DOCSLIB.ORG

Turner Field Redevelopment DRI #2658

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Turner Field Redevelopment DRI #2658 Transportation Analysis Turner Field Redevelopment DRI #2658 City of Atlanta, Georgia Report Prepared: November 2017 Prepared for: Carter Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 817 West Peachtree Street NW, The Biltmore, Suite 601 Atlanta, Georgia 30308 011490003 Turner Field Redevelopment DRI #2658 - Transportation Analysis TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1 Preferred Alternative (Road Diet) Recommendations ..................................................................... 3 Projected 2023 Phase 1 Build Conditions – Road Diet Recommendations ..................................... 4 Projected 2031 Phase 2 Build Conditions – Road Diet Recommendations ..................................... 4 Existing 2016 Conditions Recommendations .................................................................................. 6 Projected 2023 No-Build Conditions Recommendations ................................................................. 6 Projected 2023 Phase 1 Build Conditions Recommendations......................................................... 6 Projected 2031 No-Build Conditions Recommendations ................................................................. 7 Projected 2031 Phase 2 Build Conditions Recommendations......................................................... 7 1.0 Project Description ................................................................................................................. 8 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 8 1.2 Site Plan Review .................................................................................................................. 12 1.3 Site Access .......................................................................................................................... 12 1.4 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities .......................................................................................... 13 1.5 Transit Facilities ................................................................................................................... 13 2.0 Traffic Analyses, Methodology and Assumptions .................................................................. 14 2.1 Growth Rate ......................................................................................................................... 14 2.2 Traffic Data Collection .......................................................................................................... 14 2.3 Detailed Intersection Analysis .............................................................................................. 15 3.0 Study Network ..................................................................................................................... 16 3.1 Trip Generation .................................................................................................................... 16 3.2 Trip Distribution .................................................................................................................... 17 3.3 Level-of-Service Standards .................................................................................................. 17 3.4 Study Network Determination............................................................................................... 17 3.5 Existing Roadway Facilities .................................................................................................. 20 4.0 Trip Generation .................................................................................................................... 21 5.0 Trip Distribution and Assignment .......................................................................................... 22 6.0 Traffic Analysis – Baseline Conditions .................................................................................. 28 6.1 Existing 2016 Conditions ...................................................................................................... 28 6.2 Projected 2023 No-Build Conditions..................................................................................... 30 6.3 Projected 2023 Phase 1 Build Conditions ............................................................................ 32 6.4 Projected 2031 No-Build Conditions..................................................................................... 35 6.5 Projected 2031 Phase 2 Build Conditions ............................................................................ 38 7.0 Traffic Analysis – Preferred Alternative (Proposed Hank Aaron Drive Road Diet) ................. 41 8.0 Ingress/Egress Analysis ....................................................................................................... 50 9.0 Identification of Programmed Projects .................................................................................. 50 10.0 Internal Circulation Analysis ................................................................................................. 51 11.0 Compliance with Comprehensive Plan Analysis ................................................................... 51 i 011490003 November 2017 Turner Field Redevelopment DRI #2658 - Transportation Analysis LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Proposed Land Uses and Densities..................................................................................... 8 Table 2 Peak Hour Summary ......................................................................................................... 14 Table 3 Trip Generation ................................................................................................................. 16 Table 4 Intersection Control Summary ........................................................................................... 18 Table 5 Roadway Classification and ADTs ..................................................................................... 20 Table 6 Net New Trip Generation ................................................................................................... 22 Table 7 Existing 2016 Intersection Levels-of-Service ..................................................................... 28 Table 8 Projected 2023 No-Build Intersection Levels-of-Service .................................................... 30 Table 9 Projected 2023 Phase 1 Build Intersection Levels-of-Service ............................................ 33 Table 10 Projected 2031 No-Build Intersection Levels-of-Service .................................................... 36 Table 11 Projected 2031 Phase 2 Build Intersection Levels-of-Service ............................................ 39 Table 12 Parallel Roadway Capacity................................................................................................ 42 Table 13 Alternatives Analysis – Road Diet Intersection Levels-of-Service ...................................... 48 Table 14 Programmed Projects ........................................................................................................ 50 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Location Map .............................................................................................................. 10 Figure 2 Site Aerial ................................................................................................................... 11 Figure 3 Study Intersections ..................................................................................................... 19 Figure 4A Residential Distribution ............................................................................................... 23 Figure 4B Office Distribution ....................................................................................................... 24 Figure 4C Retail Distribution ....................................................................................................... 25 Figure 5A Projected 2023 Phase 1 Build Project Trips................................................................ 26 Figure 5B Projected 2031 Phase 2 Build Project Trips................................................................ 27 Figure 6 Existing 2016 Conditions ............................................................................................ 29 Figure 7 Projected 2023 No-Build Conditions ........................................................................... 31 Figure 8 Projected 2023 Phase 1 Build Conditions ................................................................... 34 Figure 9 Projected 2031 No-Build Conditions ........................................................................... 37 Figure 10 Projected 2031 Phase 2 Build Conditions ................................................................... 40 Figure 11 Projected 2023 Phase 1 Build – Road Diet Diverted Trips .......................................... 43 Figure 12 Projected 2031 Phase 2 Build – Road Diet Diverted Trips .......................................... 44 Figure 13 Parallel Routes ........................................................................................................... 45 Figure 14 Projected 2023 Phase 1 Build – Road Diet Conditions ............................................... 46 Figure 15 Projected 2031 Phase 2 Build – Road Diet Conditions ............................................... 47 ii 011490003 November 2017 Turner Field Redevelopment DRI #2658 - Transportation Analysis LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A Land Use and Zoning Maps Appendix
Load more

Recommended publications
  • REGIONAL RESOURCE PLAN Contents Executive Summary
    REGIONAL RESOURCE PLAN Contents Executive Summary ................................................................5 Summary of Resources ...........................................................6 Regionally Important Resources Map ................................12 Introduction ...........................................................................13 Areas of Conservation and Recreational Value .................21 Areas of Historic and Cultural Value ..................................48 Areas of Scenic and Agricultural Value ..............................79 Appendix Cover Photo: Sope Creek Ruins - Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area/ Credit: ARC Tables Table 1: Regionally Important Resources Value Matrix ..19 Table 2: Regionally Important Resources Vulnerability Matrix ......................................................................................20 Table 3: Guidance for Appropriate Development Practices for Areas of Conservation and Recreational Value ...........46 Table 4: General Policies and Protection Measures for Areas of Conservation and Recreational Value ................47 Table 5: National Register of Historic Places Districts Listed by County ....................................................................54 Table 6: National Register of Historic Places Individually Listed by County ....................................................................57 Table 7: Guidance for Appropriate Development Practices for Areas of Historic and Cultural Value ............................77 Table 8: General Policies
    [Show full text]
  • Game Information
    GAME INFORMATION Atlanta Braves Baseball Communications Department • Truist Park • Atlanta, GA 30339 404.522.7630 braves.com bravesmediacenter.com /braves @braves @braves ATLANTA BRAVES (68-58, 1st NL East, +5.5 GA) Braves vs. Giants 2018 2019 All-Time vs. Overall (since 1900) 3-3 5-2 952-1135-18 SAN FRANCISCO GIANTS (83-44, 1st NL West, +2.5 GB) Atlanta Era (since 1966) --- --- 338-344-1 at Atlanta 0-3 2-1 185-156-1 LH Max Fried (11-7, 3.49) vs. RH Kevin Gausman (12-5, 2.47) at Truist Park --- --- 5-5 Game No. 127 • Home Game No. 63 at Turner Field (‘97-’16) -- --- 45-29-1 at SF (since 1966) 3-0 3-1 153-188 August 27, 2021 • 7:20 p.m. • Truist Park • Atlanta, GA • BSSO at Oracle Park (‘00) --- --- 30-36 Dansby Swanson TONIGHT'S GAME: The Braves and Giants open FRIED LAST START: LHP Max Fried last started SS Dansby Swanson gave Atlanta a 2-0 lead up a three-game set tonight with the first of six games on August 20 at Baltimore and pitched the first shutout in the first inning Tuesday night, lining his between the clubs this season...Atlanta will travel to San of his career, holding the Orioles to just four hits on the 30th double into left-center field. Francisco for three games, September 17-19, to kick off night while striking out four...He completed the game He is the only primary shortstop in baseball the Braves' final road trip of the season.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Retro Stadiums on Major League Baseball Franchises
    ABSTRACT MENEFEE, WILLIAM CHADWICK. The Impact of Retro Stadiums on Major League Baseball Franchises. (Under the direction of Dr. Judy Peel). The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of “retro” stadiums on professional baseball franchises. Retro stadiums, baseball-exclusive facilities modeled on classic architectural designs of the past, were built at an increasing rate beginning in 1992 with Baltimore’s Camden Yards. This study analyzed changes in franchises’ attendance, winning percentage, revenue and team value in the seasons following a team’s relocation to a retro stadium. Retro stadiums were found to positively increase attendance, revenue and team value for franchises at a higher rate than teams that did not build retro stadiums. An analysis of these variables and a discussion of the results for all individual franchises that constructed retro stadiums during the 1992-2004 period are presented in this study. THE IMPACT OF RETRO STADIUMS ON MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL FRANCHISES By WILLIAM CHADWICK MENEFEE A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of North Carolina State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science PARKS, RECREATION AND TOURISM MANAGEMENT Raleigh 2005 APPROVED BY: _______________________ _______________________ _______________________ Chair of Advisory Committee ABOUT THE AUTHOR William Chadwick Menefee was born in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, and raised in Houston, Texas. He received his undergraduate degree in Business at Wake Forest University, and completed his graduate degree in Parks, Recreation, and Tourism Management with a concentration in Sport Management. He has been employed with the New Jersey Red Dogs of the Arena Football League, James Madison University, San Diego State University, and Lowe’s Motor Speedway.
    [Show full text]
  • The Paradox of Championships “Be Careful, Sports Fans, What You
    The Paradox of Championships “Be Careful, Sports Fans, What You Wish For” Robert A. Baade Victor A. Matheson James D. Vail Professor of Economics Department of Economics Lake Forest College Fernald House Lake Forest, IL Williams College Phone: 847-735-5136 Williamstown, MA 01267 Fax: 847-735-6193 Phone: 413-597-2144 E-mail: [email protected] Fax: 413-597-4045 E-mail: [email protected] ABTRACT: This paper examines issues related to the economic impact of sports championships on the local economy of host cities. While boosters frequently claim a large positive effect of such championships, a closer examination leads to the conclusion that the impact is likely much smaller than touted and may even be negative. Key Words: Mega-event, sports, sporting events, impact analysis JEL Classification Codes: L83 - Sports; Gambling; Recreation; Tourism; R53 - Public Facility Location Analysis; Public Investment and Capital Stock 1 INTRODUCTION Economics has frequently been used as a rationale in defense of public subsidies for professional sports. Subsidy advocates argue that new teams and/or stadiums provide an economic stimulus, and public support for professional sports should be construed as an investment rather than expenditure. This proposition is thought to be particularly true when the public subventions for sport produce championship teams. Two issues need to be analyzed in conjunction with this thesis. First, do greater subsidies translate into more frequent championships? Second, do sports championships correspond to higher levels of economic activity? The purpose of this report is to provide answers to these questions. A direct correlation between subsidies and championships has theoretical appeal.
    [Show full text]
  • Soohueyyap Capstone.Pdf (6.846Mb)
    School of City & Regional Planning COLLEGE OF DESIGN A Text-Mining and GIS Approach to Understanding Transit Customer Satisfaction Soo Huey Yap MS-GIST Capstone Project July 24, 2020 1 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Transit Performance Evaluation……………………………………………………………………………….. 3 1.2 Using Text-Mining and Sentiment Analysis to Measure Customer Satisfaction………… 5 2. METHODOLOGY 2.1 Study Site and Transit Authority……………………………………………………………………………….. 9 2.2 Description of Data…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 9 2.3 Text-Mining and Sentiment Analysis 2.3.1 Data Preparation……………………………………………………………………………………….. 11 2.3.2 Determining Most Frequent Words…………………………………………………………… 12 2.3.3 Sentiment Analysis……………………………………………………………………………………. 13 2.4 Open-Source Visualization and Mapping………………………………………………………………… 14 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 3.1 Determining Most Frequent Words………………………………………………………………………… 16 3.2 Sentiment Analysis…………………………………………………………………………………………………. 17 3.3 Location-based Analysis…………………………………………………………………………………………. 19 4. CHALLENGES AND FUTURE WORK……………………………………………………………………………………. 24 5. CONCLUSION………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….… 25 6. REFERENCES……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 26 7. APPENDICES……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 29 Appendix 1: Final Python Script for Frequent Words Analysis Appendix 2: Results from 1st Round Data Cleaning and Frequent Words Analysis Appendix 3: Python Script for Sentiment Analysis using the NLTK Vader Module Python Script for Sentiment Analysis using TextBlob Appendix 4:
    [Show full text]
  • Why Are the Braves Moving? • the Braves' Lease at Turner Field, Which Is
    Why are the Braves moving? • The Braves’ lease at Turner Field, which is owned by the City of Atlanta and the Atlanta- Fulton County Recreation Authority, ends at the conclusion of 2016. The Braves have decided to not extend the lease beyond its expiration. • Since the facility opened in 1997, the Braves have invested nearly $125 million in Turner Field. • The facility needs $150 million in infrastructure work (replacing the seats, repairing and upgrading lighting, etc.), none of which would significantly enhance the fan experience. If the Braves were to pay for additional projects focused on improving the fan experience, the additional costs could exceed $200 million. • Even with a significant capital investment in Turner Field, there are several issues that cannot be overcome – lack of consistent mass transit to the facility, lack of adequate parking and lack of access to major roadways. • The Braves also do not have control over the development of the area surrounding Turner Field. New Facility Information: • The Atlanta Braves have secured property to build a world-class Major League Baseball stadium and integrated mixed-use development on 60 acres at the northwest intersection of I-75 and I-285. • The property has an Atlanta address and is located in Cobb County with easy access to I- 75, I-285, U.S. 41/Cobb Parkway and a variety of other transportation options. • The new stadium will be located near the geographic center of the Braves’ fan base. • The stadium will occupy a portion of the site, with the balance being used for parking, a mixed-use development and green space.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transformation Alliance
    The TransFormation Alliance Strengthening Communities Through Transit The TransFormation Alliance is a diverse collaboration of organizations including, community advocates, policy experts, transit providers, and government agencies working toward a common goal to change how transit and community development investments shape the future, to offer all residents the opportunities for a high quality of life, linked by our region’s critically important transit system. Issues Driven People and Creative Placemaking Housing Choice and Transit Innovative Capital Equitable TOD Climate and Job Access Health Why It Matters Housing Cost Jobs Access 48% The percentage of income paid in 3.4% rent by City of Atlanta HH of jobs are accessible by a earning the lowest 20th 45 minute trip on transit. percentile. - Brookings Institute, 2016 Income Mobility 4% A child raised in the bottom fifth income bracket in Atlanta has just 4% chance of reaching the top fifth - Brookings Institute, 2016 MARTA links disparate communities The five highest median The five lowest median household incomes by MARTA household incomes by MARTA stop stop 1) Buckhead Station: 1) West End Station: $19,447 $104,518 2) Ashby Station: $21,895 2) Brookhaven-Oglethorpe 3) Oakland City Station: Station: $104,168 $23,000 3) East Lake Station: $97,037 4) Lakewood-Ft. McPherson 4) Lenox Station: $90, 766 Station: $25,236 5) Medical Center Station: 5) Bankhead Station: $26,168 $89,281 Station Area Typology Type A: • In/near major job centers • Improve job access Low Vulnerability + • Affluent
    [Show full text]
  • Atlanta Braves, Operating Agreement, March 16, 1993
    LEASE SUMMARY BASICS TEAM: Atlanta BRAVES Team Owner: Liberty Media Team Website: http://atlanta.braves.mlb.com/index.jsp?c_id=atl FACILITY: Turner Field Facility Website: http://mlb.com/atl/ballpark/ Year Built: 1997 Ownership: Atlanta-Fulton County Recreation Authority TYPE OF FINANCING: The original stadium was built for the 1996 Summer Olympics and cost $232 million. After the games, it was converted into a 50,000-seat baseball stadium for the Braves. The Braves paid for the conversion. Appendix 1, Sports Facility Reports, Vol. 12, https://law.marquette.edu/assets/sports-law/pdf/sports-facility-reports/v12-mlb-2011.pdf. TITLE OF AGREEMENT: Operating Agreement Between the City of Atlanta and Fulton County Recreation Authority and Atlanta National League Baseball Club, Inc. TERM OF AGREEMENT: The term began with the opening of the 1997 National League Season and lasts until December 31 following the conclusion of the 20th Major League Baseball Season thereafter. The team holds four successive five-year options. –Article 6, pgs. 18-20 PAYMENTS/EXPENSES RENT: No rent requirement; the Team is expected to pay an operator’s fee and remit payments to the capital fund. The Team also pays a community fee based on parking revenues: Article 12.8— “During the Term, as a Community Fee, the Team shall pay to the Authority . a sum equal to 8.25% of the gross revenues. [T]he Community Fee shall be made in two parts: the first part being based upon revenues received prior to July 1 . , and the second part being based upon revenues received during the remainder of such Major League Baseball Season.” –pg.
    [Show full text]
  • Served Proposed Station(S)
    CURRENT PROPOSED ROUTE NAME JURISDICTION PROPOSED MODIFICATION STATION(S) STATION(S) SERVED SERVED Discontinue Service -N ew proposed Routes 21 and 99 would provide service along Jesse Hill Ave., Coca Cola Pl. and Piedmont Ave. segments. New proposed Route 99 would provide service along the Martin Luther King, Jr. Dr. segment. New proposed Routes 32 and 51 would provide service on Marietta St. between Forsyth St. and Ivan Allen Jr. Blvd. New proposed Route 12 would provide service on the Howell Mill Rd segment between 10th St. and Marietta Chattahoochee Ave.. New proposed Route 37 would provide service on Chattahoochee Ave. between Hills Ave. and Marietta Blvd and Marietta Blvd City of Atlanta, 1 Boulevard/Centennial between Bolton Dr. and Coronet Way. New proposed Routes 37 and 60 would provide service on Coronet Way between Marietta Blvd and Bolton Rd Georgia State Fulton County Olympic Park segments. Service will no longer be provided on Edgewood Ave. between Piedmont Ave. and Marietta St.; Marietta St. between Edgewood Ave. and Forsyth St.; Marietta St. between Ivan Allen, Jr. Blvd and Howell Mill Rd; Howell Mill Rd between Marietta St. and 10th St.; Huff Rd, Ellsworth Industrial Blvd and Marietta Blvd; Chattahoochee Ave. between Ellsworth Industrial Blvd and Hill Ave.; Bolton Pl., Bolton Dr.; Coronet Way between Defoors Ferry Rd and Moores Mill Rd, and Moores Mill Rd between Bolton Rd and Coronet Way. Proposed modification includes Route 2 operate from Inman Park station via Moreland Ave. (currently served by Route 6-Emory) Freedom Parkway and North Avenue, North Avenue City of Atlanta, 2 Ponce De Leon Avenue Ralph McGill Blvd (currently served by Route 16-Noble), continuing via Blvd,and North Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Fox Sports Notes, Quotes & Anecdotes
    FOX SPORTS NOTES, QUOTES & ANECDOTES Nationals Phenom Stephen Strasburg Makes FOX Sports Debut vs. Mets Rosenthal: Strasburg Might Actually Give National League A Chance To Win For A Change MLB ON FOX SPENDS JULY 4 TH WEEKEND IN OUR NATION’S CAPITAL – Being one of the most hyped pitching-prospects ever, Stephen Strasburg has, so far, lived up to it for the Nationals. On Saturday, July 3 at 4:00 PM ET, he makes his national broadcast television debut when he faces David Wright and the Mets. The No. 1 overall pick in the 2009 draft, Strasburg has been a smash posting a 2.27 ERA and an staggering 48/7 BB/K ratio. In Atlanta, NL East rivals meet as the division-leading Braves host Hanley Ramirez and the Marlins. Also, Evan Longoria and the Rays take on Joe Mauer and the Twins at Target Field. This week, the pregame show originates live from Nationals Park in Washington, DC with host Chris Rose . Once game action begins, Rose joins the game crew including Joe Buck , Kevin Millar and Ken Rosenthal as a field reporter. For instant updates throughout the week and during games from the entire MLB on FOX crew, follow us on Twitter at http://twitter.com/MLBONFOX . Fans can gain more access to exclusive FOX Sports content by logging on to www.facebook.com/foxsports and www.myspace.com/foxsports . GAME PLAY-BY-PLAY/ANALYST COV. New York Mets at Washington Nationals Joe Buck, Kevin Millar 77% & Ken Rosenthal Nationals Park – Washington, DC MARKETS INCLUDE: Albuquerque, Austin, Baltimore, Buffalo, Chicago, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Columbus, Dallas, Dayton, Denver, Detroit, Hartford, Houston, Indianapolis, Kansas City, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Louisville, Memphis, Milwaukee, Nashville, New Orleans, New York, Norfolk, Oklahoma City, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Pittsburgh, Portland, Providence, Richmond, Sacramento, Salt Lake City, San Antonio, San Diego, San Francisco, Seattle, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Suggestions for Exploring Atlanta on Your Own
    Suggestions for Exploring Atlanta on Your Own Atlanta CityPASS You can purchase a CityPASS that gets you admission to multiple attractions at a discounted rate. A CityPASS allows you entrance to: Georgia Aquarium Inside CNN Studio Tour World of Coca-Cola Zoo Atlanta OR Center for Civil and Human Rights Fernbank Museum OR College Football Hall of Fame A CityPASS is $73.25 for adults and $59.35 for children ages 3-12. You can find additional information here http://www.citypass.com/atlanta Arts: High Museum of Art: Visit the South’s leading art museum! Discover both classic and modern artists such as Monet and Rothko, and the celebrated architecture by Richard Meier and Renzo Piano (Closed on Mondays). http://www.high.org/ During the MBACSEA conference there will be an Eric Carle exhibit http://www.high.org/Art/Exhibitions/Eric-Carle . The exhibit will feature more than 80 of Carle’s signature collages from 15 of his most popular books that span his nearly 50- year career, including many original works rarely on view. He is the creator of ”The Very Hungry Caterpillar”. There will also be an exhibit on the history of sneakers http://www.high.org/Art/Exhibitions/Sneaker-Culture Transportation: Parking deck is $10 from 7am to 5 pm on weekdays. The High is located directly across the street from the MARTA Arts Center (N5) station. Exit the station at the top level and follow signs to the Museum. Cost: $19.50 for an adult’s ticket. Michael C. Carlos Museum: Located on the beautiful campus at Emory University, the Carlos Museum features an exquisite collection of Ancient American, African, and Classical art.
    [Show full text]
  • Downtown Atlanta Living
    DOWNTOWN ATLANTA LIVING WWW.ATLANTADOWNTOWN.COM http://www.fontsite.com/Pages/FFDownloads.html DOWNTOWN NEIGHBORHOODS AND SURROUNDING AREAS Howell Mill Rd 10th St 10th St 10th St MIDTOWN VIRGINIA-HIGHLAND W Marietta St Howell Mill Rd Northside Dr 8th St Monroe Dr Peachtree St Joseph E Lowery Blvd GEORGIA TECH 75 Marietta St 85 Ponce De Leon Ave W Peachtree St W Peachtree Piedmont Ave Donald Lee Hollowell Pkwy Freedom Pkwy Northside Dr Ponce De Leon Ave North Ave North Ave North Ave MARIETTA ARTERY North Ave Spring St SONO OLD FOURTH WARD ENGLISH AVENUE NORTHSIDE DRIVE Marietta St CORRIDOR Boulevard Glen Iris Dr Centennial Olympic Park Drive Park Olympic Centennial James P Brawley Dr James P Brawley CENTENNIAL PLACE Peachtree St CENTENNIAL HILL Ralph McGill Blvd Ralph McGill Ave Freedom Parkway Spring St CENTENNIAL Baker - Highland Connector VINE CITY Marietta St HOTEL Highland Ave OLYMPIC PARK DISTRICT Freedom Parkway Northside Dr Andrew Young International Blvd Joseph E Lowery Blvd Andrew Young International Blvd Piedmont Ave FAIRLIE- Boulevard INMAN PARK Vine City POPLAR MARTA Station Auburn Ave Auburn Ave Edgewood Ave M L King Jr Dr GEORGIA Edgewood Ave STATE Spring St DeKalb Ave ATLANTA 75 UNIVERSITY 85 Wylie St CENTER Piedmont Ave KING HISTORIC James P Brawley Dr James P Brawley Decatur St DISTRICT CASTLEBERRY CABBAGETOWN HILL Jesse Hill Jr Dr Boulevard M L King Jr Dr Kirkwood Ave Peachtree St SOUTH CBD M L King Jr Dr Northside Dr Memorial Dr Memorial Dr MEMORIAL DRIVE CORRIDOR Boulevard 20 20 Capitol Ave Capitol GRANT PARK WEST END SUMMERHILL Joseph E Lowery Blvd MECHANICSVILLE Ralph David Abernathy Blvd Georgia Ave 75 West End West Metropolitan Pkwy Metropolitan DOWNTOWN NEIGHBORHOODS MARTA Station MARTA 85 SURROUNDING AREAS DOWNTOWN RESIDENTIAL MARKET FACTS & FIGURES EXISTING HOUSING Rental Units Market Rate.....................................................................
    [Show full text]