DOCSLIB.ORG

Ender P1.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ender P1.Indd 14 NEW VISION, Monday, September 3, 2018 NATIONAL NEWS AMBITIOUS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY IS SAID TO HAVE LED THE RENOVATIONS Supreme Court orders fresh National Theatre renovation hearing of five-year-old case By Hillary Nsambu of the High Court in 2013, seeking a declaration that it The Supreme Court has was the lawful owner of the leaves arts lovers in doubt faulted the High Court for land, as the lease issued to it is dismissing a land case that for 20 years, commencing from has been in the courts of law August 2006. By John Agaba for years without hearing it on Represented by Dr Joseph its merits. Byamugisha and Brian Osenyu, Joseph Wasswa is an ardent In a judgment delivered Hwan Sung sued as a registered theatre goer. He does not miss recently, the Supreme Court owner who had possession of Tuesday’s dance sessions nor directed the Land Division of the suit-property and that the comedy nights on Thursdays at the High Court to hear the respondent was a continuing the National Theatre, located in case afresh and finally decide trespasser. the heart of Kampala. it on its merits. Upon appeal, the Court So, when he heard that the The Land Division of the of Appeal upheld the High auditorium, first built in 1956, High Court had dismissed the Court’s decision dismissing was under renovation, he was suit with costs before hearing it Hwan Sung’s lawsuit, hence excited. on its merits, on a technicality its appeal to the Supreme It was announced that the that it was time-barred. This Court, that has directed the National Theatre would paint means, according to the High High Court to hear the case its ageing walls and repair the Court, that the case was filed afresh. sound system and flickering in court late. The coram was chaired by lights. The Supreme Court’s Justice Eldad Mwangusya. The But, as Pius Bigirimana, the directive followed an appeal by other members were Justice permanent secretary in the a South Korean multipurpose Faith Mwondha, Richard Ministry of Gender, Labour company, Hwan Sung Limited, Buteera, Augustine Nshimye and Social Development, challenging the dismissal of and Jotham Tumwesigye. inspected the newly renovated its case by the Land Division “If the trial judge had studied premises on Wednesday, before of the High Court without the plaint carefully, he would officially commissioning it, the hearing and deciding on it on have found differently from smile on Wasswa’s face slowly its merits. what he held in his judgment,” faded. This was not the kind of Bigirimana signs an art piece during the commissioning of the renovated National Hwan Sung had sought to Justice Richard Buteera, who renovation he expected to see. Theatre on Wednesday. Photo by Godiver Asege evict a local company — M wrote the main judgment, “You cannot tell the difference and D Timber Merchants and observed. between the before and after,” markings from years ago and they would have loved to see Transporters Limited — from a The Supreme Court also Wasswa said. the walls are still dirty. BETWEEN THE LINES a much more trendy theatre. prime piece of land situated in blamed the Court of Appeal for Wasswa, like several other Bigirimana said they worked Nonetheless, they commended near Kyambogo. ruling that the appellant (Hwan theatregoers, complained on the leaking roof and n The renovations are the Government for its said to have cost sh3.1b. The disputed property that Sung Ltd) had no automatic about the theatre’s new look, renovated office rooms at levels effort. measures approximately right of appeal against the which required sh3.1b. So we one and two of the premises. n Theatre lovers say the Francis Peter Ojede, the National Theatre does not 1.112 hectares, is comprised dismissal of its case without decided to see for ourselves. He said they required sh4b executive director of the Uganda in Leasehold Register Volume first obtaining permission from Work has been done on the to renovate both the inside and look much different after National Cultural Centre, also the renovations. 2517, Folio 25 Plot 30 Mukabya court. reception area: the counter outside of the structure. But known as the National Theatre, Road, Nakawa Industrial Area. “So, this court would, looks decent. But the stage and they only got sh3.1b, which said renovation works started M and D Timber Merchants therefore, have no basis upon main auditorium still look the was given to them by President in August last year. had resisted eviction, arguing which to make findings of fact same. Well, the high curtains Yoweri Museveni in 2017. of first managing director. Ambitious Construction that the lawsuit was barred by and determine the rights and can now be drawn and opened “When we get more money, P’Bitek wanted Uganda’s Company led the renovations. statute. remedies of the parties. I would, on prompt, all lights have we shall make the place even diverse culture showcased. He With construction complete, In a counterclaim, M and D therefore, not grant the prayer been fitted and respond to the better,” he said. rooted for the opening of more Bigirimana said Uganda was Timber Merchants had made of counsel for the appellant to switches. “Some people spread theatres in all parts of Uganda. ready for JamaFest (Jumuiya ya an application in 2015, in go ahead and determine the Also, the sound seems okay, rumours that the theatre was Prominent plays staged Afrika Mashariki Utamaduni which it sought orders striking appeal on its merits,” Justice but that old numbness still for sale. This is to assure you at the theatre include I Will Festival). out Hwan Sung’s appeal. The Buteera said. hangs all over the place, not that the theatre is here to stay,” Marry When I Want by This year’s East Africa arts and company claimed ownership The court unanimously set typical of new things. Bigirimana said. Ngugi Wa Thiong’o, which culture festival will take place at of the property, arguing that it aside the judgment of the Court The bathrooms have been Built in 1956, the theatre was was performed by Makerere Kololo Independence Grounds was in exclusive possession of of Appeal, awarded costs of the fitted with new urinals and initially the preserve of whites University students. Even in Kampala, from Friday to the property. suit in the Supreme Court, the bowls, but the door frames, and Indians. Robert Serumaga’s satire Saturday this week. under the According to the record, Court of Appeal and in the which are still rotten at the The trend changed in 1959 Majangwa was performed in theme: Culture and Creative Hwan Sung Limited filed its High Court to the appellant base, betray the work done. The after poet Okot P’Bitek was the old theatre. Industries: An Engine for Unity case in the Land Division (Hwan Sung Ltd). terrazzo floor still bears urine named the theatre’s equivalent Phillip Matovu, an artiste, said and Employment Creation. KYEBANDO CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED HR managers faulted on endless meetings Sekati Zone, Gayaza Road P.O. Box 4770, Kampala By Carol Kasujja gossiping, hence not delivering They were urged at work,” he said. Instead of serving the public, While addressing delegates, human resource managers the First Deputy Prime Minster, GENERAL NOTICE spend their time attending to pay retirement Moses Ali, called on human endless meetings, the former resource managers to network BOARD POSITIONS/SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE state minister for public service, packages on and share ideas. (RE-ADVERTISED) Prisca Ssezi Mbaguta, has said. “The objective of this Mbaguta was speaking time always conference is to build Reference is made to the Annual General Meeting held on 31st March during the fifth African understanding of the global 2018, Kyebando Co-operative Society Limited hereby invites qualifi ed public sector human resource development agendas managers’ capacity building run meetings from Monday and, thereby, facilitate the members to fi ll the vacant Board / Supervisory Committee positions. to Friday, which should stop,” attainment of these targets. st st conference held at Kampala The duration for receiving applications is from 1 September to 31 Serena Hotel last week. Mbaguta said. The Africa Human Resource October 2018. No application shall be received after the deadline for “While completely “It is your work as HR to Managers Network was submission. eliminating meetings may be make sure people enjoy their conceived in the spirit that nearly impossible, there are retirement. Pay their retirement networking and sharing of Please hand deliver your application to: ways to reduce the time spent packages on time,” he said. ideas enhances opportunities The General Manager, in them, so you can serve In his speech, Godfrey for building more prosperous Kyebando Co-operative Society Limited, the public. These days, when Bagwa, the head of human societies. P.O. Box 4770 Kampala, Uganda you go to public offices to resource at East African Affairs, “As a solutions-oriented get information or to meet a said workers spend too much network, I would like to urge Please note that only members can apply and those who submitted human resource manager, it is time on social media. you to find ways to bridge gaps their applications before this notice need not to re-apply. hard to access them because “These days, when people in society, especially those they are always in meetings clock in at work, the first thing affecting the competitiveness MANAGEMENT and they do not leave anyone they do is log on to their social and the competence of our behind to help. It seems they media platforms and start labour force,” he said..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Presentation on Performance of the Supreme Court Made to the 18 Annual Judges' Conference at the Speke Resort Hotel, 19 – 21
    PRESENTATION ON PERFORMANCE OF THE SUPREME COURT MADE TO THE 18TH ANNUAL JUDGES’ CONFERENCE AT THE SPEKE RESORT HOTEL, 19TH – 21ST JANUARY, 2016 BY HON. JUSTICE JOTHAM TUMWESIGYE JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT 1 The Hon. Chief Justice The Hon. Deputy Chief Justice The Hon. Principal Judge The Hon. Justices of the Supreme Court The Hon. Justices of the Court of Appeal The Hon. Judges of the High Court The Secretary to the Judiciary The Chief Registrar Distinguished guests, Ladies and gentlemen. Introduction. The Supreme Court of Uganda is a creature of the 1995 Constitution. It is established under Article 130 of the Constitution which provides: The Supreme Court shall consist of – (a) The Chief Justice; and 2 (b) Such number of justices of the Supreme Court not being less than six, as parliament may by law prescribe. The Judicature (Amendment) Act No. 9 of 2011 provides that the Supreme Court shall consist of the Chief Justice and ten justices of the Supreme Court. However, currently the Supreme Court consists of 9 members who are: (i) Hon. Justice Bart Katureebe, C.J, (ii) Hon. Justice Jotham Tumwesigye, JSC, (iii) Hon. Lady Justice Dr. E.K Kisaakye, JSC, (iv) Hon. Lady justice Stella Arach-Amoko, JSC, (v) Hon. Justice Augustine Nshimye, JSC, (vi) Hon. Justice Eldad Mwangusya, JSC, (vii) Hon. Justice Rubby Opio Aweri, JSC (viii) Hon. Lady Justice Faith Mwondha, JSC, (ix) Hon. Lady Justice Tibatemwa Ekirikubinza, JSC. Commendation Five of the justices who were recently appointed replaced: Hon. Justice B.J Odoki, Chief Justice Emeritus Hon. Justice J.W.N Tsekooko Hon Justice G.M Okello Hon Lady Justice C.N.B Kitumba 3 I would like to take this opportunity to thank the recently retired justices of the Supreme Court for their dedicated and exemplary service to judiciary and the country as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Officers Should Retire with Benefits- Museveni
    DIC JU IA E R H Y T U GAN DA Magazine Issue 03 | April - October, 2015 INSIDE: Judicial officers should retire with benefits- Museveni Meet the newly Hotlines to boost fight elevated Justices against corruption Judges pose with President Yoweri Museveni after a meeting at State House, Entebbe on September 2. NEW JUDICIARY COMMITTEES Judiciary Editorial Board What you need to know Dear colleagues and friends of the Judiciary, on June 11, 2015, the Hon. Chief Justice, Mr Bart Katureebe, inaugurated the Judiciary Editorial Board Committee. s chairperson thereof, I take this Our duties are to regularly plan, poor internal communication, a opportunity to introduce my review and approve the content of negative public mindset towards the Ateam which includes Mr. Gad- official positions of the Judiciary which Judiciary and many others. However, it enya Paul Wolimbwa (Chief Registrar), are intended for the public; enhance is our hope that with your concerted Mrs. Dorcas Okalany (Secretary to and sustain information sharing and effort, we can achieve what we have set the Judiciary), Mr. Eliasa Omar Kisawuzi communication within and outside the out to do. We keep our communication (Registrar/PRO), Ms. Jessica Chemeri Judiciary with the view to improving lines open for ideas and means on how (Senior Law Reporting Officer) and Mr. public trust and confidence in the to take our Judiciary to greater heights Solomon Muyita (Senior Communica- Judiciary; create general awareness and call on all of you not to take the tions Officer). about the courts in Uganda; oversee back seat. the branding of the Judiciary to improve DIC JU IA E R H Y T U Our mandate includes the enhancement its image and the production of The Together we can! GAN DA of effective administration of justice Judiciary Insider magazine and other by judicial officers and streamlining publications from time to time.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation of Performance of the Supreme Court Made
    PRESENTATION OF PERFORMANCE OF THE SUPREME COURT MADE TO THE 19TH ANNUAL JUDGES’ CONFERENCE AT THE SPEKE RESORT HOTEL, MUNYONYO, KAMPALA 26TH – 30TH JANUARY, 2017 BY HON. JUSTICE JOTHAM TUMWESIGYE JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT 1 | P a g e Introduction: The Supreme Court of Uganda is currently housed in Kololo, Kampala. The Supreme Court of Uganda is a creation of the 1995 Constitution. It is the final Appellate Court in the country. In the matters of Presidential Election Petitions, Section 59, of the Presidential Elections Act, gives the Supreme Court original jurisdiction in the Presidential Election Petitions. Composition of the Supreme Court: The composition of the Supreme Court is laid out under Article 130 of the Constitution. It consists of the Chief Justice and such other numbers of Justices not being less than six, as Parliament may by law prescribe. Currently the prescribed number of Justices, according to the Judicature (Amendment) Act 2007, inclusive the Chief Justice, is 11. The Current Members of the Court are: 1- The Hon. The Chief Justice, Hon. Justice Bart M. Katureebe 2- Hon. Justice Jotham Tumwesigye, JSC 3- Hon. Lady Justice Dr. Esther Kisaakye-Kitimbo, JSC 4- Hon. Lady Justice Stella Arach-Amoko, JSC 2 | P a g e 5- Hon. Justice Augustine S. Nshimye, JSC (Retired) 6- Hon. Justice Eldad Mwangusya, JSC 7- Hon. Justice Rubby Opio Aweri, JSC 8- Hon. Lady Justice Faith Mwondha, JSC 9- Hon. Lady Justice Prof.Tibatemwa Ekirikubinza, JSC The other Members of staff are the Registrar, H/W Tom Chemutai, and the Deputy Registrar, H/W Godfrey Opifeni.
    [Show full text]
  • The Republic of Uganda in the Supreme Court of Uganda
    5 THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION PETITION NO. O1 OF 2016 10 (CORAM: KATUREEBE,C.J; TUMWESIGYE, KISAAKYE,ARACH AMOKO, NSHIMYE, MWANGUSYA ,OPIO-AWERI, MWONDHA, TIBATEMWA-EKIRIKUBINZA, JJ.SC.) AMAMA MBABAZI …………………………………….PETITIONER 15 VERSUS YOWERI KAGUTA MUSEVENI……………………1st RESPONDENT ELECTORAL COMMISSION………………………2ND RESPONDENT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ………………………3RD ESPONDENT 20 PROFESSOR OLOKA ONYANGO & 8 ORS………..AMICI CURIAE DECISION OF THE COURT The Petitioner, who was one of the candidates in the Presidential election that 25 was held on the 18th February, 2016 petitioned the Supreme Court, under the Constitution, the Presidential Elections Act and the Electoral Commission Act. He challenged the result of the election and sought a declaration that Yoweri Kaguta Museveni, was not validly elected and an order that the election be annulled. 30 On the 20th February 2016, the 2nd respondent declared the election results as follows; 1 5 - Abed Bwanika 86,075 (0.93%) - Amama Mbabazi 132,574 (1.43%) - Baryamureeba Venansius 51,086 (0.55%) - Benon Buta Biraaro 24,675. (0.27%) - Kiiza Besigye Kifefe 3, 270,290 (35.37%) 10 - Mabiriizi Joseph 23,762 (0.26%) - Maureen Faith Kyalya Waluube 40,598 (0.44%) - Yoweri Kaguta Museveni 5,617,503 (60.75%) The petitioner contends that the election was conducted without compliance with the provisions and the principles of the Presidential Elections Act, 2000 15 the Electoral Commissions Act, 1997 ( hereinafter referred to as the “PEA”, and the “ECA” ) and the 1995 Constitution and that this affected the result of the election in a substantial manner.
    [Show full text]
  • The Republic of Uganda in the Supreme
    5 THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION PETITION NO. O1 OF 2016 (CORAM: KATUREEBE, C.J, TUMWESIGYE, KISAAKYE, 10 ARACH AMOKO, NSHIMYE, MWANGUSYA, OPIO-AWERI, MWONDHA, TIBATEMWA-EKIRIKUBINZA, JJ. SC.) AMAMA MBABAZI …………………………………….PETITIONER VERSUS 15 YOWERI KAGUTA MUSEVENI ……………. 1st RESPONDENT ELECTORAL COMMISSION ……………… 2nd RESPONDENT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ………………… 3rd RESPONDENT PROFESSOR OLOKA ONYANGO & 8 ORS………..AMICI 20 CURIAE DETAILED REASONS FOR THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT The Petitioner, who was one of the candidates in the presidential 25 election that was held on the 18th February, 2016 petitioned the 1 5 Supreme Court under the Constitution, the Presidential Elections Act, 2000 and the Electoral Commission Act, 1997 (hereinafter referred to as the PEA and the ECA, respectively). He challenged the result of the election and sought a declaration that Yoweri Kaguta Museveni, the 1st Respondent, was not 10 validly elected and an order that the election be annulled. On the 31st March 2016, we delivered our decision in line with the Constitutional timeline imposed on the Court to render its judgment within 30 days from the date of filing the petition. We were not, however, in a position to give detailed reasons for our 15 findings and conclusion. We found that the 1st Respondent was validly elected as President in accordance with Article 104 of the Constitution and Section 59 of the PEA. Accordingly, we unanimously dismissed the petition. We made no order as to costs. 20 We promised to give the detailed reasons at a later date, which we now give in this judgment.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance of the Supreme Court for 2017 Made to the 20Th Annual
    PRESENTATION OF PERFORMANCE OF THE SUPREME COURT MADE AT THE 20TH ANNUAL JUDGES’ CONFERENCE AT THE SPEKE RESORT HOTEL, MUNYONYO, KAMPALA 21ST – 25TH JANUARY, 2018 BY HON. JUSTICE JOTHAM TUMWESIGYE JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT - The Hon. The Chief Justice - The Hon. Deputy Chief Justice 1 | P a g e - The Hon. The Principal Judge - Honourable Justices and Judges - Your Worships the Registrars and Magistrates - The Administrative Staff - The facilitators - Distinguished Ladies and Gentlemen. Introduction: Am pleased to once more share the Performance, Opportunities and Challenges the Supreme Court experienced in the year 2017. The Supreme Court of Uganda is currently housed in rented premises at Kololo, Kampala. The Supreme Court of Uganda is a creation of the 1995 Constitution. It is the final Appellate Court in the country. In matters of Presidential Election disagreements, Section 59 of the Presidential Elections Act, gives the Supreme Court original jurisdiction in the Presidential Election Petitions. To those of us who have had the opportunity to listen to the previous reports, it will be clear that, the narrative in many aspects remains unchanged. The reason is that the circumstances on the ground have remained the same 2 | P a g e especially in as far as the physical challenges the Court faces are concerned. Composition of the Supreme Court: The composition of the Supreme Court is laid out under Article 130 of the Constitution. It consists of the Chief Justice and such other numbers of Justices not being less than six, as Parliament may by law prescribe. Currently the prescribed number of Justices, according to the Judicature (Amendment) Act 2007, inclusive of the Chief Justice, is 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Chief Justice Katureebe's Key Milestones
    Issue 06 | May-July 2016 Chief Justice Katureebe’s key milestones 130 judicial appointments, promotions since 2015 INSIDE Commercial Justice 3,000 cases cleared Litigants recover billions Reports launched through Plea Bargaining as SCP reaches 26 courts President Yoweri Museveni (L) receives the Coat of Arms from Chief Justice, Bart M. Katureebe, after swearing-in as the 12th President of the Republic of Uganda on May 12, 2016. INSIDE... Count your blessings name 2 | Chief Justice Katureebe’s key achievements them one by one 4 | 3,000 cases cleared through Plea Bargaining 6 | The Judicature (Plea Bargain) Rules, 2016 any choose to capitalise on what they do not have in- 8 |CJ explains presidential election petition, Dr. Besigye treason case stead of identifying and celebrating what they have. 10 | 80% of election petitions concluded We, at the Judiciary, love to celebrate our milestones with oomph. We look at achievements as stepping 11 | Meet the new judicial officers Mstones for bigger things. 12 | Commercial Justice Reports launched For the first time, the Judiciary launched two Commercial Justice 13 | Chief Inspector of Courts embarks on countrywide tour Reports to highlight how both the Commercial Division of the High Court and the Small Claims Procedure have been a dream-come-true 14 | Pictorial: Judiciary through the lens for the Ugandan business community. 16 | Judges okay adoption of appellate mediation For Small Claims Procedure (SCP) – now operational in 26 of the 38 17 | Courts to get children’s testimonies by audio video link Magisterial Areas across the country in just three years after its launch 18 | Litigants recover billions as SCP reaches 26 courts – is a success story for both the Judiciary the court users.
    [Show full text]
  • The Uganda Judiciary: 2018 Scorecard
    THE UGANDA JUDICIARY SCORECARD REPORT 2018 THE UGANDA JUDICIARY: 2018 SCORECARD 1 | P a g e THE UGANDA JUDICIARY SCORECARD REPORT 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................................................................ 2 LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................................ 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................................................... 10 1.1 Background .......................................................................................................................................... 10 1.2 Scorecard Rationale .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Unveiled: the Proposed Judiciary Headquarters Inside: • Make Us
    Magazine: Issue 1: February - March 2015 Unveiled: The proposed Judiciary headquarters Inside: • Make us autonomous - Judicial officers • Full list of Uganda Judicial officers, top administrators • Judiciary headquarters: International bidders visit site • The Judiciary committed to administer justice Chief Justice Designate Justice Bart M. Katureebe Meet Judiciary’s top administrators Deputy Chief Justice Designate Steven S.B. Kavuma Principal Judge Dr Yorokamu Bamwine Chief Registrar Secretary to the Judiciary Paul Wolimbwa Gadenya Dorcas W. Okalany Under Secretary Registrar Supreme Court Registrar High Court Registrar Planning & Devt Registrar Execution & Bailiffs Ngene E. Muhindo Roy Milton Byaruhanga Isaac Muwata Elias Omar Kisawuzi Tom Chemutai Registrar Court of Appeal Deo Nizeyimana Commissioner HR Mary Goretti Sendyona Registrar Training & Research Charles Emuria Registrar Inspectorate Estates Manager Principal Accountant Principal Asst. Secretary Principal HR Officer Principal IT Officer Tadeo Asiimwe Christopher Ebal Hilda Nyamaizi Eva Kabasindi Byaruhanga Jolly Joe Sonko David Kikabi Supreme Court Justices Head - Supreme Court Justice Justice Justice Justice Justice Justice Justice Justice Bart Katureebe Jotham Tumwesigye Dr Esther Kisaakye Stella Arach-Amoko Dr Benjamin Odoki John Wilson Tsekooko Galdino M. Okello Christine N. Kitumba Constitutional / Court of Appeal Justices Head - Court of Appeal Justice Justice Justice Justice Justice Steven Kavuma Augustine Nshimye Remmy Kasule Eldad Mwangusya Rubby Aweri-Opio Faith Mwondha
    [Show full text]
  • Key Highlights - 2017 Launched Five-Year ICT Strategy | New Brand Identity Rolled-Out | New Deputy Chief Justice Starts Work
    21st - 25th JANUARY, 2018 Issue 9 |Special Edition -January 2018 Key highlights - 2017 Launched five-year ICT Strategy | New brand identity rolled-out | New Deputy Chief Justice starts work 175,000 cases Over 80 Registrars, Full list of Uganda disposed of in Magistrates Judicial Officers 2017 transfered inside THROUGH THE LENS Refurbished: The new-look of Judiciary Head Office which was freshly renovated. The Northern and Southern parking drives were paved and marked, and the High Court Grounds were also greened, for the first time since 2008. Members of the Civil Review Committee at their inauguration Senior Judiciary staff join HW Aloysius Natwijuka at the celebra- ceremony at the High Court in Kampala. tion of his marriage, June 2017. Chief Justice chats with Judiciary staff on the sidelines of a Chief Justice Hon. Bart M. Katureebe and senior members of the Magistrates Meeting held in Kampala on November 10, 2017. Judiciary at the launch of Judiciary’s Five-year ICT strategy, July 2017. Part of the Ugandan delegation to the International Women Chief Justice, Principal Judge and other Judiciary staff chatting on Judges Meeting in Nairobi, Kenya, May 2017. the sidelines of Judges and Registrar’s Meeting, November 2017. Members of the JLOS Leadership at the launch of their Annual Principal Judge, Dr Yorokamu Bamwine at the launch Plea Bargain Performance Report - 2016/17, November 30, 2017. at Nakasongola Government Prison, December 8, 2017. Public sensitisation: Head of Commercial Court/Mediation, Judge Judiciary staff celebrating a successful year at the Staff End-of- David K. Wangutusi appearing on Arua One, October 18, 2017 Year Party at Kampala High Court grounds, December 14, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Arising from Court of Appeal Civil Appeal No.15 of 2013]
    5 THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA MISC CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14 OF 2015 [ARISING FROM COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO.15 OF 2013] 10 (Appeal from the Judgment of the Court if Appela of Ugnda at Kampala, Before A.S Nshimye,Kenneth Kakuru and Geoffrey Kiryabwire, JJA dated 14th May 2015) HON. MICHEAL MABIKKE :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: APPLICANT VERSUS THE LAW DEVELOPMENT CENTRE::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: RESPONDENT 15 (Coram: Kisaakye, Mwangusya, Opio-Aweri, Mwondha, Tibatemwa- Ekirikubinza, JJSC) RULING OF THE COURT This is an application for stay of execution. It is brought under Section 4, 6(1), 7, 8(1), 33,38 of the Judicature Act, Section 98 of the CPA 20 and Articles 26,28,40(2),42,44,45,50 of the Constitution, the Judicature (Judicial Review) Rules , 2009 and Rules 2(2), 6(2)(b), 42(1 ),(2),43,50(2)b and 72 of The Judicature (Supreme Court) Rules Directions seeking for the following orders: 1. That execution and orders of the Judgment of the Court of 25 Appeal of Uganda at Kampala, Delivered by the Honorable Justices A.S.Nshimye, Kenneth Kakuru and Geoffrey Kiryabwire, JJA dated 14th May 2015 allowing the Respondent’s committee appointed to review the recommendations of The Report of The i % 5 Forensic Audit of the Bar Course Examination for the period 2004/2005 to 2010/2011 pursuant to the Judgment of the High Court and the Court of Appeal be stayed pending the hearing and final disposal of an Appeal to be filed in the Supreme Court of Uganda against the said Judgments.
    [Show full text]
  • Uganda Legal and Judicial Sector Study Report
    49701 Uganda Legal and Judicial Sector Study July 2009 Uganda Legal and Judicial Sector Study Legal Vice Presidency The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Uganda Legal and Judicial Sector Study Report THE WORLD BANK 1818 H Street, N.W. July 2009 Washington, DC 20433 Tel: (202) 477-1234 Fax: (202) 477-6391 E-mail: [email protected] World Wide Web: http://www.worldbank.org/lji Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized The World Bank Legal Vice Presidency Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................. 1 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................................................................... 3 A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................. 1 OBJECTIVES AND PURPOSE ......................................................................................................................... 1 METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE OF THE STUDY ................................................................................................................................. 1 REPORT STRUCTURE ................................................................................................................................... 2 CONTEXT ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]