DOCSLIB.ORG

For Sale Acheson North

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
For Sale Acheson North FOR SALE ACHESON NORTH 109.14 ACRE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT SITE ACHESON EDMONTON HIGHWAYHIGHWAY 4444 YELLOWHEADYELLOWHEAD HIGHWAYHIGHWAY TOWNSHIPTOWNSHIP ROADROAD 532A532A 4,000,000 3,900,000 $ 35,734/acre • NW corner of Yellowhead Highway and Highway 44 interchange • Direct exposure to the Yellowhead Highway; Alberta's East/West thoroughfare • Adjacent to Acheson's existing development, short commute to Edmonton's westend, Anthony Henday ring road, Spruce Grove and Stony Plain • Site is zoned Highway Commercial Industrial Corridor District (HCIC) offering multiple permitted uses RE/MAX Commercial Capital Brandon Hughes, Associate Broker Scott Hughes, Broker/Owner Ritchie Mill Investment Sales & Leasing Investment Sales & Leasing #302, 10171 Saskatchewan Drive 780 966 0699 780 915 7895 Edmonton, AB T6E 4R5 [email protected] [email protected] rcedm.ca | 780 757 1010 ACHESON NORTH SPRUCE GROVE YELLOWHEADYELLOWHEAD HIGHWAYHIGHWAY TOWNSHIPTOWNSHIP ROADROAD 532A532A HIGHWAYHIGHWAY 4444 PROPERTY DETAILS Legal Plan 7823142, Block A & B Block A = 60.16 Acres Site Block B = 48.98 Acres Area Total = 109.14 Acres 2020 OFF-SITE DEVELOPMENT LEVIES Transportation Levy $2,287 per ha = $925/acre Net Water Levy $12,721 per ha = $5,148/acre Developable ± 85 Acres Sanitary Sewer Levy $1,235 per ha = $500/acre HCIC - Highway Commercial Zoning Storm Water Levy $90 per ha = $36/acre Industrial Corridor District Estimated Total Offsite Levy Charges = $6,610/acre Services Fully Serviceable *rates are subject to change Taxes $5,912.45 (2019 actual) DEVELOPMENT CHARGES/RECOVERIES • $2,559/acre = payment of recovery for the front-ending costs for the construction and installation of two water trunk mains, this payment is exclusive of off-site levies, both payments due and payable upon application for subdivision and prior to development/building permit approval or subdivision endorsement from Parkland County HIGH-LEVEL OVERVIEW • County of Parkland is pro-development - ready to assist developers, investors, tenants and owner users • Acheson has easy access to all major transportation corridors • Lower Operating Costs - Parkland County has low commercial and industrial tax rates and NO business taxes • Access to skilled labour and close to world class education and technical training centres • Alberta Transportation approval is required prior to development of the site SERVICING AND CONNECTION POINTS • 300mm existing water main is located in close proximity to the east • Sanitary service is located on-site, a tie-in to the Alberta Region Wastewater Commission Line • Natural gas, power & telephone are available at the property line WWW.RCEDM.CA Eric Tan / Aug. 12, 14 / J:\14100\14150_Parkland County Industrial\02_CADD\20_Drafting\Development Concept #4.dwg CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT PLANS 250m Eric Tan / Aug. 12, 14 / J:\14100\14150_Parkland County Industrial\02_CADD\20_Drafting\Development Concept #4.dwg TOWNSHIP RD 532A 176.44 14.14 97.72 120.02 94.98 141.58 11.12 73.51 14.03 1.7 ha 8.88 ACCESS 80.13 (4.2 acre) 16.87 14.56 HIGHWAY 44 14.25 LOCATION ACCESS 1.3 ha ACCESS LOCATION 90.01 179.45 100.00 100.01 LOCATION (3.2 acre) 1.6 ha 100.36 (4.0 acre) 163.32 149.33 1.6 ha 151.25 141.27 1.5 ha 130.02 (3.7 acre) 156.14 (4.0 acre) 1.7 ha 93.51 93.50 (4.2 acre) 20.00 20.00 1.3 ha 102.65 104.35 178.13 100.01 100.01 (3.2 acre) 102.34 104.35 130.02 20.00 20.00 1.7 ha 222.51 222.51 95.01 3.5 ha 95.00 (4.2 acre) (8.6 acre) DUE-DILIGENCE 1.6 ha 250m 1.6 ha 176.79 151.25 153.82 151.27 1.3 ha 30m (4.0 acre) (4.0 acre) 153.82 100.01 100.01 (3.2 acre) 30m DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE 130.02 TOWNSHIP RD 532A 1.7 ha 176.44 96.00 2020(4.2 acre) 96.01 100.00 14.14 156.14 104.35 97.72 171.12 169.38 Parkland County Off-Site 120.02 94.98 141.58 11.12 73.51 14.03 1.7 20.00ha 8.88 175.44 ACCESS1.3 ha 80.13 (4.2 acre) 16.87 Levy/Boundary Recoveries HIGHWAY 44 100.01 14.56 14.25 LOCATION(3.2 acre) 100.01 ACCESS 1.3 ha ACCESS LOCATION 90.01 179.45 Estimate Report 100.00 100.01 1.9 ha LOCATION 102.50 100.36 112.50 112.50 1.9 ha (3.2 acre) 1.6 ha 102.51 (4.0130.02 acre) (4.7 acre) (4.7 acre) 1.7 ha 86.65 97.96 163.32 14.14 149.33 1.6 ha (4.2 acre) 151.25 141.27 1.5 ha (4.0 acre)14.25 20.00 9.78 130.02 (3.7 acre) 156.14 15.00 31.47 159.38 1.7 ha 159.38 20191.89 93.51 93.50 (4.2 acre) 171.48 9.78 20.00 1.9 ha 20.00 Phase I Environmental 102.65 23.54 104.35 172.48 1.3 ha (4.7 acre) 26.84 178.13 15.43 5.68 100.01 100.00 95.27 104.74 100.01 (3.2 acre) 30.07Site Assessment 23.549.78 9.78 46.25 102.34 104.35 24.11 2.1 ha 221.36 (5.2 acre) 130.02 20.00 20.00 1.7 ha 160.69 222.51 204.93 222.51 95.01 118.63 95.00 1.4 ha (4.2 acre) 139.04 2019 3.5 ha 1.7 ha 1.7 ha (3.5 acre) (8.6 acre) 171.34 166.13 (4.2 acre) (4.2 acre) 169.64 1.6 ha 2.0 ha 1.6 ha 176.79 HCIC Zoning District (update) 151.25 153.82 151.27 63.19 1.3 ha 30m (4.0 acre) (4.0 acre) 153.82 100.01 (4.9 acre) 100.01 (3.2 acre) 30m 104.77 130.02 188.24 7.70 1.7 ha 96.00 2015 100.14 (4.290.27 acre) 96.01 100.00 156.14 104.35 GeotechnicalAT LANDS Feasibility of 171.12 169.38 1.3 ha 20.00 175.44 Groundwater2.5 ha Control Report 100.01 HIGHWAY 16 (6.2 acre) (3.2 acre) 100.01 1.9 ha 102.50 112.50 112.50 1.9 ha 102.51 130.02 (4.7 acre) (4.7 acre) 1.7 ha 86.65 14.14 (4.2 acre) 97.96 14.25 20.00 2014 9.78 15.00 31.47 159.38 159.38 1.89 171.48 Topographical Survey 1.9 ha 9.78 23.54 15.43 172.48 (4.7 acre) 26.84 100.00 95.27 104.74 5.68 30.07 23.549.78 9.78 46.25 2013 24.11 2.1 ha 221.36 (5.2 acre) Atim Creek Area Structure Plan 204.93 160.69 1.4 ha 118.63 1.7 ha 1.7 ha 139.04 (3.5 acre) 171.34 166.13 2.0 ha (4.2 acre) (4.2 acre) 169.64 (4.9 acre) 63.19 LEGEND 104.77 SITE AREA (44.1 ha) / (109.0 acre) 188.24 7.70 100.14 INDUSTRIAL AREA (16.9 ha) / (41.9 acre) 90.27 AT LANDS 2.5 ha HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL AREA (17.4 ha) / (43.0 acre) HIGHWAY 16 (6.2 acre) PUL AREA (0.6 ha) / (1.5 acre) ER AREA (1.9 ha) / (4.7 acre) STORM WATER MANAGEMENT FACILITY (3.5 ha) / (8.6 acre) INTERNAL CIRCULATION (3.8 ha) / (9.3 acre) * TOTAL LENGTH OF ROADWAY = 1,319 m CONCONI FT HOLDINGS LTD. 14150 WWW.RCEDM.CA OPTION #4 LEGENDPARKLAND COUNTY DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT SITE AREA (44.1 ha) / (109.0 acre) AUGUST 2014 INDUSTRIAL AREA (16.9 ha) / (41.9 acre) HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL AREA (17.4 ha) / (43.0 acre) PUL AREA (0.6 ha) / (1.5 acre) ER AREA (1.9 ha) / (4.7 acre) STORM WATER MANAGEMENT FACILITY (3.5 ha) / (8.6 acre) INTERNAL CIRCULATION (3.8 ha) / (9.3 acre) * TOTAL LENGTH OF ROADWAY = 1,319 m CONCONI FT HOLDINGS LTD. 14150 OPTION #4 PARKLAND COUNTY DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT AUGUST 2014 DRIVE TIMES Acheson 2 minutes Spruce Grove 4 minutes HIGHWAY 44 HIGHWAY 44 Edmonton 9 minutes Villeneuve Airport 10 minutes ST. ALBERT Stony Plain 11 minutes St. Albert 12 minutes SITE YELLOWHEADYELLOWHEAD HIGHWAYHIGHWAY(61,700(61,700 VPDVPD 2018)2018) ACHESON SPRUCE GROVE EDMONTON ANTHONY HENDAY ANTHONY ANTHONY HENDAY ANTHONY HIGHWAYHIGHWAY 16A16A STONY PLAIN To receive additional information about this property, please contact: Brandon Hughes, Associate Broker Scott Hughes, Broker/Owner RE/MAX Commercial Capital | Ritchie Mill Investment Sales & Leasing Investment Sales & Leasing #302, 10171 Saskatchewan Drive 780 966 0699 780 915 7895 Edmonton, AB T6E 4R5 [email protected] [email protected] rcedm.ca | 780 757 1010 The information contained herein was obtained from sources deemed to be reliable and is believed to be true; it has not been verified and as such, cannot be warranted nor form a part of any future contract. All measurements need to be independently verified by the Purchaser/Tenant. WWW.RCEDM.CA.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tri-Municipal Regional Transit Plan City of Spruce Grove | Town of Stony Plain | Parkland County
    Tri-Municipal Regional Transit Plan City of Spruce Grove | Town of Stony Plain | Parkland County Executive Summary | February 2018 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In collaboration with the City of Spruce Grove, the Town of Stony Plain and Parkland County, Watt Consulting Group and our project partners would like to thank all those Tri-Municipal Region municipal staff, stakeholders and service providers who provided their feedback and ideas into this process. In particular, we are grateful to the contributions of the project Steering Committee Members Erin Felker (Parkland County), Patrick Inglis (City of Spruce Grove), and Miles Dibble (Town of Stony Plain). The project also appreciatively acknowledges the support of the Canada-Alberta Public Transit Infrastructure Fund (PTIF). 2 | Tri-Municipal Regional Transit Plan – Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction Project Process and Timeline The Tri-Municipal Regional Transit Plan seeks to deliver a Undertaken from April to December 2017, the project was unified vision for future transit service and its supporting guided by a Steering Committee made up of staff infrastructure and strategies for the City of Spruce Grove, representatives from the three partner municipalities. With theTown of Stony Plain and Parkland County, Alberta (the “Tri- many previous transit plans and materials undertaken for the Municipal Region”). respective individual communities, the Regional Transit Plan mainly focused on consolidating existing information and Developed by Watt Consulting Group in collaboration with ensuring alignment on a regional scale. these municipalities, the Regional Transit Plan encompasses all forms of transit in the local communities, as well as The Plan project team also conducted interviews with key local connections to the Edmonton Metropolitan Region.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Report FINAL
    City of North Battleford Transportation Master Plan Technical Report FINAL December 2017 CA000196 City of North Battleford Transportation Master Plan Technical Report FINAL Project noCA000196 17 12 21 Prepared by : ______________________________ Rosemarie Draskovic, P.Eng., PTOE, PTP Verified by : ______________________________ René Rosvold, P.Eng. 17 12 21 CIMA+ 333 – 3rd Avenue N, 4th Floor Saskatoon SK S7K 2M2 December 2017 CA000196 City of North Battleford Transportation Master Plan –Technical Report FINAL December 2017 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Study Purpose .................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Study Team ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Regional Context ................................................................................................................................................ 3 1.4 Previous Plans and Studies .............................................................................................................................. 5 1.4.1 Land Use Plans ....................................................................................................................................... 5 1.4.2 Transportation Studies ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2018-2019 County Map Book
    2018 - 2019 OWNERSHIP MAPBOOK PARKLAND COUNTY OWNERSHIP MAP LEGEND Lake or River ´ Parkland County Lease County Day Use Park Provincial Highways ´´ ´´ ´´ ´ Paved Surface Highway Map Grid (Township) ´´´´´ County Land County Service ´´ ´´´ Y w Y ´ ´ Y Gravel Surface Highway ´´´ First Nations Reserve* Y Y Crown Land RCMP Station ´´´´ Y Yw County Roads City, Town or Village* Jx No Thru Traffic County Office O Paved Surface Road Hamlet '( Sewage Lagoon Fire Hall Gravel Surface Road Industrial Area !» Sewage Transfer Station Hospital Non-County Roads N Crown/Grazing Reserve or Natural Area Buck for Wildlife Area Cemetery NNNN NNN N N N N N NN TransAlta Corporation Waste Transfer Station Community Hall Paved Surface Road NNN N N N NNNN NNN N N N N N N N N N NN N N Tomahawk Cattle Ranch Ltd Swimming Pool Church Gravel Surface Road N N N NN N Railway Electoral Division Sports Park School Stream Campground *Excluded from County Jurisdiction Parkland County Land Ownership Mapbook - Produced using digital geographic data provided by Parkland County and ALTALIS. NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ERRORS OR OMISSIONS Copyright © 2018 by Parkland County, Parkland County, Alberta, Canada Not to be copied in whole or in part by any means without the expressed written permission of the copyright holder. R.08 R.07 R.06 R.05 R.04 R.03 R.02 R.01 R.27 R.26 R.25 T.56 T.55 T.55 Table of Contents E T.54 T.54 Page 13 Magnolia Fallis Wabamun Page T.53 T.53 Page 4 Entwistle Spruce Gainford Grove 1 #133B Page Page 10 Page#1 3 3B 7 WABAMUN Duffield Carvel LAKE Stony Acheson 14 Plain
    [Show full text]
  • County of Vermilion River Transportation Profile
    COUNTY OF VERMILION RIVER TRANSPORTATION PROFILE Towns Vermilion A great location! Villages Kitscoty The County of Vermilion Riv- Marwayne er is a large, rural municipal- Paradise Valley ity with a diversified econo- Hamlets my, and a population of over Blackfoot 8,000 people. The County is a Clandonald dynamic, friendly place to do Dewberry business with strong growth Islay potential. There are business McLaughlin opportunities in the oil and gas Rivercourse Tulliby Lake and agricultural sectors of the Streamstown community, reasonable land costs, and it boasts a skilled, highly adaptable labour force. The County of Vermilion River is well served with a network of quality transportation systems. The transportation infrastructure in the county is a major factor in support- ing the primary industries in the region including the oil and gas industry, related oil and gas service industries, and the County’s varied agriculture operations. The County has over 1,000 farms, and 1.3M acres of farmable and hay land. The County’s integrat- ed highway, rail and air systems allow for efficient delivery and transport of goods and people throughout the communities in County of Vermilion River. Highways The main east-west highway traversing central Alberta, This network of primary and secondary highways serves the Provincial Highway 16, travels directly through the Coun- region, providing access to markets in Saskatchewan, con- ty of Vermilion River. The highway is designated as a core necting the oil and agriculture rich areas in the County and route in Canada’s National Highway System and forms to the north and south, without the need of dealing with the Yellowhead branch of the Trans-Canada Highway.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridge Construction at BF 09254 Request For
    Request for Quotations For Tributary to Sturgeon River: Bridge Construction at BF 09254 Request for Quotation No.: Q201124EN Issued: November 25, 2020 Submission Deadline: December 16, 2020 at 14:00:00 local time Posted to: Alberta Purchasing Connection at www.purchasingconnection.ca Parkland County website at www.parklandcounty.com/Bids RFQ No. Q201124EN – Tributary to Sturgeon River Bridge Construction at BF 09254 Page 1 of 67 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1 – INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................. 3 PART 2 – EVALUATION OF QUOTATIONS..................................................................... 6 PART 3 – TERMS OF REFERENCE AND GOVERNING LAW ........................................... 8 PART 4 – RFQ PARTICULARS....................................................................................... 10 APPENDIX A - FORM OF AGREEMENT......................................................................... 16 APPENDIX B – QUOTATION FORM .............................................................................. 18 APPENDIX C – RATE BID FORM ................................................................................... 21 APPENDIX D – CONTRACTOR QUESTIONNAIRE FORM ............................................. 26 APPENDIX E – SPECIAL PROVISIONS .......................................................................... 32 APPENDIX F – PLANS, DRAWING AND PERMITS ....................................................... 59 APPENDIX G – CONTRACT INFORMATION DOCUMENTS .........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Parkland-County-And-Lac-Ste.-Anne
    3 GOALS: 6 TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE POLICIES: 7 ENVIRONMENTAL POLICIES: Parkland County/Lac Ste. Anne County ` a. To establish in good faith a method for collaboration between both municipalities on land use matters. 6.1 Transportation Network Referral(s) – Any proposed changes or expansion to the transportation 7.1 Environmentally Signicant Areas – Environmentally Signicant Areas of regional and provincial b. To reduce the potential for future conict(s) and encourage understanding. network within the Plan Area shall be referred to the adjacent municipality and Alberta Transportation (if signicance have been identied within Map 3 - Environmental Features. Intermunicipal Development Plan c. To identify and conserve environmental features, recreation, and open space. required) for review and comment prior to any changes (see Map 2 - Transportation). 7.2 Environmental Reserve – Both Counties shall follow provincial regulations as it pertains to the dedication, Bylaw 2018-19 d. To harmonise and conrm future land uses, infrastructure, transportation, and development within the 6.2 Alberta Transportation – Where applicable, the Counties will work together with Alberta classication, and use of Environmental Reserve, Municipal Reserve, and Conservation Reserve in an eort Plan Area. Transportation to maintain a safe and eective transportation network within the Plan Area. to maintain the integrity of the systems identied in Map 3. At time of development and/or subdivision, e. To provide a process and procedure for dispute resolution, amendments and administration of the Plan. 6.3 Transportation Networks – All new and expanding development(s) within the Plan Area shall ensure both Counties will require the dedication of Environmental Reserve lands along the shoreline of Isle Lake, f.
    [Show full text]
  • Communities Within Specialized and Rural Municipalities (May 2019)
    Communities Within Specialized and Rural Municipalities Updated May 24, 2019 Municipal Services Branch 17th Floor Commerce Place 10155 - 102 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4L4 Phone: 780-427-2225 Fax: 780-420-1016 E-mail: [email protected] COMMUNITIES WITHIN SPECIALIZED AND RURAL MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES COMMUNITY STATUS MUNICIPALITY Abee Hamlet Thorhild County Acadia Valley Hamlet Municipal District of Acadia No. 34 ACME Village Kneehill County Aetna Hamlet Cardston County ALBERTA BEACH Village Lac Ste. Anne County Alcomdale Hamlet Sturgeon County Alder Flats Hamlet County of Wetaskiwin No. 10 Aldersyde Hamlet Foothills County Alhambra Hamlet Clearwater County ALIX Village Lacombe County ALLIANCE Village Flagstaff County Altario Hamlet Special Areas Board AMISK Village Municipal District of Provost No. 52 ANDREW Village Lamont County Antler Lake Hamlet Strathcona County Anzac Hamlet Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo Ardley Hamlet Red Deer County Ardmore Hamlet Municipal District of Bonnyville No. 87 Ardrossan Hamlet Strathcona County ARGENTIA BEACH Summer Village County of Wetaskiwin No. 10 Armena Hamlet Camrose County ARROWWOOD Village Vulcan County Ashmont Hamlet County of St. Paul No. 19 ATHABASCA Town Athabasca County Atmore Hamlet Athabasca County Balzac Hamlet Rocky View County BANFF Town Improvement District No. 09 (Banff) BARNWELL Village Municipal District of Taber BARONS Village Lethbridge County BARRHEAD Town County of Barrhead No. 11 BASHAW Town Camrose County BASSANO Town County of Newell BAWLF Village Camrose County Beauvallon Hamlet County of Two Hills No. 21 Beaver Crossing Hamlet Municipal District of Bonnyville No. 87 Beaver Lake Hamlet Lac La Biche County Beaver Mines Hamlet Municipal District of Pincher Creek No. 9 Beaverdam Hamlet Municipal District of Bonnyville No.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Development Strategy
    Red Deer County Economic Development Strategy January 2017 Page 2 Red Deer County Economic Development Strategy Table of Contents Section 1 – Introduction to The Red Deer County Strategic Planning Process ...................... 3 1.1 Red Deer County Today – Summary of The Baseline Report ............................................................. 4 Key Demographics .............................................................................................................................. 4 Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats ................................................................................ 5 Overview of Economic Sectors ........................................................................................................... 6 Key Characteristics of Major Industries ............................................................................................. 6 1.2 Red Deer County – The Plan Going Forward ...................................................................................... 8 The Plan’s Vision, Guiding Principles & Strategic Objectives ............................................................. 8 Understanding This Economic Development Plan ........................................................................... 10 Economic Development in the County ............................................................................................ 11 Section 2 – The Strategy Recommendations ............................................................................13 2.1 How This Strategy Works
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C Traffic Forecast Report
    APPENDIX C TRAFFIC FORECAST REPORT JUNEAU ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS SUPPLEMENTAL DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT STATE PROJECT NUMBER: 71100 FEDERAL PROJECT NUMBER: STP-000S (131) Prepared for Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities 6860 Glacier Highway Juneau, Alaska 99801-7999 Prepared by McDowell Group, Inc. Juneau · Anchorage With Assistance From Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon OCTOBER 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ..............................................................................................1 Introduction and Methodology...............................................................................3 Introduction......................................................................................................3 Methodology....................................................................................................5 Data Sources...................................................................................................5 Notes and Limitations ......................................................................................6 Baseline Lynn Canal Traffic ..................................................................................7 AHMS Traffic Characteristics...........................................................................7 Lynn Canal Ferry Markets................................................................................9 Freight Traffic.................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Communities Within Rural Municipal
    Communities Within Specialized and Rural Municipalities Updated December 18, 2020 Municipal Services Branch 17th Floor Commerce Place 10155 - 102 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4L4 Phone: 780-427-2225 Fax: 780-420-1016 E-mail: [email protected] COMMUNITIES WITHIN SPECIALIZED AND RURAL MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES COMMUNITY STATUS MUNICIPALITY Abee Hamlet Thorhild County Acadia Valley Hamlet Municipal District of Acadia No. 34 ACME Village Kneehill County Aetna Hamlet Cardston County AIRDRIE City Rocky View County ALBERTA BEACH Village Lac Ste. Anne County Alcomdale Hamlet Sturgeon County Alder Flats Hamlet County of Wetaskiwin No. 10 Aldersyde Hamlet Foothills County Alhambra Hamlet Clearwater County ALIX Village Lacombe County ALLIANCE Village Flagstaff County Altario Hamlet Special Areas Board AMISK Village Municipal District of Provost No. 52 ANDREW Village Lamont County Antler Lake Hamlet Strathcona County Anzac Hamlet Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo Ardley Hamlet Red Deer County Ardmore Hamlet Municipal District of Bonnyville No. 87 Ardrossan Hamlet Strathcona County ARGENTIA BEACH Summer Village County of Wetaskiwin No. 10 Armena Hamlet Camrose County ARROWWOOD Village Vulcan County Ashmont Hamlet County of St. Paul No. 19 ATHABASCA Town Athabasca County Atmore Hamlet Athabasca County Balzac Hamlet Rocky View County BANFF Town Improvement District No. 09 (Banff) BARNWELL Village Municipal District of Taber BARONS Village Lethbridge County BARRHEAD Town County of Barrhead No. 11 BASHAW Town Camrose County BASSANO Town County of Newell BAWLF Village Camrose County BEAUMONT City Leduc County Beauvallon Hamlet County of Two Hills No. 21 Beaver Crossing Hamlet Municipal District of Bonnyville No. 87 Beaver Lake Hamlet Lac La Biche County Beaver Mines Hamlet Municipal District of Pincher Creek No.
    [Show full text]
  • Genesee Area Structure Plan
    Leduc County Genesee Area Structure Plan Recreation Economy Geotechnical Environment Transportation Aggregate June 2013 Suite 101 – 1101 5th Street Nisku, AB T9E 2X3 www.leduc-county.com Phone: 780-955-3555 [Type your address] [Type your BOBB BOBB G E N Acknowledgements E S Contributors: [Type your phone number] E D’Anne O’Keefe Planning E Charlene Haverland Planning A Doug Woodliffe Planning R Kim Koroll Planning E [Type your e-mail address] A Lorne Stadnick Public Works and Engineering Nicholas Moffatt Parks and Recreation S Dave Desimone Plan Graphic Design T Genivar Transportation Assessment R U Genivar Biophysical and Environmental Assessment C Genivar Geotechnical and Hydrogeological Assessment T Genivar Public Engagement U R E P L A N TABLE OF CONTENTS PART A - INTRODUCTION ...................................................................... 5 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................. 6 1.1 Purpose of the Area Structure Plan .............................................................................. 6 1.2 Vision ............................................................................................................................ 6 PART B - BACKGROUND ....................................................................... 8 2.0 BACKGROUND .............................................................................. 9 2.1 History ........................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Plan Location,
    [Show full text]
  • Alberta Municipalities Classified by Region*
    Alberta Municipalities Classified by Region* South Region* Central Region* North East Region* Legal Name AMC Reference Legal Name AMC Reference Legal Name AMC Reference Cardston County ------- M.D. No. 6 Acadia No. 34 MD 34 M.D. No. 34 Beaver County ------- County No. 9 Cypress County ------- M.D. No. 1 Bighorn No. 8 MD 8 M.D. No. 8 Bonnyville No. 87 MD 87 M.D. No. 87 Foothills No. 31 MD 31 M.D. No. 31 Calgary ------- Calgary Camrose County No. 22 CO 22 County No. 22 Forty Mile County No. 8 CO 8 County No.8 Clearwater County ------- M.D. No. 99 Flagstaff County ------- County No. 29 Lethbridge County ------- County No. 26 Kneehill County ------- M.D. No. 48 Lakeland County ------- M.D. No. 87 Newell County No. 4 CO 4 County No. 4 Lacombe County ------- County No. 14 Lamont County ------- County No. 30 Pincher Creek No. 9 MD 9 M.D. No. 9 Mountain View County ------- County No. 17 Minburn County No. 27 CO 27 County No. 27 Ranchland No. 66 MD 66 M.D. No. 66 Paintearth County No. 18 CO 18 County No. 18 Opportunity No. 17 MD 17 M.D. No. 17 Taber MD M.D. No. 14 Ponoka County ------- County No. 3 Provost No. 52 MD 52 M.D. No. 52 Vulcan County ------- County No. 2 Red Deer County ------- County No. 23 Smoky Lake County ------- County No. 13 Warner County No. 5 CO 5 County No. 5 Rocky View No. 44 MD 44 M.D. No. 44 St. Paul County No. 19 CO 19 County No.
    [Show full text]