DOCSLIB.ORG

Fully Sited and Designed to Minimize Visual Impacts, Particularly of Distant Front Range Mountain Views and Open Meadows

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fully Sited and Designed to Minimize Visual Impacts, Particularly of Distant Front Range Mountain Views and Open Meadows 20352202035200303500333555 Department of Community Development Douglas County 2035 Comprehensive Master Plan Douglas County Department of Community Development Planning Services Division Douglas County, Colorado Adopted by the Douglas County Planning Commission June 16, 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS On behalf of the Douglas County Planning Commission, staff would like to thank all those who participated in this incredible effort to aid in Douglas County’s development well into the future. Special thanks to all of the citizens who have Douglas County Community Development Staff participated in the 2035 Comprehensive Master Terence T. Quinn, AICP, Director of Community Plan Update. Without your input, the Plan Development would not be possible. Randy Burkhardt, Assistant Director of Parks, Planning Commission 2014 Trails & Building Grounds Pam Schenck Kelly, Chair Edward Brewer Jennifer Eby, Manager of Community and Jim Dullea Resource Services Clarence Hughes Scott Kirkwood Steve Koster, AICP, Assistant Director of David Simonson Planning Services Stevan Strain Bill Vincent Update Team Krystal Woodbury Joe Fowler Dustin Smith, Alternate Kati Rider, AICP Michael O’Muireadhaigh, Alternate Curt Weitkunat, AICP Lloyd Whittal, Jr., Alternate Editing and Graphics Former Planning Commissioners Kim Smith Gary Dani Gary Weaver Contributing Staff Dan Avery, AICP Board of County Commissioners Jeanette Bare, AICP Roger A. Partridge, Chair Chris Boyd Jack A. Hilbert Donna Coffin Jill E. Repella Dan Dertz Tina Dill Doug DeBord, County Manager Nancy Gedeon Judy Hammer Legal Review Breanna Howerton Lance Ingalls, Douglas County Attorney Matt Jakubowski, AICP Kristin Decker, Senior Assistant County Attorney Carol Konecny Carol Kuhn Douglas County Public Affairs Krystal Marquez Wendy Holmes, Director Tim Murrell Rhonda Gentry Becky Nelson Cindy Perez Technical Support Brett Thomas, AICP Douglas County Geographic Information Kristin Wehri Systems Lynne Wilson Joel Hanson, Manager Caitlin Zeiler Julie Barrett Mark Rankin Gail Stere CMP Logo Chris Vodnik, Douglas County Information Technology Photography Michael Cairy Holly Carrell TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: Introduction Page 1-1 SECTION 2: Urban Land Use Page 2-1 SECTION 3: Nonurban Land Use Page 3-1 SECTION 4: Rural Communities Page 4-1 A. Franktown Page 4-1 B. Louviers Page 4-11 C. Sedalia Page 4-15 SECTION 5: Community Resources Page 5-1 SECTION 6: Community Services Page 6-1 SECTION 7: Transportation Page 7-1 SECTION 8: Water Supply Page 8-1 SECTION 9: Environmental Quality Page 9-1 SECTION 10: Wildlife Page 10-1 SECTION 11: Amendments and Updates Page 11-1 APPENDIX A: Glossary Page A-1 Douglas County 2035 Comprehensive Master Plan LIST OF MAPS MAP 1.1: Comprehensive Master Plan Land Use Map Page 1-10 MAP 2.1: Chatfield Urban Area Page 2-17 MAP 2.2: Castle Pines Village SUA Page 2-18 MAP 2.3 Pinery SUA Page 2-19 MAP 2.4: Roxborough SUA Page 2-20 MAP 2.5 Castle Rock Municipal Planning Area Page 2-21 MAP 2.6: Parker Municipal Planning Area Page 2-22 MAP 2.7: Lone Tree Municipal Planning Area Page 2-23 MAP 2.8 Larkspur Municipal Planning Area Page 2-24 MAP 3.1: Nonurban Subareas Page 3-10 MAP 3.2: Chatfield Valley Subarea Page 3-11 MAP 3.3: Cherry Valley Subarea Page 3-12 MAP 3.4: Indian Creek Subarea Page 3-13 MAP 3.5: High Plateau Subarea Page 3-14 MAP 3.6: Northeast Subarea Page 3-15 MAP 3.7: West Plum Creek Subarea Page 3-16 MAP 3.8: Pike National Forest and Foothills Subarea Page 3-17 MAP 4.1: Rural Communities Page 4-19 MAP 4.2: Franktown Rural Community Page 4-20 MAP 4.3: Franktown Village Page 4-21 MAP 4.4: Franktown Subarea Soils and Riparian Corridors Page 4-22 MAP 4.5: Louviers Rural Community Page 4-23 MAP 4.6: Sedalia Rural Community Page 4-24 MAP 8.1: Water Supply Zones Page 8-5 MAP 8.2: Bedrock Aquifers in the Denver Basin Page 8-6 MAP 9.1: Class 3 Hazards and Environmental Constraints Page 9-9 MAP 9.2: Steeply Dipping Bedrock Page 9-10 MAP 10.1: Wildlife Resources Page 10-4 Douglas County 2035 Comprehensive Master Plan INTRODUCTION SECTION 1 VISION STATEMENT • The Safe Environment • The Sense of Community The Douglas County Comprehensive Master Plan (CMP or Plan) reflects, acknowledges and • Water Supply balances the common values, rights, and needs The value statements for each category of all County residents and landowners, and can be found in the Chatfield Basin Public honors and protects its unique, diverse commu- Involvement Process Report, available from nities and resources. This intent is most effec- the Community Development Department. tively realized through citizen understanding of, Subsequently these values were validated as and participation in, land-use review processes being applicable on a County-wide basis. and public forums. This Plan builds on these community The CMP clearly states the desired com- values in developing goals, objectives, and munity vision for the future and establishes the policies to guide land-use decisions and shape guiding policies needed to achieve sustainable development. A future land use map is includ- growth over a twenty to thirty year period. ed to demonstrate how this Plan’s policies guide the desired location, use, and intensity The CMP has been developed as the of land development. Each of these compo- foundation for the County’s future growth and nents of the CMP is described below: development, and as such, is intended to provide decision makers with guidance on • Goals provide general statements how to maintain and improve identified reflecting County desires regarding community values. land-use, decision-making processes. The first County Comprehensive Master • Objectives establish a more specific Plan was completed in 1974 and conditions framework for the larger goal. in the County have been changing ever since. • Policies provide the guidelines for direction Therefore, the Comprehensive Master Plan or action. must be periodically updated to ensure the • The Comprehensive Master Plan Land community vision is achieved. Use Map illustrates future land uses and In the State of Colorado, it is the duty of the important geographic features based on county planning commission to draft and adopt this Plan’s goals, objectives, and policies. a comprehensive plan for the unincorporated Plan components address growth-related territory of the county, pursuant to C.R.S. topics such as land use, transportation, com- §30-28-106(1). munity resources, parks and open space, The CMP uses community values as the water supply, environmental quality, and basis for goals, objectives, and policies to wildlife. shape and guide future growth. An extensive This Plan is divided into land use, environ- process was followed to identify community mental, and service sections that detail the values in the Chatfield Basin area, an area community’s desired goals, objectives, and previously identified for future growth, during policies by topic and geographic area. Sec- this update. The community identified values tion background and Plan amendment pro- in 10 categories: cesses are provided to assist with using and • Access and Transportation maintaining the relevance of the document. • The Natural Environment The CMP is the instrument that establishes • The Planning Process long-range general policies in a coordinated and unified manner. Decision makers can use • Property Rights and Property Values this Plan for guidance on resource allocation, • Quiet, Peacefulness, and Privacy zoning of land, the subdivision of land, capital • Recreation improvement plans, budgeting, and County • The Rural/Unique Area work programs. Douglas County 2035 Comprehensive Master Plan Page 1-1 SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER The CMP is actually a group of documents. This Plan’s sub-elements provide additional PLANS AND REGULATIONS information, and in some cases, are referenced The CMP is supported by many other plan- in the primary Comprehensive Master Plan ning documents that serve to shape develop- document. The sub-elements include: ment and the provision of County services. • Transportation Plan The chart in Figure 1.1 lists all relevant docu- • Mineral Extraction Plan ments and depicts the context within which the CMP is considered. • Parks, Trails, and Open Space Master Plan • Recreation and Tourism Plan Figure 1.1 MUNICIPAL COMPREHENSIVE AND MASTER PLANS WITHIN DOUGLAS COUNTY DRCOG Clean Water and State Implementation County External Metro Vision Basin Authority Plan for Air Quality Intergovernmental 2035 Plan Plans Agreements Referenced Documents Departmental Facilities Master Fairgrounds Master Budget Plan Plan Strategic Plans Other Departments Adults with Wild Land Fire Emergency Douglas County Developmental Annual Operating Medical Services Emergency Disabilities Plan Plan Subsidy Plan Operations Plan DOUGLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN Sub-elements Supportive Documents Implementation Documents Population and Zoning Resolution Parks, Trails and Recreation and Subdivision Development and Planned Open Space Tourism Plan Resolution Master Plan Report Developments Douglas County Mineral Extraction Transportation Plan Building Codes Landmark Plan Designation Capital Matters of State Improvements Interest (1041) Program (CIP) Regulations Parks, Trails Roadway Design and Building and Construction Grounds CIP Standards Page 1-2 Douglas County 2035 Comprehensive Master Plan SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION Figure 1.1 also shows the relationship Douglas County is home to a diversity of between the CMP and its supporting docu- wildlife including deer, elk, coyote, mountain ments and the implementation and long range lion, fox, hawk, black bear, the Preble’s plans produced by neighboring municipalities meadow jumping mouse (a threatened and outside agencies. species), and is the nesting ground of the The Metro Vision 2035 Plan is established Sharp-tailed Grouse. by the Denver Regional Council of Govern- ments (DRCOG). Metro Vision 2035 identifies DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT such things as future transportation invest- The County’s coveted natural amenities ments, growth trends, regional open space accommodate a wide array of lifestyles ranging needs and opportunities, and air and water from pastoral agricultural settings to faster paced quality standards over a 27 year horizon.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Can You Unlock the Secrets? Douglas County Outdoors How to Play Has a Secret
    CAN YOU UNLOCK THE SECRETS? DOUGLAS COUNTY OUTDOORS HOW TO PLAY HAS A SECRET... 1. Have fun and enjoy your parks, trails and open spaces. but it’s encrypted, and we need YOU 2. Each individual may complete their own booklet (one booklet per person). to crack the code! 3. Visit the first location, which is LOCATION J. Visit eight scenic Douglas County Outdoors Open Space (Find the list of locations and their corresponding letters or Parks locations to find the numbers to solve the code. on pages 4-7.) Your first destination is provided on page eight of this decoder booklet. 4. Know before you go. Look at trail maps online or at the trailheads. Explore each trail or park while keeping your eyes peeled for a wooden post with a plaque on top. That’s where you’ll find 5. DON’T FORGET A CRAYON or PENCIL. a number in the code and the clue to your next location. 6. Find the post with the numbered plaque. Create a Once you collect all eight numbers you’ve cracked the code! rubbing of the plaque in the first box on page 8 by Use them to open two four-digit locks on a chest located at placing your booklet over the plaque and running your our Parks office. crayon or pencil over it. (The number in the center of the rubbing is the first Unlock the Decode Douglas County secrets to win a prize and number of the code that opens the locks on the chest.) be entered into the grand prize drawing.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Existing Conditions
    Inventory of Existing Conditions Introduction Boulder Municipal Airport is located in the City of Boulder, Colorado. Nestled at the foot of the Rocky Mountains, the Airport has served an important niche in the general aviation market for the City and its surrounding region. Boulder Municipal Airport is open to the general public and to visiting aircraft. The Airport does not have commercial passenger activity and has been in continuous operation at this site since 1928. Boulder Municipal Airport is located three miles northeast of the City of Boulder, in north-central Colorado. The Airport is located within the Denver metropolitan area, on the eastern fringe of the Rocky Mountain range. The Airport provides a safe operating environment for a variety of general aviation aircraft types, ranging from gliders and small powered aircraft to corporate jet aircraft. The airport’s relative location within the region is illustrated in Figure A1, AIRPORT LOCATION MAP. The City of Boulder is located at the base of the eastern Front Range of the Rocky Mountains in Colorado. Boulder is surrounded by several communities, including Superior, Broomfield, Louisville, Lafayette, Erie, Longmont, and Lyons. Although Boulder has not grown significantly in the last ten years, the exponential growth of the surrounding communities has influenced the City of Boulder and the regional transportation system. While airport planning documents related to the layout of airport facilities have been kept up-to-date, an overall master planning study of airport facilities has not been completed since 1994. During this time, aviation issues on a local, regional, and national level have changed, and the FAA also recommends that an Airport Master Plan be updated every 5-10 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Solutions Found for the Arvada Colorado Police Department Case Study
    DRAGON NATURALLYSPEAKING CASE STUDY CHALLENGE SOLUTIONS FOUND FOR THE ARVADA The time and cost of creating police reports was taking COLORADO POLICE DEPARTMENT resources away from other important needs. The city of Arvada Colorado is part of the Denver metropolitan area and has a population of over 100,000 people. The Arvada Police Department has more than 166 SOLUTION sworn officers and was facing a series of problems relating to the use of its third-party Dragon NaturallySpeaking was implemented department- transcription system and report writing. wide, for use throughout the Administration, Patrol and Investigation Divisions. This series of problems was tackled head-on by the department Administration using Dragon NaturallySpeaking voice recognition software throughout the Administration, Patrol and Investigation Divisions. The problems and solutions: RESULTS This 166 officer department saw a 789% Return on COST FACTOR: 789% Return on Investment Investment (ROI), a 50% reduction in time spent on The department was paying a substantial, $200,000 annual fee for third-party reports and greatly reduced lag time on report filing. transcription services. With a one-time purchase of Dragon NaturallySpeaking at approximately 20% of the annual transcription cost, the department was able to eliminate the need for the annual third-party transcription service. The department HOW IT WAS DONE opted for Dragon’s yearly maintenance contract (including free upgrades and no-cost To bring this solution to its department, Arvada Police direct access to the Dragon NaturallySpeaking engineering staff to resolve any issues work closely with Dragon’s Gold Level Partner for Law Enforcement sales and training, Lieutenant John Kane or problems) to help them maintain the solution.
    [Show full text]
  • Adams County Total Funds - $1,146,099
    2015 MAINTENANCE WORK PLAN ADAMS COUNTY TOTAL FUNDS - $1,146,099 11/17/2014 2015 ROUTINE SERVICES WORK 2013 WORK PLAN DRAINAGEWAY NAME- LOCAL NEARBY WORK WORK PLAN NO. TRIBUTARY NAME GOVERNMENT STREETS DESCRIPTION TYPE BUDGET 1 BIG DRY CREEK- WESTMINSTER FROM U/S TO 200 L.F. D\S OF VEGETATION MANAGEMENT & --- 750 TANGLEWOOD CREEK 121ST AND DELAWARE DEBRIS REMOVAL 2 BIG DRY CREEK- ADAMS CO. 144TH AVENUE TO YORK VEGETATION MANAGEMENT & --- 1,500 LAKE ERIE TRIB. NO 1 STREET DEBRIS REMOVAL 3 BIG DRY CREEK- THORNTON BIG DRY CREEK TO YORK STREET VEGETATION MANAGEMENT & --- 1,500 WADLEY SOUTH CREEK DEBRIS REMOVAL 4 BRANTNER GULCH THORNTON FOREST DRIVE TO COLORADO DEBRIS REMOVAL --- 500 BLVD. SOUTH OF 124TH AVE 5 BRANTNER GULCH THORNTON HOLLY STREET DEBRIS REMOVAL --- 500 6 BRANTNER GULCH- THORNTON N.W. OF COLORADO BLVD. VEGETATION MANAGEMENT & --- 500 TRIBUTARY 5 AND 124TH AVE. DEBRIS REMOVAL (EASTLAKE RESVR. D'WAY) 7 BRANTNER GULCH - TRIB 3 THORNTON JASMINE STREET DEBRIS REMOVAL --- 500 LAKEVIEW TRIBUTARY 8 CITY PARK DRAINAGEWAY WESTMINSTER 800 LF D/S OF LOWELL TO 400 LF VEGETATION MANAGEMENT & --- 750 U/S OF LOWELL DEBRIS REMOVAL 9 CLEAR CREEK ADAMS CO. N.E. OF 56TH & LOWELL VEGETATION MANAGEMENT & --- 750 DEBRIS REMOVAL 10 CLEAR CREEK ADAMS CO. S.E.OF 78TH & WASHINGTON DEBRIS REMOVAL --- 750 METRO VIEW DETENTION 11 CLEAR CREEK- ADAMS CO. BROADWAY AND 70TH VEGETATION MANAGEMENT & --- 500 DEBRIS REMOVAL 12 DUPONT DRAINAGE ADAMS CO. 80TH AVE. AT BRIGHTON RD. VEGETATION MANAGEMENT & --- 2,000 80TH AVE DETENTION DEBRIS REMOVAL 13 GRANGE HALL CREEK THORNTON RIVERDALE ROAD TO VEGETATION MANAGEMENT & --- 1,000 COLORADO BLVD.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis and Correlation of Growth
    ANALYSIS AND CORRELATION OF GROWTH STRATA OF THE CRETACEOUS TO PALEOCENE LOWER DAWSON FORMATION: INSIGHT INTO THE TECTONO-STRATIGRAPHIC EVOLUTION OF THE COLORADO FRONT RANGE by Korey Tae Harvey A thesis submitted to the Faculty and Board of Trustees of the Colorado School of Mines in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Geology). Golden, Colorado Date __________________________ Signed: ________________________ Korey Harvey Signed: ________________________ Dr. Jennifer Aschoff Thesis Advisor Golden, Colorado Date ___________________________ Signed: _________________________ Dr. Paul Santi Professor and Head Department of Geology and Geological Engineering ii ABSTRACT Despite numerous studies of Laramide-style (i.e., basement-cored) structures, their 4-dimensional structural evolution and relationship to adjacent sedimentary basins are not well understood. Analysis and correlation of growth strata along the eastern Colorado Front Range (CFR) help decipher the along-strike linkage of thrust structures and their affect on sediment dispersal. Growth strata, and the syntectonic unconformities within them, record the relative roles of uplift and deposition through time; when mapped along-strike, they provide insight into the location and geometry of structures through time. This paper presents an integrated structural- stratigraphic analysis and correlation of three growth-strata assemblages within the fluvial and fluvial megafan deposits of the lowermost Cretaceous to Paleocene Dawson Formation on the eastern CFR between Colorado Springs, CO and Sedalia, CO. Structural attitudes from 12 stratigraphic profiles at the three locales record dip discordances that highlight syntectonic unconformities within the growth strata packages. Eight traditional-type syntectonic unconformities were correlated along-strike of the eastern CFR distinguish six phases of uplift in the central portion of the CFR.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Comprehensive Plan
    Town of Superior COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DECEMBER 2012 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii Acknowledgements Town Board of Trustees Consultants Mayor Andrew Muckle Clarion Associates Mayor Pro‐Tem Elia Gourgouris Foxfire Community Planning and Development Trustee Joe Cirelli Economics & Planning Systems, Inc. Trustee Chris Hanson Russell + Mills Studios Trustee Sandy Pennington Greenplay, LLC Trustee Lisa Skumatz LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Trustee Debra Williams The Planning Group (McCaslin Corridor Concepts) OZ Architecture and Team (Town Center) Planning Commission Chairperson Clint Folsom Citizens of the Town of Superior Vice‐Chairperson Bob McCool Commissioner Rozita Abdul‐ Williams Commissioner Joanne Eaton Commissioner Phyllis Hardin Commissioner Robert Mommaerts Commissioner Thomas Ricker Commissioner Rochelle Rittmaster Chairperson John Cracraft (Former) Commissioner Ian Elverson (Former) Vice‐Chairperson Kraig Prestesater (Former) Town Staff Town Manager Matt Magley Assistant Town Manager Beth Moyski Town Clerk Phyllis Hardin Finance Director Paul Nilles Parks, Recreation and Open Space Director Martin Toth Public Works and Utilities Director Alex Ariniello Management Analyst Lisa Ritchie Town of Superior Comprehensive Plan Town of Superior Comprehensive Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS v Chapter 1: Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1‐1 Purpose of Plan .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Hydrology, Front Range Urban Corridor, Colorado
    Bibliography and Index of Geology and Hydrology, Front Range Urban Corridor, Colorado By FELICIE CHRONIC and JOHN CHRONIC GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1306 Bibliographic citations for more than 1,800 indexed reports, theses, and open-file releases concerning one of the Nation's most rapidly growing areas UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1974 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 74-600045 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D. C. 20402- Price $1.15 (paper cover) Stock Number 2401-02545 PREFACE This bibliography is intended for persons wishing geological information about the Front Range Urban Corridor. It was compiled at the University of Colorado, funded by the U.S. Geological Survey, and is based primarily on references in the Petroleum Research Microfilm Library of the Rocky Mountain Region. Extensive use was made also of U.S. Geological Survey and American Geological Institute bibliographies, as well as those of the Colorado Geological Survey. Most of the material listed was published or completed before July 1, 1972; references to some later articles, as well as to a few which were not found in the first search, are appended at the end of the alphabetical listing. This bibliography may include more references than some users feel are warranted, but the authors felt that the greatest value to the user would result from a comprehensive rather than a selective listing. Hence, we decided to include the most significant synthesizing articles and books in order to give a broad picture of the geology of the Front Range Urban Corridor, and to include also some articles which deal with geology of areas adjacent to, and probably pertinent to, the corridor.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Aurora, Colorado Analysis of Impediments (AI) to Fair Housing Choice
    City of Aurora, Colorado Analysis of Impediments (AI) to Fair Housing Choice FINAL July 13, 2016 Prepared by: EV Studio, LLC 1117 Cherokee St Denver, CO 80204 City of Aurora Community Development Division Neighborhood Services Department 9898 E. Colfax Avenue Aurora, CO 80010 2015-2016 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – City of Aurora, Colorado Table of Contents SECTION 1 3 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….3 Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………………………………………….4 SECTION 2 12 Community Profile……………………………………………………………………………………………………12 Population…………………………………………………………………………………………………….13 Population by Age…………………………………………………………………………………14 Population by Race……………………………………………………………………………….16 Population by Ethnicity…………………………………………………………………………17 Foreign Born Population……………………………………………………………………….18 Language……………………………………………………………………………………………….21 Disabilities……………………………………………………………….……………………………26 Households……………………………………………………………………………………………………………...27 Household Income…………………………………………………………………………………………28 Median Household income……………………………………………………………………28 Types of Households……………………………………………………………………………..33 Low to Moderate Census Tracts…………………………………………………………….35 Poverty………………………………………………………………………………………………………….39 Employment………………………………………………………………………………………………….42 Employment Status……………………………………………………………………………….42 Occupations………………………………………………………………………………………….44 Travel to Work for City of Aurora Residents……………………………..…………..46 Housing…………………………………………………………………………………………………………48 Occupancy and Tenure………………………………………………………………………….49
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Directors Meeting
    BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING Date: Thursday, April 16, 2020 Time: 1:00 pm This Meeting Held via GoToWebinar: CLICK HERE TO REGISTER How the District Works – 12:45 – 1:00 pm 1. Call to Order and A Moment of Silence for COVID-19 Victims – 1:00 pm 2. Introductions a. Swearing in of New Board Members i. Mayor Pro Tem Nicole Johnston, City of Aurora b. Visitors/Guests/Staff 3. Roll Call – Determination of Quorum 4. Presentation of 2019 Audit – Discussion a. Kim Higgins, CPA, Eide Bailly, LLP b. Paul Kane, CPA, Eide Bailly, LLP 5. Committee Reports a. Audit & Finance Committee b. Facility Committee 6. Approval of February 20, 2020 Meeting Minutes (If there are no corrections “Minutes stand approved”, or with corrections “Minutes stand approved as corrected”) 7. Presentation Agenda (Each resolution will, after introduction and presentation from District staff, be placed on the Consent Agenda unless a request is made by a Board Member for action upon the resolution separately) a. Authorization to Participate in a Planning Study of Second Creek Tributaries Downstream of Denver International Airport (DIA) (Resolution No. 44, Series of 2020) b. Authorization to Participate in a Planning Study of the City of Englewood (Resolution No. 45, Series of 2020) c. Authorization to Participate in an Outfall Systems Planning Study of Westerly Creek Downstream of Westerly Creek Dam (Resolution No. 46, Series of 2020) d. Authorization to Participate in Drainage and Flood Control Improvements on Goldsmith Gulch near Evans and Monaco, City and County of Denver (Resolution No. 47, Series of 2020) e. Authorization to Participate in Drainage and Flood Control Improvements on Happy Canyon Creek and Badger Gulch, City of Lone Tree, Douglas County (Resolution No.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Floods in the Rocky Mountain Region, by Robert Follansbee and P
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Hubert Work. Secretary U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY George Otis Smith. Director Water-Supply Paper 520 CONTRIBUTIONS TO rfHE HYDROLOG-Y OF THE UNITED STATES 1923-1924 NATHAN C. GROVER, Chief Hydraulic Engineer WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICEl 1925 CONTENTS. (The letters in parentheses preceding the titles are those used to designate the papers for advance publication.) Page. (A) Variation in annual run-off in the Rocky Mountain region, by Robert Follansbee (published Dec. 21, 1923)-------------------------- 1 (B) Additional ground-water supplies for the city of Enid, Okla., by B. C. Renick (published May 27, 1924) ________________ ------------ 15 (C) Power resources of Snake River between Huntington, Oreg., and Lewiston, Idaho, by W. G. Hoyt (published Sept. 2, 1924)________ 27 (D) Base exchange in ground water by silicates as illustrated in Montana, by B. C. Renick (published Dec. 15, 1924)_____________________ 53 '(E) The artesian-water supply of the Dakota sandstone in North Dakota, with special reference to the Edgeley quadrangle, by 0. E. Meinzer and H. A. Hard (published Jan. 24, 1925)--------------------- 73 (F) Temperature of water available for industrial use in the United States, by W. D. Collins (published Apr. 20, 1925)--------------------- 97 (G) Some floods in the Rocky Mountain region, by Robert Follansbee and P. V. Hodges (published Apr. 21, 1925)------- · ------------ 105 IndeX----------------------------------------------------------- 127 ILLUSTRATIONS. Page. PLATE I. Yearly percentage of mean run-off for streams in Rocky Moun- tain region ___________________________________________ _ 6 II. Influence of topography upon variation in annual run-off of streams in Rocky Mountain region ______________________ _ 8 III. Photomicrographs of thin sections showing the texture and minerals of the rocks in the Lance formation _____________ _ 58 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado's 303(D) List of Impaired Waters
    COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT WATER QUALITY CONTROL COMMISSION 5 CCR 1002-93 REGULATION #93 COLORADO'S SECTION 303(D) LIST OF IMPAIRED WATERS AND MONITORING AND EVALUATION LIST 93.1 Authority These regulations are promulgated pursuant to section 25-8-101 et seq C.R.S. as amended, and in particular, 25-8-202 (1) (a), (b), (i), (2) and (6); 25-8-203 and 25-8-204. 93.2 Purpose This regulation establishes Colorado’s Lists of Impaired Waters. These waters include Water- Quality-Limited Segments Requiring Total Maximum Daily Loads (“TMDLs”), impaired waters that do not require a TMDL, and Colorado’s Monitoring and Evaluation List: (1) The list of Water-Quality-Limited Segments Requiring TMDLs fulfills requirements of section 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act which requires that states submit to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency a list of those waters for which technology-based effluent limitations and other required controls are not stringent enough to implement water quality standards. These segments are included in Section 93.3 with parameters included in the Clean Water Section 303(d) Impairment column. (2) Colorado’s Monitoring and Evaluation List identifies water bodies where there is reason to suspect water quality problems, but there is also uncertainty regarding one or more factors, such as the representative nature of the data. Water bodies that are impaired, but it is unclear whether the cause of impairment is attributable to pollutants as opposed to pollution, are also placed on the Monitoring and Evaluation List. This Monitoring and Evaluation list is a state-only document that is not subject to EPA approval.
    [Show full text]