DOCSLIB.ORG

15/12/2017 9:45:59 PM Submission No: 1 Given Name

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
15/12/2017 9:45:59 PM Submission No: 1 Given Name Submission Date: 15/12/2017 9:45:59 PM Submission No: 1 Given Name: Michael Family Name: Brennan Submission Type: Organisation Organisation: Commonminds Which category best describes your interest: Ocean Cluture and Enviroment Comments in relation to draft amendment: Please consider that the Industries being supported are of unsustainable practice and the proposed sites will have irreversible negative effects on our Community and Important related Industries as well as our natural enviroment and ecosystem habitats that are connected to these areas. Please do not hesitate to contact me ASAP. Thankyou Mike Attachments: No Request for Hearing: Yes Confidential box checked: No Comments Commercial in Confidence (yes/no): Yes Submission Date: 15/12/2017 11:55:16 PM Submission No: 2 Given Name: jacob Family Name: walsh Submission Type: Individual Organisation: Which category best describes your interest: because i surf and fish Comments in relation to draft amendment: Attachments: No Request for Hearing: No Confidential box checked: No Comments Commercial in Confidence (yes/no): No Submission Date: 18/12/2017 5:18:21 AM Submission No: 3 Given Name: stephen Family Name: roberts Submission Type: Individual Organisation: Which category best describes your interest: Community Comments in relation to draft amendment: TASSAL seems to be expending and doing very little by way of minimising their visual impact through sensible and innovative marine engineering practices , so as to develop equipment and processes that are less visually obvious and distracting to the rest of us. Better water filtration for instance that will remove reliance on locating these unsightly pens in areas simply to take best advantage of ocean currents and natural water purity. Lower visual impact pens that do not need to 'tower' out of the water to reduce predator impacts. Grouping so that rather than having lines of pens reaching across horizons, the pens can be group closer together, again with some innovation of engineering to manage water quality and waste removal issues. I would ask that TASSAL demonstrate that they have exhausted possibilities in these areas before grasping at the cheaper and easier option of filling our waterways and views, with their fish pens Attachments: No Request for Hearing: No Confidential box checked: No Comments Commercial in Confidence (yes/no): No Submission Date: 26/12/2017 1:29:35 AM Submission No: 4 Given Name: Fraser Family Name: Petrie Submission Type: Individual Organisation: Which category best describes your interest: Community Comments in relation to draft amendment: Marine Farming submission - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT TO ACCOMPANY DRAFT AMENDMENT NO.5 TO THE TASMAN PENINSULA AND NORFOLK BAY MARINE FARMING DEVELOPMENT PLAN – From Tassal Response to EIS 1. Environmental Outcome: While is it pleasing to see that there will be baseline environmental measurements carried out prior to the installation of the marine farm equipment (I am not qualified to know the value of the baseline measurements) and that there will be continued monitoring of the environmental impact of the farming operations. I would like to know that the findings will be available to the public so we can also understand the impact this farming is having on Storm Bay. I also want to understand what the “red Lines” are in regards to environmental impact, what environmental impacts the EPA will set as unacceptable, and what are the penalties. 2. Fish Faeces Discharged: The EIS forecasts >4000 tons of fish faeces per annum to be dumped into Storm bay. Why is the proponent not collecting these faeces in the same way it collects the “morts”, ie vacuuming up from the bottom of the nets. 4000 tons is a significant amount of faeces, especially given that a further two farms are being proposed in the bay and the total annual discharge into Storm bay exceeds 10,000 tons. 3. Collective Impact on Storm Bay: While the EIS looks at the impact of this farm, where is the total impact of all farms being modelled and understood? The cumulative impacts of these fish farm proposals could exceed the impact of the three in isolation. Also none of the EIS for the proposals discuss the final destination for fish farming in storm bay, I understand this may be the government regulators role, but I believe the community would have a greater acceptance if they could see the big picture of where this industry will end up. Thank you for considering the concerns regarding ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT TO ACCOMPANY DRAFT AMENDMENT NO.5 TO THE TASMAN PENINSULA AND NORFOLK BAY MARINE FARMING DEVELOPMENT PLAN. Regards Fraser Petrie Attachments: No Request for Hearing: No Confidential box checked: No Comments Commercial in Confidence (yes/no): No Submission Date: 1/01/2018 2:01:02 AM Submission No: 5 Given Name: Matthew Family Name: Morgan Submission Type: Organisation Organisation: Wild Fishers against the Salmon ( Finfish) Farms Which category best describes your interest: Commercial / Recreational Fishing and a Concerned Citizen of Tasmania Comments in relation to draft amendment: It is Immoral that This Proposal is to Go Ahead It need An Inquiry on Why this Proposal Coincides with Christmas Holidays and the Short time For Submissions Adaptive Management to be OutLawed We must Teturn To proper Environmetal and Ecological impact Studies Any Less than that is Dereliction of Duty of a Public Waterway and the Government and the Department Responsable Should be Held Accountable A Complete Moratorium on Any more Sea Caged Salmon or Finfish Farms until they Zclean Up and Prove they can Sustainably Manage what they Have Already Got No other Course of Wction is Acceptable Attachments: No Request for Hearing: Yes Confidential box checked: No Comments Commercial in Confidence (yes/no): No Submission Date: 1/01/2018 2:11:35 AM Submission No: 6 Given Name: Chris Family Name: Chris Vonderborch Submission Type: Individual Organisation: Which category best describes your interest: Aquaculture industry Comments in relation to draft amendment: I attach a word file concerning salmon farm expansion in the Storm Bar area Attachments: Yes Request for Hearing: No Confidential box checked: No Comments Commercial in Confidence (yes/no): No OFFSHORE SALMON FARMING IN THE STORM BAY AREA, TASMANIA Some environmental concerns Chris vonderBorch, Professor Emeritus of Marine Geology, Flinders University Offshore salmon farming in the Nubeena region has been underway for a considerable period. However, we now see an on-going massive expansion, within and immediately outside Parsons Bay, with an even more massive expansion proposed for nearby Storm Bay, west of Wedge Island. In addition the number of salmon pens has increased significantly near the very restricted Parsons Bay area. A serious risk of pollution and environmental degradation is possible, due to excessive nutrient input into these areas. A concern, therefore, is the lack of independent baseline environmental studies, focussing on such relevant items as nutrient levels, before and after the expansion. Obviously it is far too late for the “before” part of such a survey. The fact that this was never carried out highlights our lack of knowledge of all the interactive aspects of a marine ecosystem. It also reflects disregard for the potential negative environmental effects of the huge amount of excess nutrient generation in such restricted waterways, related to the growing salmon farms. Effective oceanic circulation studies on a seasonal basis have not been made. Meaningful water turbidity and nutrient measurements are essentially non- existent. Yet the salmon farms continue to expand into the offshore environment. A very visible example is the huge “breakwater” of continually expanding salmon pens immediately outside the restricted waters of Parsons Bay. This “breakwater”, which indeed it is, comprises a chain of pens, each reaching almost to the sea-floor, and extending 1-2 Km along the coast, almost from the shoreline near the entrance to Parsons Bay. Do we know what effect this is having on the environment? Has an independent marine circulation study been carried out in relation to that “breakwater”? It is likely that such a study is non- existent I would like to suggest that human ignorance, and the ever-present desire for expansion, has increasingly dogged industrial developments on a global scale. This has resulted in the very obvious environmental disasters that we are increasingly witnessing today around the world. Do we wish to continue such behaviour? Or do we wish to be much more responsible in our interaction with the finite and fragile environment upon which all life depends? A responsible action would be to impose a moratorium on the expansion of salmon farming activities until all aspects have been carefully studied and assessed. Submission Date: 3/01/2018 10:24:36 PM Submission No: 7 Given Name: Dinah Family Name: Jones Submission Type: Individual Organisation: Which category best describes your interest: Community Comments in relation to draft amendment: The huge expansion of lease areas is very concerning in terms of boating safety. There are numerous reports of potentially hazardous objects (large pipes, lengths of rope, buoys and even a small pen) coming loose from current aquaculture operations. If the fish farming industry cant keep its waste under control now, how much worse will it be if this expansion is allowed to go ahead. The huge amounts of smaller debris being washed up on the foreshore and virtually ignored by the industry is also of great concern. Yes, sometimes the companies will go and do a token cleanup but, considering the extent of the problem, perhaps they should employ full time clean up crews. The other matter of great importance is visability. In rough seas, with spray flying, fish pens are extremely difficult to see, even duing the day. At night, in large swells, the lights on the leases are invisible for long periods of time.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Groundwater, Mineral Resources and Land Stability in the Tasman Peninsula. 1. Groundwater from Fractured Rocks
    1979/3. Groundwater, mineral resources and land stability in the Tasman Peninsula. W.C. Cromer, R.C. Donaldson P. C. Stevenson V.N. Threader Abstract Groundwater prospects, mineral deposits and land stability are discussed to provide information for a planning study of the Tasman Peninsula. INTRODUCTION This report was written at the request of the Commissioner for Town and Country Planning, and is the result of a map compilation, a search of records and field work during the period 20 - 24 November 1978. 1. Groundwater from fractured rocks P.C. Stevenson The amoun~ of water that may be obtained from the hard rocks of the Peninsula by boreholes is controlled by the composition and conditions of weathering and fracture. The amount of direct information is limited because only eight bore­ holes have been recorded, all at Koonya, Premaydena or Nubeena, but exper­ ience in other parts of the State enable some general comments to be made. The geology of the Peninsula is shown in Figure 1. The Jurassic dolerite, which forms many of the most rugged and remote parts of the Peninsula, has not been drilled for water but is regarded throughout Tasmania as an extremely poor prospect; very hard to drill, almost always dry and where water exists it is hard and saline. It cannot be recommended. The Permian mudstone and fine-grained sandstone have not been drilled in the Peninsula, but elsewhere are reliable producers of good quality groundwater. yields of 20 to 150 l/min and qualities of 200 - 600 mg/l of total dissolved solids are usual.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda of the Annual General Meeting of the Tasman Council Wednesday 11 December 2019 at 5:30Pm
    AGENDA OF THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF THE TASMAN COUNCIL WEDNESDAY 11 DECEMBER 2019 AT 5:30PM 1. WELCOME 2. PRESENT 3. APOLOGIES (Councillors Only) 4. REPORTS 4.1 PRESENATION OF ANNUAL REPORT The Annual Report is prepared in accordance with section 72 of the Local Government Act 1993 and relates to the Financial Year 2018-2019. ATTACHMENT – 1 Recommendation 01/12.2019/AGM Moved: Cr Seconded: Cr That Council resolves to adopt the Annual Report 2018-2019. 5. DISCUSSIONS OF SUBMISSIONS RECEIVED Nil submissions have been received. 6. CALL FOR MOTIONS FROM THE FLOOR AND DISCUSSION 7. CLOSE OF MEETING TASMAN COUNCIL ‘A Natural Escape’ ANNUAL REPORT 2018-2019 INFORMATION ABOUT TASMAN The Tasman Municipality is located on outcrops, sheltered bays and sea caves. Tasmania’s picturesque southeast coast Walking tracks and kayaks give access to the approximately 90 minutes from Hobart. As in area’s most isolated and spectacular areas. many rural communities, Tasman’s population is dispersed with the majority of people COUNCIL’S VISION 2015-2025 centered in and around the township of Make Tasman an inspirational place to live Nubeena and the localities of White Beach, and visit. Highcroft, Port Arthur, Premaydena, Saltwater River, Koonya, Taranna, Eaglehawk Neck and Improve cultural and recreational Murdunna. The Municipal area covers opportunities for everyone. approximately 660 square kilometres. Maximise the attributes of the region. Practically an island, the diversity and Provide the opportunity for sustainable abundance of wildlife and plant life is growth. remarkable. Ensure growth and development is done The population is relatively stable at in balance with the natural and built approximately 2400 swelling to between 8,000 environment, community and lifestyle and 9,000 as a result of tourists and visitors expectations.
    [Show full text]
  • Tasman Peninsula
    7 A OJ? TASMAN PENINSULA M.R. Banks, E.A. Calholln, RJ. Ford and E. Williams University of Tasmania (MRB and the laie R.J. Ford). b!ewcastle fo rmerly University of Tasmama (EAC) and (ie,a/Ogle,Cl; Survey of Tasmania (E'W) (wjth two text-figures lUld one plate) On Tasman Peninsula, southeastern Tasmania, almost hOrizontal Permian marine and Triassic non-marine lOcks were inllUded by Jurassic dolerite, faulted and overiain by basalt Marine processes operating on the Jurassic and older rocks have prcl(iU!ced with many erosional features widely noted for their grandeur a self-renewing economic asset. Key Words: Tasman Peninsula, Tasmania, Permian, dolerite, erosional coastline, submarine topography. From SMITH, S.J. (Ed.), 1989: IS lllSTORY ENOUGH ? PA ST, PRESENT AND FUTURE USE OF THE RESOURCES OF TA SMAN PENINSULA Royal Society of Tasmania, Hobart: 7-23. INTRODUCTION Coal was discovered ncar Plunkett Point by surveyors Woodward and Hughes in 1833 (GO 33/ Tasman Peninsula is known for its spectacular coastal 16/264·5; TSA) and the seam visited by Captain scenery - cliffs and the great dolerite columns O'Hara Booth on May 23, 1833 (Heard 1981, p.158). which form cliffs in places, These columns were Dr John Lhotsky reported to Sir John Franklin on the first geological features noted on the peninsula. this coal and the coal mining methods in 1837 (CSO Matthew Flinders, who saw the columns in 1798, 5/72/1584; TSA). His thorough report was supported reported (1801, pp.2--3) that the columns at Cape by a coloured map (CSO 5/11/147; TSA) showing Pillar, Tasman Island and Cape "Basaltcs" (Raoul) some outcrops of different rock This map, were "not strictlybasaltes", that they were although not the Australian not the same in form as those Causeway Dictionary of (Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Populations of Tasman Peninsula
    139 POPULATIONS OF TASMAN PENINSULA by L. J. Wood Department of Geography. University of Ta smania (with four tables and four text-figures) Understanding of the characteristics and dynamics of the population permanently resident in Tasman municipality has to recognise that the area receives numerically large influxes of both recreational and tourist groups. Census data suggest that the economy of the peninsula is undergoing a major shift from one reliant on traditional primary industries to one focused on tourism. At the same time, the amenities of the natural landscape have prompted a substantial in-migration of non-conventional lifestylers. Key Words: Tasman Peninsula, popUlation, counterurbanisation, alternative communities, holiday homes, tourism. From SMITH, S.J. (Ed.), 1989: IS HISTORY ENO UGH? PA ST, PRESENT AND FUTURE USE OF THE RESOURCES OF TA SMAN PE/I"NSULA . Royal Society of Tasmania, Hobart: 139-148. INTRODUCTION the postwar period, with a gradual rise in numbers to the mid 1960s, followed by a decade of decline and Censuses, the main mechanism for gathering then a further increase into the 1980s (table 1; unless information about the population of an area, focus otherwise stated, all population statistics reported in attention on long-term trends in the numbers and this paper �re from ABS sources). Without specific characteristics of permanently resident populations. surveys, the reasons for these changes can only be This focus is important in that, inter alia, it provides a proxy measure of changes in the social and economic structure of a region. For Tasman Peninsula, TABLE 1 however, to focus solely on the permanent population would be to ignore other groups of people that are of Resident Population, Tasman Municipality, major importance to the economy of the region.
    [Show full text]
  • 3966 Tour Op 4Col
    The Tasmanian Advantage natural and cultural features of Tasmania a resource manual aimed at developing knowledge and interpretive skills specific to Tasmania Contents 1 INTRODUCTION The aim of the manual Notesheets & how to use them Interpretation tips & useful references Minimal impact tourism 2 TASMANIA IN BRIEF Location Size Climate Population National parks Tasmania’s Wilderness World Heritage Area (WHA) Marine reserves Regional Forest Agreement (RFA) 4 INTERPRETATION AND TIPS Background What is interpretation? What is the aim of your operation? Principles of interpretation Planning to interpret Conducting your tour Research your content Manage the potential risks Evaluate your tour Commercial operators information 5 NATURAL ADVANTAGE Antarctic connection Geodiversity Marine environment Plant communities Threatened fauna species Mammals Birds Reptiles Freshwater fishes Invertebrates Fire Threats 6 HERITAGE Tasmanian Aboriginal heritage European history Convicts Whaling Pining Mining Coastal fishing Inland fishing History of the parks service History of forestry History of hydro electric power Gordon below Franklin dam controversy 6 WHAT AND WHERE: EAST & NORTHEAST National parks Reserved areas Great short walks Tasmanian trail Snippets of history What’s in a name? 7 WHAT AND WHERE: SOUTH & CENTRAL PLATEAU 8 WHAT AND WHERE: WEST & NORTHWEST 9 REFERENCES Useful references List of notesheets 10 NOTESHEETS: FAUNA Wildlife, Living with wildlife, Caring for nature, Threatened species, Threats 11 NOTESHEETS: PARKS & PLACES Parks & places,
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Bay and Frederick Henry Bay Monitoring Program
    EPA Water Quality Monitoring Plan for Norfolk Bay, 2018-19 Introduction The EPA has undertaken to conduct water quality monitoring within Norfolk Bay (and Frederick Henry Bay) to assist in understanding of the marine environment and provide an independent validation of water quality data provided by the aquaculture industry. Aims To provide water quality information to increase the understanding of water quality within Norfolk Bay and Frederick Henry Bay To provide water quality information to assist nutrient dispersion modelling and biogeochemical model development and validation To provide independent validation of water quality information collected by (or on behalf of) Huon Aquaculture. Description Norfolk Bay forms the northern extent of the Tasman Peninsula and Norfolk Bay Marine Farm Development Plan Area (MFDPA). The monitoring program is to commence during August 2018, prior to the Huon Aquaculture Permit Area being stocked with fish. Under the terms of Environmental Licence 9957 held by Huon Aquaculture, water quality monitoring is to be conducted at six (6) locations within Norfolk Bay and Fredrick Henry Bay. Of these five (5) were selected for monitoring under this program for validation purposes (See Table 1). Water quality data is to be collected on a monthly basis. Program commencement: August 2018 Scheduled completion: January 2019 Extension of the monitoring program is subject to review. An overview of the monitoring locations is shown in Table 1 and a map of the locations is shown in Figure 1. A list and overview of the environmental parameters to be collected is shown in Table 2. EPA Water Quality Monitoring Plan for Norfolk Bay 2018 1 Table 1: List and overview of monitoring locations WQ monitoring Distance from Site ID Location Easting Northing Latitude longitude Comments required lease boundary Nutrients, phytoplankton, ~13.3 km EPA-NB1 Eaglehawk Bay 567205 5237334 -43.0137 147.8247 field measurements Far-Field Nutrients, phytoplankton, ~ 600 m Baseline site 2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges in Developing a Small Residential Microgrid Jack Gilding Backroad Connections Pty Ltd Location Context – the Tasman Peninsula
    Presentation to the National Consumer Roundtable on Energy Hobart 28 February 2019 Challenges in developing a small residential microgrid Jack Gilding Backroad Connections Pty Ltd Location Context – the Tasman Peninsula • Geographically distinct area • Road access limited at Dunalley and Eaglehawk Neck • About 2500 permanent residents, population can triple in summer • Major tourist destinations: – Port Arthur Historic Site, Three Capes Walk • Concerns about electricity reliability • Concerns about emergency situations: – Dunalley fires 2013, Port Arthur Massacre 1996 Electricity reliability • Long feeders, geographical constraints • Nubeena outages (over last five years) – 4.6 outages a year – average customer fault duration 3.4 hours – average fault duration 9.2 hours • Implications – cost, inconvenience, lots of generators – major outage issues: health, telecommunications, fuel supply Survey – electricity reliability Survey – priorities for TPP More affordable power Reduce overall outages Ensure supply for emergency services Ensure supply for my house in major events Creating businesses and jobs on the Peninsula The Residential Microgrid project • Part of a project funded by the state government • Five community residential units • Objectives: – provide power for essential services during grid outages – reduce the cost of electricity for residents – test trading of locally generated energy between residents (peer-to-peer trading) Context – Essential Services Microgrid Challenges • Construction • Technology • Regulatory environment • Business arrangements • Consumer engagement Challenges – Construction • The grant to TPP was first announced in February 2018. A year later the Tasman Council has still not signed a construction contract with the preferred builder. • Until the Council signs a contract we cannot negotiate with the builder about integration of solar PV and the implications for wiring the buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution Act 1934 (Tas) [Transcript
    [Received from the Clerk of the Legislative Council the 10th day of January 1935 A.G. Brammall Registrar Supreme Court] TASMANIA. _________ THE CONSTITUTION ACT 1934. _________ ANALYSIS. PART I. – PRELIMINARY. Division III. – The Assembly. 1. Short title. 22. Constitution of the Assembly. 2. Repeal. 23. Triennial Parliaments. 3. Interpretation. 24. Election of Speaker. 25. Quorum of the Assembly. PART II. – THE CROWN. Division IV. – Electoral Divisions and 4. Parliament not dissolved by demise Qualifications Of Electors. of the Crown. 5. Demise of the Crown not to affect 26. Council Divisions. things done before proclamation 27. Assembly Divisions. thereof. 28. Qualification of electors for the 6. All appointments, &c., by the Gover- Legislative Council. nor to continue in force notwith- Joint tenants. standing demise of the Crown. 29. Assembly electors. 7. All civil or criminal process, and all contracts, bonds, and engagements Division V. – Disqualification; Vacation with or on behalf of His Majesty Of Office; Penalty. to subsist and continue notwith- standing demise. 30. Oath to be taken by members. 8. Deputy-Governor’s powers. 31. Commonwealth membership. Interpretation. 32. Office of profit. Exercise of powers by Deputy- 33. Contractors. Governor. 34. Vacation of office for other causes. Provision as to deputy of Lieutenant- 35. Penalty for sitting when disqualified. Governor or Administrator. Act to be retrospective. PART IV. – MONEY BILLS; POWERS OF HOUSES PART III. – PARLIAMENT. 36. Interpretation. Division I. – Both Houses. 37. Money bills to originate in the Assembly. 9. Continuation of existing Houses. 38. All money votes to be recommended Continuance in office of existing by the Governor.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Development Information to Accompany
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT TO ACCOMPANY A REQUEST TO AMEND THE TASMAN PENINSULA AND NORFOLK BAY MARINE FARMING DEVELOPMENT PLAN NOVEMBER 2005 This environmental impact statement has been prepared by; Tassal Operations Pty Ltd. G.P.O. Box 1645 Hobart Tasmania Australia 7001 Phone: 1300 TASSAL (1300 827725) Fax: 1300 880 179 Web: www.tassal.com.au E-mail: [email protected] ii GLOSSARY ADCP Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler AGD Amoebic Gill Disease ASC Aquaculture Stewardship Council Salmon Aquaculture Standard CAMBA China-Australia Migratory Bird Agreement DPIW Department of Primary Industries and Water EIS Environmental Impact Statement EPBCA Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 FCR Feed Conversion Rate GDA Geocentric Datum of Australia GPS Global Positioning System HAB Harmful Algal Bloom IMAS Institute of Marine and Antarctic Studies JAMBA Japan-Australia Migratory Bird Agreement MAST Marine and Safety Tasmania MFDP Marine Farming Development Plan MFPA Marine Farming Planning Act 1995 MFPRP Marine Farming Planning Review Panel PA Planning Authority PS Proposal Summary PSEG Proposal Specific Environmental Impact Statement Guidelines ROKAMBA Republic of Korea-Australia Migratory Bird Agreement SCUBA Self Contained Underwater Breathing Apparatus TSPA Threatened Species Protection Act iii 1 Table of Contents Contents GLOSSARY ...................................................................................................... III 1 ......... Table of Contents .......................................................................iv
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Mount Koonya Area
    Mineral Resources Tasmania Tasmanian Geological Survey Tasmania DEPARTMENT of INFRASTRUCTURE, Record 2003/08 ENERGY and RESOURCES Geology of the Mount Koonya area by S. M. Forsyth CONTENTS SUMMARY ……………………………………………………………………………………… 3 INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………………… 5 Acknowledgements ………………………………………………………………………… 5 GEOLOGY ……………………………………………………………………………………… 6 Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………… 6 Previous geological maps and investigations …………………………………………………… 6 Stratigraphy ………………………………………………………………………………… 7 Lower Parmeener Supergroup ……………………………………………………………… 7 Upper Parmeener Supergroup ……………………………………………………………… 7 Cygnet Coal Measures correlate — Permian? ………………………………………………… 7 Dominantly quartz sandstone sequence (Rqph) — Early Triassic ………………………………… 8 Interbedded siltstone, fine-grained sandstone and mudstone sequence (Rqm) — Early Triassic ………… 8 Quartz sandstone unit with granules (Rvvp) — Middle? Triassic………………………………… 9 Undifferentiated quartz rich lithic sandstone, quartz sandstone and mudstone (Rvv)— Middle Triassic … 10 Quaternary deposits ……………………………………………………………………… 10 Slope deposits …………………………………………………………………………… 10 Other Quaternary deposits ………………………………………………………………… 11 Igneous rocks ………………………………………………………………………………… 11 Jurassic dolerite …………………………………………………………………………… 11 Metamorphic effects of the dolerite …………………………………………………………… 12 Structure …………………………………………………………………………………… 13 Attitude of Upper Parmeener Supergroup …………………………………………………… 13 Dolerite structure ………………………………………………………………………… 13 Faults ……………………………………………………………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Broadscale Monitoring Report for the Tasman Peninsula and Norfolk Bay
    Annual Broadscale Monitoring Report for the Tasman Peninsula and Norfolk Bay Marine Farming Development Plan Area for the period June 2017 to May 2018 July 2018 AQUENAL www.aquenal.com.au Aquenal Pty Ltd Tasman Annual Broadscale Monitoring Report July 2018 Document Control and Distribution Document Date Name Company Version Copies Type 31/7/2018 Matt Barrenger Tassal Electronic 1.0 1 1/8/2018 Mark Churchill EPA Electronic 1.0 1 COPYRIGHT: The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Aquenal Pty Ltd. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Aquenal Pty Ltd constitutes an infringement of copyright. DISCLAIMER: This report has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of Aquenal Pty Ltd’s client and is subject to and issued in connection with the provisions of the agreement between Aquenal Pty Ltd and its Client. Aquenal Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party. 2 Aquenal Pty Ltd Tasman Annual Broadscale Monitoring Report July 2018 Table of Contents 1. Operational Summary .................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 6 3. Methods ........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 734 Tasman Peninsula to Hobart
    EFFECTIVE 29 NOVEMBER 2020 734 Tasman Peninsula to Hobart ROUTE NUMBER ROUTE 734 Nubeena to Hobart BUS ROUTE MAP Legend Route 734 N Map reference Interchange Hospital Educational institution Shopping centre Point of interest Map not to scale Tasma SORELL n H w y J d R Arthur Hw y e P r e n o na lm R 734 e d D wy K r H COPPING y I hu w rt Marion Bay Rd H A n H a m s a an Hwy T sm a T FORCETT Rd f a o o l Bo 734 r m a G e r g R u d Continues below S DUNALLEY Fulham Rd F 734 E d R A y a rt B h s u r r e H w m y m o S EAGLEHAWK Rosny Park NECK Interchange Old Jetty Road y D Continues above w H t n WARRANE rwe e Nubeena D d 734 ROSE R Nubeena Rd t 734 Tasman Hwy e D s g o BAY a Ross Ave id m E br South St ai R Queens n 734 m C o a South Arm Hwy H Domain s C Tasman Hwy Back Rd wy n a TARANNA y MORNINGTON Roaring n ee Royal Botanic Gardens MONTAGU Hi L Gordons Hill Rd Beach Rd b u ll A R N BAY d GLEBE Rosny Tasman Hwy Hill Bligh St UTAS Medical ROSNY CampbellScience St NUBEENA wy Argyle St Precinct ROSNY PARK H r Elizabeth St hu rt A N u BELLERIVE beena Rd Liverpool St Royal Hobart B Hospital M N Hobart City Interchange 734 PORT Collins St ARTHUR Morrison St MacquarieDavey St St HOBART WHO OPERATES ACCESSIBLE SERVICE 734 All services are operated by MY SERVICE? tassielink.com.au 1300 300 520 wheelchair accessible vehicles.
    [Show full text]