DOCSLIB.ORG

Canadian Patriot #5

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Canadian Patriot #5 In this issue The history of Canada is one of the most obscured and mis-understood dra- mas in the western world. Until today, no principled investigation has un- veiled the character of the Canadian experience as located between the bi- polar tension caused by the incompatible co-existence of the American and British Systems of political economy. The shedding of light upon this ob- scurity is the challenge which the authors of the following report in this Ca- nadian Patriot have taken up. Through the analysis provided by the groundbreaking studies of American Editor-in-Chief economist Lyndon LaRouche on physical economy, and his proof of the anti -entropic character of human economic systems, researchers of history have Matthew Ehret-Kump been granted a key to unlock the causal principles of historical changes. The fact is, as this issue and past reports have rigorously laid out, it is not merely human economic systems which must submit to the principle of con- Managing Editor stant anti-entropy (ie: constant creative growth), but that the entire universe exhibits the same characteristic property, from abiotic, to living matter. The Jean-Philippe Lebleu perceived interests of empire which rely upon its control of fixed parameters and monetary logic, has developed a complex web of institutions enforced Associate Editors by “change agents” over countless generations that have been driven by what LaRouche has called “the Oligarchical Principle”… or the submission Avneet Thapar to the ideology of master-slave social organization. The physical economic expression of this principle as it is presented in the following reports strives Pascal Chevrier to destroy the potential for creative anti-entropic change exhibited by hu- manity. David Gosselin This fifth issue of the Patriot begins with two reports on Daniel Johnson’s François Lépine fight to break free of the fixed limits of the British Empire, taking advantage Robert Hux, Ph.D. of the bold insight and vision of the great French President Charles de Gaulle. We then introduce a series of studies which expose for the first time Pierre Beaudry ever, the entire complex of “change agents” from Maurice Strong, Liberal Party controller Walter Gorden, Louis Mortimer Bloomfield and General Richard Sanders Andrew MacNaughton. These agents, often tragically believed to be great "canadian heroes" worked with full vigor to destroy the potential unleashed For more information visit: by the allies of FDR, Eisenhower and JFK in Canada who, up until the early 1960s were on the cusp of ushering in a new age of continental water and www.committeerepubliccanada.ca energy development beginning with NAWAPA and the optimistic belief in Www.canadianpatriot.org the unbounded potential of human progress. These British Imperial “change agents” working though the World Wildlife Fund and 1001 Club have also To know more about our associates in influenced the brainwashing of the native populations of the Americas to the USA through our Political Action take on identities incompatible with scientific and technological optimism Committee or Intelligence Magazine which has served as justification for the passage of the recent genocidal bill (Executive Intelligence Review), visit: C-383 in Canada’s House of Commons. www.larouchepac.com We urge you to read the following studies with an intention not merely to www.larouchepub.com consume history, but rather to become equipped to shape the future. To contact the Committee for the Re- public of Canada, write to [email protected] or call (514)-461-7209 2 The Canadian Patriot Contents In this issue .................................................................................................................................2 The de Gaulle-Johnson Struggle to Save the Soul of Quebec………………………………………….....4 The Fight for Continental Water Management in Quebec……………………………………………….14 The 1001 Club and Maurice Strong`s Kindergarden……………………………………………………….17 Walter Gordon`s Cultural Engineering, Global Governance and Anarchism in Canada……..18 Sections of Assembly of First Nations and Idle No More being Played by Monarchy…………25 The British Crown is Guilty of Canadian Inuit Deportation…………………………………………….26 Permindex Ties revealed to JFK Murder, 1001 Club……………………………………………………....29 The Ugly Truth About General Andrew McNaughton……………………………………………………..36 The History of NAWAPA: Reviving the Spirit of JFK……………….…………………………………….39 The Genocidal Mind of Empire…………………………………………………………………………………….44 3 The De Gaulle-Johnson Intervention to Save the Soul of Quebec (and the world) By a CRC Investigative Team (Based on original research done by Raynald Rouleau in 2002 speaking Canadians liv- and published in l’Acropole) ing in Quebec and the rest of Canada. A per- Every revolutionary scientific discovery must necessar- ceived unbridgeable di- ily throw into question our entire system of axioms vide that was famously which compose our scientific baggage. For example, called The Two Solitudes, had Kepler accepted the theory that pre-supposed the in earlier times. earth to be at the center of the Solar System 500 years ago, he could never have calculated the relative dis- In fact, these catalysers of tance between the planets, nor their elliptical orbits or the separatist movement harmonic arrangement around the Sun. Likewise, had had fought tooth and nail Eratosthenes supposed the earth to be flat 2500 years against Daniel Johnson ago, he never could have calculated its circumference. Sr. who was among the leading nation-builders in Similarly, in order to ensure Canada’s and Quebec’s Canadian history and one full participation in a new international Glass-Steagall who did have a mission Quebec’s republican Premier system revolution, it will be necessary to address and to implement a constitu- challenge the axioms underlying some of our popula- Daniel Johnson (1915-68) tional republic for Can- struggled to free Canada of its tion’s deeply held beliefs about national history and ada modeled on the British Constitution culture. American constitution. The PQ was created 16 days after the tragic death of Part 1 Daniel Johnson, the then Premier of Quebec. The goal was simple: attract all separatist-nationalist forces; The Origins of the Parti Québécois whether they be left, right, communist, socialist, or catholic. The game plan was straightforward: maintain The founders of the Parti Québécois (PQ) never had the the separatist movement as a wedge issue, a divide and intention of transforming Quebec into a truly sovereign conquer British Empire tactic and prevent a Johnson country: that is to say, a constitutional republic, inde- solution that would overthrow the British stranglehold pendent of the British Empire. A republic that would be built upon the inalienable rights of citizens, as these over Canada. were defined and later enshrined in the preamble of the In 1982, the LaRouche authored Draft Proposal for a United States Constitution by the founding fathers of the Commonwealth of Canada was also an attempt to free American republic, as the right to life, liberty and the all Canadians from British imperial control. Now, in pursuit of happiness. 2013, the required policy is called the Glass-Steagall system that would eliminate speculative banking and We are not referencing the actual leaders of the PQ, but create a Canadian National Bank, on Hamilton’s model, rather those who, from the beginning, catalyzed the PQ that would issue large amounts of productive public into existence and continue, to this day, to forge and credit that would transform Canada into a fully sover- profit from the artificial divisions that were partly suc- cessful in setting up the larger segment of the population eign nation-state. of Quebec, the French speakers against the English 4 Lazareff, the editor-in- The Queen’s Crown Agents chief of the French ser- One of the impediments to a sovereign Canada has vices of the OWI (4). He been an aspect of the Monarchy’s extension into its was quickly sent to Lon- colonies and beyond which is of exceptional impor- don. By the end of the tance for Canadians and Quebecois to become familiar war he had attained the with: Her Majesty’s Crown Agents. equivalent to the level of captain: “We were still Before Canada was ever given the legal status of among the best paid guys. “country”, the term in usage was “Dominion of Can- I had something equiva- ada”; an appendage of the British Empire within the lent to the grade of lieu- North American continent, administered by Crown tenant. I think I ended as Agents, across hundreds of institutions. a captain. I wasn’t a cap- tain in charge of a unit, This structure still exists to this day, and in certain but something equiva- René Lévesque ways, exercises an even greater influence today. lent” said René Lévesque “Crown Agents have no formal Constitution and are in an interview years later. After this experience, he not part of the United Kingdom Civil Service or of the was recruited by British intelligence as a “journalist” United Kingdom Government machine... Crown agents for the Montreal office of the international radio ser- act as businesses and financial agents for the Govern- vice of the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC). ments of all territories for the administration of which He was transferred to television services in the 1950s the Secretary of State is ultimately responsible, includ- and became a celebrity for the French Canadians with ing the territories under the protection of Her Majesty his popular political-economic news program “Point de and the territories administered on behalf of the United Mire” on Radio Canada. Nations”(1). During the 1950s and early Crown Agents work directly through such key organi- zations that run the upper echelons of the Civil Service, 1960s, Lévesque was a regu- as well as the Canadian Institute for International Af- lar contributor to the maga- fairs. These bodies coordinate directly with the Cana- zine Cité Libre begun by his dian oligarchy and London’s Foreign Office through school period friend, Pierre the Canadian Council of Chief Executives.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • T Savoir Tout Savoir Sur Lequébec Sur Lequébec
    Tout savoir Tout savoir sur leQuébec sur leQuébec Voici un guide pratique qui renferme tout ce que l’on est censé savoir sur le Québec… mais qu’on a tendance à oublier! Explication des armoiries, symbolique du drapeau, origine de la devise du Québec, emblèmes offi ciels, principales dates historiques… Tout savoir sur le Québec est un recueil à la fois instructif et ludique. Un véritable «condensé du Québec» d’une grande valeur informative, facile à consulter, et qui pourra servir aussi bien d’aide-mémoire pour savoir sur le Québec Tout tous que de livret éducatif pour les jeunes, ou de guide de référence pour les nouveaux arrivants. Vous trouverez dans ce guide • De nombreux textes concis sur des thèmes aussi variés que la gastronomie, les Amérindiens, l’architecture, la géographie, les grandes réalisations québécoises... • Des questions quiz qui ajoutent une dimension interactive tout en permettant d’aborder encore davantage de sujets. • De nombreux encadrés qui mettent en lumière de façon amusante d’autres facettes méconnues du Québec. ISBN: 9782894648780 12,95 $ www.guidesulysse.com 9,99 € TTC en France Le plaisir de mieux voyager Tout savoir sur leQuébec Le plaisir de mieux voyager Recherche et rédaction Illustrateur Pierre Daveluy Pascal Biet Jean-Hugues Robert Collaboration Photographies Pierre Ledoux p 11 © Shutterstock.com/Bruce Amos; p 12 © Dreamstime.com/Andrzej Fryda; p 23 Éditeur et directeur de production © Dreamstime.com/Lauren Jones, Mike Rogal, Olivier Gougeon Reinhard Tiburzy; p 24 © Dreamstime.com/ André Nantel, Graça Victoria; p 38 © Dreams- Correcteur time.com/Mary Lane; p 45 © Dreamstime. Pierre Daveluy com/Marieve Bouchard; p 55 © Dreamstime.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada and the Cold War P6
    By: Ryleigh Johnson ¡ The Union Nationale Coming to Power: § Came about in 1936 when it won the provincial election. § The leader was Maurice Duplessis, a lawyer. He almost single-handly brought down the Liberal government of Louis-Alexandre Taschereau. § Union Nationale defended provincial autonomy, conservatism, economic liberalism and rural life. § Brought on new reforms as they promised. § One of the most important was Office du crédit agricole (farm credit board) in 1936 that helped farmers save their farms from bankruptcy. § They pushed many plans that were announced during the election into the background. § Duplessis dissolved the Legislative Assembly in 1939 and called an election. § The Liberal Party of Adélard Godbout won the election making the Union nationale become the official opposition. § This was seen as a very bad political move. ¡ The Union Nationale Reign: § Returned to power in 1944 after accusing both the provincial and the federal Liberals of betraying Québec and violating its rights. § The Union Nationale received fewer votes than the Liberal Party but won an absolute majority of seats in the Legislative Assembly. § Began the 15 year reign. § Quebec experienced an industrialization and urbanization boom during this time. § Economic issues-the government advocated development at all costs. § Social issues-the government was very conservative. § Did not believe in ANY form of government intervention. ¡ Emphasized Three Points to Their Program: 1. Duplessis gave generously to his province. 2. Union nationale's achievements were impressive. 3. The Union nationale provided a solid line of defence against the federal government. ¡ Decline: § In 1959 Duplessis died. § Paul Sauvé then led the party until his death four months later.
    [Show full text]
  • Québec's Historical Position on the Federal Spending Power 1944-1998
    PositionEng QUÉBEC'S HISTORICAL POSITION ON THE FEDERAL SPENDING POWER 1944-1998 Secrétariat aux Affaires intergouvernementales canadiennes Direction des politiques institutionnelles et constitutionnelles Ministère du Conseil exécutif July 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1. Governments of Mr. Maurice Duplessis and Mr. Paul Sauvé (1944-1960) A. General position regarding the federal spending power B. Illustration of Québec's position on education, health and social services a) Shared-cost programs b) Family allowances c) Grants to universities 2. Government of Mr. Jean Lesage (1960-1966) A. General position regarding the federal spending power B. Illustration of Québec's position on education, health and social services a) Schooling allowances and the student loans and bursaries program b) The pension plan c) Québec's withdrawal from "established" shared-cost programs http://www.cex.gouv.qc.ca/saic/english.htm (1 sur 42) [2001-05-04 08:43:07] PositionEng 3. Governments of Mr. Daniel Johnson (senior) and Mr. Jean-Jacques Bertrand (1966-1970) A. General position regarding the federal spending power B. Illustration of Québec's position on education, health and social services a) Education b) Health and social services 4. First government of Mr. Robert Bourassa (1970-1976) A. General position regarding the federal spending power B. Illustration of Québec's position on education, health and social services a) Social policy b) Health insurance 5. Governments of Mr. René Lévesque and Mr. Pierre Marc Johnson (1976-1985) A. General position regarding the federal spending power B. Illustration of Québec's position on education, health and social services a) Health and social services b) Education 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Quebec–US Relations: the Big Picture
    American Review of Canadian Studies ISSN: 0272-2011 (Print) 1943-9954 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rarc20 Quebec–US Relations: The Big Picture Stéphane Paquin To cite this article: Stéphane Paquin (2016) Quebec–US Relations: The Big Picture, American Review of Canadian Studies, 46:2, 149-161, DOI: 10.1080/02722011.2016.1185596 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/02722011.2016.1185596 Published online: 12 Aug 2016. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 138 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rarc20 Download by: [École nationale d'administration publique] Date: 29 November 2017, At: 05:39 AMERICAN REVIEW OF CANADIAN STUDIES, 2016 VOL. 46, NO. 2, 149–161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02722011.2016.1185596 Quebec–US Relations: The Big Picture Stéphane Paquin École nationale d’administration publique, Montréal, Canada ABSTRACT KEYWORDS The objective of this article is to propose a periodization of the International policy; Quebec; international policy between Quebec and the United States focus- United States; periodization; ing on two levels of analysis: The first level is interested in public paradiplomacy; paradigm policy instruments such as the opening of delegations, while shift the second focuses on the paradigm of state action. From these two main criteria, I propose an analysis of five periods. The first period (1867–1960) is characterized by the absence of a structured paradigm and the virtual absence of diplomatic instruments with the exception of a tourism and trade office in New York.
    [Show full text]
  • Livret De Lecture
    Situation d’évaluation Troisième cycle Primaire LLee QQuuéébbeecc,, vveerrss llaa mmooddeerrnniittéé…… Dossier documentaire Note Les textes et les illustrations proviennent du site www.recitus.qc.ca Ils ont été adaptés pour les élèves du 3e cycle du primaire. Le Québec, vers la modernité… La Révolution tranquille désigne la période de transformations de la société québécoise entre 1960 et 1970. C’est la traduction de « Quiet revolution », comme l’a surnommée un journaliste du Globe and Mail (journal de Toronto). Il y a eu plusieurs Petit changements sur une courte période, particulièrement de 1960 à 1966, où le Parti libéral de Jean Lesage est au pouvoir. rappel Ces changements se sont fait rapidement sentir tant aux niveaux social, politique, religieux, qu’au niveau économique. C’est à partir de cette époque que l’État va davantage intervenir dans la société en prenant en charge le secteur de la santé et de l’éducation par exemple. C’est un gros changement, car les gouvernements précédents laissaient les compagnies privées et l’Église gérer les intérêts du Québec. Les premiers ministres au Québec 1905-1920 Lomer Gouin (Parti libéral) 1920-1936 Louis-Alexandre Taschereau (Parti libéral) 1936-1939 Maurice Duplessis (Union nationale) 1939-1944 Adélard Godbout (Parti libéral) 1944-1959 Maurice Duplessis (Union nationale) 1959-1960 Paul Sauvé (Union nationale) 1960 Antonio Barrette, en remplacement de Sauvé (Union nationale) 1960-1966 Jean Lesage (Parti libéral) 1966-1968 Daniel Johnson, père (Union nationale) 1968-1970 Jean-Jacques Bertrand (Union nationale) 1970-1976 Robert Bourassa (Parti libéral) 1976-1985 René Lévesque (Parti québécois) 1985 Pierre-Marc Johnson (Parti québécois) 1985-1994 Robert Bourassa (Parti libéral) 1994 Daniel Johnson, fils (Parti libéral) 1994-1996 Jacques Parizeau (Parti québécois) BIM .
    [Show full text]
  • Forgotten Battles Against the Deep State
    Matthew J.L Ehret – Forgotten Battles Against the Deep State Forgotten Battles Against the Deep State Parts 1-5 Author: Matthew J.L. Ehret July, 2019 Editor’s Note: This document is a consolidation of five articles written by Matthew Ehret and Anton Chaitkin in the period from January, 2015 through June, 2019. Each section is treated separately, but all five documents are included herein. Page 1 of 83 Matthew J.L Ehret – Forgotten Battles Against the Deep State Forgotten Battles Against the Deep State Part I: John Diefenbaker’s Northern Vision Sabotaged by Rhodes Scholars By Matthew J.L. Ehret The years following World War II featured the greatest boom in economic progress and quality of life ever experienced in history. Today, the reasons for this acceleration of development of the western world are largely misdiagnosed by historians and economists who, consciously or not, know nothing of the principled struggle between the American and British Systems and are totally ignorant of basic elementary principles of physical economy. These dynamics were understood clearly by those few who, for good or for ill, have inflected the curvature of universal history, and without such knowledge quickly regained, no hope exists for our current population and its organic leadership to escape the tragic devolution of cultural, economic and intellectual life now pressing upon our future. As our current world continues to be pulled in two opposing directions expressed by the dystopian “end of history” vision of the Deep State and their oligarchical masters on the one side and the new multi-polar model of “win-win cooperation” espoused by the Russia-China alliance on the other, it is a fitting moment to pause and review some of the leading battles against the hives of Malthusian technocrats who infested western society in the wake of WWII.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Sovereignty Rests with the Courts:” the Constitutional Foundations of J
    Title Page “Parliamentary sovereignty rests with the courts:” The Constitutional Foundations of J. G. Diefenbaker’s Canadian Bill of Rights Jordan Birenbaum Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the PhD degree in History Department of History Faculty of Arts University of Ottawa © Jordan Birenbaum, Ottawa, Canada, 2012 Abstract The 1980s witnessed a judicial “rights revolution” in Canada characterized by the Supreme Court of Canada striking down both federal and provincial legislation which violated the rights guaranteed by the 1982 Charter of Rights. The lack of a similar judicial “rights revolution” in the wake of the 1960 Canadian Bill of Rights has largely been attributed to the structural difference between the two instruments with the latter – as a “mere” statute of the federal parliament – providing little more than a canon of construction and (unlike the Charter) not empowering the courts to engage in judicial review of legislation. Yet this view contrasts starkly with how the Bill was portrayed by the Diefenbaker government, which argued that it provided for judicial review and would “prevail” over other federal legislation. Many modern scholars have dismissed the idea that the Bill could prevail over other federal statutes as being incompatible with the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty. That is, a bill of rights could only prevail over legislation if incorporated into the British North America Act. As such, they argue that the Diefenbaker government could not have intended the Bill of Rights to operate as anything more than a canon of construction. However, such a view ignores the turbulence in constitutional thinking on parliamentary sovereignty in the 1930s through 1960s provoked by the Statute of Westminster.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Federation House Leadership Project
    INTRODUCING The New Federation House Leadership Project A unique Une collection collection featuring unique sur les Canadian and leaders politiques world leaders ― canadiens et their legacies internationaux qui and impact on ont marqué history. l’histoire. 130 Albert Street, Suite 201 204, rue de l’Hôpital, pièce 201 Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5G4 Montréal (Québec) H2Y 1V8 ( 613 ) 230-6017 ( 514 ) 848-9573 New Federation House is a La Maison nouvelle fédération non profit corporation and [email protected] est un organisme de a registered charity bienfaisance enregistré qui se dedicated to public www.newfederation.org consacre à l’étude des questions education on political, politiques, économiques et social and economic issues. © Copyright New Federation House 2011 sociales à des fins éducatives. VERSION 4 1 The Prime Ministers of Canada Les Premiers Ministres du Canada From John A Macdonald to De John A Macdonald à Stephen Harper Stephen Harper The first in a series of books on Premiers d’une série d’ouvrages sur les leaders Canadian political leaders, The politiques canadiens édités en français et en Prime Ministers of Canada and Les anglais par la Maison nouvelle fédération, Premiers Ministres du Canada, were Les Premiers Ministres du Canada et The Prime published in 2002 and have sold Ministers of Canada ont été publiés en 2002 et over 10,000 copies across the vendus à plus de 10 000 exemplaires. country. A third edition has now Une troisième édition vient tout been published in 2011. juste de paraître en 2011. These hundred-page books Ces ouvrages, d’une centaine de pages feature original essays by chacun, contiennent des Canada's leading historians biographies inédites rédigées par des illustrated with exceptional historiens renommés et de splendides archival images.
    [Show full text]
  • Et Si Paul Sauvé N'avait Jamais Prononcé Le « Désormais…
    Document généré le 5 oct. 2021 08:41 Revue d’histoire de l’Amérique française Et si Paul Sauvé n’avait jamais prononcé le « Désormais… » ? Alexandre Turgeon Volume 67, numéro 1, été 2013 Résumé de l'article « Désormais… ». Il n’y aurait pas de mots plus célèbres dans l’histoire du URI : https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1026615ar Québec. Le premier ministre Paul Sauvé l’aurait prononcé sans cesse à DOI : https://doi.org/10.7202/1026615ar l’automne 1959, alors qu’il succède à Maurice Duplessis, afin de tirer un trait définitif entre deux mondes : la Grande Noirceur duplessiste et la Révolution Aller au sommaire du numéro tranquille. Que Paul Sauvé ait prononcé le « Désormais… », on ne saurait en douter. Les contemporains en attestent, maints historiens le confirment. Osons malgré tout une question : Et si Paul Sauvé n’avait jamais prononcé le Éditeur(s) « Désormais… » ? C’est ce qui apparaît au terme de recherches exhaustives menées dans les journaux et documents de l’époque. Cet article propose Institut d’histoire de l’Amérique française d’étudier comment le « Désormais… » est devenu un mythistoire. ISSN 0035-2357 (imprimé) 1492-1383 (numérique) Découvrir la revue Citer cet article Turgeon, A. (2013). Et si Paul Sauvé n’avait jamais prononcé le « Désormais… » ? Revue d’histoire de l’Amérique française, 67(1), 33–56. https://doi.org/10.7202/1026615ar Tous droits réservés © Institut d’histoire de l’Amérique française, 2014 Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d’auteur. L’utilisation des services d’Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d’utilisation que vous pouvez consulter en ligne.
    [Show full text]
  • 1950-1960 Alexandre-Turgeon-Critique-De-La
    CRITIQUE DE LA GRANDE NOIRCEUR QUELQUES CONSIDÉRATIONS SUR LE RAPPORT AU PASSÉ DES QUÉBÉCOIS 1 Alexandre Turgeon Département d’histoire Université Laval CÉLAT 18 th Biennal Conference of the American Council for Québec Studies. North/South – Québec – Nord/Sud , Sarasota (États-Unis), 8-11 novembre 2012 Bien le bonjour. Les mythistoires de la Grande Noirceur et de la Révolution tranquille comptent parmi les plus puissants qu’ait connus la société québécoise. Ils articulent une conception dichotomique du passé québécois où l’année 1960 apparaît comme une fracture. Le décès de Maurice Duplessis et celui de Paul Sauvé cent jours plus tard, suivis de l’élection de Jean Lesage et de son « équipe du tonnerre », scellent dans l’imaginaire collectif l’idée d’une rupture nette entre deux temps et deux mondes. Pour reprendre une expression de Léon Dion, la Révolution tranquille met fin aux sombres années de la Grande Noirceur, sorte d’Ancien Régime québécois. Encore de nos jours, il n’est pas rare de voir la Grande Noirceur être évoquée dans l’espace public, notamment en période électorale. Comment expliquer cette prégnance qui ne se dément pas? Je dois le reconnaître, cela m’intrigue. C’est pour cela que je veux revenir sur la Grande Noirceur aujourd’hui, pour en faire mon objet d’étude. Cela s’inscrit dans un plus large projet, soit celui de faire l’histoire de la Grande Noirceur – de ses usages, de ses critiques, de son recyclage. Qu’est-ce que la Grande Noirceur? Que peut-elle nous apprendre sur le rapport au passé des Québécois? Et que faire de la Grande Noirceur aujourd’hui? Telles sont les questions que je souhaite approfondir dans cette communication.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX 1275 Twenty-Third Ministry—New Brunswick Upon the Death on Jan. 2, 1960 of the Hon. Jean-Paul Sauve, Who Took Office
    APPENDIX 1275 Twenty-Third Ministry—New Brunswick (Party Standing at latest General Election, June 27, 1960: 31 Liberal and 21 Progressive Conservative) Premier and Attorney General Hon. Louis J. ROBICHAUD Provincial Secretary-Treasurer Hon. L. G. DESBRISAY Minister of Lands and Mines Hon. H. G. CROCKER Minister of Education Hon. HENRY G. IRWIN Minister of Public Works Hon. ANDREW F. RICHARD Minister of Agriculture Hon. J. ADRIEN LEVESQUE Minister of Health and Social Services Hon. GEORGE L. DUMONT Minister of Labour Hon. KENNETH J. WEBBER Minister of Municipal Affairs Hon. JOSEPH E. LEBLANC Chairman, New Brunswick Electric Power Commission Hon. DONALD HARPER Minister without Portfolio Hon. WILLIAM R. DUFFIE Minister of Industry and Development Hon. MICHEL FOURNIER Upon the death on Jan. 2, 1960 of the Hon. Jean-Paul Sauve, who took office as the Premier of Quebec on Sept. 11, 1959 after the death of the Hon. Maurice Duplessis, the following Cabinet was appointed:— Twenty-Second Ministry—Quebec Premier and Minister of Labour Hon. ANTONIO BARRETTE Minister of Finance Hon. JOHN-S. BOURQUE Minister of Colonization Hon. Jos.-D. BEGIN Minister of Agriculture Hon. LAURENT BARRE Minister of Roads Hon. ANTONIO TALBOT Minister of Fisheries and Game Hon. CAMILLE-E. POULIOT Minister of Public Works Hon. ROMEO LORRAIN Minister of Trade and Commerce Hon. PAUL BEAULIEU Attorney General and Minister of Transportation and Communications Hon. ANTOINE RIVARD Provincial Secretary Hon. YVES PREVOST Minister of Mines Hon. W. M. COTTINGHAM Minister of Municipal Affairs Hon. PAUL DOZOIS Minister of Health Hon. ARTHUR LECLERC Minister of Lands and Forests Hon. JACQUES MIQUELON Minister of Hydraulic Resources Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • The Structural Stability of the Quebecer Public Sphere, 1956-1966 an Inquiry in the Elites' Power Struggles Francis Therrien
    The Structural Stability of the Quebecer Public Sphere, 1956-1966 An Inquiry in the Elites' Power Struggles Francis Therrien Master’s Thesis in Media Studies (Nordic Media) Institutt for medier og kommunikasjon Universitetet i Oslo May 2020 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND FOREWORD The thesis contained in the following pages is the result of a full year of work in Oslo, Montreal and Rome. However, this work is not solely mine. In addition to the multitude of important thinkers and social scientists that made my own work possible, the contribution of my supervisor, Terje Rasmussen is substantive. From the discussions we had around the development of a research project, to his insightful feedback and the use his own published work, Terje’s presence is underlying the entirety of my thesis. I appreciate the great level of freedom that I could enjoy being supervised by him; yet it came with good advice and thorough exchanges in person – before that a pandemic hit the globe. In addition to that, I am indebted to two scholars in Quebec who reviewed the Chapter 3 of my thesis to ensure the validity of the information I have put forward. Indeed, Anne- Marie Brunelle (Université du Québec à Montréal) – who has been an excellent teacher of mine at the bachelor’s level – appraised the section on the media; while Jean-Philippe Warren (Concordia University) kindly accepted to assess the section on the parliamentarianism – even if I were an unknown person to him. I should also thank my friends Simon Zemp (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München) for proofreading the Chapter 1; and Marit Bredeli Kveim (Universitetet i Oslo) for the validation of the Bokmål summary of my thesis.
    [Show full text]