DOCSLIB.ORG

South Eastern Franchise: Train Service Specification, Attachment A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

South Eastern Franchise Train Service Requirements (TSR2) FINAL 29/11/2017 Attachment A part 1: Table EK South Eastern Train Service Requirement from December 2022 SX, SO and SuO Faversham-Ramsgate Ashford-Dover Priory-Sandwich-Minster-Margate Ashford-Canterbury West-Minster-Margate Table EK1: First and Last Trains Table EK3: First and Last Trains tph and service pattern: EK1 EK2 tph and service pattern: EK3EK4 tph and service pattern: EK5 Ramsgate-Faversham-St Pancras International SX SO SuO Dover Priory-Ashford International-St Pancras International SX SO SuO A B B B A F F A A M M First train to arrive STP no later than: 07:05 08:10 10:10 First train to arrive STP no later than: 06:55 06:55 08:55 Last train to depart RAM no earlier than: 21:20 21:20 21:20 Last train to depart DVP no earlier than: 22:45 22:45 21:45 Faversham FAV H Ashford International AFK H H Ashford International AFKH St Pancras International-Faversham-Ramsgate SX SO SuO St Pancras International-Ashford International-Dover Priory SX SO SuO Whitstable WHI H Westenhanger WHA X X Wye WYE X 1+ 1+ First train to arrive RAM no later than: 09:15 09:15 10:15 First train to arrive DVP no later than: 08:40 07:45 09:45 Chestfield and Swalecliffe CSW 1 1 1 1 Sandling SDG X X Chilham CIL X 1+ 1+ Last train to depart STP no earlier than: 22:25 22:25 22:25 Last train to depart STP no earlier than: 23:35 23:35 22:35 Herne Bay HNB H Folkestone West FKW H H Chartham CRTX 1+ 1+ Ramsgate-Faversham-BFR/LBG or VIC SX SO SuO Dover Priory-Ashford International-London Bridge SX SO SuO Birchington-on-Sea BCH H Folkestone Central FKC H H Canterbury West CBW H First train to arrive BFR/LBG or VIC no later than: 06:25 07:00 09:05 First train to arrive LBG no later than: 06:20 06:45 09:45 Westgate-on-Sea WGA 1 1 1 1 Dover Priory DVP H H Sturry STU 2 2 2 Last train to depart RAM no earlier than: 21:50 21:50 21:50 Last train to depart DVP no earlier than: 20:55 20:55 20:55 Margate MAR H Martin Mill MTM 2 2 2 2 Minster MSR2 2 2 BFR/LBG or VIC-Faversham-Ramsgate SX SO SuO London Bridge-Ashford International-Dover Priory SX SO SuO Broadstairs BSR H Walmer WAM 2 2 2 2 Sandwich SDW K K First train to arrive RAM no later than: 09:45 09:45 09:45 First train to arrive DVP no later than: 07:35 09:35 10:35 Dumpton Park DMP X 1 1 1 Deal DEA 2 2 2 2 Ramsgate RAM H L L Last train to depart BFR/LBG or VIC no earlier than: 00:10 00:10 22:40 Last train to depart LBG no earlier than: 23:45 23:45 22:45 Ramsgate RAM H 1 1 Sandwich SDW 2 2 2 2 Dumpton Park DMP X 1 1 Ramsgate-Faversham SX SO SuO Dover Priory-Ashford International SX SO SuO Minster MSR X D D D Broadstairs BSR H 1 1 First train to arrive FAV no later than: 05:10 05:20 07:50 First train to arrive AFK no later than: 05:05 05:30 08:15 C C C C Ramsgate RAM E E E E Margate MAR H 1 1 Last train to depart RAM no earlier than: 23:10 23:10 22:35 Last train to depart DVP no earlier than: 23:45 23:45 22:45 Dumpton Park DMP 1 1 1 X Faversham-Ramsgate SX SO SuO Ashford International-Dover Priory SX SO SuO Broadstairs BSR 1 1 1 1 J J J First train to arrive RAM no later than: 07:10 07:10 09:40 First train to arrive DVP no later than: 06:00 06:45 08:45 Margate MAR 1 1 1 1 Last train to depart FAV no earlier than: 01:25 01:25 23:50 Last train to depart AFK no earlier than: 01:05 01:05 00:05 ` Ramsgate-Dover Priory SX SO SuO G G G G First train to arrive DVP no later than: 05:30 06:50 07:50 Last train to depart RAM no earlier than: 23:10 23:10 22:10 Dover Priory-Ramsgate SX SO SuO tph and service pattern description First train to arrive RAM no later than: 06:45 07:20 09:20 Bidders are required to operate 3tph between MAR and RAM all day, whilst also meeting the requirements of each specific table below. The exact timing of these trains can vary from hour to hour, but must be as evenly spread across each hour as possible. The interval between two Last train to depart DVP no earlier than: 00:40 00:40 23:40 EK1-5 successive trains in either direction must not exceed 30 minutes. Table EK5: First and Last Trains EK1 Bidders must operate 2tph between RAM and FAV, and a minimum of 1tph of these must operate to and from STP via GRV to meet the requirements of service pattern HJ1 in Table HJ. Margate-Ashford International-St Pancras International SX SO SuO Bidders must operate a minimum of six additional trains to arrive at BFR; LBG; STP; and/or VIC between 07:00 and 09:29, and six additional trains to depart BFR; LBG; STP; and/or VIC between 16:30 and 18:59. At least three of these must serve CST in each peak First train to arrive STP no later than: 07:15 07:25 09:25 EK2 period. Last train to depart MAR no earlier than: 21:50 21:50 21:50 Bidders must operate 2tph between AFK and DVP calling at all stations and as close to even interval as possible, at least 1tph of this pair must be extended to and from SDW if not covered by an EK4 service. Bidders must also operate 1tph between STP and DVP St Pancras International-Ashford International-Margate SX SO SuO EK3 calling at FKW and FKC. At least 1tph must operate between DVP and MAR. Bidders must operate a total 2tph between DVP and SDW, and also meet the requirement for High Speed services shown in Table HJ. First train to arrive MAR no later than: 08:40 08:40 10:40 EK4 The bidder must provide additional trains between AFK and DVP to meet the minimum requirements of service pattern HJ2 in Table HJ. Last train to depart STP no earlier than: 23:10 23:10 23:10 The bidder must provide a minimum of 3tph between AFK and CBW and 1tph of these must call all stations. Between CBW and MSR bidders must provide 2tph one of which must also run through to MAR. These services must also meet the minimum requirements Ramsgate-Ashford International-LBG or VIC SX SO SuO EK5 of service pattern HJ2 in Table HJ. Bidders must provide a minimum of two trains per day between MSR and SDW in each direction in order to meet local traffic needs, and they may run 1tph all day between MSR and SDW. First train to arrive LBG or VIC no later than: 07:40 07:15 09:15 Last train to depart RAM no earlier than: 21:15 21:15 21:15 Station stops in each hour and service structure notes LBG or VIC-Ashford International-Ramsgate SX SO SuO Mandatory station stop on all-day service. First train to arrive RAM no later than: 08:45 08:15 10:15 H Mandatory station stop on all-day High Speed service that must operate to or from STP. For full High Speed requirements see Table HJ. Last train to depart LBG or VIC no earlier than: 23:15 23:15 22:15 Mandatory station stop on SX peak additional service in the UP direction a.m. peak, and in the DOWN direction p.m. peak. High peak hour tph shown. Full peak quantum shown in tph and service description above. Ramsgate-Canterbury West-Ashford International SX SO SuO H Mandatory station stop on SX peak additional High Speed services in the UP direction a.m. peak and in the DOWN direction p.m. peak. High peak hour tph shown. Full peak quantum shown in tph and service description above. For full HJ requirements see First train to arrive AFK no later than: 05:45 05:45 08:05 Table HJ. Last train to depart RAM no earlier than: 23:05 23:05 23:05 X Bidders are not permitted to make a station stop at this station on any High Speed service that operates to or from STP. Ashford International-Canterbury West-Ramsgate SX SO SuO 1 Bidders must stop a minimum of 1tph at this station in this service pattern. i.e. 1tph in EK1 and 1tph in EK2 and 1tph in EK3 and 1tph in EK4 and 1tph in EK5. First train to arrive RAM no later than: 06:50 07:15 09:15 1 Bidders must stop a minimum of 1tph at this station in any service pattern. i.e. 1tph in EK1 or 1tph in EK2 or 1tph in EK3 or 1tph in EK5. Last train to depart AFK no earlier than: 00:35 00:30 23:50 2 Bidders must stop a minimum of 2tph at this station in service patterns EK3 and EK4 combined.
Recommended publications
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Planning Applications Committee, 02/09/2020 10:00

    (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Planning Applications Committee, 02/09/2020 10:00

    PLANNING APPLICATIONS COMMITTEE Wednesday, 2nd September, 2020 10.00 am Online AGENDA PLANNING APPLICATIONS COMMITTEE Wednesday, 2nd September, 2020, at 10.00 Ask for: Andrew Tait am Online Telephone: 03000 416749 Membership (13) Conservative (10): Mr R A Marsh (Chairman), Mr R A Pascoe (Vice-Chairman), Mr M A C Balfour, Mrs R Binks, Mr A Booth, Mr A H T Bowles, Mr P C Cooper, Mr H Rayner, Mr C Simkins and Mr J Wright Liberal Democrat (1): Mr I S Chittenden Labour (1) Mr J Burden Independents (1) Mr P M Harman UNRESTRICTED ITEMS (During these items the meeting is likely to be open to the public A. COMMITTEE BUSINESS 1. Substitutes 2. Declarations of Interests by Members in items on the Agenda for this meeting. 3. Minutes - 15 July (Pages 1 - 6) 4. Site Meetings and Other Meetings B. GENERAL MATTERS 1. General Matters C. MINERALS AND WASTE DISPOSAL APPLICATIONS D. DEVELOPMENTS TO BE CARRIED OUT BY THE COUNTY COUNCIL 1. Proposal TH/19/1696 (KCC/TH/0256/2019) -Construction of a new railway station consisting of two platforms connected via an existing underpass (to be refurbished) with stair and lift access and associated infrastructure including vehicle and cycle parking, public announcement system, drainage, security and lighting, landscaping, level crossing upgrade works, and vehicle, pedestrian and cycle access including the creation of a vehicle access onto the A299 Hengist Way with associated highway works and a footway/cycle link to Clive Road at Land to the north and south of the A299 (Hengist Way) and to the east of the A256 (Richborough Way) including an existing railway line and part of the A299, Cliffsend (Thanet Parkway Station); KCC Growth, Environment and Transport (Pages 7 - 70) E.
  • Kent Rail Strategy 2021

    Kent Rail Strategy 2021

    Kent Rail Strategy 2021 Public Consultation Report January 2021 Kent Rail Strategy 2021 Consultation Report Table of Contents 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 4 2. Consultation process................................................................................................................ 4 3. Consultation responses ............................................................................................................ 8 4. Kent Rail Strategy ambitions .................................................................................................. 10 5. Rail policy .............................................................................................................................. 15 6. Fares policy ........................................................................................................................... 20 7. Rail infrastructure enhancements ........................................................................................... 25 8. Rolling stock improvements ................................................................................................... 29 9. Passenger services ................................................................................................................ 33 10. Community Rail Partnerships (CRPs) ................................................................................. 37 11. Rail freight provision ..........................................................................................................
  • Planning Committee Report REPORT

    Planning Committee Report REPORT

    Planning Committee Report REPORT SUMMARY REFERENCE NO - 18/502379/LBC APPLICATION PROPOSAL Listed Building application for proposed upgrade of Network Rail's East Farleigh Level Crossing from a Manned Gated Hand Worked (MGHW) Level Crossing to a Manually Controlled Barrier(s) (MCB) type (Resubmission). ADDRESS East Farleigh Mghw Level Crossing Farleigh Lane Farleigh Bridge East Farleigh Maidstone Kent ME16 9NB RECOMMENDATION – Grant Listed Building Consent SUMMARY OF REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION for approval The level crossing gates do not form part of the main listing for the East Farleigh railway station; The level crossing gates do not appear to be curtilage listed structures, as they constructed after the 1948; Any harm to the character, integrity and setting of the Listed Building, would be outweighed the public safety benefit; The erection of the new level crossing gates does not require Listed Building Consent. REASON FOR REFERRAL TO COMMITTEE Teston Parish Council wishes to see the application refused and request that the application be reported to Planning Committee for the reasons set out in their consultation response. (Note – The site lies with Barming Parish, not Teston Parish) WARD Barming And PARISH/TOWN APPLICANT Network Rail Teston COUNCIL Barming Infrastructure Limited AGENT Network Rail Infrastructure Limited DECISION DUE DATE PUBLICITY EXPIRY OFFICER SITE VISIT 27/06/18 DATE DATE 22/06/18 01/06/18 RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY (including appeals and relevant history on adjoining sites): App No Proposal Decision Date 17/506600/LBC Listed Building Consent for the upgrade Withdraw 26/2/201 of the level crossing n 8 15/504142/LBC Listed Building Consent - Replacement of Approved 14/7/201 station roof covering 5 MAIN REPORT 1.0 DESCRIPTION OF SITE 1.01 East Farleigh station lies along Farleigh Lane and just to the north of the River Medway.
  • The Dover Pullman Boat Express

    The Dover Pullman Boat Express

    No. 7 - The Dover Pullman Boat Express First published in the Meccano Magazine July 1927 What the real name of the train is I could not say. For many years past the “Eleven o’clock” service from Victoria has been familiar to travellers all over the Continent but our train this month cannot rightly be called the “Eleven o’clock,” because it starts at 10:45! It is, in fact a first portion of the 11 a.m. train, designed to give its fortunate passengers the choice of places on the boat at Dover. Sometimes it is called the “Golden Arrow,” but that name belongs to the French express that runs in connection on the other side of the Channel, and which was described in the May article. The rudest name that I have heard bestowed upon the 10.45 down is that of the enginemen who, in joint recognition of the beautiful cream and umber livery of the Pullmans and the enormous weight of the train, have nicknamed it the “White Elephant.” It will be agreed that so famous a train as this needs a name of its own, and one day perhaps the Southern Railway authorities will think out some telling designation, to rank with the “Southern Belle” and the “Atlantic Express.” Meanwhile it is difficult to write an article of this character in description of a train without a name! 1 Popularity of the Train So far from being a “White Elephant” in reality, the 10.45 a.m. from Victoria is one of the best-paying trains on the line.
  • Railway Development Society Limited Is a Not-For-Profit Company Limited by Guarantee Registered in England & Wales No.5011634

    Railway Development Society Limited Is a Not-For-Profit Company Limited by Guarantee Registered in England & Wales No.5011634

    railse no. 128 June 2015 Railfuture in London and the South East quarterly branch newsletter The independent campaign for a better passenger and freight rail network Terminal decline of diesels Refreshing electrification London terminals – a group of 14 mainline stations The most recent Network Rail strategy on electrification spread around Zone 1, all but one of which are fully was the Network RUS published back in October 2009. equipped for electric traction, yet half of them are still Since September 2012 the Network RUS Working invaded by noisy, smelly and polluting diesel trains. Group: Electrification ‘refresh’ remit has been to review That’s not to mention the diesels’ higher operating and options for further electrification over the next 30 years, maintenance costs, and generally poorer performance and consider a priority for delivery. A consultation draft in terms of reliability and acceleration. Railfuture has is expected imminently, postponed from pre-purdah. long advocated the various benefits of electric traction. The drivers for further electrification are seen as: ~ reduced rolling stock leasing, maintenance and operating costs; ~ reduced infrastructure maintenance costs; ~ improved rolling stock reliability; ~ reduced journey times and potential reduction in rolling stock requirement; ~ shorter freight routeings and potential release of capacity through more consistent train performance; ~ ability to haul greater freight loads; ~ enhancing capacity on un-electrified routes through cascade of diesel rolling stock; ~ increased network availability through provision of diversionary routes; ~ lower emissions and reduced noise; ~ compliance with environmental policy legislation. The shape of things to come – IEP train for Paddington The ‘Smelly Seven’ stations are: Euston – Virgin’s Voyagers King’s Cross – Grand Central and Hull Trains London Bridge – Southern’s Turbostars, to Uckfield Marylebone – the only all-diesel London terminus Paddington – all, except Heathrow Express/Connect St.
  • Local Plan Transport Assessment (May 2021)

    Local Plan Transport Assessment (May 2021)

    www.bexley.gov.uk Local Plan Transport Assessment May 2021 Local Plan Transport Assessment Contents Local Plan Transport Assessment ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Contents .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Chapter 1 – Introduction........................................................................................................................................................... 6 Local Plan Transport Assessments .................................................................................................................................... 6 This LPTA for Bexley .............................................................................................................................................................. 6 Preface: Covid-19 and the Local Plan Transport Assessment ................................................................................. 7 Chapter 2 – Partnering with Stakeholders ......................................................................................................................... 9 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................................. 9 Highways England ..................................................................................................................................................................
  • AECOM Strategic Environmental Assessment

    AECOM Strategic Environmental Assessment

    Strategic Environmental Assessment for the Benenden Neighbourhood Plan Environmental Report to accompany the Regulation 14 consultation of the Neighbourhood Plan Benenden Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group August 2019 Strategic Environmental Assessment for the Environmental Report to accompany Benenden Neighbourhood Plan Regulation 14 consultation Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved by Tamsin Stevens Nick Chisholm-Batten Steve Smith Graduate Environmental Associate Director Technical Director Consultant Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position V2.0 9th August 2019 Consultation 9th August 2019 Nick Chisholm- Associate Director version Batten Prepared for: Benenden Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group Prepared by: AECOM Limited 3rd Floor, Portwall Place Portwall Lane Bristol BS1 6NA United Kingdom T: +44 117 901 7000 aecom.com © 2019 AECOM Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. Prepared for: Benenden Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group AECOM Strategic Environmental Assessment for the Environmental Report to
  • Ashford Station

    Ashford Station

    Ashford Station On the instruction of London and South Eastern Railway Limited Mobile Catering Opportunity On the instruction of LSER Catering Opportunity ASHFORD INTERNATIONAL STATION TN23 1EZ Ashford International railway station is a international and regional station in Ashford, Kent. It connects several railway lines, including High Speed 1 and the South Eastern main line. Domestic trains that call at Ashford are operated by Southeastern and Southern, and international services by Eurostar. Location Agreement Details An opportunity exists to let a street food pitch at the We are inviting offers from retailers looking to trade front of Ashford International Station adjacent to the documented by a Licence. taxi rank. The Licence will cost £575 plus vat. The council should be contacted to enquire whether a Description street traders licence will also be needed. The site is pop up pitch which would require the Rent tenant to remove the set up in full at the end of every day. They would need to bring in water and remove waste daily. The mobile vehicle would need to be run We are inviting offers in excess of £5000 plus vat per on a leisure battery or certificated LPG. No generators annum for this opportunity. would be permitted. Business plans detailing previous experience with We are not looking for a hot drinks offer here. visuals should be submitted with the financial offer. Information from the Office of the Rail Regulator stipulates that in 2019/2020 there were over 4.021 million passenger entries and exits per annum. AmeyTPT Limited and their clients give notice that: (i) These particulars do not form part of any offer or contract and must not be relied upon as statements or representations of fact.
  • A CRITICAL EVALUATION of the LOWER-MIDDLE PALAEOLITHIC ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORD of the CHALK UPLANDS of NORTHWEST EUROPE Lesley

    A CRITICAL EVALUATION of the LOWER-MIDDLE PALAEOLITHIC ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORD of the CHALK UPLANDS of NORTHWEST EUROPE Lesley

    A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF THE LOWER-MIDDLE PALAEOLITHIC ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORD OF THE CHALK UPLANDS OF NORTHWEST EUROPE The Chilterns, Pegsdon, Bedfordshire (photograph L. Blundell) Lesley Blundell UCL Thesis submitted for the degree of PhD September 2019 2 I, Lesley Blundell, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Signed: 3 4 Abstract Our understanding of early human behaviour has always been and continues to be predicated on an archaeological record unevenly distributed in space and time. More than 80% of British Lower-Middle Palaeolithic findspots were discovered during the late 19th/early 20th centuries, the majority from lowland fluvial contexts. Within the British planning process and some academic research, the resultant findspot distributions are taken at face value, with insufficient consideration of possible bias resulting from variables operating on their creation. This leads to areas of landscape outside the river valleys being considered to have only limited archaeological potential. This thesis was conceived as an attempt to analyse the findspot data of the Lower-Middle Palaeolithic record of the Chalk uplands of southeast Britain and northern France within a framework complex enough to allow bias in the formation of findspot distribution patterns and artefact preservation/discovery opportunities to be identified and scrutinised more closely. Taking a dynamic, landscape = record approach, this research explores the potential influence of geomorphology, 19th/early 20th century industrialisation and antiquarian collecting on the creation of the Lower- Middle Palaeolithic record through the opportunities created for artefact preservation and release.
  • Glyne Gap – Operational Assessment (Pdf)

    Glyne Gap – Operational Assessment (Pdf)

    Proposed new passenger station at Glyne Gap, Bexhill Technical note – Stage 3b: Operational assessment March 2013 Rother District Council, East Sussex County Council, Land Securities Group PLC Confidential Proposed311776 ITD newITN passenger1 A Document5 station at Glyne Gap,5 October Bexhill 2012 Technical note – Stage 3b: Operational assessment March 2013 Rother District Council, East Sussex County Council, Land Securities Group PLC Confidential Rother District Council, Town Hall, Bexhill-on-Sea TN39 3JX Mott MacDonald, Spring Bank House, 33 Stamford Street, Altrincham, Cheshire WA14 1ES, United Kingdom T +44(0) 161 926 4000 F +44(0) 161 926 4100, W www.mottmac.com Proposed new passenger station at Glyne Gap, Bexhill Confidential Issue and revision record Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description A 26 Nov 2012 MCS KP RJF Draft technical note summarising operational issues surrounding Glyne Gap station B 28 March 2013 MCS/KP KP/RJF RJF Final version with client comments addressed This document is issued for the party which commissioned it We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this and for specific purposes connected with the above-captioned document being relied upon by any other party, or being used project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission which used for any other purpose. is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties. This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other parties without consent from us and from the party which commissioned it.
  • SLIPPING AWAY DOVER's HISTORIC a Disappearing World MAISON DIEU See Page 46 and the Pubs of Ladywell

    SLIPPING AWAY DOVER's HISTORIC a Disappearing World MAISON DIEU See Page 46 and the Pubs of Ladywell

    Issue 46 Winter 2010/11 INSIDE SLIPPING AWAY DOVER'S HISTORIC A Disappearing World MAISON DIEU See Page 46 and the Pubs of Ladywell See Page 42 Getting to Know THE ABIGALE BREWERY Ashford's new brewers See Page 44 Channel Draught is published and ISSUE 46 ©2011 by the Deal Dover Winter 2010/11 Sandwich & District Branch of the elcome to 2011 and the latest issue of Channel Campaign for Real Ale W Draught - and one not without a note of sadness, www.camra-dds.org.uk as we report the deaths of Daphne Fagg, long serving landlady of the Carpenters Arms, Coldred; and of former Editorial Team Branch Member and Beery Boater, Phil Simpson. Editor & If you don't recognise the photograph on the front cover Advertising it's not because it's a little known local gem you have yet Martin Atkins to become acquainted with, but because it is in fact, a Editorial Assistants unique Worcestershire cider house. Known, for what­ Trisha Wells ever obscure reason, as the Monkey House, Roger John Pitcher Marples visited it recently and describes it in greater Design & Format detail elsewhere (see 2010 Divisional Trip). He also Steve Bell points out, that quite likely it will not to be there for much longer - a survivor from another age, whose life has perhaps finally run its course. For some two hundred Editorial Address years it happily supplied a needed community service, You can write to the without feeling any necessity to pursue wealth and ce­ lebrity, or promote and replicate itself all over the coun­ Editor c/o try.
  • Submissions to the Call for Evidence from Organisations

    Submissions to the Call for Evidence from Organisations

    Submissions to the call for evidence from organisations Ref Organisation RD - 1 Abbey Flyer Users Group (ABFLY) RD - 2 ASLEF RD - 3 C2c RD - 4 Chiltern Railways RD - 5 Clapham Transport Users Group RD - 6 London Borough of Ealing RD - 7 East Surrey Transport Committee RD – 8a East Sussex RD – 8b East Sussex Appendix RD - 9 London Borough of Enfield RD - 10 England’s Economic Heartland RD – 11a Enterprise M3 LEP RD – 11b Enterprise M3 LEP RD - 12 First Great Western RD – 13a Govia Thameslink Railway RD – 13b Govia Thameslink Railway (second submission) RD - 14 Hertfordshire County Council RD - 15 Institute for Public Policy Research RD - 16 Kent County Council RD - 17 London Councils RD - 18 London Travelwatch RD – 19a Mayor and TfL RD – 19b Mayor and TfL RD - 20 Mill Hill Neighbourhood Forum RD - 21 Network Rail RD – 22a Passenger Transport Executive Group (PTEG) RD – 22b Passenger Transport Executive Group (PTEG) – Annex RD - 23 London Borough of Redbridge RD - 24 Reigate, Redhill and District Rail Users Association RD - 25 RMT RD - 26 Sevenoaks Rail Travellers Association RD - 27 South London Partnership RD - 28 Southeastern RD - 29 Surrey County Council RD - 30 The Railway Consultancy RD - 31 Tonbridge Line Commuters RD - 32 Transport Focus RD - 33 West Midlands ITA RD – 34a West Sussex County Council RD – 34b West Sussex County Council Appendix RD - 1 Dear Mr Berry In responding to your consultation exercise at https://www.london.gov.uk/mayor-assembly/london- assembly/investigations/how-would-you-run-your-own-railway, I must firstly apologise for slightly missing the 1st July deadline, but nonetheless I hope that these views can still be taken into consideration by the Transport Committee.