GAZİANTEP UNIVERSITY FACULTY of ARCHITECTURE

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

GAZİANTEP UNIVERSITY FACULTY of ARCHITECTURE GAZİANTEP UNIVERSITY FACULTY of ARCHITECTURE 2018-19 Fall Semester Name of the course: Architectural History II Course code: ARCH 211 Name of the Module: Ottoman Architecture in Istanbul ECTS Credit: 4 2nd year– 1st term Undergraduate Compulsory 3 h/w Theoretical: 3 hours per week Practical: 0 h/w Course language: English Instructor: Asst. Prof. Muzaffer Özgüleş Address: Gaziantep University, Faculty of Architecture, Office: 207 e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +90 342 317 2666 Office Hour: Wednesday 14:00-15:00 Course web page: http://www.gantep.edu.tr/ab/ders_icerik.php?id=6867&bolum_id=20255733 DESCRIPTION OF THE COURSE This course module, entitled “Ottoman Architecture in Istanbul”, is designed as a part of ARCH211 Architectural History course taught at Gaziantep University’s Faculty of Architecture for the second year undergraduate students. It is composed of four lectures, each having two parts, and it is adjusted for four weeks of the semester. The contents of the course module will be taught via Timeline Travel e- learning platform. OBJECTIVE OF THE COURSE The primary objective of the course is initiating the encounter of the students with the examples and notion of Ottoman architecture, through the lens of significant historic buildings located in Istanbul, as well as some others in Bursa and Edirne. General objectives The general objectives of the course are as follows: - Learning Ottoman architecture and its principal characteristics. - Understanding different features of Ottoman architecture in different periods. - Differentiating the characteristics of Ottoman architecture from other architectural styles. - Understanding the development of Ottoman Istanbul in the course of history. - Understanding building-patron relationship and the evolution of the landscape of Istanbul in the reigns of different sultans. Specific objectives - Learning the development of Ottoman Architecture before Istanbul with early Ottoman structures from Bursa and Edirne - Understanding the evolution of Ottoman mosques and variations of plan types - Learning the first buildings in Ottoman Istanbul during the reigns of Mehmed II and Bayezid II - Comprehending the gradual transformation of Byzantine Constantinople into Ottoman Istanbul - Learning Architect Sinan’s life and career, Sinan’s imprint on Istanbul by means of mosque complexes of royal family, viziers’ and others - Understanding Sinan’s legacy, Sinan as a trademark and features of Sinan’s buildings in provinces - Comprehending the 17th Century Ottoman Architecture as a continuation of the classical tradition - Learning The Sultanate of Women and royal Ottoman women’s buildings in Istanbul - Understanding the changes in the early 18th Century Ottoman architecture and Tulip Period characteristics - Learning the Westernization trends in the 18th Century and Ottoman Baroque, new forms and elements in the Ottoman architectural lexicon 1 - Understanding the developments in the 19th century Ottoman Architecture under the effect of the Europe and the West - Learning the early 20th century Ottoman architecture and Neo-Ottoman style COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES At the end of the course, the students are expected to gain following skills and social competences: Skills: Students would able to: - Comprehend the characteristics of Ottoman architecture and its common features. - Distinguish the features of Ottoman architecture from other Islamic buildings. - Learn and recognize principal buildings of Architect Sinan. - Draw the plans of Ottoman buildings. - Comment on the development of Ottoman Istanbul, the regions where and when the buildings intensify. - Distinguish different periods of Ottoman architecture. Social competences: Students would able to: - Understand the evolution of Ottoman architecture - Indigenize cultural diversity with the help of architecture. - Benefit from the Ottoman’s architectural legacy while creating new designs. - Comprehend the effects of regional architectural traditions. - Obtain critical thinking skills to make comparisons of different architectural styles. - Gain research skills to carry out a research about a building. COURSE CONTENT 1st week Ottoman Architecture before Istanbul: Early Ottoman Buildings in Bursa and Edirne 2nd week The first buildings in Ottoman Istanbul 3rd week Sinan’s Istanbul and Ottoman’s Golden Age 4th week Sinan’s Later Works and His Legacy 5th week 17th and early 18th Century Ottoman Architecture: the Sultanate of Women and the Tulip Period 6th week Ottoman Westernization: 18th Century Ottoman Architecture and Beyond 1st Lecture: Ottoman Architecture before Istanbul: Early Ottoman Buildings in Bursa and Edirne Ottoman Architecture before Istanbul: Early Ottoman structures from Bursa and Edirne. (zaviyes, inverse T plan buildings, interaction with Byzantine architecture) Evolution of Ottoman mosques and different plan types Other building types (khans, baths, palaces) Buildings to be discovered: Bursa Orhan Gazi Zaviye/Mosque Bursa Alaeddin Mosque Bursa Market Neighbourhood Bursa Koza Hanı Edirne Eski Cami Edirne Üç Şerefeli Cami 2nd lecture: The First Buildings in Ottoman Istanbul The first buildings in Ottoman Istanbul: Buildings from the reigns of Mehmed II and Bayezid II Impact of Hagia Sophia on evolution of Ottoman mosque architecture 2 Transformation of Byzantine Constantinople into Ottoman Istanbul. The Old Palace and the New Palace Buildings to be discovered: Rumelihisarı Fortress Yedikule Fortress Hagia Sophia as a mosque (External video: https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/art-history/art- islam/islamic-art-late-period/v/hagia-sophia-mosque) Mahmud Pasha Complex (mosque and tomb), Other Vizier Complexes (Rum Mehmed Pasha, Murad Pasha, Davud Pasha complexes-links to TT tool) Fatih Complex Bayezid II Complex Other church-mosque conversions (links to TT tool) The Old Palace and the Topkapı Palace (buildings of the Fatih’s reign) 3rd lecture: Sinan’s Istanbul and Ottoman’s Golden Age Sinan’s life and his ascent to the post of chief royal architect, his reatises Sinan and his patrons Sinan’s early works (Haseki Complex, Üsküdar Mihrimah Complex) His work of apprenticeship: Şehzade Mosque Süleymaniye Mosque and other parts of the Complex Buildings to be discovered: Haseki Complex Haseki Hurrem Bath Üsküdar Mihrimah Sultan Complex Şehzade Complex Süleymaniye Mosque 4th lecture: Sinan’s Later Works and His Legacy Sinan’s later works Selimiye Mosque in Edirne Sinan’s legacy Sinan as a trademark Sinan’s buildings in provinces Buildings to be discovered: Rüstem Pasha Mosque, Eminönü Kadırga Sokollu Complex Büyükçekmece Bridge Mağlova Aqueduct and Kırkçeşme Waterways Selimiye Mosque, Edirne Other Buildings of Sinan in Istanbul (Edirnekapı Mihrimah Sultan Complex, Zal Mahmut Paşa Complex, Kılıç Ali Paşa Complex, Sokollu Mehmed Paşa Madrasa, Eyüp, Kara Ahmed Paşa Complex, Azapkapı Sokollu Mehmet Paşa Mosque–Links to TT tool) 5th lecture: 17th and early 18th Century Ottoman Architecture: the Sultanate of Women and the Tulip Period 17th Century Ottoman Architecture: continuation of the classical tradition Vizier complexes of the 17th century the Sultanate of Women Ottoman Women’s Istanbul Map of Women Patrons’ Structures in Ottoman Istanbul (http://saltonline.org/en/map) Early 18th Century Ottoman Empire 3 Tulip Period Buildings to be discovered: Cerrah Pasa Complex Sultan Ahmet Külliyesi Vizier complexes on Divanyolu (Sinan Paşa Complex, Köprülü Complex, Gazanfer Ağa Complex) New Mosque Complex, Eminönü Üsküdar New Mosque Complex Ahmed III Fountain Tophane Fountain Üsküdar Ahmed III Fountain Hekimoğlu Ali Pasha Complex Üsküdar New Mosque Complex 6th lecture: Ottoman Westernization: 18th Century Ottoman Architecture and Beyond Westernization trends in the 18th Century Ottoman Baroque New Forms and Elements in the 18th Century Ottoman Architecture Developments in the 19th century Ottoman Architecture: Becoming Completely Western Military barracks for modern army New palaces Buildings to be discovered: Nuruosmaniye Complex Laleli Külliyesi Fatih Mosque (new) Ayazma Mosque Zeynep Sultan Mosque Mihrişah Sultan Complex Nusretiye Complex Dolmabahçe Palace Yıldız Hamidiye Mosque Sirkeci Train Station Hidayet Mosque LEARNING-TEACHING PROCESS Timeline Travel e-Learning Platform will be used as the main tool of teaching for this course module. Following techniques will be used during the learning-teaching process: -Reading compulsory articles prepared for the lectures. -Reading Timeline Travel Tool building entries and browsing images related with those buildings. -Using Timeline Travel Tool to learn about different periods and styles. -Directing students to read other online articles or motivating them to make their own research on the internet. -Watching compulsory videos -Solving quizzes without interactive questions -Solving quizzes with interactive questions (requiring the use of TT tool) -Drawing the plans of buildings and uploading them -Comparing the architectural details (doors, windows, wall construction technique, column capitals) by using filter/search functions of the tool -Adding new buildings into Timeline Travel Tool (Learning by doing) -Comparing the timelines of two cities and commenting on differences/similarities ASSESSMENT Reading articles: 10 % Completing videos: 10 % Answering quizzes: 20 % 4 Completing other tasks: 20 % Exam: 40 % RESOURCES Reference books: Altun, Ara, Ortaçağ Türk Mimarisinin Ana Hatları İçin Bir Özet, Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları, 1989. Aslanapa, Oktay., Turkish Art and Architecture, London,
Recommended publications
  • The Application of Visualisation
    THE APPLICATION OF VISUALISATION TOOLS TO ENABLE ARCHITECTS TO EXPLORE THE DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF SMART MATERIALS IN A CONTEMPORARY SHANASHIL BUILDING DESIGN ELEMENT FOR HOT ARID CLIMATES Tamarah Alqalami Ph.D. Thesis 2017 THE APPLICATION OF VISUALISATION TOOLS TO ENABLE ARCHITECTS TO EXPLORE THE DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF SMART MATERIALS IN A CONTEMPORARY SHANASHIL BUILDING DESIGN ELEMENT FOR HOT ARID CLIMATES School of the Built Environment University of Salford, Salford, UK Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, August 2017 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................................................... I LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................ V LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................. IX ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ....................................................................................................................... X DEDICATION ...................................................................................................................................... XI ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................................. XII ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ATINER's Conference Paper Series ARC2017-2294
    ATINER CONFERENCE PAPER SERIES No: LNG2014-1176 Athens Institute for Education and Research ATINER ATINER's Conference Paper Series ARC2017-2294 Changing Urban Pattern of Eminönü: Reproduction of Urban Space via Current Images and Function Tuba Sari Research Assistant Istanbul Technical University Turkey 1 ATINER CONFERENCE PAPER SERIES No: ARC2017-2294 An Introduction to ATINER's Conference Paper Series ATINER started to publish this conference papers series in 2012. It includes only the papers submitted for publication after they were presented at one of the conferences organized by our Institute every year. This paper has been peer reviewed by at least two academic members of ATINER. Dr. Gregory T. Papanikos President Athens Institute for Education and Research This paper should be cited as follows: Sari, T. (2017). "Changing Urban Pattern of Eminönü: Reproduction of Urban Space via Current Images and Function", Athens: ATINER'S Conference Paper Series, No: ARC2017-2294. Athens Institute for Education and Research 8 Valaoritou Street, Kolonaki, 10671 Athens, Greece Tel: + 30 210 3634210 Fax: + 30 210 3634209 Email: [email protected] URL: www.atiner.gr URL Conference Papers Series: www.atiner.gr/papers.htm Printed in Athens, Greece by the Athens Institute for Education and Research. All rights reserved. Reproduction is allowed for non-commercial purposes if the source is fully acknowledged. ISSN: 2241-2891 06/11/2017 ATINER CONFERENCE PAPER SERIES No: ARC2017-2294 Changing Urban Pattern of Eminönü: Reproduction of Urban Space via Current Images and Function Tuba Sari Abstract Considering the mixture of civilizations as one of the central locations of Istanbul, the Eminonü district has many different urban patterns related to its historical background.
    [Show full text]
  • Archnet 2.0: Building a New Asset Management System for MIT’S Online Architectural Library of the Islamic World
    Archnet 2.0: Building a new asset management system for MIT’s online architectural library of the Islamic World Andrea Schuler is the Visual Resources Librarian for Islamic Architecture in the Aga Khan Documentation Center (AKDC) at MIT. In that role she manages the creation, cataloging, uploading and storage of digital assets from the AKDC’s vast collections. She administers the Aga Khan Visual Archive and provides access to the Documentation Center’s visual collections for the MIT community and for a worldwide community of users. She also contributes content to Archnet as part of the AKDC team. Abstract Archnet 2.0 is a new front end website and back end cataloging tool and asset management system for Archnet (http://archnet.org), the largest openly accessible online architectural library focusing on the Muslim world. The site, a partnership between the Massachusetts Institute for Technology and the Aga Khan Trust for Culture (AKTC), contains articles and publications, images, maps and drawings, video, archival material, course syllabi, and site records relating to architecture in the Islamic world. By 2012, when the Aga Khan Documentation Center (AKDC) at MIT, part of the MIT Libraries, took over the digital library, the site has become dated and was no longer meeting the needs of its users. A software development firm was hired to build new front and back ends for the site. This paper explores the development of the new back end cataloging and asset management tool, including the reasoning behind building a new tool from scratch; considerations during development such as database structure, fields, and migration; highlights of features; and lessons learned from the process.
    [Show full text]
  • Arabesques, Unicorns, and Invisible Masters: the Art Historian's Gaze
    ARABESQUES, UNICORNS, AND INVISIBLE MASTERS 213 EVA-MARIA TROELENBERG ARABESQUES, UNICORNS, AND INVISIBLE MASteRS: THE ART HISTORIAN’S GAZE AS SYMPTOMATIC ACTION? Is it still true that art history, traditionally understood as be to look at these objects. As Margaret Olin has argued, an explicitly object-based discipline, lacks a thorough “The term ‘gaze’ … leaves no room to comprehend the understanding of an “action tradition” that could be em- visual without reference to someone whose vision is un- ployed to explain and theorize, for example, artistic der discussion.”3 Although she refers generally to the agency? And that therefore art history, as opposed to gaze of all possible kinds of beholders, viewers, or spec- other disciplines such as sociology or linguistic studies, tators, she also stresses: “While most discourse about the has found it particularly difficult to look at its own his- gaze concerns pleasure and knowledge, however, it gen- toriography in terms of academic or scholarly action or erally places both of these in the service of issues of agency? Such explanations were employed until quite power, manipulation, and desire”; furthermore, “The recently when expounding the problem of a general de- choice of terms from this complex can offer a key to the lay in critical historiography concerning the discipline’s theoretical bent or the ideology of the theorist.”4 Ac- traditions and methods, particularly in relation to Ger- cordingly, an action-based theory of historiography man art history under National Socialism.1 must find
    [Show full text]
  • 171 Abdülkerimzade Mehmed, 171 Abdullah Bin Mercan, 171
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-17716-1 — Scholars and Sultans in the Early Modern Ottoman Empire Abdurrahman Atçıl Index More Information Index Abdülkerim (Vizeli), 171 AliFenari(FenariAlisi),66 Abdülkerimzade Mehmed, 171 ʿAli bin Abi Talib (fourth caliph), 88 Abdullah bin Mercan, 171 Ali Ku¸sçu, 65, 66, 77n77 Abdülvahhab bin Abdülkerim, 101 Al-Malik al-Muʾayyad (Mamluk ruler), Abdurrahman bin Seydi Ali, 157, 42 157n40 Altıncızade (Mehmed II’s physician), Abdurrahman Cami, 64 80 Abu Bakr (irst caliph), 94 Amasya, 127n37, 177 Abu Hanifa, 11 joint teaching and jurist position in, ahi organization, 22 197 Ahizade Yusuf, 100 judgeship of, 79n84 Ahmed, Prince (Bayezid II’s son), 86, Anatolian principalities, 1, 20, 21, 22, 87 23n22, 24n26, 25, 26, 28, 36, 44, Ahmed Bey Madrasa, 159 64 Ahmed Bican (Sui writer), 56 Ankara, 25, 115, 178 Ahmed Pasha (governor of Egypt), 123 battle of, 25, 54 Ahmed Pasha bin Hızır Bey. See Müfti joint teaching and jurist position in, Ahmed Pasha 197 Ahmed Pasha bin Veliyyüddin, 80 Arab Hekim (Mehmed II’s physician), Ahmed Pasha Madrasa (Alasonya), 80 161 Arab lands, 19, 36, 42, 50, 106, Ahmedi (poet), 34 110n83, 119, 142, 201, 202, ʿAʾisha (Prophet’s wife), 94 221 Akkoyunlus, 65, 66 A¸sık Çelebi, 10 Ak¸semseddin, 51, 61 A¸sıkpa¸sazade, 38, 67, 91 Alaeddin Ali bin Yusuf Fenari, 70n43, Ataullah Acemi, 66, 80 76 Atayi, Nevizade, 11, 140, 140n21, Alaeddin Esved, 33, 39 140n22, 194, 200 Alaeddin Pasha (Osman’s vizier), 40 Hadaʾiq al-Haqaʾiq, 11, 206 Alaeddin Tusi, 42, 60n5, 68n39, 81 Ayasofya Madrasa, 60, 65, 71,
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Muslim Economic Thinking in the 11Th A.H
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive A study of Muslim economic thinking in the 11th A.H. / 17th C.E. century Islahi, Abdul Azim Islamic Economics Institute, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, KSA 2009 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/75431/ MPRA Paper No. 75431, posted 06 Dec 2016 02:55 UTC Abdul Azim Islahi Islamic Economics Research Center King Abdulaziz University Scientific Publising Centre King Abdulaziz University P.O. Box 80200, Jeddah, 21589 Kingdom of Saudi Arabia FOREWORD There are numerous works on the history of Islamic economic thought. But almost all researches come to an end in 9th AH/15th CE century. We hardly find a reference to the economic ideas of Muslim scholars who lived in the 16th or 17th century, in works dealing with the history of Islamic economic thought. The period after the 9th/15th century remained largely unexplored. Dr. Islahi has ventured to investigate the periods after the 9th/15th century. He has already completed a study on Muslim economic thinking and institutions in the 10th/16th century (2009). In the mean time, he carried out the study on Muslim economic thinking during the 11th/17th century, which is now in your hand. As the author would like to note, it is only a sketch of the economic ideas in the period under study and a research initiative. It covers the sources available in Arabic, with a focus on the heartland of Islam. There is a need to explore Muslim economic ideas in works written in Persian, Turkish and other languages, as the importance of these languages increased in later periods.
    [Show full text]
  • Arcadius 8; (Column
    index INDEX 319 Arcadius 8; (column of) 184 Balat 213–14 Archaeological Museum 93ff Baldwin, Count of Flanders 15 Argonauts, myth of 259, 263, 276 Balıklı Kilisesi 197–98 Major references, in cases where many are listed, are given in bold. Numbers in italics Armenian, Armenians 25, 189, 192, Balkapanı Han 132 are picture references. 193, 241–42, 258, 278; (Cemetery) Baltalimanı 258 268; (Patriarchate) 192 Balyan family of architects 34, 161, 193; Arnavutköy 255 (burial place of) 268 A Alexander, emperor 67 Arsenal (see Tersane) Balyan, Karabet 34, 247 Abdülaziz, sultan 23, 72, 215, 251; Alexander the Great 7; (sculptures of) 96 Ashkenazi Synagogue 228 Balyan, Kirkor 34, 234 (burial place of) 117 Alexander Sarcophagus 94, 95 Astronomer, office of 42 Balyan, Nikoğos 34, 246, 247, 249, Abdülhamit I, sultan 23, 118; (burial Alexius I, emperor 13, 282 At Meydanı (see Hippodrome) 252, 255, 274, 275 place of) 43 Alexius II, emperor 14 Atatürk 24, 42, 146, 237, 248; Balyan, Sarkis 34, 83, 247, 258, 272, Abdülhamit II, sultan 23, 251, 252, Alexius III, emperor 14 (Cultural Centre) 242; (Museum) 243; 267 278; (burial place of) 117 Alexius IV, emperor 15 (statue of) 103 Bank, Ottoman 227 Abdülmecit I, sultan 71, 93, 161, 164, Alexius V, emperor 15 Atik Ali Pasha 171; (mosque of) 119 Barbarossa, pirate and admiral 152, 247; (burial place of) 162 Ali Pasha of Çorlu, külliye of 119–20 Atik Mustafa Paşa Camii 216 250, 250; (burial place of) 250; Abdülmecit II, last caliph 24 Ali Sufi, calligrapher 157, 158 Atik Sinan, architect 130, 155, 212; (ensign
    [Show full text]
  • Women and Power: Female Patrons of Architecture in 16Th and 17Th Century Istanbul1
    Women and Power: Female Patrons of Architecture in 16th and 17th Century Istanbul1 Firuzan Melike Sümertas ̧ Anadolu University, Eskisehir, ̧ TÜRKlYE ̇ The aim of this paper is to discuss and illustrate the visibility of Ottoman imperial women in relation to their spatial presence and contribution to the architecture and cityscape of sixteenth and seventeenth century Istanbul. The central premise of the study is that the Ottoman imperial women assumed and exercised power and influence by various means but became publicly visible and acknowledged more through architectural patronage. The focus is on Istanbul and a group of buildings and complexes built under the sponsorship of court women who resided in the Harem section of Topkapı Palace. The case studies built in Istanbul in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries are examined in terms of their location in the city, the layout of the complexes, the placement and plan of the individual buildings, their orientation, mass characteristics and structural properties. It is discussed whether female patronage had any recognizable consequences on the Ottoman Classical Architecture, and whether female patrons had any impact on the building process, selection of the site and architecture. These complexes, in addition, are discussed as physical manifestation and representation of imperial female power. Accordingly it is argued that, they functioned not only as urban regeneration projects but also as a means to enhance and make imperial female identity visible in a monumental scale to large masses in different parts of the capital. Introduction Historical study, since the last quarter of the 20th The study first summarizes outlines the role of women century has concentrated on recognizing, defining, in the Ottoman society.
    [Show full text]
  • Christian Allies of the Ottoman Empire by Emrah Safa Gürkan
    Christian Allies of the Ottoman Empire by Emrah Safa Gürkan The relationship between the Ottomans and the Christians did not evolve around continuous hostility and conflict, as is generally assumed. The Ottomans employed Christians extensively, used Western know-how and technology, and en- couraged European merchants to trade in the Levant. On the state level, too, what dictated international diplomacy was not the religious factors, but rather rational strategies that were the results of carefully calculated priorities, for in- stance, several alliances between the Ottomans and the Christian states. All this cooperation blurred the cultural bound- aries and facilitated the flow of people, ideas, technologies and goods from one civilization to another. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Christians in the Service of the Ottomans 3. Ottoman Alliances with the Christian States 4. Conclusion 5. Appendix 1. Sources 2. Bibliography 3. Notes Citation Introduction Cooperation between the Ottomans and various Christian groups and individuals started as early as the beginning of the 14th century, when the Ottoman state itself emerged. The Ottomans, although a Muslim polity, did not hesitate to cooperate with Christians for practical reasons. Nevertheless, the misreading of the Ghaza (Holy War) literature1 and the consequent romanticization of the Ottomans' struggle in carrying the banner of Islam conceal the true nature of rela- tions between Muslims and Christians. Rather than an inevitable conflict, what prevailed was cooperation in which cul- tural, ethnic, and religious boundaries seemed to disappear. Ÿ1 The Ottomans came into contact and allied themselves with Christians on two levels. Firstly, Christian allies of the Ot- tomans were individuals; the Ottomans employed a number of Christians in their service, mostly, but not always, after they had converted.
    [Show full text]
  • Decagonal and Quasi-Crystalline Tilings in Medieval Islamic Architecture
    REPORTS 21. Materials and methods are available as supporting 27. N. Panagia et al., Astrophys. J. 459, L17 (1996). Supporting Online Material material on Science Online. 28. The authors would like to thank L. Nelson for providing www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/315/5815/1103/DC1 22. A. Heger, N. Langer, Astron. Astrophys. 334, 210 (1998). access to the Bishop/Sherbrooke Beowulf cluster (Elix3) Materials and Methods 23. A. P. Crotts, S. R. Heathcote, Nature 350, 683 (1991). which was used to perform the interacting winds SOM Text 24. J. Xu, A. Crotts, W. Kunkel, Astrophys. J. 451, 806 (1995). calculations. The binary merger calculations were Tables S1 and S2 25. B. Sugerman, A. Crotts, W. Kunkel, S. Heathcote, performed on the UK Astrophysical Fluids Facility. References S. Lawrence, Astrophys. J. 627, 888 (2005). T.M. acknowledges support from the Research Training Movies S1 and S2 26. N. Soker, Astrophys. J., in press; preprint available online Network “Gamma-Ray Bursts: An Enigma and a Tool” 16 October 2006; accepted 15 January 2007 (http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/astro-ph/0610655) during part of this work. 10.1126/science.1136351 be drawn using the direct strapwork method Decagonal and Quasi-Crystalline (Fig. 1, A to D). However, an alternative geometric construction can generate the same pattern (Fig. 1E, right). At the intersections Tilings in Medieval Islamic Architecture between all pairs of line segments not within a 10/3 star, bisecting the larger 108° angle yields 1 2 Peter J. Lu * and Paul J. Steinhardt line segments (dotted red in the figure) that, when extended until they intersect, form three distinct The conventional view holds that girih (geometric star-and-polygon, or strapwork) patterns in polygons: the decagon decorated with a 10/3 star medieval Islamic architecture were conceived by their designers as a network of zigzagging lines, line pattern, an elongated hexagon decorated where the lines were drafted directly with a straightedge and a compass.
    [Show full text]
  • Islamic Gunpowder Empires : Ottomans, Safavids, and Mughals / Douglas E
    “Douglas Streusand has contributed a masterful comparative analysis and an up-to- S date reinterpretation of the significance of the early modern Islamic empires. This T book makes profound scholarly insights readily accessible to undergraduate stu- R dents and will be useful in world history surveys as well as more advanced courses.” —Hope Benne, Salem State College E U “Streusand creatively reexamines the military and political history and structures of the SAN Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal empires. He breaks down the process of transformation and makes their divergent outcomes comprehensible, not only to an audience of special- ists, but also to undergraduates and general readers. Appropriate for courses in world, early modern, or Middle Eastern history as well as the political sociology of empires.” D —Linda T. Darling, University of Arizona “Streusand is to be commended for navigating these hearty and substantial historiogra- phies to pull together an analytical textbook which will be both informative and thought provoking for the undergraduate university audience.” GUNPOWDER EMPIRES —Colin Mitchell, Dalhousie University Islamic Gunpowder Empires provides an illuminating history of Islamic civilization in the early modern world through a comparative examination of Islam’s three greatest empires: the Otto- IS mans (centered in what is now Turkey), the Safavids (in modern Iran), and the Mughals (ruling the Indian subcontinent). Author Douglas Streusand explains the origins of the three empires; compares the ideological, institutional, military, and economic contributors to their success; and L analyzes the causes of their rise, expansion, and ultimate transformation and decline. Streusand depicts the three empires as a part of an integrated international system extending from the At- lantic to the Straits of Malacca, emphasizing both the connections and the conflicts within that AMIC system.
    [Show full text]
  • Kivunim Academic Booklet 2015-16
    KIVUNIM ACADEMIC PROGRAM 2015-16 STUDY THE PAST • EXPERIENCE THE PRESENT • BUILD THE FUTURE 300 Central Park West Suite 12J2 New York, NY 10024 917-930-3092 Israel Office: Beit Shmuel. 6 Eliyahu Shama Street, Jerusalem 94108 [email protected] WWW.KIVUNIM.ORG BUILDING WORLD CONSCIOUSNESS Table of Contents INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................. 1 ACADEMIC PROGRAM – Credit Distribution............................................... 4 THE JEW IN HISTORY: HOMELANDS IN EXILE? ........................................ 5 Unit I -- Medieval Spain and Portugal • Ancient & Modern Greece Ottoman Empire and Turkey……………………………….7 Unit II -- India .......................................................................................... 17 Unit III -- Morocco ................................................................................... 20 Unit IV – Central Europe: Bulgaria • Hungary • The Czech Republic German……………………………………………………………….26 LAND, PEOPLE, IDEAS: THE CHALLENGE OF ZIONISM......................... 32 ARABIC AND HEBREW LANGUAGES........................................................ 45 Arabic Language....................................................................................... 46 Arabic Language and Arab Culture ........................................................ 49 Hebrew Language..................................................................................... 54 VISUAL THINKING: THE ART OF SEEING……………………………………60 KIVUNIM AND THE ARTS: MUSIC AND FILM
    [Show full text]