as counsel in the U.S. Supreme Court for, After graduation from law school. Professor Schotland among others, Dr. Timothy Quill and two other served as a law clerk for U.S. Supreme Court Justice doctors in Vacco v. Quill, a challenge to the constitu• William J. Brennan and was an associate with the tionality of New York's ban on physician assisted New York firm of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton suicide, and Planned Parenthood in Rust v. Sullivan, and Garrison. He has also taught law as a professor the Supreme Court challenge to the abortion "gag at the University of Virginia, as a visiting professor rule" imposed in the 1980s upon family planning at the University of Pennsylvania, and came to clinics that received federal funding. He also repre• Georgetown as Associate Dean. He is co-editor of sented a group of pregnant women who sought Administrative Law, Cases and Comments (9th ed., prenatal care at the Medical University of South 1995). His writings include Conflicts of Interest in Carolina but who instead were arrested after their the Securities Markets (ed.), Divergent Investing of medical records indicating positive drug tests were Pension Assets, Campaign Financing of Elective Judges, turned over to police without their consent; the women's and Proposals for Campaign Finance Reform. In constitutional claims were recently vindicated by the addition, he has served as a consultant to the Federal Supreme Court in Ferguson v. City of Charleston. Reserve Board, several Congressional committees and Professor Rubin's recent writing includes "Reconnecting state pension systems, the Government of Bermuda, Doctrine and Purpose: A Comprehensive Approach and recently the ABA on campaign finance. He is to Strict Scrutiny After Adarand and Shaw," pub• a member of the American Law Institute. lished in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, and "Equal Rights, Special Rights, and the Nature of Antidiscrimination Law," published in the Michigan Law Review. In November and December 30 FULL-TIME FACULTY

Philip G. Schrag Louis Michael Seidman Professor of Law; Director, Centerfor Applied Legal Professor of Law Studies and Public Interest Law Scholars Program A. B., Chicago; J.D., Harvard A.B, Harvard; LL.B., Yale After graduating from Harvard Law School in Professor Schrag teaches Civil Procedure and I97I, Professor Seidman served as a law clerk for directs the Center for Applied Legal Studies, in J. Skelly Wright of the D.C. Circuit and U.S. which students represent refugees from persecution Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall. He who are seeking asylum in the United States. He is then was a staff attorney with the D.C. Public also the Director of the Public Interest Law Scholars Defender Service until joining the Law Center fac• Program, through which selected law students who ulty in 1976. He teaches a variety of courses in the plan careers as puhlic interest lawyers receive fields of constitutional and criminal law. He is co• scholarship grants and special academic enrichment author of a constitutional law casebook and the and guidance in that field. Before joining the Law author of several articles concerning criminal justice Center faculty in 1981, he was assistant counsel to and constitutional law. His most recent hook is the NAACP Legal Defense Educational Fund, Our Unsettled Constitution: A New Defense of Consumer Advocate of the City of New York, a Constitutionalism and Judicial Review (Yale 2001). professor at Columbia University Law School, and Deputy General Counsel of the U.S. Arms Control Abbe Smith and Disarmament Agency, from which he received Professor of Law; Associate Director, Criminal Justice a Meritorious Honor Award in 1981. Professor Clinic and L. Barrett Prettyman Fellowship Program Schrag has also had a distinguished and varied B. A., Yale; J.D., New York University career in civic service, which has included positions as a delegate to the District of Columbia Statehood From 1990 to 1996, Professor Smith was Education Constitutional Convention in 1982, an editor and Director and then Deputy Director of the Criminal consultant on consumer protection during the Justice Institute at Harvard Law School. While at Carter-Mondale transition, a consultant to the Harvard, she was also a clinical instructor in the New York State Consumer Protection Board, a criminal defense clinic and a lecturer on law in the consultant to the Governor's Advisory Council of Trial Advocacy Workshop. Since 1987, Professor Smith Puerto Rico, and an Academic Specialist for the has taught criminal law, criminal procedure, and United States Information Agency in the Czech trial advocacy at American University Washington Republic and Hungary. In addition, he drafted College of Law, Temple University School of Law, New York City's Consumer Protection Act of 1969. and City University New York School of Law. She He is also a prolific author, having written dozens is the author of articles on feminism and criminal of articles on consumer law, nuclear arms control, law, clinical legal education, legal ethics, and juve• political asylum, and various other topics for both nile justice. She is also a cartoonist. A collection of law journals and popular publications. He is the her cartoons, Carried Away: The Chronicles of a author of eleven books, including A Well-founded Feminist Cartoonist, was published in 1984. From Fear: The Congressional Battle to Save Political Asylum 1982 to 1990, Professor Smith was a trial attorney in America (Routledge, 2000). with the Defender Association of Philadelphia. She has practiced criminal law in Pennsylvania, New York, Massachusetts, Maryland, and the District of Warren F. Schwartz Columbia. Professor Smith is a former memher of Professor of Law the Board of Directors of the American Civil Liherties A.B., Brooklyn; LL.B., Columbia Union of Massachusetts and an active member of the National Lawyers Guild. Warren F. Schwartz is Professor of Law and Director, The John M. Olin Program in Law and Girardeau A. Spann Economics. He has applied economic analysis to a Professor of Law variety of subjects, including the convention of dueling, the meaning of the term "the reasonable A.B., Princeton; J.D., Harvard man" (person) in tort law, the most favored nation Professor Spann served as a staff attorney for principle in the GATT and decision-making hy Ralph Nader's Public Citizen Litigation Group juries. He has also lectured on law and economics at before joining the Law Center faculty in 1979. He various research and educational institutions in the is the author of hooks and articles concerning race United States, Europe, Latin America, Australia and the nature of legal reasoning. He has been a and Asia. trustee of the D.C. Bar Client Security Fund and has served on the hoard of the Law Center's Institute for Public Representation. He has also served on the hoard of the D.C. Legal Services Program, the Board of Governors of the D.C. FULL-TIME FACULTY 31

Bar, and as a member of the D.C. Circuit Advisory professional responsihility. Since joining the Law Committee on Procedures. Center faculty in 1976, he has also served as the Scholar in Residence of Kings College in London, Jane E. Stromseth as visiting professor at the Universities of New Professor of Law; Co-Director, Joint Degree in South Wales and Melbourne and at New York International Studies and Law University Law School, twice as visiting professor for San Diego Law School's summer law programs B.A., Swarthmore; D.Phil., Oxford; J.D., Yale in Oxford and in Dublin, and once for its program Professor Stromseth joined the Law Center faculty in Paris, and twice at the Law Center's Summer Law in 1991. She received her doctorate in International Program in Florence. He practiced law for over four Relations at Oxford, where she was a Rhodes Scholar. years as a lawyer with the Public Defender's Office in At Yale Law School, she served as an articles editor Alameda County, California and for two years with of the Yale Law Journal and a student director of the the San Francisco firm of Howard and Prim, and Lowenstein International Human Rights Law pro• clerked for J. Walter Mansfield, then of the District gram. After receiving her J.D. in 1987, she served Court in the Southern District of New York. He is as a law clerk to Judge Louis F. Oberdorfer of the active in the American Bar Association, having U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and served as chair of the Committee on Defense Counsel to U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. Competency and as vice-chair of the Committees on From February 1999-Februaty 2000, Professor Professional Responsibility and on Rules of Criminal Stromseth served as Director for Multilateral and Procedure and Evidence. He has published a book Humanitarian Affairs at the National Security about the practice of criminal law by harristers in Council. During 1989-90, she was an Attorney- England, and numerous articles in the areas of Adviser in the Office of the Legal Adviser at the professional ethics, evidence, and criminal defense. U.S. Department of State. She is the author of The Origins of Flexible Response: NATO's Debate Over Daniel K. Tarullo Strategy in the 1960s (1988). She is a member of Professor of Law the Council on Foreign Relations and the American Society of International Law. At Georgetown, she A. B., Georgetown; M.A., Duke; J.D., University teaches International Law, Constitutional Law, a of Michigan seminar on the United Nations and Conflict Professor Tarullo teaches in the areas of interna• Resolution. tional economic regulation, international law, and banking law. From 1993 to 1998 he was, succes• Robert K. Stumberg sively. Assistant Secretary of State for Economic Professor of Law; Director, Harrison Institute for and Business Affairs, Deputy Assistant to the Public Law President for Economic Policy, and Assistant to the President for International Economic Policy. From B.A., Macalester; J.D., LL.M., Georgetown 1995 to 1998 he was also President Clinton's per• Professor Stumberg is the author of various reports sonal representative to the G7/G8 group of indus• on reinvestment, housing, welfare reform, economic trialized nations. Prior to joining the Administration, development, sustainable agriculture, and the impact he had practiced law for several years in Washington, of trade agreements on state law. He has been affili• mostly in the areas of antitrust, financial markets, ated with the Law Center since receiving his J.D. and international transactions. From I987-I989 he here in 1975, as a Georgetown teaching fellow was chief counsel on the staff of Senator Edward from 1975-77, and as Deputy Director of the D.C. M. Kennedy. From I98I-I987 he taught at Harvard Project of Georgetown University from 1977-79. In Law School. Outside the Law Center, Professor addition, he has served as the chair of the Section Tarullo moderates the bi-monthly World Economic on Legislation of the AALS, the coordinator of the Update series of the Council on Foreign Relations, D.C. Housing Action Council, on the Board of a forum for debate on the U.S. and global economies Directors of Washington Consumer Checkbook Magazine, among leading Wall Street economists. Professor the Committee of 100 on the Federal City, and the Tarullo is a also a non-resident senior fellow at the D.C. Mutual Housing Association. His past positions Brookings Institution. include service as Policy Director of the Center for Policy Alternatives in Washington, D.C. John R. Thomas Professor of Law Peter W.Tague B. S., Carnegie Mellon University; J.D., University Professor of Law of Michigan; LL.M., George Washington A.B., Harvard; J.D., University of Michigan Professor Thomas was formerly Associate Professor Professor Tague's principal areas of expertise are of Law at the George Washington University. He evidence, criminal procedure, criminal law, and has previously joined the visiting faculties at Cornell 32 FULL-TIME FACULTY

Law School and the University of Tokyo, and also as an associate professor in 1991. Since 2000, he been the Congressional Research Service Visiting has served as the United States member of the Inter- Scholar in Economic Growth and Entrepreneurship. American Juridical Committee, the organ of the Professor Thomas formerly served as law clerk to Organization of American States responsible for Chief Judge Helen W. Nies of the U.S. Court of juridical matters and for promoting the progressive Appeals for the Federal Circuit; visiting fellow at the development and codification of international law in Max Planck Institute for Foreign and Comparative the Americas. Professor Vazquez has written and Patent, Copyright and Unfair Competition Law in taught primarily in the areas of international law, Munich, Germany; and research scholar at the constitutional law, and federal courts. Institute of Intellectual Property in Tokyo, Japan. He was previously associated with the law firm of David C. Vladeck Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett 8c Dunner, Associate Professor of Law L.L.P., in Washington, D.C. Professor Thomas has published numerous articles on intellectual property B.A., New York University; J.D., Columbia; law, most recently in the Boston College, Illinois LL.M., Georgetown and UCLA Law Reviews. He is also co-author of a Professor Vladeck joins the Law Center faculty patent law casebook and a one-volume treatise on intellectual property, both published hy the West from Public Citizen Litigation Group, a nationally- Publishing Company. prominent public interest law firm based in Washington, D.C. He spent over 25 years with the Litigation Group, becoming its Director in 1992. Mark V. Tushnet He has handled a broad range of litigation, includ• Carmack Waterhouse Professor of Constitutional Law ing First Amendment, health and safety, civil B.A., Harvard; M.A., J.D., Yale rights, class actions and open government cases. He has argued a number of cases before the United After receiving his J.D. from Yale, Professor States Supreme Court, state courts of last resort, and Tushnet served as a clerk to U.S. Supreme Court over 40 cases before the federal courts of appeal. He Justice Thurgood Marshall from 1972-73. He then also testifies before Congress, writes on administra• was a member of the law faculty of the University tive law and First Amendment issues and serves on of Wisconsin at Madison until joining the Law the Council of the Administrative Law Section of Center faculty in I98I. He is co-author of three the ABA and previously on the Administrative casebooks. Federal Courts in the 21st Century: Policy Conference of the United States. Professor Vladeck and Practice; Constitutional Law: Cases and Commentary, was a graduate teaching fellow at the Law Center's and co-author with Vicki Jackson of a coursehook Institute for Puhlic Representation, and he joined on Comparative Constitutional Law. His other the adjunct faculty in 1987. He was a visiting pro• recent writings include The NAACP's Legal Strategy fessor at the Law Center from spring 1999 through Against Segregated Lducation 1925-1950, which spring 2000 teaching Civil Procedure and an upper- received the Littleton Griswold Award of the class seminar in first amendment litigation. He has American Historical Association; Red, White and Blue: A Critical Analysis of Constitutional Law; also taught the Puhlic Interest Advocacy Seminar Making Civil Rights Law: Thurgood Marshall and the and the Civil Litigation Seminar. Supreme Court, 1936-1961; Making Constitutional Law: Thurgood Marshall and the Supreme Court, William T. Vukowich 1961-1991; and Taking the Constitution Away from Professor of Law the Courts. He was the secretary of the Conference on Critical Legal Studies from 1976-85, and is the A.B., Indiana; J.D., California-Berkeley; President Elect of the Association of American J.S.D., Columbia Law Schools. Professor Vukowich teaches Contracts, Comparative Consumer Protection, Bankruptcy, and Commercial Carlos Manuel Vazquez Law. He has served as a consultant on bankruptcy Professor of Law and consumer law matters to the State Department, Federal Trade Commission, Pension Benefit Guarantee B.A.,Yale;J.D., Columbia Corporation, and the Montgomery County Office After graduating from law school, where he was of Consumer Affairs. He is on the Advisory Board Articles and Book Reviews Editor of the Columbia of the American Bankruptcy Institute Law Review Law Review, Professor Vazquez served as a law and is a member of the Institute, ABA, D.C. Bar, clerk to the Honorahle Stephen Reinhardt of the California Bar, and International Association for U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. He Consumer Law. His scholarly interests are in the then practiced law with Covington and Burling in fields of European Union law and consumer law. In Washington, DC, hefore joining the law school fac• the 1999-2000 school year, he was Visiting Professor ulty as a visiting professor of law in 1990, and then at Liberce Universita Internazionale degli Studi FULL-TIME FACULTY 33

Sociali, Rome during the fall, and at University of Center. Professor Waxman has argued 31 cases in Heidelberg in the spring. the Supreme Court and has tried and argued dozens of other high-profile, complex civil and criminal Heathcote Woolsey Wales cases in federal and state courts across the country. Associate Professor of Law Professor Waxman is a summa cum laude graduate of Harvard College and a former RockefeUer Fellow. A.B., University of North Carolina; J.D., University He received his law degree from rhe Yale Law School, of Chicago where he was managing editor of the Yale Law Professor Wales is perhaps best known to students for Journal. Before commencing the practice of law, he his performances with the Georgetown Gilherr and served as law clerk to rhe Honorable Gerhard A. Sullivan Society. Off-stage, he reaches Constitutional Geseii of rhe United States District Court for the Law, Criminal Law, Law and Psychiatry, and Law District of Columbia. and Social Science at the Law Center. Before join• ing the faculty, he was an associate professor at the Peter P. Weidenbruch, Jr. University of Mississippi. He also has been a visit• Ralph H. Dwan Professor of Taxation ing professor at the University of Colorado, the University of Texas Law Schools, and the University B.S., Northwestern; J.D., LL.M., LL.D. (Hon), of Heidelberg. His recent writings focus on the role Georgetown of the criminal jury and proposals for its reform. He Professor Weidenbruch reaches a variety of courses has also been active on committees of the American in the fields of federal taxation and decedents' estates Psychiatric Association and the American Psychology- and also serves as the faculty adviser to The Tax Law Society relating to the presentation of expert Lawyer. His extensive professional experience in rhe psychological information in the courts. taxation field includes six years in various positions with the Internal Revenue Service, including service Silas J. Wasserstrom as Assistant Commissioner (Technical) and Acting Professor of Law Commissioner. He also served for four years as tax A.B., Amherst; LL.B., Yale counsel to Mobil Oil Corporation. He is rhe co• author of Federal Income Taxation of Corporations and Professor Wasserstrom joined the Law Centet Stockholders in a Nutshell and has lectured at many faculty in 1981 and has since taught courses in institutes on federal taxation. In addition, he has Property, Criminal Justice, Constitutional Law, and served on the Legal Activities Policy Board of Tax Criminal Law. After receiving his LL.B. in 1967, Analysts and Advocates and on the Tax Advisory he served as a law clerk for Judge J. Skelly Wright Board of Maxwell Macmiiian, Inc. He is a feUow of of the D.C. Circuit and fot U.S. Supreme Court the American Bar Foundation. Justice Potter Stewart. His criminal law experience includes positions as Trial Lawyer and Chief of the Edith Brown Weiss Appellate Section of the D.C. Public Defender Francis Cabell Brown Professor of International Law; Service and Commissioner of the D.C. Law Review Co-Director, Joint Degree in Political Science and Law Commission. A.B., Stanford; J.D., Harvard; Ph.D., University of Seth P. Waxman California-Berkeley; LL.D. Honors, Chicago-Kent Distinguished Visitorfrom Practice Professor Weiss is highly active in the areas of public international, environmental, and water A.B., Harvard; J.D., Yale resources law. Her professional experience includes Professor Waxman is a partner at the firm of Wilmer, positions as Associate General Counsel for Intemationai Cutler & Pickering, where he specializes in Supreme Activities at the U.S. Environmental Protection Court, appellate, and complex civil and criminal Agency, 1990-92, Assistant Professor of Civil litigation, and in advising clients with muitifaceted Engineering and Politics at Princeton University, legal and public policy challenges. Professor Waxman and Research Associate at Columbia Universiry and served as the 41st Solicitor General of the United the Brookings Institution. She has served as an States, from 1997 until January 2001. Prior to his confirmation as Solicitor General, Professor Waxman attorney- advisor to the U.S. Arms Control and served in several other senior positions in the United Disarmament Agency. Her numerous professional States government, including Acting Deputy Attorney activities in both international and environmental General. Before entering government service in law have included positions as president of the 1994, Professor Waxman practiced law for 17 years American Society of International Law, April 1994- in Washington, D.C. After leaving government, 96, chair of the Committee for Research in Global Professor Waxman taught both as a Visiting Fellow Environmental Change of the Social Science at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Research Council, 1989-94, U.S. Special Legal Government and as a Visiting Professor at the Law Advisor to the North American Commission on the 34 FULL-TIME FACULTY

Environment 1996-presenr, and elected member of narius) and holds the chair for civil law, the law of the Council on Foreign Relations, the American Law obHgations, and European private law. He reaches Institute, and the Commission on Environmental and researches in tort law, European private law, Law of rhe lUCN. She has been a memher of the European contract law, and comparative law. Professor National Academy of Science's Commission on Werro is an invited professor at the Federal Polytechnic Geosciences, Environment and Resources, NAS School (Lausanne) reaching the introductory course Water Science and Technology Board, rhe NAS/ on private construction law for architecture students. Israel, Jordan, Palestinian Territories Panel on He was a visiting professor at the University of Pan Sustainable Water Supplies in the Middle East, (France), University of Bordeaux (France), and and rhe NAS Environmental Studies Board. She University of Poitiers (France). Professor Werro is serves on rhe Board of Directors of rhe Japanese also a private consultant for law firms on various Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, the commercial disputes and arbitrator in contract dis• Board of Directors of the Center for Intemationai putes. He was a special assignment attorney at rhe law Environmental Law, the Advisory Council of the offices of FareUa, Braun & Mattel, San Francisco, National Center for Atmospheric Research, and the California, where he focused on American commer• Council of Advisors to the Cousteau Society. She is cial disputes. Professor Werro is president of the Vice-Chair of the ABA Committee on Internationai Federal Commission of Experts (medical research). He is currently working on a commentary on the Environmental Law. From 1998-2000, Professor Swiss law of ohligations, as well as on a monograph Brown Weiss was a memher of rhe Board of Editors in European tort law. Professor Werro taught as a of rhe American Journal of International Law. She visiting professor at the Law Center in the fall now serves on the editorial boards of the Journal of semesters of 1999 and 2000. International Lconomic Law; Berkeley Journal of International Law; Lnvironmental Magazine; Global Governance; Global Lnvironmental Politics; Robin L. West International Lnvironmental Agreements; Politics, Professor of Law Law and Economics; International Review for B.A.,J.D., Universiry of Maryland; J.S.M., Stanford Lnvironmental Strategies; and is the faculty adviser to the Georgetown International Environmental Professor West came to the Law Center from the Law Review. She is also on the advisory board for University of Maryland Law School, where she was Transnational Publishers and the United Nations professor of law and taught Constitutionai Law, University Press. She has published numerous arti• Contracts, Legal Methods, Jurisprudence, Law and cles in international and environmental law, and is Literature, and a Maryland Legal Theory Workshop. the author of many books, including Reconciling She has been a visiting professor at the Universiry of Environment and Trade (co-author, 2001), Engaging Chicago and Stanford Law Schools, the Cieveiand- Countries: Strengthening Compliance with International Marshall College of Law at Cleveland State Lnvironmental Accords (co-author, 1998), International Universiry, and, most recently, at the Law Center. Lnvironmental Law and Policy (co-author 1998), Professor West has written extensively on gender and In Fairness to Future Generations: International issues and feminist legal theory, jurisprudence and Law, Common Patrimony, and Intergenerational legal philosophy, and law and literature. Equity (1989), which received the Certificate of Merit Award in 1990 from the American Society Timothy M. Westmoreland of International Law, and has been published in Visiting Professor of Law French, Japanese, Spanish, and Chinese. In 1995, B.A., Duke; J.D., Yale Professor Brown Weiss won the Elizabeth Haub Prize for international environmental law given by From 1979 through 1995, Professor Westmoreland the Free University of Brussels and the lUCN, served as Counsel to the Subcommittee on Health and in 1996 received rhe Prominent Women in and the Environment in rhe U.S. House of Intemationai Law Award from the American Representatives. From 1995 through 1999, he was Society of Intemationai Law. She received an the Senior Policy Fellow at rhe Law Center's Honorary Doctorate of Laws from Chicago-Kent Federal Legislation Clinic. From mid-1999 College of Law. through January 2001, Professor Westmoreland was the Director of rhe Medicaid program for rhe Federal government. He has worked extensively on Franz Werro public health and health finance policy. Professor Professor of Law Westmoreland was counsel to the Advisory Committee on Tobacco Policy and Public Health Licence en droit, Docteur en droit. University of and an advisor to rhe Henry J. Kaiser Family Frihourg; LL.M., University of California-Berkeley Foundation and the Elizabeth Giaser Pediatric Professor Werro is professor of private law at rhe AIDS Foundation. Faculty of Law of rhe Universiry of Frihourg (ordi- FULL-TlME FACULTY 35

Wendy Webster Williams Supreme Court, a Reginald Heber Smith Fellow, Professor of Law and a founder of Equal Rights Advocates, a public interest law firm in San Francisco. Professor WiUiams B.A., J.D., Universiry of California-Berkeley served on rhe National Research Council Panel on Professor Williams is well known for her work in Employer Policies and Working Families and the the area of gender and law, especially concerning Blue Ribbon Advisory Committee to the Yale Bush issues of work and family and is rhe co-author of a Cenrer Project on Infant Care Leaves. She is a past- recent casebook on gender and law. She helped president of the Society of American Law Teachers draft and testified hefore Congressional committees and is a member of the American Law Institute. on the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 and Since 1983, she has been a member of rhe board of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993. Before rhe Georgerown Women's Law and Puhlic Policy joining rhe Law Center faculty in 1976, she was a law Fellowship Program. She served as Associate Dean clerk for Justice Raymond Peters of the California of the Law Center from 1989-93.

FULLTIME PROGRAM 39 PART TIME PROGRAM 39

ACADEMIC REQUIREMENTS AND POLICIES 39

JD Degree Requirements 40

Required First Year Program 40

Upperclass Legal Writing Requirement 40

Supervised Research 40

Dther Provisions Applicable to Legal Writing Seminars 41

Professional Responsibility Requirement 41

Required Time in Residence (Residency Requirement) 41

Transfer Between Full Time and Part Time Programs 42

Academic Evaluation and Attrition Standards 42

Attendance, Examinations, and Written Work 45

Credit for Law Center Summer Programs 46

Credit for Courses in Law Center Graduate Program 46

Credit for Courses in the Graduate Scbool of the University 46

Credit for Study Dutside the Law Center 46

Credit for Work Completed at Other Law Schools 47

Duplication of Courses 47

Restrictions on Student Employment 48

Student Conduct and Student Disciplinary Code 48

Student Conduct in the Job Search Process 48

Withdrawals and Leaves of Absence 48

Policies Related to Clinic Enrollment 49

37

JURIS DOCTOR PROGRAM 39

The Law Center offers both a Full Time and a study together with elective courses. During the Part Time program leading to the J.D. degree. The third and fourth years, part time students pursue an same standards of performance are required of stu• elective program of study in addition to the required dents in both programs. Members of the full time course in Professional Responsibility and the upper- faculty teach the courses in hoth programs assisted hy class legal writing requirement. During each semes• members of the adjunct faculty in certain specialized ter, a student in the Part Time Program will enroll courses. in 8 to 11 credit hours. A part time student may not enroll in fewer than FULL TIME PROGRAM 8 or more than 11 credit hours without the permis• The program of instruction for the Full Time Program sion of the Registrar, an Assistant Dean for the J.D. requires a minimum of six full time semesters program, or the Director of J.D. Academic Services. (three academic years) for completion of the degree Permission to enroll in 12 credit hours of courses requirements. Full time students may not advance may be given under the following circumstances: their date of graduation by attendance at summer (1) a student registers in a clinic that awards 12 credit sessions. Students enrolled in the Full Time Program hours; (2) a student registers for a seminar meeting are expected to devote substantially ail of their time the upperclass legal writing requirement and he or during the academic year to the study of law. she has not previously fulfilled the legal writing During the first year of academic studies, stu• requirement; or (3) a student may take 12 credits in dents in the Full Time Program pursue a required either the fail or spring semester of his or her final 29 credit hour program of instruction. During the year (but not in both semesters) in order to meet second and third years, full time students pursue an the graduation requirements. elective program of instruction while completing the First year classes in this Program generally meet required course in Professional Responsibility and from 5:45 p.m. until 7:45 p.m. on weekdays; in the the upperclass legal writing requirement. first year, some classes are scheduled until 8:50 p.m. A student in the Full Time Program may not Some upperclass eiectives are scheduled until 8:50 p.m. enroll in fewer than 12 or more than 16 credit on weeknights and a limited number of eiectives are hours without the permission of the Registrar, an offered on Saturdays between 9:30 a.m. and early Assistant Dean for the J.D. program, or the afternoon. Elective courses meeting during the day Director of J.D. Academic Services. Students in are open to part time students. the Full Time Program are expected to graduate at Students in the Part Time Program are expected the end of three academic years, and may take no to graduate within four academic years of matric• longer than five consecutive calendar years from ulation and may take no longer than six consecutive the date of matriculation to meet ail J.D. degree calendar years from the date of matriculation to requirements. If after five consecutive calendar meet ail graduation requirements. If after six con• years a student has not yet completed ail academic secutive calendar years a student has not completed requirements necessary to graduate, the student ail academic requirements necessary to graduate, the will be dismissed from the roils of the Law Center student will be dismissed from the roUs of the Law with no possibility of readmission or graduation, Center with no possibility of readmission or gradua• unless excused by operation of law (i.e., military tion, unless excused hy operation of law (i.e., mili• call-up, Americans with Disabilities Act, etc.) or tary call-up, Americans with Disabilities Act, etc.) by grant of a waiver. Students seeking a waiver of or by grant of a waiver. Students seeking a waiver the five-year requirement must submit their writ• of the six-year requirement must submit a written ten petition and supporting documentation to the petition and supporting documentation to the Registrar as soon as their situation becomes appar• Registrar as soon as their situation becomes appar• ent. Unless a written waiver of this rule is granted, ent. Unless a written waiver is granted, the six-year the five-year rule is strictly enforced. rule is strictly enforced.

ACADEMIC REQUIREMENTS AND POLICIES PART TIME PROGRAM The Law Center reserves the right to change The Part Time Program is designed to allow the academic requirements when, in the view of the part time student to complete the J.D. degree faculty or administration, such changes are neces• requirements in eight academic semesters. Students sary to maintain the quality of the degree. Notice of may accelerate their program to seven semesters changes to academic or administrative policies are plus two eight-week summer sessions, see Required sent to students via email. The primary means hy Time in Residence: Part Time Program. which the Law Center communicates with students During the first year, students in the Part Time is through the Law Center's student email system Program pursue a required 22 credit hour program called "BuUdog." Each student is given a Bulldog of study. During the second year, part time students email address and must check this email address pursue a required seven credit hour program of regularly for important Law Center information. 40 JURIS DOCTOR PROGRAM

J.D. Degree Requirements resolving the issues raised hy the paper. Final In order to earn the J.D. degree, a student must papers must he submitted through the Office of successfully complete the following academic the Registrar and not directly to the professor. requirements: The technical requirements for writing in • 83 credit hours of academic credit (a minimum approved seminars include: (1) use of legal forms of 53 credit hours must be earned at the Law of citation (when appropriate); (2) submission of an Center); outline and a first draft, in accordance with the professor's instructions and schedule; (3) submission • The required first year curriculum; of a revised final paper based on the professor's • Successful completion of the upperclass legal comments; and (4) hoth the first draft and the final writing requirement, described below; paper must have a length of no less than 6,000 words • A course in Professional Responsibility; (excluding footnotes), which is approximately • The requisite period in residence at the Law twenty-five (25) typewritten pages using customary margins and spacing. AH work must he that of the Center; and student in consultation with the professor or must • The minimum cumulative scholastic average. be cited for attribution to others.

Students may not extend their degree program Supervised Research beyond the semester in which they have completed all academic requirements for the degree. The faculty has augmented the Law Center's seminar offerings by providing Supervised Research, In addition to the academic requirements, a J.D. which students may undertake under the supervi• degree will not be conferred until a student's account sion of a faculty memher for two credits. Supervised has been paid in full. In addition, transcripts, diplo• Research provides a seminar-type experience to a mas, bar certificates, and other educational certifi• student in those areas where there is no curricular cates will not be released if there is an outstanding offering or where a student wished to explore a student account balance or a student who has subject in greater depth than would he possible in received financial aid has not fulfilled the federal an existing course or seminar. The professor and requirement for a financial aid "exit interview." The student establish a calendar of substantial meetings Law Center will not confer a J.D. degree to a stu• that allows for the kind of interaction contemplated dent who is the subject of a pending disciplinary for writing seminars. action. In meeting the graduation requirements, students To he eligible for Supervised Research, a student should he aware of the following academic regulations must have a "C" average(2.00) and must ordinarily and policies of the Law Center. be sponsored hy a full time faculty member. If a student makes a good-faith effort to obtain spon• Required First Year Program sorship by a full time member and is unable to do Students must successfully complete the required so, sponsorship by an adjunct faculty member may sometime he approved. However, no adjunct faculty first year program described in the First Year J.D. member may sponsor more than one student project Curriculum section of this Bulletin. per semester. Upperclass Legal Writing Requirement To apply for Supervised Research, a student Students must complete the upperclass legal writing completes the application form (available form the requirement as follows: (1) hy successfully completing Office of the Registrar, Room 315) and submits it a seminar or clinic approved hy the Legal Research to the Office of the Registrar before the final day of and Writing Committee as meeting the legal writ• registration (close of Add/Drop period). The appli• ing requirement, or (2) hy completing a supervised cation form requires that the student describe the research project that has been approved by the Chair topic for research; demonstrate why the topic would of the Legal Research and Writing Committee. lead to an original paper satisfying the legal writing The upperclass J.D. legal writing requirement is requirement; show the sponsoring professor's agree• intended to provide students with the opportunity ment; indicate the scheduled meeting dates with the to refine research and writing skills learned in the professor and the due dates for submission of the first year, and to develop the skills necessary to outline, first draft, and final draft; list the semester(s) undertake writing projects on their own following in which the project is to he completed; and, if graduation from law school. Students choose topics, approval is sought for sponsorship by an adjunct submit outlines, prepare and submit a first draft, faculty member, describe the student's efforts to and complete the final paper in consultation with obtain sponsorship hy a fuU time faculty member. faculty members in approved seminars and clinics. After submission of the completed form, the The upperclass writing project should show the Registrar will check to ensure that the student has student's mastery of the in-depth research undertaken the required "C" average and will then forward the and demonstrate how the student has organized, form to the Legal Research, Writing, and Journals clarified, or advanced this body of knowledge in Committee for its decision on the application. JURIS DOCTOR PROGRAM 41

Because the Committee wants to ensure that the elective, American Legal Profession. J.D. degree sm- proposals will he successfully completed, it will be dents will not satisfy their Professional Responsihility guided by the principles set out below in reviewing requirement by completing Professional Responsibility a student's proposal. courses offered in the Graduate Program. 1. The Committee will be receptive to all proposals meeting the goals of Supervised Research and expects, Required Time in Residence within the limits of faculty resources, to approve (Residency Requirement) most proposals. In addition to all the other degree requirements, 2. Because the time demanded of the professor is students must complete the required time in residence, suhstantial, the Committee expects that students will which is calculated using residency points. To earn ordinarily seek sponsorship from full time faculty. a Juris Doctor degree, fuU time and part time students The Committee and the academic deans will help must attain a total of six residency credits. students identify possible faculty sponsors. When no full time faculty member can serve as a sponsor, Full Time Program the Committee may approve a proposal with an A fuU time student earns one residency point for adjunct faculty sponsor. each semester in which he or she enrolls in a mini• 3. A student may not ordinarily undertake mum of 12 credits, and passes at least 10 of these Supervised Research more than once. (Students credits (so after 6 fuU time semesters, a student proposing to take Supervised Research for a second earns the 6 residency points needed to graduate). time must disclose this to the Committee.) Similarly, A fuH time student who fails to pass at least 10 credits Supervised Research will not he approved when the in a given semester will earn proportional residency proposal repeats work for which credit has previously points for that semester and will need to attend a been granted in another course or for which the summer session or a seventh semester in order to student has been compensated during employment. earn additional residency points. Approval for internships or externships is not granted. FuU time students may not advance the date of 4. Proposals may call for research to be completed their graduation hy taking classes and earning in one semester or two; only two credits, however, additional residency points during the summer. can be awarded. Two drafts of papers prepared for Residency requirements are sufficiently complex Supervised Research should be submitted to the that a fiiU time student should consult with the Office of the Registrar, which will forward one to Registrar if he or she does not complete a minimum the sponsoring Journals Committee. The paper will of 10 credits during any semester. be graded under the usual evaluation system hy the sponsoring professor. It may also he reviewed by Part Time Program members of the Legal Research, Writing, and A part time student earns .75 residency points for Journals Committee. Credit for the JD legal writing each semester in which he or she enroUs in and passes requirement will be given for papers receiving a a minimum of eight credits. Part time students can passing grade. meet the Residency Requirement in either of two ways:

Other Provisions Applicablo to Legal Writing Eight Academic Semesters: A part time student can Seminars earn the required 6.0 residency points upon the Students may submit one paper to satisfy the completion of eight part time semesters. A part requirements in two seminars or writing projects time student who fails to pass at least eight credits by securing the written approval of both professors in a given semester will earn proportional residency and the Registrar in advance of writing the paper. points for that semester and will need to attend a When permission is granted, the student will be summer session or a ninth semester in order to earn required to write a paper of at least 50 pages additional residency points. (12,000 words excluding footnotes), and meet all Seven Semesters and at Least Two Summer Sessions: A other requirements of both seminars and will he part time student can earn the required 6.0 residency expected to indicate the joint nature of the paper on points upon the completion of seven part time the cover page of all submissions. Each professor approving such a project will independently submit semesters and at least a total of eight credits over two a final grade indicating his or her judgment of the or more summer sessions. A part time student who paper as it pertains to his or her course and the final fails to pass at least eight credits in a given semester grades given for the two seminars need not he wUl earn proportional residency points for that semes• identical. ter and will need to attend additional semesters or summer sessions in order to earn additional residency points. Residency requirements are sufficiently Professional Responsibility Requirement complex that a part time student should consult Each student must successfully complete either an with the Registrar if he or she does not complete a upperclass course in the J.D. Program's Professional minimum of eight credits during any semester. Responsibility offerings or the first year perspective 42 JURIS DOCTOR PROGRAM

Students should take care to distinguish between Academic Evaluation and Attrition Standards the required time in residence and the total academic Academic Evaluation System credits required for graduation. While two eight-week summer sessions are necessary to achieve the required The Law Center's faculty awards the grades of A, time in residence under the accelerated option for A-, B+, B, B-, C+, C, C-, D and F. In the clinical part time students, a third summer session may be programs, the graduate fellows also participate in necessary to complete the 83 credit hours to earn the grading process. Each student's grade point the J.D. degree. Part time students who wish to average is computed at the end of each academic accelerate their graduation should consult with the year in order to award academic honors and for the Registrar before completing registration during the purpose of graduation and attrition. spring of their second year to make sure that they will be able to meet all degree requirements under Grading System: The following numerical equivalents the accelerated program. are assigned to each letter grade:

Transfer Between Full Time and Part Time Programs A 4.00 C+ 2.33 Students who wish to transfer from one program to A- 3.67 C 2.00 the other should apply to the Registrar by March IS B+ 3.33 C- 1.67 of their first full year at the Law Center. The Law B 3.00 D 1.00 Center may limit the number of interdivisional B- 2.67 F 0 transfers. Students must complete all first year courses, including those normally taken in the second year A student's cumulative grade point average is by part time students, in the program in which they computed by multiplying the numerical equivalent began. of each letter grade hy the credit value of the course, To meet the residency requirement and graduate adding the results together, then dividing the total after two more years of law studies, students who thus obtained by the total number of credits. In transfer to the FuU Time Program would subsequently computing a student's average, computations are need to take four full time semesters plus at least carried to two decimal places. While the cumulative six credits of summer course work. grade point average is based upon all of a student's Students may not transfer from the Full Time grades, the annual grade point average is based only Program to the Part Time Program in the student's upon a student's grades for one academic year. The sixth semester. Attendance at summer session will academic year begins with the summer term and not in itself justify any transfer. Residency require• ends with the following spring semester. In calculat• ments are sufficiently complex that any student ing the student's cumulative grade point average, considering a transfer between programs should the Law Center will include the credit hours in any consult with the Registrar to ascertain the required course the student has failed, even when the student periods of attendance and the earliest date upon has successfully retaken the course. which graduation may occur as a result of a transfer. The examination and grading processes are Students who transfer to the FuU Time Program anonymous and are designed to he as fair as possi• must pay a tuition equalization fee equal to the ble. Faculty are asked to submit grades within five tuition charge for six credits. The tuition equaliza• weeks of the end of an examination period. Students tion fee is assessed in two installments—one after may access their grades by logging on to Student the first year in the Part Time Program and the other Access*. To determine if a particular set of grades after the second year in the FuU Time Program. The has been received, access your transcript by Student tuition equalization fee covers the tuition for up to Access*, or call (202) 662-9220. Grades cannot be seven credits of Law Center course work. Summer released for any student who has an outstanding classes not taken at the Law Center or at a Law student account balance. The Law Center will not Center-sponsored Summer Abroad program are not release grades over the telephone, even to the stu• covered by the tuition equalization fee. dent, because of concerns for our students' privacy. Students with financial aid concerns should discuss Grades for courses taken at other law schools are the application procedures and awarding policies not included in the computation of the student's with the Assistant Dean for Financial Aid to learn Law Center cumulative grade point average, hut all what funds might he available. Scholarship funding grades (including failing grades) earned by a Law for upperclass aid applicants is extremely limited Center student transferring from or visiting at because awards are made on a three-year basis to another law school will appear on his or her Law entering students. Center transcript. See Graduation Honors Policy for Students seeking to transfer at times other than Transfer/Visitor Students, below. the end of the first year will be permitted to do so only in case of compeUing personal need, based on changed circumstances. JURIS DOCTOR PROGRAM 43

Academic Honors the degree magna cum laude, to the top 10%. The J.D. degree summa cum laude is the highest academic The Law Center does not rank its students. The honor that the faculty can bestow upon a graduating faculty has, however, authorized three separate acad• student. There is no cumulative grade point average emic honors for students with distinguished acade• that automatically entitles a student to that honor. mic records. Instead, the J.D. degree summa cum laude is granted at the sole discretion of the faculty. To he eligible Dean's List: J.D. students whose annual cumulative for consideration for the award of summa cum laude, grade point averages place them in the top one-third a graduate must have completed at least 71 earned of their class at the Law Center will have their hours at Ceorgetown and have a minimum grade transcripts marked "Dean's List" for the appropriate point average of 3.70. academic year. All candidates for the J.D. degree at For the purpose of calculating students' eligibility the Law Center are eligible for the Dean's List for degrees with honors, students graduating in provided they completed, during the academic year, October will be included with the class receiving at least 24 hours of credit at the Law Center if their degrees the previous May. Students who enrolled in the Full Time Program or 16 hours of graduate in February will he included with the class credit at the Law Center if enrolled in the Part graduating the following May. Time Program. Students who transfer from one program to the other during an academic year must earn a minimum of 12 credits in the semester in Graduation Honors Policy for Transfer/Visitor which they are a fuU time student, and a minimum Students: Graduation honors for students who of eight credits for the semester in which they are a transfer to Ceorgetown after their first year of law part time student, to he eligible for Dean's List. school or for students who visit another institution Joint degree students are eligible for Dean's List will be based solely on grades earned at Ceorgetown recognition, based solely on their J.D. courses, if University Law Center. This policy applies only to they carry at least 16 J.D. credits during the acade• magna cum laude and cum laude graduation honors. mic year and maintain full time status in their joint To be eligible for consideration for the award of program. Students earning fewer than the minimum summa cum laude, a graduate must have completed number of hours of credit are not eligible for the at least 71 earned hours at Ceorgetown. Dean's List in the academic year in question. Courses taken at the Law Center in the summer session or Drder of the Coif, Georgetown Chapter: The Order in the Graduate Program at the Law Center are of the Coif was established in 1912 to recognize included in the calculation of the required minimum graduating students who achieved an exemplary number of hours of credit for Dean's List eligibility. cumulative grade point average. Graduating students whose cumulative grade point averages place them in Dean's List eligibility is computed separately for the top 10% of the class are elected to membership first year students, upperclass, and graduating stu• in the Order, the national law school honor society dents, as foUows. For the first year class, the Dean's for the encouragement of scholarship and advance• List is calculated separately for each of the five first ment of ethical standards in the legal profession. year sections. The Dean's List for first year students consists of those students whose annual cumulative Academic Attrition grade point averages place them in the top one- third of their particular first year section. The sec• In order to graduate, a J.D. student must satisfy tions are not further subdivided on the hasis of the the following academic requirements: he or she "small section" or first year elective in which a student must earn 83 credit hours, must meet the residency was enrolled. requirement, must successfully complete every The upperclass Dean's List is calculated separately required course, must successfully fulfill every cur• in two groups. The first group consists of students riculum requirement and must achieve a cumulative in their final year of law school; that is, third year grade point average of 2.00 within the time frame full time students and fourth year part time students. outlined below. A transfer student must achieve the The second group consists of all other upperclass cumulative grade point average of 2.00 in Law students; that is, second year full time students and Center courses. second- and third-year part time students. Unless excused hy operation of law (i.e., military call-up, Americans with Disabilities Act, etc.), a fiill Diplomas with Honors: Students who meet the aca• time student must satisfy all graduation require• demic standards set by the faculty may be awarded ments within five consecutive calendar years; a part the J.D. degree with honors and such student diplo• time student, within six consecutive calendar years. mas will he marked cum laude, magna cum laude, or A student who has completed three or more semes• summa cum laude, as appropriate. ters in the fiill time program shall he treated as a The degree cum laude is awarded to those stu• full time student for purposes of establishing the dents whose cumulative grade point averages place maximum period to meet all degree requirements. them in the top one-third of those graduating, and 44 JURIS DOCTOR PROGRAM

If the student fails to satisfy the graduation require• grade point average of 1.33 by the end of the next ments within the appropriate time period, he or she academic year and satisfy all graduation require• shall be dismissed with no possibility of readmission ments within the allotted time period. They may or graduation. allow the student to return subject to any conditions they choose to impose. Petitions by students who First Year Students: (1) A student must successfully have been absent from the rolls for more than one complete every first year required course and a first year under the circumstances of this subsection will year elective course (this includes those required be governed by Provisions for Readmission of courses taken in the second year by students in the Dismissed Students, below. Part Time Program). A student must retake any first year required course (including the required Upperclass Students: A student no longer in his or first year "perspective" elective) in which he or she her first academic year at the Law Center and any received a grade of F. In the case of a first year elec• transfer student will he dismissed from the rolls of tive, a student who fails the course may repeat that the Law Center for academic insufficiency if at the elective or substitute another first year elective. end of any academic year he or she has a cumulative Both the original grade of "F" and whatever grade grade point average of less than 1.67. For a transfer the student receives upon retaking the course will student, only Law Center grades will be counted. appear on the student's transcript. The Registrar See Provisions for Readmission of Dismissed Students, will include the grades and the credit hours for both below. times the student took the course in calculating the student's cumulative grade average for purposes of Counseling Requirement for All Students: A student honors, attrition, and graduation. who has a cumulative grade point average of less than (2) When a student has completed the first year 2.33 at the end of any semester must meet with an with a cumulative grade point average of less than Assistant Dean for the J.D. Program or the Registrar 1.67, the student must retake any course in which to discuss the requirements for graduation and ways he or she received a grade of D or F. Both the Ds for the student to improve his or her performance. and Fs the student first received and the grades he or she receives in retaking the course will appear on Summer Session Attendance: If a student is the student's transcript, and the credit hours for enrolled in a Ceorgetown summer program when a hoth the first and retaken courses will be included failure to maintain the required minimum cumula• in calculating the student's cumulative average for tive grade point average is determined, that student purposes of honors, attrition and graduation. The may elect to continue in the summer session, and student wiU receive hourly credit toward the require• the student's cumulative grade point average will he ment of obtaining 83 hours of credit only for the recalculated taking the summer session grades into courses he or she successfully retakes. account. If such a student has secured approval to If, in retaking a course, a student receives a grade attend the summer session at another law school, of D, the student has satisfied the requirement that that school will be notified of the student's academic he or she pass every required and first year elective dismissal at the Law Center. course. (3) A first year student whose cumulative grade Provisions for Readmission of Dismissed Students: point average is less than 1.67 but 1.33 or higher Students dismissed for academic insufficiency may may elect a leave of absence from the Law Center petition the Professional Responsibility/Appeals for one calendar year before returning. In order to Committee (a faculty/student committee) for read- return the student must submit a written request to mission to the Law Center. Readmission can he the Registrar no later than the first of August for granted only if the Committee, hy majority vote, the following fall semester. If the student returns, he finds that it is probable that the student will satisfy- or she must satisfy all requirements, including the all graduation requirements within the allotted time completion of degree requirements within the period. In applying this test, the Committee may mandated time limits. consider any factors its members believe are rele• (4) A first year student whose cumulative average vant, including the student's apparent ability and is less than 1.33 must take a leave of absence for at desire to become a lavvyer, the record of academic least one calendar year. Readmission is not guaran• performance at the Law Center, and circumstances teed. To seek readmission after a leave of one year that may have temporarily impeded the student's the student must submit a written petition to the performance. The Committee may readmit the Registrar no later than August 1 for the following student subject to any conditions the Committee fall semester. The petition will be considered hy chooses to impose. the Registrar and the Associate Dean for the J.D. With the exception of students who fail to Program. The student will be allowed to return only complete all graduation requirements within the if the Registrar and the Associate Dean find that it required time period, each time a student is dis• is probable that the student will attain a cumulative missed, he or she may appeal to the Committee. If JURIS DOCTOR PROGRAM 45 the Committee votes not to readmit the student, A student failing to present himself or herself the student may appeal to the faculty only if at least for any examination because of illness or other one-third of those Committee members who voted extraordinary cause must contact the Registrar on cast votes to readmit the student. The student may the day of the examination prior to the start of the seek Committee reconsideration, no more than once examination, if not before. If the Registrar is satis• every six months, if he or she has new evidence fied that the absence is legitimate and supported indicating that he or she will successfully meet the hy appropriate documentation (doctor's note, etc.), graduation requirements. permission may be given for the student to take a The provisions for readmission outlined in this deferred examination. The requirements of a student's section apply to upperclass students and to first year employment will not be regarded as an "extraordinary students who, after failing to secure the required cause." If the Registrar does not permit a deferral, minimum cumulative grade point average of 1.67 at the student must take the examination as originally the end of any academic year, fail to re-enroll during scheduled. See Exam Deferral Policy in General the prescrihed time period. Administrative Policies section of this Bulletin. Any student who does not take an examination Attendance, Examinations, and Written Work as originally scheduled, and who does not obtain permission from the Registrar prior to the start of Attendance and Participation an examination to take a deferred examination, will The Law Center must he satisfied at all times of receive a grade of F in the course. A student who the serious purpose of each student. Any student presents himself or herself for examination in a will be dropped from the rolls if it is found that the course hut fails to submit that examination for student is not giving proper time and attention to grading will receive a grade of F for that course. his or her studies. No post-examination relief will he granted. If a Regular and punctual attendance at all class ses• student becomes ill prior to the administration of sions is required of each student. Student participa• the examination, it is the student's responsihility to tion is expected in all courses. A student who, even determine, in consultation with the Registrar, whether though registered for a course, has not regularly he or she should request a deferred examination. attended and participated may, at the professor's If a student becomes ill during the examination, or option, be excluded from the course or examination if some outside force disrupts the examination, the (with the same consequences as a voluntary failure student must immediately make the proctor aware to appear for a final examination) or receive a low• of the situation and follow the instructions of the ered grade in the course. Even if a student has proctor or Registrar, as be case may be. passed all examinations, academic credit will not be No re-examination will be given in any course for awarded and no student will he advanced, nor will the purpose of raising a grade obtained in a previous his or her degree he conferred, if attendance or final examination in that course. participation is unsatisfactory. Students may review their graded exams by com• A student who has not properly registered for a pleting a request form at the Office of the Registrar. course may not take the final examination or receive The Library contains copies of past examinations any credit for participation in the course. administered at the Law Center. Students may use these prior examinations as study aids in preparing Examinations for examinations. In many cases, faculty have also placed on file in the Library model or "best" answers Written examinations are held at the end of the to their past examinations. classwork in all courses unless otherwise indicated on the schedule of courses. No examination wiU be given Written Work prior to its originally scheduled date. Curricular offerings designated as "seminars" generally do not Final papers in seminars and other courses are nor• have examinations; instead, substantial written work mally due on the date announced in the academic is required. Clinical programs do not have written calendar. By announcement at the beginning of the final examinations. semester, a professor may advance or extend for up The Law Center requires students to take their to a maximum of 60 days the due date of all papers examinations at the regularly scheduled time. Dates for the seminar (except for those of graduating stu• for all examinations are announced at the time the dents). AH final papers submitted for academic credit course schedule is released so that students may must be submitted to the Office of the Registrar anticipate the date of their examinations and sched• and not to the professor. ule personal, travel and employment plans that do Due dates for papers are as firm as the dates of not interfere with the announced dates of their examinations. Individual extensions may he granted examinations. If, however, a student experiences a hy the professor only in writing on a form available serious medical or personal situation that makes it from the Office of the Registrar. The form, signed impossible to take an examination on the scheduled hy the professor, must be submitted to the Office of date, a deferred examination may be requested. the Registrar. Extensions for more than 60 days are 46 JURIS DOCTOR PROGRAM rarely granted. Any request for an extension beyond averages. Complete descriptions of Graduate Program 60 days is effective only upon review and signature offerings may he found in the Online Curriculum by the Associate Dean of the J.D. Program. Guide at . due date (including any extension), the Office of the Registrar will enter a withdrawal from the Credit for Courses in the Graduate School of the course on the student's transcript. Once a final University paper is submitted for grading, another paper may Upperclass students may take a maximum of six not be substituted for the final paper. credits in the Graduate School of the University with permission of Assistant Dean Everett Bellamy Review Process for a Passing Grade at the Law Center and the professor teaching the graduate course. For some courses, the approval of Once a grade is reported to the Registrar, a faculty the academic department is required in addition to member may change a passing grade for an exami• the permission of the professor. Course descrip• nation, seminar or research paper, or clinic only upon tions may he found in the catalog of the Graduate written proof of demonstrable clerical error in the School. Language classes may he taken on a space- grading or grade reporting process. available hasis, hut will not he credited towards the J.D. degree. Full time students may take graduate Review Process for a Failing Grade courses and undergraduate language courses without Any student who has received a failing grade on an additional charge. Part time students pay for all examination or paper may, after first discussing the courses at the applicable Law Center credit hour matter with the professor who reported the failing rate, except for summer courses, which are hilled at grade, request that the Registrar submit that exami• the applicable main campus tuition rate. AH courses, nation or paper to another professor teaching in the credits, and grades taken in the Graduate School subject for evaluation. Students receiving a failing wiH appear on the student's Law Center transcript, grade in a clinic may request a conference with the hut the grades will not he counted in the student's Associate Dean for Clinical Programs to discuss grade point average. the evaluation, once they have discussed their grade with the professor offering the clinic. The other Credit for Study Outside the Law Center professor, or the Associate or Assistant Dean in the Credit for courses taken outside the Law Center's case of a clinical grade, serves merely in a consulting J.D. or Graduate Programs is given under the cir• capacity. Final decision for the course grade rests cumstances described below. Students should he with the professor conducting the course, but the aware of the following academic policies that apply course professor shall give due and appropriate con• to transfer of credit from another division of the sideration to the views of the consulting colleague. University or another institution. A request for such evaluation must be made by the student within the time period as set hy the Office • In order to earn a J.D. degree, 83 credits are of the Registrar for students' review of examinations required; a minimum of 53 credits must he and papers. earned at the Law Center. • A passing grade is required for transfer of any Credit for Law Center Summer Programs credits from another school toward the degree Except as expressly modified in the Summer Session requirements at the Law Center. Brochure, all academic regulations applicable during • AH courses, credits, and grades undertaken at the regular academic year are applicable during another law school wiU he displayed on the summer sessions. Students in good standing at the student's Law Center transcript whether or not Law Center may enroll in summer session courses transfer credit is actually granted. These grades at the Law Center and earn academic credit toward are not computed into the student's Law degree requirements. Center cumulative grade point average. Full time students may not advance the date of • Please refer to the preceding section on their graduation by attending summer session courses. Academic Evaluation and Attrition Standards for the rules that govern how courses taken at Credit for Courses in Law Center Graduate Program other schools affect academic evaluation and Upperclass students may take up to six credits of attrition and academic and graduation honors. courses in the Graduate Program of the Law Center • Under certain circumstances credit for clinical without special permission. Permission from an programs wiU not transfer. Students contem• Assistant Dean of the J.D. Program is required, however, to take more than six credits of Graduate plating taking a clinical course at another law Program offerings. Grades for Law Center graduate school must consult the Associate or Assistant courses and seminars are displayed on students' Dean for Clinical Programs hefore enrolling in transcripts and computed into students' grade point the course. JURIS DOCTOR PROGRAM 47

• No academic credit is given for internships or permission from Assistant Dean Everett Bellamy. externships. Permission to visit away is granted only to students • Students considering the transfer of credit from showing compelling personal circumstances that require their relocation. other law schools should consult with Assistant Dean Everett Bellamy in order to he advised of There are a limited number of law schools that all applicable rules and necessary procedures. sponsor study ahroad programs during the fall or spring semesters. A list can he obtained from the Assistant Deans' Office for the J.D. Program. Under Credit for Work Complotod at Other Law Schools ABA rules, no more than 12 credits earned ahroad The Law Center will not grant credit for any course may be applied toward the J.D. degree. work completed prior to a student's matriculation in a J.D. program at an American Bar Association The Law Center reserves the right to designate (ABA) or Association of American Law Schools the schools to which a student may apply, to approve (AALS) approved law school. This includes law the student's selection of courses, and to limit the number of students to whom permission to visit is courses taken at law schools. granted. In order to visit another law school, students must submit their request, in writing, to Assistant Summer Sessions: Law Center students may take Dean Everett Bellamy by April 1. up to six credits at a summer session of another ABA/AALS approved law school. If the courses Students will not be permitted to visit at another taken are approved in advance hy Assistant Dean school unless they are in good standing at Georgetown for the semester(s) for which they wish to visit away. Everett Bellamy, the credits will count toward the Georgetown students who wish to visit at another Law Center degree. Students should send a written school must have earned the minimum grade point request to Dean Bellamy indicating the school they average required for graduation hefore permission wish to attend and the course(s) they wish to take. to visit away will he given, since grades earned at Students must have a compelling reason in order to other schools, while displayed on the Georgetown attend a summer session at another law school in transcript, will not he calculated into a student's the D.C. area. grade point average. Students with an unpaid stu• dent account balance will not be approved to visit Study Ahroad Programs: While enrolled at the away until their account is paid in full. There is an Law Center, students may earn a limited number of administrative fee of $200.00 for each semester a credits at study abroad programs conducted hy other student visits at another school. ABA/AALS approved law schools. Absent com• It is the student's responsibility to make sure peUing personal circumstances, students may earn no transcripts of grades and petitions for graduation more than four credits from study ahroad programs are submitted to the Registrar in a timely fashion. held during the summer other than those sponsored Students who petition to visit at another ABA/AALS hy the Law Center. approved law school during their final year of study Most study ahroad programs are held during the are cautioned that difficulties in course selection and summer session. There are, however, a limited the timely submission of grades may affect graduation number of ABA approved study ahroad programs clearance. offered during the regular academic year. The policy In addition, students requesting to visit away described below regarding visiting at another law must review a degree audit with Dean Bellamy to school applies to those programs. assure that they can meet all degree requirements, Permission to apply to a study ahroad program including the required time in residence. Smdents (other than those sponsored by the Law Center) must complete the upperclass legal writing requirement must he obtained from Assistant Dean Everett at the Law Center. BeUamy prior to applying. The Law Center reserves Students visiting at another law school must the right to designate the schools to which a student carry private medical insurance, be covered by a may apply and to approve the student's selection of student policy at the visited school, or purchase courses. The Law Center does not give credit for medical insurance provided hy Georgetown. clinical work done ahroad. Residence credit for For information on the policy governing acade• summer programs is calculated on the number of mic and graduating honors for students who visit weeks in the program and should be determined in at other schools, see Graduation Honors Policy for consultation with the Registrar. TransferA^isitor Students, above.

Visiting at Another Law School: In extraordinary Duplication of Courses circumstances, a student may be granted permission Students will not receive credit toward the degree to attend another ABA/AALS approved law school for a course that is substantially similar to any for his or her final semester or year of law school, other course completed by the student as part of while still earning the Georgetown degree. Before the requirements for the J.D. degree. Students with applying to another school, the student must obtain questions ahout the applicability of this rule to 48 JURIS DOCTOR PROGRAM

their course choices should consult the Registrar, an acceptance. Students should also consider acceptance Assistant Dean, or the Director of J.D. Academic of a volunteer position as binding as acceptance of a Services. Waivers should be secured in writing, with position with remuneration. The expectations of a copy to he maintained in the student's file. professionally responsible behavior are in no way diminished because a position does not provide Restrictions on Student Employment financial compensation. The program of instruction in the Full Time t Program is a demanding one designed to command Withdrawals and Leaves of Absence substantially all of the student's time during the academic year. Experience indicates that a student Withdrawals from Individual Courses frequently cannot successfully carry a full time A student may withdraw from a required or elective course load if substantially employed in an outside first year course (including those required courses job. Devoting too much time to employment is a taken during the second year of study hy part time frequent cause of disappointing academic perfor• students) only with the permission of the Registrar, mance and sometimes of academic failure. For an Assistant Dean for the J.D. Program, or the these reasons, professional organizations, including Director of J.D. Academic Services. In order to accrediting agencies, require that a student enrolling withdraw from any course for which the permission in the full time program be in a position to devote of the professor was required to enroll, a student substantially all of his or her working hours to the must obtain the permission of that professor. study of law. After the first week of the semester, an upperclass The Law Center strongly urges first year full student may withdraw from a course only with the time students not to accept outside employment. permission of the Registrar, an Assistant Dean for All full time students should carefully restrict their the J.D. Program, or the Director of J.D. Academic hours of employment and in no event may a full Services. A withdrawal is recorded on a student's time student exceed 20 hours of employment per transcript either as a "withdrawal" or an "excused week during the academic year, as required by the withdrawal." After the fourth week of the semester, American Bar Association. A student enrolled in a withdrawal will be considered "excused" only the Full Time Program who is contemplating suh• under exceptional circumstances. Special rules stantial employment should request a transfer to the regarding withdrawal from a clinic are set forth in Part Time Program, which is structured to accom• the section on Policies Related to Clinic Enrollment, modate those who are employed full time during below. their study at the Law Center. Leaves of Absence and Withdrawal from the Student Conduct and Student Disciplinary Code Law Center The faculty expects all students to exhibit high Upperclass students in good standing may request a standards of academic and professional responsihility. leave of absence from the Law Center. Leaves of The faculty has adopted the Student Disciplinary absence are rarely granted for longer than two academic Code, which is printed in a subsequent chapter. semesters. The Code sets forth the ohligations of students, In general, students may retain credit for the the jurisdiction of the Professional Responsihility work successfully completed prior to withdrawal Committee, the Ethics Counsel, and the procedures and he readmitted upon request without submitting to he followed in determining whether a student has to the usual admissions process if (1) their leave of violated the Code. The Code covers student conduct absence is approved in advance; (2) they do not attend in a variety of situations, including the job search another law school while on leave without the prior process. written approval of an Assistant Dean for the J.D. Program; and (3) they can complete their degree Student Conduct in the Job Search Process program within the required time period for their Students are expected to exhibit high standards of program, as specified above. Circumstances sur• professional responsibility in all of their job-seeking rounding the leave of absence may lead to a deter• activities. Students are cautioned to avoid even the mination that the student must apply for readmission. appearance of impropriety in the preparation of Under the following circumstances, students will their job resumes, letters and application forms. be dropped from the roUs and must reapply through Misleading, inaccurate, or false information on regular admissions channels for readmission to the these materials are viewed as a violation of the Law Center: (a) students who have withdrawn from Student Disciplinary Code. Students are also the Law Center during their first year without expected to honor commitments to an employer. having successfully completed all first year courses Students are expected to attend all scheduled inter• required in their division; (h) students who have views, unless cancelled in a timely and appropriate been absent from the Law Center longer than their manner. If an offer for employment is accepted, the approved leave of absence; or (c) students who have student should not consider offers received after the withdrawn without having received approval for a JURIS DOCTOR PROGRAM 49 leave of absence in advance. The time limitations for Tribunal Rules Governing Student Practice completion of legal studies described above in the Students seeking admission to clinics requiring section on Academic Attrition apply to all leaves of practice in the courts or agencies of the District of absence and withdrawals. Columbia must be certified for practice under the D. C. Student Practice Rule. To be certifiable under Policies Related te Clinic Enreliment this rule, a student must have successfully completed 41 credits, including Evidence, Civil Procedure and Credits Required to Enroll Criminal Procedure (hoth curricula A & B satisfy Seven clinical courses (the Center for Applied the Civil Procedure and Criminal Procedure Legal Studies, Federal Legislation, Federal requirements) and receive a character clearance from Legislation - D.C. Division, Harrison Institute the Bar Character Committee before the beginning Policy, Harrison Instimte Housing and Community of the semester in which the student is enrolled in a Development, Institute for Public Representation, clinic. Students who have transferred or are visiting and International Women's Human Rights), are from another school should note that a Criminal open to students (full-time and part-time) who will Law course taken at the student's former school have completed a minimum of 28 credits hefore the generally will not fulfill the Criminal Procedure pre• beginning of the semester in which the students are requisite. As a result, students who have not taken enrolled in a clinic. The two Street Law clinics Criminal Procedure at their former schools will will also accept part-time students who have com• need to complete Georgetown's Criminal Justice pleted the required 22 credits of their first year. course before being admitted to a clinic that prac• Four clinical courses (Criminal Justice, Domestic tices before the courts or agencies of the District of Violence, Family Advocacy, Juvenile Justice, and Columbia. Law Students in Court) are only open to students who will have completed 41 credits by the time Students with felony and some misdemeanor clinic classes begin and who comply with the D.C. convictions or arrests (including juvenile cases or cases Student Practice Rule (see Trihunal Rules Governing in which expungement has taken place), students Student Practice, below). The Appellate Litigation with a history of dishonesty including plagiarism, Clinic is only open to third year full-time students, students with a recent history of drug or alcohol and part-time students who will have completed the abuse, and students with a history of serious finan• equivalent of four full-time semesters by the end of cial irresponsibility might not he cleared by the D.C. their fall semester in the clinic. Course prerequisites Bar Character Committee in time to actually appear and other eligibility requirements apply to some in court while a memher of the clinic. The D.C. Bar courses (see Clinic Course Descriptions below). Character Committee is also unwilling to admit students who have matters pending before the law Part Time Student Enrollment school's Professional Responsibility Committee. While part-time students are encouraged to apply, Students applying to clinics that practice in other those with substantial job responsibilities during the jurisdictions, such as federal court, may also need to day may find it difficult to participate in a clinic. comply with student practice rules. Most federal Clinic directors, however, are often able to accom• courts require certification by the Dean of a student's modate part-time students whose job schedules good character hefore the student is permitted to have some degree of flexibility. In addition, summer appear before the court. An adverse disciplinary rul• school clinics give preference to part-time students, ing in law school or college could prevent a student and generally schedule their clinic seminar classes at from receiving the required certification. night. Second year part-time students may not defer Students with questions about the character taking their required second year courses (Criminal clearance and Dean's certifications should contact Justice and the perspective elective) until their third Associate Dean Wallace MIyniec. or fourth year in order to participate in a clinic. Conflict of Interest Visiting Student Enrollment Because of the federal conflicts of interest statute Visiting students are eligible to enroll in a clinic, (see 18 U.S.C. §205), students with part-time or hut will he admitted only after all interested full-time jobs with the Federal government may not Georgetown students have been accepted. LL.M. he eligible to participate in the Appellate Litigation students are not permitted to enroll in any clinic. Clinic, the Criminal Justice Clinic, the Center for Applied Legal Studies, the Family Advocacy Minimum Cumulative Average Clinic, the Federal Legislation Clinic, the Harrison Students seeking to enroll in a clinic during their Institute, or the Institute for Public Representation. second year in law school must have maintained at Students with part-time or full-time jobs with the least a 2.0 cumulative average. District of Columbia or the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia may not be eligible to participate in the Juvenile Justice Clinic, the 50 JURIS DOCTOR PROGRAM

Harrison Institute, the Family Advocacy Clinic, the November 1, 2002 hy notifying the clinic director in D.C. Division of the Federal Legislation Clinic, or writing. After November 1, 2002, professor permission the Institute for Public Representation. Students is required for withdrawal from a spring semester who are uncertain about the application of this rule clinic. Permission is not readily granted. to them should consult the Director of the clinic in In the absence of permission to withdraw, a stu• which they would like to enroll. dent failing to participate in the clinic to which he or she was admitted will receive a grade of F for the Limits on Clinical Credits appropriate number of credits. Strict enforcement of It is theoretically possible to take two or more dif• this poUcy is necessary to protect students who might ferent client representation clinics, although limited otherwise he foreclosed from obtaining a clinic seat, clinical resources make this unlikely. To ensure clients who might not be adequately served, clinic equitable access to clinics, preference will be given morale, and the Law Center's relationships with to students who have not previously taken a clinical other institutions. course other than Street Law. As a result, students In the absence of a showing of special hardship, who enroll in a clinic other than Street Law might students taking fuU year clinics may not obtain any not be able to gain access to another clinic in a sub• credit unless they remain in the clinic for the full sequent year. Participating in two clinics in the same academic year and complete all required work. If the year (not including summer) is prohibited. clinic director and the Associate Dean for Clinical The Bar admission rules of certain states limit Education permit a student to withdraw from a the number of clinical credits an applicant may take clinic prior to completing the clinic requirements, toward their degree. (E.g., New York permits stu• the amount of credit received for work the student dents to take a maximum of 20 clinical credits out has actually completed will be determined by the of a required 80 credit degree program.) Applicants professor responsible for assigning the student's should consult the jurisdiction in which they plan grade. Credits for year long clinics are allocated in to take the Bar to determine whether such a restric• accordance with a fixed formula set by the faculty tion applies. For assistance in obtaining information on the hasis of classroom seminars, skills training, regarding the rules in a particular jurisdiction, stu• and field work. No additional credits will be awarded dents may contact Professor Michael Frisch, Ethics regardless of the amount of time or effort involved Counsel ([email protected]). in fulfilling clinic ohligations.

Overlap with Skills Training Courses Clinic Extension Policy If a student has taken or is currently enrolled in CUnic students are generally expected to work for Civil Litigation Practice, Patent Trial Practice, their clinic until the end of the examination period Trial Advocacy and Practice, Trial Practice - Expert unless the clinic director has established a shorter Witnesses, or any section of Trial Practice, that stu• period. In some cases, the needs of clinic clients will dent may not also enroll for credit in the Center for require that a student perform some tasks after the Applied Legal Studies, Criminal Justice, Domestic semester ends. In other cases, students may request Violence, Family Advocacy, Juvenile Justice, or Law an extension to complete a project. In either case, Students in Court (or vice versa). If a student has an extension form, available from the Registrar's taken or is currently enrolled in the Appellate Practice Office, must be fiUed out hefore the examination Seminar or Appellate Courts and Advocacy Seminar, period begins and will he effective only upon review that student cannot also enroll for credit in the and signature of the Associate Dean for Clinical Appellate Litigation Clinic (or vice versa). Education. If a tribunal or legislative body has con• tinued a clinic case for hearing beyond the period of Dropping a Clinic or Withdrawal from a Clinic in the student's clinic enrollment, the Associate Dean Progress wiU generaUy grant an extension until the comple• tion of the hearing. Except in unusual cases, an The Law Center's policy regarding withdrawal from extension requested for any other reason wiU not he a clinic is very strict. Any student seeking to with• approved if it exceeds one month from the end of draw from a fall semester or fuU year clinic must the examination period. If an extension is approved, obtain permission from the professor who originally grades will he submitted to the Registrar's office admitted the student. A student may withdraw his or within three weeks after the extension expires. her acceptance of a spring term clinic no later than JURIS DOCTOR/MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 53

JURIS DOCTOR/MASTER OF SCIENCE IN FOREIGN SERVICE 54 JURIS DOCTOR/PH.D IN GOVERNMENT 54

JURIS DOCTOR/PH.D IN PHILOSOPHY 54 JURIS DOCTOR/MASTER OF PUBLIC HEALTH 55 JURIS DOCTOR/MASTER OF PUBLIC POLICY 55

51

JOINT DEGREE PROGRAMS 53

The Law Center sponsors degree programs in • The M.B.A. requirements include hoth which a student May simultaneously pursue study traditional functional courses and 5 integrated leading to the Juris Doctor (J.D.) from the Law experiences. These are intensive team-based Center and a graduate degree from the Ceorgetown experiences lasting approximately one week University School of Business Administration that focus on a critical business issue that (M.B.A.), Ceorgetown Institute of Public Policy incorporates various functional topics and tools; (M.P.P), School of Foreign Service (M.S.F.S.), the • 4.5 hours of selective M.B.A. courses taken in Department of Covernment (J.D./Ph.D.), or the the spring of the third or fourth year of the Department of Philosophy (J.D./M.A., J.D./Ph.D.). program. Selective courses are required but A J.D./M.P.H. is also offered in cooperation with students may select from several versions. The the Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public selective courses are the Clohal Experience and Health (M.P.H.). the Decision Support Systems; The J.D./M.B.A., J.D./M.P.R, and J.D./M.S.F.S. • 13.5 hours of M.B.A. eiectives in the third or programs provide for accelerated achievement of fourth year. Students are encouraged to focus two degrees in four years instead of the five normally their elective course work in a particular func• required to complete the degrees separately (three tional area related to a career track. Examples years for the J.D. and two years for the M.S.F.S. or include, but are not limited to: finance (either M.B.A.). J.D./Philosophy and J.D./Government investment banking or corporate finance); degrees are also accelerated with completion depend• marketing (consumer product marketing); and ing on whether a student is full time or part time strategy (consulting); and and is a Master or Doctoral candidate. The J.D./M.P.H. degree program, while not an • 21-27 hours in upperclass law elective courses, accelerated program, affords students who are not including the required Professional Responsibility health professionals the opportunity to coordinate course and satisfactory completion of the legal the study of law and public health at two highly writing requirement. Credit requirements in respected institutions. this area will vary depending upon the student's For information on admissions requirements and choice of courses within one of the focus areas application procedures for the joint degree programs, described below. see the Admissions Brochure available at the Office of Admissions. Students must apply separately to the Corporate Law Focus Law Center and to the companion graduate program. In addition to the core requirements, students selecting the corporate law focus must complete: JURIS DOCTOR/MASTER OF BUSINESS • 12 hours of required business-related law ADMINISTRATION courses taken in the third and fourth years, J.D./M.B.A. students must satisfactorily complete which include: Corporations, Taxation I and course requirements for hoth the J.D. and M.B.A. Taxation II; and degree programs. In addition to the J.D. and M.B.A. • 6 hours of business-related law courses to he degrees, a Joint Program Certificate will he awarded taken in the third or fourth year (in addition upon completion of the program. to those listed above) from a list of more than The J.D./M.B.A. Program requires completion 20 courses distributed to students in April of of 122 semester hours (74 hours in law and 48 hours each year. in M.B.A. courses.) Upperclass J.D. courses must fulfill distribution requirements for either the Public Policy Focus Corporate Law or the Public Policy focus as outiined In addition to the core requirements, students below. selecting the puhlic policy focus must complete: The 122 credit hours constituting the • 18 hours of required puhlic policy related law J.D./M.B.A. curriculum are distributed as follows: courses taken in the third and fourth years, which • 29 hours of the required first-year law curriculum; include: Administrative Law, Constitutional • 25.5 hours of required and 4.5 hours of elective Law II, Corporations, Legislation and M.B.A. courses taken in the second year. Taxation I; and Required courses include: Business and Public • 6 hours of required puhlic policy related law Policy, Business Ethics, Economics, Economics courses to be taken in the third or fourth year and International Business, Finance I and II, (in addition to those listed above) from a list of Financial Accounting I and II, Management more than 20 courses distributed to students in Accounting, Management Communication, April of each year. Marketing, Organizational Behavior, Operations Management, Quantitative Methods I and II, A typical distribution of semester hours in this Strategy, and Technology and Knowledge joint degree program, 74 J.D. and 48 M.B.A. Management; semester hours, is as follows: 54 JOINT DEGREE PROGRAMS

First Year: 29 J.D. semester hours Second Year: 29 J.D. semester hours Second Year: 30 M.B.A. semester hours Third Year: 21 J.D. semester hours Third Year: 30 J.D. semester hours 9 M.S.F.S. semester hours Fourth Year: 15 J.D. semester hours Fourth Year: 24 J.D. semester hours 18 M.B.A. semester hours 6 M.S.F.S. semester hours

(NOTE: J.D./M.B.A. smdents typically commit JURIS DOCTOR/PH.D. IN GOVERNMENT one spring semester in the last two years of the pro• The J.D./Government program awards the Juris gram to business school smdies. Individual decisions Doctor and a Doctorate in Government (with an ahout participation in law school clinical programs and MA en passant). The program allows students to other curriculum choices will determine which year specialize in American government, international smdents complete the business school curriculum.) relations, comparative government, or political theory. J.D./Ph.D. smdents must satisfactorily complete JURIS DOCTOR/MASTER OF SCIENCE IN requirements for both the J.D. and the Ph.D. degrees. FOREIGN SERVICE Separate diplomas will he awarded, and upon satis• J.D./M.S.F.S. degree candidates must satisfactorily factory completion of the program, a Joint Degree complete course requirements for hoth the J.D. and Certificate will be awarded as well. An M.A. degree M.S.F.S. degrees. In addition to the J.D. and M.S.F.S. is awarded en passant to smdents enrolled in the degrees, a Joint Program Certificate will he awarded Ph.D. program upon completion of 24 credit hours upon satisfactory completion of the program. and course distribution requirements in the govern• The J.D./M.S.F.S. program requires completion ment program and at least 6 credit hours of upper- of 113 semester hours (74 hours in law and 39 hours class J.D. course work. Smdents who enter the in M.S.F.S. courses), satisfactory performance on government program with advanced standing are the M.S.F.S. oral proficiency examination in a foreign excluded from applying for the M.A. en passant. language and the M.S.F.S. oral examinations. Smdents in the joint degree program are required The required 113 J.D./M.S.F.S. credit hours are to take the first year of law school as an intact distributed as follows: block. This school year may be taken prior to or • 29 hours in the required first year law curriculum; after completing one year of government course • 15 hours of required M.S.F.S. courses taken work, but no earlier or later. Smdents may spend a during the first year: International Trade; year entirely devoted to government course work, International Finance; History: Globalization but they need not do so. of Intersocietal Relations; International J.D./Government smdents must complete all Relations: Theory and Practice; and Statistics required courses and the total number of credit hours for International Analysis; for graduation (74 in law and 24 in government for • 21 hours in M.S.F.S. eiectives generally in one the M.A., and an additional 15 for the Ph.D. in the of five broad divisional concentrations: Foreign fields of Comparative Government, International Policy/International Security; International Relations, and Political Theory, or an additional Finance and Commerce; International 18 for the Ph.D. in American Government); per• Business-Government Relations; International form satisfactorily in both the oral/reading foreign Development; International Economic Policy language examinations and the major and minor Analysis; and self-designed concentration comprehensive examinations; submit a dissertation (subject to approval, including regional smdies) proposal; successfully complete and defend a disser• taken in the first, third and fourth years; tation in government; and satisfy the J.D. professional responsihility and legal writing requirements. • a 3-hour M.S.F.S. Workshop, taken in the third or fourth year; Students may enroll in the joint degree program on a full or part time basis. (International Relations • 16 hours in the international law curriculum Ph.D. smdents must he full time when enrolled in taken in the third and fourth years; and the Government Department.) A smdent in this joint • 29 hours in additional upperclass law courses, degree program may receive his or her law degree including Professional Responsibility and a before the completion of the program providing that seminar meeting the legal writing requirement, the course work for the law degree has been com• taken in the third and fourth years. pleted and the smdent has completed 24 credit hours of government course work. A typical distribution of the 113 semester hours in the J.D./M.S.F.S. Program is as follows: JURIS DOCTOR/PH.D. IN PHILOSOPHY First Year: 24 M.S.F.S. semester hours J.D./Philosophy smdents must satisfactorily com• (smdents are also expected plete the course requirements for both the J.D. and to a complete 15-20 hours/ Philosophy degrees. A Joint Program Certificate week internship during will be awarded upon completion of the entire pro• this year) gram. The J.D./M.A. program requires the smdent JOINT DEGREE PROGRAMS 55

to complete 98 credit hours (74 hours in J.D. course With permission, students are eligible to enroll work and 24 in philosophy course work), pass a in courses at Georgetown's Kennedy Institute of comprehensive examination in philosophy, satisfy Ethics. The M.P.H. degree will not he awarded the legal writing requirement and complete a course until requirements for the J.D. degree have been in Professional Responsibility. The J.D./Philosophy completed. requires an additional 12 credit hours of philosophy course work and a dissertation. Philosophy degrees JURIS DOCTOR/MASTER OF PUBLIC POLICY are available in general philosophy, ethics, business J.D./M.P.P. degree candidates must satisfactorily ethics, or hioethics. complete all course requirements of hoth the J.D. and J.D./Philosophy students are required to take M.P.P. degrees. In addition to the J.D. and M.P.P. the first year of law school and the first year of degrees, a Joint Program Certificate will be awarded philosophy course work as intact blocks. The law upon satisfactory completion of the program. school year may be taken prior to or after complet• The J.D./M.P.P. program requires completion of ing one year of philosophy course work, hut no 111 semester hours (74 hours in law and 37 hours earlier or later. in M.P.P. courses). The required 111 J.D./M.P.P. credit hours are JURIS DOCTOR/MASTER OF PUBLIC HEALTH distributed as follows: The J.D./M.P.H. program comprises two individual • 29 hours in the required first-year law curriculum; degrees. A student in this program is expected to complete the required 83 credit hours for the J.D. at • 21 required M.P.P. courses taken during second Georgetown, as well as the 80 units necessary for or third year: Innovations in Public Management; the M.P.H. at Johns Hopkins, in four years. Introduction to Microtheory; Ethics Values and Students may request, hy written petition, to apply Puhlic Policy; Public Finance; Public Policy 6 M.P.H. credits to their J.D. academic credit Process; and Quantitative Methods I and II; requirement. • 7 hours of M.P.P. required courses taken in the The student will spend his or her first year at third or fourth year: Quantitative Methods III the Law Center, taking the standard curriculum of and a two semester practicum; 29 credit hours for a first-year J.D. student. The • 9 hours of M.P.P. elective courses taken in the student then will spend the ensuing 11 months in second, third, and fourth years; residence at Johns Hopkins completing the M.P.H. component of the joint degree program. After com• • 10 required J.D. courses: Administrative Law; pleting the M.P.H., the student will return to the Constitutional Law II; and Legislation; and Law Center to complete the remaining two years of • 35 hours in additional J.D. courses, including the J.D. program, including a course in Professional Professional Responsihility and a seminar Responsihility and the legal writing requirement. meeting the legal writing requirement, taken in Participants in this joint degree program complete the third and fourth years. the following: A typical distribution of the 111 semester hours • 29 credits in required first-year law curriculum; in the J.D./M.P.P. Program is as follows: • 11 months (starting in July) in residence at Johns Hopkins; During this period, students First Year: 29 J.D. semester hours complete a series of M.P.H. core courses. Second Year: 24 M.P.P. semester hours While at Johns Hopkins, they are also required (students are expected to to take: Puhlic Health and the Law, and complete 15-20 hours/ Ethical Issues in Puhlic Health. Students are week internship during also directed to suggested elective courses; this year). Third Year: 21 J.D. semester hours • During the final two years at the Law Center 7 M.P.P. semester hours students are required to take the Advanced Fourth Year: 24 J.D. semester hours Health Law seminar and advised to take M.P.P. semester hours Administrative Law, Constitutional Law II, and at least one additional seminar in health law, biomedical ethics, law and science, or a related subject.

MASTER OF LAWS, CERTIFICATE AND NON-DEGREE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS 59 General Requirements for All LL.M. Students 59 Specific Requirements for LL.M. Degrees Open to Students Who Earned J.D. at a Law School in the U.S. 59

Specific Requirements for LLM. Degrees Open to Students Who Earned Their First Degree in Law Outside the U.S. 60

Requirements for Dual Degrees 61 Requirements for Two LL.M. Degrees 61 Transfer Between LL.M. Degree Programs 61 Requirements for Certificate in Employee Benefits Law 61 Non-Degree Enrollment 61 REQUIREMENTS FOR DOCTOR OF JURIDICAL SCIENCE 62 ACADEMIC REQUIREMENTS 62 ENROLLMENT AND CREDIT POLICIES 64 ATTENDANCE AND EVALUATION POLICIES 65 LEAVE OF ABSENCE AND WITHDRAWAL POLICIES 67 GRADUATION POLICIES 67 PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY 67

57

GRADUATE PROGRAM 59

This section of the Bulletin describes the programs and/or required courses as described in the and policies of the Law Center Graduate Program. appropriate section below: It lists the various programs offered, summarizes the • Earn a minimum cumulative grade point average requirements for completion of each program, then of 2.00; explains in depth the options for completing the • Submit a suhstantial research paper in their writing requirement. Finally, it lists the policies and area of study, meeting the scope, quality, and procedures pertaining to Graduate students, including minimum length requirements described in the enrollment, attendance, examinations, grading, and appropriate section below; other matters. • Complete all requirements for the degree The Graduate Program offers the following within the prescribed period of study. In gen• courses of study for U.S. students: eral, full time students are expected to complete the degree in one academic year, and part time • Master of Laws, individualized program students may take up to three years. All inter• • Master of Laws in Securities and Financial national students are required to enroll as full Regulation time students unless they receive special per• • Master of Laws in Taxation mission from the Admissions Committee and the International Student Advisor to attend • Master of Laws in International and part time. Such permission is rarely granted, Comparative Law for U.S. students matriculating because of the nature of the program of study prior to the Fall 2003 and visa restrictions. • Master of Laws in Advocacy,yor students who complete the Clinical Fellowship Programs Specific Requirements for LL.M. Degrees • Doctor of Juridical Studies (S.J.D.) Open to Students Who Earned a J.D. at a • Certificate in Employee Benefits Law Law School In the U.S.:

a) Master of Laws (Individualized) requires, in The Graduate Program offers the following addition to the general requirements, above: courses of study for students educated outside the U.S.: • Twenty-four semester hours of course work in a program of study approved hy the • Master of Laws, general program Graduate Admissions Committee. There is • Master of Laws in International Legal Studies no limitation on the number of J.D. upper • Master of Laws in Securities and Financial class courses that may be included in the Regulation approved program, but approval does not • Master of Laws in Taxation guarantee entry into any particular course or seminar. The S.J.D., the LL.M. in Advocacy and the • LL.M. students may not enroll as students in LL.M. programs for international students require the clinical programs, and no more than two full time enrollment. Otherwise, the graduate pro• two-credit Supervised Research projects may gram of instruction is designed hoth for the full be approved for any student. time student and for the attorney who seeks to • An approved program of study may be further his or her legal education on a part time revised during the course of the degree pro• basis in the evening. gram hy petitioning the Assistant Dean for Most graduate courses are offered in the evening. International and Graduate Programs. Therefore, a student completing a program on a full time hasis should he prepared for inevitable time h) Master of Laws In Advocacy requires, in the conflicts between courses. Full time students also place of the general requirements, above: should be aware that Summer Session offerings are • Twenty-four months of residency during limited, and most students are able to schedule at two academic years as a Clinical Teaching most four semester hours of credit during the Fellow, engaged in the full time supervision summer. and instruction of J.D. students who are enrolled in a clinic. Fellows must complete MASTER OF LAWS, CERTIFICATE AND their residency with one of the following NON-DEGREE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS clinics: Appellate Litigation, Center for General Requirements for all LL.M. students Applied Legal Studies, Criminal Justice, Domestic Violence, Family Advocacy, Federal Candidates for ail Master of Laws Degrees Must: Legislation, Harrison Institute (Policy Clinic • Complete the required number of semester or Housing & Community Development hours of credit for the degree, including any Clinic), Institute for Public Representation, minimum number of hours in a specialization 60 GRADUATE PROGRAM

International Women's Human Rights, the twenty-four total hours required for the Juvenile Justice, or Street Law. degree. • Twenty-four credit hours of academic credit awarded for satisfactory performance of e) Master of Laws In Taxation requires, in addi teaching and practice, supervision of students, tion to the general requirements, above: participation in clinic seminar, and, in some • Twenty-four semester hours of course work, cases, completion of course work. Grades are including 20 credits in courses listed undei: recorded pass/fail. Taxation. • Completion of written work. The type of • Prior completion of a basic course in individ• written work required is determined hy the ual federal income taxation. (Note: this clinic director. Fellows in the following clin• requirement may not be waived nor may the ics must complete a paper of puhlishable course he taken after matriculation in the quality within five years of their date of Tax Program). matriculation: Appellate Litigation, Center • Completion of the LL.M. courses in Income for Applied Legal Studies, Criminal Justice, Tax Accounting and Corporate Income Tax Domestic Violence, Family Advocacy, and Law I Students who have taken prior courses \e Justice. on these subjects may petition the Assistant Director of Graduate Programs (Taxation c) Master of Laws in International and and Securities) to have a requirement waived Comparative Law requires, in addition to in order to substitute a tax elective. general requirements, above: • Twenty-four semester hours of course work, Specific Requirements for LL.M. Degrees Open to including 16 credits in courses listed as Students Who Earned Their First Degree In Law International and Comparative Law. Outside the U.S. • Prior completion of a basic course in public a) Master of Laws requires, in addition to general international law. At the discretion of the requirements, above: Admissions Committee, an applicant for this • Twenty semester hours of course work in degree who has not completed the prerequi• a program of study approved hy the site course, but who is otherwise qualified, International Student Advisor, including at may he permitted to enroll in International least one course in U.S. law in which stu• Law I: Introduction to International Law after dents are exposed to common law cases and matriculation at the Law Center. When this methods. is permitted, credit for the course will count as elective credit toward the twenty-four • The required course for international students, total hours required for the degree. U. S. Legal Discourse.

Note: Georgetown University Law Center will Note: Civil-law trained students also must attend not accept students into the LL.M. (International the program. Foundations of American Law and and Comparative Law) degree program after Fall Legal Lducation, before beginning an LL.M. degree 2002. U.S. Students interested in advanced study of program. International Law should apply to the individualized LL.M. program after that date. h) Master of Laws In International Legal Studies requires, in addition to the general requirements, d) Master of Laws In Securities and Financial above: Regulation requires, in addition to the general • Twenty semester hours of course work requirements, above: approved by the International Student • Twenty-four semester hours of course work, Advisor, including at least one course in including 16 credits in courses listed as U.S. law in which students are exposed to Securities and Financial Regulation. common law cases and methods, and a min• imum of 12 semester hours of courses listed • Prior completion of a basic course in securi• as International and Comparative Law. ties regulation. At the discretion of the Admissions Committee, an applicant for • The required course for international students, this degree who has not completed the pre• U. S. Legal Discourse, and requisite course, hut who is otherwise quali• fied, may be permitted to enroll in Securities Note: Civil-law trained students also must attend Regulation after matriculation at the Law the summer program. Foundations of American Law Center. When this is permitted, credit for and Legal Education, before beginning an LL.M. the course will count as elective credit toward degree program. GRADUATE PROGRAM 61

c) Master of Laws in Secnrities and Financial already completed one degree should apply to the Regnlation requires, in addition to the general Office of Admissions and pay the appropriate requirements, above: application fee for the second degree. • Twenty-four semester hours of course work, If the application is approved, four credits from in a program of study approved by the the first degree may he applied to the second degree, International Student Advisor, including the resulting in a total of 44 credit hours required for basic course in Securities Regulation, and a hoth. Note: Courses and grades comprising those four minimum of 12 additional semester hours in credits will remain part of the record for the first courses listed as Securities and Financial LL.M.degree; grades for those courses will not he Regulation. included in the CPA computed for the second LL.M. degree. Four credits will not be granted to students • Required course for international students, who have earned or are in the process of earning U.S. Legal Discourse. the LL.M. in Advocacy or one of the 20-credit degree programs for international students as their Note: Civil-law trained students also must attend first degree. the summer program, Foundations of American Law and Legal Lducation, before beginning an LL.M. degree program. Transfer Between LL.M. Degree Programs A student in one LL.M. degree program may d) Master of Laws in Taxation requires, in addition apply to transfer to a different program hy submit• to the general requirements, above: ting a written request to the Assistant Dean for International and Graduate Programs. • Twenty-four semester hours of course work, in a program of study approved by the A transfer will he granted if the applicant's International Student Advisor, of which six• academic record, background, and experience meet teen hours must he in Taxation courses, the criteria set by the Admissions Committee for including 1) Taxation J or The U.S. Income admission to the desired program. Tax: Principles and Practices, and 2) Corporate Income Taxation I or Taxation II. Requirements for Certificate In Employee Benefits Law • Required course for international students, This Certificate is available to students admitted U. S. Legal Discourse. to the Taxation or individualized LL.M. degree program or to attorneys admitted separately for the Note: Civil-law trained students also must attend Certificate program. Successful completion of a the summer program. Foundations of American Law basic course in federal individual income taxation and Legal Lducation, hefore beginning an LL.M. degree program. is a prerequisite to commencing work on the Certificate program. Candidates must complete Retirement Plans Qualification Requirements, Requirements for Dual Degrees Retirement Plans Design and Taxation, and LRISA: Students who earned their first degree in law (J.D.) The Fiduciary Provisions, and two additional courses in the U.S. may apply to earn a degree combining two of the specialized courses of study offered by from the list of Lmployee Benefits offerings. the Graduate Program hy submitting a request in Students must also complete a Graduate Paper writing to the Assistant Dean for International and on a topic in Lmployee Benefits Law. A single Graduate Programs. Graduate Paper may be submitted by a student seek• If admitted to dual degree status, a student must ing to complete the requirements for both an LL.M. complete the required number of semester hours in degree and the Certificate program. A minimum each specialty and write a separate Graduate Paper grade of "C" must be attained in each course counted in each area. One combined degree is awarded. toward the Certificate program's requirements. For Dual Degrees are not available to students in the purposes of earning the LL.M. in Taxation, Lmployee Advocacy or individualized LL.M. programs. Dual Benefits Certificate courses will he counted toward degree students must enroll for a minimum of three the sixteen hours of taxation coursework. fuU time semesters, not including summer sessions. Non-Degree Enrollment Requirements for Two LLM. Degrees Attorneys who wish to supplement their degrees Students who wish to complete two separate degrees with additional courses in a particular field may may apply to do so. Current students should submit apply for admission as a non-degree student. Such an updated application to the Assistant Dean for admission is limited to applicants holding a J.D. International and Graduate Programs, who will from an ABA accredited law school with at least a consult with the Office of Admissions. No applica• C+ cumulative grade point average. tion fee is required for current students. Those who Students accepted into the non-degree program will be beginning their first degree or who have are not candidates for a graduate degree. 62 GRADUATE PROGRAM

Non-degree students may enroll in a total of no ACADEMIC REQUIREMENTS more than four graduate courses, with no more than The following requirements apply to all LL.M. and two courses per semester. Non-degree students must Certificate programs except that requirements and satisfy the same academic requirements and abide policies of the graduate fellowship programs by the same Law Center rules and policies as candi• (LL.M. in Advocacy) are described in the section dates for graduate degrees. on Master of Laws in Advocacy, above, and supersede Non-degree students are not eligible to enroll in these policies where inconsistent. Juris Doctor level courses unless they are Georgetown University Law Center graduates. Non-degree stu• Period of Study dents may not enroll in J.D. first year or clinical The LL.M. or Certificate program should be com• courses, nor may they enroll in a Graduate Seminar pleted within three years. A dual degree program or in a program of Supervised Research. should he completed within four years. However, Students in the non-degree program who subse• for good cause and with the written approval of quently apply for and are accepted into a degree the Assistant Dean for International and Graduate program, will be awarded up to eight semester hours Programs, these limits may he extended by two of coursework completed at the Law Center with a years. Where credit for non-degree course work has "C" or better during the two years immediately pre• been granted, the maximum period of study allowed ceding the student's entry into the degree program. will he reduced hy one semester for every four hours The period of study allowed for completion of the of credit. LL.M. will he reduced by one semester for every four hours of non-degree course work counted Graduate Paper Requirement under this rule. In addition to completing the required credit hours of course work, candidates for all LL.M. degrees REQUIREMENTS FOR DOCTOR OF must submit a paper of puhlishable quality in their JURIDICAL SCIENCE major field of study. The Graduate Paper may be Georgetown offers a program of study leading to a completed either: doctorate in law (S.J.D.). Admission to the S.J.D. program is extremely rare and is open only to out• 1) for one additional credit, in connection with standing applicants who have earned an LL.M. a course or seminar in which a student is degree at an ABA/AALS accredited law school, or enrolled, or has previously completed, in addi• who have a J.D. degree and have taught at the law tion to the regular requirements of the courses school level for at least three years. (students who matriculated prior to Fall 2002 Candidates complete a two-year full time course may enroU in a Graduate Paper in conjunction of study, research, and writing under the supervision with an exam course or seminar for zero- of a full time memher of the faculty. During the credit. Please see the Cffice of International first year, the candidate must complete an approved and Graduate Programs for information on program of at least 10 credit hours of course work, this option); with an average of "B" or better, and suhstantial 2) in fulfillment of the requirements of a four- written work. The candidate's dissertation commit• credit "Graduate Seminar," described below; or tee will then decide whether to recommend that the 3) as the final work product of an approved pro• student continue for the second year. gram of Supervised Research, described below, The student will complete a substantial disserta• for which the student receives two semester tion that makes a significant contribution to legal hours of credit. scholarship. The completed dissertation must be defended before a committee of three members of the faculty, who may then recommend the conferral A student cannot offer any work, or part thereof, of the S.J.D. degree. Where the scholarship is truly prepared, submitted or used for any other purpose exceptional, the committee may recommend that (such as, hy way of example, work prepared for a law the degree be awarded with distinction. journal or other publication, clinic, law firm, gov• Tuition for the S.J.D. degree is charged at the ernment agency or other organization) except upon full time LL.M. rate for the first year, and at a rate receipt of written permission, after fuU disclosure, equivalent to four semester hours of credit each from the professor to whom the work is offered semester for the second year (unless off-campus study and from the Assistant Dean for International and is approved, in which case a reduced tuition may be Graduate Programs. Such permission is rare and charged). Tuition beyond the first two years is will be granted only where the student demonstrates charged at the rate of one credit hour per semester. that the proposal is academically and ethically sound. S.J.D. students are expected to complete their This rule does not limit the student's right to seek degrees within four years. publication of work prepared as part of the LL.M. Note: S.J.D. students are limited to part time on- degree after the final paper has been submitted to campus employment in the first year, and part time the professor for grading. employment (on or off campus) in their second year. GRADUATE PROGRAM 63

a) Technical requirements for the Graduate Paper The student and faculty member set due dates for • At least 10,000 words of text. This length submission of the draft and final paper. The date for requirement does not include citations hut may submission of the final paper may be up to 60 days include suhstantive footnotes. after the end of examinations, except that in a stu• dent's final semester the paper must he submitted • Footnotes must be at the bottom of the page, by the date appearing on the academic calendar for single-spaced, unless the reviewing professor graduating students. approves placing them at the end of the paper. • Citations must follow standard "Blue Book" 2) Graduate Papers in Conjunction with Two- or form, as set forth in the booklet "A Uniform Three-Credit Seminars System of Citation" (cite blue book). A student in a two- or three-credit seminar may • Final papers must he typed, double-spaced, in undertake to write a single paper that will satisfy a readable type, with 1" margins on standard both the seminar paper requirement and the 8V2" X 11" paper. Graduate Paper requirement. The scope, content, and length of such a paper must meet all require• • Final papers must include a Title Page show• ments for the Graduate Paper, as well as those of ing the paper title, name of reviewing professor, the seminar. The student writing an extended paper student's name, address, e-mail and telephone receives one additional credit in recognition of the number, and should he submitted in a term extra effort and the completion of the Graduate paper cover. Paper requirement. The extra credit and paper grade • All graduate papers must be reviewed in draft is recorded separately from the seminar credit and form by the professor prior to being submitted grade on the student's transcript. The professor's for grading. If a student has failed to submit a written approval for an extended paper must he draft, the reviewing professor will return the submitted on the Graduate Paper Registration paper for a rewrite, regardless of whether the Form to the International and Graduate Programs student has submitted it as his or her final Cffice during the first week of the semester. paper, or whether or not he required revision The paper is due on the same date as all other will delay the student's expected date of papers for the seminar. Extensions are not granted graduation. based solely on the fact that the student has chosen • All final papers must he submitted to the to write the Graduate Paper for the seminar. Cffice of the Registrar, not directly to the pro• fessor. The Registrar will review the paper for 3) Graduate Papers in Conjunction with Four-Credit compliance with technical requirements, Graduate Seminars record the date of submission, and forward it Four-credit Graduate Seminars give LL.M. students to the reviewing professor. the opportunity to complete an extensive research and writing project. Each seminar usually meets for • All final papers must receive a grade of "C" or two hours per week, hut carries four semester hours better ("C+" in Graduate Seminars) in order to of credit because of the more extensive workload satisfy this requirement. involved. Professors provide extensive consultation on each student's paper. They carefully critique a b) Options for completing the Graduate Paper complete draft which must subsequently he re-written. 1) Graduate Papers In Conjunction with Seminar meetings are primarily devoted to the Examination Courses presentation and analysis of student papers. If a student chooses to complete the Graduate A student must he enrolled in the specialized Paper in conjunction with an examination course, LL.M. program in which the seminar is offered and the student must receive topic approval hy the pro• must satisfy any other prerequisites established by fessor on a Graduate Paper Registration form. The the professor. Some seminars require the student to form must he submitted to the International and have completed eight credits within their area of Graduate Programs Cffice during the first week of specialization prior to enrolling. the semester during which the student intends to A single, four-credit grade will he entered hy the write the paper. professor for each student's entire seminar perfor• Papers may he written in Graduate or Juris mance. To satisfy the Graduate Paper requirement Doctor level courses as long as the professor agrees the student must complete a paper that, standing to read the draft and final paper. Students choosing alone, is deserving of a grade of C+ or better. this option must also take the course examination Therefore, a separate paper grade is entered on the unless the course is designated as offering the option student's transcript but will not he included in of a paper in lieu of the exam. The grade and one computation of the grade point average. credit awarded for the Graduate Paper is entered Students who have not satisfied the Graduate separately on the student's record. Paper requirement are given preference in enroll• ment in Graduate Seminars. A student may enroll 64 GRADUATE PROGRAM in only one Graduate Seminar during their course repetition is appropriate. Hence, students are not of study at Georgetown (except for students com• required to seek permission to take course that may pleting dual or two degrees, who may enroll in one duplicate previous work, except that U.S. students Graduate Seminar per specialization). in the Tax program may not receive credit toward the LL.M. (Taxation) for Tax I or an equivalent 4) Graduate Papers as Product of Program of basic course in individual income taxation. Supervised Research Graduate students may satisfy the Graduate Paper Registration After Completion of Degree requirement, and receive two semester hours of Requirements credit, hy completing a suhstantial writing project of No student will he permitted to extend his or her academic interest under the guidance of a memher study beyond the semester in which he/she has of the full time or adjunct faculty. completed all degree requirements and been cleared To undertake supervised research, a student must for graduation hy the Gffice of the Registrar, except first identify a faculty member willing to supervise as a non-degree student with the permission of the the project. After agreeing upon a topic, the student Registrar or as a student admitted to a second and the faculty supervisor hoth sign the Graduate LL.M. program. Paper Registration form. This form is available from the Gffice of the Registrar, the International and Full Time Enrollment Defined Graduate Programs Gffice and on the Registrar's The Graduate Program defines full time enrollment weh page. as eight or more semester hours during the fall and The student must submit the completed form, a spring semesters, and as four or more semester research proposal, and a schedule of meetings and due hours during the summer session. dates, to the Gffice of International and Graduate Programs for final approval no later than the final Limitations on Hours of Credit day of add/drop for the semester. Generally, only No fiill time student may enroll for more than one such paper may be written for academic credit, 13 semester hours, and no part time student may although a second project may he approved in enroll for more than 7 semester hours of course appropriate cases. work in any semester without the prior written The program may extend over either one or two approval of the Assistant Dean for International and semesters. In addition to the general requirements Graduate Programs. No student who is employed for the Graduate Paper, the student and faculty more than 20 hours per week may enroll for more supervisor must meet regularly to discuss the pro• than 7 semester hours of course work in one semes• ject, and the student must submit an outline and ter. Deviations from these limitations will he approved only under exceptional circumstances. complete draft to the faculty supervisor for review and comment. The final paper must be submitted through the Gffice of the Registrar, not directly to Credits Earned at Other Institutions the professor. The final paper must be submitted by A cumulative maximum of six credits may he the date set in the approved proposal, which may be applied to the LL.M. degree under the provisions no later than 60 days beyond the date set for paper listed below. Credits for course work and grades submission in the academic calendar, except that earned at another law school and accepted for credit students in their final semester must submit the paper toward a Georgetown degree wiU be entered on the hy the date announced in the academic calendar Georgetown transcript but will not he taken into for graduate students. account in the computation of a student's grade point average at Georgetown.

ENROLLMENT AND CREDIT POLICIES a) The Consortium Program Enrollment for Bar Purposes Under a Consortium agreement between The Law Center's graduate programs are not Georgetown University and George Washington designed to prepare students for admission to the University, Georgetown students enrolled in Master ranks of the American legal profession. Accordingly, of Laws degree programs may enroll for credit in the Graduate Program will not guarantee enroll• the Graduate School of Puhlic Law of George ment in any course, graduate or J.D., which Bar Washington University. authorities may require as a condition of eligibility Arrangements for enrollment in Consortium to sit for a bar examination. courses should be made during the George Washington University add/drop period at Georgetown Duplication of Coursos University Law Center by completing a Consortium The Graduate Program discourages students from application form at the Gffice of the Registrar. repeating courses for which they have previously Priority for enrollment is given to students of the received credit in another degree program, hut rec• institution offering the course. Georgetown stu• ognizes that there may be circumstances where such dents will be charged for consortium courses at GRADUATE PROGRAM 65

Georgetown University Law Center rates. Please course, has not regularly attended and participated check the George Washington academic calendar may, at the professor's option, be excluded from the for the start of classes, which may be earlier than course or examination or receive a lowered grade in that at the Law Center. the course.

b) Advanced Standing Examinations LL.M. students who recently completed some post- Written examinations are held at the end of class J.D. work at another ABA accredited law school work in all courses unless otherwise indicated in the may be admitted to the Law Center with up to six schedule of classes. Seminars generally do not have credits of advanced standing. The maximum period examinations, hut require substantial written work. of study allowed for the degree is reduced by one The Law Center requires students to take their semester if four or more credits of advanced stand• examinations at the regularly scheduled time. Dates ing have been awarded. Advanced standing is not for all examinations are announced at the time the available to students entering the LL.M. degree course schedule is released so that students may programs for international students. anticipate the date of their examinations. If, how• ever, a student experiences a serious medical or per• c) Transfer of Credit sonal situation that makes it impossible to take an In certain circumstances it may be necessary for an examination on the scheduled date, a deferred exam LL.M. student to earn credit toward the Georgetown may be requested in advance from the Gffice of the degree at another law school. Students must apply Registrar. to the Assistant Dean for International and A student who fails to present himself/herself for Graduate Programs, or the Assistant Director of a required examination must contact the Registrar Graduate Programs (Taxation and Securities), for on the day of the examination before the exam permission prior to enrolling in any course at administration begins. If the Registrar is satisfied another law school for which they intend to seek that the absence is due to illness or other extraordi• transfer credit. nary cause, she/he may give permission for the stu• Grades for all approved courses will he entered dent to take a deferred examination. If the Registrar on the student's transcript, but will not he included is not satisfied, the student will receive an excused in the student's grade point average. Credit will not withdrawal in the course. be awarded for any course for which the students A student who presents himself/herself for received a grade lower than a "C". examination in a course but fails to submit that examination for grading will receive a grade of F d) Advanced Standing for Credit Earned as a J.D. for that course unless the Assistant Dean of Student at Georgetown University Law Center International and Graduate Programs determines Recent Georgetown J.D. graduates may apply from otherwise. two to six hours of credit earned while a J.D. stu• No post-examination relief will be granted to dent toward an LL.M. degree, provided those hours individual students. If a student feels ill prior to the were in excess of the 83 credits required for the J.D. administration of an examination, it is the student's degree. Courses and grades involved will remain responsihility to determine, in consultation with the part of the J.D. record; advanced standing credit for Registrar, whether he or she qualifies for a deferred specific courses will be applied to the LL.M. degree examination. If a student becomes ill during the examination, or if some outside force disrupts the and the courses and grades will be entered on the examination, the student should immediately make transcript, hut grades for those courses will not be the proctor aware of the situation and follow the included in the computation of the LL.M. grade instructions of the exam administrator. point average. The maximum period of study allowed will he reduced hy one semester if four or No re-examination will be given in any course more credits are applied to the LL.M. degree under for the purpose of raising a grade obtained therein this provision. on a prior examination. Students may review their graded exams by completing the necessary form at the Gffice of the AHENDANCE AND EVALUATIDN POLICIES Registrar. The Library contains copies of past exam• Attendance inations administered at the Law Center. Students All graduate students are expected to attend classes may use these prior examinations as study aids in regularly. Any student will be promptly dropped preparing for examinations. In many cases, faculty from the roUs if it is found that the student is not have also placed on file in the library model or giving proper time and attention to his/her studies. "best" answers to their past examinations. A student who has not properly registered for a course may not seek admission to the final examina• Seminar Papers tion or receive any credit for participation in the Four-credit Graduate Seminar paper requirements course. A student who, even though registered for a are described above. 66 GRADUATE PROGRAM

Two-credit seminars offered by the Graduate the determination of the student's academic average Program are expected to require a suhstantial if it was written for one credit in conjunction with research paper, or series of shorter papers, totaling a course or seminar or for two credits under the approximately 6000 words of text excluding foot• supervised research option. A grade of "C" or better notes. Papers submitted in lieu of an examination in is required on the Graduate Paper in order to meet a course (permitted only when announced in the the degree requirement ("C+" is required for papers schedule of courses) must also meet this minimum written for a Graduate Seminar). standard. J.D. students may not satisfy their writing If a student repeats a failed course, hoth grades requirement in LL.M. seminars. will be entered on the student's transcript and will Linal papers in seminars and other courses are be included for the purpose of determining the normally due on the date announced in the acade• cumulative grade point average of the student. mic calendar. By announcement at the beginning of Any student accumulating three failures wiU be the semester, a professor may advance, or extend for dismissed for defective scholarship. up to 60 days, the due date of all papers for the seminar (except for graduating students in their Grade Review Policies final semester). Due dates for papers are as firm as Any student who has received a failing grade on the dates of examinations, unless a student submits an examination or paper, after first discussing the a request for an extension to the Office of the matter with the professor who submitted the failing Registrar after receiving the professor's approval and grade, may request the Registrar to submit that signature on the request form. If a student fails to examination or paper to another professor teaching submit a final paper by the due date (including any in the field for review. The other professor serves extension), the Office of the Registrar will enter merely in a consulting capacity. The final decision a withdrawal from the course on the student's for the course grade rests with the professor con• transcript. ducting the course, hut the course professor shall A seminar or Graduate Paper submitted for grad• give due and appropriate consideration to the views of the consulting colleague. A request for review ing may not be rewritten for the purpose of raising must be made hy the student within the time period the grade on that paper except that, where a student allowed for review of students' examinations and has not submitted the required first draft of a papers. Gnly grades of F may be reviewed. Graduate Paper, the reviewing professor will return a paper for revision prior to awarding a final grade. All final papers submitted for academic credit are Grade Change Policy to he submitted to the Gffice of the Registrar and A faculty member may change a reported passing not to the individual professor. Students are advised grade for an examination or paper only upon proof to make copies of all papers submitted since they of demonstrable clerical error in the grading or become part of the records of the University and grade reporting process. will not he returned. Probation Grading LL.M. students who fail to achieve a 2.00 cumula• Final grades are given on a letter system: A, A-, B+, tive grade point average at the end of any semester will he placed on academic probation. If the stu• B, B-, C+, C, C-, D and F. dent's cumulative grade point average remains below 2.00 after the next semester in residence (after at The following numerical equivalents are assigned least four credits of course work), he or she will he to each letter grade: dismissed for defective scholarship. A 4.00 C+ 2.33 Academic Honors A- 3.67 C 2.00 B+ 3.33 c- 1.67 a) Graduating with Distinction B 3.00 D 1.00 LL.M. students who have achieved a minimum B- 2.67 F 0 cumulative grade point average of 3.42 in courses taken at the Law Center will receive their degrees A minimum cumulative grade point average of with the notation with distinction. Grades earned in 2.00 in all courses and seminars taken is required courses taken through the Consortium at George each semester a student is enrolled in the LL.M. Washington University, or transferred from any program. other law school, while displayed on the Law Center Any paper submitted in satisfaction of the transcript, will be excluded from the computation of Graduate Paper requirement will be graded sepa• this average. Distinction will he granted only where rately from the course or seminar in which it was a smdent has completed a minimum of 18 semester submitted. The separate paper grade will he posted hours of course work in an LL.M. program at the on the student's transcript. It will he included in Law Center. GRADUATE PROGRAM 67 b) The Thomas Bradbury Chetwood, S.J., Prizes Withdrawal for Failure to Register Founded by the Law Center Class of 1928, these A student who either fails to register or to obtain an prizes are given in honor of Reverend Thomas B. approved leave of absence, regardless of the reason Chetwood, S J., a former Regent of the Law Center. for that failure, will be withdrawn from the roUs of A plaque is awarded to the students who hoth the Law Center by the Registrar. This action will be graduate with distinction and have the hest academic noted on the student's transcript. Such a student records for that academic year in course work lead• may not register for a subsequent semester without ing to the degree of Master of Laws in Taxation, the approval of the Assistant Dean for International Master of Laws in International and Comparative and Graduate Programs. Permission to re-enroU will Law, Master of Laws in Securities and Financial not he granted unless the degree can be completed Regulation, Master of Laws (general studies), and within the maximum period of study allowed. Master of Laws in International Legal Studies. At the discretion of the Assistant Dean of International GRADUATION POLICIES and Graduate Programs, a prize may be awarded for the most outstanding work in an approved Application to Graduate individualized Master of Laws program. Students anticipating graduation must complete an application for degree in order that a graduation audit may be completed and diplomas ordered. LEAVE OF ABSENCE AND WITHDRAWAL POLICIES Students are solely responsible for monitoring their Voluntary Withdrawal from Individual Courses progress to ensure they meet all degree requirements A graduate student may voluntarily withdraw from by their anticipated graduation date. There is no any course, regular seminar or graduate paper at any graduation fee for students who submit their appli• time prior to the examination period, unless the cation according to the following schedule: professor has set a different rule for withdrawal in writing. Students may withdraw from four credit May graduate: Deadline January 25 graduate seminars only with the permission of the Gctoher graduate: Deadline April 19 professor and the Assistant Dean for International February graduate: Deadline November 22 and Graduate Programs, which will he granted only in extraordinary circumstances. A student desiring Students are responsible for obtaining an appli• to withdraw from any course or from the Law cation to graduate at the Gffice of the Registrar in Center must submit a request in writing to the sufficient time to meet the filing deadline. Gffice of the Registrar. Notification to any other person or in any form other than in writing is not Clear Account Balance effective as official notice of intention to withdraw. Regardless of the completion of all course require• If a student properly withdraws from a course or ments, a degree cannot he conferred until the student from the Law Center under the foregoing rules, has a clear student account balance. In addition, refunds of tuition will he calculated, from the date transcripts, diplomas, bar forms, and other certifi• the Registrar receives written notification, according cates will not be released if there is an outstanding to the percentages listed in the Tuition and Fees student account balance. section of this Bulletin. c> » PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY Leaves of Absence The faculty expects all students to conduct them• LL.M. students in good standing may request a selves with the highest degree of honesty, integrity leave of absence for up to one academic year from and trustworthiness. For the rare case in which a the Registrar, the Assistant Dean for International student's conduct is dishonest or evidences a lack of and Graduate Programs, or the Assistant Director integrity or trustworthiness or may unfairly impinge of Graduate Programs (Taxation and Securities). upon the rights or privileges of members of the The student requesting the leave must demonstrate Law Center community, the faculty has promul• that the degree can be completed within the allowed gated standards and procedures that govern the period of study, counting the time on leave of disposition of such cases. Those standards and pro• absence. cedures are set forth in the Student Disciplinary Code, a copy of which is printed in this Bulletin.

GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES 71 Application to Graduate 71

Audiotaping of Classes, Policy and Procedures 71

Bar Admissions, Examinations, and Reviews 71 The Crime Awareness and Campus Security Act of 1990 72 Exam Deferral Policy 72

I.D. Cards 73 Immunization Records 73

Medical Insurance 73 Registration for Courses 73

Student Access+ 74

Student Records, Academic 74 Student Records, Access 74 Student Records, Directory Information, and Confidentiality 74

Student Work, Confidentiality 75

Transcripts 75

69

GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES 71

GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES Requests the AV Department Will Decline The AV Department will not audiotape classes due Application to Graduate to work conflicts, vacation plans, minor illness, Students anticipating graduation must submit to the inclement weather or job interviews. If you are Office of the Registrar a degree application. Students unable to attend a class for one of these reasons, are responsible for obtaining a degree application to we ask that you make arrangements with fellow graduate at the Office of the Registrar in sufficient students in the class to audiotape the class for you. time to meet the filing deadline. Students may borrow tape recorders from the Students are responsible for monitoring their Library Circulation Desk. Please note: Some pro• progress to ensure they meet all degree requirements fessors do not allow the audiotaping of their classes hy their anticipated graduation date. Regardless of under any circumstances. The AV Department is the completion of all academic requirements, a required to honor their wishes. degree will not be conferred until the student has a clear student account balance. In addition, tran• Terms and Conditions scripts, diplomas, bar certification and other certifi• The AV Department's capacity to audiotape is cates will not he released if there is an outstanding limited, so requests will be taken on a first-come, student account balance, or a student who has first-served hasis. Please hear in mind that equipment received financial aid has not fulfilled the federal failure and/or human error may affect our ability to requirement for a financial aid exit interview. deliver satisfactory recordings. On the degree application, students provide Tapes of classes made for religious holidays and information necessary to order diplomas and prepare make-up classes will he kept on file for two weeks, the commencement hook: after which they will he erased and reused. Before this occurs, you may listen to the tapes in the AV May graduate: Deadline January 25 Preview Room or the Law Library. Tapes of classes October graduate: Deadline April 19 must he returned the same day they are borrowed February graduate: Deadline November 22 and may not be kept overnight. This is necessary in order to ensure their availability for other students. Audiotaping of Classes, Policy and Procedures If you supply your own blank C-120 cassette, you The Audio Visual (AV) Department adheres to the may use AV's high-speed duplicator to make a copy following policies and procedures regarding the for your personal use. Only students who are cur• audiotaping of class sessions. rently enrolled at the Law Center may use the AV Department's high-speed duplicating equipment. Circumstances Under Which Students Can Ask the This equipment can only he used to duplicate tapes AV Department to Audiotape a Class of Law Center classes. Students can ask the AV Department to audiotape a class if they will miss the class to observe a religious Bar Admissions, Examinations, and Reviews holiday. Please notify the AV Department well in Most states have promulgated rules that govern advance of your needs, as it may not be possible to eligibility to sit for the bar examination and to gain fulfill last minute requests. admission to the bar. In some states, a student is required to register with the bar examiners at the Circumstances Under Which Students Can Ask a commencement of the study of law. Other common Professor to Have a Class Audiotaped requirements pertain to required courses, mini• If a professor schedules a make-up class that con• mum course loads and similar matters. Some states flicts with a student's schedule, the student may ask require completion of courses which are not required the professor to have the make-up class audiotaped. hy the Law Center. Still others require the success• Only the professor may contact the AV Department ful completion of the Multi-State Professional with this request. Responsibility examination prior to sitting for the bar examination. The Audiotaping of Classes Due to Cases of It is the student's responsihility to become famil• Extreme Hardship iar with the rules and procedures, including the If you have a serious medical or family emergency, investigation of character and other qualifications, and want to have a class audiotaped, you must con• that pertain to the state where he or she plans to tact the Assistant Dean's office at 202-662-9039 sit for the bar examination. Early investigation of with your request. They will discuss the situation these matters is important. The Office of the with you and may arrange for class to he audiotaped Registrar has contact information for all state bars in your absence, if appropriate. Only the Assistant and wiU be happy to render what additional assis• Dean's office may contact the AV Department with tance it can. As a rule, questions should he resolved this request. with appropriate authorities at the particular state bar admissions offices. 72 GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES

The Law Center's Ethics Counsel, Michael following calendar day), DO NOT Frisch (202-662-9926), will advise students on constimte a conflict under this rule. issues regarding disclosures for bar applications. (2) for any smdent who has three examina• According to faculty policy, a student should not tions scheduled within four consecutive take a bar examination without the permission of days, or four examinations scheduled the dean until after completion of all law school within five consecutive days. courses. Any fiill time student registering in a bar review course is advised that the total time allowed h. Exam Relief h Smdents may request exam for outside work and a bar review course cannot relief for extraordinary cause. The following exceed twenty hours per week. Any violation of the above rules may result in unfavorable action on an are reasons which will he considered in appeal from a dismissal for academic deficiency. granting relief: (1) Illness of Student. If you are seeking a The Crime Awareness and Campus Security Act deferred examination for medical rea• of 1990 sons, a written medical diagnosis from This law requires the University to prepare infor• your doctor, Smdent Health, the Law mation on current campus law enforcement poli• Center Nurse Practitioner, or emergency cies, crime prevention programs, and campus room is required. All medical certificates security statistics. The information is available are subject to verification and approval. upon request from the Director of Public Safely, Please remember that once you start an exam you Georgetown University Law Center, 600 New must finish it, so if you feel iU hefore beginning, Jersey Avenue, NW, Room 125, Washington, DC please contact the Office of the Registrar. If you 20001-2075, (202) 662-9325. The 2001 edition of become iU during the exam, report to the proctor the Crime Awareness and Campus Security Report immediately and follow his/her directions. is available for review electronically from the Department of Puhlic Safety's web site located at; (2) Death or serious illness in immediate . (3) Automobile accident, mugging, robbery, or similar traumatic experience at the Exam Deferral Policy time of the exam or period immediately The Law Center's rules for deferred examinations preceding the exam. are as follows: (4) Subpoena requiring court appearance at 1. Requests to defer exams will he DENIED if for: the time of exam or period immediately a. Travel, vacation, personal or social plans preceding the exam. b. Employment reasons for fiill time JD smdents (5) Childbirth that interferes with exam or Dates for all examinations are announced at the period immediately preceding the exam time the course schedule is released so that smdents (applies to either parent). may anticipate the dates of their exams and sched• (6) Religious holiday. ule personal, travel, and employment plans that do (7) Military commitment. Written military not interfere with these dates. DO NOT schedule orders are required. any employment or personal travel plans during the (8) Extraordinary family circumstances, such examination period. as the wedding of a sibling. Master of Laws and part time JD students may for unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances 3. Requests for an exam deferral must he in writ• request to have an examination rescheduled for rea• ing. If your file shows that you have previously sons of employment. deferred one or more examinations for reasons other than exam conflicts, another deferred 2. Examinations will he rescheduled for examination will he granted in only the most a. Exam Conflicts extraordinary circumstances. (1) for any smdent who has two examina• tions which BEGIN within 24 hours. 4. Requests for exam relief require satisfactory Examinations which BEGIN 25 hours documentation of the reasons. Students should apart or more (For example, at 9:00 a.m. be prepared to provide complete documentation, on one day and 10:00 a.m. on the which is subject to veriflcation and approval.

^Any student who does not take an examination as originaUy scheduled and who does not obtain permission from the Office of the Registrar to take a deferred examination wiU receive a grade of "F" in the course. Permission to take a deferred examination must be sought and obtained prior to the original administration of the examination. GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES 73

5. Some guidelines the Office of the Registrar or you may report the lost or stolen card to the follows in rescheduling examinations: GOCard Satellite Office. In order to receive your a. No examination will be given earlier than its replacement card, you will need to go to the GOCard original date. Office to get your replacement ID. A replacement card will he issued for a $25 fee. b. An exam conflict does not permit the student to self-schedule examinations. Immunization Records c. The conflicting examination to he changed District of Columbia law requires the Law Center will be determined hy the Office of the to gather medically satisfactory proof of immu• Registrar so as to assist the greatest number nization for a number of diseases (measles, rubella, of students with conflicts, and to minimize the poliomyehtis, mumps, tetanus, and diphtheria) prior number of times each exam is administered. to registration, from all students who are under d. In most cases, the conflicting examination 26 years of age on registration day. The Registrar which carries the lowest number of credits is will provide students with the necessary forms prior changed. to registration. e. Students with self-scheduled take-home examinations are responsible for avoiding Medical insurance conflicts with in-class examinations. The Law Center requires students carrying eight or more credit hours in an academic semester to carry f. Examinations rescheduled because of con• medical insurance throughout the academic year. flicts may he given at any date during the Students may submit proof of private coverage or examination period or on the date listed for may purchase insurance through the University. Plans deferred examinations on the academic are also available for spouse and family coverage. calendar. Georgetown students attending an off-campus program or visiting at another school must provide 6. Changes in student's examination schedule proof of private coverage or they will be covered by If, after the Office of the Registrar has the Georgetown plan and the appropriate charge rescheduled an examination for you, there is a will he posted to their student account. Students material change in a student's examination should contact the Office of Financial Affairs for schedule (i.e., withdrawal from a course, sub• more information. stitution of a take-home examination or a paper option for an in-class examination, etc.) Registration for Courses which would eliminate the conflict, it is the Registration for continuing students takes place in student's responsihility under the Student April each year for the entire upcoming academic Code of Professional Responsibility to notify year. Faculty, deans, and the Registrar are available the Office of the Registrar of the change in for individual academic counseling and provide order to determine whether he or she remains curricular advice at various events throughout the eligible for a rescheduled examination. spring registration period. Course descriptions, schedules and curriculum essays are available in the I.D. Cards Law Center's searchable Online Curriculum Guide at The Georgetown One Card (GOCard) is the . official Georgetown University identification card. Continuing students register online, using Student All students, faculty and staff affiliated with the Access+. Students may adjust their course schedules University need to carry the GOCard for identifica• during the periods announced in the registration tion purposes. The GOCard is used to gain access materials distributed to students early in April. The to Law Center buildings and Library services and registration deadlines are also published in these has a debit account feature, which can he used materials. around campus. Funds can he deposited onto the First year students register during their August card at the Law Center GOCard Satellite Office orientation. (Room 133 McDonough Hall), at various VTS If students register after the published deadlines machines around campus or at the Online Card for registration, they incur a late registration fee of Office located at . $50.00. A student's registration is not processed Items that can be purchased with the GOCard are until all tuition and fees for the semester have been course materials, parking tickets, lockers, laundry in paid in full. Tuition is charged for all courses in the Gewirz Center, vending items and copying. which a student has enrolled until the Office of the Please retain your GOCard throughout your years Registrar receives a written notice of withdrawal. at Georgetown. If your GOCard is lost or stolen, it See Withdrawal Refunds in the Tuition and Fees should be deactivated as soon as possible. You can section of this Bulletin. deactivate your GOCard on-line 24 hours a day at the GOCard web site () 74 GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES

Student Access+ educational interests. A school official can Student Access* allows each student to view and he a person in an administrative, supervisory, print his/her address, class schedule, grades, hilling academic or research, or support staff position statement, and other personal data, and to forward (including law enforcement unit personnel and address changes to the Office of the Registrar. Each health staff); a person or company with whom student is assigned a NETID and temporary pass• the Law Center has contracted (such as an word (which needs to he reset) to gain access to this attorney, auditor, or collection agent); a person information. If you lose or forget your NETID or serving on the Board of Trustees; or a student password, please contact the Office of the Registrar, serving on an official committee, such as the which wiU provide you with a new one. Committee on Professional Responsibility, or assisting another school official in performing Student Records, Academic his or her tasks. A school official has a legiti• In compliance with federal law, the Law Center has mate educational interest if the official needs implemented policies and procedures designed to to review an education record in order to fulfill preserve the confidentiality of a student's academic his or her professional responsibility. records. Unless required by law to do so, the Law Center will not release a student's record except 4) A student has the right to file a complaint with the student's written permission. The policies with the U.S. Department of Education con• governing release of a student's academic records, cerning alleged failures by the Law Center to and the circumstances under which such a record comply with the requirements of FERPA. will be released without the student's written per• The name and address of the Office that mission, may he obtained from the Registrar. administers FERPA are: Family Policy Compliance Office, U.S. Department of Student Records, Access Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW, The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of Washington, DC 20202-4605. 1974 as amended (FERPA) affords students certain rights with respect to their education records: Student Records, Directory Information, and Confidentiality 1) A student has the right to inspect and review Georgetown University Law Center considers the his or her education records within 45 days of following information as "directory information," the day the Law Center receives a request for that is, information that can he made available to access. To do so, a student should submit to the general public: name, address, telephone num• the Registrar a written request that identifies ber, date and place of birth, parents' names, dates of the record(s) he or she wishes to inspect. The attendance, expected graduation date, program of Registrar will make arrangements for access study, degrees and awards received, previous educa• and notify the student of the time and place tional institutions, and participation in extracurricu• where the records may be inspected. lar activities. No other items of student information will he released to any person or organizations outside of 2) A student has the right to request the amend• Georgetown University without the written consent of ment of the education records that the student the student, except for certain categories of outside believes are inaccurate. To do so, a student persons or organizations specifically exempted by should submit to the Registrar a written request federal law. A document listing these exceptions is clearly identifying the part of the record he available at the Office of the Registrar. or she wants changed, and specify why it is Under the provisions of FERPA, students have inaccurate. If the Law Center decides not to the right to instruct the University to withhold even amend the record as requested by the student, the "directory information" hsted above. To do so, the Registrar will notify the student of the students need to fill out a "Request to Prevent decision and advise the student of his or her Disclosure of Directory Information" form available right to a hearing regarding the request for at the Office of the Registrar within the first two amendment. Additional information regarding weeks of the Fall semester. A new form must be the hearing procedures will be provided to the completed each academic year. student when notified of the right to a hearing. Students should consider very carefully the con• sequences of a decision to withhold "Directory 3) A student has the right to consent to disclo• Information," which means that the Law Center sures of personally identifiable information will not release this information and any future contained in the student's education records, requests for such information will be refused, except to the extent that FERPA authorizes unless excepted hy law. The Law Center assumes disclosure without consent. One exception, no liahility for honoring instructions that such which permits disclosure without consent, is information be withheld. disclosure to school officials with legitimate GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES 75

Student Work, Confidentiality Current students who request a transcript in Students who work at the Law Center may he asked person prior to 3:00 p.m. may claim their transcript to sign a confidentiality statement as a condition of after 1:00 p.m. on the next business day. their employment. Transcripts ordered hy mail are usually provided in three business days. Transcripts We regret that we cannot accept telephone The Cffice of the Registrar will provide transcripts authorization to release a transcript, even from the for students upon a written request from the student student. Third party authorization to release a tran• and the payment of a $2.00 fee per transcript. All script or third party requests for a transcript will requests for transcripts must identify the student by not he honored without the student's written social security number and bear the student's signa• authorization. These restrictions are the result of ture. Transcripts may be requested at the Registrar's our concerns for our students' privacy and regula• Counter on the third floor of McDonough Hall, hy tions governing the Law Center under the General mail, or by fax (202) 662-9235. Transcripts will be Education Provisions Act. Transcripts cannot be issued according to the following schedule: released for any student who has an outstanding student account balance.

STUDENT DISCIPLINARY CODE 79 Preamble 79 Part One: Substantive Violations 79 Part Two: Procedures 79 Part Three: Appeals 80 Part Four: Sanctions 80 Part Five: Confidentiality and Reporting 81 Appendix: Plagiarism 81 Endnotes 82

GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY AFFIRMATIVE ACTION GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES TO INVESTIGATE ALLEGATIONS OF UNLAWFUL DISCRIMINATION 82

GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY POLICY STATEMENT ON SEXUAL HARASSMENT 85 GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY POLICY STATEMENT ON CONSENSUAL SEXUAL RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN SENIOR AND JUNIOR MEMBERS OF THE UNIVERSITY COMMUNITY 85

GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY COMPUTER SYSTEMS ACCEPTABLE USE POLICY 88 DISCRIMINATION GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES ADMINISTERED BY OFFICE OF CAREER SERVICES 89

77

CONDUCT POLICIES 79

STUDENT DISCIPLINARY CDDE It will be composed of faculty and students, and the Registrar and Ethics Counsel will be memhers ex Preamble officio. The Committee Chair will be responsible for Students at the Georgetown University Law Center, creating panels from the faculty and student mem• as present and future memhers of a self-regulated hers of the committee to hear disciplinary charges. profession, are required to conduct themselves with Each panel shall consist of two faculty members and the highest degree of honesty, integrity and trust• one student; panels are authorized to act hy majority worthiness. Doubts about the propriety of particular vote. conduct should be resolved in favor of avoiding even the appearance of impropriety. Each matriculating b) The Ethics Counsel will he a memher of the bar student is held to have notice of the high standard and an employee of the University, appointed by the of conduct demanded by the Law Center. A stu• Dean. The Ethics Counsel will investigate and dent's failure to satisfy this standard of conduct in resolve all administrative charges, and prosecute all connection with academic or nonacademic activities disciplinary charges. In every case, the Ethics subjects the student to sanctions under this discipli• Counsel will act in accordance with fairness to the nary code. Jurisdiction is not limited to the territor• accused student, the need for accurate and prompt ial limits of the Law Center or to conduct which resolution of complaints, and the imperative for affects other memhers of the Law Center commu• high standards of honesty hy Georgetown students. nity. Allegations of minor misconduct are processed The Ethics Counsel is not prohibited from acting under the informal provisions of the code governing on information received from any source, including administrative violations. Allegations of more seri• a student seeking advice. The Ethics Counsel ous misconduct, involving a degree of moral offen- should administer his or her duties with careful siveness or untrustworthiness that may call into regard for the educative value of the Code and the question a student's suitability for the practice of rights of students. law, are processed under the more formal provisions of the code governing disciplinary violations. The code is administered by a student-faculty discipli• c) AH students charged with violating the Student nary committee that is guided in its interpretation Disciplinary Code shall have a right to counsel. and implementation by the code's overriding pur• Counsel will he appointed for the student by the pose of promoting among law students the highest Committee Chair from a list of faculty prepared to degree of honesty, integrity and trustworthiness. If he defense counsel maintained hy the Chair. The special circumstances so require, the Law Center student may also be represented for free by any may override the provisions of this code. other full-time faculty memher who agrees to do so. The student also retains the right to retain outside counsel of the student's own choice and at the PART ONE: SUBSTANTIVE VIOLATIONS student's own expense. §101 Standard of Conduct Without regard to motive, intentional student con• §202 Complaints duct that is dishonest, evidences lack of integrity or Complaints of student misconduct may he made by trustworthiness, or may unfairly impinge upon the any member of the academic community. They rights or privileges of members of the Law Center should be filed with the Ethics Counsel, who will Community is prohibited.^ decide whether the complaint should he processed as an administrative or disciplinary charge. The §102 Administrative Violations Ethics Counsel is encouraged to consult with the Prohibited conduct that does not evidence a serious Committee Chair in close cases and may not add lack of honesty, integrity or trustworthiness on the new charges after a complaint is filed without the part of the student engaged in such conduct, consti• approval of the Chair. tutes an administrative violation, hut does not con• stitute a disciplinary violation. §203 Administrative Charges a) Administrative charges shall he promptly investi• §103 Disciplinary Violations gated hy the Ethics Counsel, who has the authority Prohibited conduct that does evidence a serious lack to adjudicate the charge, either hy dismissing it or of honesty, integrity or trustworthiness on the part hy finding a violation and imposing an appropriate of the student engaged in such conduct constitutes a sanction. Before finding a violation, the Ethics disciplinary violation. Counsel must provide the student with notice of the charge and a fair opportunity informally to explain PART TWO: PROCEDURES or defend his or her conduct. If, in the course of the investigation of the alleged administrative violation, §201 General the Ethics Counsel wishes to speak to the student, a) The Professional Responsihility Committee shall the student must be advised of the right to counsel. oversee operation of the Student Disciplinary Code. 80 CONDUCT POLICIES b) The Ethics Counsel shall provide a written report PART THREE: APPEALS to the Associate Dean for the JD or Graduate §301 General Programs, as appropriate, explaining the disposition of each administrative charge, including dismissals. Only appeals from final dispositions are permitted. Such reports should not become part of any official No appeals from agreed dispositions approved by a student record, nor should they fall within the scope hearing panel are permitted. of outside requests for disciplinary information about particular students.^ §302 Administrative Appeals Within 15 calendar days of the Ethics Counsel's finding of an administrative violation, a student may §204 Disciplinary Charges seek discretionary appeal to the Committee Chair a) Disciplinary charges shall be promptly investi• hy written notice to the Registrar as outlined in gated hy the Ethics Counsel, who may dismiss the §304. An appeal may he taken only on the grounds charges, reach an agreed disposition with the stu• that the penalty is disproportionately severe to those dent, or prosecute the charges hefore a hearing imposed on other students for similar conduct. panel. If, in the course of the investigation of the alleged disciplinary violation, the Ethics Counsel §303 Disciplinary Appeals wishes to speak to the student, the student must Within 15 calendar days after a hearing panel decides first be advised of the right to counsel. a disciplinary charge, either party may appeal in writing to the full Professional Responsihility h) If the Ethics Counsel does not dismiss a discipli• Committee. If an appeal is lodged, the other party nary charge, the Ethics Counsel must promptly shall he notified and given 10 days to file a written notify the student of the pendency of the charge response. The Committee may hear from the parties and advise him or her of the right to counsel. The in person at its discretion. The only grounds for right to counsel attaches at this stage. appeal are a serious misreading of the disciplinary code, gross insufficiency of the evidence, or a gross c) If the Ethics Counsel dismisses the charge, the impropriety that tainted the proceedings. Ethics Counsel shall submit a brief written report to the Committee Chair and responsible Associate §304 Procedure for Filing an Appeal Dean, describing the complaint and the reason for The only written document that will he required for the dismissal. all appeals will be a written notice indicating the date the appeal is filed with the Registrar, the ruling d) If the Ethics Counsel and the student agree to a being appealed, the discipline code authority for the disposition of the charge, it must he memorialized appeal and the entity or person to whom the appeal in writing and submitted to the Committee Chair is taken. The Registrar shall notify the Ethics for approval or rejection. The Ethics Counsel shall Counsel, the Committee Chair and the reviewing report approved dispositions to the responsible entity of the pendency of the appeal. Appeals shall Associate Dean. In cases in which the Committee he presented orally with written presentations used Chair rejects the disposition, the matter shall be to the extent practicable. Appeals shall be heard as referred to a hearing panel. promptly as possible consistent with protecting the rights of the charged student. e) If the Ethics Counsel prosecutes a charge before a disciplinary panel, the Ethics Counsel must pre• §305 Advisory Opinions sent a written complaint to the Committee Chair If the Ethics Counsel or the chairperson is uncer• and to the charged student. The panel must conduct tain whether charged conduct, if proven, constitutes a fair hearing and decide the complaint only upon a serious offense, he or she may ask for an advisory the evidence presented. However, formal rules of opinion from the full committee. The ex parte rul• evidence will not apply and procedural irregularities ing shall control the charging process and the track should he considered only when they result in actual determination. prejudice.^ The hearing panel may acquit the stu• dent, or find the student guilty of a disciplinary or administrative violation and impose an appropriate PART FOUR: SANCTIONS sanction. The hearing panel may convict only upon §401 General clear and convincing evidence of a violation. The Sanctions shall be appropriate to the nature and hearing panel should submit to the Committee severity of the violations to which they attach.'* Chair and responsible Associate Dean a brief writ• When possible, sanctions should seek to educate the ten report explaining its disposition. Convictions student about the nature and importance of honesty and approved dispositions of disciplinary charges and mutual respect. Community service may consti• normally become part of the student's official tute all or part of any sanction. record. Disciplinary charges resulting in acquittals should not appear in a student's official record. CONDUCT POLICIES 81

§402 Administrative Sanctions practice of law. In the presentation of written work, The Ethics Counsel may estahlish, in consultation such honesty is the soul of academic integrity and, with the Associate Deans, schedules of grade reduc• for the lawyer, at the heart of credible and effective tions and/or community service for administrative assistance of counsel. The damage to reputation violations other than late submission of take-home (and to a cause) which springs from deceit in the exams. Late submission of take-home exams will be presentation of ideas will commonly prove both subject to the following penally scale: Take-home devastating and enduring. One becomes known as exams that are submitted from 6 to 15 minutes late untruthful, or at least untrustworthy, and in either will receive a one-step grade reduction (e.g., from A case careless of the rights of others. These are to A-); exams submitted 16 to 30 minutes late will contingencies devoutly to be avoided. receive a twostep reduction (e.g., from A to B+); This notion of deceit is not easily translated into exams submitted 31 to 45 minutes late will receive a an all-inclusive description of plagiarism. The Law threestep reduction (e.g., from A to B); exams sub• Center, therefore, has not attempted a definition so mitted 46 to 60 minutes late will receive a four-step meticulously crafted as to be worthy of inclusion in reduction (e.g., from A to B-); if an exam is submit• a criminal code. But surely some central proposi• ted over 60 minutes late the student will receive a D tions are declarable, and understandable, and no in the course if the instructor determines that the student can fail to he aware of the broad thrust of exam is entitled to a passing grade. Under this scale, the notion that the work of others must never be there is a 5 minute grace period, and the maximum claimed as one's own. reduction for any late exam that receives a passing Here are several of those propositions. The use grade will be a D. There will be no deviation from of another's work typically takes the form of either a this scale except in the case of bona fide, documented direct quotation, where the other author's exact medical or other emergencies to be determined hy words are used, or a paraphrasing, where the true the Dean or delegated Associate Dean. author's ideas or language are recast in the words of the borrower. Both these forms require that he or §403 Disciplinary Sanctions she who thus uses the work of another person give Any appropriate sanction may be imposed for a dis• adequate credit to that person. Perhaps as important ciplinary violation, including expulsion, suspension, as the fact that the credit is given is the manner in failing grades, and transcript notation. which it is given. Where exact words are used, they must be designated as a quotation (quotation marks PART FIVE: CONFIDENTIALITY AND REPORTING or indentation) and footnoted in the obligatory form, identifying source and precise page of loca• §501 Confidentiality tion. Similar attribution is called for in the use of Confidentiality shall be maintained with respect to charts, tables, diagrams, and like presentations of all proceedings under this code, except that students rather more visual evidence, when originated hy charged with disciplinary violations have a right to a someone else. Paraphrasing too demands that the puhlic hearing if they so desire. paraphraser candidly and fuUy account for the deriva• tion of that which the paraphraser has reworded. §502 Central Reporting As a general proposition, prolonged paraphrasing is Notwithstanding the requirement of confidentiality, to be discouraged, hut when lengthy paraphrasing convictions involving suspension or expulsion may, does occur the true source is not sufficiently cited to the extent permitted by law, he reported to a cen• when it is cited only at the end, and generally. The tral collection service such as the Law School Data rule should rather be that each discreet subportion Assembly Service for use by other schools. of the material thus used receive its own recogni• tion, in quite precise form, including page citation. §503 Publication Of course, matters of general knowledge, and The disciplinary committee shall publicize, without terms so commonly employed as to have entered the identifying details, the results of its disciplinary puhlic domain need not he footnoted,' just as this proceedings. In addition, each year the disciplinary brief essay does not footnote the widely recognized committee shall publish, in summary form and truths appearing in the foregoing lines. But we without identifying details, a report disclosing the strongly agree that, in any case involving the slight• number of cases handled during the previous year, est doubt, you will he better served to grant rather and the nature and disposition of each case. Copies than to withhold recognition of your dependency on of reports and memoranda issued by the committee the work of another. Attributions that are arguably are available for inspection by students from the unnecessary in these marginal instances will at the Office of the Registrar and the library. very least direct the reader to material which could he useful, and so advance the possibility for learning. APPENDIX: PLAGIARISM Finally, note that plagiarism can be said to have Every law student must grasp the overriding occurred without any affirmative showing that the importance of scrupulous honesty in the study and student's use of another's work was intentional. 82 CONDUCT POLICIES

Intent is presumed in any disciplinary case where comply with an administrative or disciplinary sanc• the source of the material is both plain and unat- tion; and attempting or conspiring to commit an act tributed. It will be for the affected student to prohibited by the code. The examples are provided demonstrate that the copying or restatement was, hy way of illustration only. Whether or not particu• in any such case, innocent. lar conduct is prohibited is determined by the stan• Forewarned is forearmed (no citation needed). dard of conduct imposed under §101, not by whether it falls within the scope of the foregoing ENDNOTES nonexhaustive examples. 1. The fact that conduct is negligent or motivated by a benign purpose does not preclude that conduct 2. The Law Center does not have complete control from being intentional, as long as the student over what information will be called for by bar intended the act upon which the charge is based. admission's character committees and others outside Unintentional acts that nevertheless result in unfair• the institution. The Law Center will, however, ness do not come within the scope of this code but, consistent with its obligation for candor, seek to rather, are handled by the dean and the Law Center prevent administrative violations from becoming a administration. Nonexhaustive examples of prohib• permanent stain on a student's record. ited conduct include: plagiarism (see Appendix: Plagiarism), cheating or assisting another student to 3. Charged students shall be accorded the basic cheat in connection with an examination or assign• components of procedural fairness, including a copy ment; unauthorized breach of anonymity in connec• of the complaint, advance notice of the identities of tion with a blind-graded examination; possession or adverse witnesses, the right to present relevant evi• use of unauthorized materials in connection with an dence, the right to cross-examine adverse witnesses, examination or assignment; failure to follow the the right to forego a hearing hy admitting guilt, instructions given for an examination or assignment, the right to admit guilt but nevertheless appeal such as unauthorized communication with other jurisdiction or sanction, the right to request a par• students, possession or use of unauthorized material, ticular sanction, and the right to place in the record or failure to stop work at the prescribed time; the student's own comment on committee action. receiving, providing, requesting or offering to pro• vide unauthorized information concerning a 4. A nonexhaustive list of authorized sanctions, in deferred examination or assignment; unauthorized order of increasing severity includes: warning; repri• use of another student's work; unauthorized use of a mand; probation, with or without conditions such as student's own work for multiple purposes; unautho• counseling; additional work such as writing extra rized use, concealment or removal of library hooks papers, or accumulating extra credits in order to or other University property; and neglect or abuse graduate; grade or credit reduction; imposition of a with respect to a clinic client. failing grade; suspension with or without automatic reinstatement; expulsion; and withdrawal of a degree. Prohibited conduct also includes: misrepresenta• Administrative and disciplinary officials are encour• tion in connection with an application for admission aged to formulate additional sanctions appropriate to the Law Center or for financial aid; misrepresen• to particular violations. When authorized, tran• tation in connection with a Law Center course, script notation may he required to satisfy the Law assignment, or competition; and misrepresentation Center's obligation of candor to those outside the Law on a transcript, or in connection with an application Center community. Accordingly, transcript notation for employment or bar admission. Misrepresentation can accompany both mild and severe sanctions, or includes submitting a resume which lists journal it can he imposed as a sanction in and of itself. membership without specifying a date of termina• tion, if the student or graduate resigned or was sus• pended from the journal. The code prohibits the 5. See Comment, Plagiarism in Legal Scholarship, use, transfer, possession and/or sale of illegal drugs 15 Toledo L. Rev. 233, 235 n. 12 (1983). on campus. In addition, conduct that may be inde• pendently illegal, for example, theft, destruction or GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY AFFIRMATIVE ACTION mutilation of properly, assault, sexual harassment, GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES TO INVESTIGATE ALLEGATIONS OF DISCRIMINATION and sexual assault, is also prohibited by the code to the extent that it interferes with the rights and priv• Introduction ileges of members of the Law Center community or Georgetown University recognizes and accepts its it calls into question the student's suitability to the responsibilities to act in accordance with the practice of law. University's Affirmative Action Plan, federal laws The code also prohihits unauthorized refusal to and regulations and the District of Columbia cooperate with the disciplinary committee; failure to Human Rights Act. Therefore, the University has maintain required confidentiality in connection with established this grievance procedure to review, administrative or disciplinary proceedings; failure to investigate, and resolve allegations of unlawful CONDUCT POLICIES 83 discrimination on the hasis of age, color, sex, Princlpio of Non-Rotallatlon including sexual harassment, disahility, marital status, The University strongly encourages any victims of national origin, race, religion, family responsihility, unlawful discrimination to report the incident and personal appearance, matriculation, political affiliation seek redress, if he or she is unable to resolve it satis• or sexual orientation. factorily and completely through informal means. This internal Affirmative Action Grievance The University recognizes the unusual burden that Procedure provides a mechanism for aggrieved the alleged discriminatory conduct places on the employees to receive a fair hearing on issues of dis• recipient and acknowledges the necessity for a thor• crimination. Complainants, respondents and wit• ough and careful resolution of all reported cases. It nesses who participate in this process are bound by is illegal and contrary to University policy for any rules of confidentiality. Employees are required to individual to engage, whether directly or indirectly, exhaust these procedures with regard to any grievance in retaliatory conduct against a person who files a hefore pursuing remedies outside the University discrimination complaint or gives testimony during with any external enforcement agencies including the an investigation of such a complaint. As used in this District of Columbia Human Rights Commission, paragraph, "retaliatory conduct" means conduct that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, adversely and unjustifiably affects another's terms the Office of Civil Rights of the Department of and conditions of employment, educational experi• Education and the Department of Labor. ence, or quality of life, and that is motivated by an It is a violation of this policy to file a discrimina• intent to cause harm because of the targeted indi• tion complaint for the purpose of injuring the repu• vidual's involvement in the filing or investigation of tation or causing harm to another person. Without a discrimination complaint. Any student or minimizing the injury that can he suffered by the employee who believes that retaliatory actions have victim of discrimination, the University also recog• been taken against him or her for having filed a nizes that the filing of a discrimination complaint can complaint or provided testimony in an investigation have serious consequences for the person accused of of discrimination may seek redress through the discrimination. That person, too, has rights that the Affirmative Action Office. policy on discrimination must preserve and protect. A person who abuses this policy hy filing a frivolous Procedures for Processing Grievances complaint wiU himself or herself be subject to disci• pline if the Affirmative Action Office determines that Step I. Informal Conciliation the complaint was filed in had faith. This provision 1) The Affirmative Action Office shall receive the is not meant in any way to discourage legitimate complaint, assist the complainant in defining the complaints. charge and completing the grievance form. The University will continue to promote affirma• 2) The Affirmative Action Office shall appraise the tive action in all areas of the University. Successful respondent and his/her administrative officer of the efforts in this area will contribute to an improved charge and its supporting documents, assist them in environment in which to work. The University interpreting the charge, and suggest a format for believes that this non-adversarial grievance procedure responding to the charge. will benefit students, faculty, staff and administrators, and wiU make "Affirmative Action/Equal Employment Opportunity" a reality at this institution. 3) The Affirmative Action Office shall have thirty (30) working days to resolve the complaint informally and shall have the right to all necessary information Requirements for Filing Grievances to do so and to interview witnesses including the 1) Any applicant for employment, current or former right to bring together complainant and respondent, employee (hereinafter referred to as complainant), if desirable. If a mutually acceptable resolution is of Ceorgetown University has a right to file a dis• achieved through the efforts of the /Affirmative crimination complaint with the Affirmative Action Action Office, the case shall he closed. A written Office. notice shall list findings and indicate the agreement reached, and shall he signed and dated hy the com• 2) Complainants must file a grievance in writing plainant, the respondent, and a staff memher of the within 120 days following the alleged discriminatory Affirmative Action Office, and copies provided to act or the date on which the complainant knew or both the complainant and respondent. If the evidence reasonably should have known the act. supports a finding that there is no hasis for a charge of illegal discrimination, the Affirmative Action 3) A grievance must be filed with the Affirmative Office shall indicate this conclusion to the com• Action Office at G-10 Darnall Hall. plainant, advising him/her that the case is closed. If conciliation is not possible, the Affirmative Further Provisions on Time Limits Action Office shall so notify hoth complainant and All of the time limits contained within this grievance respondent in writing, and shall advise complainant procedure may be extended. 84 CONDUCT POLICIES

of his/her right to proceed to the formal step of a 6) Within 45 working days from its formation, the University hearing. The complainant shall have ten Ad-Hoc Grievance Panel shall submit its findings (10) working days to advise the Affirmative Action to the Special Assistant to the President for Office of his/her desire to have a hearing. Affirmative Action Programs for review. This offi• cial shall forward the panel's findings and the hack- Step II. Formal Hearing ground documentation to the appropriate Executive 1) If the complainant requests a formal hearing, the Vice President or Vice President for Administrative Affirmative Action Office shall send written notifi• Services for review and comment. After this offi• cation to the appropriate Executive Vice President cial approves the panel's recommendations, the or the Vice President for Administrative Services, Affirmative Action Office shall forward the find• the respondent and his/her administrative officer. ings to the complainant, respondent and his/her This notification shall include a copy of the charge administrative officer. naming the complainant and respondent, a descrip• tion of the nature of the complaint, and other written 7) If the panel sustains the complainant's grievance documents pertaining to the case. the Affirmative Action Office shall monitor the Panel's recommendation. The appropriate Executive 2) The Affirmative Action Office shall then estab• Vice President or Vice President for Administrative lish a three member Ad-Hoc Affirmative Action Services shall ensure that the Panel's recommenda• Grievance Panel selected from the Equal Opportunity tions are smoothly implemented and that no retalia• Examining Board made up of Georgetown University tory actions are taken against the complainant or administrators, faculty and staff. Grievances involv• respondent. ing discriminatory denials of tenure, promotion or reappointment of faculty members shall be heard by Student Employment Grievances panels composed of faculty or academic administra• Georgetown University students who are also full- tors only. The three member Ad-Hoc Affirmative time or part-time employees of the University, in Action Grievance Panel shall he selected in the their employee capacity, are subject and entitled to following manner: the preceding grievance procedures. If the student The complainant shall select one member of the employee initiates his/her discrimination com• Equal Opportunity Examining Board, and the plaint with the academic Dean or Department respondent shall select another. The Affirmative Chairperson, the Dean or Department Chairperson Action Office shall convene a meeting of these two win transfer the case to the Affirmative Action selected panelists who shall choose the third member Office for resolution. to form the Ad-Hoc Affirmative Action Grievance Panel. Student Grievances in Academic and Non-Employment Matters 3) A memher of the Affirmative Action Office The grievance procedures in this document to shall present the details of the complaint to the review, investigate and resolve allegations of unlaw• panel memhers who shall be asked to disqualify ful discrimination on the basis of age, color, sex, themselves if they have prior knowledge of the including sexual harassment, disability, marital sta• complaint, the circumstances surrounding the inci• tus, national origin, race, religion, family responsi• dents, or any other reason which might prevent bility, personal appearance, matriculation, political them from rendering an impartial decision. affiliation or sexual orientation, do not apply to stu• dent complaints in strictly academic areas, nor do 4) The Special Assistant to the President for these procedures refer to students in non-employ• Affirmative Action Programs, or a designee shall ment relationships. Special procedures have been present all documents relevant to the complaint, established by all of the University's colleges and instruct them in effective investigative processes, schools to resolve academic concerns. The matters and ensure that they thoroughly understand the should he discussed first with the Dean of the process. The panel shall be charged formally with its school. The student may submit formal written responsibility to investigate the complaint, issue its complaint to the Dean, and a copy of this written findings including recommendation for corrective formal complaint must be sent to the Special action if warranted. A staff memher of the Assistant to the President for Affirmative Action Affirmative Action Office shall be present at all Programs, so that the Affirmative Action Office deliberations of the Ad-Hoc Grievance Panel. may be informed of the complaint. The procedures for discrimination complaints are listed in the official school publications of the individual University's 5) The Ad-Hoc Grievance Panel shall have the colleges and schools. right to all relevant information and to interview witnesses, including the right to bring together complainant and respondent. CONDUCT POLICIES 85

GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY POLICY STATEMENT community, who wishes to file a complaint of sexual ON SEXUAL HARASSMENT harassment. The process is administered hy trained This Policy on Sexual Harassment will be widely counselors in the Office of Affirmative Action disseminated to members of the University commu• Programs. Students, faculty memhers, or non- nity, and will he consistently enforced. The policy teaching academic employees who believe that they will be reexamined, updated as appropriate, and dis• have been sexually harassed and wish either addi• tributed regularly to all students, faculty, and staff. tional information or assistance in filing a complaint For the purposes of this policy, sexual harassment is can contact Rosemary Kilkenny, Esq., Special defined as any unwelcome sexual advance, request Assistant to the President for Affirmative Action for sexual favors or other verbal or physical conduct Programs. Staff employees seeking information or of a sexual nature when: assistance can contact Sara A. Amiryar, Associate Director or Michael Smith, Associate Director. The A. Submission to such conduct is made explicitly Affirmative Action Programs Office is located at or implicitly a term or condition of an individual's G-10 DarnaU Hall. The telephone number is (202) employment or academic advancement; or 687-4798. B. Submission to or rejection of such conduct is used as a basis for making an employment or GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY POLICY STATEMENT academic decision affecting an individual; or ON CONSENSUAL SEXUAL RELATIONSHIPS' BETWEEN SENIOR AND JUNIOR MEMBERS OF C. Such conduct has the purpose or effect of THE UNIVERSITY COMMUNITY interfering with an individual's work or educa• tional performance, or of creating an intimi• I. Introduction dating, hostile, or offensive environment for There are various approaches an institution could work or learning. take to address the issue of consensual sexual rela• tionships between a "senior" and "junior" person Sexual harassment may involve the behavior of a {see definitions below). One extreme is to ban all person of either gender toward a person of the same such relationships. The other is to pretend such or opposite gender when that behavior falls within relationships do not exist. The University has taken the operative definition of sexual harassment. a middle ground on this policy. Sexual harassment is especially serious when it The policy not only points out the potential occurs between teachers and students or supervisors legal and ethical pitfalls of consensual sex in the and subordinates. In such situations, sexual harass• University setting, hut also, and more specifically in ment unfairly exploits the power inherent in a faculty the section called Standards and Procedures asserts member's or supervisor's position. Although sexual the University's right to protect the integrity of its harassment often occurs when one person takes own operations from the conflicts of interest and advantage of a position of authority over another, disruptions in the academic and employment the University recognizes that sexual harassment environments that can arise from consensual sexual may also occur between people of equivalent status. activity involving members of the University Regardless of the form it may take, the University community. will not tolerate conduct of a sexual nature that creates an unacceptable working or educational environment. II. The Nature of the Prohlem Consensual sexual relationships between "senior" and It is contrary to University policy for the University "junior" members of the Georgetown community— or any officer, administrator, dean, department chair, that is, between two persons where one party (the faculty memher, or any other employee to base an "senior") possesses direct academic, administrative, adverse academic or employment-related action counseling, or extracurricular authority over the affecting a person on an unsubstantiated allegation other (the "junior")—do not violate laws prohibit• or remor of sexual harassment. ing sex-hased discrimination.^ Nevertheless, such The University recognizes that supervisors hear relationships are a matter of significant concern to an important responsihility to deter sexual harassment, the University because of the ethical and adminis• to investigate any such allegation that is brought to trative problems they can pose. Those problems are their attention and if warranted, to consult with the the most severe when a consensual relationship Office of Affirmative Action Programs about the takes places between a teacher (e.g. professor, teach• situation. In addition, the Supervisor must report the ing assistant, clinical fellow) and a student and the matter to a higher authority responsible for ensuring student is enrolled in one of the teacher's courses for a prompt review and taking strong remedial action. which the student will receive a grade, or when the The "Grievance Procedures to Investigate Allegations student is likely to he enrolled in such a course in of Unlawful Discrimination", administered by the the future. These problems can also he very severe Affirmative Action Office, is a confidential process in a counseling setting between counselors and that is available to any memher of the University counselees. Given the potential for such problems, 86 CONDUCT POLICIES the University strongly recommends that members the reality of a conflict of interest on the part of of the University community avoid any senior-junior both parties to the relationship. Others may believe consensual sexual relationships. This recommenda• that the senior favors the junior because of the tion has particular force with regard to undergradu• sexual relationship, thus creating an atmosphere of ate students. At Georgetown University, virtually suspicion and resentment among other juniors who all undergraduate students are between the ages of think the junior in the relationship is obtaining eighteen and twenty-two, and many are living away undeserved benefits. The junior person's professional from home for the first time. Because of the unique reputation or academic standing may he injured susceptibility of these young men and women, because of the perception that the benefits were due teaching professionals are under a special obligation to the sexual relationship, rather than to the junior's to preserve the integrity of the teacher-student own work or study. relationship in situations involving undergraduate There is also a serious risk that either party may students. If memhers of the community choose hy exploit the other. The senior person may be inter• mutual consent to enter into such relationships, ested in the junior solely for the purposes of sexual however, the University requires that they take spe• gratification, hut the junior may construe that atten• cific steps to minimize the problems that may arise tion as related to the junior's intellect, as revealed from them. Sanctions shall he commensurate with through his or her studies or work. If the junior par• the magnitude of the harm, if any, caused. ticipates in a sexual relationship and then discovers the true situation, there is a potential for a damag• The Problems ing loss of self-esteem by the junior (especially where There are many ways problems can arise when a the two are teacher and young student and there is a senior member of the Georgetown community significant age disparity between them). There is engages in a consensual sexual relationship with a also the risk of the junior exploiting the senior. For junior memher. First, when one person has the example, a junior might seek out a relationship ability to grade, advance, promote, recommend, or solely because of a desire to obtain some academic otherwise influence the employment or academic or employment benefit from the relationship (such status of the other, there is the possibility that as a higher grade or a promotion).'* what appears to he a consensual relationship is falsely perceived to be so. Some recipients of sexual III. Standards and Procedures advances may fear that refusal will result in loss of For the reasons expressed in the previous section of employment or academic benefit. They may go this Policy, the University strongly urges members along with the requested relationship even though of the University community to refrain from it is in fact unwelcome to them (and may even engaging in consensual sexual relationships with cause them psychological harm). The United States another member of the University community Supreme Court has ruled that such a person is a when one person possesses direct authority over victim of illegal sexual harassment, and that a the other, whether that authority is used by one school can be liable for monetary damages for a who is a teacher, counselor, or supervisor of the teacher's coercive intercourse with a student.' Apart other or hy someone who can directly influence the from a policy of avoiding legal liahility for such academic or work status of the other (e.g., a senior conduct, the University wants to ensure that it pro• professor serving as memher of the tenure commit• vides an environment free from sexual coercion and tee for a junior professor, a professor serving as the intimidation in which to study and work. thesis advisor for a graduate student, a senior student The person in the position of authority who may on the editorial hoard of a newspaper or a journal desire a sexual relationship with a junior neverthe• voting whether a junior student should attain the less has strong reasons to avoid it, since what seems same status, a supervisor filling out a performance initially to be consensual may turn out to be unwel• evaluation for his or her subordinate). come or coercive from the perspective of the junior If the two nevertheless commence such a rela• participant. The junior participant may file an inter• tionship, the University requires that they take the nal grievance or a formal lawsuit, creating a risk that following measures, in order to lessen or minimize the person in authority will suffer negative career the conflict of interest and disruption of the acade• consequences and may have to pay damages to the mic and employment environment that can arise in victim. Because of the serious consequences to the such situations. The University emphasizes that the senior participant, that person also subjects himself following measures cannot eliminate entirely the or herself to the possibility of coercion or blackmail. substantial likelihood of conflict and disruption, and Even when such a relationship is genuinely con• that the course of action strongly preferred by the sensual (and therefore does not constitute sexual University would he for the two to refrain from harassment or raise the other concerns noted above), engaging in consensual sexual relations for as long the relationship can cause problems for both parties as necessary to prevent conflict and disruption. and harm the academic and work environment at the University. There is the appearance and often CONDUCT POLICIES 87

(1) Relationships between Teachers and Students of the teaching professional's department; and in The University has determined that there is an the case of other individuals covered hy this section, inherent conflict of interest when a faculty memher by the appropriate director or other supervisory offi• and a student simultaneously maintain both a direct cial, including the Senior Vice President for student-teacher relationship and a consensual sexual Georgetown University. But in the case of a student relationship, and therefore prohibits simultaneous violating these procedures, sanctions shall he deter• participation in hoth roles. Thus, if one party to a mined by the appropriate Dean on that student's consensual sexual relationship is a student of the campus. other person in a course for which the student will receive a grade, the student should immediately (B) The imposition of any sanction imposed under withdraw from the course and should never again this Policy may be subject to review under any take a course with that teacher. In such case it is the applicable provision of an established University duty of the teacher to take all steps, including if grievance procedure. necessary consultation with the appropriate Dean, to assure that the student's enrollment in the course Endnotes is promptly terminated. If the student is not cur• 1. This policy does not apply to married couples. rently enrolled in any of the teacher's courses when The pohcy on nepotism offers clarification on this the relationship begins, the student should refrain point. This policy does not replace The Benefit of this from taking any future course with the teacher. The Establishment: A Student Code of Conduct. policy of not taking courses with the teacher should continue even after the relationship has ceased. 2. "Consensual" means a sexual relationship between two people who both genuinely desire the relation• (2) Counselors and Counselees ship and neither of whom is coerced into having the Because of the potential for emotional harm, indi• relationship. The term "consensual" is used through• viduals should not engage in both a consensual sex• out this document to mean such a relationship. ual relationship and an official counselor/counselee "Extracurricular" refers to participation in extracur• relationship. If a consensual sexual relationship ricular student activities such as a student newspaper commences during an official relationship, the offi• or law review. A "senior" student is sometimes in a cial relationship should immediately he terminated position to influence whether a "junior" student wiU and never be started again. Similarly individuals in, gain some desired position within the organization. or who have been in a consensual sexual relation• ship should thereafter never enter into an official 3. Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson 477 U.S. 57 counseling relationship. (1986); Franklin v. Gwinnett County Puhlic Schools, 503 U.S. 60 (1992) (unlimited damages). Title VII (3) All Other Senior-Junior Relationships of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the In any other situation where a senior has direct Civil Rights Act of 1991, now provides for mone• authority over a junior, and can thus advance, pro• tary damages for victims of sexual harassment in mote, recommend, or in any other way directly federal employment discrimination suits as well. influence the academic or work status of the junior, 42 U.S.C. § § 1981a(a), (b)(3) (maximum damages of the senior person should recuse himself or herself $300,000 for employers more than 500 employees). from any decision involving the status of the junior.' See also Harris v. Forklift Systems, 510 U.S. 17 If the fact of refusal causes the senior to experience (1993). difficulty with a superior, the senior should explain the reason for the refusal to the person in authority. 4. A number of problems analogous to those The senior's obligation to explain also exists where described in this section affect consensual sexual an unexplained failure to participate might create an relationships among members of the University inference of a negative evaluation of the junior by the senior. community of relatively equal status, but these rules do not apply to this behavior, which may become subject to disciplinary action for other reasons. IV. Sanctions for Violations of this Policy; Review; Other Limitations 5. For example, a senior faculty member who has (A) Any teaching professional who violates the had a relationship with a junior faculty member procedures in Part III of this Policy, or any other should not participate in the deliberations of a individual engaged in a consensual sexual relation• tenure committee concerning the junior, or on an ship who violates any of the procedures in Part III academic personnel committee deciding such issues of this Policy, shall he subject to sanctions commen• as salary increases for the junior. Similarly, a teacher surate with the severity of the offense. The sanction should not provide a letter of recommendation for a shall he determined in the case of a teaching profes• student with whom the teacher has had a relationship sional, hy the appropriate Dean or Executive Vice President, after consultation with the chair, if any. even if the relationship began after the course was 88 CONDUCT POLICIES

completed (and thus did not violate the University University. When used appropriately, these tools can policy on teacher-student relationships.) Another enhance dialog and communications. When used example is that a senior student on a student publi• unlawfully or inappropriately, however, these tools cation editorial board should not vote on whether a can infringe on the beliefs or rights of others. junior student with whom the senior has had a rela• tionship should be promoted to the editorial hoard. Responsibilities The following examples, though not covering every GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY COMPUTER SYSTEMS situation, specify some of the responsibilities that ACCEPTABLE USE POLICY accompany computer use at Georgetown and/or on networks to which Georgetown is connected. [Note: Please check for updates to this policy.] 1. Users may not attempt to modify the University system or network facilities or attempt to crash This policy is designed to guide students, faculty, systems. They should not tamper with any soft• and staff in the acceptable use of computer and ware protections or restrictions placed on computer information systems and networks provided by applications or files. Georgetown University. More importantly, it is meant as an application of the principles of respect 2. Users may use only their own computer accounts. and reverence for every person that are at the core Users may not supply false or misleading data nor of Georgetown's Catholic, Jesuit identity. improperly obtain another's password in order to gain access to computers or network systems, data Guiding Principles or information. The negUgence or naivete of an The Georgetown University community is encour• other user in revealing an account name or password aged to make innovative and creative use of infor• is not considered authorized use. Convenience of mation technologies in support of education and file or printer sharing is not sufficient reason for research. Access to information representing a mul• sharing a computer account. Users should not titude of views on current and historical issues attempt to subvert the restrictions associated with should be allowed for the interest, information and their computer accounts. enlightenment of the Georgetown University com• 3. munity. Consistent with other University policies, Users are responsible for all use of their computer this policy is intended to respect the rights and account(s). They should make appropriate use of the ohligations of academic freedom. The University system and network-provided protection feamres recognizes that the purpose of copyright is to pro• and take precautions against others obtaining access tect the rights of the creators of intellectual property to their computer resources. Individual password and to prevent the unauthorized use or sale of works security is the responsibility of each user. available in the private sector. Also consistent with 4. Users may not encroach on others' use of com• other University policies, an individual's right of puter resources. Such activities would include, hut access to computer materials should not be denied are not limited to, tying up computer resources for or abridged because of race, creed, color, age, national excessive game playing or other trivial applications; origin, gender, sexual orientation, or disability. sending harassing messages; sending frivolous or The University cannot protect individuals against excessive messages, including chain letters, junk the existence or receipt of material that may he mail, and other types of broadcast messages, either offensive to them. As such, those who make use of locally or over the Internet; using excessive amounts electronic communications are warned that they of storage; intentionally introducing any computer may come across or he recipients of material they viruses, worms, Trojan Horses, or other rogue pro• find offensive. Those who use e-mail and/or make grams to Georgetown University hardware or sofiware; information ahout themselves available on the physically damaging systems; or running grossly Internet should be forewarned that the University inefficient programs when efficient ones are availahle. cannot protect them from invasions of privacy and 5. Users are responsible for making use of software other possible dangers that could result from the and electronic materials in accordance with copy• individual's distribution of personal information. right and licensing restrictions and applicable uni• Georgetown University computing and network versity policies. Georgetown University equipment resources are to he used only for University-related and software may not be used to violate copyright research, instruction, learning, enrichment, dissemi• or the terms of any license agreement. No one may nation of scholarly information, and administrative inspect, modify, distribute, or copy proprietary data, activities. The computing and network facilities of t directories, programs, files, disks or other software he University are limited and should he used wisely without proper authorization. and carefully with consideration for the needs of others. Computers and network systems offer power• 6. Users must remember that information distrib• ful tools for communications among members of uted through the University's computing and net• the community and of communities outside the working facilities is a form of publishing, and some CONDUCT POLICIES 89 of the same standards apply. For example, anything because of age, color, gender, handicap or disability, generated at GU that is available on the Internet national origin, race, religion, and sexual orientation; represents GU and not just an individual. Even with to prohibit sexual harassment; and to promote the disclaimers, the University is represented hy its stu• realization of equality of opportunity in education dents, faculty and staff, and appropriate language, and employment throughout the Law Center in behavior and style is warranted. accordance with the pohcy expressed in the University- wide Affirmative Action Plan. Administration and Implementation This internal grievance procedure has been estab• The University encourages all members of its com• lished to provide a mechanism for any Law Center munity to use electronic communications in a man• degree candidate who beheves that under the standards ner that is respectful to others. While respecting stated in the above policy he or she has been the users' confidentiality and privacy, the University subject of discrimination by a prospective employer reserves the right to examine all computer files. The recruiting students to fUl part-time, temporary and University takes this step to enforce its policies full-time positions. regarding harassment and the safety of individuals; to prevent the posting of proprietary software or Requirements for Filing Grievances electronic copies of electronic texts or images in Any degree candidate, enrolled as a student at the disregard of copyright restrictions or contractual Law Center when the alleged discriminatory act obligations; to safeguard the integrity of computers, occurred, has the right to file a discrimination networks, and data either at the University or else• complaint with the Office of Career Services. where; and to protect the University against seriously Complainants must file a grievance within 30 days damaging consequences. The University may restrict of the alleged discriminatory act. Earlier filing is the use of its computers and network systems for encouraged, including a confidential statement of electronic communications when faced with evi• probable intention to file based upon specific allega• dence of violation of University policies, or federal tions of misconduct. Later filing may be permitted or local laws. The University reserves the right to for good cause shown. Umit access to its networks through University- owned or other computers, and to remove or limit A grievance must be filed with the Assistant access to material posted on University-owned Dean, Office of Career Services. The grievance may computers. be filed using the grievance form available in the Office of Career Services and the Office of Public All users are expected to conduct themselves Interest and Community Service, but any written consistent with these responsibilities and all other submission containing the information requested hy applicable University policies. Abuse of computing that form will be satisfactory. In addition to briefly privileges will subject the user to disciplinary action, describing the event in question, the complaint as established by the applicable operating poUcies should set forth as precisely as possible any allegedly and procedures of the University. Abuse of networks offensive language that was part thereof. or computers at other sites through the use of Georgetown University resources will be treated as Procedures for Processing Grievances an abuse of computing privileges at the University. When appropriate, temporary restrictive actions will Upon receipt of the complaint the Assistant Dean be taken by system or network administrators pend• shall first determine whether the complaint states a ing further disciplinary action; the loss of computing violation of the Law Center non-discrimination privileges may result. policy set forth above. If the Assistant Dean finds that no violation has been stated, the student shall The University and users recognize that all be promptly informed and may appeal the decision members of the University community are bound by to the Dean, who may confirm the decision or for• federal and local laws relating to civil rights, harass• ward the matter for handling under the next process ment, copyright, security and other statutes relating described. If the complaint states a violation, the to electronic media. It should he understood that this policy does not preclude enforcement under Assistant Dean shall immediately apprise the indi• the laws and regulations of the United States of vidual respondent(s) and the organization's ultimate America or the District of Columbia. hiring authority of the charge and request a written response to the allegations.

DISCRIMINATION GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES The Assistant Dean shall seek to resolve the ADMINISTERED BY OFFICE OF CAREER SERVICES complaint within 21 working days from the notifi• cation of the respondent. This office may conduct Policy Statement interviews with all relevant persons and seek infor• The policy of Georgetown University Law Center mation in any other relevant form. The Assistant is to provide equal opportunity in education and Dean may delegate the interviewing and informa• employment for all qualified persons; to prohibit tion seeking functions to the Law Center's Legal discrimination in education and employment Ethics Counsel. 90 CONDUCT POLICIES

If a mutually acceptable resolution is achieved to the Faculty-Student Placement Committee for a through the Assistant Dean's efforts, the case shall determination of appropriate further sanctions to he be closed. A written notice shall list findings and recommended to the Dean. indicate the agreement reached. The agreement shall be retained in the files of the Office of Career Appeal to the Dean Services and copies provided to the complainant, The complainant or the respondent shall have the the respondent and his/her ultimate hiring authority. right to file a written appeal of the Assistant Dean's If no mutually acceptable resolution can be achieved, decision to the Dean of the Law Center within ten the Assistant Dean shall make, and provide the days of receiving the Assistant Dean's decision. parties with, a written finding on the merits of the The notice of appeal shall indicate the reasons complaints. for the party's appeal. The Dean may with written Upon a finding adverse to the respondent, sanc• explanation affirm, or remand the matter for further tions may he imposed depending on the severity of consideration hy the Assistant Dean. the offense, including but not limited to requesting a written apology or other conciliatory steps, issuing Record a reprimand to the individual and/or the organiza• The Assistant Dean, Cffice of Career Services, shall tion, placing the individual and/or the organization submit to the Chair of the Placement Committee a on probation, or denying the individual or organiza• bimonthly summary of all grievances filed during tion recruiting access to Law Center facilities and that period, and of further action taken with regard services for a specified time. The sanctions of proba• to all such cases previously pending. Confidentiality tion or denial of individual or organization recruit• with regard to these summaries shall he maintained ing access may only he imposed by the Law Center so far as is possible. Dean upon the recommendation of the Faculty- Nothing contained herein shall he considered as Student Placement Committee. Refusals of an limiting a complainant's right to pursue any other individual or organizational respondent to issue an remedy provided hy federal or local law, or as apology or take some other conciliatory step as may requiring the University to pursue any process other be called for by the Assistant Dean shall be referred than those described by this code. JURIS DOCTOR PROGRAM 93

JOINT DEGREE PROGRAMS 93 GRADUATE PROGRAM 93 OTHER FEES 93

TUITION AND FEE ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS 94 TUITION DEFERMENTS 94 MONTHLY PAYMENT PLAN 94

WITHDRAWAL REFUNDS 94

TUITION REFUND INSURANCE 95

91

TUITION AND FEES 93

JURIS DOCTOR PROGRAM* For Part Time Students: Prior to completing all J.D. courses and at least Full Time Law Center Students 24 credits in philosophy or government: charged at $29,440.00 (per academic year) the Law Center part time rate for all courses. Full Time Visitors from Another J.D. Program $14,720.00 (per semester) After completing all J.D. courses and at least 24 credits in philosophy or government: charged Part Time Law Center Students Graduate School tuition. $1,060.00 (per credit-hour)

J.D./M.P.H. Part Time Visitors from Another J.D. Program While at the Law Center: Law Center tuition $1,060.00 (per credit-hour) (to the Law Center).

Tuition Equalization Charge While at Johns Hopkins: Johns Hopkins tuition Students who have heen granted approval to trans• (to Johns Hopkins). fer from the part time J.D. program to the full time J.D. Program will be accessed a Tuition Equalization PLEASE NOTE: Students enrolled in joint degree pro• Charge, the net result of which will he that at the grams may he charged additional fees for language end of three years, the student will have paid the labs or other courses necessary to earn their degree. same total tuition as other fuU time students. Part time students who transfer to the full time program and pay the tuition equalization charge are entitled J.D./M.P.P. to take up to seven credits in any Georgetown For Full Time Students: University Law Center summer program here or Four years Law Center full time tuition abroad without paying any additional tuition. Consistent with our policies ahout receiving credit For FartTime Students (taking tewerthan 11 credits): for courses taken at other schools, student may take Law Center part time rate for all courses summer courses at other schools. However, students who do so are required to pay the full amount of the GRADUATE PROGRAM tuition equalization charge. The tuition equalization Graduate Students (including International students): charge for those students approved for transfer into For purposes of tuition calculations, full time stu• the full time program during the 2002-2003 academic dents are those who enroll for 8 or more credit year will he $6,040. hours in a semester, and part time students are those who enroll for fewer than 8 credit hours in a semes• JOINT DEGREE PROGRAMS ter. Also, the date of matriculation for tuition pur• poses for students who enroll in a graduate degree J.D./M.B.A. program, after successfully completing Non-degree courses as a Non-degree student, is the initial day of Four years Law Center full time tuition. the first semester in which the student enrolls, after the date the student is admitted to degree status. J.D./M.S.F.S. The following tuition rates apply to the 2002- Tuition for the year that the student is taking the 2003 academic year for hoth degree and non-degree first year of the M.S.F.S. program is M.S.F.S. students: tuition. M.S.F.S. tuition for the 2002-2003 acade• mic year is $23,832. For the three remaining years Full Time Law Center Graduate Students of the program, the full time Law Center tuition is $29,440.00 (per academic year) charged. FartTime Law Center Graduate Students J.D./Philosophy and J.D./Government $1,180 (per credit hour)

For Full Time Students: OTHER FEES Prior to completing all J.D. courses and at least Fees not covered by the above tuition and fee schedule: 24 credits in philosophy or government: Law Center tuition. Application Fee $70.00 (non-refundable) After completing all J.D. courses and at least 24 credits in philosophy or government: Graduate Tuition Deferment Handling Charge School tuition. $30.00 (must be submitted with deferment application) plus 1.5% per month

•Tuition and fees are subject to change zuithoutprior notice. 94 TUITION AND FEES

Late Payment Fee • AH accounts with an outstanding balance after $50.00 (plus 1.5% per month on unpaid balance) the last day of the add/drop period will be assessed a late payment fee of $50.00 plus a Transcript Fee monthly 1.5% service charge. A block wiH also $2.00 (per copy) be placed on the account. • A $50.00 late registration fee will be charged to Visitor Fee any student who has not completed aH neces• (Law Center student approved to visit another school) sary arrangements, including financial matters, $100.00 per semester by the date of registration noted on the acade• mic calendar. This late fee cannot he waived Language Lab Fee unless the student has a pending loan or schol• (J.D./M.S.F.S.) varies with course arship and the Student Accounts Office has documentation from the Office of Financial Yates Field House Aid. To avoid the late fee, students must com• $117.00 per semester (for LL.M. students enrolled plete their loan application prior to June 1 for in less than eight semester hours each semester) the faH semester and prior to November 1 for the spring semester. Course Materials There is a charge for certain course materials pro• • Any and aH charges incurred after registration duced by the Law Center when such materials are day are due and payable at the time they are used in lieu of, or in addition to, a regular textbook. incurred.

Printing TUITION DEFERMENTS Students are given an allowance of 50 free pages of • AH semester charges must he paid in full at the printing per semester at the Law Library. Any time of registration. In the event of an unfore• amount over the 50 page allowance will he assessed seeable personal emergency, an approved tuition $.10 per page. deferment can he obtained from the Law Center Cffice of Student Accounts. This defer• Returned Check Fee ment must be obtained no later than the tuition $55.00 due date.

TUITION AND FEE ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS • A $30 handling charge is applied to aU tuition deferments and one and a half percent per • Students will not be permitted to attend class month interest charge is assessed on any unpaid until they have paid all outstanding balances balance. on their student accounts, or until they have received approval from the Law Center Student • Tuition deferments are not granted automati• Accounts Office for alternate financial arrange• cally and should not he expected more than ments. No deduction can be made for absence once in an academic year. from classes. • Tuition is deferred for a maximum of 60 days. • Students in arrears of tuition will not he per• mitted to register for subsequent semesters, or MONTHLY PAYMENT PLAN to receive grades, transcripts, bar certificates, or • Georgetown University offers a monthly pay• diplomas. ment plan which enables a student to pay all or • By registering, students accept the responsihil• part of his or her yearly tuition in ten monthly ity for all charges until such time as they notify instaHments. the Registrar, in writing, of their withdrawal from the course or the program. See • Participation is on an annual basis and is Withdrawal Refunds, below. renewable each year at an annual fee of $80. The Monthly Payment Plan is interest-free if • Full payment of tuition and fees must be made payments are made on time. Fees and interest by the scheduled due dates: August 30, 2002 for the Fall 2002 semester and January 3, 2003 charges are assessed for late payments. for the Spring 2003 semester. • All arrangements must be in place by the start • Part-time or evening students whose tuition is of the academic year. calculated based on the per credit hour and who are adding or dropping classes during the WITHDRAWAL REFUNDS scheduled add/drop period must pay the tuition • Students who want to withdraw from an indi• in full on or before the last day of the add/drop vidual course or from the Law Center must period. Bills will not be printed during the notify the Cffice of the Registrar in writing. add/drop period. TUITION AND FEES 95

• Notification to persons other than those in the • Students who take an approved leave of absence Office of the Registrar, or in other than written after the beginning of a semester will receive form, is not effective as notice of withdrawal. tuition adjustments according to the schedule • Should a student voluntarily withdraw from the above. Law Center, tuition charges will he adjusted as • Students who are charged by the credit hour of the date the Cffice of the Registrar receives receive adjustments on the above basis for courses written notification of withdrawal, according to from which they have withdrawn in accordance the percentages listed helow for the fall or with the faculty's provisions governing course spring semester. withdrawals. • For purposes of refund calculation, weeks will • Students attending summer sessions receive be computed from the first day of class as tuition adjustments according to the refund shown on the Academic Calendar. schedule printed in the Summer Session Bulletin. *Prior to the start of classes 100% TUITION REFUND INSURANCE 1st through 2nd week 80% The Dewar Tuition Refund Plan is a purchased 3rd through 4th week 50% insurance plan which will protect students from 5th through 6th week 25% financial loss if they withdraw from the Law Center "Refunds for degree candidates who have federal because of a covered illness or injury. Information financial aid and who withdraw during their first is mailed to students and is also available to stu• semester of enrollment are governed by the 1992 dents upon request from the Law Center Cffice of Amendments to the Higher Education Act. Student Accounts. The deadline for enrollment in Refund schedules are available from the Registrar this plan is the first day of the academic year. The and Financial Aid Cffice. purchase of this insurance plan is not mandatory, • Entering first-year students should consult however, the Law Center encourages students to the refund schedule issued hy the Cffice of consider tuition refund insurance coverage. Admissions for withdrawal prior to first-year registration. For additional information, please check the • No reduction of tuition will he given for a Cffice of Student Accounts website at student's absence from class. .

FIRST YEAR J.D. PROGRAM OF STUDY 99 Curriculum "A" Courses 99

Curriculum "A" Eiectives (2002-2003) 99 Curriculum "B" Courses 99

THE UPPERCLASS J.D. PROGRAM OF STUDY 99

GRADUATE CURRICULUM 100

SUMMER PROGRAM 100 ACADEMIC RESOURCE PROGRAMS 101 First Year Tutorial Program 101

The Writing Center 101

97

THE LAW CURRICULUM 99

FIRST YEAR J.D. PRDGRAM OF STUDY Covernment Processes,yiar credits During the first year, students are enrolled in either Legal Justice Seminar, three credits the "A" or the "B" curriculum. All students in the Legal Practice: Writing and Analysis, three credits "A" curriculum begin their legal studies with eight Legal Process and Society,credits courses, including a three credit elective in the spring Property In Time, four credits semester chosen from a group of "perspective" courses such as American Legal Profession, Economic THE UPPERCLASS J.D. PROGRAM OF STUDY Justice, Great Philosophers on Law, Health and Beyond the first year the only required upperclass Legal Reasoning, International Law I: Introduction courses are Professional Responsihility and a course to International Law, Religion and Law and Sports or supervised research project that meets the upper- and the Law. Students in the FuU Time Program class writing requirement. Many years ago, the take aU eight courses during their first year. Students Law Center, like most law schools, had a prescrihed in the Part Time Program take Civil Procedure, upperclass curriculum. Faculty stopped dictating Constitutional Law I: The Federal System, Contracts, which courses upperclass students should take, how• Legal Research and Writing, Property, and Torts ever, when they themselves no longer agreed ahout during their first year and Criminal Justice and the what should be required, given the increasing diver• "perspective" course during their second year, along sity of law practice and divergent views ahout the with other elective courses. First year students in benefits of various courses of study. This movement the Full Time Program register for the "perspective" away from required upperclass curriculum has elective during the fall semester. Part time students occurred at most law schools in the county. register for the "perspective" elective during the Nonetheless, most faculty and lawyers would course registration period in April of their first year. probably concur that it is advisable for smdents to The "B" curriculum, available in 2002-2003 to take Tax I, Constitutional Law II, and Corporations. one section of fiill time students, requires seven Taxation and the corporate form are ubiquitous in courses different in emphasis from those in the our society and therefore lawyers should have at "A" curriculum: Bargain, Exchange and Liahility; least some familiarity with these areas. In addition, Democracy and Coercion; Government Processes; these courses are prerequisites to a number of more Legal Justice Seminar; Legal Practice: Writing and advanced offerings in the areas of business and cor• Analysis; Legal Process and Society; and Property porate law. Constimtional Law is not only relevant in Time. The "B" section emphasizes the sources of to other courses, it addresses fundamental issues law in history, philosophy, political theory, and about the namre of our government that well edu• economics. It also seeks to reflect the increasingly cated lawyers should understand. In addition to public nature of contemporary law. these courses, most smdents take Evidence: it is a prerequisite for many clinical courses and in the Curriculum "A" Courses view of many is basic to understanding the American Civil Procedure,yoMr credits judicial processes. Finally, given increased globaliza• Constitutional Law I: The Federal System, tion, lawyers frequently need to be able to operate effectively beyond our national borders—communi• three credits cating with people of other legal traditions and ContmcXs, four credits understanding the potential complications when Criminal Jxsstictffour credits other legal traditions are impUcated. As a result, the Legal Research and Writing, three credits faculty recommends that smdents take one or more Property, four credits courses in international or comparative law. "Torts, four credits Perspective Elective, three credits Beyond these courses, smdents should select a balanced and well-rounded array of courses that add Curriculum "A" Eiectives (2002-2003): to their theoretical understanding, your doctrinal {three credits) breadth, and provide you with exposure to the range of skiUs that a good lawyer needs. You should American Legal Profession choose a mixmre of public law courses, such as Conflict of Laws: Choice of Law Administrative Law, Criminal Law, Lnvironmental Economic Justice Law, International Law I, or Federal Courts, and Great Philosophers on Law private law courses such as Commercial Law, Health and Legal Reasoning Corporate Finance, InteUecmal Property, International International Law I: Introduction to International Law Law II, or Family Law. Most faculty members Religion and Law would also encourage you to take at least one course Sports and the Law a year (or semester) that particularly piques your interest even if it is not clear how it will fit into Curriculum "B" Courses your career plans. Bargain, Exchange, and Liability, six credits Lawyers are caUed upon to use not only their Democracy and Coercion,yc)Mr credits analytical skiUs and substantive knowledge, hut also 100 THE LAW CURRICULUM their ahility to structure creative solutions, to work process in the spring semester, the Dean's Office collaboratively with others, to negotiate effectively, sponsors a number of events such as the Curriculum to be persuasive orally and in writing, and to com• Fair and Faculty Panels on Course Selection that municate effectively with both lawyers and non- are helpful sources of information. lawyers. Therefore, students should consider taking Clinic selection also occurs in the spring semes• courses that use a variety of pedagogical formats and ter, prior to the last day of registration. Each clinic enhance their skills in a variety of areas. The courses has its own method of selection. Students may be in the Law Center's clinical program offer not only chosen either by lottery or by a competitive process. the opportunity to "learn by doing," hut also the Those clinics that use competitive selection base unique opportunity to engage in critical self-reflec• their choices on prior experience, writing samples, tion ahout the lawyering process. The Law Center statements of interest and other criteria. Most clin• currently offers fifteen clinical courses to J.D. stu• ics also give preference to students who are entering dents for academic credit. All clinics are directed by their final year of law school. During the spring Georgetown faculty members. The clinical courses semester informational meetings are held and a clinic available to students are the following: application packet, including detailed information ahout the clinics, their selection criteria and the Appellate Litigation Clinic application process, is made available to students. Center for Applied Legal Studies Criminal Justice Clinic GRADUATE CURRICULUM D.C. Law Students in Court Students in the Law Center's graduate programs Domestic Violence Clinic may take courses in both the J.D. curriculum and Family Advocacy Clinic the graduate curriculum. The Law Center offers Federal Legislation Clinic specialized graduate courses in four areas related to Federal Legislation Clinic - D.C. Division specific degree and certificate programs: Lmployee Harrison Institute for Puhlic Law, Housing and Benefits; International Legal Studies; Securities and Community Development Clinic Financial Regulation; and Taxation. Those courses Harrison Institute for Public Law, Policy Clinic are listed by subject area in the Course Cluster Institute for Puhlic Representation Listing that follows, along with J.D. courses in the International Women's Human Rights Clinic same field. Some courses are jointly offered in both Juvenile Justice Clinic the J.D. and graduate curriculums to encourage Street Law: Community students from hoth programs to enroll. Street Law: High Schools International students trained in civil law who attend a graduate program at the Law Center take a In addition to our clinics, Georgetown offers an required preliminary course of study, Foundations extensive array of practice and problem based of American Law, in the summer preceding their courses such as Business Planning Seminar, enrollment. Foundations is an intensive, one-month Negotiations, Civil Discovery, Trial Practice, and course that introduces smdents to the common law Appellate Practice. process, American law, American legal education, Finally, many students find very rewarding an legal writing and legal research techniques. experience of deep and intensive engagement in During their course of smdy, mternational sm• their third year either through a capstone seminar dents also take a course in U.S. Legal Discourse, such as Professor Tushnet's Advanced which introduces students to U.S. legal resources, Constitutional Law Seminar or the Lnvironmental research methods, and analytical paradigms. Law Workshop. Writing assignments give smdents the opportunity Because Georgetown has an enormous range of to develop written analysis using the approaches course offerings, selecting courses as a second and forms, and conventions common in U.S. law. third year student can be a daunting task. For this The Office of International and Graduate reason, the following list of courses is organized Programs provides individualized curriculum by subject area. Faculty essays describing these counseling as well as oppormnities to consult with areas of legal interest are located in the Online faculty and practioners in their fields of interest. Curriculum Guide, at . SUMMER PROGRAM Students are encouraged to consult faculty The Law Center offers a summer program in members and deans for individualized advice on the London, England. Course demands are the same as selection and sequencing of courses in particular for regular courses, and admission is competitive, subject areas as well as guidance on how to approach with priority given to Georgetown smdents. course planning when a student is unsure about the The 2002-2003 Director of the London Summer specific direction of his or her professional interest Law Program is James Feinerman, Associate Dean in law. In addition, during the course registration of International and Graduate Programs. THE LAW CURRICULUM 101

For Further Information, contact: The Writing Center The Writing Center assists J.D. and LL.M. students Terrie Puckett and graduate fellows on writing projects. Senior Coordinator for Special International Programs Writing Fellows at the Center provide feedback on Georgetown University Law Center choosing a topic, researching scholarly papers, 600 New Jersey Avenue, NW revising memos, outlining papers, defining scope, Washington, DC 20001-2075 and reaching conciseness, among other ideas. Phone: (202) 662-9319 AU Law Center students are eligible to receive Fax: (202) 662-9487 individualized tutoring at the Writing Center from Email: [email protected] a Senior Writing Fellow, a speciaUy trained upper- class student. The work of the Writing Center ACADEMIC RESOURCE PROGRAMS reinforces the methods of legal analysis, research, First Year Tutorial Program writing and citation form taught in the first year. The tutorial program primarily provides academic A student's first consultation with a Senior support to first year students. Each of the first year Writing Fellow is granted automatically on request. sections is assigned an upperclass tutor who meets To receive continuing help, a student can partici• with students on a weekly hasis. The topics covered pate in a series of sessions designed to evaluate and include: case analysis, case hriefing, course outlining, address the student's specific writing concerns. For substantive review sessions and exam preparation, as more information contact the Legal Research and well as general advice on the law school experience. Writing Office, room 540, (202) 662-9525. Students are admitted to the program on a voluntary basis. Individual tutors are also available for first year and upperclass students.

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND GOVERNMENT REGULATION 105

ADVANCED TORTS 105 ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION 105 ANTITRUST LAW 105

COMMERCIAL AND ADVANCED CONTRACT LAW 106 COMMUNICATIONS LAW 106 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND GOVERNMENT 106

CORPORATE LAW AND SECURITIES REGULATION 107 CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE 108 EMPLOYMENT, EMPLOYEE BENEFITS AND LABOR LAW 108

ENVIRONMENTAL LAW 109 FAMILY LAW 109 HEALTH LAW, POLICY, AND BIOETHICS 109 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, ENTERTAINMENT, AND TECHNOLOGY LAW 110

INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LEGAL STUDIES 110 INTERNATIONAL/NATIONAL SECURITY LAW 112

JURISPRUDENCE 112

LAW AND OTHER DISCIPLINES 112 LEGAL HISTORY 113 LEGAL PROFESSION/PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY 113

LEGAL SCHOLARSHIP AND WRITING 113 LITIGATION AND THE JUDICIAL PROCESS 113 PUBLIC INTEREST LAW 114 REAL ESTATE, LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT 115 TAXATION 115

TRUSTS AND ESTATES 116

103

COURSE CLUSTERS 105

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND GOVERNMENT Quantitative Methods: Statistics for Lawyers REGULATION Sports Law

J.D. Courses J.D. Seminars Administrative Law Class Action Law and Practice Seminar Administrative Law and Regulatory Policy Complex Litigation Seminar: Perspectives on Art of the Washington Lawyer Federal Court Reform Aviation Law Selected Topics in Tort Law (formerly Advanced Banking and Financial Institutions Regulation Torts Seminar) Election Law: Ballots, Bucks, Maps, and the Law Federal Regulation of Financial Institutions ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESDLUTION Fiduciaries: Myths and Realities Food and Drug Law J.D. Courses Government Contracts Alternative Dispute Resolution: Theory, Practice, Insurance Law and Policy Local Government Law Maritime Law J.D. Seminars Products Liahility and Safety Alternative Dispute Resolution Seminar Quantitative Methods: Statistics for Lawyers Drafting and Negotiating Commercial Real Estate The New Agency and the New Statute Documents: Real Estate Contracts, Loan Documents, and the Commercial Lease Seminar J.D. Seminars Drafting and Negotiating Commercial Advocacy Seminar: Current Antitrust and Transactional Documents Telecommunications Competition Issues International Negotiations Seminar Alternative and Complementary Medicine: Legal Labor Arbitration Seminar Issues Seminar Mediation Seminar Antitrust and Intellectual Property Seminar Multi-Party Dispute Resolution Seminar: Deregulated Natural Gas and Electric Power Consensus Building and Other Negotiation Industries Seminar Processes Election Law: Advanced Seminar Negotiating Across the Spectrum: Intensive Energy Problems Seminar Course in Two-Party and Multi-Party Financial Institutions and Consumer Financial Negotiation Services Seminar Negotiation and Mediation in Puhlic Interest Settings Social Welfare Law and Policy Seminar Negotiations and Drafting Seminar Space Law Seminar Negotiations and Mediation Seminar Technology Law and Policy Seminar: Welcome to Negotiations Seminar the Dark Side Urban Policy, MetropoUtanism, and the Law Seminar Graduate Courses Dispute Resolution in Federal Systems of J.D. Clinics Government Center for Applied Legal Studies Dispute Resolution Under International Trade and Family Advocacy Clinic Investment Agreements Federal Legislation Clinic, District of Columbia International Commercial Arbitration Division Harrison Institute for Public Law: Housing and Graduate Seminars Development Clinic Harrison Institute for Public Law: Policy Clinic International Negotiations Seminar Institute for Public Representation Investor-State Dispute Settlement

Graduate Courses ANTITRUST LAW Federal Systems of Government: The U.S., J.D. Courses Australia, and the E.U. Antitrust Economics and Law The SEC Enforcement Process Antitrust Law Intellectual Property Licensing ADVANCED TDRTS International Telecommunications Policy J.D. Courses Sports Law Comparative Products Liability Damages and Remedies J.D. Seminars Insurance Law Advanced Antitrust Economics and Law Seminar Mass Torts Advocacy Seminar: Current Antitrust and Products Liability and Safety Telecommunications Competition Issues 106 COURSE CLUSTERS

Antitrust and Health Care Seminar COMMUNICATIONS LAW Antitrust and Intellectual Property Seminar J.D. Courses Mergers in a Global Economy Seminar Communications Law Constitutional Law: Theories of Free Speech Graduate Courses Copyright Law Competition Law in an International Economy International Telecommunications Policy Law of Cyberspace COMMERCIAL AND ADVANCED CONTRACT LAW Telecommunications and Cable Law (formerly J.D. Courses Telecommunications Law and Policy) Banking and Financial Institutions Regulation Bankruptcy and Creditors' Rights J.D. Seminars Commercial Law: Payment Systems Advocacy Seminar: Current Antitrust and Commercial Law: Sales Transactions Telecommunications Competition Issues Commercial Law: Secured Transactions Communications Law Seminar: Selected Topics Commercial Law: Secured Transactions and Comparative Media Law Seminar Payment Systems Cyberspace and Telecommunications Law in a Entrepreneurship Global Society Seminar Federal Regulation of Financial Institutions Cyberspace and the Law Seminar Finance of Real and Personal Property Free Press Seminar Government Contracts Information Privacy Law Seminar Intellectual Property Licensing Land Use Law J.D. Clinics Law of Cyberspace Sports Law Institute for Public Representation Structuring Venture Capital and Entrepreneurial Transactions Graduate Courses Taxes.com: A Study of the Taxation of Electronic International Telecommunications Regulation Commerce Related J.D. Courses Administrative Law J.D. Seminars Administrative Law and Regulatory Policy Comparative Consumer Protection Law Seminar Antitrust Law Construction Contract Law Seminar Constitutional Law II: Individual Rights and Drafting and Negotiating Commercial Real Estate Liherties Documents: Real Estate Contracts, Loan Copyright Law Documents, and the Commercial Lease Seminar Drafting and Negotiating Commercial Related J.D. Seminars Transactional Documents Entertainment Law Seminar Financial Institutions and Consumer Financial Services Seminar CDNSTITUTIONAL LAW AND GOVERNMENT Small Business Law Seminar J.D. Courses J.D. Clinics Citizenship Harrison Institute for Public Law: Housing and Civil Rights Development Clinic Communications Law Law Students in Court Comparative Constitutional Law Constitutional Law II: Individual Rights and Graduate Courses Liberties Federal Taxation of Bankruptcy and Workouts Constitutional Law: Theories of Free Speech Global Commerce and Litigation Disability Discrimination Law Infrastructure Projects in Developing and Transition Flection Law: Ballots, Bucks, Maps, and the Law Countries Employment Discrimination International Business Transactions Federal Courts and the Federal System International Commercial Arbitration Federal Money: Policymaking and Budget Rules International Contracting Gender and the Law International Finance Government Contracts International Project Finance Immigration and Nationality Law International Project Finance and Investment Law of Cyberspace Transacting International Finance Legislation Legislative Process COURSE CLUSTERS 107

Local Government Law Technology Law and Policy Seminar: Welcome to Sexual Orientation and the Law: Selected Topics in the Dark Side Civil Rights Theoretical Approaches to Contemporary Sports Law Constitutional Issues Seminar Urban Policy, Metropolitanism, and the Law The New Agency and the New Statute Seminar

J.D. Seminars J.D. Clinics Advanced Constitutional Law Seminar Criminal Justice Clinic Advanced Evidence: Supreme Court and the Federal Legislation Clinic Constitution Seminar Federal Legislation Clinic, District of Columbia African-American Critical Thought Seminar Division Asian Americans and Legal Ideology Seminar Harrison Institute for Puhlic Law: Policy Clinic Capital Punishment Seminar Institute for Puhlic Representation Church-State Law Seminar Juvenile Justice Clinic Civil Rights Policy Seminar Civil War and the Constitution Seminar Graduate Courses Communications Law Seminar: Selected Topics Comparative Constitutional Rights Comparative Constitutional Law Seminar Dispute Resolution in Federal Systems of Congressional Investigations Seminar Government Conservatism in Law and Politics in America Federal Systems of Government: The U.S., Seminar Australia, and the L.U. Constitutional Aspects of Foreign Affairs Seminar Introduction to U.S. Constitutional Law Constitutional Law Seminar: Contemporary Problems in American Constitutional Law CORPORATE LAW AND SECURITIES REGUUTION Constitutional Law: Critical Race Perspectives Seminar J.D. Courses Constitutional Property Law: Takings Seminar Accounting Concepts for Lawyers Contemporary Issues in First Amendment Theory Accounting for Lawyers Seminar Advanced Corporate Law Cyberspace and the Law Seminar Banking and Financial Institutions Regulation Federal Indian Law Seminar Corporate Finance Federalism Seminar Corporate Governance Fourteenth Amendment Seminar Corporations Free Press Seminar Counseling the Corporation in Crisis Gender and the Law Seminar Criminal Enforcement of Lnvironmental Laws Immigration Law and Policy: Advanced Research Lconomic Justice (offered as a perspective elective) Seminar Entrepreneurship Information Privacy Law Seminar Federal Regulation of Financial Institutions Law and Aging Seminar Federal White Collar Crime Law and Higher Lducation Seminar Fiduciaries: Myths and Realities Law and Religion Seminar Financial Reporting and Analysis Law, Puhlic Lducation, and Equality of Going Puhlic Opportunity Seminar International Financial Regulation Lawmaking and Statutory Interpretation Seminar Mergers and Acquisitions Legislative Drafting Seminar Professional Responsibility and Corporate Law Legislative Investigations Seminar Practice National Security Law and the War on Terrorism Securities Regulation Seminar Structuring Venture Capital and Entrepreneurial National Security Law Seminar Transactions Pro-Seminar In Constitutional Theory Public School Reform: Policy, Practice and the J.D. Seminars Law Seminar Business Planning Seminar Race and American Law Seminar Doing WeU and Doing Good: Enhancing Pro Bono Separation of Powers Seminar at Major Law Firms Social Welfare Law and Policy Seminar Lconomic Justice Seminar Solicitor General Seminar Financial Institutions and Consumer Financial Strategic Decision-making in First Amendment Services Seminar Litigation Seminar High Technology Start-Ups and Their Venture Strategic Intelligence and Puhlic Policy Seminar Capital Financing Seminar: Principles and Supreme Court Seminar Practice 108 COURSE CLUSTERS

Interdisciplinary Workshop on Law and Business Quantitative Methods: Statistics for Lawyers Institutions Role of the Federal Prosecutor Mergers and Acquisitions Truth, Falsehood, and the Law Non-Profit Organizations Seminar Role of Taxes in Business Decisions Seminar J.D. Seminars Securities Fraud Seminar Art and Cultural Property Law Seminar: Indiana Jones and the Elgin Marbles J.D. Clinics Capital Punishment Seminar Harrison Institute for Public Law: Housing and Computer Crime Seminar Development Clinic Crime and Punishment Seminar Deterring Computer Crime Seminar Graduate Courses History of Crime and Punishment Seminar Accounting for Securities Lawyers International Drug Policy Seminar Basic Accounting Concepts for Lawyers National Security Law and the War on Terrorism Current Issues in Lnforcement of the Federal Seminar Securities Laws National Security Law Seminar Disclosure Under the Federal Securities Laws Puhlic Corruption Seminar Financial Reporting and Accounting Fraud and Fiduciary Duties Under the Federal J.D. Clinics Securities Laws Appellate Litigation Clinic Futures Regulation and the Commodity Criminal Justice Clinic Exchange Act Domestic Violence Clinic Global Commerce and Litigation Juvenile Justice Clinic Global Securities Markets Global Securities Cfferings Graduate Courses International White Collar Crime Comparative and International Law of Cyberspace Professional Responsihility in Corporate and Global Cybercrime Law Securities Practice International Criminal Law Regulation of Derivatives and Cther Evolving International White Collar Crime Financial Instruments Regulation of Investment Companies and Advisers Graduate Seminars Regulation of Securities Professionals and the War Crimes and Prosecutions Seminar Securities Markets Securities Law and the Internet EMPLDYMENT, EMPLOYEE BENEFITS AND Small Business Financing and Venture Capital LABOR LAW Takeovers, Mergers, and Acquisitions J.D. Courses Advanced Labor Law Graduate Seminars Alternative Dispute Resolution: Theory, Practice, Financial Derivatives Regulation Seminar and Policy Graduate Seminar: Current Issues in Securities Disahility Discrimination Law Regulation Employment Discrimination Graduate Seminar: International Finance, Employment Law Investment and eCommerce Issues Fiduciaries: Myths and Realities Selected Topics in Investment Management Gender and the Law Regulation Seminar Labor Law in the Professional Sports Industry Twenty-First Century Money, Banking and Labor Law: Union Organization, Collective Commerce Seminar Bargaining, and Unfair Labor Practices Venture Capital and Technology Transactions Quantitative Methods: Statistics for Lawyers Sexual Orientation and the Law: Selected Topics in CRIMINAL LAW AND PRDCEDURE Civil Rights J.D. Courses Sports and the Law (offered as a perspective elective) Advanced Criminal Procedure Sports Law Advanced Criminal Procedure and Litigation Criminal Lnforcement of Environmental Laws J.D. Seminars Criminal Law Gender and the Law Seminar Federal White Collar Crime Labor Arbitration Seminar Grand Jury Mediation Seminar International Criminal Law Negotiations Seminar Law of Cyberspace COURSE CLUSTERS 109

Related J.D. Courses Related J.D. Courses Civil Rights Administrative Law Constitutional Law II: Individual Rights and Administrative Law and Regulatory Policy Liberties Lconomic Reasoning and the Law Evidence Federal Courts and the Federal System Federal Courts and the Federal System Sports and the Law Related J.D. Seminars Negotiations and Mediation Seminar Related J.D. Seminars Negotiations Seminar Alternative Dispute Resolution Seminar Negotiations and Drafting Seminar Related Graduate Course Negotiations and Mediation Seminar Cceans Law and Policy Negotiations Seminar Trial Practice FAMILY LAW

J.D. Courses Emioyee Benefits J.D. Courses Canon Law Retirement Income: Taxation and Regulation Family Law Family Law I: Marriage and Divorce Employee Benefits Graduate Courses Family Law II: Child, Parent, and the State Employee Benefits in Corporate Transactions Gender and the Law LRISA: Participant Rights Sexual Crientation and the Law: Selected Topics in LRISA: Plan Termination and Withdrawal Liability Civil Rights LRISA: The Fiduciary Provisions Executive Compensation: Equity 8c Cash-Based J.D. Seminars Incentives Comparative Family Law Seminar Retirement Plan Design and Taxation Gender and the Law in American History Seminar Retirement Plan Qualification Requirements Gender and the Law Seminar Tax Aspects of Lmployee Welfare Benefits Law and Aging Seminar

Employee Benefits Graduate Seminars J.D. Clinics Graduate Seminar: Current Issues in Lmployee Domestic Violence Clinic Benefits Family Advocacy Clinic Juvenile Justice Clinic ENVIRONMENTAL LAW

J.D. Courses HEALTH LAW, POLICY, AND BIOETHICS

Advanced Lnvironmental Law J.D. Courses Criminal Lnforcement of Environmental Laws Drug Abuse and the Law: Policy, Politics, and Environmental Law Puhlic Health Environmental Research Workshop Food and Drug Law International Lnvironmental Law Health and Legal Reasoning (offered as a perspective Land Use Law elective) Natural Resources Law Health Law and Policy International Human Rights J.D. Seminars Puhlic Health Law and Ethics Deregulated Natural Gas and Electric Power Industries Seminar J.D. Seminars Energy Problems Seminar Advanced Health Law Seminar Lnvironmental Law Seminar: Selected Topics Alternative and Complementary Medicine: Legal Lnvironmental Research Workshop Issues Seminar International Environment and Trade Law Seminar Bioethics and the Law Seminar Natural Resources Law Seminar: Selected Topics Biotechnology and Patent Law Seminar Negotiations Seminar Genetics, Ethics and the Law Seminar Water Resources Law Seminar Health and Human Rights Seminar: Application of the International Bill of Human Rights to J.D. Clinics Global Health Harrison Institute for Puhlic Law: Policy Clinic Law and Psychiatry Seminar Institute for Puhlic Representation Medical Law Seminar 110 COURSE CLUSTERS

J.D. Clinics Entertainment Law Seminar Family Advocacy Clinic Information Privacy Law Seminar Federal Legislation Clinic Intellectual Property Legislative Process Seminar Harrison Institute for Public Law: Policy Clinic Patent Law: Current Issues Seminar International Women's Human Rights Clinic Patent Licensing Seminar Patent Prosecution and Lnforcement Seminar Graduate Courses Patent Trial Practice Tax Aspects of Lmployee Welfare Benefits Software Intellectual Property Seminar Technology Law and Policy Seminar: Welcome to Related J.D. Courses the Dark Side Criminal Law Theories of Information Ownership Seminar Disahility Discrimination Law Trademark Pretrial Litigation Skills Lmployment Law Trademarks and Unfair Competition Seminar Lnvironmental Law Insurance Law Graduate Courses International Lnvironmental Law Comparative and International Law of Cyberspace Quantitative Methods: Statistics for Lawyers Global Cybercrime Law Sexual Orientation and the Law: Selected Topics in International Aspects of Customs Law Civil Rights International Protection of Intellectual Properly Securities Law and the Internet Related J.D. Seminars Taxation of Intellectual Property Antitrust and Health Care Seminar U.S. and International Customs Law International Drug Policy Seminar International Human Rights Workshop Graduate Seminars Law and Aging Seminar Twenty-First Century Money, Banking and Law and Science Seminar Commerce Seminar

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, ENTERTAINMENT, INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LEGAL AND TECHNOLOGY LAW STUDIES

J.D. Courses J.D. Courses Copyright Law Aviation Law Entrepreneurship Citizenship Intellectual Property Licensing Comparative Constitutional Law International Intellectual Property Law Comparative Law International Telecommunications Policy Comparative Law: Legal Systems in Transition Introduction to Intellectual Property Law Comparative Products Liability Labor Law in the Professional Sports Industry Conflict of Laws: Choice of Law Law of Cyberspace Conflict of Laws: Choice of Law (offered as a Patent and Trade Secret Law (Patent Law I) perspective elective) Patent Law Lnvironmental Research Workshop Patent Law: Basic Concepts and Broad Implications Immigration and Nationality Law Sports Law International and Comparative Law on the Rights Taxes.com: A Study of the Taxation of Electronic of Women Commerce International Criminal Law Trademark and Unfair Competition Law International Lnvironmental Law Trademark Prosecution International Financial Regulation International Human Rights J.D. Seminars International Intellectual Property Law Advanced Patent Law Seminar (Patent Law II) International Law I: Introduction to International Antitrust and Intellectual Property Seminar Law Art and Cultural Property Law Seminar: Indiana International Law I: Introduction to International Jones and the Elgin Marbles Law (offered as a perspective elective) Biotechnology and Patent Law Seminar International Law II Computer Crime Seminar International Legal Philosophy Copyright Law: Advanced International Trade Cyljerspace and Telecommunications Law in a Introduction to Roman Law Global Society Seminar Maritime Law Cyberspace and the Law Seminar Professional Responsibility and the International Deterring Computer Crime Seminar Legal Profession COURSE CLUSTERS ill

Refugee and Asylum Law Comparative and International Law of Cyberspace Refugee Law and Policy Comparative Constitutional Rights Comparative International Taxation J.D. Seminars Comparative Tax Law Asian Law and Policy Studies Seminar Competition Law in an International Economy Chinese Law Seminar Dispute Resolution in Federal Systems of Comparative Constitutional Law Seminar Government Comparative Consumer Protection Law Seminar Dispute Resolution Under International Trade and Comparative Family Law Seminar Investment Agreements Comparative Media Law Seminar European Union Law I Constitutional Aspects of Foreign Affairs Seminar European Union Law II: Business & Economic Law Copyright Law: Advanced Federal Systems of Government: The U.S., Lnvironmental Research Workshop Australia, and the L.U. Health and Human Rights Seminar: Application of Global Cybercrime Law the International Bill of Human Rights to Global Securities Offerings Global Health Infrastructure Projects in Developing and Transition Human Rights Enforcement Seminar Countries Immigration and Citizenship: Advanced Research International Agreements Seminar International Aspects of Customs Law Immigration Law and Policy: Advanced Research International Business Transactions Seminar International Civil Litigation International and Foreign Legal Research Seminar International Commercial Arbitration International Drug Policy Seminar International Conflict of Laws International Environment and Trade Law Seminar International Contracting International Human Rights Workshop International Criminal Law International Law Seminar: Use of Force and International Economics for Lawyers Conflict Resolution International Finance International Litigation in U.S. Courts Seminar International Human Rights Law International Negotiations Seminar International Institutions International Tax Planning Seminar International Project Finance International Trade and Human Rights Seminar International Project Finance and Investment International Women's Human Rights Seminar International Protection of Intellectual Property Islamic Law International Telecommunications Regulation Issues in Disarmament: Proliferation of Modern International Trade Law & Regulation Weapons Seminar International Trafficking of Women 8c Children Jurisprudence of International Human Rights Introduction to Private International Law Introduction to U.S. Legal Methods Seminar Investment and Trade Laws of the Middle Last Law and Development Seminar Islamic Law Law and Policy of International Lconomic Israeli Legal System Relations Seminar Japan/US Comparative Legal Study Law of War Seminar Korean Trade Law and Policies in Perspective Mergers in a Global Economy Seminar Latin American Legal Institutions Nationalism and Cultural Identity Seminar NAFTA and Other Regional Trade Agreements Patent Law: Current Issues Seminar Oceans Law and Policy Refugee Protection: Advanced Research Seminar Transacting International Finance Refugees and Humanitarian Emergencies: U.S. Export Controls for National Security, Advanced Research Seminar Space Law Seminar Non-Proliferation and Counter-Terrorism Transnational Investment in Developing Countries U.S. Taxation of International Income I Seminar U.S. Taxation of International Income II WTO Jurisprudence: Subsidies and Countervailing U.S. Taxation of International Transactions Duties Seminar World Trade Organization: Negotiation and Texts of Agreements J.D. Clinics Center for Applied Legal Studies Graduate Seminars Harrison Institute for Public Law: Policy Clinic Development Law and Finance Seminar International Women's Human Rights Clinic Foreign Investment in the Americas Seminar Graduate Seminar: International Finance, Graduate Courses Investment and eCommerce Issues Anatomy of an International Acquisition 112 COURSE CLUSTERS

Graduate Seminar: International Law at the Great Philosophers on the Law: From Socrates Beginning of the 21st Century Through Aquinas (offered as a perspective Graduate Seminar: International Law at the Turn of elective) the Century International Legal Philosophy Graduate Seminar: The World Trade Organization Jurisprudence Graduate Seminar: U.S. Unfair Trade Practice Statutes J.D. Seminars International Negotiations Seminar African-American Critical Thought Seminar International Transportation Seminar Conservatism in Law and Politics in America Investor-State Dispute Settlement Seminar War Crimes and Prosecutions Seminar Feminist Legal Theory Seminar Judaic Sources of American Law Seminar INTERNATIONAL/NATIONAL SECURITY LAW Jurisprudence of International Human Rights Seminar J.D. Seminars Law, Conscience, and Nonviolence Seminar Constitutional Aspects of Foreign Affairs Seminar Legal Lthics Seminar: Can Good Lawyers Be International and Foreign Legal Research Seminar Good Ethical Deliberators? International Law Seminar: Advanced Topics International Law Seminar: Use of Force and J.D. Clinics Conflict Resolution Federal Legislation Clinic Issues in Disarmament: Proliferation of Modern Federal Legislation Clinic, District of Columbia Weapons Seminar Division Law of War Seminar National Security Law and the War on Terrorism Graduate Courses Seminar International Trafficking of Women 8c Children National Security Law Seminar Refugees and Humanitarian Lmergencies: LAW AND OTHER DISCIPLINES Advanced Research Seminar Strategic Intelligence and Public Policy Seminar J.D. Courses Technology Law and Policy Seminar: Welcome to Lconomic Reasoning and the Law the Dark Side Law and Literature Seminar Law and Social Science J.D. Clinics Law of Cyberspace Quantitative Methods: Statistics for Lawyers Center for Applied Legal Studies Religion and Law (offered as a perspective elective)

Graduate Courses J.D. Seminars Comparative and International Law of Cyberspace Bioethics and the Law Seminar Global Cybercrime Law Crime and Punishment Seminar International Agreements Deterring Computer Crime Seminar International Institutions Films and the Law Seminar International Peace and Security: Current Legal Law and Economics Workshop Problems Law and Higher Lducation Seminar National Security Law Law and Literature Seminar United Nations Peace Operations Law and Psychiatry Seminar Graduate Seminars Law and Religion Seminar International Law of Armed Conflict Seminar Law and Science Seminar War and Peace Seminar: New Thinking ahout the Law in Literature Seminar Causes of War and War Avoidance Legal Imagination Seminar: The Moral Decision Literacy and Law Seminar Related Graduate Courses Nationalism and Cultural Identity Seminar Oceans Law and Policy J.D. Clinics JURISPRUDENCE Federal Legislation Clinic Harrison Institute for Public Law: Housing and J.D. Courses Development Clinic Canon Law Harrison Institute for Public Law: Policy Clinic Feminist Legal Theory Great Philosophers on the Law: From Socrates Graduate Courses Through Aquinas Basic Accounting Concepts for Lawyers COURSE CLUSTERS 113

Financial Reporting and Accounting Juvenile Justice Clinic International Economics for Lawyers Law Students in Court Street Law: Community LEGAL HISTORY Street Law: High School

J.D. Courses Graduate Courses American Legal History International White Collar Crime Introduction to Roman Law Professional Responsibility in Corporate and Securities Practice J.D. Seminars Tax Lawyering and Professional Responsihility in Asian Americans and Legal Ideology Seminar Federal Tax Practice British Legal History Seminar: from the Celts to the American Revolution LEGAL SCHOLARSHIP AND WRITING Civil War and the Constitution Seminar Gender and the Law in American History Seminar J.D. Courses History of Crime and Punishment Seminar Advanced Legal Research Techniques History of Washington Lawyering Seminar Applied Legal Composition The Jury: The Anglo-American Tradition Seminar Legal Research SkiUs for Practice

LEGAL PRDFESSIDN/PRDFESSIDNAL J.D. Seminars RESPDNSIBILITY Advanced Legal Writing In Practice Seminar Advanced Legal Writing Seminar J.D. Courses Applied Scholarly Editing Seminar American Legal Profession (offered as a perspective International and Foreign Legal Research Seminar elective) Introduction to Scholarly Editing Seminar Art of the Washington Lawyer Law Fellow Seminar Counseling the Corporation in Crisis Law FeUow Seminar (USED) Fiduciaries: Myths and Realities Research Strategy and Management Seminar Professional Responsibility Seminar Research Methods Professional Responsibility and Corporate Law Practice UTIGATION AND THE JUDICIAL PROCESS Professional Responsihility for Clinics Professional Responsihility: Lthics in Public J.D. Courses Interest Practice Advanced Criminal Procedure The New Agency and the New Statute Advanced Criminal Procedure and Litigation Truth, Falsehood, and the Law Art of the Washington Lawyer Comparative Products Liability J.D. Seminars ConUict of Laws: Choice of Law Advanced Legal Lthics Seminar Conflict of Laws: Choice of Law (offered as a Doing Well and Doing Good: Enhancing Pro Bono perspective elective) at Major Law Firms Damages and Remedies Leadership and Decision Making Seminar Evidence Legal Lthics Seminar: Can Good Lawyers Be Federal Courts and the Federal System Good Ethical Deliberators? Grand Jury Professional Responsihility Seminar: Legal Ethics Law and Social Science and Legal Malpractice Litigation with the Federal Government Mass Torts J.D. Clinics Professional Responsibility for Clinics Appellate Litigation Clinic Puhlic Interest Advocacy Center for Applied Legal Studies Quantitative Methods: Statistics for Lawyers Criminal Justice Clinic Remedies Domestic Violence Clinic Role of the Federal Prosecutor Family Advocacy Clinic Truth, Falsehood, and the Law Federal Legislation Clinic Federal Legislation Clinic, District of Columbia J.D. Seminars Division Advanced Evidence: Supreme Court and the Harrison Institute for Puhlic Law: Housing and Constitution Seminar Development Clinic Advanced Legal Writing Seminar Harrison Institute for Public Law: Policy Clinic Advanced Patent Law Seminar (Patent Law II) Institute for Public Representation Appellate Practice Seminar International Women's Human Rights Clinic Civil Discovery Seminar 114 COURSE CLUSTERS

Civil Litigation Practice Lmployment Law Civil Litigation Seminar Lnvironmental Law Class Action Law and Practice Seminar Lnvironmental Research Workshop Complex Litigation Seminar: Perspectives on Federal Money: Policymaking and Budget Rules Federal Court Reform Fiduciaries: Myths and Realities Homelessness and Legal Advocacy Seminar Food and Drug Law Housing Today: Lawyering Affordable Housing Gender and the Law Seminar Immigration and Nationality Law International Litigation in U.S. Courts Seminar International and Comparative Law on the Rights Patent Prosecution and Lnforcement Seminar of Women Patent Trial Practice International Lnvironmental Law Presentation Skills For Lawyers Seminar International Human Rights Public Corruption Seminar Labor Law: Union Organization, Collective Solicitor General Seminar Bargaining, and Unfair Labor Practices Strategic Decision-making in First Amendment Local Government Law Litigation Seminar Natural Resources Law Supreme Court Seminar Professional Responsibility for Clinics The Jury: The Anglo-American Tradition Seminar Professional Responsihility: Lthics in Public Trademark Pretrial Litigation Skills Interest Practice Trademarks and Unfair Competition Seminar Public Health Law and Lthics Trial Practice Puhlic Interest Advocacy Trial Practice Seminar: Working with Expert Quantitative Methods: Statistics for Lawyers Witnesses Refugee Law and Policy Sexual Orientation and the Law: Selected Topics in Trial Practice: Criminal Law and Advocacy Civil Rights Sign Language for Lawyers J.D. Clinics Appellate Litigation Clinic J.D. Seminars Center for Applied Legal Studies Advanced Health Law Seminar Criminal Justice Clinic African-American Critical Thought Seminar Domestic Violence Clinic Animal Law Seminar Institute for Public Representation Asian Americans and Legal Ideology Seminar International Women's Human Rights Clinic Bioethics and the Law Seminar Juvenile Justice Clinic Capital Punishment Seminar Law Students in Court Civil Litigation Seminar Street Law: Community Civil Rights Policy Seminar Street Law: High School Class Action Law and Practice Seminar Graduate Courses Comparative Consumer Protection Law Seminar Global Commerce and Litigation Comparative Family Law Seminar International Civil Litigation Complex Litigation Seminar: Perspectives on Introduction to Private International Law Federal Court Reform Tax Practice and Procedure (Litigation) Constitutional Law Seminar: Contemporary Problems in American Constitutional Law PUBLIC INTEREST LAW Constitutional Law: Critical Race Perspectives Seminar J.D. Courses Crime and Punishment Seminar Administrative Law Doing Well and Doing Good: Enhancing Pro Bono Administrative Law and Regulatory Policy at Major Law Firms Advanced Lnvironmental Law Lconomic Justice Seminar Civil Rights Flection Law: Advanced Seminar Constitutional Law II: Individual Rights and Lnvironmental Research Workshop Liberties Fourteenth Amendment Seminar Constitutional Law: Theories of Free Speech Gender and the Law Seminar Corporate Governance Genetics, Lthics and the Law Seminar Disahility Discrimination Law Health and Human Rights Seminar: Application of Drug Abuse and the Law: Policy, Politics, and the International Bill of Human Rights to Puhlic Health Global Health Lconomic Justice (offered as a perspective elective) Homelessness and Legal Advocacy Seminar Flection Law: Ballots, Bucks, Maps, and the Law Housing Today: Lawyering Affordahle Housing Lmployment Discrimination Seminar COURSE CLUSTERS 115

Immigration and Citizenship: Advanced Research Graduate Seminars Seminar Development Law and Finance Seminar Immigration Law and Policy: Advanced Research Seminar Related J.D. Courses Information Privacy Law Seminar Economic Reasoning and the Law International Human Rights Workshop International Trade and Human Rights Seminar REAL ESTATE, LAND USE AND URBAN International Women's Human Rights Seminar DEVELOPMENT Issues in Disarmament: Proliferation of Modern J.D. Courses Weapons Seminar Finance of Real and Personal Property Jurisprudence of International Human Rights Land Use Law Seminar Law and Aging Seminar Quantitative Methods: Statistics for Lawyers Law and Development Seminar Law and Psychiatry Seminar J.D. Seminars Law, Public Lducation, and Equality of Constitutional Property Law: Takings Seminar Opportunity Seminar Drafting and Negotiating Commercial Real Estate Literacy and Law Seminar Documents: Real Estate Contracts, Loan Natural Resources Law Seminar: Selected Topics Documents, and the Commercial Lease Seminar Negotiation and Mediation in Public Interest Drafting and Negotiating Commercial Settings Transactional Documents Non-Profit Organizations Seminar Historic Preservation Seminar Puhlic School Reform: Policy, Practice and the Housing Today: Lawyering Affordable Housing Law Seminar Seminar Race and American Law Seminar Urban Policy, Metropolitanism, and the Law Refugee Protection: Advanced Research Seminar Seminar Refugees and Humanitarian Lmergencies: J.D. Clinics Advanced Research Seminar Harrison Institute for Public Law: Housing and Social Welfare Law and Policy Seminar Development Clinic Strategic Decision-making in First Amendment Law Students in Court Litigation Seminar Strategic Intelligence and Public Policy Seminar Graduate Courses Urban Policy, Metropolitanism, and the Law Tax Planning for Real Estate Transactions Seminar Taxation of Properly Transactions

J.D. Clinics TAXATION Appellate Litigation Clinic Center for Applied Legal Studies J.D. Courses Criminal Justice Clinic Entrepreneurship Domestic Violence CUnic Estate and Gift Taxation Family Advocacy Clinic Fiduciaries: Myths and Realities Federal Legislation Clinic Partnership Taxation Federal Legislation Clinic, District of Columbia Retirement Income: Taxation and Regulation Division Structuring Venture Capital and Entrepreneurial Harrison Institute for Public Law: Housing and Transactions Development Clinic Taxation I Harrison Institute for Public Law: Policy Clinic Taxation II Institute for Public Representation Taxes.com: A Study of the Taxation of Electronic International Women's Human Rights Clinic Commerce Juvenile Justice Clinic Law Students in Court J.D. Seminars Street Law: Community Business Planning Seminar Street Law: High School Estate Planning Seminar High Technology Start-Ups and Their Venture Graduate Courses Capital Financing Seminar: Principles and International Human Rights Law Practice Tax Treatment of Charities and Cther Nonprofit International Tax Planning Seminar Organizations Role of Taxes in Business Decisions Seminar Tax Policy Seminar Graduate Courses Taxation of Property Transactions Advanced Partnership Taxation The U.S. Income Tax: Policies and Practices Charitable Organizations and Planned Giving U.S. Taxation of International Income I Comparative International Taxation U.S. Taxation of International Income II Comparative Tax Law U.S. Taxation of International Transactions Consolidated Returns: Principles and Planning Corporate Income Tax Law I Graduate Seminars Corporate Income Tax Law II Graduate Seminar: Advanced Corporate Taxation Lmployee Benefits in Corporate Transactions Graduate Seminar: Advanced International Tax European Tax Law Policy European Tax Law of Mergers 8c Reorganizations Graduate Seminar: Advanced International Executive Compensation: Equity 8c Cash-Based Taxation Incentives Graduate Seminar: Advanced Private Wealth and Federal Taxation of Bankruptcy and Workouts Charitable Planning Financial Derivatives Taxation Graduate Seminar: Comparative State and Federal Graduate Seminar: Current Issues in Lmployee Taxation Benefits Graduate Seminar: Recent Tax Legislative Income Tax Accounting Developments Income Taxation of Trusts and Estates Graduate Seminar: Selected Topics in Federal Tax International Transfer Pricing: Theory vs. Practice Policy Introduction to Taxation of Deferred Compensation Graduate Seminar: Selected Topics in State and Retirement Plan Design and Taxation Local Taxation S Corporations and Limited Liahility Companies: Tax and Business Issues TRUSTS AND ESTATES State and Local Taxation J.D. Courses Tax Aspects of Employee Welfare Benefits Decedents' Estates Tax Lawyering and Professional Responsibility in Estate and Gift Taxation Federal Tax Practice Fiduciaries: Myths and Realities Tax Planning for Business Transactions Retirement Income: Taxation and Regulation Tax Planning for Corporate Acquisitions and Dispositions J.D. Seminars Tax Planning for Real Estate Transactions Estate Planning Seminar Tax Practice and Procedure (Administrative Practice) Tax Practice and Procedure (Litigation) Graduate Courses Tax Research Advanced Partnership Taxation Tax Treatment of Charities and Other Nonprofit Charitable Organizations and Planned Giving Organizations Income Taxation of Trusts and Estates Taxation of Financial Institutions and Products Tax Treatment of Charities and Other Nonprofit Taxation of Intellectual Property Organizations Taxation of Partnerships APPENDIX A: DIRECTORY DF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERS AND OFFICERS OF INSTRUCTION 119

APPENDIX B: JO PROGRAM ADJUNCT FACULTY 126 Instructors of Mock Trial Advocacy 131

APPENDIX C: GRADUATE PROGRAM ADJUNCT FACULTY 133 APPENDIX 0: CHARLES FAHY DISTINGUISHED ADJUNCT PROFESSOR AWARD RECIPIENTS 138 APPENDIX E: SCHOLARSHIPS 139 APPENDIX F: LOANS 145 APPENDIX G: PRIZES AND AWARDS 146

117

APPENDIX A: DIRECTORY OF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERS AND OFFICERS OF INSTRUCTION II9

APPENDIX A: DIRECTORY OF ADMINISTRATIVE Leslie Jacobson OFFICERS AND OFFICERS OF INSTRUCTION Fred Kammer, S.J. Board of Directors Peter F. Karches Chair Edmond D. Villani Dorothy Ann Kelly, O.S.U.

Vice Chair Gerard M. Kenny

Rev. Howard J. Gray, S.J. The Hon. Robert M. Kimmitt

Secretary James V. Kimsey

Edward M. Quinn Theodore J. Leonsis

The Board Yvonne B. Maher

Kathleen Adams Baczko Philip A. Marineau

William A. Baker, Jr. John P. McDaniel

William R. Berkley Rev. Brian O. McDermott, S.J.

David G. Bradley Robert E. McDonough

Rev. Jean-Yves Calvez, S.J. Virginia Mortara

Lloyd E. Campbell Thomas A. Reynolds, III

Rev. Edwin H. Cassem, S.J. Patricia F. Russo

John J. Cassidy Rev. Thomas H. Stahel, S.J.

Winston J. Churchill Allan J. Wade

Marcia Cooke Marcus Wallenberg

Peter C. Cooper Lance L. Weaver

John J. DeGioia, Ph.D. Stephen Wolf

James M. Denny Hans P. Ziegler

John J. Fauth, IV President of the University Waiiam P. Frank John J. DeGioia, B.A., Ph.D. John A. Gaberino, Jr. Executive Vice President, Law Center Affairs The Hon. Arthur Gajarsa Judith Areen, A.B., J.D.

Elliot S. Hall Law Center Deans and Vice Presidents

Rev. J. Bryan Hehir Judith Areen, A.B., J.D., Executive Vice President, Law Center Affairs, and Dean Michael E. Heisley, Sr. Chris Augostini, B.A., M.A., Associate Vice President James F. Higgins (Business and Financial Affairs)

Shirley Ann Jackson 120 APPENDIX A: DIRECTORY OF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERS AND OFFICERS OF INSTRUCTION

Kevin T. Conry, B.S.F.S.,].D., Associate Vice Ellen Farwell, B.A., M.A., Director of Graduate President (Development and External Affairs) Career Services

James V. Feinerman, B.A., J.D., Associate Dean Beth Sherman, B.A., J.D., Associate Director of (International and Graduate Programs) Career Services (Covernment)

Vicki Jackson, B.h..,)lQ., Associate Dean (Research) Mern Horan, B.A., J.D., Associate Director of Career Services (Public Interest) Wallace J. MIyniec, B.S., J.D., Associate Dean (Clinical Education and Public Service Programs) Victoria DeMaret, B.A., J.D., Assistant Director of Career Services (Judicial Clerkships) Wendy Collins Perdue, B.A., J.D., Associate Dean (JD Program) Tiffani MiUien, B.A., J.D., Assistant Director of Career Services (Diversity Outreach) Everett Bellamy, B.S., M.S., J.D., Assistant Dean (J.D. Program) Anna Nicol, B.A., J.D., Assistant Director of Career Services (Programming) Andrew P. Cornblatt, B.A., J.D., Assistant Dean (Admissions) Christine Washington, B.S.F.S., J.D., Assistant Director of Graduate Career Services Gihan Fernando, B.A., J.D., Assistant Dean (Career Services) Chaplains and Counselors

Susan K. Gurley, B.A., J.D., Assistant Dean Rev. Alexei Michalenko, B.A., M.A., S.E.O.L., M.S. (International & Graduate Programs) Dorinda Young, S.S.J., B.S., M.A. Ruth Lammert-Reeves, B.A., M.A., Assistant Dean (Financial Aid) Continuing Legal Education Lawrence J. Center, B.A., J.D., Executive Director of Barbara Moulton, B.A., J.D., Assistant Dean Continuing Legal Education (Public Interest and Community Service) Financial Aid Office Carol Q. O'Neil, B.A., M.A.T, J.D., Assistant Dean Charles Pruett, B.A., J.D., Director of Financial Aid (J.D. Program) Jennifer Sommerman, B.A., M..A., Assistant Lisa Porcari, B.A., J.D., Assistant Dean Director of Financial Aid (Clinical Legal Studies) Rebecca Cady, B.A., M.A., Assistant Director of Therese Lee Stratton, B.S., M.^., Assistant Dean Financial Aid (Faculty Support and Campus Services) Financial Planning, Administrative and Support Admissions Office Services Sophia Sim, B.A., J.D., Director of Admissions Linda D. Davidson, B.A., Director, Financial Affairs Sherry Gilman, B.A., J.D., Associate Director of Katherine M. McCarthy, B.A., M.A., Special Admissions Assistant to the Dean

Alumni, Development and Public Relations Deborah Morey, B.A., M.S., Director of Business Paul Seifert, B.A., Senior Director of Development Services

Marsha Berry, B.S., Executive Director of Alma Robinson, Executive Assistant to the Dean Communications Raymond V. Smith, B.A., Director of Public Safety Patricia Roth, B.S., M.S., J.D., LL.M, Director of Alumni Affairs Melvinia Towns, B.S., Manager of Payroll Services

Career Services Offices International and Graduate Programs Office Marilyn Tucker, B.A., M.A., Director of Alumni Dorothy M. Mayer, B.A., M.A., J.D., Foreign Career Services Student Advisor APPENDIX A; DIRECTORY OF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERS AND OFFICERS OF INSTRUCTION 121

Mary BilodeauJackson, B.A., Administrator, Craig Leiansky, B.A., M.L.S., International Programs Acquisitions/Documents Librarian

Office of Public Interest and Community Service Douglas Find, B.A., M.L.S., J.D., Collection Development Librarian Lauren Dubin, B.A., M.A., Senior Public Interest Counselor Barbara Monroe, B.A., M.L.S., J.D., Reference Librarian Holly Eaton, B.A., J.D., Pro Bono Coordinator Susan Ryan, B.A., M.A., M.L.S., Office of the Registrar Reference/Lducational Services Librarian Scott Foster, A.B.J.D., LL.M., Registrar Hilary Seo, B.A., M.L.S., Preservation Librarian Cornelia Gustafson, B.A., Associate Registrar Mabel Shaw, B.A., M.L.S., Assistant International Debbie Naylor, B.A., Associate Registrar and Foreign Law Librarian

Simone Woung, B.A., J.D., Assistant Registrar WaiiamTaylor, B.A., M.L.S., Reference/Llectronic Services Librarian Office of Student Affairs and Residence Life Katherine Hall, B.A., M.A., Director of Student KristinaTryon, B.A., J.D., Nl.C?!., Acquisitions Affairs and Residence Life Librarian

Elise Perram, B.A., M.A., Assistant Director of Jane F. Walsh, B.A., M.A., Library Systems Manager Student Affairs Yuan Yao, B.A., M.L.S., Head of Cataloging Carol Walsh, B.A., Assistant Director of Residence Life Clinics The Law Library Wallace J. MIyniec, B.S., J.D., Associate Dean for Robert L. Oakley, B.A., J.D., M.S.L.S., Professor of Clinical Lducation and Public Service Programs, Law and Director, Law Library Lupo-Ricci Professor of Clinical Legal Studies, Director, Juvenile Justice Clinic Janice Snyder Anderson, B.A., yiD.'S., Associate Law Librarian for Technical Services Lisa M. Porcari, B.A., J.D., Assistant Dean for Clinical Lducation Laura Bedard, B.A., M.L.S., M.A., Special Collections Librarian Appellate Litigation Clinic Steven H. Goldblatt, B.A., J.D., Professor of Law, Jeffrey Bowen, B.A., M.L.S., Cataloging Librarian Director Gary J. Bravy, B.MUS., M.L.S., M.A., Roy Fnglert, Jr., A.B., J.D., Adjunct Professor Media/Reference Librarian

Center for Applied Legal Studies Tracey Bridgman, B.A., M.L.S., Faculty Services Librarian PhUip G. Schrag, A.B., LL.B., Professor of Law, Director Margaret Collins, B.A., M.I.L.S., J.D., Head of Reference David Koplow, B.A., J.D., Professor of Law, Director

Kevin A. Dames, B.B.A, M.L.S., J.D., Resident Charles R. Filson, B.A., M.A., Ph.D. Adjunct Librarian Professor

Margaret A. Fry, B.A., yLLIis., Associate Law Judy B. Okawa, B.A., M.A, TBH., Adjunct Professor Librarian for Administration Criminal Justice Clinic Marci Hoffman, B.A., M.L.I.S., International and Foreign Law Librarian John Copaeino, B.A., M.A.T, J.D., LL.M., Professor of Law, Director Christopher A. Knott, B.A., M.L.S., J.D., Associate Law Librarian for Public Services Abbe Smith, B.A., J.D., Professor of Law 122 APPENDIX A; DIRECTORY OF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERS AND OFFICERS OF INSTRUCTION

Paul Dennenfeld, B.A., J.D., Adjunct Professor International Women's Human Rights Clinic Susan Deller Ross, B.A., J.D., Professor of Law, Domestic Violence Clinic Director Deborah Epstein, B.A., J.D., Professor of Law, Director Johanna Bond, B.A., M.A., J.D., Visiting Associate Professor of Law, Assistant Director Laurie Kohn, B.A., J.D., LL.M., Visiting Associate Professor of Law, Assistant Director Juvenile Justice Clinic Wallace J. MIyniec, B.S.,].D., Associate Dean for Family Advocacy Clinic Clinical Lducation and Public Service Programs, Laura W. S. Macklin, B.A.,J.D., Professor of Law, Lupo-Rici Professor of Clinical Legal Studies, Director Director Kristin Henning, B.A.,J.D., Visiting Associate Federal Legislation Clinic Professor of Law, Deputy Director

Chai Feldblum, B.A., J.D., Professor of Law, Director Barbara Butterworth, B.A., J.D., LLM., Adjunct Professor of Law Deven McGraw, B.A., B.S., J.D., M.P.H., Visiting Associate Professor of Law, Assistant Director Law Students in Court Clinic

Robert Dove, B.A., M.A., J.D., Adjunct Professor Ann Marie Hay, B.A., J.D., Adjunct Professor, Director Federal Legislation Clinic-D.C. Division Karen Bower, B.K., ].!)., Adjunct Professor Peter Edelman, B.A., LL.B., Professor of Law, Director Lorien Buehler, B.A., J.D., Adjunct Professor

Harrison Institute of Public Law Dorene Haney, B.A., J.D., Adjunct Professor Jason Newman, B.A.,].F)., Adjunct Professor, Director Nathan A. Neal, B.A., J.D., Adjunct Professor Robert K. Stumberg, B.A., J.D., LL.M., Professor of Law, Clinical Director D.C. Street Law Project

Michael Diamond, B.A., J.D., LL.M., Senior Richard L. Roe, B.A., J.D., Professor of Law, Director Academic & Policy Fellow, Associate Director Lee Arbetman, B.A., J.D., Adjunct Professor John Hurson, B.A., J.D., Adjunct Professor Edward O'Brien, B.K.,].Y)., Adjunct Professor Richard Gervase, B.A., J.D., Adjunct Professor Judith Zimmer, B.A., J.D., Adjunct Professor Aaron O'Toole, B.A., J.D., Adjunct Professor Women's Law and Public Policy Fellowship Matthew Porterfield, B.A., J.D., Adjunct Professor Mary Hartnett, B.A., J.D., Senior Lecturer, Director

Jacqueline Belk Scott, B.A., J.D., Adjunct Professor Wendy Williams, B.A., J.D., Professor of Law

William Waren, A.B., M.A.P.A., J.D., Adjunct Professor Institutes and Dther Scholarly Programs

Institute for Public Representation Asian Law and Policy Studies Program David C. Vladeck, B.A., J.D., IdLM., Associate James V. Feinerman, B.A., M.A., M.Phil., J.D., Professor of Law, Co-Director Ph.D.,/flOTef M. Morita Professor of Asian Legal Studies, Associate Dean, International & Craduate Angela Campbell, B.A., J.D., LL.M., Professor of Programs, Director Law, Co-Director Center for Constitutional Studies Hope Babcock, B.A., LL.B., Professor of Law, Mark V. Tushnet, B.A., M.A., J.D., Carmack Co-Director Waterhouse Professor of Constitutional Law APPENDIX A: DIRECTORY OF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERS AND OFFICERS OF INSTRUCTION 123

Susan Low Bloch, B.A., M.A., Ph.C, J.D., Professors Emeriti Professor of Law Chester James Antieau, B.S., M.S., Detroit Institute of Technology; J.D., Detroit; LL.M., Center for Law & the Public's Health at Georgetown S.J.D., University of Michigan and Johns Hopkins University Lawrence O. Gostin, B.A., J.D., LL.D. (Hon.), Norman Birnbaum, B.A., Williams; M.A., Ph.D., Professor of Law, Professor of Public Health, the Johns Harvard Hopkins University, Director Edwin J. Bradley, A.B., Mount St. Mary's; LL.B., Environmental Law and Policy Institute Georgetown J. Peter Byrne, B.A., M.A., J.D., Professor of Law John Shea Bulman, A.B., Amherst; LL.B., Georgetown Georgetown-Hewlett Program on Conflict Resolution and Legal Problem Solving Richard Alan Gordon, B.S.F.S., J.D., LL.M., Carrie Menkel-Meadow, A.B. J.D., LL.D., Professor Georgetown of Law, Director Stanley Metzger, A.B., J.D., Cornell; LL.B., Institute for the Study of International Migration Georgetown In affiliation with the Georgetown School of Foreign Service Douglas L. Parker, B.A., Stanford; J.D., Harvard T. Alexander Aleinikoff, B.A., J.D., Professor of Law Martin Riger, B.A., LL.B., Columbia Institute of Criminal Law and Procedure Samuel Dash, B.S., J.D., Professor of Law, Director John R. Schmertz, Jr., A.B., Holy Cross; LL.B., LL.M., Georgetown Institute of International Economic Law Robert S. Schoshinski, B.S., Notre Dame; LL.B., John H.Jackson, A.B., J.D., University Professor, LL.M., Georgetown Director Helen L. Steinbinder, A.B., Manhattanville; M.A., Olin Law and Economics Program M.S.L.S., Columbia; J.D., LL.M., Georgetown Warren F. Schwartz, A.B., LL.B., Professor of Law, Director Don Wallace, Jr., B.A., Yale; LL.B., Harvard

Program on International Business and Economic Law The Executive Officers of the University Barry F. Carter, B.A., M.P.A., J.D., Professor of Law, President, John J. DeGioia, Ph.D. Director Provost, James J. O'DonneU, Ph.D. The Sioan-Georgetown Project on Business Institutions Executive Vice President for Law Center Affairs and Donald Langevoort, B.A., J.D., Professor of Law, Dean of the School of Law, Judith Areen Director Interim Executive Vice President for Health Sciences, J. Richard Gaintner, M.D. Supreme Court Institute Richard Lazarus, B.S., B.A., J.D., Professor of Law, Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer, Director Spirios Dimohtsas, Ph.D.

Vice President for Alumni and University Relations, Deans Emeriti Michael Goodwin Paul R. Dean, A.B., Youngstown; LL.B., LL.M., LL.D., Georgetown Vice President for Communications and Public Affairs, Daniel Porterfield David J. McCarthy, Jr., A.B., Fairfield; J.D., LL.M., LL.D., Georgetown 124 APPENDIX A: DIRECTORY OF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERS AND OFFICERS OF INSTRUCTION

Vice President and University Counsel, Flizabeth HefFernan, L'80 Jane E. Genster Hogan & Hartson, LLP Washington, DC Vice President for Information Services and CIO, H. David Lambert Thomas Heyman, L'62 Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue Acting Vice President and Treasurer, New York, NY Earnest W. Porta, Jr. N. Lynn Hiestand, F75, L'80 Secretary of the University, Edward M. Quinn Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom Chicago, IL Board of Visitors J. Clifford Hudson, L'80 Chair Sonic Dennis Meyer, L'60, LL.M.'62 Oklahoma City, OK Baker & McKenzie Washington, DC Honorable Michael Kantor, L'68 Vice-Chair Mayer, Brown & Piatt Regina Pisa, L'82 Washington, DC Goodwin Procter Boston, MA Jules Kroll, L'66 Kroll Associates Board New York, NY Caryl Bernstein, L'67 The Bernstein Law Firm, PLLC Weldon H. Latham, L'71 Washington, DC Holland lA Knight, LLP Washington, DC Joan Claybrook, L'73 Public Citizen Honorable Cheryl Long, F'71, L'74 Washington, DC D. C. Superior Court Washington, DC James P. Connelly, L72 Foley & Lardner Gordon S. Macklin Milwaukee, WI Bethesda, MD Honorable Julian Cook, L'57, H'92 David J. McCarthy, Jr., L'60, LL.M.'62, H'83 US. District Court Charlottesville, VA Detroit, MI R. Bruce McLean Patricia Dean, B75, L'81 Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer A Feld, LLP Arnold & Porter Washington, DC Washington, DC

Lee I. Miller, C'69, L'72 John Delaney, L'88 Piper, Marbury, Rudnick and Wolf, LLP Capital Source Chicago, IL Chevy Chase, MD

John E. Nolan, L'55 James A. Gilbert, L74 Steptoe A Johnson Live Oak Equity Partners Washington, DC Alpharetta, GA Paul A. Nussbaum, L'71 Scott Ginsburg, L78 Dallas, TX Dallas, TX Lawrence S. Okinaga, L'72 Frankin Gittes, L73 Carlsmith Ball Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom New York, NY Honolulu, HI

Thomas F.O'NeU III, L'82 John F. Hartigan, L75 Piper Rudnick, LLP Morgan, Lewis & Bockius Washington, DC Los Angeles, CA APPENDIX A: DIRECTORY OF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERS AND OFFICERS OF INSTRUCTION

Rev. Ladislas Orsy, S.J. Robert M. Ruyak, L'74 Georgetown University Law Center Howrey Simon Arnold A White, LLP Washington, DC Washington, DC

Carmen A. Policy, L'66 Paul Saunders, L'66 Cleveland Browns Cravath, Swaine A Moore Cleveland, OH New York, NY

Honorable Michael K. Powell, L'93 Bernard M. Shapiro (Bob), L'67, LL.M.'70 Federal Communications Commission Price Waterhouse LLP Washington, DC Washington, DC

Gregory R. Raifman, L'84 Honorable Thomas L. Siebert, C'68, L'72 Mediaplex U.S. Telemetry Corporation San Francisco, CA Annapolis, MD

Edward M.Ricci, L'73 Katherine McG. Sullivan, L'88 Ricci, Leopold, Farmer & McAfee, PA. Citigroup West Palm Beach, PL New York, NY

Eric Roiter, L'73 Brendan V. Sullivan, Jr., C'64, L'67 Fidelity Investments Williams A Connolly Boston, MA Washington, DC 126 APPENDIX B: JD PROGRAM ADJUNCT FACULTY

APPENDIX B: JD PRDGRAM ADJUNCT FACULTY Fmanuel Boasberg B.A., Yale; J.D., Harvard W.ShepherdsonAbeU A. B., Boston College; M.P.A., Harvard; J.D., Mark Healy Bonner Georgetown A.B., Georgetown; J.D., American University The Honorable Francis M. AUegra Robert C. Bordone B. A., Borromeo College of Ohio; J.D., Cleveland A. B., Dartmouth; J.D., Harvard State University Stephen L. Braga Stephen D. Altman B. A., Fairfield University; J.D., Georgetown B.A., Duke; J.D., Syracuse College of Law Richard L. Brand Anthony Clark Arend B.S.B.A. (Finance), Georgetown; J.D., University B.S.F.S., Georgetown; M.A., Ph.D., University of Pennsylvania of Virginia Douglas M. Bregman Jonathan Band B.A., Colgate; J.D., Georgetown B.A., Harvard; J.D., Yale Daniel L. Brenner MarkT. Banner B.A., A.M., J.D., Stanford B.A., Purdue; J.D., John Marshall Law School William H. Briggs, Jr. Kenneth C. Bass, III A. B., Davidson College; J.D., Duke A. B., Duke; LL.B., Yale Frank Burk Jack M. Beard B. S.F.S., LL.M., Georgetown; J.D., University B. A., Dartmouth; J.D., George Washington of Michigan William F. Burton Alfred F. Belcuore B.A., Miami University; J.D., Georgetown B.A., Notre Dame; J.D., Georgetown William A. Buder Fverett Bellamy B.A., Stanford; J.D., Yale; Ph.D., Harvard B.S., M.S., University of Wisconsin; J.D., Cleveland Caria C. Calcagno State University B.A., J.D., Georgetown Joseph J. Berghammer Fllen M. Callinan B.S., Massachusetts Institute of Technology; B.A., Trinity College; J.D., William & Mary; J.D., Yale M.S.F.S., Catholic University Jeffrey Scott Barman Joseph A. CarabiUo B.A., Connecticut College; J.D., Yale B.A., Wmiam Paterson College; J.D., Seton Hall; LL.M., New York University Joshua G. Berman B.A., Cornell; J.D., University of Michigan Stephen Case A. B., LL.B., Columbia FdwardK.M.Bilich B.A., Wake Forest; J.D., Harvard Kent Cassibry

Mark J. Biros B. A.,Troy State University; J.D., Samford A. B., Princeton; J.D., Georgetown William F. Causey Professor Gary F. Blemaster B.A., American University; J.D., University of Maryland B. A., Ohio State University; M.M., Northwestern; Reid P. Chambers M.A., Columbia; M.S.P.P., Johns Hopkins B.A., Amherst; M.A., Balliol College, Oxford; Jeffrey Blumenfeld J.D., Harvard A.B., Brown; J.D., University of Pennsylvania APPENDIX B: JD PROGRAM ADJUNCT FACULTY 127

Scott Alien Chambers, Ph.D. Michael R. Diamond B.S., Ohio State University; Ph.D., Florida State B.A., Syracuse University; J.D., Fordham; LL.M., University; J.D., George Washington New York University

Steve Charnovitz David M. Dorsen B.A., J.D., Yale; Master of Puhlic Policy, Harvard A. B.,J.D., Harvard

Anjali Chaturvedi Michael Dreeben B.S., Cornell; J.D., Georgetown B. A., University of Wisconsin- Madison; M.A., University of Chicago; J.D., Duke Paul D. Clement B.S.F.S., Georgetown; M. Phil., Cambridge; Jane Moretz Edmisten J.D., Harvard B.A., M.A., University of North Carolina; J.D., George Washington James S. Cockburn Randall D. Eliason LL.B., LL.M., Ph.D., Leeds University, Lngland B.A., University of North Dakota; J.D., Harvard

George H. Cohen Mark C. Ellenberg B.S., Cornell; J.D., Georgetown B.A., LL.B., Cornell; LL.M., Georgetown W. Mason Emnett Peter J. Cohen, M.D. B.A., University of Texas-Arlington; B.A., Princeton; M.D., Columbia; J.D., Georgetown J.D., Georgetown Jeremiah C. Collins B.S., J.D., Georgetown Roger A. Fairfax, Jr. John T. Collins A. B., J.D., Harvard; M.A., University of London; B.A., Holy Cross; J.D., LL.M., Georgetown Kenneth R. Feinberg Meg Collins B. A., University of Massachusetts; J.D., New A. B., Smith; J.D., Georgetown; M.I.L.S., York University University of Michigan The Honorable Gerald I. Fisher EarlM. Colson B.A., William & Mary; J.D., Catholic University B. S., Syracuse University; J.D., Harvard Luin Fitch The Honorable John O. Colvin B.A., Johns Hopkins; LL.B., Columbia A. B., University of Missouri; J.D., LL.M. (Taxation), Georgetown James F. Fitzpatrick A.B., J.D., Indiana University Kevin T. Conry B. S.F.S., J.D., Georgetown Scott F. Flick

Diane E. Cooley A. B., University of Michigan; J.D., Northwestern B.A., Boston University; J.D., Georgetown Rabbi Barry Freundel Marc S. Cooperman B. A., Yeshiva College; B.S., Erna Michael College B.S.M.L., J.D, University of lUinois of Hebraic Studies; M.S., Bernard Revel Graduate School Cathy A. Costantino Michael S. Frisch B.A., M.S.W., Catholic University; J.D., University B.A., Case Western Reserve; J.D., Georgetown of California-Berkeley Patricia Mullahy Fugere The Honorable Edward J. Damich A.B., J.D., Georgetown A. B., St. Stephen's College; J.D., Catholic University; LL.M.,J.S.D., Columbia Nancy Caroline Garrison A.B., Brown; J.D., Yale Harold J. Datz B. A., LL.B., University of Florida 128 APPENDIX B: JD PROGRAM ADJUNCT FACULTY

Russell A. Gaudreau,Jr. James G. Hodge, Jr. B.A., University of Massachusetts; J.D., Suffolk B.S., College of Charleston; J.D., Northern University; LL.M. (Taxation), New York University Kentucky University; LL.M., Georgetown

Christian S. Genetski Marci B. Hoffman B.A., Birmingham-Southern College; J.D. B.A., University of California-Davis; M.L.I.S., Vanderhilt University of California-Berkeley

Elizabeth S. Gere Judith Richards Hope

B.A., Denison University; J.D., George Washington A. B., Wellesley College; J.D., LL.D. (Hon), Harvard

Richard W. Gibson Richard C. Hotvedt

A.B., Fordham; J.D., Catholic University B. S., Marquette University; LL.B., Harvard

Daniel J. Gilman Carole S. Houk A. B., Dartmouth; A.M., Ph.D., The University of B.S., Michigan State University; J.D., Wayne State Chicago; J.D., Georgetown University; LL.M, Georgetown Edward M. Gleason, Jr. David B. Isbell B.A., LL.B., Yale B. A., Fordham; J.D., Dickinson School of Law Samuel S. Jackson, Jr.

Jordan B. Goldstein A. B., Princeton; J.D., University of North Carolina B.A., University of Wisconsin; M.A., Johns Hopkins; J.D., Stanford Cally Jordan David J. Goldstone D.E.A., French Civil Law, University of Paris I B.S., M.S., Massachusetts Institute of Technology; (Pantheon-Sorhonne); B.C.L., LL.B, McGill; J.D., Harvard M.A., University of Toronto Donald H. Green Thomas F. Kaufman B.A., Syracuse University; LL.B., Harvard B. S.F.E., State University of New York-Buffalo; J.D., Georgetown; M.B.A., The Wharton School of John D. Hagner the University of Pennsylvania

B.S.M.L., University of Cincinnati; J.D., Georgetown Charles B. Keely, Ph.D. B.A., M.A., Ph.D., Fordham; Ph.L., Timothy A. Harr Woodstock College

B.A., Princeton; J.D., University of Virginia Paul Yoshio Kiyonaga B.A., University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill; Mary Hartnett J.D., Harvard

B.A., Grinnell College; J.D., Georgetown Robert H. Klonoff A. B., University of California-Berkeley; J.D., Yale Ann Marie Hay B.A., University of California-Berkeley; Christopher A. Knott J.D., Georgetown John C. Hayes, Jr. B. A., University of Iowa; J.D., University of Michigan; M.L.I.S., Indiana University B.A., Williams College; J.D., George Washington Mark L. Kovner

J. Gerald Hebert B.A., Brandeis; J.D., Georgetown

B.A., StonehiU College; J.D., Suffolk University Frederick J. Krebs University of Manchester (England); B.A., Bennett L. Hecht Allegheny College; J.D., Case Western Reserve B.S., University of Maryland; J.D., Georgetown Kenneth Krisko Owen E. Herrnstadt B.S., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State B.S., M.S., J.D., University of Wisconsin University; J.D., University of Virginia John C. Hirsh B.A., Boston College; M.A., Ph.D., Lehigh University; Post-Doctoral Study in Lducation, University of California-Berkeley APPENDIX B: JD PROGRAM ADJUNCT FACULTY 129

Steven R. Kuney Joseph L. Mayer B.A., Wesleyan; M.A. (Public Policy), J.D., B. A., J.D., University of Minnesota; M.A., University of Pennsylvania University of Missouri

Esther E Lardent C. DeanMcGrath,Jr. B.A., Brown; J.D., University of Chicago B.A., Duke; J.D., University of Nebraska

The Honorable David Laro Jamie F. Metzl B.A., University of Michigan; J.D., University of B.A., Brown; D.Phil, St. Antony's CoUege, Oxford; Illinois; LL.M. (Taxation), New York University J.D., Harvard

Paul B. Larsen Betsy A. MiUer LL.B., University of Cincinnati; LL.M., New York University and McGill University, Montreal B.A., Dartmouth; J.D., Harvard

Kenneth A. Lazarus Glenn H. MiUer, M.D. B.A., University of Dayton; J.D., Notre Dame; LL.M., George Washington B.A., University of Iowa; M.D., University of Chicago

Richard J. Leon John T. MiUer, Jr. A. B., Holy Cross; J.D., Suffolk University; A.B., Clark University; J.D., Georgetown; Docteur LL.M., Harvard en Droit, University of Geneva, Switzerland Helen HiUMinsker Lee Levine A. B., Vassar; J.D., George Washington Jonathan F. Missner B. A., M.A., University of Pennsylvania; J.D., Yale B. A., Johns Hopkins; M.B.A., George Washington; J.D., Georgetown Michael J. Levitin A.B., J.D., Harvard; M.A.L.D., Fletcher School of The Honorable Robert F. Morin Law and Diplomacy B.A., University of Massachusetts; J.D., Michael K. Lewis Catholic University A. B., Dartmouth; J.D., Georgetown Robert F. Muse Nancy J. Linck B.S., Boston CoUege; J.D., Georgetown Ph.D., University of California-San Diego; J.D., Western New Lngland College Rev. Raymond C. O'Brien Douglas Lind B.A., La SaUe College; J.D., University of Virginia; B. A., Perdue; J.D., Valparaiso; M.I.L.S., University M.Ch.A., D.Min., Catholic University of Michigan Matthew G. Olsen David A. Lipton B.A., University of Virginia; J.D., Harvard B.A., Cornell; M.A., Columbia; J.D., University of Michigan Sczerina Perot B.A., Columbia; J.D., Georgetown Robert AUen Long, Jr. B.A., University of North Carolina; B.A., Oxford Joseph D. Piorkowski, Jr. University; J.D., Yale B.A., Hofstra; D.O., Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine; J.D., Georgetown; M.P.H., Abbe David LoweU Johns Hopkins B.A.,J.D., Columbia Alexander J. Pires, Jr. Gerald A. Malia B.S.B.A., Boston University; J.D., LL.M., George Washington B.S., St. Peter's CoUege; J.D., LL.M., Georgetown BUly L. Ponds R. Paul Margie B.A., University of South Carolina; J.D., Howard

B.A., Haverford CoUege; J.D., University of Chicago Mark S. Popofsky A.B., Brown; J.D., Harvard Susan Martin B.A., Rutgers; M.A., Ph.D., University of Pennsylvania 130 APPENDIX B: JD PROGRAM ADJUNCT FACULTY

Julia L. Porter Richard Salgado B.A., University of Nebraska; J.D., George Washington B.A. University of New Mexico; J.D., Yale

Joseph M. Potenza Thomas R. SaUey B.S.E.E., Rochester Institute of Technology; J.D., Georgetown B.A., Washington & Lee; J.D., University of Virginia

Michael S. Raab David N. Saperstein B.S., Indiana University; J.D., Yale B.A., CorneU; M.H.L., Hebrew Union CoUege; J.D., American University Richard A. Ratner, M.D. Michael G. Scheininger B.A., University of Chicago; M.D., University B.A., Franklin and MarshaU; J.D., University of of Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Lois J. Schiffer Douglas Reed A. B., Radcliffe; J.D., Harvard B.A., University of California- Santa Cruz; M.A., M.Phil, Ph.D., Yale University Mark D. Schneider

Melissa G. Reinherg B. A., Haverford College; J.D., Georgetown

A. B., Cornell; J.D, Harvard; LL.M., Georgetown Andrew I. Schoenholtz

John P. Relman B.A., HamUton CoUege; J.D., Harvard; Ph.D., Brown

B. A., Harvard. J.D., University of Michigan Eric J. Schwartz

Christopher J. Renk B.A., Johns Hopkins; J.D., American University B.S., Iowa State University; J.D., University of Minnesota Anthony W. Shaw Jennifer Lee Renne B.A., University of Pennsylvania; J.D., Georgetown A. B., M.Lng., Cornell; J.D., Georgetown Daniel A. Rezneck B.A., LL.B., Harvard Judd Andrew Sher B. S., University of Maine; J.D., University of Dayton; Michael L. Rosenthal LL.M., Georgetown B.S., Cornell; J.D., Harvard Scott A. Siff A.B.,J.D., Harvard Adam L. Rosman The Honorable Laurence H. SUberman B.A., Union CoUege; J.D., Stanford A. B., Dartmouth; LL.B., Harvard David C. Simmons Marc Rotenberg B. A. Howard University; J.D., Georgetown A. B., Harvard; J.D., Stanford Linda R. Singer Paula N. Rubin B. A., University of Texas-Austin; J.D., State B.A., Radcliffe; J.D., George Washington University of New York-Buffalo Eric B. Sloan Jonathan J. Rusch A. B., Princeton; M.A., J.D., University of Virginia B.A., Northwestern; J.D., The University of Chicago; LL.M., Georgetown Peregrine D. RusseU-Hunter Gary D. SoUs B. A., Syracuse University; J.D., Northwestern B.A., San Diego State College; J.D., University of California-Davis; LL.M., George Washington; Stephen Michael Ryan Ph.D., The London School of Economics & B.S., Cornell; J.D., Notre Dame Political Science Steven P. Solow

Charles P. Sabatino B.A., Brown; J.D., New York University A.B., Cornell; J.D., Georgetown Debra L. Soltis B.A., Duquesne University; J.D., Georgetown APPENDIX B: JD PROGRAM ADJUNCT FACULTY 131

Michael J. Songer AUen P. Waxman B.S., B.A., Notre Dame; J.D., Duke A. B., Dartmouth; J.D., Harvard

Terri A. Southwick W.MackWebner BJ., University of Missouri; J.D., Duke B. S., J.D., University of Akron; LL.M., New York University Robert J. Spagnoletti B.A., Lafayette College; J.D., Georgetown Robert M. Weinberg B.A., J.D., University of Michigan Valerie J. Stanley Judy WhaUey A.B., Goucher College; J.D., Catholic University B.S., J.D., University of California-Davis Jacob A. Stein A. A., LL.B., George Washington Richard M. Whiting PalmaJ. Strand B.A., State University of New York-Binghamton; B. S.,J.D., Stanford J.D., Boston College; Graduate, Stonier School of Banking, Rutgers University Julia E. Sullivan Bruce T.Wieder B.A., Texas A&M; J.D., American University B.S., CorneU; M.B.A., J.D., University of Texas-Austin Michael E. Tankersley B.A., William and Mary; J.D., Harvard JohnWoUr LL.D., University of Heidelberg; LL.M., Columbia William Taylor B.A., Brooklyn CoEege, City University of New York; Professor Andrew D. Wolvin LL.B., Yale B.S., M.A., University of Nebraska; Ph.D., Purdue

Andrew S. Tulumello Raymond J. Wyrsch A. B.,J.D., Harvard B.A., Seton Hall; J.D., University of Houston; LL.M., M.B.A., George Washington Alan D. UUberg

B. A., Reed College; LL.B., Harvard James W. Zirkle B.S., Carson-Newman College; J.D., University of Carl L. Vacketta Tennessee; LL.M., Yale B.S., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; J.D., University of Illinois Instructors of Mock Trial Advocacy Francis A. Vasquez, Jr. B.S., California Institute of Technology; Bonnie K. Arthur J.D., Georgetown Chadbourne & Parke, LLP Washington, DC Aaron J. VeUi B.A., Brown; J.D., University of Maryland WUUam J. Bachman Williams & Connelly Donald B.VerriUi, Jr. Washington, DC B.A., Yale;J.D., Columbia Michael J. Barta John K. ViUa Miller, Cassidy, Larroca & Lewin, LLP Washington, DC A.B., Duke; J.D., University of Michigan Deborah Connor Richard C.Visek U.S. Attorney's Office Washington, DC A. B., Stanford; J.D., Georgetown; LL.M., Cambridge Eric P. GaUun J. Brent Walker Office of the Corporation Counsel, Criminal Division B. A., M.A., University of Florida; J.D., Stetson Washington, DC University; M. Div., Southern Baptist Theological SaraSeminarh Wartey U A.B., Princeton; J.D., Yale 132 APPENDIX B: JD PROGRAM ADJUNCT FACULTY

Scot A. Hinshaw Precious Murchison Hunton & Williams District of Columbia Superior Court Washington, DC Washington, DC

Deana A. LaBarbera TobinJ. Romero Securities &c Exchange Commission Williams and Connolly, LLP Washington, DC Washington, DC

Joy L. Langford Matthew R. Stiglitz Chadbourne & Parke, LLP Office of State's Attorney for Charles County Washington, DC LaPlata, MD

Mark J. Lesko Amul Thapar U.S. Attorney's Office U.S. Attorney's Office Washington, DC Washington, DC

Marc O. Litt Francis A. Vasquez, Jr. U.S. Attorney's Office White & Case, LLP Washington, DC Washington, DC

Stephen Russell Martin, II Michael A. Zito U.S. Attorney's Office Federal Trade Commission, Bureau of Competition Washington, DC Washington, DC

James G. McGovern U.S. Attorney's Office Washington, DC APPENDIX C: GRADUATE PROGRAM ADJUNCT FACULTY 133

APPENDIX C: GRADUATE PROGRAM John L. Buckley ADJUNCT FACULTY J.D., University of Wisconsin Grant D. Aldonas Deborah Kay Burand B.A., J.D., University of Minnesota B.A., DePauw University; J.D./M.S.F.S., Georgetown Christopher Anzidei Michael S. Caldwell B.A., Rutgers; J.D., Georgetown B.A., Notre Dame; J.D., Georgetown Paul M. Architzel Joseph M. Calianno B.A., State University of New York - Albany; J.D., B.A., University of Scranton; J.D., Villanova; George Washington LL.M., M.B.A., New York University James L. Atkinson Richard A. Capino B.A., University of South Carolina; J.D., University B.A., J.D., University of Maryland; M.B.A., of Illinois Old Dominion

Robert G. B agnail Douglas W. Charnas B.A.,Yale;J.D., Harvard A. B., Ohio University; J.D., Case Western Reserve; LL.M. (Taxation), Georgetown Markham Ball B.A., Amherst; B.A., M.A., Oxford; L.L.B., Harvard William R. Charyk B. A., Johns Hopkins; J.D., George Washington Lori Ann Bean B.A., Vanderhilt; J.D., Cornell Sheila C. Cheston B.A., Dartmouth; J.D., Columbia Edward J. Beckwith B.S., Pennsylvania State University; J.D., LL.M. Richard R Chovanec (Taxation), Georgetown B.A., Virginia Polytechnic Institute; J.D., William and Mary; LL.M., Georgetown Dennis P. Bedell

A.B., Harvard; J.D., University of Michigan Larry E. Christensen B.A., University of South Dakota; J.D., Duke Mary C. Bennett David Stewart Christy, Jr. A. B., Harvard; J.D., Columbia; LL.M. (Taxation), B.A., University of Kansas; J.D., University Boston College of Chicago WiUiam G. Beyer B. S., George Mason; J.D., LL.M. Sean Patrick Clancy (Taxation), Georgetown B.A., Lehigh; J.D., Widener; LL.M. (Taxation), Georgetown Karan K. Bhatia A. B., Princeton; M.Sc, London School of Shirley A. Coffield Economics; J.D., Columbia B.A., Willamette; M.A., University of Wisconsin; J.D., George Washington GUbertD. Bloom B. S., University of Maryland; J.D., George Bryan P. Collins Washington; LL.M. (Taxation), Georgetown; C.P.A. B.B.A. (Accounting), J.D., University of Texas; LL.M. (Taxation), New York University Hilary Coyne BrUl A. B., Harvard; Raoul Wallenberg Fellow, Hebrew The Honorable John C. Colvin University; J.D., Georgetown A.B., University of Missouri; J.D., LL.M. (Taxation), Georgetown Kyle Nelson Brovm B. A., University of North Carolina; J.D., Campbell Andrea M. Corcoran University; LL.M. (Taxation), George Washington A. B., Stanford; LL.B., Harvard Gregory S. Bruch David L. Crawford, Jr. A.B., Stanford; J.D., University of Iowa B. S., Georgetown; J.D., George Washington 134 APPENDIX C: GRADUATE PROGRAM ADJUNCT FACULTY

Robert J. Crnkovich Peter I. RUnsky B.S., J.D., Marquette; LL.M. (Taxation), B.S., University of Connecticut; J.D., Suffolk Georgetown; C.P.A. University; LL.M. (Taxation), Boston University

David B. Cubeta David M. Rstabrook, CPA B.A., Colgate; J.D., Albany Law School B.A., Stanford; MBA, University of California - Los Angeles; C.P.A. Robert Culbertson B.A., Yale; J.D., Harvard Marianne Rvans B.B.S., J.D., Oklahoma City University; LL.M. David J. Curtin (Taxation), Georgetown; C.P.A. B.A., J.D., St. Louis University Jerry Reigen James L. Dahlberg B.A., Brooklyn CoUege B.A., CorneU; J.D., Boston CoUege; LL.M. (Taxation), Georgetown PhiUp Reigen B.S., Boston University; J.D., Catholic University Robert E. Dalton A.B., Holy Cross; LL.B., Columbia WiUiam J. Planagan B.S., J.D., Georgetown Peter M. Daub A. B., Harvard; J.D., Yale T. Keith Fogg B.A., LL.M., WiUiam and Mary, J.D., University Warren L. Dean of Richmond B. A., J.D., University of Maryland; LL.M. (Taxation), Georgetown Richard A. Frank A. B.,J.D., Harvard Donald R. Dinan B.S., Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania; Kenneth R. Fries J.D., Georgetown; LL.M., London School of B. A., Stanford; J.D., University of Economics California - Berkeley

EUzabeth Thomas Dold Lawrence M. Garrett B.S., Pennsylvania State University; J.D., A. B.,JD, Harvard Dickinson; LL.M., New York University Dennis C. Garris John C. Donovan B. S., Youngstown State University; J.D., LL.M. B.B.A., James Madison; J.D., George Mason; (Taxation), University of Akron LL.M. (Taxation), Georgetown Thomas S. Gigot Marc B. Dorfman B.S., Marquette; J.D., Georgetown A. B., Yale; J.D., Harvard Karen Griffith GUbreath Jonathan Charles Drimmer B.S., Christian Brothers College; J.D., LL.M. B. A., Stanford; J.D., University of California - (Taxation) Georgetown Los Angeles Carl F. Goodman Christopher R Dugan B.B.A., City CoUege of New York - Baruch; J.D., B.A., Johns Hopkins; J.D., Georgetown Brooklyn Law School; LL.M., Georgetown

Martin P. Dunn Robert G. GottUeb B.A., Pennsylvania State University; J.D., B.B.A., Notre Dame; J.D., American University George Washington

Michael C. Durst Seth M. Green B.A., Williams; M.A., J.D., University of A.B., Harvard; J.D., University of Maryland; LL.M. California - Berkeley; LL.M., Harvard (Taxation), New York University Andrew M. Risenberg B.B.A., Mercer; M.S. (Taxation), American Rldon C. V. Greenberg University; J.D., California Western; LL.M. A.B., J.D, Harvard; C.E.P., Institut d'Etudes (Taxation), Georgetown Politiques de Paris APPENDIX C: GRADUATE PROGRAM ADJUNCT FACULTY 135

Leon B. Greenfield Jessica Katz B.S., Pennsylvania State University; J.D., University of Chicago B.S.E., Princeton; J.D., Columbia

Marian M. Hagler Kevin M. Keyes A.B., University of California - Berkeley; M.S., B.S., Bowling Green State University; J.D., Case J.D., Georgetown Western Reserve; C.P.A. Daoud L. KhairaUah Kenneth W. Hansen Licence en Droit, Lebanese University; M.C.L., A. B., M.P.A, Harvard; M.A., Yale; J.D., University LL.M., S.J.D., University of Michigan of Pennsylvania MelanieJ. Khanna Mary Hartnett B.A., Columbia; J.D., Yale

B. A., Grinnell College; J.D., Georgetown Philip S. Khinda B.A.,J.D., Columbia EUen A. Hennessy B.A., Michigan State Unviersity; J.D., Catholic Jay R. Kraemer University; LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown B.A., J.D., George Washington John Paul Hewko A. B, Hamilton; M.LITT, Oxford; J.D., Harvard Mark Kreitman B.A., Yale; J.D., Harvard Barksdale Hortenstine B. A., University of Texas; J.D., Southern NeU S. Lang Methodist University B.A., City College of New York; J.D., St. John's Jasper A. Howard B.S., University of Kentucky; J.D., Duke; LL.M. Joni D. Larson (Taxation), New York University J.D., University of Montana; LL.M. (Taxation), University of Florida David S. Hudson Laura J. Lederer B.S., J.D., George Mason; LL.M. (Taxation), Georgetown B.A., University of Michigan; J.D., DePaul

Gary R. Huffman Benedict M. Lenhart B.S., University of Illinois; J.D., University of Texas B.A., University of Michigan; J.D., Harvard Barbara C. Jacobs Kathleen Joann Lester A.B., University of California - Berkeley; J.D., University of San Francisco; LL.M. (Securities), B.A., DePauw University; J.D., Georgetown; Georgetown M.PH, Johns Hopkins Mark Rene Joelson Richard A. Levine A. B., J.D., Harvard; Diploma in Law, B.A., State University of New York-Albany; J.D., Oxford University University of Michigan Michael S. Lim J. Walker Johnson B.S., Georgetown; M.B.A., University of Maryland B. A., Cornell; J.D., University of Kansas; LL.M. (Taxation), Georgetown Robert Liquerman Youngjin Jung B.S., State University of New York - Binghamton; LL.B., LL.M., J.S.D., Seoul National University, J.D., St. John's; LL.M.(Taxation), New York Korea; LL.M., J.S.D., Yale University Donald R. Longano Gerald A. Kafka A. B., Notre Dame; J.D., Georgetown; LL.M. B.S., Wheeling Jesuit University; J.D., University of (Taxation), New York University Cincinnati; LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown Heather Maloy Mark Kantor B. S., Emory; J.D., Cornell; LL.M., University B.A., University of Southern California; M.P.P., of Florida J.D., University of Michigan 136 APPENDIX C: GRADUATE PROGRAM ADJUNCT FACULTY

Maryanne Ann Mancini Joseph M. Pari B.A., Washington College; J.D., Catholic B. S., Providence College; JD, Boston College, University; LL.M. (Taxation), Georgetown LL.M. (Taxation), New York University

Jennifer A. Manner C. Christopher Parlin B.A., State University of New York - Albany; J.D., B.A., Yale; Graduate Diploma, SAIS, Johns New York Law School; LL.M.(International and Hopkins; J.D., American University Comparative Law), Georgetown LindyL.PauU D. Stephen Mathias B.B.A., Florida International Universiry; J.D., B.S.F.S., Georgetown; J.D., Columbia LL.M. (Taxation), University of Florida

Mohamad Y. Mattar Alan A. Pemberton LL.B., D.P.L., Alexandria University, Lgypt; M.C.L., B.A., University of Chicago; M.A., J.D., University University of Miami; LL.M., S.J.D., Tulane of Michigan

Louis T. Mazawey Deborah J. Pflieger B.S., J.D., Georgetown; LL.M.(Taxation), New B.A., New York University; J.D., Georgetown York University

Philip A. MeCarty Joseph E. Price B.S., University of Colorado; J.D., University of B.A., University of Wisconsin; J.D., Fordham Denver; LL.M. (Taxation), New York University Jerry J. McCoy Markus G. Puder B.S., West Virginia University; LL.B., Duke; LL.M. (Taxation), New York University First Legal State Lxamination, Ph.D., Ludwig- Maximilians University, Germany; Second Legal Christopher C. Mclsaac State Lxamination, Munich Upper Court of Appeals; LL.M. (Common Law Studies), Georgetown B.A., University of North Carolina; J.D., University Mark S. Radke of Virginia B.A., University of Washington; J.D., Universiry of Baltimore; LL.M. (Securities and Financial Andrea J. Menaker Regulation), Georgetown B.S., Georgetown; J.D., University of Washington Timothy M. Reif Allan I. Mendelsohn A.B., M.P.A., Princeton; J.D., Columbia Diploma, Sorhonne; LL.B., University of Illinois; LL.M., Harvard Noah D. Rubins Dan L. Mendelson, CPA B.S., Indiana University; J.D., LL.M. (Taxation), A.B., Brown; J.D., M.A.L.D., Harvard Georgetown; C.P.A. Jonathan J. Rusch Geerten M. Michielse Master in Economies (Tax Law), Ph.D. (Tax Law), A. B., Princeton; M.A., J.D., University of Virginia Katholieke Universiteit Brabant Michael I. Sanders Charles R. Mills B. S., LL.B., New York University; LL.M. B.A., Ceeidental College; J.D., Georgetown (Taxation), Georgetown; C.P.A. William A. Schmidt Claudius B. Modesti B.A., J.D., University of Virginia; LL.M. B.S.F.S., J.D., Georgetown (Taxation), Georgetown PaulT. Shultz John Norton Moore A. B., Drew; LL.B., Duke; LL.M., University B.A., Princeton; J.D., Cornell of Illinois Peter K. Scott Regina A. C'Brien B.A., J.D., University of Tulsa; LL.M. (Taxation), B. A., George Mason; J.D., Georgetown Georgerown Bernard M. Shapiro B.A., Washington & Lee; J.D., LL.M. (Taxation), Georgetown; C.P.A. APPENDIX C: GRADUATE PROGRAM ADJUNCT FACULTY 137

Linda K. Shore Leonard B. Terr B.A., Boston University; J.D., University of A. B., LaSalle College; A.M., Ph.D., Brown; Michigan; LL.M. (Lahor Law), Georgetown J.D., Cornell

Alexander W. Sierck Michael A. Thrasher B.A., LL.B., University of Virginia B. A., Duke; J.D., Universiry of North Carolina; LL.M. (Taxation), Georgetown Stafford SmUey B.A., Yale; J.D., Harvard Victor Thuronyi M.A., Cambridge; J.D., Harvard Diann L. Smith Stephanie Tsaeoumis B.A., Miami University; J.D., Georgetown B.A., WiUiam and Mary; J.D., University of Virginia Eric Solomon A. B., Princeton; J.D., University of Virginia; LL.M. Stefan R Tucker (Taxation), New York University James Sottile, IV B.B.A., J.D., University of Michigan

B. S., University of Florida; J.D., Georgerown Thomas P. Vartanian B.A., Cathedral College of the Immaculate Frederic T. Spindel Conception; J.D., Brooklyn Law School John VasUy B.A., CorneU; J.D., University of Texas B.S. Accounting, Villanova; J.D., Georgetown Charles Cwen VerrUl, Jr. Mark S. Srere A. B., Tufts; J.D., Duke B.A., Reed College; J.D., University of Texas Lawrence StaduUs Anthony A. Vertuno B.S.,J.D., Boston CoUege B. A., Sr. Mary's CoUege of Minnesota; John Reed Stark J.D., Northwestern B.A., Union College; J.D., Duke Donald A. Walker, Jr., C.P.A. Samuel P. Starr A. B., Amherst; M.B.A., Dartmouth B.S., Pennsylvania State University; J.D., University of Virginia; LL.M. (Taxation), Georgetown; C.P.A. Jennifer A. Warren B. S., J.D., Georgetown David P. Stewart B.A., Princeton; M.A., J.D., Yale; LL.M., New WiUiam Karl WUburn York University A. B., Johns Hopkins; J.D., University of Baltimore Terence P. Stewart B.A., Holy Cross; M.B.A., Harvard; Rose L. WiUiams J.D., Georgerown B. S., University of Wisconsin - Cshkosh; J.D., University of Nebraska Jeanne EngUsh SuUivan Marcia A. Wiss B. A., Trinity CoUege; J.D., L.L.M., Georgetown B.S.F.S., J.D., Georgetown

C. David Swenson JohnWoUr B.A., J.D., University of Mississippi; LL.M. LL.D., University of Heidelberg; LL.M., Columbia (Taxation), Georgetown Mark D. Young Gerald Tanyi B.A., Tufts; J.D., Georgerown LL.B., honors, Maitrise en Droit, DLA University of Yaounde, Cameroon; LL.M, J.S.D., Yale Leocadia I. Zak B.A., Mount Holyoke; J.D., Northeastern PhiUp M. Tatarowicz B.A., lUinois Benedictine College; J.D., Northern Illinois University; LL.M. (Taxation), Georgetown; CPA. 138 APPENDIX D: CHARLES FAHY DISTINGUISHED ADJUNCT PROFESSOR AWARD RECIPIENTS

APPENDIX D: CHARLES FAHY DISTINGUISHED ADJUNCT PROFESSOR AWARD RECIPIENTS

Each year, hundreds of Washington, DC, lawyers selflessly dedicate time and energy to teaching courses as adjunct professors at the Law Center. Their presence has enabled Georgetown to offer the most wide-ranging curriculum of J.D. and LL.M. courses in the country. To recognize the contributions of these adjuncts, the Law Center's "hidden endowment," the dean designates two of them for each academic year as Charles Fahy Distinguished Adjunct Professors. Fahy Professors have provided exceptional service to Georgetown in teaching, curriculum development, student counseling, and involvement in extra-curricular Law Center activities. The award is named after the late Charles Fahy, a noted Georgetown alumnus who served as U.S. Solicitor General and U.S. Court of Appeals Judge.

1988- 1989 1995- 1996 Kenneth R. Feinberg, J.D. Program Gerald A. Malia, J.D. Program John Wolff, Graduate Program Arthur F. Mathews, Graduate Program

1989- 1990 1996- 1997 Roger M. Adehnan, J.D. Program Bennett L. Hecht,/D. Program HughJ. Beins, Graduate Program Shirley A. Coffield, Graduate Program

1990- 1991 1997- 1998

Martin S. Thaler, J.D. Program Nancy Firestone,/D. Program Earl M. Colson, Graduate Program Lois J. Schiffer,/D. Program Dennis P. BedeU, Graduate Program 1991- 1992 1998- 1999 Paul B. Larsen, J.D. Program Charles Gordon, Graduate Program David C. Vladeck,/D. Program WiUiam R. Charyk, Graduate Program 1992- 1993 1999- 2000 Kirhy Howlerr,/.D. Program Harold J. Heltzer, Graduate Program JaekM. Beard,/D. Program Michael T. Leibig, Graduate Program 1993- 1994 2000- 2001 Steven A. Winkelman, J.D. Program Charles Cwen VerriU, Graduate Program W. Shepherdson AbeU, J.D. Program Marcia A. Wiss, Graduate Program 1994- 1995 2001- 2002 Daniel A. Rezneck, J.D. Program Bernard M. Shapiro, Graduate Program John C. Hayes, Jr.,/D. Program Michael G. Scheininger, J.D. Program Michael 1. Sanders, Graduate Program APPENDIX E: SCHOLARSHIPS 139

APPENDIX E: SCHOLARSHIPS Caryl S. Bernstein Scholarship: Lstablished hy Caryl S. Bernstein, L'67, a distinguished and loyal The Georgetown University Law Center named alumna. scholarship awards are made possible through the generosity of Law Center alumni and friends, law James E. Blower Memorial Scholarship: Lstablished firms, corporations, and foundations. Awards are in memory of her husband, James L. Blower, L'49, based on demonstrated financial need in accordance hy his wife, Betty. with the aid policies of the Law Center. Students interested in applying for these scholarships should Brand Names Education Foundation: Lstablished contact the Financial Aid Office for information on by the Brand Names Lducation Foundation (BNLF) Law Center financial aid procedures and deadlines. to promote awareness of the role and importance of trademarks and brand names. This scholarship African-American Endowed Scholarship: will he used to support a student at Georgetown Lstablished hy Law Center alumni/ae to he University Law Center who is studying trademark awarded with preference to African-American J.D. law. The grant is funded by the law firm of Finnegan, students with demonstrated financial need. Henderson, Farrahow, Garrett 8c Dunner.

Alumni Scholarship: Lstablished hy the Stanley M. Brand Scholarship Fund: Lstablished Washington Club to be awarded to students from by Stanley M. Brand, L'74, a distinguished and loyal the Washington metro area. alumnus, to be awarded to law students with demonstrated financial need. Arnold 8c Porter Scholarship: Lstablished hy the law firm of Arnold 8c Porter, to be awarded to a Betnie R. Burrus Memorial Scholarship Fund: second-year law student from a disadvantaged LstahUshed in memory of Professor Bernie R. Burrus. background who has shown potential for academic achievement. Churchill Family Fndowed Scholarship Fund: Fstahlished hy Winston J. Churchill, Jr. Pedro Arrupe, S.J., Scholarship in Peace: Lstablished hy an anonymous donor to honor the Class of 1953 Fndowed Scholarship Fund: former Superior General of the Society of Jesus, Fstahlished by members of the Class of 1953 in Pedro Arrupe, who inspired Jesuits and others to honor of their 50* Law Reunion, to be awarded to integrate a commitment to social justice into their law students with demonstrated financial need. faith. The Scholarship is to be awarded with prefer• ence to students with limited financial resources Coca-Cola Scholarship Fund: Fstahlished hy the from troubled areas of the world, with the hope that Coca-Cola Company. their Georgetown experience will not only benefit the students directly, but also their communities The Theodore Cogswell Scholarship: Established upon their return. in memory of Theodore Cogswell, L'16, by Elaine Ward Cogswell. Association of Securities and Exchange Commission Alumni Scholarship: Lstablished by the Association Lester Cohen Memorial Scholarship: Established of Securities and Exchange Commission Alumni, hy the law firm of Hogan 8c Hartson in memory of Inc., to assist one or more deserving J.D. or LL.M. Lester Cohen, L'35, to be awarded to a third-year students who are current or former employees of the law student with outstanding scholastic achievement U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. studying communication law. Andrew HuU Baker Scholarship: Lstablished by the late Daniel W. Baker, LL.B. 1892, LL.M. 1893, a The Paul R. Connolly Memorial Scholarship Fund: former United States district attorney and professor Established hy colleagues at the law firm of at the Law Center. Williams 8c Connolly and friends of the late Paul R. Connolly, a Washington, D.C, attorney and Baker 8c McKenzie Scholarship Fund: Established alumnus, LL.B.'48, LL.M.'52. by the law firm of Baker 8c McKenzie to assist a minority law student with financial aid. Virginia Cooke Fndowed Law Scholarship Fund: Established hy Roger A. Cooke, C'70, L'73, in Rudolph B. and Suevia Nordlinger Behrend honor of his mother, Virginia Cooke, to he awarded Scholarship: Established by Amy Behrend to law students with demonstrated financial need. Goldstein and Ruth Behrend SmaU in memory of their beloved parents. Rudolph B. Behrend was an Michael J. and Karen M. Cuddy Scholarship outstanding graduate and the valedictorian of the Fund: Established by Michael J. Cuddy, L'64, a Class of 1897 and the Class of 1898. distinguished alumnus, and his wife, Karen. 140 APPENDIX E: SCHOLARSHIPS

William J. Curtin Scholarship in Labor Relations: James T. Finlen Scholarship Fund: Fstahlished hy Established to honor the memory of William J. Jim Finlen, L'28, for the purpose of maintaining Curtin, C'53, L'56, LL.M.'57, hy his friends and and educating students with demonstrated financial colleagues in the law firm of Morgan, Lewis & need in the law school. Bockius LLR This scholarship is awarded to a third-year student who has demonstrated merit and Leo T. Franz Family Scholarship: FstabHshed hy a strong interest in lahor relations and employee Jack M. Franz, L'41, in memory of his father, Leo benefits law. T. Franz, to provide tuition assistance to students at the Law Center with demonstrated financial need. DeCrane Scholarship Fund: Established by Mr. and Mrs. Alfred C. DeCrane, Jr., L'59. Jean Shirley Frohlicher Scholarship Fund: Established in memory of Jean Shirley Frohlicher, John K. Delaney and April McClain-Delaney L'66, hy her husband, John Frohlicher, L'66, family, Fndowed Scholarship Fund : Established by John and friends, to be awarded with preference to an K. Delaney, L'88, and April McClain-Delaney, L'89, evening student with demonstrated need. to provide tuition assistance to students at the Law Center with demonstrated financial need. Morris M. Geifman Scholarship Fund: Fstahlished by Stephen L. Geifman, L'69, and Terri Geifman in Murray Lindsley Dondy and Daird L. Dondy honor of his father, Morris M. Geifman, to provide Scholarship Fund: Established by Virginia Dondy tuition assistance to students at the Law Center Green, L'71, in honor of her parents, Murray with demonstrated financial need. Lindsley Dondy and Daird L. Dondy. Law Alumni of Georgia Scholarship Fund: Donnelly Law Scholarship: Established by the Fstahlished by Law Center alumni/ae in Georgia to estate of Mary D. Meehan in memory of her father, assist J.D. students with demonstrated financial Lt. Col. Richard John Donnelly, U.S.A., to assist need, with preference to students from Georgia. graduates of St. John's Military Academy in Washington, DC. The Ralph J. Gilbert/PhUip A. Ryan Memorial Scholarship: Established by Ralph Gilbert, L'57, a Nancy Reisinger Donovan Memorial Fund: retired partner from Baker & McKenzie in Chicago Established in memory of the late Nancy Jean to honor the memory of Philip A. Ryan, his teacher, Donovan by her husband, Daniel J. Donovan, L'68, partner, and friend. family, and friends; partially funded by matching grants from the Kraft General Foods Corporation. Patricia and John GiUick Scholarship Fund: Established hyjohn E. GiUick, Jr., L'70, and his Bryan and Eleanor Farrell Scholarship: Established wife, Patricia, to be awarded to law students with in 1990 in memory of Bryan, L'31, and Eleanor demonstrated financial need. Farrell for the benefit of law students who have demonstrated financial need. Gillis-PoUock Scholarship Fund: Fstahlished by Theresa M. Gillis, L'74, a distinguished and loyal Federal Employees Law Scholarship Fund: alumna, in honor of her father and mother. Established hy Joseph F. Reece, L'89, to provide tuition assistance to J.D. or LL.M. students who Walter Gutmann Scholarship: Established in 1991 have heen, currently are, or expect to be employees hy the estate of Walter Gutmann, L'42. of the Federal Government. Thomas M. Haderlein Scholarship Fund: The April and Rachel Fegyveresi Scholarship: Established in honor of Thomas M. Haderlein, Established by Tom Fegyveresi, F'66, in honor of L'60, LL.M.'62, by his colleagues at the law firm of his daughters, April, C'92, L'96, and Rachel, B'90, Baker & McKenzie. N'95. The Harnisch Family Scholarship: Established hy Louis B. Fine Scholarship Fund: Fstahlished by William O.C. Harnisch, L'65, and his family. the family of Louis B. Fine, L'25, H'68, former President of the Georgetown University Alumni F. Kirhy and Flizabeth Hayes Scholarship Fund: Association and generous henefactor to the Fstahlished by John Clarke Kane and John Clarke University, to support a student at Georgetown Kane, Jr., L'71, to he awarded to J.D. students University Law Center who demonstrates tenacity, who demonstrate financial need, with preference to aggressiveness, and dedication to the law. students from Eastern Massachusetts. APPENDIX E: SCHOLARSHIPS 141

The John B. Hayward Scholarship: Estahlished hy Jankowky Family Fndowed Scholarship Fund: the IBM Corporation in honor of the late John B. Established by the Jankowsky Family, to be awarded Hayward in recognition of his 50 years of distinguished to law students with demonstrated financial need, service and his contrihution to the patent policies with preference given to students who aspire to be of the Corporation. actively involved with their communities and/or their nation. Edwin A. and Florence M. Heafey Endowment Fund: Estahlished by the late Edwin A. Heafey, Todd W.Johnson Scholarship Fund: Fstahlished by LL.B.'23, LL.D.'68, an attorney from California. the late Todd W. Johnson, LL.B.'19, an attorney from California. Jerome H. Heckman Scholarship Fund: Fstahlished by Jerome H. Heckman, C'48, L'53, to he awarded Edmund L.Jones Memorial Scholarship: with preference to a J.D. student studying Food and Established hy the firm of Hogan & Hartson to be Drug Law. awarded to a Georgetown University Law Center student who participated in collegiate sports as a John J. and Yvonne J. Held Scholarship Fund: Georgetown University undergraduate student. Established hy John J. Held, L'64, a distinguished alumnus, and his wife, Yvonne, to be awarded with Mercedes C.Jose Memorial Scholarship Fund: preference to an outstanding married law student Fstahlished hy Aurora Jose Wong, L'77, in memory residing in the state of Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky of her sister, to assist one or more deserving J.D. or Ohio. students, with preference to Asian Pacific American students from Hawaii or Guam, in order to support Thomas V. and Mary B. Heyman Scholarship: the goal for a diverse Law Center community. Established by Thomas V. Heyman, L'62, a distinguished and loyal alumnus, and his wife, Mary. Henry Kaiser Memorial Lecture and Scholarship Fund: Estahlished by the family and friends of the Benjamin and Lillian Holstein Memorial late Henry Kaiser, to honor his contrihutions to Scholarship: Estahlished by the Benjamin, L'36, lahor law and the betterment of working people. and Lillian Holstein Estate. The scholarship will he awarded to an outstanding law student studying labor relations. Joseph A. Hoskins Scholarship Fund: Established hy the family and colleagues of the late Joseph A. Charles A. Keigwin Scholarship: Established by Hoskins, LL.B.'37, LL.M.'39, a Kansas City, the Josephine Kratzer Carvill Trust in memory of Missouri attorney. Charles A. Keigwin, a distinguished professor at the Law School for more than 20 years, whose Adolph Charles Hugin Scholarship Endowment teaching greatly influenced the legal career of Fund: Established by a bequest from Dr. Adolph Richard Carvill, LL.B.'27. Charles Hugin, L'34, to be awarded to law students with demonstrated financial need. The Joseph E. and Mary E. Keller Foundation Scholarship: Lstablished by the Joseph L. and Keith and Celeste Hummel Scholarship: Estahlished Mary L. Keller Foundation of Dayton, Ohio, to hy Keith R. Hummel, L'90, and Celeste Hummel assist deserving students. to provide tuition assistance to students at the Law Center with demonstrated financial need. William C. Keller and Dorothy D. Keller Hunton & Williams Scholarship: Established hy Scholarship Fund: Established hy William C. the law firm of Hunton & Williams. Keller, L'52, to provide scholarships to deserving students in the Georgetown University Law Center The C. Keefe Hurley Scholarship: Estahlished hy Juris Doctor program. C. Keefe Hurley, a Boston attorney and alumnus, LL.B.'34,J.D.'35. John J. Kirhy Scholarship Fund: Established by Peter M. Kirhy, L'79, and John J. Kirhy, Jr., in honor Linda Hyatt Lauve Scholarship: Established hy her of their father, John J. Kirhy, Sr., L'35. mother, Grace Hyatt, in memory of Linda Hyatt Lauve, a memher of the Class of 1989, whose The John F. Lanigan Scholarship: Lstablished by untimely death in her third year was a great loss to the late John F. Lanigan, LL.B.'22. her family, her children, and the legal profession. Hyatt Lauve scholars will be chosen on the hasis of Brent Leahey Scholarship in Law: Estahlished hy need, and will he students who exemplify Linda's Mary Jo Leahey in memory of her grandson, Brent commitment to using her talents to serve the needs Leahey, C'88, L'92. of others. 142 APPENDIX E: SCHOLARSHIPS

Robert D. L'Heureux Memorial Scholarship Fund: Edward P. and Joan N. Morgan Fndowed Established by the National Cable Television Scholarship: Established by Linda J. Morgan, L'76, Association and friends of the late Robert D. and her husband, Michael E. Karam, F'72, L'76, L'Heureux, LL.B.'40, LL.M.'42, an attorney with L'82, in memory of her father, Edward P. Morgan, the Federal Communications Commission. and mother, Joan N. Morgan.

Sanford M. Litvack and Judith Goldenson Litvack The Rita C. Murray Memorial Scholarship Fund: Endowed Scholarship Fund: Established by Sanford Fstahlished by Dennis I. Meyer, L'60, LL.M.'62, in M. Litvack, L'59, and his wife, Judith Goldenson memory of his mother-in-law. Litvack, to provide tuition assistance to students at the Law Center with demonstrated financial need. Martin J. O'Brien Law Scholarship Fund: Established hy The Honorable Martin J. O'Brien, Ralph B. Long Memorial Scholarship: Fstahlished C'52, L'55, to be awarded to law students with in memory of Ralph B. Long, L'67, by his friends, demonstrated financial need. family, and former colleagues in the firm of Metzger, Shadyac & Schwarz. Timothy J. and Linda D. O'NeUl Scholarship Fund: Established hy Timothy J. O'Neill, L'77, and Charles Lucey Scholarship: Lstablished hy Charles his wife, Linda D. O'Neill, N'77, distinguished and Lmmet Lucey, C'56, L'59, in honor of his father. loyal alumni.

MacRae Law Scholarship Fund: Fstahlished by The Paige Family Scholarship Fund: Estahlished Alexander K. MacRae, L'15, L'16, to he awarded to by Stephen B. Paige, L'72, a distinguished alumnus, law students with demonstrated financial need. and his wife, Deborah, to he awarded with preference to an outstanding law student residing in Brooklyn, Gregory J. Maier Scholarship in Patent Law New York, who has demonstrated financial need. Fund: Established by Gregory J. Maier, L'69, a dis• tinguished and loyal alumnus, to be awarded to law Richard J. and Barbara A. Phelan Scholarship students with demonstrated financial need, with Fund: Established by Richard J. Phelan, L'61, and preference given to students interested in practicing Barbara A. Phelan to be awarded to students at the patent law who have earned undergraduate degrees Law Center with demonstrated financial need. in one of the technical subjects recognized hy the United States Patent and Trade Mark Office. The Daniel J. PUiero II Memorial Scholarship Fund: Established in memory of Daniel J. Piliero II, Tim and Marcia McBride Fndowed Scholarship a Washington, DC, attorney, committed parent, and Fund: Established by Timothy B. McBride, L'75, dear friend to Georgetown University, by his wife, L'80, and his wife, Marcia, to provide assistance to a Joyce, children, relatives, friends, and colleagues. student demonstrating financial need and a strong interest in tax law. Law Prefects Scholarship Fund: Estahlished in 1999 by Law Center alumni who served as Prefects Eugene P. McCahiU Scholarship Fund: Established in undergraduate residence halls on Georgetown's hy James L'60 and Catherine Denny through the main campus while attending the Law Center, in James and Catherine Denny Foundation. recognition of the assistance they received from the University in the form of room and board. This Stanley and Mavis Metzger Fndowed Scholarship scholarship is to provide financial support to current Fund: Estahlished by Stanley and Mavis Metzger to Law Center students with demonstrated need. provide financial assistance to students of Georgetown University Law Center who are members of under A. Kenneth Pye Scholarship Fund: Established by represented groups in the legal profession. Richard A. Hibey, L'65, LL.M.'66, in memory of former Law Center Associate Dean and Professor MiUer 8t Chevalier Charitable Foundation A. Kenneth Pye, LL.B.'53, LL.M.'55, LL.D.'78, to Scholarship: Estahlished hy the Miller & assist J.D. students with demonstrated need. Chevalier Charitable Foundation to assist students demonstrating financial need. Milton M. Ratner Scholarship Fund: Estahlished hy a grant from the Milton M. Ratner Foundation. The Moran FamUy Endowed Scholarship in Law: Lstablished by Ldmond J., B'67, and Judy Moran, The Honorable John N. Reynolds Fndowed Fund: N'68, to provide support to law students demon• Established by Nancy Doerr O'Neil, L'82, and strating financial need, with preference to students Thomas F. O'Neil III, L'82, distinguished and loyal interested in careers in legal services. alumni, in honor of Judge John N. Reynolds, L'50. APPENDIX E: SCHOLARSHIPS 143

Marvin Rosenberg Scholarship Fund: Fstahlished Jonathan Sobeloff Memorial Scholarship Fund: by Marvin Rosenberg, L'61, LL.M.'67, to assist J.D. Estahlished hy Mr. and Mrs. Isidore Sobeloff and students with demonstrated need. family in memory of the late Georgetown University Law Center professor Jonathan Sobeloff, who Louis and Anne Rosoff Scholarship: Established taught at the Law Center from 1966 to 1979. hy the estate of Louis Rosoff, L'23, to assist students of high academic standing who have demonstrated C.V. Starr Scholarship Fund: Established hy the financial need, with preference to students from Starr Foundation in honor of its founder, the late Connecticut. C.V. Starr.

Tom and Joan Rothman Fndowed Scholarship Howard E. Steinberg Scholarship: Established by Fund: Established by Thomas M. Rothman, L'68, Howard Steinberg, L'69, a distinguished and loyal and his wife, Joan, to provide assistance to Native alumnus. American law students who demonstrate financial need. William Carroll Stephenson, Mary Finley Stephenson, and Dennis Finley Stephenson Sidney Sachs Memorial Fund: Established in Memorial Scholarship: Estahlished by Andrew W. memory of Sidney S. Sachs, L'41, by his family and Stephenson, L'76, to be awarded with preference to friends to provide tuition assistance to students at a law student with either a Native-American hack- the Law Center with demonstrated financial need. ground, or an alumnus/a of Boys Town of America.

Sallie Mae Scholarship Fund: Established by Jan A. Stransky Memorial Scholarship: Lstablished Marianne M. Keler, F'76, L'80, and Michael R. hy the family and friends of Jan A. Stransky, a mem• Kershow, L'80, distinguished and loyal alumni. ber of the class of 1989 who died in his first year of law school. Reflecting Jan's spirit of commitment The Daniel J. Sammon Scholarship Fund: to puhlic and community service, the Stransky Fstahlished in memory of her husband, Daniel Scholarship is awarded to students participating in Sammon, L'60, by Juanita Sammon. the Puhlic Interest Law Scholars Program.

Morris A. Schapiro Scholarship Fund: Fstahlished Students of Hawaii Scholarship Fund: Established hy the M. A. Schapiro Fund. to assist law students from Hawaii who have demon• strated financial need. The scholarship awards from Thomas F. Schlafly Scholarship Fund: Established this fund are generated from the proceeds of the hy Thomas F. Schlafly, C'70, L'77, a distinguished Bert and Susan Kohayashi Georgetown University alumnus, to be awarded to law students with Golf Tournament held in Hawaii and gifts from demonstrated financial need. loyal alumni/ae in Hawaii.

The Leo Schlosberg Scholarship: Estahlished in John F. and Noreen C. Sweeney Scholarship: memory of Leo Schlosberg, LL.B.'24, by his family Estahlished by Noreen C. Sweeney and John F. and son, Hank M. Schlosberg, L'56. Sweeney, L'73, to he awarded to students with demonstrated need, with preference to outstanding John F. Schrankel Scholarship Fund: Fstahlished students from Washington, DC. by a bequest from John F. Schrankel, LL.M.'59. Law Alumni of Texas Scholarship Fund: Fstahlished The Schuyler Scholarship: Lstablished hy Jean H. hy Law Center alumni in Texas to assist J.D. students and William L. Schuyler, Jr., L'40, a distinguished with demonstrated financial need, with preference patent attorney. to students from Texas.

Donald E. Schwartz Memorial Scholarship Fund: The Martin S. Thaler Memorial Scholarship in Established in memory of the late Georgetown Law and Philosophy: Established hy the law firm University Law Center professor Donald E. of Weil, Gotshal & Manges to assist a student Schwartz, by his family and friends, in recognition pursuing a joint degree in law and philosophy who of his contrihutions to the development of corporate demonstrates financial need. and securities law and to legal education. James L. Waite Fndowed Scholarship Fund: The WUliam A. and May Nora Shea Memorial Estahlished by Donald L. Waite, L'59, and Anna T. Scholarship Fund: Fstahlished in memory of Waite in memory and honor of Donald's brother, WiUiam A. Shea, C'30, L'31, LL.D.'71, and May James L. Waite, L'58. Nora Shea by the law firm of Shea & Gould, their colleagues, friends, and family. 144 APPENDIX E: SCHOLARSHIPS

Bertha Eulalie Wilmot Scholarship: Established by RaymundT. Yingling Scholarship Fund: Established David W. Wilmot, L'73, a distinguished and loyal by the estate of Raymond T. Yingling, L'21, to alumnus, in honor of his mother, Bertha Eulalie assist students of high academic standing who have Wilmot, to be awarded with preference to African- demonstrated financial need, with preference to American students with demonstrated need. Catholic students.

Women in Law as a Second Career Scholarship Fund: Established by distinguished Law Center alumnae to assist women entering the legal profession as a second career. APPENDIX F: LOANS 145

APPENDIX F: LOANS The Kuro Murase Loan Fund: Established by Jiro Murase, L'58, in memory of his father and by Harry C. Cox Loan: Established hy the Estate of Saturo Murase, L'83, in memory of his grandfather. Irma C. Cox in memory of her husband, Harry C. Cox, LT2. Edward M. Ricci and the Honorable Mary F. Lupo Loan Fund: Established hy Edward M. Ricci, The Paul Dean Loan Fund: Established hy an L'73, and the Honorahle Mary E. Lupo, L'74, to anonymous donor in honor of Paul Dean, LL.B.'46, support those students dedicated to serving the LL.M.'S2, LL.D.'69, Dean of the Law Center from puhlic interest. 1954 to 1969, and Professor of Law. Abe Plough Law Student Loan Fund: Established The Dean's Loan Fund (The Law Center Loan by a grant from the Plough Foundation. Fund II): Established by an alumnus and henefactor as a supplement to The Law Center Loan Fund. Philip A. Ryan Memorial Loan: Established by the partners of the law firm of Baker 8c McKenzie in Bryan Farrell Student Loan: Fstahlished by Mrs. memory of Philip A. Ryan, a partner with the firm Eleanor Farrell in memory of her husband, Bryan and professor of law at Georgetown from 1949 to Farrell, L'31. 1966.

The George Arthur Ginsburg Student Loan Fund: William and Rebecca Sachs Loan: Fstahlished by Established hy Mattie L. Ginsburg in memory of Sidney S. Sachs, L'41, in memory of his parents. her husband, George A. Ginsburg, L'24. The Joseph F. and Madeline M. Sheehy Student Richard Alan Gordon Student Emergency Loan Loan Fund: Established hy Mrs. Sheehy and the Fund: Established hy Paul A. Nussbaum, L'71, in late Mr. Sheehy, LL.B.'24, an attorney and official honor of Professor of Law, Richard Alan Gordon, with the Federal Trade Commission and a member B'50, L'53, LL.M.'61, to provide emergency loans to of the adjunct faculty of the Law Center from 1959 Law Center students. to 1969.

George Link, Jr. Loan: Established by the George The Davis and Maurine Weir Endowment Fund: Link, Jr. Foundation of New York. Estahlished hy Davis and Maurine Weir to assist disadvantaged students. Edward T. Mitchell Memorial Loans Program: Fstahlished by the law firm of Patton, Boggs 8c Blow in memory of the late Edward T. Mitchell, L'62, a former senior partner of the firm. 146 APPENDIX G: PRIZES AND AWARDS

APPENDIX G: PRIZES AND AWARDS CALI Excellence for the Future Award: CALI, the Center for Computer-Assisted Legal Instruction, ABA/BNA Award for Excellence in Intellectual presents an award to the student in each law school Property Law: This award is presented annually to course achieving the top grade in the course. The up to three (3) graduating students with the high• award is a certificate suitable for framing. CALI is a est grade point average in a hasic intellectual consortium of the nation's law schools which pro• property law course or who are otherwise regarded vides research and development and a distribution as outstanding in these fields. network for computer-assisted instruction in the law. Its library of instructional materials contains ABA/BNA Award for Excellence in Labor and over 90 lessons in 21 areas of the law. CALI's com• Employment Law: This award is presented annually mitment to innovation and achievement in teaching to up to three (3) graduating students with the and learning in the law schools prompted it to highest grade point average in a hasic labor and/or sponsor this awards program. employment law course or who are otherwise regarded as outstanding in these fields. Thomas Bradbury Chetwood, S.J. Prize: A plaque is awarded to graduating students who achieve the American Bankruptcy Institute Medal of Excellence: rank of distinction and have the highest academic A medal, certificate, and one year membership in average in each of the following programs. the American Bankruptcy Institute is awarded Master of Laws in Taxation, Master of Laws in annually to the graduating student who has achieved the Graduate Program for International Students, academic excellence in the area of bankruptcy law. Master of Laws in International and Comparative Law, Master of Laws in Securities and Financial American Bankruptcy Law Journal— Student Prize: Regulation, and Master of Laws. This prize was The American Bankruptcy Law Journal will award a founded by the Law Center Class of 1928 in honor free one-year subscription to the Journal to the stu• of the Reverend Thomas B. Chetwood, S.J., a former dent who earns the highest grade in any bankruptcy Regent of the Law Center. class at any accredited United States law school. Joyce Chiang Memorial Award: Established in American Bar Association Section of Urban, memory of Joyce Chiang, L'95, by her classmates, State, and Local Government Law Certificate of friends, and colleagues, to he awarded to an evening Recognition: This award is designated to the top student with a demonstrable commitment to puhlic student of each section of Land Use and Local service. Government Law. Each student will receive from the American Bar Association a personalized award The Jeffrey Crandall Award: A prize of $100 will certificate in recognition of their academic achievement. be awarded annually to the third-year student who best exemplifies the ideals and commitment of the The Baker & McKenzie Law Student Assistance late Jeffrey Crandall, whose involvement in Legal Program: Estahlished hy the law firm of Baker & Aid and personal dedication to his fellow man McKenzie to assist first-year minority students. inspired the establishment of the fund in his name.

The Beaudry Cup: The Beaudry Cup appellate Dean's Certificate: This honor is presented to advocacy competition was estahlished in 1952 to graduating students in recognition of special and honor the hest advocates of the first-year class. It is outstanding service to the Law Center community. named in honor of Robert J. Beaudry, who distin• guished himself by virtue of his outstanding enthu• Kathleen Stowe Dixon Visiting Student Prize: siasm, scholarship and ability in oral argument, and A prize of $100 is awarded annually to the visiting who was killed in a tragic accident in the spring of student earning the highest grade point average his first year. Each year, the name of the winner of during his or her year at Georgetown University the Competition is inscribed on the Beaudry Cup, Law Center. The prize was created hy a former on permanent display in the trophy case outside the visiting student in honor of his mother. Hart Moot Courtroom. The Dean HughJ. Fegan Memorial Prize: A prize The Nathan Burkan Memorial Competition: of $100 is awarded annually to the student in the This competition was estahlished by the American Day Division with the hest overall academic record Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers in at the conclusion of the first year. The award is given memory of Nathan Burkan. A monetary award is in memory of Dean Fegan, who devoted nearly half made each year to the student submitting the best a century to the Law School. His guiding presence thesis, in the judgment of the dean, on an assigned from 1911 to 1943 greatly enhanced Georgetown's subject in the field of copyright law. The second development during these critical years. place award is also a monetary award. APPENDIX G: PRIZES AND AWARDS 147

Michael Feldman Advocacy Award: This is an Kirby S. Howlett III Memorial Award: Lstablished award given by vote of the students in the Criminal by the family and friends of Kirby S. Howlett III, Justice Clinic to the outstanding advocate in the adjunct professor to the Criminal Justice Clinic, to clinic. honor his professional accomplishments. A grant is awarded annually to a recent graduate who have Georgetown Club of Metropolitan Washington, participated in the Criminal or Juvenile Justice DC Award: The Georgetown Club of Metropolitan Clinics, accrued smdent loans while attending the Washington, DC, annually awards a gift to the Law Center and upon graduation accepts employment graduating JD student from the Metropolitan at a public defenders office. Washington, DC, area with the hest overall academic performance. Howrey & Simon Award for Excellence in Trial Advocacy: Fstahlished hy the Washington, DC, Georgetown Law Journal Meritorious Service law firm of Howrey & Simon, this award is pre• Award: The Editor in Chief recognizes up to four sented annually to the smdent Trial Team Advocate graduating/oMtwfl/ members whose hard work and who best demonstrates preparedness, creativity and spirit as non-Senior board members made an out• resourcefulness during trial competition, dedication standing contribution to the Journal. Winners receive to the Law Center Mock Trial Program and a com• a bound and embossed copy of their year's Volume. mitment to the high standards of professionalism and ethics in advocacy, which the Program seeks to Alan J. Goldstein Memorial Award: An annual instill in each Trial Team Advocate. cash award to the Criminal Justice Clinic student who best demonstrates the qualities Alan J. Goldstein The International Academy of Trial Lawyers' tried to instUl in his smdents: the use of intelligence, Award: Each year a plaque is awarded to trial clinic creativity, and resourcefulness in defending criminal smdents excelling in the art of advocacy. One grad• clients and a dedication to criminal law, fair play, uating smdent from each of the advocacy clinical and justice. programs is selected hy the Dean upon the recom• mendation of the faculty supervisors for the clinics. Greenfield Trial Practice Award: Substantial The award is on permanent display outside the Moot monetary awards to help defray the cost of student Court Room. In addition, each winner receives a loans are given to several smdents in the Criminal scroll suitable for framing. Justice Clinic who have accepted jobs as prosecutors and as public defenders. The Juvenile Justice Clinic Public Service Award: This cash award, provided by the alumni of the The Nelson T. Hartson Memorial Award: This Juvenile Justice Clinic to help defray the cost of annual scholarship award is made to a graduating student loans, is given each year to a graduating Georgetown University Law Center student in the clinic student who has accepted a job providing Juris Doctor program on the basis of scholastic service to the community. achievement, economic need, or a combination of the two factors. The scholarship is used for graduate The Kappa Beta Pi Prize: A cash award is made smdy in a degree program permitting concentration annually to the smdent with the highest academic of a majority of the graduate smdent's hours in the average upon the completion of the first year. field of tax law at any accredited instimtion selected hy the recipient. The graduate smdy may be under• The Milton A. Kaufman Prize: A cash award and taken on either a full-time or part-time hasis. The an accompanying plaque are offered annually to fiind to support the Award was donated in 1977 hy the smdent who does the hest work for the year on the law firm of Hogan & Hartson as a memorial to the Georgetown Law Journal. The late Milton A. its distinguished founding partner. Nelson T. Hartson, Kaufman, of the District of Columbia Bar, was Esquire. Mr. Hartson served as the senior partner of graduated from the Law Center in the class of 1913. the firm for 47 years and was for a time an Adjunct Professor of Taxation at the Law Center. The Charles A. Keigwin Award: Each year a plaque is awarded to the student in the Evening Division Deborah K. Hauger Memorial Fellowship Fund: with the best overall academic record at the conclu• Fstahlished by the family, friends and colleagues of sion of the first year. The prize honors the memory "Deb" Hauger, L'88, this fund is a tribute to her of Charles Keigwin, a distinguished professor at the life, interests and dedication to the ideals she worked Law School for over 20 years. so hard to achieve. Each year, a recent graduate is selected as a Deborah K. Hauger Fellow and is John F. Kennedy Labor Law Award: In memory of awarded a stipend to facilitate the smdy of issues in John F. Kennedy, President of the United States, international affairs, specifically in the realm of January 20, 1961 to November 22, 1963, a fund has peacekeeping in developing nations. heen created hy Jacob Kossman used to award an 148 APPENDIX G: PRIZES AND AWARDS annual cash award to the graduating senior who has Vincent G. Panati Memorial Award: From proceeds achieved the hest overall performance in the field of of a fund created by the friends of the late Vincent Labor Law. An additional sum has been given by G. Panati, LL.B'34, former first Assistant District Mr. Kossman for the creation and annual award of a Attorney for Philadelphia and former Secretary of plaque to accompany the John F. Kennedy Labor Revenue for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, a Law Award. prize of $300 is awarded each year to the student in the Day or Evening Division achieving the best The Leahy Prize Argument: Each year, the best combined scholastic record in the courses in Moot Court advocates in the Law Center are hon• Criminal Justice. ored in the Leahy Prize Argument, open to all upperclass students. The Argument is named in Bettina E. Pruckmayr Memorial Award: An annual memory of William E. Leahy, a Law Center alum• cash award is presented annually to the third-year nus and an outstanding advocate. The name of the student who hest exemplifies a commitment to the winner of the Argument is inscribed on the Leahy ideals of the late Bettina L. Pruckmayr, whose belief Cup and on the Roll of Best Advocates on perma• in human rights, and the obligation of everyone to nent display outside the Hart Moot Courtroom. ensure the protection of these rights, inspired the establishment of this fund in her name. The Francis F. Lucey, S.J. Award: The graduating student who has earned the highest academic aver• The Leon Robbin Patent Award: From proceeds age for his or her law school career will receive a of a fund created hy Leon Rohhin, LL.B'22, a gold plaque, awarded in honor of Rev. Francis E. Lucey, medallion will he awarded annually to the graduat• Regent of the Law School for 30 years. Father Lucey ing student who has done the hest work in the field guided the school during the difficult years of the of patent law at the Law Center. Depression and World War II and lived to see Georgetown's emergence as the important national The Sewall Key Prize: The Sewall Key Prize of law school which it is today. $200 has been established by friends of the late Sewall Key, LL.B'20, former Special Assistant to James John McTigue Essay Award: Each year the the Attorney General, Tax Division, Department dean selects a group of seminars eligible to compete of Justice. The prize is awarded annually to the for this award. A certificate and a cash prize of $200 graduating senior who does the hest work in the is made annually to the author of the best seminar field of taxation at the Law Center. paper for each designated seminar. The Tamm Memorial Award: A prize of $300 and The George Brent Mickum III Prize: The family, a plaque are awarded annually as a prize for the colleagues and friends of George Brent Mickum III, hest student writing on the Georgetown Law Journal. C'49, L'52, have established this prize to honor the The award fund was created in memory of the memory of George Mickum, a former member of Honorahle Edward Allen Tamm by Chief Justice the firm of Steptoe and Johnson. The prize of and Mrs. Warren Burger. $3,000 is awarded annually to the student with the best overall academic record at the conclusion of Tutorial Program Award: In recognition of the the first year. outstanding contrihutions made to the Law Center's academic program. The Saint Thomas More Award: An award consist• ing of a framed certificate will he given to the top The Washington Law Reporter Prize: Estahlished three graduating note authors for their outstanding by the Washington Law Reporter Company, the work on the Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics and Prize consists of a one-year subscriptions to the their names will be added to a perpetual plaque in Washington Law Reporter. Awards are made annually the Georgetown Journal of Legal Lthics office. to one student whose efforts during the preceding six months have most contributed to the success of National Association of Women Lawyers' Award: the Student Bar Association. Selection is made by Presented to an outstanding graduating student who the dean upon recommendation of the president of has achieved academic excellence and contributes to the Student Bar Association. the advancement of women in society. West Publishing Company Outstanding Scholastic The John M. Olin Prize in Law and Economics: Achievement Award: Each year the West This prize is awarded annually to the student who Publishing Company awards a certificate to the writes the best paper in the workshop comprising first-, second-, third-, and fourth-year law student part of the John M. Olin Program in Law and who achieves the best scholastic record in his/her Economics of the Georgetown University Law class. Center. Academic Attrition 43 Application Fee 93 Academic Calendar, 2002-2003 153 Application to Graduate 67, 71 Academic Evaluation and Attrition Standards 42 Asian Law and Policy Studies Program 122 Academic Evaluation System 42 Attendance and Evaluation Policies, Graduate 65 Academic Honors, JD Program 43 Attendance and Participation 45 Academic Honors, Graduate Program 66 Attendance, Examinations, and Written Work 45 Academic Requirements and Policies, Attendance, Graduate Program 65 JD Program 39 Audiotaping of Classes, Policies and Procedures 71 Academic Requirements, Graduate Program 62 Awards, Appendix G: Prizes and 146 Academic Resource Programs 101 Bar Admissions, Examinations, and Reviews 71 Board of Directors 119 Administrative Law and Board of Visitors 124 Government Regulation 105 Campus Security Act of 1990, Administrative Officers and Officers of The Crime Awareness and 72 Instruction, Appendix A: Directory of 119 Career Services Offices 120 Admissions Office 120 Center for Applied Legal Studies 121 Adjunct Faculty, Appendix B: JD Program 126 Center for Constitutional Studies 122 Adjunct Faculty, Appendix C: Center for Law & the Public's Health at Graduate Program 133 Georgetown and Johns Hopkins Adjunct Faculty, Charles Fahy Award University 123 Recipients 138 Certificate in Lmployee Benefits Law, Advanced Torts 105 Requirements 61 Advanced Standing, Graduate 65 Chaplains and Counselors 120 Advanced Standing for Credit Earned as a Clinic Enrollment, Policies Related to 49 JD Student at GULC 65 Clinic Lxtension Policy 50 Affirmative Action, University Grievance Clinical Credits, Limits on 50 Procedures 82 Clinics •» 121 Alternative Dispute Resolution 105 Commercial and Advanced Contract Law 106 Alumni, Development and Public Relations 120 Communications Law 106 Antitrust Law 105 Computer Systems Acceptable Use Policy 88 Appellate Litigation Clinic 121 Conduct Policies 77 Appendices 117 Consortium Program, Graduate 64 Appendix A: Directory of Administrative Constitutional Law and Government 106 Officers and Officers of Instruction 119 Continuing Legal Lducation 120 Appendix B: JD Program Adjunct Faculty 126 Corporate Law and Securities Regulation 107 Appendix C: Graduate Program Corporate Law Focus, JD/MBA 53 Adjunct Faculty 133 Counselors, Chaplains and 120 Appendix D: Charles Fahy Distinguished Course Clusters 103 Adjunct Professor Award Recipients 138 Course Materials 94 Appendix E: Scholarships 139 Credit for Courses in Appendix F: Loans 145 Law Center Graduate Programs 46 Appendix G: Prizes and Awards 146 Credit for Courses in the Appendix: Plagiarism 81 Graduate School of the University 46

149 150 INDEX

Credit for Law Center Summer Programs 46 Georgetown University Affirmative Action Credit for Study Outside the Law Center 46 Grievance Procedures to Investigate Credit for Work Completed at Complaints of Unlawfiil Discrimination 82 Other Law Schools 47 Grade Change Policy, Graduate 66 Credits Lamed at Other Institutions, Graduate .... 64 Grade Review Policies, Graduate 66 Credits Required to LnroU, Clinics 49 Grading, Graduate 66 Criminal Justice Clinic 121 Graduate Curriculum 100 Criminal Law and Procedure 108 Graduate Paper Requirement 62 Crime Awareness and Campus Security Act Graduate Program 57 of 1990, The 72 Graduate Program Adjunct Faculty, Curriculum, The Law 97 Appendix C: 133 Curriculum "A" Courses 99 Graduate Program, Tuition and Fees 93 Curriculum "A" Eiectives 2002-2003 99 Graduation Policies, Graduate 67 Curriculum "B" Courses 99 Harrison Institute for Public Law 122 D.C. Street Law Project 122 Health Law, Policy, and Bioethics 109 Deans and Vice Presidents 3,119 I.D. Cards 73 Deans Emeriti 123 Immunization Records 73 Degree Requirements, JD Program 40 Institute for the Study of Discrimination Grievance Procedures International Migration 123 Administered by Office of Career Institute for Puhlic Representation 122 Services 89 Institute of Criminal Law and Procedure 123 Doctor of Juridical Science, Requirements for 62 Institute of International Lconomic Law 123 Domestic Violence Clinic 122 Institutes and Other Scholarly Programs 122 Dropping a Clinic or Withdrawal from a Intellectual Property, Entertainment and Clinic in Progress 50 Technology Law 110 Dual Degrees, Graduate Program 61 International and Comparative Legal Studies 110 Duplication of Courses 47, 64 International and Graduate Programs Office 120 Lmployment, Lmployee Benefits and International/National Security Law 112 Labor Law 108 Enrollment and Credit Policies, Graduate 64 International Women's Human Rights Clinic 122 Enrollment for Bar Purposes, Graduate 64 JD Degree Requirements 40 Environmental Law 109 JD Program Adjunct Faculty, Appendix B: 126 Lnvironmental Law and Policy Institute 123 JD Program of Study, Upperclass 99 Examinations, JD Program 45 Joint Degree Programs 51 Examinations, Graduate Program 65 Joint Degree Programs, Tuition and Fees 93 Exam Deferral Policy 72 Juris Doctor Program, Tuition and Fees 93 Executive Officers of the University, The 123 Juris Doctor/Ph.D. in Government 54 Executive Vice President, Law Center Affairs 119 Juris Doctor/Master of Business Family Advocacy Clinic 122 Administration 53 Family Law 109 Juris Doctor/Master of Public Health 55 Federal Legislation Clinic 122 Juris Doctor/Master of Public Policy 55 Federal Legislation Clinic-D.C. Division 122 Juris Doctor/Master of Science in Financial Aid Office 120 Foreign Service 54 Financial Planning, Administrative and Juris Doctor/Ph.D. in Philosophy 54 Support Services 120 Juris Doctor Program 37 First Year JD Curriculum 99 Jurisprudence 112 First Year Tutorial Program 101 Juvenile Justice Clinic 122 Full Time Enrollment, Graduate 64 LL.M. Degree, Requirements for Full-Time Faculty 2002-2003 6 Obtaining Two Degrees 61 FuU Time Program, JD 39 Law and Other Disciplines 112 General Administrative Policies 69 Law Center Deans and Vice Presidents 119 General Requirements for AU LL.M. Students 59 Law Library, The 121 Georgetown-Hewlett Program on Conflict Law Students in Court Clinic 122 Resolution and Problem Solving 123 Leave of Absence and Withdrawal Policies, Georgetown University Policy Statement Graduate Program 67 on Consensual Sexual Relationships Leaves of Absence and Withdrawal from Between Senior and Junior Members the Law Center, JD Program 48 of the Community 85 Legal History 113 Georgetown University Policy on Legal Profession/Professional Responsibility 113 Sexual Harassment 85 Legal Scholarship and Writing 113 INDEX 151

Legal Writing Requirement, Upperclass 40 Required Time in Residence: Legal Writing Requirements, Other Provisions Full Time Program 41 Applicahle to 41 Required Time in Residence: Limitations on Hours of Credit, Graduate 64 FartTime Program 41 Litigation and the Judicial Process 113 Restrictions on Student Lmployment 48 Loans, Appendix F: 145 Review Process for a Failing Grade 46 Master of Laws, Certificate and Review Process for a Passing Grade 46 Non-Degree Program Requirements 59 Scholarships, Appendix E: 139 Master of Laws, Specific Requirements for Sexual Harassment, Georgetown LL.M. Degrees for Students Who Earned a University Policy 85 JD at a Law School in the US 59 Seminar Papers, Graduate 65 Master of Laws, Specific Requirements for LL.M. Sloan-Georgetown Project 123 Degrees Open to Students Who Earned Student Access* 74 First Degree in Law Outside the US 60 Student Conduct and Student Master of Laws 60 Disciplinary Code 48 Master of Laws (individualized) 59 Student Disciplinary Code 79 Master of Laws in Advocacy 59 Student Conduct in the Job Search Process 48 Master of Laws in International and Student Lmployment Grievances 84 Comparative Law 60 Student Lmployment, Restrictions on 47 Master of Laws in International Legal Studies.... 60 Student Grievances in Academic and Master of Laws in Securities and Non-Employment Matters 84 Financial Regulation 60, 61 Student Practice, Tribunal Rules Governing 49 Master of Laws in Taxation 60, 61 Student Records, Academic 74 Medical Insurance 73 Student Records, Access 74 Mock Trial Advocacy, Instructors of 131 Student Records, Directory Information, Monthly Payment Plan 94 and Confidentiality 74 Non-Degree Program, Graduate 61 Student Work, Confidentiality 75 Cffice of Public Interest and Summer Program 100 Community Service 121 Supervised Research 40 Cffice of the Registrar 121 Supreme Court Institute 123 Cffice of Student Affairs and Residence Life 121 Taxation 115 Cfficers of the University, Executive 123 Transcripts 75 Clin Law and Economics Program 123 Transfer Between FuU Time and Part Time Program, JD 39 Part Time Programs 42 Part Time Student Enrollment, Clinics 49 Transfer Between LL.M. Degree Programs 61 Period of Study, Graduate 62 Transfer of Credit, Graduate 65 Plagiarism, Appendix: 81 Trihunal Rules Governing Student Practice, Policies Related to Clinical Enrollment 49 Clinics 49 Policy Statement on Consensual Sexual Trusts and Estates 116 Relationships Between Senior and Tuition and Fees 91 Junior Memhers of the University Tuition Deferments 94 Community 85 Tuition Equalization Charge 93 Policy Statement on Sexual Harassment 85 Tuition Refund Insurance 95 President of the University 119 Tutorial Program, First Year 101 Prizes and Awards, Appendix G: 146 Upperclass JD Program of Study 99 Probation, Graduate 66 Upperclass Legal Writing Requirement 40 Professional Responsibility 67 Visiting Student Enrollment, Clinics 49 Professional Responsihility Requirement 41 Withdrawal for Failure to Register, Graduate 67 Professors Emeriti 123 Withdrawal Refiinds 94 Program on International Business and Withdrawal and Leaves of Absence 48 Economic Law 123 Withdrawal from Individual Courses, Public Interest Law 114 Graduate Program 67 Puhlic Policy Focus, JD/MBA 53 Withdrawal from Individual Courses, Real Estate, Land Use and Urban JD Program 48 Development 115 Women's Law and Public Policy FeUowship 122 Registration after Completion of the Writing Center, The 101 LL.M. Degree 64 Written Work 45 Registration for Courses 73 Yates Field House 94 Required First Year Program 40

2002 FALL SEMESTER

JULY Mon, July22 Tuition due for incoming J.D. and Full-time Graduate Students

AUGUST Friday, Aug 23 Registration and Orientation for J.D. Transfer students Sat, Aug 24 - Sun, Aug 25. . On-Campus Interview Program Orientation Mon, Aug 26 On-Campus Interview Week Begins Mon, Aug 26 Registration and Orientation for J.D. Visiting Students Tue, Aug 27 - Wed, Aug 28 Registration for First Year J.D. students Wed, Aug 28 - Fri, Aug 30 First Year Orientation Mon, Aug 26 Registration and Orientation for new Graduate students (tuition due for part-time Graduate Students) Tue, Aug27-Thur, Aug29 Continuing Crientation for new Graduate Students Fri, Aug 30 Late Registration: all unregistered New and Continuing students ($50 late fee) Tuition due for all transfer, visitor and continuing Students Financial Aid Transactions: All students

SEPTEMBER Mon, Sept 2 LABOR DAY HOLIDAY: No classes meet Tue, Septs Classes Begin Tue, Sept3-Tue, Sept 10 Add/Drop and Wait-list activity for Fall and Spring Courses Late Registration: ($70 late fee) Fri, Sept 6 (Rosh Hashanah begins at sundown, Friday, Sept 6) Sun, Sept 15 (Yom Kippur begins at sundown Sunday, Sept 15)

OCTOBER Men, Oct 14 COLUMBUS DAY HOLIDAY: No classes meet Tue, Oct 15 Monday classes meet instead of Tuesday classes

NOVEMBER Wed, Nov 27-Sun, Dec 1 THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY: No classes meet

DECEMBER Fri, Dec 6 Last day of classes Tue, Dec 10 - Sat, Dec 21 Final Exams Fri, Dec 20 All Papers Due unless other due date set by the professor

153 154 2002-2003 ACADEMIC CALENDAR

2003 SPRING SEMESTER

JANUARY Thlir, Jan 2 Spring Tuition due by mail or it must be paid at walk-in registration on Jan 3 Fri, Jan 3 Deferred Exams from Fall 2002 Registration: New Graduate students, J.D. visitors and transfer students Late Registration: Continuing students who did not register previously ($50 fee) Financial Aid Transactions: All students Sat, Jan 4 Orientation for new Graduate Students Mon, Jan 6 Classes Begin Mon, Jan 6 - Fri, Jan 10 Add/Drop and Wait-list activity Late Registration: ($70 late fee) Mon, Jan 20 MARTIN LUTHER KING HOLIDAY: No classes meet

FEBRUARY Mon, Feb 3 Reception for Fehruary 2003 Graduates Mon, Feb 17 PRESIDENT'S DAY HOLIDAY: No classes meet Tue, Feb 18 - Wed, Feb 19 FACULTY RETREAT: No classes meet Thur, Feb 20 Monday classes meet instead of Thursday classes

MARCH Sat, Mar 8 - Sun, Mar 16 SPRING BREAK: No classes meet

APRIL Fri, Apr 18 - Sun, Apr 20 FASTER BREAK: No classes meet Fri, Apr 25 Last Day of Classes Mon, Apr 28 May Graduates' Papers Due unless an earlier due date set by the professor Sat, Apr 26 - Mon, Apr 28 Snow Make Up and Reading Days Tue, Apr 29 - Tue, May 13 Final Exams

MAY Tue, Apr 29 - Tue, May 13 Final Exams Tue, May 13 AU Cther Papers Due unless other due date set by the professor

Sat, May 17 Graduation Gala Sun, May 18 Commencement

Georgetown University Law Center 600 New Jersey Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001