DOCSLIB.ORG

Flood Mitigation Plan Township of Montgomery

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Flood Mitigation Plan Township of Montgomery Pike Run at Bridgepoint Road looking east, Flood of June 3, 1946 Flood Mitigation Plan Township of Montgomery Somerset County, New Jersey January 2006 Prepared with assistance from USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service 220 Davidson Avenue, 4th Floor Somerset, NJ 08873 732-537-6040 Montgomery Township Flood Mitigation Plan January 2006 2 USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Montgomery Township Flood Mitigation Plan January 2006 Table of Contents Table of Contents................................................................................................................ 3 List of Tables ...................................................................................................................... 5 List of Figures..................................................................................................................... 7 List of Photos ...................................................................................................................... 9 Acknowledgements........................................................................................................... 10 Preface............................................................................................................................... 11 Setting .......................................................................................................................... 11 Section A - Community Organization .............................................................................. 15 Section B - Public Involvement ........................................................................................ 15 Initial Public Meeting.................................................................................................. 15 Public Meeting on Draft Plan.................................................................................... 15 Public Information Activities...................................................................................... 16 Questionnaires............................................................................................................ 16 Solicitation of Comments .......................................................................................... 17 Planning Process, Planning Committee Meetings................................................ 17 Section C - Coordination with Other Agencies ................................................................ 17 Initial Contact with Agencies, Comments............................................................... 17 Meetings with Agencies............................................................................................. 17 Agency Comments on Draft Action Plan ......................................................................... 18 Review of Community Needs, Goals, Plans for the Area.................................... 18 Section D – Assessing the Hazard .................................................................................... 18 Background Information: Record of Past Floods ................................................. 18 FEMA Flood Insurance Study .................................................................................. 19 Principal Flood Problems ...................................................................................... 19 Flood Prone Areas Map ........................................................................................ 33 Description of Other Natural Hazards................................................................. 33 Section E – Assessing the Problem................................................................................... 47 Repetitive Flood Losses............................................................................................ 47 Affected Structures .................................................................................................... 47 Description and Impact of Flooding......................................................................... 51 Critical Facilities in Plan Area................................................................................... 51 Description of Development, Redevelopment, Population Trends, and Discussion of Possible Future Development and Redevelopment in the Floodplain, Watershed and Natural Resource Areas........................................... 56 Beneficial Function Areas ......................................................................................... 58 Impact of Flooding...................................................................................................... 62 Existing Flood Protection Measures........................................................................ 62 Procedures for Warning and Evacuating Residents and Visitors....................... 62 Section F – Set Goals........................................................................................................ 63 Section G – Review of Possible Activities ....................................................................... 64 Section H – Implementation of an Action Plan ................................................................ 64 Recommendations ..................................................................................................... 64 3 USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Montgomery Township Flood Mitigation Plan January 2006 I. Evacuation Route Enhancement........................................................................... 64 II. Incorporation of Flood Mitigation Planning into Local...................................... 65 Ordinances and Master Planning .............................................................................. 65 III. Private Property Flood and other Natural Hazard (Erosion) ............................. 66 Mitigation.................................................................................................................. 66 IV. Public Participation............................................................................................ 68 V. Post-Disaster Mitigation Policies and Procedures .............................................. 69 Section I – Plan Adoption................................................................................................. 71 Section J – Plan Monitoring and Evaluation .................................................................... 72 Bibliography ..................................................................................................................... 74 Appendix........................................................................................................................... 76 Resolution Establishing the Montgomery Township Flood Mitigation Committee ....................................................................................................................................... 78 Montgomery Township Flood Mitigation Planning Committee Minutes............. 82 Property Owner Survey Questionnaire and Final Survey Results ................... 111 Letter to Neighboring Municipalities, State and County Agencies ................... 126 Comments Received from Others ......................................................................... 130 Montgomery Township Flood Plain Ordinance ................................................... 134 Suggested Changes to Existing Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance.......... 153 Preliminary Damage Assessment Report and Emergency Log for Hurricane Floyd in Montgomery Township............................................................................. 160 Community Rating System ..................................................................................... 162 Flood Mitigation Funding Sources and Contact Information ............................. 170 Resolution of Adoption of Flood Mitigation Plan ................................................. 174 4 USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Montgomery Township Flood Mitigation Plan January 2006 List of Tables Table 1 - Gaging Station in the Montgomery Township Vicinity.................................... 18 Table 2 - Major Floods and Their Recurrence Interval .................................................... 21 Table 3 - Summary of Discharges .................................................................................... 22 Table 4 – Summary of Number of Flood First Floor Vulnerable Residential Properties along Millstone River and Lower Bedens Brook in Montgomery Township* ........ 48 Table 5 – Summary of Number and Type of Structures Affected by 100 Year Flood Event Along Millstone River and Lower Bedens Brook in Montgomery Township48 Table 6 – Critical Facilities in Montgomery Township.................................................... 55 Table 7 – Suitable Habitat Types in Montgomery Township........................................... 59 Table 8 – Action Plan Timetable ...................................................................................... 70 Table 8 – Action Plan Timetable (Continued).................................................................. 71 5 USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Montgomery Township Flood Mitigation Plan January 2006 6 USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Montgomery Township Flood Mitigation Plan January 2006 List of Figures Figure 1 – Montgomery Township Location Map....................................................... 13 Figure 2 – Annual Peak Discharges at Blackwells Mills Gaging Station .................. 23 Figure 3 – Location of Reported Flood Damages .......................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2020 Natural Resources Inventory
    2020 NATURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY TOWNSHIP OF MONTGOMERY SOMERSET COUNTY, NEW JERSEY Prepared By: Tara Kenyon, AICP/PP Principal NJ License #33L100631400 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................... 5 AGRICULTURE ............................................................................................................................................................. 7 AGRICULTURAL INDUSTRY IN AND AROUND MONTGOMERY TOWNSHIP ...................................................... 7 REGULATIONS AND PROGRAMS RELATED TO AGRICULTURE ...................................................................... 11 HEALTH IMPACTS OF AGRICULTURAL AVAILABILITY AND LOSS TO HUMANS, PLANTS AND ANIMALS .... 14 HOW IS MONTGOMERY TOWNSHIP WORKING TO SUSTAIN AND ENHANCE AGRICULTURE? ................... 16 RECOMMENDATIONS AND POTENTIAL PROJECTS .......................................................................................... 18 CITATIONS ............................................................................................................................................................. 19 AIR QUALITY .............................................................................................................................................................. 21 CHARACTERISTICS OF AIR .................................................................................................................................. 21
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Resources Inventory for the Township and Borough of Princeton
    PRINCETON ERI The Delaware Valley Regional Planning The symbol in our logo is adapted from the official DVRPC seal and is designed as a Commission is dedicated to uniting the stylized image of the Delaware Valley. The region’s elected officials, planning outer ring symbolizes the region as a whole, professionals, and the public with the while the diagonal bar signifies the Delaware common vision of making a great region River. The two adjoining crescents represent even greater. Shaping the way we live, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the State of New Jersey. work, and play, DVRPC builds consensus on improving transportation, DVRPC is funded by a variety of funding promoting smart growth, protecting the sources, including federal grants from the environment, and enhancing the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) economy. We serve a diverse region of and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), nine counties: Bucks, Chester, Delaware, the Pennsylvania and New Jersey Montgomery, and Philadelphia in departments of transportation, as well Pennsylvania; and Burlington, Camden, as by DVRPC’s state and local member Gloucester, and Mercer in New Jersey. governments. This ERI was also funded by ANJEC’s Smart Growth Assistance Program, DVRPC is the federally designated supported by the Geraldine R. Dodge Metropolitan Planning Organization for Foundation. The authors, however, are solely the Greater Philadelphia Region— responsible for the findings and conclusions leading the way to a better future. herein, which may not represent the official views or policies of the funding agencies. DVRPC fully complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes and regulations in all programs and activities.
    [Show full text]
  • HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS in the JACOBS CREEK, STONY BROOK, and BEDEN BROOK DRAINAGE BASINS, WEST-CENTRAL NEW JERSEY, 1986-88 By
    HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS IN THE JACOBS CREEK, STONY BROOK, AND BEDEN BROOK DRAINAGE BASINS, WEST-CENTRAL NEW JERSEY, 1986-88 By Eric Jacobsen, Mark A. Hardy, and Barbara A. Kurtz U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 91-4164 Prepared in cooperation with the NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ENERGY West Trenton, New Jersey 1993 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Books and Open-File Reports Section Mountain View Office Park Box 25425 Suite 206 Federal Center 810 Bear Tavern Road Denver, CO 80225 West Trenton, NJ 08628 CONTENTS Page Abstract.............................................................. 1 Introduction.......................................................... 2 Purpose and scope................................................ 2 Previous studies................................................. 2 Acknowledgments.................................................. 2 Description of study area............................................. 4 Location and setting............................................. 4 Climate.......................................................... 4 Geology.......................................................... 6 Hydrogeology..................................................... 6 Methods of investigation.............................................. 8 Ground
    [Show full text]
  • M U N Ic Ip a L S T O R M W a T E R M a N a G E M E N T P L a N E X Is T in G L a N D U S E /L a N D C O V
    . Y E Y , S R D S A R T A E E T E I U D T N A J T T B N C O D N , A I O A W D E A H S G S C R E E I T . H S R N T I E I P S N H T S ’ R Y X S E D T M O F R D . A T E L I L R U E D F E E O Y L O W L E E H N A I S E O T E 02030105110080 S V P C T T A N B N U H T T O . E W E N L A E N A I C S E A N H S A I E I C P D D ’ H L S E U I R D N L E T M H D R R T O R T N S R E A H . R S D T PIKE RUN (ABOVE CRUSER BROOK) N U R E I T E T S S A I O E I I E O S S O E K A N I D R R W H S U . T W B E S : I N Y T T A W I E O E . C E E D S N I P F Y R . D H S N H E G A A L R O T H T E O S : C H A H F O Y B S E C N N S U S T M , E E O Y I S N , U T A D I O A S R E I E W S W N E S O D D Y T E R B S E R E I O U S R S R E I A U H P I R V E A B M J P T E R X F O D E S N A P P S E M O D F I E K O R W A T T A P E O T , E H E Y N S C D S W R M E G C C HILLSBOROUGH TOWNSHIP S H T N I E I S U E U 02030105030060 T O R T I N S P S L E Y I D A E I N L C A E T E E W N B H O B P P O SOMERSET COUNTY B L I R U T D O T R H I R P E MONTGOMERY D M S A P T O T F A P I NESHANIC RIVER (BELOW FNR / SNR CONFL) U N R E P E N H F D C I TOWNSHIP T F S P R R O P D R T O O C A I O A I E O L T A P A D O P P N T U W R S O I M Y T N E U C E E A O N T H A D Y I R H U S R M H S E D N L D R P .
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix-J-JCMUA-SIAR-092520.Pdf
    Passaic Valley Sewerage Commission October 2020 PVSC Treatment District Regional Long Term Control Plan Appendix J Selection and Implementation of Alternatives Report for Jersey City MUA Jersey City Municipal Utilities Authority Selection and Implementation of Alternatives Report NJPDES Permit No. NJ0108723 March 2020 Jersey City Municipal Utilities Authority January 2020 Selection and Implementation of Alternatives Report Page 1 of 45 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION A - INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 4 SECTION B - SCREENING OF CSO CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES ........................................ 9 SECTION C - EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES................................................................ 10 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 10 DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF ALTERNAtIVES.................................. 11 SECTION D - SELECTION OF RECOMMENDED LTCP ....................................................... 12 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 12 LTCP SELECTION PROCESS ..................................................................................... 12 SELECTION OF ALTERNATIVES ............................................................................. 12 D.3.1 Description ............................................................................................................... 13 D.3.2
    [Show full text]
  • Streamwatcher Your Water
    The StreamWatcher Your water. Your environment. Winter 2013 Your voice. STREAMWATCH MISSION Protecting and enhancing our watershed through chemical, physical, and biological monitoring, restoration, appropriate action, and education. Volunteers are the key! IN THIS ISSUE . SCIENCE DEPARTMENT STAFF PAGE 1 Nationwide Water Quality Portal Now Online Jim Waltman SBMWA Executive Director PAGE 2 Announcements What’s Bugging You - How does road salting affect waterways? Amy M. Soli, Ph.D PAGE 3 What’s Bugging You, continued Science Director August and November Bacteria Monitoring Results Erin McCollum Stretz PAGE 4 Summer and Fall 2013 Macroinvertebrate Monitoring Results StreamWatch Program Coordinator PAGE 5 View Our Data Nicholas Ho Resources for StreamWatchers GIS Specialist Upcoming Dates to Remember ———————————————— NATIONWIDE WATER QUALITY PORTAL NOW ONLINE STONY BROOK-MILLSTONE SEE YOUR DATA ON A NATIONAL SCALE WATERSHED ASSOCIATION You have worked long and hard to collect your StreamWatch data—now what? J. Seward Johnson, Sr. There is a new website available to the public to see your data put on display. A Environmental Center project that has been in development for years by the National Water Quality 31 Titus Mill Road Council, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the US Geological Survey, the Pennington, NJ 08534 Water Quality Portal is now available online. Released last year, it provides “one- stop shopping” for access to water quality data collected across the country by Phone: (609) 737-3735 Fax: (609) 737-3075 national, state, and local government agencies, utilities, academia, and nonprofit www.thewatershed.org organizations—including the Stony Brook-Millstone Watershed Association! Rather than visiting multiple websites, you can find physical, chemical, and bio- For questions about how to get logical data all in one place.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places REGISTER Multiple Property Documentation Form
    NPS Form 10-900-b $f££\VE*' OMB No. 1024-0018 (June 1991) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places REGISTER Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting multiple property groups relating to one ol several historic contexts. See instructions in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. X New Submission __ Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing_________________ Early Stone Arch Bridges of Sonerset County, New Jersey B. Associated Historic Contexts_____________________________________________ (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) Early Stone Arch Bridges of Somerset County, New Jersey, 1786-c. 1890 C. Form Prepared by name/title ^^^ A - Brown organization Cultural Resource Consulting Group___________ date 7/23/92 street & number 54 W^odbridge Avenue tel hone (908) 985-4380 city or town Highland Park________ state _NJ_____________ zjp code 08904 D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60 and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and; Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation. (Q See continuation sheet for additional comments.) /j Signatu^and title'of certifying official Date rvh rnrnmi SRI nnp-r fnr Tfo-hTral fc Higt-nrir.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 1: Introduction
    SECTION 5.4.3: RISK ASSESSMENT – FLOOD 5.4.3 FLOOD This section provides a profile and vulnerability assessment for the flood hazard. HAZARD PROFILE This section provides profile information including description, location, extent, previous occurrences and losses and the probability of future occurrences. Description Floods are one of the most common natural hazards in the U.S. They can develop slowly over a period of days or develop quickly, with disastrous effects that can be local (impacting a neighborhood or community) or regional (affecting entire river basins, coastlines and multiple counties or states) (Federal Emergency Management Agency [FEMA], 2010). Most communities in the U.S. have experienced some kind of flooding, after spring rains, heavy thunderstorms, coastal storms, or winter snow thaws (George Washington University, 2001). Floods have been and continue to be the most frequent, destructive, and costly natural hazard in the State of New Jersey. The large majority of the State’s damage reported for major disasters is associated with flooding (NJOEM, 2011). There are a number of flood categories in the U.S., which include: Riverine flooding, including overflow from a river channel, flash, alluvial fan, ice-jam, and dam breaks Local drainage or high groundwater levels Fluctuating lake levels Coastal flooding, including storm surges Debris flow (NJOEM, 2011) One hundred-year floodplains (or 1% annual A floodplain is defined as the land adjoining the channel of a chance floodplain) can be described as a bag of river, stream, ocean, lake, or other watercourse or water body 100 marbles, with 99 clear marbles and one black that becomes inundated with water during a flood.
    [Show full text]
  • Sourland Planning Council Spring 2006 Toward a “Smart Future” Phase II of Smart Growth Begins
    Back Roads Sourland Planning Council www.sourland.org Spring 2006 Toward A “Smart Future” Phase II of Smart Growth Begins Phase I of the Smart Growth and exclusively dedicated to end product is consistent with the project for which the Sourland Sourland Mountain issues, the SPC community values of each of the Planning Council received $80,000 will manage the funds. The seven participants, as well as providing for from the New Jersey Department of municipalities, three counties, and the long term protection of the Community Affairs (NJDCA) is three nonprofit organizations, as unique character of the Sourlands. now complete. The final report of well as several State agencies, will Thanks to NJDCA for their gen- all the information gathered during be invited to appoint members to a erous support of this important the course of this project has been steering committee which will work. printed in a limited edition book approve the overall plan and all which has been distributed to the expenditures of grant funds. The municipalities and counties, as well tasks enumerated in the grant agree- Visit Our Website as other participants. All of the ment are: (1) Selection of Steering same reports, along with maps and Committee and Planning www.sourland.org other graphics, are also available on Consultant(s); (2) Data Collection our SPC website at www.sour- and Analysis; (3) Regional and It features land.org. We are very excited about Community Visioning Sessions; (4) A virtual tour of the the enormous amount of informa- Preparation of a Draft Sourlands tion which has now been assembled Comprehensive Management Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Raritan TMDL – Solving In-Stream Nutrient Impairments,” Presented at the NJWEA, Central Section by TRC Omni
    Amendment to the Lower Raritan/Middlesex, Mercer County, Monmouth County, Northeast, Upper Delaware and Upper Raritan Water Quality Management Plans Total Maximum Daily Load Report For the Non-Tidal Raritan River Basin Addressing Total Phosphorus, Dissolved Oxygen, pH and Total Suspended Solids Impairments Watershed Management Areas 8, 9 and 10 Proposed: June 16, 2014 Established: June 2, 2015 Re-submittal: January 19, 2016 Approved: May 9, 2016 Adopted: May 24, 2016 New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Division of Water Monitoring and Standards Bureau of Environmental Analysis, Restoration and Standards PO Box 420, Mail Code: 401-04I Trenton, New Jersey 08625-0420 1 Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary……………………………………………………..……………. 4 2.0 Introduction……………………………………………………………………….…... 8 3.0 Pollutant of Concern and Area of Interest…………………………………….…… 9 4.0 Source Assessment………………………………………………………………..….. 24 5.0 Analytical Approach and TMDL Calculation …………………………………..… 28 6.0 Follow-up Monitoring…………………………………………………………..…… 45 7.0 Implementation Plan……………………………………………………………..….. 45 8.0 Reasonable Assurance…………………………………………………………….…. 58 9.0 Public Participation………………………………………………………………….. 58 Appendix A: Cited References………………………………………………………..... 79 Appendix B: Municipalities Located in the Raritan River Basin, NJPDES Permit Number and their MS4 Designation ……………………….…. 81 Appendix C: Additional Impairments within TMDL Area …………………………. 84 Appendix D: TMDLs completed in the Raritan River Basin ……………………...…. 89 Appendix E: New Jersey Water Supply Authority - Nonpoint Source Implementation Activities ……………………...….……………………...….………………. 91 Tables Table 1. Assessment units addressed by the TMDL report……………………………… 6 Table 2. HUC 14 watersheds assessed by this TMDL study………………………..…… 17 Table 3. 2007 Land Use in the Raritan River Basin Covered by this TMDL………..….. 23 Table 4. Permitted Point Sources within the Non-Tidal Raritan River TMDL Study Area ……………………………………………………………….….
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Sites & Districts in Somerset County, Nj
    HISTORIC SITES & DISTRICTS IN SOMERSET COUNTY, NJ µ Open To The Public F BERNARDSVILLE BORO D *# 53 *# +$ 10 5 +$ C 54 +$ 4 PEAPACK GLADSTONE BORO 7+$ 21 *# 8*# BEDMINSTER TWP FAR HILLS BORO BERNARDS TWP A 3+$ 9 +$ E 1+$ 6 +$ +$ B 2 WATCHUNG BORO 68+$ +$ WARREN TWP 67 NORTH PLAINFIELD BORO 66 +$ 36 +$ H +$52 Z1 34+$ GREEN BROOK TWP BRIDGEWATER TWP 17+$ Z 61 +$35 $ RARITAN BORO 18+ SOMERVILLE BORO BOUND BROOK 57*# 64 +$+$63 58 +$+$ +$+$ +$62 !@ 16 +$ 55 60 11 56 !@ 40 +$ *#+$ 20+$ 12 R!13 19 SOUTH BOUND BROOK BORO I 38+$ +$65 15+$ MANVILLE BORO 23+$ U !@ 44 J J BRANCHBURG TWP 32 +$ !@ !@14 42 +$ 43 46 FRANKLIN TWP 39 !@ G 45+$ +$24 V K P T MILLSTONE BORO 26 30 R HILLSBOROUGH TWP +$ +$ 33+$ +$ S +$ 22 31 Q 49 +$ 37R! 41 Legend R! X +$+$ 25 A-Z R! 50 Y 28 Historic Districts MONTGOMERY TWP +$ Historic Sites 48 +$ !@ Metal Truss Bridges 51R! L *# Operating Train Stations W R! Stone Arch Bridges 5+$9 47 ROCKY HILL BORO Selected Local Roads R! J Z2 County Roads $ +29 State Routes O R! M US Routes 27 N Interstates Rail Lines Municipal Boundaries 2 1 0 2 Miles Prepared By: Somerset County Cultural & Heritage Commission 11/13 HISTORIC SITES & DISTRICTS IN SOMERSET COUNTY, NEW JERSEY OPEN TO THE PUBLIC BEDMINSTER TOWNSHIP HISTORIC SITES 1) Pluckemin Continental Artillery Cantonment* HILLSBOROUGH TOWNSHIP 2) Pluckemin School House, 2020 Burnt Mills Road HISTORIC SITES 3) Jacobus Vanderveer House, 955 US Route 202/206 37) Cat Tail Brook Bridge, Montgomery Road HISTORIC DISTRICTS 38) Duke Farms, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • SOMERSET County
    NJ DEP - Historic Preservation Office Page 1 of 15 New Jersey and National Registers of Historic Places Last Update: 6/23/2021 SOMERSET County Pluckemin Continental Artillery Cantonment Site (28-So-27) SOMERSET County (ID#4769) NR: 3/14/2008 (NR Reference #: 08000180) SR: 1/17/2008 Bedminster Township Bedminster Reformed Church (Grace Fellowship Church) (ID#3531) Pluckemin Village Historic District (ID#2465) 375 Main Street District is concentrated along US Route 206 and Burnt Mills Road SHPO Opinion: 2/25/1985 NR: 7/26/1982 (NR Reference #: 82003303) COE: 6/23/2005 SR: 2/22/1982 Greater Cross Roads Historic District (ID#3441) Pottersville Village Historic District (ID#1633) Lamington Road County Route 512, Hill Street, and McCann Mill Road, Black River and Hacklebarney roads SHPO Opinion: 6/13/1997 NR: 9/18/1990 (NR Reference #: 90001475) SR: 8/9/1990 Hamilton Farm Stable Complex (ID#5101) 1040 Pottersville Road See Main Entry / Filed Location: NR: 5/18/2018 (NR Reference #: RS100001243) HUNTERDON County, Tewksbury Township SR: 4/6/2017 COE: 8/3/2011 Jacobus Vanderveer House (ID#2808) (a.k.a. James Cox Brady Stable, U.S. Equestian Team US Routes 202 and 206, north of River Road Headquarters, COE is for individual property) NR: 9/29/1995 (NR Reference #: 95001137) SR: 7/13/1995 A. Herzog Farmstead (ID#2459) 190 Pottersville Road Vanderveer Archaeological Site (28-So-97) (ID#2466) SHPO Opinion: 12/29/1993 SHPO Opinion: 11/1/1988 Lamington Historic District (ID#2461) Portions of Lamington, Black River, Rattlesnake Bridge and Bernards Township
    [Show full text]