AECOM Report 4.Dot
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
City of Ottawa Environmental Study Report Hope Side Road/Old Richmond Road Corridor (Terry Fox Drive to Highway 416) Class Environmental Assessment Prepared by: AECOM 302 – 1150 Morrison Drive 613 820 8282 tel Ottawa, ON, Canada K2H 8S9 613 820 8338 fax www.aecom.com In Association with: CSW Landscape Architects Ltd. Ecotec Environmental Consultants Inc. FoTenn Consultants RWDI Air Inc. Stantec Report Number: 60117447 Date: January, 2014 City of Ottawa Environmental Study Report Hope Side Road/Old Richmond Road Corridor (Terry Fox Drive to Highway 416) Class Environmental Assessment Statement of Qualifications and Limitations Distribution List The attached Report (the “Report”) has been prepared by AECOM Canada Ltd. (“Consultant”) for the benefit of the client (“Client”) in accordance with the agreement between Consultant and Client, including the scope of work detailed therein (the “Agreement”). # of Hard Copies PDF Required Association / Company Name The information, data, recommendations and conclusions contained in the Report (collectively, the “Information”): 5 5 City of Ottawa 7 7 Public Review Locations is subject to the scope, schedule, and other constraints and limitations in the Agreement and the qualifications contained in the Report (the “Limitations”); represents Consultant’s professional judgement in light of the Limitations and industry standards for the preparation of similar reports; may be based on information provided to Consultant which has not been independently verified; has not been updated since the date of issuance of the Report and its accuracy is limited to the time period and circumstances in which it was collected, processed, made or issued; Revision Log must be read as a whole and sections thereof should not be read out of such context; was prepared for the specific purposes described in the Report and the Agreement; and in the case of subsurface, environmental or geotechnical conditions, may be based on limited testing and on the assumption that such conditions are uniform and not variable either geographically or over time. Revision # Revised By Date Issue / Revision Description 0 CG/VM December 2013 Draft for Client Review Consultant shall be entitled to rely upon the accuracy and completeness of information that was provided to it and has no obligation to 1 CG/VM January 2014 Final update such information. Consultant accepts no responsibility for any events or circumstances that may have occurred since the date on which the Report was prepared and, in the case of subsurface, environmental or geotechnical conditions, is not responsible for any variability in such conditions, geographically or over time. Consultant agrees that the Report represents its professional judgement as described above and that the Information has been prepared for the specific purpose and use described in the Report and the Agreement, but Consultant makes no other representations, or any guarantees or warranties whatsoever, whether express or implied, with respect to the Report, the Information or any part thereof. AECOM Signatures Without in any way limiting the generality of the foregoing, any estimates or opinions regarding probable construction costs or construction schedule provided by Consultant represent Consultant’s professional judgement in light of its experience and the knowledge and information available to it at the time of preparation. Since Consultant has no control over market or economic conditions, prices for construction labour, equipment or materials or bidding procedures, Consultant, its directors, officers and Report Prepared By: employees are not able to, nor do they, make any representations, warranties or guarantees whatsoever, whether express or implied, Catherine Ghioureliotis, B. Soc. Sc. with respect to such estimates or opinions, or their variance from actual construction costs or schedules, and accept no responsibility for any loss or damage arising therefrom or in any way related thereto. Persons relying on such estimates or opinions do so at their own risk. Except (1) as agreed to in writing by Consultant and Client; (2) as required by-law; or (3) to the extent used by governmental reviewing agencies for the purpose of obtaining permits or approvals, the Report and the Information may be used and relied upon only by Client. and: Consultant accepts no responsibility, and denies any liability whatsoever, to parties other than Client who may obtain access to the Valerie McGirr, P. Eng. Report or the Information for any injury, loss or damage suffered by such parties arising from their use of, reliance upon, or decisions or actions based on the Report or any of the Information (“improper use of the Report”), except to the extent those parties have obtained the prior written consent of Consultant to use and rely upon the Report and the Information. Any injury, loss or damages arising from improper use of the Report shall be borne by the party making such use. This Statement of Qualifications and Limitations is attached to and forms part of the Report and any use of the Report is subject to the terms hereof. Report Reviewed By: Renée Pettigrew, MCIP, RPP ACOM: 2012-01-06 © 2009-2014 AECOM Canada Ltd. All Rights Reserved. RPT-2014-01-22_Kanata_South_ESR__FINAL-60117447.Docx City of Ottawa Environmental Study Report Hope Side Road/Old Richmond Road Corridor (Terry Fox Drive to Highway 416) Class Environmental Assessment Alternative Designs Executive Summary Based on the description of the problem and existing conditions, the following alternative designs were identified: A Class Environmental Assessment (EA) study was undertaken in accordance with the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment, 2000 as amended in 2007 & 2011, for transportation in South Kanata, focusing on the road corridor along Road realignment – between Hope Side Road and Old Richmond Road and/or between Old Richmond Road Hope Side Road (Eagleson Road/Terry Fox Drive to Old Richmond Road), Old Richmond Road (Hope Side Road to and West Hunt Club Road West Hunt Club Road) and West Hunt Club Road (Old Richmond Road to Highway 416). The corridor is about 7.6 km Cross-section – three lanes with centre lane reversible or four lanes and a median (Old Richmond Road and long. The purpose of the project was to provide adequate transportation capacity for existing and planned growth, to West Hunt Club Road) support the desired shift to sustainable and active transportation modes and to address safety issues along the corridor. Intersection traffic control – signals or roundabout Description of the Problem The road realignment between Hope Side Road and Old Richmond Road was screened out when the analysis showed The City of Ottawa Official Plan (OP) includes significant growth areas in Kanata and Stittsville and this growth will that it did not have a significant benefit to traffic overall but had significant impacts to approved development lands. The increase the number of trips into and out of the area, exacerbating the existing levels of congestion during peak periods. road realignment between Old Richmond Road and West Hunt Club Road was carried forward with consideration for Planned transit improvements will help to achieve the targets for transit use set in the 2013 Transportation Master Plan cross-section and intersection alternatives. (TMP) update but will not eliminate the need for road improvements. In addition to addressing travel demand, corridor improvements will provide an opportunity to introduce measures to address existing safety issues. For the evaluation of the three and four-lane alternatives (from Stonehaven Drive to Highway 416), it was noted that the footprint of the three-lane cross-section through Stony Swamp was less than the four-lane cross-section. While this Preferred Solution smaller footprint results in lower environmental effects, safety during operations was a significant concern. Without the benefit of an example in North America of a reversible lane of similar length and speed, a standard 4-lane roadway with a The alternative solutions generated to address identified needs were: narrow raised median was preferred. This decision was made with the knowledge that mitigation acceptable to the NCC would be a requirement for approvals. During detail design, potential methods to minimize the footprint will be Do nothing considered. Enhance Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Measures Implement Transportation Systems Management (TSM) Measures In accordance with City of Ottawa policies, roundabouts were investigated at each intersection location. At all locations, Expand the arterial road network roundabouts provided equal or superior levels of service for traffic. Roundabouts were carried forward for consideration Hope Side, Old Richmond and West Hunt Club Roads during detail design at study area intersections, with the exception of Moodie Drive and West Hunt Club Road where Fallowfield Road and connecting roads as needed traffic signals were preferred to minimize the impact on adjacent wetlands. The presence of traffic signals at the Highway Provide a combination of the above alternatives 416 southbound ramp terminal intersection means that there are two signals adjacent to each other. These signals will not interfere with the operation of the roundabouts elsewhere along the corridor. A combination of the identified alternative solutions was selected as the preferred solution. It is recognized that TDM and TSM measures will play an important role in the overall solution, as they do in the transportation