DOCSLIB.ORG

Cochrane Library

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cochrane Library Cochrane Library Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Antidepressant treatment for postnatal depression (Review) Brown JVE, Wilson CA, Ayre K, Robertson L, South E, Molyneaux E, Trevillion K, Howard LM, Khalifeh H Brown JV, Wilson CA, Ayre K, Robertson L, South E, Molyneaux E, Trevillion K, Howard LM, Khalifeh H. Antidepressant treatment for postnatal depression. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2021, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD013560. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013560.pub2. www.cochranelibrary.com Antidepressant treatment for postnatal depression (Review) Copyright © 2021 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Cochrane Trusted evidence. Informed decisions. Library Better health. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S HEADER......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 ABSTRACT..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY....................................................................................................................................................................... 2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS.............................................................................................................................................................................. 4 BACKGROUND.............................................................................................................................................................................................. 14 OBJECTIVES.................................................................................................................................................................................................. 15 METHODS..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 15 RESULTS........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 20 Figure 1.................................................................................................................................................................................................. 21 Figure 2.................................................................................................................................................................................................. 23 Figure 3.................................................................................................................................................................................................. 24 DISCUSSION.................................................................................................................................................................................................. 31 AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS........................................................................................................................................................................... 34 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS................................................................................................................................................................................ 34 REFERENCES................................................................................................................................................................................................ 35 CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDIES.................................................................................................................................................................. 40 DATA AND ANALYSES.................................................................................................................................................................................... 65 Analysis 1.1. Comparison 1: Antidepressants vs placebo, Outcome 1: Depression response (acute phase)................................... 66 Analysis 1.2. Comparison 1: Antidepressants vs placebo, Outcome 2: Depression remission (acute phase).................................. 66 Analysis 1.3. Comparison 1: Antidepressants vs placebo, Outcome 3: Severity of depression - overall (acute phase)................... 67 Analysis 1.4. Comparison 1: Antidepressants vs placebo, Outcome 4: Severity of depression - EPDS (acute phase)..................... 67 Analysis 1.5. Comparison 1: Antidepressants vs placebo, Outcome 5: Severity of depression - HAM-D (acute phase)................... 67 Analysis 1.6. Comparison 1: Antidepressants vs placebo, Outcome 6: Severity of depression - CGI-S (acute phase)..................... 68 Analysis 1.7. Comparison 1: Antidepressants vs placebo, Outcome 7: Treatment acceptability - dropouts................................... 68 Analysis 2.1. Comparison 2: Antidepressants vs treatment as usual, Outcome 1: Depression remission (early phase).................. 69 Analysis 2.2. Comparison 2: Antidepressants vs treatment as usual, Outcome 2: Severity of depression - EPDS (early phase)...... 69 Analysis 2.3. Comparison 2: Antidepressants vs treatment as usual, Outcome 3: Treatment acceptability - dropouts.................. 69 Analysis 2.4. Comparison 2: Antidepressants vs treatment as usual, Outcome 4: Parenting-related outcomes - MAMA (early 70 phase)..................................................................................................................................................................................................... Analysis 2.5. Comparison 2: Antidepressants vs treatment as usual, Outcome 5: Parenting-related outcomes - MAMA 70 (continuation phase)............................................................................................................................................................................. Analysis 2.6. Comparison 2: Antidepressants vs treatment as usual, Outcome 6: Quality of life - SF-12 mental health................. 70 Analysis 2.7. Comparison 2: Antidepressants vs treatment as usual, Outcome 7: Quality of life - SF-12 physical health............... 70 Analysis 2.8. Comparison 2: Antidepressants vs treatment as usual, Outcome 8: Quality of life - EQ5D utility score..................... 71 Analysis 2.9. Comparison 2: Antidepressants vs treatment as usual, Outcome 9: Quality of life - EQ5D visual analogue scale....... 71 Analysis 3.1. Comparison 3: Antidepressants vs psychological interventions, Outcome 1: Severity of depression - EPDS (acute 72 phase)..................................................................................................................................................................................................... Analysis 3.2. Comparison 3: Antidepressants vs psychological interventions, Outcome 2: Severity of depression - BDI (acute 72 phase)..................................................................................................................................................................................................... Analysis 3.3. Comparison 3: Antidepressants vs psychological interventions, Outcome 3: Severity of depression - BDI 72 (continuation phase)............................................................................................................................................................................. Analysis 3.4. Comparison 3: Antidepressants vs psychological interventions, Outcome 4: Treatment acceptability..................... 72 Analysis 3.5. Comparison 3: Antidepressants vs psychological interventions, Outcome 5: Parenting-related outcomes - PSI 73 (acute phase)......................................................................................................................................................................................... Analysis 3.6. Comparison 3: Antidepressants vs psychological interventions, Outcome 6: Parenting-related outcomes - PSI 73 (continuation phase)............................................................................................................................................................................. Analysis 4.1. Comparison 4: Antidepressants vs psychosocial interventions, Outcome 1: Depression remission (continuation 74 phase)..................................................................................................................................................................................................... Analysis 4.2. Comparison 4: Antidepressants vs psychosocial interventions, Outcome 2: Severity of depression - EPDS 74 (continuation phase)............................................................................................................................................................................. Analysis 4.3. Comparison 4: Antidepressants vs psychosocial interventions, Outcome 3: Treatment acceptability - dropouts...... 74 Analysis 4.4. Comparison 4: Antidepressants vs psychosocial interventions, Outcome 4: Parenting-related outcomes - MAMA 74 (continuation phase)............................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Methylphenidate Hydrochloride
    Application for Inclusion to the 22nd Expert Committee on the Selection and Use of Essential Medicines: METHYLPHENIDATE HYDROCHLORIDE December 7, 2018 Submitted by: Patricia Moscibrodzki, M.P.H., and Craig L. Katz, M.D. The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Graduate Program in Public Health New York NY, United States Contact: [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 3 Summary Statement Page 4 Focal Point Person in WHO Page 5 Name of Organizations Consulted Page 6 International Nonproprietary Name Page 7 Formulations Proposed for Inclusion Page 8 International Availability Page 10 Listing Requested Page 11 Public Health Relevance Page 13 Treatment Details Page 19 Comparative Effectiveness Page 29 Comparative Safety Page 41 Comparative Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Page 45 Regulatory Status Page 48 Pharmacoepial Standards Page 49 Text for the WHO Model Formulary Page 52 References Page 61 Appendix – Letters of Support 2 1. Summary Statement of the Proposal for Inclusion of Methylphenidate Methylphenidate (MPH), a central nervous system (CNS) stimulant, of the phenethylamine class, is proposed for inclusion in the WHO Model List of Essential Medications (EML) & the Model List of Essential Medications for Children (EMLc) for treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) under ICD-11, 6C9Z mental, behavioral or neurodevelopmental disorder, disruptive behavior or dissocial disorders. To date, the list of essential medications does not include stimulants, which play a critical role in the treatment of psychotic disorders. Methylphenidate is proposed for inclusion on the complimentary list for both children and adults. This application provides a systematic review of the use, efficacy, safety, availability, and cost-effectiveness of methylphenidate compared with other stimulant (first-line) and non-stimulant (second-line) medications.
    [Show full text]
  • Implications in the Management of Depression and Anxiety
    Journal name: Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment Article Designation: Review Year: 2016 Volume: 12 Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment Dovepress Running head verso: Montoya et al Running head recto: Noradrenergic paradox in depression and anxiety open access to scientific and medical research DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S91311 Open Access Full Text Article REVIEW The noradrenergic paradox: implications in the management of depression and anxiety Alonso Montoya1 Abstract: Both major depressive disorder and the anxiety disorders are major causes of disability Robert Bruins1 and markedly contribute to a significant global burden of the disease worldwide. In part because Martin A Katzman2 of the significant socioeconomic burden associated with these disorders, theories have been devel- Pierre Blier3 oped to specifically build clinical treatment approaches. One such theory, the monoaminergic hypothesis, has led to the development of several generations of selective and nonselective inhibi- 1Eli Lilly Canada Inc, 2START Clinic for the Mood and Anxiety Disorders, tors of transporters of serotonin and norepinephrine, with the goal of augmenting monoaminergic Toronto, 3Mood Disorders Research transmission. These efforts have led to considerable success in the development of antidepressant Unit, Institute of Mental Health therapeutics. However, there is a strong correlation between enhanced noradrenergic activity Research, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada and fear and anxiety. Consequently, some physicians have expressed concerns that the same enhanced noradrenergic activity that alleviates depression could also promote anxiety. The fact that the serotonergic and noradrenergic reuptake inhibitors are successfully used in the treatment For personal use only. of anxiety and panic disorders seems paradoxical. This review was undertaken to determine if any clinical evidence exists to show that serotonergic and noradrenergic reuptake inhibitors can cause anxiety.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2012/0190743 A1 Bain Et Al
    US 2012O190743A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2012/0190743 A1 Bain et al. (43) Pub. Date: Jul. 26, 2012 (54) COMPOUNDS FOR TREATING DISORDERS Publication Classification OR DISEASES ASSOCATED WITH (51) Int. Cl NEUROKININ 2 RECEPTORACTIVITY A6II 3L/23 (2006.01) (75) Inventors: Jerald Bain, Toronto (CA); Joel CD7C 69/30 (2006.01) Sadavoy, Toronto (CA); Hao Chen, 39t. ii; C Columbia, MD (US); Xiaoyu Shen, ( .01) Columbia, MD (US) A6IPI/00 (2006.01) s A6IP 29/00 (2006.01) (73) Assignee: UNITED PARAGON A6IP II/00 (2006.01) ASSOCIATES INC., Guelph, ON A6IPI3/10 (2006.01) (CA) A6IP 5/00 (2006.01) A6IP 25/00 (2006.01) (21) Appl. No.: 13/394,067 A6IP 25/30 (2006.01) A6IP5/00 (2006.01) (22) PCT Filed: Sep. 7, 2010 A6IP3/00 (2006.01) CI2N 5/071 (2010.01) (86). PCT No.: PCT/US 10/48OO6 CD7C 69/33 (2006.01) S371 (c)(1) (52) U.S. Cl. .......................... 514/552; 554/227; 435/375 (2), (4) Date: Apr. 12, 2012 (57) ABSTRACT Related U.S. Application Data Compounds, pharmaceutical compositions and methods of (60) Provisional application No. 61/240,014, filed on Sep. treating a disorder or disease associated with neurokinin 2 4, 2009. (NK) receptor activity. Patent Application Publication Jul. 26, 2012 Sheet 1 of 12 US 2012/O190743 A1 LU 1750 15OO 1250 OOO 750 500 250 O O 20 3O 40 min SampleName: EM2OO617 Patent Application Publication Jul. 26, 2012 Sheet 2 of 12 US 2012/O190743 A1 kixto CFUgan <tro CFUgan FIG.2 Patent Application Publication Jul.
    [Show full text]
  • Guaiana, G., Barbui, C., Caldwell, DM, Davies, SJC, Furukawa, TA
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Explore Bristol Research Guaiana, G., Barbui, C., Caldwell, D. M., Davies, S. J. C., Furukawa, T. A., Imai, H., ... Cipriani, A. (2017). Antidepressants, benzodiazepines and azapirones for panic disorder in adults: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2017(7), [CD012729]. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012729 Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to published version (if available): 10.1002/14651858.CD012729 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via Cochrane Library at https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD012729/full . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/pure/about/ebr-terms Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Antidepressants, benzodiazepines and azapirones for panic disorder in adults: a network meta-analysis (Protocol) Guaiana G, Barbui C, Caldwell DM, Davies SJC, Furukawa TA, Imai H, Koesters M, Tajika A, Bighelli I, Pompoli A, Cipriani A Guaiana G, Barbui C, Caldwell DM, Davies SJC, Furukawa TA, Imai H, Koesters M, Tajika A, Bighelli I, Pompoli A, Cipriani A. Antidepressants, benzodiazepines and azapirones for panic disorder in adults: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategies for Managing Sexual Dysfunction Induced by Antidepressant Medication
    King’s Research Portal DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003382.pub3 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication record in King's Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Taylor, M. J., Rudkin, L., Bullemor-Day, P., Lubin, J., Chukwujekwu, C., & Hawton, K. (2013). Strategies for managing sexual dysfunction induced by antidepressant medication. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (5). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003382.pub3 Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on King's Research Portal is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Post-Print version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognize and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. •Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. •You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain •You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the Research Portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/0110428A1 De Juan Et Al
    US 200601 10428A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/0110428A1 de Juan et al. (43) Pub. Date: May 25, 2006 (54) METHODS AND DEVICES FOR THE Publication Classification TREATMENT OF OCULAR CONDITIONS (51) Int. Cl. (76) Inventors: Eugene de Juan, LaCanada, CA (US); A6F 2/00 (2006.01) Signe E. Varner, Los Angeles, CA (52) U.S. Cl. .............................................................. 424/427 (US); Laurie R. Lawin, New Brighton, MN (US) (57) ABSTRACT Correspondence Address: Featured is a method for instilling one or more bioactive SCOTT PRIBNOW agents into ocular tissue within an eye of a patient for the Kagan Binder, PLLC treatment of an ocular condition, the method comprising Suite 200 concurrently using at least two of the following bioactive 221 Main Street North agent delivery methods (A)-(C): Stillwater, MN 55082 (US) (A) implanting a Sustained release delivery device com (21) Appl. No.: 11/175,850 prising one or more bioactive agents in a posterior region of the eye so that it delivers the one or more (22) Filed: Jul. 5, 2005 bioactive agents into the vitreous humor of the eye; (B) instilling (e.g., injecting or implanting) one or more Related U.S. Application Data bioactive agents Subretinally; and (60) Provisional application No. 60/585,236, filed on Jul. (C) instilling (e.g., injecting or delivering by ocular ion 2, 2004. Provisional application No. 60/669,701, filed tophoresis) one or more bioactive agents into the Vit on Apr. 8, 2005. reous humor of the eye. Patent Application Publication May 25, 2006 Sheet 1 of 22 US 2006/0110428A1 R 2 2 C.6 Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub
    US 20130289061A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/0289061 A1 Bhide et al. (43) Pub. Date: Oct. 31, 2013 (54) METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS TO Publication Classi?cation PREVENT ADDICTION (51) Int. Cl. (71) Applicant: The General Hospital Corporation, A61K 31/485 (2006-01) Boston’ MA (Us) A61K 31/4458 (2006.01) (52) U.S. Cl. (72) Inventors: Pradeep G. Bhide; Peabody, MA (US); CPC """"" " A61K31/485 (201301); ‘4161223011? Jmm‘“ Zhu’ Ansm’ MA. (Us); USPC ......... .. 514/282; 514/317; 514/654; 514/618; Thomas J. Spencer; Carhsle; MA (US); 514/279 Joseph Biederman; Brookline; MA (Us) (57) ABSTRACT Disclosed herein is a method of reducing or preventing the development of aversion to a CNS stimulant in a subject (21) App1_ NO_; 13/924,815 comprising; administering a therapeutic amount of the neu rological stimulant and administering an antagonist of the kappa opioid receptor; to thereby reduce or prevent the devel - . opment of aversion to the CNS stimulant in the subject. Also (22) Flled' Jun‘ 24’ 2013 disclosed is a method of reducing or preventing the develop ment of addiction to a CNS stimulant in a subj ect; comprising; _ _ administering the CNS stimulant and administering a mu Related U‘s‘ Apphcatlon Data opioid receptor antagonist to thereby reduce or prevent the (63) Continuation of application NO 13/389,959, ?led on development of addiction to the CNS stimulant in the subject. Apt 27’ 2012’ ?led as application NO_ PCT/US2010/ Also disclosed are pharmaceutical compositions comprising 045486 on Aug' 13 2010' a central nervous system stimulant and an opioid receptor ’ antagonist.
    [Show full text]
  • )&F1y3x PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX to THE
    )&f1y3X PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE )&f1y3X PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE TARIFF SCHEDULE 3 Table 1. This table enumerates products described by International Non-proprietary Names (INN) which shall be entered free of duty under general note 13 to the tariff schedule. The Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry numbers also set forth in this table are included to assist in the identification of the products concerned. For purposes of the tariff schedule, any references to a product enumerated in this table includes such product by whatever name known. Product CAS No. Product CAS No. ABAMECTIN 65195-55-3 ACTODIGIN 36983-69-4 ABANOQUIL 90402-40-7 ADAFENOXATE 82168-26-1 ABCIXIMAB 143653-53-6 ADAMEXINE 54785-02-3 ABECARNIL 111841-85-1 ADAPALENE 106685-40-9 ABITESARTAN 137882-98-5 ADAPROLOL 101479-70-3 ABLUKAST 96566-25-5 ADATANSERIN 127266-56-2 ABUNIDAZOLE 91017-58-2 ADEFOVIR 106941-25-7 ACADESINE 2627-69-2 ADELMIDROL 1675-66-7 ACAMPROSATE 77337-76-9 ADEMETIONINE 17176-17-9 ACAPRAZINE 55485-20-6 ADENOSINE PHOSPHATE 61-19-8 ACARBOSE 56180-94-0 ADIBENDAN 100510-33-6 ACEBROCHOL 514-50-1 ADICILLIN 525-94-0 ACEBURIC ACID 26976-72-7 ADIMOLOL 78459-19-5 ACEBUTOLOL 37517-30-9 ADINAZOLAM 37115-32-5 ACECAINIDE 32795-44-1 ADIPHENINE 64-95-9 ACECARBROMAL 77-66-7 ADIPIODONE 606-17-7 ACECLIDINE 827-61-2 ADITEREN 56066-19-4 ACECLOFENAC 89796-99-6 ADITOPRIM 56066-63-8 ACEDAPSONE 77-46-3 ADOSOPINE 88124-26-9 ACEDIASULFONE SODIUM 127-60-6 ADOZELESIN 110314-48-2 ACEDOBEN 556-08-1 ADRAFINIL 63547-13-7 ACEFLURANOL 80595-73-9 ADRENALONE
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2015/072852 Al 21 May 2015 (21.05.2015) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2015/072852 Al 21 May 2015 (21.05.2015) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every A61K 36/84 (2006.01) A61K 31/5513 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, A61K 31/045 (2006.01) A61P 31/22 (2006.01) AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, A61K 31/522 (2006.01) A61K 45/06 (2006.01) BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, (21) International Application Number: HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, PCT/NL20 14/050780 KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, (22) International Filing Date: MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, 13 November 2014 (13.1 1.2014) PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, (25) Filing Language: English TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (26) Publication Language: English (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (30) Priority Data: kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, 61/903,430 13 November 2013 (13. 11.2013) US GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, TZ, UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, (71) Applicant: RJG DEVELOPMENTS B.V.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,264,917 B1 Klaveness Et Al
    USOO6264,917B1 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,264,917 B1 Klaveness et al. (45) Date of Patent: Jul. 24, 2001 (54) TARGETED ULTRASOUND CONTRAST 5,733,572 3/1998 Unger et al.. AGENTS 5,780,010 7/1998 Lanza et al. 5,846,517 12/1998 Unger .................................. 424/9.52 (75) Inventors: Jo Klaveness; Pál Rongved; Dagfinn 5,849,727 12/1998 Porter et al. ......................... 514/156 Lovhaug, all of Oslo (NO) 5,910,300 6/1999 Tournier et al. .................... 424/9.34 FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS (73) Assignee: Nycomed Imaging AS, Oslo (NO) 2 145 SOS 4/1994 (CA). (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 19 626 530 1/1998 (DE). patent is extended or adjusted under 35 O 727 225 8/1996 (EP). U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. WO91/15244 10/1991 (WO). WO 93/20802 10/1993 (WO). WO 94/07539 4/1994 (WO). (21) Appl. No.: 08/958,993 WO 94/28873 12/1994 (WO). WO 94/28874 12/1994 (WO). (22) Filed: Oct. 28, 1997 WO95/03356 2/1995 (WO). WO95/03357 2/1995 (WO). Related U.S. Application Data WO95/07072 3/1995 (WO). (60) Provisional application No. 60/049.264, filed on Jun. 7, WO95/15118 6/1995 (WO). 1997, provisional application No. 60/049,265, filed on Jun. WO 96/39149 12/1996 (WO). 7, 1997, and provisional application No. 60/049.268, filed WO 96/40277 12/1996 (WO). on Jun. 7, 1997. WO 96/40285 12/1996 (WO). (30) Foreign Application Priority Data WO 96/41647 12/1996 (WO).
    [Show full text]
  • Lilly Announces Edivoxetine Did Not Meet Primary Endpoint of Phase III Clinical Studies As Add-On Therapy for Major Depressive Disorder
    December 5, 2013 Lilly Announces Edivoxetine Did Not Meet Primary Endpoint of Phase III Clinical Studies as Add-On Therapy for Major Depressive Disorder INDIANAPOLIS, Dec. 5, 2013 /PRNewswire/ -- Eli Lilly and Company (NYSE: LLY) announced today that results from three studies of edivoxetine did not meet the primary study objective of superior efficacy in depression after eight weeks of treatment. When added to a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), edivoxetine did not separate from placebo on the Montgomery- Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) in three acute randomized placebo-controlled Phase III studies (LNBM, LNBQ and LNBR). While the safety and tolerability of edivoxetine was consistent with previous studies, the efficacy results do not support a regulatory submission for adjunctive treatment in patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Data from all three studies will be disclosed in appropriate scientific forums in 2014. In 2010, Lilly launched the Phase III program for edivoxetine — a potent and highly selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor — to assess the benefits and risks of edivoxetine as an add-on therapy in patients with MDD. The Phase III program specifically focused on meeting the unmet needs of patients with major depression who had achieved only a partial response to treatment with an SSRI. In these three trials, patients remained on SSRI treatment and additionally received either edivoxetine or placebo. "Lilly undertook a robust Phase III program to address a significant unmet need for people suffering from depression," said David Ricks, senior vice president, and president, Lilly Bio-Medicines. "However, the lack of efficacy compared to SSRI alone in three separate clinical trials means that Lilly will not proceed with development of edivoxetine as an add-on treatment for depression." The ongoing clinical study evaluating the long-term maintenance effect of edivoxetine will continue to completion.
    [Show full text]
  • Potentiation of Yohimbine-Induced Lethality in Mice: Predictor of Antidepressant Potential
    Drug Development Research 3:357-363 (1983) Potentiation of Yohimbine-Induced Lethality in Mice: Predictor of Antidepressant Potential Jeffrey B. Malick Biomedical Research Department, Stuart Pharmaceuticals, Division of ICI Americas, Inc., Wilmington, Delaware ABSTRACT Malick, J.B.: Potentiation of yohimbine-induced lethality in mice: Predictor of antidepres- sant potential. Drug Dev. Res. 3:357-363, 1983. The ability of antidepressant agents to potentiate the lethal or toxic effects of yohimbine in mice was evaluated. With very few exceptions, the antidepressants were the only agents that significantly enhanced yohimbine-induced lethality. All of the clinically effective anti- depressants, both typical (e.g., amine reuptake inhibitors, monoamine oxidase inhibitors) and atypical (e.g., mianserin, iprindole, bupropion, quipazine) drugs, produced a dose- related potentiation of yohimbine in mice. Representative anxiolytics and antipsychotics failed to potentiate yohimbine over a wide range of doses. Although several possible “false positives” (e.g., atropine, chlorpheniramine, and d-amphetamine) would be detected in this procedure, these same agents would be detected in other models (e.g., tetrabenazine antagonism, behavioral despair) considered predictive of antidepressant potential. Thus, the potentiation of yohimbine-induced lethality test in mice appears to represent a useful screening procedure for discovering potential antidepressant drugs. Key words: yohimbine, antidepressants, potentiation INTRODUCTION Antidepressants potentiate
    [Show full text]