The Black-Billed Magpie in Ontario

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Black-Billed Magpie in Ontario 6 The Black-billed Magpie in Ontario David H. Elder The Black-billed Magpie (Pica hud­ American Bison (Bison bison) that sonia) is a spectacular, long-tailed, through death by predation, dis­ black and white corvid (Figure 1) ease, accident and old age provided that is found in western North a constant food source. America from Alaska south to New In Ontario, it is a fairly recent Mexico and Arizona (Sibley 2000). colonizer in the northwestern part Its Canadian range extends from of the province and breeds mainly extreme western Ontario through in two separate areas, one west of Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta, Fort Frances and one west of British Columbia and the Yukon Dryden (Figure 2). Both are exten­ (Godfrey 1986). The original range sive agricultural areas that have of the species likely coincided with been developed since the late 1800s the great central North American and early 1900s; farmland carved prairies populated by huge herds of out of the forested wilderness. Figure 1: The Black-billed Magpie is a recent colonist to Ontario. Photo by George K. Peck. ONTARIO BIRDS APRIL 2006 7 r:: r:: co 0 ~ Figure 2: Northwestern Ontario, showing the two main breeding areas of the Black­ billed Magpie in the province, near Dryden and Fort FranceslRainy River (hatched areas). Map by Andrew Jano. Nesting (Salix spp.) growing under The first documented Black-billed Trembling Aspen (Populus tremu­ Magpie nests (four) in Ontario loides). Occasionally, they are were found by John Lamey, A. placed in a tall tree, well above Gray, B. Duncan and W. Wilson in a ground, a location that is favoured small patch of aspen woodland in the more western part of the about 10 km northeast of Rainy species' range (Figure 4). Magpies River on 6 July 1980 (Lamey 1981). very often place their nests close to Magpies build large, conspicu­ human dwellings or farm buildings. ous nests. The nest consists of a Nest construction is usually com­ large oval mass of sticks in which a pleted from mid-April to mid-May grass-lined mud bowl is placed. (Peck and James 1987), and nests Access to the interior of the stick are frequently used for several mass is through a hole in the side. years. The nests are very bulky and resem­ ble a small barrel in size and shape. Discussion In the Rainy River area, nests When the great herds of bison were (Figure 3) are typically placed killed off during the latter half of rather low in clumps of willow the 19th century, the Black-billed VOLUME 24 NUMBER 1 8 The magpie has also become somewhat urban­ ized and is common in many western Canadian cities, such as Calgary. Nearly all known Black-billed Magpie breeding in Ontario has occurred in two areas. The main breeding area is found west of Fort Frances in farmland extending to the Lake of the Woods and north to the boreal forest. Settlement and land clearing began as the fur trade slowly declined and logging of the forests began. The first farms along the Rainy River were established on the 'I heels of the loggers in the 1870s. By 1893, about 600 farms fronted the river between the towns of Fort Figure 3: A nest ofthe Black-billed Magpie near Rainy Frances and Rainy River River in a small willow, showing the ''barrel'' shape (Nute 1950). Land clear­ and central entrance hole. Photo by David H. Elder. ing advanced slowly north of the Rainy River until Magpie all but disappeared from the rock and thin soil of the Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Precambrian Shield was reached. Alberta (Buitron and Taylor 2003). Peatlands were also cleared and A return began in the early 20th drained by a system of ditches. century, encouraged by agricultural Land clearing for agriculture con­ industries and practices. In addi­ tinues today (Figure 5) and covers tion, land clearing to the north of about 36,100 hectares (OMNR, the area covered by the original pers. comm.). prairies created new habitat. Today, The second Ontario breeding the Black-billed Magpie is closely area is also farmland and is located associated with farmland or ranch­ west of the town of Dryden, centred land throughout most of its range. on the small communities of ONTARIO BIRDS APRIL 2006 9 hectares of cleared agri­ cultural land exist (OMNR, pers. comm.). Black-billed Magpies appear to be recent arrivals to both areas. A biological survey carried out in the Emo-Rainy River area in 1929 failed to record the species (Snyder 1938), and it had not been recorded as a breeding species in Ontario by 1937 (Baillie and Harrington 1937). Magpies were not record­ ed by Royal Ontario Museum staff working on ornithological surveys along the Canadian National and Canadian Pacific Railway lines between the Manitoba boundary and western Thunder Bay District in 1937, 1947 and 1949 (Snyder 1953). However, Figure 4: A Black-billed Magpie nest near Rainy an apparently wandering River located high in a Balsam Poplar (P. balsam­ ifera), an unusual site for magpies in Ontario. Photo individual was observed by David H. Elder. by 1. R. Dymond in the Kenora area during June Minnitaki and Oxdrift. Agricultural 1947 (Snyder 1953). settlement of this area began in the Birders started to visit the late 1890s at Dryden, once the Rainy River area in the early 1970s. Canadian Pacific Railway provided There were few if any local resi­ access, and slowly moved westward dents seriously interested in birds at (Wice 1967). Settlement was that time. The first birder to men­ encouraged by a huge forest fire tion Black-billed Magpies was the that burned from Vermillion Bay to late Gerry Bennett who saw one at Ignace. It removed a vast area of the Emo landfill site on 23 June forest and exposed the claybelt soils 1975. In his notes, Bennett stated: of the area. Today, about 9,100 "I'd been told to watch for magpies VOLUME 24 NUMBER 1 10 A Figure 5: Typical Black-billed Magpie breeding habitat near Rainy River: farmlands with scattered stands of aspen with a willow understorey. Photo by David H. Elder. ONTARIO BIRDS APRIL 2006 11 in this country and, at a dump about lar movement put them into areas 4 miles north of Rainy River, I found of suitable habitat with a sufficient one in with ravens" (Alan "critical mass" of birds to facilitate Wormington, pers. comm.). It would breeding. To reach both areas, it is appear from this statement that local likely the birds "island hopped" residents were aware of and familiar across the Lake of the Woods or with the species. Importantly, Bennett skirted the lake to the north or to did not see any magpies during previ­ the south. It is possible that move­ ous visits to the area in 1966 and ments of a similar nature occurred 1974. in the past but did not include In the Dryden area, Christmas enough birds to establish breeding. Bird Counts have been carried out Since then, Black-billed Magpies since 1961. Magpies were first have flourished in the farmlands west recorded in 1972, when two were of Fort Frances to Rainy River, and it found. Numbers gradually is not unusual to see post-breeding increased (although it was not flocks of 25 or more individuals feed­ found on every count) until 2002, ing in the hayfields during August. when 52 were observed. Numbers The species has done well in the dropped to 26 in 2003 (Darlene Minnitaki-Oxdrift farmlands west of Salter, pers. comm.). Dryden also, although the smaller The Black-billed Magpie has a area of suitable habitat may be a lim­ propensity to wander. It has been iting factor on the population. found at one time or another as a Will the Black-billed Magpie vagrant throughout most of continue to move east in Ontario as Ontario from the far north to the a breeding bird? Despite the mag­ extreme south (Speirs 1985). A pie's inclination to wander, it may major eastward flight occurred in be unlikely. The nearest areas of the fall of 1972, when 40 reports suitable habitat (farmland) are at were made in northwestern Thunder Bay (360 km eastward), at Ontario, from Sioux Lookout, Sault Ste Marie (800 km away) and Atikokan, Terrace Bay and Nakina at the Hearst-Cochrane areas (900 (Speirs 1985). Was this the invasion km to the east), distances that are that established the species in the covered by more or less continuous Rainy River and Dryden areas? forest. Perhaps even more impor­ The above noted numbers and sub­ tantly, there is evidence that the sequent observations would appear Black-billed Magpie is heat-intoler­ to support this suggestion. ant and not physiologically adapted It would thus appear that to the hot and humid summers of Black-billed Magpies gained a eastern North America (Bock and breeding foothold in the Rainy Lepthien 1975, Hayworth and River and Dryden areas at about Weathers 1984, Pittaway 1997, Trost the same time, in 1972. This particu- 1999). VOLUME 24 NUMBER 1 12 Acknowledgements Alan Wormington supplied infor­ Ministry of Natural Resources mation on the Black-billed Magpie (OMNR) offices in Dryden and in the Rainy River area from his Fort Frances supplied data concern­ personal notes and those of the late ing farmland area in 2004. Andrew Gerry Bennett. Darlene Salter pro­ Jano prepared the map, and George vided magpie information in the Peck made his photograph avail­ Dryden area from notes of the late able. Ron Tozer helped with the lit­ Laura Howe. Nick Escott and Marc erature and commented on an ear­ Johnson contributed pertinent lier draft.
Recommended publications
  • Health Services Inventory – Rainy River District Final
    Final Appendix 1d: Health Services Inventory – Rainy River District Final Contents Health Services Inventory – Rainy River District 1 PopulationEstimatesandProjections 1 AcuteCareHospitalsinRainyRiverDistrict 2 Access to Health Services in Rainy River District 3 Emergency Department Care 8 Long Term Care 10 Community Mental Health and Addictions 12 Emergency Department Use 14 Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions 18 HospitalAmbulatoryClinics 19 AlternateLevelofCareDays:Acute 20 Inpatient Days for External Causes 21 Forecasting Health Services in Rainy River District 22 HBAM:ClinicallyAdjustedForecasts 26 Final Rainy River District: Summary of Empirical Analysis Population Estimates and Projections Rainy River District accounts for 9 percent of the North West LHIN’s population and is expected to shrink by 3 percent over the next 10 years. Expected growth rates vary by age group. For example, the population aged 0 to 19 is expected to decrease by 11 percent over the next 10 years while the population of 65 to 79 year olds expected to increase by 34 percent. Rainy River District 10-year Age Group 2009 2019 Growth 00-19 5,681 5,031 -11% 20-44 6,226 6,043 -3% 45-64 6,351 5,743 -10% 65-79 2,392 3,195 34% 80+ 1,117 1,163 4% Total 21,767 21,175 -3% NW LHIN 239,579 238,464 0% Total Source: Ontario Ministry of Finance Population Estimates Rainy River has the North West LHIN’s lowest rate of population growth in the population 65 and older. Rainy River also has the LHIN’s fastest shrinking population in the 45-64 age group. Comparison of 10-Year
    [Show full text]
  • Rank of Pops
    Table 1.3 Basic Pop Trends County by County Census 2001 - place names pop_1996 pop_2001 % diff rank order absolute 1996-01 Sorted by absolute pop growth on growth pop growth - Canada 28,846,761 30,007,094 1,160,333 4.0 - Ontario 10,753,573 11,410,046 656,473 6.1 - York Regional Municipality 1 592,445 729,254 136,809 23.1 - Peel Regional Municipality 2 852,526 988,948 136,422 16.0 - Toronto Division 3 2,385,421 2,481,494 96,073 4.0 - Ottawa Division 4 721,136 774,072 52,936 7.3 - Durham Regional Municipality 5 458,616 506,901 48,285 10.5 - Simcoe County 6 329,865 377,050 47,185 14.3 - Halton Regional Municipality 7 339,875 375,229 35,354 10.4 - Waterloo Regional Municipality 8 405,435 438,515 33,080 8.2 - Essex County 9 350,329 374,975 24,646 7.0 - Hamilton Division 10 467,799 490,268 22,469 4.8 - Wellington County 11 171,406 187,313 15,907 9.3 - Middlesex County 12 389,616 403,185 13,569 3.5 - Niagara Regional Municipality 13 403,504 410,574 7,070 1.8 - Dufferin County 14 45,657 51,013 5,356 11.7 - Brant County 15 114,564 118,485 3,921 3.4 - Northumberland County 16 74,437 77,497 3,060 4.1 - Lanark County 17 59,845 62,495 2,650 4.4 - Muskoka District Municipality 18 50,463 53,106 2,643 5.2 - Prescott and Russell United Counties 19 74,013 76,446 2,433 3.3 - Peterborough County 20 123,448 125,856 2,408 2.0 - Elgin County 21 79,159 81,553 2,394 3.0 - Frontenac County 22 136,365 138,606 2,241 1.6 - Oxford County 23 97,142 99,270 2,128 2.2 - Haldimand-Norfolk Regional Municipality 24 102,575 104,670 2,095 2.0 - Perth County 25 72,106 73,675
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom Liberty
    2013 ACCESS AND PRIVACY Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner Ontario, Canada FREEDOM & LIBERTY 2013 STATISTICS In free and open societies, governments must be accessible and transparent to their citizens. TABLE OF CONTENTS Requests by the Public ...................................... 1 Provincial Compliance ..................................... 3 Municipal Compliance ................................... 12 Appeals .............................................................. 26 Privacy Complaints .......................................... 38 Personal Health Information Protection Act (PHIPA) .................................. 41 As I look back on the past years of the IPC, I feel that Ontarians can be assured that this office has grown into a first-class agency, known around the world for demonstrating innovation and leadership, in the fields of both access and privacy. STATISTICS 4 1 REQUESTS BY THE PUBLIC UNDER FIPPA/MFIPPA There were 55,760 freedom of information (FOI) requests filed across Ontario in 2013, nearly a 6% increase over 2012 where 52,831 were filed TOTAL FOI REQUESTS FILED BY JURISDICTION AND RECORDS TYPE Personal Information General Records Total Municipal 16,995 17,334 34,329 Provincial 7,029 14,402 21,431 Total 24,024 31,736 55,760 TOTAL FOI REQUESTS COMPLETED BY JURISDICTION AND RECORDS TYPE Personal Information General Records Total Municipal 16,726 17,304 34,030 Provincial 6,825 13,996 20,821 Total 23,551 31,300 54,851 TOTAL FOI REQUESTS COMPLETED BY SOURCE AND JURISDICTION Municipal Provincial Total
    [Show full text]
  • Kenora District Human Capital Series
    Northern Projections Kenora District Human Capital Series Dr. Bahktiar Moazzami northernpolicy.ca Huskie the Muskie, McLeod Park, Kenora, ON Northern Policy Institute / Institut des politiques de Nord Kenora District | August 2019 3 Who We Are Northern Policy Institute Northern Policy Institute is Northern Ontario’s independent think tank. We perform research, collect and disseminate evidence, and identify policy opportunities to support the growth of sustainable Northern Communities. Our operations are located in Thunder Bay and Sudbury. We seek to enhance Northern Ontario’s capacity to take the lead position on socio-economic policy that impacts Northern Ontario, Ontario, and Canada as a whole. About the Series This Human Capital Series is an update of an earlier series published in partnership with Northern Ontario Workforce Planning. Workforce Planning Ontario is a network of 26 Workforce Planning Boards covering four regions across the province. Workforce Planning Boards gather intelligence on local labour market supply and demand, and work in partnership with employers, employment services, educators, researchers, economic development, government and other stakeholders to identify, understand and address labour market issues. This includes supporting and coordinating local responses to meet current and emerging workforce needs. Given the unique geography and labour market issues that impact Northern Ontario, all 6 planning boards in the north have collaborated to form Northern Ontario Workforce Planning. They include: Algoma Workforce Investment Corporation (AWIC); Far Northeast Training Board (FNETB); The Labour Market Group (LMG); Northwest Training and Adjustment Board (NTAB); North Superior Workforce Planning Board (NSWPB); and Workforce Planning for Sudbury & Manitoulin (WPSM). FNETB and NSWPB are currently pilot sites for Local Employment Planning Councils (LEPC).
    [Show full text]
  • Community Profiles for the Oneca Education And
    FIRST NATION COMMUNITY PROFILES 2010 Political/Territorial Facts About This Community Phone Number First Nation and Address Nation and Region Organization or and Fax Number Affiliation (if any) • Census data from 2006 states Aamjiwnaang First that there are 706 residents. Nation • This is a Chippewa (Ojibwe) community located on the (Sarnia) (519) 336‐8410 Anishinabek Nation shores of the St. Clair River near SFNS Sarnia, Ontario. 978 Tashmoo Avenue (Fax) 336‐0382 • There are 253 private dwellings in this community. SARNIA, Ontario (Southwest Region) • The land base is 12.57 square kilometres. N7T 7H5 • Census data from 2006 states that there are 506 residents. Alderville First Nation • This community is located in South‐Central Ontario. It is 11696 Second Line (905) 352‐2011 Anishinabek Nation intersected by County Road 45, and is located on the south side P.O. Box 46 (Fax) 352‐3242 Ogemawahj of Rice Lake and is 30km north of Cobourg. ROSENEATH, Ontario (Southeast Region) • There are 237 private dwellings in this community. K0K 2X0 • The land base is 12.52 square kilometres. COPYRIGHT OF THE ONECA EDUCATION PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM 1 FIRST NATION COMMUNITY PROFILES 2010 • Census data from 2006 states that there are 406 residents. • This Algonquin community Algonquins of called Pikwàkanagàn is situated Pikwakanagan First on the beautiful shores of the Nation (613) 625‐2800 Bonnechere River and Golden Anishinabek Nation Lake. It is located off of Highway P.O. Box 100 (Fax) 625‐1149 N/A 60 and is 1 1/2 hours west of Ottawa and 1 1/2 hours south of GOLDEN LAKE, Ontario Algonquin Park.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORIC POPULATIONS of NORTHWESTERN ONTARIO KAC Dawson Lakehead University Published In
    157 HISTORIC POPULATIONS OF NORTHWESTERN ONTARIO K.A.C. Dawson Lakehead University Published in: Papers of the 7th Algonquian Conference (1975) 158 This paper was prompted by the continuing emphasis placed by some eth­ nologists on the rather vague historical references to Assiniboine peoples in northwestern Ontario as evidence of their occupation of portions of the area. The prime purpose of the paper is to examine the historical record. It is recognized that the early archaeological literature dealing with Minn­ esota and Manitoba (Wilford 1941, 1945, 1955; MacNeish 1954, 1958) strongly influenced the approach in equating the Terminal Woodland period Blackduck tradition as an exclusive product of the Assiniboine. This was prior to the record of the presence of the tradition in Ontario from the Severn River in the north, south to the border region of west of Lake Superior and east to roughly the Ottawa river region (Conway 1975; Dawson 1974, 1975a, 1975d; Hurley and Kenyon 1972; Kenyon 1961; Pollock and Noble 1975; Ridley 1954,19- 66; Wright 1965, 1966, 1968c, 1972, n.d.). The extensive spacial and temp­ oral depth of the tradition and its presence into historic times in this area historically dominated by Algonkian speaking peoples negates Assiniboine affinities in Ontario. Further it is implicit in the record that the Algon­ kian speakers are not recent arrivals to northwestern Ontario. Information pertaining to the early historic period is reviewed in this paper and the results of the extensive archaeological records are introduced concluding that northwestern Ontario has been occupied from time out of mind by Algonkian speaking peoples.
    [Show full text]
  • A Fact-Finder's Guide to Local & Regional Data
    A FACT-FINDER'S GUIDE TO LOCAL & REGIONAL DATA: How To Find National Statistics 2017 Acknowledgements This document was prepared as a project of the Rural Ontario Institute under the Measuring Rural Community Vitality initiative which received financial assistance from the Government of Ontario. The information contained in this report is provided solely by the Rural Ontario Institute for general information purposes and is intended for the benefit of rural organizations, researchers and community stakeholders. Reproduction for non-commercial purposes is permitted and encouraged. The Government of Ontario is not responsible for the content or accuracy of the information contained in the report. The Government of Ontario makes no representations of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability or suitability of the information. The Guide was authored by Ray D. Bollman. A number of individuals graciously provided comment or suggestions on drafts of the Guide. The input and advice of the following individuals is acknowledged with gratitude: Tracey Birtch, Ken Clarke, Sam Coghlan, Michael Florio, Chris Fullarton, Jon King, Stephen Morris, Spencer Sandor, Nelson Rogers, plus numerous colleagues at Statistics Canada. The Rural Ontario Institute welcomes feedback on the utility of this information resource and its value for those making reference to it. In light of the many website links contained in the Guide, we anticipate that these will inevitably become out-dated. If we are made aware of these and how the Guide is being used we can consider up-dating it. Any such comments or testimonials can be directed to [email protected]. If you would like to get in touch with Ray, his email address: [email protected], his telephone number is: 613-297-5826.
    [Show full text]
  • Wataynikaneyap Power
    Issue 1, November 2019 Wataynikaneyap Power The Environmental Assessment (EA) approvals for Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the Wataynikaneyap Power Project were received in Summer 2019. Since this time, the Project has been following-up with additional technical studies and submitting environmental permits to the appropriate authorities for approval. Most of these permits, including those from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO), the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (MNRF) and the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) are in place. The Environmental Team is actively working with identified Aboriginal communities and stakeholders to address Conditions of Approvals (CoA) for these authorizations. A summary of Project activities will be provided to identified Aboriginal communities and government agencies 15-days in advance of any proposed work. This overview will be updated and available on the project website every three months throughout the course of the Project construction. The update will include an outline of Project construction activities that are planned to occur during the following three months, including a list of potential environmental features, considerations and permit applications expected to be submitted. Wataynikaneyap PM and Opiikapawiin Services LP (OSLP) are working together with Aboriginal Communities and qualified contractors to complete several environmental monitoring programs as outlined in the EA. Along with Contractor’s compliance monitoring activities, Wataynikaneyap Power will also conduct audits of Project activities to ensure ongoing compliance with EA and engagement commitments and various other requirements. Results of monitoring activities will be made available through an Annual Compliance Report (ACR) posted to the Wataynikaneyap Environmental Webpage.
    [Show full text]
  • District of Rainy River Community Profile & Demographics
    District of Rainy River Community Profile & Demographics January 2021 Prepared by: Rainy River Future Development Corporation District of Rainy River Contents Community Futures Development Corporation ............................................................... 3 Natural Resources........................................................................................................... 5 Strategic Location ........................................................................................................... 6 Levels of Government ..................................................................................................... 7 Municipal Contact Information ......................................................................................... 7 Regional First Nation Communities ................................................................................. 8 Regional Chambers of Commerce .................................................................................. 9 Education ...................................................................................................................... 10 Educational Institutions ................................................................................................. 11 Rainy River District Schools .......................................................................................... 12 Telecommunications ..................................................................................................... 15 Utilities ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PEGMATITE MINERALS of ONTARIO and QUEBEC Hucn S. Srnncp,Mines Branch
    PEGMATITE MINERALS OF ONTARIO AND QUEBEC Hucn S. SrnNcp,Mines Branch. Ottawa. Canada.l INTRODUCTORY Pegmatitesoccur over wide areasin Canada,and are of various types. They may be roughly classified according to their char- acteristic component minerals. A certain type may have a wide distribution, while another type may be distinctly regional. Thus, normal granite pegmatites (with minor modifications due t<r structure and mineral composition e.g. graphic granite, soda-rich feldspar dykes, potash-rich feldspar dykes, dykes either rich or poor in mica, etc.) occur abundantly throughout practically the entire region of the Pre-Cambrian crystalline rocks of eastern Canada, from Hudson strait and Labrador, in the east, to the Rainy river district, in western Ontario. South of the St. Lawrence river, in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, there occur what are probably small and strictly local distributions of tin- and tungsten-bearingpegmatites. fn the Ottawa region, throughout a broad belt stretching from the Libvre river, in Quebec,nearly to Kingston, on Lake Ontario, is found an abundant series of dark-coloured, basic pyroxenite- pegmatites, which have been extensively mined for apatite and phlogopite mica. - fn Renfrewand Haliburton counties,Ont., as well as at scattered outlying localities in the same general region, there occurs a series of molybdenite-bearing pegmatites (in part, pegmatitic qlrartz veins), which are probably of a distinct type. In the Bancroft-Haliburton district, Ont., there is a local development of syenite pegmatites, which are characterizedby a most interesting assemblageof minerals. Further west, in southeasternManitoba, there has lately been discovered an extensive series of lithium pegmatites, similar in their general character to those of the Black Hills, in South Da- kota.
    [Show full text]
  • Council Information Sheet – January 20, 2021 - February 18, 2021 Corporation of the Township of Lake of Bays COUNCIL INFORMATION SHEET
    Township of Lake of Bays Municipal Offices Phone (705) 635-2272 Fax (705) 635-2132 Council Information Sheet – January 20, 2021 - February 18, 2021 Corporation of the Township of Lake of Bays COUNCIL INFORMATION SHEET Page January 20, 2021 - February 18, 2021 RESOLUTIONS RECEIVED: 4 1. Township of Emo - re: Resolution supporting the Township of South Stormont regarding the Re-Opening of Small Businesses, dated February 12, 2021. *Note: The Township of Lake of Bays did not receive the resolution from the Township of South Stormont. 5 - 6 2. Town of Orangeville - re: Resolution requesting Support to Implement a Plan to Phase-out All Gas-Fired Electricity Generation, dated February 10, 2021. 7 3. Township of Georgian Bay - re: Resolution supporting the Municipality of Charleton and Dack regarding Municipal Insurance Premiums, dated February 9, 2021. *Note: The Township of Lake of Bays did not receive the resolution from the Municipality of Charlton and Dack. 8 - 9 4. City of St. Catharines - re: Resolution requesting Support for Universal Paid Sick Days in Ontario, dated February 9, 2021. 10 - 12 5. Township of Guelph/Eramosa - re: Resolution requesting Support regarding a Review and Reform of the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, 1990, dated February 8, 2021. 13 - 16 6. Municipality of Meaford - re: Resolution supporting the Township of Matachewan regarding Grant Application Deadlines, dated February 3, 2021. 17 - 18 7. Township of Terrace Bay - re: Resolution requesting Support for the Province of Ontario to reverse their decision to Close the Ontario Fire College, dated February 2, 2021. Page 1 of 97 Council Information Sheet – January 20, 2021 - February 18, 2021 Page 19 - 20 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Northern Centre of Excellence for Addiction and Mental Health
    Towards a Northern Centre of Excellence for Addiction and Mental Health Engagement Results for: RAINY RIVER DISTRICT Northwestern Ontario Engagement Nov 2017 - Mar 2018 Rainy River District Engagement Sessions NORTH WEST LHIN FACE-TO-FACE SESSIONS 2 Fort Frances 1: Jan 2018 Fort Frances 2: Jan 2018 VIDEOCONFERENCE SESSIONS Northwestern Ontario WEST: 2 Jan 2018 Northwestern Ontario WEST 2: March 2018 PARTICIPANTS FROM 15 ORGANIZATIONS serving Fort Frances, Atikokan, Emo, Rainy River, surrounding rural communities, and 10 First Nations RAINY RIVER 23 Of these, 5 participants were affiliated with Indigenous DISTRICT organizations and organizations serving Indigenous people 20 110 people | 15 474 km2 42% rural ** 2% Francophone SECTORS ROLES 27% Aboriginal* Identity 17% adults over age 65 Addiction, Mental Health, Front-line workers and Managers 30% children and youth 0-24 years Hospital, Emergency Medical in Indigenous-specific and non- Services, Primary Health Indigenous organizations, including 4 major towns, 10 First Nations Care, Public Health, Tribal Nurse, Paramedic, Policy Maker, Fort Frances to Thunder Bay: Health Authority, Social Social Worker, Counsellor, Volunteer 4 hours drive Services, Education, Health Coordinator, Superintendent, (Source: Statistics Canada, 2016 Census) Administration Director, People with Lived Experience *“Aboriginal” is used to reflect census terminology **inclusive definition INSIDE: What are the mental How could a Northern What should a Centre health and addiction Centre of Excellence for of Excellence
    [Show full text]