Art and Cultural Property Law

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Art and Cultural Property Law Prof. Anastasia Grammaticaki-Alexiou Art and Cultural Property Law Cases and Materials Loyola Law School Summer Program Spetses 2019 1 A. General Introduction Art law is a highly specialized legal field. It is an interdisciplinary area, including all aspects of the law connected with art and cultural objects in general. At present art trade, licit or illicit, as well as the protection and preservation of valuable goods, has become international for its most part, the knowledge of at least the basics in international law and conflict of laws is essential. The relevant issues are numerous and in a short course it is impossible to cover all of them in a detailed manner. The present course will cover only visual arts. The issues presented are really the highlights, which can provide to the interested lawyer the platform to build a more thorough knowledge of this area of the law later. Definitions The meaning of the term “cultural good” is neither self-understood, nor identical among the various jurisdictions. Its definition is a very difficult task, usually unsuccessful, especially since the concept to be defined includes vague notions, such as “culture” or “art”. Culture in itself is a complex and constantly developing concept, depending on various factors. Its content is hard to determine. Equally difficult, therefore, is the definition of “cultural goods”, since it must take into account the complex character of the cultural element of an object. What we usually call “cultural goods” are diverse objects, movable or immovable, humble or important, used for various purposes, made of worthless or valuable materials, elaborate or not artistic at all. They acquire the quality of “cultural” with the aid of sociology, art history, anthropology, aesthetics, history etc. If each group of people, each country, or grater geographical area understands –as it does- culture in a different manner, the meaning of “cultural good” is bound to differ accordingly. What is extremely significant for a country may be valueless for another. The Stone of Scone, for example, an oblong block of red sandstone, used for centuries in the coronation of the monarchs of Scotland and later the monarchs of England, Great Britain, and the United Kingdom, is precious for the Scots, has been 2 the object of a treaty in 1328 between the Kingdom of Scotland and the Kingdom of England, but if it was found in another area of the world and if its history was unknown, it would be treated as a cheap building block. Every discussion on culture and its derivatives usually finds, at the very start, this difficulty concerning definitions: What is the meaning of culture and what is the meaning of cultural heritage? It is exactly the vastness of the world cultural wealth and its variety of forms that makes definitions difficult and inadequate. The relevant discussion is interlined with philosophical, social, historical, aesthetic, anthropological, political and other parameters, takes time and its conclusions are hardly ever generally accepted. Most of the time an attempt of defining cultural heritage is a description complemented with a list of objects. We may say that it is the legacy of physical artefacts and intangible attributes of a group or society, which are inherited from past generations, maintained in the present and bestowed for the benefit of future generations. We remember a people long gone by the cultural remains they leave behind: Egyptian writing and temples, Greek and Roman sculpture, Mesoamerican ballgame courts, Cambodian temples, Etruscan tombs, and ancient African masks and drums. These expressions of human creativity and achievement are celebrated as the highest accomplishments of human work, and we attribute an ever-increasing monetary value to objects of art and antiquity. Quite often what one generation considers cultural heritage may be rejected by the next generation, and is revived by a succeeding generation. Physical or "tangible" cultural heritage includes buildings, monuments, or historic places, artefacts, etc. that are considered worthy of preservation for the future. Objects significant to archaeology, architecture, prehistory, history, religion, science or technology of a specific culture are included in it. Heritage can also include cultural landscapes (natural features that may have cultural attributes), such as a cave or even a tree! Tangible cultural property comprises movables (e.g. the Koh-I-Noor diamond decorating the English crown of Queen mother Elizabeth, or the Bell of Freedom) and immovables (such as the Acropolis in Athens, the Pyramids in Egypt, or the Coliseum in Rome). Intangible cultural property includes social values and traditions, customs, and practices, aesthetic and spiritual beliefs, artistic expression, language and other aspects of human activity. Intangible cultural heritage is usually more difficult to preserve than physical objects, as it is not always possible to “encase” it in a physical manner 3 The concept of “cultural good” varies in time as well. Much depends on the time it has been produced and the prevailing idea of culture at the time when it is evaluated. Sometimes an object that was meant for everyday use, without anything artistic on it, may later be considered an important cultural good, because it represents a certain era in the history of mankind. The legislator does not define something in abstracto; he has certain purposes to serve. For example, a wide definition of cultural goods chosen by a country’s legal system means that a greater number of cultural objects of that country are protected. There are several ways to define cultural goods. One is the enumeration of categories (e.g. religious, historic, ethnographic etc. objects). Another is listing certain objects, a method which may leave out whatever for any reason has not been listed. A third method, quite often used, is the combination of the said methods. Often the term “cultural good” is confused with the term “cultural heritage”. However the latter designates an array of objects of great significance, which must be safeguarded with extra care on behalf of future generations. And it should be added that there exists the concept of cultural heritage of a nation and that of cultural heritage of mankind. In many cases the former is also part of the latter. Art is a problematic concept as well, considering its various forms all over the world and the ideas it represents through time. Many of the modern art pieces would probably be totally discarded by art specialists in the past. An antique brass lamp may not be high art according to present day criteria, but it may have been an artistic and technical achievement in its time. Cultural nationalism and cultural internationalism A basic issue related to cultural goods is the question “who they belong to”. This issue is of great importance, because a huge number of tangible cultural goods originating from art-rich countries are found in museums and collections all over the world, far from their countries of origin, either because of historical and political reasons or due to illicit trade. It is true that the discussion on the ownership of cultural items supplants the dominant cultural element and may reduce such items to the level of ordinary goods that may be owned, bought or sold freely. For this reason I would personally prefer to use the term “possession”. For many of those representing countries which receive cultural goods in their territory, museums and collectors, the 4 issue of responsibility for such goods and their repatriation is set on a pure property basis, and the connection of cultural goods with human rights is considered a mere sentimentality. Countries where cultural goods are created or found naturally wish to own and keep them. Two theories have been advanced as regards such a claim: a) cultural internationalism and, b) cultural nationalism. According to cultural internationalism objects with artistic, archaeological, ethnological or historical value constitute elements of the common human civilization, regardless their country of origin, their present location, or ownership rights of a country. The cultural achievements of a people are the product of global interaction and the heritage of future generations all over the world. In other words cultural internationalism sees cultural goods as assets of humanity. Cultural internationalism attributes more importance to the ability of a country to safe keep cultural goods than to its affinity with them, as long as all people are offered the opportunity to see and enjoy them. Consequently it seems logical that Greece should not request the return of the Parthenon Sculptures from the British Museum, since they are protected and millions of visitors can visit them every year. However the real aim of this theory is the rebuff of restitution claims by the countries of origin of cultural objects. It serves fine the importing countries and does not do justice the exporting countries; this is the reason why it is supported by the former. The canvass of most arguments supporting cultural internationalism is actually the veil covering the endeavors of museums and countries, usually wealthy, which possess cultural treasures that other countries claim as belonging to their cultural heritage, to keep those treasures in their possession. The principle of preservation has furthermore led to the idea of their being part of a world cultural heritage that has to be taken good care of. The capstone of that idea is that rich, hoarding countries, are the ones that can offer such care for the benefit of humanity and thus should keep the objects. According to cultural nationalism cultural artifacts should belong to a country or a group because of the relationship between them and the cultural identity of the country or group. The supporters of cultural nationalism do not focus on the ability of a country to safeguard and preserve more effectively the cultural objects.
Recommended publications
  • Digital Preservation Workflows for Museum Imaging Environments
    The 11th International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage VAST (2010) A. Artusi, M. Joly, D. Pitzalis, G. Lucet, and A. Ribes (Editors) Digital preservation workflows for museum imaging environments Michael Ashley1 1 Cultural Heritage Imaging, San Francisco, California, USA From: Principles and Practices of Robust, Photography-based Digital Imaging Techniques for Museums. Contributors: Mark Mudge, Carla Schroer, Graeme Earl, Kirk Martinez, Hembo Pagi, Corey Toler-Franklin, Szymon Rusinkiewicz, Gianpaolo Palma, Melvin Wachowiak, Michael Ashley, Neffra Matthews, Tommy Noble, Matteo Dellepiane. Edited by Mark Mudge and Carla Schroer, Cultural Heritage Imaging. The 11th International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage VAST (2010) A. Artusi, M. Joly, D. Pitzalis, G. Lucet, and A. Ribes (Editors) This is a pre-print copy of a paper that is currently under review. Please respect the intellectual property of the authors and the efforts of the publishers and reviewers until its publication. If you find any errors that need modification please contact the author at [email protected]. Meanwhile this pdf is distributed to interested readers under a Creative Commons 3.0 license. M. Ashley / Digital Preservation Workflows For Museum Imaging Environments Digital preservation workflows for museum imaging environments Michael Ashley1 1 Cultural Heritage Imaging, San Francisco, California, USA Abstract We discuss and demonstrate practical digital preservation frameworks that protect images throughout the entire production life-cycle. Using off the shelf and open source software coupled with a basic understanding of metadata, it is possible to produce and manage high value digital representations of physical objects that are born archive- ready and long-term sustainable.
    [Show full text]
  • Introducticn Tc Ccnservoticn
    introducticntc ccnservoticn UNITED NATTONSEDUCATIONA],, SCIEIilIIFTC AND CULTIJRALOROANIZATTOII AN INIRODUCTION TO CONSERYATIOI{ OF CULTURAT PROPMTY by Berr:ar"d M. Feilden Director of the Internatlonal Centre for the Preservatlon and Restoratlon of Cultural Property, Rome Aprll, L979 (cc-ig/ws/ttt+) - CONTENTS Page Preface 2 Acknowledgements Introduction 3 Chapter* I Introductory Concepts 6 Chapter II Cultural Property - Agents of Deterioration and Loss . 11 Chapter III The Principles of Conservation 21 Chapter IV The Conservation of Movable Property - Museums and Conservation . 29 Chapter V The Conservation of Historic Buildings and Urban Conservation 36 Conclusions ............... kk Appendix 1 Component Materials of Cultural Property . kj Appendix 2 Access of Water 53 Appendix 3 Intergovernmental and Non-Governmental International Agencies for Conservation 55 Appendix k The Conservator/Restorer: A Definition of the Profession .................. 6? Glossary 71 Selected Bibliography , 71*. AUTHOR'S PREFACE Some may say that the attempt to Introduce the whole subject of Conservation of Cultural Propety Is too ambitious, but actually someone has to undertake this task and it fell to my lot as Director of the International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cxiltural Property (ICCROM). An introduction to conservation such as this has difficulties in striking the right balance between all the disciplines involved. The writer is an architect and, therefore, a generalist having contact with both the arts and sciences. In such a rapidly developing field as conservation no written statement can be regarded as definite. This booklet should only be taken as a basis for further discussions. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In writing anything with such a wide scope as this booklet, any author needs help and constructive comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Selection in Web Archives: the Value of Archival Best Practices
    WITTENBERG: SELECTION IN WEB ARCHIVES Selection in Web Archives: The Value of Archival Best Practices Jamie Wittenberg, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States of America Abstract: The abundance of valuable material available online has mobilized the development of preservation initiatives at collecting institutions that aim to capture and contextualize web content. Web archiving selection criteria are driven by the limitations inherent in harvesting technologies. Observing core archival principles like provenance and original order when establishing collection development policies for web content will help to ensure that archives continue to assure the authenticity of the materials they steward. Keywords: Web Archives; Archival Theory; Digital Libraries; Internet Content; Selection and Appraisal Introduction The abundance of valuable material available online has mobilized the development of preservation initiatives at collecting institutions that aim to capture and contextualize web content. Methodologies for web collection practices are institution and collection-specific. Among institutions charged with preserving cultural heritage, web archiving has become commonplace. However, the disparity between institutional selection and appraisal criteria reveals the absence of standardization for web archive establishment. The Australian web archive, for example, accessions content that it evaluates as having long-term research value. The Library of Congress web archive, represented by its Minerva team, established a collection
    [Show full text]
  • Stone of Destiny a 'Fake to Dupe Invading English' Abbot of Scone Hid Real Stone from Edward I, Says Salmond
    Printer Friendly http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/scotland/article4144587.ece?pr... From The Times June 15, 2008 Stone of Destiny a 'fake to dupe invading English' Abbot of Scone hid real stone from Edward I, says Salmond David Lister, Scotland Correspondent Do you think the Stone should be sent to England? Vote here For centuries it has held a mystical place in Scottish history, but Alex Salmond sparked fresh debate about the Stone of Destiny yesterday by claiming that the version on display at Edinburgh Castle is a fake. The stone, said to have been used in the coronation of early Scottish monarchs and in Biblical times by Jacob as a pillow, is one of the earliest symbols of Scottish nationhood and has been an emblem of strained relations with England ever since it was stolen by Edward I in 1296. But the First Minister has claimed that the block of red sandstone held until 1996 at Westminster Abbey, and now on permanent display in Edinburgh, was almost certainly not the original coronation stone. He said that monks at Scone Abbey had probably duped the English into believing that they had stolen the stone when in fact they took a replica. “If you're the Abbot of Scone and the strongest and most ruthless king in Christendom is charging toward you in 1296 to steal Scotland's most sacred object and probably put you and half of your cohorts to death, do you do nothing and wait until he arrives or do you hide yourself and the stone somewhere convenient in the Perthshire hillside? I think the second myself,” Mr Salmond said.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Technical Guidelines for Digitizing Cultural Heritage Materials
    September 2016 Technical Guidelines for Digitizing Cultural Heritage Materials Creation of Raster Image Files i Document Information Title Editor Technical Guidelines for Digitizing Cultural Heritage Materials: Thomas Rieger Creation of Raster Image Files Document Type Technical Guidelines Publication Date September 2016 Source Documents Title Editors Technical Guidelines for Digitizing Cultural Heritage Materials: Don Williams and Michael Creation of Raster Image Master Files Stelmach http://www.digitizationguidelines.gov/guidelines/FADGI_Still_Image- Tech_Guidelines_2010-08-24.pdf Document Type Technical Guidelines Publication Date August 2010 Title Author s Technical Guidelines for Digitizing Archival Records for Electronic Steven Puglia, Jeffrey Reed, and Access: Creation of Production Master Files – Raster Images Erin Rhodes http://www.archives.gov/preservation/technical/guidelines.pdf U.S. National Archives and Records Administration Document Type Technical Guidelines Publication Date June 2004 This work is available for worldwide use and reuse under CC0 1.0 Universal. ii Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 7 SCOPE .......................................................................................................................................................... 7 THE FADGI STAR SYSTEM .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Art Deaccessioning Policy
    Deaccessioning Policy Document No. CUR 4.0 – Deaccessioning Policy Page 1 Approved: December 2020 Approved by: National Gallery of Australia Council next review due: December 2022 Summary Name of Policy Description of Policy Deaccessioning Policy Policy applies to ☒ NGA wide ☐ Specific (eg. Department) Policy Status ☐ New policy ☒ Revision of Existing Policy (previously Art Acquisition Policy) Approval Authority Director Responsible Officer Assistant Director, Artistic Programs Contact area Artistic Programs Date of Policy Review* October 2022 Related Policies, Procedures, National Gallery Act 1975 Guidelines and Local Protocols Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013 Council Instructions including Financial Delegations Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultural Rights and Engagement Policy Due Diligence and Provenance Policy Acquisitions Policy Research Library Collection Development Policy Research Archive Acquisition Policy The Copyright Act 1968 The Privacy Act 1988 Privacy Policy Australian Best Practice Guide to Collecting Cultural Material 2015 Collections Law: Legal issues for Australian Archives, Galleries, Libraries and Museums *Unless otherwise indicated, this policy will still apply beyond the review date. Approvals Position Name Endorsed Date Assistant Director Natasha Bullock Yes Director Nick Mitzevich Yes Council Ryan Stokes Yes Document No. CUR 4.0 – Deaccessioning Policy Page 2 Approved: December 2020 Approved by: National Gallery of Australia Council next review due: December 2022 Table of contents
    [Show full text]
  • “We Wanted a Parliament but They Gave Us a Stone” the Coronation Stone of the Scots As a Memory Box in the Twentieth Century
    “We wanted a parliament but they gave us a stone” The Coronation Stone of the Scots as a Memory Box in the Twentieth Century JÖRG ROGGE In this article a memory box is presented, in which and to which different meanings were contained and attached in the course of seven centuries.1 This memory box is the coronation stone of Scottish kings, nowadays on display in Edinburgh Castle, the external form of which has remained for the most part unchanged. The roughly 150 kg heavy, 67 cm long, 42 cm wide and 28 cm high sandstone block was used in the Middle Ages at the inauguration of Scottish kings.2 In the course of history, however, it was removed from its original functional context and transferred to other cultural and political contexts. In this connection, both diachronic and also synchronic transfers of the coronation stone and the concepts of political order in the island of Britain stored in it were carried out. At present it is still an important memory box filled with political concepts, and it was and is a starting point for research into the relationship between the Scots and the English over the past 700 years. It is remarkable that this stone was used by nationally emotional Scots and also by the Government in London as symbol in important debates in the twentieth century. Historical recollections are transported by the Scots and the English with the stone that one may certainly call a container of memory. Here I 1 My thanks go to John Deasy for translating the German text into English as well as to the editors for finishing the final formatting.
    [Show full text]
  • The Adventure of the Stone of Scone - Ston the Return of Solar Pons, 1958
    The Adventure of the Stone of Scone - Ston The Return of Solar Pons, 1958 Date Copper/December 25, 1930 Pattrick/December, 1935 The Case Parker is awakened at Pons just before 4 AM on Christmas morning. Bancroft is on his way over to Praed Street. Once he arrives, he tells them that the Stone of Scone, the ancient Coronation Stone of the Scottish people has been stolen from Westminster Abbey. It is a symbolic item and the English government wants it back with a minimum of embarrassment. Pons quickly determines that it was taken by three men and a woman and goes to work. Quotes This bids fair to be the merriest of Christmases! Comments Pons tells his brother that Bancroft must have come “on a matter of the utmost gravity.” He adds that it is not connected with the Foreign Office because of the hour. That seems a specious deduction, at best. Foreign Office affairs would certainly be likely to require immediate attention at any moment, twenty-four hours a day. Certainly, this is a police matter: the symbol of Scottish independence has been stolen. But Bancroft makes it clear that it is the government that is most concerned. Wouldn’t the issue be a Foreign Office matter as well? The Stone of Scone’s formal name is the Stone of Destiny, though the former name is used widely outside of Scotland. The kings of Scotland were crowned upon a throne built above the Stone of Destiny, which was “about twenty-six inches long and sixteen wide, and weights considerably over four hundred pounds, almost five.” Edward I conquered Scotland and took the stone back to England.
    [Show full text]
  • Provenance in Digital Collections, Margo Seltzer
    Provenance in Digital Collections Margo Seltzer Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences September 20, 2012 Provenance: Special Metadata • From the French word for “source” or “origin” • The complete history or lineage of a object • In the art world, provenance documents the chain of ownership of an artifact. • In the digital world, provenance records: – The process that created an artifact – The transformations applied to an artifact – The human and computational agents that operated upon an artifact – Open question: sufficient information to reproduce the artifact? Designing Storage Architectures: 9/20/12 2 Example: Art Designing Storage Architectures: 9/20/12 3 Example: Art with Provenance Provenance < 1662 Simon de Vos, Antwerp (possibly) by 1662 Guilliam I Forchoudt, Antwerp (possibly) to 1747 Jacques de Roore, The Hague 1747 - 1771 Anthonis de Groot and Stephanus de Groot, The Hague 1771 - ? Abelsz to 1779 Jacques Clemens to 1798 Supertini and Platina, Brussels to 1814 Pauwels, Brussels to 1822 Robert Saint-Victor, Paris 1822 - ? Roux to 1924 Marquise d'Aoust,&nbspFrance 1924 Galerie Georges Petit, Paris to 1940 Federico Gentili di Giuseppe,&nbspdied 1940, Paris 1940 - 1950 Mrs. A. Salem, Boston (Mr. Gentili di Giuseppe's daughter ) 1950 - 1954 Frederick Mont and Newhouse Galleries, New York 1954 - 1961 Samuel H. Kress Foundation, New York 12/09/1961 Seattle Art Museum Designing Storage Architectures: 9/20/12 4 Example: Data with Provenance Meleana e From the Library of Congress National Jukebox From the page: Musical Group: Irene West Royal Hawaiians Label Name/Number: Victo 17864 Matrix Number/Take Number: B‐15530/2 Recording Date: 12/19/1914 Location: Camden, NJ Size: 10” From http://www.loc.gov/jukebox/about/making‐the‐jukebox: “A slip that provides the elements of the filename of the digital copy is inserted in the sleeve of each selected disc: institution/collection code, label name, label number, disc copy, matrix number, and take number are all noted on the slip.
    [Show full text]
  • Westminster Abbey ASERVICE to CELEBRATE the 60TH ANNIVERSARY of the CORONATION of HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH II
    Westminster Abbey ASERVICE TO CELEBRATE THE 60TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE CORONATION OF HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH II Tuesday 4th June 2013 at 11.00 am FOREWORD On 2nd June 1953, the Coronation of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II followed a pattern established over the centuries since William the Conqueror was crowned in Westminster Abbey on Christmas Day 1066. Our intention in this Service of Thanksgiving is to evoke and reflect the shape of the Coronation service itself. The Queen’s entrance was marked by the Choirs’ singing Psalm 122—I was glad—set to music for the Coronation of EdwardVII by Sir Hubert Parry. The Queen’s Scholars of Westminster School exercised their historic right to exclaim Vivat Regina Elizabetha! (‘Long live Queen Elizabeth!’); so it will be today. The coronation service begins with the Recognition. The content of this part of the service is, of course, not today what it was in 1953, but the intention is similar: to recognise with thanksgiving the dutiful service offered over the past sixty years by our gracious and noble Queen, and to continue to pray God saveThe Queen. The Anointing is an act of consecration, a setting apart for royal and priestly service, through the gift of the Holy Spirit. The Ampulla from which the oil was poured rests today on the HighAltar as a reminder of that central act. St Edward’s Crown also rests today on the High Altar as a powerful symbol of the moment of Coronation. In today’s Service, a flask of Oil is carried by representatives of the people of the United Kingdom to the Sacrarium, received by theArchbishop and placed by the Dean on the High Altar.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stone of Scone
    The Stone of Scone Some time ago, in London on holiday, I went along to Westminster Abbey to see the throne that God’s word promised would exist until Christ returned to claim it. Sadly I never got to see the throne of David, or King Edward’s throne as it is called, as the Abbey was temporarily closed, so I ended up in the Abbey bookshop, but there I came across a book entitled ‘Jacob’s Pillar – A Biblical Historical Study’, by E. Raymond Capt. M.A. A.I.A. F.S.A. Scot. That book started me off on a journey through the Bible that will today provide the evidence for you that our monarch is indeed a descendant of Israel’s King David, that the throne has existed through the ages, and still awaits the return of the One who’s right it is, to claim it. In 2 Samuel 7:16, David’s throne is prophesied by God, through Nathan the prophet, to remain forever on the earth, ‘And your house and your kingdom shall be established forever before you: your throne shall be established forever.’ Much of the history of the stone can be gleaned from the pages of the Bible, (plus secular history) but God has played down its role to avoid idolatry, though the evidence of its travels makes our subject today…… It was about 760BC, and Jacob had been sent by Isaac his father, son of Abraham, to find a wife from amongst his own people. He was on a journey from Beersheba to Padan-Haran, Genesis 28: 10- 22, ‘And Jacob went out from Beersheba, and went toward Haran’ ….
    [Show full text]
  • Provenance: What Is It and Why Do We Care?
    Provenance: What is it and why do we care? What is it? PROVENANCE: “The pedigree of a book’s previous ownership. This may be clearly marked by the owner’s name, arms, bookplate, or evidence in the book itself; or it may have to be pieced together from such outside sources as auction records or booksellers’ catalogues.” --John Carter, ABC for Book Collectors (Oak Knoll Press, 1998) Why do we care? “Recorded ownership in a particular book at a particular time can tell us something about both owner and text; it can allow us to make deductions about the tastes, intellectual abilities or financial means of the owner, and it can show the reception of the text at different periods of history. If the book is annotated, we can see further into that world of private relationship between reader and text, and the impact of books in their contemporary contexts.” --David Pearson, Books as History (British Library, 2008) What are the common types of provenance? “There are numerous ways in which people have left traces of their ownership in books; they have written their names on the title page, they have pasted in printed bookplates, they have put their names or arms on the binding, they have used codes and mottos.” --David Pearson, Books as History (British Library, 2008) How do we explore? Each copy of a particular title has its own history. If a book, such as Thomas Paine’s Common Sense, is published in 1776, then each surviving individual copy of that work has its own 240- plus year history.
    [Show full text]