DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix B Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix B Bibliography Marin RCD Lagunitas Creek Watershed Enhancement Program Request for Qualifications Appendix B Bibliography Devils Gulch Creek California Department of Fish and Game. 1955. Devils Gulch Creek (Lagunitas Creek Tributary) stream survey, 02 June 1955. Unpublished CDFG file memo by W. Evans. Yountville, CA, CA. 2 pp. California Department of Fish and Game. 1957. Compilation of field notes on Devils Gulch Creek (Lagunitas Creek Tributary) 1953-1956. Unpublished CDFG file memo. Yountville, CA, CA. 2 pp. California Department of Fish and Game. 1966. Devils Gulch Creek (Lagunitas Creek tributary) field note from December 1965 and January 1966. Unpublished CDFG file memo by W.A. Evans. Yountville, CA. 1pp. California Department of Fish and Game. 1966. Devils Gulch Creek (Lagunitas Creek tributary) stream survey, 01 March 1966. Unpublished CDFG file memo by D. Netherby. Yountville, CA. 3pp. California Department of Fish and Game. 1969. Devils Gulch Creek (Lagunitas Creek tributary) spawner survey note, December 2968. Unpublished CDFG file memo by W.E. Stohschein. Yountville, CA. 1p. California Department of Fish and Game. 1979. Steelhead observations in Devils Gulch Creek (Lagunitas Creek tributary), January 1979. Unpublished CDFG file memo by K.R. Anderson. Yountville, CA. 1p. Page 1 Marin RCD Lagunitas Creek Watershed Enhancement Program Request for Qualifications Lagunitas Creek Andrew, G.M. and M.L. Cronin. 1998. Juvenile salmonid population monitoring report, Lagunitas Creek, Marin County, California: Fall 1997. Marin Municipal Water District, February, 1998. 28pp.plus appendices. Andrew, G.M. and M.L. Cronin. 1998. Lagunitas Creek coho salmon spawner survey report fall & winter 1997- 1998. Marin Municipal Water District, March, 1998. Andrew, G.M., M.L. Cronin, and E. Ettlinger. 2000. Lagunitas Creek coho salmon spawner survey report, fall and winter 1997-1998. Marin Municipal Water District. Corte Madera, CA 21pp. Andrew, G.M., E. Ettlinger, M. Diamont, and J. Sisco. 2000. Lagunitas Creek coho salmon spawner survey report, fall and winter 1998-99 (3rd Draft). Marin Municipal Water District. Corte Madera, CA. 21pp. Andrew, G.M., E. Ettlinger, J. Goin, and B. Irons. 2001. Lagunitas Creek coho salmon spawner survey report 1999-2000. Marin Municipal Water District, April 2001. 19 pp. plus appendices (320 pp.). Balance Hydrologics, Inc. 1992. Sediment overview report: Development of an Initial Sediment-Management Plan for Lagunitas Creek, Marin County, California. Prepared for Marin Municipal Water District. Balance Hydrologics, Inc. 2001. Annual hydrologic record and bedload-sediment transport measurements for San Geronimo Creek at Lagunitas Road Bridge, Marin County, California: Data Report for Water Year 2000. Prepared for Marin Municipal Water District. Bratovich, P.M., H. Brooks, and D. Kelley. 1984. Investigations on Lagunitas Creek, Marin County, California. Second progress report. Bratovich, P.M., and D.W. Kelley. 1988. Investigations of salmon and steelhead in Lagunitas Creek, Marin County, California. Volume 1. Migration, spawning, embryo incubation and emergence, juvenile rearing, and emigration. In Summary of study results and proposed mitigation measures, Lagunitas Creek basin, Marin County, California, October 1988. Prepared for the Marin Municipal Water District. Corte Madera, CA. 206pp. Brouwer, Liesbeth and Julie Hall. 1996. Evaluating Water Quality Suitable for Coho Salmon: A Comparison of the Salmon Creek and Lagunitas Creek Stream Systems. Environmental Studies 124: Marine and Coastal Field Ecology, Summer 1996. Bodega Marine Laboratory, UC Davis (unpublished report). Brown, G.G., K.N. Kundargi, D.J. Manning, and R.W. Smith. 1998. Coho and Steelhead Restoration Project: Annual Section 10 permit data report, June 30, 1997 - July 1, 1998. National Park Service, Point Reyes National Seashore, Golden Gate National Recreation Area, and Muir Woods National Monument. 29pp. Brown, G.G., K.N. Kundargi, D.J. Manning, and R.W. Smith. 1999. Coho and Steelhead Restoration Project: Annual Section 10 permit data report, June 30, 1998 - July 1, 1999. National Park Service, Point Reyes National Seashore, Golden Gate National Recreation Area, and Muir Woods National Monument. 29pp. Buhrman, M. 1989. The downstream effects of the enlargement of the Kent Lake Reservoir on the fishery habitat of coho salmon and steelhead trout in Lagunitas Creek, Marin County, California. California Department of Fish and Game. 1970. Juvenile steelhead and silver salmon population estimates, San Geronimo, Lagunitas, and Olema Creeks, Marin County. Unpublished CDFG file memo by M. Coots. Yountville, CA. 6pp. Marin RCD Lagunitas Creek Watershed Enhancement Program Request for Qualifications California Department of Fish and Game. 1976. Status of steelhead and salmon in Redwood, Pine Gulch, Lagunitas, and Corte Madera Creeks. Unpublished CDFG file memo by G. Scoppettone. Yountville, CA. 2pp. California Department of Fish and Game. 1977. San Geronimo Creek, Marin County, repair of fishway. March 10, 1977. Unpublished CDFG file memo by G. Holman. Yountville, CA. 3pp. California Department of Fish and Game. 1980. August 1980 fish populations sampling, Lagunitas Creek drainage, Marin County. October 16, 1980. Unpublished CDFG file memo by K.R. Anderson. Yountville, CA. 6pp. California Department of Fish and Game. 1980. Memorandum regarding Syncaris pacifica survey on October 15, 1980 in Lagunitas Creek. Unpublished CDFG file memo by L. Eng. Yountville, CA. 4pp. California Department of Fish and Game. 1981. Letter to R. Thomson, Marin County Department of Public Works, regarding need for fish passage facilities on bridges in San Geronimo Creek. August 5, 1981. Unpublished CDFG file memo by B. Hunter. Yountville, CA. California Department of Fish and Game. 1982. Bear Valley Creek (Lagunitas Creek tributary) stream survey. 18 March 1982. Unpublished CDFG file memo by J. Ambrosius. Yountville, CA. 3pp. California Department of Fish and Game. 1982. Lagunitas Creek electrofishing, summers 1982 and 1983. Unpublished CDFG file memo by B. Cox. Yountville, CA. 4pp. California Department of Fish and Game. 1983. Letter from E.R. Gunter (CDFG) to J.L. Turner regarding stocking record of salmon and steelhead in Lagunitas and Nicasio Creeks, 1955-1981. Unpublished CDFG file memo. California Department of Fish and Game. 1985. Lagunitas Creek, Marin County, 1984 electrofishing survey. Unpublished CDFG file memo by B. Cox. Yountville, CA. 3pp. California Department of Fish and Game. 1986. Lagunitas Creek, Marin County, 1986 electrofishing survey. Unpublished CDFG file memo by B. Cox. Yountville, CA. 4pp. California Department of Fish and Game. 1986. Lagunitas Creek, Marin County, 1986 electrofishing survey, 24 November 1986. Unpublished CDFG file memo by B. Cox. Yountville, CA. 4pp. California Department of Fish and Game. 1987. Electrofishing in Lagunitas Creek above Giacomini's dam, 23 July 1987. Unpublished CDFG file memo by B. Cox. Yountville, CA. 4pp. California Department of Fish and Game. 1987. Memorandum regarding pink salmon found dead in Lagunitas Creek. Unpublished CDFG file memo by B. Cox. Yountville, CA. 1p. California Department of Fish and Game. 1987. Seining in Lagunitas Creek estuary on September 25, 1987. Unpublished CDFG file memo by B. Cox. Yountville, CA. California Department of Fish and Game. 1989. Letter to C. Fong, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding Rich's environmental assessment on Giacomini summer dam on Lagunitas Creek. Unpublished CDFG file memo by B. Hunter. Yountville, CA. 2pp. Marin RCD Lagunitas Creek Watershed Enhancement Program Request for Qualifications California Department of Fish and Game. 1990. 1989-1990 coho salmon index stream survey, Lagunitas Creek, Marin County.January 24, 1990. Unpublished CDFG file memo by B. Cox. Yountville, CA. 2pp. California Department of Fish and Game. 1992. 1991-1992 coho salmon index stream survey, Lagunitas Creek, Marin County.January 4, 1992. Unpublished CDFG file memo by B. Cox. Yountville, CA. 2pp. California Department of Fish and Game. 1993. 1992-1993 coho salmon index stream survey, Lagunitas Creek, Marin County. December 23, 1992. Unpublished CDFG file memo by B. Cox. Yountville, CA. 2pp. California Department of Fish and Game. 1993. 1993-94 coho salmon index stream survey, Lagunitas Creek, Marin County. December 21, 1993. Unpublished CDFG file memo by B. Cox. Yountville, CA. 2pp. California Department of Fish and Game. 1993. Habitat assessment and electrofishing in Lagunitas Creek. Unpublished CDFG file memo by B. Cox. Yountville, CA. 2pp. California Department of Fish and Game. 1995. Memo regarding Vision Fire in Lagunitas Creek/Tomales Bay watersheds. Unpublished CDFG file memo by B. Cox. Yountville, CA. 2pp. California Department of Fish and Game. 1996. Letter to W. Evans regarding migration of coho salmon at Roy's dam on San Geronimo Creek. December 20,1 996. Unpublished CDFG file memo by B. Hunter. Yountville, CA. California Department of Fish and Game. 1997. Some notes on coho salmon abundance in Lagunitas Creek drainage (Marin County) between 1951-1996 with emphasis on Devils Gulch. Unpublished CDGF file memo by E. Gerstung. Yountville, CA. California State Water Resources Control Board. 1982. Water rights decision 1582. In the matter of application 26242 to appropriate water from Lagunitas Creek, and petitions for extensions of time for permitted applications 9892,14278, 17317. Marin County, CA. 74pp. California State Water Resources Control Board. 1996. Order amending water rights
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Brief Description of Project
    Detailed Background on Existing Resource Conditions in Project/Study Area Giacomini Wetland Restoration Project Golden Gate National Recreation Area/ Point Reyes National Seashore Land Use: The Giacomini Ranch has been used for dairy farming since 1917. The Giacominis established their operation in the 1940s with diking of what is now referred to as the East and West Pastures and are still farming the ranch currently. The National Park Service’s reservation of use agreement with the Giacominis ends in 2007 at which the dairy operation will cease, and the entire 563 acres will be under the National Park Service (Park Service) ownership and management. Olema Marsh, which is directly south of the Giacomini Ranch in the Olema Valley, has been owned by the non-profit organization, Audubon Canyon Ranch. The marsh is primarily used by the public for walking, birding, and sightseeing opportunities. The West Marin area, including Point Reyes National Seashore (Seashore) and north district of Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA), is largely rural and comprised of agricultural operations and small residential communities. The dominant type of agriculture within the region is dairy and beef cattle operations. South of Olema Marsh lies pasturelands that are owned by the Park Service and grazed under lease by beef cattle. Leased beef cattle grazing also occurs near Park Service land at Railroad Point northeast of the Giacomini Ranch. Otherwise, most of the Giacomini Ranch and Olema Marsh is surrounded by the towns of Point Reyes Station and Inverness Park, which consist largely of residential homes and small businesses. To the north of Giacomini Ranch lies undiked marshlands that are owned by the State Lands Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • California Coastal Commission Staff Report and Recommendation
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA—THE RESOURCES AGENCY ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, GOVERNOR CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION 45 FREMONT, SUITE 2000 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105- 2219 VOICE AND TDD (415) 904- 5200 FAX (415) 904- 5400 F 4b STAFF RECOMMENDATION ON CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION Consistency Determination No. CD-048-07 Staff: LJS-SF File Date: 8/10/2007 60th Day: 10/9/2007 75th Day: 10/24/2007 Commission Meeting: 9/7/2007 FEDERAL AGENCY: National Park Service PROJECT LOCATION: Point Reyes National Seashore and Golden Gate National Recreation Area, Point Reyes Station, Marin County (Exhibits 1-3) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Giacomini Wetland Restoration Project (Exhibit 7) SUBSTANTIVE FILE DOCUMENTS: See Page 39 CD-048-07 (National Park Service) Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Executive Summary 3 I. Staff Summary 5 A. Project Background 5 Site Location and Description 5 Site History 6 Federal Land Purchase/Mitigation Requirement/ Previous Federal Consistency Review 8 Project Purpose and Objectives 10 Public Involvement 11 B. Project Description 11 Overview (Exhibit 7) 11 Project Elements 11 On-Site and Off-Site Disposal of Excavated Materials 14 Construction Schedule 14 Long-Term Management and Monitoring 15 C. Federal Agency’s Consistency Determination 15 II. Staff Recommendation 15 Motion 15 Staff Recommendation 16 Resolution to Concur 16 III. Findings and Declarations 16 A. Wetlands 16 B. Environmentally Sensitive Habitat 22 C. Water Quality 27 D. Public Access and Recreation 30 E. Hazards 34 F. Cultural Resources 35 G. Scenic Views 36 H. Agriculture 37 Substantive File Documents 39 CD-048-07 (National Park Service) Page 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Coastal Commission received a consistency determination from the National Park Service (NPS) for wetland restoration at the 550-acre Giacomini Ranch, located in Point Reyes Station at the head of Tomales Bay in Marin County.
    [Show full text]
  • Goga Wrfr.Pdf
    The National Park Service Water Resources Division is responsible for providing water resources management policy and guidelines, planning, technical assistance, training, and operational support to units of the National Park System. Program areas include water rights, water resources planning, regulatory guidance and review, hydrology, water quality, watershed management, watershed studies, and aquatic ecology. Technical Reports The National Park Service disseminates the results of biological, physical, and social research through the Natural Resources Technical Report Series. Natural resources inventories and monitoring activities, scientific literature reviews, bibliographies, and proceedings of technical workshops and conferences are also disseminated through this series. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the National Park Service. Copies of this report are available from the following: National Park Service (970) 225-3500 Water Resources Division 1201 Oak Ridge Drive, Suite 250 Fort Collins, CO 80525 National Park Service (303) 969-2130 Technical Information Center Denver Service Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225-0287 Cover photos: Top: Golden Gate Bridge, Don Weeks Middle: Rodeo Lagoon, Joel Wagner Bottom: Crissy Field, Joel Wagner ii CONTENTS Contents, iii List of Figures, iv Executive Summary, 1 Introduction, 7 Water Resources Planning, 9 Location and Demography, 11 Description of Natural Resources, 12 Climate, 12 Physiography, 12 Geology, 13 Soils, 13
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Gentrification on the urban fringe: Prosperity and displacement in West Marin, California Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/96p636xj Author Lage, Jessica Publication Date 2019 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Gentrification on the urban fringe: Prosperity and displacement in West Marin, California By Jessica Lage A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geography in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Nathan Sayre, Chair Professor Richard Walker Professor Nancy Peluso Professor Rachel Brahinsky Spring 2019 Gentrification on the urban fringe: Prosperity and displacement in West Marin, California By Jessica Lage Copyright 2019 Abstract Gentrification on the urban fringe: Prosperity and displacement in West Marin, California by Jessica Lage Doctor of Philosophy in Geography University of California, Berkeley Professor Nathan Sayre, Chair The global housing crisis, the epidemic of foreclosures, and rising global inequality have put the spotlight on gentrification in cities around the world. In the gentrifying San Francisco Bay Area, Marin County (and West Marin in particular) has escaped attention by gentrification scholars, but it is an essential part of the larger story of gentrification in the Bay Area. This dissertation examines the history of gentrification in West Marin, its relationship to regional socioeconomic transformations, and its local articulations. Gentrification in West Marin has similar characteristics to that in San Francisco and Oakland, though the continuity in West Marin’s physical landscape conceals the extent of the socioeconomic transformations gentrification has caused.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Mitten Crab (Eriocheir Sinensis) in San Francisco Bay
    Distribution, Ecology and Potential Impacts of the Chinese Mitten Crab (Eriocheir sinensis) in San Francisco Bay Deborah A Rudnick Kathleen M. Halat Vincent H. Resh Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management University of California, Berkeley TECHNICAL COMPLETION REPORT Project Number: UCAL-WRC-W-881 University of California Water Resources Center Contribution #206 ISBN 1-887192-12-3 June 2000 The University of California prohibits discrimination against or harassment of any person employed by or seeking employment with the University on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, physical or mental disability, medical condition (cancer- related), ancestry, marital status, age, sexual orientation, citizenship or status as a Vietnam-era veteran or special disabled veteran. The University of California is an affirmative action/equal opportunity employer. The University undertakes affirmative action to assure equal employment opportunity for underutilized minorities and women, for persons with disabilities, and for Vietnam-era veterans and special disabled veterans. University policy is intended to be consistent with the provisions of applicable State and Federal law. Inquiries regarding this policy may be addressed to the Affirmative Action Director, University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources, 300 Lakeside Drive, 6th Floor, Oakland, CA 94612-3560, (510) 987-0097. This publication is a continuation in the Water Resources Center Contribution series. It is published and distributed by the UNIVERSITY
    [Show full text]
  • A History of the Salmonid Decline in the Russian River
    A HISTORY OF THE SALMONID DECLINE IN THE RUSSIAN RIVER A Cooperative Project Sponsored by Sonoma County Water Agency California State Coastal Conservancy Steiner Environmental Consulting Prepared by Steiner Environmental Consulting August 1996 Steiner Environmental Consulting Fisheries, Wildlife, and Environmental Quality P. O. Box 250 Potter Valley, CA 95469 A HISTORY OF THE SALMONID DECLINE IN THE RUSSIAN RIVER A Cooperative Project Sponsored By Sonoma County Water Agency California State Coastal Conservancy Steiner Environmental Consulting Prepared by Steiner Environmental Consulting P.O. Box 250 Potter Valley, CA 95469 August 1996 (707) 743-1815 (707) 743-1816 f«x [email protected] EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND Introduction This report gathers together the best available information to provide the historical and current status of chinook salmon, coho salmon, pink salmon, and steelhead in the Russian River basin. Although the historical records are limited, all sources depict a river system where the once dominant salmonids have declined dramatically. The last 150 years of human activities have transformed the Russian River basin into a watershed heavily altered by agriculture and urban development. Flows in the main river channel river are heavily regulated. The result is a river system with significantly compromised biological functions. The anthropogenic factors contributing to the decline of salmonids are discussed. Study Area The 1,485 square mile Russian River watershed, roughly 80 miles long and 10 to 30 miles wide, lies in Mendocino, Sonoma, and Lake counties. The basin topography is characterized by a sequence of northwest/southeast trending fault-block ridges and alluvial valleys. Lying within a region of Mediterranean climate, the watershed is divided into a fog-influenced coastal region and an interior region of hot, dry summers.
    [Show full text]
  • California Freshwater Shrimparesmall.Females Areusually (Corpus)
    Endangered SpecU.S. Environmental iesFacts Protection Agency California Freshwater Shrimp Syncaris pacifica Description and Ecology Status Endangered, listed October 31, 1988. of Marin, Sonoma and Napa counties. They are still found in all three counties but in much fewer numbers and fewer Critical Habitat Not designated. streams. The distribution of the shrimp has been separated Appearance The California freshwater shrimp is a 10- into four drainage units: 1) tributary streams of the lower legged crustacean belonging to the atyid family. Of the three Russian River drainage, that flow westward to the Pacific other atyid members in North America, two are also listed Ocean, 2) coastal streams flowing westward directly into as endangered (Kentucky cave shrimp (Palaemonias ganteri) the Pacific Ocean, 3) streams draining into Tomales Bay, Female California freshwater shrimp with egg s, courtes y of Larr y Serpa and Alabama cave shrimp (Palaemonias alabamae)) and one and 4) streams flowing southward into San Pablo Bay. While which once inhabited coastal streams in California is believed California freshwater shrimp in laboratories can tolerate The California freshwater shrimp to be extinct (Pasadena shrimp (Syncaris pasadenae)). brackish waters, they are unable to tolerate ocean salinities. is an endangered species. These species were believed to have been isolated from a It is thought that the isolated streams that harbor these Endangered species are marine environment during the Jurassic period. They are shrimp were once connected, but later separated by geologic plants and animals that are anatomically distinguished from other shrimp by the length of uplift and rising sea level. in immediate danger of their pincer-like claws (chelae) and the bristles (setae) at the Habitat Within the low elevation-low gradient streams tips of the first two chelae.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology at Point Reyes National Seashore and Vicinity, California: a Guide to San Andreas Fault Zone and the Point Reyes Peninsula
    Geology at Point Reyes National Seashore and Vicinity, California: A Guide to San Andreas Fault Zone and the Point Reyes Peninsula Trip highlights: San Andreas Fault, San Gregorio Fault, Point Reyes, Olema Valley, Tomales Bay, Bolinas Lagoon, Drakes Bay, Salinian granitic rocks, Franciscan Complex, Tertiary sedimentary rocks, headlands, sea cliffs, beaches, coastal dunes, Kehoe Beach, Duxbury Reef, coastal prairie and maritime scrublands Point Reyes National Seashore is an ideal destination for field trips to examine the geology and natural history of the San Andreas Fault Zone and the North Coast of California. The San Andreas Fault Zone crosses the Point Reyes Peninsula between Bolinas Lagoon in the south and Tomales Bay in the north. The map below shows 13 selected field trip destinations where the bedrock, geologic structures, and landscape features can be examined. Geologic stops highlight the significance of the San Andreas and San Gregorio faults in the geologic history of the Point Reyes Peninsula. Historical information about the peninsula is also presented, including descriptions of the aftermath of the Great San Francisco Earthquake of 1906. Figure 9-1. Map of the Point Reyes National Seashore area. Numbered stops include: 1) Visitor Center and Earthquake Trail, 2) Tomales Bay Trail, 3) Point Reyes Lighthouse, 4) Chimney Rock area, 5) Drakes Beach, 6) Tomales Bay State Park, 7) Kehoe Beach, 8) McClures Beach, 9) Mount Vision on Inverness Ridge, 10) Limantour Beach, 11) Olema Valley, 12) Palomarin Beach, 13) Duxbury Reef 14) Bolinas Lagoon/Stinson Beach area. Features include: Point Reyes (PR), Tomales Bay (TB), Drakes Estero (DE), Bolinas Lagoon (BL), Point Reyes Station (PRS), San Rafael (SR), and San Francisco (SF), Lucas Valley Road (LVR), and Sir Francis Drake Boulevard (SFDB).
    [Show full text]
  • THIRD BIENNIAL STATE of TOMALES BAY CONFERENCE, 1992 AGENDA October 24, 1992 9:00 AM to 4:40 PM 9:00 Registration 9:30 Welcom
    THIRD BIENNIAL STATE OF TOMALES BAY CONFERENCE, 1992 AGENDA October 24, 1992 9:00 AM to 4:40 PM 9:00 Registration 9:30 Welcome: John Grissim, Environmental Action Committee of West Marin 9:35 Keynote: Skip Schwartz, Audubon Canyon Ranch 9:50 Summation of First Two Conferences: Bruce Wyatt, U.C. Cooperative Extension Sea Grant Program 10:10 Current Issues Facing Tomales Bay: Richard Plant 10:30 State Government & Bay Protection: Senator Milton Marks 10:40 The Role of County Government and the Coastal Commission: Supervisor Gary Giacomini 10:50 My Front Yard: Clayton Lewis 11:00 Break: Refreshments 11:15 Water Quality Panel: Guest Moderator, Steve Eabry 12:35 Poetry: Dr. Michael Whitt 12:45 Lunch (provided) 1:45 Citizen Stewardship for Tomales Bay: Michael Herz, San Francisco Baykeeper 2:15 Research Panel: Guest Moderator, Jules Evens 3:35 Break: Refreshments 3:50 Tomales Bay Poetry/Song: Rhiannon 4:00 Herding Fleas: Steve Eabry, Coordinator Morro Bay Task Force 4:30 Concluding Remarks: Suzanne d'Coney, Conference Coordinator THIRD BIENNIAL STATE OF TOMALES BAY CONFERENCE 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS A Summary of the Past Two Conferences: Bruce Wyatt…………………………..………. 10 Water Quality Panel: Moderator, Steve Eabry Suntan Lotion and Other Impacts Affecting Tomales Bay: Richard Plant…………. 12 Programs and Practices for the Protection of Tomales Bay: Richard H. Bennett Ph.D……………………………………………………. 16 California Department of Fish & Game: Activities and Plans: Mike Rugg……............…… 19 California Regional Water Quality Control Board Activities and Plans Dale Hopkins…………………………………………………………….….. 21 California Department of Health Services Preharvest Shellfish Sanitation Program Gregg W. Langlois………………………………………………………….. 24 National Marine Sanctuary Protection in the Area: Edward Ueber………………… 26 Marin- Sonoma Dairy Waste Committee: Joe Mendoza…………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • W • 32°38'47.76”N 117°8'52.44”
    public access 32°32’4”N 117°7’22”W • 32°38’47.76”N 117°8’52.44”W • 33°6’14”N 117°19’10”W • 33°22’45”N 117°34’21”W • 33°45’25.07”N 118°14’53.26”W • 33°45’31.13”N 118°20’45.04”W • 33°53’38”N 118°25’0”W • 33°55’17”N 118°24’22”W • 34°23’57”N 119°30’59”W • 34°27’38”N 120°1’27”W • 34°29’24.65”N 120°13’44.56”W • 34°58’1.2”N 120°39’0”W • 35°8’54”N 120°38’53”W • 35°20’50.42”N 120°49’33.31”W • 35°35’1”N 121°7’18”W • 36°18’22.68”N 121°54’5.76”W • 36°22’16.9”N 121°54’6.05”W • 36°31’1.56”N 121°56’33.36”W • 36°58’20”N 121°54’50”W • 36°33’59”N 121°56’48”W • 36°35’5.42”N 121°57’54.36”W • 37°0’42”N 122°11’27”W • 37°10’54”N 122°23’38”W • 37°41’48”N 122°29’57”W • 37°45’34”N 122°30’39”W • 37°46’48”N 122°30’49”W • 37°47’0”N 122°28’0”W • 37°49’30”N 122°19’03”W • 37°49’40”N 122°30’22”W • 37°54’2”N 122°38’40”W • 37°54’34”N 122°41’11”W • 38°3’59.73”N 122°53’3.98”W • 38°18’39.6”N 123°3’57.6”W • 38°22’8.39”N 123°4’25.28”W • 38°23’34.8”N 123°5’40.92”W • 39°13’25”N 123°46’7”W • 39°16’30”N 123°46’0”W • 39°25’48”N 123°25’48”W • 39°29’36”N 123°47’37”W • 39°33’10”N 123°46’1”W • 39°49’57”N 123°51’7”W • 39°55’12”N 123°56’24”W • 40°1’50”N 124°4’23”W • 40°39’29”N 124°12’59”W • 40°45’13.53”N 124°12’54.73”W 41°18’0”N 124°0’0”W • 41°45’21”N 124°12’6”W • 41°52’0”N 124°12’0”W • 41°59’33”N 124°12’36”W Public Access David Horvitz & Ed Steck In late December of 2010 and early Janu- Some articles already had images, in which ary of 2011, I drove the entire California I added mine to them.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biological Resources Section Provides Background Information
    4.5 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES The Biological resources section provides background information on sensitive biological resources within Napa County, the regulations and programs that provide for their protection, and an assessment of the potential impacts to biological resources of implementing the Napa County General Plan Update. This section is based upon information presented in the Biological Resources Chapter of the Napa County Baseline Data Report (Napa County, BDR 2005). Additional information on the topics presented herein can be found in these documents. Both documents are incorporated into this section by reference. This section addresses biological resources other than fisheries which are separately addressed in Section 4.6. 4.5.1 SETTING REGIONAL SETTING The Napa County is located in the Coast Ranges Geomorphic Province. This province is bounded on the west by the Pacific Ocean and on the east by the Great Valley geomorphic province. A dominant characteristic of the Coast Ranges Province is the general northwest- southeast orientation of its valleys and ridgelines. In Napa County, located in the eastern, central section of the province, this trend consists of a series of long, linear, major and lesser valleys, separated by steep, rugged ridge and hill systems of moderate relief that have been deeply incised by their drainage systems. The County is located within the California Floristic Province, the portion of the state west of the Sierra Crest that is known to be particularly rich in endemic plant species (Hickman 1993, Stein et al. 2000). LOCAL SETTING The County’s highest topographic feature is Mount St. Helena, which is located in the northwest corner of the County and whose peak elevation is 4,343 feet.
    [Show full text]
  • COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOWS Guidance for Long-Term Control Plan Offbtiw-Maragement MUNICIPAL TECHNOLOGY BRANCH STAPLE HERE
    United States Office Of Water EPA 832-B-95-002 Environmental Protection (4204) September 1995 Agency EPA Combined Sewer Overflows Guidance For Long-TermControl Plan EPA/832-B-95-002 August 1995 Combined Sewer Overflows Guidance for Long-Term Control Plan U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Wastewater Management Washington, DC 20460 Recycled/Recyclablel Printed with VegetableBased Inks on RecycledPaper (20% Postconsumer) NOTICE The statements in this document are intended solely as guidance. This document is not intended, nor can it be relied on, to create any rights enforceable by any party in litigation with the United States. EPA and State officials may decide to follow the guidance provided in this document, or to act at variance with the guidance, based on an analysis of specific site circumstances. This guidance may be revised without public notice to reflect changes in EPA’s strategy for implementation of the Clean Water Act and its implementing regulations, or to clarify and update the text, Mention of trade names or commercial products in this document does not constitute an endorsement or recommendation for use. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 OFFICEOF MEMORANDUM WATER SUBJECT: Guidance for Long Term Control Plan FROM: Michael B. Cook, Office of Wastewater Management (4201) TO: Interested Parties I am pleased to provide you with the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA'S) guidance document on the development and implementation of a long-term control plan for combined sewer overflows (CSOs). This document is one of several being prepared to foster implementation of EPA's CSO Control Policy.
    [Show full text]