DOCSLIB.ORG

With Particular Reference to FHI/E Past Experience

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ADDIS ABABA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE PROGRAM THE ROLE OF FOOD AID IN SUSTAINABLE LAND MANAGEMENT: THE CASE OF TACH GAYINT WEREDA, SOUTH GONDAR ZONE, AMHARA REGION With Particular Reference to FHI/E Past Experience GIRMA DERESSA June 2006 Addis Ababa THE ROLE OF FOOD AID IN SUSTAINABLE LAND MANAGEMENT: THE CASE OF TACH GAYINT WEREDA, SOUTH GONDAR ZONE, AMHARA REGION A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES, ADDIS ABABA UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE BY GIRMA DERESSA YADETE JUNE 2006 ADDIS ABABA ADDIS ABABA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES THE ROLE OF FOOD AID IN SUSTAINABLE LAND MANAGEMENT: THE CASE OF TACH GAYINT WEREDA, SOUTH GONDAR ZONE, AMHARA REGION A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies of Addis Ababa University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Environmental Science By GIRMA DERESSA YADETE Advisors Signature 1. Dr. Fisseha Itana _______________________ 2. Dr. Belay Simane _______________________ Examiners 1. 2. Department Head Acknowledgements I would like to express my deep sense of gratitude to my research advisors, Drs. Belay Simane and Fisseha Itana for their unreserved help, guidance and supervision during my research work. I am very much respectful and appreciate Dr. Fisseha’s commitment for technically refining my research methodology, traveling and visiting to the research site, which is about 750km away from Addis Ababa. Similarly, I also appreciate and acknowledge the invaluable advice offered to me by Dr. Belay during the fortnight research progress review meeting with him, which makes this thesis a reality. My thanks also goes to Addis Ababa University, Amhara Region Disaster Prevention and Food Security Bureau, Agriculture and Rural Development Bureau, Planning and Economic Development Bureau and Water, Mines and Energy Bureau who responded to my request for ideas, information, publications and materials for use in the realization of this research. I am also indebted to all Tach Gayint Wereda Office of Agriculture and Rural Development Staff, Wereda Administration and other sector offices for their inputs and transparent cooperation during my actual field work. My profound gratitude goes to the study area Administrators and the community for sharing their invaluable knowledge and information. In particular, my special thanks go to AAU, for offering me the necessary logistical and financial support during my research work. I am also indebted to all Food for the Hungry International/Ethiopia field as well as head office staff for their moral, material and logistical support. I am especially grateful to Dr. Andrew Barnes, Country Director of FHI/E and Ato Messele Fitsum, FHI Regional Relief Director, who greatly supported and encouraged me to pursue my study though arrangement of a part time work during my study. The regular encouragement and moral support I have got from my immediate work supervisors, W/t Etsegenet Hailu and Ato Gashaw Belay is highly acknowledged. Above all, my greatest debt of gratitude is owed to my Almighty God for his daily guidance and care through out my life. Without his abundant mercies and meticulous help, I would have not reached this stage. i Table of Contents Acknowledgements........................................................................................................................ i Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................... ii List of Tables................................................................................................................................. iv List of Figures................................................................................................................................ v List of Pictures/Maps ................................................................................................................... vi List of Appendices ....................................................................................................................... vi List of Acronyms and Local Names........................................................................................... vii Abstract ....................................................................................................................................... viii CHAPTER ONE:-INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Land Degradation and Food Aid in Ethiopia.................................................................. 1 1.1.2. Food for the Hungry International/Ethiopia (FHI/E) ...................................................... 2 1.2. Statement of the Problem .............................................................................................................. 3 1.3. Research Objectives....................................................................................................................... 4 1.4. Organization of the Paper .............................................................................................................. 5 CHAPTER TWO:-LITERATURE REVIEW ..................................................................................... 6 2.1. Land Degradation and Trends in Food Production in Ethiopia................................................. 6 2.2. Food Aid Trend and Integration to Long-Term Development in Ethiopia ............................... 8 2.3. Debates on Food Aid...................................................................................................................... 9 2.4. Food Aid Disbursement Mechanisms and Effectiveness ........................................................ 12 2.5. Contribution of Labor-Intensive Works to Long-Term Objectives .......................................... 14 2.6. Factors for Sustainable Land Management .............................................................................. 16 2.6. 1. Biophysical Issues for Sustainable Land management............................................. 16 2.6.2. Land Tenure System................................................................................................... 20 2.6.3. Empowerment and Respect for Local Knowledge...................................................... 21 2.6.4 Poverty......................................................................................................................... 21 2.6.5 Pressure on Land......................................................................................................... 22 ii CHAPTER THREE:-MATERIALS AND METHODS..................................................................... 25 3.1. Description of the Study Area...................................................................................................... 25 3.1.1. Location ...................................................................................................................... 25 3.1.2. Topography and Climate ............................................................................................ 27 3.1.3. Population and Socio-Economic Futures ................................................................... 28 3.1.4. Vegetation, Crop and Land Use ................................................................................. 28 3.2. Methods and Processes of Data Collection .............................................................................. 29 3.2.1. Review of Relevant Literatures................................................................................... 29 3.2.2. Qualitative and Quantitative Method of Data collection.............................................. 29 3.2. 3. Observations/Measurements..................................................................................... 31 3.3. Data Analysis ................................................................................................................................. 32 CHAPTER FOUR:-RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS.................................................................... 34 4.1. Results and Discussions .............................................................................................................. 34 4.1.1 Household Characteristics........................................................................................... 34 4.1.2. Sustainable Land Management Practices .................................................................. 35 4.1.2.1. Ecological Benefits........................................................................................................ 35 4.1.2.2. Economic and Social Benefits..................................................................................... 53 4.1.3. Food Aid Trend and Integration to the Long-Term Development............................... 56 4.1.3.1 Integration of Food Aid with Long-Term Development............................................. 56 4.1.3.2 Food Disbursement Mechanisms and their Effectiveness....................................... 58 4.1.3.3. Evolution and Trend of Food Aid in the Study Area................................................. 63 4.1.3.4. Contribution of FHI/E Past Interventions to Wereda Food Security. ..................... 65 4.1.4. Factors Affecting Sustainable Land
Recommended publications
  • Districts of Ethiopia

    Districts of Ethiopia

    Region District or Woredas Zone Remarks Afar Region Argobba Special Woreda -- Independent district/woredas Afar Region Afambo Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Asayita Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Chifra Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Dubti Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Elidar Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Kori Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Mille Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Abala Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Afdera Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Berhale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Dallol Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Erebti Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Koneba Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Megale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Amibara Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Awash Fentale Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Bure Mudaytu Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Dulecha Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Gewane Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Aura Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Ewa Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Gulina Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Teru Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Yalo Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Dalifage (formerly known as Artuma) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Dewe Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Hadele Ele (formerly known as Fursi) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Simurobi Gele'alo Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Telalak Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Amhara Region Achefer -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Angolalla Terana Asagirt -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Artuma Fursina Jile -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Banja -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Belessa --
  • ETHIOPIA - National Hot Spot Map 31 May 2010

    ETHIOPIA - National Hot Spot Map 31 May 2010

    ETHIOPIA - National Hot Spot Map 31 May 2010 R Legend Eritrea E Tigray R egion !ª D 450 ho uses burned do wn d ue to th e re ce nt International Boundary !ª !ª Ahferom Sudan Tahtay Erob fire incid ent in Keft a hum era woreda. I nhabitan ts Laelay Ahferom !ª Regional Boundary > Mereb Leke " !ª S are repo rted to be lef t out o f sh elter; UNI CEF !ª Adiyabo Adiyabo Gulomekeda W W W 7 Dalul E !Ò Laelay togethe r w ith the regiona l g ove rnm ent is Zonal Boundary North Western A Kafta Humera Maychew Eastern !ª sup portin g the victim s with provision o f wate r Measle Cas es Woreda Boundary Central and oth er imm ediate n eeds Measles co ntinues to b e re ported > Western Berahle with new four cases in Arada Zone 2 Lakes WBN BN Tsel emt !A !ª A! Sub-city,Ad dis Ababa ; and one Addi Arekay> W b Afa r Region N b Afdera Military Operation BeyedaB Ab Ala ! case in Ahfe rom woreda, Tig ray > > bb The re a re d isplaced pe ople from fo ur A Debark > > b o N W b B N Abergele Erebtoi B N W Southern keb eles of Mille and also five kebeles B N Janam ora Moegale Bidu Dabat Wag HiomraW B of Da llol woreda s (400 0 persons) a ff ected Hot Spot Areas AWD C ases N N N > N > B B W Sahl a B W > B N W Raya A zebo due to flo oding from Awash rive r an d ru n Since t he beg in nin g of th e year, Wegera B N No Data/No Humanitarian Concern > Ziquala Sekota B a total of 967 cases of AWD w ith East bb BN > Teru > off fro m Tigray highlands, respective ly.
  • Final Report1

    Final Report1

    PROJECT REPORT To: Austrian Development Agency NGO Cooperation and Humanitarian Aid Zelinkagasse 2, 1010 Vienna E-mail: [email protected] Project progress reports are to be presented by e-mail as contractually agreed. Originals of additional documents can be sent to the NGO Cooperation desk. Final Report1 Contract number: 2679-00/2016 Contract partner in Austria Local project partner Name: Name: CARE Österreich CARE Ethiopia Address: Address: Lange Gasse 30/4, 1080 Vienna, Austria Telephone, e-mail: Telephone, e-mail: +43 1 715 0 715 +251 911 237 582 [email protected] +251911819687 Project officer/contact: Project officer/contact: Stéphanie Bouriel Teyent Taddesse [email protected] [email protected] Worku Abebaw [email protected] Project title: Emergency Seed Support to Smallholder Drought- Affected Farmers in South Gondar Ethiopia Country: Ethiopia Region/place: Amhara /South Gondar Duration from: 29 Feb 2016 to: 30 November 2016 Report as at (date):November 30, 2016 submitted on: March 7, 2017 Invoicing as at (date) in euros Submitted for Total project costs Invoiced to date Outstanding verification as at (date) 430,000 EURO 424,598.14 EURO 424.598,14 EURO 5.401,86 Date, report written by CARE Ethiopia, February 2017 1 Delete as applicable NGO individual projects– version: January 2009 | 1 PROJECT REPORT 1. Brief description of project progress2 (German, max. 1 page) A drought due to the effect of El Niño phenomenon had impacted 10.2 million people in various regions of Ethiopia. South Gonder administrative zone located in Amhara region and comprising seven livelihood zones, was amongst the areas most affected.
  • AMHARA REGION : Who Does What Where (3W) (As of 13 February 2013)

    AMHARA REGION : Who Does What Where (3W) (As of 13 February 2013)

    AMHARA REGION : Who Does What Where (3W) (as of 13 February 2013) Tigray Tigray Interventions/Projects at Woreda Level Afar Amhara ERCS: Lay Gayint: Beneshangul Gumu / Dire Dawa Plan Int.: Addis Ababa Hareri Save the fk Save the Save the df d/k/ CARE:f k Save the Children:f Gambela Save the Oromia Children: Children:f Children: Somali FHI: Welthungerhilfe: SNNPR j j Children:l lf/k / Oxfam GB:af ACF: ACF: Save the Save the af/k af/k Save the df Save the Save the Tach Gayint: Children:f Children: Children:fj Children:l Children: l FHI:l/k MSF Holand:f/ ! kj CARE: k Save the Children:f ! FHI:lf/k Oxfam GB: a Tselemt Save the Childrenf: j Addi Dessie Zuria: WVE: Arekay dlfk Tsegede ! Beyeda Concern:î l/ Mirab ! Concern:/ Welthungerhilfe:k Save the Children: Armacho f/k Debark Save the Children:fj Kelela: Welthungerhilfe: ! / Tach Abergele CRS: ak Save the Children:fj ! Armacho ! FHI: Save the l/k Save thef Dabat Janamora Legambo: Children:dfkj Children: ! Plan Int.:d/ j WVE: Concern: GOAL: Save the Children: dlfk Sahla k/ a / f ! ! Save the ! Lay Metema North Ziquala Children:fkj Armacho Wegera ACF: Save the Children: Tenta: ! k f Gonder ! Wag WVE: Plan Int.: / Concern: Save the dlfk Himra d k/ a WVE: ! Children: f Sekota GOAL: dlf Save the Children: Concern: Save the / ! Save: f/k Chilga ! a/ j East Children:f West ! Belesa FHI:l Save the Children:/ /k ! Gonder Belesa Dehana ! CRS: Welthungerhilfe:/ Dembia Zuria ! î Save thedf Gaz GOAL: Children: Quara ! / j CARE: WVE: Gibla ! l ! Save the Children: Welthungerhilfe: k d k/ Takusa dlfj k
  • Transhumance Cattle Production System in North Gondar, Amhara Region, Ethiopia: Is It Sustainable?

    Transhumance Cattle Production System in North Gondar, Amhara Region, Ethiopia: Is It Sustainable?

    WP14_Cover.pdf 2/12/2009 2:21:51 PM www.ipms-ethiopia.org Working Paper No. 14 Transhumance cattle production system in North Gondar, Amhara Region, Ethiopia: Is it sustainable? C M Y CM MY CY CMY K Transhumance cattle production system in North Gondar, Amhara Region, Ethiopia: Is it sustainable? Azage Tegegne,* Tesfaye Mengistie, Tesfaye Desalew, Worku Teka and Eshete Dejen Improving Productivity and Market Success (IPMS) of Ethiopian Farmers Project, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia * Corresponding author: [email protected] Authors’ affiliations Azage Tegegne, Improving Productivity and Market Success (IPMS) of Ethiopian Farmers Project, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Tesfaye Mengistie, Bureau of Agriculture and Rural Development, Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia Tesfaye Desalew, Kutaber woreda Office of Agriculture and Rural Development, Kutaber, South Wello Zone, Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia Worku Teka, Research and Development Officer, Metema, Amhara Region, Improving Productivity and Market Success (IPMS) of Ethiopian Farmers Project, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Eshete Dejen, Amhara Regional Agricultural Research Institute (ARARI), P.O. Box 527, Bahir Dar, Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia © 2009 ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute). All rights reserved. Parts of this publication may be reproduced for non-commercial use provided that such reproduction shall be subject to acknowledgement of ILRI as holder of copyright. Editing, design and layout—ILRI Publications Unit, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Correct citation: Azage Tegegne, Tesfaye Mengistie, Tesfaye Desalew, Worku Teka and Eshete Dejen. 2009. Transhumance cattle production system in North Gondar, Amhara Region, Ethiopia: Is it sustainable? IPMS (Improving Productivity and Market Success) of Ethiopian Farmers Project.
  • Rice Value Chain Development in Fogera Woreda Based on the IPMS Experience

    Rice Value Chain Development in Fogera Woreda Based on the IPMS Experience

    Rice value chain development in Fogera woreda based on the IPMS experience Tilahun Gebey, Kahsay Berhe, Dirk Hoekstra and Bogale Alemu March 2012 Canadian International Agence canadienne de Development Agency développement international ILRI works with partners worldwide to help poor people keep their farm animals alive and productive, increase and sustain their livestock and farm productivity, and find profitable markets for their animal products. ILRI’s headquarters are in Nairobi, Kenya; we have a principal campus in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, and 14 offices in other regions of Africa and Asia. ILRI is part of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (www.cgiar.org), which works to reduce hunger, poverty and environmental degradation in developing countries by generating and sharing relevant agricultural knowledge, technologies and policies. © 2012 International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) This publication is copyrighted by the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). It is licensed for use under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/. Unless otherwise noted, you are free to copy, duplicate, or reproduce, and distribute, display, or transmit any part of this publication or portions thereof without permission, and to make translations, adaptations, or other derivative works under the following conditions: ATTRIBUTION. The work must be attributed, but not in any way that suggests endorsement by ILRI or the author(s) NON-COMMERCIAL. This work may not be used for commercial purposes. SHARE ALIKE. If this work is altered, transformed, or built upon, the resulting work must be distributed only under the same or similar license to this one.
  • Spatial Modeling, Prediction and Seasonal Variation of Malaria in Northwest Ethiopia Asefa Adimasu Taddese, Adhanom Gebreegziabher Baraki* and Kassahun Alemu Gelaye

    Spatial Modeling, Prediction and Seasonal Variation of Malaria in Northwest Ethiopia Asefa Adimasu Taddese, Adhanom Gebreegziabher Baraki* and Kassahun Alemu Gelaye

    Taddese et al. BMC Res Notes (2019) 12:273 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4305-1 BMC Research Notes RESEARCH NOTE Open Access Spatial modeling, prediction and seasonal variation of malaria in northwest Ethiopia Asefa Adimasu Taddese, Adhanom Gebreegziabher Baraki* and Kassahun Alemu Gelaye Abstract Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the spatial modeling, seasonal variation of malaria and making prediction map of malaria in northwest Ethiopia. Results: The overall average cumulative annual malaria incidence during the study period was 30 per 100 popula- tions at risk. The highest proportion (29.2%) was observed from June 2015 to October 2016. In temporal analysis of clusters, the epidemic was observed from 2015/7/1 to 2016/12/31 throughout the study period in all districts. Hot- spot areas with high clusters (p < 0.001) were observed in Metema district it accounts 18.6% of the total malaria cases. An area of high median predicted incidence proportion (> 50%) was seen in the southwest part of the region. Most of the northern part of the study area was predicted to have a low median incidence proportion (< 10%). Keywords: Spatial analysis, Interpolation, Bayesian kriging, Clustering, Geostatistics modeling Introduction Malaria mosquitos are aggregated over large areas and Malaria is a mosquito-borne infectious disease of time periods. Tere are few studies examining the extent humans caused by the genus Plasmodium, which are and drivers of local variation in malaria exposure. introduced into the circulatory system by the bite of an In geographical location, close proximity share com- infected female anopheles mosquito [1].
  • F-3: Livelihood Improvement Component

    F-3: Livelihood Improvement Component

    F-3: Livelihood Improvement Component F-4: Activity Sheet of the Verification Project Appendix F: Verification Projects F-4: Activity Sheet of the Verification Projects Table of Contents Page Agricultral Promotion Component ....................................................................................................... F-4-1 Natural Resource Management Component ........................................................................................ F-4-23 Livelihood Improvement Component .................................................................................................. F-4-31 F-4-i Appendix F: Verification Projects F-4: Activity Sheet of the Verification Projects Activity Sheet for JALIMPS Verification Project Agricultural Promotion Component 1: 1. Activity Demonstration/Verification Plot: Primary Crops (15 activities in total) Name 2. Site Ebinate, Simada, Bugena, Gidan, Kobo, Mekedela, Legambo, Aregoba - 2009 meher season: Ebinate, Simada, Bugena, Gidan, Mekedela, Kobo - 2009/10 belg season: Gidan, Mekedela, Legambo - 2010 meher season: Ebinate, Simada, Bugena, Gidan, Kobo 3. Objectives Demonstration/verification of integrated approaches for the improvement of productivity of primary crops & farm land conservation in the watershed. 4. Implementer CRGs under the guidance & supervision of DAs & WAO 5. Beneficiaries CRGs: 34 CRGs formed 34 CRGs x 5 members = 170 members (beneficiaries) 6. Activity Establishment of demonstration/verification plot(s) for the integrated approaches Description for the productivity improvement
  • 2020 Annual Report P.O

    2020 Annual Report P.O

    Wageningen Centre for Development Innovation Wageningen Centre for Development Innovation supports value creation by Wageningen University & Research strengthening capacities for sustainable development. As the international expertise BENEFIT Partnership – 2020 Annual Report P.O. Box 88 and capacity building institute of Wageningen University & Research we bring 6700 AB Wageningen knowledge into action, with the aim to explore the potential of nature to improve The Netherlands the quality of life. With approximately 30 locations, 6,500 members (5,500 fte) of T +31 (0)317 48 68 00 staff and 12,500 students, Wageningen University & Research is a world leader in its www.wur.eu/cdi domain. An integral way of working, and cooperation between the exact sciences Bilateral Ethiopian-Netherlands Eff ort for Food, Income and Trade Partnership and the technological and social disciplines are key to its approach. Report WCDI-21-136 Dawit Alemu, Irene Koomen, Selome Kebede, Legesse Abate & Mirjam Schaap, Amsalu Ayana, Mohammed Hassena & Gareth Borman, Eyasu Elias & Eric Smaling, Helen Getaw & Monika Sopov, Geremew Terefe & Ted Schrader, Tewodros Tefera & Remko Vonk BENEFIT Partnership – 2020 Annual Report Bilateral Ethiopian-Netherlands Effort for Food, Income and Trade Partnership Dawit Alemu, Irene Koomen, Selome Kebede, Legesse Abate & Mirjam Schaap1 Amsalu Ayana, Mohammed Hassena & Gareth Borman2 Eyasu Elias & Eric Smaling3 Helen Getaw & Monika Sopov4 Geremew Terefe & Ted Schrader5 Tewodros Tefera & Remko Vonk6 1 PCU 2 ISSD 3 CASCAPE 4 ENTAG 5 SBN 6 REALISE Wageningen University & Research Wageningen / Addis Ababa, February 2021 Report WCDI-21-136 Dawit Alemu, Irene Koomen, Selome Kebede, Legesse Abate & Mirjam Schaap, Amsalu Ayana, Mohammed Hassena & Gareth Borman, Eyasu Elias & Eric Smaling, Helen Getaw & Monika Sopov, Geremew Terefe & Ted Schrader, Tewodros Tefera & Remko Vonk, 2021.
  • English-Full (0.5

    English-Full (0.5

    Enhancing the Role of Forestry in Building Climate Resilient Green Economy in Ethiopia Strategy for scaling up effective forest management practices in Amhara National Regional State with particular emphasis on smallholder plantations Wubalem Tadesse Alemu Gezahegne Teshome Tesema Bitew Shibabaw Berihun Tefera Habtemariam Kassa Center for International Forestry Research Ethiopia Office Addis Ababa October 2015 Copyright © Center for International Forestry Research, 2015 Cover photo by authors FOREWORD This regional strategy document for scaling up effective forest management practices in Amhara National Regional State, with particular emphasis on smallholder plantations, was produced as one of the outputs of a project entitled “Enhancing the Role of Forestry in Ethiopia’s Climate Resilient Green Economy”, and implemented between September 2013 and August 2015. CIFOR and our ministry actively collaborated in the planning and implementation of the project, which involved over 25 senior experts drawn from Federal ministries, regional bureaus, Federal and regional research institutes, and from Wondo Genet College of Forestry and Natural Resources and other universities. The senior experts were organised into five teams, which set out to identify effective forest management practices, and enabling conditions for scaling them up, with the aim of significantly enhancing the role of forests in building a climate resilient green economy in Ethiopia. The five forest management practices studied were: the establishment and management of area exclosures; the management of plantation forests; Participatory Forest Management (PFM); agroforestry (AF); and the management of dry forests and woodlands. Each team focused on only one of the five forest management practices, and concentrated its study in one regional state.
  • Determinants of Smallholder Farmers' Rice Market Participation in Libo Kemekem Woreda, Amhara Region

    Determinants of Smallholder Farmers' Rice Market Participation in Libo Kemekem Woreda, Amhara Region

    International Journal of Development in Social Sciences and Humanities http://www.ijdssh.com (IJDSSH) 2019, Vol. No.8, Jul-Dec e-ISSN: 2455-5142; p-ISSN: 2455-7730 DETERMINANTS OF SMALLHOLDER FARMERS’ RICE MARKET PARTICIPATION IN LIBO KEMEKEM WOREDA, AMHARA REGION Endesew Eshetie University of Gondar College of Business and Economics Department of Marketing Management ABSTRACT Cultivation of rice in Ethiopia is generally a recent phenomenon. Rice has become a commodity of strategic significance across many parts of Ethiopia for domestic consumption as well as export market for economic development. This study was conducted in Libo Kemekem Woreda, Amhara Region. The main purpose of this study was to analyze the determinants of smallholder farmers’ participation in rice market. In this study three representative Kebeles were selected using multistage sampling technique. Then, sample household farmers were drawn by random sampling technique. Thus, 215 smallholder rice producer farmers were selected to the study, and through questionnaire and interview data were gathered. The collected data then be analyzed using SPSS and the results were interpreted and presented using descriptive statistics. Hence, the result revealed that 91.2% were male headed households and 8.8% were female headed. The minimum ageof participants were 29 and the maximum age was 70. About 94.9% of respondents were married, 3.3% were divorced, and 1.9% was separated; the major reason for growing rice was mainly for market. The result also identified about 98.1% smallholder farmer heads were members of cooperatives. On the contrary, farmers faced lack of improved seed and fertilizer, fear of crop failure due to unexpected rains and existence of different diseases.
  • Good Governance for Achieving Food Security in Ethiopia: Challenges and Issues

    Good Governance for Achieving Food Security in Ethiopia: Challenges and Issues

    57 Good Governance for Achieving Food Security in Ethiopia: Challenges and Issues Mussie Ybabe, Addis Ababa University Sisay Asefa, Western Michigan University Abstract Although rice technologies have been introduced in Fogera district over the last two decades, farm household’s food demand was not met as expected. Sustained, intensified and coordinated rice research is the key to curb the problem but impaired due to lack of good governance coupled with weak institutional capacity. This has resulted snowballing effects like little or no discussion among/with farmers on good practices, successes/failures of technology adoption and input delivery; poor linkage of small farmers to market and knowledge gap in Development Agents. Therefore, this study identified and evaluated potential determinants of household food security with basic emphasis to factors linked to good governance introduced to address the problem of food security in the study area through farm household rice technology adoption. A multistage sampling technique is used to select respondents. To this end, the primary data was gathered from the field survey by administering pre-tested structured and semi-structured questionnaire. Good governance dimensions of food security are evaluated using binary logit model for its comparative mathematical and interpretational simplicity. Farmers’ own perception of rice technology intervention vis-a-vis farm household food security is explored using focus group discussions supplemented by in-depth interviews. This study result would be primarily important in designing policy interventions and good governance strategies ensuring appropriate use of rice technology and tackle food security problems. Key words: Rice technology, logit model, good governance, food security Introduction Ethiopia is one of the most famine-prone countries with a long history of famines and food shortages.