DOCSLIB.ORG

Flagstaff County Boards and Committees

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Flagstaff County Boards and Committees tutoTAPP Flagstaff County Boards and Committees COUNCILLOR REPORT Meeting Information Councillor Name* Board/ Committee Name* If Other, Please Type Name Don Kroetch Other meeting with Minister Sohi Date of Meeting* Length of meeting Location of Meeting 01- Aug- 19 Between 2 and 3 hours canada place edmonton Did you Attend?* Did you receive any meeting materials?* t: Yes fNo Digital If you received an Agenda Package, minutes, or reports, please upload here. OR please forward to Administration by email. WD Notes. docx 24. 94KB Agenda for Infrastructure Engagement 82. 08KB August 1st( 002). docx Notes from the Meeting Any recommendations to be included for the next Council meeting?* r Yes C' No Notes for Discussion* 106 million available for, six coal impact communities, 4 in Alberta, 2 in Sask hope to have process finalized in October funds dispersed in April Anna Curtis to work with breoc on process Submitted By Added to eScribe* Date Received Next Council Meeting* Grace Bratland F Yes c No 01- Aug- 19 14- Aug- 19 AGENDA CanadaCoalTransitionInitiative –Infrastructure Fund EngagementSession August1,2019 1:00P.M.to 3:30P.M. Location: EdmontonMinisters’rd RegionalOffice Room352,3 FloorCanadaPlace, 9700JasperAvenue Edmonton, Alberta Attendees: ChrisWarwick, Mayor,Town ofHanna ConnieDeadlock, CouncillorTownofHannaandChairofCactusCorridorEconomic Development JordonChristianson, ChairofSpecialAreasBoardandmemberofHannaClimate ChangeTaskForce RodShaigec, Mayor, ParklandCounty DarrellHollands, DeputyMayor, ParklandCounty LauraSwaine, A/ChiefAdministrativeOfficer, ParklandCounty GeorgeGlazier, CouncillorofPaintearthCountyandChairofBattleRiverEconomic OpportunitiesCommittee (BREOC) DonKroetch, ReeveofFlagstaffCountyandmemberofBREOC TanniDoblanko, Mayor, LeducCounty RickSmith, Councillor/JTTFmember,Leduc County JordanEvans, ManagerofLongRangePlanning, LeducCounty RobertMurray, ManagingDirectorofDentons, ConsultanttoLeducCounty GoC: TheHonourableAmarjeetSohi, MinisterofNaturalResourcesandMemberof ParliamentforEdmontonMillWoods JoannePawluk, ActingAssistantDeputyMinister –Alberta Region, WesternEconomic DiversificationCanada (WD) Recorders: AnnaCurtis, Manager, CanadaCoalTransitionInitiative (CCTI) – AlbertaRegion, WD PaolaCasillas, PolicyAnalyst,CCTI - AlbertaRegion, WD EventItinerary: 1:00p.m. CoffeeandNetworking 1:30p.m. WelcomeandIntroductions - JoannePawluk, A/ADMWDAlbertaRegion Openingremarks - TheHonourableAmarjeetSohi, MinisterofNaturalResources 1:40p.m. CommunityOverviews: 1:40 –Cactus Corridor 1:50 –Parkland County 2:00 –BREOC 2:10 –Leduc County 2:20p.m. OpendiscussionwithMinisterSohi 3:15p.m. Wrap-up 3:30p.m. Meetingconcludes RuralConnectivity: MajorchallengefortheBREOCRegionandsomeuniquenessinthatweare remoterural. Includesaccessissueswithinternet,cell andradio Thischallengehasanegativeeffectonallaspectsofecdev,from theability toattractbusiness, keepingyouthinarea,being abletobeapartofthegig economy,continuing educationandhealthservices, accessinggov programs,and businesssupport Havingastrongruralconnectivitystrategyandinfrastructurewouldopen newandendlesspossibilityfortheBREOCregion ThroughourReda (RegionalEconomicDevelopmentAlliance –ours isBRAED; BattleRiverAllianceforEconomicDevelopment),a feasibilitystudywasdone,it wasquicklyidentifiedthatourregionfallswellbelowbasiclevelofservice identifiedinthefederalgovernmentconnectivitystrategy. Inthestudyitwasalso identifiedthathavingaruralhigh-speedaccessinourregioncanbeaccomplish. Asaregionwearetakingthenextstepsintryingtoachievethegoalofhigh- speedaccessforall.We havestarteddevelopingabusinessplanandmodelthat wouldhavetheabilitytohaveasustainablereliableserviceforallruralremote communities. possibilityofusingthemodelweareworkingontobeexpandedto anyruralremotetransitioningcommunities. Biggesthurtleinbeingabletoaccomplishahighlevelofconnectivityinrural remoteareasuchastheBREOCregion,is thecostofinfrastructure.We will continuetotryaengagealllevelsofgovernmentandlookforstrategicpartners, tohelptheBREOCregiongrowanddiversifyoureconomyandlessenour dependenceonresousesbasedeconomy SkiHill: TheValleySkiHillisanotherIntermuncipalpartnershipwithintheBREOCregion andhasastrongopportunitytobringtourismtotheforefrontasaneconomic driver.A feasibilitystudyhasrecentlybeendoneontheskihillandit’sbeen foundthatmaintainingthehillwouldbepossibleandbeneficial. Bringingin tourismdollarstoourbusinesscommunityallowsustodiversifytheeconomyin anoilandagdependentregion. Theskihillalsohaspositiveeffectsoncitizen retentionandattraction. Incollaboration, PaintearthandFlagstaff,identified thestrongpositiveimpactof thevalleyskihillhasonourregionandworkedtogetheronthefeasibilitystudy. Recentlyabusinessplanwasdevelopedhoweverinordertobesuccessfultheski hillisnowinneedofaninfrastructureupgradeonthefacilityandhill.Both countiescontinuetoengagetheskillhillclub,looking forpossiblepartnersin investinginourregion MarketAccess TheBREOCregionwiththecactuscorridorsharestheveteranmemorialhighway hwy36)that givesourregionnorth/southmarketaccess. Thisisaveryviableand economicalalternativetothehighway2corridor.A uniquecharacteristicofthe veteran’smemorialhighwayisitintersectionwiththebattleriverrailline.The BRRlineisownedanoperatedbyanewgenerationcoop. thisshortlinecanmove productandmaterialonits60-milelinetothetotheCNlinethatgivesmarket accesstoeastandwest.The BREOCboardwillcontinuetolookatwaysto leveragetheuniquemarketaccesstoallindustryandwilldevelopan infrastructureplaninthefuturetohelptheentireeastcentralregiongrowour economy. StrongadvantagewithworkingwithBBRispriorityofservicetoany industrylocatedintheregion, TheBIOSALIXprogramatthePaintearthMine, whichisdemonstrating theuseofmunicipal residualstogrowwillowsforbiomassfeedstock, iswhattheprojectteamhopeswillbethe tippingpointforthecreationofagreeneconomyhubforthecommunity ofForestburgtohelp transitionthecommunity awayfromcoal. The optionsforthebiomassareendless, butwill requirethebuildingofinfrastructure tousethebiomassinthemostadvantageous way. This infrastructure includesarangeofoptionsfromasyntheticfuelplanttogreenalgaeenergyhuts toacompostfacility. PartoftheBIOSALIXprojectincludesanOptionsAssessmentthatwillbe completedbyAlbertaInnovates, whichwillbetterhoneinonthebestinfrastructure tobuild. Apark (day-use/camping) atanendpitlakeforfishingandrecreation. Oncereclamation isdone therewillberoughly5-6endpitlakesthatwecanturnafewinto troutpondswithaparkfor publictoaccess.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WAM Industrial Park Local Area Structure Plan with Amendments
    (Consolidation including Bylaw 04-16 March 22, 2016) WAM Development Group WAM Industrial Park Local Area Structure Plan Prepared by: UMA Engineering Ltd. 17007 - 107 Avenue Edmonton, AB T 780-486-7000 F 780-486-7070 www.uma.aecom.com E527-003-00-01-4.6.1 January 2008 WAM Industrial Park - Local Area Structure Plan Office Consolidation – March 22, 2016 Bylaws Amending WAM Industrial Park - LASP Bylaw No. Date 04-16 March 22, 2016 Maps 5 – 10 Replaced with Dec. 17, 2015 Version of Maps 5 - 10 NOTE: Anyone using this consolidation is advised that the amendment has been included for convenience only and that the original WAM Industrial Park LASP and the original amending Bylaws should be consulted for all purposes of interpreting and applying the Bylaws. BY-LAW NO. 40-07 OF LEDUC COUNTY IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA A BYLAW OF LEDUC COUNTY TO ADOPT THE WAM INDUSTRIAL PARK LOCAL AREA STRUCTURE PLAN. WHEREAS The Council of Leduc County deems it to be in the public interest to adopt the WAM Industrial Park Local Area Structure Plan; NOW THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF LEDUC COUNTY, DULY ASSEMBLED, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: That the WAM Industrial Park Local Area Structure Plan, being Schedule "An attached and forming part of this Bylaw, be adopted. This Bylaw shall take effect on the date of the third reading. Read a first time this 28th day of August, A.D., 2007. SEAL COUNTY MANAGER Read a second time this 29th day of January, A.D., 2008. Read a third time this 29th day of January, A.D., 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Tri-Municipal Regional Transit Plan City of Spruce Grove | Town of Stony Plain | Parkland County
    Tri-Municipal Regional Transit Plan City of Spruce Grove | Town of Stony Plain | Parkland County Executive Summary | February 2018 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In collaboration with the City of Spruce Grove, the Town of Stony Plain and Parkland County, Watt Consulting Group and our project partners would like to thank all those Tri-Municipal Region municipal staff, stakeholders and service providers who provided their feedback and ideas into this process. In particular, we are grateful to the contributions of the project Steering Committee Members Erin Felker (Parkland County), Patrick Inglis (City of Spruce Grove), and Miles Dibble (Town of Stony Plain). The project also appreciatively acknowledges the support of the Canada-Alberta Public Transit Infrastructure Fund (PTIF). 2 | Tri-Municipal Regional Transit Plan – Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction Project Process and Timeline The Tri-Municipal Regional Transit Plan seeks to deliver a Undertaken from April to December 2017, the project was unified vision for future transit service and its supporting guided by a Steering Committee made up of staff infrastructure and strategies for the City of Spruce Grove, representatives from the three partner municipalities. With theTown of Stony Plain and Parkland County, Alberta (the “Tri- many previous transit plans and materials undertaken for the Municipal Region”). respective individual communities, the Regional Transit Plan mainly focused on consolidating existing information and Developed by Watt Consulting Group in collaboration with ensuring alignment on a regional scale. these municipalities, the Regional Transit Plan encompasses all forms of transit in the local communities, as well as The Plan project team also conducted interviews with key local connections to the Edmonton Metropolitan Region.
    [Show full text]
  • Olivia Colic
    Olivia Colic Managing Partner, Alberta A seasoned and trusted real estate lawyer, clients Region turn to Olivia for her practical and timely solutions Partner to help them overcome obstacles facing the real Calgary estate industry [email protected] Olivia is McCarthy Tétrault’s Regional Managing Partner for Alberta and t. +1 403-260-3661 is a partner in the firm’s Real Property & Planning Group in Calgary. Her practice encompasses all areas of commercial real estate including acquisition and sale transactions, domestic and cross-border financing, development and leasing. With more than 25 years’ experience acting as a trusted real estate advisor to property owners, lenders and borrowers, landlords, managers and tenants, Olivia’s solutions- Olivia Colic orientated approach ensures clients are successful in mitigating any multi-faceted contractual, operational and financial issues they may Managing Partner, Alberta Region face throughout Canada and abroad. Partner Calgary She’s good to deal with and knows her stuff. She takes reasonable positions on matters and her work is of a high quality. [email protected] t. +1 403-260-3661 — CHAMBERS CANADA, REAL ESTATE - ALBERTA, CLIENT INTERVIEW Bar Admission Having acted for several major property developers, pension funds, Alberta 1995 REIT’s as well as other private investors on the acquisition and disposition of office and industrial properties, hotels and shopping Law School centres, clients benefit from Olivia’s wide-range of experience on many University of Alberta commercial property financings ranging from single property loans to large financings involving complex ownership structures and properties Practices across multiple jurisdictions. She is also one of only a few lawyers in Real Estate Canada to have been invited to become a Fellow of the American Real Property Acquisitions & College of Mortgage Attorneys.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fiscal Implications of Land Use
    Cost of Community Services study for Red Deer County The Fiscal Implications of Land Use: A “Cost of Community Services” Study for Red Deer County MAIN REPORT The Fiscal Implications of Land Use: A “Cost of Community Services” Study for Red Deer County Report 2: MAIN REPORT Prepared by Guy Greenaway and Stephanie Sanders April 2006 Miistakis Institute c/o EVDS - University of Calgary 2500 University Drive NW Calgary, AB T2N 1N4 Ph: 403-220-8968 Email: [email protected] Web: www.rockies.ca Acknowledgements In developing the methods for this study, we relied heavily on those who had gone before, and those with expertise in this area. We are particularly indebted to Mark Haggerty and Ray Rasker of the Sonoran Institute, Carl Mailler and Julia Freedgood of the American Farmland Trust, Bill Symonds of Alberta Municipal Affairs, Larissa Muller of the Faculty of Environmental Design, University of Calgary, and Mike Quinn and Greg Chernoff of the Miistakis Institute, University of Calgary. We are also grateful to the other municipalities who took the time to participate and contribute to the Cost of Community Services Multi-Municipality Workshop, specifically the representatives from County of Camrose, County of Stettler, Lacombe County, Leduc County, MD of Rocky View, Mountain View County, Strathcona County, Sturgeon County, Town of Bowden, and Wheatland County. One of the greatest difficulties we anticipated with conducting this project was appearing in the Red Deer County offices as outside researchers and facing a group of managers and staff who saw this study as an unclear academic exercise that was a drain on their already full calendars.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018-2019 County Map Book
    2018 - 2019 OWNERSHIP MAPBOOK PARKLAND COUNTY OWNERSHIP MAP LEGEND Lake or River ´ Parkland County Lease County Day Use Park Provincial Highways ´´ ´´ ´´ ´ Paved Surface Highway Map Grid (Township) ´´´´´ County Land County Service ´´ ´´´ Y w Y ´ ´ Y Gravel Surface Highway ´´´ First Nations Reserve* Y Y Crown Land RCMP Station ´´´´ Y Yw County Roads City, Town or Village* Jx No Thru Traffic County Office O Paved Surface Road Hamlet '( Sewage Lagoon Fire Hall Gravel Surface Road Industrial Area !» Sewage Transfer Station Hospital Non-County Roads N Crown/Grazing Reserve or Natural Area Buck for Wildlife Area Cemetery NNNN NNN N N N N N NN TransAlta Corporation Waste Transfer Station Community Hall Paved Surface Road NNN N N N NNNN NNN N N N N N N N N N NN N N Tomahawk Cattle Ranch Ltd Swimming Pool Church Gravel Surface Road N N N NN N Railway Electoral Division Sports Park School Stream Campground *Excluded from County Jurisdiction Parkland County Land Ownership Mapbook - Produced using digital geographic data provided by Parkland County and ALTALIS. NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ERRORS OR OMISSIONS Copyright © 2018 by Parkland County, Parkland County, Alberta, Canada Not to be copied in whole or in part by any means without the expressed written permission of the copyright holder. R.08 R.07 R.06 R.05 R.04 R.03 R.02 R.01 R.27 R.26 R.25 T.56 T.55 T.55 Table of Contents E T.54 T.54 Page 13 Magnolia Fallis Wabamun Page T.53 T.53 Page 4 Entwistle Spruce Gainford Grove 1 #133B Page Page 10 Page#1 3 3B 7 WABAMUN Duffield Carvel LAKE Stony Acheson 14 Plain
    [Show full text]
  • Bridge Construction at BF 09254 Request For
    Request for Quotations For Tributary to Sturgeon River: Bridge Construction at BF 09254 Request for Quotation No.: Q201124EN Issued: November 25, 2020 Submission Deadline: December 16, 2020 at 14:00:00 local time Posted to: Alberta Purchasing Connection at www.purchasingconnection.ca Parkland County website at www.parklandcounty.com/Bids RFQ No. Q201124EN – Tributary to Sturgeon River Bridge Construction at BF 09254 Page 1 of 67 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1 – INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................. 3 PART 2 – EVALUATION OF QUOTATIONS..................................................................... 6 PART 3 – TERMS OF REFERENCE AND GOVERNING LAW ........................................... 8 PART 4 – RFQ PARTICULARS....................................................................................... 10 APPENDIX A - FORM OF AGREEMENT......................................................................... 16 APPENDIX B – QUOTATION FORM .............................................................................. 18 APPENDIX C – RATE BID FORM ................................................................................... 21 APPENDIX D – CONTRACTOR QUESTIONNAIRE FORM ............................................. 26 APPENDIX E – SPECIAL PROVISIONS .......................................................................... 32 APPENDIX F – PLANS, DRAWING AND PERMITS ....................................................... 59 APPENDIX G – CONTRACT INFORMATION DOCUMENTS .........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Parkland-County-And-Lac-Ste.-Anne
    3 GOALS: 6 TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE POLICIES: 7 ENVIRONMENTAL POLICIES: Parkland County/Lac Ste. Anne County ` a. To establish in good faith a method for collaboration between both municipalities on land use matters. 6.1 Transportation Network Referral(s) – Any proposed changes or expansion to the transportation 7.1 Environmentally Signicant Areas – Environmentally Signicant Areas of regional and provincial b. To reduce the potential for future conict(s) and encourage understanding. network within the Plan Area shall be referred to the adjacent municipality and Alberta Transportation (if signicance have been identied within Map 3 - Environmental Features. Intermunicipal Development Plan c. To identify and conserve environmental features, recreation, and open space. required) for review and comment prior to any changes (see Map 2 - Transportation). 7.2 Environmental Reserve – Both Counties shall follow provincial regulations as it pertains to the dedication, Bylaw 2018-19 d. To harmonise and conrm future land uses, infrastructure, transportation, and development within the 6.2 Alberta Transportation – Where applicable, the Counties will work together with Alberta classication, and use of Environmental Reserve, Municipal Reserve, and Conservation Reserve in an eort Plan Area. Transportation to maintain a safe and eective transportation network within the Plan Area. to maintain the integrity of the systems identied in Map 3. At time of development and/or subdivision, e. To provide a process and procedure for dispute resolution, amendments and administration of the Plan. 6.3 Transportation Networks – All new and expanding development(s) within the Plan Area shall ensure both Counties will require the dedication of Environmental Reserve lands along the shoreline of Isle Lake, f.
    [Show full text]
  • Communities Within Specialized and Rural Municipalities (May 2019)
    Communities Within Specialized and Rural Municipalities Updated May 24, 2019 Municipal Services Branch 17th Floor Commerce Place 10155 - 102 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4L4 Phone: 780-427-2225 Fax: 780-420-1016 E-mail: [email protected] COMMUNITIES WITHIN SPECIALIZED AND RURAL MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES COMMUNITY STATUS MUNICIPALITY Abee Hamlet Thorhild County Acadia Valley Hamlet Municipal District of Acadia No. 34 ACME Village Kneehill County Aetna Hamlet Cardston County ALBERTA BEACH Village Lac Ste. Anne County Alcomdale Hamlet Sturgeon County Alder Flats Hamlet County of Wetaskiwin No. 10 Aldersyde Hamlet Foothills County Alhambra Hamlet Clearwater County ALIX Village Lacombe County ALLIANCE Village Flagstaff County Altario Hamlet Special Areas Board AMISK Village Municipal District of Provost No. 52 ANDREW Village Lamont County Antler Lake Hamlet Strathcona County Anzac Hamlet Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo Ardley Hamlet Red Deer County Ardmore Hamlet Municipal District of Bonnyville No. 87 Ardrossan Hamlet Strathcona County ARGENTIA BEACH Summer Village County of Wetaskiwin No. 10 Armena Hamlet Camrose County ARROWWOOD Village Vulcan County Ashmont Hamlet County of St. Paul No. 19 ATHABASCA Town Athabasca County Atmore Hamlet Athabasca County Balzac Hamlet Rocky View County BANFF Town Improvement District No. 09 (Banff) BARNWELL Village Municipal District of Taber BARONS Village Lethbridge County BARRHEAD Town County of Barrhead No. 11 BASHAW Town Camrose County BASSANO Town County of Newell BAWLF Village Camrose County Beauvallon Hamlet County of Two Hills No. 21 Beaver Crossing Hamlet Municipal District of Bonnyville No. 87 Beaver Lake Hamlet Lac La Biche County Beaver Mines Hamlet Municipal District of Pincher Creek No. 9 Beaverdam Hamlet Municipal District of Bonnyville No.
    [Show full text]
  • RVC Recreation Governance Report
    Note: This report reflects the direction chosen by Rocky View County Council at their July 23, 2019 Council Meeting. RVC Recreation Governance Report Theresa Cochran Rocky View County 7/23/2019 0 | P a g e Table of Contents Contents Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3 Background ................................................................................................................................ 4 Recreation Grants .................................................................................................................. 6 Why Change? ............................................................................................................................ 6 Recreation Governance Best Practice Research ....................................................................... 7 Rural Alberta Recreation Overview ......................................................................................... 8 Rural and Specialized Alberta Municipalities Recreation Survey ................................................ 8 A New Way Forward for Rocky View County ............................................................................10 Recreation Governance
    [Show full text]
  • Doc 637116739200408611.Pdf
    9th Street (Nisku Spine Road) Functional Planning Study August 2008 Plan Update between 25 Avenue and the City of Edmonton Corporate Limits e t a d p U 8 0 t e e r t s 0 h t 9 2 CONFIDENTIALITY AND © COPYRIGHT This document is for the sole use of the addressee and Associated Engineering Alberta Ltd. The document contains proprietary and confidential information that shall not be reproduced in any manner or disclosed to or discussed with any other parties without the express written permission of Associated Engineering Alberta Ltd. Information in this document is to be considered the intellectual property of Associated Engineering Alberta Ltd. in accordance with Canadian copyright law. This report was prepared by Associated Engineering Alberta Ltd. for the account of Leduc County. The material in it reflects Associated Engineering Alberta Ltd.’s best judgement, in light of the information available to it, at the time of preparation. Any use which a third party makes of this report, or any reliance on or decisions to be made based on it, are the responsibility of such third parties. Associated Engineering Alberta Ltd. accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this report. REPORT Table of Contents SECTION PAGE NO. Table of Contents i 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Study Background 1 1.2 Study Purpose and Scope 1 2 Issues 2 2.1 East/West Freeway 2 2.2 Building in NW ¼ of 31-50-24 2 2.3 Western Asset Management (WAM) development 3 3 Revised Plan 3 4 Cost Estimates 4 4.1 Quantities and Breakdown Strategy 4 4.2 Unit Costs 4 4.3 Summary of Cost Estimates 4 5 Closure 6 Appendix A - Staging Plans Appendix B - Cost Estimates i P:\20053920\00_9thStFPStudy\Engineering\04.02_Preliminary_Design_Report\rpt-NSR 2008 Update r1.doc REPORT 1 Introduction 1.1 Study Background Nisku Spine Road (locally known as 9 Street) is an important north-south corridor through Nisku in Leduc County.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Fieldman's Directory
    AGRICULTURAL FIELDMAN’S DIRECTORY SOUTH REGION (37 members) M.D. of Acadia Rick Niwa (AF) Ph: (403) 972-3808 Box 30, Acadia Valley Kristyn Smigelski(AAF) Shop: (403) 972-3755 T0J 0A0 Fax: (403) 972-3833 Cell: (403) 664-9236(Rick) Cell: (403) 923-8273(Krystin) email [email protected] Cardston County Rod Foggin (AF) Ph: (403) 653-4977 Box 580, Cardston Stephen Bevans (AAF) Fax: (403) 653-1126 T0K 0K0 Cell: (403) 382-8236 (Rod) Cell: (403) 634-9474 (Stephen) email: [email protected] [email protected] Municipality of Crowsnest Pass Ph: (403)-563-8658 (Kim) Mail: Kim Lutz (AF) email: [email protected] Box 600 Crowsnest Pass, AB T0K 0E0 Office: Room 1, MDM Community Center 2802 - 222 Street Bellevue, AB Cypress County Jason Storch (AF)President Ph: (403) 526-2888 816 2nd Ave, Dunmore Lisa Monkman(AAF) Fax: (403) 526-8958 T1B 0K3 Cell: (403) 878-7021(Lisa) email: [email protected] [email protected] M.D. of Foothills Jeff Porter (AF) Ph: (403) 603-5410 (Jeff) Box 5605, High River Bree Webb (AAF) Shop: (403) 652-2423 (Bree) T1V 1M7 ext 5446 Fax : (403) 603-5414 email : [email protected] [email protected] County of Forty Mile Dave Matz (AF) Ph: (403) 867-3530 Box 160, Foremost Darrell VanArragon (AAF) Fax: (403) 867-2242 T0K 0X0 Kevin Jesske (Fieldman’s Asst.) Cell: (403) 647-8080 (Dave) email: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Lethbridge County Gary Secrist(AF) Ph: (403) 328-5525 905-4th Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Development Strategy
    Red Deer County Economic Development Strategy January 2017 Page 2 Red Deer County Economic Development Strategy Table of Contents Section 1 – Introduction to The Red Deer County Strategic Planning Process ...................... 3 1.1 Red Deer County Today – Summary of The Baseline Report ............................................................. 4 Key Demographics .............................................................................................................................. 4 Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats ................................................................................ 5 Overview of Economic Sectors ........................................................................................................... 6 Key Characteristics of Major Industries ............................................................................................. 6 1.2 Red Deer County – The Plan Going Forward ...................................................................................... 8 The Plan’s Vision, Guiding Principles & Strategic Objectives ............................................................. 8 Understanding This Economic Development Plan ........................................................................... 10 Economic Development in the County ............................................................................................ 11 Section 2 – The Strategy Recommendations ............................................................................13 2.1 How This Strategy Works
    [Show full text]