DOCSLIB.ORG

BE RESPONSIBLE! 2011 Donors and Partners Since 2005

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Annua l Re p o rt and Pro g ram Overview BE RESPONSIBLE! 2011 Donors and Partners since 2005 Over $ 100,000 Under $100,000 BP Access Carnegie Corporation of New York Azerphone CASALS Bakcell Delegation of the European Union to British Embassy in Armenia ENGAGING Georgia CARE International in the Caucasus East West Management Institute (EWMI) Central Election Commission (CEC) CITIZENS, Government of Finland Council of American Overseas Research National Democratic Institute (NDI) Conciliation Resources (C-R) EMPOWERING Norwegian Government Czech Republic Development Partnership for Economics Education and Cooperation COMMUNITIES Resources (PEER) Danish Refugee Council (DRC) Statoil Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale The Federal Government of Belgium Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) UK Department for International Embassy of Canada in Georgia Development (DFID) Embassy of Netherlands UK Foreign and Commonwealth Oi ce EU Tacis (FCO) European Training Foundation (ETF) FOUNDING PARTNERS UN Association of Georgia (UNAG) European Commission (EC) United Nations Democracy Fund (UNDEF) Garadah Cement Unite d Sta te s Ag e nc y fo r Inte rna tio na l United Nations Development Program GARANTS De ve lo pme nt (USAID) (UNDP) Gulbekian Foundation US Department of State International Foundation for Electoral Swe dish Inte rnational De ve lopme nt Volkswagen Foundation Systems (IFES) Cooperation Agenc y (Sida) International Finance Corporation (IFC) Eurasia Foundation, a me mbe r o f the International Research & Exchanges EF Ne two rk, o ve rse e s the d isb urse me nt Board (IREX) o f c o re USAID fund s to EPF Jinishyan Foundation Mercy Corps National Council for Eurasian and East European Research (NCEER) National Opinion Research Center (NORC) Netherlands Institute for Multiparty Democracy (NIMD) Open Society Institute (OSI) Open Society Georgia Foundation (OSGF) Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) Philip Morris/Altria Polish Aid Robert Bosch Foundation/THK Saferworld Transparency International (TI) The Civilitas Foundation The Lodestar Foundation United Nations Children Fund (UNICEF) Western Union Foundation World Bank (WB) This publication is made possible be the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), and by the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida). The contents are the responsibility of Eurasia Partnership Foundation and do not necessarily represent the views of USAID, the U.S. Government, Sida or the Swedish Government. Annua l Re p o rt and Pro g ram Overview 2011 Letter of the President Dear Friends, At Eurasia Partnership Foundation (EPF), we believe that people need household survey, known as the Caucasus Barometer. The Caucasus to acquire the necessary skills and seize all opportunities to improve Barometer is widely used by researchers, academics, journalists, and their communities, their countries, and the conl ict-prone South analysts in writing articles and devising policy recommendations both Caucasus region as a whole. Through our work, we encourage local inside and outside of the South Caucasus. We have been excited to see ownership in the processes of identifying problems, devising solutions, that in 2011, important policy debates frequently included CRRC’s data and establishing a positive feedback loop between responsible civic as a basis for discussion. engagement and tangible improvements for the public. Our data has also been tracking an important phenomenon: people We design our programs to address the root causes of the obstacles working together to achieve common aims, across society. This that prevent people from recognizing and addressing the problems phenomenon, known as social capital, is vital for sustaining democratic they face in their communities. For example, after some unsuccessful institutions and for transforming the conl icts in the South Caucasus. attempts to give grants to think tanks to draft evidence-based public Using our own data, we design programs that seek to promote policy recommendations, we recognized that one of the underlying greater civic engagement, foster personal involvement, and engender problems was the lack of available quantitative data from households collective responsibility. These programs range from engaging youth on demographic, social, economic, and political issues. What data did to improve their own communities, through supporting constructive exist was either unpublished or unreliable. In addition to the lack of linkages via new media across boundaries to broaden perspectives data, researchers didn’t know how to integrate the data into their and open borders, to improving the institutional capacity of other research papers and policy arguments. non-governmental organizations to increase their i nancial stability and programmatic ef ectiveness. These activities are described in this In response to this, and with the indispensible support from Carnegie 2011 Annual Report. Corporation of New York, we created three research and resource centers to re-focus the skills of social scientists in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Responsibility to change our communities starts with each one of us. and Georgia on quantitative research and better qualitative methods. We encourage you to join us in engaging individuals and empowering These centers, known as the Caucasus Research Resource Center communities to develop democratic institutions and promote peace (CRRC), also began undertaking data collection through an annual and stability in the South Caucasus! George Zarubin Preside nt EPF ANNUAL REPO RT 2011 / 1 MISSION STATEMENT: To empower people to ef ect change for social justice and economic prosperity, through hands-on programs, helping them to improve their communities and their own lives. elaborated by EPF-led initiatives have been fuli lled by the Mandates and Programs: Government of Georgia (GoG). The European Commission’s decision to launch negotiations on a deep and comprehensive free trade Be A Responsible Citizen … area with Georgia, which was oi cially announced in December 2011, rel ects the GoG’s success in aligning its economic policies In order to facilitate stronger EU-Armenia relations, EPF, in with those of the EU. cooperation with the Yerevan Press Club (YPC) disseminated Eastern Partnership (EaP)-related information among all interested parties in In 2011, EPF’s Transparency in Municipal Service Delivery Armenia. As a result, the EaP weekly newsletter was launched as the program in Azerbaijan continued to cooperate with nine partner blog www.eaparmenianews.wordpress.com. Issues of the newsletter municipalities to improve the public transparency and strategic are posted weekly, as well as disseminated through a mailing list planning capabilities of Azerbaijani local governance. EPF expanded to over 800 recipients. The subscription is open to the public, and the pool of specialists involved in the program and engaged the number of subscribers is growing. Twenty i ve issues of the EaP prominent experts in the i eld of local governance issues. This allows Armenia Newsletter were produced in 2011. EPF to extend its ef orts in promoting the Municipal Performance Management System (MPMS) as a viable public service measurement EPF’s Youth Initiatives strengthen civic engagement among young tool at the national level. EPF succeeded in compiling all the contact people in the South Caucasus. Because such projects are of a cross- details of all 1,718 municipalities. Moreover, EPF has an electronic border nature, participants get to know groups of their peers version of the municipal budgets from 2005–2010 and the income from neighboring countries and thereby acquire cross-cultural and expenditures in 58 districts of Azerbaijan. EPF will be placing communication skills. In 2011, EPF expanded its Youth Bank program these resources on the program website in order to provide public in all three South Caucasus countries. Twelve more Youth Banks in access to this information. eleven targeted regions have been established in Azerbaijan. The total number of benei ciaries in Armenia has now reached over a thousand. In Georgia, twelve additional YBs were launched in areas Be Responsible for Improved populated by ethnic minorities. Policy Making … & Keep Government The Caucasus Barometer (CB), the annual survey carried out nationwide in Armenia, Georgia, and Azerbaijan, has been conducted Responsible! by the Caucasus Research Resource Centers (CRRC) since 2004. It explores the social, political, and economic dynamics in these three In 2011 EPF continued to promote positive reforms in the area of counties and of ers comparative data on individual and household food safety as part of its Toward European Integration program knowledge, attitudes, and practices. The Caucasus Barometer uses an in Georgia. Through its consistent and well-informed approach, identical methodological approach and survey instrument in all three EPF made a valuable contribution toward advancing Georgia’s countries. The collected data is open to all interested researchers and EU integration. A signii cant portion of the recommendations policymakers worldwide and is available for free on CRRC’s website EPF ANNUAL REPO RT 2011 / 2 at: www.crrccenters.org/caucasusbarometer/datasets/. The CB can also the border to collaborate. Most importantly, joint lobbying ef orts of be accessed via CRRC’s new online data analysis (ODA) tool at www. EPF’s Armenian and Turkish partners led to the Turkish government’s crrc.ge/oda. In
Recommended publications
  • Report on the Implementation of the State Strategy for Civic Equality And

    Report on the Implementation of the State Strategy for Civic Equality And

    GOVERNMENT OF GEORGIA STATE INTER-AGENCY COMMISSION OFFICE OF THE STATE MINISTER OF GEORGIA FOR RECONCILIATION AND CIVIC EQUALITY REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF STATE STRATEGY FOR CIVIC EQUALITY AND INTEGRATION AND 2016 ACTION PLAN FEBRUARY 2017 1 Office of the State Minister of Georgia for Reconciliation and Civic Equality Address: 3/5 G. Leonidze Street, Tbilisi 0134 Telephone: (+995 32) 2923299; (+995 32) 2922632 Website: www.smr.gov.ge E-mail: [email protected] 2 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ I. EQUAL AND FULL PARTICIPATION IN CIVIC AND POLITICAL LIFE .......................................................................... 5 SUPPORTING SMALL AND VULNERABLE ETHNIC MINORITY GROUPS ........................................................... 5 GENDER MAINSTREAMING ...................................................................................................................... 7 IMPROVING ACCESS TO STATE ADMINISTRATIONS, LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES AND MECHANISMS FOR REPRESENTATIVES OF EHTNIC MINORITIES .............................................................................................. 9 PROVIDING EQUAL ELECTORAL CONDITIONS FOR ETHNIC MINORITY VOTERS .......................................... 12 PROVIDING ACCESS TO MEDIA AND INFORMATION ................................................................................ 16 II. CREATING EQUAL SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES ..................................................
  • Reserved Domains

    Reserved Domains

    Countries: (.ge; .edu.ge; .org.ge; .net.ge; .pvt.ge; .school.ge) afghanistan cameroon ghana lebanon nigeria spain zambia albania canada greece lesotho norway srilanka zimbabwe algeria centralafricanrepublic grenada liberia oman sudan andorra chad guatemala libya pakistan suriname angola chile guinea liechtenstein palau swaziland antiguaandbarbuda china guinea-bissau lithuania palestina sweden argentina colombia guyana luxembourg panama switzerland armenia comoros haiti macau papuanewguinea syria aruba congo honduras macedonia paraguay taiwan australia costarica hongkong madagascar peru tajikistan austria croatia hungary malawi philippines tanzania azerbaijan cuba iceland malaysia poland thailand bahama curacao india maldives portugal timor-leste bahrain cyprus indonesia mali qatar togo bangladesh czechia iran malta romania tonga barbados denmark iraq marshallislands russia trinidadandtobago belarus djibouti ireland mauritania rwanda tunisia belgium dominica israel mauritius saintlucia turkey belize dominicanrepublic italy mexico samoa turkmenistan benin ecuador jamaica micronesia sanmarino tuvalu bhutan egypt japan moldova saudiarabia uganda birma elsalvador jordan monaco senegal ukraine bolivia equatorialguinea kazakhstan mongolia serbia unitedarabemirates bosniaandherzegovina eritrea kenya montenegro seychelles uk botswana estonia kiribati morocco sierraleone england brazil ethiopia northkorea mozambique singapore unitedkingdom brunei fiji korea namibia sintmaarten uruguay bulgaria finland southkorea nauru slovakia uzbekistan burkinafaso
  • Obstacles Impeding the Regional Integration of the Kvemo Kartli Region of Georgia

    Obstacles Impeding the Regional Integration of the Kvemo Kartli Region of Georgia

    Obstacles Impeding the Regional Integration of the Kvemo Kartli Region of Georgia Jonathan Wheatley ECMI Working Paper #23 February 2005 EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR MINORITY ISSUES (ECMI) Schiffbruecke 12 (Kompagnietor) D-24939 Flensburg ( +49-(0)461-14 14 9-0 fax +49-(0)461-14 14 9-19 e-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.ecmi.de ECMI Working Paper #23 European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) Director: Marc Weller © Copyright 2005 by the European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) Published in February 2005 by the European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) 2 Table of Contents I. Introduction.............................................................................4 II. Background Information........................................................5 Geographical Features and Ethnic Demography......................................................................5 Economy and Infrastructure....................................................................................................7 Local Structures of Administration........................................................................................10 III. Recent Historical Events.....................................................13 IV Actors in the Local Arena....................................................18 The Local Authorities...........................................................................................................18 Ethnic Balance in the Recruitment of Personnel....................................................................19 Political Parties.....................................................................................................................21
  • Georgia Regioonid

    Georgia Regioonid

    fsou laSifse salxino Salkhino quTufSara avadxara saqarTvelo Ritsa Avadkhara riwa baviu xifsTabaRnari Bagnari fsxu leseliZe Pskhu Leselidze iufSara reSevie GEORGIA Reshevie bzifi das. gumisTa gagra CxalTa Gagra amtyeli aafsTa alaxaZe xifsTa East Gumista aWandara aZibJara Alakhadze miusera Achandara Adzibdjara Miusera Chkhalta biWvinTa Amtkeli kelasuri Bichvinta kliCi Aafsta axalSeni Akhalsheni Rvandra gudauTa abluxvara aJara odiSi Ablukhvara Azhara sakeni Gudauta Amtkeli Gvandra sakeni nakra axali aToni Odishi mramba gumisTa q. ambrolauri Sakeni mazeri Akhali Atoni laTa kodori eSera kelasuri Mazeri mestia kostavas q. 12 Eshera Kelasuri Lata enguri JabeSi jampali nenskra Mestia amzara Djabeshi soxumi waneri Amzara svifi adiSi Sokhumi merxeuli ienaSi maWara Svipi Adishi Merkheuli \ Ienashi ganaxleba usgviri gulrifSi Ganakhleba otafi idliani Otafi Idliani Usgviri Gulripshi dranda Galidzga xaiSi lalxori yoruldaSi Dranda qosleTi Khaishi Lalkhori Koruldashi babuSara tyvarCeli moqvi barjaSi Babushera Tkvarcheli cana zesxo moqvi Barjashi saydari Zeskho tamiSi Tsana Mokvi Sakdari kindRi xeledula luxi galiZga bavari Kindgi xeledi Luji q. gori Bavari tamiSi beslaxuba CxorToli Kheledi lentexi cxeniswyali Tamishi Beslokhuba Chkhortoli Lentekhi stalinis q. 48 lajanuri sasaSi lebarde laskadura Rebi oqumi jvari Sasashi 79422 oCamCire Lebarde Gebi Okumi Jvari gvimbrali luxuniswyali Ochamchire okumi Sovi Gvimbrala aCigvara Chanchakhi Shovi Achigvara faxulani sakaura xde gudava gali saCino xobi uravi WanWaxi Pakhulani cageri asa Gudava Gali Sachino orbeli riweuli Uravi sakao stefanwmida Satili Andak Wuburxinji Tsageri Orbeli Sakao Stepantsmida uwera resi Shatili CxouSi walenjixa lajanuri Chuburkhinji lajanuri lixeTi Utsera Resi Wrebalo Garula Tsalenjikha Lajanuri Likheti oni tergi muco Chrebalo Oni Qqvebi sioni taleri rioni Sioni Mutso ganaxleba jumi Kvedi juTiswyali Taleri xidikari Ganakhleba Chanistskali bari kobi gudani zugdidi Cxorowyu nakuraleSi Khidikari jojora edisi juTa Bari kvaisi Gudani Chkhorotsku Nakuraleshi Edisi Kobi Juta q.
  • Draft Initial Environmental Examination Proposed Loan Georgia

    Draft Initial Environmental Examination Proposed Loan Georgia

    Draft Initial Environmental Examination Project Number: 52339-001 September 2020 Proposed Loan Georgia: Modern Skills for Better Jobs Sector Development Program Prepared by the Government of Georgia for the Asian Development Bank. This Draft Initial Environmental Examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section on ADB’s website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 25 August 2020) Currency unit – lari (GEL) GEL1.00 = €0.27556 or $0.32483 $1.00 = GEL3.0785 or €0.84832 €1.00 = GEL3.62894 or $1.17880 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank ACM – asbestos-containing materials CBTE – competency based training and assessment COVID-19 – coronavirus disease CSOs – civil society organizations EAC – Environmental Assessment Code EIA – environmental impact assessment EHS – environmental, health and safety EMP – environmental management plan EMS – environmental management system GDP – gross domestic product GFP – grievance focal person GoG – Government of Georgia GRM – grievance redress mechanism GRCE – grievance redress committee GRCN – grievance redress commission
  • Reserved Domains

    Reserved Domains

    Countries: (.ge; .edu.ge; .org.ge; .net.ge; .pvt.ge; .school.ge) afghanistan cameroon ghana greece lebanon nigeria spain zambia albania canada grenada lesotho liberia norway srilanka zimbabwe algeria centralafricanrepublic guatemala libya oman sudan andorra chad guinea liechtenstein pakistan palau suriname angola chile guinea-bissau lithuania palestina swaziland antiguaandbarbuda china guyana luxembourg panama sweden argentina colombia haiti macau papuanewguinea switzerland macedonia armenia comoros honduras paraguay peru syria madagascar aruba congo hongkong philippines taiwan malawi australia costarica hungary poland portugal tajikistan malaysia austria croatia iceland qatar romania tanzania maldives mali azerbaijan cuba india russia malta thailand bahama curacao indonesia marshallislands rwanda timor-leste bahrain cyprus iran iraq mauritania saintlucia togo tonga bangladesh czechia ireland mauritius samoa trinidadandtobago barbados denmark israel italy mexico sanmarino tunisia turkey belarus djibouti dominica jamaica micronesia saudiarabia turkmenistan belgium dominicanrepublic japan moldova senegal serbia tuvalu uganda seychelles belize ecuador egypt jordan monaco ukraine sierraleone benin elsalvador kazakhstan mongolia unitedarabemirates singapore bhutan equatorialguinea kenya montenegro uk england sintmaarten birma eritrea kiribati morocco unitedkingdom slovakia bolivia estonia northkorea mozambique uruguay slovenia bosniaandherzegovina korea namibia nauru uzbekistan ethiopia solomonislands botswana brazil southkorea nepal vatikan
  • Identity Issues Among Azerbaijani Population of Kvemo Kartli and Its

    Identity Issues Among Azerbaijani Population of Kvemo Kartli and Its

    Identity Issues among Azerbaijani Population of Kvemo Kartli and Its Political and Social Dimensions Identity Issues among Azerbaijani Population of Kvemo Kartli and Its Political and Social Dimensions Researchers: Sopo Zviadadze and Davit Jishkariani Research Coordinator: Tamta Mikeladze, Human Rights Education and Monitoring Center (EMC) The research was conducted within the project “Strengthening the Participation of National Minorities in Political Life” supported by the OSCE High Commissionaire on National Minorities. The project is implemented by Center for the studies of Ethnicity and multiculturalism (CSEM). Introduction: Recognition of religious and ethnic minorities, as well as the question of their social and cultural engagement is one of the major challenges for the Georgian state. This issue is closely linked to the emergence of Georgia as a judicial and democratic state, and its social consolidation. Minority politics in Georgia have been changing and evolving since the 1990s, however we have yet to witness suitable solutions to the challenges that this multi- religious and multiethnic state faces in regards to integration. Among these issues are low level of political participation, low level of formal education, discrimination and cultural hierarchies. Azerbaijanis represent the largest ethnic minority in Georgia. According to the 2014 census, ethnic minorities make up 13,2 % of the total population in Georgia, among them 6,3 % are Azerbaijanis.1 The majority of Azerbaijanis are densely populated in the Kvemo Kartli region, making up 41,75 % of the total population.2 There is scarce knowledge about history and challenges faced by the ethnic Azerbaijani community living in Georgia both in academic and political circles, and general public.
  • The Reasons of Xenophobic and Racist Manifestation

    The Reasons of Xenophobic and Racist Manifestation

    VIRUS OF URGENCY Part #2 by CIVIC IDEA HANDS FACE SPACE VIRUS Design: Tamar Tkabladze OF The following people are responsible for the research: Tamar Avaliani Nana Akopiani Zurab Akhobadze URGENCY Tinatin Khidasheli Giorgi Kanashvili Translation: Versio LLC Published by Civic IDEA within the library of the Virtual Democracy Academy with the financial support of the Black Sea Trust Foundation and an endowment Prodemos. The opinions and assessments expressed by the authors may not necessarily reflect the position of the funding organization. Accordingly, the Foundation is not responsible for the content of the material. by CIVIC IDEA © Civic IDEA, 2020 www.civicidea.ge HANDS FACE SPACE VIRUS OF URGENCY Part #2 by CIVIC IDEA HANDS FACE SPACE C O N T E N T C O N T E N T Introduction .....................................................................................................................................6 Methodology and Limitations .......................................................................................................9 Hate Speech Manifestation towards Azerbaijani Community and State Policy ....................10 The reasons of xenophobic and racist manifestation .............................................................14 Dominant Narrative - “We” and “Others” ..................................................................................15 Signs of alienation of cultures, erasure of local culture and domination of Georgian culture .....................................................................................................................18
  • Monitoring Results of Implementation of the National Concept and Action Plan on Tolerance and Civil Integration

    Monitoring Results of Implementation of the National Concept and Action Plan on Tolerance and Civil Integration

    Monitoring results of implementation of the National Concept and Action Plan on Tolerance and Civil Integration Monitoring results of implementation of the National Concept and Action Plan on Tolerance and Civil Integration Council of National Minorities under the auspices of the Public Defender of Georgia 2010-2011 Published by the Tolerance Center under the Public Defender of Georgia with the support of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in Georgia, United States Agency for International Development (USAID) funded Advancing National Integration (ANI) Project of the United Nations Association of Georgia (UNAG), and the European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI). The views expressed in this publication are those of the author/s and do not necessarily represent those of UNDP, USAID, UNAG and ECMI. ISBN 978-9941-0-5067-1 Content 2010 Rule of Law; Political Integration and Civil Participation; Social and Regional Integration 11 State Language and Education 17 Culture and Identity Preservation 45 Media and Access to Information 70 2011 Rule of Law; Political Integration and Civil Participation; Social and Regional Integration 87 State Language and Education 95 Culture and Identity Preservations 126 Media and Access to Information 146 AnneX AnneX #1. National Concept for Tolerance and Civil Integration 165 AnneX #2. Action Plan 170 Introduction This publication presents findings of 2010-2011 monitoring of implementation of the Na- tional Concept and Action Plan on Tolerance and Civil Integration. The monitoring was conducted by the Council of National Minorities under the Public Defender of Georgia with the aim to assess state programs in support of civil integration and to elaborate rec- ommendations for addressing existing challenges.
  • GEORGIA National-Level Review of the Implementation of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action Beijing

    GEORGIA National-Level Review of the Implementation of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action Beijing

    GEORGIA National-level Review of the Implementation of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action Beijing +25 1 Table of Contents Section I – Priorities, Achievements, Challenges and Setbacks ................................ 3 Section II - Progress across the 12 critical areas of concern ...................................18 1. Inclusive development, shared prosperity and decent work ..........................18 2. Poverty eradication, social protection and social services .............................27 4. Participation, accountability and gender-responsive institutions ...................56 5. Peaceful and inclusive societies .....................................................................67 6. Environmental conservation, protection and rehabilitation ...........................77 Section III – National Institutions and processes.....................................................81 Section IV – Data and Statistics ...............................................................................90 Annex 1 – Global gender-specific SDG indicators available in Georgia .............97 Annex 2 – Additional Country Gender Specific Indicators ...............................100 2 Section I – Priorities, Achievements, Challenges and Setbacks Georgia is an independent, democratic state confirmed by the Referendum of 31 March 1991 and by the Act of Restoration of the State Independence of Georgia of 9 April 1991. The territorial integrity of Georgia and the inviolability of the state frontiers are recognized by the UN and other international

  • Naming and Renaming of Places in Minority Inhabited Areas in Georgia

    NOMEN EST OMEN? NAMING AND RENAMING OF PLACES IN MINORITY INHABITED AREAS IN GEORGIA María Diego Gordón ECMI WORKING PAPER #103 December 2017 ECMI- Working Paper # 103 The European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) is a non-partisan institution founded in 1996 by the Governments of the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, and the German State of Schleswig-Holstein. ECMI was established in Flensburg, at the heart of the Danish-German border region, in order to draw from the encouraging example of peaceful coexistence between minorities and majorities achieved here. ECMI’s aim is to promote interdisciplinary research on issues related to minorities and majorities in a European perspective and to contribute to the improvement of interethnic relations in those parts of Western and Eastern Europe where ethno- political tension and conflict prevail. ECMI Working Papers are written either by the staff of ECMI or by outside authors commissioned by the Centre. As ECMI does not propagate opinions of its own, the views expressed in any of its publications are the sole responsibility of the author concerned. ECMI Working Paper # 103 European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) Director: Prof. Dr. Tove H. Malloy © ECMI 2017 ISSN 1435-9812; ISSN-Internet 2196-4890 2 | P a g e ECMI- Working Paper # 103 NOMEN EST OMEN? NAMING AND RE- NAMING OF PLACES IN MINORITY INHABITED AREAS IN GEROGIA Georgia is home for almost 490,000 members of different ethnic minority groups, people that are mostly inhabiting the Kvemo Kartli and Samkhtse-Javakheti regions. Since the beginning of the 1990’s claims have been made by local activists and some NGOs regarding the renaming of their villages in these areas.

  • Annual Report 2010 1 Mandates and Programs

    Annual Report and Program Overview Inspire, Encourage, Act! 2010 Engaging FOUNDING PARTNERS Citizens, United States Agency for International Development Empowering Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency Eurasia Foundation, a member of the EF Network, oversees the Communities disbursement of core USAID funds to EPF. DONORS AND PARTNERS SINCE 2005 Over $ 100,000 Under $100,000 BP Access Carnegie Corporation of New York Azerphone CASALS Bakcell Delegation of the European Union British Embassy in Armenia to Georgia CARE International in the Caucasus National Democratic Institute (NDI) Council of American Overseas Norwegian Government Research Partnership for Economics Education Danish Refugee Council (DRC) and Resources (PEER) Embassy of Canada in Georgia Statoil EU Tacis UK Department for International Garadah Cement Development (DFID) GARANTS UK Foreign and Commonwealth GTZ Office (FCO) IFES UN Association of Georgia (UNAG) International Finance Corporation (IFC) United Nations Democracy Fund (UNDEF) Jinishyan Foundation United Nations Development National Council for Eurasian and East Program (UNDP) European Research (NCEER) US Department of State National Opinion Research Center Open Society Institute (OSI) Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) Philip Morris/Altria Polish Aid Robert Bosch Foundation/THK The Lodestar Foundation United Nations Children Fund (UNICEF) Western Union Foundation World Bank This publication is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), and by the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida). The contents are the responsibility of Eurasia Partnership Foundation and do not necessarily represent the views of USAID, the U.S. Government, Sida or the Swedish Government. LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT Dear Friends, participation and promote As a foundation with offices in communities today.