DOCSLIB.ORG

Risks of Chlorpyrifos Use to Federally Threatened & Endangered

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Risks of Chlorpyrifos Use to Federally Threatened & Endangered Risks of Chlorpyrifos Use to Federally Threatened & Endangered California red-legged frog (Rana aurora draytonii), California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense), San Francisco garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis tetrataenia), California clapper rail, (Rallus longirostris obsoletus), Salt marsh harvest mouse (Reithrodontomys raviventris), Bay checkerspot butterfly (Euphydryas editha bayensis), Valley elderberry longhorn beetle (Desmocerus californicus dimorphus), San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica), California freshwater shrimp (Syncaris pacifica), and Delta smelt (Hypomesus transpacificus) Pesticide Effects Determinations Environmental Fate and Effects Division Office of Pesticide Programs Washington, D.C. 20460 October 16, 2009 Primary Authors: Mark Corbin, Senior Environmental Scientist Rebecca Daiss, Senior Biologist Donna R. Judkins, Ph.D., Biologist Secondary Review: James K. Wolf, Ph.D., Soil Physicist Pamela Hurley, Senior Toxicologist Dana Spatz, Branch Chief Environmental Risk Assessment Branch 3 2 Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary...............................................................................................8 2 Problem Formulation ..........................................................................................16 2.1 Purpose..........................................................................................................................16 2.2 Scope..............................................................................................................................18 2.3 Previous Assessments...................................................................................................19 2.4 Stressor Source and Distribution ...............................................................................22 2.4.1 Environmental Fate Properties ..........................................................................22 2.4.2 Environmental Transport Mechanisms.............................................................26 2.4.3 Mechanism of Action ...........................................................................................27 2.4.4 Use Characterization ...........................................................................................27 2.5 Assessed Species ...........................................................................................................44 2.6 Designated Critical Habitat ........................................................................................50 2.7 Action Area...................................................................................................................53 2.8 Assessment Endpoints and Measures of Ecological Effect ......................................54 2.8.1 Assessment Endpoints .........................................................................................55 2.8.2 Assessment Endpoints for Designated Critical Habitat ...................................59 2.9 Conceptual Model ........................................................................................................61 2.9.1 Risk Hypotheses ...................................................................................................61 2.9.2 Diagram ................................................................................................................61 2.10 Analysis Plan ................................................................................................................63 2.10.1 Measures to Evaluate the Risk Hypothesis and Conceptual Model................64 2.10.2 Data Gaps .............................................................................................................68 3 Exposure Assessment...........................................................................................68 3.1 Label Application Rates and Intervals ......................................................................69 3.2 Aquatic Exposure Assessment ....................................................................................74 3.2.1 Modeling Approach .............................................................................................74 3.2.2 Model Inputs.........................................................................................................75 3.2.3 Results ...................................................................................................................77 3.2.4 Existing Monitoring Data....................................................................................83 3.3 Terrestrial Animal Exposure Assessment .................................................................87 3.4 Terrestrial Plant Exposure Assessment.....................................................................93 4 Effects Assessment ...............................................................................................93 4.1 Toxicity of Chlorpyrifos to Aquatic Organisms........................................................96 4.1.1 Toxicity to Freshwater Fish and Aquatic-Phase Amphibians .........................98 4.1.2 Toxicity to Freshwater Invertebrates...............................................................102 4.1.3 Toxicity to Estuarine/Marine Fish ...................................................................103 4.1.4 Toxicity to Estuarine/Marine Invertebrates....................................................103 4.1.5 Toxicity to Aquatic Plants.................................................................................103 4.1.6 Freshwater Field/Mesocosm Studies................................................................104 4.2 Toxicity of Chlorpyrifos to Terrestrial Organisms.................................................105 4.2.1 Toxicity to Birds, Reptiles, and Terrestrial-Phase Amphibians....................107 4.2.2 Toxicity to Mammals .........................................................................................112 4.2.3 Toxicity to Terrestrial Invertebrates ...............................................................116 4.2.4 Toxicity to Terrestrial Plants............................................................................117 3 4.3 Use of Probit Slope Response Relationship to Provide Information on the Endangered Species Levels of Concern .....................................................................................................117 4.4 Incident Database Review .........................................................................................118 4.5 Toxicity of Chlorpyrifos Oxon..................................................................................118 5 Risk Characterization........................................................................................120 5.1 Exposures in the Aquatic Habitat ............................................................................120 5.1.1 Freshwater Fish and Aquatic-phase Amphibians...........................................121 5.1.2 Freshwater Invertebrates..................................................................................124 5.1.3 Estuarine/Marine Fish.......................................................................................126 5.1.4 Estuarine/Marine Invertebrates.......................................................................127 5.1.5 Non-vascular Aquatic Plants ............................................................................127 5.2 Exposures in the Terrestrial Habitat .......................................................................128 5.2.1 Birds (surrogate for Reptiles and Terrestrial-phase amphibians)................128 5.2.2 Mammals ............................................................................................................131 5.2.3 Terrestrial Invertebrates...................................................................................134 5.2.4 Terrestrial Plants ...............................................................................................135 5.3 Primary Constituent Elements of Designated Critical Habitat.............................137 5.4 Spatial Extent of Potential Effects............................................................................137 5.4.1 Spray Drift..........................................................................................................138 5.4.2 Downstream Dilution Analysis .........................................................................138 5.4.3 Overlap between CRLF and SFB Species habitat and Spatial Extent of Potential Effects ..............................................................................................138 5.5 Risk Description.........................................................................................................139 5.5.1 Direct Effects ......................................................................................................144 5.5.2 Indirect Effects...................................................................................................156 5.5.3 Potential Modification of Habitat.....................................................................160 5.5.4 Modification of Designated Critical Habitat ...................................................161 6 Uncertainties.......................................................................................................162 6.1 Exposure Assessment Uncertainties.........................................................................162 6.1.1 Oxon Exposure and Risk...................................................................................162 6.1.2 Maximum
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chinese Mitten Crab (Eriocheir Sinensis) in San Francisco Bay
    Distribution, Ecology and Potential Impacts of the Chinese Mitten Crab (Eriocheir sinensis) in San Francisco Bay Deborah A Rudnick Kathleen M. Halat Vincent H. Resh Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management University of California, Berkeley TECHNICAL COMPLETION REPORT Project Number: UCAL-WRC-W-881 University of California Water Resources Center Contribution #206 ISBN 1-887192-12-3 June 2000 The University of California prohibits discrimination against or harassment of any person employed by or seeking employment with the University on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, physical or mental disability, medical condition (cancer- related), ancestry, marital status, age, sexual orientation, citizenship or status as a Vietnam-era veteran or special disabled veteran. The University of California is an affirmative action/equal opportunity employer. The University undertakes affirmative action to assure equal employment opportunity for underutilized minorities and women, for persons with disabilities, and for Vietnam-era veterans and special disabled veterans. University policy is intended to be consistent with the provisions of applicable State and Federal law. Inquiries regarding this policy may be addressed to the Affirmative Action Director, University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources, 300 Lakeside Drive, 6th Floor, Oakland, CA 94612-3560, (510) 987-0097. This publication is a continuation in the Water Resources Center Contribution series. It is published and distributed by the UNIVERSITY
    [Show full text]
  • California Freshwater Shrimparesmall.Females Areusually (Corpus)
    Endangered SpecU.S. Environmental iesFacts Protection Agency California Freshwater Shrimp Syncaris pacifica Description and Ecology Status Endangered, listed October 31, 1988. of Marin, Sonoma and Napa counties. They are still found in all three counties but in much fewer numbers and fewer Critical Habitat Not designated. streams. The distribution of the shrimp has been separated Appearance The California freshwater shrimp is a 10- into four drainage units: 1) tributary streams of the lower legged crustacean belonging to the atyid family. Of the three Russian River drainage, that flow westward to the Pacific other atyid members in North America, two are also listed Ocean, 2) coastal streams flowing westward directly into as endangered (Kentucky cave shrimp (Palaemonias ganteri) the Pacific Ocean, 3) streams draining into Tomales Bay, Female California freshwater shrimp with egg s, courtes y of Larr y Serpa and Alabama cave shrimp (Palaemonias alabamae)) and one and 4) streams flowing southward into San Pablo Bay. While which once inhabited coastal streams in California is believed California freshwater shrimp in laboratories can tolerate The California freshwater shrimp to be extinct (Pasadena shrimp (Syncaris pasadenae)). brackish waters, they are unable to tolerate ocean salinities. is an endangered species. These species were believed to have been isolated from a It is thought that the isolated streams that harbor these Endangered species are marine environment during the Jurassic period. They are shrimp were once connected, but later separated by geologic plants and animals that are anatomically distinguished from other shrimp by the length of uplift and rising sea level. in immediate danger of their pincer-like claws (chelae) and the bristles (setae) at the Habitat Within the low elevation-low gradient streams tips of the first two chelae.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biological Resources Section Provides Background Information
    4.5 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES The Biological resources section provides background information on sensitive biological resources within Napa County, the regulations and programs that provide for their protection, and an assessment of the potential impacts to biological resources of implementing the Napa County General Plan Update. This section is based upon information presented in the Biological Resources Chapter of the Napa County Baseline Data Report (Napa County, BDR 2005). Additional information on the topics presented herein can be found in these documents. Both documents are incorporated into this section by reference. This section addresses biological resources other than fisheries which are separately addressed in Section 4.6. 4.5.1 SETTING REGIONAL SETTING The Napa County is located in the Coast Ranges Geomorphic Province. This province is bounded on the west by the Pacific Ocean and on the east by the Great Valley geomorphic province. A dominant characteristic of the Coast Ranges Province is the general northwest- southeast orientation of its valleys and ridgelines. In Napa County, located in the eastern, central section of the province, this trend consists of a series of long, linear, major and lesser valleys, separated by steep, rugged ridge and hill systems of moderate relief that have been deeply incised by their drainage systems. The County is located within the California Floristic Province, the portion of the state west of the Sierra Crest that is known to be particularly rich in endemic plant species (Hickman 1993, Stein et al. 2000). LOCAL SETTING The County’s highest topographic feature is Mount St. Helena, which is located in the northwest corner of the County and whose peak elevation is 4,343 feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Assessment
    CHARLES M. SCHULZ SONOMA COUNTY AIRPORT BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT SONOMA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Submitted to: Federal Aviation Administration Western-Pacific Region 15000 Aviation Blvd. Hawthorne, California 90250 Submitted by: Sonoma County Department of Transportation and Public Works 2300 County Center Drive, Suite B-100 Santa Rosa, California 95403 Prepared by: LSA Associates, Inc. 157 Park Place Point Richmond, California 94801 (510) 236-6810 LSA Project No. MHN530 March 24, 2006 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. CHARLES M. SCHULZ SONOMA COUNTY AIRPORT MARCH 2006 BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT SONOMA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................1 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT...........................................................1 1.2 SITE LOCATION AND PROJECT AREA..........................................................................1 1.3 NOMENCLATURE..............................................................................................................6 2.0 SPECIES ADDRESSED .................................................................................................................7 2.1 LISTED SPECIES ................................................................................................................7 2.2 OTHER SPECIAL-STATUS SPECIES .............................................................................10 2.3 CRITICAL HABITAT STATUS........................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Species Account CALIFORNIA FRESHWATER SHRIMP Syncaris Pacifica
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Sacramento Fish & Wildlife Office Species Account CALIFORNIA FRESHWATER SHRIMP Syncaris pacifica CLASSIFICATION: Endangered Federal Register 53:43884; October 30, 1988 http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/federal_register/fr1497.pdf This species is undergoing a 5-year review. The results have not been published yet. Read March 22, 2006 news release announcing the review. CRITICAL HABITAT: None designated RECOVERY PLAN: Final California Freshwater Shrimp (Syncaris pacifica Holmes) Recovery Plan. August 28, 1988. http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/recovery_plan/980731a.pdf DESCRIPTION The California freshwater shrimp (Syncaris pacifica) is a 10-legged crustacean of the family Atyidae. Shrimps from this family can be distinguished from others by the length of their pincer-like claws (chelae) and presence of terminal bristles (setae) at the tips of the first and second chelae. The presence of a short spine above the eye and the angled articulation of the second chelae with the carpus ("wrist") separate the California freshwater shrimp from other shrimp found in California. Shrimp coloration is quite variable. Males are translucent to nearly transparent. They have small surface and internal color-producing cells (chromatophores) clustered in a pattern to disrupt perception of their body outline and maximize the illusion that they are submerged, decaying vegetation. Undisturbed shrimp move slowly and are virtually invisible on submerged leaf and twig substrates, and among the fine, exposed, live roots of vegetation along undercut stream banks. The coloration of females ranges from a dark brown to a purple color. In some, a broad tan dorsal band also may be present. Females may change rapidly from this very dark cryptic color to nearly transparent with diffuse chromatophores.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Plan for the California Freshwater Shrimp
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Recovery Plan forthe California Freshwater Shrimp (Syncaris pw~jflca Holmes 1895) Total Postorbital Length Carapace Length Rostrum Length CL RL First Antenna Pleopod I (PerelopodI) Second Antenna Figure 1. The California freshwater shrimp, Syncaris pac~fiCa. CALIFORNIA FRESHWATER SHRIMP (Syncarispac~fica Holmes 1895) RECOVERY PLAN Region 1 U.S. Fishand Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon Approved: Manager, Califo~~~i’evada Operations Office Region 1, U.S. wish and Wildlife Service Date: CALIFORNIA FRESHWATER SHRIMP (Syncarispa~flca Holmes 1895) RECOVERY PLAN Region 1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon 1998 DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover and protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. They represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Regionai Director or Director as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion ofrecovery tasks. Literature citation should read as follows: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • California Freshwater Shrimp (Syncaris Pacifica) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation
    California Freshwater Shrimp (Syncaris pacifica) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation Photo: Larry Serpa U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office Sacramento, California September 2011 5-YEAR REVIEW California freshwater shrimp (Syncaris pacifica) I. GENERAL INFORMATION Purpose of 5-Year Reviews: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is required by section 4(c)(2) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) to conduct a status review of each listed species at least once every 5 years. The purpose of a 5-year review is to evaluate whether or not the species’ status has changed since it was listed (or since the most recent 5-year review). Based on the 5-year review, we recommend whether the species should be removed from the list of endangered and threatened species, be changed in status from endangered to threatened, or be changed in status from threatened to endangered. Our original listing of a species as endangered or threatened is based on the existence of threats attributable to one or more of the five threat factors described in section 4(a)(1) of the Act, and we must consider these same five factors in any subsequent consideration of reclassification or delisting of a species. In the 5-year review, we consider the best available scientific and commercial data on the species, and focus on new information available since the species was listed or last reviewed. If we recommend a change in listing status based on the results of the 5-year review, we must propose to do so through a separate rule-making process defined in the Act that includes public review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT Sonoma Creek Watershed Enhancement Plan
    DRAFT Sonoma Creek Watershed Enhancement Plan An owner’s manual for the residents & landowners of the Sonoma Creek Watershed. Prepared by: The Sonoma Resource Conservation District in conjunction with the people of the Sonoma Creek Watershed and collaboration with the Sonoma Ecology Center. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................................. 6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .............................................................................................................. 8 SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND.............................................................. 9 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 10 PURPOSE OF THE SONOMA CREEK WATERSHED ENHANCEMENT PLAN....................................... 10 PROCESS FOR DEVELOPING THE PLAN ........................................................................................ 10 STAKEHOLDER GROUPS ............................................................................................................. 11 ORGANIZATION OF THE PLAN ..................................................................................................... 14 WATERSHED GOALS ................................................................................................................... 15 CHAPTER 2: WATERSHED DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY ............................................... 18 WATERSHED BOUNDARY OVERVIEW ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Assessment
    BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT The Boathouse 12856 Sir Francis Drake Boulevard Inverness, California Prepared for: Tom Dinwoodie Happy Druids LLC 12856 Sir Francis Drake Blvd. Inverness California, 94937 Prepared by: Rana Creek Habitat Restoration July 17, 2019 Rana Creek Habitat Restoration 27875 Berwick Drive, Carmel, California 93923 Tele.(831) 659 - 3820 Fax.(831) 646-2106 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Regional Context .................................................................................................. 1 1.2 The Property ......................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Land Use .............................................................................................................. 2 1.4 Project Description ............................................................................................... 2 2.0 Biology ..................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Natural Communities ........................................................................................... 5 2.2 Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species .......................................................... 6 2.2.1 Critical Habitat .............................................................................................. 6 2.3 Plants ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • California Freshwater Shrimp Inventory at Golden Gate National Recreation Area and Point Reyes National Seashore
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Pacific Coast Science and Learning Center Research Project Summary August 2007 California Freshwater Shrimp Inventory at Golden Gate National Recreation Area and Point Reyes National Seashore The Question: What is the distribution of the federally endangered California freshwater shrimp (Syncaris pacifica) within the Lagunitas Creek watershed? The California freshwater shrimp is a translucent crustacean inhabiting low-elevation coastal streams. Listed as federally endangered since 1988, it is known to inhabit 16 streams in Marin, Sonoma and Napa Counties. Within Point Reyes National Seashore and Golden Gate National Recreation Area, the only streams to harbor these shrimp are mainstem Lagunitas Creek and its major tributary, Olema Creek. Other streams within both parks Gary Fellers have the potential to harbor shrimp, but prior to this The translucent Callifornia freshwater shrimp blends into its surroundings. inventory in 2002, suitable habitat had not been surveyed. The camouflage fools most native predators, like salmon and trout, but To fully document the distribution of this species of shrimp cannot always hide from introduced fish. special concern, biologists surveyed thirteen streams within park boundaries for California freshwater shrimp presence. The Project: Survey reaches in 13 creeks for California freshwater shrimp. Biologists surveyed 13 creeks within the Lagunitas watershed with features characteristic of California freshwater shrimp habitat - perennial flows, slow moving water, and flat gradients. Because California freshwater shrimp inhabit sluggish water where exposed roots and overhanging vegetation collect food particles and provide cover from predators, biologists surveyed along the stream banks. To do this, biologists first divided each stream into reaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix H: Biological Resources Special Status Species Table
    Plan Bay Area Environmental Impact Report Appendix H: Biological Resources Special‐Status Species Table H‐1 SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES LIST TABLE H‐1: FOCUSED LIST OF SPECIAL‐STATUS SPECIES WITH POTENTIAL TO OCCUR IN OR NEAR PROPOSED PLAN BAY AREA PROJECTS Listing Status Common Name USFWS/CDFG Scientific Name / CNPS General Habitat SPECIES LISTED AS THREATENED OR ENDANGERED Invertebrates Conservancy fairy shrimp FE/‐‐ Endemic to grasslands of the northern two‐thirds of Branchinecta conservatio Critical the Central Valley; found in large turbid seasonal Habitat pools. Longhorn fairy shrimp FE/‐‐ Endemic to the eastern margin of the central coast Branchinecta longiantenna Critical mountains in seasonal grassland vernal pools; typically Habitat found in sandstone depressions or clear‐to‐turbid clay or grass bottomed pools. Vernal pool fairy shrimp FT/‐‐ Grassland vernal pools. Branchinecta lynchi Critical Habitat Vernal pool tadpole shrimp FE/‐‐ Vernal pools and swales in the Sacramento Valley with Lepidurus packardi clear to highly turbid water; pools commonly found in grass‐bottomed swales of unplowed grasslands, also can be mud‐bottomed and highly turbid. San Bruno elfin butterfly FE/‐‐ Coastal scrub. Callophrys mossii bayensis Valley elderberry longhorn beetle FT/‐‐ Dependent on elderberry bushes, which may occur Desmocerus californicus dimorphus individually or associated with riparian habitats. Bay checkerspot butterfly FT/‐‐ Serpentine bunchgrass grassland. Euphydryas editha bayensis Critical Habitat Mission blue butterfly FE/‐‐ Grasslands with Lupinus albifrons, L. formosa, and Plebejus icarioides missionensis L. varicolor. H‐1 Appendices Appendix H: Biological Resources TABLE H‐1: FOCUSED LIST OF SPECIAL‐STATUS SPECIES WITH POTENTIAL TO OCCUR IN OR NEAR PROPOSED PLAN BAY AREA PROJECTS Listing Status Common Name USFWS/CDFG Scientific Name / CNPS General Habitat SPECIES LISTED AS THREATENED OR ENDANGERED Callippe silverspot butterfly FE/‐‐ Grasslands with Viola pedunculata as larval food plant.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Environmental DNA for the Detection of Palaemonias Ganteri (Hay, 1901), a Federally Endangered Cave Species
    Eastern Kentucky University Encompass Online Theses and Dissertations Student Scholarship January 2019 The use of environmental DNA for the detection of Palaemonias ganteri (Hay, 1901), a federally endangered cave species Andrew Joseph Stump Eastern Kentucky University Follow this and additional works at: https://encompass.eku.edu/etd Part of the Bioinformatics Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Stump, Andrew Joseph, "The use of environmental DNA for the detection of Palaemonias ganteri (Hay, 1901), a federally endangered cave species" (2019). Online Theses and Dissertations. 651. https://encompass.eku.edu/etd/651 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at Encompass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Online Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Encompass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE USE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DNA FOR THE DETECTION OF PALAEMONIAS GANTERI (HAY, 1901), A FEDERALLY ENDANGERED CAVE SPECIES BY ANDREW J STUMP THESIS APPROVED: THE USE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DNA FOR THE DETECTION OF PALAEMONIAS GANTERI (HAY, 1901), A FEDERALLY ENDANGERED CAVE SPECIES BY ANDREW J STUMP Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Eastern Kentucky University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE 2019 © Copyright by ANDREW J STUMP 2019 All Rights Reserved. ii DEDICATION I would like to dedicate this thesis to my family. My wife, Jill, and my two children, Andrew and Lillian, have been exceedingly reassuring and patient with me through this process. In addition, I would like to thank Dr.
    [Show full text]