DOCSLIB.ORG

Norfolk & Suffolk Brecks

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

NORFOLK & SUFFOLK BRECKS Landscape Character Assessment Page 51 Conifer plantations sliced with rides. An abrupt, changing landscape of dense blocks and sky. Page 34 The Brecks Arable Heathland Mosaic is at the core of the Brecks distinctive landscape. Page 108 Secret river valleys thread through the mosaic of heaths, plantations and farmland. BRECKS LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 04 Introduction Page 128 Local landscapes Context Introduction to the case studies Objectives Status Foulden Structure of the report Brettenham Brandon Page 07 Contrasting acidic and calcareous soils are Page 07 Evolution of the Mildenhall juxtaposed on the underlying Lackford landscape chalk Physical influences Human influences Page 146 The Brecks in literature Biodiversity Article reproduced by kind permission of Page 30 Landscape character the Breckland Society Landscape character overview Page 30 The Brecks Arable Structure of the landscape Heathland Mosaic is at the Annexes character assessment core of the Brecks identity Landscape type mapping at 1:25,000 Brecks Arable Heathland Mosaic Note this is provided as a separate Brecks Plantations document Low Chalk Farmland Rolling Clay Farmland Plateau Estate Farmland Settled Fen River Valleys Page 139 Brettenham’s Chalk River Valleys landscape today, explained through illustrations depicting its history 03 BREAKING NEW GROUND INTRODUCTION Introduction Context Sets the scene Purpose and timing of the study How the study should be used Status and strategic fit with other documents Structure of the report BRECKS LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT INTRODUCTION Introduction Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2013 Context Study Area (NCA 85) Study Area Buffer This landscape character assessment focuses County Boundary Castle Acre on the Brecks, a unique landscape of heaths, District Boundary conifer plantations and farmland on part of the Main Road chalk plateau in south-west Norfolk and north- Railway west Suffolk. It was commissioned in 2013 by River Narborough Swaffham the Brecks Partnership as part of the suite of Water bodies documents required for a Heritage Lottery Fund Settlement Areas bid entitled ‘Breaking New Ground’. However, Norfolk it is intended to be a stand- alone report which Watton Breckland District describes the distinctive character of the Brecks King’s Lynn & West Norfolk District and supports the positive management of the Suffolk area. Forest Heath District St. Edmundsbury District Feltwell The study area is the whole of the Brecks Cambridgeshire National Character Area (NCA 85)1, one of 159 East Cambridgeshire District Methwold such NCAs across England. The NCAs are areas that share similar landscape characteristics and which follow natural lines in the landscape Brandon rather than administrative boundaries, making Thetford them a useful framework for land management Lakenheath decisions. Objectives Mildenhall Landscape character assessment (LCA) has been developed as a means of identifying Bury St Edmunds 1 Natural England, National Character Area profile:85 - The Map 1 Brecks, 2013 The Brecks study area 0 2500 5000 10000m 05 BRECKS LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT INTRODUCTION what it is that makes a landscape special and Status distinctive - its ‘sense of place’. By articulating 1. Evolution of the landscape - an overview and describing the distinctive characteristics of The study area covers parts of Norfolk, Suffolk of the physical character of the Brecks, the history different types of landscape, LCA can be used to and a (very small) part of Cambridgeshire. It falls of human settlement and the development of the inform decisions about landscape planning and within five different local planning authorities region’s distinctive land cover and biodiversity. management that can guide future change. The (LPA): aim is to conserve and enhance the distinctive 2. Landscape character – summary of landscape character that makes places like the • Kings Lynn & West Norfolk (Norfolk); existing landscape character assessments and Brecks special, counteracting forces for change • Breckland (Norfolk); description of the specific landscape typology that may otherwise erode local distinctiveness. that has been developed for the Brecks. These • Forest Heath (Suffolk); sections identify landscape elements and The twin objectives of the Brecks LCA are to: • St Edmundsbury (Suffolk); and features that are particularly sensitive to change • East Cambridgeshire (Cambridgeshire). and provide guidance for directing landscape • provide a technical assessment of the change so that it conserves and enhances area by developing landscape typologies and Each of these LPAs has its own policies covering distinctive landscape character. descriptions, with guidelines for their future environment and planning issues and this LCA management, together with appropriate digital sets out to supplement and complement these 3. Local landscapes – five case studies mapping. existing formal decision-making frameworks. which demonstrate how the Brecks LCA can It draws on the existing LCAs within the area be used to interpret landscape character and • develop a public-facing narrative (see page 31), re-interpreting the material to landscape history at a local scale. The case that tells the story of the landscape, defining provide a tailored, ‘Brecks-centric’ LCA which studies tell the story of these local landscapes, landscape areas that make sense locally and fits within the hierarchy of available landscape illustrating how the landscape has evolved with which people can associate. The intention characterisation work. The adopted LCAs will from post glacial times to the present day. They is that this narrative will help improve people’s remain the principal reference for development highlight the remnant historic features that help understanding of the Brecks, their connection to control policy, but this Brecks LCA will provide to create a strong local identity, contributing it, and thereby building their ‘sense of place’. supplementary detailed information on local layers of meaning and a sense of time-depth in landscape character and guidance for managing the landscape. The assessment and guidance will be used, change to conserve and enhance that character. outwith the Breaking New Ground project 4. The Brecks in literature -The Chairman to influence and inform land management Structure of the report of the Brecks Society explores how the decisions. landscapes of the Brecks have motivated and Following this introduction, the report is inspired writers through the centuries. subdivided into the following four sections: 06 BRECKS LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT EVOLUTION OF THE LANDSCAPE Evolution of the landscape Physical influences Overview of topography, geology and soils Human influences Evolving history of the land, from prehistoric to present-day Biodiversity Land cover and the development of valuable biodiversity habitats BRECKS LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT EVOLUTION OF THE LANDSCAPE Brecks geology, landform and soils Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2013 Geological data derived from DGM50 BGS Digital data under licence DEFR IPR/139-2DY British Geological Survey. © NERC The distinctive character of the Brecks stems Study Area (NCA 85) from the underlying chalk bedrock, the effects Study Area Buffer of glaciations, which left only a thin mantle of County Boundary Castle Acre soil covering the chalk, and the freeze-thaw District Boundary conditions that occurred in the final stages of the Main Road last Ice Age. Railway River Narborough Swaffham Bedrock Water bodies Settlement Areas The Brecks lie on the broad band of chalk that Chalk Watton extends diagonally across England from the Mudstone Chilterns to north-west Norfolk. Generally Sand the chalk is upstanding as a gentle ridge, but Sand and gravel the Brecks lie on a slight depression between Sandstone Newmarket and Swaffham where the chalk Feltwell Sandstone and mudstone forms a low plateau, 15-30m above sea level. Methwold Brandon Thetford Lakenheath Mildenhall Bury St Edmunds Map 2 Geology - Bedrock 0 2500 5000 10000m 08 BRECKS LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT EVOLUTION OF THE LANDSCAPE Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2013 Study Area (NCA 85) Geological data derived from DGM50 BGS Digital data under licence DEFR IPR/139-2DY British Geological Survey. © NERC Chalk was formed around 90 million years ago Study Area Buffer from the minute calcite plates shed from marine County Boundary District Boundary organisms that accumulated in deep layers on Castle Acre the bed of a great sea. The resulting calcite ooze Main Road gradually consolidated to form rock which was Railway subsequently uplifted to form ridges. In East River Anglia, the chalk strata are inclined eastwards Narborough Swaffham Water bodies towards the North Sea, with the harder, grey Settlement Areas Lower Chalk forming the lower part of the chalk Alluvium escarpment which faces westwards over the Fen Banham Member Basin. The overlying Upper Chalk is paler and Watton Blown Sand typically contains nodules of flint, formed from Bytham Sand and Gravel the silica of sponges and microscopic marine Cover Sand Formation creatures. Happisburgh Glacigenic Feltwell Head Shaping the land Kesgrave Catchment Lowestoft Formation Methwold Nar Valley Formation The topography of the Brecks was shaped by Peat the Ice Age glaciers, particularly the Anglian R.Terrace Deposits Glaciation in which
Recommended publications
  • Council Tax Rates 2020 - 2021

    Council Tax Rates 2020 - 2021

    BRECKLAND COUNCIL NOTICE OF SETTING OF COUNCIL TAX Notice is hereby given that on the twenty seventh day of February 2020 Breckland Council, in accordance with Section 30 of the Local Government Finance Act 1992, approved and duly set for the financial year beginning 1st April 2020 and ending on 31st March 2021 the amounts as set out below as the amount of Council Tax for each category of dwelling in the parts of its area listed below. The amounts below for each parish will be the Council Tax payable for the forthcoming year. COUNCIL TAX RATES 2020 - 2021 A B C D E F G H A B C D E F G H NORFOLK COUNTY 944.34 1101.73 1259.12 1416.51 1731.29 2046.07 2360.85 2833.02 KENNINGHALL 1194.35 1393.40 1592.46 1791.52 2189.63 2587.75 2985.86 3583.04 NORFOLK POLICE & LEXHAM 1182.24 1379.28 1576.32 1773.36 2167.44 2561.52 2955.60 3546.72 175.38 204.61 233.84 263.07 321.53 379.99 438.45 526.14 CRIME COMMISSIONER BRECKLAND 62.52 72.94 83.36 93.78 114.62 135.46 156.30 187.56 LITCHAM 1214.50 1416.91 1619.33 1821.75 2226.58 2631.41 3036.25 3643.49 LONGHAM 1229.13 1433.99 1638.84 1843.70 2253.41 2663.12 3072.83 3687.40 ASHILL 1212.28 1414.33 1616.37 1818.42 2222.51 2626.61 3030.70 3636.84 LOPHAM NORTH 1192.57 1391.33 1590.09 1788.85 2186.37 2583.90 2981.42 3577.70 ATTLEBOROUGH 1284.23 1498.27 1712.31 1926.35 2354.42 2782.50 3210.58 3852.69 LOPHAM SOUTH 1197.11 1396.63 1596.15 1795.67 2194.71 2593.74 2992.78 3591.34 BANHAM 1204.41 1405.14 1605.87 1806.61 2208.08 2609.55 3011.01 3613.22 LYNFORD 1182.24 1379.28 1576.32 1773.36 2167.44 2561.52 2955.60 3546.72
  • Little Ouse and Waveney Project

    Little Ouse and Waveney Project

    Transnational Ecological Network (TEN3) Mott MacDonald Norfolk County Council Transnational Ecological Network (TEN3) Little Ouse and Waveney Project May 2006 214980-UA02/01/B - 12th May 2006 Transnational Ecological Network (TEN3) Mott MacDonald Norfolk County Council Transnational Ecological Network (TEN3) Little Ouse and Waveney Project Issue and Revision Record Rev Date Originator Checker Approver Description 13 th Jan J. For January TEN A E. Lunt 2006 Purseglove workshop 24 th May E. Lunt J. B Draft for Comment 2006 Purseglove This document has been prepared for the titled project or named part thereof and should not be relied upon or used for any o ther project without an independent check being carried out as to its suitability and prior written authority of Mott MacDonald being obtained. Mott MacDonald accepts no responsibility or liability for the consequence of this document being used for a pur pose other than the purposes for which it was commissioned. Any person using or relying on the document for such other purpose agrees, and will by such use or reliance be taken to confirm his agreement to indemnify Mott MacDonald for all loss or damage re sulting therefrom. Mott MacDonald accepts no responsibility or liability for this document to any party other than the person by whom it was commissioned. To the extent that this report is based on information supplied by other parties, Mott MacDonald accepts no liability for any loss or damage suffered by the client, whether contractual or tortious, stemming from any conclusions based on data supplied by parties other than Mott MacDonald and used by Mott MacDonald in preparing this report.
  • Forest Heath District Council

    Forest Heath District Council

    Forest Heath District Council Single Issue Review Policy CS7 of the Core Strategy Document Habitats Regulations Assessment, (HRA), Screening Stage July 2012 Contents 1. Introduction 1.1 Overview of the process to date 1.2 Background to Habitats Regulations Assessment 1.3 Outline of Habitats Regulations Assessment process 1.4 Introduction to the HRA screening process 2. European sites potentially affected by the Single Issue Review 3. Baseline conditions affecting European sites 4. Is it necessary to proceed to the next HRA stage? Which aspects of the document require further assessment? 4.1 Screening of the Single Issue Review 1 1. Introduction 1.1 Overview of the process to date: In order to ensure that the Single Issue Review is compliant with the requirements of the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010, Forest Heath District Council has embarked upon an assessment of the ‘Reviews’ implications for European wildlife sites, i.e. a Habitats Regulations Assessment of the plan. This report sets out the first stage of the HRA process for the Single Issue Review, the Screening Stage. To establish if the ‘Review’ is likely to have a significant adverse effect on any European sites it is necessary to consider evidence contained in the original HRA of the Forest Heath Core Strategy DPD that was produced in March 2009. For a number of policies within the Core Strategy, including the original Policy CS7, it was considered either that significant effects would be likely, or that a precautionary approach would need to be taken as it could not be determined that those particular plan policies would not be likely to have a significant effect upon any European Site.
  • Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan

    Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan

    Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan Regulation 18 HRA Report May 2021 Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan Regulation 18 HRA Report LC- 654 Document Control Box Client South Norfolk Council Habitats Regulations Assessment Report Title Regulation 18 – HRA Report Status FINAL Filename LC-654_South Norfolk_Regulation 18_HRA Report_8_140521SC.docx Date May 2021 Author SC Reviewed ND Approved ND Photo: Female broad bodied chaser by Shutterstock Regulation 18 – HRA Report May 2021 LC-654_South Norfolk_Regulation 18_HRA Report_8_140521SC.docx Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of this report ............................................................................................................................................... 1 2 The South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan ................................................................... 3 2.1 Greater Norwich Local Plan .................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan ................................................................................ 3 2.3 Village Clusters ..........................................................................................................................................................
  • Landscape Character Assessment Documents 2

    Landscape Character Assessment Documents 2

    Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm Landscape Character Assessment Documents 2. Breckland District Part 1 of 5 Applicant: Norfolk Vanguard Limited Document Reference: ExA; ISH; 10.D3.1E 2.1 Deadline 3 Date: February 2019 Photo: Kentish Flats Offshore Wind Farm May 2007 Breckland District Landscape Character Assessment Final Report for Breckland District Council by Land Use Consultants LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT OF BRECKLAND DISTRICT Final Report Prepared for Breckland Council by Land Use Consultants May 2007 43 Chalton Street London NW1 1JD Tel: 020 7383 5784 Fax: 020 7383 4798 [email protected] CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................... 1 PART 1: OVERVIEW 1. Introduction ......................................................................................... 1 The landscape of Breckland...................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose of the report................................................................................................................................ 1 Structure of the report ............................................................................................................................. 1 2. Method Statement.............................................................................. 3 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Data collation
  • Thetford Area Hereward Way P 2 Santon House Little Ouse River

    Thetford Area Hereward Way P 2 Santon House Little Ouse River

    Norfolk health, heritage and biodiversity walks Blood Hill 3 Tumulus Walks in and around the Thetford area Hereward Way P 2 Santon House Little Ouse River Norfolk County Council at your service Contents folk or W N N a o r f o l l k k C o u s n t y C o u n c y i it l – rs H ve e di alth io Introduction page 2 • Heritage • B Walk 1 Thetford Castle Hill page 6 Walk 2 Thetford Haling Path page 10 Walk 3 Thetford Abbeygate page 14 Walk 4 Thetford Spring Walk page 18 Walk 5 Thetford BTO Nunnery Lakes Walk page 22 Walks 6 and 7 Great Hockham Woods page 28 Walks 8, 9 and 10 Santon Downham page 32 Walks 11 and 12 Lynford Stag Walks page 38 Walk 13 Rishbeth Wood page 42 Walks locations page 46 Useful contacts page 47 Project information page 48 •Song thrush Photograph by John Harding 1 Introduction ontact with natural surroundings offers a restorative enhance and restore the County’s biological diversity. On these walks you C environment which enables you to relax, unwind and recharge your will be able to see many aspects of the rich and varied biodiversity Norfolk batteries, helping to enhance your mood and reduce your stress levels. has to offer. More details can be found at www.norfolkbiodiversity.org To discover more about the Brecks, visit the website www.brecks.org Regular exercise can help to prevent major conditions, such as coronary heart disease, type II diabetes, high blood pressure, strokes, obesity, osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, bowel cancer and back pain.
  • Habitats Regulation Assessment East Cambridgeshire Local Plan

    Habitats Regulation Assessment East Cambridgeshire Local Plan

    Habitats Regulation Assessment East Cambridgeshire Local Plan June 2018 (Supersedes the November 2017 Screening Report) Contents Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................... 1 Non-Technical Summary .................................................................................................................. 1 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1 Background to the East Cambridgeshire Local Plan ..................................................................... 1 Key Components of the Emerging East Cambridgeshire Local Plan ............................................. 2 Potential Impacts Arising from the Local Plan ............................................................................... 5 Report Purpose and Overview ...................................................................................................... 6 2. Habitats Regulation Assessment - Legislation and Requirements ................................................ 8 HRA Guidance and Best Practice ................................................................................................. 8 Main Stages of HRA ..................................................................................................................... 9 Consultation with Natural England .............................................................................................
  • Trewithen and the “Brettingham Plans”’, the Georgian Group Journal, Vol

    Trewithen and the “Brettingham Plans”’, the Georgian Group Journal, Vol

    Paul Holden, ‘Trewithen and the “Brettingham plans”’, The Georgian Group Journal, Vol. XXI, 2013, pp. 58–72 TEXT © THE AUTHORS 2013 TREWITHEN AND THE ‘BRETTINGHAM PLANS’ PAUL HOLDEN Amongst the Hawkins papers in the Cornwall Record c. a new west range was added to the rear of the Office are three undated and unsigned architectural existing east-facing L-shaped house creating a U- drawings showing six alternative schemes to shaped plan. A drawing of this work exists but the modernise the north front of Trewithen, near Truro, architect is not recorded. Cornwall. Inscribed in pencil on the reverse of one of In June Philip Hawkins wrote to his friend, these drawings are the words ‘Brettingham Plans’. the Cornish antiquary, geologist and naturalist, In his biographical dictionary the late Sir Howard William Borlase ( – ) stating: ‘I am currently Colvin pointed out that Robert William Furze making alterations to my house’. There has been a Brettingham (c. – ) may have been behind good deal of scholarly debate over the originator of these plans − an attribution based on the fact that he this second-phase of alterations but most now agree had displayed drawings entitled ‘Improved elevations that James Gibbs ( – ) was the architect. to an old house in the West of England’ at the Royal Gibbs proposed two schemes for Trewithen. The Academy in . There is, however, no evidence to first considered sweeping away the old buildings in suggest that the house illustrated was Trewithen. This favour of a new four-storeyed seven-bay house in a article will, for the first time, assess the ‘Brettingham simple English Palladian form (Fig.
  • Parish Registers and Transcripts in the Norfolk Record Office

    Parish Registers and Transcripts in the Norfolk Record Office

    Parish Registers and Transcripts in the Norfolk Record Office This list summarises the Norfolk Record Office’s (NRO’s) holdings of parish (Church of England) registers and of transcripts and other copies of them. Parish Registers The NRO holds registers of baptisms, marriages, burials and banns of marriage for most parishes in the Diocese of Norwich (including Suffolk parishes in and near Lowestoft in the deanery of Lothingland) and part of the Diocese of Ely in south-west Norfolk (parishes in the deanery of Fincham and Feltwell). Some Norfolk parish records remain in the churches, especially more recent registers, which may be still in use. In the extreme west of the county, records for parishes in the deanery of Wisbech Lynn Marshland are deposited in the Wisbech and Fenland Museum, whilst Welney parish records are at the Cambridgeshire Record Office. The covering dates of registers in the following list do not conceal any gaps of more than ten years; for the populous urban parishes (such as Great Yarmouth) smaller gaps are indicated. Whenever microfiche or microfilm copies are available they must be used in place of the original registers, some of which are unfit for production. A few parish registers have been digitally photographed and the images are available on computers in the NRO's searchroom. The digital images were produced as a result of partnership projects with other groups and organizations, so we are not able to supply copies of whole registers (either as hard copies or on CD or in any other digital format), although in most cases we have permission to provide printout copies of individual entries.
  • David Tyldesley and Associates Planning, Landscape and Environmental Consultants

    David Tyldesley and Associates Planning, Landscape and Environmental Consultants

    DAVID TYLDESLEY AND ASSOCIATES PLANNING, LANDSCAPE AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS Habitat Regulations Assessment: Breckland Council Submission Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Document Durwyn Liley, Rachel Hoskin, John Underhill-Day & David Tyldesley 1 DRAFT Date: 7th November 2008 Version: Draft Recommended Citation: Liley, D., Hoskin, R., Underhill-Day, J. & Tyldesley, D. (2008). Habitat Regulations Assessment: Breckland Council Submission Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Document. Footprint Ecology, Wareham, Dorset. Report for Breckland District Council. 2 Summary This document records the results of a Habitat Regulations Assessment (HRA) of Breckland District Council’s Core Strategy. The Breckland District lies in an area of considerable importance for nature conservation with a number of European Sites located within and just outside the District. The range of sites, habitats and designations is complex. Taking an area of search of 20km around the District boundary as an initial screening for relevant protected sites the assessment identified five different SPAs, ten different SACs and eight different Ramsar sites. Following on from this initial screening the assessment identifies the following potential adverse effects which are addressed within the appropriate assessment: • Reduction in the density of Breckland SPA Annex I bird species (stone curlew, nightjar, woodlark) near to new housing. • Increased levels of recreational activity resulting in increased disturbance to Breckland SPA Annex I bird species (stone curlew, nightjar, woodlark). • Increased levels of people on and around the heaths, resulting in an increase in urban effects such as increased fire risk, fly-tipping, trampling. • Increased levels of recreation to the Norfolk Coast (including the Wash), potentially resulting in disturbance to interest features and other recreational impacts.
  • 233 08 SD50 Environment Permitting Decision Document

    233 08 SD50 Environment Permitting Decision Document

    Environment Agency permitting decisions Bespoke permit We have decided to grant the permit for Didlington Farm Poultry Unit operated by Mr Robert Anderson, Mrs Rosamond Anderson and Mr Marcus Anderson. The permit number is EPR/EP3937EP. We consider in reaching that decision we have taken into account all relevant considerations and legal requirements and that the permit will ensure that the appropriate level of environmental protection is provided. Purpose of this document This decision document: • explains how the application has been determined • provides a record of the decision-making process • shows how all relevant factors have been taken into account • justifies the specific conditions in the permit other than those in our generic permit template. Unless the decision document specifies otherwise we have accepted the applicant’s proposals. Structure of this document • Key issues • Annex 1 the decision checklist • Annex 2 the consultation, web publicising responses. EPR/EP3937EP/A001 Page 1 of 12 Key Issues 1) Ammonia Impacts There are two Special Areas for Conservation (SAC) within 3.4km, one Special Protection Area (SPA) within 850m, seven Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) within 4.9km and six Local Wildlife Sites (LWS) within 1.4km of the facility, one of which is within 250m. Assessment of SAC and SPA If the Process Contribution (PC) is below 4% of the relevant critical level (CLe) or critical load (CLo) then the farm can be permitted with no further assessment. Initial screening using Ammonia Screening Tool (AST) v4.4 has indicated that the PC for Breckland SAC, Norfolk Valley Fens SAC and Breckland SPA is predicted to be greater than 4% of the CLe for ammonia.
  • Site Improvement Plan Norfolk Valley Fens

    Site Improvement Plan Norfolk Valley Fens

    Improvement Programme for England's Natura 2000 Sites (IPENS) Planning for the Future Site Improvement Plan Norfolk Valley Fens Site Improvement Plans (SIPs) have been developed for each Natura 2000 site in England as part of the Improvement Programme for England's Natura 2000 sites (IPENS). Natura 2000 sites is the combined term for sites designated as Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) and Special Protected Areas (SPA). This work has been financially supported by LIFE, a financial instrument of the European Community. The plan provides a high level overview of the issues (both current and predicted) affecting the condition of the Natura 2000 features on the site(s) and outlines the priority measures required to improve the condition of the features. It does not cover issues where remedial actions are already in place or ongoing management activities which are required for maintenance. The SIP consists of three parts: a Summary table, which sets out the priority Issues and Measures; a detailed Actions table, which sets out who needs to do what, when and how much it is estimated to cost; and a set of tables containing contextual information and links. Once this current programme ends, it is anticipated that Natural England and others, working with landowners and managers, will all play a role in delivering the priority measures to improve the condition of the features on these sites. The SIPs are based on Natural England's current evidence and knowledge. The SIPs are not legal documents, they are live documents that will be updated to reflect changes in our evidence/knowledge and as actions get underway.