THEORETICAL PHYSICS AND INDIAN PHILOSOPHY: CONCEPTUAL COHERENCE Anna Sidorova-Biryukova M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University 119991, Russian Federation, Moscow, Leninskie gory, 1 E-mail:
[email protected] I have tried to read philosophers of all ages and have found many illuminating ideas but no steady progress toward deeper knowledge and understanding. Science, however, gives me the feeling of steady progress: I am convinced that theoretical physics is actual philosophy. Max Born ... with all our science, we are not a step closer to understanding the essence than an old Indian sage. K. Jaspers INTRODUCTION These two epigraphs at first glance seem contradictory to each other; however, this contradiction could be better understood as complementarity, when two observers look at the same phenomenon from mutually orthogonal directions. One of the authors is a physicist, the other is a philosopher, and the subject they speak about can be called “metaphysics”, or the science of eternal questions. The philosopher emphasizes their eternal character, i.e. the impossibility for a human mind to reach the finish line, while the physicist talks about the possibility and even the human duty to go along this endless path. This reminds of how Alice in the Looking-Glass Land had to run as fast as she could just to stay in place. Indeed, as long as humanity remembers itself, it has been occupied by eternal questions. They changed their clothes, appearing in the form of religion, art, philosophy, and finally, science, but their essence remains the same. An Indian sage reflected on them, and modern science is trying to solve them.