Ligands of Adrenergic Receptors: a Structural Point of View

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ligands of Adrenergic Receptors: a Structural Point of View biomolecules Review Ligands of Adrenergic Receptors: A Structural Point of View Yiran Wu 1, Liting Zeng 1,2 and Suwen Zhao 1,2,* 1 iHuman Institute, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China; [email protected] (Y.W.); [email protected] (L.Z.) 2 School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Adrenergic receptors are G protein-coupled receptors for epinephrine and norepinephrine. They are targets of many drugs for various conditions, including treatment of hypertension, hypoten- sion, and asthma. Adrenergic receptors are intensively studied in structural biology, displayed for binding poses of different types of ligands. Here, we summarized molecular mechanisms of ligand recognition and receptor activation exhibited by structure. We also reviewed recent advances in structure-based ligand discovery against adrenergic receptors. Keywords: adrenergic receptor; adrenoreceptor; aminergic receptor; GPCR; activation mechanism; receptor–ligand interactions; selectivity; allosteric modulator; structure-based drug design 1. Introduction Adrenergic receptors (adrenoreceptors, ARs) are membrane proteins mediating the actions of epinephrine and norepinephrine. Epinephrine and norepinephrine (also called (–)-adrenaline and (–)-noradrenaline, respectively) are neurotransmitters of the sympathetic Citation: Wu, Y.; Zeng, L.; Zhao, S. nervous system and the central nervous system, and function as hormones secreted by the Ligands of Adrenergic Receptors: A adrenal medulla. There are nine members of adrenergic receptors in humans (Figure1a) , Structural Point of View. Biomolecules widely distributed throughout the body and playing key roles in many important physio- 2021, 11, 936. https://doi.org/ logical processes, such as response to stress, control of heart rate and blood pressure, and 10.3390/biom11070936 regulation of metabolism [1–3]. Besides epinephrine and norepinephrine as emergency medicines, adrenergic receptors are also the target of many medications in treatment of Academic Editor: Karsten Melcher various conditions, including hypertension, hypotension, heart failure, arrhythmias, and asthma [1,4]. In the 21st century, the development of new drugs against adrenergic re- Received: 25 May 2021 ceptors has slowed down, but the once most-neglected member β3-adrenergic receptor is Accepted: 12 June 2021 raising more attention than ever (Figure1b). Published: 24 June 2021 The adrenergic receptors belong to the rhodopsin family/class A G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR) is a prototype GPCR for studies Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral of sequence, structure, and function: β2AR is the first GPCR cloned [5], the second GPCR with regard to jurisdictional claims in was determined for atomic structure [6,7] (only after rhodopsin), and the first GPCR solved published maps and institutional affil- for the active state structure in a functional complex [8] (with Gs protein heterotrimer). iations. β-arrestins, the cytoplasmic partners responsible for desensitization of most GPCRs, were named after the β2AR [9,10]. Turkey β1AR has been comprehensively studied in structural biology (in this article, all structure of β1AR refers to turkey β1AR unless noted). A complex of β1AR and β-arrestin-1 was reported in 2020 [11]. Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. β2AR and β1AR are among the GPCRs with the largest numbers of structures obtained, Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. providing rich information for ligand recognition and activation mechanisms (β2AR has 38 This article is an open access article structures for 19 ligands and β1AR has 30 structures for 17 ligands). In 2019, structures of distributed under the terms and the three α2 adrenergic receptors were also reported, disclosing the structural basis for the conditions of the Creative Commons receptor-type selectivity of ligands. In this review, we summarized current achievements Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// of structural study in adrenergic receptors and advances in drug discovery based on creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ these structures. 4.0/). Biomolecules 2021, 11, 936. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11070936 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/biomolecules Biomolecules 2021, 11, x 936 FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 19 Figure 1. Adrenergic receptors as drug targets. (a) Binding affinities [12–14] of endogenous agonists in the nine adrenergic Figure 1. Adrenergic receptors as drug targets. (a) Binding affinities [12–14] of endogenous agonists in the nine adrenergic receptors. (b) Number of new drugs (approved or first marketing) for the nine adrenergic receptors in each decade. Data receptors. (b) Number of new drugs (approved or first marketing) for the nine adrenergic receptors in each decade. Data retrieved from Guide to PHARMACOLOGY [15](www.guidetopharmacology.org, accessed on 25 April 2021), GPCRdb [16] retrieved from Guide to PHARMACOLOGY [15] (www.guidetopharmacology.org, accessed on 25, April 2021), GPCRdb (gpcrdb.org, accessed on 25 April 2021), and DrugBank [17](go.drugbank.com, accessed on 25 April 2021). [16] (gpcrdb.org, accessed on 25, April 2021), and DrugBank [17] (go.drugbank.com, accessed on 25, April 2021). 2. Adrenergic Receptors in the Aminergic Receptor Subfamily 2. Adrenergic Receptors in the Aminergic Receptor Subfamily The nine adrenergic receptors in human body can be classified into three major types: The nine adrenergic receptors in human body can be classified into three major types: α1, α2, and β, each having three subtypes. Members within a major type are highly similar αin1, sequenceα2, and β, andeach function,having three but subtypes. in different Members major types within are a major distinct type in theseare highly aspects similar (see innext sequence section and for detail).function, All but the in adrenergicdifferent ma receptorsjor types belongare distinct to the in aminergic these aspects receptor (see nextsubfamily, section whichfor detail). has 42All members,the adrenergic forming receptors a single belong clade to inthe the aminergic phylogenetic receptor tree sub- of family,GPCRs which [18–21 ]has. The 42 aminergic members, receptors forming binda single monoamine clade in the neurotransmitters, phylogenetic tree acetylcholine, of GPCRs [18–21].or trace amines,The aminergic and share receptors common bind features mono inamine sequence, neurotransmitters, structure, and function acetylcholine, (Figure 2or): tracein the amines, orthosteric and siteshare (binding common site features of endogenous in sequence, ligand), structure, a conserved and function D3.32 (Ballesteros– (Figure 2): inWeinstein the orthosteric numbering, site (binding BWN [site22]) of forms endogenous a salt bridge ligand), to a theconser positivelyved D3.32 charged (Ballesteros– amino Weinsteingroup in ligand, numbering, and Y7.43 BWN and [22]) W7.40 forms stabilize a salt thisbridge salt to bridge the positively through a hydrogencharged amino bond groupand π -inπ interactionsligand, and Y7.43 (Figure and3b). W7.40 Because stabilize of the this shared salt bridge ligand through recognition a hydrogen mechanism, bond andpolypharmacology π-π interactions (drugs (Figure interacting 3b). Because with of multiplethe shared targets) ligand is recognition common inmechanism, aminergic polypharmacologyreceptors. For example, (drugs ergotamine interacting (anwith alkaloid multiple produced targets) is by common fungus) in can aminergic bind to re- 22 ceptors.aminergic For receptors example, with ergotamineKi less than (an alkaloid 1 µM[23 produced]. Other notable by fungus) cases can include bind clozapineto 22 aminer- [24] gicand receptors apomorphine with K [25i less]. Therefore, than 1 μM selectivity [23]. Other is a notable major concern cases include in drug clozapine discovery [24] against and apomorphineaminergic receptors. [25]. Therefore, selectivity is a major concern in drug discovery against aminergicThe endogenous receptors. ligands of adrenergic receptors, epinephrine and norepinephrine, are monoamineThe endogenous neurotransmitters. ligands of adrenergic Monoamine receptors, (also includeepinephrine dopamine, and norepinephrine, serotonin, and arehistamine) monoamine contains neurotransmitters. an amino group Monoamine connected to (also an aromatic include ringdopamine, by a two-carbon serotonin, chain and histamine)(Figure2b). contains When an binding amino to group receptors, connected the aromaticto an aromatic ring formsring by πa -two-carbonπ interactions chain to (FigureF6.51 and 2b). F6.52 When (Figures binding2a to and receptors,3b). Among the aromatic the monoamines, ring forms dopamineπ-π interactions is most to sim-F6.51 andilar F6.52 to epinephrine (Figures 2a and and norepinephrine 3b). Among the in monoamines, chemical structure: dopamine each is most contains similar a catechol to epi- nephrine(1,2-dihydroxybenzene) and norepinephrine group in (thus chemical collectively structure: referred each to contains as catecholamines). a catechol (1,2-dihy- The cate- cholamines are products of three successive steps in the tyrosine metabolism pathway. Their Biomolecules 2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 19 Biomolecules 2021, 11, 936 3 of 19 droxybenzene) group (thus collectively referred to as catecholamines). The catechola- mines are products of three successive steps in the tyrosine metabolism pathway. Their receptorsreceptors recognize recognize the the catechol catechol hydroxy hydroxy groups groups by by S5.42 S5.42 and
Recommended publications
  • Characterisation of the Α1b-Adrenoceptor by Modeling, Dynamics and Virtual Screening Kapil Jain B.Pharm, M.S.(Pharm.)
    Characterisation of the α1B-Adrenoceptor by Modeling, Dynamics and Virtual Screening Kapil Jain B.Pharm, M.S.(Pharm.) A Thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2018 Institute for Molecular Bioscience 0 Abstract G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest druggable class of proteins yet relatively little is known about the mechanism by which agonist binding induces the conformational changes necessary for G protein activation and intracellular signaling. Recently, the Kobilka group has shown that agonists, neutral antagonists and inverse agonists stabilise distinct extracellular surface (ECS) conformations of the β2-adrenergic receptor (AR) opening up new possibilities for allosteric drug targeting at GPCRs. The goal of this project is to extend these studies to define how the ECS conformation of the α1B-AR changes during agonist binding and develop an understanding of ligand entry and exit mechanisms that may help in the design of specific ligands with higher selectivity, efficacy and longer duration of action. Two parallel approaches were initiated to identify likely functional residues. The role of residues lining the primary binding site were predicted by online web server (Q-Site Finder) while secondary binding sites residues were predicted from molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Predicted functionally significant residues were mutated and their function was established using FLIPR, radioligand and saturation binding assays. Despite the α1B-AR being pursued as a drug target for over last few decades, few specific agonists and antagonists are known to date. In an attempt to address this gap, we pursued ligand-based approach to find potential new leads.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Signatures of G-Protein-Coupled Receptors A
    REVIEW doi:10.1038/nature11896 Molecular signatures of G-protein-coupled receptors A. J. Venkatakrishnan1, Xavier Deupi2, Guillaume Lebon1,3,4,5, Christopher G. Tate1, Gebhard F. Schertler2,6 & M. Madan Babu1 G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are physiologically important membrane proteins that sense signalling molecules such as hormones and neurotransmitters, and are the targets of several prescribed drugs. Recent exciting developments are providing unprecedented insights into the structure and function of several medically important GPCRs. Here, through a systematic analysis of high-resolution GPCR structures, we uncover a conserved network of non-covalent contacts that defines the GPCR fold. Furthermore, our comparative analysis reveals characteristic features of ligand binding and conformational changes during receptor activation. A holistic understanding that integrates molecular and systems biology of GPCRs holds promise for new therapeutics and personalized medicine. ignal transduction is a fundamental biological process that is comprehensively, and in the process expand the current frontiers of required to maintain cellular homeostasis and to ensure coordi- GPCR biology. S nated cellular activity in all organisms. Membrane proteins at the In this analysis, we objectively compare known structures and reveal cell surface serve as the communication interface between the cell’s key similarities and differences among diverse GPCRs. We identify a external and internal environments. One of the largest and most diverse consensus structural scaffold of GPCRs that is constituted by a network membrane protein families is the GPCRs, which are encoded by more of non-covalent contacts between residues on the transmembrane (TM) than 800 genes in the human genome1. GPCRs function by detecting a helices.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,498,481 B2 Rao Et Al
    USOO9498481 B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,498,481 B2 Rao et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Nov. 22, 2016 (54) CYCLOPROPYL MODULATORS OF P2Y12 WO WO95/26325 10, 1995 RECEPTOR WO WO99/O5142 2, 1999 WO WOOO/34283 6, 2000 WO WO O1/92262 12/2001 (71) Applicant: Apharaceuticals. Inc., La WO WO O1/922.63 12/2001 olla, CA (US) WO WO 2011/O17108 2, 2011 (72) Inventors: Tadimeti Rao, San Diego, CA (US); Chengzhi Zhang, San Diego, CA (US) OTHER PUBLICATIONS Drugs of the Future 32(10), 845-853 (2007).* (73) Assignee: Auspex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., LaJolla, Tantry et al. in Expert Opin. Invest. Drugs (2007) 16(2):225-229.* CA (US) Wallentin et al. in the New England Journal of Medicine, 361 (11), 1045-1057 (2009).* (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this Husted et al. in The European Heart Journal 27, 1038-1047 (2006).* patent is extended or adjusted under 35 Auspex in www.businesswire.com/news/home/20081023005201/ U.S.C. 154(b) by Od en/Auspex-Pharmaceuticals-Announces-Positive-Results-Clinical M YW- (b) by ayS. Study (published: Oct. 23, 2008).* This patent is Subject to a terminal dis- Concert In www.concertpharma. com/news/ claimer ConcertPresentsPreclinicalResultsNAMS.htm (published: Sep. 25. 2008).* Concert2 in Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 6(6), 782 (2008).* (21) Appl. No.: 14/977,056 Springthorpe et al. in Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 17. 6013-6018 (2007).* (22) Filed: Dec. 21, 2015 Leis et al. in Current Organic Chemistry 2, 131-144 (1998).* Angiolillo et al., Pharmacology of emerging novel platelet inhibi (65) Prior Publication Data tors, American Heart Journal, 2008, 156(2) Supp.
    [Show full text]
  • Emerging Evidence for a Central Epinephrine-Innervated A1- Adrenergic System That Regulates Behavioral Activation and Is Impaired in Depression
    Neuropsychopharmacology (2003) 28, 1387–1399 & 2003 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0893-133X/03 $25.00 www.neuropsychopharmacology.org Perspective Emerging Evidence for a Central Epinephrine-Innervated a1- Adrenergic System that Regulates Behavioral Activation and is Impaired in Depression ,1 1 1 1 1 Eric A Stone* , Yan Lin , Helen Rosengarten , H Kenneth Kramer and David Quartermain 1Departments of Psychiatry and Neurology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA Currently, most basic and clinical research on depression is focused on either central serotonergic, noradrenergic, or dopaminergic neurotransmission as affected by various etiological and predisposing factors. Recent evidence suggests that there is another system that consists of a subset of brain a1B-adrenoceptors innervated primarily by brain epinephrine (EPI) that potentially modulates the above three monoamine systems in parallel and plays a critical role in depression. The present review covers the evidence for this system and includes findings that brain a -adrenoceptors are instrumental in behavioral activation, are located near the major monoamine cell groups 1 or target areas, receive EPI as their neurotransmitter, are impaired or inhibited in depressed patients or after stress in animal models, and a are restored by a number of antidepressants. This ‘EPI- 1 system’ may therefore represent a new target system for this disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology (2003) 28, 1387–1399, advance online publication, 18 June 2003; doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300222 Keywords: a1-adrenoceptors; epinephrine; motor activity; depression; inactivity INTRODUCTION monoaminergic systems. This new system appears to be impaired during stress and depression and thus may Depressive illness is currently believed to result from represent a new target for this disorder.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Selectivity and Partial Efficacy at the Monoamine Transporters: a Unified Model of Allosteric Modulation and Amphetamine-Induced Substrate Release
    1521-0111/95/3/303–312$35.00 https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.118.114793 MOLECULAR PHARMACOLOGY Mol Pharmacol 95:303–312, March 2019 Copyright ª 2019 by The Author(s) This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC Attribution 4.0 International license. MINIREVIEW Functional Selectivity and Partial Efficacy at the Monoamine Transporters: A Unified Model of Allosteric Modulation and Amphetamine-Induced Substrate Release Peter S. Hasenhuetl,1,2 Shreyas Bhat,2 Michael Freissmuth, and Walter Sandtner Downloaded from Institute of Pharmacology, Gaston H. Glock Research Laboratories for Exploratory Drug Development, Center of Physiology and Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria Received October 2, 2018; accepted December 13, 2018 ABSTRACT molpharm.aspetjournals.org All clinically approved drugs targeting the plasmalemmal trans- allosteric inhibition and stimulation of MATs, which can be porters for dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin act either functionally selective for either substrate uptake or amphetamine- as competitive uptake inhibitors or as amphetamine-like releas- induced release. These concepts are integrated into a parsimonious ers. Monoamine transporter (MAT) ligands that allosterically kinetic framework, which relies exclusively on physiologic transport affect MAT-mediated substrate uptake, release, or both were modes (without any deviation from an alternating access mecha- recently discovered. Their modes of action have not yet been nism). The model posits cooperative substrate and Na1 binding and explained in a unified framework. Here, we go beyond compet- functional selectivity by conformational selection (i.e., preference of itive inhibitors and classic amphetamines and introduce con- the allosteric modulators for the substrate-loaded or substrate-free cepts for partial efficacy at and allosteric modulation of MATs.
    [Show full text]
  • Neurotensin Activates Gabaergic Interneurons in the Prefrontal Cortex
    The Journal of Neuroscience, February 16, 2005 • 25(7):1629–1636 • 1629 Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive Neurotensin Activates GABAergic Interneurons in the Prefrontal Cortex Kimberly A. Petrie,1 Dennis Schmidt,1 Michael Bubser,1 Jim Fadel,1 Robert E. Carraway,2 and Ariel Y. Deutch1 1Departments of Pharmacology and Psychiatry, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37212, and 2Department of Physiology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts 01655 Converging data suggest a dysfunction of prefrontal cortical GABAergic interneurons in schizophrenia. Morphological and physiological studies indicate that cortical GABA cells are modulated by a variety of afferents. The peptide transmitter neurotensin may be one such modulator of interneurons. In the rat prefrontal cortex (PFC), neurotensin is exclusively localized to dopamine axons and has been suggested to be decreased in schizophrenia. However, the effects of neurotensin on cortical interneurons are poorly understood. We used in vivo microdialysis in freely moving rats to assess whether neurotensin regulates PFC GABAergic interneurons. Intra-PFC administra- tion of neurotensin concentration-dependently increased extracellular GABA levels; this effect was impulse dependent, being blocked by treatment with tetrodotoxin. The ability of neurotensin to increase GABA levels in the PFC was also blocked by pretreatment with 2-[1-(7-chloro-4-quinolinyl)-5-(2,6-dimethoxyphenyl)pyrazole-3-yl)carbonylamino]tricyclo(3.3.1.1.3.7)decan-2-carboxylic acid (SR48692), a high-affinity neurotensin receptor 1 (NTR1) antagonist. This finding is consistent with our observation that NTR1 was localized to GABAergic interneurons in the PFC, particularly parvalbumin-containing interneurons. Because neurotensin is exclusively localized to dopamine axons in the PFC, we also determined whether neurotensin plays a role in the ability of dopamine agonists to increase extracellular GABA levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Ageing, Sex and Cardioprotection Marisol Ruiz-Meana1,2, Kerstin Boengler3, David Garcia-Dorado1,2, Derek J
    Kaambre Tuuli (Orcid ID: 0000-0001-5755-4694) Kararigas Georgios (Orcid ID: 0000-0002-8187-0176) Ageing, sex and cardioprotection Marisol Ruiz-Meana1,2, Kerstin Boengler3, David Garcia-Dorado1,2, Derek J. Hausenloy4,5,6,7,8,9, Tuuli Kaambre10, Georgios Kararigas11,12, Cinzia Perrino13, Rainer Schulz3, Kirsti Ytrehus14. 1 Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Department of Cardiology. Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR).Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain. 2 Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red-CV, CIBER-CV, Spain. 3Institute of Physiology, Justus-Liebig University Giessen. Giessen 35392, Aulweg 129, Germany. 4Cardiovascular & Metabolic Disorders Program, Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore. 5National Heart Research Institute Singapore, National Heart Centre, Singapore. 6Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore. 7The Hatter Cardiovascular Institute, University College London, London, UK. 8The National Institute of Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, Research & Development, London, UK. 9Tecnologico de Monterrey, Centro de Biotecnologia-FEMSA, Nuevo Leon, Mexico. 10Laboratory of Chemical Biology, National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics, Akadeemia tee 23, 12618 Tallinn, Estonia. 11Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany. 12DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Berlin,
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Online Material
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Supplementary Information for 8 9 Fractalkine-induced microglial vasoregulation occurs within the retina and is altered early in diabetic 10 retinopathy 11 12 *Samuel A. Mills, *Andrew I. Jobling, *Michael A. Dixon, Bang V. Bui, Kirstan A. Vessey, Joanna A. Phipps, 13 Ursula Greferath, Gene Venables, Vickie H.Y. Wong, Connie H.Y. Wong, Zheng He, Flora Hui, James C. 14 Young, Josh Tonc, Elena Ivanova, Botir T. Sagdullaev, Erica L. Fletcher 15 * Joint first authors 16 17 Corresponding author: 18 Prof. Erica L. Fletcher. Department of Anatomy & Neuroscience. The University of Melbourne, Grattan St, 19 Parkville 3010, Victoria, Australia. 20 Email: [email protected] ; Tel: +61-3-8344-3218; Fax: +61-3-9347-5219 21 22 This PDF file includes: 23 24 Supplementary text 25 Figures S1 to S10 26 Tables S1 to S7 27 Legends for Movies S1 to S2 28 SI References 29 30 Other supplementary materials for this manuscript include the following: 31 32 Movies S1 to S2 33 34 35 36 1 1 Supplementary Information Text 2 Materials and Methods 3 Microglial process movement on retinal vessels 4 Dark agouti rats were anaesthetized, injected intraperitoneally with rhodamine B (Sigma-Aldrich) to label blood 5 vessels and retinal explants established as described in the main text. Retinal microglia were labelled with Iba-1 6 and imaging performed on an inverted confocal microscope (Leica SP5). Baseline images were taken for 10 7 minutes, followed by the addition of PBS (10 minutes) and then either fractalkine or fractalkine + candesartan 8 (10 minutes) using concentrations outlined in the main text.
    [Show full text]
  • M100907, a Serotonin 5-HT2A Receptor Antagonist and Putative Antipsychotic, Blocks Dizocilpine-Induced Prepulse Inhibition Defic
    M100907, a Serotonin 5-HT2A Receptor Antagonist and Putative Antipsychotic, Blocks Dizocilpine-Induced Prepulse Inhibition Deficits in Sprague–Dawley and Wistar Rats Geoffrey B. Varty, Ph.D., Vaishali P. Bakshi, Ph.D., and Mark A. Geyer, Ph.D. a In a recent study using Wistar rats, the serotonergic 5-HT2 1 receptor agonist cirazoline disrupts PPI. As risperidone a receptor antagonists ketanserin and risperidone reduced the and M100907 have affinity at the 1 receptor, a final study disruptive effects of the noncompetitive N-methyl-D- examined whether M100907 would block the effects of aspartate (NMDA) antagonist dizocilpine on prepulse cirazoline on PPI. Risperidone partially, but inhibition (PPI), suggesting that there is an interaction nonsignificantly, reduced the effects of dizocilpine in Wistar between serotonin and glutamate in the modulation of PPI. rats, although this effect was smaller than previously In contrast, studies using the noncompetitive NMDA reported. Consistent with previous studies, risperidone did antagonist phencyclidine (PCP) in Sprague–Dawley rats not alter the effects of dizocilpine in Sprague–Dawley rats. found no effect with 5-HT2 antagonists. To test the hypothesis Most importantly, M100907 pretreatment fully blocked the that strain differences might explain the discrepancy in effect of dizocilpine in both strains; whereas SDZ SER 082 these findings, risperidone was tested for its ability to had no effect. M100907 had no influence on PPI by itself reduce the PPI-disruptive effects of dizocilpine in Wistar and did not reduce the effects of cirazoline on PPI. These and Sprague–Dawley rats. Furthermore, to determine studies confirm the suggestion that serotonin and glutamate which serotonergic receptor subtype may mediate this effect, interact in modulating PPI and indicate that the 5-HT2A the 5-HT2A receptor antagonist M100907 (formerly MDL receptor subtype mediates this interaction.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the Serotonergic System and the Effects of Antidepressants During Brain Development Examined Using in Vivo Pet Imaging and in Vitro Receptor Binding
    From THE DEPARTMENT OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden THE ROLE OF THE SEROTONERGIC SYSTEM AND THE EFFECTS OF ANTIDEPRESSANTS DURING BRAIN DEVELOPMENT EXAMINED USING IN VIVO PET IMAGING AND IN VITRO RECEPTOR BINDING Stal Saurav Shrestha Stockholm 2014 Cover Illustration: Voxel-wise analysis of the whole monkey brain using the PET radioligand, [11C]DASB showing persistent serotonin transporter upregulation even after more than 1.5 years of fluoxetine discontinuation. All previously published papers were reproduced with permission from the publisher. Published by Karolinska Institutet. Printed by Universitetsservice-AB © Stal Saurav Shrestha, 2014 ISBN 978-91-7549-522-4 Serotonergic System and Antidepressants During Brain Development To my family Amaze yourself ! Stal Saurav Shrestha, 2014 The Department of Clinical Neuroscience The role of the serotonergic system and the effects of antidepressants during brain development examined using in vivo PET imaging and in vitro receptor binding AKADEMISK AVHANDLING som för avläggande av medicine doktorsexamen vid Karolinska Institutet offentligen försvaras i CMM föreläsningssalen L8:00, Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, Solna THESIS FOR DOCTORAL DEGREE (PhD) Stal Saurav Shrestha Date: March 31, 2014 (Monday); Time: 10 AM Venue: Center for Molecular Medicine Lecture Hall Floor 1, Karolinska Hospital, Solna Principal Supervisor: Opponent: Robert B. Innis, MD, PhD Klaus-Peter Lesch, MD, PhD National Institutes of Health University of Würzburg Department of NIMH Department
    [Show full text]
  • Accelerated Resensitization of the D 1 Dopamine Receptor-Mediated
    The Journal of Neuroscience, October 1994, 74(10): 6260-6266 Accelerated Resensitization of the D 1 Dopamine Receptor-mediated Response in Cultured Cortical and Striatal Neurons from the Rat: Respective Role of CY1 -Adrenergic and /U-methybaspartate Receptors Fabrice Trovero, Philippe Marin, Jean-PO1 Tassin, JoQl Premont, and Jacques Glowinski INSERM U 114, Chaire de Neuropharmacologie, College de France, 75231 Paris Cedex, France As previously shown in vivo, noradrenergic and glutama- cortex. In the rat, bilateral electrolytic lesions of the mesence- tergic neurons can regulate the denervation supersensitivity phalic ventral tegmental area induce a complex and permanent of Dl dopaminergic (DA) receptors in the rat prefrontal cor- behavioral syndrome characterized by a locomotor hyperactiv- tex and striatum respectively. Therefore, the effects of meth- ity and the incapacity of the animal to focalize its attention (Le oxamine (an al-adrenergic agonist) and glutamate on the Moal et al., 1969). Some of the behavioral deficits observed in resensitization of Dl DA receptors were investigated in cul- the lesioned animals, particularly the locomotor hyperactivity, tured cortical and striatal neurons from the embryonic rat. have been attributed for a large part to the selective destruction In the presence of sulpiride and propranolol, DA stimulated of the cortical dopaminergic (DA) innervation (Tassin et al., the Dl DA receptor-mediated conversion of 3H-adenine into 1978). This locomotor hyperactivity was markedly reduced in 3H-cAMP in both intact cortical and striatal cells and these rats with 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) lesions,which destroy responses were markedly desensitized in cells preexposed not only the ascendingDA neurons but also the ascendingnor- for 15 min to DA (50 AM).
    [Show full text]
  • Covalent Agonists for Studying G Protein-Coupled Receptor Activation
    Covalent agonists for studying G protein-coupled receptor activation Dietmar Weicherta, Andrew C. Kruseb, Aashish Manglikb, Christine Hillera, Cheng Zhangb, Harald Hübnera, Brian K. Kobilkab,1, and Peter Gmeinera,1 aDepartment of Chemistry and Pharmacy, Friedrich Alexander University, 91052 Erlangen, Germany; and bDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305 Contributed by Brian K. Kobilka, June 6, 2014 (sent for review April 21, 2014) Structural studies on G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) provide Disulfide-based cross-linking approaches (17, 18) offer important insights into the architecture and function of these the advantage that the covalent binding of disulfide-containing important drug targets. However, the crystallization of GPCRs in compounds is chemoselective for cysteine and enforced by the active states is particularly challenging, requiring the formation of affinity of the ligand-pharmacophore rather than by the elec- stable and conformationally homogeneous ligand-receptor com- trophilicity of the cross-linking function (19). We refer to the plexes. Native hormones, neurotransmitters, and synthetic ago- described ligands as covalent rather than irreversible agonists nists that bind with low affinity are ineffective at stabilizing an because cleavage may be promoted by reducing agents and the active state for crystallogenesis. To promote structural studies on disulfide transfer process is a reversible chemical reaction the pharmacologically highly relevant class
    [Show full text]