GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITYLAW CENTER

GBULLETIN 2006–2007 EORGETOWN FULL TIME FACULTY 1 JURIS DOCTOR PROGRAM 11 JOINT DEGREE PROGRAMS 27 GRADUATE PROGRAMS 35 s t n

GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES 49 e t n

CONDUCT POLICIES 57 o C f

TUITION AND FEES 73 o e l b

THE LAW CURRICULUM 79 a T APPENDICES 85 Appendix A: Directory of Administrative Officers and Officers of Instruction 87 Appendix B: J.D. Program Adjunct Faculty 95 Appendix C: Graduate Program Adjunct Faculty 104 Appendix D: Charles Fahy Distinguished Adjunct Professor Award Recipients 111 Appendix E: Scholarships 112 Appendix F: Loans 119 Appendix G: Prizes and Awards 120 INDEX 124 2006-2007 ACADEMIC CALENDAR 127

This Bulletin contains information about the faculty of the Law Center, the law curriculum and degree requirements, and policies governing members of the community. Students are responsible for knowledge of its content.

i

DEANS ANDVICEPRESIDENTS FULL TIMEFACULTY 2006–2007 4 3

1 Full Time Faculty

FULL TIME FACULTY 3

Members of the Law Center faculty represent an Andrew P.Cornblatt extraordinary range of professional and scholarly Associate Vice President (Graduate Admissions Programs); accomplishment in every area of legal practice. Dean of Admissions Many have achieved national or international B.A., Harvard; J.D., Boston College prominence and remain actively involved in their specialized field. Members of the Georgetown fac- ulty share a common commitment to teaching; they Deborah Epstein place a special value on accessibility and informal Associate Dean (Clinical Education and Public Interest discussion. They share the desire to help students & Community Service Programs); Director, Domestic learn how to view each legal issue from the broadest Violence Clinic; Professor of Law intellectual and social perspective. They are commit- B.A., Brown; J.D., New York University ted to helping every student develop the habits of mind that are characteristic of the best lawyers. Gihan Fernando DEANS AND VICE PRESIDENTS Assistant Dean (Career Services) B.A., Johns Hopkins; J.D., Georgetown T. Alexander Aleinikoff Executive Vice President, Law Center Affairs; Dean of the Law Center; Professor of Law R. Scott Foster B.A., Swarthmore College; J.D., Yale Assistant Dean (Academic Administration) Professor Aleinikoff joined the law faculty after B.A., Harvard; J.D., George Washington; LL.M., having served as the Executive Associate Georgetown Commissioner for Programs in the U.S. Department of Justice's Immigration and Lawrence O. Gostin Naturalization Service and as General Counsel in Associate Dean, Research and Academic Programs; the Immigration and Naturalization Service. He has Professor of Public Health, the Johns Hopkins been on the faculty at the University of Michigan University; Director, Center for Law & the Public’s Law School. After receiving his law degree, he Health; Professor of Law served as law clerk to the Honorable Edward Weinfeld, U.S. District Judge. He has published B.A., State University of New York at Brockport; numerous articles in the areas of immigration, race, J.D., Duke; LL.D., (Hon.) State University of statutory interpretation, and constitutional law, and New York his most recent scholarship includes Semblances of Sovereignty: The Constitution, the State, and American Katherine Hall Citizenship, Citizenship Policies for An Age of Assistant Dean of Students Migration (with Douglas Klusmeyer), Immigration: Process and Policy (with David Martin and Hiroshi B.A., California State University, Chico; M.A., Motomura), and Modern Constitutional Theory: A Catholic University of America Reader (with John Garvey). Ruth Lammert-Reeves Mitchell C. Bailin Assistant Dean (Financial Aid) Assistant Dean (J.D. Academic Services) B.A., Ohio; M.A., Bowling Green State University A.B., Harvard; M.St., Oxford; J.D., Yale

Pablo G. Molina Everett Bellamy Chief Information Officer Senior Assistant Dean (J.D. Program); Adjunct Professor of Law B.A., M.B.A., St. Louis B.S., M.S., Wisconsin; J.D., Cleveland State University Barbara Moulton Assistant Dean (Public Interest and Community Service) Nancy Cantalupo B.A., Assumption College; J.D., Georgetown Assistant Dean (Clinical Programs) B.S.F.S., J.D., Georgetown

Kevin T. Conry Associate Vice President (Development and External Affairs); Adjunct Professor of Law B.S.F.S., J.D., Georgetown 4 FULL TIME FACULTY

Carol Q. O’Neil Susan Low Bloch Associate Dean (Academic Administration) Professor of Law B.A., Manhattanville College; M.A.T., University B.A., Smith; M.A., Ph.D., J.D., University of of Massachusetts; J.D., Georgetown Michigan

Wendy Collins Perdue Maxwell Gregg Bloche Associate Dean (Graduate Programs); Professor of Law Co-Director, Joint Degree in Law and Public Health; Adjunct Professor of Public Health, Johns Hopkins B.A., Wellesley; J.D., Duke University; Professor of Law B.A., Columbia; J.D., M.D., Yale Therese Lee Stratton Assistant Dean (Faculty Support and Campus Services) William W. Bratton B.S., M.S., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and Professor of Law State University B.A., J.D., Columbia FULL TIME FACULTY Rosa Brooks Charles F. Abernathy Professor of Law Professor of Law A.B., Harvard; M.St., Oxford; J.D., Yale A.B., J.D., LL.M., Harvard J. Peter Byrne Lama Abu-Odeh Professor of Law Professor of Law B.A., Northwestern; M.A., J.D., University of LL.B., University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; Virginia LL.M., University of Bristol, England; MA, University of York, England; S.J.D., Harvard Angela J. Campbell Director, Institute for Public Representation; Professor Judith C. Areen of Law Dean Emeritus; Paul Regis Dean Professor of Law B.A., Hampshire; J.D., UCLA; LL.M., A.B., Cornell; J.D., Yale Georgetown

Hope Babcock Barry E. Carter Professor of Law Director, International and Transnational Programs; Professor of Law B.A., Smith College; LL.B., Yale B.A., Stanford; M.P.A., Princeton; J.D., Yale Catherine Barnard Visiting Professor of Law Sheryll D. Cashin Professor of Law M.A., (Cantab.); LL.M. (EUI); Ph.D. (Cantab.) B.E., Vanderbilt; M.A., Oxford; J.D., Harvard Randy E. Barnett Carmack Waterhouse Professor of Legal Theory Richard H. Chused Professor of Law B.A., Northwestern; J.D., Harvard A.B., Brown; J.D., Chicago Jeffrey D. Bauman Professor of Law Julie E. Cohen Professor of Law B.A., M.A., LL.B., Yale A.B., Harvard-Radcliffe; J.D., Harvard Andrea Biondi Visiting Professor of Law Stephen B. Cohen Professor of Law M.A., J.D., Ph.D., University of Florence A.B., Amherst; J.D., Yale FULL TIME FACULTY 5

Sherman L. Cohn Lisa Fairfax Professor of Law Visiting Professor of Law B.S.F.S., LL.B., LL.M., Georgetown A.B., J.D., Harvard

David D. Cole James V. Feinerman Professor of Law James M. Morita Professor of Asian Legal Studies; Co-Director, Asian Law and Policy Studies B.A., J.D., Yale B.A., M.A., M.Phil., Ph.D., Yale; J.D., Harvard Anthony E. Cook Professor of Law Chai R. Feldblum Director, Federal Legislation Clinic; Professor of Law B.A., Princeton; J.D., Yale B.A., Barnard College; J.D., Harvard John M. Copacino Director, Criminal Justice Clinic and E. Barrett Heidi Li Feldman Prettyman Program; Professor of Law Co-Director, Joint Degree in Law & Philosophy; Professor of Law B.A., M.A.T., Duke; J.D., University of Virginia; LL.M., Georgetown A.B., Brown; J.D., Ph.D., University of Michigan

Frances C. DeLaurentis James Forman, Jr. Professor of Legal Research and Writing Associate Professor of Law B.A., Notre Dame; J.D., Catholic University A.B., Brown University; J.D., Yale

Richard D. Diamond Martin D. Ginsburg Professor of Law Professor of Law A.B., Princeton; M.A., J.D., Yale A.B., Cornell; J.D., Harvard

Viet D. Dinh Vicki W. Girard Co-Director, Asian Law & Policy Studies Program; Associate Professor of Legal Research and Writing Professor of Law B.A., Drew University; J.D., Georgetown A.B., J.D., Harvard Steven P.Goldberg Diana Roberto Donahoe Professor of Law Professor of Legal Research and Writing A.B., Harvard; J.D., Yale B.A., Williams; J.D., LL.M., Georgetown Steven H. Goldblatt Robert F. Drinan, S.J. Director, Appellate Litigation Clinic; Professor of Law Professor of Law B.A., Franklin & Marshall; J.D., Georgetown B.A., M.A., Boston College; LL.B., LL.M., Georgetown; Th.D., Gregorian University, Rome Michael H. Gottesman Professor of Law Peter B. Edelman A.B., Chicago; LL.B., Yale Co-Director, Joint Degree in Law & Public Policy; Professor of Law Charles H. Gustafson A.B., LL.B., Harvard Professor of Law B.S., Buffalo; J.D., Chicago Daniel R. Ernst Professor of Law Robert J. Haft B.A., Dartmouth; J.D., Chicago; M.A., Ph.D., Professor of Law Princeton; LL.M., University of Wisconsin B.A., City College of New York; J.D., Columbia 6 FULL TIME FACULTY

Pamela Harris Laurie S. Kohn Visiting Professor of Law Deputy Director, Domestic Violence Clinic; Visiting Associate Professor of Law B.A., J.D., Yale B.A., Harvard; J.D., LL.M., Georgetown Lisa Heinzerling Professor of Law David A. Koplow Director, Center for Applied Legal Studies; Professor A.B., Princeton; J.D., Chicago of Law B.A., Harvard, Queen’s College at Oxford; J.D., Yale Kristin Nicole Henning Deputy Director, Juvenile Justice Clinic; Associate Professor of Law Abe Krash Distinguished Visitor from Practice B.A., Duke; J.D., Yale; LL.M., Georgetown B.A., J.D., Chicago Craig Hoffman Professor of U.S. Legal Discourse Michael Lang Visiting Professor of Law B.A., College of William & Mary; Ph.D., University of Connecticut; J.D., University of Texas Mag.-inv, Dr. inv., University of Vienna Judith Richards Hope Distinguished Visitor from Practice Donald C. Langevoort Thomas Aquinas Reynolds Professor of Law A.B., Wellesley College; J.D., LL.D. (Hon.), Harvard B.A., University of Virginia; J.D., Harvard

John H. Jackson Charles R. Lawrence, III University Professor Professor of Law A.B., Princeton; J.D., University of Michigan B.A., Haverford College; J.D., Yale

Vicki C. Jackson Richard J. Lazarus Professor of Law Professor of Law B.A., J.D., Yale B.S., B.A, University of Illinois; J.D., Harvard

Emma Coleman Jordan Martin S. Lederman Professor of Law Visiting Professor of Law B.A., San Francisco State University; J.D., Howard A.B., Michigan; J.D., Yale

Neal K. Katyal Amanda Leiter Professor of Law Visiting Associate Professor of Law A.B., Dartmouth; J.D., Yale B.S., Stanford; M.S., University of Washington; J.D., Harvard Patricia A. King Carmack Waterhouse Professor of Law, Medicine, David J. Luban Ethics, and Public Policy Frederick J. Haas Professor of Law and Philosophy B.A., Wheaton College; J.D., Harvard B.A., University of Chicago; M.A., M.Phil., Ph.D., Yale Gregory Klass Associate Professor of Law Laura W.S. Macklin Professor of Law B.A., Carleton College; Ph.D., Graduate Faculty, New School; J.D., Yale B.A., California (Santa Barbara); J.D., California (Berkeley) FULL TIME FACULTY 7

Mari J. Matsuda Robert L. Oakley Professor of Law Professor of Law; Director, Law Library B.A., Arizona State; J.D., Hawaii; LL.M., Harvard B.A., J.D., Cornell; M.S.L.S., Syracuse

Heather R. McCabe James C. Oldham Associate Professor of Legal Research and Writing St. Thomas More Professor of Law and Legal History B.A., Amherst; J.D., George Washington B.S., Duke; LL.B., Stanford; M.S.B.A., Denver

Carrie J. Menkel-Meadow Ladislas Orsy, S.J. A.B. Chettle, Jr. Professor of Dispute Resolution and Visiting Professor of Law Civil Procedure M.A., Oxford; D.C.L., Gregorian University, A.B., Barnard College, Columbia; J.D., University Rome; L.Ph., L.S.T., School of Theology, of Pennsylvania, LL.D., Quinnipiac College of Law St. Albert, Belgium

Naomi Mezey Joseph A. Page Professor of Law Director, Center for the Advancement of the Rule of Law in the Americas; Professor of Law B.A., Wesleyan University; J.D., Stanford; M.A., University of Minnesota B.A., LL.B., LL.M., Harvard

John Mikhail Elizabeth Hayes Patterson Associate Professor of Law Associate Professor of Law B.A., Amherst College; Ph.D., Cornell; J.D., A.B., Emmanuel; J.D., Catholic University Stanford Joost Pauwelyn Wallace J. Mlyniec Visiting Professor of Law Lupo-Ricci Professor of Clinical Legal Studies; Cand. Jur., University of Namur, Belgium; Lic. Jur., Director, Juvenile Justice Clinic Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium; Magister B.S., Northwestern; J.D., Georgetown Juris, University of Oxford, Corpus Christi College, UK; Ph.D. in law, University of Neuchâtel, Switzerland John G. Murphy, Jr. Professor of Law Ronald A. Pearlman A.B., Harvard; LL.B., Georgetown Professor of Law B.A., J.D., Northwestern; LL.M., Georgetown Peter-Christian Müller-Graff Visiting Professor of Law Gary Peller Dr. jur. habil., Dr. iur., Tübingen University Professor of Law B.A., Emory; J.D., Harvard Eleanor Holmes Norton Professor of Law Nina Pillard B.A., Antioch; M.A., LL.B., Yale Professor of Law B.A., Yale; J.D., Harvard Noah Novogrodsky Visiting Professor of Law Robert Pitofsky B.A., Swarthmore; M.Phil., Cambridge; J.D., Yale Sheehy Professor in Antitrust and Trade Regulation Law; Dean Emeritus Julie Rose O’Sullivan A.B., New York University; LL.B., Columbia Professor of Law A.B., Stanford; J.D., Cornell 8 FULL TIME FACULTY

John Podesta David Schneiderman Distinguished Visitor from Practice Visiting Associate Professor of Law B.A., Knox College; J.D., Georgetown B.A, McGill; LL.B., Windsor; LL.M., Queen's

Kevin P.Quinn, S.J. Andrew I. Schoenholtz Professor of Law Deputy Director, Georgetown University Institute for the Study of International Migration; Visiting Professor A.B., Fordham; M.Div., S.T.L., Jesuit School of of Law Theology at Berkeley; J.D., Ph.D., University of California (Berkeley) B.A., Hamilton College; J.D., Harvard; Ph.D., Brown

Milton C. Regan, Jr. Roy A. Schotland Professor of Law Professor of Law B.A., University of Houston; M.A., University of A.B., Columbia; LL.B., Harvard California (Los Angeles); J.D., Georgetown Philip G. Schrag Richard L. Roe Director, Center for Applied Legal Studies and Public Director, D.C. Street Law Project; Professor of Law Interest Law Scholars Program; Professor of Law B.A., Yale; J.D., University of Maine A.B., Harvard; LL.B., Yale

Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz Louis Michael Seidman Associate Professor of Law Carmack Waterhouse Professor of Constitutional Law B.A., J.D., Yale A.B., Chicago; J.D., Harvard

Julia L. Ross Jeffrey Shulman Professor of Legal Research and Writing Associate Professor of Legal Research and Writing B.A., Hamilton College; J.D., Harvard B.A., University of Maryland; M.A., University of Wisconsin; J.D., Georgetown Susan Deller Ross Director, International Women’s Human Rights Clinic; J. Gregory Sidak Professor of Law Visiting Professor of Law B.A., Knox; J.D., New York University A.B., A.M., J.D., Stanford

Paul F. Rothstein Laurence H. Silberman Professor of Law Distinguished Visitor from the Judiciary B.S., J.D., Northwestern A.B., Dartmouth; LL.B., Harvard

Peter J. Rubin Abbe Smith Professor of Law Co-Director, Criminal Justice Clinic and E. Barrett Prettyman Fellowship Program; Professor of Law B.A., Yale; J.D., Harvard B.A., Yale; J.D., New York University Steven C. Salop Professor of Economics and Law Girardeau A. Spann Professor of Law B.A., University of Pennsylvania; M.Phil., Ph.D., Yale A.B., Princeton; J.D., Harvard Paul C. Saunders Distinguished Visitor from Practice Jane E. Stromseth Co-Director, Joint Degree in International Studies and A.B., Fordham; J.D., Georgetown Law; Professor of Law B.A., Swarthmore; D.Phil., Oxford; J.D., Yale Heather Sawyer Visiting Professor of Law B.A., Dartmouth; J.D., Chicago FULL TIME FACULTY 9

Robert K. Stumberg Silas J. Wasserstrom Clinical Director, Harrison Institute for Public Law; Professor of Law Professor of Law A.B., Amherst; LL.B., Yale B.A., Macalester; J.D., LL.M., Georgetown Seth Waxman Peter W. Tague Distinguished Visitor from Practice Professor of Law A.B., Harvard; J.D., Yale A.B., Harvard; J.D., University of Michigan Peter P.Weidenbruch, Jr. Daniel K. Tarullo Ralph H. Dwan Professor of Taxation Professor of Law B.S., Northwestern; J.D., LL.M., LL.D., A.B., Georgetown; M.A., Duke; J.D., University of Georgetown Michigan Edith Brown Weiss John R. Thomas Francis Cabell Brown Professor of International Law; Professor of Law Co-Director, Joint Degree in Political Science and Law B.S., Carnegie Mellon University; J.D., University of A.B., Stanford; J.D., Harvard; Ph.D., University of Michigan; LL.M., George Washington University California-Berkeley; LL.D. (Hon.), Chicago-Kent

Kristen Konrad Tiscione Franz Werro Professor of Legal Research and Writing Professor of Law B.A., Wellesley College; J.D., Georgetown Licence en droit, Docteur en droit, University of Fribourg; LL.M., University of California-Berkeley Rebecca L. Tushnet Associate Professor of Law Robin L. West Professor of Law B.A., Harvard; J.D., Yale B.A., J.D., University of Maryland; J.S.M., Stanford Carlos Manuel Vázquez John Carroll Research Professor of Law Timothy M. Westmoreland Visiting Professor of Law B.A., Yale; J.D., Columbia B.A., Duke; J.D., Yale David Vladeck Associate Professor of Law Wendy Webster Williams Professor of Law B.A., New York University; J.D., Columbia; LL.M., Georgetown A.B., J.D., University of California-Berkeley

Alexander “Sasha” Volokh David Wolitz Visiting Associate Professor of Law Associate Professor of Legal Research and Writing B.S., B.A., University of California, Los Angeles; B.A., Stanford; J.D., Yale J.D., Ph.D., Harvard Ethan Yale William T. Vukowich Associate Professor of Law Professor of Law B.S., Cornell; J.D., Tulane A.B., Indiana; J.D., California-Berkeley; J.S.D., Columbia Kathryn Zeiler Associate Professor of Law Heathcote Woolsey Wales B.S., Indiana University; M.S., Golden Gate Associate Professor of Law University; M.S., California Institute of A.B., University of North Carolina; J.D., University Technology; J.D., University of Southern of Chicago California; M.S., Ph.D., California Institute of Technology

Specifi rdtfrCussi h rdaeSho fteUiest 21 Credit forCoursesintheGraduateSchoolofUniversity eurdTm nRsdne(eiec eurmn)15 Required Time inResidence(ResidencyRequirement) c rnfrBtenFl ieadPr iePorm 16 Transfer BetweenFullTime andPartTime Programs rdtfrCussi a etrGaut rga 21 Credit forCoursesinLawCenterGraduateProgram Requir Cr ACADEMIC REQUIREMENTSANDPOLICIES edit forW tedne xmntos n rte ok20 Attendance, Examinations,andWritten Work Academic EvaluationandAttritionStandar ements forStudentsonNon-ImmigrantV rnfrSuet rmOhrLwShos16 Transfer StudentsfromOtherLawSchools rfsinlRsosblt eurmn 15 Professional ResponsibilityRequirement Cr rdtfrSuyOtieteLwCne 22 Credit forStudyOutsidetheLawCenter pecasLglWiigRqieet14 Upperclass LegalWriting Requirement edit forLawCenterSummerPr ihrwl n evso bec 24 Withdrawals andLeavesofAbsence r opee tOhrLwShos22 ork CompletedatOtherLawSchools etitoso tdn mlyet23 Restrictions onStudentEmployment ui otrDge eurmns14 Juris DoctorDegreeRequirements n ae o w eias15 One PaperforTwo Seminars eurdFrtYa rga 14 Required FirstYear Program lncErlmn oiis 24 Clinic EnrollmentPolicies PART TIMEPROGRAM FULL TIMEPROGRAM Duplication ofCourses uevsdRsac 14 Supervised Research Exter nship Pr gas21 ograms ogram isas ds 17 17 23 23 1 13 13 4

11 Juris Doctor Program

JURIS DOCTOR PROGRAM 13

The Law Center offers both a Full Time and a Part credits. During the second year, part time students Time program leading to the Juris Doctor degree. take a required program of 7 academic credits The same standards of performance are required of together with elective courses. During the third and students in both programs. Members of the full fourth years, part time students pursue an elective time faculty teach the courses in both programs, program of study. In addition to the required first assisted by members of the adjunct faculty in certain and second year courses, students must complete a specialized courses. course in Professional Responsibility and the upperclass legal writing requirement. FULL TIME PROGRAM A part time student may not enroll in fewer than The program of instruction for the Full Time 8 or more than 11 academic credits without the Program requires a minimum of six full time semes- permission of the Registrar, an Assistant Dean for ters (three academic years) for completion of the J.D. Academic Services, or the Director of J.D. degree requirements. Full time students may not Academic Services. Permission to enroll in 12 acad- advance their date of graduation by attendance at emic credits may be given under the following cir- Summer sessions. See Required Time in Residence: cumstances: (1) a student registers in a clinic that Full Time Program. Students enrolled in the Full awards 12 credit hours; (2) a student registers for a Time Program are expected to devote substantially seminar meeting the upperclass legal writing all of their time during the academic year to the requirement and he or she has not previously ful- study of law. filled the legal writing requirement; (3) a student During the first year of academic studies, stu- in either the Fall or Spring semester of his or her dents in the Full Time Program take a required final year (but not in both semesters) needs to take program of 30 academic credits. During the second 12 academic credits to complete the J.D. degree and third years, full time students pursue an elective requirements; or (4) a student is a law fellow in the program of instruction while completing the Legal Research and Writing or USLD program. required course in Professional Responsibility and A part time student enrolled in a clinic his or her the upperclass legal writing requirement. third or fourth year may seek permission from the A student in the Full Time Program may not Registrar, an Assistant Dean for J.D. Academic enroll in fewer than 12 or more than 16 academic Services, or the Director of JD Academic Services credits without the permission of the Registrar, an to exceed the 11-credit maximum in order to take a Assistant Dean for J.D. Academic Services, or the course required or recommended for the clinic. Part Director of J.D. Academic Services. Students in the time students who are permitted to take 12 credits Full Time Program are expected to graduate at the in a given semester will continue to be part time end of three academic years, and may take no longer students charged tuition on a per-credit basis. than five consecutive calendar years from the date of First year classes in the Part Time Program matriculation to meet all J.D. degree requirements. generally meet from 5:45 p.m. until 7:45 p.m. on If after five consecutive calendar years a student has weekdays; in the first year, Legal Research and not yet completed all academic requirements neces- Writing classes are scheduled from 7:55 p.m. to sary to graduate, the student will be withdrawn 8:50 p.m. Some upperclass electives are scheduled from the Law Center with no possibility of read- until 8:50 p.m. on weeknights and a limited number mission or graduation, unless excused by operation of electives are offered on Saturdays or in some of law (i.e., military call-up, Americans with instances, in an intensive format. Elective courses Disabilities Act, etc.) or by grant of a waiver. meeting during the day are open to part time students. Students seeking a waiver of the five-year require- Students in the Part Time Program are expected ment must submit their written petition and sup- to graduate within four academic years of matricula- porting documentation to the Registrar as soon as tion and may take no longer than six consecutive their situation becomes apparent. Unless a written calendar years from the date of matriculation to waiver of this rule is granted, the five-year rule is meet all J.D. degree requirements. If after six con- strictly enforced. secutive calendar years a student has not completed all degree requirements necessary to graduate, the PART TIME PROGRAM student will be withdrawn from the Law Center The Part Time Program is designed to allow the with no possibility of readmission or graduation, part time student to complete the J.D. degree unless excused by operation of law (i.e., military requirements in eight academic semesters. Students call-up, Americans with Disabilities Act, etc.) or by may accelerate their program to seven semesters grant of a waiver. Students seeking a waiver of the plus 8 or more credits over two or more Summer six-year requirement must submit a written petition sessions. See Required Time in Residence: Part Time and supporting documentation to the Registrar as Program. soon as their situation becomes apparent. Unless a During the first year, students in the Part Time written waiver is granted, the six-year rule is strictly Program take a required program of 23 academic enforced. 14 JURIS DOCTOR PROGRAM

ACADEMIC REQUIREMENTS AND POLICIES legal writing requirement, or (2) by completing a The Law Center reserves the right to change acade- supervised research project that has been approved mic requirements. Notice of changes to academic or by the Chair of the Legal Research and Writing administrative policies in this Bulletin are sent to Committee. students via e-mail. The primary means by which The upperclass legal writing requirement is the Law Center communicates with students is intended to provide students with the opportunity through the Law Center’s student e-mail system to refine research and writing skills learned in the called “LawMail.” Each student is given a LawMail first year, and to develop the skills necessary to e-mail address and must check this e-mail address undertake writing projects on their own following regularly. graduation from law school. Students choose topics, submit outlines, prepare and submit a first draft, JURIS DOCTOR DEGREE REQUIREMENTS and complete the final paper in consultation with In order to earn the J.D. degree, a student must faculty members in approved seminars, clinics, and successfully complete the following academic supervised research projects. requirements: Through meeting the upperclass legal writing • 84 credits are required for students who matricu- requirement, the student is to show his or her mas- late in August, 2005 or thereafter; 83 credits are tery of the in-depth research undertaken and required for transfer students who matriculated in demonstrate how the student has organized, clari- August, 2005, and students who matriculated fied, or advanced this body of knowledge in resolv- before August, 2005; (a minimum of 53 academic ing the issues raised by the paper. Final papers must credits must be earned at the Law Center); be submitted to the Office of the Registrar and not • The required first year curriculum; directly to the professor. • The upperclass legal writing requirement, The technical requirements for the upperclass described below; legal writing requirement include: (1) use of legal • A course in Professional Responsibility; forms of citation (when appropriate); (2) submission • The required time in residence (“Residency of an outline and a first draft, in accordance with Requirement”), described below; and the professor’s instructions and schedule; (3) sub- • A minimum cumulative grade point average of mission of a revised final paper based on the profes- 2.00 in Law Center courses. sor’s comments; and (4) both the first draft and the final paper of at least 6,000 words (excluding foot- Students may not extend their program beyond notes), which is approximately 25 typewritten pages the semester in which they have completed all using customary margins and spacing. All work academic requirements for the J.D. degree. must be that of the student in consultation with the In addition to the academic requirements, a J.D. professor or must be cited for attribution to others. diploma will not be issued until a student’s account balance has been paid in full. In addition, tran- SUPERVISED RESEARCH scripts, diplomas, bar certificates, and other educa- The faculty augments the Law Center’s seminar tional certificates will not be released if there is an offerings by providing a Supervised Research outstanding student account balance or a student option, which students may undertake under the who has received financial aid has not fulfilled the supervision of a faculty member for 2 academic federal requirement for a financial aid “exit inter- credits. Supervised Research provides faculty guid- view.” The Law Center will not confer a J.D. degree ance to students in areas where there is no curricular on a student who is the subject of a pending admin- offering or where a student wishes to explore a sub- istrative or disciplinary action, as described in the ject in greater depth than would be possible in an Student Disciplinary Code, printed in the Conduct existing course or seminar. The professor and stu- Policies section of this Bulletin. dent establish a calendar of meetings that allows for In meeting academic requirements, students the kind of interaction contemplated for writing should be aware of the following academic seminars. regulations and policies of the Law Center. To be eligible for Supervised Research, a student must have at least a “C” average (2.00) and must be REQUIRED FIRST YEAR PROGRAM sponsored by a faculty member. If a student makes a Students must successfully complete the required good faith effort to obtain sponsorship by a full first year program described in the First Year J.D. time member and is unable to do so, sponsorship by Curriculum section of this Bulletin. an adjunct faculty member sometimes may be approved. UPPERCLASS LEGAL WRITING REQUIREMENT To apply for Supervised Research, a student must Students must complete the upperclass legal writing complete an application form (available from the requirement as follows: (1) by successfully complet- Office of the Registrar, Room 315 or online) and ing a seminar or clinic approved by the Legal submit it to the Office of the Registrar by the dead- Research and Writing Committee as meeting the line for the relevant semester (see the Registrar’s JURIS DOCTOR PROGRAM 15 website for details, at www.law.georgetown.edu/ permission is granted, the student will be required registrar/). The application form requires that the to write a paper of at least 12,000 words excluding student describe the topic for research; demonstrate footnotes (approximately 50 pages), and meet all why the topic would lead to an original paper satis- other requirements of both seminars. Students will fying the legal writing requirement; show the spon- be expected to indicate the joint nature of the paper soring professor’s agreement; indicate the scheduled on the cover page of all submissions. Each professor meeting dates with the professor and the due dates approving such a project independently will submit for submission of the outline, first draft, and final a final grade indicating his or her judgment of the draft; list the semester(s) in which the project is to paper as it pertains to his or her course, and the be completed; and, if approval is sought for sponsor- final grades given for the two seminars need not be ship by an adjunct faculty member, describe the stu- identical. dent’s efforts to obtain sponsorship by a full time faculty member. To ensure that the proposals will be PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY REQUIREMENT completed successfully, approval will be guided by Each student must successfully complete either the principles set out below in reviewing a student’s an upperclass course meeting the Professional proposal: Responsibility requirement or the first year 1. The student must have at least the required “C” perspective elective, American Legal Profession. average. J.D. students will not satisfy their Professional 2. The Assistant Dean and Registrar will be Responsibility requirement by completing receptive to all proposals meeting the goals of Professional Responsibility courses offered in Supervised Research and expects to approve most the Graduate Program. proposals for supervision by full time faculty. 3. Because the time demanded of the professor is REQUIRED TIME IN RESIDENCE substantial, the Assistant Dean and Registrar (RESIDENCY REQUIREMENT) expects that students ordinarily will seek sponsor- In addition to all other degree requirements, stu- ship from full time faculty. The Assistant Dean dents must complete the required time in residence. and Registrar and the academic deans will help students identify possible faculty sponsors. When FULL TIME PROGRAM no full time faculty member can serve as a spon- A full time student must complete six semesters sor, the Associate Dean may approve a proposal in which he or she enrolls in a minimum of 12 aca- with an adjunct faculty sponsor. demic credits, and passes at least 10 of these credits. 4. A student ordinarily may not undertake After six full time semesters, a student achieves the Supervised Research more than once. (Students required time in residence needed to graduate. A proposing to take Supervised Research for a sec- full time student who fails to pass at least 10 acade- ond time must disclose this on their application.) mic credits in a given semester will not have success- Similarly, Supervised Research will not be fully completed that full time semester and will need approved when the proposal repeats work for to attend a Summer session or a seventh semester in which credit previously has been granted in order to meet the residency requirement. another course or for which the student has been compensated during employment. Supervised Full time students may not advance the date of Research credit cannot be awarded for internships their graduation by taking classes during the or externships. Summer session. 5. Proposals may call for research to be completed A full time student should consult with the in one semester or two; only 2 academic credits, Registrar if he or she does not successfully complete however, can be awarded. Final drafts of papers a minimum of 10 academic credits during any prepared for Supervised Research should be sub- semester. mitted to the Office of the Registrar. The paper will be graded under the usual evaluation system PART TIME PROGRAM by the sponsoring professor. It also may be A part time student can achieve the required time reviewed by members of the Legal Research and in residence in either of two ways: Writing Committee. Credit for the upperclass writing requirement will be given for papers Eight Semesters: A part time student can meet the receiving a passing grade. residency requirement upon the completion of eight semesters. A part time student who fails to pass at ONE PAPER FOR TWO SEMINARS least 8 academic credits in a given semester will need Students may submit one paper to satisfy the to attend a Summer session or a ninth semester in requirements in two seminars or writing projects by order to meet the residency requirement. securing the written approval of both professors and the Registrar in advance of writing the paper. When 16 JURIS DOCTOR PROGRAM

Seven Semesters and at Least Two Summer Sessions: including the Law Center. Students who have ques- A part time student can meet the residency require- tions concerning a transfer between programs ment upon the completion of seven part time should consult with the Registrar to ascertain the semesters and at least a total of 8 academic credits required periods of attendance and the earliest date over two or more Summer sessions. A part time stu- upon which graduation may occur as a result of a dent who fails to pass at least 8 academic credits in transfer. a given semester will need to attend one or more Students who transfer to the Full Time Program additional semesters or Summer sessions in order to after their first year must pay a tuition equalization achieve the required time in residence. fee. See Tuition and Fees. Part time students who A part time student should consult with the transfer to the full time program and pay the Registrar if he or she does not complete a minimum tuition equalization charge are entitled to take up to of 8 credits during any semester. 7 credits in any Georgetown University Law Center Part time students who wish to accelerate their summer program at the Law Center or abroad graduation should consult with the Registrar to without paying any additional tuition. Summer make sure that they will be able to meet all degree classes not taken at the Law Center or at a Law requirements under the accelerated program. Center-sponsored Summer Abroad program are not covered by the tuition equalization fee. TRANSFER STUDENTS FROM OTHER LAW SCHOOLS Students with financial aid concerns should Students who transfer from other law schools must discuss the application procedures and awarding complete the equivalent of four full time semesters policies with the Assistant Dean for Financial Aid of residence at the Law Center. Transfer students to learn what funds might be available. Scholarship who are admitted to the full time program can fulfill funding for upperclass aid applicants is extremely their remaining residency requirement by complet- limited because awards are made on a three-year ing four additional full time semesters at the Law basis to entering students. Center, in accordance with the provisions set forth Students seeking to transfer at times other than above. For transfer students who are admitted to the the end of the first year must submit a request in part time program, the remaining Law Center resi- writing to the Office of the Registrar. The request dency requirement will depend on the value of the must include a statement of the student’s com- residency earned at the student’s prior law school. pelling personal need to transfer. Note: Part Time Therefore, transfer students admitted to the part students who transfer to the Full Time Program time program will need to consult with the after their second year will continue to pay tuition Registrar to determine how they can fulfill their on a per credit basis. remaining Law Center residency requirement. SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR STUDENTS ON TRANSFER BETWEEN FULL TIME AND NON-IMMIGRANT VISAS PART TIME PROGRAMS By provision of Federal law, any school that enrolls Students who wish to transfer from one program to foreign nationals is required to comply with strict the other should apply to the Registrar by March 15 reporting requirements. Before the start of each of their first full year at the Law Center. (At the semester, all newly enrolled international students beginning of the Spring semester, part time students (including U.S. permanent residents) at the Law will receive information from the Office of the Center are required to provide documentation prov- Registrar about the process for applying to transfer.) ing they are legally permitted to be in the country The Law Center may limit the number of interdivi- and attend school. Students in F-1 or J-1 status are sional transfers. Students must complete all first additionally required to attend a Visa Information year courses, including those normally taken in the Session given by the Graduate Programs Office. second year by part time students, in the program in The Graduate Programs Office will provide all new which they began. international students with detailed information To meet the residency requirement and graduate concerning the time, date, and location of the ses- after two more years of law studies, students who sion prior to the start of the semester. Visa and reg- transfer to the Full Time Program would subse- ulatory information is also available at the Graduate quently need to take four full time semesters plus at Program’s website at www.law.georgetown.edu/intl/ least 6 credits of Summer course work. visa.html A student may not transfer from the Full Time Program to the Part Time Program in the student’s Note: Foreign national students who fail to provide sixth semester. Attendance at Summer sessions does documentation of a valid non-immigrant status not constitute a basis for a transfer. In addition, a permitting study at a U.S. university prior to the student may not transfer to the Full Time program start of classes will not be permitted to complete in a semester in which the student receives tuition registration or attend classes. For further information, benefits as an employee of Georgetown University, please contact the Graduate Programs Office by calling the Visa Hotline, (202) 662-9471 and/or e-mail your immigration related questions to [email protected]. JURIS DOCTOR PROGRAM 17

ACADEMIC EVALUATION AND ATTRITION STANDARDS Pass/Fail Option In order to encourage students to be more adventur- ACADEMIC EVALUATION SYSTEM ous in their curricular choices, the faculty adopted The Law Center’s faculty awards the grades of A, the following limited Pass/Fail option. A-, B+, B, B-, C+, C, C-, D and F. Some courses available to upperclass students are graded under the Eligible Students Pass/Fail Option described below. In the clinical Upperclass J.D. students are eligible to use the programs, the graduate fellows also participate in Pass/Fail option for upperclass electives and cross- the grading process. Each student’s grade point listed Law Center graduate courses that are avail- average is computed at the end of each semester. able for Pass/Fail. The option is not available to first year J.D. students. The Pass/Fail option is STUDENTS AUDITING COURSES not available to LL.M. students. Enrolled degree students may audit additional classes, with the permission of the professors. Eligible Courses Auditors receive no transcript notation of their The following courses are not eligible for the attendance in class. Pass/Fail option: (1) all required courses: that is, first year courses, including the first year elective; any Grading System course that meets the Professional Responsibility The following numerical equivalents are assigned to requirement; and Writing Requirement seminars and each letter grade: supervised research projects; (2) clinics, except for Street Law: Community; (3) Law Center graduate A 4.00 C+ 2.33 courses which are not cross-listed; and (4) courses A- 3.67 C 2.00 where the faculty member has elected not to make a B+ 3.33 C- 1.67 course available for the Pass/Fail option. B 3.00 D 1.00 All other courses may be available for the B- 2.67 F 0 Pass/Fail option. The Office of the Registrar posts a list of the courses not eligible for the Pass/Fail A student’s cumulative grade point average is option for each semester on its website. computed by multiplying the numerical equivalent of each letter grade by the credit value of the course, adding the results together, and then dividing the Other Restrictions total by the total number of credits. In computing a Students may take a total of 6 academic credits student’s average, computations are carried to two Pass/Fail during their J.D. program. All Pass/Fail decimal places. While the cumulative grade point courses, including externships and courses offered average is based upon all the student’s Law Center only Pass/Fail, count toward the 6 credit limit, grades, the annual grade point average is based only except for the International Law Perspectives, Law upon a student’s Law Center grades for one acade- Fellow Seminar, USLD Teaching Assistant mic year. The academic year begins with the Seminar, and Week One courses. Summer term and ends with the following Spring Students may use the Pass/Fail option for only semester. In calculating the student’s cumulative one course or seminar per semester, except that stu- grade point average, the Law Center will include dents taking Ethics and Professional Responsibility the academic credits for any course the student has Seminars, Externships, International Law failed, even when the student has successfully Perspective, Intro to Scholarly Editing, Law Fellow retaken the course. Seminar, USLD Teaching Assistant Seminar, and The grading processes for examination courses Week One courses may take an additional Pass/Fail are anonymous and are designed to be as fair as pos- course in the same semester. sible. Faculty are asked to submit grades approxi- mately four weeks after the end of an examination Grading period. Students may access their grades through A student must decide whether to use the Pass/Fail Student Access+. Grades cannot be released for any option and designate to the Office of the Registrar student who has an outstanding student account the pass/fail course during the first two weeks of the balance. The Law Center will not release grades relevant semester. By the end of the sixth week, the over the telephone, even to the student, because of student must designate to the Registrar’s Office the concern for students’ privacy. target grade the student hopes to receive. Students Grades for courses taken at other law schools are sign up for the Pass/Fail option online and receive not included in the computation of the student’s instructions on how to do so from the Office of the Law Center cumulative grade point average. See Registrar. Graduation Honors Policy for Transfer/Visitor If the student earns the target grade or above, the Students, below. actual grade will appear on the student’s transcript. If the student earns a grade below the target but at 18 JURIS DOCTOR PROGRAM least a grade of C, a pass will appear on the tran- other upperclass students, that is, second year full script. If the student earns a grade of C or lower, time students and second and third year part time the actual grade will appear on the transcript. students. Whether a student receives a pass or the grade, the academic credits associated with the course will Diplomas with Honors count toward the 6 credit limit. If a student with- Students who meet the academic standards set by draws from a course taken on a Pass/Fail basis, the the faculty may be awarded the J.D. degree with academic credits associated with the course will honors and their diplomas will be marked cum laude, count toward the 6 credit limit. magna cum laude, or summa cum laude, as appropriate. The degree cum laude is awarded to students Academic Honors whose cumulative grade point averages place them The Law Center does not rank its students. The in the top one-third of those graduating, and the faculty has, however, authorized three separate degree magna cum laude, to the top 10%. The J.D. academic honors for students with distinguished degree summa cum laude is the highest academic academic records. honor that the faculty can bestow upon a graduating student. There is no cumulative grade point average Dean’s List that automatically entitles a student to that honor. J.D. students whose annual cumulative grade point Instead, the J.D. degree summa cum laude is granted averages place them in the top one-third of their at the sole discretion of the faculty. To be eligible class at the Law Center will have their transcripts for consideration for the award of summa cum laude, marked “Dean’s List” for the appropriate academic a graduate must have completed at least 71 acade- year. All candidates for the J.D. degree at the Law mic credits at the Law Center and have a minimum Center are eligible for the Dean’s List provided cumulative grade point average of 3.70. they completed, during the academic year, at least For the purpose of calculating students’ eligibility 24 academic credits at the Law Center if enrolled in for degrees with honors, students graduating in the Full Time Program or 16 academic credits at October will be included with the class that gradu- the Law Center if enrolled in the Part Time ated the previous May. Students who graduate in Program. Students who transfer from one program February will be included with the class graduating to the other during an academic year must earn a the following May. minimum of 12 academic credits in the semester in which they are a full time student, and a minimum Graduation Honors Policy for of 8 academic credits for the semester in which they Transfer/Visitor Students are a part time student, to be eligible for Dean’s Graduation honors for students who transfer to List. Joint degree students are eligible for Dean’s Georgetown after their first year of law school or for List recognition, based solely on their J.D. courses, students who visit another institution will be based if they carry at least 16 J.D. credits during the acad- solely on grades earned at Georgetown University emic year and maintain full time status in their joint Law Center. This policy applies only to magna cum program. Students earning fewer than the minimum laude and cum laude graduation honors. To be number of academic credits are not eligible for the eligible for consideration for the award of summa Dean’s List in the academic year in question. cum laude, a graduate must have completed at least Courses taken at the Law Center in the preceding 71 academic credits at Georgetown. Summer session or in the Graduate Program at the Law Center are included in the calculation of the Order of the Coif, Georgetown Chapter required minimum number of academic credits for The Order of the Coif was established in 1912 to Dean’s List eligibility. recognize graduating students who achieved an Dean’s List eligibility is computed separately for exemplary cumulative grade point average. first year students, upperclass, and graduating stu- Graduating students whose cumulative grade point dents, as follows. For the first year class, the Dean’s averages place them in the top 10% of the class are List is calculated separately for each of the five first elected to membership in the Order, the national year sections. The Dean’s List for first year students law school honor society for the encouragement of consists of the students whose annual cumulative scholarship and advancement of ethical standards in grade point averages place them in the top one- the legal profession. third of their particular first year section after the Spring semester. The sections are not further sub- ACADEMIC ATTRITION divided on the basis of the “small section” or first Unless excused by operation of law (i.e., military year elective in which a student was enrolled. call-up, Americans with Disabilities Act, etc.), a full The upperclass Dean’s List is calculated sepa- time student must satisfy all graduation require- rately in two groups. The first group consists of ments within five consecutive calendar years; a part students in their final year of law school; that is, time student, within six consecutive calendar years. third year full time students and fourth year part If the student fails to satisfy the graduation require- time students. The second group consists of all ments within the appropriate time period, he or she will be dismissed with no possibility of readmission or graduation. JURIS DOCTOR PROGRAM 19

First Year Students Upperclass Students (1) A student must successfully complete every first A student no longer in his or her first academic year year required course and a first year “perspective” at the Law Center and any transfer student will be elective course (this includes those required courses withdrawn from the Law Center for academic taken in the second year by students in the Part insufficiency if at the end of any academic year he Time Program). A student must retake any first year or she has a cumulative grade point average of less required course (including the required first year than 1.67. For a transfer student, only Law Center elective) in which he or she received a grade of F. In grades will be counted. See Provisions for the case of a first year elective, a student who fails Readmission of Withdrawn Students, below. the course may repeat that elective or substitute another first year elective. Both the original grade of Counseling Requirement for Certain Students “F” and whatever grade the student receives upon A student who has a cumulative grade point average retaking the course will appear on the student’s of less than 2.33 at the end of any semester must transcript. The Registrar will include the grades and meet with an Assistant Dean for J.D. Academic the academic credits for both times the student took Services or the Registrar to discuss the requirements the course in calculating the student’s cumulative for graduation and ways for the student to improve grade point average for purposes of honors, attrition, his or her performance. and graduation. (2) When a student has completed the first year with a cumulative grade point average of less than Summer Session Attendance 1.67, the student must retake any course in which If a student is enrolled in a Law Center Summer he or she received a grade of D or F. Both the D’s program when a failure to maintain the required and F’s the student first received and the grade he minimum cumulative grade point average is deter- or she receives in retaking the course will appear on mined, that student may elect to continue in the the student’s transcript, and the credit hours for Summer session, and the student’s cumulative grade both the first and retaken courses will be included point average will be recalculated taking the in calculating the student’s cumulative grade point Summer session grades into account. If such a stu- average for purposes of honors, attrition and gradu- dent has secured approval to attend the Summer ation. The student will receive academic credit session at another law school, that school will be toward the requirement of obtaining 84 hours of notified of the student’s academic dismissal from credit only for the courses he or she successfully the Law Center. retakes. If, in retaking a course, a student receives a grade Provisions for Readmission of Withdrawn Students of D, the student has satisfied the requirement that Students withdrawn for academic insufficiency after he or she pass every required and first year elective their first year may reapply for admission after one course. full year. Readmission is not guaranteed. To seek (3) A first year student whose cumulative grade readmission after one year, the student must submit point average is less than 1.67 but 1.33 or higher a written petition to the Registrar no later than must take a leave of absence from the Law Center August 1 for the following Fall semester. The peti- for one calendar year. In order to return, the student tion will be considered by the Registrar and the must submit a written request to the Registrar no Associate Dean for Academic Administration. later than August 1 for the following Fall semester. The student will be allowed to return only if the If the student returns, he or she must satisfy all Registrar and the Associate Dean find that it is degree requirements within the required time limits. probable that the student will be able to attain a (4) A first year student whose cumulative grade cumulative grade point average of 2.00 and satisfy point average is less than 1.33 will be withdrawn for all graduation requirements within the allotted time academic insufficiency, with the right to apply for period. readmission after one full year. Readmission is not The provisions for readmission outlined in this guaranteed. To seek readmission after one year, the section apply to upperclass students and to first year student must submit a written petition to the students who, after failing to secure the required Registrar no later than August 1 for the following minimum cumulative grade point average of 1.67 at Fall semester. The petition will be considered by the the end of any academic year, fail to re-enroll during Registrar and the Associate Dean for Academic the prescribed time period. Administration. The student will be allowed to return only if the Registrar and the Associate Dean find that it is probable that the student will be able to attain a cumulative grade point average of 2.00 and satisfy all graduation requirements within the allotted time period. Petitions by students who have been absent from the rolls for more than one year under the circumstances of this subsection will be governed by Provisions for Readmission of Withdrawn Students, below. 20 JURIS DOCTOR PROGRAM

ATTENDANCE, EXAMINATIONS, AND WRITTEN WORK examination to take a deferred examination, will receive a grade of F in the course. A student who ATTENDANCE AND PARTICIPATION presents himself or herself for examination in a The Law Center must be satisfied at all times of the course but fails to submit that examination for grad- serious purpose of each student. Any student will be ing will receive a grade of F for that course. No withdrawn if it is found that the student is not giving post-examination relief will be granted. If a student proper time and attention to his or her studies. becomes ill prior to the administration of the exam- Regular and punctual attendance at all class ses- ination, it is the student’s responsibility to deter- sions is required of each student. Student participa- mine, in consultation with the Registrar, whether he tion is expected in all courses. A student who, even or she should request a deferred examination. If a though registered for a course, has not regularly student becomes ill during the examination, or if attended and participated may, at the professor’s some outside force disrupts the examination, the option, be withdrawn, excluded from the course or student must immediately make the proctor aware examination (with the same consequences as a of the situation and follow the instructions of the voluntary failure to appear for a final examination) proctor or Registrar. or receive a lowered grade in the course. Even if a No re-examination will be given in any course for student has passed all examinations, academic the purpose of raising a grade obtained in a previous credit will not be awarded and no student will be final examination in that course. advanced, nor will his or her degree be conferred, if Students may review their graded exams during attendance or participation is unsatisfactory. specified exam review periods by completing a A student who has not properly registered for a request form at the Office of the Registrar. course may not take the final examination or receive The Library collects copies of past examinations any credit for participation in the course. administered at the Law Center. Students may use these prior examinations as study aids in preparing EXAMINATIONS for examinations. In many cases, model or “best” Written examinations are held at the end of the answers to past examinations are also on file in the classwork in all courses unless otherwise indicated Library. on the course schedule. No examination will be given prior to its originally scheduled date. WRITTEN WORK Curricular offerings designated as “seminars” gener- Final papers in seminars and other courses are due ally do not have examinations; instead, substantial on the date announced in the academic calendar. By written work is required. Clinical programs do not announcement at the beginning of the semester, a have written final examinations. professor may advance or extend for up to a maxi- The Law Center requires students to take their mum of 60 days in the fall semester and 45 days in examinations at the regularly scheduled time. Dates the spring semester the due date of all papers for for all examinations are announced at the time the the seminar (except for those of graduating stu- course schedule is released so that students may dents). All final papers must be submitted to the anticipate the date of their examinations and sched- Office of the Registrar and not to the professor. ule personal and employment commitments so as Due dates for papers are as firm as the dates of not to interfere with the announced dates of their examinations. Individual extensions for fewer than examinations. If, however, a student experiences a the maximum allowable days (mentioned above) serious medical or personal situation that makes it may be granted by the professor, provided the stu- impossible to take an examination on the scheduled dent submits an Individual Extension Form to the date, the student may request a deferred examina- Office of the Registrar. The form, available at the tion. See the Exam Deferral Policy in the General Office of the Registrar and online, must be signed Administrative Policies section of this Bulletin. by the professor. Extensions for more than the A student failing to appear for any examination maximum are rare and not granted solely by the because of illness or other extraordinary cause must professor. Any request for an extension beyond the contact the Registrar prior to the start of the exami- maximum is effective only upon review and signa- nation. If the Registrar is satisfied that the absence ture of the Individual Extension Form by the is legitimate and supported by appropriate docu- Associate Dean, Academic Administration. mentation (such as a doctor’s note), permission may If a student fails to submit a final paper by the be given for the student to take a deferred examina- due date (including any extension), the student will tion. The requirements of a student’s employment receive a grade of “F” for the course. Once a final will not be regarded as an “extraordinary cause.” If paper is submitted for grading, a revised version of the Registrar does not permit a deferral, the student that paper may not be substituted for the final must take the examination as originally scheduled. paper. Any student who does not take an examination as Note to International Students: U.S. visa restric- originally scheduled, and who does not obtain per- tions dictate that extending the paper due date mission from the Registrar prior to the start of an beyond the expected date of graduation as listed in JURIS DOCTOR PROGRAM 21 the certificate of eligibility (I-20 or DS-2019 form) CREDIT FOR COURSES IN THE can be permitted only for compelling academic GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY and/or medical reasons. Any such paper extension Upperclass students may take a maximum of 6 cred- must be approved in writing by an international stu- its in the Graduate School of the University with dent advisor in the Office of Graduate Programs in the permission of Senior Assistant Dean Everett consultation with the Associate Dean of Graduate Bellamy at the Law Center and the professor teach- Programs in advance of the paper submission ing the graduate course. For some courses, the deadline. The faculty member must agree to the approval of the academic department is required in extension but cannot grant the extension. addition to the permission of the professor. Course descriptions may be found in the Graduate School REVIEW PROCESS FOR A PASSING GRADE Catalogue. Language classes and undergraduate Once a grade is reported to the Registrar, a faculty courses may be taken on a space-available basis, but member may change a grade for an examination, will not be credited towards the J.D. degree. Full seminar or research paper, or clinic only upon time students may take graduate courses and under- written proof of demonstrable clerical error in the graduate language courses during the Fall and grading or grade reporting process. Spring semesters without additional charge. Part time students pay for all courses at the applicable REVIEW PROCESS FOR A FAILING GRADE Law Center credit hour rate. Full time or part time Any student who has received a failing grade on an students taking courses in a Main Campus Summer examination or paper may, after first discussing the session, are billed at the applicable Main Campus matter with the professor who reported the failing tuition rate. All courses, credits, and grades taken in grade, request that the Registrar submit that exami- the Graduate School will appear on the student’s nation or paper to another professor teaching in the Law Center transcript, but the grades will not be subject for evaluation. Students receiving a failing counted in the student’s grade point average. grade in a clinic may request a conference with the Associate or Assistant Dean for Clinical Programs CREDIT FOR STUDY OUTSIDE THE LAW CENTER to discuss the evaluation, once they have discussed Credit for courses taken outside the Law Center’s their grade with the professor offering the clinic. J.D. or Graduate Programs is given under the cir- The other professor, or the Associate or Assistant cumstances described below. Students should be Dean in the case of a clinical grade, serves merely in aware of the following academic policies that apply a consulting capacity. Final decision for the course to transfer of credit from another division of the grade rests with the professor conducting the University or another institution. course, but the course professor shall give due and • Students considering taking classes and transfer- appropriate consideration to the views of the con- ring credit from other ABA-approved law schools sulting colleague. A request for such evaluation must consult with Senior Assistant Dean Everett must be made by the student within the time period Bellamy to be advised of all applicable rules and set by the Office of the Registrar for students’ necessary procedures and obtain approval for the review of examinations and papers. course work. • Under certain circumstances credit for clinical CREDIT FOR LAW CENTER SUMMER PROGRAMS programs will not transfer. Students contemplat- Except as expressly modified in the Summer Session ing taking a clinical course at another ABA- Brochure, all academic regulations applicable during approved law school must consult the Associate the regular academic year are applicable during or Assistant Dean for Clinical Programs before Summer sessions. Students in good standing at the enrolling in the course. Law Center may enroll in Summer session courses • In order to earn a J.D. degree, 84 credits are at the Law Center and earn academic credit toward required for students who matriculate in August, degree requirements. 2005 or thereafter; 83 credits are required for Full time students may not advance the date of transfer students who matriculated in August their graduation by attending Summer session 2005, or earlier; a minimum of 53 credits must be courses. earned at the Law Center. • A passing grade is required for transfer of any CREDIT FOR COURSES IN THE credits from another school toward the degree LAW CENTER GRADUATE PROGRAM requirements at the Law Center. Upperclass students may take up to 6 credits of • All approved credits undertaken at another ABA- courses in the Graduate Program of the Law Center approved law school will be displayed on the stu- without permission. Permission from an Assistant dent’s Law Center transcript. These grades are Dean of the J.D. Program is required, however, to not included in the student’s Law Center cumula- take more than 6 credits of Graduate Program tive grade point average. offerings. Grades for Law Center graduate courses • Please refer to the preceding section on Academic and seminars are displayed on students’ transcripts Evaluation and Attrition Standards for the rules and computed into students’ grade point averages. that govern how courses taken at other schools 22 JURIS DOCTOR PROGRAM

affect academic evaluation and attrition and acad- only to students showing compelling personal circum- emic and graduation honors. stances that require their relocation. • No academic credit is given for internships or There are a limited number of law schools that externships offered at other institutions. sponsor study abroad programs during the Fall or Spring semesters. A list can be obtained from the CREDIT FOR WORK COMPLETED AT OTHER LAW SCHOOLS Office of J.D. Academic Services or on the ABA’s The Law Center will not grant credit for any course website, ABAnet.org (www.abanet.org/legaled/ work completed prior to a student’s matriculation in studyabroad/abroad.html). Under the Law Center’s a J.D. program at an American Bar Association policy, no more than 12 credits earned abroad may (ABA) approved law school. This includes law be applied toward the J.D. degree. courses taken at law schools. The Law Center reserves the right to designate the schools to which a student may apply, to SUMMER SESSIONS approve the student’s selection of courses, and to Law Center students may take up to 6 academic limit the number of students to whom permission credits at a Summer session of another ABA- to visit is granted. In order to visit another law approved law school, if the courses taken are school, students must submit their request, in writing, approved in advance by Senior Assistant Dean to Senior Assistant Dean Everett Bellamy by April 1. Everett Bellamy. Students must send a written Students will not be permitted to visit at request to Dean Bellamy indicating the school they another school unless they are in good standing at wish to attend and the course(s) they wish to take. Georgetown for the semester(s) for which they wish Students must have a compelling reason in order to to visit away. Georgetown students who wish to visit attend a Summer session at another law school in at another school must have earned the minimum the Washington, D.C. area. 2.0 grade point average required for graduation before permission to visit away will be given, since STUDY ABROAD PROGRAMS grades earned at other schools will not be calculated While enrolled at the Law Center, students may into a student’s grade point average. A student with earn a limited number of credits at study abroad an unpaid student account balance will not be programs conducted by other ABA-approved law approved to visit away until the student's account schools. Students may earn no more than 4 credits is paid in full. There is an administrative fee of from Summer study abroad programs sponsored by $200.00 for each semester a student visits at another institution. another school. Most study abroad programs are held during the It is the student’s responsibility to make sure the Summer session. There are, however, a limited official transcript of grades and a degree application number of ABA-approved study abroad programs are submitted to the Registrar by the Law Center offered during the regular academic year. The policy grades deadline. Students who petition to visit at described below regarding visiting at another law another ABA-approved law school during their final school applies to those programs. year of study are cautioned that grades not received Permission to apply to a study abroad program by the Law Center’s grades deadline will affect (other than those sponsored by the Law Center) graduation clearance. must be obtained from Senior Assistant Dean In addition, students requesting to visit away Everett Bellamy prior to applying. The Law Center must complete a degree audit with Senior Assistant reserves the right to designate the schools to which Dean Everett Bellamy to assure that they can meet a student may apply and to approve the student’s all degree requirements. Students must complete the selection of courses. The Law Center does not give upperclass legal writing requirement at the Law credit for clinical work done abroad. The residency Center. value of Summer programs are calculated based on Students visiting at another law school must carry the number of class hours each week and the num- private medical insurance, be covered by a student ber of weeks in the program, as determined by the policy at the visited school, or purchase medical Registrar. insurance provided by Georgetown. For information on the policy governing acade- VISITING AT ANOTHER LAW SCHOOL mic and graduating honors for students who visit at In extraordinary circumstances, a student may be other schools, see Graduation Honors Policy for granted permission to attend another ABA-approved Transfer/Visitor Students, above. law school for his or her final semester or year of law school, while still earning the Georgetown degree. EXTERNSHIP PROGRAM Before applying to another school, the student must The Law Center provides juris doctor candidates an obtain permission from Senior Assistant Dean opportunity to receive two hours of academic credit Everett Bellamy. Permission to visit away is granted for participation in its externship program. Students are graded on a pass-fail basis and the credits count JURIS DOCTOR PROGRAM 23 toward the total number of pass-fail credits that a DUPLICATION OF COURSES student may take at the Law Center. Students will not receive credit for a course that is Students may enroll after earning 29 credit hours. substantially similar to any other course completed Externships may be in government, judicial or pub- by the student as part of the requirements for the lic interest offices. Students may not combine for- J.D. degree. Students with questions about the credit and paid work at the externship. Students applicability of this rule to their course choices must have completed or be enrolled in an upperclass should consult the Registrar, an Assistant Dean for course that directly relates to the substantive work J.D. Academic Services, or the Director of J.D. of the placement. The work must be legal in nature Academic Services. Waivers must be secured in writ- and a lawyer must supervise the student extern. ing, with a copy to be maintained in the student’s file. Student may not concurrently participate in a clinic and an externship. RESTRICTIONS ON STUDENT EMPLOYMENT Although the program coordinator maintains a The program of instruction in the Full Time list of externship opportunities, students are respon- Program is a demanding one designed to command sible for securing their own placements. Students substantially all of the student’s time during the aca- who are interested in participating in the externship demic year. Devoting too much time to employment program are encouraged to contact the program is a frequent cause of disappointing academic per- coordinator and OPICS for placement suggestions. formance and, sometimes, of academic failure. For Externs are required to attend an orientation class these reasons, professional organizations, including in the first week of the semester and at least one accrediting agencies, require that a student enrolling additional class or meeting with the program coor- in the Full Time Program be in a position to devote dinator mid-semester. Students are then required to substantially all of his or her working hours to the devote a minimum of 10 hours per week for at least study of law. 11 weeks to the externship. Students must keep a The Law Center strongly urges first year full time weekly time records that reflect the number of hours students not to accept outside employment. All full the student has worked and describes the nature of time students should carefully restrict their hours of the work performed without disclosing any confi- employment and in no event may a full time stu- dential information. At the end of the semester, the dent exceed 20 hours of employment per week dur- student will be required to submit a 5 to 10 page ing the academic year, as required by the American paper reflecting on the externship experience. Bar Association. A student enrolled in the Full Students will be enrolled on a first-come, first Time Program who is contemplating substantial served basis, with a total enrollment of no more employment must request a transfer to the Part than 60 per semester. Eligible students will be Time Program, which is structured to accommodate enrolled when they submit a notification of place- those who are employed full time during their study ment and supervision form signed by the supervisor at the Law Center. for a placement that meets the criteria set forth above. The forms are available on the Registrar’s WITHDRAWALS AND LEAVES OF ABSENCE web page. WITHDRAWALS FROM INDIVIDUAL COURSES STUDENT INITIATED SEMINAR A student may withdraw from a required or elective Students who wish to study a subject not offered first year course (including those required courses by the faculty may organize a student initiated taken during the second year of study by part time seminar. Students wishing to do so must persuade a students) only with the permission of the Registrar, faculty member to supervise the seminar and grade an Assistant Dean for J.D. Academic Services, or the participants. The organizing students must the Director of J.D. Academic Services. In order to submit a course proposal to the Associate Dean, withdraw from any course for which the permission (Academic Administration), before the close of of the professor was required to enroll, a student registration indicating the title of the seminar, the must obtain the permission of that professor. supervising faculty member, a syllabus, and a After the end of the Add/Drop period for the reading list. The Associate Dean will approve the relevant semester, an upperclass student may with- application upon determination that the proposed draw from a course only with the permission of the seminar has substantial educational value and likely Registrar, an Assistant Dean for J.D. Academic will be conducted with academic seriousness. Services, or the Director of J.D. Academic Services. Approved seminars will earn two credits. These A withdrawal is recorded on a student’s transcript seminars may be taken pass/fail and will count either as a “withdrawal” or an “excused withdrawal.” toward a student’s maximum of six-credit pass/fail After the fourth week of the semester, a withdrawal credits. will be considered “excused” only under exceptional circumstances. Special rules regarding withdrawal from a clinic are set forth in the section on Clinic Enrollment Policies, below. 24 JURIS DOCTOR PROGRAM

LEAVES OF ABSENCE AND WITHDRAWAL PART TIME STUDENT ENROLLMENT FROM THE LAW CENTER While part time students are encouraged to apply, Upperclass students in good standing may request a those with substantial job responsibilities during the leave of absence from the Law Center. Leaves of day may find it difficult to participate in a clinic. absence are rarely granted for longer than two Clinic directors, however, are often able to accom- academic semesters. modate part time students whose job schedules have In general, students may retain credit for work some degree of flexibility. In addition, Summer ses- successfully completed prior to their leave of sion clinics give preference to part time students absence if (1) their leave of absence is approved in and generally schedule their clinic seminar classes at advance; (2) they do not attend another law school night. Second year part time students may not defer while on leave without the prior written approval of taking their required second year courses (Criminal an Assistant Dean for J.D. Academic Services; and Justice and the perspective elective) until their third (3) they can complete their degree program within or fourth year in order to participate in a clinic. the required time period for their program, as specified above. Circumstances surrounding the VISITING STUDENT ENROLLMENT leave of absence may lead to a determination that Visiting students are eligible to enroll in a clinic, the student must apply for readmission. but will be admitted only after all interested Under the following circumstances, students will Georgetown students have been accepted. be withdrawn and must reapply through regular admissions channels for readmission to the Law MINIMUM CUMULATIVE GRADE POINT AVERAGE Center: (a) students who withdraw from the Law AND ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE Center before completing their first semester; Students seeking to enroll in a clinic during their (b) students who have been absent from the Law second year in law school must have maintained at Center longer than their approved leave of absence; least a 2.0 cumulative grade point average at the end or (c) students who have withdrawn without having of their first year. Students who fail or withdraw received approval for a leave of absence in advance. from any of their required first year courses will not The time limitations for completion of the J.D. be permitted to enroll in a clinic in any year until degree, described above in the section on Academic they have retaken and successfully completed the Evaluation and Attrition Standards, apply to all course(s) they failed or from which they withdrew. leaves of absence and withdrawals. Part time and interdivisional (part time to full time) transfer students are permitted to enroll in certain clinics prior to completing Criminal Justice and the CLINIC ENROLLMENT POLICIES perspective elective.

GENERAL ELIGIBILITY TRIBUNAL RULES GOVERNING STUDENT PRACTICE Georgetown’s clinics are open to upperclass J.D. Students seeking admission to clinics requiring students. LL.M. students are not permitted to enroll practice in the courts or agencies of the District of in any clinic. Six clinical courses (the Center for Columbia must be certified for practice under the Applied Legal Studies, Federal Legislation, D.C. Student Practice Rule. To be certifiable under Harrison Institute Policy, Harrison Institute this rule, a student must have successfully completed Housing and Community Development, Institute 41 academic credits, including Evidence, Civil for Public Representation, and International Procedure and Criminal Procedure (both curricula Women’s Human Rights), are open to students (full A and B satisfy the Civil Procedure and Criminal time and part time) who will have completed a min- Procedure requirements), and receive a character imum of 28 academic credits before the beginning clearance from the Bar Character Committee before of the semester in which the students are enrolled in the beginning of the semester in which the student a clinic. The two Street Law clinics will also accept is enrolled in a clinic. Students who have transferred part time students who have completed the required or are visiting from another school should note that 22 academic credits of their first year. Five clinical a Criminal Law course taken at the student’s former courses (Criminal Justice, Domestic Violence, school generally will not fulfill the Criminal Family Advocacy, Juvenile Justice, and Law Procedure prerequisite. As a result, students who Students in Court) are only open to students who have not taken Criminal Procedure at their former have completed the courses and credits required by schools will need to complete Georgetown’s the D.C. Student Practice Rule (see Tribunal Rules Criminal Procedure course before being admitted to Governing Student Practice below). The Appellate a clinic that practices before the courts or agencies Litigation Clinic is only open to third year full time of the District of Columbia. students and part time students who will have com- Students with felony and some misdemeanor pleted the equivalent of four full time semesters by convictions or arrests (including juvenile cases or the end of their Fall semester in the clinic. cases in which expungement has taken place), stu- dents with a history of dishonesty including plagia- rism, students with a recent history of drug or alcohol abuse, and students with a history of serious JURIS DOCTOR PROGRAM 25

financial irresponsibility might not be cleared by the a restriction applies. For assistance in obtaining D.C. Bar Character Committee in time to actually information regarding the rules in a particular juris- appear in court while a member of the clinic. The diction, students may contact Professor Michael D.C. Bar Character Committee is also unwilling to Frisch, Ethics Counsel, (202) 662-9926. admit students who have matters pending before the law school’s Professional Responsibility OVERLAP WITH SKILLS TRAINING COURSES Committee. If a student has taken or is currently enrolled in Students applying to clinics that practice in other Civil Litigation Practice, Patent Trial Practice, Trial jurisdictions, such as federal court, may also need to Practice – Expert Witnesses, or any section of Trial comply with student practice rules. Most federal Practice, that student may not also enroll for credit courts require certification by the Dean of a student’s in the Center for Applied Legal Studies, Criminal good character before the student is permitted to Justice, Domestic Violence, Juvenile Justice, or Law appear before the court. An adverse disciplinary ruling Students in Court (or vice versa). If a student has in law school or college could prevent a student from taken or is currently enrolled in the Appellate receiving the required certification. Practice Seminar, that student cannot also enroll for Students with questions about the character credit in the Appellate Litigation Clinic (or vice clearance and Dean’s certifications should contact versa). the Associate or Assistant Dean for Clinical Programs. DROPPING A CLINIC OR WITHDRAWAL FROM A CLINIC IN PROGRESS CONFLICT OF INTEREST The Law Center’s policy regarding withdrawal from Because of the federal conflicts of interest statute a clinic is very strict. Any student seeking to with- (see 18 U.S.C. §205-207), students with part time draw from a Fall semester or full-year clinic must or full time jobs with the Federal government may obtain permission from the professor who originally not be eligible to participate in the Appellate admitted the student. A student may withdraw his Litigation Clinic, the Criminal Justice Clinic, the or her acceptance of a Spring semester clinic no Center for Applied Legal Studies, the Family later than November 10, 2006, by notifying the Advocacy Clinic, the Federal Legislation Clinic, the clinic director in writing. After November 10, 2006, Harrison Institute, Law Students in Court or the professor permission is required for withdrawal from Institute for Public Representation. Students with a Spring semester clinic. Permission is not readily part time or full time jobs with the District of granted. Columbia or the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the In the absence of permission to withdraw, a District of Columbia may not be eligible to student failing to participate in the clinic to which participate in the Juvenile Justice Clinic, the he or she was admitted will receive a grade of F for Harrison Institute, the Family Advocacy Clinic, the appropriate number of credits. Strict Law Students in Court, or the Institute for Public enforcement of this policy is necessary to protect Representation. Students who are uncertain about students who might otherwise be foreclosed from the application of this rule to them should consult obtaining a clinic seat, clients who might not be with the Associate or Assistant Dean for Clinical adequately served, clinic morale, and the Law Programs. Center’s relationships with other institutions. In the absence of a showing of special hardship, LIMITS ON CLINICAL CREDITS students taking full-year clinics may not obtain any It is theoretically possible to take more than one credit unless they remain in the clinic for the full client representation clinic, although limited clinical academic year and complete all required work. If the resources make this extremely unlikely. To ensure clinic director and the Associate Dean for Clinical equitable access to clinics, preference will be given Education permit a student to withdraw from a to students who have not previously taken a clinical clinic prior to completing the clinic requirements, course other than Street Law. As a result, students the amount of credit received for work the student who enroll in a clinic other than Street Law will has actually completed will be determined by the probably not be able to gain access to another clinic professor responsible for assigning the student’s in a subsequent year. Participating in two clinics in grade. Credits for year-long clinics are allocated in the same year (not including Summer) is prohibited. accordance with a fixed formula set by the faculty The Bar admission rules of certain states limit on the basis of classroom seminars, skills training, the number of clinical credits an applicant may and field work. No additional credits will be apply toward their degree (e.g., New York permits awarded regardless of the amount of time or effort students to take a maximum of 20 clinical credits involved in fulfilling clinic obligations. out of a required 80 credit degree program). Applicants should consult the jurisdiction in which they plan to take the Bar to determine whether such 26 JURIS DOCTOR PROGRAM

CLINIC EXTENSION POLICY Clinic students are generally expected to work for their clinic until the end of the examination period unless the clinic director has established a shorter period. In some cases, the needs of clinic clients will require that a student perform some tasks after the semester ends. In other cases, students may request an extension to complete a project. In either case, if a student’s grade is to be delayed, an extension form must be filled out before the examination period begins and will be effective only upon review and signature of the Associate Dean for Clinical Education. If a tribunal or legislative body has con- tinued a clinic case for hearing beyond the period of the student’s clinic enrollment, the Associate Dean will generally grant an extension until the comple- tion of the hearing. Except in unusual cases, an extension requested for any other reason will not be approved if it exceeds one month from the end of the examination period. If an extension is approved, grades will be submitted to the Registrar’s office within three weeks after the extension expires. ui otrMse fAt nRsinadEs uoenSuis31 Juris Doctor/MasterofArtsinRussianandEastEuropeanStudies ui otrMse fAt nGra n uoenSuis31 Juris Doctor/MasterofArtsinGermanandEuropeanStudies ui otrMse fAt nLtnAeia tde 32 Juris Doctor/MasterofArtsinLatinAmericanStudies ui otrMse fSinei oeg evc 30 Juris Doctor/MasterofScienceinForeignService J ui otrMse fAt nScrt tde 32 Juris Doctor/MasterofArtsinSecurityStudies rsDco/atro uiesAmnsrto 29 uris Doctor/MasterofBusinessAdministration ui otrMse fAt nAa tde 30 Juris Doctor/MasterofArtsinArabStudies ui otrMse fPbi elh33 Juris Doctor/MasterofPublicHealth ui otrMse fPbi oiy34 Juris Doctor/MasterofPublicPolicy ui otrP. nGvrmn 33 Juris Doctor/PH.DinGovernment ui otrP. nPiooh 33 Juris Doctor/PH.DinPhilosophy ON EREPORM 29 JOINT DEGREEPROGRAMS

27 Joint Degree Programs

JOINT DEGREE PROGRAMS 29

JOINT DEGREE PROGRAMS Macroeconomics, International Business, Finance The Law Center sponsors degree programs in I and II, Financial Accounting I and II, which a student may simultaneously pursue study Management Accounting, Management leading to the Juris Doctor ( J.D.) from the Law Communication, Marketing I and Marketing Center and a graduate degree from the Georgetown Selective, Organizational Behavior, Operations University School of Business Administration Management, Quantitative Methods I and II, (M.B.A.), Georgetown Institute of Public Policy Strategic Management, and Introduction to (M.P.P.), School of Foreign Service (M.S.F.S., Business Planning; M.A.A.S., M.A.R.E.E.S., M.A.G.E.S., • The M.B.A. requirements include both traditional M.A.L.A.S., and M.A.S.S.P.), the Department of functional courses and 3 integrated experiences. Government ( J.D./Ph.D.), or the Department of These are intensive team-based experiences lasting Philosophy ( J.D./M.A., J.D./Ph.D.). A approximately one week that focus on a critical J.D./M.P.H. is also offered in cooperation with the business issue that incorporates various functional Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of topics and tools; Public Health (M.P.H.). • 6 credits of selective M.B.A. courses taken in the The J.D./M.B.A., J.D./M.P.P., and J.D./School Spring of the third or fourth year of the program. of Foreign Service programs provide for accelerated Selective courses are required but students may achievement of two degrees in four years instead of select from several versions. The selective courses the five normally required to complete the degrees are the Global Experience and the Decision separately. J.D./Philosophy and J.D./Government Sciences; degrees are also accelerated, with completion • 13.5 credits of M.B.A. electives in the third or depending on whether a student is full time or part fourth year. Students are encouraged to focus their time and is a Masters or Doctoral candidate. elective course work in a particular functional area The J.D./M.P.H. degree program, while not an related to a career track. Examples include, but are accelerated program, affords students who are not not limited to: finance (either investment banking health professionals the opportunity to coordinate or corporate finance); marketing (consumer prod- the study of law and public health at two highly uct marketing); and strategy (consulting); respected institutions. • 21-27 credits in upperclass law courses, including For information on admissions requirements and Professional Responsibility and satisfactory com- application procedures for the joint degree pro- pletion of the legal writing requirement. Credit grams, see the Law Center’s J.D. Admissions requirements in this area will vary depending upon Brochure available at the Office of Admissions. the student’s choice of courses within one of the Students must apply separately to the Law Center focus areas described below; and to the companion graduate program. • Residency Requirement (see J.D. Program section, Transfer students must complete a minimum of page 15); and 53 credits at the Law Center. Credits awarded for • Minimum cumulative grade point average of 2.0. work completed in a graduate program will not count toward the 53 Law Center credits. CORPORATE LAW FOCUS In addition to the core requirements, students JURIS DOCTOR/MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION selecting the corporate law focus must complete: J.D./M.B.A. students must satisfactorily complete • 12 credits of required business related law courses course requirements for both the J.D. and M.B.A. taken in the third and fourth years, which include: degree programs. In addition to the J.D. and Corporations, Taxation I and Taxation II; and M.B.A. degrees, a Joint Program Certificate will be • 6 credits of business related law courses to be awarded upon completion of the program. taken in the third or fourth year (in addition to The J.D./M.B.A. program requires completion of those listed above). 123* academic credits (75* credits in law and 48 credits in M.B.A. courses with 9 credits of MBA PUBLIC POLICY FOCUS course work counted toward the J.D. and 12 credits In addition to the core requirements, students of J.D. course work counted toward your MBA). selecting the public policy focus must complete: Upperclass J.D. courses must fulfill distribution • 18 credits of required public policy related law requirements for either the Corporate Law or the courses taken in the third and fourth years, which Public Policy focus as outlined below. include: Administrative Law, Constitutional Law The 123 credit hours constituting the II, Corporations, Legislation and Statutory J.D./M.B.A. curriculum are distributed as follows: Interpretation, and Taxation I; and • 30 credits of the required first year law curriculum*; • 6 credits of required public policy related law • 27 credits of required and 3 credits of elective courses to be taken in the third or fourth year M.B.A. courses taken in the second year. Required (in addition to those listed above). courses include: Business and Government, Business Ethics, Microeconomics,

* 1 fewer credits is required for students who completed the first year law curriculum prior to the 2005-2006 academic year. 30 JOINT DEGREE PROGRAMS

A typical distribution of semester hours in this • Residency Requirement (see J.D. Program section, joint degree program, 75 J.D. and 48 M.B.A. page 15); and academic credits, is as follows: • Minimum cumulative grade point average of 2.0.

First Year: 30* J.D. credits A typical distribution of the 114 academic credits Second Year: 30 M.B.A. credits in the J.D./M.S.F.S. Program is as follows: Third Year: 30 J.D. credits First Year: 24 M.S.F.S. credits Fourth Year: 15 J.D. credits (students are also 18 M.B.A. credits expected to complete 15-20 hours/week NOTE: J.D./M.B.A. students typically commit internship during this one Spring semester in the last two years of the year) program to business school studies. Individual Second Year: 30* J.D. credits decisions about participation in law school clinical Third Year: 21 J.D. credits programs and other curriculum choices will 9 M.S.F.S. credits determine which year students complete the Fourth Year: 24 J.D. credits business school curriculum. 6 M.S.F.S. credits JURIS DOCTOR/MASTER OF SCIENCE JURIS DOCTOR/MASTER OF ARTS IN ARAB STUDIES IN FOREIGN SERVICE J.D./M.A.A.S. degree candidates must satisfactorily J.D./M.S.F.S. degree candidates must satisfactorily complete course requirements for both the J.D. and complete course requirements for both the J.D. and M.A.A.S. degrees. In addition to the J.D. and M.S.F.S. degrees. In addition to the J.D. and M.A.A.S. degrees, a Joint Program Certificate will M.S.F.S. degrees, a Joint Program Certificate will be awarded upon satisfactory completion of the pro- be awarded upon satisfactory completion of the gram. Students undertake a four-year course of program. study comprising a minimum of 108* academic The J.D./M.S.F.S. program requires completion credits (78* credits of Law Center courses and 30 of 114* academic credits (75* credits in law and 39 credits of M.A.A.S. work, with 6 credits from the credits in M.S.F.S. courses with 9 credits of Law Center counted toward the M.A.A.S. degree M.S.F.S. course work counted toward the J.D.), sat- and 6 credits of M.A.A.S. course work counted isfactory performance on the M.S.F.S. oral profi- toward the J.D.). Candidates for this joint degree ciency examination in a foreign language and the must satisfy the academic standards of the two pro- M.S.F.S. oral examinations, and maintenance of a grams: maintain a minimal B (3.0/4.0) average, minimum cumulative GPA of 3.0. demonstrate advanced language ability through suc- The required 114* J.D./M.S.F.S. academic credits cessful completion of the M.A.A.S. Arabic language are distributed as follows: oral and written proficiency examinations, and suc- • 30 credits in the required first year law curriculum*; cessfully complete the oral comprehensive examina- • 15 credits of required M.S.F.S. courses taken dur- tion of the M.A.A.S. Program (or the thesis ing the first year: International Trade; option). International Finance; History: Globalization of Students may pursue the joint program toward Intersocietal Relations; International Relations: the M.A. in Arab Studies/Juris Doctor from a num- Theory and Practice; and Statistics for ber of different M.A.A.S. concentrations: International Analysis; M.A.A.S. concentration in Women/Gender • 21 credits in M.S.F.S. electives in one of six (with law focus on Family Law or International/ broad divisional concentrations: Foreign Comparative Law - Human Rights) Policy/International Security; Global Commerce M.A.A.S. concentration in Politics (with law and Finance; International Business-Government focus on International/Comparative Law - Human Relations; International Development; International Rights, or on International/National Security Law) Conflict Management; or a self-designed concentra- M.A.A.S. concentration in Culture/Society – tion (subject to approval, including regional studies) especially Islam/Islamic societies (with law focus on taken in the first, third and fourth years; International/Comparative Law, Family Law, or • a 3-credit M.S.F.S. Workshop, taken in the third Law and Other Disciplines) or fourth year; • 16 J.D. credits in the international law curriculum taken in the third and fourth years; • 29 credits in additional upperclass law courses, including Professional Responsibility and successful completion of the legal writing requirement, taken in the third and fourth years;

* 1 fewer credits is required for students who completed the first year law curriculum prior to the 2005-2006 academic year. JOINT DEGREE PROGRAMS 31

CURRICULUM OUTLINE satisfactory completion of the program. Students • 24 credits of M.A.A.S. course work, or 18 credits undertake a four-year course of study comprising a plus intensive Arabic if necessary, taken during the minimum of 108* academic credits (75* credits of first year of the joint program (see Language Law Center courses and 33 credits of Requirement); M.A.R.E.E.S. courses), with 9 credits from the • 30 credits of the required first year law curriculum Law Center counted toward the M.A.R.E.E.S. taken during the second year (see Language degree and 9 credits of M.A.R.E.E.S. course work Requirement) of the joint program*; counted toward the J.D. Candidates for this joint • 29 credits in further law courses including degree must satisfy the academic standards of the Professional Responsibility and the legal writing two programs including: maintain a minimal B requirement. These courses are distributed among (3.0/4.0) average, complete the two required the third and fourth years; courses, Introduction to Area Studies and the • 19 credits in international law courses including: 3 Capstone Seminar, demonstrate advanced relevant credits in the required course: International Law I: foreign language ability through successful Introduction to International Law; 4 credits in completion of two advanced language courses, and further international law courses; and 12 other make a public presentation of research completed in credits in international law or international law- the Capstone Seminar. related courses which complement the student's area of concentration. These courses are taken in CURRICULUM OUTLINE the third and fourth years. Students should focus • 24 credits of M.A.R.E.E.S. course work, including their electives on their M.A.A.S. divisional con- two advanced language courses, Introduction to centration, integrating their interests in law and Area Studies and the Capstone Seminar; the Arab world; • 30 credits of the required first year law curriculum • 6-12 credits (depending on how many hours were (taken in the second year of the joint program)*; completed in the first or second year) of M.A.A.S. • 29 credits in further law courses including course work, taken in the second, third, and/or Professional Responsibility and the legal writing fourth years or during Summer sessions; and requirement. These courses are distributed among • Residency Requirement (see J.D. Program section, the third and fourth years; page 15). • 16 credits in international law courses including: 3 credits in the required course International Law LANGUAGE REQUIREMENT I: Introduction to International Law; 4 credits in The M.A. in Arab Studies program is distinct from further international law courses; and 9 other the other School of Foreign Service Masters pro- credits in international law or international law- grams in that it builds intensive study of Arabic lan- related courses which complement the student's guage (for those who need it) into its curriculum. area concentration. These courses are taken in the Thus, the Arabic language requirement will have third and fourth years; some bearing on the proposed joint M.A.A.S./J.D. • 9 credits of additional M.A.R.E.E.S. course work, program. taken in the second, third, and/or fourth years or The first year may be pursued at either the Law during Summer sessions; and Center or Main Campus, primarily depending on • Residency Requirement (see J.D. Program section, the student’s Arabic status. In most cases, first year page 15). will be at the Law Center; in those cases in which the student has just completed a course of intensive JURIS DOCTOR/MASTER OF ARTS IN GERMAN Arabic language study prior to matriculation, such AND EUROPEAN STUDIES that a disruption in study of the language would be J.D./M.A.G.E.S. degree candidates must counterproductive, the student should start at the satisfactorily complete course requirements for both Main Campus in the appropriate level of Arabic. In the J.D. and M.A.G.E.S. degrees. In addition to the all cases, before starting Main Campus course work, J.D. and M.A.G.E.S. degrees, a Joint Program a student should be at least at an intermediate level Certificate will be awarded upon satisfactory of Arabic, i.e., have completed one year or a completion of the program. Students undertake a Summer program in intensive beginning Arabic, four-year course of study comprising a minimum of totaling 12 credits. 114* academic credits: 75* Law Center credits and 39 credits of M.A.G.E.S. work, with 9 credits from JURIS DOCTOR/MASTER OF ARTS IN RUSSIAN the Law Center counted toward the M.A.G.E.S. AND EASTERN EUROPEAN STUDIES degree and 9 credits of M.A.G.E.S. course work J.D./M.A.R.E.E.S. degree candidates must counted toward the J.D. Candidates for this joint satisfactorily complete course requirements for both degree must satisfy the academic standards of the the J.D. and M.A.R.E.E.S. degrees. In addition to two programs including: maintain a minimal B the J.D. and M.A.R.E.E.S. degrees, a Joint (3.0/4.0) average, demonstrate relevant foreign Program Certificate will be awarded upon language ability through successful completion of

* 1 fewer credits is required for students who completed the first year law curriculum prior to the 2005-2006 academic year. 32 JOINT DEGREE PROGRAMS the M.A.G.E.S. written and oral language • 32 credits in further law courses including examinations, and successfully complete the oral Professional Responsibility and the legal writing examination of the M.A.G.E.S. Program. requirement. These courses are distributed among the third and fourth years; CURRICULUM OUTLINE • 16 credits in international law courses including: • 30 credits of required first year law curriculum 3 credits in the required course International (normally taken in the first year of the joint Law I: Introduction to International Law and program)*; 13 credits in further international law courses at • 24 credits of M.A.G.E.S. course work normally least 6 of which should focus on Latin America. taken in the second year of the joint program; These courses are taken in the third and fourth • 29 credits in further law courses including years of the joint program; and Professional Responsibility and the legal writing • Residency Requirement (see J.D. Program section, requirement. These courses are distributed among page 15). the third and fourth years; • 16 credits in international law courses including: JURIS DOCTOR/MASTER OF ARTS IN SECURITY STUDIES 3 credits in the required course: International Law J.D./M.A.S.S.P. degree candidates must satisfacto- I: Introduction to International Law; 4 credits in rily complete course requirements for both the J.D. further international law courses; and 9 other cred- and M.A.S.S.P. degrees. In addition to the J.D. and its in international law or international law-related M.A.S.S.P. degrees, a Joint Program Certificate will courses which complement the student's area con- be awarded upon satisfactory completion of the pro- centration. These courses are taken in the third gram. Students in the joint degree program under- and fourth years; take a four-year course of study comprising a • 15 credits of additional M.A.G.E.S. course work, minimum of 108* academic credits (78* Law Center taken in the second, third, and/or fourth years; and credits and 30 credits of M.A.S.S.P. courses). 6 • Residency Requirement (see J.D. Program section, credits from the Law Center will satisfy M.A.S.S.P. page 15). degree requirements, and 6 credits of M.A.S.S.P. course work will satisfy J.D. requirements. JURIS DOCTOR/MASTER OF ARTS IN LATIN AMERICAN STUDIES CURRICULUM OUTLINE J.D./M.A.L.A.S. degree candidates must • 24 credits of M.A.S.S.P. course work taken in the satisfactorily complete course requirements for both first year of the joint program, including comple- the J.D. and M.A.L.A.S. degrees. In addition to the tion all of all core classes for the program. J.D. and M.A.L.A.S. degrees, a Joint Program Students will also be responsible for completing Certificate will be awarded upon satisfactory most of the M.A.S.S.P. requirements in this first completion of the program. Students undertake a year, specifically: four-year course of study comprising a minimum of 1. Completion of SEST-500, Theory and Practice 108* academic credits (78* Law Center credits and of Security; 30 credits of M.A.L.A.S. courses). 6 credits from 2. Selection and completion of a concentration – the Law Center will satisfy M.A.L.A.S. degree either U.S. National Security, International requirements and 6 credits of M.A.L.A.S. course Security, Technology and Security, or a cus- work will satisfy J.D. requirements. Candidates for tomized concentration negotiated with the this joint degree must satisfy the academic standards Director of the SSP. This concentration of the two programs: maintain a minimum B includes: a core class for the concentration, (3.0/4.0) average; demonstrate advanced foreign three electives within the concentration, and a language ability through successful completion of a research seminar in the concentration; Spanish or Portuguese oral proficiency examination; 3. Completion of distribution requirements in and successfully complete the written four of the five following areas (not including comprehensive examination of the M.A.L.A.S. the concentration): U.S. National Security, Program. International Security, Technology and Security, Area Security Studies, and Economics CURRICULUM OUTLINE and Security; • 24 credits of M.A.L.A.S. course work, ordinarily • 30 credits of the required first year law curriculum taken in the first year of the joint program; (taken in the second year of the joint program)*; • 6 credits of additional M.A.L.A.S. course work, in • 32 credits in further law courses including the second, third, and/or fourth years or during Professional Responsibility and the legal writing Summer session; requirement. These courses are distributed among • 30 credits of the required first year law curriculum, the third and fourth years; ordinarily taken in the second year of the joint • 16 credits in international law courses, including program*; three credits in International Law I and 13 credits in further international law courses, at least 3 of

* 1 fewer credits is required for students who completed the first year law curriculum prior to the 2005-2006 academic year. JOINT DEGREE PROGRAMS 33

which need to be in international/national security JURIS DOCTOR/PH.D. IN PHILOSOPHY law; J.D./Philosophy students must satisfactorily com- • 6 credits of additional M.A.S.S.P. course work, plete the course requirements for both the J.D. and taken in the third, and/or fourth years or during Philosophy degrees. A Joint Program Certificate Summer sessions; will be awarded upon completion of the entire pro- • Residency Requirement (see J.D. Program section, gram. The J.D./M.A. program requires the student page 15); and to complete 99* academic credits (75* credits in J.D. • Minimum cumulative grade point average of 2.0 course work and 24 in philosophy course work with for the Law Center and a 3.0 for the M.A.S.S.P. 9 credits of Philosophy course work counted toward the J.D.), pass a comprehensive examination in phi- JURIS DOCTOR/PH.D. IN GOVERNMENT losophy, satisfy the legal writing requirement, com- The J.D./Government program awards the Juris plete a course in Professional Responsibility, and Doctor and a Doctorate in Government (with an meet the J.D. residency requirement. The J.D./Ph.D. M.A. en passant). The program allows students to in Philosophy requires an additional 12 credits of phi- specialize in American government, international rela- losophy course work and a dissertation. Philosophy tions, comparative government, or political theory. degrees are available in general philosophy, ethics, J.D./Ph.D. students must satisfactorily complete business ethics, or bioethics. requirements for both the J.D. and the Ph.D. J.D./Philosophy students are required to take the degrees. Separate diplomas will be awarded, and first year of law school and the first year of philosophy upon satisfactory completion of the program, a Joint course work as intact blocks. The law school year may Degree Certificate will be awarded as well. An be taken prior to or after completing one year of M.A. degree is awarded en passant to students philosophy course work, but no earlier or later. enrolled in the Ph.D. program upon completion of 48 academic credits and course distribution require- JURIS DOCTOR/MASTER OF PUBLIC HEALTH ments in the Government program and at least The J.D./M.P.H. program comprises two individual 6 credits of upperclass J.D. course work. degrees. A student in this program is expected to Students in the joint degree program are required complete the required 84* academic credits for the to take the first year of law school as an intact J.D. at Georgetown, as well as the 80 units neces- block. This school year may be taken prior to or sary for the M.P.H. at the Johns Hopkins after completing one year of Government course Bloomberg School of Public Health, in four years. work, but no earlier or later. Students may spend a Students may request, by written petition, to apply year entirely devoted to Government course work, 10 M.P.H. credits (equivalent to 6 Law Center but they need not do so. credits) to their J.D. academic credit requirement. J.D./Government students must complete all The student will spend his or her first year at required courses and the total number of academic the Law Center, taking the standard curriculum of credits for graduation (75* in law and 48 in govern- 30* credits for a first year J.D. student. The student ment for the M.A., with 9 credits of Government then will spend the ensuing 11 months in residence course work counted toward the J.D., and an addi- at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public tional 15 for the Ph.D. in the fields of Comparative Health completing the M.P.H. component of the Government, International Relations, and Political joint degree program. After completing the M.P.H., Theory, or an additional 18 for the Ph.D. in the student will return to the Law Center to com- American Government); Approximately 21 credits plete the remaining two years of the J.D. program, from the J.D. count toward the Ph.D. Therefore, including a course in Professional Responsibility students must take about 27 credits unique to the and the legal writing requirement. Ph.D.; perform satisfactorily in both the oral/read- Participants in this joint degree program ing foreign language examinations and the major complete the following: and minor comprehensive examinations; submit a • 30* credits in required first year law curriculum; dissertation proposal; successfully complete and • 11 months (starting in July) in residence at the defend a dissertation in Government; satisfy the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public J.D. professional responsibility and legal writing Health. During this period, students complete a requirements; and meet the J.D. residency require- series of M.P.H. core courses. While at the Johns ment (see J.D.Program section, page ?). Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, they Students may enroll in the joint degree program are also required to take: Public Health and the on a full or part time basis. A student in this joint Law, and Ethical Issues in Public Health. degree program may receive his or her law degree Students are also directed to suggested elective before the completion of the program providing that courses; the course work for the law degree has been com- pleted and the student has completed 48 credits of government course work.

* 1 fewer credits is required for students who completed the first year law curriculum prior to the 2005-2006 academic year. 34 JOINT DEGREE PROGRAMS

• During the final two years at the Law Center A typical distribution of the 114 semester hours students are strongly urged to take the Advanced in the J.D./M.P.P. Program is as follows: Health Law seminar, Administrative Law, First Year: 30* J.D. credits Constitutional Law II, and at least one additional Second Year: 24 M.P.P. credits seminar in health law, biomedical ethics, law and Third Year: 21 J.D. credits science, or a related subject; and 9 M.P.P. credits • Residency Requirement (see J.D. Program section, Fourth Year: 24 J.D. credits page 15). 6 M.P.P. credits With permission, students are eligible to enroll in courses at Georgetown’s Kennedy Institute of Ethics. The M.P.H. degree will not be awarded until requirements for the J.D. degree have been completed.

JURIS DOCTOR/MASTER OF PUBLIC POLICY J.D./M.P.P. degree candidates must satisfactorily complete all course requirements of both the J.D. and M.P.P. degrees. In addition to the J.D. and M.P.P. degrees, a Joint Program Certificate will be awarded upon satisfactory completion of the program. The J.D./M.P.P. program requires completion of 114* academic credits (75* credits in law and 39 credits in M.P.P. courses). The required 114 J.D./M.P.P. credit hours are distributed as follows: • 30* credits in the required first year law curriculum; • 21 required M.P.P. credits taken during second or third year: Introduction to Microtheory; Public Finance; Public Policy Process; Public Management; Ethics Values and Public Policy; Statistical Methods for Policy Analysis (formerly Quantitative Methods I); and Regression Methods for Policy Analysis (formerly Quantitative Methods II); • 9 credits of M.P.P. required courses taken in the third or fourth year: Advanced Regression & Program Evaluation Methods (formerly Quantitative Methods III) and a two-semester thesis; • 9 credits of M.P.P. elective courses taken in the second, third, and fourth years; • 10 required J.D. credits: Administrative Law; Constitutional Law II; and Legislation and Statutory Interpretation (Administrative Law is not required for students who have completed Government Processes in Curriculum B); • 35 credits in additional J.D. courses, including Professional Responsibility and a course meeting the legal writing requirement, taken in the third and fourth years; and • Residency Requirement (see J.D. Program section, page 15).

* 1 fewer credits is required for students who completed the first year law curriculum prior to the 2005-2006 academic year. ATRO AS ETFCT N O-EREPORMRQIEET 37 MASTER OFLAWS, CERTIFICATE ANDNON-DEGREEPROGRAMREQUIREMENTS pcfi LM ereRqieet o oeg-dctdAtres38 Specific LL.M.DegreeRequirementsforForeign-EducatedAttorneys pcfi LM ereRqieet o ..Euae ..Gauts37 Specific LL.M.DegreeRequirementsforU.S.EducatedJ.D.Graduates EURMNSFRDCO FJRDCLSINE40 REQUIREMENTS FORDOCTOROFJURIDICALSCIENCE WITHDRA rnfrbtenFl ieadPr ieSau 39 Transfer betweenFullTime andPartTime Status eurmnsfrToSprt LM ere 39 Requirements forTwo SeparateLL.M.Degrees G nrlRqieet o l LM tdns37 eneral RequirementsforAllLL.M.Students TEDNEADEAUTO OIIS43 ATTENDANCE ANDEVALUATION POLICIES rnfrbtenL..Dge rgas39 Transfer betweenLL.M.DegreePrograms W AL ANDLEA NOLETADCEI OIIS43 ENROLLMENT ANDCREDITPOLICIES PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY CDMCRQIEET 41 ACADEMIC REQUIREMENTS VE OFABSENCEPOLICIES o-ereErlmn 40 Non-Degree Enrollment TE RVSOS46 OTHER PROVISIONS etfiae 39 Certificates 47 48

35 Graduate Programs

GRADUATE PROGRAMS 37

In addition to the Juris Doctor degree, the Law • All foreign-educated attorneys on student visas Center offers the following degree programs: are required to enroll as full time students. A stu- • Master of Laws (individualized program/general dent’s visa cannot be extended to provide addi- studies) tional time for the student to complete a paper or • Master of Laws in International Legal Studies coursework except for compelling academic or • Master of Laws in Securities and Financial medical reasons consistent with U.S. visa regula- Regulation tions. Other foreign-educated students may enroll • Master of Laws in Taxation as part time students if they are U.S. citizens, per- • Master of Laws in Advocacy, for students who manent residents of the U.S. or if they are on a complete a Clinical Teaching Fellowship visa permitting part time study. • Doctor of Juridical Studies (S.J.D.) SPECIFIC LL.M. DEGREE REQUIREMENTS FOR The Law Center also offers the following U.S. EDUCATED J.D. GRADUATES Certificates to students enrolled in a Law Center LL.M. program: MASTER OF LAWS (INDIVIDUALIZED PROGRAM) • Certificate in Employee Benefits Law Requires, in addition to the general requirements • Certificate in International Human Rights Law above: • Certificate in National Security Law • 24 academic credits in a program of study • Certificate in World Trade Organization approved by the Graduate Admissions (WTO) Studies Committee. There is no limitation on the num- ber of J.D. upperclass courses that may be The Certificate in Employee Benefits Law, unlike included in the approved program, but approval the other Certificates, is open to students who are does not guarantee entry into any particular not enrolled in an LL.M. program but who were course or seminar. admitted separately to the Certificate program. • An approved program of study may be revised The S.J.D., the LL.M. in Advocacy, and the during the course of the degree program, if LL.M. programs for international students on stu- approved by the Associate Dean for Graduate dent visas require full time enrollment. Otherwise, Programs; students seeking to revise their pro- the graduate program of instruction is designed gram of study must provide a written request to both for full time and part time students. the Associate Dean for Graduate Programs Most graduate courses are offered in the evening. explaining the need for the revision. Therefore, a student completing a program on a full time basis should be prepared for some time con- MASTER OF LAWS IN ADVOCACY flicts between courses. The Law Center’s Summer Requires, in place of the general requirements session offerings are limited, and most students are above: able to schedule at most 2 or 4 academic credits • 24 months of residency during two consecutive during the Summer session. academic years as a Clinical Teaching Fellow, engaged in teaching and the full time supervi- MASTER OF LAWS, CERTIFICATE, AND sion and instruction of J.D. students who are NON-DEGREE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS enrolled in a clinic. • 24 academic credits awarded for satisfactory per- GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL LL.M. STUDENTS formance of some combination of the following, (BOTH U.S. AND FOREIGN-EDUCATED ATTORNEYS) as determined by the student’s supervising fac- ulty member: teaching, course development, Candidates for all Master of Laws degrees (with the practice of law, supervision of students, partici- exception of the Master of Laws in Advocacy) must: pation in clinic seminars, and completion of • Complete the required number of academic cred- coursework. Grades are recorded pass/fail. its for the degree, including any minimum num- • All Fellows affiliated with the Center for ber of hours in a specialization and/or required Applied Legal Studies must also complete a courses as described in the appropriate section paper of publishable quality within five years of below; their date of matriculation in order to obtain the • Earn a minimum cumulative grade point average LL.M. in Advocacy. of at least 2.00; • The possibility of graduating with distinction is • Complete all requirements for the degree within available to all Master of Laws in Advocacy the prescribed period of study (see section on candidates. To achieve the with distinction Academic Requirements below.) Full time students designation, Master of Laws in Advocacy are expected to complete the degree in one acade- candidates must receive certification from their mic year, and part time students may take up to supervising faculty member that they have three years. performed outstanding work throughout their two years in residence, and have completed a paper of publishable quality. 38 GRADUATE PROGRAMS

• With the exception of Clinical Teaching SPECIFIC LL.M. DEGREE REQUIREMENTS FOR Fellows affiliated with the Center for Applied FOREIGN-EDUCATED ATTORNEYS Legal Studies or Street Law, all Clinical Teaching Fellows must be admitted to practice MASTER OF LAWS (GENERAL STUDIES) in the District of Columbia. Clinical Teaching Requires, in addition to the general requirements Fellows affiliated with the Center for Applied above: Legal Studies must be admitted to practice in • 20 academic credits in a program of study the bar of any state or the District of Columbia. approved by an international student advisor • The Academic Policies pertaining to the from the Office of Graduate Programs; Clinical Teaching Fellowships are further • the required course for international students, defined in the Clinics brochure and supersede U.S. Legal Discourse; the policies set forth elsewhere in this Bulletin • one course that focuses primarily on U.S. law, as in the event of any inconsistency. approved by the Office of Graduate Programs.

MASTER OF LAWS IN SECURITIES AND MASTER OF LAWS IN INTERNATIONAL LEGAL STUDIES FINANCIAL REGULATION Requires, in addition to the general requirements Requires, in addition to the general requirements above: above: • 20 academic credits in a program of study • 24 academic credits, including 16 academic approved by an international student advisor credits in courses listed under Securities and from the Office of Graduate Programs, includ- Financial Regulation in the course schedule; ing a minimum of 12 academic credits in • prior completion or concurrent completion of a courses listed under International and basic course in Securities Regulation [note: this Comparative Law in the course schedule; course does not count towards the required • the required course for international students, 16 Securities credits but, if taken as part of the U.S. Legal Discourse; student’s LL.M. program, may count as elective • one course that focuses primarily on U.S. law, as credit toward the 24 total academic credits approved by the Office of Graduate Programs. required for the degree]. MASTER OF LAWS IN SECURITIES AND MASTER OF LAWS IN TAXATION FINANCIAL REGULATION Requires, in addition to the general requirements Requires, in addition to the general requirements above: above: • 24 academic credits, including 20 academic • 20 academic credits in a program of study credits in courses listed under Taxation in the approved by an international student advisor course schedule; from the Office of Graduate Programs, includ- • Prior completion of a basic course in individual ing a minimum of 12 academic credits in federal income taxation [note: this requirement courses listed under Securities and Financial may not be waived nor may the course be taken Regulation in the course schedule; after matriculation in the Graduate Tax • the required course for international students, Program]; U.S. Legal Discourse; • Completion of the courses (1) Income Tax • completion of the basic course in Securities Accounting and (2) Corporate Income Tax Law Regulation [note: this course does not count I (with permission of the Director of the towards the required 12 Securities credits]. Graduate Tax Program, the J.D. course, Taxation II, may be substituted for Corporate MASTER OF LAWS IN TAXATION Income Tax Law I to satisfy this requirement). Requires, in addition to the general requirements Students who have taken prior courses on these above: subjects may petition the Director of Graduate • 20 academic credits in a program of study Tax Programs to have a required course waived approved by an international student advisor in order to substitute a tax elective. Petitions to from the Office of Graduate Programs, includ- waive either of these required courses will be ing a minimum of 16 academic credits in considered only if (i) the student, in writing, courses listed under Taxation in the course petitions for the waiver during the first semester schedule;. of enrollment in the Master of Laws in • the required course for international students, Taxation Program and (ii) the student received U.S. Legal Discourse; a minimum grade of “B” in a comparable course • completion of the courses 1) The U.S. Income from an ABA-approved law school. Tax: Principles and Practices, and 2) Corporate Income Tax Law I or Taxation II. GRADUATE PROGRAMS 39

REQUIREMENTS FOR TWO SEPARATE LL.M. DEGREES Requirements, Retirement Plan Design and Students who wish to complete two separate LL.M. Taxation, and ERISA: The Fiduciary Provisions. degrees may apply to do so. Current students should • A minimum grade point average of “B-” must be submit an updated application to the Associate attained in the courses that are counted toward Dean for Graduate Programs, who will consult with the Certificate’s specialization requirements. the Office of Admissions. No application fee is required for current students. Those who will be For purposes of earning the LL.M. in Taxation, beginning their first degree or who have already Employee Benefits Law Certificate courses will be completed one degree should apply to the Office of counted toward the required academic credits in Admissions and pay the appropriate application fee taxation. Students who wish to apply for the for the second degree. Employee Benefits Law Certificate must do so by the end of the add/drop period of their last semester TRANSFER BETWEEN LL.M. DEGREE PROGRAMS before graduation. A student in an LL.M. degree program may apply to transfer to a different program by submitting a Note: Students admitted for the Employee Benefits written request explaining the academic reasons for Law Certificate only (i.e., students who are not requesting the transfer to the Associate Dean for enrolled in an LL.M. degree program) are not Graduate Programs or the Director of LL.M. eligible for financial aid, nor are they eligible for Academic Services. graduation with distinction or the Dean's List.

TRANSFER BETWEEN FULL TIME AND PART TIME STATUS CERTIFICATE IN INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW A student in an LL.M. degree program may apply The International Human Rights Law Certificate is to transfer from full time to part time status, or available to students enrolled in a Law Center from part time to full time status, subject to visa LL.M. program. The Law Center will not admit requirements, by submitting a written request students solely for the International Human Rights detailing the reasons for requesting the transfer to Law Certificate program. the Associate Dean for Graduate Programs or the The following are requirements for the Director of LL.M. Academic Services. International Human Rights Law Certificate: • Candidates must successfully complete a basic Note: Students will not be permitted to transfer course in International Law I (or its equivalent) between full time and part time status more than in a J.D. program (or an equivalent course in once during their LL.M. degree program, except their home country, in the case of foreign-edu- under extraordinary circumstances as determined by cated LL.M. students) or during the first year at the Associate Dean for Graduate Programs. the Law Center. This course does not count towards the 10 specialization credits for the CERTIFICATES program. Certificate programs offer students an opportunity • Students must successfully complete a mini- to concentrate within one of the designated fields of mum of 10 academic credits of courses listed study. To be eligible for a Certificate (other than the under International Human Rights Law Employee Benefits Certificate) a student must be Certificate in the course schedule. admitted to an LL.M. degree program. • In addition to the 10 specialization credits, each student must successfully complete the basic CERTIFICATE IN EMPLOYEE BENEFITS LAW International Human Rights Law course. The Employee Benefits Law Certificate is available • A minimum grade point average of “B-” must to students enrolled in a Law Center LL.M. degree be attained in the courses that are counted program and to students who are not so enrolled toward the International Human Rights Law but who were admitted separately to the Certificate Certificate’s specialization requirements. program. Successful completion of a basic course in federal individual income taxation is a prerequisite CERTIFICATE IN NATIONAL SECURITY LAW to commencing work on the Employee Benefits The National Security Law Certificate is available Law Certificate. to students enrolled in a Law Center LL.M. pro- The following are requirements for the Employee gram. The Law Center will not admit students Benefits Law Certificate: solely for the National Security Law Certificate • Candidates must successfully complete a mini- program. mum of 10 academic credits of courses listed The following are requirements for the National under Employee Benefits Law Certificate in the Security Law Certificate: course schedule. • Candidates must successfully complete a basic • Six of the 10 required credits must be satisfied by course in International Law I (or its equivalent) successfully completing the following three in a J.D. program (or an equivalent course in required courses: Retirement Plan Qualification their home country, in the case of foreign- educated LL.M. students) or during the first 40 GRADUATE PROGRAMS

year at the Law Center. This course does not NON-DEGREE ENROLLMENT count toward the 10 specialization credits for Attorneys who wish to take courses in a particular the program. field may apply for admission as a non-degree stu- • Students must successfully complete a mini- dent. To be considered for acceptance into this pro- mum of 10 academic credits in courses listed gram, students must hold a J.D. or LL.M. degree under the National Security Law Certificate in from an ABA-approved law school with at least a the course schedule. “C+” cumulative grade point average or an LL.M. • In addition to the 10 specialization credits, from Georgetown. Students who do not have a each student must successfully complete the degree from a U.S. law school but who have a law course “National Security Law.” degree from outside the U.S. will be considered for • A minimum grade point average of “B-” must admission on a case by case basis. Students accepted be attained in the courses that are counted into the non-degree program are not candidates for toward the National Security Law Certificate’s a graduate degree. specialization requirements. Non-degree students may enroll in a total of no more than four graduate courses or a maximum of CERTIFICATE IN WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION eight credit hours, and may take no more than two (WTO) STUDIES courses per semester. Non-degree students must sat- The WTO Studies Certificate is available to stu- isfy the same academic requirements and abide by dents earning a J.D. or LL.M. at the Law Center. the same Law Center rules and policies as candi- (Students earning an S.J.D. at the Law Center, and dates for graduate degrees. students earning graduate degrees in other related Non-degree students are not eligible to enroll in subjects at Georgetown University who are eligible Juris Doctor level courses unless they are Law to enroll in courses at the Law Center, may obtain Center graduates. Non-degree students cannot the WTO Studies Certificate only by permission of enroll in J.D. first year or clinical courses, nor can the Institute of International Economic Law.) they enroll in a program of Graduate Independent Students will not be admitted solely for the WTO Research. Studies Certificate program. Successful completion Students in the non-degree program who subse- of a basic international law course, either at the Law quently apply for and are accepted into a degree Center or elsewhere, is a prerequisite for the WTO program, will be awarded up to eight academic Studies Certificate, and this qualifying course does credits for coursework with a “C” or better com- not count toward the 12 credits required for the pleted at the Law Center during the two years WTO Studies Certificate. immediately preceding the student’s entry into the The following are requirements for the WTO degree program. The period of study allowed for Studies Certificate: completion of the LL.M. will be reduced by one • Students who wish to apply for the WTO semester for every 4 academic credits of non-degree Studies Certificate must do so through the Law coursework counted under this rule. Center’s Institute of International Economic Law by the end of the second week of classes in Note: Enrollment is on a space-available basis with the first semester of graduate studies, or, for enrollment priority given to degree candidates. J.D. students, by the end of the second week of classes in the first semester of their second year. REQUIREMENTS FOR • Candidates must successfully complete 12 acad- DOCTOR OF JURIDICAL SCIENCE emic credits of coursework on WTO-related subjects, selected from specific courses listed as Georgetown offers a program of study leading to a eligible for the WTO Studies Certificate and doctorate in law (S.J.D.). Admission to the S.J.D. posted on the website of the Law Center’s program is subject to rigorous requirements and is Institute of International Economic Law open only to outstanding applicants. Admission is (www.iiel.org). based upon the applicant’s academic qualifications, • Students must maintain an overall grade point scholarly potential, dissertation topic and the avail- average of “B” or higher. ability of a full time faculty member willing to • Students must complete a seminar paper on a supervise the applicant throughout the program. WTO law subject approved by the IIEL. Candidates complete a two-year full time course • Students must participate in two extracurricular of study, research, and writing under the supervision activities related to WTO subjects (i.e., attend a of a full time member of the faculty. If a candidate conference, congressional or court hearing, or received an LL.M. from the Law Center within the equivalent event) each semester. past five years, he or she may ask to transfer four credits from the LL.M. degree towards the S.J.D. Note: Academic credit transferred from other insti- by applying in writing to the Associate Dean for tutions and/or graduate programs will not count Graduate Programs. During the first year, the toward the WTO Studies Certificate. candidate must complete an approved program of at least ten academic credits of coursework, with an GRADUATE PROGRAMS 41 average of “B” or better, and substantial written PERIOD OF STUDY work. The candidate’s dissertation committee will The LL.M. and Certificate programs must be then decide whether to recommend that the student completed within three years from the date of continue for the second year. A copy of the matriculation; however, full time students are dissertation committee’s recommendation will be expected to graduate within one year from the date provided to the Office of the Registrar. of matriculation unless a waiver is granted. During the second year, the student will focus on A student may petition the Associate Dean for the research and writing of the dissertation. A stu- Graduate Programs in writing to extend this limit dent is expected to be in frequent contact with his for up to two additional years. Permission to extend or her supervisor, who will monitor progress and the period of study will be granted for extraordinary provide advice throughout the writing process. After circumstances. the faculty supervisor accepts the final version of the Where credit for non-degree coursework has dissertation, the student must make an oral defense been granted, the maximum period of study allowed before a dissertation committee of three members of will be reduced by one semester for every four acad- the faculty, who may recommend the conferral of emic credits granted. the S.J.D. degree. Where the scholarship is truly exceptional, the committee may recommend that Note: The period of study for international students the degree be awarded with distinction. is limited by U.S. visa restrictions. Please see the Tuition for the S.J.D. degree is charged at the full section above on Special Requirements for time LL.M. rate for the first year, and at a rate International Students. equivalent to four academic credits each semester for the second year. Beyond the first two years, stu- GRADUATE INDEPENDENT RESEARCH dents are charged a continuing registration fee equal Graduate students may undertake a Graduate to the rate for one academic credit. Independent Research project during their degree The candidate must complete the required first program, and receive 2 semester hours of credit, by year of coursework and research while in residence completing a writing project with a minimum of in the Washington, D.C., area, and is also expected 6,000 words of text excluding footnotes (about to complete the second year here as well. In special 25 pages) under the guidance of a member of the circumstances, usually involving the nature of the full time or adjunct faculty. research required for the dissertation, the candidate To undertake a Graduate Independent Research may, with permission from his/her faculty supervisor project, a student must first identify a faculty and the Associate Dean for Graduate Programs, be member with relevant expertise who is willing to given permission to complete the dissertation away supervise the project. After agreeing upon a topic, from the Washington, D.C., area. In this case, the the student and the faculty supervisor both sign the candidate will be expected to return to the Law registration form available from the Office of the Center at least once a semester to meet with his or Registrar, the Graduate Programs Office and on the her faculty supervisor. Graduate or Registrar’s web page. The registration S.J.D. students are expected to complete their form is due no later than August 11, 2006 for the degrees within four years after commencing the Fall 2006 semester, December 1, 2006 for the program. Up to two additional years of study may Spring 2007 semester and May 4, 2007 for the be granted if the candidate obtains the consent of Summer 2007 session. Exceptions or waivers to his/her faculty supervisor, and the request is these dates will only be granted under extraordinary approved by the Associate Dean for Graduate circumstances (which does not include the Programs. Approval will only be granted under unavailability of a professor). extraordinary circumstances. Approval of a registration form for a Graduate Independent Research project is not automatic. Note: For the first two years of the program, S.J.D. Students must demonstrate that they have a well- students are expected to be full time students and to developed topic suitable for a substantial scholarly limit any employment accordingly. paper. In addition, Graduate Independent Research projects will only be approved if they are unavailable ACADEMIC REQUIREMENTS as a class option in the graduate program. Ordinarily, students are limited to one Graduate The following requirements apply to all LL.M. and Independent Research project during their degree Certificate programs except those requirements and program, but a second project may be approved by policies of the Graduate Fellowship Programs in the Associate Dean for Graduate Programs. Advocacy that are described in the section on The student and faculty supervisor must meet Master of Laws in Advocacy, above, which supersede regularly to discuss the project. The student must these policies where inconsistent. submit an outline and a draft to the faculty supervi- sor for review and comment on an agreed upon schedule. The final paper must be submitted to the 42 GRADUATE PROGRAMS

Office of the Registrar, not directly to the professor. ONE PAPER FOR TWO SEMINARS The final paper must be submitted by the date set in Students may submit one paper to satisfy the the approved proposal, which may be no later than requirements in two seminars or writing projects by 60 days in the fall semester or 45 days in the spring securing the written approval of both professors and semester beyond the date set for paper submission the Registrar in advance of writing the paper. When in the academic calendar, except that students in permission is granted, the student will be required their final semester must submit the paper by the to write a paper of at least 12,000 words excluding date announced in the academic calendar for gradu- footnotes (approximately 50 pages), and meet all ating students. Students who do not receive the other requirements of both seminars. Students will approval of the Associate Dean for Graduate be expected to indicate the joint nature of the paper Programs for extensions beyond the maximum or on the cover page of all submissions. Each professor who fail to submit a final paper by the due date approving such a project independently will submit (including any extension) will receive a grade of “F” a final grade indicating his or her judgment of the for the Graduate Independent Research project. paper as it pertains to his or her course, and the final grades given for the two seminars need not be SEMINAR PAPERS identical. Final papers in seminars and other courses are nor- mally due on the date announced in the academic LL.M. EXTERNSHIP PROGRAM calendar. By announcement at the beginning of the The Law Center offers a “for-credit” externship semester, a professor may advance, or extend for up program course for LL.M. students each spring to 60 days in the fall semester and up to 45 days in semester. All current LL.M. students are eligible to the spring semester, the due date of all papers for participate in the externship program, except for the seminar (except for graduating students in their COST Scholars (who participate in a separate final semester). Final papers must be submitted to externship program at COST). the Office of the Registrar and not directly to the Although the Office of Graduate Programs professor. maintains a list of externship opportunities, students are responsible for securing their own placements. TWO-CREDIT SEMINARS All placements must be with a government agency The two-credit seminars offered in the Graduate or non-profit organization. Placements with law Program require a substantial research paper, or a firms or businesses will not be approved. The work series of shorter papers, totaling approximately must be legal in nature and under the direct super- 6,000 words of text excluding footnotes (about vision of a lawyer. To be eligible for credit, students 25 pages). Papers submitted in lieu of an may not receive pay or other compensation from the examination in a course (permitted only when placement organization during the externship announced in the schedule of courses) must also period. meet this minimum standard. LL.M. students who participate in the for-credit program will receive two credits graded on a THREE-CREDIT SEMINARS pass/fail basis. The LL.M. student must register for The three-credit seminars offered in the Graduate the two credits in order to participate in the pro- Program allow a student the opportunity to write a gram and these two credits will count toward the paper under close faculty supervision. Students maximum of 13 academic credits allowed per receive comments on their outlines and first drafts semester. and then edit and rewrite to produce a polished LL.M. externs are required to attend an orienta- final paper. Three credit seminars meet two hours tion class in the first week of the Spring semester per week. The extra credit that these seminars and at least one additional class or meeting at the receive reflects the additional time and work that end of the Spring semester. LL.M. students are students are expected to devote to their papers. then required to devote a minimum of ten hours per week for at least eleven weeks to the externship. The papers that students write for these seminars Students must keep a weekly diary that reflects the should show the student’s mastery of the in-depth number of hours the student has worked and research undertaken and demonstrate how the stu- describes the nature of the work performed without dent has organized, clarified, or advanced this body disclosing any confidential information. This diary of knowledge in resolving the issues raised by the must be submitted on a weekly basis to the paper. The technical requirements for a paper in a Externship Coordinator. At the end of the semester, three-credit seminar include: (1) submission of an the student will be required to submit a five to ten outline and a first draft, in accordance with the pro- page paper reflecting on the externship experience. fessor’s instructions and schedule; (2) submission of a revised final paper based on the professor’s com- Note: Although LL.M. students may receive acade- ments; and (3) both the first draft and the final mic credit only once for an externship during their paper of at least 6,000 words (excluding footnotes), LL.M. program, they are free to participate in other which is approximately 25 typewritten pages using non-credit internships, subject to visa rules and the customary margins and spacing. Law Center’s regulations on student employment. GRADUATE PROGRAMS 43

ENROLLMENT AND CREDIT POLICIES LIMITATIONS ON ACADEMIC CREDITS PER SEMESTER No full time student may enroll in more than thir- ENROLLMENT FOR BAR PURPOSES teen semester hours of academic credit. Part time The Law Center’s Graduate Program is not students may not enroll in more than seven semes- designed as a bar preparation program. Accordingly, ter hours of academic credit in any semester without the Graduate Program does not guarantee enroll- the prior written approval of the Associate Dean for ment in any course, graduate or J.D., which Bar Graduate Programs to be a full time student for that authorities may require as a condition of eligibility semester, in which case full time tuition will apply. to sit for a bar examination. Note: No student who is or anticipates being DUPLICATION OF COURSES employed more than 20 hours per week during a The Graduate Program discourages students from semester may enroll for more than seven semester repeating courses for which they have previously hours of academic credit in that semester. received credit in another degree program, but rec- Deviations from these limitations will be approved ognizes that there may be circumstances where such only under exceptional circumstances. repetition is appropriate. Hence, students are not required to seek permission to take course that may CREDIT FOR COURSES IN THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF duplicate previous work, except that U.S. students GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY in the Taxation LL.M. program may not count LL.M. students may take a maximum of four acad- toward the 20 taxation credits required for the emic credits in the Graduate School of Georgetown LL.M. degree either Tax I or an equivalent basic University with the permission from both the course in individual income taxation. However, with Associate Dean for Graduate Programs and the permission of the Director of the Graduate Tax professor teaching the graduate course. For some Program, a Tax I course taken at the Law Center Graduate School courses, the approval of the acade- may count as elective credits towards the Taxation mic department is required in addition to permis- LL.M. degree. sion from the professor. The completed registration form for main campus Graduate School courses CONFERRAL OF THE DEGREE must be turned in to the Office of Graduate Once a student has completed the requirements for Programs in order to register for such courses. an LL.M. degree and any certificate that the stu- Course descriptions may be found in the catalog of dent is pursuing, the student’s final cumulative the Graduate School. G.P.A. will be calculated and the degree and certifi- Undergraduate level courses cannot be applied cate conferred. If a student who is pursuing a cer- toward an LL.M. degree or Certificate. Language tificate has completed the requirements for an classes may be taken on a space-available basis, but LL.M. degree but not the requirements for the cer- will not be credited towards the LL.M. degree. tificate, then with the permission of the Associate Full time students may take graduate courses and Dean for Graduate Programs, the student can take undergraduate language courses during the Fall and the courses necessary to complete the certificate. In Spring semesters without additional charge. Part this situation, both the degree and the certificate time students pay for all courses at the applicable will be conferred when the certificate requirements Law Center credit hour rate. Full time or part time are completed. students taking Summer Main Campus courses are billed at the applicable Main Campus tuition rate. FULL TIME AND PART TIME ENROLLMENT DEFINED All courses, credits, and grades taken in the The Graduate Program defines full time enrollment Graduate School will appear on the student’s Law as eight or more semester hours of academic credit Center transcript, but the grades will not be during the Fall and Spring semesters, and as four or counted in the student’s grade point average. more semester hours of academic credit during the LL.M. students are limited to 4 total credits out- Summer session. Part time enrollment is seven or side of the Law Center. Any credits taken in the fewer semester hours of academic credit during the Graduate School of Georgetown University are sub- Fall and Spring semesters. By the end of the tracted from the number of credits that can be taken add/drop period, students must ensure that they are at another institution (see below). enrolled in the appropriate number of academic credits required to maintain their full time or part Note: International students considering taking a time status. For example, if a part time student reg- U.S. bar exam should be aware that non-Law isters for eight or more academic credits, he or she Center courses may not count towards the required will automatically be charged full time tuition number of law credits necessary to be eligible to despite his or her designation as a part time student. take the bar exam. 44 GRADUATE PROGRAMS

CREDITS EARNED AT OTHER INSTITUTIONS and grades will be entered on the transcript, but With the prior approval of the Associate Dean for grades for those courses will not be included in the Graduate Programs, and subject to the conditions computation of the LL.M. grade point average. For listed below, a student may apply to the LL.M. part time students, the maximum period of study degree a cumulative maximum of 4 academic credits allowed will be reduced by one semester if 4 or earned at institutions while an LL.M. student at the more credits are applied. Law Center. The Law Center does not award LL.M. credit for courses taken at another institu- ATTENDANCE AND EVALUATION POLICIES tion before a student matriculated at the Law Center. ATTENDANCE AND PARTICIPATION • Credits for course work and grades earned at The Law Center must be satisfied at all times of the another ABA-approved law school and accepted serious purpose of each student. Any student will be for credit toward a Georgetown LL.M. degree by withdrawn if it is found that the student is not giv- the Associate Dean for Graduate Programs will ing proper time and attention to his or her studies. be entered on the Georgetown transcript but will Regular and punctual attendance at all class ses- not be taken into account in the computation of a sions is required of each student. Student participa- student’s grade point average at the Law Center. tion is expected in all courses. A student who, even • Even if prior approval is obtained for taking a though registered for a course, has not regularly course at another ABA-approved law school, stu- attended and participated may, at the professor’s dents who do not receive a minimum grade of option, be withdrawn, excluded from the course or “C+” in the course will not be allowed to transfer examination (with the same consequences as a vol- the academic credits. untary failure to appear for a final examination), or • Credits earned at other institutions will count receive a lowered grade in the course. Even if a stu- toward the specialization requirement for any dent has passed all examinations, academic credit degree or certificate program only with the prior will not be awarded and no student will be approval of the Associate Dean for Graduate advanced, nor will his or her degree be conferred, if Programs. attendance or participation is unsatisfactory. • The Law Center does not allow distance learning A student who has not properly registered for a in connection with meeting LL.M. degree course may not take the final examination or receive requirements. any credit for participation in the course. • LL.M. students are limited to 4 total credits out- side of the Law Center. Any credits taken at EXAMINATIONS another institution are subtracted from the num- Written examinations are held at the end of the ber of credits that can be taken in the Graduate class work in all courses unless otherwise indicated School of Georgetown University (see above). on the course schedule. No examination will be given prior to its originally scheduled date. ADVANCED STANDING FOR GRADUATE CREDITS EARNED Curricular offerings designated as “seminars” gener- AS A NON-DEGREE STUDENT AT GEORGETOWN ally do not have examinations; instead, substantial UNIVERSITY LAW CENTER written work is required. Clinical programs do not Students in an LL.M. degree program may apply up have written final examinations. to 8 non-degree academic credits that were earned The Law Center requires students to take their at the Law Center within two academic years prior examinations at the regularly scheduled time. Dates to matriculation in the degree program. Courses and for all examinations are announced at the time the grades will be entered on the transcript, and the course schedule is released so that students may grades for those courses will be included in the anticipate the date of their examinations and sched- computation of the LL.M. grade point average. The ule personal, travel and employment commitments maximum period of study allowed for the degree so as not to interfere with the announced dates of will be reduced by one semester if 4 or more credits their examinations. If, however, a student experi- of advanced standing are applied. ences a serious medical or personal situation that makes it impossible to take an examination on the ADVANCED STANDING FOR CREDIT EARNED AS A J.D. scheduled date, a deferred examination may be STUDENT AT GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY LAW CENTER requested. See Exam Deferral Policy in the General Students who received their J.D. degree from the Administrative Policies section of this Bulletin. Law Center within three years of matriculating in A student failing to present himself or herself for an LL.M. degree program may apply up to 6 acade- any examination because of illness or other mic credits earned while a J.D. student, provided extraordinary cause must contact the Registrar prior those credits were in excess of the minimum num- to the start of the examination. If the Registrar is ber of credits required for the J.D. degree. Courses satisfied that the absence is legitimate and and grades involved will remain part of the J.D. supported by appropriate documentation (such as a record; advanced standing credit for specific courses doctor’s note), permission may be given for the will be applied to the LL.M. degree. The courses student to take a deferred examination. The GRADUATE PROGRAMS 45 requirements of a student’s employment will not be receive a grade of “F” for the course. Once a final regarded as an “extraordinary cause.” If the Registrar paper is submitted for grading, a revised version of does not permit a deferral, the student must take that paper may not be substituted for the final the examination as originally scheduled. paper. Any student who does not take an examination as Note for International Students: U.S. visa originally scheduled, and who does not obtain per- restrictions dictate that extending the paper due mission from the Registrar prior to the start of an date beyond the expected date of graduation as examination to take a deferred examination, will listed in the certificate of eligibility (I-20 or receive a grade of “F” in the course. A student who DS-2019 form) can be permitted for compelling presents himself or herself for examination in a academic and/or medical reasons only. Any such course but fails to submit that examination for grad- paper extension must be approved in writing by an ing will receive a grade of “F” for that course. No international student advisor in the Office of post-examination relief will be granted. If a student Graduate Programs in consultation with the becomes ill prior to the administration of the exam- Associate Dean for Graduate Programs in advance ination, it is the student’s responsibility to deter- of the paper submission deadline. The faculty mine, in consultation with the Registrar, whether he member must agree to the extension but cannot or she should request a deferred examination. If a grant the extension. student becomes ill during the examination, or if some outside force disrupts the examination, the GRADING student must immediately make the proctor aware Final grades are given on a letter system: A, A-, B+, of the situation and follow the instructions of the B, B-, C+, C, C-, D and F. proctor or Registrar. No re-examination will be given in any course for The following numerical equivalents are assigned the purpose of raising a grade obtained in a previous to each letter grade: final examination in that course. Students may review their graded exams during A 4.00 C+ 2.33 specified exam review periods by completing a A- 3.67 C 2.00 request form at the Office of the Registrar. B+ 3.33 C- 1.67 The Library contains copies of past examinations B 3.00 D 1.00 administered at the Law Center. Students may use B- 2.67 F 0 these prior examinations as study aids in preparing for examinations. In many cases, model or “best” A minimum cumulative grade point average of answers to past examinations are also on file in the 2.00 in all courses and seminars taken is required Library. each semester a student is enrolled in the LL.M. program. WRITTEN WORK If a student repeats a failed course, both grades Final papers in seminars and other courses are nor- will be entered on the student’s transcript and will mally due on the date announced in the academic be included for the purpose of determining the calendar. By announcement at the beginning of the cumulative grade point average of the student. semester, a professor may advance or extend for up Any student accumulating three failures will be to a maximum of 60 days in the fall semester and dismissed for defective scholarship. 45 days in the spring semester the due date of all papers for the seminar (except for those of graduat- GRADE REVIEW POLICIES ing students). All final papers must be submitted to Any student who has received a failing grade on an the Office of the Registrar and not to the professor. examination or paper, after first discussing the mat- Due dates for papers are as firm as the dates of ter with the professor who submitted the failing examinations. Individual extensions for less than the grade, may request the Registrar to submit that maximum allowable (mentioned above) may be examination or paper to another professor teaching granted by the professor, provided the student sub- in the field for review. The other professor serves mits an Individual Extension Form to the Office of merely in a consulting capacity. The final decision the Registrar. The form, available at the Office of for the course grade rests with the professor con- the Registrar, must be signed by the professor. ducting the course, but the course professor shall Extensions for more than the maximum are rare and give due and appropriate consideration to the views not granted solely by the professor. Any request for of the consulting colleague. A request for review an extension beyond the maximum is effective only must be made by the student within the time period upon review and signature of the Individual allowed for review of students’ examinations and Extension Form by the Associate Dean for papers. Only grades of “F” may be reviewed. Graduate Programs. If a student fails to submit a final paper by the due date (including any extension), the student will 46 GRADUATE PROGRAMS

GRADE CHANGE POLICY Note: The difference between graduation A faculty member may change a reported passing with distinction and Dean’s List is that graduation grade for an examination or paper only upon proof with distinction is calculated based upon the entire of demonstrable clerical error in the grading or graduating LL.M. class and then printed on the grade reporting process. diploma and the student’s transcript, whereas Dean’s List is calculated based upon the graduating class PROBATION within each respective LL.M. degree program and LL.M. students who fail to achieve a 2.00 then printed on the student’s transcript only. cumulative grade point average at the end of any semester will be placed on academic probation. If THE THOMAS BRADBURY CHETWOOD, S.J., PRIZES the student’s cumulative grade point average Founded by the Law Center Class of 1928, these remains below 2.00 after the next semester in prizes are given in honor of Reverend Thomas B. residence (after at least 4 credits of coursework), he Chetwood, S.J., a former Regent of the Law Center. or she will be dismissed for defective scholarship. Plaques are awarded to the students who both grad- uate with distinction and have the best academic RANKING OF STUDENTS records for that academic year in the following The Law Center does not provide ranking informa- LL.M. degree programs: International Legal tion with respect to its students’ academic perfor- Studies, Securities and Financial Regulation, and mance, whether in an S.J.D., LL.M. or J.D. degree Taxation. At the discretion of the Associate Dean program. for Graduate Programs, a prize may be awarded for the most outstanding work in an approved individu- PASS/FAIL OPTION NOT AVAILABLE alized Master of Laws program and for an interna- The pass/fail Option available to students in the tional student in a general studies Master of Laws J.D. program is not available to S.J.D. or LL.M. program. students. The only exceptions are for international students who are taking the U.S. Legal Discourse OTHER PROVISIONS course and LL.M. students enrolled in the LL.M. Externship Program, whereby students are graded SPECIFIC VISA REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR exclusively on a pass/fail basis. INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS By provision of federal law, any school that enrolls ACADEMIC HONORS foreign nationals is required to comply with strict reporting requirements. Before the start of each GRADUATING WITH DISTINCTION semester, all newly enrolled international students To graduate with distinction, an LL.M. student must (including U.S. permanent residents) at the Law attain a minimum cumulative grade point average Center are required to provide documentation prov- that places the student in the top one-third of the ing they are legally permitted to be in the country entire graduating LL.M. class. Grades transferred and attend school. Students who fail to provide such from any other law school, while displayed on the documentation will not be permitted to complete Law Center transcript, will be excluded from the registration or attend classes. Students in F-1 or J-1 computation of this average. Distinction will be status are additionally required to attend a Visa granted only where a student has completed a mini- Information Session given by the Graduate mum of 20 academic credits in an LL.M. degree Programs Office. The Graduate Programs Office program at the Law Center. will provide all new international students with detailed information concerning the time, date, and DEAN’S LIST location of the session prior to the start of the An LL.M. student who graduates in the top one- semester. Visa and regulatory information is also third of the graduating students in his or her spe- available at the Graduate Program’s website at cific LL.M. degree program will be designated as a www.law.georgetown.edu/intl/visa.html Dean’s List graduate for that specific LL.M. degree program. Dean’s List designation will be granted for TUITION the following LL.M. degree programs: See the Tuition and Fees section of the Bulletin. Individualized, International Legal Studies, General Studies, Securities and Financial Regulation, and Note: Full time LL.M. students who have paid two Taxation. Grades transferred from any other law consecutive semesters of full time tuition may enroll school, while displayed on the Law Center tran- in the immediately following Summer or Fall script, will be excluded from the computation of this session at the Law Center to complete their degree average. Dean’s List designation will be granted requirements at no additional charge. Tuition will be only where a student has completed a minimum of charged on a per credit basis for any credits 20 academic credits in an LL.M. degree program at exceeding the credits required for the degree. the Law Center. GRADUATE PROGRAMS 47

STUDENTS AUDITING COURSES or consider other offers of employment that would Enrolled degree students may audit additional require revocation of the offer previously accepted. classes, with the permission of the professors. Students should consider acceptance of a volunteer Auditors receive no transcript notation of their or public interest position as binding as acceptance attendance in class. of a position with greater remuneration; the expec- tations of professionally responsible behavior are in RESTRICTIONS ON STUDENT EMPLOYMENT no way diminished because a position provides less The program of instruction in the full time program by way of financial compensation. is a demanding one designed to command substan- tially all of the student’s time during the academic POST LL.M. DEGREE EMPLOYMENT year. Experience indicates that a student frequently The professional development staff of the Office of cannot successfully carry a full time course load if Graduate Programs assists student in identifying substantially employed in an outside job. Devoting potential employment opportunities. However, all of too much time to employment is a frequent cause of the steps in securing employment are ultimately the disappointing academic performance and sometimes responsibility of each student and the Law Center of academic failure. For these reasons, professional does not guarantee that a graduate from its LL.M. organizations, including accrediting agencies, program will secure post-graduation employment. require that a student enrolling in the full time pro- gram be in a position to devote substantially all of WITHDRAWAL AND LEAVE OF ABSENCE POLICIES his or her working hours to the study of law. The Law Center strongly urges full time students VOLUNTARY WITHDRAWAL FROM INDIVIDUAL COURSES not to accept outside employment. All full time stu- A graduate student may voluntarily withdraw from dents should carefully restrict their hours of any course or regular seminar at any time prior to employment and in no event may a full time stu- the examination period, unless the professor has set, dent exceed 20 hours of employment per week dur- in writing, a different rule for withdrawal. A student ing the academic year. A student enrolled in the full desiring to withdraw from any course or from the time program who is contemplating substantial Law Center must submit a request in writing to the employment should request a transfer to the part Office of the Registrar. Notification to any other time program, which is structured to accommodate person or in any form other than in writing is not those who have significant employment responsibil- effective as official notice of intention to withdraw. ities during their period of study at the Law Center. A withdrawal is recorded on a student’s transcript either as a “withdrawal” or an “excused withdrawal.” Note: International students in the U.S. on student After the fourth week of the semester, a withdrawal visas are very restricted with respect to on- and off- will be considered “excused” only under exceptional campus employment. For more information, stu- circumstances. dents should check the website regarding visas and If a student properly withdraws from a course or employment issues. Although on-campus employ- from the Law Center under the foregoing rules, ment is permitted, the opportunities are very limited refunds of tuition will be calculated, from the date and few students are selected for these few posi- the Office of the Registrar receives written notifica- tions. In any event, an international student advisor tion, according to the Tuition Refund Schedule from the Office of Graduate Programs must give listed in the Tuition and Fees section of this Bulletin. written permission for the student to seek on-cam- pus employment. Students cannot rely on the possi- Note: Due to U.S. visa restrictions, international bility of on-campus employment when determining students who wish to withdraw from a course must their financial resources for the year. first obtain approval from the Associate Dean for Graduate Programs or an international student STUDENT CONDUCT IN THE JOB SEARCH PROCESS advisor in the Office of Graduate Programs. Students are expected to exhibit high standards of professional responsibility in all of their job-seeking LEAVES OF ABSENCE activities. Students are cautioned to avoid even the LL.M. students in good standing, both academically appearance of impropriety in the preparation of and financially, may request a leave of absence for their job resumes, letters and application forms. up to one academic year from the Registrar or the Misleading, inaccurate, or false information on these Associate Dean for Graduate Programs, or the materials is viewed as a violation of the Student Director of LL.M. Academic Services. The student Disciplinary Code. Students are also expected to requesting the leave must demonstrate that the honor commitments to an employer or prospective degree can be completed within the allowed period employer. Students are expected to attend all sched- of study, counting the time on leave of absence. See uled interviews, unless cancelled in a timely and also Period of Study, above. appropriate manner. If a student accepts an offer for employment, he or she should not thereafter solicit 48 GRADUATE PROGRAMS

A leave of absence for longer that one year will not be granted for those LL.M. students who have not successfully completed a minimum of 10 acade- mic credits. In addition, any LL.M. student with fewer than 10 academic credits who does not return to the program within the approved leave of absence period will be withdrawn from the program, subject to the readmission provision below. Any LL.M. student with fewer than 10 academic credits who is absent from the Law Center longer than one year must reapply for reentry into the LL.M. program through the Office of Admissions. If granted readmission, up to 4 academic credits earned within the past three years at the Law Center will be applied toward their LL.M. degree program. Furthermore, the student’s matriculation date will be their original matriculation date into the LL.M. degree program. LL.M. students read- mitted to a degree program will still be required to graduate according to the Law Center’s rules on the Period of Study based on their original matricula- tion date. LL.M. students may not attend another law school while on leave without the prior written approval from the Associate Dean for Graduate Programs.

WITHDRAWAL FOR FAILURE TO REGISTER A student who either fails to register or to obtain an approved leave of absence, regardless of the reason for that failure, will be withdrawn from the Law Center. This action will be noted on the student’s transcript. Such a student may not register for a subsequent semester without the approval of the Associate Dean for Graduate Programs. Permission to re-enroll will not be granted unless the degree can be completed within the maximum period of study allowed.

PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY

The faculty expects all students to conduct them- selves with the highest degree of honesty, integrity and trustworthiness. For the rare case in which a student’s conduct is dishonest or evidences a lack of integrity or trustworthiness or may unfairly impinge upon the rights or privileges of members of the Law Center community, the faculty has promulgated standards and procedures that govern the disposi- tion of such cases. Those standards and procedures are set forth in the Student Disciplinary Code, a copy of which is printed in this Bulletin. tdn eod,DrcoyIfrain n ofietaiy54 Student Records,DirectoryInformation,andConfidentiality h rm wrns n apsScrt c f19 52 The CrimeAwareness andCampusSecurityActof1990 uitpn fCassPlc n rcdrs51 Audiotaping ofClassesPolicyandProcedures a disos xmntos n eiw 51 Bar Admissions,Examinations,andReviews EEA DIITAIEPLCE 51 GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES Student W tdn eod,Aaei 54 Student Records,Academic tdn eod,Acs 54 Student Records,Access eitainfrCuss53 Registration forCourses A piaint rdae51 pplication toGraduate muiainRcrs53 Immunization Records xmDfra oiy52 Exam DeferralPolicy ork, Confi elhIsrne53 Health Insurance Student Access+ T ranscripts ..Crs53 I.D. Cards dentiality 55 54 55

49 General Administrative Policies

GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES 51

GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES will discuss the situation with you and may arrange for class to be audiotaped in your absence, if appro- These policies apply to all students. priate. Only the Assistant Dean or the Director of LL.M Academic Services may contact the AV APPLICATION TO GRADUATE Department with this request. Please note: Some Students anticipating graduation must submit to the professors do not allow the audiotaping of their Office of the Registrar a degree application. Students classes under any circumstances. The AV are responsible for obtaining a degree application to Department is required to honor their wishes. graduate at the Office of the Registrar in sufficient time to meet the filing deadline. REQUESTS THE AV DEPARTMENT WILL DECLINE Students are responsible for monitoring their The AV Department will not audiotape classes due progress to ensure they meet all degree requirements to work conflicts, vacation plans, minor illness, by their anticipated graduation date. Regardless of inclement weather or job interviews. If you are the completion of all academic requirements, a unable to attend a class for one of these reasons, we diploma will not be issued until the student has a ask that you make arrangements with fellow stu- clear student account balance. In addition, tran- dents in the class to audiotape the class for you. scripts, diplomas, bar certification and other certifi- Students may borrow tape recorders from the cates will not be released if there is an outstanding Library Circulation Desk. Please note: Some pro- student account balance, or if a student who has fessors do not allow the audiotaping of their classes received financial aid has not fulfilled the federal under any circumstances. The AV Department is requirement for a financial aid exit interview. required to honor their wishes. On the degree application, students provide infor- mation necessary to order diplomas and prepare the TERMS AND CONDITIONS commencement book: The AV Department’s capacity to audiotape is lim- February 2007 graduates: ited, so requests will be taken on a first-come, first- Deadline October 20, 2006 served basis. Please bear in mind that equipment May 2007 graduates: failure and/or human error may affect our ability to Deadline January 19, 2007 deliver satisfactory recordings. October 2007 graduates: Tapes of classes made for religious holidays and Deadline April 20, 2007 make-up classes will be kept on file for two weeks, after which they will be erased and reused. Before AUDIOTAPING OF CLASSES POLICY AND PROCEDURES this occurs, you may listen to the tapes in the AV The Audio Visual (AV) Department adheres to the Preview Room or the Law Library. Tapes of classes following policies and procedures regarding the must be returned the same day they are borrowed audiotaping of class sessions. and may not be kept overnight. This is necessary in order to ensure their availability for other students. CIRCUMSTANCES UNDER WHICH STUDENTS CAN ASK If you supply your own blank C-120 cassette, you THE AV DEPARTMENT TO AUDIOTAPE A CLASS may use AV’s high-speed duplicator to make a copy Students can ask the AV Department to audiotape a for your personal use. Only students who are cur- class if they will miss the class to observe a religious rently enrolled at the Law Center may use the AV holiday. Please notify the AV Department well in Department’s high-speed duplicating equipment. advance of your needs, as it may not be possible to This equipment can only be used to duplicate tapes fulfill last minute requests. of Law Center classes.

CIRCUMSTANCES UNDER WHICH STUDENTS CAN ASK BAR ADMISSIONS, EXAMINATIONS, AND REVIEWS A PROFESSOR TO HAVE A CLASS AUDIOTAPED Each state has promulgated rules that govern eligi- If a professor schedules a make-up class that con- bility to sit for the bar examination and to gain flicts with a student’s schedule, the student may ask admission to the bar. Common requirements pertain the professor to have the make-up class audiotaped. to required courses, minimum course loads and sim- Only the professor may contact the AV Department ilar matters. Some states require completion of with this request. courses which are not required by the Law Center. Most require the successful completion of the AUDIOTAPING OF CLASSES DUE TO CASES OF Multi-State Professional Responsibility EXTREME HARDSHIP Examination prior to sitting for the bar examination. If you have a serious medical or family emergency It is the student’s responsibility to become famil- and want to have a class audiotaped, J.D. students iar with the rules and procedures, including the must contact the Assistant Dean's office for the J.D. investigation of character and other qualifications, program at (202) 662-9039 with their requests. that pertain to the state where he or she plans to sit LL.M. students must contact the Director of for the bar examination. Early investigation of these LL.M. Academic Services for permission at matters is important. The Office of the Registrar (202) 662-9036. The Assistant Dean or Director 52 GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES has contact information for all state bars and will be b. Exam Relief1: Students may request exam happy to render what additional assistance it can. relief for extraordinary cause. The following As a rule, questions should be resolved with appro- are reasons which will be considered in priate authorities at the particular state bar admis- granting relief: sions offices. Access to state bar admission offices (1) Illness of Student. If you are seeking a may be found at: www.ncbex.org deferred examination for medical reasons, The Law Center’s Ethics Counsel, Michael a written medical diagnosis from your Frisch, (202) 662-9926, will advise students on doctor, Student Health, the Law Center issues regarding disclosures on bar applications. Nurse Practitioner, or emergency room is required. All medical certificates are THE CRIME AWARENESS AND CAMPUS SECURITY ACT subject to verification and approval. OF 1990 Please remember that once you start an This law requires the University to prepare informa- exam you must finish it, so if you feel ill tion on current campus law enforcement policies, before beginning, please contact the crime prevention programs, and campus security Office of the Registrar. If you become ill statistics. The information is available upon request during an exam, report to the proctor from the Director of Public Safety, Georgetown immediately and follow his/her directions. University Law Center, 600 New Jersey Avenue, (2) Death or serious illness in immediate NW, Room 101, Washington, DC 20001-2075, family. (202) 662-9312. The 2006 edition of the Crime (3) Automobile accident, mugging, robbery, Awareness and Campus Security Report (which or similar traumatic experience at the reports crime statistics for the three previous calen- time of the exam or period immediately dar years) is available for review electronically from preceding the exam. www.law.georgetown.edu/publicsafety/crimestatistics.html. (4) Subpoena requiring court appearance at the time of exam or period immediately EXAM DEFERRAL POLICY preceding the exam. The Law Center’s rules for deferred examinations (5) Childbirth that interferes with exam or are as follows: period immediately preceding the exam (applies to either parent). 1. Requests to defer exams will be DENIED if for: (6) Religious holiday. a. Travel, vacation or other personal plans (7) Military commitment. Written military b. Employment reasons for full time J.D. students orders are required. Dates for all examinations are announced at the (8) Extraordinary family circumstances, such time the course schedule is released so that stu- as the wedding of a sibling. dents may anticipate the dates of their exams and schedule personal, travel, and employment plans 3. Requests for an exam deferral must be in writing. that do not interfere with these dates. DO NOT If your file shows that you have previously schedule any employment or personal travel plans deferred one or more examinations for reasons during the examination period. other than exam conflicts, another deferred LL.M. and part time J.D. students may for examination will be granted in only the most unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances request extraordinary circumstances. to have an examination rescheduled for reasons of employment. 4. Requests for exam relief require satisfactory docu- mentation of the reasons. Students should be pre- 2. Examinations will be rescheduled for pared to provide complete documentation, which a. Exam Conflicts is subject to verification and approval. (1) for any student who has two examinations which BEGIN within 24 hours. 5. To protect your anonymity and remain in compli- Examinations which BEGIN more than ance with the Student Disciplinary Code, stu- 25 hours apart (for example, at 9:00 a.m. dents may not indicate to the professor(s) that an on one day and 1:30 p.m. on the follow- exam has been deferred. Students may not discuss ing calendar day), DO NOT constitute a the subject of the deferred exam with the profes- conflict under this rule. sor or other students after the originally sched- (2) for any student who has three examina- uled exam date/time. Under no circumstances tions scheduled within four consecutive may a student initiate communication with the days, or four examinations scheduled course professor(s) about the examination within five consecutive days. (including anonymous communications) until grades are posted.

1Any student who does not take an examination as originally scheduled and who does not obtain permission from the Office of the Registrar to take a deferred examination will receive a grade of “F” in the course. Permission to take a deferred examination must be sought and obtained prior to the original administration of the examination. GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES 53

6. Some guidelines the Office of the Registrar I.D. CARDS follows in rescheduling examinations: The Georgetown One Card (GOCard) is the offi- a. No examination will be given earlier than its cial Georgetown University identification card. All original date. students, faculty and staff affiliated with the b. An exam conflict does not permit the University need to carry the GOCard for identifica- student to self-schedule examinations. tion purposes. The GOCard is used to gain access c. The conflicting examination to be changed to Law Center buildings and Library services and will be determined by the Office of the has a debit account feature, which can be used Registrar so as to assist the greatest number around campus. Funds can be deposited onto the of students with conflicts, and to minimize card at the Law Center GOCard Satellite Office the number of times each exam is (Room 101 McDonough Hall), at various VTS administered. machines around campus or at the Online Card d. In most cases, the conflicting examination Office located at http://onlinecardoffice. which carries the lowest number of credits is georgetown.edu. Items that can be purchased with changed. the GOCard are course materials, parking tickets, e. Students with self-scheduled take-home laundry in the Gewirz Center, vending items and examinations are responsible for avoiding copying. The GOCard can also be used in the Law conflicts with in-class examinations. Center’s food service facilities. f. Examinations rescheduled because of Please retain your GOCard throughout your conflicts may be given at any date during the years at Georgetown. If your GOCard is lost or examination period or on the date listed for stolen, it should be deactivated as soon as possible. deferred examinations on the academic You can deactivate your GOCard online 24 hours a calendar. day at the GOCard web site (http://gocard.george- town.edu) or you may report the lost or stolen card 7. If, after the Office of the Registrar has resched- to the GOCard Satellite Office. In order to receive uled an examination, there is a material change in your replacement card, you will need to go to the a student’s examination schedule (i.e., withdrawal GOCard Office to get your replacement ID. A from a course, substitution of a take-home exami- replacement card will be issued for a $25 fee. nation or a paper option for an in-class examina- tion, etc.) which would eliminate the conflict, it is IMMUNIZATION RECORDS the student’s responsibility under the Student District of Columbia law requires the Law Center Disciplinary Code, as outlined in the Conduct to gather medically satisfactory proof of immuniza- Policies section of this Bulletin, to notify the tion for a number of diseases (measles, rubella, Office of the Registrar of the change in order to poliomyelitis, mumps, tetanus, and diphtheria) prior determine whether he or she remains eligible for to registration, from all students who are under a rescheduled examination. 26 years of age on registration day. The Office of Admissions will provide students with the necessary HEALTH INSURANCE information prior to registration. Law Center students registered in a degree program for 8 or more credits must have medical insurance REGISTRATION FOR COURSES coverage in effect for the entire academic year. Registration for continuing students takes place in Students may submit proof of private coverage or April each year for the entire upcoming academic purchase insurance through the University. Plans are year. Faculty, deans, and other advisors are available also available for spouse and family coverage. Health for individual academic counseling and provide cur- insurance rates are posted on the Student Accounts ricular advice at various events throughout the website at: www.law.georgetown.edu/finaff/studaccts/ Spring registration period. Course descriptions, tuition.html. schedules and curriculum essays are available in the Georgetown students attending an off-campus Law Center’s searchable Online Curriculum Guide program or visiting at another school must provide at www.law.georgetown.edu/curriculum/. Continuing proof of private coverage or they will be covered by students register online, using Student Access+. the Georgetown plan and the appropriate charge Students may adjust their course schedules during will be posted to their student account. Health the periods announced in the registration materials insurance benefit information and acceptance/waiver distributed to students early in April. The registra- instructions are on the Student Health Insurance tion deadlines are also published in these materials. web site at: www.georgetown.edu/student-affairs/ First year students register during their August insurance/. orientation. If students register after the published deadlines for registration, they incur a late registration fee of $60.00. A student’s registration is not processed 54 GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES until all outstanding tuition and fees have been paid 3) A student has the right to consent to disclosures in full. Tuition is charged for all courses in which a of personally identifiable information contained in student has enrolled until the Office of the the student’s education records, except to the extent Registrar receives a written notice of withdrawal. that FERPA authorizes disclosure without consent. See Withdrawal Refunds in the Tuition and Fees One exception, which permits disclosure without section of this Bulletin. consent, is disclosure to school officials with legiti- mate educational interests. A school official can be a STUDENT ACCESS+ person in an administrative, supervisory, academic Student Access+ allows each student to view and print or research, or support staff position (including law his or her address, class schedule, grades, billing enforcement unit personnel and health staff ); a per- statement, and other personal data, and to forward son or company with whom the Law Center has address changes to the Office of the Registrar. Each contracted (such as an attorney, auditor, or collec- student is assigned a NETID and temporary pass- tion agent); a person serving on the Board of word (which needs to be reset) to gain access to this Directors; or a student serving on an official com- information. If you lose or forget your NETID or mittee, such as the Committee on Professional password, please contact the Office of the Registrar Responsibility, or assisting another school official in or the IST Student Help Desk located in the Law performing his or her tasks. A school official has a Library. legitimate educational interest if the official needs to review an education record in order to fulfill his or STUDENT RECORDS, ACADEMIC her professional responsibility. In compliance with federal law, the Law Center has implemented policies and procedures designed to 4) A student has the right to file a complaint with preserve the confidentiality of a student’s academic the U.S. Department of Education concerning records. Unless required by law to do so, the Law alleged failures by the Law Center to comply with Center will not release a student’s record except the requirements of FERPA. The name and address with the student’s written permission. The policies of the Office that administers FERPA are: Family governing release of a student’s academic records, Policy Compliance Office, U.S. Department of and the circumstances under which such a record Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW, will be released without the student’s written Washington, DC 20202-4605. permission, may be obtained from the Registrar. STUDENT RECORDS, DIRECTORY INFORMATION, AND STUDENT RECORDS, ACCESS CONFIDENTIALITY The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of Georgetown University Law Center considers the 1974 as amended (FERPA) affords students certain following information as “directory information,” rights with respect to their education records: that is, information that can be made available to the general public: name, address, telephone num- 1) A student has the right to inspect and review his ber, date and place of birth, photographs, parents’ or her education records within 45 days of the day names, major field of study, full time or part time the Law Center receives a request for access. To do program, dates of attendance, expected graduation so, a student should submit to the Registrar a writ- date, degrees and awards received, and previous ten request that identifies the record(s) he or she educational institutions. No other items of student wishes to inspect. The Registrar will make arrange- information will be released to any person or organiza- ments for access and notify the student of the time tions outside of Georgetown University without the and place where the records may be inspected. written consent of the student, except for certain cate- gories of outside persons or organizations specifi- 2) A student has the right to request the cally exempted by federal law. A document listing amendment of the education records that the these exceptions is available at the Office of the student believes are inaccurate. To do so, a student Registrar. should submit to the Registrar a written request Under the provisions of FERPA, students have clearly identifying the part of the record he or she the right to instruct the University to withhold the wants changed, and specify why it is inaccurate. If “directory information” listed above. To do so, stu- the Law Center decides not to amend the record as dents need to fill out a “Request to Prevent requested by the student, the Registrar will notify Disclosure of Directory Information” form available the student of the decision and advise the student of at the Office of the Registrar within the first two his or her right to a hearing regarding the request weeks of the Fall semester. A new form must be for amendment. Additional information regarding completed at the beginning of a subsequent acade- the hearing procedures will be provided to the mic year if the student wishes to make any changes student when notified of the right to a hearing. to the list of directory information which may be disclosed. GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES 55

Students should consider very carefully the con- sequences of a decision to withhold “Directory Information,” which means that the Law Center will not release this information, unless excepted by law. The Law Center assumes no liability for honor- ing instructions that such information be withheld.

STUDENT WORK, CONFIDENTIALITY Students who work at the Law Center may be asked to sign a confidentiality statement as a condition of their employment.

TRANSCRIPTS The Office of the Registrar will provide transcripts for students upon a written request from the student and the payment of a $5.00 fee per transcript. All requests for transcripts must identify the student by student identification number and bear the student’s signature. Transcripts may be requested at the Registrar’s Office on the third floor of McDonough Hall, by mail, or by fax (202) 662-9235. Transcripts will be issued according to the following schedule: Current students who request a transcript in per- son prior to 5:00 p.m. may claim their transcript after 2:00 p.m. on the next business day. Transcripts ordered by mail are usually provided in three business days. We regret that we cannot accept telephone authorization to release a transcript, even from the student. Third party authorization to release a tran- script or third party requests for a transcript will not be honored without the student’s written authoriza- tion. These restrictions are the result of our concern for our students’ privacy and regulations governing the Law Center under FERPA. Transcripts cannot be released for any student who has an outstanding student account balance.

ADMINISTRATIVE MEASURES TO PROTECT COMMUNITY WELFARE 59 STUDENT DISCIPLINARY CODE 59 Preamble 59 Part One: Substantive Violations 59 s e

Part Two: Procedures 59 i c i l

Part Three: Appeals 60 o P t

Part Four: Sanctions 61 c u d

Part Five: Confidentiality and Reporting 61 n o Notice to the Law Center Community Regarding Disciplinary Proceedings C Involving Law Center Students as both Accuser and Accused (April 5, 2006) 61 Appendix: Plagiarism 62 Endnotes 63 STUDENT CONDUCT IN THE JOB SEARCH PROCESS 64 GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY AFFIRMATIVE ACTION GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES TO INVESTIGATE ALLEGATIONS OF DISCRIMINATION 64 GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY POLICY STATEMENT ON HARASSMENT 66 GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY POLICY STATEMENT ON CONSENSUAL SEXUAL RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN SENIOR AND JUNIOR MEMBERS OF THE UNIVERSITY COMMUNITY 67 GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY COMPUTER SYSTEMS ACCEPTABLE USE POLICY 69 DISCRIMINATION GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES ADMINISTERED BY THE OFFICE OF CAREER SERVICES 70

57

CONDUCT POLICIES 59

The faculty expects all students to exhibit high stan- PART ONE: SUBSTANTIVE VIOLATIONS dards of academic and professional responsibility. This section of the Bulletin contains policies gov- §101 STANDARD OF CONDUCT erning the behavior of members of the Law Center Without regard to motive, intentional student con- community. duct that is dishonest, evidences lack of integrity or trustworthiness, or may unfairly impinge upon the ADMINISTRATIVE MEASURES TO PROTECT rights or privileges of members of the Law Center COMMUNITY WELFARE Community is prohibited.1

Georgetown University Law Center is committed §102 ADMINISTRATIVE VIOLATIONS to promoting an environment that supports its edu- Prohibited conduct that does not evidence a serious cational mission and preserves the health and safety lack of honesty, integrity or trustworthiness on the of its members. Sometimes a student might act with part of the student engaged in such conduct behavior that threatens his or her well being or the constitutes an administrative violation, but does not welfare of the community. Such behavior could constitute a disciplinary violation. include but is not limited to threats or attempts to harm oneself or others, disruptive behavior in class, §103 DISCIPLINARY VIOLATIONS or abusive behavior directed towards students, fac- Prohibited conduct that does evidence a serious lack ulty, or staff. In these cases, the Law Center reserves of honesty, integrity or trustworthiness on the part the right to take appropriate administrative steps for of the student engaged in such conduct constitutes a the well being of the students and of the commu- disciplinary violation. nity. In rare cases, administrative or medical leave or both might be required. PART TWO: PROCEDURES

STUDENT DISCIPLINARY CODE §201 GENERAL a) The Professional Responsibility Committee shall PREAMBLE* oversee operation of the Student Disciplinary Code. Students at the Georgetown University Law Center, It will be composed of faculty and students. The as present and future members of a self-regulated Registrar, Ethics Counsel and those faculty mem- profession, are required to conduct themselves with bers who are assigned as defense counsel will be the highest degree of honesty, integrity and trust- members ex officio. The Committee Chair will be worthiness. Doubts about the propriety of particular responsible for creating panels from the faculty and conduct should be resolved in favor of avoiding even student members of the committee to hear discipli- the appearance of impropriety. Each matriculating nary charges. Each panel shall consist of two faculty student is held to have notice of the high standard members and one student; panels are authorized to of conduct demanded by the Law Center. A stu- act by majority vote. dent's failure to satisfy this standard of conduct in b) The Ethics Counsel will be a member of the bar connection with academic or nonacademic activities and an employee of the University, appointed by the subjects the student to sanctions under this discipli- Dean. The Ethics Counsel will investigate and nary code. Jurisdiction is not limited to the territor- resolve all administrative charges, and prosecute all ial limits of the Law Center or to conduct which disciplinary charges. In every case, the Ethics affects other members of the Law Center commu- Counsel will act in accordance with fairness to the nity. Allegations of minor misconduct are processed accused student, the need for accurate and prompt under the informal provisions of the Code govern- resolution of complaints, and the imperative for ing administrative violations. Allegations of more high standards of honesty by Law Center students. serious misconduct, involving a degree of moral The Ethics Counsel is authorized to act on infor- offensiveness or untrustworthiness that may call mation received from any source, including a stu- into question a student's suitability for the practice dent seeking advice. The Ethics Counsel shall of law, are processed under the more formal provi- administer his or her duties with careful regard for sions of the Code governing disciplinary violations. the educative value of the Code and the rights of The Code is administered by a student-faculty dis- students. ciplinary committee that is guided in its interpreta- c) All students formally charged with violating the tion and implementation by the Code's overriding Student Disciplinary Code or questioned by Ethics purpose of promoting among law students the high- Counsel in the course of an investigation of a com- est degree of honesty, integrity and trustworthiness. plaint, shall have a right to counsel. Upon request, If special circumstances so require, the Law Center after the right attaches, counsel will be appointed may override the provisions of this Code. for the student by the Committee Chair from a list of faculty prepared to be defense counsel maintained

* Please note and read the “Notice to the Law Center Community Regarding Disciplinary Proceedings Involving Law Center Students as both Accuser and Accused (April 5, 2006),” on page 61. 60 CONDUCT POLICIES by the Chair. The student may also be represented bring charges, the student must first be advised of by any other full time faculty member who agrees to the right to counsel. do so on a pro bono basis. The student also retains b) If the Ethics Counsel brings disciplinary charges the right to retain outside counsel of the student's they shall be in writing and filed with the Registrar own choice and at the student's own expense. who shall provide the charged student with a copy of the charges. The right to counsel, if it has not §202 COMPLAINTS attached pursuant to §204(a), attaches when the Complaints regarding student conduct may be made charges are filed. by any member of the Law Center community. c) If the Ethics Counsel dismisses the complaint, They should be directed to the Ethics Counsel and the Ethics Counsel shall notify the student and sub- may be in writing or oral. The Ethics Counsel will mit a brief written report to the Committee Chair decide whether the allegations should be processed and responsible Associate Dean, describing the as potential administrative or disciplinary charges. complaint and the reason for the dismissal. In close cases, before a final charging decision is d) The Ethics Counsel and the charged student may made, the Ethics Counsel is encouraged to consult agree to a disposition of the charges. Such a disposi- with the Committee Chair. The Ethics Counsel tion must be in writing and submitted to the may not add charges unrelated to the allegations in Committee Chair for approval. The Ethics Counsel a complaint without the approval of the Chair. All shall report approved dispositions to the responsible complaints of student misconduct shall be Associate Dean. In cases in which the Committee investigated promptly by the Ethics Counsel. Chair rejects the disposition, the matter shall be referred to a hearing panel. §203 ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGES e) If the charge or charges are referred to a hearing a) If a complaint alleges administrative violations, panel, the student may plead guilty, not guilty or no the Ethics Counsel has the authority to dismiss the contest. Regardless of the plea entered, the panel complaint or to bring and adjudicate administrative must conduct a fair hearing and decide the charges charges. If the Ethics Counsel elects to dismiss a only upon the evidence or stipulated facts that are complaint that alleges administrative violations, presented. However, formal rules of evidence will notice of the filing and disposition shall be given to not apply and procedural irregularities should be the student named in the complaint. Administrative considered only when they result in actual charges shall be in writing and filed with the prejudice.3 The hearing panel may acquit the stu- Registrar who shall provide the student with a copy dent, or find the student guilty of a disciplinary or of the charges. Before finding an administrative vio- administrative violation and impose an appropriate lation, the Ethics Counsel must provide the student sanction or sanctions. If the charges are contested, with notice of the charges and a fair opportunity the hearing panel may convict only upon clear and informally to explain or defend his or her conduct. convincing evidence of a violation. The hearing In the course of the investigation of the alleged panel should submit to the Committee Chair and administrative violation, if the Ethics Counsel responsible Associate Dean a brief written report wishes to speak to the student before deciding to explaining its disposition. Convictions and approved proceed with administrative charges, the student dispositions of disciplinary charges normally must be advised of the right to counsel. The right to become part of the student’s official record. counsel otherwise attaches when the administrative Disciplinary charges resulting in acquittals should charges are filed. not appear in a student's official record. b) The Ethics Counsel shall provide a written report to the Associate Dean for the J.D. or Graduate PART THREE: APPEALS Programs, as appropriate, explaining the disposition of each administrative complaint. Such reports do §301 GENERAL not become part of any official student record, nor Only appeals from final dispositions are permitted. do they fall within the scope of outside requests for No appeals from agreed dispositions approved by disciplinary information about particular students.2 the Committee Chair are permitted.

§204 DISCIPLINARY CHARGES §302 ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS a) If a complaint alleges disciplinary violations, the Within 15 calendar days of the Ethics Counsel's Ethics Counsel may dismiss the complaint or bring finding of an administrative violation, a student may disciplinary charges. If disciplinary charges are appeal to the Committee Chair by submitting a brought, the Ethics Counsel may reach an agreed written notice of appeal to the Registrar. The disposition with the student, or prosecute the written notice of appeal should conform to the charges before a hearing panel. If, in the course of requirements of §304. An appeal may be taken the investigation, the Ethics Counsel wishes to only on the grounds that the penalty is speak to the student before deciding whether to disproportionately severe to those imposed on other CONDUCT POLICIES 61 students for similar conduct. No further review of exams submitted 16 to 30 minutes late will receive a administrative sanctions is authorized. two-step reduction (e.g., from A to B+); exams submitted 31 to 45 minutes late will receive a three- §303 DISCIPLINARY APPEALS step reduction (e.g., from A to B); exams submitted Within 15 calendar days after a hearing panel 46 to 60 minutes late will receive a four-step decides a disciplinary charge, either party may reduction (e.g., from A to B-); if an exam is appeal to the full Professional Responsibility submitted over 60 minutes late the student will Committee by submitting a written notice of appeal receive a D in the course if the instructor to the Registrar. The written notice should conform determines that the exam is entitled to a passing to the requirements of §304. The only grounds for grade. Under this scale, there is a five minute grace appeal are a serious misreading of the Student period, and the maximum reduction for any late Disciplinary Code, gross insufficiency of the evidence, exam that receives a passing grade will be a D. or a gross impropriety that tainted the proceedings. There will be no deviation from this scale except in the case of bona fide, documented medical or other §304 PROCEDURE FOR FILING AN APPEAL emergencies to be determined by the Dean or The only written document that will be required for delegated Associate Dean. all appeals will be a written notice indicating the date the appeal is filed with the Registrar, the ruling §403 DISCIPLINARY SANCTIONS being appealed, the Disciplinary Code authority for Any appropriate sanction may be imposed for a dis- the appeal and the entity or person to whom the ciplinary violation, including expulsion, suspension, appeal is taken. The Registrar shall notify the par- failing grades, and transcript notation. ties, the Committee Chair and the reviewing entity of the pendency of the appeal. Administrative PART FIVE: CONFIDENTIALITY AND REPORTING appeals shall be presented orally. Disciplinary appeals may be presented orally but written presentations §501 CONFIDENTIALITY should be used by counsel to the extent practicable or Confidentiality shall be maintained with respect to as directed by the Committee. Appeals shall be heard all proceedings under this Code, except that stu- as promptly as possible consistent with protecting the dents charged with disciplinary violations have a rights of the charged student. right to a public hearing if they so desire.

§305 ADVISORY OPINIONS §502 CENTRAL REPORTING If the Ethics Counsel or the chairperson is uncer- Notwithstanding the requirement of confidentiality, tain whether charged conduct, if proven, constitutes convictions involving suspension or expulsion may, a serious offense, he or she may ask for an advisory to the extent permitted by law, be reported to a cen- opinion from the full committee. The ex parte ruling tral collection service such as the Law School Data shall control the charging process and the track Assembly Service for use by other schools. determination. §503 PUBLICATION PART FOUR: SANCTIONS The disciplinary committee shall publicize, without identifying details, the results of its disciplinary pro- §401 GENERAL ceedings. In addition, each year the disciplinary Sanctions shall be appropriate to the nature and committee shall publish, in summary form and severity of the violations to which they attach.4 without identifying details, a report disclosing the When possible, sanctions should seek to educate the number of cases handled during the previous year, student about the nature and importance of honesty and the nature and disposition of each case. Copies and mutual respect. Community service may of annual reports issued by the committee shall be constitute all or part of any sanction. available for inspection by students in the Office of the Registrar. §402 ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTIONS The Ethics Counsel may establish, in consultation Notice to the Law Center Community Regarding with the Associate Deans, schedules of grade Disciplinary Proceedings Involving Law Center reductions and/or community service for Students as both Accuser and Accused (April 5, 2006) administrative violations other than late submission of take-home exams. Late submissions of take- The “Clery Act,” 20 U.S.C. § 1092f, the home exams are dealt with outside the provisions of Department of Education (DOE) regulations pro- the Disciplinary Code and are subject to the mulgated thereunder, 34 C.F.R. § 668.46, and Title following penalty scale: Take-home exams that are IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 submitted from 6 to 15 minutes late will receive a U.S.C. § 1681 et seq., as interpreted by DOE’s one-step grade reduction (e.g., from A to A-); Office of Civil Rights, require the University to 62 CONDUCT POLICIES implement particular procedures in certain discipli- proceedings pending at this time or arising nary proceedings. In order to ensure compliance thereafter, regardless of when the underlying with the law and fair and responsive processes, the conduct occurred. This announcement shall be Law Center hereby directs the following: distributed to the Law Center Community and included in the next published Bulletin. 1. In all disciplinary cases involving alleged conduct within the scope of the Clery Act, in which both APPENDIX: PLAGIARISM the accuser and accused are Law Center students, the following procedures shall be implemented: Every law student must grasp the overriding importance of scrupulous honesty in the study and a. When a Law Center student presents allega- practice of law. In the presentation of written work, tions against another Law Center student to such honesty is the soul of academic integrity and, the Ethics Counsel for investigation, the Ethics for the lawyer, at the heart of credible and effective Counsel may direct that both the accused and assistance of counsel. The damage to reputation the accuser refrain from contact with the other, (and to a cause) which springs from deceit in the either directly or indirectly, during the pen- presentation of ideas will commonly prove both dency of the disciplinary investigation and any devastating and enduring. One becomes known as proceeding initiated based upon the allegations. untruthful, or at least untrustworthy, and in either case careless of the rights of others. These are b. Both the accuser and the accused shall be enti- contingencies devoutly to be avoided. tled to faculty counsel appointed by the Chair of This notion of deceit is not easily translated into the Professional Responsibility Committee at no an all-inclusive description of plagiarism. The Law expense and both accuser and accused shall have Center, therefore, has not attempted a definition so the right to have their appointed faculty counsel meticulously crafted as to be worthy of inclusion in present at the disciplinary hearing. a criminal code. But surely some central proposi- tions are declarable, and understandable, and no c. The disciplinary hearing shall be confidential student can fail to be aware of the broad thrust of unless the accuser and the accused agree that the notion that the work of others must never be the hearing shall be open to the public. claimed as one’s own. Here are several of those propositions. The use of d. The Law Center acting through the Associate another’s work typically takes the form of either a Dean for Academic Administration, upon direct quotation, where the other author's exact request of the accuser or accused, will change words are used, or a paraphrasing, where the true the student’s academic and/or University- author's ideas or language are recast in the words of controlled living conditions, if the changes are the borrower. Both these forms require that he or deemed to be reasonable. The Ethics Counsel she who thus uses the work of another person give may request such changes be made by the adequate credit to that person. Perhaps as important Associate Dean on behalf of the student, if as the fact that the credit is given is the manner in such a request has not been made by the which it is given. Where exact words are used, they student directly. must be designated as a quotation (quotation marks or indentation) and footnoted in the obligatory e. Both the accuser and the accused shall be form, identifying source and precise page of loca- informed of the outcome of the disciplinary tion. Similar attribution is called for in the use of proceeding, including any sanctions imposed, charts, tables, diagrams, and like presentations of to the extent required by the Clery Act. rather more visual evidence, when originated by someone else. Paraphrasing too demands that the 2. In adjudicating allegations of sexual harassment, paraphraser candidly and fully account for the including allegations of any unwelcome conduct derivation of that which the paraphraser has of a sexual nature, the standard of proof to be reworded. As a general proposition, prolonged para- applied by the hearing panel under § 204(e) of phrasing is to be discouraged, but when lengthy the Code shall be a preponderance of the paraphrasing does occur the true source is not suffi- evidence standard. ciently cited when it is cited only at the end, and generally. The rule should rather be that each dis- To the extent that any of these provisions is crete subportion of the material thus used receive its inconsistent with provisions of the Student own recognition, in quite precise form, including Disciplinary Code, the Code is hereby overridden, page citation. as authorized by the Code “if special circumstances Of course, matters of general knowledge, and so require.” These superseding provisions shall take terms so commonly employed as to have entered the effect immediately and apply to all disciplinary public domain need not be footnoted5, just as this CONDUCT POLICIES 63 brief essay does not footnote the widely recognized conduct that may be independently illegal, for truths appearing in the foregoing lines. But we example, theft, destruction or mutilation of strongly agree that, in any case involving the slight- property, assault, sexual harassment, and sexual est doubt, you will be better served to grant rather assault, is also prohibited by the Code to the extent than to withhold recognition of your dependency on that it interferes with the rights and privileges of the work of another. Attributions that are arguably the members of the Law Center community or it unnecessary in these marginal instances will at the calls into question the student’s suitability to the very least direct the reader to material which could be practice of law. useful, and so advance the possibility for learning. The Code also prohibits unauthorized refusal to Finally, note that plagiarism can be said to have cooperate with the disciplinary committee; failure to occurred without any affirmative showing that the maintain required confidentiality in connection with student’s use of another's work was intentional. administrative or disciplinary proceedings; failure to Intent is presumed in any disciplinary case where comply with an administrative or disciplinary sanc- the source of the material is both plain and unat- tion; and attempting or conspiring to commit an act tributed. It will be for the affected student to prohibited by the Code. The examples are provided demonstrate that the copying or restatement was, in by way of illustration only. Whether or not particu- any such case, innocent. lar conduct is prohibited is determined by the stan- Forewarned is forearmed (no citation needed). dard of conduct imposed under §101, not by whether it falls within the scope of the foregoing ENDNOTES nonexhaustive examples. [1] The fact that conduct is negligent or motivated [2] The Law Center does not have complete control by a benign purpose does not preclude that conduct over what information will be called for by bar from being intentional, as long as the student admission's character committees and others outside intended the act upon which the charge is based. the institution. The Law Center will, however, Unintentional acts that nevertheless result in unfair- consistent with its obligation for candor, seek to ness do not come within the scope of this Code but, prevent administrative violations from becoming a rather, are handled by the Dean and the Law permanent stain on a student’s record. Center administration. Nonexhaustive examples of [3] Charged students shall be accorded the basic prohibited conduct include: plagiarism (see components of procedural fairness, including a copy Appendix: Plagiarism), cheating or assisting another of the complaint, advance notice of the identities of student to cheat in connection with an examination adverse witnesses, the right to present relevant evi- or assignment; unauthorized breach of anonymity in dence, the right to cross-examine adverse witnesses, connection with a blind-graded examination; pos- the right to forego a hearing by admitting guilt, the session or use of unauthorized materials in connec- right to admit guilt but nevertheless appeal jurisdic- tion with an examination or assignment; failure to tion or sanction, the right to request a particular follow the instructions given for an examination or sanction, and the right to place in the record the assignment, such as unauthorized communication student’s own comment on committee action. with other students, possession or use of unautho- [4] A nonexhaustive list of authorized sanctions, in rized material, or failure to stop work at the pre- order of increasing severity includes: warning; repri- scribed time; receiving, providing, requesting or mand; probation, with or without conditions such as offering to provide unauthorized information con- counseling; additional work such as writing extra cerning a deferred examination or assignment; papers, or accumulating extra credits in order to unauthorized use of another student's work; unau- graduate; grade or credit reduction; imposition of a thorized use of a student's own work for multiple failing grade; suspension with or without automatic purposes; unauthorized use, concealment or removal reinstatement; expulsion; and withdrawal of a of library books or other University property; and degree. Administrative and disciplinary officials are neglect or abuse with respect to a clinic client. encouraged to formulate additional sanctions appro- Prohibited conduct also includes: priate to particular violations. When authorized, a misrepresentation in connection with an application transcript notation may be required to satisfy the for admission to the Law Center or for financial aid; Law Center’s obligation of candor to those outside misrepresentation in connection with a Law Center the Law Center community. Accordingly, a tran- course, assignment, or competition; and script notation can accompany both mild and severe misrepresentation on a transcript, or in connection sanctions, or it can be imposed as a sanction in and with an application for employment or bar of itself. admission. Misrepresentation includes submitting a [5] See Comment, Plagiarism in Legal Scholarship, resume which lists journal membership without 15 Toledo L. Rev. 233, 235 n. 12 (1983). specifying a date of termination, if the student or graduate resigned or was suspended from the journal. The Code prohibits the use, transfer, possession and/or sale of illegal drugs on campus. In addition, 64 CONDUCT POLICIES

STUDENT CONDUCT IN THE JOB SEARCH PROCESS accused of discrimination. That person, too, has rights that the policy on discrimination must pre- Students are expected to exhibit high standards of serve and protect. A person who abuses this policy professional responsibility in all of their job-seeking by filing a frivolous complaint will himself or herself activities. Students are cautioned to avoid even the be subject to discipline if the Affirmative Action appearance of impropriety in the preparation of Office determines that the complaint was filed in their job resumes, letters and application forms. bad faith. This provision is not meant in any way to Misleading, inaccurate, or false information on these discourage legitimate complaints. materials are viewed as a violation of the Student The University will continue to promote affirma- Disciplinary Code. Students are also expected to tive action in all areas of the University. Successful honor commitments to an employer. Students are efforts in this area will contribute to an improved expected to attend all scheduled interviews, unless environment in which to work. The University cancelled in a timely and appropriate manner. If an believes that this non-adversarial grievance procedure offer for employment is accepted, the student will benefit students, faculty, staff and administrators, should not consider offers received after the accep- and will make “Affirmative Action/Equal tance. Students should also consider acceptance of a Employment Opportunity” a reality at this institution. volunteer position as binding as acceptance of a position with remuneration. The expectations of REQUIREMENTS FOR FILING GRIEVANCES professionally responsible behavior are in no way 1) Any applicant for employment, current or for- diminished because a position does not provide mer employee (hereinafter referred to as com- financial compensation. plainant), of Georgetown University has a right to file a discrimination complaint with the GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY AFFIRMATIVE ACTION Affirmative Action Office. GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES TO INVESTIGATE ALLEGATIONS OF DISCRIMINATION 2) Complainants must file a grievance in writing within 120 days following the alleged discrimi- INTRODUCTION natory act or the date on which the complainant Georgetown University recognizes and accepts its knew or reasonably should have known the act. responsibilities to act in accordance with the University’s Affirmative Action Plan, federal laws 3) A grievance must be filed with the Affirmative and regulations and the District of Columbia Action Office at M36 Darnall Hall. Human Rights Act. Therefore, the University has established this grievance procedure to review, FURTHER PROVISIONS ON TIME LIMITS investigate, and resolve allegations of unlawful All of the time limits contained within this grievance discrimination on the basis of age, color, sex, procedure may be extended. (including sexual harassment), disability, marital status, national origin, race, religion, family PRINCIPLE OF NON-RETALIATION responsibility, personal appearance, matriculation, The University strongly encourages any victims of political affiliation or sexual orientation. unlawful discrimination to report the incident and This internal Affirmative Action Grievance seek redress, if he or she is unable to resolve it satis- Procedure provides a mechanism for aggrieved factorily and completely through informal means. employees and students to receive a fair hearing on The University recognizes the unusual burden that issues of discrimination. Complainants, respondents the alleged discriminatory conduct places on the and witnesses who participate in this process are recipient and acknowledges the necessity for a thor- bound by rules of confidentiality. Employees are ough and careful resolution of all reported cases. It required to exhaust these procedures with regard to is illegal and contrary to University policy for any any grievance before pursuing remedies outside the individual to engage, whether directly or indirectly, University with any external enforcement agencies in retaliatory conduct against a person who files a including the District of Columbia Human Rights discrimination complaint or gives testimony during Commission, the Equal Employment Opportunity an investigation of such a complaint. As used in this Commission, the Office of Civil Rights of the paragraph, "retaliatory conduct" means conduct that Department of Education and the Department of adversely and unjustifiably affects another’s terms Labor. and conditions of employment, educational experi- It is a violation of this policy to file a discrimina- ence, or quality of life, and that is motivated by an tion complaint for the purpose of injuring the repu- intent to cause harm because of the targeted indi- tation or causing harm to another person. Without vidual’s involvement in the filing or investigation of minimizing the injury that can be suffered by the a discrimination complaint. Any student or victim of discrimination, the University also recog- employee who believes that retaliatory actions have nizes that the filing of a discrimination complaint been taken against him or her for having filed a can have serious consequences for the person complaint or provided testimony in an investigation CONDUCT POLICIES 65 of discrimination may seek redress through the and staff. Grievances involving discriminatory Affirmative Action Office. denials of tenure, promotion or reappointment of faculty members shall be heard by panels com- PROCEDURES FOR PROCESSING GRIEVANCES posed of faculty or academic administrators only. The three member Ad-Hoc Affirmative Action STEP I. INFORMAL CONCILIATION Grievance Panel shall be selected in the following 1) The Affirmative Action Office shall receive the manner: complaint, assist the complainant in defining the The complainant shall select one member of charge and completing the grievance form. the Equal Opportunity Examining Board, and the respondent shall select another. The 2) The Affirmative Action Office shall appraise the Affirmative Action Office shall convene a meet- respondent and his/her administrative officer of ing of these two selected panelists who shall the charge and its supporting documents, assist choose the third member to form the Ad-Hoc them in interpreting the charge, and suggest a Affirmative Action Grievance Panel. format for responding to the charge. 3) A member of the Affirmative Action Office shall 3) The Affirmative Action Office shall have present the details of the complaint to the panel 30 working days to resolve the complaint infor- members who shall be asked to disqualify them- mally and shall have the right to all necessary selves if they have prior knowledge of the com- information to do so and to interview witnesses plaint, the circumstances surrounding the including the right to bring together complainant incidents, or any other reason which might pre- and respondent, if desirable. If a mutually accept- vent them from rendering an impartial decision. able resolution is achieved through the efforts of the Affirmative Action Office, the case shall be 4) The Special Assistant to the President for closed. A written notice shall list findings and Affirmative Action Programs, or a designee shall indicate the agreement reached, and shall be present all documents relevant to the complaint, signed and dated by the complainant, the respon- instruct them in effective investigative processes, dent, and a staff member of the Affirmative and ensure that they thoroughly understand the Action Office, and copies provided to both the process. The panel shall be charged formally with complainant and respondent. If the evidence sup- its responsibility to investigate the complaint, ports a finding that there is no basis for a charge issue its findings including recommendation for of illegal discrimination, the Affirmative Action corrective action if warranted. A staff member of Office shall indicate this conclusion to the com- the Affirmative Action Office shall be present at plainant, advising him/her that the case is closed. all deliberations of the Ad-Hoc Grievance Panel. If conciliation is not possible, the Affirmative Action Office shall so notify both complainant 5) The Ad-Hoc Grievance Panel shall have the and respondent in writing, and shall advise com- right to all relevant information and to interview plainant of his/her right to proceed to the formal witnesses, including the right to bring together step of a University hearing. The complainant complainant and respondent. shall have10 working days to advise the Affirmative Action Office of his/her desire to 6) Within 45 working days from its formation, the have a hearing. Ad-Hoc Grievance Panel shall submit its findings to the Special Assistant to the President STEP II. FORMAL HEARING for Affirmative Action Programs for review. This 1) If the complainant requests a formal hearing, the official shall forward the panel’s findings and the Affirmative Action Office shall send written background documentation to the appropriate notification to the appropriate Executive Vice Executive Vice President or Senior Vice President or the Senior Vice President and Chief President and Chief Administrative Officer for Administrative Officer, the respondent and review and comment. After this official approves his/her administrative officer. This notification the panel’s recommendations, the Affirmative shall include a copy of the charge naming the Action Office shall forward the findings to the complainant and respondent, a description of the complainant, respondent and his/her nature of the complaint, and other written docu- administrative officer. ments pertaining to the case. 7) If the panel sustains the complainant’s grievance 2) The Affirmative Action Office shall then estab- the Affirmative Action Office shall monitor the lish a three-member Ad-Hoc Affirmative Action Panel’s recommendation. The appropriate Grievance Panel selected from the Equal Executive Vice President or Senior Vice Opportunity Examining Board made up of President and Chief Administrative Officer shall Georgetown University administrators, faculty ensure that the Panel’s recommendations are smoothly implemented and that no retaliatory actions are taken against the complainant or respondent. 66 CONDUCT POLICIES

STUDENT EMPLOYMENT GRIEVANCES SEXUAL HARASSMENT Georgetown University students who are also full For the purposes of this policy, sexual harassment is time or part time employees of the University, in defined as any unwelcome sexual advance, request their employee capacity, are subject and entitled to for sexual favors or other verbal or physical conduct the preceding grievance procedures. If the student of a sexual nature when: employee initiates his/her discrimination complaint A. Submission to such conduct is made explicitly or with the academic Dean or Department implicitly a term or condition of an individual's Chairperson, the Dean or Department Chairperson employment or academic advancement; or will transfer the case to the Affirmative Action B. Submission to or rejection of such conduct is Office for resolution. used as a basis for making an employment or academic decision affecting an individual; or STUDENT GRIEVANCES IN ACADEMIC AND C. Such conduct has the purpose or effect of NON-EMPLOYMENT MATTERS interfering with an individual's work or educational The grievance procedures in this document to performance, or of creating an intimidating, hostile, review, investigate and resolve allegations of or offensive environment for work or learning. unlawful discrimination on the basis of age, color, Sexual harassment may occur between persons of sex, (including sexual harassment), disability, marital the same or opposite gender. status, national origin, race, religion, family Sexual harassment subverts the University’s responsibility, personal appearance, matriculation, mission, diminishes the dignity of both perpetrator political affiliation or sexual orientation, do not and victim, and threatens permanent damage to the apply to student complaints in strictly academic careers, educational experience, and well-being of areas, nor do these procedures refer to students in our students, faculty and staff. non-employment relationships. Special procedures Sexual harassment is especially serious when it have been established by all of the University’s occurs between teachers and students or supervisors colleges and schools to resolve academic concerns. and subordinates. In such situations, sexual The matters should be discussed first with the Dean harassment unfairly exploits the power inherent in a of the school. The student may submit formal faculty member’s or supervisor's position. Although written complaint to the Dean, and a copy of this sexual harassment often occurs when one person written formal complaint must be sent to the takes advantage of a position of authority over Special Assistant to the President for Affirmative another, the University recognizes that sexual Action Programs, so that the Affirmative Action harassment may also occur between people of Office may be informed of the complaint. The equivalent status. This includes peer student sexual procedures for discrimination complaints are listed harassment. Regardless of the form it may take, the in the official school publications of the individual University will not tolerate conduct of a sexual University’s colleges and schools. nature that creates an unacceptable working or educational environment. PEER SEXUAL HARASSMENT It is contrary to University policy for the It is contrary to University policy for students to University or any officer, administrator, dean, subject their peers to sexual harassment. Therefore department chair, faculty member, or any other students may use these grievance procedures to file employee to base an adverse academic or employ- such complaints against their peers. ment-related action affecting a person on an unsub- stantiated allegation or rumor of sexual harassment. GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY POLICY STATEMENT It is also unacceptable for students to subject their ON HARASSMENT peers to sexual harassment. The University recognizes that supervisors bear This policy on Harassment will be widely dissemi- an important responsibility to deter sexual harass- nated to members of the University community, and ment, to investigate any such allegation that is will be consistently enforced. The policy will be brought to their attention and if warranted, to con- reexamined, updated as appropriate, and distributed sult with the Office of Affirmative Action Programs regularly to all students, faculty, and staff. about the situation. In addition, the supervisor must It is the policy of Georgetown University to report the matter to a higher authority responsible prohibit harassment on the basis of race, color, for ensuring a prompt review and taking strong religion, national origin, personal appearance, sexual remedial action. orientation, family responsibilities, political affiliation, The “Grievance Procedures to Investigate Allegations source of income, pregnancy, disability or other factor of Unlawful Discrimination,” administered by the prohibited by law. Affirmative Action Office, is a confidential process that is available to any member of the University community, who wishes to file a complaint of sexual harassment. The process is administered by trained counselors in the Office of Affirmative Action CONDUCT POLICIES 67

Programs. Students, faculty members, or non-teach- undergraduate students. At Georgetown University, ing academic employees who believe that they have virtually all undergraduate students are between the been sexually harassed and wish either additional ages of eighteen and twenty-two, and many are information or assistance in filing a complaint can living away from home for the first time. Because of contact Rosemary Kilkenny, Esq., Special Assistant the unique susceptibility of these young men and to the President for Affirmative Action Programs. women, teaching professionals are under a special Staff employees seeking information or assistance obligation to preserve the integrity of the teacher- can contact Michael Smith, Associate Director. The student relationship in situations involving Affirmative Action Programs Office is located at undergraduate students. If members of the M36 Darnall Hall. The telephone number is (202) community choose by mutual consent to enter into 687-4798. such relationships, however, the University requires that they take specific steps to minimize the GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY POLICY STATEMENT problems that may arise from them. Sanctions shall ON CONSENSUAL SEXUAL RELATIONSHIPS1 be commensurate with the magnitude of the harm, BETWEEN SENIOR AND JUNIOR MEMBERS OF THE if any, caused. UNIVERSITY COMMUNITY THE PROBLEMS INTRODUCTION There are many ways problems can arise when a There are various approaches an institution could senior member of the Georgetown community take to address the issue of consensual sexual rela- engages in a consensual sexual relationship with a tionships between a "senior" and "junior" person (see junior member. First, when one person has the definitions below). One extreme is to ban all such ability to grade, advance, promote, recommend, or relationships. The other is to pretend such relation- otherwise influence the employment or academic ships do not exist. The University has taken a mid- status of the other, there is the possibility that what dle ground on this policy. appears to be a consensual relationship is falsely The policy not only points out the potential legal perceived to be so. Some recipients of sexual and ethical pitfalls of consensual sex in the University advances may fear that refusal will result in loss of setting, but also, and more specifically in the section employment or academic benefit. They may go called Standards and Procedures asserts the University’s along with the requested relationship even though it right to protect the integrity of its own operations is in fact unwelcome to them (and may even cause from the conflicts of interest and disruptions in the them psychological harm). The United States academic and employment environments that can Supreme Court has ruled that such a person is a arise from consensual sexual activity involving victim of illegal sexual harassment, and that a school members of the University community. can be liable for monetary damages for a teacher's coercive intercourse with a student.3 Apart from a THE NATURE OF THE PROBLEM policy of avoiding legal liability for such conduct, Consensual sexual relationships between “senior” the University wants to ensure that it provides an and “junior” members of the Georgetown environment free from sexual coercion and community—that is, between two persons where intimidation in which to study and work. one party (the “senior”) possesses direct academic, The person in the position of authority who may administrative, counseling, or extracurricular desire a sexual relationship with a junior neverthe- authority over the other (the “junior”)—do not less has strong reasons to avoid it, since what seems violate laws prohibiting sex-based discrimination.2 initially to be consensual may turn out to be unwel- Nevertheless, such relationships are a matter of come or coercive from the perspective of the junior significant concern to the University because of the participant. The junior participant may file an inter- ethical and administrative problems they can pose. nal grievance or a formal lawsuit, creating a risk that Those problems are the most severe when a the person in authority will suffer negative career consensual relationship takes places between a consequences and may have to pay damages to the teacher (e.g. professor, teaching assistant, clinical victim. Because of the serious consequences to the fellow) and a student and the student is enrolled in senior participant, that person also subjects himself one of the teacher's courses for which the student or herself to the possibility of coercion or blackmail. will receive a grade, or when the student is likely to Even when such a relationship is genuinely con- be enrolled in such a course in the future. sensual (and therefore does not constitute sexual These problems can also be very severe in a harassment or raise the other concerns noted counseling setting between counselors and above), the relationship can cause problems for both counselees. Given the potential for such problems, parties and harm the academic and work environ- the University strongly recommends that members ment at the University. There is the appearance and of the University community avoid any senior- often the reality of a conflict of interest on the part junior consensual sexual relationships. This of both parties to the relationship. Others may recommendation has particular force with regard to believe that the senior favors the junior because of the sexual relationship, thus creating an atmosphere 68 CONDUCT POLICIES of suspicion and resentment among other juniors participation in both roles. Thus, if one party to a who think the junior in the relationship is obtaining consensual sexual relationship is a student of the undeserved benefits. The junior person’s professional other person in a course for which the student will reputation or academic standing may be injured receive a grade, the student should immediately because of the perception that the benefits were due withdraw from the course and should never again to the sexual relationship, rather than to the junior’s take a course with that teacher. In such case it is the own work or study. duty of the teacher to take all steps, including if There is also a serious risk that either party may necessary consultation with the appropriate Dean, exploit the other. The senior person may be inter- to assure that the student’s enrollment in the course ested in the junior solely for the purposes of sexual is promptly terminated. If the student is not cur- gratification, but the junior may construe that atten- rently enrolled in any of the teacher's courses when tion as related to the junior’s intellect, as revealed the relationship begins, the student should refrain through his or her studies or work. If the junior par- from taking any future course with the teacher. The ticipates in a sexual relationship and then discovers policy of not taking courses with the teacher should the true situation, there is a potential for a damag- continue even after the relationship has ceased. ing loss of self-esteem by the junior (especially where the two are teacher and young student and COUNSELORS AND COUNSELEES there is a significant age disparity between them). Because of the potential for emotional harm, There is also the risk of the junior exploiting the individuals should not engage in both a senior. For example, a junior might seek out a rela- consensual sexual relationship and an official tionship solely because of a desire to obtain some counselor/counselee relationship. If a consensual academic or employment benefit from the relation- sexual relationship commences during an official ship (such as a higher grade or a promotion).4 relationship, the official relationship should immediately be terminated and never be started STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES again. Similarly individuals in, or who have been in For the reasons expressed in the previous section of a consensual sexual relationship should thereafter this Policy, the University strongly urges members never enter into an official counseling relationship. of the University community to refrain from engaging in consensual sexual relationships with ALL OTHER SENIOR/JUNIOR RELATIONSHIPS another member of the University community when In any other situation where a senior has direct one person possesses direct authority over the other, authority over a junior, and can thus advance, pro- whether that authority is used by one who is a mote, recommend, or in any other way directly teacher, counselor, or supervisor of the other or by influence the academic or work status of the junior, someone who can directly influence the academic or the senior person should recuse himself or herself work status of the other (e.g., a senior professor from any decision involving the status of the junior.5 serving as a member of the tenure committee for a If the fact of refusal causes the senior to experience junior professor, a professor serving as the thesis difficulty with a superior, the senior should explain advisor for a graduate student, a senior student on the reason for the refusal to the person in authority. the editorial board of a newspaper or a journal The senior’s obligation to explain also exists where voting whether a junior student should attain the an unexplained failure to participate might create an same status, a supervisor filling out a performance inference of a negative evaluation of the junior by evaluation for his or her subordinate). the senior. If the two nevertheless commence such a rela- tionship, the University requires that they take the SANCTIONS FOR VIOLATIONS OF THIS POLICY; REVIEW; following measures, in order to lessen or minimize OTHER LIMITATIONS the conflict of interest and disruption of the acade- A. Any teaching professional who violates the pro- mic and employment environment that can arise in cedures in Part III of this Policy, or any other indi- such situations. The University emphasizes that the vidual engaged in a consensual sexual relationship following measures cannot eliminate entirely the who violates any of the procedures in Part III of this substantial likelihood of conflict and disruption, and Policy, shall be subject to sanctions commensurate that the course of action strongly preferred by the with the severity of the offense. The sanction shall University would be for the two to refrain from be determined in the case of a teaching professional, engaging in consensual sexual relations for as long by the appropriate Dean or Executive Vice as necessary to prevent conflict and disruption. President, after consultation with the chair, if any, of the teaching professional’s department; and in the RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN TEACHERS AND STUDENTS case of other individuals covered by this section, by The University has determined that there is an the appropriate director or other supervisory official, inherent conflict of interest when a faculty member including the Senior Vice President for Georgetown and a student simultaneously maintain both a direct University. But in the case of a student violating student-teacher relationship and a consensual sexual relationship, and therefore prohibits simultaneous CONDUCT POLICIES 69 these procedures, sanctions shall be determined by has had a relationship should be promoted to the the appropriate Dean on that student’s campus. editorial board.

B. The imposition of any sanction imposed under GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY COMPUTER SYSTEMS this Policy may be subject to review under any ACCEPTABLE USE POLICY applicable provision of an established University grievance procedure. The Law Center follows Georgetown University's Computer Systems Acceptable Use Policy (http:// Endnotes www.georgetown.edu/policy/technology/acceptuse. [1] This policy does not apply to married couples. htm) and Georgetown University's Copyright in the The policy on nepotism offers clarification on this Information Age Policy (http://www.georgetown.edu/ point. This policy does not replace The Benefit of this policy/copyright). General information about both Establishment: A Student Code of Conduct. is provided below. However, it is a good idea to check above to sites for any changes and/or additions. [2] “Consensual” means a sexual relationship between two people who both genuinely desire the GUIDING PRINCIPLES relationship and neither of whom is coerced into Our community is encouraged to make innovative having the relationship. The term “consensual” is and creative use of information technologies in sup- used throughout this document to mean such a rela- port of education and research. Access to informa- tionship. “Extracurricular” refers to participation in tion representing a multitude of views on current extracurricular student activities such as a student and historical issues promotes the interest, informa- newspaper or law review. A “senior” student is tion and enlightenment of the Georgetown sometimes in a position to influence whether a University community. Consistent with other “junior” student will gain some desired position University policies, the Acceptable Use and Copyright within the organization. in the Information Age policies were written to pro- mote and respect the rights and obligations of acad- [3] Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson 477 U.S. 57 emic freedom. The University recognizes that the (1986); Franklin v. Gwinnett County Public Schools, purpose of copyright is to protect the rights of the 503 U.S. 60 (1992) (unlimited damages). Title VII creators of intellectual property and to prevent the of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the unauthorized use or sale of works available in the Civil Rights Act of 1991, now provides for mone- private sector. tary damages for victims of sexual harassment in The University cannot protect individuals against federal employment discrimination suits as well. 42 the existence or receipt of material that may be U.S.C. § § 1981a(a), (b)(3) (maximum damages of offensive to them. As such, those who make use of $300,000 for employers more than 500 employees). electronic communications are warned that they See also Harris v. Forklift Systems, 510 U.S. 17 may come across or be recipients of material they (1993). find offensive. Those who use email and/or make information about themselves available on the [4] A number of problems analogous to those Internet should be forewarned that the University described in this section affect consensual sexual cannot protect them from invasions of privacy and relationships among members of the University other possible dangers that could result from the community of relatively equal status, but these rules individual’s distribution of personal information. do not apply to this behavior, which may become The University’s computing and network subject to disciplinary action for other reasons. resources are to be used only for University-related research, instruction, learning, enrichment, dissemi- [5] For example, a senior faculty member who has nation of scholarly information, and administrative had a relationship with a junior faculty member activities. The computing and network facilities of should not participate in the deliberations of a the University are limited, and should be used tenure committee concerning the junior, or on an wisely and carefully with consideration for the needs academic personnel committee deciding such issues of others. Computers and network systems are pow- as salary increases for the junior. Similarly, a teacher erful communication tools. When used appropri- should not provide a letter of recommendation for a ately, these tools can enhance dialog and student with whom the teacher has had a communications. However, when used unlawfully or relationship even if the relationship began after the inappropriately, they can infringe on the beliefs or course was completed (and thus did not violate the rights of others. University policy on teacher-student relationships.) Another example is that a senior student on a student publication editorial board should not vote on whether a junior student with whom the senior 70 CONDUCT POLICIES

RESPONSIBILITIES ADMINISTRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION The following examples, though not covering every The University encourages all members of its com- situation, specify some of the responsibilities that munity to use electronic communications in a man- accompany computer and network use at ner that is respectful to others. While respecting Georgetown University. users’ confidentiality and privacy, the University reserves the right to examine all computer files. The 1. Users may not attempt to modify or destroy the University takes this step to enforce its policies University’s network facilities or computing regarding harassment and the safety of individuals; systems. Users may not tamper with any software to prevent the posting of proprietary software or protections or restrictions placed on computer electronic copies of electronic texts or images in dis- applications or files. regard of copyright restrictions or contractual oblig- 2. Users may only use their own computer accounts. ations; to safeguard the integrity of computers, They may not supply false or misleading data, or networks, and data either at the University or else- improperly obtain another person's account where; and to protect the University against seri- information to gain access to computers, network ously damaging consequences. The University may systems, data or information. The negligence or restrict the use of its computers and network sys- naiveté of another user in revealing an account tems when faced with evidence of a violation of name or password is not considered authorized University policies, federal or local laws. The use. Convenience of file or printer sharing is not University reserves the right to limit access to its sufficient reason for sharing a computer account. network through University-owned or other com- Users should not attempt to subvert the puters, and to remove or limit access to material restrictions associated with their computer posted on University-owned computers. accounts. All users are expected to conduct themselves in a 3. Users are responsible for all use of their computer manner that is consistent with these responsibilities account(s). They should make appropriate use of and policies. Abuse of computing privileges will the system and take precautions against others subject the user to disciplinary action, as established obtaining access to their computer resources. by the applicable operating policies and procedures Individual password security is the responsibility of the University. Abuse of networks or computers of each user. at other sites through the use of Georgetown 4. Users may not encroach on others' use of University resources will be treated as an abuse of computer resources. Such activities would computing privileges at the University. If necessary, include, but are not limited to, game playing; restrictive actions can and will be taken by system or sending harassing messages; sending frivolous or network administrators pending further disciplinary excessive messages, including chain letters, junk action; the loss of computing privileges may result. mail, and other types of broadcast messages; The University recognizes that all members of using excessive amounts of storage; intentionally the University community are bound by federal and introducing computer viruses, worms, Trojan local laws relating to civil rights, harassment, copy- Horses, or other rogue programs to Georgetown right, security and other statutes relating to elec- University hardware or software; physically tronic media. It should be understood that this damaging systems; or running grossly inefficient policy does not preclude enforcement under the programs when efficient ones are available. laws and regulations of the United States of 5. Users are responsible for following all copyright America or the District of Columbia. and licensing restrictions as listed in the various University policies. Georgetown University DISCRIMINATION GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES equipment and software may not be used to ADMINISTERED BY THE OFFICE OF violate copyrights or the terms of any license CAREER SERVICES agreement. No one may inspect, modify, distribute, or copy proprietary data, directories, POLICY STATEMENT programs, files, disks or other software without The policy of Georgetown University Law Center is proper authorization. to provide equal opportunity in education and 6. Users must remember that information employment for all qualified persons; to prohibit distributed through the University's computing discrimination in education and employment and networking facilities is a form of publishing, because of age, color, gender, disability, national ori- and that some of the same standards apply. For gin, race, religion, and sexual orientation; to prohibit example, anything generated at Georgetown sexual harassment; and to promote the realization of University that is available on the Internet equality of opportunity in education and employ- represents Georgetown University, not just an ment throughout the Law Center in accordance individual. Even with disclaimers, the University is with the policy expressed in the University-wide represented by its students, faculty and staff: thus Affirmative Action Plan. appropriate language, behavior and style is warranted. CONDUCT POLICIES 71

This internal grievance procedure has been be closed. A written notice shall list findings and established to provide a mechanism for any Law indicate the agreement reached. The agreement Center degree candidate who believes that under shall be retained in the files of the Office of Career the standards stated in the above policy he or she Services and copies provided to the complainant, the has been the subject of discrimination by a respondent and his/her ultimate hiring authority. prospective employer recruiting students to fill part If no mutually acceptable resolution can be time, temporary and full time positions. achieved, the Assistant Dean shall make, and pro- Students who have a question about whether a vide the parties with, a written finding on the merits particular action or statement might constitute of the complaints. improper conduct should speak with a counselor in Upon a finding adverse to the respondent, sanc- the Office of Career Services or the Office of Public tions may be imposed depending on the severity of Interest and Community Service. the offense, including but not limited to requesting a written apology or other conciliatory steps, issuing REQUIREMENTS FOR FILING GRIEVANCES a reprimand to the individual and/or the organiza- Any degree candidate, enrolled as a student at the tion, placing the individual and/or the organization Law Center when the alleged discriminatory act on probation, or denying the individual or organiza- occurred, has the right to file a discrimination com- tion recruiting access to Law Center facilities and plaint with the Office of Career Services. services for a specified time. The sanctions of proba- Complainants must file a grievance within tion or denial of individual or organization recruit- 30 days of the alleged discriminatory act. Earlier ing access may only be imposed by the Law Center filing is encouraged, including a confidential Dean upon the recommendation of the Faculty- statement of probable intention to file based upon Student Placement Committee. Refusals of an indi- specific allegations of misconduct. Later filing may vidual or organizational respondent to issue an be permitted for good cause shown. apology or take some other conciliatory step as may A grievance must be filed with the Assistant be called for by the Assistant Dean shall be referred Dean, Office of Career Services. The grievance may to the Faculty-Student Placement Committee for a be filed using the grievance form available in the determination of appropriate further sanctions to be Office of Career Services and the Office of Public recommended to the Dean. Interest and Community Service, but any written APPEAL TO THE DEAN submission containing the information requested by that form will be satisfactory. In addition to briefly The complainant or the respondent shall have the describing the event in question, the complaint right to file a written appeal of the Assistant Dean’s should set forth as precisely as possible any allegedly decision to the Dean of the Law Center within ten offensive language that was part thereof. days of receiving the Assistant Dean’s decision. The notice of appeal shall indicate the reasons for the PROCEDURES FOR PROCESSING GRIEVANCES party’s appeal. The Dean may with written Upon receipt of the complaint the Assistant Dean explanation affirm, or remand the matter for further shall first determine whether the complaint states a consideration by the Assistant Dean. violation of the Law Center non-discrimination RECORD policy set forth above. If the Assistant Dean finds that no violation has been stated, the student shall The Assistant Dean, Office of Career Services, shall be promptly informed and may appeal the decision submit to the Chair of the Placement Committee a to the Dean, who may confirm the decision or for- bimonthly summary of all grievances filed during ward the matter for handling under the next process that period, and of further action taken with regard described. If the complaint states a violation, the to all such cases previously pending. Confidentiality Assistant Dean shall immediately apprise the indi- with regard to these summaries shall be maintained vidual respondent(s) and the organization’s ultimate so far as is possible. hiring authority of the charge and request a written Nothing contained herein shall be considered as response to the allegations. limiting a complainant’s right to pursue any other The Assistant Dean shall seek to resolve the remedy provided by federal or local law, or as complaint within 21 working days from the requiring the University to pursue any process other notification of the respondent. This office may than those described by this code. conduct interviews with all relevant persons and seek information in any other relevant form. The Assistant Dean may delegate the interviewing and information seeking functions to the Law Center’s Legal Ethics Counsel. If a mutually acceptable resolution is achieved through the Assistant Dean’s efforts, the case shall

UTO EUDSHDL IHRWLAJSMNS77 TUITION REFUNDSCHEDULE–WITHDRAWAL ADJUSTMENTS UTO N E DIITAIERGLTOS76 TUITION ANDFEEADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS UTO EUDISRNE78 TUITION REFUNDINSURANCE J OTL AMN LN77 MONTHLY PAYMENT PLAN UI OTRPORM75 JURIS DOCTORPROGRAM ITDGE RGAS75 OINT DEGREEPROGRAMS UTO EEMNS77 TUITION DEFERMENTS RDAEPORM75 GRADUATE PROGRAM TE ES76 OTHER FEES

73 Tuition and Fees

TUITION AND FEES 75

JURIS DOCTOR PROGRAM J.D./PH.D. IN GOVERNMENT AND J.D./PH.D. IN PHILOSOPHY FULL TIME LAW CENTER STUDENTS $37,220.00 (per academic year) FOR FULL TIME STUDENTS: Prior to completing all J.D. courses and at least FULL TIME VISITORS FROM ANOTHER J.D. PROGRAM 24 credits in government or philosophy: Law Center $18,610.00 (per semester) tuition. After completing all J.D. courses and at least PART TIME LAW CENTER STUDENTS 24 credits in government or philosophy: Graduate $1,365.00 (per credit-hour) School tuition.

PART TIME VISITORS FROM ANOTHER J.D. PROGRAM FOR PART TIME STUDENTS: $1,365.00 (per credit-hour) Prior to completing all J.D. courses and at least 24 credits in government or philosophy: charged at TUITION EQUALIZATION CHARGE Law Center part time rate for all courses. Students who have been granted approval to trans- After completing all J.D. courses and at least fer from the part time J.D. program to the full time 24 credits in government or philosophy: charged J.D. program will be assessed a tuition equalization Graduate School tuition. charge, the net result of which will be that at the end of three years, the student will have paid the J.D./M.P.H. same total tuition as other full time students. Part While at Law Center: Law Center tuition (to Law time students who transfer to the full time program Center). and pay the tuition equalization charge are entitled While at Johns Hopkins: Johns Hopkins tuition to take up to 7 credits in any Georgetown (to Johns Hopkins). University Law Center Summer program here or abroad without paying any additional tuition. J.D./M.P.P. Consistent with our policies about receiving credit for courses taken at other schools, students may take FOR FULL TIME STUDENTS: summer courses at other schools. However, students Four years Law Center full time tuition who do so are required to pay the full amount of the tuition equalization charge. The tuition equalization FOR PART TIME STUDENTS charge for those students approved for transfer into (taking fewer than 9 credits): the full time program in Spring 2007 will be Law Center part time rate for all courses $5,525.00. The tuition equalization fee is assessed in two equal installments. Note: Students enrolled in joint degree programs may be charged additional fees for language labs or JOINT DEGREE PROGRAMS other courses necessary to earn their degree.

J.D./M.B.A. Four years Law Center full time tuition. GRADUATE PROGRAM

J.D./M.S.F.S.; J.D./M.A.A.S.; J.D./M.A.R.E.E.S; GRADUATE STUDENTS J.D./M.A.G.E.S.; J.D./M.A.L.A.S.; J.D./M.A.S.S.P. (INCLUDING INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS): Traditionally, students spend the first year of their For purposes of tuition calculations, full time students joint degree program at the School of Foreign are those who enroll for 8 or more credit hours in a Service. Tuition for that year is paid to the School semester, and part time students are those who enroll of Foreign Service; S.F.S. tuition for the 2006-2007 for fewer than 8 credit hours in a semester. academic year is $31,512.00. For the remaining three years of their joint degree program, students The following tuition rates apply to the pay Law Center tuition. Law Center tuition for the 2006-2007 academic year for both degree and 2006-2007 academic year is $37,220. non-degree students:

Full Time Law Center Graduate Students $37,220.00 (per academic year) 76 TUITION AND FEES

Part Time Law Center Graduate Students RETURNED CHECK FEE $1,510.00 (per credit hour) $60.00 (plus retroactive $60.00 late fee and/or 1.75% service charge) Full time LL.M. students who pay two consecutive semesters of full time tuition and who must enroll TUITION AND FEE ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS in the immediately following Summer Session in order to complete their degree within one calendar Tuition and fees are subject to change without prior year, may enroll only at the Law Center for the nec- notice. essary Summer Session courses to complete their degree without payment of additional tuition. • Students will not be permitted to attend class Tuition will be charged on a per-credit basis for any until they have paid all outstanding balances on additional credits. their student accounts, or until they have received approval from the Law Center Student Accounts OTHER FEES Office for alternate financial arrangements. No deduction can be made for absence from classes. Fees not covered by the above tuition and fee schedule: • Students with an outstanding account balance will APPLICATION FEE not be permitted to register for subsequent semes- $75.00 (non-refundable) ters and will not receive grades, transcripts, bar certificates, and diplomas. TUITION DEFERMENT HANDLING CHARGE $50.00 (must be submitted with deferment • By registering, students accept the responsibility application) plus 1.75% service charge per month on for all charges until such time as they notify the unpaid balance Office of the Registrar, in writing, of their with- drawal from the course or the program. See LATE REGISTRATION FEE Tuition Refund Schedule, below. $80.00 per semester • Full payment of tuition and fees must be made by LATE PAYMENT FEE the scheduled due dates: August 31, 2006 for the $60.00 (plus 1.75% service charge per month on Fall 2006 semester and January 5, 2007 for the unpaid balance) Spring 2007 semester.

TRANSCRIPT FEE • For part time students only, tuition for additional $5.00 (per copy) classes enrolled in during the add/drop period must be paid by the end of add/drop period. VISITOR FEE (Law Center student approved to visit another school) • All accounts with an outstanding balance will be $200.00 per semester assessed a late payment fee of $60.00 plus a monthly 1.75% service charge. A block will also LANGUAGE LAB FEE be placed on the account. ( J.D./M.S.F.S.) varies with course • A $80.00 late registration fee and/or a $60.00 late YATES FIELD HOUSE payment fee will be charged to any student who $141.00 per semester (for LL.M. students enrolled has not completed all necessary arrangements, in less than 8 credits each semester) including financial matters, by the date of regis- tration noted on the academic calendar. These late COURSE MATERIALS fees cannot be waived unless the student has a There is a charge for certain course materials pro- pending loan or scholarship and the Student duced by the Law Center when such materials are Accounts Office has documentation from the used in lieu of, or in addition to, a regular textbook. Office of Financial Aid. To avoid the late fee, stu- dents must complete their loan application prior PRINTING to June 1 for the Fall semester and prior to Students are given an allowance of 50 free pages of November 1 for the Spring semester. printing per semester at the Law Library. Any amount over the 50-page allowance will be assessed • Any and all charges incurred after registration day at $.10 per page. are due and payable at the time they are incurred. TUITION AND FEES 77

TUITION DEFERMENTS • For purposes of refund calculation, weeks will be computed from the first day of class as shown on • All semester charges must be paid in full by the the Academic Calendar. schedule payment due date. In the event of an unforeseeable personal emergency, an approved TUITION REFUND SCHEDULE tuition deferment can be obtained from the Law Center Office of Student Accounts. This defer- FOR THE FALL OR SPRING SEMESTER ment must be obtained no later than the tuition Prior to the start of classes 100% due date. 1st through 2nd week 80% 3rd through 4th week 50% • A $50.00 handling charge is applied to all tuition 5th through 6th week 25% deferments and 1.75% service charge per month After 6th week 0% is assessed on any unpaid balance.

• Tuition deferments are not granted automatically FOR THE SUMMER SEMESTER and should not be expected more than once in an Prior to the start of classes 100% academic year. 1st week 80% 2nd week 50% • Tuition is deferred for a maximum of 60 days. 3rd week 25% After 3rd week 0% MONTHLY PAYMENT PLAN Note: Refunds for students who have federal student • Monthly payment plan is designed to assist stu- loans and who withdraw are governed by the refund dents in paying their tuition and fees over a procedures established by the Department of period of ten months (Fall and Spring semester’s Education for return of student loan proceeds to the tuition) or five months (one semester’s tuition). lender. The regulations require a student to “earn” federal financial aid on a daily basis as the term pro- • Students on this plan will not be assessed the gresses. For example, if there were 100 days in the 1.75% service charge on the contracted amount as semester, a student withdrawing on the 30th day long as all payments are made by the due date will have earned 30 percent of their federal aid. As (every 1st of the month). of the 60% point in a given semester, the student is considered to have earned 100% of the federal loans • Students must complete a GU Monthly Payment borrowed for that term. Withdrawal before then Plan Contract to enroll in the plan. Applications requires the Law Center to return loan funds to the must include the $90.00 non-refundable applica- lender even though, based on the tuition refund tion fee and the necessary monthly payments to schedule shown above, this may result in the student open the payment plan account in a current status. owing a balance to the Law Center. Before officially withdrawing, consult the Financial Aid or Note: The first monthly payment for the academic Registrar’s Offices for more information on the year 2006-2007 is due on July 1, 2006. Any applica- financial implications of your decision. The GULC tions filed after this date must include any missed tuition refund policy is subject to change at any payments. time due to federal regulatory and/or school policy revisions or updates. TUITION REFUND SCHEDULE– WITHDRAWAL ADJUSTMENTS • Entering first year students should consult the refund schedule issued by the Office of • Students who want to withdraw from an individ- Admissions for withdrawal prior to first year ual course or from the Law Center must give Registration and Orientation. notice in writing to the Office of the Registrar. • Entering first year students who want to with- • Written notification to persons other than those draw from the Law Center prior to the deadline in the Office of the Registrar is not effective as set by the Office of Admission and/or prior to the notice of withdrawal. first year Registration and Orientation must give notice in writing to the Office of Admissions. • Credit for tuition will be calculated from the date the Office of the Registrar receives written • No reduction of tuition will be made for being notification of withdrawal. absent from classes. 78 TUITION AND FEES

• Students who take an approved leave of absence after the beginning of a semester will receive tuition adjustments, if applicable, based on the Tuition Refund Schedule.

• Students who are charged by the credit hour must comply with the faculty’s provisions governing course withdrawals and will receive refunds, if applicable, based on the Tuition Refund Schedule.

TUITION REFUND INSURANCE – A.W.G. DEWAR, INC.

Tuition Refund Insurance can protect you and your family from tuition loss should an illness or injury cause you to withdraw from school after the start of the class. This insurance extends and enhances the Law Center’s published tuition refund schedule and insures that a covered student will receive 100% of tuition monies paid if the student must withdraw from school for a covered injury or illness (a maxi- mum of 60% through the plan if the withdrawal occurs after the expiration of the Law Center’s tuition refund period). The cost to cover tuition for both the Fall 2006 and Spring 2007 semesters is set forth below: (If you are interested in securing your tuition for only one semester, the rate is one half of the cost.) J.D. & LL.M. Full Time $186.00 J.D. Part Time $130.00 LL.M. Part Time $76.00 Gewirz Housing $52.00

The cost to cover tuition for Summer 2007: J.D. $27.00 LL.M. $23.00

Those who wish to participate in the plan must return the completed application form and payment to A.W.G. Dewar, Inc. on or before the first day of class as shown on the Academic Calendar. The Tuition Refund Insurance brochure and application form are available at the Office of Student Accounts, Room 581 McDonough Hall. For additional information, please check the Office of Student Accounts website at www.law.georgetown.edu/finaff/studaccts. H PECASJD RGA FSUY81 THE UPPERCLASSJ.D.PROGRAMOFSTUDY IS ERJD RGA FSUY81 FIRST YEARJ.D.PROGRAMOFSTUDY urclm“”Eetvs(0620)81 Curriculum “A”Electives(2006–2007) CDMCRSUC RGAS83 ACADEMIC RESOURCEPROGRAMS is erCniun retto 83 First Year ContinuingOrientation is erTtra rga 83 First Year Tutorial Program RDAECRIUU 82 GRADUATE CURRICULUM urclm“”Cuss81 Curriculum “B”Courses C riuu A ore 81 urriculum “A”Courses UMRPORM83 SUMMER PROGRAM h rtn etr83 The Writing Center

79 The Law Curriculum

THE LAW CURRICULUM 81

FIRST YEAR J.D. PROGRAM OF STUDY International Law I: Introduction to International Law Law and Religion During the first year, students are enrolled in either Lawmaking: Introduction to Legislation and the “A” or the “B” curriculum. All students in the Statutory Interpretation “A” curriculum begin their legal studies with nine Public Interest Law courses, including a 3 credit elective in the Spring Transnational Law semester chosen from a group of “perspective” courses such as American Legal Profession, CURRICULUM “B” COURSES Comparative Constitutional Law, Criminal Bargain, Exchange, and Liability, 6 credits Responsibility and Theories of Punishment, Democracy and Coercion, 4 credits Economic Justice, International Law I: Introduction Government Processes, 4 credits to International Law, Law and Religion, Legal Justice Seminar, 3 credits Lawmaking: Introduction to Legislation and Legal Practice: Writing and Analysis, 3 credits Statutory Interpretation, Public Interest Law and Legal Process and Society, 5 credits Transnational Law. Full time students enrolled in Property In Time, 5 credits the “A” curriculum take all nine courses during their Week One: Law in a Global Context, 1 credit first year. In their first year, students in the Part Time Program take Civil Procedure, Constitutional THE UPPERCLASS J.D. PROGRAM OF STUDY Law I: The Federal System, Contracts, Legal Research and Writing, Property, Torts, and Week Beyond the first year, the only required upperclass One: Law in a Global Context (a one-week, inten- courses are Professional Responsibility and a semi- sive study of a complex problem of international nar, clinic or supervised research project that meets law, taken in the first week of the Spring semester). the upperclass writing requirement. Many years ago, During their second year, students take Criminal the Law Center, like most law schools, had a pre- Justice and the “perspective” course, along with scribed upperclass curriculum. Faculty stopped dic- other elective courses. First year students in the Full tating which courses upperclass students should Time Program register for the “perspective” elective take, however, when they themselves no longer during the Fall semester. Part time students register agreed about what should be required, given the for the “perspective” elective during the course regis- increasing diversity of law practice and divergent tration period in April of their first year. views about the benefits of various courses of study. The “B” curriculum, available in 2006-2007 to This movement away from required upperclass cur- one section of full time students, requires eight riculum has occurred at most law schools in the courses different in emphasis from those in the “A” country. curriculum: Bargain, Exchange and Liability; Nonetheless, most faculty and lawyers would Democracy and Coercion; Government Processes; probably concur that it is advisable for students to Legal Justice Seminar; Legal Practice: Writing and take Tax I, Constitutional Law II, and Analysis; Legal Process and Society; Property in Corporations. Taxation and the corporate form are Time, and Week One: Law in a Global Context. ubiquitous in our society and therefore lawyers The “B” section emphasizes the sources of law in should have at least some familiarity with these history, philosophy, political theory, and economics. areas. In addition, these courses are prerequisites to It also seeks to reflect the increasingly public nature a number of more advanced offerings in the areas of of contemporary law. business and corporate law. Constitutional Law is not only relevant to other courses, it addresses CURRICULUM “A” COURSES fundamental issues about the nature of our Civil Procedure, 4 credits government that well-educated lawyers should Constitutional Law I: The Federal System, 3 credits understand. In addition to these courses, many Contracts, 4 credits students take Evidence: it is a prerequisite for many Criminal Justice, 4 credits clinical courses and in the view of many is basic to Legal Research and Writing, 3 credits understanding the American judicial processes. Property, 4 credits Additionally, many faculty recommend that students Torts, 4 credits take introductory courses in Administrative Law Perspective Elective, 3 credits and Legislation and Statutory Interpretation. Week One: Law in a Global Context, 1 credit Finally, given increased globalization, lawyers frequently need to be able to operate effectively CURRICULUM “A” ELECTIVES (2006-2007): beyond our national borders—communicating with (3 credits) people of other legal traditions and understanding American Legal Profession the potential complications when other legal Comparative Constitutional Law traditions are implicated. As a result, the faculty Criminal Responsibility and Theories of Punishment recommends that students take one or more courses in Economic Justice international or comparative law. 82 THE LAW CURRICULUM

Beyond these courses, students should select a professional identity, ethics and moral values in a balanced and well-rounded array of courses that add small, informal setting. to their theoretical understanding, doctrinal Finally, many students find very rewarding an breadth, and that provide exposure to the range of experience of deep and intensive engagement in skills that a good lawyer needs. Students should their third year either through a capstone seminar choose a mixture of public law courses, such as such as Professor Gostin's Advanced Health Law Criminal Law, Environmental Law, International Seminar or the Environmental Research Workshop. Law I, or Federal Courts, and private law courses Because Georgetown has an enormous range of such as Commercial Law, Corporate Finance, course offerings, selecting courses as a second and Intellectual Property, International Law II, or third year student can be a daunting task. For this Family Law. Most faculty members would also reason, the list of courses in the Course Clusters sec- encourage students to take at least one course a year tion is organized by subject area. Faculty essays (or semester) that particularly piques their interest describing these areas of legal interest are located in even if it is not clear how it will fit into their career the Online Curriculum Guide, at: www.law. plans. georgetown.edu/curriculum/ Lawyers are called upon to use not only their Students are encouraged to consult faculty mem- analytical skills and substantive knowledge, but also bers and deans for individualized advice on the their ability to structure creative solutions, to work selection and sequencing of courses in particular collaboratively with others, to negotiate effectively, subject areas as well as guidance on how to to be persuasive orally and in writing, and to com- approach course planning when a student is unsure municate effectively with both lawyers and non- about the specific direction of his or her professional lawyers. Therefore, students should consider taking interest in law. In addition, during the course regis- courses that use a variety of pedagogical formats and tration process in the Spring semester, the Dean’s enhance their skills in a variety of areas. The courses Office sponsors a number of events such as the in the Law Center’s clinical program offer not only Curriculum Fair and Faculty Panels on Course the opportunity to “learn by doing,” but also the Selection that are helpful sources of information. unique opportunity to engage in critical self-reflec- Clinic selection also occurs in the Spring tion about the lawyering process. The Law Center semester, prior to the last day of registration. Each currently offers thirteen clinical courses to J.D. stu- clinic has its own method of selection. Students may dents for academic credit. All clinics are directed by be chosen either by lottery or by a competitive Georgetown faculty members. The clinical courses process. Those clinics that use competitive selection available to students are the following: base their choices on prior experience, writing samples, statements of interest and other criteria. Appellate Litigation Clinic Most clinics also give preference to students who Center for Applied Legal Studies are entering their final year of law school. During Criminal Justice Clinic the Spring semester informational meetings are held D.C. Law Students in Court and a clinic application packet, including detailed Domestic Violence Clinic information about the clinics, their selection criteria Federal Legislation Clinic and the application process, is made available to Harrison Institute for Public Law, Housing and students. Community Development Clinic Harrison Institute for Public Law, Policy Clinic GRADUATE CURRICULUM Institute for Public Representation International Women’s Human Rights Clinic Students in the Law Center’s graduate programs Juvenile Justice Clinic may take courses in both the J.D. curriculum and Street Law: Community the graduate curriculum. The Law Center offers Street Law: High School specialized graduate courses in seven areas related to specific degree and certificate programs: Employee In addition to the clinical program, Georgetown Benefits; International Human Rights; International offers an extensive array of alternative dispute reso- Legal Studies; National Security Law; Securities lution, simulation, and problem-based courses such and Financial Regulation; Taxation; and World as Business Planning Seminar, Negotiations, Civil Trade Organization (WTO) Studies. Those courses Discovery, Trial Practice, and Appellate Practice. are listed by subject area in the Course Clusters sec- Students in their second year are encouraged to tion, along with J.D. courses in the same field. Some take advantage of the Law Center’s Ethics and courses are jointly offered in both the J.D. and grad- Professional Identity seminar series. Students may uate curriculums to encourage students from both enroll in the Fall of their second year for a small programs to enroll. seminar that will meet in the home of a faculty International students trained in civil law who member during the upcoming Spring and the attend a graduate program at the Law Center take a following Fall. The seminars explore issues of required preliminary course of study, Foundations of THE LAW CURRICULUM 83

American Law, in the summer preceding their The topics covered include: case analysis, case enrollment. Foundations is an intensive, one-month briefing, course outlining, substantive review course that introduces students to the common law sessions and exam preparation, as well as general process, American law, American legal education, advice on the law school experience. Students are legal writing and legal research techniques. admitted to the program on a voluntary basis. During their course of study, international stu- Individual tutors are also available for first year and dents also take a course in U.S. Legal Discourse, upperclass courses. which introduces students to U.S. legal resources, research methods, and analytical paradigms. Writing THE WRITING CENTER assignments give students the opportunity to The Writing Center assists J.D. and LL.M. develop written analysis using the approaches forms, students and graduate fellows on writing projects. and conventions common in U.S. law. All Law Center students are eligible to receive The Office of Graduate Programs provides indi- individualized assistance at the Writing Center from vidualized curriculum counseling as well as opportu- a Senior Writing Fellow, a specially trained upper- nities to consult with faculty and practioners in their level student. The work of the Writing Center fields of interest. reinforces the methods of legal analysis, research, and writing taught in the first year. Senior Writing SUMMER PROGRAM Fellows at the Center provide feedback on choosing a topic; researching scholarly papers; defining scope; The Law Center offers a summer program in organizing, writing and revising papers; and London, England, at the University College improving clarity and coherence. London (UCL). Course demands are the same as Students may request a conference by signing up for courses taught at the Law Center, and admission at the Writing Center at a podium outside room is competitive, with priority given to Georgetown 540 or by e-mailing thewritingcenter@law. students. georgetown.edu. Papers, along with a questionnaire For further information, contact: available from the Center, must be submitted at least 24 hours before the conference. For more Cara Morris information, contact the Legal Research and Assistant Director, International and Writing office, room 540, or call (202) 662-9525. Transnational Programs Georgetown University Law Center 600 New Jersey Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001-2075 Phone: (202) 662-9860 Fax: (202) 662-4038 Email: [email protected]

ACADEMIC RESOURCE PROGRAMS

FIRST YEAR CONTINUING ORIENTATION The assistant deans sponsor a continuing orienta- tion program for first year J.D. students called “Maximizing Learning in Law School,” which pro- vides helpful information and discussion with fac- ulty and upperclass students on issues such as class participation, outlining, and exam taking. In the Spring semester, the assistant deans sponsor various events to assist students in curriculum planning and course registration. For times and dates, check “What’s Happening!,” the Registrar’s home page, http://www.law.georgetown.edu/registrar/index.html, or the calendar on the Student Services page on the Law Center’s website, http://www.law.georgetown. edu/students.html.

FIRST YEAR TUTORIAL PROGRAM The tutorial program primarily provides academic support to first year students. Each of the first year sections is assigned an upperclass tutor who meets with students, in a small group, on a weekly basis.

PEDXA IETR FAMNSRTV FIESADOFCR FISRCIN87 APPENDIX A:DIRECTORY OFADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERSANDOFINSTRUCTION PEDXD HRE AYDSIGIHDAJNTPOESRAADRCPET 111 APPENDIX D:CHARLESFAHY DISTINGUISHEDADJUNCTPROFESSORAWARD RECIPIENTS PEDXC RDAEPORMAJNTFCLY104 APPENDIX C:GRADUATE PROGRAMADJUNCTFACULTY A PNI :JD RGA DUC AUT 95 PPENDIX B:J.D.PROGRAMADJUNCTFACULTY PEDXG RZSADAAD 120 APPENDIX G:PRIZESANDAWARDS PEDXE COASIS112 APPENDIX E:SCHOLARSHIPS PEDXF ON 119 APPENDIX F:LOANS

85 Appendices

APPENDIX A: DIRECTORY OF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERS AND OFFICERS OF INSTRUCTION 87

APPENDIX A: DIRECTORY OF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERS AND OFFICERS OF INSTRUCTION

BOARD OF DIRECTORS Mark J. Siskin Thomas H. Stahel, S.J. CHAIR Edmond D. Villani, Ph,D. Lance L. Weaver

PRESIDENT OF THE UNIVERSITY VICE CHAIR Howard J. Gray, S.J. John J. DeGioia, B.A., Ph.D.

EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT, LAW CENTER AFFAIRS THE BOARD William R. Berkley T. Alexander Aleinikoff, B.A., J.D. Arthur B. Calcagnini LAW CENTER DEANS AND VICE PRESIDENTS Winston J. Churchill Peter C. Cooper T. Alexander Aleinikoff, B.A., J.D., Executive Vice John J. DeGioia, Ph.D. President, Law Center Affairs, and Dean John J. Fauth Kevin T. Conry, B.S.F.S., J.D., Associate Vice Richard H. Frank President (Development and External Affairs)

William P. Frank Deborah Epstein, B.A., J.D., Associate Dean Lynn C. Fritz (Clinical Education and Public Interest & Community The Hon. Arthur J. Gajarsa Service Programs) Thomas J. Healey Lawrence O. Gostin, B.A., J.D., LL.D. (Hon.), Rev. J. Bryan Hehir Associate Dean (Research and Academic Programs)

Michael E. Heisley, Sr. Pablo Molina, B.A., M.B.A., Chief Information James F. Higgins Officer Franco Imoda, S.J. Carol Q. O'Neil, B.A., M.A.T., J.D., Associate Dean Shirley Ann Jackson, Ph.D. (Academic Administration) Leslie H. Jacobson Wendy Collins Perdue, B.A., J.D., Associate Dean Sr. Dorothy Ann Kelly, O.S.U. (Graduate Programs) Catherine R. Kinney Mitchell C. Bailin, A.B., M.St., J.D., Nemir A. Kirdar Assistant Dean (J.D. Academic Services) Theodore J. Leonsis Yvonne B. Maher, M.D. Everett Bellamy, B.S., M.S., J.D., Senior Assistant Dean (J.D. Program) Frank H. McCourt, Jr. John P. McDaniel Nancy Cantalupo, B.S.F.S., J.D., Assistant Dean (Clinical Programs) Robert E. McDonough Peter C. Morse Andrew P. Cornblatt, B.A., J.D., Associate Vice Virginia L. Mortara President (Graduate Admissions Programs and Dean of Admissions, Law Center) Bienvenido F. Nebres, S.J. Timothy J. O’Neill Gihan Fernando, B.A., J.D., Assistant Dean (Career Services) Michael Petty, S.J. Ruthann Quindlen R. Scott Foster, B.A., J.D., LL.M., Assistant Dean, Thomas A. Reynolds, III Academic Administration Jeanette W. Ruesch Bradley M. Schaeffer, S.J. 88 APPENDIX A: DIRECTORY OF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERS AND OFFICERS OF INSTRUCTION

Katherine Hall, B.A., M.A., Assistant Dean of BUSINESS AND FINANCIAL AFFAIRS Students Linda Davidson, B.S., Director of Law Center Ruth Lammert-Reeves, B.A., M.A., Assistant Dean Financial Affairs (Financial Aid) Cathy Perry-Jones, B.B.A., M.B.A., Director of Barbara Moulton, B.A., J.D., Assistant Dean (Public Business Operations Interest and Community Service) Sharon R. Weslow, B.A., Director of Special Events Therese Lee Stratton, B.S., M.S., Assistant Dean (Faculty Support and Campus Services) CAREER SERVICES

ADMINISTRATIVE AND SUPPORT SERVICES Marilyn Tucker, B.A., M.A., Director of Alumni Career Services Katherine M. McCarthy, B.A., M.A., Assistant to the Dean (Law Center Board Relations) Amy Jones-Mattock, B.A., J.D., Assistant Director (Job Programming) Alma Robinson, Executive Assistant to the Dean Janice Manganello, B.A., J.D., Associate Director Raymond V. Smith, B.A., Director of Public Safety (Small Firm Initiative)

Melvinia Towns, B.S., Manager of Payroll Services Katy Montgomery, B.A., J.D., Associate Director (Judicial Clerkships) ADMISSIONS OFFICE Anna Nicol, B.A., J.D., Director (Job Search Sophia Sim, B.A., J.D., Director of Admissions Initiative)

Caryn Voland, B.A., J.D., Associate Director of Hsinyu Yu, B.A., J.D., Associate Director (Diversity Admissions Initiative)

Alison Spada, B.A., J.D., Assistant Director of CHAPLAINS AND COUNSELORS Admissions Michael Goldman, B.A., J.D., Jewish Chaplain ALUMNI, DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC RELATIONS Imam Yahya Hendi, Muslim Chaplain Anne Cassidy, B.A., M.A.T., M.S.J., Editor, Law Magazine Rev. Alexei Michalenko, B.A., M.A., S.E.O.L., M.S., Roman Catholic Chaplain Mary Matheron, B.S., Executive Director of Development Rev. Constance Wheeler, B.B.A., M.Div., Protestant Chaplain Elissa Free, B.A., Executive Director of Communications Dorinda Young, S.S.J., B.S., M.A., Roman Catholic Chaplain Margaret Garigan, Director of Corporate and Foundation Giving CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION

Patricia Roth, B.S., M.S., J.D., LL.M., Director of Lawrence J. Center, B.A., J.D., Executive Director of Alumni Affairs Continuing Legal Education

Kara Tershel, B.A., Associate Director of Jill C. Castleman, B.S., Assistant Director of Communications (Media Relations) Continuing Legal Education

Marla Vickers, B.A., M.A., Director, Law Donor ETHICS COUNSEL Relations Michael S. Frisch, B.A., J.D., Ethics Counsel APPENDIX A: DIRECTORY OF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERS AND OFFICERS OF INSTRUCTION 89

FINANCIAL AID OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR

Charles Pruett, B.A., J.D., Director of Financial Aid Deborah Naylor, B.A., Associate Registrar

Denae Newman, B.A., M.A., Assistant Director of Denise A. Seeley, B.S., Associate Registrar Financial Aid Simone Woung, B.A., J.D., Assistant Registrar Andrea Tazioli, B.A., M.A., Assistant Director of Financial Aid OFFICE OF STUDENT AFFAIRS AND RESIDENCE LIFE

OFFICE OF GRADUATE PROGRAMS Steve Cooper, B.A., M.A., Assistant Director for Scheduling and Programs Sandra P. Buteau, LL.M., Director, Professional Development Chris Hall, B.A., M.A., Coordinator of Residence Life

Mary Bilodeau Jackson, B.A., Special Assistant to the Dana Onorato, B.A., M.A., Associate Director of Associate Dean Student Affairs

Albert G. Lauber, Jr., B.A., M.A., J.D., Director of Karen Pierce, B.A., M.A., Director of Wellness Graduate Tax and Securities Programs Promotion

Dorothy M. Mayer, B.A., M.A., J.D., Director of Carol Walsh, B.A., M.A., Assistant Director of International Student Services Residence Life

Nandita Mazumder, B.S., J.D., Director, Professional THE LAW LIBRARY Development Robert L. Oakley, B.A., J.D., M.S.L.S., Professor of John T. Stephens, B.A., J.D., Director, LL.M. Law and Director, Law Library Academic Services Janice Snyder Anderson, B.A., M.L.S., Associate INTERNATIONAL AND TRANSNATIONAL Law Librarian for Collection Services PROGRAMS OFFICE Laura Bedard, B.A., M.L.S., M.A., Special Barry E. Carter, B.A., M.P.A., J.D., Professor of Collections Librarian Law, Director Heather C. Bourk, B.S., M.S.L.S., Archivist Cara E. Morris, B.A., M.A., Assistant Director Amy Burchfield, B.A., M.A., J.D., M.L.S, J.D. ACADEMIC SERVICES International & Foreign Law Reference Librarian

Dominique Brown, B.A., Assistant Director, J.D. Matthew Ciszek, B.A., M.L.S., Access Services Academic Services (Course Scheduling) Librarian

Sarah E. McCarthy, B.A., J.D., Director, J.D. Linda Davis, B.A., M.L.S., Head of Acquisitions Academic Services Veronica Foster, B.A., M.L.S., J.D., Resident OFFICE OF PUBLIC INTEREST AND COMMUNITY SERVICE Librarian

Lauren Dubin, B.A., M.A., Director of Public Margaret A. Fry, B.A., M.L.S., Associate Law Interest Careers Librarian for Administration

Holly Eaton, B.A., J.D., Director of Pro Bono Sara E. Kelly, B.A., J.D., M.L.I.S., Reference Programs Librarian

Mern Horan, B.A., J.D., Director of Government Craig Lelansky, B.A., M.L.S., Head of Serials Careers Yan (Clara) Liao, B.A., M.L.S., Head of Cataloging and Metadata Services 90 APPENDIX A: DIRECTORY OF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERS AND OFFICERS OF INSTRUCTION

Douglas Lind, B.A., M.L.S., J.D., Collection FEDERAL LEGISLATION CLINIC Development Librarian Chai Feldblum, B.A., J.D., Professor of Law, Director Barbara Monroe, B.A., M.L.S., J.D., Reference Librarian Heather Sawyer, B.A., J.D., Visiting Associate Professor of Law, Assistant Director Smita Parkhe, B.S., M.S.L.S., Cataloging/Electronic Collections Librarian HARRISON INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC LAW

H. Kumar Percy, B.S., M.L.S., J.D., Associate Robert K. Stumberg, B.A., J.D., LL.M., Professor of Librarian for Patron Services Law, Director

Marylin Johnson Raisch, B.A., M.Litt., J.D., Michael Diamond, B.A., J.D., LL.M., Senior M.L.S., International and Foreign Law Librarian Academic & Policy Fellow, Associate Director

Mabel Shaw, B.A., M.L.S., Assistant International Julie Lawton, B.S., J.D., LL.M., Adjunct Professor and Foreign Law Librarian Jason Newman, B.A., J.D., Adjunct Professor Jane F. Walsh, B.A., M.A., Library Systems Manager Matthew Porterfield, B.A., J.D., Adjunct Professor CLINICS and Senior Fellow

Nancy Cantalupo, B.S.F.S., J.D., Assistant Dean Jacqueline Belk Scott, B.A., J.D., Adjunct Professor (Clinical Programs) Travis Seegmiller, B.A., J.D., Adjunct Professor APPELLATE LITIGATION CLINIC William Waren, A.B., M.A.P.A., J.D., LL.M., Steven H. Goldblatt, B.A., J.D., Professor of Law, Adjunct Professor Director INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC REPRESENTATION CENTER FOR APPLIED LEGAL STUDIES Hope Babcock, B.A., LL.B., Professor of Law, David Koplow, B.A., J.D., Professor of Law, Director Co-Director

Philip G. Schrag, A.B., LL.B., Professor of Law, Angela Campbell, B.A., J.D., LL.M., Professor of Director Law, Co-Director

CRIMINAL JUSTICE CLINIC David C. Vladeck, B.A., J.D., LL.M., Associate Professor of Law, Co-Director Tucker Carrington, B.A., J.D., Visiting Associate Professor of Law INTERNATIONAL WOMEN’S HUMAN RIGHTS CLINIC

John Copacino, B.A., M.A.T., J.D., LL.M., Susan Deller Ross, B.A., J.D., Professor of Law, Professor of Law, Co-Director Director

Abbe Smith, B.A., J.D., Professor of Law, Co-Director JUVENILE JUSTICE CLINIC

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CLINIC Wallace J. Mlyniec, B.S., J.D., Lupo-Ricci Professor of Clinical Legal Studies, Director Deborah Epstein, B.A., J.D., Associate Dean (Clinical Education and Public Interest & Community Kristin Henning, B.A., J.D., Associate Professor of Service Programs), Professor of Law, Co-Director Law, Deputy Director

Laurie Kohn, B.A., J.D., LL.M., Visiting Associate Margaret Kreitzer, B.A., M.S.W., Adjunct Professor Professor of Law, Co-Director APPENDIX A: DIRECTORY OF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERS AND OFFICERS OF INSTRUCTION 91

LAW STUDENTS IN COURT CLINIC CENTER FOR LAW & THE PUBLIC’S HEALTH AT GEORGETOWN AND JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY Ann Marie Hay, B.A., J.D., Adjunct Professor, Director Lawrence O. Gostin, B.A., J.D., LL.D. (Hon.), Associate Dean (Research and Academic Programs), Lorien Buehler, B.A., J.D., Adjunct Professor Professor of Law, Professor of Public Health, the Johns Hopkins University, Director Marcy Dunlap, B.A., J.D., Adjunct Professor GEORGETOWN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND Dorene Haney, B.A., J.D., Adjunct Professor POLICY INSTITUTE

Tracy Hayes, B.A., M.A., J.D., Adjunct Professor J. Peter Byrne, B.A., M.A., J.D., Professor of Law, Faculty Director Nathan A. Neal, B.A., J.D., Adjunct Professor John Echeverria, B.A., M.F.S., J.D., Executive D.C. STREET LAW PROJECT Director

Richard L. Roe, B.A., J.D., Professor of Law, HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTE Director Jane Stromseth, B.A., D. Phil., J.D., Director WOMEN’S LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY FELLOWSHIP INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF INTERNATIONAL Julia Ernst, B.A., M.A., J.D., Adjunct Professor, MIGRATION Director In affiliation with the Georgetown School of Foreign Service Wendy Williams, B.A., J.D., Professor of Law T. Alexander Aleinikoff, B.A., J.D., Dean of the INSTITUTES AND OTHER SCHOLARLY PROGRAMS Law Center

ASIAN LAW AND POLICY STUDIES PROGRAM Susan Martin, B.A., M.A., Ph.D., Executive Director Viet D. Dinh, A.B., J.D., Professor of Law; Co-Director Andrew L. Shoenholtz, B.A., J.D., Ph.D., Deputy Director James V. Feinerman, B.A., M.A., M.Phil., J.D., Ph.D., James M. Morita Professor of Asian Legal INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW Studies, Co-Director John H. Jackson, A.B., J.D., University Professor, CENTER FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF THE RULE OF LAW Director IN THE AMERICAS A. Jane Bradley, B.A., M.A., Deputy Director Joseph A. Page, B.A., LL.B., LL.M., Harvard, Professor of Law, Director LEGAL ETHICS IN CORPORATE PRACTICE

CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL STUDIES Jeffrey D. Bauman, B.A., M.A., LL.B., Professor of Law Randy E. Barnett , B.A., J.D., Carmack Waterhouse Professor of Legal Theory Milton C. Regan, Jr., B.A., M.A., J.D., Professor of Law Susan Low Bloch, B.A., M.A., Ph.D., J.D., Professor of Law THE SLOAN PROJECT ON BUSINESS INSTITUTIONS

Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz, B.A., J.D., Associate William Wilson Bratton, B.A., J.D., Professor of Professor of Law Law, Director 92 APPENDIX A: DIRECTORY OF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERS AND OFFICERS OF INSTRUCTION

SUPREME COURT INSTITUTE THE EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE UNIVERSITY

Steve Goldblatt, B.A., J.D., Professor of Law, President, John J. DeGioia, Ph.D. Co-Director Provost, James J. O’Donnell, Ph.D. Richard Lazarus, B.S., B.A., J.D., Professor of Law, Co-Director Executive Vice President for Law Center Affairs and Dean of the School of Law, T. Alexander Aleinikoff WORKPLACE FLEXIBILITY 2010 Interim Executive Vice President, Executive Dean of Katie Corrigan, B.A., J.D., Co-Director the School of Medicine, Stuart Bondurant, M.D.

Chai R. Feldblum, B.A., J.D., Professor of Law, Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer, Co-Director Spiros Dimolitsas, Ph.D.

Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and DEANS EMERITI Treasurer, Christopher Augostini

Paul R. Dean, A.B., Youngstown; LL.B., LL.M., Vice President for Alumni and University Relations, LL.D., Georgetown James Langley

David J. McCarthy, Jr., A.B., Fairfield; J.D., LL.M., Vice President for Public Affairs and Strategic LL.D., Georgetown Development, Daniel R. Porterfield, Ph.D.

PROFESSORS EMERITI Vice President for Mission and Ministry, Rev. Philip L. Boroughs, S.J. Chester James Antieau, B.S., M.S., Detroit Institute of Technology; J.D., Detroit; LL.M., Vice President and General University Counsel, S.J.D., University of Michigan Jane E. Genster

Norman Birnbaum, B.A., Williams; M.A., Ph.D., Secretary of the University, Edward M. Quinn Harvard BOARD OF VISITORS Edwin J. Bradley, A.B., Mount St. Mary’s; LL.B., Georgetown CHAIR Jules Kroll, L’66 Stanley Metzger, A.B., J.D., Cornell; Kroll, Inc. LL.B., Georgetown New York, NY

Douglas L. Parker, B.A., Stanford; J.D., Harvard BOARD Kim J. Askew Martin Riger, B.A., LL.B., Columbia Hughes & Luce, LLP Dallas, TX John R. Schmertz, Jr., A.B., Holy Cross; LL.B., LL.M., Georgetown Caryl Bernstein L’67 The Bernstein Law Firm, PLLC Robert S. Schoshinski, B.S., Notre Dame; Washington, DC LL.B., LL.M., Georgetown Bruce Blume, L’80 Warren F. Schwartz, A.B., Brooklyn; The Blume Company LL.B., Columbia Seattle, WA

Helen E. Steinbinder, A.B., Manhattanville; M.A., Edmund W. Burke, C’70, L’73 M.S.L.S., Columbia; J.D., LL.M., Georgetown Steptoe & Johnson, LLP Washington, DC Mark V. Tushnet, B.A. Harvard; M.A., J.D., Yale Joan Claybrook, L’73 Public Citizen Don Wallace, Jr., B.A., Yale; LL.B., Harvard Washington, DC

James P. Connelly, L’72 Foley & Lardner Milwaukee, WI APPENDIX A: DIRECTORY OF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERS AND OFFICERS OF INSTRUCTION 93

Paul J. Diaz, L’88 The Honorable Margaret McKeown, L’75 Kindred Healthcare, Inc. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Louisville, KY San Diego, CA

James A. Gilbert, L’74 R. Bruce McLean Live Oak Equity Partners Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, LLP Atlanta, GA Washington, DC

Theresa M. Gillis, L'74 Dennis Meyer, L'60, LLM'62 Jones Day Baker & McKenzie New York, NY Washington, DC

Scott Ginsburg, L’78 Lee I. Miller, C’69, L’72 Dallas, TX DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary Chicago, IL Franklin Gittes, L’73 Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom Patrick J. Moran, L’73 New York, NY Moran Resources Company Houston, TX John F. Hartigan, L’75 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius The Honorable Linda J. Morgan, L’76 Los Angeles, CA Covington & Burling Washington, DC John J. Held, L’64 McAndrews, Held & Malloy Paul A. Nussbaum, L’71 Chicago, IL Washington, CT

N. Lynn Hiestand, F’75, L’80 Lawrence S. Okinaga, L’72 Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom Carlsmith Ball London, England Honolulu, HI

Judith Richards Hope Thomas F. O’Neil III, L’82 Hope & Company, P.C. DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary Washington, DC Washington, DC

J. Clifford Hudson, L’80 Rev. Ladislas Orsy, S.J. Sonic Georgetown University Law Center Oklahoma City, OK Washington, DC

Keith R. Hummel, L’90 Regina Pisa, L’82 Cravath, Swaine & Moore Goodwin Procter New York, NY Boston, MA

Michael D. Jones, L'85 Carmen A. Policy, L’66 Kirkland & Ellis San Francisco, CA Washington, DC Gregory R. Raifman, L’84 The Honorable Michael Kantor, L’68 Westmont Capital, LLC Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw Piedmont, CA Washington, DC Edward M. Ricci, L’73 The Honorable Robert A. Katzmann Ricci Leopold, P.A. United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit West Palm Beach, FL New York, NY Thomas A. Roberts, C'69, L'72 Marianne Keler, L’76 Weil Gotshal & Manges Potomac, MD New York, NY

April McClain-Delaney, L’89 Eric Roiter, L’73 CommonSense Media Fidelity Investments Washington, DC Boston, MA 94 APPENDIX A: DIRECTORY OF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERS AND OFFICERS OF INSTRUCTION

Robert F. Ruyak, L’74 Howrey Simon Arnold & White, LLP Washington, DC

Paul Saunders, L’66 Cravath, Swaine & Moore New York, NY

Barry Schwartz, L'74 MacAndrews Forbes Holdings, Inc. New York, NY

The Honorable Thomas L. Siebert, C’68, L’72 Greenberg Traurig Washington, DC

Sidney J. Silver, L'62 Silver, Freedman & Taff, LLP Washington, DC

Brendan V. Sullivan, Jr., C’64, L’67 Williams & Connolly Washington, DC

Donald L. Waite, L’59 Saratoga, CA

Ralph V. Whitworth, L’85 Relational Investors, LLC San Diego, CA APPENDIX B: J.D. PROGRAM ADJUNCT FACULTY 95

APPENDIX B: J.D. PROGRAM ADJUNCT FACULTY Alfred F. Belcuore B.A., University of Notre Dame; J.D., Georgetown W. Shepherdson Abell A.B., Boston College; M.P.A., Harvard; J.D., Everett Bellamy Georgetown B.S., M.S., University of Wisconsin; J.D., Not Teaching 2006-2007 Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, Cleveland State University David Albert B.S., Wharton School of Finance and Commerce, Miguel Beltran University of Pennsylvania; J.D., American J.D., Ph.D., Complutense University of Madrid, University; LL.M., Georgetown Law School Not Teaching 2006-2007 Edward A. Bernstein The Honorable Francis M. Allegra B.A., Johns Hopkins University; J.D., Columbia B.A., Borromeo College of Ohio; J.D., Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, Cleveland Lisa Bhansali State University B.A., University of Michigan; M.P.P., Columbia; J.D., Georgetown Stephen D. Altman B.A., Duke; J.D., Syracuse College of Law Edward K.M. Bilich B.A., Wake Forest; J.D., Harvard Brian Anderson Not Teaching 2006-2007 B.A., University of California Berkeley; J.D., Stanford Christina Biebesheimer Christopher Anzidei B.A., University of Iowa; J.D., Harvard B.A., Rutgers; J.D., Georgetown Not Teaching 2006-2007 C. Coleman Bird A.B., Williams College; J.D., Harvard Anthony Clark Arend B.S.F.S., Georgetown; M.A., Ph.D., University of Mark J. Biros Virginia A.B., Princeton; J.D., Georgetown

Barton Aronson Gary F. Blemaster B.A., Yale University; J.D., University of Chicago B.A., Ohio State University; M.M., Northwestern University; M.A., Columbia University; M.S.P.P., James M. Assey, Jr. Johns Hopkins University B.A., M.A., Stanford; J.D., Georgetown Jeffrey Blumenfeld Donald B. Ayer A.B., Brown; J.D., University of Pennsylvania A.B., Stanford; M.A., American History, J.D., Not Teaching 2006-2007 Harvard Emanuel Boasberg The Honorable James Baker B.A., Yale; J.D., Harvard B.A., J.D., Yale Michael Bochenek Jonathan Band B.A., Michigan State; J.D., Columbia B.A., Harvard; J.D., Yale Mark Healy Bonner Elizabeth Banker A.B., Georgetown; J.D., American University B.A., Northwestern University; J.D., Catholic University School of Law; M.A., Catholic David Bookbinder University, School of Philosophy A.B., Princeton; J.D., University of Chicago Law School Mark T. Banner Not Teaching 2006-2007 B.A., Purdue; J.D., John Marshall Law School Robert C. Bordone Kenneth C. Bass, III A.B., Dartmouth; J.D., Harvard A.B., Duke; LL.B., Yale Nicholas J. Boyle LL.B., University of London; LL.M., University of Cambridge; LL.M., Harvard Law School, Fulbright Scholar. 96 APPENDIX B: J.D. PROGRAM ADJUNCT FACULTY

A. Jane Bradley Douglas M. Chapin, Jr. B.A., Mary Washington College; M.A., George B.A., Princeton; M.P.A, Harvard; J.D., Georgetown Washington Mark E. Chopko Stephen L. Braga B.S., University of Scranton; J.D., Cornell B.A., Fairfield University; J.D., Georgetown Cyra Choudhury Richard L. Brand B.A., The College of Wooster; M.A., Columbia; B.S.B.A. (Finance), Georgetown; J.D., University J.D., Georgetown of Pennsylvania James S. Cockburn Douglas M. Bregman LL.B., LL.M., Ph.D., Leeds University, England B.A., Colgate; J.D., Georgetown June Cohan Daniel L. Brenner B.A., University of Virginia; J.D., Georgetown B.A., A.M., J.D., Stanford Not Teaching 2006-2007

Eric Bruggink George Cohen B.A., M.A., Auburn; J.D., University of Alabama B.A., LL.B., Cornell; LL.M., Georgetown Not Teaching 2006-2007 Not Teaching 2006-2007

John M. Bryson, II Peter J. Cohen, M.D. B.S., J.D., University of Virginia B.A., Princeton; M.D., Columbia; J.D., Georgetown William A. Butler B.A., Stanford; J.D., Yale; Ph.D., Harvard Jeremiah C. Collins B.S., J.D., Georgetown Carla C. Calcagno B.A., J.D., Georgetown John T. Collins B.A., Holy Cross College; J.D., LL.M., Ellen M. Callinan Georgetown B.A., Trinity College; M.S.L.S., Catholic University of America; J.D., William & Mary John Colvin A.B., University of Missouri; J.D., Joseph A. Carabillo LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown B.A., William Paterson College; J.D., Seton Hall; LL.M., New York University Paul Connors B.A., Holy Cross College; M.D., University of Robert M. Cary Maryland; J.D., George Washington B.A., Dartmouth College; J.D., University of Not Teaching 2006-2007 Virginia. Kevin T. Conry Stephen Case B.S.F.S., J.D., Georgetown A.B., LL.B., Columbia James L. Cooper William F. Causey A.B., A.M., University of Chicago; J.D., Ph.D., B.A., American University; J.D., University of Indiana University Maryland Marc S. Cooperman Reid P. Chambers B.S.M.E., J.D, University of Illinois B.A., Amherst; M.A., Balliol College, Oxford; J.D., Harvard Cathy A. Costantino B.A., M.S.W., Catholic University; J.D., University Scott Chambers of California-Berkeley B.S., Ohio State University; Ph.D., Florida State University; J.D., George Washington Scott Dahl Not Teaching 2006-2007 B.A., J.D., University of Texas

Harold J. Datz B.A., LL.B., University of Florida APPENDIX B: J.D. PROGRAM ADJUNCT FACULTY 97

The Honorable Edward J. Damich Salvatore Fiscina A.B., St. Stephen’s College; J.D., Catholic A.B., Harvard; M.D., University of Rochester; University; LL.M., S.J.D., Columbia J.D., George Washington Not Teaching 2006-2007 Not Teaching 2006-2007

Jennifer Locke Davitt The Honorable Gerald I. Fisher B.A., Middlebury College; J.D., Duke; B.A., William & Mary; J.D., Catholic University M.L.I.S., University of Washington Luin Fitch Eric Delinsky B.A., Johns Hopkins; LL.B., Columbia B.A., Tufts University; J.D., Georgetown Not Teaching 2006-2007

Timothy Dowling James F. Fitzpatrick B.A., University of Notre Dame; J.D., Georgetown A.B., J.D., Indiana University Not Teaching 2006-2007 Maurice Foley Michael Dreeben B.A. Swarthmore; J.D. U.C. Berkeley; B.A., University of Wisconsin; M.A. University of LL.M. Taxation, Georgetown Chicago; J.D., Duke Not Teaching 2006-2007 Joel M. Freed B.A., B.S.M.E., Lehigh University; Michael M. DuBose J.D., Georgetown A.B., Dartmouth; J.D., Harvard Rabbi Barry Freundel Richard Dulik B.A., Yeshiva College; B.S., Erna Michael College B.S., M.S.E.(Computer Engineering), Case of Hebraic Studies; M.S., Bernard Revel Graduate Western Reserve University; J.D., Yale School; Ph.D., Baltimore Hebrew University Not Teaching 2006-2007 Michael S. Frisch Charles Edson B.A., Case Western Reserve University; B.A., J.D., Harvard J.D., Georgetown Not Teaching 2006-2007 Patricia Mullahy Fugere Susan H. Ehringhaus A.B., J.D., Georgetown B.A., J.D., University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill The Honorable Arthur J. Gajarsa Mark C. Ellenberg B.S.E.E., Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; M.A., B.S., Cornell; J.D., Georgetown Catholic University; J.D., Georgetown

E. Donald Elliott Adrian Robert Gardner B.A., J.D., Yale B.A., Northeastern University; M.P.P., J.D., Harvard W. Mason Emnett B.A., University of Texas-Arlington; Russell A. Gaudreau, Jr. J.D., Georgetown B.A., University of Massachusetts; J.D., Suffolk; LL.M.(Taxation), New York University Julia L. Ernst B.A., Yale; J.D., M.A., University of Michigan Christian S. Genetski B.A., Birmingham-Southern College; J.D. Kenneth R. Feinberg Vanderbilt University School of Law B.A., University of Massachusetts; J.D., New York University Elizabeth S. Gere B.A., Denison University; J.D., George Washington Amy Fettig B.A., Carleton College; M.A., Columbia, School of Richard W. Gibson International and Public Affairs; J.D., Georgetown A.B., Fordham; J.D., Catholic University

Nancy Firestone John Gillick B.A., Washington University; J.D., University of A.B., Colgate; J.D., Georgetown Missouri Not Teaching 2006-2007 98 APPENDIX B: J.D. PROGRAM ADJUNCT FACULTY

Jonathan Gimblett John C. Hirsh B.A., Cambridge University; J.D., Georgetown B.A., Boston College; M.A., Ph.D., Lehigh Not Teaching 2006-2007 University; Post-Doctoral Study in Education, University of California-Berkeley Edward M. Gleason, Jr. B.A., Fordham; J.D., Dickinson School of Law James Hodge B.S., College of Charleston; J.D., Northern Karen Goldman Kentucky University; LL.M., Georgetown B.A., M.A., University of California at Santa Not Teaching 2006-2007 Barbara; Ph.D., University of California at San Francisco; J.D., Georgetown Richard C. Hotvedt Not Teaching 2006-2007 B.S., Marquette University; LL.B., Harvard

Michael Goldman Robert Huffman B.A., University of Pennsylvania; J.D., Georgetown B.A., Harvard; J.D., Stanford Not Teaching 2006-2007 Jordan B. Goldstein B.A., University of Wisconsin; M.A., Johns Professor James Hunt Hopkins University; J.D., Stanford B.A., University of Notre Dame; B.S., Rochester Institute of Technology Randolph Goodman B.A., Franklin and Marshall College; L.L.M., John A. Hurvitz New York University; J.D., Rutgers University B.A., Haverford College; J.D., Yale Not Teaching 2006-2007 Philip T. Inglima Julia E. Griffith A.B.; J.D. Georgetown B.A., Oberlin College; M.Phil., Cambridge University; J.D., New York University William G. Isasi B.S., University of Illinois- Champaign-Urbana; John D. Hagner J.D., Georgetown B.S.M.E., University of Cincinnati; J.D., Georgetown David B. Isbell B.A., LL.B., Yale Timothy A. Harr B.A., Princeton; J.D., University of Virginia The Honorable Craig Iscoe B.A., University of Texas; J.D., Stanford; Todd Harris LL.M., Georgetown B.A., Birmingham-Southern College; J.D., M.A.R Not Teaching 2006-2007 Ethics, Yale Deborah H. Isser Michael R. Hatcher A. B., Columbia; J.D., Harvard; M.A.L.D., A.B., Dartmouth; J.D., Georgetown Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy

Ann Marie Hay Samuel S. Jackson, Jr. B.A., University of California-Berkeley; B.S., A.B., Princeton; J.D., University of North Carolina University of Minnesota; J.D., Georgetown Tristan Jones John C. Hayes, Jr. B.A., Cambridge University; M.P.A. Harvard B.A., Williams College; J.D., George Washington Kennedy School of Government

Bennett L. Hecht Kenneth Jost B.S., University of Maryland; J.D., Georgetown A.B., Harvard; J.D., Georgetown Not Teaching 2006-2007 The Honorable Ronald Hedges B.A., University of Maryland; J.D., Georgetown Jane Juliano Not Teaching 2006-2007 B.A., University of Colorado; J.D., Georgetown

Owen E. Herrnstadt Thomas F. Kaufman B.S., M.S., J.D., University of Wisconsin B.S.E.E., State University of New York at Buffalo; J.D., Georgetown; M.B.A., Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania APPENDIX B: J.D. PROGRAM ADJUNCT FACULTY 99

Erin Rahne Kidwell Mary Leary B.A., Ohio State University; J.D., Capital B.A., J.D., Georgetown University Law School; LL.M., S.J.D., Georgetown The Honorable Lynn Leibovitz Richard F. Kingham B.A., Brown; J.D., Georgetown B.A., George Washington; J.D., University of Virginia The Honorable Richard J. Leon A.B., Holy Cross College; J.D., Suffolk University Paul Yoshio Kiyonaga Law School; LL.M., Harvard B.A., University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; J.D., Harvard Nancy F. Lesser B.A., City College of the City of New York; M.A., Alisa Klein University of Virginia; J.D., Georgetown. A.B., Princeton; J.D., Harvard Not Teaching 2006-2007 Kathleen Lester B.A., DePauw University; J.D., Georgetown; Eric Klumb M.PH, Johns Hopkins B.A., University of Minnesota; J.D., Marquette Not Teaching 2006-2007 University Lee Levine Mark Kovner B.A., M.A., University of Pennsylvania; J.D., Yale B.A., Brandeis University; J.D., Georgetown Not Teaching 2006-2007 Michael Levitin A.B., J.D., Harvard; M.A.L.D., Fletcher School of Thomas Krause Law and Diplomacy B.S., University of Illinois; J.D. Harvard Not Teaching 2006-2007 Not Teaching 2006-2007 Michael K. Lewis Frederick J. Krebs A.B., Dartmouth; J.D., Georgetown University of Manchester (England); B.A., Allegheny College; J.D., Case Western Reserve Nancy Linck University Ph.D., University of California-San Diego; J.D., Western New England College Ken Krisko Not Teaching 2006-2007 B.S., Virginia Tech; J.D., University of Virginia Douglas Lind David R. Kuney B.A., Purdue; J.D., Valparaiso; M.I.L.S., University B.A., J.D., University of Virginia of Michigan

Steven R. Kuney Robert Allen Long,Jr. B.A., Wesleyan; M.A. (Public Policy), J.D., B.A., University of North Carolina; B.A., Oxford University of Pennsylvania University; J.D., Yale Not Teaching 2006-2007 Esther F. Lardent B.A., Brown; J.D., University of Chicago Catherine Lotrionte B.A., University of Massachusetts-Amherst; The Honorable David Laro J.D., New York University; M.A., Georgetown B.A., University of Michigan; J.D., University of Not Teaching 2006-2007 Illinois; LL.M.(Taxation), New York University Abbe David Lowell Paul B. Larsen B.A., J.D., Columbia LL.B., University of Cincinnati; LL.M., New York Not Teaching 2006-2007 University and McGill University, Montreal John Lynch Weldon H. Latham B.S., Fordham; J.D., Georgetown B.A., Howard University; J.D., Georgetown Not Teaching 2006-2007

Kenneth A. Lazarus Joan A. Magagna B.A., University of Dayton; J.D., University of B.A., University of Wyoming; M.A., J.D., Notre Dame; LL.M., George Washington Georgetown 100 APPENDIX B: J.D. PROGRAM ADJUNCT FACULTY

Daniel Magraw Samuel C. Miller, III A.B., Harvard; J.D., University of California- B.S., Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Berkeley J.D., Georgetown

Gerald A. Malia Glenn Mincey B.S., St. Peter's College; J.D., LL.M., Georgetown B.A., J.D., Louisiana State University; LL.M., Georgetown R. Paul Margie Not Teaching 2006-2007 B.A., Haverford College; J.D., University of Chicago Jeffrey Minear B.S., University of Utah; M.S., J.D., University of Joanne Mariner Michigan B.A., Columbia; J.D., Yale Not Teaching 2006-2007 Not Teaching 2006-2007 Helen Hill Minsker David Marsh A.B., Vassar College; J.D., George Washington B.Sc., University of London; Ph.D., Institute of Plant Science Research, England; C.P.E., Jonathan E. Missner Nottingham Law School, England; J.D., New York B.A., Johns Hopkins; M.B.A., George Washington; University J.D., Georgetown Not Teaching 2006-2007 The Honorable Robert E. Morin Susan Martin B.A., University of Massachusetts; J.D., Catholic B.A., Rutgers; M.A., Ph.D., University of University Pennsylvania Robert F. Muse Elisa C. Massimino B.S., Boston College; J.D., Georgetown B.A., Trinity University; M.A., Johns Hopkins University; J.D., University of Michigan Glen Nager B.B.A., The University of Texas at Austin; Erik S. Maurer J.D., Stanford B.S., University of Illinois; J.D., Northwestern Guy S. Neal Colman McCarthy B.A., William and Mary; J.D., Georgetown. B.S., Spring Hill College Allison Nichol C. Dean McGrath, Jr. B.A. Indiana University; J.D. Valparaiso University B.A., Duke; J.D., University of Nebraska School of Law

Joseph A. Micallef Sharon Nokes B.E.E., Catholic University of America; B.Mus., Eastman School of Music; Mus., J.D., University of Virginia Manhattan School of Music; J.D., Georgetown Not Teaching 2006-2007 Betsy A. Miller B.A., Dartmouth; J.D., Harvard Michael Nussbaum B.A., Dartmouth; J.D., LL.M., University of Glenn H. Miller, M.D. Chicago B.A., University of Iowa; M.D., University of Chicago Rev. Raymond C. O'Brien B.A., La Salle College; J.D., University of Virginia; John T. Miller, Jr. M.Ch.A., D.Min., Catholic University A.B., Clark University; J.D., Georgetown; Docteur en Droit, University of Geneva, Switzerland Matthew G. Olsen B.A., University of Virginia; J.D., Harvard Laurel E. Miller A.B., Princeton University’s Woodrow Wilson Nina Olson School of Public and International Affairs; A.B., Bryn Mawr; J.D., North Carolina Central J.D. University of Chicago School of Law; LL.M., Georgetown Not Teaching 2006-2007 APPENDIX B: J.D. PROGRAM ADJUNCT FACULT 101

C. Christopher Parlin Christopher J. Renk B.A., Yale; Graduate Diploma, SAIS, Johns B.S., Iowa State University; J.D., University of Hopkins; J.D., American University Minnesota

William Laurence Patrick Jennifer Lee Renne B.A., University of Kentucky; M.S. University of B.A., University of Pennsylvania; J.D., Georgetown Tennessee; Ph.D., Ohio University; J.D., Georgetown University Law Center Daniel A. Rezneck Not Teaching 2006-2007 B.A., LL.B., Harvard

H. Kumar Percy Jeannie Rhee B.S., J.D., Tulane; M.L.I.S., San Jose State University B.A., J.D., Yale Not Teaching 2006-2007 Sczerina Perot B.A., Columbia; J.D., Georgetown Henry Richardson B.A., Ph.D., J.D., M.P.P., Harvard Mark Perry B.A., University of California, Berkeley; Stewart C. Robinson, Jr. J.D., University of Chicago B.A., University of Texas at Austin; J.D., University of Texas School of Law Joseph G. Petrosinelli A.B., Brown; J.D., Georgetown Eric Rosenthal B.A., University of Chicago; J.D., Georgetown Joseph D. Piorkowski, Jr. B.A., Hofstra University; D.O., Philadelphia Michael L. Rosenthal College of Osteopathic Medicine; J.D., B.S., Cornell; J.D., Harvard Georgetown; M.P.H., Johns Hopkins Seth Rosenthal Jonathan B. Pitt B.A. Dartmouth; J.D. Harvard B.A., M.G.A. (Government), University of Not Teaching 2006-2007 Pennsylvania; J.D., Yale Marc Rotenberg Mark S. Popofsky A.B., Harvard; J.D., Stanford A.B., Brown; J.D., Harvard. Lukasz Rozdeiczer Joseph M. Potenza J.D., Warsaw University, School of Law and B.S.E.E., Rochester Institute of Technology; Administration; a Diploma in British and European J.D., Georgetown Legal Studies from Cambridge and Warsaw Universities; LL.M., Harvard Tom Pratt B.S., J.D., University of Kansas Paula Rubin B.A., University of Texas-Austin; J.D., State Michael S. Raab University of New York-Buffalo B.S., Indiana University; J.D., Yale Not Teaching 2006-2007

Marylin J. Raisch Jonathan Rusch B.A., Smith; M.Litt., St. Hugh’s College, Oxford; A.B., Princeton; M.A. (Government), J.D., M.L.S, Columbia; J.D., Tulane University of Virginia

Richard A. Ratner, M.D. Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter B.A., University of Chicago; M.D., University of B.A., Syracuse University; J.D., Northwestern Pennsylvania University

Melissa G. Reinberg Susan Ryan A.B., Cornell; J.D, Harvard; LL.M., Georgetown B.A., M.A., American University; M.L.S., University of Maryland- College Park John Relman B.A., Harvard. J.D., University of Michigan Charles P. Sabatino Not Teaching 2006-2007 A.B., Cornell; J.D., Georgetown 102 APPENDIX B: J.D. PROGRAM ADJUNCT FACULTY

David N. Saperstein Eric B. Sloan B.A., Cornell; M.H.L., Hebrew Union College; B.A., Northwestern; J.D., The University of J.D., American University Chicago; LL.M., Georgetown Not Teaching 2006-2007 Richard A. Sauber B.A., Yale; J.D., New York University School of Marilyn G. Sneiderman Law; M.Litt., Oxford B.A., M.A., University of Wisconsin-Madison

Michael G. Scheininger Dr. Gary D. Solis B.A., Franklin and Marshall College; J.D., B.A, San Diego State College; J.D., University of University of Pennsylvania California-Davis; LL.M., George Washington; Ph.D., The London School of Economics & Lois J. Schiffer Political Science A.B., Radcliffe; J.D., Harvard Steven P.Solow Mark D. Schneider B.A., Brown University; J.D., New York University B.A., Haverford College; J.D., Georgetown School of Law

Andrew I. Schoenholtz Debra L. Soltis B.A., Hamilton College; J.D., Harvard; B.A., Duquesne University; J.D., Georgetown Ph.D., Brown Michael J. Songer Steven Schulman B.S., B.A., University of Notre Dame; J.D., Duke B.A., Brandeis; J.D., Northwestern Valerie J. Stanley Eric J. Schwartz A.B., Goucher College; J.D., Catholic University B.A., Johns Hopkins; J.D., American University John Reed Stark Philip Sechler B.A., Union College; J.D., Duke B.S., Pennsylvania State University; J.D., Georgetown Jacob A. Stein A.A., LL.B., George Washington A. Christopher Sega A.B., Dartmouth; M.B.A., George Washington; Mark B. Stern J.D., Catholic University B.A., Antioch College; M.A., Brandeis; M.A., Boston College; J.D., Harvard Sandra Sellers Not Teaching 2006-2007 B.A., Dickinson College; J.D., George Washington University Richard S. Stockton B.S., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champagne; Anthony W. Shaw J.D., University of Illinois A.B., M.Eng., Cornell; J.D., Georgetown Palma Strand Diane M. Shust B.S., J.D., Stanford B.A., M.S., University of Pennsylvania; J.D., Georgetown Julia Sullivan B.A., Texas A & M; J.D., Washington College Scott A. Siff of Law A.B., J.D., Harvard Not Teaching 2006-2007

David C. Simmons Michael E. Tankersley B.A. Howard University; J.D., Georgetown B.A., College of William and Mary; J.D., Harvard

Linda R. Singer William Taylor B.A., Radcliffe; J.D., George Washington B.A., Brooklyn College, City University of New York; LL.B., Yale Rima Sirota B.A., Trinity College; J.D., Harvard Andrew S. Tulumello A.B., J.D., Harvard Arthur Siskind B.A., J.D., Cornell APPENDIX B: J.D. PROGRAM ADJUNCT FACULT 103

Alan D. Ullberg Jacqueline E. Zins B.A., Reed College; LL.B., Harvard B.A. Princeton University; J.D. Yale

Carl L. Vacketta James W. Zirkle B.S., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; B.S., Carson-Newman College; J.D., University of J.D., University of Illinois Tennessee; LL.M., Yale

Francis A. Vasquez, Jr. B.S., California Institute of Technology; J.D., Georgetown

Mary H. Vasquez B.A., Marquette University; M.A. University of Scranton; J.D. Georgetown.

Aaron J. Velli B.A., Brown; J.D., University of Maryland

Donald B. Verrilli, Jr. B.A., Yale; J.D., Columbia

John K. Villa A.B., Duke; J.D., University of Michigan

Richard Visek A.B., Stanford; J.D., Georgetown; LL.M., Cambridge Not Teaching 2006-2007

Paul Vitrano B.A., Villanova; J.D., George Washington University

Don Wallace, Jr. B.A., Yale; LL.B., Harvard

Robert M. Weinberg B.A., J.D., University of Michigan

Jonathan Weisgall B.A., Columbia; J.D., Stanford Not Teaching 2006-2007

Richard M. Whiting B.A., State University of New York-Binghamton; J.D., Boston College; Graduate, Stonier School of Banking, Rutgers University

Bruce T.Wieder B.S., Cornell; M.B.A., J.D., University of Texas, Austin

Andrew D. Wolvin B.S., M.A., University of Nebraska; Ph.D., Purdue

Jay Kelly Wright A.B., Dartmouth; J.D., M.P.P., Harvard 104 APPENDIX C: GRADUATE PROGRAM ADJUNCT FACULTY

APPENDIX C: GRADUATE PROGRAM A. Jane Bradley ADJUNCT FACULTY B.A., Mary Washington College; M.A., George Washington Jonathan Z. Ackerman B.S.B.A., University of Arizona; M.T., University Gilda Brancato of Denver; J.D., University of Chicago B.A., SUNY Stony Brook; J.D., New York University Grant D. Aldonas B.A., J.D., University of Minnesota Brian Breheny B.S., J.D., St. John's University Kevin D. Anderson B.B.A., University of Wisconsin–Whitewater; Lorraine M. Brennan J.D., University of Michigan; CPA B.A., Cornell University; M.A.L.D., Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy; J.D., Suffolk Barbara M. Angus University Law School A.B., Dartmouth College; J.D., Harvard Law School; M.B.A., University of Chicago Graduate Timothy C. Brightbill School of Business B.S., Northwestern; J.D., Georgetown

Paul M. Architzel Roger M. Brown B.A., State University of New York–Albany; B.A., Bucknell University; J.D., American J.D., George Washington University; LL.M. (Taxation), New York University

Barry P.Barbash Gregory S. Bruch A.B., Bowdoin College; J.D., Cornell A.B., Stanford; J.D., University of Iowa

Erin M. Barclay Ronald L. Buch Jr. B.A., State University of New York at Binghamton; B.B.A., Northwood University; J.D., Detroit J.D., University of Buffalo School of Law. College of Law; LL.M., Capital University Law & Graduate Center John P. Barrie J.D., University of California; LL.M.(Taxation), John L. Buckley New York University J.D., University of Wisconsin

Edward J. Beckwith R. Clif Burns B.S., Pennsylvania State University; J.D., B.A., J.D., Northwestern LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown Richard A. Capino Dennis P.Bedell B.A., J.D., University of Maryland; M.B.A., A.B., Harvard; J.D., University of Michigan Old Dominion

Ray Beeman Phyllis Cela B.S., University of California, Berkeley; J.D., B.A., Tufts University; J.D., Boston College Pepperdine University School of Law; LL.M. (Taxation), Boston University School of Law Christina M. Cerna B.A., New York University; M.A., Ludwig- Beth M. Benko Maximilian Universität; J.D., American University; B.S.B.A., Bowling Green; J.D., William & Mary LL.M., Columbia University

Kenneth J. Berman Douglas W. Charnas B.A., Dickenson College; J.D., University A.B., Ohio University, Honors Tutorial College; of Chicago J.D., Case Western Reserve; LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown Andrea Biondi J.D., M.A., Ph.D., University of Florence Richard F. Chovanec B.A., Virginia Tech; J.D., William & Mary; David B. Blair LL.M., Georgetown B.A., Georgetown; J.D., Cornell Law School APPENDIX C: GRADUATE PROGRAM ADJUNCT FACULTY 105

David Stewart Christy, Jr. Andrew M. Eisenberg B.A., University of Kansas; J.D., University B.B.A., Mercer University; M.S. (Taxation), of Chicago American University; J.D., California Western; LL.M. (Taxation), Georgetown Adam B. Cohen B.A., University of Virginia; J.D., Harvard Peter I. Elinsky B.S., University of Connecticut; J.D., Suffolk; Bryan P.Collins LL.M. (Taxation), Boston University B.B.A. (Accounting), J.D., University of Texas; LL.M. (Taxation), New York University David M. Estabrook, CPA B.A., Stanford; MBA, University of California - The Honorable John O. Colvin Los Angeles; CPA A.B., University of Missouri; J.D., LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown Marianne Evans B.B.S., J.D., Oklahoma City University; Andrea M. Corcoran LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown; CPA A.B., Stanford; LL.B., Harvard William M. Evans David L. Crawford, Jr. B.A., Brigham Young University; J.D., University of B.S., Georgetown; J.D., George Washington Virginia School of Law

Robert J. Crnkovich William M. Evans B.S., J.D., Marquette; LL.M.(Taxation), B.A., Brigham Young University; J.D., University of Georgetown; C.P.A. Virginia School of Law

David J. Curtin Philip Feigen B.A., J.D., St. Louis University B.S., Boston University; J.D., Catholic University

Robert E. Dalton Rocco V. Femia A.B., Holy Cross; LL.B., Columbia B.A., Duke University; J.D., Georgetown

Jeffrey Gates Davis Thomas F. Field B.S., David Lipscomb University; J.D., Pepperdine B.A., M.A. Oxford; J.D., Harvard; LL.M. University; LL.M. (Taxation), Georgetown (Taxation), Georgetown

Louis H. Diamond William J. Flanagan B.A., J.D. , George Washington University; B.S., J.D., Georgetown LL.M., Georgetown T. Keith Fogg Donald R. Dinan B.A., LL.M., William & Mary; J.D., University B.S., Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania; of Richmond J.D., Georgetown; LL.M., London School of Economics Sean Foley B.S., University of Michigan; J.D., LL.M., Marc B. Dorfman Georgetown A.B., Yale; J.D., Harvard Matthew W. Frank Jonathan Charles Drimmer B.A., Swarthmore College; J.D., University of B.A., Stanford; J.D., University of California- Michigan Law School Los Angeles Richard A. Frank Paul Dudek A.B., J.D., Harvard B.A., Fordham; J.D., New York University Lynn Fraser Christopher F. Dugan B.A., Linfield College; M.A., Columbia Pacific B.A., Johns Hopkins; J.D., Georgetown University; J.D., Northwestern School of Law at Lewis & Clark Henry Charles Eickelberg B.A., DePaul University; J.D., John Marshall Law School; LL.M., John Marshall Law School 106 APPENDIX C: GRADUATE PROGRAM ADJUNCT FACULTY

Barbara Fredericks Kenneth W. Hansen B.A., Case Western Reserve; J.D., Boston University A.B., M.P.A, Harvard; M.A., Yale; J.D., University of Pennsylvania Cynthia M. Frey B.A., University of California, Davis; J.D., George Robert P.Hanson Washington University; L.L.M., Georgetown. B.S., Indiana University–Bloomington; J.D., Michigan Jeffrey A. Friedman B.S., J.D. University of Maryland; Ellen A. Hennessy LL.M., Georgetown B.A., Michigan State; J.D., Catholic University; LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown Richard D. Fultz B.A, University of Florida (Gainsesville); Knut W. Hetzer J.D., University of Florida (Gainsesville); Law, Econ. and Fin., University of Bonn LL.M., Georgetown (Germany)

David C. Garlock Harry J. Hicks, III B.S., J.D., Harvard University B.A., William & Mary; J.D., University of Virginia; LL.M.(Taxation), New York University Karen J. Garnett B.A., Dartmouth College; J.D., University of Texas Laura Hume Hills B.A., M.A., J.D., Stanford Dennis O. Garris B.S., Youngstown State University; J.D., Master of Michael Holzman Taxation, University of Akron B.A., Miami University; J.D., Catholic University; LL.M., Georgetown Thomas S Gigot B.A., Marquette University; J.D., Georgetown Robert Honigman B.S., University of Virginia; J.D., Boston Israel Goldowitz University; LL.M., Georgetown B.A., Boston University; J.D., George Washington H. Carter Hood Carl F. Goodman A.B., J.D., Harvard; M.T., George Washington B.B.A., City College of New York - Baruch; J.D., University Brooklyn Law School; LL.M., Georgetown Barksdale Hortenstine Robert G. Gottlieb B.A., University of Texas; J.D., Southern B.A., Pennsylvania State University; J.D., Methodist University George Washington Jasper A. Howard David Gourevitch B.S., University of Kentucky; J.D., Duke; B.A., American; J.D., Georgetown LL.M.(Taxation), New York University

Jaime A. Granados David S. Hudson Licenciado en Derecho ( J.D. equivalent), University B.S., J.D., George Mason; LL.M.(Taxation), of Costa Rica; M.S., Oxford University; LL.M., Georgetown University of Georgia Gary R. Huffman John D. Graubert B.S., University of Illinois; J.D., University of Texas B.A., Williams; J.D., Georgetown Monte Jackel Eldon C. V. Greenberg J.D., Hofstra University; LL.M. (Taxation), A.B., J.D, Harvard; C.E.P., Institut d'Etudes New York University Politiques de Paris Frederick E. Jenney Paul M. Hamburger B.A., Yale; M.B.A., University of Virginia; J.D., B.A., J.D., University of Michigan University of Virginia

J. Walker Johnson B.A., Cornell; J.D., University of Kansas; LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown APPENDIX C: GRADUATE PROGRAM ADJUNCT FACULTY 107

Gerald A. Kafka Alan C. Levine B.S., Wheeling Jesuit University; J.D., University of A.B., Brown; J.D., Vanderbilt University; Cincinnati; LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown

Jean Kalicki Stuart M. Lewis B.A., Swarthmore College; J.D., University of B.A., University of Virginia; J.D., University Michigan Law School of Virginia.

Mark Kantor Robert Liquerman B.A., University of Southern California; M.P.P., B.S., State University of New York–Binghamton; J.D., University of Michigan J.D., St. John's; LL.M.(Taxation), New York University Brian P.Kaufman B.A., Duke; J.D., Northwestern; LL.M. (Taxation), Donald R. Longano Georgetown A.B., Notre Dame; J.D., Georgetown; LL.M.(Taxation), New York University Yoram Keinan B.A., LL.B., Tel Aviv University; LL.M. (Taxation), Louis Lopez Hebrew University; M.B.A., Bar Ilan University; B.S., University of Kansas; J.D., Harvard; LL.M. M.P.A., LL.M. (International Taxation), Harvard; (Labor & Employment), Georgetown LL.M. (Taxation), J.S.D., University of Michigan Daniel Luchsinger Charles K. "Chip" Kerby, III B.S., University of Minnesota; J.D., Georgetown B.A., University of Delaware; J.D., Washington and Lee; LL.M. (Taxation), Georgetown John B. Magee B.A., Pomona College; J.D., University of Kevin M. Keyes Washington; LL.M., Georgetown B.S., Bowling Green; J.D., Case Western Reserve; CPA Kimberly T. Majure B.A., University of Virginia; J.D., Harvard; LL.M. Andrew J. Keyso (Taxation), Georgetown B.A., J.D., Temple; M.A., Miami University Jennifer A. Manner Daoud L. Khairallah B.A., State University of New York–Albany; J.D., Licence en Droit, Lebanese University; M.C.L., New York Law School; LL.M.(International and LL.M., S.J.D., University of Michigan Comparative Law), Georgetown

Philip S. Khinda Mohamed Y. Mattar B.A., J.D., Columbia LL.B., D.P.L., Alexandria University, Egypt; M.C.L., University of Miami; LL.M., Mark Kreitman S.J.D., Tulane B.A., Yale; J.D., Harvard Jeffrey P.Maydew Cynthia Krus B.S., Iowa State University; J.D., University of B.A., Emory; J.D., Tulane Iowa; LL.M., Georgetown

Marlene Laro Louis T. Mazawey B.S.F.S., Georgetown; J.D., New York University B.A., New York University; J.D., Georgetown School of Law; LL.M. (Taxation), New York University School of Law Philip A. McCarty B.S., University of Colorado; J.D., University of Kurt L.P.Lawson Denver; LL.M.(Taxation), New York University B.A., M.A., Yale; J.D., University of Virginia Jerry J. McCoy Laura J. Lederer B.S., West Virginia University; LL.B., Duke; B.A., University of Michigan; J.D., DePaul LL.M.(Taxation), New York University

Benedict M. Lenhart Andrea J. Menaker B.A., University of Michigan; J.D., Harvard B.S., Georgetown; J.D., University of Washington 108 APPENDIX C: GRADUATE PROGRAM ADJUNCT FACULTY

Dan L. Mendelson Lindy L. Paull B.S., Indiana University; J.D., LL.M.(Taxation), B.B.A., Florida International University; J.D., Georgetown LL.M.(Taxation), University of Florida

Dwight Norris Mersereau Jonathan C. Pavony B.S., Bridgewater State College; J.D., University B.S., University of Florida; J.D., Catholic University of New Mexico; LL.M. (Taxation), University of Florida Alan A. Pemberton B.A., University of Chicago; M.A., J.D., University Charles R. Mills of Michigan B.A., Occidental College; J.D., Georgetown David Pickle Claudius B. Modesti B.A., Carleton College; J.D., University of Kansas B.S.F.S., J.D., Georgetown Elliot E. Polebaum John Norton Moore B.A., Middlebury College; M.P.A., Harvard; J.D., A.B., Drew; LL.B., Duke; LL.M., University New York University of Illinois John Polise Matt T. Morley B.A., University of Pennsylvania; J.D., New York B.A., Colgate; J.D., Yale University

Elizabeth Mary Murphy Markus G. Puder B.S., University of Virginia; J.D., Notre Dame First Legal State Examination, Ludwig- Maximilians University, Munich, Germany; Second Fred F. Murray Legal State Examination, Munich Upper Court of B.A., Rice University; J.D. University of Texas Appeals; LL.M.(Common Law Studies), at Austin Georgetown; Ph.D., Ludwig-Maximilians University Donald J. Myers B.A., College of the City of New York; J.D., Mark S. Radke Cornell; LL.M (Taxation), Georgetown B.A., University of Washington; J.D., University of Baltimore; LL.M.(Securities), Georgetown Mikol S.B. Neilson B.S., J.D., University of Santa Clara; LL.M. Albert C. Rees (Taxation), New York University B.A., University of Southwestern Louisiana; J.D., Loyola University, New Orleans; LL.M. Francisco Miguel Noyola (International & Comparative Law), Georgetown Licenciado en Derecho, Universidad La Salle; L.L.M., J.D., Southern Methodist Timothy M. Reif A.B., M.P.A., Princeton; J.D., Columbia Brian J. O'Connor J.D., Washington and Lee University; LL.M. Diane L. Renfroe (Taxation), Georgetown B.A., Wellesley College; J.D., Boston College

John T. Oliver Frederick H. Robinson B.A., Stanford University; J.D., University of B.A., Cornell; J.D., University of Virginia Washington; LL.M. (International), S.J.D., University of Virginia Jonathan J. Rusch A.B., Princeton; M.A., J.D., University of Virginia André E. Owens B.S., Providence College; J.D., Harvard Peter Saba B.A., University of Virginia; J.D., Harvard Joseph M. Pari B.S., Providence College; J.D., Boston College, Michael I. Sanders LL.M.(Taxation), New York University B.S., LL.B., New York University; LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown; C.P.A. C. Christopher Parlin B.A., Yale; Graduate Diploma, SAIS, Johns Rumu Sarkar Hopkins; J.D., American University B.A., Columbia; J.D., Antioch; LL.M.(Public International Law), Cambridge APPENDIX C: GRADUATE PROGRAM ADJUNCT FACULTY 109

Paul M. Schmidt David P.Stewart B.S., Miami University; J.D., LL.M. (Taxation), B.A., Princeton; M.A., J.D., Yale; LL.M., New York Georgetown University

William A. Schmidt Terence P.Stewart B.A., J.D., University of Virginia; LL.M.(Taxation), B.A., Holy Cross; M.B.A., Harvard; J.D., Georgetown Georgetown

Steven Schneider C. David Swenson B.S., University of Missouri; J.D., Washington B.A., J.D., University of Mississippi; University; LL.M. (Taxation), Georgetown LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown

Joseph A. Seiner Gerald Tanyi B.A., University of Michigan; J.D., Washington & LL.B., Maitrise en Droit, DEA University of Lee University Yaounde, Cameroon; LL.M, J.S.D., Yale

Chantel Sheaks Philip M. Tatarowicz B.A., Randolph Macon Woman's College; B.A., Illinois Benedictine College; J.D., Northern J.D., Northeastern University Illinois University; LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown; CPA Linda K. Shore B.A., Boston University; J.D., University of Leonard B. Terr Michigan; LL.M.(Labor Law), Georgetown A.B., LaSalle College; A.M., Ph.D., Brown; J.D., Cornell Alexander W. Sierck B.A., LL.B., University of Virginia Karen Tramontano B.A., Boston College; J.D., Catholic University Stafford Smiley B.A., Yale; J.D., Harvard Stephanie Tsacoumis B.A., William & Mary; J.D., University of Virginia Eufrona A. Snyder B.A., University of California-Long Beach; Stefan F.Tucker J.D., Southwestern University B.B.A., J.D., University of Michigan

Eric Solomon Chang Turkmani A.B., Princeton; J.D., University of Virginia; B.A., M.A., Northwestern University; LL.M.(Taxation), New York University J.D., Georgetown

Michael Solomon Andrea T.Tyler B.A., Yale; J.D., Harvard B.A., M.A. (Library Science), M.A. (Linguistics), Ph.D. (Linguistics), University of Iowa James Sottile, IV B.S., University of Florida; J.D., Georgetown Mario A. Umaña LL.B., Universidad Autónoma de Centroamérica Mark S. Srere (San José, Costa Rica); LL.M. (Common Law), B.A., Reed College; J.D., University of Texas S.J.D., Georgetown

Lawrence Stadulis John Vasily B.S., J.D., Boston College B.S. (Accounting), Villanova; J.D., Georgetown

John Reed Stark Charles Owen Verrill, Jr. B.A., Union College; J.D., Duke A.B., Tufts; J.D., Duke

Richard C. Stark Gary R. Vogel J.D., Vanderbilt University B.A., Gettysburg College; J.D., George Washington University; LL.M. (Taxation), New York University Samuel P.Starr B.S., Pennsylvania State University; J.D., University Donald A. Walker,Jr. of Virginia; LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown; C.P.A. A.B., Amherst; M.B.A., Amos Tuck Graduate School of Business Administration, C.P.A. 110 APPENDIX C: GRADUATE PROGRAM ADJUNCT FACULTY

Don Wallace, Jr. B.A., Yale; LL.B., Harvard

Brinton T.Warren B.A., University of Virginia; J.D., George Mason University; LL.M. (Taxation), Georgetown

Jennifer A. Warren B.S., J.D., Georgetown

Rose L. Williams B.S., University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh; J.D., University of Nebraska

Marcia A. Wiss B.S.F.S., J.D., Georgetown

John Wolff LL.D., University of Heidelberg; LL.M., Columbia

Steve Wrappe B.A., Notre Dame; J.D., University of Texas; LL.M. (Taxation), New York University

Mark D. Young B.A., Tufts; J.D., Georgetown

Leocadia I. Zak B.A., Mount Holyoke; J.D., Northeastern

H. Karl Zeswitz, Jr. B.S., Pennsylvania State University; J.D., Dickinson; LL.M.(Taxation), Georgetown APPENDIX C: GRADUATE PROGRAM ADJUNCT FACULTY 111

APPENDIX D: CHARLES FAHY 1996-1997 DISTINGUISHED ADJUNCT PROFESSOR AWARD RECIPIENTS Bennett L. Hecht, J.D. Program Shirley A. Coffield, Graduate Program Each year, hundreds of Washington, D.C., lawyers 1997-1998 selflessly dedicate time and energy to teaching courses as adjunct professors at the Law Center. Nancy Firestone, J.D. Program Their presence has enabled Georgetown to offer the Lois J. Schiffer, J.D. Program most wide-ranging curriculum of J.D. and LL.M. Dennis P. Bedell, Graduate Program courses in the country. To recognize the contributions of these adjuncts, 1998-1999 the Law Center’s “hidden endowment,” the dean David C. Vladeck, J.D. Program designates two of them for each academic year as William R. Charyk, Graduate Program Charles Fahy Distinguished Adjunct Professors. Fahy Professors have provided exceptional service to 1999-2000 Georgetown in teaching, curriculum development, student counseling, and involvement in extra- Jack M. Beard, J.D. Program curricular Law Center activities. Michael T. Leibig, Graduate Program The award is named after the late Charles Fahy, a noted Georgetown alumnus who served as U.S. 2000-2001 Solicitor General and U.S. Court of Appeals Judge. W. Shepherdson Abell, J.D. Program Marcia A. Wiss, Graduate Program 1988-1989 Kenneth R. Feinberg, J.D. Program 2001-2002 John Wolff, Graduate Program John C. Hayes, Jr., J.D. Program Michael G. Scheininger, J.D. Program 1989-1990 Michael I. Sanders, Graduate Program Roger M. Adelman, J.D. Program Hugh J. Beins, Graduate Program 2002-2003 The Honorable Laurence H. Silberman, J.D. Program 1990-1991 John L. Buckley, Graduate Program Martin S. Thaler, J.D. Program The Honorable John O. Colvin, Graduate Program Earl M. Colson, Graduate Program 2003-2004 1991-1992 The Hon. Gerald I. Fisher, J.D. Program Paul B. Larsen, J.D. Program The Hon. Robert E. Morin, J.D. Program Charles Gordon, Graduate Program Robert Dalton, Graduate Program David Stewart, Graduate Program 1992-1993 2004-2005 Kirby Howlett, J.D. Program Harold J. Heltzer, Graduate Program Michael Frisch, J.D. Program Mark Kreitman, Graduate Program 1993-1994 Mark S. Radke, Graduate Program Steven A. Winkelman, J.D. Program Charles Owen Verrill, Graduate Program

1994-1995 Daniel A. Rezneck, J.D. Program Bernard M. Shapiro, Graduate Program

1995-1996 Gerald A. Malia, J.D. Program Arthur F. Mathews, Graduate Program 112 APPENDIX D: CHARLES FAHY DISTINGUISHED ADJUNCT PROFESSOR AWARD RECIPIENTS

APPENDIX E: SCHOLARSHIPS Baker & McKenzie Scholarship Fund: Established by the law firm of Baker & McKenzie to assist a The Georgetown University Law Center named minority law student with financial aid. scholarship awards are made possible through the generosity of Law Center alumni and friends, law Rudolph B. and Suevia Nordlinger Behrend firms, corporations, and foundations. Awards are Scholarship: Established by Amy Behrend based on demonstrated financial need in accordance Goldstein and Ruth Behrend Small in memory of with the aid policies of the Law Center. Students their beloved parents. Rudolph B. Behrend was an interested in applying for these scholarships should outstanding graduate and the valedictorian of the contact the Financial Aid Office for information on Class of 1897 and the Class of 1898. Law Center financial aid procedures and deadlines. Caryl S. Bernstein Scholarship: Established by African-American Endowed Scholarship: Caryl S. Bernstein, L’67, a distinguished and loyal Established by Law Center alumni/ae to be alumna. awarded with preference to African-American J.D. students with demonstrated financial need. Michael E. and Carol S. Bleier Endowed Scholarship Fund: Established by Michael E. Alumni Scholarship: Established by the Bleier, L’65 and Carol S. Bleier, to be awarded to Washington Club to be awarded to students from law students with demonstrated financial need. the Washington metro area. James E. Blower Memorial Scholarship: Judith C. Areen Endowed Scholarship Fund: Established in memory of her husband, James E. Established by alumni and friends of Georgetown Blower, L’49, by his wife, Betty. University Law Center in honor of Judith C. Areen for her fifteen years of distinguished service as Dean Bruce and Ann Blume Endowed Scholarship Fund: of the Law Center, to be awarded to law students Established by Bruce Blume, L’80, and his wife, with demonstrated financial need. Ann, to be awarded to law students with demonstrated financial need. Arnold & Porter Scholarship: Established by the law firm of Arnold & Porter, to be awarded to a Brand Names Education Foundation: Established second year law student from a disadvantaged back- by the Brand Names Education Foundation ground who has shown potential for academic (BNEF) to promote awareness of the role and achievement. importance of trademarks and brand names. This scholarship will be used to support a student at Pedro Arrupe, S.J., Scholarship in Peace: Georgetown University Law Center who is studying Established by an anonymous donor to honor the trademark law. The grant is funded by the law firm former Superior General of the Society of Jesus, of Finnegan, Henderson, Farrabow, Garrett & Pedro Arrupe, who inspired Jesuits and others to Dunner. integrate a commitment to social justice into their faith. The Scholarship is to be awarded with prefer- Stanley M. Brand Scholarship Fund: Established by ence to students with limited financial resources Stanley M. Brand, L’74, a distinguished and loyal from troubled areas of the world, with the hope that alumnus, to be awarded to law students with their Georgetown experience will not only benefit demonstrated financial need. the students directly, but also their communities upon their return. Bernie R. Burrus Memorial Scholarship Fund: Established in memory of Professor Bernie R. Association of Securities and Exchange Burrus. Commission Alumni Scholarship: Established by the Association of Securities and Exchange Churchill Family Endowed Scholarship Fund: Commission Alumni, Inc., to assist one or more Established by Winston J. Churchill, Jr. deserving J.D. or LL.M. students who are current or former employees of the U.S. Securities and Class of 1953 Endowed Scholarship Fund: Exchange Commission. Established by members of the Class of 1953 in honor of their 50th Law Reunion, to be awarded to Andrew Hull Baker Scholarship: Established by the law students with demonstrated financial need. late Daniel W. Baker, LL.B. 1892, LL.M. 1893, a former United States district attorney and professor Coca-Cola Scholarship Fund: Established by the at the Law Center. Coca-Cola Company. APPENDIX E: SCHOLARSHIPS 113

Robert M. Coffelt Endowed Scholarship Fund: economic, educational, and ethnic background of Established in memory of Robert M. Coffelt, L’48, the Law Center’s student body. by his wife, Annetta J. Coffelt, and his son, Robert M. Coffelt, Jr., to assist law students with demon- Paul J. Diaz Scholarship Fund: Established by Paul strated financial need who aspire to careers in public J. Diaz, L’88, to be awarded to law students with interest law. demonstrated financial need, with preference for law students who contribute to the diverse economic, The Theodore Cogswell Scholarship: Established educational, and ethnic background of the Law in memory of Theodore Cogswell, L’16, by Elaine Center’s student body. Ward Cogswell. Murray Lindsley Dondy and David L. Dondy Lester Cohen Memorial Scholarship: Established Scholarship Fund: Established by Virginia Dondy by the law firm of Hogan & Hartson in memory of Green, L’71, in honor of her parents, Murray Lester Cohen, L’35, to be awarded to a third year Lindsley Dondy and David L. Dondy. law student with outstanding scholastic achievement studying communication law. Donnelly Law Scholarship: Established by the estate of Mary D. Meehan in memory of her father, Sherman and Lucy Cohn Endowed Scholarship Lt. Col. Richard John Donnelly, U.S.A., to assist Fund: Established by Professor Sherman L. Cohn, graduates of St. John’s Military Academy in F’54, L’57, LL.M.’60, and his wife, Lucy, to be Washington, D.C. awarded to law students with demonstrated financial need. Nancy Reisinger Donovan Memorial Fund: Established in memory of the late Nancy Jean The Paul R. Connolly Memorial Scholarship Fund: Donovan by her husband, Daniel J. Donovan, L’68, Established by colleagues at the law firm of family, and friends; partially funded by matching Williams & Connolly and friends of the late Paul grants from the Kraft General Foods Corporation. R. Connolly, a Washington, D.C., attorney and alumnus, LL.B.’48, LL.M.’52. Bryan and Eleanor Farrell Scholarship: Established in 1990 in memory of Bryan, L’31, and Eleanor Virginia Cooke Endowed Law Scholarship Fund: Farrell for the benefit of law students who have Established by Roger A. Cooke, C’70, L’73, in demonstrated financial need. honor of his mother, Virginia Cooke, to be awarded to law students with demonstrated financial need. Federal Employees Law Scholarship Fund: Established by Joseph E. Reece, L’89, to provide Michael J. and Karen M. Cuddy Scholarship Fund: tuition assistance to J.D. or LL.M. students who Established by Michael J. Cuddy, L’64, a have been, currently are, or expect to be employees distinguished alumnus, and his wife, Karen. of the Federal Government.

William J. Curtin Scholarship in Labor Relations: The April and Rachel Fegyveresi Scholarship: Established to honor the memory of William J. Established by Tom Fegyveresi, F’66, in honor of Curtin, C’53, L’56, LL.M.’57, by his friends and his daughters, April, C’92, L’96, and Rachel, B’90, colleagues in the law firm of Morgan, Lewis & N’95. Bockius LLP.This scholarship is awarded to a third year student who has demonstrated merit and a Louis B. Fine Scholarship Fund: Established by the strong interest in labor relations and employee family of Louis B. Fine, L’25, H’68, former benefits law. President of the Georgetown University Alumni Association and generous benefactor to the DeCrane Scholarship Fund: Established by Mr. University, to support a student at Georgetown and Mrs. Alfred C. DeCrane, Jr., L’59. University Law Center who demonstrates tenacity, aggressiveness, and dedication to the law. John K. Delaney and April McClain-Delaney Endowed Scholarship Fund: Established by John James T. Finlen Scholarship Fund: Established by K. Delaney, L’88, and April McClain-Delaney, L’89, Jim Finlen, L’28, for the purpose of maintaining to provide tuition assistance to students at the Law and educating students with demonstrated financial Center with demonstrated financial need. need in the law school.

Dewey Ballantine Dean’s Scholars Fund: Thomas B. Flynn Endowed Scholarship Fund: Established by the law firm of Dewey Ballantine Established by the estate of Anne L. Kuritzky in LLP to be awarded with preference to a first year memory of her husband, Thomas B. Flynn. law student who contributes to the diverse 114 APPENDIX E: SCHOLARSHIPS

Leo T. Franz Family Scholarship: Established by The John B. Hayward Scholarship: Established by Jack M. Franz, L’41, in memory of his father, Leo the IBM Corporation in honor of the late John B. T. Franz, to provide tuition assistance to students at Hayward in recognition of his 50 years of distin- the Law Center with demonstrated financial need. guished service and his contribution to the patent policies of the Corporation. Jean Shirley Frohlicher Scholarship Fund: Established in memory of Jean Shirley Frohlicher, Edwin A. and Florence M. Heafey Endowment L’66, by her husband, John Frohlicher, L’66, family, Fund: Established by the late Edwin A. Heafey, and friends, to be awarded with preference to an LL.B.’23, LL.D.’68, an attorney from California. evening student with demonstrated need. Jerome H. Heckman Scholarship Fund: Established Morris M. Geifman Scholarship Fund: Established by Jerome H. Heckman, C’48, L’53, to be awarded by Stephen L. Geifman, L’69, and Terri Geifman in with preference to a J.D. student studying Food and honor of his father, Morris M. Geifman, to provide Drug Law. tuition assistance to students at the Law Center with demonstrated financial need. John J. and Yvonne J. Held Scholarship Fund: Established by John J. Held, L’64, a distinguished Law Alumni of Georgia Scholarship Fund: alumnus, and his wife, Yvonne, to be awarded with Established by Law Center alumni/ae in Georgia to preference to a third year law student with demon- assist J.D. students with demonstrated financial strated financial need who is interested in pursuing need, with preference to students from Georgia. a career in public interest law.

The Ralph J. Gilbert/Philip A. Ryan Memorial James F. Henriot Endowed Scholarship Fund: Scholarship: Established by Ralph Gilbert, L’57, a Established by James F. Henriot, L’54, LL.M.’61, to retired partner from Baker & McKenzie in Chicago be awarded to law students with demonstrated to honor the memory of Philip A. Ryan, his teacher, financial need. partner, and friend. Thomas V. and Mary B. Heyman Scholarship: Patricia and John Gillick Scholarship Fund: Established by Thomas V. Heyman, L’62, a distin- Established by John E. Gillick, Jr., L’70, and his guished and loyal alumnus, and his wife, Mary. wife, Patricia, to be awarded to law students with demonstrated financial need. Joe G. Hollingsworth Scholarship Fund: Established by Joe G. Hollingsworth, L’74, to be Gillis-Pollock Scholarship Fund: Established by awarded to law students with demonstrated Theresa M. Gillis, L’74, a distinguished and loyal financial need. alumna, in honor of her father and mother. Benjamin and Lillian Holstein Memorial Walter Gutmann Scholarship: Established in 1991 Scholarship: Established by the Benjamin, L’36, and by the estate of Walter Gutmann, L’42. Lillian Holstein Estate.

Thomas M. Haderlein Scholarship Fund: Joseph A. Hoskins Scholarship Fund: Established Established in honor of Thomas M. Haderlein, by the family and colleagues of the late Joseph A. L’60, LL.M.’62, by his colleagues at the law firm of Hoskins, LL.B.’37, LL.M.’39, a Kansas City, Baker & McKenzie. Missouri attorney.

The Harnisch Family Scholarship: Established by Adolph Charles Hugin Scholarship Endowment William O.C. Harnisch, L’65, and his family. Fund: Established by a bequest from Dr. Adolph Charles Hugin, L’34, to be awarded to law students John F. and Laurie K. Hartigan Endowed with demonstrated financial need. Scholarship Fund: Established by Laurie K. and John F. Hartigan, L’75, to be awarded to law Keith and Celeste Hummel Scholarship: students with demonstrated financial need, with Established by Keith R. Hummel, L’90, and Celeste preference to students who show an interest in Hummel to provide tuition assistance to students at securities law. the Law Center with demonstrated financial need.

E. Kirby and Elizabeth Hayes Scholarship Fund: Hunton & Williams Scholarship: Established by Established by John Clarke Kane and John Clarke the law firm of Hunton & Williams. Kane, Jr., L’71, to be awarded to J.D. students who demonstrate financial need, with preference to students from Eastern Massachusetts. APPENDIX E: SCHOLARSHIPS 115

The C. Keefe Hurley Scholarship: Established by William C. Keller and Dorothy D. Keller C. Keefe Hurley, a Boston attorney and alumnus, Scholarship Fund: Established by William C. LL.B.’34, J.D.’35. Keller, L’52, to provide scholarships to deserving students in the Georgetown University Law Center Linda Hyatt Lauve Scholarship: Established by her Juris Doctor program. mother, Grace Hyatt, in memory of Linda Hyatt Lauve, a member of the Class of 1989, whose John J. Kirby Scholarship Fund: Established by untimely death in her third year was a great loss to Peter M. Kirby, L’79, and John J. Kirby, Jr., in honor her family, her children, and the legal profession. of their father, John J. Kirby, Sr., L’35. Hyatt Lauve scholars will be chosen on the basis of need, and will be students who exemplify Linda’s The John F. Lanigan Scholarship: Established by commitment to using her talents to serve the needs the late John F. Lanigan, LL.B.’22. of others. Robert S. Lavet Endowed Scholarship Fund: Jankowsky Family Endowed Scholarship Fund: Established by Robert S. Lavet, L’79 to be awarded Established by the Jankowsky Family, to be awarded to law students with demonstrated financial need. to law students with demonstrated financial need, with preference given to students who aspire to be Brent Leahey Scholarship in Law: Established by actively involved with their communities and/or Mary Jo Leahey in memory of her grandson, Brent their nation. Leahey, C’88, L’92.

Todd W. Johnson Scholarship Fund: Established by Robert D. L’Heureux Memorial Scholarship Fund: the late Todd W. Johnson, LL.B.’19, an attorney Established by the National Cable Television from California. Association and friends of the late Robert D. L’Heureux, LL.B.’40, LL.M.’42, an attorney with Edmund L. Jones Memorial Scholarship: the Federal Communications Commission. Established by the firm of Hogan & Hartson to be awarded to a Georgetown University Law Center Sanford M. Litvack and Judith Goldenson Litvack student who participated in collegiate sports as a Endowed Scholarship Fund: Established by Georgetown University undergraduate student. Sanford M. Litvack, L’59, and his wife, Judith Goldenson Litvack, to provide tuition assistance to Mercedes C. José Memorial Scholarship Fund: students at the Law Center with demonstrated Established by Aurora José Wong, L’77, in memory financial need. of her sister, to assist one or more deserving J.D. students, with preference to Asian Pacific American Dow Lohnes Diversity Scholarship: Established by students from Hawaii or Guam, in order to support the law firm of Dow Lohnes PLLC, to be awarded the goal for a diverse Law Center community. to a rising second year J.D. student with demon- strated financial need, who contributes to the Amy Weiss and Peter J. Kadzik Endowed diverse economic and ethnic composition of the Scholarship Fund: Established by Peter J. Kadzik, legal profession, and who has achieved academic L’77 and Amy Weiss, to be awarded to law students excellence. with demonstrated financial need. Ralph B. Long Memorial Scholarship: Established Henry Kaiser Memorial Lecture and Scholarship in memory of Ralph B. Long, L’67, by his friends, Fund: Established by the family and friends of the family, and former colleagues in the firm of late Henry Kaiser, to honor his contributions to Metzger, Shadyac & Schwarz. labor law and the betterment of working people. The scholarship will be awarded to an outstanding Charles Lucey Scholarship: Established by Charles law student studying labor relations. Emmet Lucey, C’56, L’59, in honor of his father.

Charles A. Keigwin Scholarship: Established by the MacRae Law Scholarship Fund: Established by Josephine Kratzer Carvill Trust in memory of Alexander K. MacRae, L’15, L’16, to be awarded to Charles A. Keigwin, a distinguished professor at the law students with demonstrated financial need. Law School for more than 20 years, whose teaching greatly influenced the legal career of Richard McLean Family Endowed Scholarship Fund: Carvill, LL.B.’27. Established by the R. Bruce McLean family, to be awarded to law students with demonstrated The Joseph E. and Mary E. Keller Foundation financial need. Scholarship: Established by the Joseph E. and Mary E. Keller Foundation of Dayton, Ohio, to assist deserving students. 116 APPENDIX E: SCHOLARSHIPS

Gregory J. Maier Scholarship in Patent Law Fund: Timothy J. and Linda D. O’Neill Scholarship Established by Gregory J. Maier, L’69, a distin- Fund: Established by Timothy J. O’Neill, L’77, and guished and loyal alumnus, to be awarded to law his wife, Linda D. O’Neill, N’77, distinguished and students with demonstrated financial need, with loyal alumni. preference given to students interested in practicing patent law who have earned undergraduate degrees Maureen F. O’Shaughnessy Endowed Scholarship in one of the technical subjects recognized by the Fund: Established by Louis J. Briskman, L’73, in United States Patent and Trade Mark Office. memory of his wife, Maureen F. O’Shaughnessy, to be awarded with preference to a woman with Tim and Marcia McBride Endowed Scholarship demonstrated financial need who most closely Fund: Established by Timothy B. McBride, L’75, matches the experience, attributes, and qualities of L’80, and his wife, Marcia, to provide assistance to a Maureen F. O’Shaughnessy’s multi-dimensional life. student demonstrating financial need and a strong interest in tax law. The Paige Family Scholarship Fund: Established by Stephen B. Paige, L’72, a distinguished alumnus, Eugene P.McCahill Scholarship Fund: Established and his wife, Deborah, to be awarded with by James L’60 and Catherine Denny through the preference to an outstanding law student residing in James and Catherine Denny Foundation. Brooklyn, New York, who has demonstrated financial need. Stanley and Mavis Metzger Endowed Scholarship Fund: Established by Stanley and Mavis Metzger to Richard J. and Barbara A. Phelan Scholarship provide financial assistance to students of Fund: Established by Richard J. Phelan, L'61, and Georgetown University Law Center who are Barbara A. Phelan to be awarded to students at the members of under-represented groups in the legal Law Center with demonstrated financial need. profession. The Daniel J. Piliero II Memorial Scholarship Miller & Chevalier Charitable Foundation Fund: Established in memory of Daniel J. Piliero Scholarship: Established by the Miller & Chevalier II, a Washington, D.C., attorney, committed parent, Charitable Foundation to assist students and dear friend to Georgetown University, by his demonstrating financial need. wife, Joyce, children, relatives, friends, and colleagues. Thomas and Helen Moloney Endowed Scholarship Fund: Established by a bequest from Thomas Law Prefects Scholarship Fund: Established in Moloney, C’28, L’31, to be awarded to law students 1999 by Law Center alumni who served as Prefects with demonstrated financial need. in undergraduate residence halls on Georgetown’s main campus while attending the Law Center, in The Moran Family Endowed Scholarship in Law: recognition of the assistance they received from the Established by Edmond J., B’67, and Judy Moran, University in the form of room and board. This N’68, to provide support to law students scholarship is to provide financial support to current demonstrating financial need, with preference to Law Center students with demonstrated need. students interested in careers in legal services. A. Kenneth Pye Scholarship Fund: Established by Edward P.and Joan N. Morgan Endowed Richard A. Hibey, L’65, LL.M.’66, in memory of Scholarship: Established by Linda J. Morgan, L’76, former Law Center Associate Dean and Professor and her husband, Michael E. Karam, F’72, L’76, A. Kenneth Pye, LL.B.’53, LL.M.’55, LL.D.’78, to L’82, in memory of her father, Edward P. Morgan, assist J.D. students with demonstrated need. and mother, Joan N. Morgan. Linda C. Quinn Memorial Scholarship: The Rita C. Murray Memorial Scholarship Fund: Established to honor the memory of Linda C. Established by Dennis I. Meyer, L’60, LL.M.’62, in Quinn, L'72, by her family, friends, classmates, col- memory of his mother-in-law. leagues and the law firm of Shearman & Sterling LLP, where Linda was a partner. This scholarship Carl W. Northrop Endowed Scholarship Fund: is awarded to a third year student who has demon- Established by Carl W. Northrop, L’76, to be strated merit and a strong interest in securities or awarded to law students with demonstrated corporate law. financial need. Milton M. Ratner Scholarship Fund: Established Martin J. O’Brien Law Scholarship Fund: by a grant from the Milton M. Ratner Foundation. Established by The Honorable Martin J. O’Brien, C’52, L’55, to be awarded to law students with demonstrated financial need. APPENDIX E: SCHOLARSHIPS 117

Janet L. Remien and Gilbert G. Menna Endowed The Leo Schlosberg Scholarship: Established in Scholarship Fund: Established by Janet L. Remien, memory of Leo Schlosberg, LL.B.’24, by his family L’82 and Gilbert G. Menna, L’82, L’83, to be and son, Hank M. Schlosberg, L’56. awarded to law students with demonstrated financial need. John F. Schrankel Scholarship Fund: Established by a bequest from John F. Schrankel, LL.M.’59. The Honorable John N. Reynolds Endowed Fund: Established by Nancy Doerr O’Neil, L’82, and The Schuyler Scholarship: Established by Jean H. Thomas F. O’Neil III, L’82, distinguished and loyal and William E. Schuyler, Jr., L’40, a distinguished alumni, in honor of Judge John N. Reynolds, L’50. patent attorney.

Harry Sansbury Ridgely Scholarship Fund: Donald E. Schwartz Memorial Scholarship Fund: Established by the estate of Helen Ridgely Kennedy Established in memory of the late Georgetown in honor of her father, Harry Sansbury Ridgely, University Law Center professor Donald E. LL.B. 1896, LL.M. 1897, to be awarded to law Schwartz, by his family and friends, in recognition students with demonstrated financial need. of his contributions to the development of corporate and securities law and to legal education. Marvin and Joan Rosenberg Scholarship Fund: Established by Marvin Rosenberg, L’61, LL.M.’67, Ivan Shandor Memorial Ukrainian American Bar and Joan Rosenberg to assist J.D. students with Association Endowed Scholarship Fund: demonstrated need. Established by Lidia Shandor in memory of her husband, Ivan Shandor, L’73, to be awarded with Louis and Anne Rosoff Scholarship: Established by preference to law students enrolled in the Master of the estate of Louis Rosoff, L’23, to assist students of Laws degree program who are residents of, or who high academic standing who have demonstrated have resided in, Ukraine. financial need, with preference to students from Connecticut. The William A. and May Nora Shea Memorial Scholarship Fund: Established in memory of Tom and Joan Rothman Endowed Scholarship William A. Shea, C’30, L’31, LL.D.’71, and May Fund: Established by Thomas M. Rothman, L’68, Nora Shea by the law firm of Shea & Gould, their and his wife, Joan, to provide assistance to Native colleagues, friends, and family. American law students who demonstrate financial need. Silver Family Endowed Scholarship Fund: Established by Peggy Silver, Sidney J. Silver, L'62, Rothschild Family Scholarship Fund: Established and David C. Silver, L'88, to be awarded to law by a bequest from Steve J. Rothschild, L’68, to be students with demonstrated financial need. awarded to law students with demonstrated financial need. Jonathan Sobeloff Memorial Scholarship Fund: Established by Mr. and Mrs. Isidore Sobeloff and Sidney Sachs Memorial Fund: Established in family in memory of the late Georgetown memory of Sidney S. Sachs, L’41, by his family and University Law Center professor Jonathan Sobeloff, friends to provide tuition assistance to students at who taught at the Law Center from 1966 to 1979. the Law Center with demonstrated financial need. Elizabeth Hunter Solomon Scholarship: Sallie Mae Scholarship Fund: Established by Established by Elizabeth Hunter Solomon to be Marianne M. Keler, F’76, L’80, and Michael R. awarded to law students with demonstrated Kershow, L’80, distinguished and loyal alumni. financial need.

The Daniel J. Sammon Scholarship Fund: C.V. Starr Scholarship Fund: Established by the Established in memory of her husband, Daniel Starr Foundation in honor of its founder, the late Sammon, L’60, by Juanita Sammon. C.V. Starr.

Morris A. Schapiro Scholarship Fund: Established Thomas Allan Steele, Jr. Endowed Scholarship by the M. A. Schapiro Fund. Fund: Established by Sarabelle Blackwell Steele, in memory of her husband, Thomas Allan Steele, Jr., Thomas F. Schlafly Scholarship Fund: Established L’41, to be awarded to law students with by Thomas F. Schlafly, C’70, L’77, a distinguished demonstrated financial need. alumnus, to be awarded to law students with demonstrated financial need. 118 APPENDIX E: SCHOLARSHIPS

Howard E. Steinberg Scholarship: Established by James L. Waite Endowed Scholarship Fund: Howard Steinberg, L’69, a distinguished and loyal Established by Donald L. Waite, L’59, and Anna T. alumnus. Waite in memory and honor of Donald’s brother, James L. Waite, L’58. William Carroll Stephenson, Mary Finley Stephenson, and Dennis Finley Stephenson Bertha Eulalie Wilmot Scholarship: Established by Memorial Scholarship: Established by Andrew W. David W. Wilmot, L’73, a distinguished and loyal Stephenson, L’76, to be awarded to a student with alumnus, in honor of his mother, Bertha Eulalie demonstrated financial need with preference for a Wilmot, to be awarded with preference to African- law student with either a Native-American back- American students with demonstrated need. ground or an alumnus/a of Boys Town of America Winston & Strawn Scholarship Fund: Established Jan A. Stransky Memorial Scholarship: Established by the law firm of Winston & Strawn LLP to be by the family and friends of Jan A. Stransky, a awarded with preference to a first year J.D. student member of the class of 1989 who died in his first with demonstrated financial need who contributes year of law school. Reflecting Jan’s spirit of commit- to the diverse economic, educational, and ethnic ment to public and community service, the Stransky background of the Law Center’s student body and Scholarship is awarded to students participating in who has expressed a desire to pursue a career in the Public Interest Law Scholars Program. private law firm practice.

Students of Hawaii Scholarship Fund: Established Women in Law as a Second Career Scholarship to assist law students from Hawaii who have Fund: Established by distinguished Law Center demonstrated financial need. The scholarship alumnae to assist women entering the legal awards from this fund are generated from the pro- profession as a second career. ceeds of the Bert and Susan Kobayashi Georgetown University Golf Tournament held in Hawaii and Raymund T. Yingling Scholarship Fund: gifts from loyal alumni/ae in Hawaii. Established by the estate of Raymund T. Yingling, L’21, to assist students of high academic standing John F. and Noreen C. Sweeney Scholarship: who have demonstrated financial need, with Established by Noreen C. Sweeney and John F. preference to Catholic students. Sweeney, L’73, to be awarded to students with demonstrated need, with preference to outstanding students from Washington, D.C.

Law Alumni of Texas Scholarship Fund: Established by Law Center alumni in Texas to assist J.D. students with demonstrated financial need, with preference to students from Texas.

The Martin S. Thaler Memorial Scholarship in Law and Philosophy: Established by the law firm of Weil, Gotshal & Manges to assist a student pursuing a joint degree in law and philosophy who demonstrates financial need.

Henry H. and Ernestine L. and Leslie Thomasina Thornton Endowed Scholarship Fund: Established by Leslie T. Thornton, L’83, in honor of her parents, to be awarded with preference to African-American J.D. students with demonstrated financial need.

William T. Vukowich Endowed Scholarship Fund: Established by Georgetown University Law Center Professor William T. Vukowich to be awarded to students with demonstrated financial need, with a preference for students who display an interest in consumer, commercial or related law. APPENDIX E: SCHOLARSHIPS 119

APPENDIX F: LOANS The Kuro Murase Loan Fund: Established by Jiro Murase, L’58, in memory of his father and by Harry C. Cox Loan: Established by the Estate of Saturo Murase, L’83, in memory of his grandfather. Irma C. Cox in memory of her husband, Harry C. Cox, L’12. Edward M. Ricci and the Honorable Mary E. Lupo Loan Fund: Established by Edward M. Ricci, The Paul Dean Loan Fund: Established by an L’73, and the Honorable Mary E. Lupo, L’74, to anonymous donor in honor of Paul Dean, LL.B.’46, support those students dedicated to serving the LL.M.’52, LL.D.’69, Dean of the Law Center from public interest. 1954 to 1969, and Professor of Law. Abe Plough Law Student Loan Fund: Established The Dean’s Loan Fund (The Law Center Loan by a grant from the Plough Foundation. Fund II): Established by an alumnus and benefactor as a supplement to The Law Center Loan Fund. Philip A. Ryan Memorial Loan: Established by the partners of the law firm of Baker & McKenzie in Bryan Farrell Student Loan: Established by memory of Philip A. Ryan, a partner with the firm Mrs. Eleanor Farrell in memory of her husband, and professor of law at Georgetown from 1949 Bryan Farrell, L’31. to 1966.

The George Arthur Ginsburg Student Loan Fund: William and Rebecca Sachs Loan: Established by Established by Mattie L. Ginsburg in memory of Sidney S. Sachs, L’41, in memory of his parents. her husband, George A. Ginsburg, L’24. The Joseph E. and Madeline M. Sheehy Student Richard Alan Gordon Student Emergency Loan Loan Fund: Established by Mrs. Sheehy and the Fund: Established by Paul A. Nussbaum, L’71, in late Mr. Sheehy, LL.B.’24, an attorney and official honor of Professor of Law, Richard Alan Gordon, with the Federal Trade Commission and a member B’50, L’53, LL.M.’61, to provide emergency loans to of the adjunct faculty of the Law Center from 1959 Law Center students. to 1969.

George Link, Jr. Loan: Established by the George The Davis and Maurine Weir Endowment Fund: Link, Jr. Foundation of New York. Established by Davis and Maurine Weir to assist disadvantaged students. Edward T. Mitchell Memorial Loans Program: Established by the law firm of Patton, Boggs & Blow in memory of the late Edward T. Mitchell, L’62, a former senior partner of the firm. 120 APPENDIX G: PRIZES AND AWARDS

APPENDIX G: PRIZES AND AWARDS The Beaudry Cup: The Beaudry Cup appellate advocacy competition was established in 1952 to ABA/BNA Award for Excellence in Health Care honor the best advocates of the first year class. It is Law: This award is presented annually to up to named in honor of Robert J. Beaudry, who distin- three graduating students with the highest grade guished himself by virtue of his outstanding enthu- point average in a basic health law course or who siasm, scholarship and ability in oral argument, and are otherwise regarded as outstanding in these who was killed in a tragic accident in the Spring of fields. his first year. Each year, the name of the winner of the Competition is inscribed on the Beaudry Cup, ABA/BNA Award for Excellence in Intellectual on permanent display in the trophy case outside the Property Law: This award is presented annually to Philip A. Hart Auditorium. up to three graduating students with the highest grade point average in a basic intellectual property The Nathan Burkan Memorial Competition: law course or who are otherwise regarded as This competition was established by the American outstanding in these fields. Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers in memory of Nathan Burkan. A monetary award is ABA/BNA Award for Excellence in Labor and made each year to the student submitting the best Employment Law: This award is presented annually thesis, in the judgment of the dean, on an assigned to up to three graduating students with the highest subject in the field of copyright law. The second grade point average in a basic labor and/or employ- place award is also a monetary award. ment law course or who are otherwise regarded as outstanding in these fields. CALI Excellence for the Future Award: CALI, the Center for Computer-Assisted Legal Instruction, ALI/ABA Scholarship and Leadership Award presents an award to the student in each law school This award is presented to the graduating student course achieving the top grade in the course. The who best represents a combination of leadership and award is a certificate suitable for framing. CALI is a scholarship. This award consists of a one-year sub- consortium of the nation’s law schools which pro- scription to a variety of ALI-ABA articles and vides research and development and a distribution materials, free tuition to a professional skills course, network for computer-assisted instruction in the and a copy of Red Flags: A Lawyer's Handbook on law. Its library of instructional materials contains Legal Ethics. over 90 lessons in 21 areas of the law. CALI’s com- mitment to innovation and achievement in teaching American Bankruptcy Institute Medal of and learning in the law schools prompted it to Excellence: A medal, certificate, and one-year sponsor this awards program. membership in the American Bankruptcy Institute is awarded annually to the graduating student who Thomas Bradbury Chetwood, S.J. Prize: A plaque has achieved academic excellence in the area of is awarded to graduating students who achieve the bankruptcy law. rank of distinction and have the highest academic average in each of the following programs, Master American Bankruptcy Law Journal Student Prize: of Laws in Taxation, Master of Laws in the The American Bankruptcy Law Journal will award a Graduate Program for International Students, free one-year subscription to the Journal to the stu- Master of Laws in International and Comparative dent who earns the highest grade in any bankruptcy Law, Master of Laws in Securities and Financial class at any accredited United States law school. Regulation, and Master of Laws. This prize was founded by the Law Center Class of 1928 in honor American Bar Association Section of Urban, State, of the Reverend Thomas B. Chetwood, S.J., a and Local Government Law Certificate of former Regent of the Law Center. Recognition: This award is designated to the top student of each section of Land Use and Local Joyce Chiang Memorial Award: Established in Government Law. Each student will receive from memory of Joyce Chiang, L’95, by her classmates, the American Bar Association a personalized award friends, and colleagues, to be awarded to an evening certificate in recognition of their academic student with a demonstrable commitment to public achievement. service.

The Baker & McKenzie Law Student Assistance The Jeffrey Crandall Award: A prize of $100 will Program: Established by the law firm of Baker & be awarded annually to the third year student who McKenzie to assist first year minority students. best exemplifies the ideals and commitment of the late Jeffrey Crandall, whose involvement in Legal Aid and personal dedication to his fellow man inspired the establishment of the fund in his name. APPENDIX G: PRIZES AND AWARDS 121

Dean’s Certificate: This honor is presented to of a majority of the graduate student’s hours in the graduating students in recognition of special and field of tax law at any accredited institution selected outstanding service to the Law Center community. by the recipient. The graduate study may be under- taken on either a full time or part time basis. The Kathleen Stowe Dixon Visiting Student Prize: A fund to support the Award was donated in 1977 by prize of $100 is awarded annually to the visiting the law firm of Hogan & Hartson as a memorial to student earning the highest grade point average its distinguished founding partner, Nelson T. Hartson, during his or her year at Georgetown University Esquire. Mr. Hartson served as the senior partner of Law Center. The prize was created by a former the firm for 47 years and was for a time an Adjunct visiting student in honor of his mother. Professor of Taxation at the Law Center.

The Dean Hugh J. Fegan Memorial Prize: A prize Deborah K. Hauger Memorial Fellowship Fund: of $100 is awarded annually to the student in the Established by the family, friends and colleagues of Day Division with the best overall academic record “Deb” Hauger, L’88, this fund is a tribute to her life, at the conclusion of the first year. The award is interests and dedication to the ideals she worked so given in memory of Dean Fegan, who devoted hard to achieve. Each year, a recent graduate is nearly half a century to the Law School. His guid- selected as a Deborah K. Hauger Fellow and is ing presence from 1911 to 1943 greatly enhanced awarded a stipend to facilitate the study of issues in Georgetown’s development during these critical international affairs, specifically in the realm of years. peacekeeping in developing nations.

Michael Feldman Advocacy Award: This is an Kirby S. Howlett III Memorial Award: Established award given by vote of the students in the Criminal by the family and friends of Kirby S. Howlett III, Justice Clinic to the outstanding advocate in the adjunct professor to the Criminal Justice Clinic, to clinic. honor his professional accomplishments. A grant is awarded annually to a recent graduate who has par- Georgetown Club of Metropolitan Washington, ticipated in the Criminal or Juvenile Justice Clinics, D.C. Award: The Georgetown Club of accrued student loans while attending the Law Metropolitan Washington, D.C., annually awards a Center and upon graduation accepts employment at gift to the graduating J.D. student from the a public defenders office. Metropolitan Washington, D.C., area with the best overall academic performance. The International Academy of Trial Lawyers’ Award: Each year a plaque is awarded to trial clinic Georgetown Law Journal Meritorious Service students excelling in the art of advocacy. One grad- Award: The Editor in Chief recognizes up to four uating student from each of the advocacy clinical graduating Journal members whose hard work and programs is selected by the Dean upon the recom- spirit as non-Senior board members made an out- mendation of the faculty supervisors for the clinics. standing contribution to the Journal. Winners The award is on permanent display outside the receive a bound and embossed copy of their year’s Moot Courtroom. In addition, each winner receives Volume. a scroll suitable for framing.

Alan J. Goldstein Memorial Award: An annual cash The Juvenile Justice Clinic Public Service Award: award to the Criminal Justice Clinic student who This cash award, provided by the alumni of the best demonstrates the qualities Alan J. Goldstein Juvenile Justice Clinic to help defray the cost of stu- tried to instill in his students: the use of intelli- dent loans, is given each year to a graduating clinic gence, creativity, and resourcefulness in defending student who has accepted a job providing service to criminal clients and a dedication to criminal law, the community. fair play, and justice. The Kappa Beta Pi Prize: A cash award of $350 Greenfield Trial Practice Award: Substantial mone- is made annually to the student with the highest tary awards to help defray the cost of student loans academic average upon the completion of the first are given to several students in the Criminal Justice year. Clinic who have accepted jobs as prosecutors and as public defenders. The Milton A. Kaufman Prize: A cash award and an accompanying plaque are offered annually to the The Nelson T. Hartson Memorial Award: This student who does the best work for the year on the annual scholarship award is made to a graduating Georgetown Law Journal. The late Milton A. Georgetown University Law Center student in the Kaufman, of the District of Columbia Bar, graduated Juris Doctor program on the basis of scholastic from the Law Center in the class of 1913. achievement, economic need, or a combination of the two factors. The scholarship is used for graduate study in a degree program permitting concentration 122 APPENDIX G: PRIZES AND AWARDS

The Charles A. Keigwin Award: Each year a plaque The Saint Thomas More Award: An award consist- is awarded to the student in the Evening Division ing of a framed certificate will be given to the top with the best overall academic record at the conclu- three graduating journal members for their out- sion of the first year. The prize honors the memory standing work on the Georgetown Journal of Legal of Charles Keigwin, a distinguished professor at the Ethics and their names will be added to a perpetual Law School for over 20 years. plaque in the Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics office. John F. Kennedy Labor Law Award: In memory of John F. Kennedy, President of the United States, National Association of Women Lawyers’ Award: January 20, 1961 to November 22, 1963, a fund has Presented to an outstanding graduating student who been created by Jacob Kossman used to award an has achieved academic excellence and contributes to annual cash award to the graduating senior who has the advancement of women in society. achieved the best overall performance in the field of Labor Law. An additional sum has been given by Vincent G. Panati Memorial Award: From pro- Mr. Kossman for the creation and annual award of a ceeds of a fund created by the friends of the late plaque to accompany the John F. Kennedy Labor Vincent G. Panati, LL.B.’34, former first Assistant Law Award. District Attorney for Philadelphia and former Secretary of Revenue for the Commonwealth of The Leahy Moot Court Competition: Each year, Pennsylvania, a prize of $300 is awarded each year some of the best Moot Court advocates in the Law to the student in the Day or Evening Division Center are honored in the Leahy Moot Court achieving the best combined scholastic record in the Competition, open to all upperclass students. The courses in Criminal Justice. Competition is named in memory of William E. Leahy, a Law Center alumnus and an outstanding Bettina E. Pruckmayr Memorial Award: An annual advocate. The name of the winner of the Competition cash award is presented annually to the third year is inscribed on the Leahy Cup and on the Roll of Best student who best exemplifies a commitment to the Advocates on permanent display outside the Philip A. ideals of the late Bettina E. Pruckmayr, whose belief Hart Auditorium. in human rights, and the obligation of everyone to ensure the protection of these rights, inspired the The Francis E. Lucey, S.J. Award: The graduating establishment of this fund in her name. student who has earned the highest academic aver- age for his or her law school career will receive a The Leon Robbin Patent Award: From proceeds of plaque, awarded in honor of Rev. Francis E. Lucey, a fund created by Leon Robbin, LL.B.’22, a gold Regent of the Law School for 30 years. Father medallion will be awarded annually to the graduat- Lucey guided the school during the difficult years of ing student who has done the best work in the field the Depression and World War II and lived to see of patent law at the Law Center. Georgetown’s emergence as the important national law school which it is today. The Sewall Key Prize: The Sewall Key Prize of $200 has been established by friends of the late James John McTigue Essay Award: Each year the Sewall Key, LL.B.’20, former Special Assistant to dean selects a group of seminars eligible to compete the Attorney General, Tax Division, Department of for this award. A certificate and a cash prize is made Justice. The prize is awarded annually to the gradu- annually to the author of the best seminar paper for ating senior who does the best work in the field of each designated seminar. taxation at the Law Center.

The George Brent Mickum III Prize: The family, The Tamm Memorial Award: A prize of $300 and a colleagues and friends of George Brent Mickum III, plaque are awarded annually as a prize for the best C’49, L’52, have established this prize to honor the student writing on the Georgetown Law Journal. The memory of George Mickum, a former member of award fund was created in memory of the Honorable the firm of Steptoe and Johnson. The prize of Edward Allen Tamm by Chief Justice and Mrs. $3,000 is awarded annually to the second year full Warren Burger. time or third year part time division student who achieved the best overall academic record at the Tutorial Program Award: In recognition of the completion of all first year courses the prior Spring. outstanding contributions made to the Law Center’s The prize only applies to first year courses. academic program. APPENDIX G: PRIZES AND AWARDS 123

The Washington Law Reporter Prize: Established by the Washington Law Reporter Company, the Prize consists of a one-year subscription to the Washington Law Reporter. Awards are made annu- ally to one student whose efforts during the preced- ing six months have most contributed to the success of the Student Bar Association. Selection is made by the dean upon recommendation of the president of the Student Bar Association. x e d n I

Academic Attrition ...... 18 Certificate in National Security Law, Requirements Academic Calendar, ...... 127 for...... 39 Academic Evaluation System...... 17 Certificate in International Human Rights Law . . 39 Academic Honors, Graduate Program...... 46 Certificate in World Trade Organization Academic Honors, J.D. Program ...... 18 (WTO) Studies, Requirements for ...... 40 Academic Requirements, Graduate Program. . . 41 Chaplains and Counselors ...... 88 Academic Requirements and Policies, Charles Fahy Distinguished Adjunct Professor J.D. Program ...... 14 Award Recipients ...... 111 Academic Resource Programs ...... 83 Clinic Enrollment Policies ...... 24 Adjunct Faculty, Graduate Program...... 104 Clinics ...... 90 Adjunct Faculty, J.D. Program ...... 95 Computer Systems Acceptable Use Policy, Administrative Measures to Protect Community Georgetown University ...... 69 Welfare ...... 59 Consensual Sexual Relationships Between Senior Administrative Officers and Officers of Instruction, and Junior Members of the University Directory of ...... 87 Community, Georgetown University Policy Admissions Office ...... 88 Statement on ...... 67 Advanced Standing, Graduate Program...... 44 Continuing Legal Education ...... 88 Advanced Standing for Credit Earned as a Counselors, Chaplains and...... 88 J.D. Student at Georgetown University Credit for Courses in the Law Center Law Center ...... 44 Graduate Program ...... 21 Affirmative Action Grievance Procedures to Credit for Courses in the Graduate School of Investigate Allegations of Discrimination, Georgetown University ...... 21 Georgetown University ...... 64 Credit for Law Center Summer Programs. . . . . 21 Alumni, Development and Public Relations . . . 88 Credit for Study Outside the Law Center . . . . . 21 Appellate Litigation Clinic ...... 90 Credit for Work Completed at Application to Graduate...... 51 Other Law Schools ...... 22 Asian Law and Policy Studies Program ...... 91 Credits Earned at Other Institutions, Graduate Attendance and Participation...... 20, 44 Program ...... 44 Audiotaping of Classes Policy and Crime Awareness and Campus Security ...... 52 Procedures ...... 51 Criminal Justice Clinic...... 90 Awards, Prizes and ...... 120 Curriculum “A” Courses ...... 81 Bar Admissions, Examinations, and Reviews. . . 51 Curriculum “A” Electives ...... 81 Board of Directors ...... 87 Curriculum “B” Courses...... 81 Board of Visitors, Law Center ...... 92 D.C. Street Law Project...... 91 Career Services Office ...... 88 Deans and Vice Presidents...... 87 Center for Applied Legal Studies ...... 90 Deans Emeriti ...... 92 Center for Constitutional Studies ...... 91 Directory of Administrative Officers and Center for Law & the Public’s Health at Officers of Instruction ...... 87 Georgetown and Johns Hopkins University. . . 91 Discrimination Grievance Procedures Administered Certificate in Employee Benefits Law, by Office of Career Services ...... 70 Requirements for ...... 39 Doctor of Juridical Science, Requirements for . . 40 Domestic Violence Clinic ...... 90

124 INDEX 125

Duplication of Courses, Graduate Program. . . . 43 Juris Doctor/Master of Arts in Latin American Duplication of Courses, J.D. Program ...... 23 Studies ...... 32 Enrollment and Credit Policies, Juris Doctor/Master of Arts in Graduate Program ...... 43 Security Studies ...... 32 Enrollment for Bar Purposes, Juris Doctor/Master of Business Graduate Program ...... 43 Administration ...... 29 Environmental Law and Policy Institute ...... 91 Juris Doctor/Master of Public Health ...... 33 Examinations ...... 20 Juris Doctor/Master of Public Policy ...... 34 Exam Deferral Policy ...... 52 Juris Doctor/Master of Science in Executive Officers of the University, The...... 92 Foreign Service...... 30 Executive Vice President, Juris Doctor/Ph.D. in Government ...... 33 Law Center Affairs ...... 87 Juris Doctor/Ph.D. in Philosophy ...... 33 Federal Legislation Clinic ...... 90 Juvenile Justice Clinic...... 90 Financial Aid Office...... 89 Law Center Deans and Vice Presidents...... 87 Financial Planning, Administrative and Support Law Library, The ...... 89 Services...... 89 Law Students in Court Clinic ...... 91 First Year Continuing Orientation...... 83 Leaves of Absence and Withdrawal First -Year J.D. Program of Study ...... 81 from the Law Center ...... 24 First Year Tutorial Program ...... 83 Legal Writing Requirement ...... 14 Full Time and Part Time Enrollment Defined, Limitations on Academic Credit per Semester, Graduate Program ...... 43 Graduate Program ...... 43 Full Time Faculty...... 4 LL.M. Externship Program ...... 42 General Administrative Policies...... 49 Loans ...... 119 General Requirements for All LL.M. Students . 37 Master of Laws, Foreign-Educated Attorneys. . 38 General Requirements for LL.M. Degree Master of Laws, U.S.-Educated Students Wishing to J.D. Graduates ...... 37 Qualify for Distinction ...... 46 Master of Laws in Advocacy, U.S.-Educated J.D. Grade Change Policy, Graduate Program . . . . . 46 Graduates ...... 37 Grade Review Policies, Graduate Program . . . . 45 Master of Laws in International Legal Studies, Grading, Graduate Program...... 45 Foreign-Educated Attorneys ...... 38 Grading System, J.D...... 17 Master of Laws in Securities and Financial Graduate Curriculum ...... 82 Regulation, Foreign-Educated Attorneys . . . 38 Graduate Independent Research ...... 41 Master of Laws in Securities and Financial Graduate Program, Tuition and Fees ...... 75 Regulation, U.S.-Educated J.D. Graduates . . 38 Graduate Programs Office ...... 89 Master of Laws in Taxation, Foreign-Educated Harrison Institute for Public Law ...... 90 Attorneys ...... 38 Health Insurance ...... 53 Master of Laws in Taxation, U.S.-Educated Human Rights Institute ...... 91 J.D. Graduates ...... 38 I.D. Cards...... 53 Monthly Payment Plan ...... 77 Immunization Records ...... 53 Non-Degree Enrollment, Graduate Program . . 40 Institute for Public Representation ...... 90 Non-Immigrant Visas, Specific Visa Reporting Institute for the Study of International Requirements for International Students . . . 17 Migration ...... 91 Office of Public Interest and Institute of International Economic Law...... 91 Community Service ...... 89 Institutes and Other Scholarly Programs...... 91 Office of Student Affairs and Residence Life . . 89 International Women’s Human Rights Clinic . . 90 Office of the Registrar ...... 89 J.D. Degree Requirements ...... 14 Officers of the University, The Executive...... 92 J.D. Program, Academic Services...... 13 Other Fees, Tuition and Fees ...... 76 J.D. Program, Full Time...... 13 Pass/Fail Option...... 17 J.D. Program, Part Time ...... 13 Period of Study, Graduate Program ...... 41 J.D. Program of Study, The Upperclass ...... 81 Plagiarism...... 62 Joint Degree Programs ...... 27 Post LL.M. Degree Employment ...... 47 Joint Degree Programs, Tuition and Fees...... 75 Prizes and Awards ...... 120 Juris Doctor Program, Tuition and Fees...... 75 Probation, Graduate Program ...... 46 Juris Doctor/Master of Arts in Arab Studies. . . 30 Professional Responsibility, Graduate Juris Doctor/Master of Arts in Russian, Eurasian, Program ...... 48 and East European Studies ...... 31 Professional Responsibility Requirement ...... 15 Juris Doctor/Master of Arts in German and Professors Emeriti ...... 92 European Studies ...... 31 Ranking of Students...... 46 126 INDEX

Registration for Courses...... 53 Required First Year Program, J.D. Program. . . . 81 Required Time in Residence, J.D. Program . . . . 15 Review Process for a Failing Grade ...... 21 Review Process for a Passing Grade...... 21 Scholarships ...... 112 Sexual Harassment, Georgetown University Policy Statement on ...... 66 Seminar Papers, Graduate Program ...... 42 Sloan Project on Business Institutions, The. . . . 91 Student Access+ ...... 54 Student Conduct in the Job Search Process. . . . 64 Student Disciplinary Code...... 59 Student Employment, Restrictions on ...... 23 Student Employment Grievances ...... 70 Student Grievances in Academic and Non-Employment Matters ...... 66 Student Records, Academic ...... 54 Student Records, Access...... 54 Student Records, Directory Information, and Confidentiality ...... 54 Student Work, Confidentiality...... 55 Summer Programs ...... 83 Supervised Research...... 14 Supreme Court Institute ...... 92 Transcripts ...... 55 Transfer between J.D. Full Time and Part Time Programs ...... 16 Transfer between Full Time and Part Time Status, Graduate Program ...... 39 Transfer between LL.M. Degree Programs . . . . 39 Transfer of Credit, Graduate Program...... 43 Tuition and Fees...... 73 Tuition and Fee Administrative Regulations . . . 76 Tuition Deferments ...... 77 Tuition Refund Insurance ...... 78 Tuition Refund Schedule ...... 77 Tutorial Program, First Year...... 83 Two Separate LL.M. Degrees, Requirements for ...... 39 Upperclass J.D. Program of Study ...... 81 Upperclass Legal Writing Requirement...... 14 Visa, Special Reporting Requirements for International Students ...... 46 Withdrawal for Failure to Register, Graduate Program ...... 48 Withdrawals from Individual Courses ...... 47 Women’s Law and Public Policy Fellowship . . . 91 Workplace Flexibility 2010 ...... 92 Writing Center, The...... 83 Written Work, J.D. Program ...... 20 Written Work, Graduate Program ...... 45 r a d n e l a C c i m e d a c A 7 0 0 2 – 6 0 0 2

2006 FALL SEMESTER

Mon., July 24 ...... Tuition due for incoming J.D. students Tuition due for incoming full-time Graduate Students Sat., Aug. 26 - Sun., Aug. 27 ...... On-Campus Interview Program Orientation Mon., Aug. 28 ...... On-Campus Interview Week Begins Fri., Aug. 25 ...... Registration for incoming JD Transfer Students Mon., Aug. 28 ...... Registration for incoming JD Visiting Students Tues., Aug. 29 - Wed., Aug. 30...... Registration for First Year JD Students Wed., Aug. 30 - Fri., Sept. 1...... First Year Orientation Mon., Aug. 28...... Registration and Orientation for new Graduate Students Tuition due for part-time Graduate Students Tues., Aug. 29 - Thurs., Aug. 31...... Continuing Orientation for new Graduate Students Thurs., August 31...... Late Registration: all unregistered New and Continuing Students ($70 late fee) (Tuition due upon registration) Tuition due for all Continuing, Transfer and Visiting Students Financial Aid Transactions: All Students Mon., Sept. 4...... LABOR DAY HOLIDAY: No classes meet Tues., Sept. 5...... Classes Begin Tues., Sept. 5 – Tues., Sept. 12...... Add/Drop and Wait-list activity for Fall and Spring Courses Late Registration: (Tuition due upon registration) Mon., Oct. 9...... COLUMBUS DAY HOLIDAY: No classes meet Tues., Oct. 10...... Monday classes meet instead of Tuesday classes Wed., Nov. 22 - Sun., Nov. 26...... THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY: No classes meet Fri., Dec. 8...... Last day of classes Tues., Dec. 12 – Sat., Dec. 23...... Final Exams Fri., Dec. 22...... All Papers Due unless other due date set by the professor

127 128 INDEX

2007 SPRING SEMESTER . . Fri., Jan. 5...... Spring tuition due for all students Mon., Jan. 8...... Week One classes begin for first-year J.D. Students Week-long mini courses for upperclass students begin Note: Some clinics may require their students to begin clinic activities this week Mon., Jan. 15...... MARTIN LUTHER KING HOLIDAY: No classes meet Tues., Jan. 16...... Regular, semester-long classes begin for all students Tues., Jan. 16 – Tues., Jan. 23...... Add/Drop and Wait-list activity Late Registration: Continuing students ($70 late fee) (Tuition due upon registration) Mon., Feb. 19...... PRESIDENTS DAY: No classes meet Tues., Feb. 20 – Wed., Feb. 21...... Faculty Retreat: No classes meet Thurs., Feb. 22 ...... Monday classes meet instead of Thursday classes Sat., March 3 – Sun., March 11...... SPRING BREAK: No classes meet Fri., April 6 – Sun., April 8...... Easter Break: No classes meet Sat., April 28...... Last Day of Classes Mon., April 30...... Snow Make Up and Reading Day May Graduates’ Papers Due unless an earlier due date set by the professor Tues., May 1 - Tues., May 15...... Final Exams Tues., May 15...... All Other Papers Due unless due date set by the professor Sun., May 20...... Commencement

Georgetown University Law Center 600 New Jersey Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001