DOCSLIB.ORG

Preliminary Program Plan FY2005

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Preliminary Program Plan FY2005 O National Radio Astronomy ProgramPlan Observatory FiscalYear-2005 NATIONAL RADIO ASTRONOMY OBSERVATORY Preliminary Program Plan FY2005 October 13, 2004 The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a facility of the National Science Foundation operated by Associated Universities Inc. Table of Contents Mission Statement............................................................................................................................1 1. Introduction.................................................................................................................................3 2. Science Programs in FY2005......................................................................................................7 Overview..............................................................................................................................7 Cosmology and the Early Universe ....................................................................................8 Radio Galaxies, Quasars, Active Galactic Nuclei, and Gamma Ray Bursts .....................11 Nearby Galaxies and the Galactic Center ..........................................................................16 Molecular Clouds, Star Formation, and Galactic Structure...............................................20 Pulsars and Other Radio Stars............................................................................................24 Solar System; Geophysics..................................................................................................26 3. ALMA Construction .................................................................................................................29 Project Overview ...............................................................................................................29 Science Objectives.............................................................................................................30 Technical Objectives..........................................................................................................31 Project Status .....................................................................................................................33 Program FY2005................................................................................................................40 4. ALMA Operations ....................................................................................................................45 Overview............................................................................................................................45 North American ALMA Science Center............................................................................45 5. Expanded Very Large Array.....................................................................................................51 Overview............................................................................................................................51 Phase I................................................................................................................................52 Planned Activities for FY2005 ..........................................................................................55 Phase II...............................................................................................................................58 6. NRAO Facilities........................................................................................................................59 Green Bank Telescope .......................................................................................................59 Very Large Array...............................................................................................................77 Very Long Baseline Array.................................................................................................88 7. Central Development Laboratory .............................................................................................99 Cooled HFET Development ..............................................................................................99 MMIC Development........................................................................................................101 Millimeter-Wave Receiver Development........................................................................103 Electromagnetics..............................................................................................................104 Budget ..............................................................................................................................105 Table of Contents 8. NRAO Science & Academic Affairs ......................................................................................107 Introduction......................................................................................................................107 The Research Staff of the NRAO ....................................................................................107 Library and Archives .......................................................................................................108 Educational Programs ......................................................................................................110 9. Observatory Computing..........................................................................................................113 Overview..........................................................................................................................113 Software Development.....................................................................................................113 Project-Based Software Development .............................................................................113 Data Storage and Retrieval ..............................................................................................116 Central Computing Services ............................................................................................119 10. Education and Public Outreach.............................................................................................125 Overview .........................................................................................................................125 New Initiatives.................................................................................................................125 ALMA .............................................................................................................................127 NRAO Website ................................................................................................................128 NRAO Brochures.............................................................................................................128 Astronomical Community................................................................................................129 Media Relations ...............................................................................................................132 Visitors Center .................................................................................................................133 Education .........................................................................................................................134 11. Observatory Management.....................................................................................................137 Overview..........................................................................................................................137 Program Office.................................................................................................................139 Business Services.............................................................................................................147 Environment, Safety, and Security ..................................................................................148 Human Resources ............................................................................................................150 12. Initiatives and Other Activities .............................................................................................155 New Initiatives.................................................................................................................155 Charlottesville Facilities ..................................................................................................159 Spectrum Management ....................................................................................................160 13. Impact of Alternate Funding Levels .....................................................................................163 Introduction......................................................................................................................163 The Need for the Mission Requirement Level.................................................................163 The Adequacy of the Mission Requirement Level ..........................................................164 The Impact of Funding at the President’s Request Level................................................165 14. FY2005 Preliminary Financial Plan......................................................................................169 Table of Contents Appendix A - Scientific Staff Research Activities ......................................................................177 Appendix B - Research Staff .......................................................................................................203
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 3. Extrasolar Planets How Planets Were Discovered in the Solar System
    3. Extrasolar Planets How planets were discovered in the solar system Many are bright enough to see with the naked eye! More distant planets are fainter (scattered light flux - 4 ∝ apl ) and were discovered by imaging the sky at different times and looking for fast-moving things which must be relatively nearby (Kuiper belt objects and asteroids etc are still discovered in this way) but People are still some (e.g., Neptune) were predicted based on searching for planet X perturbations to the orbit of known planets in the solar system (e.g., Gaudi & Bloom Problem for detecting planets is that there is a lot of 2005 say Gaia will area of sky the planets could be hiding in, so narrow detect 1M out to searches to ecliptic planet (although tenth planet J 2000AU) has i=450) and use knowledge of dynamics to predict planet locations Can we do the same thing in extra-solar systems? Extra-solar planet Not quite so easily! The geometry of the problem is SS planet different, which means that: Earth • you don’t get a continuous motion across the sky • although we have narrowed down the region where the planet can be • but the planet is very far away and so it is faint, scattered light flux -2 -2 ∝ d* apl where d* is measured in pc (1pc=206,265AU) • which is compounded by the fact that it is close to a very bright star So how do we detect extrasolar planets? Mostly using indirect detection techniques: Effect on motion of parent star • Astrometric wobble • Timing shifts • Doppler wobble method Effect on flux we detect from parent star • Planetary transits
    [Show full text]
  • Naming the Extrasolar Planets
    Naming the extrasolar planets W. Lyra Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, K¨onigstuhl 17, 69177, Heidelberg, Germany [email protected] Abstract and OGLE-TR-182 b, which does not help educators convey the message that these planets are quite similar to Jupiter. Extrasolar planets are not named and are referred to only In stark contrast, the sentence“planet Apollo is a gas giant by their assigned scientific designation. The reason given like Jupiter” is heavily - yet invisibly - coated with Coper- by the IAU to not name the planets is that it is consid- nicanism. ered impractical as planets are expected to be common. I One reason given by the IAU for not considering naming advance some reasons as to why this logic is flawed, and sug- the extrasolar planets is that it is a task deemed impractical. gest names for the 403 extrasolar planet candidates known One source is quoted as having said “if planets are found to as of Oct 2009. The names follow a scheme of association occur very frequently in the Universe, a system of individual with the constellation that the host star pertains to, and names for planets might well rapidly be found equally im- therefore are mostly drawn from Roman-Greek mythology. practicable as it is for stars, as planet discoveries progress.” Other mythologies may also be used given that a suitable 1. This leads to a second argument. It is indeed impractical association is established. to name all stars. But some stars are named nonetheless. In fact, all other classes of astronomical bodies are named.
    [Show full text]
  • Instrumental Methods for Professional and Amateur
    Instrumental Methods for Professional and Amateur Collaborations in Planetary Astronomy Olivier Mousis, Ricardo Hueso, Jean-Philippe Beaulieu, Sylvain Bouley, Benoît Carry, Francois Colas, Alain Klotz, Christophe Pellier, Jean-Marc Petit, Philippe Rousselot, et al. To cite this version: Olivier Mousis, Ricardo Hueso, Jean-Philippe Beaulieu, Sylvain Bouley, Benoît Carry, et al.. Instru- mental Methods for Professional and Amateur Collaborations in Planetary Astronomy. Experimental Astronomy, Springer Link, 2014, 38 (1-2), pp.91-191. 10.1007/s10686-014-9379-0. hal-00833466 HAL Id: hal-00833466 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00833466 Submitted on 3 Jun 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Instrumental Methods for Professional and Amateur Collaborations in Planetary Astronomy O. Mousis, R. Hueso, J.-P. Beaulieu, S. Bouley, B. Carry, F. Colas, A. Klotz, C. Pellier, J.-M. Petit, P. Rousselot, M. Ali-Dib, W. Beisker, M. Birlan, C. Buil, A. Delsanti, E. Frappa, H. B. Hammel, A.-C. Levasseur-Regourd, G. S. Orton, A. Sanchez-Lavega,´ A. Santerne, P. Tanga, J. Vaubaillon, B. Zanda, D. Baratoux, T. Bohm,¨ V. Boudon, A. Bouquet, L. Buzzi, J.-L. Dauvergne, A.
    [Show full text]
  • TAAS Observing Challenge, March 2016 Deep Sky Object
    TAAS Observing Challenge, March 2016 Deep Sky Object NGC 3242 (PN) Hydra ra: 10h 24m 46.2s dec: -18° 38’ 34” Magnitude (visual) = 7.7 Size = 64” Distance = approximately 2,500 light years Description: William Herschel discovered this planetary nebula on February 7, 1785, and cataloged it as H IV.27. John Herschel observed it from the Cape of Good Hope, South Africa, in the 1830s, and numbered it as h 3248, and included it in the 1864 General Catalogue as GC 2102; this became NGC 3242 in J.L.E. Dreyer's New General Catalogue of 1888. This planetary nebula consists of a small dense nebula of about 16" x 26" in diameter, surrounded by a fainter envelop measuring about 40 x 35 arc seconds. This central nebula is embedded in a much larger faint halo, measuring 1250" or about 20.8 arc minutes in diameter. The bright inner nebula is described as looking like an eye by Burnham, and the outer shell gave rise to its popular name, as it is of about the apparent size of Jupiter. This planetary nebula is most frequently called the Ghost of Jupiter, or Jupiter's Ghost, but it is also sometimes referred to as the Eye Nebula, or the CBS Eye. Source: http://messier.seds.org/spider/Misc/n3242.html AL: Herschel 400, Caldwell [59]; TAAS 200 Challenge Object NGC 3962 (GX) Crater ra: 11h 54m 40.0s dec: -13° 58’ 34” Magnitude (visual) = 10.7 Size = 2.6’ x 2.2’ Position angle = 10° Description: NGC3962 is a small, elliptical galaxy in the constellation of Crater.
    [Show full text]
  • Employment Programs; Federal Programs; Job Training That
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 241 725 CE 038 465 AUTHOR; Mailer, Charles; And Others TITLE Evaluation of the Economic Impact of the Job Corps Program. Third Follow-up Report. INSTITUT:ON Mathematica Policy Research, Princeton, N.J. SPONS AGENCY Employment and Training Administration (DOL), Washington, D.C. Office of Policy, Evaluation and Research. PUB DATE Sep 82 CONTRACT 23-34-76-06 NOTE 309p.; For related documents, see ED 203 060-061 and ED 206 865. PUB TYPE Reports - Evaluative/Feasibility (142) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC13 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Cost Effectiveness; *Economically Disadvantaged; *Employment Programs; Federal Programs; Job Training *Program Effectiveness; Youth Problems; *Youth Programs IDENTIFIERS *Economic Impact; *Job Corps ABSTRACT This.report presents data and findings on the economic impact of Job Corps on its participants and analyses of the program's benefits in relation to its costs. Findings are based on postprogram experience of individuals enrolled in the`Job Corps in 1977, compared to a group of disadvantaged youth not in the program. The first three chapters introducei the rep'ort, review the Job Corps program and the evaluation, and discuss the estimation procedures used in the data analysis underlying subsequent chapters. Chapters .4 through 7 present the empirical findings on whether Job Corps is successful in (1) increasing employment and earnings; (2) improving future labor market opportunities through higher education, military training, and other human capital activities; (3) reducing dependence on welfare assistance and other public transfers; and 14) reducing criminality among former Corps members. The comparative evaluationlbf Job Corps benefits and costs is summarized in chapter 8.
    [Show full text]
  • April 14 2018 7:00Pm at the April 2018 Herrett Center for Arts & Science College of Southern Idaho
    Snake River Skies The Newsletter of the Magic Valley Astronomical Society www.mvastro.org Membership Meeting President’s Message Tim Frazier Saturday, April 14th 2018 April 2018 7:00pm at the Herrett Center for Arts & Science College of Southern Idaho. It really is beginning to feel like spring. The weather is more moderate and there will be, hopefully, clearer skies. (I write this with some trepidation as I don’t want to jinx Public Star Party Follows at the it in a manner similar to buying new equipment will ensure at least two weeks of Centennial Observatory cloudy weather.) Along with the season comes some great spring viewing. Leo is high overhead in the early evening with its compliment of galaxies as is Coma Club Officers Berenices and Virgo with that dense cluster of extragalactic objects. Tim Frazier, President One of my first forays into the Coma-Virgo cluster was in the early 1960’s with my [email protected] new 4 ¼ inch f/10 reflector and my first star chart, the epoch 1960 version of Norton’s Star Atlas. I figured from the maps I couldn’t miss seeing something since Robert Mayer, Vice President there were so many so closely packed. That became the real problem as they all [email protected] appeared as fuzzy spots and the maps were not detailed enough to distinguish one galaxy from another. I still have that atlas as it was a precious Christmas gift from Gary Leavitt, Secretary my grandparents but now I use better maps, larger scopes and GOTO to make sure [email protected] it is M84 or M86.
    [Show full text]
  • SAA 100 Club
    S.A.A. 100 Observing Club Raleigh Astronomy Club Version 1.2 07-AUG-2005 Introduction Welcome to the S.A.A. 100 Observing Club! This list started on the USENET newsgroup sci.astro.amateur when someone asked about everyone’s favorite, non-Messier objects for medium sized telescopes (8-12”). The members of the group nominated objects and voted for their favorites. The top 100 objects, by number of votes, were collected and ranked into a list that was published. This list is a good next step for someone who has observed all the objects on the Messier list. Since it includes objects in both the Northern and Southern Hemispheres (DEC +72 to -72), the award has two different levels to accommodate those observers who aren't able to travel. The first level, the Silver SAA 100 award requires 88 objects (all visible from North Carolina). The Gold SAA 100 Award requires all 100 objects to be observed. One further note, many of these objects are on other observing lists, especially Patrick Moore's Caldwell list. For convenience, there is a table mapping various SAA100 objects with their Caldwell counterparts. This will facilitate observers who are working or have worked on these lists of objects. We hope you enjoy looking at all the great objects recommended by other avid astronomers! Rules In order to earn the Silver certificate for the program, the applicant must meet the following qualifications: 1. Be a member in good standing of the Raleigh Astronomy Club. 2. Observe 80 Silver observations. 3. Record the time and date of each observation.
    [Show full text]
  • 7.5 X 11.5.Threelines.P65
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-19267-5 - Observing and Cataloguing Nebulae and Star Clusters: From Herschel to Dreyer’s New General Catalogue Wolfgang Steinicke Index More information Name index The dates of birth and death, if available, for all 545 people (astronomers, telescope makers etc.) listed here are given. The data are mainly taken from the standard work Biographischer Index der Astronomie (Dick, Brüggenthies 2005). Some information has been added by the author (this especially concerns living twentieth-century astronomers). Members of the families of Dreyer, Lord Rosse and other astronomers (as mentioned in the text) are not listed. For obituaries see the references; compare also the compilations presented by Newcomb–Engelmann (Kempf 1911), Mädler (1873), Bode (1813) and Rudolf Wolf (1890). Markings: bold = portrait; underline = short biography. Abbe, Cleveland (1838–1916), 222–23, As-Sufi, Abd-al-Rahman (903–986), 164, 183, 229, 256, 271, 295, 338–42, 466 15–16, 167, 441–42, 446, 449–50, 455, 344, 346, 348, 360, 364, 367, 369, 393, Abell, George Ogden (1927–1983), 47, 475, 516 395, 395, 396–404, 406, 410, 415, 248 Austin, Edward P. (1843–1906), 6, 82, 423–24, 436, 441, 446, 448, 450, 455, Abbott, Francis Preserved (1799–1883), 335, 337, 446, 450 458–59, 461–63, 470, 477, 481, 483, 517–19 Auwers, Georg Friedrich Julius Arthur v. 505–11, 513–14, 517, 520, 526, 533, Abney, William (1843–1920), 360 (1838–1915), 7, 10, 12, 14–15, 26–27, 540–42, 548–61 Adams, John Couch (1819–1892), 122, 47, 50–51, 61, 65, 68–69, 88, 92–93,
    [Show full text]
  • Caldwell Catalogue - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Caldwell catalogue - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Log in / create account Article Discussion Read Edit View history Caldwell catalogue From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Main page Contents The Caldwell Catalogue is an astronomical catalog of 109 bright star clusters, nebulae, and galaxies for observation by amateur astronomers. The list was compiled Featured content by Sir Patrick Caldwell-Moore, better known as Patrick Moore, as a complement to the Messier Catalogue. Current events The Messier Catalogue is used frequently by amateur astronomers as a list of interesting deep-sky objects for observations, but Moore noted that the list did not include Random article many of the sky's brightest deep-sky objects, including the Hyades, the Double Cluster (NGC 869 and NGC 884), and NGC 253. Moreover, Moore observed that the Donate to Wikipedia Messier Catalogue, which was compiled based on observations in the Northern Hemisphere, excluded bright deep-sky objects visible in the Southern Hemisphere such [1][2] Interaction as Omega Centauri, Centaurus A, the Jewel Box, and 47 Tucanae. He quickly compiled a list of 109 objects (to match the number of objects in the Messier [3] Help Catalogue) and published it in Sky & Telescope in December 1995. About Wikipedia Since its publication, the catalogue has grown in popularity and usage within the amateur astronomical community. Small compilation errors in the original 1995 version Community portal of the list have since been corrected. Unusually, Moore used one of his surnames to name the list, and the catalogue adopts "C" numbers to rename objects with more Recent changes common designations.[4] Contact Wikipedia As stated above, the list was compiled from objects already identified by professional astronomers and commonly observed by amateur astronomers.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts of Talks 1
    Abstracts of Talks 1 INVITED AND CONTRIBUTED TALKS (in order of presentation) Milky Way and Magellanic Cloud Surveys for Planetary Nebulae Quentin A. Parker, Macquarie University I will review current major progress in PN surveys in our own Galaxy and the Magellanic clouds whilst giving relevant historical context and background. The recent on-line availability of large-scale wide-field surveys of the Galaxy in several optical and near/mid-infrared passbands has provided unprecedented opportunities to refine selection techniques and eliminate contaminants. This has been coupled with surveys offering improved sensitivity and resolution, permitting more extreme ends of the PN luminosity function to be explored while probing hitherto underrepresented evolutionary states. Known PN in our Galaxy and LMC have been significantly increased over the last few years due primarily to the advent of narrow-band imaging in important nebula lines such as H-alpha, [OIII] and [SIII]. These PNe are generally of lower surface brightness, larger angular extent, in more obscured regions and in later stages of evolution than those in most previous surveys. A more representative PN population for in-depth study is now available, particularly in the LMC where the known distance adds considerable utility for derived PN parameters. Future prospects for Galactic and LMC PN research are briefly highlighted. Local Group Surveys for Planetary Nebulae Laura Magrini, INAF, Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri The Local Group (LG) represents the best environment to study in detail the PN population in a large number of morphological types of galaxies. The closeness of the LG galaxies allows us to investigate the faintest side of the PN luminosity function and to detect PNe also in the less luminous galaxies, the dwarf galaxies, where a small number of them is expected.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy Magazine 2011 Index Subject Index
    Astronomy Magazine 2011 Index Subject Index A AAVSO (American Association of Variable Star Observers), 6:18, 44–47, 7:58, 10:11 Abell 35 (Sharpless 2-313) (planetary nebula), 10:70 Abell 85 (supernova remnant), 8:70 Abell 1656 (Coma galaxy cluster), 11:56 Abell 1689 (galaxy cluster), 3:23 Abell 2218 (galaxy cluster), 11:68 Abell 2744 (Pandora's Cluster) (galaxy cluster), 10:20 Abell catalog planetary nebulae, 6:50–53 Acheron Fossae (feature on Mars), 11:36 Adirondack Astronomy Retreat, 5:16 Adobe Photoshop software, 6:64 AKATSUKI orbiter, 4:19 AL (Astronomical League), 7:17, 8:50–51 albedo, 8:12 Alexhelios (moon of 216 Kleopatra), 6:18 Altair (star), 9:15 amateur astronomy change in construction of portable telescopes, 1:70–73 discovery of asteroids, 12:56–60 ten tips for, 1:68–69 American Association of Variable Star Observers (AAVSO), 6:18, 44–47, 7:58, 10:11 American Astronomical Society decadal survey recommendations, 7:16 Lancelot M. Berkeley-New York Community Trust Prize for Meritorious Work in Astronomy, 3:19 Andromeda Galaxy (M31) image of, 11:26 stellar disks, 6:19 Antarctica, astronomical research in, 10:44–48 Antennae galaxies (NGC 4038 and NGC 4039), 11:32, 56 antimatter, 8:24–29 Antu Telescope, 11:37 APM 08279+5255 (quasar), 11:18 arcminutes, 10:51 arcseconds, 10:51 Arp 147 (galaxy pair), 6:19 Arp 188 (Tadpole Galaxy), 11:30 Arp 273 (galaxy pair), 11:65 Arp 299 (NGC 3690) (galaxy pair), 10:55–57 ARTEMIS spacecraft, 11:17 asteroid belt, origin of, 8:55 asteroids See also names of specific asteroids amateur discovery of, 12:62–63
    [Show full text]
  • The Caldwell Catalogue+Photos
    The Caldwell Catalogue was compiled in 1995 by Sir Patrick Moore. He has said he started it for fun because he had some spare time after finishing writing up his latest observations of Mars. He looked at some nebulae, including the ones Charles Messier had not listed in his catalogue. Messier was only interested in listing those objects which he thought could be confused for the comets, he also only listed objects viewable from where he observed from in the Northern hemisphere. Moore's catalogue extends into the Southern hemisphere. Having completed it in a few hours, he sent it off to the Sky & Telescope magazine thinking it would amuse them. They published it in December 1995. Since then, the list has grown in popularity and use throughout the amateur astronomy community. Obviously Moore couldn't use 'M' as a prefix for the objects, so seeing as his surname is actually Caldwell-Moore he used C, and thus also known as the Caldwell catalogue. http://www.12dstring.me.uk/caldwelllistform.php Caldwell NGC Type Distance Apparent Picture Number Number Magnitude C1 NGC 188 Open Cluster 4.8 kly +8.1 C2 NGC 40 Planetary Nebula 3.5 kly +11.4 C3 NGC 4236 Galaxy 7000 kly +9.7 C4 NGC 7023 Open Cluster 1.4 kly +7.0 C5 NGC 0 Galaxy 13000 kly +9.2 C6 NGC 6543 Planetary Nebula 3 kly +8.1 C7 NGC 2403 Galaxy 14000 kly +8.4 C8 NGC 559 Open Cluster 3.7 kly +9.5 C9 NGC 0 Nebula 2.8 kly +0.0 C10 NGC 663 Open Cluster 7.2 kly +7.1 C11 NGC 7635 Nebula 7.1 kly +11.0 C12 NGC 6946 Galaxy 18000 kly +8.9 C13 NGC 457 Open Cluster 9 kly +6.4 C14 NGC 869 Open Cluster
    [Show full text]