DOCSLIB.ORG

From Tom Ditullio '17

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The following are excerpts from major papers written last year by Class of 2017 students in the honors-level “Sacramental & Moral Theology” class. In these papers, students were required to engage with the writings of multiple Church Fathers, medieval mystics, and other theologians in order to compose a unique expression of Trinitarian and Christological doctrine contrasted with competing heresies, an assignment in which they also needed to incorporated quotes from these texts into their own writing with parenthetical citations in order to enhance their explanations and support their arguments. From Tom DiTullio ’17: … God is triune both in Himself and in us. The Catholic Church teaches that God is made up of the Holy Trinity, a fundamental belief and foundation of doctrine. This consists of God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit. This does not mean there are three gods, as it might sound, but three persons in God. These persons or “hypostases” are all distinct from each other but are all of the same nature or “ousia.” This nature is God-ness, which they all possess, but it is the same ousia making them all one God. This can be thought of as three people sharing one copy of a movie; they all have the movie but it is that same copy of the movie. … Since all three hypostases in God share the same ousia, they are homoousios. … The three hypostases mutually indwell within each other. This is known as perichoresis, or circumincession. While the hypostases indwell in each other, there is also a pattern of procession as well. The Father, who is the source of God-ness, overflows in love and begets/generates the Son, the Father’s Word. Blessed John van Ruusbroec depicts this generation in The Spiritual Espousals, saying: He eternally, ceaselessly, and without intermediary utters a single, fathomless word, and only this word. In this word he gives utterance to Himself and all things. This word, which is none other than “See,” is the generation and birth of the Son, the eternal light, in whom all blessedness is seen and known. (CP3 32) Ruusbroec is saying that the Father speaks His Word, Christ, in creation and that through Christ all of creation is able to learn and be united with God in His Mystical Body, the Church. The Father also spirates the Holy Spirit along with the Son. This takes place outside of space and time so the Spirit is not a creation of both persons but a procession of love and being from one to the others, because they are all eternal. Johannes Tauler summarizes the processions in saying that: [The Father] turns inward, comprehending Himself, and He flows outward in the generation of his Image (that of His Son), which He has known and comprehended. And again He returns to Himself in perfect self-delight. And this delight streams forth as ineffable love, and that ineffable love is the Holy Spirit. (CP3 35) This is because the Word, the Son, is the Father’s self-expression through which He knows Himself and the Holy Spirit is the way in which the Father expresses Himself. However, these processions also take place in space and time in the distinct temporal missions of the Trinity. “The Father pours Himself forth in the processions of the divine Persons and then on into creatures” (Tauler, CP3 35), creations of God, in these missions where the Father sends His Word to Earth to become Jesus Christ in the Incarnation and allows creation to take part in the begetting and generation of the Son through Jesus. … This takes place when the Word is made flesh; He takes on our human nature and unites it with His divine nature, which is known as the hypostatic union. This is comparable to, as St. Gregory of Nazianzus depicts it, the Son “[taking] on the poverty of [our] flesh, that [we] may gain the riches of His divinity” (CP3 15). This is a sacrament/revelation, where the Father gives His love to us inwardly as grace through the outward sign of the Incarnation, and in this sacrament, Christ brings the Church, His Mystical Body, into union with His divinity and saves us. From Katie Morris ’17: …In order to understand God and how He relates to us, the human race must view God as Triune. The most important aspect of Catholic doctrine is the belief that God is a Trinity. There is one God in three Persons. More specifically, God is one divine ousia/substance/nature in three distinct Persons/Hypostases. One must not believe that these distinct Persons (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit) are all one and the same Person. This clearly goes against Catholic doctrine and is considered heretical (Sabellianism). As well as being distinct, these three Persons of the Trinity are homoousios/consubstantial with each other. This means that they are all one and the same divine ousia/substance/nature (as mentioned previously). The Persons are co-equal and co-eternal, and they are each equally God. One Person is not more dominant than another. The three distinct Persons of the Trinity are also perichoretic, or within each other. To elaborate, Perichoresis/Circumincession is the mutual indwelling of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit within one another. Blessed John van Ruusbroec, an orthodox writer who lived from 1293 to 1381, discusses this perichoretic behavior and the natural “flowing” motion that Perichoresis provides. Ruusbroec refers to God the Father and God the Son, stating that “the Father is in the Son and the Son is in the Father” (CP3 34). He further states how this “meeting” of the Trinity (Perichoresis) is “constantly renewed in the bond of love, for just as the Father ceaselessly sees all things anew in the birth of the Son, so too are all things loved anew by the Father and Son in the flowing of the Holy Spirit. This is the active meeting of the Father and the Son, in which we are lovingly embraced by means of the Holy Spirit in eternal love” (CP3 33). The term “Perichoresis” can also refer to the communion of the three Persons in “mutual inflowing” and love. Through the grace of God in Christ, this communion of eternal love is extended to us (humanity). In other words, we take part in the Perichoresis of the Trinity. This Perichoresis also relates to the divine/eternal processions and temporal missions. The divine/eternal processions of the Trinity are the ways in which the three Persons within the Trinity are related to one another. The Father is the origin or source of the Trinity. The eternal procession of God the Son is the eternal generation/begetting of the Son from God the Father. The procession of God the Holy Spirit is the spiration of the Holy Spirit from the Father and Son. Hans Urs von Balthasar, a Catholic theologian who lived from 1905 to 1988, writes about these eternal processions within his writings. He discusses especially the eternal generation/begetting of the Son from the Father. He refers to the Son’s eternal procession when stating that the Father “lets go of His God-ness, and in a way shows a God-like Godless-ness of love. … But we must remember this: the Father, in uttering and surrendering Himself, does not lose Himself. He does not extinguish Himself by self-giving, just as He does not keep back anything of Himself either” (CP3 42). In other words, God fully utters Himself through the Son while remaining fully Himself. He does not lose a part of His being when begetting the Son and/or spirating the Holy Spirit. …The temporal missions of the Son and Holy Spirit are the eternal processions expressed within time. However, the temporal missions and eternal processions are distinguished by theology in certain aspects. The temporal missions occur “temporally” or within time. They also take place “outside” God and happen freely by God’s grace for us. The Son’s mission is being sent by the Father in the Incarnation. The Son’s mission also includes His life, death, and Resurrection, which unite all of humanity as we become a part of the Mystical Body, the Church, through the sacraments. The Holy Spirit’s mission occurs when He is sent by the Father and Son at Pentecost to fill the hearts of those members within the Church. These temporal missions (and divine processions), through the power of God’s grace, are poured outwardly to each and every one of us. We take part in the Perichoresis and processions of the Trinity. This outpouring of God’s love to creation is reflected in the writings of Meister Eckhart. He states that “[t]he Father speaks the Son always, in unity, and pours out in Him all things. They are all called to return into whence they have flowed out. All their life and their being is a calling and a hastening back to Him from whom they have issued…” (CP3 27). Eckhart explains that the Son is poured out of God the Father into each and every one of us. This occurs so that we may freely express/show God’s grace/glory. When viewing Catholic doctrine, one must also remember to analyze the purpose of Jesus Christ’s Incarnation (and our resulting redemption). In the Incarnation, God becomes human (as Christ) while remaining fully divine. In other words, Jesus Christ is fully human and fully divine. It is incorrect to say that Christ only appeared to have a physical/human body (Docetism), for Christ was fully human.
Recommended publications
  • Durham E-Theses

    Durham E-Theses

    Durham E-Theses The Christology of nestorius and the chalcedonian settlement Fletcher, Stanley P. How to cite: Fletcher, Stanley P. (1972) The Christology of nestorius and the chalcedonian settlement, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/9976/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk THE REVEREND STANLEY P. FLETCHER, B.A. THE CHRISTOLOGY OP NESTORIUS AND THE CHALCEDONIAN SETTLEMENT A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN THE UNIVERSITY OF DURHAM The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. THE GHRISTOLOGY OF NESTORIUS AND THE CHALCEDONIAN SETTLEMENT - ABSTRACT The assessment of Nestorius1 Christology begins with a consideration of his indebtedness to Paul of Samosata, Diodore of Tarsus and Theodore of Mopsuestia.
  • "Breaking Ground" a Look at the Impact of the Cappadocian Fathers on the Establishment of the Doctrine of the Holy

    "Breaking Ground" a Look at the Impact of the Cappadocian Fathers on the Establishment of the Doctrine of the Holy

    Verbum Volume 7 Issue 1 Article 11 December 2009 "Breaking Ground" A look at the Impact of the Cappadocian Fathers on the Establishment of the Doctrine of the Holy Spirit During the Transition Between the Council of Nigeria (325) and the Council of Constantinople (381). Frederick J. Flo St. John Fisher College Follow this and additional works at: https://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/verbum Part of the Religion Commons How has open access to Fisher Digital Publications benefited ou?y Recommended Citation Flo, Frederick J. (2009) ""Breaking Ground" A look at the Impact of the Cappadocian Fathers on the Establishment of the Doctrine of the Holy Spirit During the Transition Between the Council of Nigeria (325) and the Council of Constantinople (381).," Verbum: Vol. 7 : Iss. 1 , Article 11. Available at: https://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/verbum/vol7/iss1/11 This document is posted at https://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/verbum/vol7/iss1/11 and is brought to you for free and open access by Fisher Digital Publications at St. John Fisher College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "Breaking Ground" A look at the Impact of the Cappadocian Fathers on the Establishment of the Doctrine of the Holy Spirit During the Transition Between the Council of Nigeria (325) and the Council of Constantinople (381). Abstract In lieu of an abstract, below is the essay's first paragraph. "At the center of Christian dogma lies the worship of the Holy Trinity. Naturally, with every central focus comes controversy. Throughout history, the interpretation of the Trinity has created a tremendous amount of debate.
  • 1 Meister Eckhart in Twentieth

    1 Meister Eckhart in Twentieth

    Moran eckhart 1 Meister Eckhart in Twentieth-Century Philosophy Dermot Moran (University College Dublin) for Jeremiah Hackett, eD. Companion to Meister Eckhart Brill’s Companions to the Christian Tradition Vol. 36. LeiDen/Boston: Brill, 2013, pp. 669–698. ISBN 9789004183476. Leiden: Brill, 2013 Final Submiited Version The manner in which Meister Eckhart has been viewed by scholars has changed considerably over the centuries.1 Nevertheless, the Bull In agro dominico of 27th March 1329 already points towards the future directions that Eckhart research would subsequently take. There Eckhart is described in three-fold manner as ‘from Germany, a doctor of sacred theology (as it is said) and a professor of the Order of Preachers’.2 These characterisations of Eckhart continue to frame the debate – in other words, his connection with the German philosophical and mystical tradition, his status as a University of Paris master and Scriptural exegete, and his role as a theologian and vernacular preacher for the Dominican Order. The revival of Eckhart during the nineteenth century uncovered many more Eckharts. Indeed, the basis for Eckhart’s growing popularity in the twentieth century was laid during the nineteenth century when Eckhart was rediscovered by the Romantics. Eckhart was initially revived by the eclectic engineer, Catholic Romantic, Franz von Baader (1765-1841), a friend of Schelling, who discovered Eckhart through his reading of Boehme. Baader inspired Hegel to refer to Eckhart in his Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion, quoting Eckhart’s saying that the eye with which we see God is also the eye with which God sees us.3 The nineteenth-century revival broadly represented Eckhart as a speculative, dialectical thinker.
  • The Importance of Athanasius and the Views of His Character

    The Importance of Athanasius and the Views of His Character

    The Importance of Athanasius and the Views of His Character J. Steven Davis Submitted to Dr. Jerry Sutton School of Divinity Liberty University September 19, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter I: Research Proposal Abstract .............................................................................................................................11 Background ......................................................................................................................11 Limitations ........................................................................................................................18 Method of Research .........................................................................................................19 Thesis Statement ..............................................................................................................21 Outline ...............................................................................................................................21 Bibliography .....................................................................................................................27 Chapter II: Background of Athanasius An Influential Figure .......................................................................................................33 Early Life ..........................................................................................................................33 Arian Conflict ...................................................................................................................36
  • CONTINUITY and DISCONTINUITY BETWEEN the Medlev AL

    CONTINUITY and DISCONTINUITY BETWEEN the Medlev AL

    229 CONTINUITY AND DISCONTINUITY BETWEEN THE MEDlEVAL MYSTICS AND THE SPIRITUALS OF THE RADICAL REFORMATION INTRODUCTION The question of whether or not there are links between the medieval mystics, particularly those of South Germany, and the more radical elements of the reformation has brought forth much dispute. There is a large literature, much of it polemical in style. The confessional approach to history has led to condemnation of the radicals from both Protestant and Catholic theologians. A small group, with an apologetic approach, has defended the anabaptist cause as distinct from the more radical and revolutionary elements, but whilst attempting to distance itself from what Zeman calls 'the embarrassing anomaly of the Miinsterite Kingdom'.1 While the Mennonites have done much research on the period, some of it is biased because of its apologetic nature. For example, we read in The Mennonite Encyclopedia that Thomas Miintzer had nothing essential in common with anabaptism and was not even interested in adult baptism.2 Miintzer was certainly a radical but to say that he did not accept adult baptism contradicts the evidence. Conrad Grebel wrote to Miintzer in 1524 that 'On the matter of baptism thy book pleases us well, and we desire to be further instructed by thee. ,3 Grebel goes on in the same letter to say that infant baptism is a 'senseless, blasphemous abomination' and that Miintzer knows this ten times better than himself. Not only did Miintzer accept adult baptism, but this was recognized by Grebel, who is accepted in The Mennonite Encyclopedia as 'not only the founder of the Swiss brethren movement and the later Mennonite Church but also one of the prophetic spirits of Christendom in its great and insistent tradition of reform and revival.
  • November 26, 2017

    November 26, 2017

    Our Lord Jesus Christ, King of the Universe - Year A November 26, 2017 St. Anthony of Padua 3009 High Ridge Blvd. High Ridge, MO 63049 Business Hours Monday - Friday 7:30 A.M. - 2:30 P.M. Phone (636) 677-4868 Fax (636) 677-2781 Website www.stanthonyhr.org Pastor Father John Reiker PARISH MISSION STATEMENT Our mission is to be on fire with the love of Jesus Christ, and with the help of the Holy Spirit, to celebrate our com- munity of faith in the Eucharist and to share God's love and mercy with our neighbors through our ministries and evangelization." Mass Schedule Sunday Saturday 5:00 P.M. Daily Sunday 8:30 A.M., 10:15 A.M. Monday - Friday 8:00 A.M Holy Days Confessions 8:00 A.M. - 7:00 P.M. Saturday 4:15-4:45 P.M. RECTORY CLOSED ON ALL HOLY DAYS By appointment anytime Rectory Office Religious Instruction Marriages: Make arrangements with Father John Reiker Parish School of Religion Priest or Deacon of your choice no less Pastor ext. 102 Phone (636) 677-4868 ext 118 than six months prior to proposed [email protected] Grades (pre-K through 8) wedding date. Mrs. Kathy Joslin Parish Help Line: St. Vincent de Paul Deacon Richard L. Stevens [email protected] Adults - RCIA Society, 1-877-238-3228, ext. 3329 [email protected] Please contact: New Parishioners: Welcome! The Rectory Office 636-677-4868 ext. 100 Please register by contacting the Deacon Jim G’Sell rectory during business hours @ 677- [email protected] Sacramental Preparation Baptism Preparation Meeting: Infant 4868 ext.
  • The Source and Application of Thomas Müntzer's Theology of Divination in His Marginal Notes on Tertullian

    The Source and Application of Thomas Müntzer's Theology of Divination in His Marginal Notes on Tertullian

    Concordia Seminary - Saint Louis Scholarly Resources from Concordia Seminary Master of Sacred Theology Thesis Concordia Seminary Scholarship 5-21-2021 The Source and Application of Thomas Müntzer's Theology of Divination in His Marginal Notes on Tertullian Roger Drinnon Concordia Seminary, St. Louis, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.csl.edu/stm Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Christian Denominations and Sects Commons, Christianity Commons, History of Christianity Commons, Liturgy and Worship Commons, Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons, and the Renaissance Studies Commons Recommended Citation Drinnon, Roger, "The Source and Application of Thomas Müntzer's Theology of Divination in His Marginal Notes on Tertullian" (2021). Master of Sacred Theology Thesis. 399. https://scholar.csl.edu/stm/399 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Concordia Seminary Scholarship at Scholarly Resources from Concordia Seminary. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master of Sacred Theology Thesis by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Resources from Concordia Seminary. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE SOURCE AND APPLICATION OF THOMAS MÜNTZER’S THEOLOGY OF DIVINATION IN HIS MARGINAL NOTES ON TERTULLIAN A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of Concordia Seminary, St. Louis, Department of Historical Theology in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Sacred Theology By Roger Andrew Drinnon May, 2021 Approved by: Rev. Dr. Timothy Dost Thesis Advisor Rev. Dr. Joel Elowsky Reader Rev. Dr. Benjamin Haupt Reader © 2021 by Roger Andrew Drinnon. All rights reserved. ii To my father, Roger for giving me the love of learning.
  • Palamism in the Twentieth Century

    Palamism in the Twentieth Century

    Palamism in the Twentieth Century An Examination of the Essence/Energies Distinction in Vladimir Lossky, Kallistos Ware and Dumitru Staniloae Jonas Eklund Supervisor Professor Gösta Hallonsten This Master’s Thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the MA degree at MF Norwegian School of Theology, 2017, autumn, in collaboration with the Newman Institute, Uppsala, Sweden AVH5010: Master's Thesis (60 ECTS) Master of Theology 43 726 words ABSTRACT This Master’s thesis will explicate, analyse and discuss the Orthodox doctrine of the essence/energies distinction in three prominent 20th century theologians, namely, Vladimir Lossky, Kallistos Ware and Dumitru Staniloae. This is urgent because of the central position this doctrine occupies in contemporary Orthodoxy, together with the lack of precision one usually encounters when references are made to this distinction. Methodologically, it will proceed by a careful reading of primary sources in order to explicate and clarify, in each theologian, the most important lines of thought concerning the essence/energies distinction. It will also explicate details which may affect, elucidate, or even put into question, these major lines of thought. As secondary sources, other Orthodox theologians as well as Greek Church fathers will be consulted. Lossky and Staniloae, respectively, present rather clear visions about the relationship between God’s essence and energies. As it turns out their positions are quite far from each other and, at some points, even incommensurable. Ware, on the other hand, affirms traditional and contemporary formulations, yet without providing any clear definition of his own opinion. As regards God’s energies towards creation, the opinions of the three theologians are pretty close; but regarding God’s eternal energies, their differences become apparent.
  • "In Persona Christi" Its Significance for the Theology of Ministerial

    "In Persona Christi" Its Significance for the Theology of Ministerial

    "IN PERSONA CHRISTI" ITS SIGNIFICANCE FOR THE THEOLOGY OF MINISTERIAL PRIESTHOOD IN THE DOCUMENTS OF VATICAN II by Jerome F. Thompson, B.A. A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Milwaukee, Wisconsin Apr iI, 1987 Preface It was in my service as Coordinator of Hispanic Affairs for the Archdiocese of Milwaukee that I felt the need to formally work toward a degree in theology at Marquette University. The Hispanic community and the staff of the Apostolate inspired and encouraged me to undertake the task. A lot of years and a lot of work have intervened since this work was first begun. I wish to express my thanks to the Hispanic community and staff in Milwaukee for their continued personal and academic support. It am grateful to the members of the theology department of Marquette, especially Rev. William Kelly SJ and Rev. Philip J. Rossi SJ in their assistance as chairs of the department, to Rev. Richard Roach SJ, my first advisor, and Rev. Donald Keefe SJ, my final advisor, for their patience and guidance, and to Rev. Joseph Lienhard SJ and Rev. Joseph Murphy SJ who served on the reading and approval committee. I wish also to express my thanks to the officers and staff of the National Organization for the Continuing Education of Roman Catholic Clergy (NOCERCC) for whom I have worked these past five years for nudging me on and enduring my research ,and writing. Catholic Theological Union in Chicago provided a great support to me especially through its fine library resources.
  • The Intertwining of Multiplicity and Unity in Dionysius’ Metaphysical Mysticism*

    The Intertwining of Multiplicity and Unity in Dionysius’ Metaphysical Mysticism*

    The Intertwining of Multiplicity and Unity In Dionysius’ Metaphysical Mysticism* Francisco J. Romero Carrasquillo Universidad Panamericana Guadalajara, México [email protected] Abstract In Dionysius, the procession of things from, and their rever- sion to, the One, far from being distinct and clear-cut events, can be understood as intertwined, simultaneous, and co-eternal ‘moments’ of the same cosmic reality, whereby a given thing oscillates, or spirals, between unity and multiplicity. Moreover, Dionysius’ mystical itinerary is a special case of his proces- sion-reversion metaphysics: mysticism is the soul’s own rever- sion to the One. This explains why the mind also intertwines cataphatic and apophatic mystical discourses, as it spirals Recibido: 05 -05 - 2012. Aceptado: 27 - 10 - 2012. * I would like to thank Richard C. Taylor and Fr. John D. Jones for having read earlier drafts of sections of this paper, and for having offered valuable comments and encouragement. In my analysis of Dionysius’ metaphysics, I am especially indebted to Fr. Jones, who taught me how to read this difficult author, not only through his graduate teaching but also through his scholarship, in particular his superb introduction to (and translation of) The Divine Names and Mystical Theology: John C. Jones, Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite: The Divine Names and Mystical Theology (Milwaukee: Marquette University Press 1980); as well as his two essays, “The Ontological Difference for St. Thomas and Pseudo- Dionysius” (Dionysius, IV (1980), pp. 119-132) and “Hyper by Any Other Name: The Logic of Negative Theology in Pseudo-Dionysius, Aquinas and Damascius” (unpublished manuscript, read at The 36th International Congress on Medieval Studies, Kalamazoo, MI, May 2001).
  • Religious Leaders and Thinkers, 1516-1922

    Religious Leaders and Thinkers, 1516-1922

    Religious Leaders and Thinkers, 1516-1922 Title Author Year Published Language General Subject A Biographical Dictionary of Freethinkers of All Ages and Nations Wheeler, J. M. (Joseph Mazzini); 1850-1898. 1889 English Rationalists A Biographical Memoir of Samuel Hartlib: Milton's Familiar Friend: With Bibliographical Notices of Works Dircks, Henry; 1806-1873. 1865 English Hartlib, Samuel Published by Him: And a Reprint of His Pamphlet, Entitled "an Invention of Engines of Motion" A Boy's Religion: From Memory Jones, Rufus Matthew; 1863-1948. 1902 English Jones, Rufus Matthew A Brief History of the Christian Church Leonard, William A. (William Andrew); 1848-1930. 1910 English Church history A Brief Sketch of the Waldenses Strong, C. H. 1893 English Waldenses A Bundle of Memories Holland, Henry Scott; 1847-1918. 1915 English Great Britain A Chapter in the History of the Theological Institute of Connecticut or Hartford Theological Seminary 1879 English Childs, Thomas S A Christian Hero: Life of Rev. William Cassidy Simpson, A. B. (Albert Benjamin); 1843-1919. 1888 English Cassidy, William A Church History for the Use of Schools and Colleges Lòvgren, Nils; b. 1852. 1906 English Church history A Church History of the First Three Centuries: From the Thirtieth to the Three Hundred and Twenty-Third Mahan, Milo; 1819-1870. 1860 English Church history Year of the Christian Era A Church History. to the Council of Nicaea A.D. 325 Wordsworth, Christopher; 1807-1885. 1892 English Church history A Church History. Vol. II; From the Council of Nicaea to That of Constantinople, A.D. 381 Wordsworth, Christopher; 1807-1885. 1892 English Church history A Church History.
  • The Rhineland Mystics

    The Rhineland Mystics

    Mendicantthe The Rhineland Mystics This year in Daily Meditations I’m exploring my “Wisdom 1328), Johannes Tauler (1300-1361), and Henry Suso Lineage,” the teachers, texts, and traditions that have most (c.1300-1366); and Cardinal Nicholas of Cusa (1401- influenced my spirituality and teaching. (Read my introduction 1464), the teacher of “dialectical mysticism” and “learned to the Wisdom Lineage in the January 2015 issue of The ignorance.” In more recent history, another Rhineland Mendicant and “Desert Christianity and the Eastern Fathers Mystic who might surprise (or shock) some of you was Carl of the Church” in the April 2015 issue at cac.org/about-cac/ Gustave Jung (1875-1961), who lived much of his life on newsletter.) —Richard Rohr, OFM the southern end of the Rhine in both Basel and Zurich, Switzerland. He himself admits he term Rhineland to being influenced by Hildegard, Mystics refers to the Eckhart, and Nicholas of Cusa’s mostly German-speaking fascination with “the opposites.” spiritual writers, preach- The mystical path was largely Ters, and teachers, who lived largely mistrusted and, some would say, between the 11th and 15th cen- squelched after Martin Luther’s turies, and whose importance has strongly stated prejudice against only recently been rediscovered. “mysticism,” emphasizing Scripture The “Trans-Alpine” Church always to such a degree that personal enjoyed a certain degree of freedom spiritual experience was considered from Roman oversight and control, unimportant and almost always simply by reason of distance, and of Bingen, 1165. Hildegard by suspect. Of course he had seen its drew upon different sources and misuse and manipulation in the Scivias inspirations than did the “Cis- medieval Catholic world, where Alpine” Church of Italy, France, and pre-rational thinking was com- Spain.