Fact Book 2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fact Book 2017 2017-2018 FACT BOOK csu.edu This is the Fact Book. We continue to attempt to incorporate all suggestions for the Fact Book. Not much has changed from the previous Fact Book. We have decided to continue using the Adobe Acrobat le format and have received praise regarding its usability. Please note that a link is provided on our website that will direct you to the information that was previously presented in Table V.1 (Comparative Discipline Cost Study) and Table V.2 (Credit Hours Generated by Pro- gram Annually). Finally, it is clear by now that no single document can meet all of the university’s operational needs. This publication, therefore, is intended to serve as a useful reference. For more speci c questions, please contact the O ce of Institutional E ectiveness and Research by phone (ext. 2382) or in writing (ADM 129). OFFICE OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS AND RESEARCH 2 Table of Contents 4 Chicago State University: Core Values, Vision, and Mission 5 Chicago State University Pro le 6-7 Fall 2017 Enrollment, Retention, Graduation, and (ERG) Summary 8 Fall 2017 Summary of Faculty – Full and Part Time Teaching 9 Fall 2017 CSU Total Enrollment and FTE – By Level, Enrollment Status, and College CSU Student Enrollment 11 CSU Total Enrollment – Five Year Trend By Student Level 12 CSU Total Enrollment – Five Year Trend By College 13 CSU Total Enrollment – Five Year Trend By Enrollment Status, Gender, Student Class, and Age 14-19 CSU Total Enrollment – Five Year Trend By Student Level and CIP Code 20-26 CSU Total Enrollment – Five Year Trend By Program and Degree Level 27 CSU Total Undergraduate Enrollment – Five Year Trend By College 28 CSU Total Undergraduate Enrollment – Five Year Trend By Enrollment Status, Gender, Student Class, and Age 29-31 CSU Total Undergraduate Enrollment – Five Year Trend By Zip Code 32 CSU Total Undergraduate Enrollment – Five Year Trend By County 33 CSU Total Graduate Enrollment – Five Year Trend By College 34 CSU Total Graduate Enrollment – Five Year Trend By Enrollment Status, Gender, Student Class, and Age 35-42 CSU Total Graduate Enrollment – Five Year Trend By Zip Code 42 CSU Total Graduate Enrollment – Five Year Trend By County CSU Freshman & Transfer Cohorts 44 CSU First Time Freshman – Five Year Trend By Enrollment Status, Gender, College, Ethnicity, and Age 45-54 CSU First Time Freshman – Five Year Trend By Name of High School 55 CSU First Time Transfer Enrollment – Five Year Trend By Enrollment Status, Gender, College, and Ethnicity 56 CSU First Time Transfer Enrollment – Five Year Trend By University Type 57 CSU First Time Transfer Enrollment – Five Year Trend From an Illinois Public University 58-60 CSU First Time Transfer Enrollment – Five Year Trend From an Illinois Public Community College 61-64 CSU First Time Transfer Enrollment – Five Year Trend From an Illinois Independent Not-for-Pro t and For Pro t Institution CSU Degrees Awarded 66 CSU Degrees Conferred – Five Year Trend By Degree Level 67-73 CSU Degrees Conferred – Five Year Trend By Major 74-77 CSU Degrees Conferred – Five Year Trend By Degree Level, Program, Ethnicity, and Gender 2017 78-81 CSU Degrees Conferred – Five Year Trend By Degree Level, Program, Ethnicity, and Gender 2016 82-85 CSU Degrees Conferred – Five Year Trend By Degree Level, Program, Ethnicity, and Gender 2015 86-89 CSU Degrees Conferred – Five Year Trend By Degree Level, Program, Ethnicity, and Gender 2014 90-93 CSU Degrees Conferred – Five Year Trend By Degree Level, Program, Ethnicity, and Gender 2013 CSU Financials 95-98 CSU Cost of Enrollment – Five Year Trend By Tuition and Fees By Residency and Student Level 99 CSU Internal Operating Budjet – Five Year Trend OFFICE OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS AND RESEARCH 3 Chicago State University Core Values, Vision, and Mission Chicago State University, a public, comprehensive, urban institution of higher learning located on the south side of Chicago, strives for excellence in teaching, research, creative expression and community service. June 2011, the Board of Trustees of Chicago State approved a resolution proposing a new set of core values, vision and mission for the University as the institution continues to go through a transformation in new leadership, new achievements and new endeavors. More detailed information can be found on the University website at: http://www.csu.edu/news/missionvisioncorevalues.htm. Core Values Chicago State University values: • Intellectual development • Diversity • Creative and innovative thinking and learning • Leadership, service, philanthropy, social • Dignity and unique talents of all persons justice, and entrepreneurship • Responsible choices and actions • Pride in self, community, and the university • Personal and academic excellence • Lifelong learning • Personal, professional, and academic integrity Vision Statement Chicago State University will be recognized for innovations in teaching and research, and in promoting ethical leadership, entrepreneurship, and social and environmental justice. We will embrace, engage, educate, and empower our students and community to transform lives locally and globally. Mission Statement Chicago State University (CSU) is a public, comprehensive university that provides access to higher education for students of diverse backgrounds and educational needs. The university fosters the intellectual development and success of its student population through a rigorous, positive, and transformative educational experience. CSU is committed to teaching, research, service and community development including social justice, leadership, and entrepreneurship. Chicago State University was founded as a teacher training school in Blue Island, Illinois on September 2, 1867. Today, the University is a fully accredited public, urban institution located on 161-picturesque acres in a residential community on Chicago’s South side. CSU is governed by a Board of Trustees appointed by the Governor of Illinois. The University’s ve colleges—Health Sciences, Arts and Sciences, Business, Education, and Pharmacy—o er 36 undergraduate and 25 graduate and professional degree-granting programs. CSU also o ers an interdisciplinary Honors College for students in all areas of study and has a Division of Continuing Education and Nontraditional Degree Programs that o ers extension courses, distance learning and not-for-credit programs to the entire Chicago community. OFFICE OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS AND RESEARCH 4 Chicago State University Pro le Fall Enrollment, 2017 Student Characteristics Headcount FTE % Female % Black % Hispanic Undergraduate 2029 1505 69% 75% 8% Graduate 1072 887 61% 52% 5% Total 3101 2393 66% 67% 7% Degrees Awarded Between July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017 Headcount % Female % Black % Hispanic Certi cate 10 0% 100% 0% Baccalaureate 468 72% 75% 11% Masters 300 53% 42% 3% Doctorate 6 83% 100% 0% PharmD 72 64% 25% 7% Total 856 64% 59% 8% CSU Fall 2017 Full Time Faculty by Tenure Median Class Size, Fall 2017 Tenure Status 9 mth 12 mth Total Course Number Range Median Tenure 85 6 91 1000-2999 15 On-Tenure Track 12 4 16 3000-3999 9 Not Tenure Track 72 10 82 4000-4999 6 Total Faculty 169 20 189 5000-6999 6 All Courses 9 Operating Budget, FY 2017* Course Number Range Median Appropriated $62,693.30 Non-Appropriated $21,457.50 Total CSU Full & Part Time Faculty by Academic Rank Academic Rank Total % Female % Black % Hispanic Professor 42 29% 31% 7% Associate Professor 59 58% 46% 5% Assistant Professor 34 68% 50% 3% Lecturer 54 57% 69% 2% Part-Time Lecturer 76 49% 57% 4% Total Faculty 265 52% 52% 4% *In thousands of dollars. OFFICE OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS AND RESEARCH 5 Fall 2017 Enrollment, Retention, Graduation, and (ERG) Summary Page 1 of 2 Enrollment by Term First-Time Full-Time Transfer Student Cohort Term Total Enrollment Freshman Enrollment Enrollment Spring 2014 5297 Fall 2014 5211 253 375 Spring 2015 4818 Fall 2015 4767 162 396 Spring 2016 4442 Fall 2016 3578 76 155 Spring 2017 3242 Fall 2017 3101 118 195 Transfer Student Cohort Fall to Fall Retention Rates Retention # in Cohort # Returned Following Fall % Returned Following Fall Fall 2013 401 284 71% Fall 2014 375 275 73% Fall 2015 396 222 56% Fall 2016 155 104 67% Fall 2017 195 - - First-Time Full-Time Freshmen Student Cohort Fall to Fall Retention Rates Retention # in Cohort # Returned Following Fall % Returned Following Fall Fall 2013 225 119 53% Fall 2014 253 147 58% Fall 2015 162 83 51% Fall 2016 76 46 61% Fall 2017 118 - - OFFICE OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS AND RESEARCH 6 Fall 2017 Enrollment, Retention, Graduation, and (ERG) Summary Page 2 of 2 Transfer Student Cohort 6 Year Graduation Rates Cohort Year # in Cohort # Graduating in 6 Years % Graduating in 6 Years Fall 2007 428 184 43% Fall 2008 391 201 51% Fall 2009 423 209 49% Fall 2010 449 206 46% Fall 2011 408 158 39% First-Time Full-Time Freshmen Student Cohort 6 Year Graduation Rates Cohort Year # in Cohort # Graduating in 6 Years % Graduating in 6 Years Fall 2007 372 77 21% Fall 2008 402 77 19% Fall 2009 589 65 11% Fall 2010 523 70 13% Fall 2011 430 51 12% OFFICE OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS AND RESEARCH 7 Fall 2017 Summary of Faculty Full and Part Time Teaching Full- and Part-Time Faculty by Employment Type Full- and Part-Time Faculty by Gender Type Count Avg Salary Percent Gender Count Avg Salary Percent Full-Time 189 $67,905.72 71% Female 137 $48,633.94 52% Part-Time 76 $5,379.01 29% Male 128 $51,407.30 48% Grand Total 265 $52,028.67 100% Grand Total 265 $52,028.67 100% Full-Time Faculty by Race/Ethnicity Full-Time and
Recommended publications
  • Chicago: a Choice District Only Half of Students Across the District Choose to Attend Their Zoned Schools
    ISSUE BRIEF WINTER 2015 Chicago: A Choice District Only half of students across the district choose to attend their zoned schools. At the high school level, only 27% of students attend their zoned schools. By: Kasia Kalata and Jelani McEwena Chicago’s public school system has undergone a dramatic transformation over the past thousands more exercise their right to How many CPS students are opting twenty years. The transformation has gone largely unnoticed, but it has had a profound choose a district-run school other than the out of their zoned schools? impact on the city’s overall educational performance. Unlike twenty years ago, Chicago one assigned to them by the system. students are now just as likely to attend a school choice option as they are to attend their local zoned school. As we demonstrate in this issue brief, Chicago students are far better off Today, half of Chicago families send their because of school choice. children to a school other than the one they are zoned to based on their address.2 For In 1988, U.S. Secretary of Education William Bennett declared Chicago’s public schools “the high schoolers, this pattern is even more worst in the nation.” In the decade following this remark, Chicago took a series of steps dramatic: only one in three students attends designed to create higher quality schools. The district established new selective enrollment his or her zoned high school. This issue brief 40% 73% 49% schools and, beginning in 1997, launched the first generation of charter public schools, examines the choices parents are making which created open enrollment schools in communities across the city with the greatest and answers a critical question: Has 20 years needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Book 2018
    2018-2019 FACT BOOK csu.edu This is the Fact Book. We continue to attempt to incorporate all suggestions for the Fact Book. Not much has changed from the previous Fact Book. We have decided to continue using the Adobe Acrobat le format and have received praise regarding its usability. Please note that information that was previously presented in Table V.1 (Comparative Discipline Cost Study) and Table V.2 (Credit Hours Generated by Program Annually) can be found at https://www.ibhe.org/cost- study.html. In addition, Discipline Cost Study data is only provided by Discipline and is no longer provided by Program. Finally, it is clear by now that no single document can meet all of the university’s operational needs. This publication, therefore, is intended to serve as a useful reference. For more speci c questions, please contact the O ce of Institutional E ectiveness and Research by phone (ext. 2382) or in writing (ADM 129). OFFICE OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS AND RESEARCH Table of Contents 5 Chicago State University: Core Values, Vision, and Mission 6 Chicago State University Pro le 7-8 Fall 2018 Enrollment, Retention, Graduation, and (ERG) Summary 9 Fall 2018 Summary of Faculty – Full and Part Time Teaching 10 Fall 2018 CSU Total Enrollment and FTE – By Level, Enrollment Status, and College CSU Student Enrollment 12 CSU Total Enrollment – Five Year Trend By Student Level 13 CSU Total Enrollment – Five Year Trend By College 14 CSU Total Enrollment – Five Year Trend By Enrollment Status, Gender, Student Class, and Age 15-20 CSU Total Enrollment
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago Architecture Biennial, Bp and Chicago Architecture Foundation Announce Winners of the Bp Student Design Competition Mayo
    CHICAGO ARCHITECTURE BIENNIAL, BP AND CHICAGO ARCHITECTURE FOUNDATION ANNOUNCE WINNERS OF THE BP STUDENT DESIGN COMPETITION MAYOR RAHM EMANUEL HONORS WINNERS AND PARTICIPANTS AT SHOWCASE RECEPTION HELD AT THE CHICAGO CULTURAL CENTER CHICAGO (December 13, 2017) – The Chicago Architecture Biennial, Founding Sponsor BP and Signature Education Partner Chicago Architecture Foundation (CAF), announced yesterday the winners of the BP Student Design Competition at a showcase reception hosted at the Chicago Cultural Center, the Biennial host site. Following on the success of the program during the inaugural 2015 BP Student Design Competition, the 2017 edition allowed aspiring artists and architects in Chicago’s elementary and high schools the opportunity to create projects that challenged their creative thinking and skills around the Biennial’s theme, “Make New History.” More than 1,000 students from 60 Chicago Public Schools were involved in the citywide competition. The winners of this year’s BP Student Design Competition are: Level 1: Graphic Design Division First Prize Winner, Roberto Duarte from Benito Juarez Community Academy, 11th Grade, Second Prize Winner, Lisbeth Droz from Kelvyn Park High School, 11th Grade, Third Prize Winner, Manuel Diaz from John F. Kennedy High School, 11th Grade, Finalist, Christian Cerna from John F. Kennedy High School, 11th Grade Finalist, Phoenix Wojnarowski from John F. Kennedy High School, 12th Grade Finalist, Jovanni Chavez from George Washington Elementary School, 6th Grade Finalist, Mary Coats from Kenwood
    [Show full text]
  • 2018-2019 Dual Credit Partner Schools Daley College
    2018-2019 DUAL CREDIT PARTNER SCHOOLS DALEY COLLEGE Austin Polytechnical Academy High School Bogan High School Bowen Environmental Studies High School Chicago High School for Agricultural Sciences Curie Metropolitan High School Farragut Career Academy High School Gage Park High School Goode High School Hancock High School Horizon High School Juarez Community Academy High School Kelly High School Kennedy High School Solorio Academy High School Spry Community Links High School HAROLD WASHINGTON COLLEGE Brooks College Prep High School Chicago Military Academy at Bronzeville Gallery 37 Harlan High School Innovations High Kenwood High School Kenwood Academy High School Legal Prep High School Perspectives Charter High School Phillips Academy High School Al Raby High School Simeon Career Academy High School Effective 09/2018 KENNEDY-KING COLLEGE Camelot Excel Academy High School Chicago Tech Academy High School Clemente High School Comer College Prep CICS Longwood CYDI High School (YCCS) Dunbar Career Academy High School Hirsch Metropolitan High School Hope High School Hyde Park Academy High School Hubbard High School Jefferson High School Juarez High School Julian High School King College Preparatory High School Lindblom High School Perspectives Technology Charter High School Tilden Achievement Academy High School Urban Prep High School Bronzeville MALCOLM X COLLEGE Back of the Yards High School Crane Medical Preparatory High School CCA High School (YCCS) Douglass High School Infinity Math and Science High School Instituto Academy of Health and Sciences High School Latino Youth High School (YCCS) Marshall High School Manley High School Michele Clark High School North Lawndale College Prep HS Phoenix Military High School York High School Effective 09/2018 OLIVE-HARVEY COLLEGE Brooks College Prep Academy High School Carver Military Academy Chicago Vocational Career Academy Corliss High School Epic Academy George Washington High School Urban Prep Academy (Englewood Campus) Gwendolyn Brooks Camelot Academy Julian High School Olive-Harvey Middle High School (YCCS) Percy L.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago Overview Program Year: 2019-2020
    Chicago Overview Program Year: 2019-2020 Michelle Mirzoian, Development Director [email protected] • Mission: NFTE (Network for Teaching Entrepreneurship) activates the entrepreneurial mindset and builds startup skills in youth from under-resourced communities to ensure their success and to create a more vibrant society. • Target Audience: youth ages 11-18 from under-resourced communities • Partners: districts with free and reduced lunch (FRL) eligibility rate of 51%+, majority of partner schools average 70%-80% FRL rates; community-based organizations www.nfte.com 2 Why NFTE? The future of work is entrepreneurial….. 90% 65% 1 in 3 of employers identify of the jobs U.S. employers want entrepreneurial skills as children entering to hire people with very important school today will do …do not exist yet entrepreneurial experience Today By 2027 20% of freelancers 50% of US workforce earn $100,000 or more will be freelancers 3 Impact & Outcomes NFTE students apply the entrepreneurial mindset—succeeding in the workplace, starting businesses, and furthering their education. 74% 89% 1IN 4 50% of college-aged NFTE alumni of alumni believe the skills NFTE alumni have started of NFTE alumni report are enrolled in college they learn from NFTE help at least one business earning more than the them in life and business national median salary 65% of low-income students Only 2% of youth aged 16-24 were nationwide are enrolled in college. Nationwide 41% of bored students self-employed in 2015. The 2016 national median salary say their class work is not relevant to was $43,264. their life. 4 Activating the Entrepreneurial Mindset NFTE empowers youth to approach the world with an innovator’s eye and a founder’s grit, not only during the NFTE course but for the rest of their lives.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Carson Scholars
    2016 Carson Scholars Payton Abernathy Samir Al-Ali Olivia Anderson Grade: 11 Grade: 11 Grade: 11 Choctaw High School Northside College Delmarva Christian High Choctaw, OK Preparatory High School School Chicago, IL Georgetown, DE Kayla Acker-Carter Grade: 11 Conner Allen Rachel Andreola Annapolis High School Grade: 11 Grade: 8 Annapolis, MD Saints Peter and Paul High St. Elizabeth Elementary School School Isabella Acosta Easton, MD Pittsburgh, PA Grade: 5 Tanglewood Elementary Theodore Almeter McKenna Andrew School Grade: 8 Grade: 8 Fort Myers, FL Saint Bernadette School Serra Catholic School Monroeville, PA Rancho Santa Margarita, CA Lizet Acuna Grade: 11 Kristen Almuete Teko Angelicchio Jr. Farragut Career Academy Grade: 11 Grade: 6 Chicago, IL Calvert High School Christ the Divine Teacher Prince Frederick, MD School Avi Adams Latrobe, PA Grade: 8 Noorhan Amani St. Agnes School Grade: 11 Madelaine Armagost West Mifflin, PA Mt. Everest Academy Grade: 11 San Diego, CA North County High School Montana Adams Glen Burnie, MD Grade: 11 Rachelle Ambroise Prestonsburg High School Grade: 11 Diana Arteaga Prestonsburg, KY Academy of Our Lady of Grade: 8 Mercy, Lauralton Hall Carl Von Linne Elementary Mitchell Adkins Milford, CT School Grade: 5 Chicago, IL Bushy Park Elementary Athreya Anand School Grade: 11 Ashley Asiedu Glenwood, MD West Ranch High School Grade: 8 Stevenson Ranch, CA Sykesville Middle School Seetal Ahluwalia Sykesville, MD Grade: 8 Kayla Andersen Harper's Choice Middle Grade: 8 Veronica Aye School Penn Yan Middle School Grade:
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Book 2016
    2016-2017 FACT BOOK csu.edu This is the Fact Book. This is the Fact Book. We continue to attempt to incorporate all suggestions for the Fact Book. Not much has changed from the previous Fact Book. We have decided to continue using the Adobe Acrobat le format and have received praise regarding its usability. Please note that a link is provided on our website that will direct you to the information that was previously presented in Table V.1 (Comparative Discipline Cost Study) and Table V.2 (Credit Hours Generated by Pro- gram Annually). Finally, it is clear by now that no single document can meet all of the university’s operational needs. This publication, therefore, is intended to serve as a useful reference. For more speci c questions, please contact the O ce of Institutional Research and Academic Evaluation by phone (ext. 2382) or in writing (ADM 106). OFFICE OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS AND RESEARCH 2 Table of Contents 4 Chicago State University: Core Values, Vision, and Mission 5 Chicago State University Pro le 6-7 Fall 2016 Enrollment, Retention, Graduation, and (ERG) Summary 8 Fall 2016 Summary of Faculty – Full and Part Time Teaching 9 Fall 2016 CSU Total Enrollment and FTE – By Level, Enrollment Status, and College CSU Student Enrollment 11 CSU Total Enrollment – Five Year Trend By Student Level 12 CSU Total Enrollment – Five Year Trend By College 13 CSU Total Enrollment – Five Year Trend By Enrollment Status, Gender, Student Class, and Age 14-19 CSU Total Enrollment – Five Year Trend By Student Level and CIP Code 20-26 CSU Total
    [Show full text]
  • School of Education and Social Policy Partnerships with Schools
    School of Education and Social Policy Partnerships with Schools Northwestern University’s School of Education and Social Policy is involved in many partnerships with schools that have significant impact on students and teachers. Following is a summary of current projects. PROJECTS INVOLVING CHICAGO PUBLIC SCHOOLS: Biotechnology Symposium and Professional Development Partner Schools (20): Alcott High School Lindblom Math and Science Academy Amundsen High School Lincoln Park High School CICS Ralph Ellison Academy Naperville Central High School City-Wide-Elementary Schools Perspectives Leadership Academy Collins Academy High School Rickover Naval Academy Daley Academy Roosevelt High School Kelvin Park High School Solorio Academy High School Lakes Community High School Steinmetz Academic Centre Lane Tech College Prep Stockton Elementary School Uplift Community High School Von Steuben Metropolitan Science Center Project Description: The Biotechnology Symposium kicks off the Biotechnology Professional Development Series. This full-day symposium is designed to excite and inspire teachers to bring biotechnology into their classrooms and to connect them with world-class scientists from Baxter International, Inc. and Northwestern University. Scientists discuss their cutting-edge research, and then experience hands-on biotechnology curriculum modules led by educators who have successfully used them in their classrooms. A summer-long series of professional development workshops prepares educators for teaching biotechnology in the classroom. Teachers
    [Show full text]
  • Without Consent an Analysis of Student Directory Information Practices in U.S
    Without Consent An analysis of student directory information practices in U.S. schools, and impacts on privacy by Pam Dixon data visualization: John Emerson editing: Robert Gellman embargoed draft Without Consent: An analysis of student directory information practices in U.S. schools, and impacts on privacy World Privacy Forum www.worldprivacyforum.org © Copyright 2020 Pam Dixon, Author; Robert Gellman, Editor Cover and design by John Emerson All rights reserved. EBook/Digital: ISBN: 978-0-9914500-1-5 Publication Date: April 2020 Nothing in this material constitutes legal advice. Brief Summary of Report If data is the new oil, then student data is among the most desirable data wells of all. While some states have enacted laws to better protect students and their privacy, policymakers have left a formidable front door open: that is, the ability for detailed student information to be made public by schools un- der an exemption in the federal student privacy law, the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act. This exemption is called the Directory Information exemption. When schools choose to, they can designate certain student information of their choice to be made public without prior consent. This information becomes directory information. To provide a balance, Congress provided a right that stu- dents and parents can restrict unconsented public disclosure of their directory information. Eligible students can place this restriction on their directory information by submitting an opt out request at the school. Parents or guardians of students under 18 will have to place the restriction for the student. This right to restrict disclosure is an essential one, but students, parents and others may not be aware of the importance and profound privacy impact of this information.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Annual Report
    Preparing Tomorrow’s Workforce JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CHICAGO ANNUAL REPORT 2018 Table of Contents 1 Letter from Our Chairmen and President 20 Bowl-A-Thon 2 Junior Achievement Programs 20 Day at the Races 4 Whole School Partners 21 Golf Outing 9 High School Scholarships 21 Chicago Business Hall of Fame 10 Our Schools 22 Major Contributors 16 Firms & Organizations 24 Individual Contributors 18 Officers and Directors 25 Financial Highlights Valued Friends and Investors Founded in 1919, our national Junior Achievement organization is proudly celebrating its 100th Anniversary this upcoming year and we are just as committed today to ensuring our students are ready for their futures as we were a century ago. You will see that legacy demonstrated across media channels as we launch a new celebratory campaign – 100 years, 100% ready. Thanks to our volunteers, donors, educators and alumni, we have successfully empowered students to manage their finances and compete in the workforce for the last 100 years and we cannot wait for the continued journey with you. Kicking off our 79th year locally, JA of Chicago is celebrating our own milestones. This year, we reached a record high 600,222 students in 28,936 classrooms! This incredible outreach was due to the commitment of nearly 14,000 volunteers making a true impact on students. In fact, 1 in 5 JA students go into the same career field as their volunteer and 1 in 3 JA students credit JA for influencing their career decision. Local educators also feel strongly about the positive difference JA is making in the lives of their students, with 95% agreeing that JA volunteers serve as role models for their students.
    [Show full text]
  • Karthik Based on Food Inspections
    karthik Based on Food Inspections Inspection ID DBA Name AKA Name License # Facility Type 2522989 IPSENTO IPSENTO 1741994 Restaurant 2522162 FLAT GRILL FLAT GRILL 2753823 Restaurant 2521532 7- ELEVEN 7- ELEVEN 1738996 Grocery Store 2500345 CHICAGO BY NIGHT CHICAGO BY NIGHT 1170649 Restaurant 2500492 THE NEW GRACE RESTAURANT THE NEW GRACE RESTAURANT 2712979 Restaurant 2497748 FURIOUS SPOON FURIOUS SPOON 2483679 Restaurant 2497741 EN PASSANT EN PASSANT 2776378 Restaurant 2497728 Beaubien Elementary School Beaubien Elementary School 22201 School 2497504 UNCOMMON GROUND UNCOMMON GROUND 2108171 Restaurant 2497367 THE DRAKE HOTEL THE DRAKE HOTEL 2766824 Restaurant 2492981 LIME LEAF LIME LEAF 2622408 Restaurant 2492889 Kozminski Kozminski 31151 School 2492437 THIRD RAIL TAVERN THIRD RAIL TAVERN 1742274 Restaurant 2492523 MAX'S TAKE OUT MAX'S TAKE OUT 11172 Restaurant 2492401 SAIGON PHO SAIGON PHO 2771254 Restaurant 2492281 GOGI NARA GOGI NARA 2263063 Restaurant 2484753 SUBWAY SUBWAY 1985307 Restaurant 2484633 Subway Subway 2054100 Restaurant 2484567 ROYALTY ROYALTY 1306130 Restaurant 2484431 ARYA BHAVAN ARYA BHAVAN 66515 Restaurant Page 1 of 259 10/02/2021 karthik Based on Food Inspections 2473041 ROSATI'S GRANT PARK ROSATI'S 2762683 Restaurant 2472891 MIMI'S TACOS MIMI'S TACOS 2766681 Restaurant 2472724 THE ORIGINA GINO'S EAST GINO'S EAST 2245990 Restaurant CHICAGO 2485212 BUTTERDOUGH BUTTERDOUGH 2677784 DELI/BAKERY 2472586 KIMBALL MINI MART KIMBALL MINI MART 2522049 Grocery Store 2472387 PRET A MANAGER PRET A MANGER 2529837 Restaurant 2464032
    [Show full text]
  • High School-To-College Success Report Illinois
    High School-to-College Success Report Illinois 2008-2010 Freshmen ACT Code: 0993 NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY 5500 N ST LOUIS AVENUE CHICAGO, IL 60625 Illinois High School to College Freshmen Success Report Page: i 2008-2010 Freshmen Code: 0993 Report Count: 1468 NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY Report Overview Introduction The charts and tables in this report describe performance indicators for the ACT-tested public high school graduates of 2008-2010 who attended a public postsecondary institution in Illinois in fall 2008-2010. Suggested next steps are provided to help guide your thinking as you work to improve the academic development of students and their success in college. The importance of academic preparation for college or work is greater than ever today. Sixty-eight percent of the top 50 occupations require postsecondary education. Clearly, students need to be ready for education beyond high school, and the goal of this report is to promote actions that will assist all students in being prepared for postsecondary education. To measure academic preparation, this report uses ACT College Readiness Benchmark Scores and College Readiness Standards Score Ranges. These measures are explained below. This report also refers to taking core coursework which is defined as 4 or more years of English, 3 or more years of mathematics beyond pre-algebra, and 3 or more years of science and social studies. What are College Readiness Benchmark Scores? College Readiness refers to the level of student preparation needed to be ready to succeed--without remediation--in an introductory level course at a two or four-year institution, trade school, or technical school.
    [Show full text]