University of Groningen Modernizing the Energy Charter Treaty Verburg

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

University of Groningen Modernizing the Energy Charter Treaty Verburg University of Groningen Modernizing the Energy Charter Treaty Verburg, Cees DOI: 10.33612/diss.109697150 IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2020 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Verburg, C. (2020). Modernizing the Energy Charter Treaty: facilitating foreign investment in the renewable energy sector. University of Groningen. https://doi.org/10.33612/diss.109697150 Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 05-10-2021 Modernizing the Energy Charter Treaty – Facilitating Foreign Investment in the Renewable Energy Sector Cees Verburg 2019 Cees_Binnenwerk.indd 1 04/12/2019 11:35:55 Modernizing the Energy Charter Treaty – Facilitating Foreign Investment in the Renewable Energy Sector ISBN/EAN: 978-94-6375-685-3 Copyright © 2019 Cees Verburg All rights reserved. No part of this thesis may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any way or by any means without the prior permission of the author, or when applicable, of the publishers of the scientific papers. Cover design by Birgit Vredenburg Layout and design by Birgit Vredenburg, persoonlijkproefschrift.nl. Printed by Ridderprint BV | www.ridderprint.nl Cees_Binnenwerk.indd 2 04/12/2019 11:35:55 Cees_Binnenwerk.indd 3 04/12/2019 11:35:56 Supervisors Assessment Committee Prof. M.M. Roggenkamp Prof. M.M.T.A. Brus Prof. R. Leal-Arcas Prof. E.C.P.D.C. De Brabandere Prof. P. Merkouris Cees_Binnenwerk.indd 4 04/12/2019 11:35:56 Cees_Binnenwerk.indd 5 04/12/2019 11:35:56 Cees_Binnenwerk.indd 6 04/12/2019 11:35:56 Voor Inge Cees_Binnenwerk.indd 7 04/12/2019 11:35:56 I. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Writing a PhD dissertation can best be compared to the weather. When you start, with many years still to go and no deadlines in sight, the skies are clear and happy days are abound. However, when the years go by and the deadline comes closer, clouds gather. Clouds that increasingly adopt a dark(er) shade of color. There is, or at least so it feels, no escape from these increasingly dark clouds. You can go on vacation to a sunny destination, but as long as your dissertation does not write itself, all will be to little avail. Although this sounds much more gruesome than it really was – and the book that you are holding means that I have (almost) made it – I could not have finished this project without the help and support of many. Without attempting to provide an exhaustive overview of all those who helped, guided and inspired me along the way, a few people deserve some specific attention. In the first place, I would like to express my gratitude for the support and supervision that I received from my supervisors, Martha Roggenkamp, Marcel Brus, and Ruven Fleming. I have experienced the whole process of writing a dissertation as a rather pleasant one and you all played a major role in that. Also, I am appreciative for the many opportunities you gave me throughout the years for lectures, presentations and publications. Over the last four years I was blessed with many great colleagues at the faculty of law, the department of Transboundary Legal Studies and especially the Groningen Centre of Energy Law. I have always enjoyed the working atmosphere and for that I thank you all. A special thanks goes to Stibbe – in particular Martin in de Braekt and the late Wouter Geldhof – and the Dutch Energy Law Association (NeVER) – especially René van ‘t Hoft – for making this research project possible. Since working in academia can be a rather lonesome affair I always highly appreciated the close ties to practice. In fact, it is safe to say that the experiences of the last few years contributed significantly to the choice for the next step in my career. I am also indebted to those who helped me in the final stages of my PhD, such as the proofreaders Frank, Sander, and Inge as well as Jaap and Joris for assisting me during the moment of truth. Cees_Binnenwerk.indd 8 04/12/2019 11:35:56 Penultimately, I would like to thank my parents, Johan and Cathrien, for their hospitality during the last four years. At times they must have considered me as a boomerang child. It goes without saying that working in Groningen and living in The Hague would have been much more challenging if it meant commuting back and forth. Thanks to your hospitality, this was not necessary. Finally, I would like to thank my wife Inge. I know that my many absences from home over the last years were not always easy, let alone the ideal start of a marriage. I will always be grateful for your support. Cees Verburg The Hague, August 2019 Cees_Binnenwerk.indd 9 04/12/2019 11:35:56 II. ABRIDGED TABLE OF CONTENTS i. Acknowledgements 8 ii. Abridged Table of Contents 10 iii. Extended Table of Contents 12 iv. List of Abbreviations 17 v. Table of Cases 21 vi. Table of Treaties and Other Relevant International Instruments 43 vii. Table of EU and Domestic Legislation 56 1. Introduction and Research Design 60 1.1. Research Objective and Contribution 64 1.2. Research Question 66 1.3. Research Design 69 1.4. Delineation and Limitations 75 2. Economic Theoretical Framework of Investment and Trade 80 Agreements 2.1. Macro-Economic Theories: Investment and Trade 81 2.2. Micro-Economic Theories 88 2.3. The Notion of Transaction Costs 92 2.4. Cost of Capital 93 2.5. Conclusion 96 3. The Energy Sector and Renewable Energy Sources 100 3.1. The Organization of the Energy Sector and Challenges for the 100 Energy Transition 3.2. Investors in the Renewable Energy Sector 104 3.3. The Interrelatedness of Investment and Trade in the Renewable 109 Energy Sector 3.4. Barriers to Investment and Trade in the Renewable Energy Sector 114 3.5. Political and Regulatory Risks in the Renewable Energy Sector: 124 The Case of Spain 3.6. Conclusion 128 4. The Energy Charter Treaty – Origin and Contemporary Relevance 132 4.1. Trade 135 4.2. Transit 137 4.3. Investment: Object, Purpose, and Scope of the Investment Chapter 139 4.4. Conclusion 150 5. Investment Protection in Part III of the Energy Charter Treaty 154 5.1. Stable, Equitable, Favorable and Transparent Investment 154 Conditions Cees_Binnenwerk.indd 10 04/12/2019 11:35:56 5.2. Fair and Equitable Treatment 157 5.3. Most Constant Protection and Security 187 5.4. Non-Impairment Standard 197 5.5. No Treatment Less Favorable than Required by International Law 213 5.6. Umbrella Clause 217 5.7. National- and Most Favored Nation Treatment 236 5.8. Effective Means Clause 245 5.9. Compensation for Losses 253 5.10. Expropriation 255 5.11. Conclusion 281 6. Investment Promotion in Part III of the Energy Charter Treaty 286 6.1. Liberalization of FDI 286 6.2. Transfer of Funds 293 6.3. Trade Related Investment Measures 298 6.4. Key Personnel 310 6.5. Conclusion 314 7. Carve-out and Exceptions 318 7.1. Taxation 318 7.2. General Exceptions 328 7.3. Conclusion 335 8. Facilitating Renewable Energy Investments: The Lege Ferenda 338 8.1. Shortcomings in the Existing Legal Framework of the ECT 338 8.2. Investment Protection 340 8.3. Investment Promotion in the Renewable Energy Sector 345 8.4. Conclusion 362 9. Legal Tools Available to Modernize the Energy Charter Treaty 366 9.1. Changing or Supplementing the Substantive Rules 366 9.2. Clarifying the Content of Existing Rules 369 9.3. Conclusion 378 10. Recommendations and Conclusion 382 10.1. Investment Protection 384 10.2. Investment Promotion 387 10.3. Comprehensive Agreement on RES Investment and Trade 391 10.4. Epilogue 392 Bibliography 394 Nederlandse Samenvatting 432 Summary 435 Curriculum Vitae 436 Cees_Binnenwerk.indd 11 04/12/2019 11:35:56 III. EXTENDED TABLE OF CONTENTS i. Acknowledgements 8 ii. Abridged Table of Contents 10 iii. Extended Table of Contents 12 iv. List of Abbreviations 17 v. Table of Cases 21 vi. Table of Treaties and Other Relevant International Instruments 43 vii. Table of EU and Domestic Legislation 56 1. Introduction and Research Design 60 1.1. Research Objective and Contribution 64 1.2. Research Question 66 1.2.1. Sub-Questions 67 1.3. Research Design 69 1.3.1. Theoretical Assessment Framework 69 1.3.2. Comparative Approach 69 1.3.3. Interpreting the Law and Establishing its Content 70 1.3.4. Practical Research Methods Employed 71 1.4. Delineation and Limitations 75 2.
Recommended publications
  • Business Valuation and Taxes Procedure, Law, and Perspective
    Business Valuation and Taxes Procedure, Law, and Perspective David Laro Judge, U.S. Tax Court Shannon P. Pratt CFA, FASA, MCBA, CM&A, MCBC John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Business Valuation and Taxes Business Valuation and Taxes Procedure, Law, and Perspective David Laro Judge, U.S. Tax Court Shannon P. Pratt CFA, FASA, MCBA, CM&A, MCBC John Wiley & Sons, Inc. This book is printed on acid-free paper. ∞ Copyright © 2005 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. All rights reserved. Published simultaneously in Canada No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400, fax 978-646-8600, or on the Web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, 201-748-6011, fax 201-748-6008. Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representatives or written sales materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgetown University Law Center
    GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY LAW CENTER UNIVERSITYLAW GEORGETOWN GBULLETIN 2006–2007 EORGETOWN FULL TIME FACULTY 1 JURIS DOCTOR PROGRAM 11 JOINT DEGREE PROGRAMS 27 GRADUATE PROGRAMS 35 s t n GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES 49 e t n CONDUCT POLICIES 57 o C f TUITION AND FEES 73 o e l b THE LAW CURRICULUM 79 a T APPENDICES 85 Appendix A: Directory of Administrative Officers and Officers of Instruction 87 Appendix B: J.D. Program Adjunct Faculty 95 Appendix C: Graduate Program Adjunct Faculty 104 Appendix D: Charles Fahy Distinguished Adjunct Professor Award Recipients 111 Appendix E: Scholarships 112 Appendix F: Loans 119 Appendix G: Prizes and Awards 120 INDEX 124 2006-2007 ACADEMIC CALENDAR 127 This Bulletin contains information about the faculty of the Law Center, the law curriculum and degree requirements, and policies governing members of the community. Students are responsible for knowledge of its content. i DEANS ANDVICEPRESIDENTS FULL TIME FACULTY 2006–2007 FULL TIMEFACULTY 4 3 1 Full Time Faculty FULL TIME FACULTY 3 Members of the Law Center faculty represent an Andrew P.Cornblatt extraordinary range of professional and scholarly Associate Vice President (Graduate Admissions Programs); accomplishment in every area of legal practice. Dean of Admissions Many have achieved national or international B.A., Harvard; J.D., Boston College prominence and remain actively involved in their specialized field. Members of the Georgetown fac- ulty share a common commitment to teaching; they Deborah Epstein place a special value on accessibility and informal Associate Dean (Clinical Education and Public Interest discussion. They share the desire to help students & Community Service Programs); Director, Domestic learn how to view each legal issue from the broadest Violence Clinic; Professor of Law intellectual and social perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court Clerkships for Four of NYU
    Volume 12 Cover: Bankoku Sekai Igyozu This Japanese woodcut from the early Tokugawa period was produced circa 1645, shortly after Japan was closed to all foreigners from outside the China- Korea-Ryukyu region, other than the Dutch. The illustrations of the diverse peoples of the world are influenced by foreign sources—direct observation was limited by restrictions on Japanese travel abroad and on foreign settlement in Japan. The map reflects new European cartological knowledge and map- making techniques, especially from Holland. It is reproduced with the kind permission of Tenri Central Library, Tenri University, Japan. © 2002 New York University School of Law All Rights Reserved MESSAGE FROM DEAN REVESZ 1 S MANY OF YOU KNOW, I RECENTLY BECAME THE 14TH Dean of NYU Law. It has been a year of challenge and change— A both for NYU and for the city we call our campus—and it is an honor for me to serve the Law School during these times of transformation. One year ago this month, the tragic events of September 11 left an indeli- ble mark on the collective soul of our nation. From those first awful moments after the planes hit, the nation has struggled to understand the forces leading to the attack and to find new ways to meet the challenges of a world that is for- ever changed. Here at NYU Law, faculty and students responded immediately to the crisis by opening dialogues on the complex legal issues arising from the attacks. Throughout the academic year, conversations in the classroom, conferences, colloquia, and symposia designed to shed new light on difficult issues, and new directions in scholarship all played a role in helping us to begin to understand the global forces that enabled September 11 to occur, and to recognize the worldwide repercussions of the tragedy.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Tax Court
    UNITED STATES TAX COURT 400 Second Street, NW., 20217, phone (202) 521–0700 L. PAIGE MARVEL, chief judge; born in Maryland; B.A., magna cum laude, College of Notre Dame, 1971; J.D. with honors, University of Maryland School of Law, Baltimore, MD, 1974; Order of the Coif; member, Maryland Law Review and Moot Court Board; Garbis and Schwait, P.A., associate (1974–76) and shareholder (1976–85); shareholder, Garbis, Marvel and Junghans, P.A., 1985–86; shareholder, Melnicove, Kaufman, Weiner, Smouse and Garbis, P.A., 1986–88; partner, Venabel, Baetjer and Howard LLP, 1988–98; member, American Bar Association, Section of Taxation, Vice-Chair, Committee Operations, 1993– 95; Council Director 1989–92; Chair, Court Procedure Committee, 1985–87; Maryland State Bar Association, Board of Governors, 1988–90, and 1996–98; Chair, Taxation Section 1982– 83; Federal Bar Association, Section of Taxation, Section Council, 1984–90; Fellow, American Bar Foundation; Fellow, Maryland Bar Foundation; fellow and former Regent, American College of Tax Counsel, 1996–98; member, American Law Institute; advisor, ALI Restatement of Law, Third, The Law Governing Lawyers 1988–98; University of Maryland Law School Board of Visitors, 1995–2001; Loyola / Notre Dame Library, Inc. Board of Trustees, 1996– 2003; Advisory Committee, University of Baltimore Graduate Tax Program, 1986–present; Co-editor, Procedure Department, The Journal of Taxation, 1990–98; member, Commissioner’s Review Panel on IRS Integrity, 1989–91; member and Chair, Procedure Subcommittee, Com- mission
    [Show full text]
  • USD-1341 Grad Tax Am
    GraduateTa x KAREN C. BURKE M. CARR FERGUSON HON. DAVID LARO Warren Distinguished Visiting Professor of Law Visiting Professor of Law Professor of Law and Executive Advisor to the B.A. 1964, University of Michigan; B.A. 1972, Smith College; Graduate Tax Program J.D. 1967, University of Illinois; M.A. 1975, Ph.D. 1979, Harvard University; A.B. 1952, J.D. 1954, LL.M. 1970, New York University J.D. 1982, Stanford University; Cornell University; The Hon. David Laro has served on the LL.M. 1985, Boston University LL.M. 1960, New York University U.S. Tax Court since 1992, after practicing After graduating from Stanford Law School, M. Carr Ferguson is a senior counsel and law in Flint and Ann Arbor, Michigan. He Karen C. Burke clerked for The Honorable retired partner at Davis Polk & Wardwell, was a regent of the University of Michigan, Robert E. Keeton of the U.S. District Court where his practice concentrated on federal a member of the State Board of Education for the District of Massachusetts, practiced and international taxation of corporations in Michigan and chairman of the State law with Sullivan & Worcester in Boston, and individuals, principally in the areas Tenure Commission in Michigan. He teaches and was the Dorsey & Whitney Professor of business transactions, including sales, Business Planning at Georgetown University of Law at the University of Minnesota acquisitions, financing and insolvency Law Center. Through a U.S. Agency for Law School. Professor Burke teaches and arrangements. He also served as a trial International Development project, Judge writes primarily in the area of federal attorney and special assistant to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Er Bios Speaker Bios
    Speaker Bios Speaker Bios Procopio International Tax Institute at the University of San Diego School of Law C.P. Daniel Alvarez Advisor to the Chief of the Tax Administration Service and former General Director of Revenue for the State of Guanajuato Mr Alvarez has been serving for the Secretariat of Treasury and Public Finance (SHCP) of Mexico since 1997. Over this period, he has been involved on a variety of international and domestic issues in both tax policy and administration fi elds, including transfer pricing, multinational taxation, revenue forecasting and fi scal federalism. During 2002, he took a one year leave from the SHCP to serve as Director of Revenue for the State Government of Guanajuato, Mexico. Currently, he is part of an advisory committee to the Chief of the Tax Administration Service (SAT), overseeing a reform project fi nanced by the World Bank aimed at the overhaul of the SAT operations and information systems. Before joining the Mexican gover- ment, he worked as a tax consultant for the MExico City based fi rm, Chevez, Ruiz, Zamarripa y Cia, S.C. Since 1995, Mr. Alvarez has been Teacher Fellow of the “Program on Tax Analysis and Revenue Forecast- ing” (TARF) at Duke University, formerly at Harvard. He has been part of the teaching and advisory staff of the TARF on diverse workshops held in Jordan, Malaysia, India, Ghana, Tanzania, the World Bank, Duke and Harvard Universities. Daniel Alvarez holds a BA in Accounting and a Master in Public Policy from the Autonomous Technological Institute of Mexico (ITAM), Mexico City, and he graduated from the International Tax Program (ITP) of Harvard Law School and the Kennedy School of Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Judiciary Supreme Court of the United States
    JUDICIARY SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES One First Street NE 20543, phone 479±3000 WILLIAM HUBBS REHNQUIST, Chief Justice of the United States; born in Milwaukee, WI, October 1, 1924; son of William Benjamin and Margery Peck Rehnquist; married to Natalie Cornell of San Diego, CA; children: James, Janet, and Nancy, member of Faith Lutheran Church, Arlington, VA; served in the U.S. Army Air Corps in this country and overseas from 1943±46; discharged with the rank of sergeant; Stanford University, B.A., M.A., 1948; Harvard University, M.A., 1950; Stanford University, LL.B., 1952, ranking first in class; Order of the Coif; member of the Board of Editors of the Stanford Law Review; law clerk for Justice Robert H. Jackson, Supreme Court of the United States, 1952±53; private practice of law, Phoenix, AZ, 1953±69; engaged in a general practice of law with primary emphasis on civil litigation; appointed Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel, by President Nixon in January 1969; nominated Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States by President Nixon on October 21, 1971, confirmed December 10, 1971, sworn in on January 7, 1972; nominated by President Reagan as Chief Justice of the United States on June 17, 1986; sworn in on September 26, 1986. JOHN PAUL STEVENS, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States; born in Chicago, IL, April 20, 1920; son of Ernest James and Elizabeth Street Stevens; A.B., University of Chicago, 1941, Phi Beta Kappa, Psi Upsilon; J.D. (magna cum laude), Northwestern University, 1947, Order of the Coif, Phi Delta Phi, co-editor, Illinois Law Review; married to Maryan Mulholland; children: John Joseph, Kathryn Jedlicka, Elizabeth Jane Sesemann, and Susan Roberta Mullen; entered active duty U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgetown University Law Center Bulletin 2002-2003
    GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY LAW CENTER BULLETIN 2002-2003 Georgetown University Law Center 600 New Jersey Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001 (202) 662-9000 The policy of Georgetown University Law Center is to provide equal opportunity in its programs, activities, and employment practices; to prohihit discrimination in edu• cation and employment because of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, age, handicap or disability, or sexual orientation; and to prohihit sexual harassment. Inquiries regarding the University's Affirmative Action Plan may be directed to: Special Assistant to the President for Affirmative Action G-10 Darnaii, Georgetown University Washington, DC 20057 Georgetown University is an Affirmative Action/ Equal Employment Opportunity Employer FULL-TIME FACULTY 1 JURIS DOCTOR PROGRAM 37 JOINT DEGREE PROGRAMS 51 GRADUATE PROGRAM 57 i2 GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES 69 3 e o CONDUCT POLICIES 77 u TUITION AND FEES 91 o THE LAW CURRICULUM 97 COURSE CLUSTERS 103 APPENDICES 117 Appendix A: Directory of Administrative Officers and Officers of Instruction 119 Appendix B: JD Program Adjunct Faculty 126 Appendix C: Graduate Program Adjunct Faculty 133 Appendix D: Charles Fahy Distinguished Adjunct Professor Award Recipients 138 Appendix E: Scholarships 139 Appendix F: Loans 145 Appendix G: Prizes and Awards 146 INDEX 149 2002-2003 ACADEMIC CALENDAR 153 I DEANS AND VICE PRESIDENTS FULL-TIME FACULTY 2002-2003 FULL-TlME FACULTY 3 Although a variety of factors contribute to the qual• York's Deputy Mayor for Operations from 1999-2000. ity of an education in the law, at the core is a period In this capacity he was responsible for overseeing of association with an exceptional group of legal the development and implementation of strategic educators.
    [Show full text]