Extended Phase 1 Survey Report Marlborough College Kennet Building

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Extended Phase 1 Survey Report Marlborough College Kennet Building Extended Phase 1 Survey Report Marlborough College Kennet Building Ref: 18-2765 Version: V1 Date: 08/03/2019 Northamptonshire Office Oxfordshire Office 8 Melbourne House Greystones House Corbygate Business Park Burford Road Weldon, Corby Chipping Norton Northamptonshire Oxfordshire NN17 5JG OX7 5UY 01536 408 840 01608 648 657 [email protected] [email protected] www.lgluk.com This page has intentionally been left blank 18-2765 EXTENDED PHASE 1 SURVEY REPORT V1 SA 010319 Page 2 of 52 DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET Ecological Team Thomas Haynes MSc MCIEEM Principal Ecological Consultant Julie Watson BSc (Hons) MSc MCIEEM PIEMA Senior Ecological Consultant Sophie Amphlett BSc (Hons) MSc ACIEEM Ecological Consultant Gill Wooloff Project Administrator Originating Author: Date: Version Notes: Sophie Amphlett 08/03/2019 D1 Original Report Reviewed By: Julie Watson 08/03/2019 D1 Quality control Approved for Issue By: Sophie Amphlett 08/03/2019 V1 Final Report COPYRIGHT © The copyright of this document remains with Lockhart Garratt Ltd. Its contents must not be copied or reproduced in whole or in part for any purpose without the written consent of Lockhart Garratt Ltd. DISCLAIMER It should be noted that the information above provides details of the Site’s current ecological situation. In the event that the proposed development does not commence within 12 months of the date of this report, further advice should be sought from a suitably qualified ecologist as to whether the information provided requires updating in light of changing ecological conditions. 18-2765 EXTENDED PHASE 1 SURVEY REPORT V1 SA 010319 Page 3 of 52 Executive Summary Purpose of Document Lockhart Garratt Ltd was commissioned by Marlborough College to carry out an Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey including desk study for the Kennet Building and surrounding habitats subject to re- development. The Site itself is not subject to any statutory or non-statutory designation. There was one statutory designation and 11 non-statutory designations within 2km of the Site. A range of protected mammal and bird species were identified within 2km of the Site by the desk study. The Extended Phase 1 Survey was undertaken on 19th February 2019. The habitat within the Site consisted of built environment, amenity grassland and ornamental shrubs and planting. The report considers the ecological conditions within the Site in the context of a potential future planning application for the redevelopment of the Site to provide new school facilities for the wider Marlborough College complex. Overall it is considered that subject to the implementation of the recommendations and enhancements set out within this report, an overall net gain in biodiversity at the Site may be achieved. Recommendations, in this context, are as follows: Further survey work in respect of bats is recommended due to the presence of suitable features to support crevice dwelling bats. The Kennet Building has been categorised as having Low Suitability. Further survey work in respect of water vole and otter is recommended due to the proximity of the wet ditch system and anticipated impacts upon this habitat as a result of the proposed works. Further survey work in respect of crayfish is recommended as several d-shaped burrows were identified along the wet ditch to the south of the site. Clearance and construction works should be scheduled outside of the main bird breeding season (March to August inclusive). If in the event works need to proceed within this period, then specialist advice from a suitably qualified ecologist should be sought. Any landscape planting should incorporate native species, including those species known to provide foraging opportunities for breeding birds and nectar sources for invertebrates. Enhancements in the form of bird and bat boxes are also recommended. 18-2765 EXTENDED PHASE 1 SURVEY REPORT V1 SA 010319 Page 4 of 52 Table of Contents 1.Purpose INTRODUCTION of Document ................................ ......................................................................... 7 Terms of Instruction .............................................................................................................. 7 Report Limitations ................................................................................................................ 7 Documents Provided ............................................................................................................. 7 Qualifications ....................................................................................................................... 7 Site Description .................................................................................................................... 7 Aim of the Study ................................................................................................................... 8 2. METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................................... 9 Desk Study ............................................................................................................................ 9 Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey .......................................................................................... 9 Faunal Surveys ...................................................................................................................... 9 Badger Appraisal ................................................................................................................. 10 Bats .................................................................................................................................... 10 Great Crested Newt ............................................................................................................ 11 Principles of Ecological Evaluation ....................................................................................... 12 3. LEGISLATION AND PLANNING POLICY OVERVIEW ..................................................... 13 Legislation .......................................................................................................................... 13 Policy ................................................................................................................................. 13 National Planning Policy Framework (England) .................................................................... 13 Local Policy ......................................................................................................................... 14 4. DESK STUDY RESULTS ............................................................................................... 15 Sites of Nature Conservation Interest .................................................................................. 15 Protected Species ............................................................................................................... 16 5. PHASE 1 HABITAT SURVEY RESULTS ......................................................................... 23 Field Survey Limitations ...................................................................................................... 23 Habitat Descriptions ........................................................................................................... 23 Evidence of Protected Species and Other Faunal Interest ..................................................... 27 6. EVALUATION OF ECOLOGICAL CONTEXT ................................................................... 28 The Site .............................................................................................................................. 28 Statutory Sites .................................................................................................................... 28 Non-statutory Sites ............................................................................................................. 28 18-2765 EXTENDED PHASE 1 SURVEY REPORT V1 SA 010319 Page 5 of 52 7. HABITAT EVALUATION ............................................................................................. 29 8. FAUNAL EVALUATION .............................................................................................. 30 Desk Study .......................................................................................................................... 30 9. RECOMMENDATIONS, FURTHER SURVEYS AND ENHANCEMENTS ............................. 34 Overview ............................................................................................................................ 34 Designated Sites ................................................................................................................. 34 Habitats .............................................................................................................................. 34 Species ............................................................................................................................... 35 Further Surveys ................................................................................................................... 35 10. REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................. 38 Appendix 1: Desk Study Results ........................................................................................... 39 Appendix 2: Phase 1 Plan .................................................................................................... 40 Appendix 3: Relevant Legislation ........................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • T1)E Bedford,1)Ire Naturaii,T 45
    T1)e Bedford,1)ire NaturaIi,t 45 Journal for the year 1990 Bedfordshire Natural History Society 1991 'ISSN 0951 8959 I BEDFORDSHffiE NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY 1991 Chairman: Mr D. Anderson, 88 Eastmoor Park, Harpenden, Herts ALS 1BP Honorary Secretary: Mr M.C. Williams, 2 Ive! Close, Barton-le-Clay, Bedford MK4S 4NT Honorary Treasurer: MrJ.D. Burchmore, 91 Sundon Road, Harlington, Dunstable, Beds LUS 6LW Honorary Editor (Bedfordshire Naturalist): Mr C.R. Boon, 7 Duck End Lane, Maulden, Bedford MK4S 2DL Honorary Membership Secretary: Mrs M.]. Sheridan, 28 Chestnut Hill, Linslade, Leighton Buzzard, Beds LU7 7TR Honorary Scientific Committee Secretary: Miss R.A. Brind, 46 Mallard Hill, Bedford MK41 7QS Council (in addition to the above): Dr A. Aldhous MrS. Cham DrP. Hyman DrD. Allen MsJ. Childs Dr P. Madgett MrC. Baker Mr W. Drayton MrP. Soper Honorary Editor (Muntjac): Ms C. Aldridge, 9 Cowper Court, Markyate, Herts AL3 8HR Committees appointed by Council: Finance: Mr]. Burchmore (Sec.), MrD. Anderson, Miss R. Brind, Mrs M. Sheridan, Mr P. Wilkinson, Mr M. Williams. Scientific: Miss R. Brind (Sec.), Mr C. Boon, Dr G. Bellamy, Mr S. Cham, Miss A. Day, DrP. Hyman, MrJ. Knowles, MrD. Kramer, DrB. Nau, MrE. Newman, Mr A. Outen, MrP. Trodd. Development: Mrs A. Adams (Sec.), MrJ. Adams (Chairman), Ms C. Aldridge (Deputy Chairman), Mrs B. Chandler, Mr M. Chandler, Ms]. Childs, Mr A. Dickens, MrsJ. Dickens, Mr P. Soper. Programme: MrJ. Adams, Mr C. Baker, MrD. Green, MrD. Rands, Mrs M. Sheridan. Trustees (appointed under Rule 13): Mr M. Chandler, Mr D. Green, Mrs B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Curculionoidea of the Maltese Islands (Central Mediterranean) (Coleoptera)
    BULLETIN OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF MALTA (2010) Vol. 3 : 55-143 The Curculionoidea of the Maltese Islands (Central Mediterranean) (Coleoptera) David MIFSUD1 & Enzo COLONNELLI2 ABSTRACT. The Curculionoidea of the families Anthribidae, Rhynchitidae, Apionidae, Nanophyidae, Brachyceridae, Curculionidae, Erirhinidae, Raymondionymidae, Dryophthoridae and Scolytidae from the Maltese islands are reviewed. A total of 182 species are included, of which the following 51 species represent new records for this archipelago: Araecerus fasciculatus and Noxius curtirostris in Anthribidae; Protapion interjectum and Taeniapion rufulum in Apionidae; Corimalia centromaculata and C. tamarisci in Nanophyidae; Amaurorhinus bewickianus, A. sp. nr. paganettii, Brachypera fallax, B. lunata, B. zoilus, Ceutorhynchus leprieuri, Charagmus gressorius, Coniatus tamarisci, Coniocleonus pseudobliquus, Conorhynchus brevirostris, Cosmobaris alboseriata, C. scolopacea, Derelomus chamaeropis, Echinodera sp. nr. variegata, Hypera sp. nr. tenuirostris, Hypurus bertrandi, Larinus scolymi, Leptolepurus meridionalis, Limobius mixtus, Lixus brevirostris, L. punctiventris, L. vilis, Naupactus cervinus, Otiorhynchus armatus, O. liguricus, Rhamphus oxyacanthae, Rhinusa antirrhini, R. herbarum, R. moroderi, Sharpia rubida, Sibinia femoralis, Smicronyx albosquamosus, S. brevicornis, S. rufipennis, Stenocarus ruficornis, Styphloderes exsculptus, Trichosirocalus centrimacula, Tychius argentatus, T. bicolor, T. pauperculus and T. pusillus in Curculionidae; Sitophilus zeamais and
    [Show full text]
  • Bladkevers Van Hellinggraslanden En Het Natuurbeleid
    NATUUIÏHISTORISCH MAANDBLAD OKTOBER 2002 lAARGANG 227 BLADKEVERS VAN HELLINGGRASLANDEN EN HET NATUURBELEID Ron Beenen, Martinus Nijhoffhove 51, 3437 ZP Nieuwegein Dit artikel behandelt bladkeversoorten {Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) die voor• komen in typisch Zuid-Limburgse natuurtypen, de hellinggraslanden. De effec• ten van het voorgenomen beleid van het Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuur• beheer en Visserij met betrekking tot dit natuurtype wordt op voorhand geëvalueerd voor bladkevers. Er wordt ingegaan op de relatie van deze kever• soorten met doelsoorten uit de groep van hogere planten. Tevens wordt bezien in hoeverre doelsoorten uit groepen van ongewervelde dieren representatief zijn voor de bladkevers van hellinggraslanden. INLEIDING is gezocht, circa 42.000 soorten waargeno• FIGUUR I Wormkruidkever (Galeruca men (VAN NIEUKERKEN & VAN LOON, 1995). tanaceti) mei eipokket Het Nederlandse natuurbeleid heeft een gro• De selectie van "slechts" 1042 doelsoorten (tekening: R. Beenen). te sprong voorwaarts gemaakt toen er natuur• (2,5 %) lijkt daarom in tegenspraak met de re• doelen geformuleerd werden. In het Hand• cente rijksnota "Natuur voor mensen, men• boek Natuurdoeltypen in Nederland (BAL et sen voor natuur" (MINISTERIE VAN LAND• al., 2001) worden 92 natuurdoeltypen be• BOUW, NATUURBEHEER EN VISSERIJ, 2000). voedselplanten van karakteristieke bladke• schreven en worden per doeltype doelsoor• Hierin staat immers als één van de taakstellin• versoorten van hellinggraslanden. Bladke• ten benoemd. Door het nauwkeurigomschrij- gen geformuleerd: "In 2020 zijn voor alle in vers zijn veelal zeer specifiek in hun voedsel• ven van Natuurdoeltypen is het mogelijk om 1982 in Nederland van nature voorkomende planten indien de voedselplant als natuurdoel de kwaliteit van natuurterreinen te toetsen. soorten en populaties de condities voor in• geformuleerd is, dan is de kans groot dat aan Uitgangspunt van het nationale natuurbeleid is standhouding duurzaam aanwezig".
    [Show full text]
  • Niedervieland/Ochtumniederung (Coleóptera, Chrysomelidae) 145-153 DROSERA ’95(2): 145-153 Oldenburg 1995-XII
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Drosera Jahr/Year: 1995 Band/Volume: 1995 Autor(en)/Author(s): Handke Klaus Artikel/Article: Zur Blattkäferfauna eines Nordwestdeutschen Flußmarschengebietes - Niedervieland/Ochtumniederung (Coleóptera, Chrysomelidae) 145-153 DROSERA ’95(2): 145-153 Oldenburg 1995-XII Zur Blattkäferfauna eines Nordwestdeutschen Fluß­ marschengebietes - Niedervieland/Ochtumniederung (Coleóptera, Chrysomelidae) Klaus Handke Abstract: Within time period between 1985 and 1994, 97 species of Chrysomelidae were proved by captures of pitfall traps, net, box and hand on more than 300 sites in the investi­ gation area of 35 km2. Reeds and borders of ditches are the most species-rich and the most important habitats for Chrysomelidae also regarding quantities. Only here could 56 species be proved, 11 species living in reeds among them. The fauna of Chrysomelidae in the several habitats is discussed. The few and mostly isolated woods are very poor in spe­ cies. Unemployed structures as, for example, fallow land, borders and reeds are important habitats for the Chrysomelidae. Only a few species can be found in the conventionally used mesophilous grassland. Especially the borders of ditches with specialized hygrophilous species after all those among the species living in reeds are important for nature con­ servation. 1. Einführung Obwohl Blattkäfer fast alle mitteleuropäischen Lebensräume in teilweise hohen Arten- und Individuenzahlen besiedeln, existieren über diese Käfergruppe nur relativ wenige faunistische Untersuchungen. So finden sich aus dem nordwestdeutschen Raum fast keine Informationen über die Blattkäferfauna von Grünland(Hildebrandt in Vorher.). Eine aktuelle systematische Artenliste über Schleswig-Holstein und das nördliche Nie­ dersachsen (Niederelbegebiet) liegt aber inzwischen vor (Gürlich 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • Entomologisches Tagebuch Nr. 1, Exkursion Nr. 1-140, Von 1887-1893
    Entomologisches Tagebuch Nr. 1, Exkursion Nr. 1-140, von 1887-1893 [?], […] unlesbar, ungenau (w) weiblich (m) männlich Bei der Übersetzung stand eine leserliche, übersichtliche und leicht recherchierbare Nutzung der Tagebücher im Vordergrund, weshalb auf eine zeilen- bzw. buchstabengetreue Transkription teilweise verzichtet wurde. Pag. Nr. Jahr Datum Ortskrzl. Ort/Sammler Arten/Fundorte und Beschreibungen Siehe besonders vervollständigtes Verzeichnis. Fundorte vor 1887 (siehe auch Bernhardts Liste) 1884 (22.05.1884 Salzsee (08.06.1884 Wechselburg (01.06.1884 Frauendorf 13.04.1884 Bienitz 11.05.1884 Lindhardt 31.10.1884 Dösen 1885 01.02.1885 Waldschenke (Kloberg) 25.05.1885 Thüringen 26.05.1885 Naumburg 26.05.1885 Freyburg 14.05.1885 Grimma 19.06.1885 Rosenthal (11.10.1885 Salzsee Nachgetragen siehe S. 16! 14.06.1885 Salzsee 14.06.1885 Süsser See 27.09.1885 Wechselburg mit Dr. Kraucher [?] jur. Imker-Versammlung 27.05.1885 Grimma (siehe Hypnoides pulchellus […] Sammlung! 8 Exemplare Pag. Nr. Jahr Datum Ortskrzl. Ort/Sammler Arten/Fundorte und Beschreibungen 1886 (23.04.1886 Salzsee 06.06.1886 Kohlenberg 13.-15.06.1886 Harz Wernigerode – Voigtstiege – Zechenhaus – Rübeland Baumnannshöhle – Neuwerck Altenbrack – Rosstrappe – Wolfsburg – Thale. 18.07.1886 Knauthain 19.09.1886 Wasser-Leitung Wasserwerke-Connewitz 03.10.1886 Connewitz Meine ersten „Reisen“ Mit dem Onkel Robert Bretschneider* als etwa 12 jähriger Knabe einmal nach Grimma; erinnerlich sind mir die Orte Kloster Nimbschen, Gatters- burg, Schiffsmühle – Rabenstein – Gesundbrunnen – Feueresse – Papier- mühle – Prinzenhöhle – Eine andere Reise, ungefähr in derselben Zeit zu den Verwandten; erinnerlich sind mir die Orte Gera – Köstritz – Ronneburg – Rittergut Mosen an der Elster (Pächter: Onkel Bretschneider [Einschub: nicht Robert] mit 10 Kindern) Pfingsten 1876(?) als angehender Lehrling Reise nach der Sächsischen Schweiz Dresden – Rathen- Wehlen – Bastei – Amselgrund mit Fall wurden besucht.
    [Show full text]
  • Intraspecific Larval Aggression in Two Species of Hyperini (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Jiří Skuhroveca*, Pavel Štysb and Alice Exnerováb
    Journal of Natural History, 2015 Vol. 49, Nos. 19–20, 1131–1146, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2014.974704 Intraspecific larval aggression in two species of Hyperini (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Jiří Skuhroveca*, Pavel Štysb and Alice Exnerováb aGroup Function of Invertebrate and Plant Biodiversity in Agrosystems, Crop Research Institute, Praha, Czech Republic; bDepartment of Zoology, Charles University in Prague, Praha, Czech Republic (Received 19 November 2013; accepted 6 October 2014; first published online 5 November 2014) Two unusual types of behaviour (wandering and intraspecific aggressive beha- viour) have been observed when rearing larvae of two species of the tribe Hyperini. Wandering of Hypera postica in search for food was observed in L1, L2 and L3 larvae, as well as in young L4 larvae. L1 larvae also disperse in response to crowding. Wandering of L2 to young L4 instars was a response to food shortage. Wandering of late L4 larva (‘prepupa’) occurs because of searching for a place to spin the cocoon and pupate. Encounters between the larvae may result in agonistic behaviour, and some larvae may die as a consequence of fighting. This aggression increases with food limitation. Agonistic intraspecific behaviour has not been described to date in weevil’s larvae and it probably may not occur under natural conditions when there is a plenty of food and larval densities are decreased by pathogens or parasitoids. Keywords: resource competition; intraspecific aggressive behaviour of coleopteran larvae; pest; Hypera postica; Brachypera vidua; Palaearctic region Introduction Intraspecific aggressiveness (IA) is a common phenomenon among insects, may take different forms and may evolve for a variety of reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • Scope: Munis Entomology & Zoology Publishes a Wide Variety of Papers
    682 _____________Mun. Ent. Zool. Vol. 11, No. 2, June 2016__________ A COMPARATIVE LIST OF THE LEAF BEETLES OF THE PROVINCES IN MARMARA REGION OF TURKEY, EXCLUDING BRUCHINAE (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE) Hüseyin Özdikmen* * Gazi University, Science Faculty, Department of Biology, 06500 Ankara, TURKEY. E- mails: [email protected] [Özdikmen, H. 2016. A comparative list of the leaf beetles of the provinces in Marmara Region of Turkey, excluding Bruchinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Munis Entomology & Zoology, 11 (2): 682-690] ABSTRACT: This work is presented a comparative list of the leaf beetles of the provinces in Marmara Region of Turkey, excluding Bruchinae. All known taxa from the provinces in Marmara Region of Turkey and thereby European Turkey are given in the present text. KEY WORDS: Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, European Turkey, Marmara Region, Turkey Any direct research on leaf beetles in Marmara Region of Turkey is not present. Therefore fauna of leaf beetles in Marmara Region of Turkey is not sufficiently known. Chiefly, a complete faunistic information about all the leaf beetle taxa established in European Turkey in Marmara Region of Turkey was firstly published by Löbl & Smetana (2010) in their Palaearctic catalogue of Chrysomeloidea. Then, an important study titled “Checklist of leaf beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) of Turkey, excluding Bruchinae” was published by Ekiz et al. (2013). Later works were published by Özdikmen (2014a,b,c), Özdikmen & Kaya (2014), Özdikmen & Mercan (2014), Özdikmen & Cihan (2014), Özdikmen & Özbek (2014), Özdikmen & Kavak (2014) and Özdikmen & Topcu (2014). Although the mentioned studies helped to determine the list of leaf beetles from the provinces in Marmara Region of Turkey, the list needs further corrections to be fully and correctly realized.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera, Curculionoidea)
    An annotated checklist of the weevil fauna of Samos Island with new records for Greece (Coleoptera, Curculionoidea) Autor(en): Germann, Christoph / Müller, Gerd / Müller, Ursula Objekttyp: Article Zeitschrift: Contributions to Natural History : Scientific Papers from the Natural History Museum Bern Band (Jahr): - (2015) Heft 27 PDF erstellt am: 11.10.2021 Persistenter Link: http://doi.org/10.5169/seals-787075 Nutzungsbedingungen Die ETH-Bibliothek ist Anbieterin der digitalisierten Zeitschriften. Sie besitzt keine Urheberrechte an den Inhalten der Zeitschriften. Die Rechte liegen in der Regel bei den Herausgebern. Die auf der Plattform e-periodica veröffentlichten Dokumente stehen für nicht-kommerzielle Zwecke in Lehre und Forschung sowie für die private Nutzung frei zur Verfügung. Einzelne Dateien oder Ausdrucke aus diesem Angebot können zusammen mit diesen Nutzungsbedingungen und den korrekten Herkunftsbezeichnungen weitergegeben werden. Das Veröffentlichen von Bildern in Print- und Online-Publikationen ist nur mit vorheriger Genehmigung der Rechteinhaber erlaubt. Die systematische Speicherung von Teilen des elektronischen Angebots auf anderen Servern bedarf ebenfalls des schriftlichen Einverständnisses der Rechteinhaber. Haftungsausschluss Alle Angaben erfolgen ohne Gewähr für Vollständigkeit oder Richtigkeit. Es wird keine Haftung übernommen für Schäden durch die Verwendung von Informationen aus diesem Online-Angebot oder durch das Fehlen von Informationen. Dies gilt auch für Inhalte Dritter, die über dieses Angebot zugänglich sind. Ein Dienst der ETH-Bibliothek ETH Zürich, Rämistrasse 101, 8092 Zürich, Schweiz, www.library.ethz.ch http://www.e-periodica.ch An annotated checklist of the weevil fauna of Samos Island with new records for Greece (Coleoptera, Curculionoidea) Christoph Germann, Gerd Müller, Ursula Müller & Karel Schön ABSTRACT Contrib. Nat. Hist 27:1-26.
    [Show full text]
  • Red List of Beetles of the Wadden Sea Area*
    HELGOLANDER MEERESUNTERSUCHUNGEN 1 Helgol6nder Meeresunters. 50, Suppl., 83-96 (1996) zgl.: SCHRIFTENREIHE FOR LANDSCHAFTSPFLEGE UND NATURSCHUTZ, H. 47 (1996) VII. Red List of Beetles of The Wadden Sea Area* CONTRIBUTORS: Denmark: V. Mahler *~ Germany: R. Suikat & Th. ABmann INTRODUCTION The beetles (Coleoptera) comprise one of the most species-rich orders of insects. With the many highly specialized species, the group is well suited as a tool to detect changes in or deterioration of the environment. In the Wadden Sea area - as delimited in the ge- neral introduction - about 300 of the occurring beetle species are restricted in their dis- tribution to typical coastal habitats or are typically found there. Delimitation of the area We have followed rather strictly the generally agreed geographical delimitation of the area. The main habitats here are the regularly flooded tidal areas and salt-water marshlands outside the dikes. Other important habitats for beetles are beaches, dikes, dunes, heaths, heath moors, as well as brackish and freshwater pools. Especially in the northernmost area, along Varde ~, there are areas only flooded by spring tides and there- fore they are mainly freshwater marshlands. Data source Denmark: The basis is the published red list (Aasbirk & Sogaard, 1991). A revised red list is in preparation, but could not be considered. Germany: The basis is the red list for the German part of Wadden Sea area and Hel- goland (Suikat & Al~mann, 1995) and the red list of Schleswig-Holstein (Ziegler & Suikat, 1994). This list forms part of the Report on the RED LISTS OF BIOTOPES, FLORA AND FAUNA OF THE TRILATERAL WADDEN SEA AREA.
    [Show full text]
  • CHRYSOMELA Linnaeus, 1758 GONIOCTENA Dejean, 1836 PHRATORA Dejean, 1836
    Subfamily Chrysomelinae Very convex hairless beetles; antennae generally somewhat thickened towards apex. They are usually collected by sweeping in summer, but some may be found in winter in moss, leaf litter etc. Source material Joy (1932) A Practical Handbook of British Beetles. Lompe A. (2013) Käfer Europas: Chrysomelinae published online on pages linked from http://www.coleo-net.de/coleo/texte/chrysomelinae.htm. Translated and published here with permission. Image credits Unless otherwise indicated, all images are reproduced from the Iconographia Coleopterorum Poloniae, with permission kindly granted by Lech Borowiec. Checklist from the Checklist of Beetles of the British Isles, 2012 edition, edited by A. G. Duff, (available to download from www.coleopterist.org.uk/checklist.htm). Subfamily Chrysomelinae TIMARCHA Samouelle, 1819 CHRYSOLINA Motschulsky, 1860 GASTROPHYSA Dejean, 1836 PHAEDON Latreille, 1829 HYDROTHASSA Thomson, C.G., 1859 PRASOCURIS Latreille, 1802 PLAGIODERA Dejean, 1836 CHRYSOMELA Linnaeus, 1758 GONIOCTENA Dejean, 1836 PHRATORA Dejean, 1836 Creative Commons. © Mike Hackston (2015). Adapted and updated from Joy (1932). Some species keys translated from the German, original from Dr Arved Lompe (published here with permission). CHRYSOLINA Motschulsky, 1860 GONIOCTENA Dejean, 1836 americana (Linnaeus, 1758) decemnotata (Marsham, 1802) banksii (Fabricius, 1775) olivacea (Forster, 1771) brunsvicensis (Gravenhorst, 1807) pallida (Linnaeus, 1758) cerealis (Linnaeus, 1767) viminalis (Linnaeus, 1758) coerulans (Scriba, 1791)
    [Show full text]
  • 1539 Insekter Og Edderkoppdyr På Bygdøy, Oslo Kommune - Supplerende Kartlegging Og Statusoppdatering
    1539 Insekter og edderkoppdyr på Bygdøy, Oslo kommune - Supplerende kartlegging og statusoppdatering Anders Endrestøl Kai Berggren NINAs publikasjoner NINA Rapport Dette er NINAs ordinære rapportering til oppdragsgiver etter gjennomført forsknings-, overvåkings- eller utredningsarbeid. I tillegg vil serien favne mye av instituttets øvrige rapportering, for eksempel fra seminarer og konferanser, resultater av eget forsknings- og utredningsarbeid og litteraturstudier. NINA Rapport kan også utgis på annet språk når det er hensiktsmessig.. NINA Temahefte Som navnet angir behandler temaheftene spesielle emner. Heftene utarbeides etter behov og serien favner svært vidt; fra systematiske bestemmelsesnøkler til informasjon om viktige problemstillinger i samfunnet. NINA Temahefte gis vanligvis en populærvitenskapelig form med mer vekt på illustrasjoner enn NINA Rapport. NINA Fakta Faktaarkene har som mål å gjøre NINAs forskningsresultater raskt og enkelt tilgjengelig for et større publikum. Faktaarkene gir en kort framstilling av noen av våre viktigste forskningstema. Annen publisering I tillegg til rapporteringen i NINAs egne serier publiserer instituttets ansatte en stor del av sine vitenskapelige resultater i internasjonale journaler, populærfaglige bøker og tidsskrifter. Insekter og edderkoppdyr på Bygdøy, Oslo kommune - Supplerende kartlegging og statusoppdatering Anders Endrestøl Kai Berggren Norsk institutt for naturforskning NINA Rapport 1539 Endrestøl, A. & Berggren, K. 2018. Insekter og edderkoppdyr på Bygdøy, Oslo kommune - Supplerende
    [Show full text]
  • BHS Guidelines for Site Selection May 2018
    These Guidelines have been subject to revision since their original publication. The pages covering the revised sections have been inserted into this document. Lancashire County Heritage Sites Scheme Biological Heritage Sites Guidelines for Site Selection Errata Page Guideline Error 34 Po1 Entries in Table 4. For U and V have been swapped (V appears before U). 43 Ff3 Add: Stellaria palustris Marsh Stitchwort 44 Ff3 Persicaria minor Small Water-pepper should read: Persicaria minor Small Water-pepper 44 Ff3 Plantanthera bifolia Lesser Butterfly-orchid should read: Plantanthera bifolia Lesser Butterfly-orchid 45 Ff4(a) Rhinanthus minor ssp. stenophyllusa Yellow-rattle should read: Rhinanthus minor ssp. stenophyllus a Yellow-rattle 46 Ff4b Polstichum setiferum should read Polystichum setiferum 51 Li6 The species listed under Application should form part of the Guideline. The Application text should read “All sites with six or more of the species listed above recorded since 1987 should be included.“ 60 Ma3 Delete the first sentence of the Justification which refers to water vole. 70 Am1a Guideline should read “...”good” or “exceptional” population...”. 71 Am2 Application reads: “...amphibians not included in (see Guideline Am1a or Am1b), as defined in Table 7.” Should read: “...amphibians (not included in Guideline Am1a or Am1b), as defined in Table 7.” 80 Mo4 Zenobiella Subrufescens now Perforatella subrufescens 82 In2 Add Hydroporus longicornis. 22/1/01 Lancashire County Heritage Sites Scheme Biological Heritage Sites Guidelines for Site
    [Show full text]