Cacapon Institute

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cacapon Institute • vol. 4, no. 3 Summer 1992 Cacapon PUBLISHED BY PINE CABIN RUN ECOLOGICAL LABORATORY Geology of the INSIDE Cacapon River Basin 6 Letters to the by Eberhard Werner,Morgantown, WV Editor Let's begin by looking at a map. Any plied slowly the rock layers will bend map will do as long as it shows the streams. (up to a point). 7 A drainage map of West Virginia, for ex­ As you can see in cross-section (figure Cacapon ample, reveals regional differences. In the 2), the surface of the earth may not mirror T-Shirts center of the state, streams do not form any the folding of the rocks. There are instances for sale! particular pattern - they simply wander where a ridge coincides with an anticline about in the general direction of the nearest and a valley with a syncline, but the reverse larger stream. In our part of eastern West also occurs. It all depends on the resistance Virginia, though, the larger streams run of the various layers to erosion, and how ac­ parallel. Only a few short segments of the tive the erosional process has been. We will mainstems flow in a direction other than discuss this further in a bit. northeast-southwest. If you follow the Fractures - Sometimes forces in the Cacapon (figure 1), you will see that it earth are applied fast enough or the bend­ proceeds for long distances in a north­ ing is so extensive that the rocks break. easterly direction, occasionally jogging Look carefully at an outcrop and you will sharply right or left. see some breaks. Most of these are simple To understand what has caused this fractures with no significant movement of curious drainage pattern we need to ex­ one piece with respect to theother; these plore the rocks underlying the surface. are called fractures or joints. Where there has been significant mQve­ Structure ment along the break, it is called a faull. The field of geology concerned with the What movement is deemed significant arrangement of rocks is known as struc­ depends on many factors. Sometimes it tural geology. The geological structures must be far enough to show up on a map, relevant here are folds and fractures. sometimes just being able to see that the Folds - You may have noticed that layers no longer line up is enough. Basically rock layers in the basin are either flat or it depends on who is looking and why. bent. Keep in mind that most folds are too The major structures of the Cacapon 8 large to be seen in their entirety; you only River basin are shown in figure 3. At this scale only the largest folds show up. Lab see a small part. Folds come in two basic News types: anticlines, where rock layers are Smaller folds and faults can be seen on folded upward at the center and slope more detailed maps (e.g., Tilton and others down away from the center; and synclines, 1927, Dean and others 1985). 9 which are like anticlines turned upside­ Cacapon down (figure 2). Kinds ofRocks Natural Folding comes about when forces Geologists divide rocks into three basic History within the earth compress a piece of the types: igneous - those formed from mol­ earth's crust (See "Cacapon Natural His­ ten ma terial either on the surface or within tory", p. 9 this issue.). If the forces are ap the earth, metamorphic those altered I r lab from previously existing rocks by heat of these and quartz, the normal name is needs: and/or pressure but without actually melt­ sandstone. Sandstone is mostly quartz, but ing them, and sedimentary - those formed it contains other minerals as well. For ex­ from tiney pieces of various kinks of ample, calcite ("lime") and hematite ("iron") canoe trailer materials laid down in water. commonly cement the grains together. The With minor exceptions, the only type of same idea applies to shale and siltstone. photocopy rock that occurs in the Cacapon River basin Limestone is different from other machine is sedimentary. Sedimentary rock usually sedimentary rocks in that it is built of foTITIS in the ocean near shore, or where material taken out of oceanic water by rivers slow down so they no longer carry plants and animals that build their shells or the load. As materials pile up on the bottom skeletons out of calcite ( and other related of the water body, their own weight com­ minerals). These skeletal remains are the presses the bottom layers. Minerals from grains which form limestone. Most caldte water in the pores come out of solution and grains are deposited near where they were ~S-:acapon £~ cement the grains together, and the result is created by organisms, unlike sandstones is published quarterly, rock. whose grains have been carried long distan­ with the arrival of each ces by rivers and ocean currents. equinox and solstice, by Pine Cabin Run Ecological Laboratory, Rock Layers Route 1, Box 469, Cacapon River Basin In the Cacapon River basin, different High View, WV 26808; o IOm!l!!!> FAX & phone kinds of rocks are found at various depths. (304) 856-3911. Rocks of the vertical column can be as­ signed to different formations. The name ap­ BOARD OF plied to a formation is the place where it DIRECTORS Nancy Ailes was first described. For example, the George Constantz Helderberg Group is named for the Helder­ Michael Dixon berg escarpment of east-central West Vir­ Ronald Knipling ginia. Identification of layers is based on Jane Licata James Matheson characteristics of the rocks themselves and fossils within, or more recently on ages STAFF determined by the rock's level of radioac­ Dr. George Constantz tivity. Most of the Cacapon River basin's Director rocks, listed below by increasing age, are Nancy Ailes Cacapon Editor ,.. detailed by Cardwell and Erwin (1968) and David Malakoff by Hobba (1985): Senior Associate I. Mississippian Rocks (formed 360 - 320 million years ago) SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY B.JARD - Pocono Group (570 feet thick) - gray or Dr. Joe Calabrese tan, massive, fairly hard sandstones Dr. Stephen Fretwell topping ridges in the western part of Dr. Robert Kahn Dr. Michael Masnik Figure 1. Stream network of the Cacapon .RIver basin the Cacapon River basin. Dr. Chris Sacchi as shown on the U.S. Geol. Surv. 1:250,000 scale maps. II. Devonian Rocks (formed 408 - 360 mil­ The two small arrows show the location of the cross­ lion years ago) COUNSEL section in figure 2. Charles Licata, JD - Hampshire Formation (2000' thick) mostly shales and fine-grained Sedimentary rocks can be classified by PHOTOGRAPHER sandstones, with some coarser grained, James Holmes the materials making them up; and most people recognize their names: shale, massive sandstone beds; mostly red or brown; generally on hillsides in the Pine Cabin Run siltstone, sandstone, and limestone. Al­ Ecological Labortory though that classification looks simple, western half of the basin. is a non-profit, tax­ there are complications. Shale, siltstone, -Chemung Group (2500 - 3000' thick) exempt grassroots alternating sandstone and shale beds, organizaHon and sandstone are named for the size, not dedicated to the composition, of the particles making them with each bed only a few inches thick; ecological preservation up. One can find sandstone made of calcite, mostly yellowish brown in color; very of the Lost, North, and fossiliferous in some places; mostly on Cacapon rivers. quartz, or hematite. Although no one would normally call a rock made entirely of hillsides in the basin. Printed on recycled sand-sized grains of calcite or hema tite a - Brallier Formation (1300-2170' thick) ­ @paper. sandstone, most geologists would call them mostly greenish-gray, very thin limestone or rock hematite. If it is a mixture bedded shales and siltstones, other- 2 • Cacapon vol. 4 no. 3, summer 1992 Published by Pine Cabin Run Ecological Laborato?1j wise fairly nondescript; weathers III. Silurian Rocks (formed 438-408 mil­ readily and tends to slump into masses lion years ago) of shale chips. • Tonoloway formation (200-400' thick)­ -Harrell Shale 025-300' thick) dark gray, sometimes very dark, thin­ brown or gray to black, thinly bedded limestones or dolomites; often laminated shale; with a few fossils. containing appreciable amounts of -Mahantango Formation (300-1000' silica. thick)-mostlybrown sanay shales with -Wills Creek and McKenzie formations a few thin beds of sandstones and limy (400-800' thick)-limy shales qr shaly sandstones; may be very fossiliferous. limestones for the most part; most of - Marcellus and Needmore shales (500­ the rock is actually gray but is almost 900'.thick)-dark brown or black shales always stained red from weathered with little variety, splitting easily into material washing onto it; the two for­ thin flakes; one or two limestone beds mations are sometimes separated by about 20 feet thick toward the base of the Williamsport sandstone which the formation. may be up to 100 feet thick. -Oriskany sandstone 000-500' thick)­ -Tuscarora Sandstone (50-300' thick)­ white to brown sandstone, locally mostly thick-bedded light gray limestone or sandy limestone; cemen­ sandstone, very resistant to weather­ tation varies from very strong to almost ing; tops the highest ridges in the east­ "With none; silica or calcite; chert layers are ern portion of the basin. mmor sometimes found at the top and bottom IV. Ordovician Rocks (formed 505-438 mil­ of the formation, although either or lion years ago) exceptions, both may be absent. -Juniata and Oswego formations (600­ the only -Helderberg Group (300-600' thick)­ 1200' thick)-mostly red or gray, thick light colored, usually gray limestone; bedded sandstones; not as resistant to type of rock upper portion is thin bedded, with weathering as the Tuscarora, but still that occurs cherty layers at the top and shaly layers quite resistant.
Recommended publications
  • The Carboniferous Bowland Shale Gas Study: Geology and Resource Estimation
    THE CARBONIFEROUS BOWLAND SHALE GAS STUDY: GEOLOGY AND RESOURCE ESTIMATION The Carboniferous Bowland Shale gas study: geology and resource estimation i © DECC 2013 THE CARBONIFEROUS BOWLAND SHALE GAS STUDY: GEOLOGY AND RESOURCE ESTIMATION Disclaimer This report is for information only. It does not constitute legal, technical or professional advice. The Department of Energy and Climate Change does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage of any nature, however caused, which may be sustained as a result of reliance upon the information contained in this report. All material is copyright. It may be produced in whole or in part subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgement of the source, but should not be included in any commercial usage or sale. Reproduction for purposes other than those indicated above requires the written permission of the Department of Energy and Climate Change. Suggested citation: Andrews, I.J. 2013. The Carboniferous Bowland Shale gas study: geology and resource estimation. British Geological Survey for Department of Energy and Climate Change, London, UK. Requests and enquiries should be addressed to: Toni Harvey Senior Geoscientist - UK Onshore Email: [email protected] ii © DECC 2013 THE CARBONIFEROUS BOWLAND SHALE GAS STUDY: GEOLOGY AND RESOURCE ESTIMATION Foreword This report has been produced under contract by the British Geological Survey (BGS). It is based on a recent analysis, together with published data and interpretations. Additional information is available at the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) website. https://www.gov.uk/oil-and-gas-onshore-exploration-and-production. This includes licensing regulations, maps, monthly production figures, basic well data and where to view and purchase data.
    [Show full text]
  • Dinantian Carbonate Development and Related Prospectivity of the Onshore Northern Netherlands
    Dinantian carbonate development and related prospectivity of the onshore Northern Netherlands Nynke Hoornveld, 2013 Author: Nynke Hoornveld Supervisors: Bastiaan Jaarsma, EBN Utrecht Prof. Dr. Jan de Jager, VU University Amsterdam Master Thesis: Solid Earth, (450199 and 450149) 39 ECTS. VU University Amsterdam 01-06-2013 Dinantian carbonate development and related prospectivity of the onshore Northern Netherlands Nynke Hoornveld, 2013 Contents Contents……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..2 Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………………..3 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………….……4 Geological History of the Netherlands relating to Dinantian development…………………………..……………..7 Tectonic history…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..9 Stratigraphy of the Carboniferous…………………………………………………………………………………………….16 Stratigraphic Nomenclature of the Netherlands……………………………………………………………….………23 Methods……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…..26 Seismic interpretation…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…27 Time-depth conversion…………………………………………………………………………………………………….……...35 Well correlation……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…38 Carbonate production, precipitation and geometries, with a focus on the Dinantian……….………40 Results………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………..57 Well information, evaluation and reservoir development………………………………………………………..58 Geometry of the Dinantian carbonate build-ups in the Dutch Northern onshore…………..……….75 The geological history
    [Show full text]
  • WV Generalized Stratigraphic Column/Chart
    Generalized Stratigraphic Chart for West Virginia Series/ Drillers’ Era System Stage Western WV Eastern WV Terminology CENOZOIC Paleogene Eocene Igneous Intrusives MESOZOIC Jurassic Igneous Intrusives PERMIAN Dunkard Group Carroll, Minshall, Murphy, Moundsville, Upper Monongahela Fm. 1st Cow Run, Little Conemaugh Group Dunkard, Big Dunkard Burning Springs, Middle Allegheny Fm. 2nd Cow Run, Kanawha Fm. Gas Sands, Horseneck (Subsystem) New River Fm. Pottsville PENNSYLVANIAN Lower Pocahontas Fm. Group Salt Sands Bluestone Fm. Pride, Ravencliff, Avis, Princeton Ss. Mauch Chunk Maxton, Little Lime, Upper Hinton Fm. Group Pencil Cave, Blue Monday Bluefield Fm. CARBONIFEROUS Greenbrier Group Big Lime, Keener, Middle Big Injun (Subsystem) Maccrady Fm. (south) MISSISSIPPIAN Lower Big Injun, Squaw, Sunbury Sh. Price Fm. Weir, Coffee (Sunbury) Sh. Berea Ss. Cleveland Sh. Gantz, 50’, 30’, Ohio Sh. Chagrin Sh. Hampshire Group Huron Sh. Gordon Stray, Gordon, Hanover Sh. bed 4th, 5th, Bayard, Java Fm. Pipe Creek Sh. bed Greenland Foreknobs Fm. Elizabeth, Warren, Upper West Falls Fm. Angola Sh. Gap Group Scherr Fm. Speechley, Balltown, Rhinestreet Sh. Bradford, Riley, Cashaqua Sh. Sonyea Fm. Middlesex Sh. Benson, Alexander, Elk, Haverty, Genesee Fm./ West River Sh. Brallier Fm. Geneseo Sh./Burket Sh. Fox, Sycamore Harrell Sh. Harrell Sh. DEVONIAN Tully Ls. Millboro Sh. Hamilton Group Mahantango Fm. Mahantango Fm. Marcellus Sh. Marcellus Sh. Middle Tioga ash beds Tioga ash beds Huntersville Chert Needmore Sh. Onondaga Ls. Oriskany Ss. “Corniferous” Lower (west only) Helderberg Group Bass Islands Fm. Big Mountain Sh. Clifton Forge Ss. Keyser Fm. PALEOZOIC Lower Keyser Mbr. PHANEROZOIC Salina Fm. Tonoloway Fm. Newburg Wills Creek Fm. Upper Bloomsburg Williamsport Fm. Fm.
    [Show full text]
  • Winchester Stone by Dr John Parker (PDF)
    Winchester Stone by John Parker ©2016 Dr John Parker studied geology at Birmingham and Cambridge universities. He is a Fellow of the Geological Society of London. For over 30 years he worked as an exploration geologist for Shell around the world. He has lived in Winchester since 1987. On retirement he trained to be a Cathedral guide. The Building of Winchester Cathedral – model in the Musée de la Tapisserie, Bayeux 1 Contents Introduction page 3 Geological background 5 Summary of the stratigraphic succession 8 Building in Winchester Romano-British and Anglo-Saxon periods 11 Early medieval period (1066-1350) 12 Later medieval period (1350-1525) 18 16th to 18th century 23 19th to 21st century 24 Principal stone types 28 Chalk, clunch and flint 29 Oolite 30 Quarr 31 Caen 33 Purbeck 34 Beer 35 Upper Greensand 36 Portland 38 Other stones 40 Weldon 40 Chilmark 41 Doulting 41 French limestones 42 Coade Stone 42 Decorative stones, paving and monuments 43 Tournai Marble 43 Ledger stones and paving 44 Alabaster 45 Jerusalem stone 45 Choice of stone 46 Quarries 47 A personal postscript 48 Bibliography and References 50 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Photographs and diagrams are by the author, unless otherwise indicated 2 Introduction Winchester lies in an area virtually devoid of building stone. The city is on the southern edge of the South Downs, a pronounced upland area extending from Salisbury Plain in the west to Beachy Head in the east (Figs. 1 & 2). The bedrock of the Downs is the Upper Cretaceous Chalk (Fig. 3), a soft friable limestone unsuited for major building work, despite forming impressive cliffs along the Sussex coast to the east of Brighton.
    [Show full text]
  • WVCCS Working Group Final Report-June 30, 2011 (C2091773
    i This page has been intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary of Terminology, Abbreviations, and Acronyms ……………………….… i List of Working Group Members ……………………………………………….…… iii I. Executive Summary ………………………………………………..…………… 1 A. Background………………………………………………………………… 1 B. Organization of the Final Report…………………………………….…… 2 C. Feasibility Subcommittee …………………………………………..…….. 2 D. Geology & Technical Committee ……………………………………..….. 4 E. Legal Subcommittee …………………………………………………..….. 6 F. Summary……………………………………………………………..…… 8 II. Details of the Working Group ……………………………………...……..…… 8 A. Meetings …………………………………………........ ………………… 8 B. Resources …………………………………………………………………. 8 III. Statutes of the Regulation of Greenhouse Gases …………………………… 9 IV. Subcommittee Reports ……………………………………………………..… 12 A. Feasibility Subcommittee Report…………………………………………. 12 Question 1: What factors need to be considered in determining if CCS is feasible and beneficial for West Virginia? ……………………… 28 Question 2: What factors need to be addressed to be able to be addressed prior to reaching a decision regarding the feasibility of encouraging CCS in West Virginia? ………………………………..……. 38 Question 3: What are the technical issues (both engineering and geological) that must be addressed to ensure the efficacy of CCS in West Virginia? ……………………………………………………………. 46 B. Geology & Technology Report …………………………………………… 46 Question 4: What legal and liability issues need to be decided before CCS can be pursued in West Virginia? ……………….…………………. 99 C. Legal Subcommittee Report ………………………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • REVISION of the UPPER DEVONIAN in the CENTRAL-SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN BASIN: Biostratigraphy and Lithostratigraphy
    REVISION OF THE UPPER DEVONIAN IN THE CENTRAL-SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN BASIN: Biostratigraphy and Lithostratigraphy Roderic Ian Brame Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geological Sciences Richard K. Bambach, Chair John M. Dennison J. Thomas Dutro, Jr. Kenneth A. Eriksson John Pojeta, Jr. Stephen Scheckler December 16, 2001 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: Devonian, Biostratigraphy, Frasnian/Famennian Extinction, Stratigraphy Copyright 2001, Roderic Ian Brame REVISION OF THE UPPER DEVONIAN IN THE CENTRAL-SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN BASIN: Biostratigraphy and Lithostratigraphy Roderic Ian Brame (ABSTRACT) The Upper Devonian of the central-southern Appalachians Valley and Ridge province of Virginia lacks stratigraphic resolution, revised formal nomenclature, and detailed biostratigraphic data. Eight of the most complete sections available in a three thousand square mile area were used to build a framework for revising the stratigraphy of the Upper Devonian strata in southwestern Virginia. Detailed lithologic descriptions of about four thousand feet (1.3 km) of rock were made at each outcrop. John Dennison’s (1970 and 1976) nomenclature for the Upper Devonian along the Alleghany Front was successfully tested for it usefulness in Southwestern Virginia and are hereby applied to these rocks. The stratigraphic interval ranges in age from the Middle Devonian to the Lower Carboniferous. The stratigraphic units include the Middle Devonian Millboro Shale, the Upper Devonian Brallier, Scherr, Foreknobs (formally the "Chemung"), Hampshire, and the Lower Carboniferous Price Formation. The Brallier contains two members (Back Creek Siltstone and Minnehaha Springs), the Foreknobs is divided into five members (Mallow, Briery Gap, Blizzard, Pound, and Red Lick), and the lower Price is divided into three members (the Cloyd Conglomerate, Sunbury Shale, and the Ceres).
    [Show full text]
  • Taylor, S.B. 1999. Geomorphic Controls
    From: Taylor, S.B. 1999. Geomorphic Controls on Sediment-Transport Efficiency in the Central Appalachians - A Comparative Analysis of Three Watersheds Underlain by the Acadian Clastic Wedge. Ph.D. Dissertation, West Virginia University ! " #$%& #$ $ #' !"#$ % " & ' ! $ & & ()*(+,-- ).*(+,-- / )0*(+,-- )1* (+,-- )2 3 +,4*& + $ 5 $ 6 &3 !6 7 & # 8 &% / & 5 # )9 9 9 *# 8 ) 8 : *5 6 )6 * 5 9 9 5 5 9 6 6 9 6 $ & & ; 2 6 7 $ & & " / ) * )*& 2 / / &8 & &< &8 & & / ; / & = 2 6 )>- < * 8 )?-< *& &" & (& )*( & !&"& " +01 % " & @ $ )$ ++1*&A ,- )9 ++0*& !&"& " ! )% " $ % &.0/-.0*& @ @ & & ./ 7 & / /7 & &+ (& # ! &0 6 ) (0+-.'--B% 0+-1'C-B% (4+0+'--B 4+1.'--B*&+ $ 5 $ 6 )./ . Table 2-1. Summary of Map Products for the Fernow Experimental Forest. Arcview 3.0 Attribute Hardcopy Map Title Shape File1 Lookup File Map Topographic Map of the Fernow Experimental Forest, Tucker County, FERNTOPO.SHP N/A Plate 2-1. West
    [Show full text]
  • WVCCS Working Group Preliminary Report-Final (C1821197.DOC;1)
    FOREWORD The Carbon Dioxide Sequestration Working Group consists of members appointed by West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (―WVDEP‖) Secretary Randy Huffman, and West Virginia Geological and Economic Survey (―WVGES‖) Director Dr. Michael Hohn. The Working Group would like to thank the WVDEP for use of its facilities and resources including the time and assistance of Kristin Boggs, Esq. and Jeff Knepper. Also, special thanks are offered to the WVGES, the West Virginia Division of Energy, the Department of Tax and Revenue, and other state agencies that have provided information and technical expertise. Many experts from these agencies, and from interested groups, traveled long distances to share their valuable experience about Carbon Capture and Sequestration. The Working Group is truly grateful for their assistance. The Working Group reviewed a substantial body of data and reports related to various aspects of Carbon Capture and Sequestration. This Interim Report incorporates or refers to data and information from a large number of sources including federal and state agencies, and non- governmental organizations. Some of this data and information may incomplete or inaccurate. The citation to these sources does not necessarily mean the Working Group agrees with the data, information, or opinions cited. This Interim Report provides preliminary conclusions and recommendations. These preliminary conclusions and recommendations are subject to further review and possible modification during the preparation of the Final Report. i TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary …………………………………………………………………… 1 A. Feasibility Subcommittee ……………………………………………….. 2 B. Geology & Technical Committee ……………………………………….. 4 C. Legal Subcommittee …………………………………………………….. 7 II. Details of the Working Group ……………………………………………………….. 9 A. Working Group Members …………………………………………........ 9 B.
    [Show full text]
  • Fossil Charcoal in Late Devonian Marine Shales As an Indicator of Expanding Terrestrial Ecosystems, Fire, and Atmospheric Change Susan M
    West Chester University Digital Commons @ West Chester University Geology & Astronomy Faculty Publications Geology & Astronomy 10-2015 The rise of fire: Fossil charcoal in late Devonian marine shales as an indicator of expanding terrestrial ecosystems, fire, and atmospheric change Susan M. Rimmer Southern Illinois University Carbondale Sarah J. Hawkins U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO Andrew C. Scott Royal Holloway University of London Walter L. Cressler III West Chester University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcupa.edu/geol_facpub Part of the Geochemistry Commons, Paleobiology Commons, and the Sedimentology Commons Recommended Citation Rimmer, S. M., Hawkins, S. J., Scott, A. C., & Cressler, W. L. (2015). The rise of fire: Fossil charcoal in late Devonian marine shales as an indicator of expanding terrestrial ecosystems, fire, and atmospheric change. American Journal of Science, 315(8), 713-733. http://dx.doi.org/10.2475/08.2015.01 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Geology & Astronomy at Digital Commons @ West Chester University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Geology & Astronomy Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ West Chester University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Fossil charcoal in Late Devonian marine shales: An indicator of expanding terrestrial ecosystems, fire, and atmospheric change Susan M. Rimmer1*, Sarah J. Hawkins1, Andrew C. Scott2, and Walter L. Cressler, III3 1 Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40506-0053, USA 2 Department of Geology, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey. TW20 0EX, UK 3 West Chester University, West Chester, PA 19383, USA ABSTRACT Fossil charcoal provides direct evidence for fire events that, in turn, have implications for the evolution of both terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • International Commission on Stratigraphy ANNUAL REPORT 2018
    International Commission on Stratigraphy ANNUAL REPORT 2018 1. TITLE OF CONSTITUENT BODY The International Commission on Stratigraphy (ICS) Summary and compilation of subcommission reports submitted jointly by: Chair: David Harper Professor, Earth Sciences and Principal Van Mildert College, Durham University Durham DH1 3LE, UK Secretary-General: Philip Gibbard Emeritus Professor, Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 1ER, UK 2. OVERALL OBJECTIVES AND FIT WITHIN IUGS SCIENCE POLICY Objectives The International Commission on Stratigraphy (ICS) is a body of expert stratigraphers founded for the purpose of promoting and coordinating long-term international cooperation and establishing standards in stratigraphy. Its principal objectives are: (a) Establishment and publication of a standard global stratigraphic time scale and the preparation and publication of global correlation charts, with explanatory notes. (b) Compilation and maintenance of a stratigraphic database centre for the global earth sciences. (c) Unification of regional chronostratigraphic nomenclature by organizing and documenting stratigraphic units on a global database. (d) Promotion of education in stratigraphic methods, and the dissemination of stratigraphic knowledge. (e) Evaluation of new stratigraphic methods and their integration into a multidisciplinary stratigraphy. (f) Definition of principles of stratigraphic classification, terminology and procedure and their publication in guides and glossaries. Fit within IUGS Science Policy The objectives satisfy the IUGS mandates of: • Fostering international agreement on nomenclature and classification in stratigraphy. • Facilitating international co-operation in geological research. • Improving publication, dissemination, and use of geological information internationally. • Encouraging new relationships between and among disciplines of science that relate to geology worldwide. • Attracting competent students and research workers to the discipline.
    [Show full text]
  • FTG-9: What The
    What the H!? Paleozoic Stratigraphy Exposed Regional Stratigraphy and Structure in the Central Appalachians from the Ordovician to the Pennsylvanian as seen in new outcrops along US 48 (“Corridor H”) and other locations Pre-Meeting Field Trip Guide for the 46th Annual Meeting Eastern Section of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists (ESAAPG) Morgantown, West Virginia September 24 and 25, 2017 Field Trip Leaders and Authors Paula J. Hunt1, Ronald R. McDowell1, B. Mitch Blake, Jr.1, Jaime Toro2, Philip A Dinterman1 1 West Virginia Geological and Economic Survey, 1 Mont Chateau Rd., Morgantown, WV 26508 2 Department of Geology and Geography, West Virginia University, PO Box 6300, Morgantown, WV 26506 CoverImages Top:Tonolowayroadcutforeground,quarrybackgroundalongUS48 Middle(lefttoright):SenecaRocks,“Dragon’sTongue,”PaleoseismitesinSpechtyKopfFormation (Dintermanforscale) Bottom(lefttoright):US48(“CorridorH”),OldReedsville/MartinsburgquarryonUS33,FieldTrip RouteonGeologicMap PhotosinthisreportweretakenbyWVGESpersonnelunlessnotedotherwise. West Virginia Geological and Economic Survey Mont Chateau Research Center 1 Mont Chateau Road • Morgantown, WV 26508-8079 304.594.2331 • fax: 304.594.2575 www.wvges.org • [email protected] 39q39’30” N, 79q50’57” W Suggested citation: Hunt, P.J., R.R. McDowell, B.M. Blake, Jr., J. Toro, and P.A. Dinterman, 2017, What the H!? Paleozoic Stratigraphy Exposed,Pre-Meeting Field Trip Guide for the 46th Annual Meeting, Eastern Section of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphical Chart of the United Kingdom: Southern Britain
    STRATIGRAPHICAL CHART OF THE UNITED KINGDOM: SOUTHERN BRITAIN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 BGS Geological Time Chart Irish Sea Lancashire Yorkshire Southern East West North South Celtic Sea – South-west Bristol – Gloucester Hampshire London – Eastern Weald English (South) & North Sea Midlands Midlands Wales Wales Bristol Channel England Basin Thames Valley England Region Channel Eon Era Series/ Stage/Age age Cheshire Basin Epoch (Ma) Sub-era System/ Period 0.01 Holocene Late Britannia 0.13 Caledonia Glacigenic Group Caledonia Glacigenic Group Caledonia Glacigenic Group not named Caledonia Glacigenic Group Caledonia Glacigenic Group Caledonia Glacigenic Group Caledonia Glacigenic Group Caledonia Glacigenic Group Britannia Britannia Caledonia Glacigenic Group Catchments British Coastal British Coastal Britannia British Coastal Britannia Britannia Britannia Britannia Britannia Britannia Britannia Britannia British Coastal Britannia British Coastal Britannia Catchments British Coastal Catchments Britannia British Coastal British Coastal British Coastal British Coastal British Coastal British Coastal British Coastal Group Deposits Group British Coastal Deposits Group Catchments Deposits Group British Coastal Catchments Catchments Catchments Catchments Catchments not named Catchments Catchments Catchments Group Deposits Group Catchments Group Deposits Group Catchments Group Deposits Group Group Catchments Deposits Group Deposits Group Deposits Group Deposits Group Deposits Group Deposits Group Deposits Group Deposits Group Group Deposits
    [Show full text]